· th e ri ce ga"bi t. supple "e nt to 41 11 edition— pre"ace. b lack’s e leventh m ove of...
TRANSCRIPT
-
ADDENDA
After go ing to press , "r. Rice found a muchbetter continu ation for White in p lace o f variations9 , I O, I I , and 1 4 by means of a sacrifice ofthe Qu ’een s pawn .After B lack’s move of K—Q,W'h ite should answer
P—K t3 Against this B lack seems to have two mainl ines o f p lay, viz, R—K or Q—B 4 ch . If I . .HR—K ;2 . P—Q6, QxP (I f PxP, B—R 3, e t 3 K t—K4,3—t ch ; 4. K—R 2, K t ; 5 . Pt , B—B 4 (IfP—K B 4 ;
_
6 . Q—O3 ch, B—Qz ; 7 . R—Q , R—K28 . B—R 3 , e t Q—Q3 ch , K—B ; 7 . K t—Q6ch , Pt ; 8 . R xR ch , K—B z ; 9 . R—K 7 ch, etc .If, however , B lack plays P4 B 6 at onc e , in reply to
P—QK t3 , th en the fo l lowing ‘ variation wou ldari se : I . Q—K3, R—K ; 2 . P—Q6, PxP ( If QxP ;K t—~K4, Q—K t3 ; K t—B s , etc . ) 3. B—R 3, P—K B 4 ;4 QR—Q . QxP (I f —K B 5 ; Q—Q4,3 EXP, etc .
ERRATA .
PrefaceRead fifteenth line : 1 2; PxB , KtxP, -et
_
c .Read sixteenth l ine : 14. K t—Qz, K—Q , etc .Read twentieth line I 4 . . K—Q .Second page
, first col . Note (a ) in variations1 - 1 4
-
THE R I CE GA"B I T .SUPPLE"ENT TO 41 11 ED ITION—PRE"ACE .
B lack’s e leven th m ove of K t—Q2 , in the Ja snogrodsky Variation o f theRice Gam bit, appeared in the first edition of that gam bit edited by Lips chue t z,and it was replied to
“
by 1 2 PxB and upon “Kt taking Pawn the analysis cont inued I 3 P
—QKt3, and as the reply to this'
wa s weak , a w in for’
White wasdem onstrated .
I n the Londo n Rice Gam bit tournam ent o f 1 90 4, however "r . Napiershowed that the continuation publ ished in. the Lips chue tz edition was de feated byan e legant sacrifice o f the Kn ight . This caused a pan ic am ong the White fo rcesso that the tournam ent
,which up to that tim e . had been altogether favorab le to
White , final ly ended in a victory for . B lack. N eve rtheless, I d id no t feel , that theun soundness o f the gam bit had been actually dem on strated , inasm uch as m anyl ines we re still ope n to White , and I there fo re pe r sistently continued the inve st igat ions , pa rticularly along lines arising out o f 1 2 B—K t5, K—Q L 1 3 B t ,B xB ; 1 4 R xB , QxP ; 1 5 R t , e tc . I did not , however, confine m ysel f to thatl ine
,but also gave con sideration to the line o f 1 2 PxB
,Pt ; 1 3 Q—K2 ,
P— KB 3 ; I 4 K t —Q2 , - ;R —Q but , owing to inco r rect after—play, cam e to theconclusion that this l ine led to de feat .
Las t sum mer "r. Janowski , however, m ade a "uite independent search inthe sam e direction and cam e to the opposite conclusion , which he publ ished inLe "onde I llus
’
tré . I n .this analysis he paid no con side ration to 1 4 R—Q,but found against the m oves o f 1 4 . B—Q2 ,or B—B 4 White would m aintain e"ual ity, i f not gain superior ity, by 1 5 Q—B 2 . This indication , although illum ina t ing, was nevertheless so brief that it could only act as guide into theoutwo rks of the po s ition s ."r . Janowski a lso gave som e con side ration to the m ove 1 2 QxP ,
regarding'
which he gave severa l variation s in an e arlie r num ber of L e "ondeI llus tre
’ which,whi le cor rect in them se lves , in no m anne r exhaust-ed the pos si
bil itie s of B lack, and, there fore , could mot h e con sidered as actua l dem on s tration s of the soundnes s of the gam bit , inasmuch as it fre"uen tly happened in thecourse of the analysis that a l in e of play that dem on strated win s for White innumerou s variation s had neve rthe less to be abandoned finally on account ofdefeat in a va r iation subse"uently com ing to light .Ho ,wever the suggestion s o f"r . Janowski were so prom i sing that I determ ined to sub"ect them to a m o stexhaus tive exam ination . To that end, I availed m ysel f o f the m ost valuableas sistance of a num ber of the st rongest playe r s of the Rice Chess C lub , whovolunteered to conduct the black p ieces while I played the white, s o as to m akeas certain as po ssible in the analysis that every resource o f B lack should, as faras po ssible, be discovered .
