teacher evaluation. bibliographies in education.'no. 52 ... · document resume ed 110 447 sp...

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 110 447 SP 009 440

T7TLE Teacher Evaluation. Bibliographies in Education.'No.52.

INSTITUTION Canadian Teachers' Federation, Ottawa (Ontario).PUB DATE May 75NOT! 31p.

EDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS

ABSTRACT

,MF-$0.76 HC-$1.95 PLUS POSTAGEAccountability; *Bibliographies; Effective TeachingFaculty EValuation; Performance Based TeacherEducation; Teacher Education; *Teacher Evaluation;Teacher Improvement; Teacher Rating: TeacherResponsibility; Teaching Quality

This bibliograRhy lists material published on teacherevaluation since June 1972. It includes listings of (a) 150 books,(b) 209 articles, and (c) 11 theses. A large number of the items inthe first listing are in the ERIC system, in which case their EDnumber is included. Some of the topics covered include (a)performance based teacher education, (b) accountability, (c)

effective teaching, and (d) staff development. (RC)

***********************************************************************Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished

* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort ** to obtain the best copy available, nevertheless, items of marginal *

* reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality *

* of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions EPIC makes available *

* via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not* responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions ** supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. *

***********************************************************************

AN 4 AUb2 6 14/

BIBLIOGRAPHIES IN EDUCATION

No. 52

TEACIER EVALUATIOI

May 1975

C-75104

US !DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHEDUCATION S. WELf ARENATIONAL INSTITUTE OF

EDUCATIONff FIf F NF `

F

CANADIAN TEACHERS' FEDERATION110 ARGYLE AYE., OTTAWA, ONTARIO. K2P 184

f 'f` fef f'Wf

TEACHER EVALUATION

This bibliography lists material published on teacher evaluationsince the first bibliography on this topic (Bibliography No. 29) waspublished in June 1972. It is planned to issue from time to timeupdated bibliographies in various subjects which have already beencovered in the series, but in which interest remains strong.

Sources consulted in preparing this bibliography include theBibliographie du Quebec, British Education Index (The Library Associa-tion), the Canadian Education Index (CEA), the Cumulative Book Index(Wilson's), the Current Index to Journals in Education (CCM), theDirectory of Education Studies in Canada (CEA), the Education Index(Wilson's), Research in Education (ERIC), Research Studies in Education(Phi Delta Kappa), and Subject Guide to Canadian Books in Print (Universityof Toronto).

Abstracts of material with an ED number may be found in Researchin Education. If marked "Available ERIC", hard copy or microfiche copiesmay be purchased through the Education Document Reproduction Service ofthe ERIC system.

Material held in the CTF Library is marked with a single asterisk.The Library is also purchasing microfiche copies of the ERIC documentsavailable. A double asterisk appears beside these titles, indicating thematerial is available on loan in microform only.

Books

Articles

Theses

C O N T E N T S

Page

1

13

25

A. Books

**1. Accountability. Washington, D.C.: NEA., 1972. 20p. Available

ERIC. :ED 077 894.

**2. Accountability and the Teacher. Washington, D.C.: NEA., 1973.

4p. Available ERIC. ED 076 558.

**3. Accountability in Education: an Annotated Bibliography. Washington,

D.C.: NEA., 1973. 6p. Available ERIC. ED 076 559.

**4. Adams, Ronald D. Follow-up and Evaluation of Teacher Education

Graduates -- A Pilot Study. Final report. Bowling Green:

Western Kentucky University, 1974. 107p. Available ERIC.

ED 090 173.

. Alberta Teachers' Association. apPriLE___...RertonOiniozcialscmthe First Year Experience of Teachers Prepared in AlbertaUniversities. Edmonton: the Association, 1973. 21p.

**6. Aleamoni, Lawrence M., Evaluation bb Students to Identify GeneralInstructional Problems. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1973.


**7. Aleamoni, Lawrence M., and.MaKonnen Yimer. Graduating Senior Ratings

Relationship to Colleague Rating, Student Rating, Research,Productivity and Academic-Rank in Rating Instructional Effective-

ness. Research Report No. 352. Urbana: University of Illinois,

1974. 13p. Available ERIC. ED 088 320.

8. Allen, Paul, and others. Tea er Self-Appraisal: A Way of Looking

Over Your Own Shoulder. B mont: C.A. Jones, 1970.

9. Armstrong, Harold R. A Tea er's Guide to Teaching Performance

Evaluation. Worthingto : School Management Institute, 1972. 24p.

ED 077 123. Not available ERIC.

**10. Artley, A. Sterl. Identifying Good Teachers of Reading. Successful

Teachers of Reading. Who are They? Denver: Colorado Reading

Association, 1973. 22p. Available ERIC. ED 074 454.

"11. Ayers, Jerry B. Tennessee Technological University Teacher Evaluation

Model. Study of the Teacher Preparation Programs of TennesseeTechnological University. Report No. 74-4. Cookeville: Tennessee

Techwlogical University, 1974. 110p. Available ERIC. ED 095 169.

**12. Babel, John. Teacher Appraisal: How to Make It More Meaningful.

Paper presented at American Association of School AdministratorsAnnual Convention, Atlantic City, 1972. 3p. Available ERIC.

ED 066 836.

1

**13. Baker, Eva L. Teaching Performance Tests as Dependent Measuresin Instructional Research. Paper presented at Annual Meetingof American Educational Research Association, New Orleans,1973. 16p. Available ERIC. ED 076 608.

**14. Baltus, Dale F. Accountable Evaluation for Improvement. Arlington:National Association of Elementary School Principals, 1974. Bp.

Available ERIC. ED 091 859.

**15. Bapst, Jennis Joseph. The Effect of Systematic Student ResponseUpon Teaching Behavior. Gresham: Mount Hood Community College,1971. 102p. Available ERIC. ED 060 651.

16. Baral, Laurie R. The Evaluation of Teachers. ERS AnnotatedBibliography. Washington, D.C.: Educational Research Service,1974. 22p. ED 089 478. Not available ERIC.

**17. Bar-On, Ehud and others. The Use of Computers in Evaluating. TeacherCompetency. Washington, D.C.: American Educational ResearchAssociation, 1974. 13p. Available ERIC. ED 093 931.

**le., Belzer, Thomas J. and Michael R. Conti. A Comparison of GradesAchieved, Attrition Rates, and Teacher Evaluation in a TraditionalGeneral Biology Course Versus a Non-Traditional, Audio-tutorialBiology Course. Fort Lauderdale: Nova University, 1973. 23p.

Available ERIC-: ED 094 810.

**19. Bergen, J.J. SChool Program Accountability. The 1971 LeadershipCourse for School Principals Lecture Series. Edmonton:University of Alberta, 1971. 71p. Available ERIC. ED 065 921.

**20. Blai, Boris. Faculty Effectiveness -- A "Pilot" Study of StudentEvaluation at Harcum Junior College. Bryn Mawr, Pa: HarcumJunior College, 1971. 5p. Available ERIC. ED 058 294.

21. Blount, G. Teacher Evaluation; ar Annotated Bibliography. Toronto:

OISE, 1974. 32p. (Current bibliography no. 8; Informal publication).

*22. Blumberg, Arthur. Supervision and Teachers; a Private Cold War.Berkeley: McCutcham Publishing Corp., 1974. 182p.

23. Bolton, D.L. Selection and Evaluation of Teachers. Berkeley:

McCutchan Publishing, 1973. 211p.

**24. Brown, Stephen W. The National Teacher Examination as an Instrumentof Prediction of Teacher Success. Washington, D.C.: AmericanEducational Research Association, 1974. 14p. Available ERIC.ED 088 947.

2

**25. Buck, James J., a James F. Parsley. The Way We See it: A

Survey of Teache Evaluation Policies and Practices Operant in

the State of Washington. Seattle: School Information and

Research Service, 1973. 19,p. Available ERIC. ED 084 223.

