the advantage

WHY ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH

TRUMPS EVERYTHING ELSE

IN BUSINESS

PATRICK LENCIONIBEST-SELLING AUTHOR OF THE FIVE DYSFUNCTIONS OF A TEAM

TheAdvantage

Patrick Lencioni—The Advantage

La

Real-World Testimonials About the Advantage of Organizational Health

“Lencioni’s organizational health principles and practices allowed our organization to tap into its intellectual capital and talent like never before. We are seeing organizational transformation right before our eyes.”—Steve Burr, senior vice president, Carolinas HealthCare System

“When I first told my team that we were going to work on organiza-tional health, everybody rolled their eyes and thought it was going to be touchy-feely. They quickly realized it wasn’t. As a result of imple-menting Lencioni’s program, we now know exactly who we are, what we do, why we do it, and who can be successful in our company. Our culture and bottom line have both been transformed.”—Clinton Anderson, CEO, Downunder Horsemanship

“After two years of work around organizational health, we had our best year ever in the midst of the most challenging time our market has ever faced. We can’t imagine having the success we did had we not adopted this approach.”—Peter Levangie, president, Bay State Milling

“Our work around organizational health helped us recognize our state of crisis and found it wasn’t due to market conditions; rather, it was because we were broken as a team and on a trajectory for failure as a business. Taking on organizational health as a priority has been nothing short of transformational.”—Matt Danilowicz, president and managing director, Clear-Com

“The work we have done around organizational health saved us. It is the reason we are in the position we are today.”—Jeff Sackrison, president, Chowan Hospital

Lencioni_1522_ffirs01_main.indd 1 1/17/2012 1:47:20 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Steve Burr, senior vice president, Carolinas HealthCare System

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Steve Burr, senior vice president, Carolinas HealthCare System

“When I first told my team that we were going to work on organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL “When I first told my team that we were going to work on organiza-

tional health, everybody rolled their eyes and thought it was going to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tional health, everybody rolled their eyes and thought it was going to be touchy-feely. They quickly realized it wasn’t. As a result of imple-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be touchy-feely. They quickly realized it wasn’t. As a result of imple-menting Lencioni’s program, we now know exactly who we are, what

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

menting Lencioni’s program, we now know exactly who we are, what we do, why we do it, and who can be successful in our company. Our

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

we do, why we do it, and who can be successful in our company. Our culture and bottom line have both been transformed.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

culture and bottom line have both been transformed.”—Clinton Anderson, CEO, Downunder Horsemanship

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Clinton Anderson, CEO, Downunder Horsemanship

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“After two years of work around organizational health, we had our best

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“After two years of work around organizational health, we had our best year ever in the midst of the most challenging time our market has ever

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

year ever in the midst of the most challenging time our market has ever faced. We can’t imagine having the success we did had we not adopted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

faced. We can’t imagine having the success we did had we not adopted this approach.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

this approach.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Peter Levangie, president, Bay State Milling

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


“Our work around organizational health helped us recognize our state COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“Our work around organizational health helped us recognize our state NOT FOR R

ESALEbe touchy-feely. They quickly realized it wasn’t. As a result of imple-

NOT FOR RESALE

be touchy-feely. They quickly realized it wasn’t. As a result of imple-menting Lencioni’s program, we now know exactly who we are, what

NOT FOR RESALEmenting Lencioni’s program, we now know exactly who we are, what

we do, why we do it, and who can be successful in our company. Our

NOT FOR RESALEwe do, why we do it, and who can be successful in our company. Our

culture and bottom line have both been transformed.”

