texas a&m presentation 2011 suit showdown

37
Leisure Destinations International SUIT Case Competitio n – AntaeusConsulting (Team: C3) S ubhankar Banerj ee, Efesa Ori gb o, Martin Knaack

Upload: seekingmastery

Post on 07-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 1/37

Leisure Destinations International

SUIT Ca se Competition – Antaeus Consulting (Team: C3)

Subhankar Banerjee , Efesa Origb o, Ma rtin Knaac k

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 2/37

Case Background

Issues Analysis

Candidate Solutions and Analysis

Our Solution

Questions

Agenda

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 3/37

Case Background

Analysis of Current State

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 4/37

SWOT Analysis: LDI

STRENGTHS

•Regional structure promoting knowledge

sharing

•Strong growth in resort club and

operations .•High customer satisfaction.

•Economies of scale

WEAKNESSES

•Decline in real estate business revenues

• Lack of synergy between corporate and

regional initiatives

OPPORTUNITIES

• Post-recession period marked with

increased willingness to spend by

customers.

• Cross selling and up selling opportunities

to the loyal customer base.

THREATS

• Real estate markets continues to remain

weak.

• Global warming and low snowfall posing

threats to some segments of the

company.

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 5/37

Strategic Issues Impact

1 Lack of standardized processesMultiple applications, security profiles and platforms built overtime

2 Role of Regional Information Officers unclear Responsibilities missed due to role absence

3Conflicting priorities between business and IT

IT strategy misaligned with business needs

4Lack of synergy between corporate andregional initiatives

Inability to derive value from IT

Operational Issues Impact

1 SLAs not defined for many applications Inability to manage user expectations and risk of downtime

2 Old and custom applications Availability and Scalability issues

3 Lack of proper documentation practices Issues in knowledge management

4 Ownership of incidents not clearly defined Creates confusion and accountability issues

5 Distributed and unconsolidated landscape Scalability issues

6 Lack of proper security model Multiple security profiles, Access management issues

Issues Identified

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 6/37

People

Lack of synergy between corporate and regional initiatives

Conflicting priorities between business and IT

Role of Regional Information Officers unclear

Process

Non-standardized processes

Absence of proper security model

Lack of SLAs for some applications

Lack of proper knowledge management processes

Ownership of incidents not clearly defined

Technology

Distributed and unconsolidated landscape

Old and Custom applications

Network issues

Root Cause Analysis

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 7/37

Implied Risks

1 Downtime

Old applications posing risks of availability

2 Security IncidentsIn absence of proper security methods, probability of security incidents is high

3 Inefficient processes

Significant loss of time and money

4 Non-Scalability

Lack of standardization is posing risk to scalability of IT

5 Decreased service level

Availability, reliability, maintainability and capacity risks

6 Expectation Management

Absence of proper metrics and SLAs causing issues in Managing expectation

H

H

H

M

H

L

Risks Imposed by Current Situation

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 8/37

“March Madness” Reflects Top 3 Risks

LDI cannot afford another “March Madness”!

DowntimeOne hour downtime on

major internal and externalsystems

SecurityIncident

Possible security breach

(Denial of Service Attack?)

Possible loss of customer dataintegrity

InefficientProcesses

Poor crisis managementprocedures

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 9/37

Analysis of Potential Solutions

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 10/37

Options Available

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 11/37

AlternativesCurrent

State

Centralized

Architecture

Distributed

Architecture

Hybrid

(Centralized/Distributed)

Architecture

Standardization

Data

Consolidation

Server

Consolidation

IT Service

Management

Web 2.0

Cloud

Computing

Outsourcing

Potential Solutions

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 12/37

Eva lua tion Matrix

Evaluation Criteria Weight Status Quo Centralized Distributed HybridAddresses Current Issues