-A s the result of this analysis , I now present , through the Am erican Ches sB u lle tin, fifty five variation s , together with num e rous sub variations , which havebeen cr itically exam ined and com p i led by D r .H. K e idanz , the editor of thefourth edition of the Rice Gam bit, as a substitute for variation s 77 to 1 0 8 of thateditio n . Should the analysis prove corre ct, . and thus the soundn ess of the RiceGam bit es tablished , I and m y colleagues in this work wi l l feel ourse lves com
plete ly repaid for our labor by the broaden ing o f the scope o f the open ings available for m atches and tournam ents now unfo rtunate ly so restr icted, as in that
-
2
case the King’s Gam bit could be offered with no le s s safety - than the Q ueen’s
Gam bit, and Othe r close open ings, which now m onopolize 1m portan t che ss event'
s .I SAAC L . RICE .
Variation ‘1 .
VARIATION 2
W h i te to m ove .
VAR IATIoN 1
K t—R 4K t —Q2
1 2 PxB KtxP a )I 3 Q—K2 P—KE3 (b )1 4 Kt—Q2 (c ) B—B 4. O1 5 Q—B 2 P—B 6 (d) VARIATION 31 6 B f—t
.1 7 P—QK t3 P —K t3
1 8 P—K t61 9 PxP
(a ) - I t i s ev ident that 1 2 . . .Q—B 4 chwou ld g ive White a good game on accountof the re"o inder, 1 3 . Q —Q4, etc . Thereare only two main l ines o f play at the di sposa l o f B lack, K txP , as analyzed in varia t ions 7
- 1 4, and QxR P, analyzed in th e rem a ining var iations .(b
_
) "orced, and now B lack canno t _ a t‘
tack the. King’s Rook’s Pawn for some. tim e ' to come .
(c ) Credit, i s due to“
D . Janowski forhaving se en the far—reaching conse"uencesof this move in con"unction with the su
'
b
se"uent Queen’s move . An ana lys i s of this
l ine of play -'was recently pub l i shed byJanowski in .Le "onde I llus tre .(d ) _ I f 1 5 P—t , in order _ to pre
pare for c astl ing, White rep l ie s, 1 6 . PQK t3 , c astles QR ; _ P—R 4, Q—K tz ( ifP—K t6 ; 50 . Q—Kz ) P—R S, QR—K °1 9 . B—R 3 , with a good attack . I f 1 5P—K t6, White plays 1 6. Q4 Q4, P—K t3 ; .1 7 . B
—K2 , etc . , and -B 6 ; 1 6 . 1Q—K3 (Janowski pref ers P—K t , etc . )with a playable game .
I O P—B 31 1 P—Q4I 2 PxB
I 3 Q—K Z1 4 Kt
—Q21 5 Q—B 21 6 P—QK t31 7 P—R 4
1 8 B—R 31 9 Pe R s20 K t t
2 1 PXP'
(a ) I f 1 5 Q—Qz ; 1 6 . K t—K4, PK t6 ' 1 7 . Q—Q4. B t ; 1 8 . R xB , etc ., or1 6
‘
B t ; ; 1 7 . R xB , with a good game .(b ) To p revent White taking the
Queen’s iR ook’s Pawn , a fter B la ck ha s
ca s tgled on that Side of the board .
-
(a ) If 1 6 P—K t3 ; I 7. Q _—B 6 chfollows With a good gam e for White ; if
c astles (QR) ; ’ I 7. QxR P, Kt ; 1 8 .Q—R8 ch, K '—Q2 ; 1 9 . Q~-R 4 ch, P—B 3 ;20 . P.xP ch, PxP ; 21 . Kt t , etc .(b ) 1 7 . . K —~B 2 i s not good , zW-hite
takes B P and exchanges Queens . I fB—Q2 ; 1 8 . K t—B 4, ExB ;
'
19. Kt t ,Pt ; 20 . QxB ch and QxP, w i th a goodattack .(c ) I f P. —QR3, White m ay rep ly
1 9 . K t—Q4, P—K t3 ; 20 . Kt , PxQ'
; 2 1 .
Kt , Kt t ; _ B —‘B 6, R—QKt ; 23 .B—K t5 , etc .
5 VAR IATI oN 4;
(a ) I f 1 6 P—B 6 ; . 1 7 . KtxP-. eh,Kt t (Qt , B—K t5, -B 4,~P —K t6 ; 1-9 . QxP, Kt—R 4 ; 20 . Q—K t5 ,Kt ; 21 Qt , with a good . ;gam e i f
P—K t6 ; 1 7. Q—K2 ,B—Kt5 ; 1 8.K txP ch, etc .
VARIATI ON 5 .