NOT FOR RESALE

culture and bottom line have both been transformed.”—Clinton Anderson, CEO, Downunder Horsemanship

NOT FOR RESALE

—Clinton Anderson, CEO, Downunder Horsemanship

NOT FOR RESALE

“After two years of work around organizational health, we had our best

NOT FOR RESALE

“After two years of work around organizational health, we had our best year ever in the midst of the most challenging time our market has ever

NOT FOR RESALE

year ever in the midst of the most challenging time our market has ever faced. We can’t imagine having the success we did had we not adopted

NOT FOR RESALE

faced. We can’t imagine having the success we did had we not adopted

NOT FOR RESALE

—Peter Levangie, president, Bay State MillingNOT FOR RESALE



La

“Our consistent focus on organizational health continues to provide us with a real competitive advantage. If the world had discovered Patrick Lencioni sooner, there would be fewer complex leadership and manage-ment cult theories, and more effective leaders.”—Gordon Samson, managing director, Williams Lea

“We have learned that in order for us to be successful at work, literally saving lives, we need to be healthy. Working through the organizational health material has helped us clarify who we are, what we do, and what kind of behaviors we expect from people. This work has allowed us to minimize organizational politics and has profoundly impacted our ability to carry out our mission.”—Elaine Berg, former president and CEO, New York Organ Donor

Network

“Our company has grown over 50 percent during the last three years of economic turmoil. It started with the game-changing work of Patrick Lencioni and our focus on organizational health. I spent my academic and professional career focused on ‘smart,’ with little attention to ‘healthy.’ We were out of balance; now we are not. The results speak for themselves.”—Richard M. Heard, president, Insight Investments

“We have made Lencioni’s methodology core to our long-term strategic roadmap. The results have been nothing short of fantastic. Employee satisfaction, communication, cooperation, and true teamwork have all improved dramatically—ensuring our spot on Inc. magazine’s list of fastest growing companies for the sixth year in a row.”—Smith Yewell, CEO, Welocalize

“The principles of organizational health have deeply impacted our company and continue to serve as a driving force for us as we grow and


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

saving lives, we need to be healthy. Working through the organizational

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

saving lives, we need to be healthy. Working through the organizational health material has helped us clarify who we are, what we do, and what

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL health material has helped us clarify who we are, what we do, and what

kind of behaviors we expect from people. This work has allowed us to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

kind of behaviors we expect from people. This work has allowed us to minimize organizational politics and has profoundly impacted our

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

minimize organizational politics and has profoundly impacted our

—Elaine Berg, former president and CEO, New York Organ Donor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Elaine Berg, former president and CEO, New York Organ Donor

“Our company has grown over 50 percent during the last three years

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“Our company has grown over 50 percent during the last three years of economic turmoil. It started with the game-changing work of Patrick

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of economic turmoil. It started with the game-changing work of Patrick Lencioni and our focus on organizational health. I spent my academic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Lencioni and our focus on organizational health. I spent my academic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and professional career focused on ‘smart,’ with little attention to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and professional career focused on ‘smart,’ with little attention to ‘healthy.’ We were out of balance; now we are not. The results speak

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

‘healthy.’ We were out of balance; now we are not. The results speak for themselves.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for themselves.”—Richard M. Heard, president, Insight InvestmentsCOPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

—Richard M. Heard, president, Insight InvestmentsNOT FOR RESALE—Elaine Berg, former president and CEO, New York Organ Donor

NOT FOR RESALE—Elaine Berg, former president and CEO, New York Organ Donor

“Our company has grown over 50 percent during the last three years

NOT FOR RESALE

“Our company has grown over 50 percent during the last three years of economic turmoil. It started with the game-changing work of Patrick

NOT FOR RESALE

of economic turmoil. It started with the game-changing work of Patrick Lencioni and our focus on organizational health. I spent my academic

NOT FOR RESALE

Lencioni and our focus on organizational health. I spent my academic

NOT FOR RESALE

and professional career focused on ‘smart,’ with little attention to

NOT FOR RESALE

and professional career focused on ‘smart,’ with little attention to ‘healthy.’ We were out of balance; now we are not. The results speak

NOT FOR RESALE

‘healthy.’ We were out of balance; now we are not. The results speak

—Richard M. Heard, president, Insight InvestmentsNOT FOR RESALE

—Richard M. Heard, president, Insight Investments


La

develop. The organizational clarity piece prompted us to become aligned and realize that we needed to make fundamental shifts in many aspects of our business. With determination and consistency, we exceeded all our goals.”—Steven C. Cooper, president and CEO, TrueBlue