1. Non-standardized IT Infrastructure and processes

30%

√ √ √

2. Lack of synergy between regions and headquarters √

3. Absence of enterprise-wide solutions √ √

Score 0 2 1 3

Resolves Symptoms

1. Strategic Level

20%

2. Operational level √ √ √

Score 0 1 1 2

Respects Restrictions

1. Rapid business growth10%

√ √ √

2. Cautious post-recession IT investments √

Score 2 0 1 1

Accomplishes Goals

1. Improve IT service levels

20%

√ √ √

2. Improve collaboration and knowledge utilizationto drive future growth√ √

3. Economies of scale for applications and data √

Score 0 3 1 2

Provides Long-term Benefits

Benefits: Scalability, Availability, Performance 20% √ √

Score 0 1 0 1

Ranking 100% 0.2 1.6 0.8 2.0

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 13/37

Hybrid System Architecture

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 14/37

Current Architecture

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 15/37

Target Architecture

Database

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 16/37

Implementation Plan

Timeline Measures Results

Short

•Consolidation•Applications•Databases

•Email• Improve Network capacity

•Consolidated IT landscape•Better availability and security forapplications like RESERVE

•Faster communication to remote sites

Medium

• Enterprise solutions• Knowledge portal (web 2.0)•Mobile Apps•Video Conferencing

•Improved collaboration and knowledgeutilization•Economies of scale.

Long

•Green-IT initiatives•Evaluate

•Cloud Computing•Outsourcing (HR, Finance)

•Reduced cost for IT operations•Focus on value providing services.

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 17/37

IT Service Management

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 18/37

IT Service Management

Severa l proc ess issues c anbe solved using ITSM

Identified 12 ITIL p roc essesto be imp lemented

Phased ap proa c h

0

1

2

3

4

5

IncidentManagement

ProblemManagement

Service Desk

ChangeManagement

ReleaseManagement

AccessManagement

Service AssetsService LevelManagement

AvailabilityManagement

CapacityManagement

IT SecurityManagement

KnowledgeManagement

Service Continuity

0- None 1- Weak 2- Fair 3- Capable 4- Mature 5- World Class Current State

Target State

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 19/37

ITSM - Roadmap

Baselineassessment

Identifyingkey painpoints

Prioritizationdepending onbusinesscriticality

ITIL proc esses toeradicate painpoints

Identify ke yme trics ,po lic ies ,proc ess ownersand resources

Redesignidentifiedprocesses toeliminate gap s

Identifying k eyme trics, proc essowne rs andresources

Implementide ntified ITILprocess

Track key me tricsto evaluateproc ess efficienc y

Businessdriven ITvision

SetupInitiative

Current StateAnalysis

StrategyDevelopment

Process

Re-Design

Implement &Measure

Continuous Business Process Improvement Cycle

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 20/37

Prioritizing ITSM processes

Process Criticality Vulnerability Score

IT Security Management 5 4 20

Service ContinuityManagement

4 4 16

Problem Management 4 4 16

Service Level Mgmt 4 4 16

Incident Management 5 3 15

Availability Management 3 4 12

Capacity Management 3 4 12

Access Management 3 4 12

Asset Management 5 2 10

Release Management 3 3 9

Knowledge Management 3 3 9

Change Management 2 4 8

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 21/37

Implementation Timeline

Timeline Measures Results

Short

•Centralize service desks• Implement ITIL processes:

•Incident

•Problem•IT Security•Service Level and•Service Continuity

•Disaster recovery plan• Ownership of incidents• Centralized help desk

• SLAs clearly defined for all applications• Strong security procedures and policies

Medium

• Review and test all implementedprocesses• Implement ITIL processes:

•Availability•Capacity and•Access management

• Mature IT Service Management processes• Optimized capacity plan and high availability• Proper management of user profiles

Long

•Implement Release, Change andKnowledge Management• Evaluate other ITIL processes

•Proper developing and testing procedures.• Optimized and flexible IT services.

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 22/37

Timeline

1 year 3 years 5 years

Medium Term

Short Term

Long Term

Current

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 23/37

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 24/37

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 25/37

Financial Analysis: Costs

Type of Investment Values*

Initial Investment

Hardware / Software $0.2 million

Consulting / Application

Development

$1.2million

Project Management $0.2 million

IT Service Management $0.7 million

TOTAL $2.3 million

Annual Operating Costs

Hardware/Software $0.9million

IT Service Management $0.07 million

TOTAL (NPV 5 Years) $4.8 million

* For detailed calculations see Exhibits

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 26/37

Financial Analysis: Benefits

Annual Gains Values*

Technology Benefits

Operations $0.09 million

Data Consolidation $0.25 millionAvailability $0.62 million

Scalability $0.05 million

Security $0.10 million

Business Benefits

Applicationdevelopment

$0.10 million

IT ServiceManagement

$0.94 million

TOTAL ANNUAL GAINS $2.15 million

* For detailed calculations see Exhibits

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 27/37

Financial Analysis: Costs / Benefits

$(2.00)

