the 101 casino - proposed amendment to gaming …our area. ifthe bmeau requires that card rooms such...

98
November 18,2014 Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820 RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations Dear Ms. George, I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City of Petaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much of which funds police and fire support in our area. If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on evmy hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetalnma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law. No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Card room: The 101 Casino

Upload: others

Post on 08-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on evmy hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetalnma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Departmeut ofJustice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetalnma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The I 01 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much of which funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: ·,~(1/fl.L]) T;.Mt

  • November 18, 2014

    SusaJme George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dea~· Ms. George,

    I aJn writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled gaJnes. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY .JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    lfthe Bureau requires that ca~·d rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal g=ing while contributing LIVING WAGE .JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other g=ing business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino chaTge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thanlc you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name:

    Signature:

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support iu our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on evety hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Depmtment ofJustice Bumau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I run writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino aod put my fmnily's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a shmp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police aod fu·e support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gmning while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Maoy of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gmning business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, aod there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS aod have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thaok you for your consideration of this matter.

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The I 0 I Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that cru·d rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 10 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: J

  • November 18,2014

    Susa1me George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY .JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetalmna will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE .JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other ganring business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susmme George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The !OJ Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich fimds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The I 0 I Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gmning business in Califomia is forced by law to chmge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS a11d have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local mmket conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The I 0 I Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY .JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's futme at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE .JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: --'(;"""~'-----,--=----'l""£-·_~___c______ Signature:--~--.J..LLVl-/\7---=--_7/__~'7''7--_L_.___ Card room: The I 01 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Depmtrnent of Justice Bureau of GaJUbling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I aJU writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled gaJUes. These proposed regulations wiii cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my faJUi!y's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we wiii be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaJUing while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENlJE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Flistmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    N•m• ~A~i""'-Signature: .1L--

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by Jaw to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Er:istmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name:\)Cflf__~ 'C'Q'( \S\)"C') Signatrn·e: ~q~'=) Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The I 01 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fn·e support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LNING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: ------"'C~C::P,.,_V\~~'-'.~=~--~____._____ Signature: ____,_d=n.L\;:Z;P2'/T"~/'--·----Card room: The 101 Casino

    -

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    DeaT Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino aod put my family's futoTe at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general :ftmd revenue much ofwhich funds police aod fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 10 I Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The I 01 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's futme at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fm1d revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 0 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our cru·d room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: ~~,eA~~J Signature: sU,:>fl\J cJ. 0...-rnp If h Card room: The I 0 I Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department ofJustice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: (J~ ll'\f }) V) (')~~ t'\J Signature: ch (vvl_ (L C:~\(1&7 Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees ou every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 10 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Deal" Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support iu our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's futru·e at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetahuna will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUM:ERS and have no place in a progressive state lilce California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: _...-0{+-'~"-'-(('-"vJ-"-~:___{P_ih_{_(\_____~ signature: --wn+r--~lrc________ Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a shrup reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fn·e support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino chru·ge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califmnia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our cru·d room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank yon for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetalmna will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 0 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 10 I Casino L~··

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Ca1ifomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    DeaT Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund Tevenue much ofwhich funds police aud fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every baud played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos aud suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs aud most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 10 asmo

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institote this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The I 01 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our aTea.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 10 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    l/ Name: A-af-er.-1 Rsch.h-P"'t-Cf\

    s;g""""'

    Card room:

    F he 101 Casmo

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: --'--H._E_LE_-_rJ_'(_.._D_6_,_T--=C:t=()---'Jf___

    Signature: _____,Ji+J;;---:;,11-~=---·______:;;o

    Card room: The 1 01 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susarme George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support iu our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetalnma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    N•me Signature:

    D~:~.:S{':'-"tos.-.., i'

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writiog to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casiuo's ability to waive collections fees iu controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casiuo and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetalmna will suffer a shmp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casiuo charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casiuo has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business iu California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to iustitute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place iu a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposiug these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Siucerely, I

    Name. . n A' ~i ../~"' I' ( [ {i \~I ' :7 c (' e Signature: i::;Jti djvJJ4 Card room: The 10 1 Casiuo

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE tbe proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 0 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of tbe tax revenue will be lost iftbese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for tbe Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to tbe special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: /11/t/httll H•flt'n/11.-tl

    Signature: jtf}tf/z,IIJ t~r"'fl·W.fittJt/

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 0 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by Jaw to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our cru·d room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Galifomia Depmtment ofJustice Bumau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I aJU writing to OPPOSE the proposed regolations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled gaJUes. These proposed regolations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaJUing while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaJUing bnsiuess in California is forced by law to charge its cnstomers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regolations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thaok you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: eo .S C:. c:;-\1 'LYV> "'- ,_, Signature:~ ~dU--= Card room: The 10 I Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bw-eau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. Geo~·ge,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's fhtme at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a shmp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich ftmds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino chm·ge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to chm·ge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to tbe special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Cm·d room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Deru· Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY .JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE .JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name:,70$?rJffFRJ/AJVPE2 signatm·e:cZOSCcZ/fe:JZ/11/tjl/OffL

    Cru·d room: The I 01 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The I 01 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction iu general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thanlc you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely, -Name: ~nt"

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's futme at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fn·e support in our area.