**26. California State Board of Education Guidelines for School Districtsto Use in Developing Procedures for Evaluating CertificatedPersonnel. Sacramento: California State Board of Education, 1972.


**27. Centra, John A. The Student as Godfather? The Impact of Student

Ratings on Academia. Princeton: Educational Testing Service,


**28. Cohen, Arthur M., and Florence B. Brawer. The Who, What, Why of

Instructor Evaluation. Los Angeles: University,of California,


**29. Coleman, Peter. The Improvement of Aggregate Teaching Effectiveness

in a School Division. Occasional paper no. 18. Winnipeg: Manitoba

Association of School Trustees, 1972. 37p. Available ERIC.

ED 074 047.

30. Contant, A. Supervision et evaluation du personnel

Bibliographie Annotee. Montreal: C.A.D.R.E. Mr173. 12:7t;

**31. Cooper, James M. Pupil Growth Measures and Teacher Evaluation:Pressing for Practical Applications. Washington, D.C.: American

Educational Research Association, 1974. 19p. Available ERIC.

ED 090 297.

**32. Deneen, James R., and others. The Selection and Evaluation of

Teachers. Presentation to the American Association of SchoolPersonnel Administrators, October 19, 1971, New Orleans,

Louisiana. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1972. 14p.


**33. Dedrick, Charles Van Loan. The Relationship Between PerceptualCharacteristics and Effective Teaching at the Junior College

Level. Gainesville: University of Florida, 1972. 14p.


**34. DeVaughn, J. Everette. Policies, Procedures and Instruments in

Evaluation of Teachers and Administrator Performance. Atlanta:

Davis Associates, Inc., 1971. 23p. Available ERIC. ED 061 607.

**35. Dieter, Donn Louis. Evaluation of Biology Teachers. Chapel Hill:

University of North Carolina, 1972. 184p. Available ERIC.

ED 074 028.

**36. Dieter, Donn L. Teacher Evaluation: A Strategy for ScienceTeachers. Asheville: North Carolina Science Teachers Associa-tions, 1972. 20p. Available ERIC. ED 082 966.

37. Dilling, H.J., and G,M. Denny. Scarborough Board of EducationComparative Study of the Effectiveness at the Junior KindergartenLevel of Certificated and Non Certificated Teachers. Toronto:

Scarborough Board of Education, 1973. 13b7.

**38. Duff, Charles F. Statement of the Philosophy Underlying theEvaluation of Educational Personnel in the Walker-Grant MiddleSchool. Fredericksburg, Virginia: Walker-Grant Middle School,1973. Available ERIC. ED 078 007.

*39. Duluth Public Schools. A Program for Evaluating Non-Tenure Teachers.Title III ESEA 1972-1975. Duluth, Minnesota: Duluth PublicSchools, 1972. various paging.

*40. Dunkin, Michael J., and Bruce J. Biddle. The Study of Teaching.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974. 490p.

*41. Educational Research Service. Evaluating Teaching Performance.

Washington, D.C.: ERS, 1972. 60p. (Circular no. 2, 1972).

**42. ERIC Abstracts: A Collection of ERIC Document Resumes on Competency-Based Evaluation of Educational Staff. ERIC Abstracts Series,

Number Twenty-Eight. Washington, D.C.: American Association ofSchool Administrators, 1973. 21p. Available ERIC. ED 084 651.

**43. Evaluation and Merit Pay Clinic. Albany: New York State School

Boards Association, 1973. Available ERIC. ED 089 419.

44. L'evaluation des enseignants. Matane: CEGEP de Matane, 1971. 13p.

*45. Evaluation des enseignants. Ottawa: L'Association des enseignantsfranco-ontariens, 1974. 7p.

46. Evaluation du _personnel enseignant. Montreal: CEGEP, Bois-de-

Boulogne, 1971. 23p.

**47. An Evaluation of "Point" -- A Program for the Orientation and

Induction of New Teachers. Washington, D.C.: District of Columbia

Public Schools, 1971. 68p. Available ERIC. ED 067 380.

**48. Feldman, Sandra. Teacher Evaluation -- A Teacher Unionist's View.

Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1972. 16p. Available

ERIC. ED 086 647.

**49. Friesen, Edwin, and others. 1971-72 Report of Merit Pay Committee.

Wichita: Wichita Unified School District 259, 1972. 6p.


4

**50. Frye, Helen B. Development and Initial Validation of the TeachingSituation Reaction Test (Elementary Form), A Measure of Teacher

Effectiveness. ,Dayton: University of, Dayton, 1972. 11p.


*51. Gage, N.L. Teacher Effectiveness and Teacher Education: The

Search for a Scientific Basis. Palo Alto, California: Pacific

Books, 1972. 228p.

*52. . Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand

McNally & Co., 1963. 1218p.

53. Gagnon, Denise. Historique et caracteristive psychometriques du

test PERPE. Montreal: Quebec Ministere de l'Education.Perceptions etudiantes de la relation professeur etudiants,

1971. 72p. (Document 0671-05).

**54. Gazzetta, Vincent C. New York State and Certification by Competency.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of

Teachers of English,. Minneapolis, 1972. 11p. Available ERIC.

ED 074 511.

55. Geisert, Paul. A Discrepancy Evaluation System for Elementary

School Teachers 1973. Laramie: Wyoming University, 1973. 32p.


56. . A Discrepancy Evaluation System for High School Teachers

1973. Laramie: University of Wyoming, 1973. 32p. ED 081 857.

Not available ERIC.

57. . A Discrepancy Evaluation System for University Professors

1973. Laramie: University/of Wyoming, 1973. 28p. ED 081 857.

Not available ERIC.

**58. Gilley, J. Wade. Evaluation and Motivation of Community College

Personnel. Gainesville: University of Florida. Institute of

Higher Education, 1972. 38p. Available ERIC. ED 060 850.

**59. Grasha, Anthony F. Evaluating Teaching: Some Problems. Cincinnati:

Cincinnati University, 1972. 5p. Available ERIC. ED 071 582.

**60. Grandgenett, Donald J. A Comparison of the Ratings Given Ten Teacher

Applicants by Ten Public School Administrators After a Traditional

Interview and a Video-Tape Teaching Demonstration. Omaha:

University of Nebraska, 1972. 84p. Available ERIC. ED 083 183.

**61. Griffin, Margaret M., and Paula J. Brousseau. Using Evaluation to

Identify "Good" Teachers of Reading. ',Newark: International

Reading Association, 1974. 14p. Available ERIC. ED 095 485.

5

*62. Griffith, Francis J. A Handbook for the Observation of Teachingand Learning. Midland: Pendell Publishing Co., 1973. 351p.

**63. Guidelines for Evaluation in California Community Colleges.Woodland Hills: Los Angeles Pierce College, 1971. 18p.Available ERIC. ED 059 708.

**64. Haak, Ruth Adlof, and others. Student Evaluation of TeacherInstrument, II. Manual. Austin: University of Texas, 1972.113p. Available ERIC. ED 080 574.

**65. Haehn, James O. Is College Teaching So Bad That Most ProfessorsOught to be Sued for Malpractice? San Diego: CaliforniaEducational Research Association, 1971. 15p. Available ERIC.ED 072 729.

**66. Hall, George L. Assessing Staff Effectiveness: Practical Approachesto Meaningful Evaluation. 1974. 12p. Available ERIC. ED 097 338.

**67. Handbook for Evaluating Instruction. Los Angeles: Los Angeles CitySchools, 1971. 40p. Available ERIC. ED 058 556.

**68. Hatfield, Robert C. Conditions for Improving Teacher Evaluation,1974. 14p. Available ERIC. ED 088 841.

**69. Helwig, Carl. Must We Employ Behavioristic Theory to Have StudentsEvaluate Us as Teachers? Blacksburg: Virginia Social SciencesAssociations, 1973. 14p. Available ERIC. ED 081 651.