(a ) —_
R 4 White m ayavo id the draw by
.
17 . Q Q4, B—B 4 ; 1 8 .1 PxP, etc .
V ariation 6.
B la ck t o move .
VARIATION ‘6
VARIATION 7
gfi % 1
W4 1 4?P i g
(7/We fig
/ fi f fi27" '7
” N Z
9 R—K
1 0 P—B 31 1 P—Q41 2 Px
‘
B
I 3 Q—K21 4 K t—Q2I 5 K
-R 2 (a )
_
1 7 KtI 8 QR t1 9 R t20 P—.Q6,ch
(a ) White may also int erpose theQueenand , a fter exchanging Queens, wi ll have aplayable end g .ame(b ) I f 1 6 Q—K t3 ; 1 7 . Q Q2 , and
_
1 6 Q Q3 White repl ie s Q—B 2, .etc .(c ) 22 R —B 4 i s not any better,
White p lays 23, B—K6, R—R 4 ; 24. PKK t3, with a good game .
-
1 8 Kt—Kt51 9 QxP20 Qt ,ch2 1 ExP
22 R—R 323 QR—K
26 B t (a )
(a ) The enti re variation, with the bri ll iant sacrifice of the King’s Bishop, i sgiven by Janow ski in a private communication to the inventor o f the gambit.
VARIATION 8 .
(a ) I f . ;Kt 1 9 . Kt R , Pt g20 . R t , P—B O ; 2 1 . PxP, PxP (K txPch ; K—K t3, P—K B 4 ; B—QB 4, etc ) ;R—K4, with a good game .
VARI ATION 9 .
protect the
Variation 9 .
B l a ck t o move .
VARIATION 1 0
(a ) If . P—K B 4, White attacks by1 9 . B—K 15, Q Q2 ; 20 . B—K t5, Q—K 3 °
Queen’s Knight with the King’s Rook andto give the Black Queen mor e freedom .(b ) White "may try ' 1 5 . P—QKt3, P
B 6 ; . 1 6. Q—K3 , R—K ; 1 7 . P—R 4, PxP ;I 8 . KxP, Kt ; 1 9 . K t t , QxQ ; 20 .B xQ, B—B 4 ; 21 . K t—Q2 etc . ( If, for instance
,B lack p lays 1 5 R—K , White gets
the attack a fter 1 6 . P—R4 , P—B 6 ; 1 7. QK3, , any ; 1 8 B—R 3, etc .(c ) I 5 Kt i s not good on account
of 1 6 . Qt , P—KB 4 ; 1 7 . B xP, Pt ;(Kt , K t—K t5, etc . ) 1 8 . B—K t5, K t—B 3 ;1 9 . R xP, Q—Q3 ; 20 . R—B 4, R—B 8 ; 2 I .QR—K B , K—K2 ; 22 . Q—K2 ch, etc . , or,1 6 R—K ; 1 7 . P—Q6, PxP ; 1 8 . ExP,K t ; 1 9 . Kt P, K t—K7 ch ; 20 . K—B z,
-
21 . Kt P, Q'
XKt ; QxQ ch, KxQ ; _ 22.
Q-R r—w—Q ch and wins .(b ) Again 1 9 . P—KB 4 canno t be re com
m ended. White ge t s the attack by 20 . BKt5, Q—Qz ; 2 1 . Kt—B 5. I f —B 5Black los e s a p iece by_ 20 . Kt—K t3 .(c )
‘
To prevent W-hite’s 22. P—B 5. I f—K B 4 ; 22 . K t—B s,'
Q—Qt6 ; 23.K t—R 6 ch, Pt ; 24. Q —'R 5 ch, and drawsby penpe tua l check , and i f B lack attacksthe Knight by 2 1 . . B—' B 4 ; 22 . P.—° B 5,B t ' ; 23. R xB , Q—K t6 ; 24. R xP, etc .
VARI ATI ON I
9 R—K
1 0 P—B 3I I P—Q41 2 PxB
1 3 Q—K21 4 K t
—Q2I 5 K t
—K41 6 K t—K t'51 7 Qt18 B +—K31 9 Kt—B 7 ,ch20 QxKB P ,ch2 1 Qt
(a ) , I f - 1 9 . K t—B 7and
.
White m ates in two .
VARIATION
9 R'—K
1 0 P—B 31 1 P—Q41 2 PxB
1 3 Q—K 2I 4 K t
—Q21 5 K t
—K4I 6 P—
'
QKt3_
I 7 K t—K t51 8 Kt—K6,eh
'
1 9 Qt20 ExP
(a ) I f —B 4 ch ; White has tointerpos e the Que en at B 2 and gets anev en end gam e
-
(b ) 1 8 K—Q-2 cannot be rec om. rnended. . White plays 1 9 . Qt and gets
. the bette r gam e(c ) If 1 9 P—K t4 ; 20 . Q—B 6 etc . ,
and i f 1 9 . . QxR P ; White rep l ie s 20 ExP° with a strong attack .
