team cohesion in water polo

19
TEAM COHESION IN WATER POLO Ong Chong Jie Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 1

Upload: eween

Post on 15-Nov-2014

126 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

TEAM COHESIONIN WATER POLO

Ong Chong Jie

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 1

Page 2: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

CONTENT

Introduction

Literature Review

Barriers to team cohesion

GEQ

Methodology

Results

Discussion

Applied Implications

Summary

Acknowledgment

References

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 2

Page 3: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

INTRODUCTION

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 3

Water Polo

-water sport

-swimming, throwing, passing

(wikipedia, 2009)

Team Cohesion

-stick together

-united to pursuit goal & objectives

(Carron, 1982)

Page 4: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

CONT’

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 4

Social Cohesion

-like and enjoy spending time

together

Task Cohesion

-stick together

-specific & identifiable goal

Carron, 1982

Page 5: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

LITERATURE REVIEW

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 5

YEAR AUTHOR PUBLICATION/ JOURNAL MAIN FINDINGS

2008 Mohammad Narimani

and Saeid Sadeghieh

Ahari

Relationship between

team cohesion, role

ambiguity, & athletic

performace

Positive correlation between

team cohesion and athletic

performance

2002 Albert V. Carron, Steven

R. Bray, Mark A. Eys.

Team cohesion and

team success in sport

very strong relationship

between cohesion and

success in sport teams

1997 Sheilds, D The Effects of Verbal

Aggressiveness and

Argumentativeness

Communication Traits

positive correlation between

argumentativeness

communication traits and

small group cohesion.

1990 Widmeyer, Brawley,

Carron

The effects of group

size in sport

enjoyment and cohesion

decreased as size increased

1982 Carron, A, V Cohesiveness in

sports group

certain factors that lead to

team cohesion

Page 6: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

BARRIERS IN TEAM COHESION

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 6

Clash of personalities

Conflict of task/social roles among members

Breakdown in communication

One/more members struggling for power

Disagreement on goals/objective

Carron (Group Cohesion,

2008)

Page 7: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

GROUP ENVIRONMENT QUESTIONNAIRES

(GEQ)

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 7Carron, 1982

Page 8: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

METHODOLOGY

Objective: to study the team cohesion in

water polo

Participants: 11 males

Age: 19-21

Training experience: 1 to 2 years

Level of participation: College

GEQ given before training starts

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/20098

Page 9: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

RESULTS

9

Group/ Name

Attraction to group-task

Attraction to group-social

Group integration-task

Group integration-social

Ath1 19 10 21 28

Ath2 15 25 19 22

Ath3 16 23 23 18

Ath4 12 12 27 24

Ath5 13 17 31 17

Ath6 17 36 31 32

Ath7 12 13 25 24

Ath8 13 15 28 14

Ath9 16 7 21 11

Ath10 16 9 29 23

Ath11 17 19 21 19

Page 10: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 10

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11

Sco

re

Athlete

GEQ Results

Attraction to group-task

Attraction to group-social

Group integration-task

Group integration-social

Page 11: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

19

15 16

12 13

17

12 13

16 16 17

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11

Sco

re

Athlete

Attraction to group-task

10

2523

12

17

36

1315

79

19

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11

Sco

re

Athlete

Attraction to group-social

11

Page 12: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

28

22

18

24

17

32

24

1411

23

19

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11

Sco

re

Athlete

Group integration-social

2119

23

27

31 31

2528

21

29

21

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Ath1 Ath2 Ath3 Ath4 Ath5 Ath6 Ath7 Ath8 Ath9 Ath10 Ath11

Sco

re

Athlete

Group integration-task

12

Page 13: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

DISCUSSION

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 13

•Group integration social and task is better

•Low due to level of training/ experience

•Misunderstand the questions

Page 14: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

APPLIED IMPLICATIONS

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 14

Coach

Carron (Group Cohesion, 2008)

Page 15: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

APPLIED IMPLICATIONS CONT’

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 15

Member

Carron (Group Cohesion, 2008)

Page 16: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

SUMMARY

Team cohesion increases performance

Takes time to build cohesion

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 16

Page 17: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 17

Thank you to SPC staffs, SPC

colleagues, athletes which had helped

me and ISN library for providing me

informations.

Page 18: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

REFERENCES

Albert V. Carron, Steven R. Bray, Mark A. Eys. (2002). Team cohesion and team

success in sport, Journal of Sports Sciences, Feb 2002 v20 i2 p119(8)

Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and

considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138

Carron, A., Brawley, L., Widmeyer, N. (2002). Group Environment Test

Questionnaire Manual. Retrieved 9/6/2009, from www.morris.umn.edu

Group Cohesion (2008), Retrieved 5/6/09 from,

http://www.lcsc.edu/mcollins/groupcohesion.htm

Mohammad Narimani and Saeid Sadeghieh Ahari, (2008). Relationship between

team cohesion, role ambiguity, & athletic performance. Journal of Biological

Sciences 3(1):45-51

Sheilds, D, (1997). The Effects of Verbal Aggressiveness and Argumentativeness

Communication Traits, Retrieved 17/6/2009, from

http://people.wcsu.edu/mccarneyh/acad/scales.html

Widmeyer, Brawley, Carron, (1990), The effects of group size in sport, Journal

of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 177-190.

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 18

Page 19: Team Cohesion in Water Polo

THANK YOU!!

Ong Chong Jie/Ktar/ISN/2009 19