70. Herman, Jerry John. Developing an Effective School Staff EvaluationProgram. Englewood Cliffs: Parker Publishers, 19731. 216p.

**71. Hillison, John H., and Sue Ellen Bird. Vocational Teacher EducationEvaluation Model Development and Implementation. Bowling Green:Western Kentucky University, 1973. 149p. Available ERIC.ED 092 742.

**72. Hind, Robert E., and others. The Evaluation of University Teachers:An Application of a Theory of Evaluation and Authority. Stanford:Stanford University, 1972. 22p. Available ERIC. ED 071 618.

*73. Houston, W. Robert, and Robert B. Howsam. Competency -Based TeacherEducation; Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Chicago: ScienceResearch Associates, 1972. 192p. ED 074 017. Not available ERIC.

**74. Hutchison, Jerry E. Improving Evaluation Programs Throuih BetterUnderstanding of the College Student and His Professor. Washington,D.C.: American Educational Research Association, 1974. 16p.

Available ERIC. ED 091-420.

6

**75. Instructional Staff Performance Profiles and Related Information.

Kalamazoo: Kalamazoo Public Schools, 1974. 109p. Available

ERIC. ED 093 041.

**76. Job Improvement by Objectives. Omaha: Westside Community Schools,


77. Johnson, Granville B. Evaluation for Teaching. Mobile: University

of South Alabama, 1969. 4p. ED 062 372. Not available ERIC.

**78. Joyce, Bruce R., and others. Performance-Based Teacher EducationDesign Alternatives: the Concept of Unity. Washington,, D.C.:

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1974.55p.

**79. Kinsel, John B., and Jefferson Latham. A Comparison of Two CourseEvaluation Forms: The Hofstra University Course and TeacherEvaluation Questionnaire and the New College Course EvaluationQuestionnaire. Report No. 3. Hempstead: Hofstra University,1974. 15p. Available ERIC. ED 095 792.

"80. Kniefel, David R A Comparison of Observed Teaching Behavior ofOral Language Program Trained and Conventionally Trained Pre-Service Reading Teachers: A Formative Evaluation. Paper

presented at the annual meeting of the AERA. Chicago, 1972.


* *81. Kulik, James A., and Stanford C. Ericksen. Evaluation of Teaching.Memo to the Faculty; Memo No. 53 February 1954. Ann Arbor:

University of Michigan, 1974. 6p. Available ERIC. ED 092 025.

**62. Lamal, P.A. Improving Elementary and Secondary Education. 1973.


**83. Levin, Henry M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Educational Policy-Profusion, Confusion, Promise. Research and Development Memorandum

No. 41. Stanford: Stanford University, 1968. 15p. Available

ERIC. ED 085 896.

**89. Levinthal, Charles F. An Analysis of the Teacher Evaluation Process.

Final report. Washington, D.C.: National Inst. of Education, 1974.


85. Lewis, James. Appraising Teacher Performance. Englewood Cliffs:

Parker Publ., 1973. 227p.

**86. Lyons, Lamont S., and others. A Systems Approach to Individualizing

Instruction: The Staff Evaluation and Renewal Components.

Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association, 1974.


7

**87. McDaniel, Ernest. The Evaluation of Teacher Effectiveness. Bp.


**88. McFadden, Dennis N. Project D: Appraising Teacher Performance.Final Report. Increasing the Effectiveness of EducationalManagement. Columbus: Battelle Memorial Institute, 1970.186p. Available ERIC. ED 075 921.

**89. McKeachie, Wilbert J. Studies of Student Ratings of Faculty.Final report. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1971. 41p.


**90. McKnight, Philip C. The Role of the Learner in ImprovingInstruction: Development of Technical Skills of Learning inClassroom Interaction. Washington, D.C.: American EducationalResearch Association, 1974. 11p. Available ERIC. ED 091 395.

**91. McNeil, John D. Supervision of Instruction: the Relationship ofTheory and Practice to Accountability. Columbus: Ohio StateDept. of Education, 1972. 7p. Available ERIC. ED 064 803.

**92. Medley, Donald M. Indicators and Measures of Teacher Effectiveness:A Review of the Research. 1971. 29p. Available ERIC. ED 088 844. ,

**93. Medley, Donald M., and Thomas J. Quirk. Race and Subject-MatterInfluences on Performance on General Education Items of theNational Teacher Examinations. Princeton: Educational TestingService, 1972. 42p. Available ERIC. ED 069 739.

94. Menzie, John Cakroll. An Analysis of the Process of Teacher Evaluationin the Community College. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms,1973. 197p. ED 083 960. Not available ERIC.

95. Miller, Richard I. Evaluating Faculty Performance. San Fkancisco:

Jossey-Bass Inc., 1972.

**96. Nash, Paul. A Humanistic Approach to Performance-Based TeacherEducation. -PETE Series No. 10. Washington, D.C.: AmericanAssociation of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1973. 35p.


**97. Okey, James R., and Donald W. Humphreys. Measuring Teacher Competence.

Lafayette: National Association for Research in Science Teaching,1974. 12p. Available ERIC. ED 090 060.

**98. Okey, James R., and Jerome L. Ciesla. Designs for the Evaluation

of Teacher Training Materials. Report No. 2. Washington, D.C.:

National Center for the Improvement of Educational Systems, 1972.


99. Oldham, Neild. Evaluating Teachers for Professional Growth,Current Trends in School Policies and Programs. An EducationU.Si. Special report. Arlington: National School PublicRelations Association, 1974. 64p. ED 091 846. Not availableERIC.

100. 014s, Robert. Self-Evaluation for Teachers and Administrators.Worthirigton: School Management Institute, 1973. 64p.

ED 083 676., Not available ERIC.

**101. Oles, Henry J. Stability of Student Evaluation of Instructors andTheir Courses. Washington, D.C.y American Educational ResearchAssociation, 1974. 17p. Available ERIC. ED 091 409.

**102. Orlosky, Donald E. Teacher Competence: To be What? New Orleans:American Educational Research Association, 1973. Available ERIC.ED 083 151.

*103. Palmer, Tunde, Donald F. Musella, and Stephen B. Lawton. Teacher

Evaluation: Current Practices in Ontario. Toronto: OISE,

1972. 47p. (Staff Study).

**104. Papalia, Anthony. Toward A Competency-Based Teacher EducationProgram in Foreign Languages at SUNYYBuffalo. Buffalo: StateUniversity of New York, 1973. 13p. Available ERIC. ED 094 552.

**105. Parsons, Gary L., and others. Experience as a Community CollegeStudent as a Criterion for the Selection of Community CollegeTeachers. 1973. 24p. Available ERIC. ED 093 438.

106. Payne, David A., and others. Teacher Achievement Test. 1971. 4p.

ED 076 628. Not available ERIC. (TM002633).

**107. Peck, Robert F. and Donald J. Veldman. Personal CharacteristicsAssociated with Effective Teaching. Austin: University of Texas,


**108. Performance-Based Teacher Appraisal Program for the Penn-Harris-Madison School Corporation. Mishawaka: Penn-Harris-MadisonSchool Corp., 1973, 62p. Available ERIC. ED 093 919.

**109. Place, Roger ,A. Removihg the Imcompetent Practitioner. Washington,

D.C.: American Association of School Adminstrators, 1974, 4p.


110. Planning the Evaluation of Educators: A Simulation. Handbook for

Conducting the Simulation (For Simulation Director Only).Washington, D.C.: NEA, 1972. 76p. ED 070 164. Not available

ERIC.

/

9

"111. Poliakoff, Lorraine L. Evaluating School Personnel Today.Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1973. 16p.


112. Popham, W. James. Eva' Iating Instruction. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1973. 157p. ED 076 036. Not available ERIC.