VARIATION 1 3 .
VARIATION 1 4 .
(a ) If 1 9 . QxB , Kt ;20 . Qt , with a good game .
VARIATION 1 5 .
1 6 P —QKt3I 7 Kt—Kt5
(a ) I f'
zz
'
K t—K t6 ; 23.ExP,K5 24 R—B . K t—Qs ; 25. K t—K5 ch,K2 ; P—B 5, etc .
-
Variation 1 5.
Whi te to move .
1 6 K t—Q21 7 Kt—K41 8 K—
,
B 2
1 9 Qt20 Q—K5
(a ) If —B 6 1 7. , K txP , R t ;1 8. PxR , Q—K t6 ch ; 1 9 . K—B , and Whiteescapes .(h) After 1 9 . —K t6 ch ; 20 . K—K2,
P—B 6 ch ; 2 1 . PxP, Q—R 7 ch ; 22 . K-f Q ,Q—R 8 ch ; 23 . K—B 2, and White i s safe .
VARIATION 1 6 .
(a ) I f . K t—f K tO ; 1 7 . B—K t5‘ ch, .QxB ; 1 8 . Q -Q4, P—.K B 3 ° 1 9 . Kt —Q2, .w ith a good‘attack.
VARIATION “ I 7 .
VARIATI ON 1 8 .
1 2 PxB
1 3 P—K6
1 4 Pt ,ch KxP
1 5 B- K t5,ch K
—Q3I 6 B—K3 PxPI 7 B
—B 5,ch KxB1 8 Q—Q4 ,eh K—Q3 .I 9 Q P—QB 420 K—B 22 1 R—K7 ,ch
(a ) White -m ates in at least sevenmoves : 1 . Q—K5 ch, K—B 4 ; 2 . QxP eh, .KxB forced ; 3. K t—R 3 ch , K—R 3 ( ifK—R 5 ; Q -B 4 ch, 4 . Q—B 4 ch,K -K t3 ;
'
5 . Q—K t5 ch , K—B 2 ; 6 . QB 5 ch , K , any ; 7 . Q mates .
1 2 PxB
I 3 P—K6
1 4 Pt ,ch
1 5 9—9 21 6 PxB (Q ) ,ch1 7 . B—B
I 8 Q—B 41 9 KxP
20 P—KK t32 1 B—K t222 B t
23 R—K7
(a ) I f 1 7 P—K t6 ; 1 8 .'
PxP andB lack has gained nothing ; i f . 1 7 KtB 5 ; 1 8 . Qt , QxR ; 1 9 . B—K3, R—K ;20 . B—B 2, etc ., and i f —K t6 ; 1 8 .Q—B 2 wins
-
VARIATION 1 9 .
9 _ R ,—K
I O' P—B_3
I I P—Q41 2 PxB
1 4 Pt ,ch
1 5 92—9 41 6 K—BI 7 QI 8 QxP1 9 K—K2
20 B—K3(a ) I f —R 8 ch , White interposes and , a fter exchanging the Queens,White has a good end game .
VAR IATION 2 1
Variation 20 .
7 1%7/
% 1
Ke fi e fiW h i te to m ove .
VARIATION 20 . V ARIATION 22
(a ) This move was al so tried byHe lbach against Schis chkin in the 1 3th round
o f the St . Petersburg R ice Gambit Tournament. It i s the only game at thi s variationplayed in
_
that tournament .(b) I f 1 6 P—B 6 ; I 7. B—Kts, Q
.K t6 ; 1 8 . B t ; K t ( forced ) 1 9 . R t'
ch , K—K t3 Q—z—K4 ch, KxR 21 . QxR Pch, K—Kt4 ; 22 . Q—K t7 ch,“ K—R 4 ;Q—R 7
I
ch'
and draws by perpetual check .-c ) I f Q—R 7 ch ; 1 8 . K g—B , Q—R 8
ch ; 1 9 . Q—K t , QxQ _20 . KxQ, wi th a good'
game .(d ) I f the attacked B lack Rook m oves ,
White repl ie s 20 . ExP, etc .
9 R—K1 0 P—B 3I I P—Q41 2 PxB
1 3 P-'
K6
1 4 PxP ,ch
I S Q—Q43Ch1 6 R—K51 7 R—K t5,ch
1 8 P -Q6 ,eh1 9 B xB ,ch
20 B xP
2 1 QxP22 KXQ23 K
—Kt
(a ) To avoid a m ate in a few moves ,B lack m -u's t surrender the Bishop .(b ) 22 K t—K4 ch i s o f doubtfu lva lue ; after K—K t , Kt ; B tch
, K t—B 2 25. PxP ; W-hite gets th e better
game .