“Our work around organizational health is literally giving kids the opportunity to go to college. We finally have the team, the culture, and the systems in place to work through the inevitable challenges we must overcome to achieve our goals.”—Tom Torkelson, founder and CEO, IDEA Public Schools

“By using the organizational health model, we have created an extraor-dinary and productive work environment. The design and construction industry has taken note, and we have had many outsiders ask what is so special about our approach.”—Jay Leopold, regional manager, DPR Construction

“By applying the tenets of organizational health, we have moved farther forward in the last eighteen months than we had the previous four years. Many of the employees had legacy issues and didn’t think we could actually change. We have proved that we can and the group is enjoying the benefits of being part of a high-performing team.”—Lynn Sasser, executive leader, Baptist State Convention of North

Carolina

“As a leader in our field, we were suffering from acute growing pains with no end in sight. Since adopting organizational health as the core of everything we do, our business is back on track with renewed energy and momentum. Our staff, our clients, our families, and our bottom line have reaped the benefits of making organizational health a priority.”—Ken Allman, founder and CEO, PracticeLink.com


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

opportunity to go to college. We finally have the team, the culture, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

opportunity to go to college. We finally have the team, the culture, and the systems in place to work through the inevitable challenges we must

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL the systems in place to work through the inevitable challenges we must

—Tom Torkelson, founder and CEO, IDEA Public Schools

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Tom Torkelson, founder and CEO, IDEA Public Schools

“By using the organizational health model, we have created an extraor-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“By using the organizational health model, we have created an extraor-dinary and productive work environment. The design and construction

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dinary and productive work environment. The design and construction industry has taken note, and we have had many outsiders ask what is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

industry has taken note, and we have had many outsiders ask what is so special about our approach.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

so special about our approach.”—Jay Leopold, regional manager, DPR Construction

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Jay Leopold, regional manager, DPR Construction

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“By applying the tenets of organizational health, we have moved farther

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“By applying the tenets of organizational health, we have moved farther forward in the last eighteen months than we had the previous four

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

forward in the last eighteen months than we had the previous four years. Many of the employees had legacy issues and didn’t think we

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

years. Many of the employees had legacy issues and didn’t think we could actually change. We have proved that we can and the group is COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

could actually change. We have proved that we can and the group is enjoying the benefits of being part of a high-performing team.”COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

enjoying the benefits of being part of a high-performing team.”NOT FOR R

ESALE“By using the organizational health model, we have created an extraor-

NOT FOR RESALE“By using the organizational health model, we have created an extraor-

dinary and productive work environment. The design and construction

NOT FOR RESALEdinary and productive work environment. The design and construction

industry has taken note, and we have had many outsiders ask what is

NOT FOR RESALE

industry has taken note, and we have had many outsiders ask what is


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

“By applying the tenets of organizational health, we have moved farther

NOT FOR RESALE

“By applying the tenets of organizational health, we have moved farther forward in the last eighteen months than we had the previous four

NOT FOR RESALE

forward in the last eighteen months than we had the previous four years. Many of the employees had legacy issues and didn’t think we NOT FOR R

ESALE

years. Many of the employees had legacy issues and didn’t think we could actually change. We have proved that we can and the group is NOT FOR R

ESALE

could actually change. We have proved that we can and the group is


La

“Our organization was historically at war. We had a strong business model, but we needed something more foundational. We needed to cut past the history and build a more cohesive leadership team that pro-vided clarity to the entire organization; we needed to build a healthier organization. It has been a journey, but the people in our multifaceted company are now working together instead of against each other.”—Robert R. Auray, vice chairman, Reverse Logistics and Remarketing,

GENCO ATC

“By applying Lencioni’s principles, our organization’s performance has dramatically improved. We are nimbler, more efficient, more cohesive, and able to focus on important challenges rather than the day-to-day minutiae that were dragging us down. This new approach to work is energizing, and more fun to boot.”—Bill Colleran, CEO, Impinj

“The concept of organizational health has enabled our management team to drive healthy behaviors throughout our company, which has supported our growth over the last eighteen months.”—Colin Guppy, managing director, HMD Pumps