113. . Designing Teacher Evaluation Systems. A Series ofSuggestions for Establishing Teacher Assessment Procedures asRequired by the Stull Bill (AB293), 1971 California Legislature,Los Angeles: Instructional Objectives Exchange, 1971. 51p.

ED 070 716. Nnt available ERIC.

**114. Potter, David, and others. The Relat ..-uctent Achievement and

Student Ratings of Teachers. Washington,, D.C.: AmericanEducational Research Association, 1973. Available ERIC. ED 090 139.

**115. Predicting Success in Teaching. Appleton: Fox Valley Technical

Institute, 1971. 58p. Available ERIC. ED 077 913.

*116. Quebec. Ministere de l'Education. Le systeme de probation des

enseignants. Quebec: le ministere, 1972. 21p.

*117. Quebec. Department of Education. The Teacher Probation System.

Quebec: the Department, 1972. 12p.

**118. Quirk, Thomas J., and others. A Critical Review of Research Related

to the National Teacher Examinations. Princeton: Educational

Testing Service, 1972. 52p. Available ERIC. ED 068 469.

119. Redfern, George B. How to Evaluate Teaching. A Performance Objectives

Approach. Worthington: School Management Institute, 1972. 112p.


**120. Ribich, Frank M. The Effects of Training and Feedback on Self-Evaluation. 1974. 16p. Available ERIC. ED 098 230.

121. Riley, John W., and others. Student 'noks at His Teacher. Port

Washington: Kennikat Press, 1969.

**122 Robertson, J. Martin. Personnel Evaluation in Vocational and

Technical Education. Columbus: Ohio State University, 1973.


"123. Romine, Stephen, and Donald L. Newport. Defining, Assessing, and

Improving Community Junior College Instructional Climate.

Boulder: UnivJrsity of Colorado, 1973. 46p. Available ERIC.

ED 087 509.

**124. Rosen, Pamela. Assessment of Teachers. Princeton: Educatibnal

Testing Service, 1973. lip. Available ERIC. ED 083 322.

10

*125, Sandefur, J.T. An Illustrated Model for the Evaluation of TeacherEducation Graduates. Washington, D.C.: American Associationof Colleges for Teacher Education, 1970. 46p.

126. School Board Policies on Teacher Evaluation. Educational PoliciesDevelopment Kit. Waterford: National School Boards Association,1971. 32p. ED 058 657. Not available ERIC.

**127. Schramm, Wilbur. Measuring Educational Development Through ClassroomInteraction. Stanford: Stanford University, 1969. 15p.


**128. Sherman, Barbara R., and Robert T. Blackburn. Personal Characteristicsand Teaching Effectiveness of College Faculty. 1974. 20p.


*129. Sherwin, Susan S. Performance-Based Teacher Education: Resultsof a Recent Survey. Princeton: Educational Testing Service,1973. 40p.

%

"1.30. Shugrue, Michael F. Performance-Based Teacher Education and theSubject Matter Fields. PBTE Series No. 11. Washington, D.C.:American Association of Colleges for Teacher Educaton, 1973. 31p.


**131. Speicher, Dean. Can Teacher Evaluation be Made Meaningful? Paper

presented at American Association of School Administrators AnnualMeeting, Atlantic City, 1972. Available ERIC. ED 060 575.

132. Stemnock, Suzanne K. Evaluating -the Evaluator. ERS Circular No. 4,

1973. Washington, D.C.: Educational Research Service, 1973.50p. ED 081 114. Not available ERIC.

133. Student Opinions About Instructional Procedures. Kalamazoo: Western

Michigan University, 1972. 7p. ED 087 796. Not available ERIC.

**134. Teacher Evaluation to Improve Learning. The Fourth Report of theCommission on Public School Personnel Policies in Ohio. Cleveland:

Commission on Public School Personnel Policies in Ohio, 1972.60p. Available ERIC. ED 076 504.

**135. Templetop, Ian. Merit Pay. Educational Management Review Series

Number 10. Eugene: Oregon University, 1972. 10p. Available

ERIC. ED 067 727.

**136. Tolle, Donald J. Evaluation: Who Needs It? Flat River, Missouri:

Mineral Area College, 1970. 15p. Available ERIC. ED 059 716.

*137. Travers, Robert M.W. (ed.). Second Handbook of Research on Teaching.

Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1973. 1400p.

11

*138. University of British Columbia, Faculty of Education. TheAssessrsnt of Teacher Effectiveness. Vancouver: the faculty,1972. 59p.

**139. Vandervert, Larry R. Student Evaluation of Instruction: SomeTheoretical Considerations and a Proposal. Washington: WashingtonState Community College, 1974. 9p. Available ERIC. ED 093 394.

**140. Vaughn,'John W. Team Teaching: Initiating Teaming, OrganizingDecision-Making Structures, Evaluating Team Teachers. Arlington:Na onal Association of Elementary School Principals, 1974. 21p.Available ERIC. ED 090 701.

**141. Veldman, Donald /., and Jere E. Brophy. Measuring Teacher Effects onPupil Achievemert. Paper presented at a symposium of AmericanEducational Research Association, New Orleans, 1973. 7p.Available ERIC. ED 076 708.

**142. Veri, Clive C., and others. Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness inExtension-Administered Programs. St. Louis: Missouri University,1973. 15p. Available ERIC. ED 078 275.

**143. Vogt, Karl E., and Harry Lasher. Does Student Evaluation StimulateImproved Teaching') Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University,1973. 14p. Available ERIC. ED 078 7.48.

*144. Walberg, Herbert J. Evaluating Educational Performance. Berkeley:McCutchan Publ. Corp., 1974. 395p.

*145. Weber, Wilford A., et al. Competency-Based Teacher Education.Washington, D.C.: AACTE, 1972. 27p.

**146. Western Kentucky University Teacher Preparation Evaluation System.Case Study. Bowling Green: Western Kentucky University, 1973.85p. Available ERIC. ED 088 874.

**147. Widlak, Frederick W., and others. Factor Analysis of an InstructorRating Scale. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of AmericanEducational Research Association, New Orleans, 1973. 25p.Available ERIC. ED 079 324.

**148. Wolf, Robert L. A New Look at Evaluating Early Childhood EducationPrograms. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1973. 14p. AvailableERIC. ED 081 487.

149. Wolfson, Morton Louis. A Consideration of Direct and IndirectTeaching with Respect to Achievement and Retention of Learning inScience Classes. Ann Arbor:/ University Microfilms, 1970. 79p.ED 085 197. Not available ERIC.

12

*150. Workshop Cc _er for Open Education. Evaluation Reconsidered. APosition Paper and Supporting Documents on Evaluating Changeand Changing Evaluation. New York: Workshop Center for OpenEducation, 1973.

B. Articles

1. Ahern, John. Identifying outstanding teachers in New England.Improv Coll & Univ Teach 21:46-7 Winter'73.

2. Armstrong, Harold R. Performance evaluation. Nat El Prin52:51-5 F'73.

3. Armstrong, W.D. Quality control: education and medicine. Challengein Ed Admin 12:no 4:8-17'73.

. Aspy, D.N. Maslow and teachers in training. J Teach Ed 20:303-9Fall'69.x

5. Baird, Leonard. Common and uncommon models for evaluating teaching.New Directions for Higher Ed 1:77-98 Winter'73.

6. Baker, G.E., and others. Identification of factors relating to theevaluation of vocational teacher education faculty by students.J of Industr Teach Ed 12:17-26 F'74.

*7. Barsalon, Judith M. Student evaluation of staff in secondary schools.NASSP Bul 58:10-14 F'74.

8. Bauman, Robert P. A preliminary model for effective teaching.Physics Teach 12:287-91 My'74.

*9. Berger, Eric. The evaluation of teachers. NASSP Bul 58:147-52 My'74.