1 8 Q—Q4;ch1 9 Qt ,ch
(a ) I f 1 5 P—Kt6‘
; White wins eas ily by 1 6 . Q—Qs Q—R 7 ch (Qs , R—K 7, .
1 7. K—B , Q—R 8 ch ; 1 8 . K—Kz ,‘P—B 6 ch ; 1 9 . QxP , K t—K5 ; 20 . ExR ch ,etc .
-
VARIATION 22A . Variation 24.
1 2 PxB
1 3 P—K6
I 4 PxP ,ch
1 5 P—Q6,ch
1 6 B—Q3,chI 7 R
—K71 8 Kt—Q21 9 Kt
—Kt20 Q—B 32 1 QxQ22 KtxP W hi te t o m ove .23 R t P
24 Kt—B Leon Sternberg of N ewark, who c-
‘
ontribut0
”
t d l t th’
t'
g t'
f th(a ) I f 1 8 . .K t—K t6 ; 1 9 . K t —K t , et c . (1
3
55; {G‘
Efii bifa 0 e a e S 1 a Ions 0 e
(b ) If I O—P—Q4 ; 20 ; P—K t ,Q—K t4 ; 2 1 . PxP, K txP ; 22 . K t—K t3 , etc .
(b ) I f 1 6 Kt K tfit then PxP ch.
VARIATION 23 . VARIATION
9 R—K Q—K2
1 0 P'
-B 3 K t—R 4
I I P—Q4 K t —Q21 2 PxB QxR PI3 P
—K6 Kt—K t31 4 P—Q6 PxP(a )1 5 PxP ,ch
I 6 R—K81 7
.9—9 4
1 8 K—B 21 9 R xR
(a ) I f 1 5 . P—Q7 chK2 ; I 6 . PxB (Q ) , etc .
VARIATION 24 .
I O P—B 31 1 P—Q4
VARIATION 26 .
I 2 PxB
I 7 P—K7I 8 Q—K t5,ch( a ) Thi s move was recomm ended
9 R—K
I O P—B 31 1 P—Q4I 2 PxB
I 3 P—K6
I 4 9—9 21 5 PxP ,ch
1 6 QxP1 7 R— B 21 8 R t
1 9 Qt20 Q—K 5
(a ) I f 1 5 KxP ; I 6 . QxP Ch, B—B 4 ;1 7. P
—Q6 ch , etc . , and i f 1 5 . K—B orK .—Q2, White rep l ie s 1 6. QxP .
-
(a) Now R—B i s faulty on account of1 7. Q—R 6 Kt—K7 e ;h R t , etc .
VARIATI ON 27 .
9 R—K Q—Kz
I O P—. B 3 Kt—R 4I I P—Q4 Kt—Q21 -2 PxB QxR PI3 P—K6 Kt—B 41 4 Q—Q2 C astles1 5 PxP,ch R xP (a )I 6 P—Q6 Kt or B—K31 7 R t v ic B B vic _Kt1 8 ExB vic Kt QR—KB1 9 PxP P
—B 6 (b )20 B xR ,ch KxB
2 1 P R xQQ—Q7 ,eh K —B 3
23 QxR P—B 7 ,ch24 K
—B K t -K t6 .ch25 KxP Kt
—Ks,eh26 K—K2 Q . —B 7,ch27 K
—Q(a ) I f KxP instead’, 1 6. Q—B 2, QxQ
ch ; 1 7 . KxQ , P—QR 3 ; 1 8 . R'—K5, K
K t3 ; I O. P—Kt4 etc . ,(b ) I f 1 9 K t—K t6 ; 20 . ExR ch ,
KxB ; 2 1 . QxP ch ; K—K3 (or 22 .QxR , Q—R 8 ch ; 23 . K—B 2, Q—~K B 8 ch ;24. K t , QxQ ; 25 . B—B 4, with a superiorgame .
VARIATION 28 .
VARIATION 29 .
VARIATION 30 .
22 K —K-323 KxP
24 R xQ25 B
-B 4
(a ) In case Black c ast le s , then Whi terepl i es 1 6 . PxP ch , KxP, and now
“ Whitecan capture the QK t without danger, whatever B lack may do. "o r instanc e , e ither1 7 Q—R 7 ch Or I 7 P .—B 6 , etc.(b
‘
) I f 1 6 Q—R 8 ch ; 1 7. K—K2 t QxP ch ; 1 8 . K—Q and White i s safe .(c )
‘
I f 1 8 -B —'K3, White w ins by1 9 . B
—K t5 ch, KxP ; 20 . QxP ch’
, etc“
.