    If the Bmeau requires that caTd rooms such as The 101 Casino chaTge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    CaTd room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writiog to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hioder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casioo and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, tbe City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires tbat card rooms such as The 101 Casioo charge fees on every band played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casioo has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many oftbese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No otber gaming business io California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and tbere is no reasonable basis for tbe Bmeau to institute tbis practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place io a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to tbe special ioterests proposiog these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration oftbis matter.

    Siocerely,

    \Cc \ \ y

    Signature: _.j~vL_-==~-'-/(-'=-'-=--t/tr-Y-/---Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bmeau of Gambling Control' Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    . Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on evety hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthesejobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is uo reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: S.'£11/(t /-J~Jiy J

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder TI1e I01 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino aod put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvaotage to local tribal casinos aod suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Maoy ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, aod there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations aod let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Depmiment of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacrmnento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled gaJUes. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 0 I Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: y:;;r7~/Yl~ C . _.., ~ Cf:Signature: u:Dq-&--~ Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like Califomia. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: :TotttN Lt Ti=AI

    Signatru·e: ~~ Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dem· Ms. George,

    I run writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The I 01 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled gmnes. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY .JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos aud suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gmning while contributing LIVING WAGE .JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs aud most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to chm·ge its customers a fee per wager, aud there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS aud have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve~y hand played, we will be at a seTious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely, •

    ~ /£____.> I!:J .e._ ~ o~ e

    Name: ~

    Siguatu·: ~~- . ~~

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that cm·d rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributhig LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    N-N-1W~~~Stguaturfi[Jf .. --k-f----1-P~=r.f--C-.-""_________/

    Card room: The 1 01 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The I 01 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to chaTge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUM:ERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    DeaT Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in om area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for yow- consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 1 0 1 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. History has shown tl1at price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on evety hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in Califomia is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire suppmt in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Histmy has shown that p1"ice controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George

    Research Analyst

    California Department ofJustice

    Bureau of Gambling Control

    Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of

    "feveil.ue. The I 01 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost if these regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    http:feveil.ue

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst Califomia Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, tbe City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Iftbe Bureau requires that card rooms such as The I 01 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs and most of tbe tax revenue will be lost iftbese regulations become law.

    No otber gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and tbere is no reasonable basis for tbe Bureau to institute tbis practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUM:ERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to tbe special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The 10 I Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    Ifthe Bmeau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVlNG WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bmeau to institute this practice. History has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let om card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name: ()00 f.l.Z.~6 GS;-;;Q.-A.\)"" ~\>:'u G)\.s. ~ ~\ \r r\.c:· "" :1> c,.,2_

    Card room: The 101 Casino

  • November 18,2014

    Susarme George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95 820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino aud put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our mea.

    Ifthe Bureau requires that cru·d rooms such as The I 01 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos aud suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City ofPetaluma. Many of these jobs aud most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to chru·ge its customers a fee per wager, ru1d there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. Elistory has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations aud let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Name:;l!l!fft{EJ /t1E/vP{)

  • November 18,2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department of Justice Bmeau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's futme at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fu·e support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on eve1y hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many ofthese jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese regulations become law.

    No other gaming business in California is forced by law to charge its customers a fee per wager, and there is no reasonable basis for the Bureau to institute this practice. 1-Iistmy has shown that price controls HURT CONSUMERS and have no place in a progressive state like California. Please do not cede to the special interests proposing these regulations and let our card room set its pricing based on local market conditions.

    Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Card room: The I 0 1 Casino

  • November 18, 2014

    Susanne George Research Analyst California Department ofJustice Bureau of Gambling Control Sacramento, CA 95820

    RE: Proposed Amendment to Gaming Activity Authorization Regulations

    Dear Ms. George,

    I am writing to OPPOSE the proposed regulations that hinder The 101 Casino's ability to waive collections fees in controlled games. These proposed regulations will cause me to LOSE MY JOB at The 101 Casino and put my family's future at risk. Moreover, the City ofPetaluma will suffer a sharp reduction in general fund revenue much ofwhich funds police and fire support in our area.

    If the Bureau requires that card rooms such as The 101 Casino charge fees on every hand played, we will be at a serious competitive disadvantage to local tribal casinos and suffer a drastic loss of revenue. The 101 Casino has provided safe, legal gaming while contributing LIVING WAGE JOBS and VITAL TAX REVENUE to the City of Petaluma. Many of these jobs and most of the tax revenue will be lost ifthese re