10. Blanchard, B. Everard. Improving teacher effectiveness. Illinois

Sch Res 8:36-40 Winter'72,

11. Bolen, John E. The dilemma in evaluating instruction.' Nat El Prin52:72-5 F'73.

12. Bolton, Dale L.F'73.

13. Bridger, James A.opinionaire.

Collecting evaluation data. Nat El Prin 52:76-86

Teachegevaluation with a computerized studentImprov Coll & Univ Teach 21:43-5 Winter'73.

14. Britton, R.J., and G.O.M.! Leith. An experimental evaluation of theeffects of microteach

ii

ng on teaching performance., Aspects ofEduc Tech 6:262-8'72.

13

Brodbelt, Samuel. The impact of educational accountability upon

teachers and supervisors. H Sch J 56:55-66 N'72.

16. Bromley, Ann, and others. Evaluation is vital and integral.

Improv Coll & Univ Teach 21:49-50 Winter'73.

*17. Burton, Kay. More must be made to mean better. Trends in Ed

33:4-8 My'74.

18. Centra, John A. Do student ratings of teachers improve instruction?

Change 5:12-13 Ap'73.

19. Chapman, L. John. Assessment and evaluation in teacher training.

Dudley Educ J 1 no. 1 Spring'72.

*20. Coats, William D. and others. Student perceptions of teachers -- a

factor analytic study. J Educ Res 65:357-60 Ap'72.x

*21. Cohen, Arthur M. Defining faculty responsibility: the individual

and his profession. Com Col R 1:7-15 Winter'74.

22. Coleman, Peter. The improvement of aggregate teaching effectiveness

in a school district. Educ Adm Q 9:28-47 Autumn'73.

*23. Cook, J. Marvin. Direct measurement of collegiate teaching effective-

ness. Educ Tech 12:51-4 Je'72.

24. Cornwell, C.D. Statistical treatment of data from student teaching

evaluation. J Chem Educ 51:155-60 Mr'74.

*25. Costin, Frank and others. Student ratings of college teaching:

reliability, validity and usefulness. Rev Educ Res 41:511-35 D'71.x

*26. Cunningham, D.J. Evaluation of replicable forms and instruction;

a classification of information needs in formative and summative

evaluation. AV Comm R 21:351-67 Fall'73.x

27. Dansereau, Raymond A. Some myths on student evaluation of faculty.

Improv Col & Univ Teach 21:48+ Winter'73.

*28. Davidson, C.D. Perceived reward value of teacher reinforcement

and attitude toward teacher: an application of Newcomb's

balance theory. J Educ Psychol 63:418-22 0'72.x

29. Davis, Henry M. How can the teacher over 40 be encouraged to

consider changes? Aqric Educ Ma9 44:277-8 My'72.

30. Deegan, William L. Should students evaluate faculty? Com & Jun

Col J 43:25-6 O'72.

14

31. Dimmitt, Norma M. Evaluation of sixth cycle teacher corps internteaching competence. Coll of Ed Record 40:11-16 N'73.

32. Dolan, Patrick, and Benson Munger. Evaluation and due process:guidelines for administrators. Nat El Prin 52:87-8 F'73.

33. Doty, Charles R. Performance evaluation for teacher certification.J Industr Teach Ed 10:61-7 Winter'73.

34. Dropkin, Stan. Twin dimensions of teacher behavior assessment.Contemporary Ed 44:142-6 Ja'73.

*35. Drumheller, Sidney J. Evaluating teachers through a jaundiced, eye.Educ Tech 14:17-22 J1'74.

36. Drummond, William H. Involving the teacher in evaluation. Nat ElPrin 52:30-2 F'73.

37. Duvall, Charlets R., and Wayne J. Krepel. The use of videotaperecordings in the analysis of student teaching performance.Teacher Educator 7:12-16 F'71.

38. Dwyer, Francis M. Selected criteria for evaluating teacher effective-ness. Improv Col & Univ Teach 21:51-2 Winter'73.

39. Ebel, R.L. Use standardized tests in evaluating teachers? Instructor

83:16 N'73.

40. Edwards, C.H. Competency based teacher education: a critique.Contemp Educ 44:188-91 Ja'73.

*41. Effective learning depends on good teachers. Man Teach 50:1F-Mr'72.

42. Ehman, Lee H. A competency-based social studies teacher educationprogram. Indiana Social Studies Q 26:45-53 Spring'73.

43. Elliott, V.L. Peer evaluation for teachers? Why not? El Engl

51:727-30 My'74.

44. Evaluating school personnel; symposium. Nat El Prin 52:12-103 F'73.

45. Evaluation de la qualification de certaines categories de candidatsa l'enseignement. Bul Officiel 3:213-9 30 Ag'72.

*46. Finkbeiner, Carl T. Course and instructor evaluation: some

dimensions of a questionnaire. J Educ Psychol 64:159-63 Ap'73.

47. Flora, Ben V. Diagnosing selected behavior characteristics ofteachers of secondary school mathematics. J Res Math Ed 3:7-20 Ja'72.

15

48. Follman, John. and others. Kinds of keys of student ratings offaculty teaching effectiveness. Res in High Ed 2:173-80'74.

49. Freese, G.T., and C.K. West. Congruence, empathy, and regard: a

comparison of adolescent ratings with teacher self-ratings;relationship-inventory. Adolescance 7:525-9 Winter'72.

50. Frey, Peter W. Research. The ongoing debate: student evaluationof teaching. Change 6:47-8+ F'74.

*51. Friesen, D., and H. Chalmers. Student perceptions of the teacherimage. Educ Lead 30:633-6 Ap'73.x

52. Gale, H.P. Teacher education: evaluating practical teaching insecondary schodls. Paedogogica Europea 8:132-7'73.

53. Gallington; Ralph 0., and Roger W. Haskell. How to test theaccountable vocational teacher., Ind Arts & Voc Ed 61:26-8 Ap'72.

54. Gibson, R. Oliver. Selection and evaluation of teachers. Educ Adm Q9:122-4 Autumn'73.

55. Gies, Frederick John, and B. Charles Leopard. Teacher evaluation:an administrative responsibility. Improv Col & Univ Teach21:53-5+ Winter'73.

*56. Ginther, J.R. Can a computer evaluate? Sch R 79:602-13 Ag'71.x

*57. Glasman, N.S. Personnel evaluation research: implications forinstructional improvement. Can Admin 13:29-33 Mr'74.

*58. Goldfaden, Bruce. Tape for teacher self-evaluation. Ed Telev3:15-16 D'71.

*59. Goldstein, William. An enlightened approach to supervising teachers.Clearing H 46:391-4 Mr'72.x

60. Gordon, C. Paul, and Ronald Gallimore. Teacher ratings of behaviorproblems of Hawaiian-American adolescents. Illinois Teach forContemp Roles 15:155-60 Mr-Ap'72.

*61. Greenwood, Gordon E., and others. Student evaluation of collegeteaching behaviors. J Educ M 2:141-4 Summer'74.

62. Student evaluation of college teaching behaviorsinstruments a factor analysis. J Higher tduc 44:596-604 N'73.

*63. Hahn, W. American teacher education through French and German eyes.J Teach Ed 23:199-202 Summer'72.x

16

64. Henke, John E. The art of teacher evaluation. Improv Col &

Univ Teach 21:56-7 Winter'73.

65. Hannon, Palph H., and Dan J. Kralik. Teacher evaluation:

business approach. J Col Science Teach 3:76 0'73.

*66. Hanson, Kenneth T. AcCountability and performance-based programs

in education: some pros and cons. Intellect 102:250-2 Ja'74.x

*67. Harrison, Alton, and John Westerman. An assessment of teacherinfluence. Clearing H 47:227-31 D'73.

68. Henson, Kenneth T. Performance-based teaching: a revolution in

American education. Ed for Teaching no.91:30-4 Summer'73.

69. Hildebrand, Milton. How to recommend promotion for a mediocre

teacher without actually lying. J Higher Educ 43:44-62 Ja'72.