“We have always considered ourselves to be a smart company and have never given our health much thought. We recently shifted our approach and have seen a great response from employees and customers alike.”—Tom Sloane, vice president sales, Export Development Canada

“As a group of highly-educated, motivated, and skeptical individuals, it only took about five minutes for Lencioni’s principles to capture our attention and subsequently take us on an important journey. We are now a healthier unit, ready to tackle the major issues facing our busi-ness. This new approach to work is now a strategic advantage.”—Alfred Foglio, managing director, GI Partners


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“By applying Lencioni’s principles, our organization’s performance has

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“By applying Lencioni’s principles, our organization’s performance has dramatically improved. We are nimbler, more efficient, more cohesive,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dramatically improved. We are nimbler, more efficient, more cohesive, and able to focus on important challenges rather than the day-to-day

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and able to focus on important challenges rather than the day-to-day minutiae that were dragging us down. This new approach to work is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

minutiae that were dragging us down. This new approach to work is

“The concept of organizational health has enabled our management

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“The concept of organizational health has enabled our management team to drive healthy behaviors throughout our company, which has

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team to drive healthy behaviors throughout our company, which has supported our growth over the last eighteen months.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

supported our growth over the last eighteen months.”—Colin Guppy, managing director, HMD Pumps

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Colin Guppy, managing director, HMD Pumps

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“We have always considered ourselves to be a smart company and have COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“We have always considered ourselves to be a smart company and have never given our health much thought. We recently shifted our approach COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

never given our health much thought. We recently shifted our approach NOT FOR R

ESALEand able to focus on important challenges rather than the day-to-day

NOT FOR RESALE

and able to focus on important challenges rather than the day-to-day minutiae that were dragging us down. This new approach to work is

NOT FOR RESALEminutiae that were dragging us down. This new approach to work is

“The concept of organizational health has enabled our management

NOT FOR RESALE

“The concept of organizational health has enabled our management team to drive healthy behaviors throughout our company, which has

NOT FOR RESALE

team to drive healthy behaviors throughout our company, which has supported our growth over the last eighteen months.”

NOT FOR RESALE

supported our growth over the last eighteen months.”—Colin Guppy, managing director, HMD Pumps

NOT FOR RESALE

—Colin Guppy, managing director, HMD Pumps

“We have always considered ourselves to be a smart company and have NOT FOR RESALE

“We have always considered ourselves to be a smart company and have


La

“Pat’s work around organizational health has been truly instrumental for our company’s success. It is the foundational underpinning of our new Leadership Institute.”—Greg Serrao, CEO, American Dental Partners

“Our executive team had plateaued and found itself unprepared to meet the fast pace of change ahead. Through the adoption of Lencioni’s model for organizational health, the executive team experienced greater cohesion and collaboration which, in turn, flowed down and impacted the entire organization. In fact, an outside rating group declared that our organization had undergone a culture change that would position us for continued success in the future.”—Ricky D. Napper, CEO, Magnolia Regional Health Center

“Lencioni’s teamwork and organizational health concepts have focused our entire organization around our mission, allowing us to achieve superior results. All organizations can benefit from these principles.”—David C. Haley, president, HBK Capital Management

“Organizational health is the cornerstone of our culture and provides a blueprint for our company’s everyday work environment. We have made critical business decisions—even closed stores—in order to main-tain our health. In the last couple of years, we have increased our cash flow, strengthened our team, and set our family of Harley-Davidson stores apart from others.”—Scott Fischer, owner and CEO, Scott Fischer Enterprises


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

model for organizational health, the executive team experienced greater

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

model for organizational health, the executive team experienced greater cohesion and collaboration which, in turn, flowed down and impacted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL cohesion and collaboration which, in turn, flowed down and impacted

the entire organization. In fact, an outside rating group declared that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the entire organization. In fact, an outside rating group declared that our organization had undergone a culture change that would position

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

our organization had undergone a culture change that would position

—Ricky D. Napper, CEO, Magnolia Regional Health Center

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—Ricky D. Napper, CEO, Magnolia Regional Health Center

“Lencioni’s teamwork and organizational health concepts have focused

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“Lencioni’s teamwork and organizational health concepts have focused our entire organization around our mission, allowing us to achieve