9 R—K
1 0 P—B 3I I P—Q41 2 PxB
1 3 P—K6
I 4 9—9 21 5 Q—Q 41 6 K —B1 7 PxP ,ch
I 8 R—K8 ,ch1 9 R xR ,ch20 Qt ,ch2 1 Kt—K tz22 P—Kt323 KtxP
24 Q—K3 ,ch
K'
—K t ; White wins. by2 1 . P—Q6 ch, etc . , and i f‘ 20 K—B 2 orKtz ; 2 1 . QxB P
‘ch and win s .
1 7 PxP,ch
1 8‘
B—K2 (a )1 9 Kt
—Qz .
(a ) White. may also try 1 8 . Qt , PB 6 ; 1 9 . P—Q6 ch , K—Kt2 ; 20 . R—K7 ch ,
-
I O
K—R ; 2 1 . ,Q—. K5 ch, Kt—B 3 22 . Qt ,oh,R xQ ; 23 . R—K8 e
'
h, R—B ; 24. R xR ch ,K—K t2 ; 25 . R—Kt8 ch, K—B 3 ; 26. R—B 8 1ch , K
_
—Kt4 ; 27. R—K t8 ch, K—R 4 ; .28 .B—B 7 o‘h, K—R 5 29 . B—Kt5 ch, ,K—K t4 ;30 . PxP ch, K—B 4 ; 3 1 . B—K3 . e tc .(b ) . -B 6 ; 1 9 . B xP, K—K t ;
20 . K—K'z ‘or K t . good gam esI f —,R 8 ch ; “ 1 9 . Q .—K t , QxQ ch ; '20 . -KxQ, .K—K t3 ; 2 1 . R -é-B , ‘etc .
VARIATION 3 I
2 1 B —K t5 ch22 B xP
,ch
23 QxP ,ch
. (a ) If .QxQ ch ; 1 6. KxQ, K t—K5ch ; 1 7 . K—K t , P—B 6 ; I 8 . B—K3 , etc . , ori f —K t6 ; 1 6. Qt , Q—R 7 ch ; 1 7.
‘
K—B , Q—R 8 ch ; 1 8 . Q—Kt , QxQ ; 1 9 . VARIATION 33 .KxQ , e tc .
Variation 32 .
Wh ite t o move .
VARIATION 32 .7
(a ) If —B 4 ; 2 1 . R—K t8 ch,Kt ; 22 . QxB ch , K—K t2 ; 23 . Q—B 3, ‘e tc .
(a ) . As a protection for the B lack 'Ki-ngthi s move i s natura l and seems to be thebest .(b ) KxP o ff ers a better chance for
B lack—s ee Variation 41 and all subse"uentvariations .(c ) I f 1 6 B—K t5 ; 1 7. PxP, with agood game .(d ) I f 1 7 P—B 6 ; White mates ih
three moves .
1 7 R—K8 ,ch1 8
'
R XR
1 9 P
20 B—Q3 ,eh2 1 R xP
,ch
22 QT B 7 ,ch v
23 Q—K t7 ,ch ~24 Q—K t6, m ate
-
I I‘
VARI ATION 34.
9‘
R—K" Q—KzI o P—B 3 Kt—R41 1 P —Q
_4 Kt—Q2
1 2 PxB QxR PI3 P—K6 QK t—B 3I 4 PxP,ch K—B1 5 P—Q6 P—K t4
1 6 R—K8,ch ° Kt
Pt (Q ) ,ch KxQ
ISI
Q
C
REKI
t
) VARIATION 36 .
20 Q .—K5(a ) I f -. K —Q ; 1 9. PxP ch ,“ KxP ;
20 . Q—K5 eh, . etc ., with a good attack .
Variation 35 .
2 1 25
2 t fi t
22;22?22 2K 2 1 2
B la ck t o move .
VARIATION 35 .
R—K Q—K2P—B 3 K t—R 4P—Q4 Kt—QzPxB QxR PP—K6 QK t—B 3PxP
,ch K—BP—Q6 PxPQxP ,ch K—Kt2R—K 5 P—Kt6 VARIATION 37 .P R xQQ—K7 ,cl. K—K t3B -Q3 ,eh
'
132 134R xB (a ) Q—R 7,chK—B Q—R 8 ,c
’
h
K—K2 QxP ,ch
24 K—Q
25 K—B 2
26 KxQ27 Q—B 5,Ch28 Kt—Q229 K .
-B 2
(a ) -White may try 2 1 . ExB ch , K ,any ; 22 . B—R 3, but i t seems as i f B lack .gets a w 1nning counter a ttack with QRQ, e tc .