*70. Hillen, D. Customer evaluation. OSSTF Bul 54:28-9 F'74.

71. Hillerich, Robert L. Teacher evaluation, performance contractingand accountability in suburban Chicago public schools. Illinois

School Res 9:28-30 Winter'72.

*72. Holmes, David S. The relationship between expected grades and students'

evaluations of their instructors. Educ & Psych M 31:951-7 Winter'71.

*73. House, Ernest R. The conscience of educational evaluation. Teach

Col Rec 73:405-14 F'72.x

*74. Howard, Alvin U. Accountability at last (and again). NASSP Bul

58:20-3 Mr'74.

75. Howsam, Robert B. Current issues in evaluation. Nat El Prin 52:12-17

F'73.

*76. Hoyle, Virginia B. In terms of excellence. Reading Teacher 26:7-13

0'72.x

77. Hoyt, Donald P. Measurement of instructional effectiveness. Res in

Higher Ed 1:367-78'73.

78. Hunter, Elizabeth. Report cards for teachers. Childhood Ed

48:410-11 My'72.

79. Hunter, Madeline C. Appraising teaching performance: one approach.

Nat El Prin 52:60-2 F'73.

*80. Hutcheon, P.D. Follow-up study of Regina B. Zd. graduates. Sask J

Ed Res Dev 3:3-10 Fall'72.

17

81. Is it true what they say about those new young teachers? Grade

Teach 89:52-5 Mr'72.

*82. Jacobson, Joan. Should students evaluate teachers? Today's Ed

62:49 My'73.x

83. Jain, Ajit Kumar. Self-evaluation of a teacher's work. Teacher

Today 14:24-8 Ja-Mr'72.

*84. Jenkins, J.R., and R.B. Bausell. How teachers view the effective

teacher: student learning is not the top criterion. Phi Delta

Kappan 55:572-3 Ap'74.x

*85. Jones, Anthony S. A realistic approach to teacher evaluation.Clearing H 46:474-81 Ap'72.x

86. Jucker, James V. and Roy E. Lave. Engineering education lost among

the steeples: let's reward good teachings J Engineering Ed61:537-40 Mr'71.

87. Kalmar, Albert. The other side of the coin. Ind Sch Bull 33:53 -4

My'74.

88. Kapel, David E. Assessment of a conceptually based instructorevaluation form. Res in Higher Ed 2:1-24'74.

*89. Keeler, B.T. Competence and certification. ATA Mag 54:45 Mr-Ap'74.

*90. Kinzer, S.M. On being a teacher educator: a changing conception?

Ed Lead 29:518-19 Mr'72.x

*91. Klingstedt, Joe Lars. Technology aids self-evaluation. Educ Tech:

Teacher & Tech Suppl 12:73 O'72.

*92. Koblitz, Minnie 4J. Judging the teacher. Today's Ed 62:46-8 Ap'73.x

93. Kohlan, Richard G. A comparison of faculty evaluations early and

late in the course. J Higher Educ 44:587-95 N'73.

94. Kolevzon, Michael S., and Kermit T. Wiltse. J of Ed for Social Work

9:24-30 Spring'73.

95. Kossoff, Evelyn. Evaluating college professors by "scientific"

methods. American Scholar 41:79-93 Winter'71/72.

*96. Kourilsky, M., and others. Phychological effects of teacher

evaluation by results; California. Phi Delta Kappan 55:348-9 Ja'74.x

*97. Krasno, Richard M. Acountability and research on teacher effectiveness.Administrator's Notebook 21:1-4 S'72.

111

*98. Kult, Lawrence E. Alternatives to teacher evaluations. Clearing U

47:277-9 Ja'73.

99. Larson, Richard L. Some underlying premises of performance-basedteacher education. Engl Ed 4:121-6 Winter'73.

100. Lavelle, Norma C. Evaluating teacher performance. Thrust for Ed

Leadership 2 no.1, 0'72.

*101. Lawson, T.E. Formative instructional product evaluation. Educ Tech

13:42-4 My'73.

*1-02. Lawton, Steve, and others. Teacher evaluation: current practices

and future directions. Orbit 4:20-2 F'73.

103. Lederman, Marie Jean. Consumer evaluation of teaching. Liberal Ed

60:242-8 My'74.

*104. Leith, G.O.M., and R.J. Britton. The influence cf learning techniquesof programmed instruction on teaching performance in school.Educ Res 15:227-31 Je'73.

*105. Lenchyshyn, D. Evaluation of teachers ... by teachers. OSSTF Bul

52:233-4 0'72.

106. Leonard, Wilbert M. Student preferences for what makes a good college

teacher. Improv Col & Univ Teach 21:10-13 Winter'73.

*107. Lieberman, Myron. The question of teacher evaluation in negotiations.

Sch Mgt 16:15-16 Ap'72.x

108. Linsky, Arnold S., and Murray A. Straus. Student evaluations of

teaching: a comparison of sociology with other disciplines.Teach Sociology 1:103-18 0'73.

*109. Lucio, William H. Pupil achievement as an index of teacher performance.

Educ Lead 31:71-7 0'73.x

*110. Lynas, E. A new argument please! Ed Courier 42:20-3 F172.

111. Magid, Joel. Evaluation of college teaching. Liberal Ed 58:474-7 D'72.

112. Marshall, M.S. Analysing evaluation. Ed Forum 35:487-90 My'71.

113. Mayo, Herbert B. Measuring faculty performance. J of Bus Ed

49:174 Ja'74.

*114. Mazoo method of measuring staff performance. Am Sch Bd J 161:40-3 Ap'74.

115. McCarter, Ronald W. Making the most of subjectivity in faculty

evaluation: truth emerges from the crossfire. Am Voc J 49:32-3 Ja'74.

19

116. McGline, Edward L., and Loren J. Anderson. The dimension ofteacher credibility. Speech Teach 22:196-200 S'73.

117. McKenna, Bernard H. A cont-xt for teacher evaluation. Nat El Prin52:18-23 F'73.

*118. . Teacher evaluation -- some implications. Today's Ed62:55-6 F'73.x

119. McNally, Harold J. What makes a good evaluation program? Nat ElPrin 52:24-9 F'73.

*120. McNeil, John D. Performance tests: assessing teachers of reading ...

A proposal. Reading Teach 25:622,624-7 Ap'72.x

*121. Means, D. Evaluation in-service education programs. Education93:292-4 F'73.

*122. Medley, D.M. Closing the gap between research in teacher effective-ness and the teacher education curriculum. J Res & Develop Educ7:39-46 Fall'73.

123. . A process approach to teacher evaluation. Nat El Prin52:33-5 F'73.

124. Menard, Tracy. An analysis of the relationship between teachereffectiveness and teacher appearance. J of the Student PersonnAssoc for Teach Ed 13:27-32 S'74.

*125. Merritt, Daniel L. The teacher assessment center: a concept.Peabody J of Ed 50:309-12 J1'73.

*126. Miller, Harry G. and Lawrence J. Dennis. Placement forms: whatgood are they? Clearing H 47:80-2 O'72.x

127. Mirus, Rolf. Some implications of student evaluation of teachers.J of Economic Ed 5:35-7 F'73.

128. Mitchell, W.T. Self-assessment for the language teacher. CanadianMod Language Review 30:256-64 Mr'74.

129. Newlin, Bruce C. Case study No. 2: implementation of teacherevaluation. Thrust for Ed Leadership 2:17-20 N'72.

*130. Niedermoyer, Fred, and Stephen Klein. An empirical evaluation of adistrict teachers' accountability program. Phi Delta Kappan54:100-3 O'72.x

131. Null, Eldon J., and James E. Walter. Values of students and theirratings of a university professor. College Student J 6:46-51 N/D'72.

20

132. Nuspl, John J. In the future: objective or subjective evaluation

of teachers? Ed Tomorrow 1:70-6 D'71.