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

our entire organization around our mission, allowing us to achieve superior results. All organizations can benefit from these principles.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

superior results. All organizations can benefit from these principles.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—David C. Haley, president, HBK Capital Management

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


“Organizational health is the cornerstone of our culture and provides

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“Organizational health is the cornerstone of our culture and provides a blueprint for our company’s everyday work environment. We have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a blueprint for our company’s everyday work environment. We have made critical business decisions—even closed stores—in order to main-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

made critical business decisions—even closed stores—in order to main-tain our health. In the last couple of years, we have increased our cash COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

tain our health. In the last couple of years, we have increased our cash NOT FOR R

ESALE—Ricky D. Napper, CEO, Magnolia Regional Health Center

NOT FOR RESALE—Ricky D. Napper, CEO, Magnolia Regional Health Center

“Lencioni’s teamwork and organizational health concepts have focused

NOT FOR RESALE

“Lencioni’s teamwork and organizational health concepts have focused our entire organization around our mission, allowing us to achieve

NOT FOR RESALE

our entire organization around our mission, allowing us to achieve superior results. All organizations can benefit from these principles.”

NOT FOR RESALE

superior results. All organizations can benefit from these principles.”

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


“Organizational health is the cornerstone of our culture and provides

NOT FOR RESALE

“Organizational health is the cornerstone of our culture and provides a blueprint for our company’s everyday work environment. We have NOT FOR R

ESALE

a blueprint for our company’s everyday work environment. We have made critical business decisions—even closed stores—in order to main-NOT FOR R

ESALE

made critical business decisions—even closed stores—in order to main-


La

Also by Patrick Lencioni

Leadership Fables

The Five Temptations of a CEOThe Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary ExecutiveThe Five Dysfunctions of a TeamDeath by MeetingSilos, Politics, and Turf WarsThe Three Signs of a Miserable JobThe Three Big Questions for a Frantic FamilyGetting Naked

Field Guide

Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Three Big Questions for a Frantic Family

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

The Advantage

Why Organizational Health Trumps Everything Else in Business

PATRICK LENCIONI


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Why Organizational Health

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Why Organizational Health

Trumps Everything Else in Business

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Trumps Everything Else in Business

PATRICK LENCIONI

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

PATRICK LENCIONI

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE

PATRICK LENCIONI

NOT FOR RESALE

PATRICK LENCIONI


La

Copyright © 2012 by Patrick Lencioni. All rights reserved.

Published by Jossey-BassA Wiley ImprintOne Montgomery Street, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94104-4594—www.josseybass.com

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.

Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.

Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataLencioni, Patrick, 1965–

The advantage : why organizational health trumps everything else in business / Patrick Lencioni. – 1st ed. p. cm.

Includes index.ISBN 978-0-470-94152-2 (cloth), 978-1-118-14786-3 (ebk), 978-1-118-26603-8 (ebk),

978-1-118-26610-6 (ebk)1. Organizational effectiveness. 2. Organization. 3. Success in

business. 4. Well-being. I. Title. HD58.9.L465 2012658.4–dc23

2011050953

Printed in the United States of Americafirst edition

HB Printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at www.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at www.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.

Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.

Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataNOT FOR R

ESALEcompleteness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of

NOT FOR RESALE

completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales

NOT FOR RESALE

merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be

NOT FOR RESALErepresentatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be

suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the

NOT FOR RESALEsuitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the

publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including

NOT FOR RESALEpublisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including

but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that

NOT FOR RESALE

but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or

NOT FOR RESALE

Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.

NOT FOR RESALE

disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.

Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly

NOT FOR RESALE

Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at

NOT FOR RESALE

call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-

NOT FOR RESALE

included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you

NOT FOR RESALE

demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information

NOT FOR RESALE

purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.NOT FOR R

ESALE

about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.


