temporal-spectral imaging of functional states randall l. barbour nirx medical technologies llc suny...
TRANSCRIPT
Temporal-Spectral Imaging of Functional States
Temporal-Spectral Imaging of Functional States
Randall L. BarbourNIRx Medical Technologies LLC
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
4th NIH Optical Imaging Workshop 2004
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Motivation
• Dynamic Optical Tomography– Natural vascular rhythms
• Arteries ~1 Hz
• Veins ~ 0.3 Hz
• Microvessels ~0.02 – 0.15 Hz
– Varying metabolic demand influences tissue vascular coupling• Response to provocation
• Influence of disease
• Effects of drugs
• Time series of images – Multiple features
– High intrinsic contrast
– No need for injection
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Motivation
• Dynamic Optical Tomography– Tumor detection / monitoring response to therapy
– Diabetes (PVD)
– Functional brain imaging
– Small animal/pharmacological agents
• Value of intrinsic signals
• Instrumentation
• Analysis tools
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Vascular Dynamic States
• Non-propagating– Time varying local change (e.g., arterial HbO2)
– Pulsating behavior
• Propagating– Mayer Waves
– Maneuver induced blood volume changes
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
1st NIH Workshop OI: Dynamic OT1st NIH Workshop OI: Dynamic OT
si
di+c
di+j
si+j+c11si+j+c11
mc
mj
Symmetry based calibrationSymmetry based calibration
Simultaneous dual-breast scanSimultaneous dual-breast scan
DYNOT at Photonic West
DYNOT at Photonic West 1st commercial DYNOT1st commercial DYNOT
DYNOTcompactDYNOTcompact
Evolving Technology – Milestones
1988/89: First description of Diffuse Optical Tomography1988/89: First description of Diffuse Optical Tomography
1995: First description of Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography1995: First description of Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography
NDM Robust Solutions
0
0R
I II x
I
W
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Integrated Imaging Platform
System setup check
1 2
Real time display of raw readings
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Simultaneous Dynamic Dual Breast Measurements
• Healthy Breast
– Coherent response to provocation
• Tumor Breast
– Sluggish perfusion– Reduced response to
natural effectors– Elevated Hb levels
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Dual Breast Measurement Head
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Simultaneous Dual Breast Measurement
1 2
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Dual Breast Imaging Result
-4.0E-05
-2.0E-05
0.0E+00
2.0E-05
4.0E-05
6.0E-05
8.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.2E-04
1.4E-04
2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 3000
Imaging Frames
Estim
ate
d
D Hb
red
[m
ol/l]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1.5e-8
0
-9.3e-9
2.1e-8
0
-1.2e-8
Left
(tum
or)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7Rig
ht (
heal
thy)
D H
bred
[m
ol/l]
Imaging frames
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Valsalva Maneuver
• Spatially averaged HbO2 response
Seconds0 1500
Left Breast
Right Breast
1-
0-
1-
0-
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Temporal Features for Valsalva
PeakHeight
MaximalNegative Slope
MaximalPositive Slope
Begin End
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Scatter Plot Analysis – Case 1
Right breast (healthy)Left breast (healthy)
HbR HbO2
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Scatter Plot Analysis – Case 2
Right breast (cyst)Left breast (healthy)
HbR HbO2
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Scatter Plot Analysis – Case 3
Right breast (healthy)Left breast (cystectomy)
HbR HbO2
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Scatter Plot Analysis – Case 4
HbR HbO2
Right breast (tumor)Left breast (healthy)
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Information Content of Dynamic Behavior
• Amplitude changes
• Time delay, rate of change, …
• Directional features– Propagating behaviors, responses
• Mayer waves
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Tensor Imaging
Time Frame n
(small subregion of image area)
Spatial distribution of imaged property has moved between times n and n+1
Estimate magnitude of displacement displacement velocity
Find distances Δx and Δy for which f2(x+ Δx,y+ Δy) and f1(x,y) are most similar
Time Frame n+1
Net displacement vector
f1(x,y) f2(x,y)
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Object Size
time
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Feature Propagation
time
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Velocity Vector Fields
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Healthy Subject
2
4
6
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
0.5
1
1.5
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
0.5
1
1.5
2
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
10
20
30
40
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Diabetic Subject
2
4
6
8
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
5
10
15
20
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
5
10
15
20
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
1
2
3
4
5
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function 5
10
15
30
210
60
240
90
270
120
300
150
330
180 0
Compass function
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Things of Interest
• Temporal organization of vector fields
• Trajectories
• Duration
• Response to provocation, etc…
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Quantitative Performance of 1st Order NDM
● NDM – 1th Order Solution:
FEM Model
Spatial Correlation: 0.2456
Temporal Correlation: 0.9946
Reconstructed Images
Targets
X-Y Plane X-Z Plane Y-Z Plane
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Image Enhancement by Linear Deconvolution
ImageMedium
Reconstruction Filter
Medium Image
Reconstruction
(a) (b)
1,
m
a D 2
,m
a D
,m
a ND
1,
r
a D 2
,r
a D
,r
a ND
1,
m
a D 2
,m
a D
,m
a ND
1,
r
a D 2
,r
a D
,r
a ND
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
T( ) ( ) ( ) ( )0 01 02 0, , , 1, 2, , i i i i
nx x x i NX r
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
t
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2[ a
(t) -
a(
0)]/[
(max
- m
in)(
a)] ·
· ·
·
·
·
· ·
·
· ·
·
·
· ·
·
·
·
·
·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· · ·
· ·
·
·
·
·
·
12
34
5, ...
Step1: Assign N independently known optical coefficient distributions
where n is the number of mesh nodes.
Temporal Encoding of Spatial Information
Rel
ativ
e A
mpl
itude
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Generation of Deconvolution Filter (2)
T( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1 2, , , 1, 2, , i i i i
r r r rnx x x i NX r
(1) (2) ( ) (1) (2) ( )11 12 101 01 01 1 1 1
(1) (2) ( ) (1) (2) ( )21 22 202 02 02 2 2 2
(1) (2) ( ) (1) (2) ( )1 20 0 0
N Nn r r r
N Nn r r r
N Nn n nnn n n rn rn rn
f f fx x x x x x
f f fx x x x x x
f f fx x x x x x
Step2: Simulate the detector readings and reconstruct the optical coefficient distributions using NDM:
Step3: Compute deconvolution filter :ijF f
Known Distribution Reconstructed Distribution
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Temporal-Spectral Imaging
Temporal Function Target X-Y Plane X-Z Plane Y-Z Plane
1st Order NDM Without Deconvol.
1st Order NDM With Deconvol.
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Image enhancement with noise
t=0 t=T/4 t=T/2 t=3T/4 t=T
X-Y Plane
X-Z Plane
X-Y Plane
X-Z Plane
X-Y Plane
X-Z Plane
(a) Before deconvolution and low-pass filter
(b) After deconvolution and before low-pass filter
(c) After deconvolution and low-pass filter
Nosie level 2: 1%--10%
Sinusoidal time series:
T=10 s
● Images with noise:
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Summary
• Integrated, scalable technology• Comprehensive software tools
– System control, calibration– Data integrity– Image recovery, analysis, display
• Simultaneous multi-site monitoring• Fast, stable reconstructions• Exploration of varying forms of dynamic behavior
– Amplitude, rate imaging– Tensor Imaging
9/22/2004 R.L. Barbour / NIH Optical Imaging Workshop
Finding … ?
…..Nemo!