9 R—K Q—K2
1 0 P—B 3 K t—R 41 1 P - Q4 Kt —Q21 2 PxB . QxR PI 3 P
—K6'
QK+—B 31 4 PxP ,ch K—B1 5 P
—Q6 PxP1 6 QxP ,ch K—Ktz1 7 R
—K 5'
Kt —K t61 8 P R xQ1 9 Q—K7 ,eh K
' —Kt3°
2o ExP Q—R 8 ,ch2 1 K—B 2 QKt—K5,ch22 R t Kt
23 Qt B—B 424 Q—K7 P—KR 325 K
—K t3 QR—K26
'
B—B 7 ,ch R xB27 QxQR B t28 Q—K4,ch
(a ) White may try 1 8 . K t'—Q2, P—B 6 ;
1 9 . R4—K t5 ch, QxR ; 20 . Ktx
'
P, Q; Kt3 ;2 1 . K t—R 4, Q—R 4 ; 22 . Qt , -etc . , or1 8 Q -R 8 e ;h 1 9 . K—B 2 QK t—K5 ch ;20 . Kt t , K t t ch ; 21 . R t , P—Kt6o ;h 22 . K
—B 3, Q—R4 ch ; 23 KxP , QB 4 ch ; 24. KxP, etc . 0 r _ 1 8 Q—R 8 ch ;
‘
1 9 . K—B 2, KK t—K5 ch ; 20 . Kt t ,
P—Kt6 ch ; 21 . K txP, Pt ch ; 22 . KxP,e tc.
-
I 2
1 4 PxP ,ch K—B
1 5 P—Q6 PxP
I 6 QxP ,ch K -K t21 7 R—K 5 B—B 4
1 8 K t—Q2 (a ) Kt—K t61 9 R—K7 Q
20' K—B z QKt—K5,ch
2 1 Kt t Kt t ,ch
22R t P—K t6,ch23 K—B 3 B —K5,ch
24 KxB QxP ,ch25 KxP Q—B 7,ch26 K—Kt4 P—KR 5 ,ch27 K—K t5
(a ) O f course White cannot capture theBishop . B lack would take possession ofthe King’s fiie With his Rook and therebyget an irres i stible attack .(b ) If —K B ; 20 . QxP, Q
R 8 ch ; 2 1 . K—B 2, QK t—K5 ch ; 22. K txK t , with a good game .
Variation 38.
(a ) If —m Kt6 ; 22 . B—Qs, etc .“
VARIATION 40
B l a ck to m 0ve .
VARIATION 38 .
Q—K2K t—R 4Kt—Q2QxR P
QKt—B 3K—BB—B 4 (a )K—K t2KR—KBK t —K t6
(a ) I f 15 K'
-K t2 ; 1 6. PxP,K t6 ; I 7. Q—Q4, etc .
2 1 QJ—K t22 K txP
23 PxB
(a ) I f . 1 9'
B -Kt5 ; 20 . Kt—B ,PB 6 ; 2 1 . PxP, etc(b ) I f
'
2o B—R 6 ; White can breakthe attack by 2 1 . .Q—Kt .
-
https://www.forgottenbooks.com/join
-
I 4
VARIATION"'
44 . .Variation 46.
I O P—B 31 1 P—Q41 2 PxBP—K6
.
1 4 PxP,ch1 5 P—Q6
'
,eh
1 6 B—Q3 ,ch1 7 K t—Q21 8 R xR
1 9 PxP
20 Kt—B'
(a ) B lack . cannot advance the King’s
Knight’s Pawn nor. the King’s Bishop’s
Pawn ; i f B lack trie s 1 9 . K t—Kt6 ; 20 . K t3 16 0 16 t o move '
B , Q—R 8 eh ( i f K t t ; 2 1 . ExP ch , etc . )2 1 . K—B
_2, K t —K5 ch ; 22 . B t , P—K t6
ch ; 23 . K txP, etc .
VARIATION 45 .
1 6 B—Q3,chI 7 Kt
—Q21 8 K t—B1 9 K—B 2
20 B t
2 1 R XK t
22 K txP
23 B xP,ch
(a ) If 26. ExP ch, etc .,or i f —K5 ch ; 20 . B t , PK t6 ; 2 1 . K txP , etc .
VARIATION 47 .
VARIATION 46 .
1 6 R K—R 3 (b )1 7 K t
— Q2 (c ) K t -K t_61 8 K t - . B ~ Q—R 8 ,ch1 9 K
—B 2 QK t'—'K5,ch
20 K—K . QxP.2 1 B xP ,ch K—R 422 B t Kt '
s —Q4(a ) White m ust chase the B lack King
to R 3, where h e is exposed, the B i shop’s
Pawn being - p inne d by White’s Queen’sBishop . “ I f B lack has the -O pportun ity toplay KR—B , hi s K ing m ight e s cape to thecorner .(b ) I f 1 6 K—Kts ; I 7 . B—B 7 'ch ' and
White ge t s'
a winning attack .(c ) White m ay try also 1 7 . Q
'—Q4, PK t6 ; I 8 . K t—Qz, Q—R 7 ch ; 1 9 . -K—B ,
‘
Q—R 8 ch ; 20.Q—i—K t , QxQ'
ch ; 2 1 . KxQ ,PxP ; 22.K t—K4, Kt t ; 23 . R t , wi tha fair game .