La

C o n t e n t s

Introduction xv

Thecasefororganizationalhealth 1

Thefourdisciplinesmodel 15

discipline1:BuildacohesiveLeadershipTeam 19

discipline2:createclarity 73

discipline3:overcommunicateclarity 141

discipline4:Reinforceclarity 153

ThecentralityofGreatmeetings 173

SeizingtheAdvantage 189

Checklist for Organizational Health 195

More Resources 199

Notes 201

Acknowledgments 203

About the Author 205

Index 207

xi

Lencioni_1522_ftoc_main.indd 11 1/17/2012 1:47:29 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lth

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lth

hesive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

hesive Lea

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Lea

c

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cla

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

larity

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rity

ve

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

vercommunicate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rcommunicate

Rei

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Reinforce

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nforce

ntrality

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ntrality

SeizingCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Seizing thCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

th NOT FOR RESALE

Lea

NOT FOR RESALE

Leadership

NOT FOR RESALE

dership

rcommunicate

NOT FOR RESALE

rcommunicate

nforce

NOT FOR RESALE

nforcec

NOT FOR RESALE

cla

NOT FOR RESALE

la

of

NOT FOR RESALE

of Gr

NOT FOR RESALE

Great

NOT FOR RESALE

eat

Ad NOT FOR RESALE

AdvantageNOT FOR RESALE

vantage


La

Lencioni_1522_ftoc_main.indd 12 1/17/2012 1:47:29 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

For my dad, Richard Lencioni (1936–2008), who gave me more than I deserved.

Lencioni_1522_flast01_main.indd 13 1/17/2012 1:47:28 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL For my dad, Richard Lencioni (1936–2008),

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL For my dad, Richard Lencioni (1936–2008),

who gave me more than I deserved.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL who gave me more than I deserved.

NOT FOR RESALE


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

This book is the result of an unpredictable journey, one that began when I was just a kid, probably eight or nine years old.

My dad was a salesman who was extremely good at what he did, but I remember that he’d often come home from work frustrated, complaining about how his company was being managed. I didn’t know what management was, but I was pretty sure my dad shouldn’t feel frustrated after putting in ten hours at work.

A few years later I started working, as a busboy in high school and a bank teller in college, and I had my first real glimpse of management. Although I still didn’t understand everything that it entailed, it was clear to me that some of the things that took place in the organization where I worked made sense, that others didn’t, and that it all had a very real impact on my colleagues and the customers we served.

After graduating from college, I went to work for a management consulting firm and thought I was finally going to figure out this management thing. Instead, I found myself doing data collection, data entry, data analysis, and a variety of other things that had to do with data.

To be fair, the firm taught me quite a bit about strategy and finance and marketing, but not much about organizations and how they should be run as a whole. But somehow I became convinced that the biggest problem our clients faced, and their biggest opportunity for competi-tive advantage, was not really about strategy or finance or marketing;

I n t r o d u c t I o n

xv


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This book is the result of an unpredictable journey, one that began

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This book is the result of an unpredictable journey, one that began when I was just a kid, probably eight or nine years old.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

when I was just a kid, probably eight or nine years old.My dad was a salesman who was extremely good at what he did,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

My dad was a salesman who was extremely good at what he did, but I remember that he’d often come home from work frustrated,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

but I remember that he’d often come home from work frustrated, complaining about how his company was being managed. I didn’t know

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

complaining about how his company was being managed. I didn’t know what management was, but I was pretty sure my dad shouldn’t feel

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what management was, but I was pretty sure my dad shouldn’t feel frustrated after putting in ten hours at work.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

frustrated after putting in ten hours at work.A few years later I started working, as a busboy in high school and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A few years later I started working, as a busboy in high school and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a bank teller in college, and I had my first real glimpse of management.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a bank teller in college, and I had my first real glimpse of management. Although I still didn’t understand everything that it entailed, it was

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Although I still didn’t understand everything that it entailed, it was clear to me that some of the things that took place in the organization

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

clear to me that some of the things that took place in the organization where I worked made sense, that others didn’t, and that it all had a very

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

where I worked made sense, that others didn’t, and that it all had a very

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

real impact on my colleagues and the customers we served.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

real impact on my colleagues and the customers we served.After graduating from college, I went to work for a management COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

After graduating from college, I went to work for a management NOT FOR R

ESALEMy dad was a salesman who was extremely good at what he did,

NOT FOR RESALE

My dad was a salesman who was extremely good at what he did, but I remember that he’d often come home from work frustrated,

NOT FOR RESALEbut I remember that he’d often come home from work frustrated,

complaining about how his company was being managed. I didn’t know

NOT FOR RESALEcomplaining about how his company was being managed. I didn’t know

what management was, but I was pretty sure my dad shouldn’t feel

NOT FOR RESALE

what management was, but I was pretty sure my dad shouldn’t feel frustrated after putting in ten hours at work.

