tasktask pr oc e s spr oc e s s evaluationevaluation conclusionconclusion
TRANSCRIPT
INTRO
T A SK
P R OC E S S
EVALUATION
CO
NC
LU
SI
ON
Aristotle has mysteriously warped you into DIMENSIA LOGIA (THE DIMENSION OF LOGIC). Inside this mysterious realm, Aristotle awaits your wise council. He knows virtually nothing about 21st century habits. Aristotle needs you to provide him with a logical answer to a probing question.
Will you help Aristotle arrive at a satisfactory conclusion?
INTRODUCTION
You have chosen to accept the challenge in
Aristotle is grateful for your courage and patiently awaits your wisdom…
YOUR GROUP HAS 2 TASKS:
1) CREATE AN ARGUMENT THAT WILL HELP PERSUADE ARISTOTLE TO MAKE A DECISION.
2) WRITE A 2-3 PARAGRAPH SUMMARY OF YOUR CONCLUSION. ?
DIMENSIA LOGIA ! ! !
WHAT AN
ODD MORSEL
SHOULD ARISTOTLE EAT THE
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUT ?
(ORIGINAL GLAZED)
ENTER PROCESS FIELD
PROCESS1) ExploreReview and experiment with all of the areas.
2) Evaluateall of the findings that Aristotle has gathered.
3) Incorporate findings and gather evidence to help support your groups position.
INGREDIENTS
HISTORY
PORTION
CALORIES
TRACKER
VISCERAL FAT
YOUR CLAIM ?
?
MYSTATS
EVALUATIONARGUMEN
T
• Were you able to clearly state your argument in one sentence?• Example: Aristotle should [should not] eat the Krispy Kreme Original Glazed doughnut
because__________________________ .
EVIDENCE
• What did you discover?• How did your findings help shape your position?• Are you merely stating your opinion? • Did your findings encourage your position?
CONCLUSIO
N
• Did you list all of the evidence that helped shape your argument? • Why did you choose this position?• Why didn’t you choose a contrasting (different) position? • Does your conclusion help explain your claim with evidence?
CLEARLY STATEDARGUMENT IN ONE SENTENCE
4
I WAS ABLE TO CLEARLY EXPRESS MY POSITION
3
I WAS ABLE TO EXPRESS MY POSITION
2
I COULD NOT MAKE MY POSTION CLEAR
1
I DID NOT FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS
SYTHESIS OF EVIDENCE MY
ARGUMENT CLOSELY WEIGHS ALL OF THE EVIDENCE
MY ARGUMENT LOOKS AT THE EVIDENCE
MY ARGUMENT IS BASED MOSTLY ON OPINION
I IGNORED THE EVIDENCE AND BASED MY ARGUMENT ON OPINON
CONCLUSION PARAGRAPH
IN 2-3 PARAGRAPHS I WAS ABLE TO CLEARLY EXPLAIN MY CLAIM WITH STRONGSUPPORT
IN 2-3PARAGRAPHSI WAS ABLE TO EXPLAIN MY CLAIM WITH MODERATE SUPPORT
IN 2-3 PARAGRAPHS I COULD NOT SHOW MUCH SUPPORT FOR MY CLAIM
IN 1 (OR LESS)PARAGRAPH I SHOWED NO SUPPORT FOR MY CLAIM
Teamwork My group worked great as a team and shared all ideas
My group worked well as a team and shared most ideas
My group was easily distracted
My group lost focus and did not collaborate
CONCLUSIONThe purpose of logic, as the science that evaluates, is thus to develop methods and techniques that allow us to distinguish good arguments from bad. A good argument (claim or position) can be used to make an important decision that will dramatically effect your life. What motivates you to make a claim or to take a position?
To learn more about how to read nutrition labels check out FDA Know your calories:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/videos/CFSAN/HWM/hwmintro.cfm
Should Aristotle eat the doughnut?
Should you eat a doughnut?
TEACHER PAGE• This Web Quest was designed for 7th Grade Language Arts.It meets Kentucky Core Standards W.7.1a-e (Writing Standards).
• Student objectives: write an argument based on relevant evidence (clear reasons) and support claim(s); provide concluding paragraphs to follow support from the argument presented.
• Additional objective: S.L.7.4 (Speaking and Listening Standards)Present claims (and findings) which sequence ideas logically by using pertinent descriptions, facts and details to accentuate main ideas. Students can present arguments to class in which a discussion or debate can be moderated.
Web Quest can be modified or manipulated for students with special needs by contacting:
Email: [email protected]
Or visit my class wiki: www. [email protected]