133. O'Donnell, Holly Smith. Accountable for what? ERIC/RCS report.

El Engl 51:721-6 My'74.

134. Oestreich, A.H. Evaluation in teacher education programs. Viewpoints

48:1-19 Mr'72.

135. Olds, Robert. Performance evaluation rates a close look. Compact

8:13-16 My-Je'74.

136. Orlando, Charles. Teacher shortages -- a problem oropportunity forchange? Pennsylvania Ed 3:15-16 Mr- Ap'72.

*137. Overby, George Robert. A new perspective in the evaluation ofprospective teachers in professional education courses. J Teach

Educ 23:50-2 Spring'72.x

*138. Pambookian, Hagop S. Initial level of student evaluation of instructionas a source of influence on instructor change after feedback.

J Educ Psychol 66:52-6 F'74.

*139. Patterson, E. Teacher evaluation

*140. Peck, Lucy, and Bruce R. Joyce.and sensitivity in teaching.

-- how? ATA Mag 54:33-5 Mr-Ap'74.

Situational assessment of strengthJ Teach Educ 23:67-81 Spring'72.x

141. Performance evaluation. NJEA Review 46:18-19 Ap'73.

142. Peters, Dianne S. The link is equitability. Research in High Ed

2:57-64'74.

143. Piveteau, Didier J. L'evaluation des professeurs aux Etats-Unis(Teacher evaluation in the United States) Pedagogie 28:509-14 e

My'73.

144. Poliakoff, Lorraine. Recent trends in evaluating school personnel.

Nat El Prin 52:39-44 F'73.

145. Popham, W. James. Found: a practical procedure to appraise teacher

achievement in the classroom. Nation's Schools 89:59-60 My'72.

*146. . The new world of accountability: in the classroom.

NASSP Bul 56:25-31 My'7Z

*147. . Teacher evaluation and domain-referenced measurement.

Educ Tech 14:35-7 Je'74.

148. . Teaching performance tests. Nat El Prin 52:56-9 F'73.

21

*149. Pulley, Jerry L. Teacher appraisal. Clearing H 47:34-6 S'72.x

*150. Quirk, Thomas J. Performance tests for beginning teachers: whyall the fuss? Educ Tech 13:14-16 My'73.

*151. . Some measurement issues in competency-based teachereducation. Phi Delta KapQan 55:316-19 Ja'74.x

*152. Quirk, Thomas J., and others. Review of studies of the concurrentand predictive validity of the national teacher examinations.Rev Educ Res 43:89-113 Winter'73.x

153. Ray, Andrew. Teacher accountability, or what? Social Science Rec2:13-14 Winter'74.

154. Reed, Horace B., and Martha C. Yarington. A procedure for establishingteacher education criteria. J of the Student Personn Assoc forTeach Ed 12:109-113 Mr'74.

*155. Reitapple, L., and V. Nunn. Ideal teacher. OTF Reporter -:11-17Winter'72.

156. Resnick, Norman H., and Henry R. Reinert. Competency-based teacherevaluation. Colorado J Educ Res 13:19-21 F'73.

157. Richardson, R.C. Can ficulty evaluation improve instruction?Com & Jun Col J 44:19-21 N'73.

*158. Robertson, E. Wayne. Teacher self- appraisal: a way to improveinstruction. J Teach Educ 22:469-73 Winter'71.x

159. Rodin, Miriam. Research. Can students evaluate good teaching?Change 5:66-7 Summer'73.

*160. Roeder, Harold H. Are today's teachers prepared to use tests?Peabody J of Ed 49:239-40 Ap'72.

161. Rbth, Theodore C. Towards a delineation of professional knowledge.Kappa Delta Pi Record 9:9-11 0'72.

162. S-ogen, H. Bradley. Student, faculty, and department chairmenratings of instructors: who agrees with whom? Research in

Higher Ed 2:265-72'74.

163. Schaff, M.E. and B.R. Siebring. What do chemistry professorsthink about evaluation of instruction? J of Chemical Ed

51:152-4 Mr'74.

164. Schulman, Benson R., and James W. Trudell. California's guidelines

for teacher evaluation. Com & Jun Col J 43:32-4 0'72.

22

165. Scott, Harry V. Classroom assignments: a constructive approachto an ignored teaching competency. Kappa Delta Pi Record8:74-6 F'72.

166. Shaw, Jane S. Students evaluate teachers and ... better sit down-- it works. Nation's Schools 91:49-53 Ap'73.

167. Sheppard, Douglas C. Certhication and evaluation of teachers.Bulft!_._le_._A'oreir...._9)Lanuaes 4:5-7 D'72.

168. Simpkins, W.S., and others. Teacher differences as perceklved bystudents. Improv Col & Univ Teach 21:64-6 Winter'73

169. Smith, Owen T. Evaluating the teacher. Thrust for Ed j.eadership2:30-1 0'72.

*170. Smithman, H.H., and W.H. Lucio. Supervision by objectives: pupilachievement as a measure of teacher performance. Educ Lead31:338-44 Ja'74.x

*171. Soar, R.S. Accountability: assessment problems and possibilities.J Teach Educ 24:205-12 Fall'73.x

172. Soelle(s,. Sue, and Billy C. Rather. Teacher evaluation forms.J Bus Ed 49:115-16 D'73.

173. Stanton, Michael. Assessment of behaviour and categories ofjudgment. J Moral Ed 3:151-8 F'74.

174. Start, K.B. A dissection of fifty headteacher-references. Educ R26:109-13 F'74.

175. Stassen, Marilyn E. Evaluation bi students, Engl J 62:459-60 Mr'73.

176. Stice, James E. I'm for evaluation of teaching, but .. J Engineering_Ed 62:529-32 Mr'72.

*177. Stoddart, W.B. Questions we need to ask to make the teaching facultymore effective. Can Univ 7:36-41 Mr-Ap'72.

*178. Stones, E., and S. Morris. The assessment of practical teaching.Educ Res 14:110-19 F'72.

179. Swanson, Richard A., and David J..Sisson. The development,evaluation, and utilization of a departmental faculty appraisalsystem. J of Industrial Teach *...4 9:64-79 F'71.

180. Sypes, D. and V. Cicci. Ranking of student teacher performance.Educ Psych 43:66-9 F'73.

23

181. Thomas, E. Barrington. Criteria employed by high school principals in

evaluating teachers in Victoria. J Educ Adm 10:19-33 My'72.

182. Thomas, Hollie. Improving teaching methods through students evaluation.

Agric Educ Ma 45:32-33+ Ag'72.

*183. Thompson, June E. Student evaluation of teachers. NASSP Bul

58:2 10 0'74.

184. Thornsley, Jerome R. Case study No. 4: recognition and respect

for teacher competency. Thrust for Ed Leadership 2:23-7 N'72.

185. Tobin, Warner E. A principal looks at evaluation. Nat El Prin

52:92-5 F'73.

*186. Tollefson, Nona. Selected student variables and perceived teacher

effectiveness. Education 94:30-5 S-0'73.

*187. Tolor, Alexander. Evaluation of perceived teacher effectiveness.

J Educ Psychol 64:98-104 F'73.

*188. Trosky, 0.S. Have supervisory conferences and teachers' self-analysis of audio tapes indirect influences upon the quality of

teachers' questioning? Man J Ed 7:43-8 Je'72.

189. Van Fleet, Ellamaye. Q-sort in teacher evaluation. Delta Pi Ipsilon

14:1-17 Ag'72.

190. Vaughn, J. Everette. Evaluation and due process: legal aspects.

Nat El Prin 52:88 -91 F'73.

191. Vining, Jean. Teacher evaluation in office machines instruction.

Bus Educ World 51:5 Mr-Ap'71.

192. Waits, Bert K., and Larry C. Elbrink. Student evaluation of

mathematics instruction. Two-year Coll Math J 4:59-66 Spring'73.