-
20 K—K2 1 B xP ,ch
23 -B t
(a ) If —K t4 (R—B ) ; 2 1 . QQ4, QxP ; 22 . Q—K5 ch (Q—K t7 ch ) , BB 4 ; 23 . ExP ch and 24. B t , e t c .(b ) I f 2 1 . .K—K t3 ; 22. B—B 7 ch,
K—B 4 ; 23 . Q Q5 ch,“
KxB ; 24. Q K 5 chand W ins .
VARIATION 48
1 3 P—K6
1 4 PxP ,ch
1 5 P—Q6 ,ch
1 6 R —K7 ,ch1 7 K t
—Qz1 8 K t— B
(a ) A fter PxR , ora fter B—R 4 ; 1 9 . B—B 7, with a goodgame .
VARIATION 49 .
9 R—K Q—K2
1 0 P—B 3 K t—R 41 1 P—Q4 K t—Q2
-1 2 PxB QxR P1 3 P—K6 Q Kt—B 3
1 4 PxP ,ch KxP
1 5 P—Q6 ,ch K—K t2
1 6 R—K7 ,ch K—R 31 7 K t —Q2 B—B 41 8 K t—B P—Kt61 9 Q—B 3 K—K t420 PxP (a ) KR—K2 1 R xR : R xR
22QxP K t —K523 Q—K t8 K t—B 724 Q—Q8 ,eh K t—B 325 B xP ,ch QxB26 K txP K t—R 6 ,eh27 K —R 2
_(a ) 20 . B —K t3, ; 2 1 . R—K5 ch ,
K—~R 3 ; 22 . K txP seems to be pre ferable .
Variation 50 .
B la ck t o move .
VARIATION 50 .
. B—Kts ; 20 . QxP, etc .
VARIATION 5 1 :
% t /
77 1 7 727 757 77 7 7
72766 66
6
66 66
‘
9 R—K
1 0 P—B 31 1 P —Q41 2 PXB
1 3 P—K6
1 4 PxP ,oh
1 5 P—Q6,ch1 6 R—K7 ,ch1 7 Kt—Q2
I 9 Pé —KKt3
20 R—Kz2 1 R—R 2
(a ) , Q—K t4 ; 20 . B—f B 7, K t—Ks(K t—Q5, Qt , QxR , Ext 2 1 .
-
16
R t , ExR ; 22 . QxP ch, K—K tz ; 23 .B t , Qt ;
'
24. Q—K 7 ch, K, any ; 2 5QxB , with
'
a good gam e .
VARIATION 52 .
Q—K2I O P—B 3 K t—R 4I I P—“ Q4 K t—Q21 2 PxB QxR P1 3 P—K6 QKt—B 3
. .Q R 6 , 20 . ExP, Kt ,
1 4 PXPQCh KxP
1 5 P_ Q6’Ch K—K tz VARIATION 54 .
1 6 R—K7 ,Ch K—R 3I 7 K t—QZ PxP
1 9 R—K B 7 (a ) B .—K3
20 P—KK t3 Q —K t42 1 PXP KKtxP
22 B xQK t . ExR23 B xB
(a ) , 1 9 . R—K4 gives White also a fairgame . B lack’s King’s Bishop
’s paw'
n m ustfal l Sooner or later
VARIATION 53 .
Q—K2K t—R 4K t—o -Q2QxR P
QK t—B 3KxP
K—K t2
A"E R I C A N CHE S S B U LL E TINTHE O NL"“ A"ERI CAN CHE SS "ONTHL".
ALWA"S OUT ON TI "E AND UP TO DATE .
INTERNATIONAL GALI E SERVICE A SPEC IALT".
Annua l Subs crip t ion, pos tage fre e , a ll countrie s
The gam e O f chess appeals strongly to inte llectua l person s in search of apastim e at once congen ial
,
and en tertain ing . P layers,problem lovers
,club m em
be r s and corresponde nce enthus iasts are catered to by.
the B ulle tin,which also
fu rn ishes all ches s suppli e s . Sam ple copies and price l ists on appl icat ion.
150 NassauSt. , New"ork City
1 2 PxB
I 3 P—K6
1 4 PxP ,ch
1 5 P—Q6 ,ch
'
1 6 R —K7 ,ch1 7 K t—Qz1 8 K t—B1 9 P—KKt3
'
2o PxP
9—9 422 K t—Kt323 Kt t
24 QxB P
(a ) I f 1 8 R—K ; 1 9 . QxP (s ee Variat ion
(b ) I f 20 Q—B 4 ch ; 2 1 . B—K3,QxK B ; 22 . P—K t3, with a good attack .