NOT FOR RESALE

frustrated after putting in ten hours at work.A few years later I started working, as a busboy in high school and

NOT FOR RESALE

A few years later I started working, as a busboy in high school and

NOT FOR RESALE

a bank teller in college, and I had my first real glimpse of management.

NOT FOR RESALE

a bank teller in college, and I had my first real glimpse of management. Although I still didn’t understand everything that it entailed, it was

NOT FOR RESALE

Although I still didn’t understand everything that it entailed, it was clear to me that some of the things that took place in the organization

NOT FOR RESALE

clear to me that some of the things that took place in the organization where I worked made sense, that others didn’t, and that it all had a very NOT FOR R

ESALE

where I worked made sense, that others didn’t, and that it all had a very real impact on my colleagues and the customers we served.NOT FOR R

ESALE

real impact on my colleagues and the customers we served.


La

Introduction

xvi

it was something a little less tangible—something that seemed to revolve around the way they managed their organizations.

When I suggested that we look into that, my superiors politely informed me that this was not something our firm did for a living, which was ironic because we were a management consulting firm. But I had been hooked and decided I needed to change the focus of my career.

I spent the next few years working in corporate America in the world of organizational behavior or development or psychology—whatever you want to call it. I found it interesting, for sure, but ulti-mately too soft, fragmented, and academic. This bothered me because I knew that there was something that needed to be more widely appre-ciated and understood. But something was missing. Context. Integra-tion. Practicality.

And so a group of colleagues and I started our own firm, and I began consulting and speaking about a practical approach to improving organizations. I have to admit that we were a bit surprised by just how quickly and enthusiastically clients responded to our approach. There was definitely a need out there. Over time it became clear that scores of people working in all kinds of organizations, at every level, were experiencing the same pain that my dad had, and they were hungry for a better way.

So I began writing books that took a practical approach to address-ing various issues relating to organizational dysfunction—teamwork, meetings, alignment, employee engagement—while my firm’s consult-ing focused on the integration of all those topics.

Demand for those books, and for our integrated approach to implementing the concepts in them, far exceeded our expectations again, and I started to become convinced that we had found that missing something—that advantage—I had been searching for through-out my career. Based on the feedback and encouragement of readers and clients, I finally decided that at some point in the future, I should


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I spent the next few years working in corporate America in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I spent the next few years working in corporate America in the world of organizational behavior or development or psychology—

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL world of organizational behavior or development or psychology—

whatever you want to call it. I found it interesting, for sure, but ulti-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

whatever you want to call it. I found it interesting, for sure, but ulti-mately too soft, fragmented, and academic. This bothered me because

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mately too soft, fragmented, and academic. This bothered me because I knew that there was something that needed to be more widely appre-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I knew that there was something that needed to be more widely appre-ciated and understood. But something was missing. Context. Integra-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ciated and understood. But something was missing. Context. Integra-

And so a group of colleagues and I started our own firm, and I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And so a group of colleagues and I started our own firm, and I began consulting and speaking about a practical approach to improving

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

began consulting and speaking about a practical approach to improving

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizations. I have to admit that we were a bit surprised by just how

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizations. I have to admit that we were a bit surprised by just how quickly and enthusiastically clients responded to our approach. There

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

quickly and enthusiastically clients responded to our approach. There was definitely a need out there. Over time it became clear that scores

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

was definitely a need out there. Over time it became clear that scores of people working in all kinds of organizations, at every level, were

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of people working in all kinds of organizations, at every level, were