$-

$2.00

$4.00

0 1 2 3 4 5

     M     i     l     l     i    o    n    s

Break-Even Analysis

Summary

Initial Investment $2.30 million

Annual Savings $1.18 million

Total Net PresentValue (NPV)

$1.51 million

Assumed InternalRate of Return(IRR): 14.6%*

5 years time horizon

ROI: 31.26%

* NSAA Research Highlights Ski Resort Industry Return on Equity, 2005/2006

Year

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 28/37

Risk Analysis

Risk Impact Probability Mitigation

Insufficient user

involvement

Gather user requirements

Hold information sessions

Provide required trainings

Constantly communicate benefits

Lack of Management

Support

Assign project champion

Define clear transformation responsibilities and

roles

Align management goals to success of project

Technical

implementation

difficulties

Hire experts from inside or outside the company,

Follow proper testing procedures

Undermining of defined

processes

Have clear escalation procedures in place

Motivate employees with ‘Carrot and stick’

approach.

Regular processes and systems audit

Unable to fully exploit

benefits of

standardized IT

architecture and

systems

Transformation strategy, with rigorous cost-benefit

analysis

Tracking of transformation progress

Focus on reusability, scalability and performance in

architecture and service design

M

H

M

M

M

L

L

L

M

M

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 29/37

Change Management

IT steering c ommittee

Inc lude business and ITleaders

Prioritize p rojec ts andalloc ate budgets

More stra teg ic role for

RIOs Inc lude in the steering

committee

Restruc turing IT to

ac commod ate c hanges

Measures Results

Better business ITalignment

Struc tured IT Organiza tion

IT Budget a ligned toBusiness stra tegy

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 30/37

Current Organization Chart

Other VPs,Engineering &Technology

SVP, FinancialPlanning & Systems

SVP, Project &Corporate Finance

SVP,Technology & CIO

VP,InformationTechnology

VP,InformationTechnology

Director,IT Solutions

Director,Infrastructure

Director,IT Operations

Director,Strategy & Planning

RetailApplications

LegacyApplications

Team

Oracle Design andSupport

Microsoft Designand Support

Web Design andE-commerce

Internet/IntranetSolutions

Data & AssuranceServices

TechnicalArchitecture

RegionalPlanning and

Support

DesktopManagement

ServerCapacityManagement

NetworkManagement

DatabaseManagement

InfrastructureMonitoring and

Control

MainframeOperations

OperationShift Teams

CentralHelp Desk

Server/ DesktopOperations

DesktopService Desk

IT ServiceManagement

QualityAssurance

Testing

QualityAssurance

Testing

Budgets

ServiceContinuity

Strategic Planning andInvestment Analysis

TechnologyRefreshment

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 31/37

Wrap-Up

ITSM raises IT Service Level

Architecture transformation ensures highersecurity

Standardization exploits economies of scale

Proper change management reduces risks

Opportunity to scale IT with business growth

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 32/37

Thank you very much for your attention!

Questions?

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 33/37

Appendix

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 34/37

Exhibit I: Investment Costs

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 35/37

Exhibit II: Investment Benefits

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 36/37

Exhibit III: Summary Investment

$(2.00)$(1.50)$(1.00)$(0.50)

$-$0.50$1.00$1.50

0 1 2 3 4 5

     M     i     l     l     i    o    n    s

Cash Flows

Cash Flows

Year

8/6/2019 Texas A&M Presentation 2011 SUIT Showdown

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/texas-am-presentation-2011-suit-showdown 37/37

People

Synergistic opportunities from collaboration between corporate and regional initiatives

Business/IT Organization alignment

Regional Information officers acting as regional project champions

Process

Standardized processes and systems

Robust and scalable security model

Appropriate SLAs to ensure high system availability

Transparent and accountable project ownership

TechnologyEconomies of scale from enterprise solutions

Efficient, flexible, and high-performing systems

Exhibit IV: Mapping Solution to Problems