193. Walker, Billy D. Course difficulty and student rating of teaching.Imploycol & Univ Teach 22:18+ Winter'74.

*194. Wanat, Stanley F. Performance tests: assessing teachers of reading ..

A response. Read Teach 25:623, 628-33 Ap'72.x

195. Warden, Sandra A. Socio-political issues of faculty activity data.

J Higher Educ 45:458-71 Je'74.

196. Watanabe, Nabuo Bob. Effective evaluation: the case for comprehensive

teacher input. Calif J of Teach Ed 1:29-40 N'73.

*197. Watman, Thomas J. Measurement sources. Clearing H 46:447-8 Mr'72.x

*198. Watman, Thomas J. Measuring interaction. Clearing H 46:382-4 F'72.x

199. Whitfield, Raymond P., and Lawrence M. Brammer. The ills of collegeteaching: diagnosis and prescription. J Higher Educ 44:1-14 Ja'73.

*200. Whittington, Kathryn D., and Patricia R. Lawler. Children'sperceptions of a teaching team. El Sch J 72:156-60 D'71.x

*201. Wicks, Larry E. Opinions differ: teacher evaluation. Today'sEducation 62 no.3, Mr'73.x

*202. Wilson, Richard E. Administering instructional programs in thecommunity college. Peabody J of Ed 49:260-7 J1'72.

203. Wise, Charles N. Student ratings of teachers: a perspective forspeech communication. Western Speech 37:196-203 Summer'73.

204. Wolff, Florence I. Teachers' potpourri: a survey of evaluativecriteria for faculty promotion in college and university speechdepartments. Speech Teacher 20:281-3 N'71.

205. Wood, Kenneth and others. Class size and student evaluations offaculty. J Higher Educ 45:524-34 0'74.

206. Yantis, John T., and Michael Carey. Improving teacher selection.J Col Placement 32:75-7 D-Ja'72.

207. Zelbey, Leon W. Student-faculty evaluation. Science 183:1267-70 Mr'74.

*208. Zelenak. M.J., and B.C. Snider. Teachers don't resent evaluation:if it's for the improvement of instruction. Phi Delta Kappan55:570-1 Ap'74.x

209. Zion, C. and S. Richter. Selecting the right criteria for evaluation.Com & Jun Col J 44:22-3 N'73.

C. Theses

1. Baxter, Wilfred H. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of SecondarySchool TeacherS Trained in Concurrent and Consecutive Programs ofTeacher Education. M.A. thesis, University of Calgary, 1974. 60p.

2. Booth, Jerry Randolph. The Development of an Instrument for MeasuringSelected Teacher Attitudes Toward the Use of Democratic Processes inClassrooms. Ph.D. thesis, University of ArizOna, 1970.

3. Chambers, Norman E., and Boris Bagdassarroff. An Evaluation of theEncounter Group Process Through Assessment of value Shifts andPatterns of Black and White Educators, Ph.D. thesis, United StatesInternational University, 1970.

25

4. Hall, George Morgan. A Factorial Analysis of Objectivitity in

Performance Evaluation of Tasks Governed by Specific Criteria.

Ph.D. thesis, American University, 1968-.---DA 490-A.

5. Jackson, Jim Leslie. An Assessment of an In-Service Program in

Earth Science for Producing Changes in Teacher Behavior and

Pupil Achievement. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University, 1970.

6. Kvidahl, Robert Frederick. Student Evaluations of Teachers Compared

with Teacher Self-Evaluation. Ph.D. thesis, University of South

Dakota, 1970.

7. Lebowitz, Murray. Tle Relationship Between Principals Ratings of

Teacher Effectiveness and Principal-Teacher Genuine Progressive

and Pseudo-Progressive Educational Attitudes. Ph.D. thesis,

New York University, 1970.

8. Love, Harris Edward. An Idenfication and Evaluation of Merit Pay

Factors. Ph.D. thesis, Auburn University, 1970.

9. Parsons, Herbert N. Teacher Evaluation: An Appraisal of the Method

of Teacher Self-Evaluation as a Technique for Evaluating and

Rating Teachers. M.Ed. thesis, University of New Brunswick, 1973.

120p.

10. Tait, George James. A Description of the Development of a Merit

Evaluation Program in a Middle Size School District. Ph.D.

thesis, Oregon State University, 1970.

11. Torrence, Preston Elbert. A Study of the Relationship of Selected

Teacher Behaviors to Teacher Effectiveness. Ph.D. thesis, Boston

University, 1970.

76

BIBLIOGRAPHIES IN EDUCATION SERIES

NO. DATE SUBJECT AND ERIC NUMBER STATUS ADDENDA

1 June 1969 Pre-Service Teacher Education in Canada ED 034 726 (o/p) Oct. 1971

2 June 1969 School Dropouts (o/p) Feb. 1971

3 October 1969 Flexible Scheduling in Secondary Schools (o/p) Nov.,1972

4 Nov. 1969 Ccmputer Uses in Instructional Programs /ED 034 728

5 Dec. 1969 Microteaching ED 036 490 / (o/p)

6 Jan. 1970 Reporting to Parents (o/p)

7 Feb. 1970 Teacher Aides ED 037 406 included inNo. 16

8 March 1970 Sex Education (o/p)

9 April 1970 Disadvantaged Children in Canada ED 041 965 (o/p)

10 June 1970 School Year Plans (o/p) Jan. 1972Oct. 1973

11 Aug. 1970 Education Fiance in Canada

12 Oct. 1970 Independent Study ED 045 585 (o/p)

13 Nc'. 1970 Individualized Instruction ED 046 881 (0/P)

14 Nov. 1970 Histories of Teachers' Associations in'Canada (o/p)

15 Dec. 1970 Differentiated Staffing ED 045 608 (0/P)

16 Dec. 1970 Paraprofessional School Personnel ED 048 102 (0/P)

17 Jan. 1971 Open Area Schools (o/p) Dec. 1971

18 Feb. 1971 Parent Involvement in School Programs ED 054 270 (o/p)

19 March 1971 Behavioral.Objectives in Education ED 051 127

20 April 1971 Teacher Workload' ED 054 060 (o/p)

21 May 1971 Merit Rating ED 057 433

22 June 1971 Team Teaching ED 055 044

23 Oct. 1971 Collective Bargaining for Teachers

24 Dec. 1971 Training Teachers for Inner City Schools ED 058 172

25 Dec. 1971 Systems Analysis in Education ED 058 171

26 Jan. 1972 COmmunity Colleges

27 March 1972 School Discipline ED 064 771

28 May 1972 Early Childhood Education ED 069 366

29 June 1972 Teacher Evaluation ED 069 607

30 Oct. 1972 Intercultural Education ...., Indians end Eskimos of North

America (o/p)

31 Dec. 1972 Community Schools ED 086 695

32 Feb. 1973 Principals and Vice-Principals

33 April 1973 Tent,re ED 077 863

34 May 1973 Teacher Autonomy and Teacher Decision Making ED 077 864

35 June 1973 Paraprofessional School Personnel

36 Sept. 1973 Differentiated Staffing

37 Oct. 1973 Secondary Education

38 Nov. 1973 Independent Study

39 Dec. 1973 The eracticum in Teacher Education

40 Jan. 1974 MicrAeaching

NO.

41

42

43

44

45

DATE SUBJECT AND ERIC NUMBER STATUS

Feb. 1974

March 1974

April 1974

May 1974

June 1974

Interaction Process Analysis

Supervision

Elementary Education

Moral and Values Education ED 097 269

Behaviour Modification

46 Sept. 1974 Work Experience and Cooperative Education Programs

47 Oct. 1974 Education Finance in Canada

48 Nov. 1974 Curriculum Development in Canada

49 Jan. 1975 School Discipline

50 Feb. 1975 Junior High and Middle Schools

51 Mar. 1975 Principals and Vice-Principals

52 May 1975 Teacher Evaluation

ADDENDA