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

experiencing the same pain that my dad had, and they were hungry for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

experiencing the same pain that my dad had, and they were hungry for a better way.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

a better way.So I began writing books that took a practical approach to address-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

So I began writing books that took a practical approach to address-NOT FOR R

ESALEI knew that there was something that needed to be more widely appre-

NOT FOR RESALE

I knew that there was something that needed to be more widely appre-ciated and understood. But something was missing. Context. Integra-

NOT FOR RESALEciated and understood. But something was missing. Context. Integra-

And so a group of colleagues and I started our own firm, and I

NOT FOR RESALE

And so a group of colleagues and I started our own firm, and I began consulting and speaking about a practical approach to improving

NOT FOR RESALE

began consulting and speaking about a practical approach to improving

NOT FOR RESALE

organizations. I have to admit that we were a bit surprised by just how

NOT FOR RESALE

organizations. I have to admit that we were a bit surprised by just how quickly and enthusiastically clients responded to our approach. There

NOT FOR RESALE

quickly and enthusiastically clients responded to our approach. There was definitely a need out there. Over time it became clear that scores

NOT FOR RESALE

was definitely a need out there. Over time it became clear that scores of people working in all kinds of organizations, at every level, were

NOT FOR RESALE

of people working in all kinds of organizations, at every level, were

NOT FOR RESALE

experiencing the same pain that my dad had, and they were hungry for NOT FOR RESALE

experiencing the same pain that my dad had, and they were hungry for


La

Introduction

xvii

bring all of the ideas from my books and consulting practice together in one place. That time is now.

Unlike my other books, this one is not a fable but rather a com-prehensive, practical guide. I’ve tried to make it as engaging and fun to read as possible using real-world examples and actual client stories to illustrate my ideas. It’s worth mentioning that many of the individual concepts I cover here have been introduced or touched on in one of my eight business fables—most notably, The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive; The Five Dysfunctions of a Team; Silos, Politics, and Turf Wars; and Death by Meeting—where I use fictional characters and plot situations to bring my theories to life.1 For those who would benefit from a narrative approach to a specific topic, I make reference to those books whenever possible.

Because I’m not a quantitative researcher, the conclusions I draw here are not based on reams of statistics or finely crunched data, but rather on my observations as a consultant over the past twenty years. But as Jim Collins, the research giant, once told me, qualitative field research is just as reliable as the quantitative kind, as long as clients and readers attest to its validity. And I’m happy to say that based on my experience with executives and their organizations, the principles in this book have proven to be as reliable as they are simple.

I hope you enjoy reading The Advantage and, more important, that it allows you to transform your organization, whether it is a corpora-tion, a department within that corporation, a small entrepreneurial venture, a school, or a church. It’s my goal that one day in the future, the simple principles contained here will be common practice, and that salespeople, busboys, bank tellers, CEOs, and everyone else who works in an organization will be more productive, successful, and fulfilled as a result.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Four Obsessions of an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive; The Five Dysfunctions of a Team; Silos, Politics,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Extraordinary Executive; The Five Dysfunctions of a Team; Silos, Politics,

—where I use fictional characters

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

—where I use fictional characters and plot situations to bring my theories to life.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and plot situations to bring my theories to life.1

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

1 For those who would

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

For those who would benefit from a narrative approach to a specific topic, I make reference

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

benefit from a narrative approach to a specific topic, I make reference

Because I’m not a quantitative researcher, the conclusions I draw

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Because I’m not a quantitative researcher, the conclusions I draw here are not based on reams of statistics or finely crunched data, but

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

here are not based on reams of statistics or finely crunched data, but rather on my observations as a consultant over the past twenty years.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rather on my observations as a consultant over the past twenty years. But as Jim Collins, the research giant, once told me, qualitative field

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

But as Jim Collins, the research giant, once told me, qualitative field research is just as reliable as the quantitative kind, as long as clients and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

research is just as reliable as the quantitative kind, as long as clients and readers attest to its validity. And I’m happy to say that based on my

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

readers attest to its validity. And I’m happy to say that based on my experience with executives and their organizations, the principles in this

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

experience with executives and their organizations, the principles in this book have proven to be as reliable as they are simple.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

book have proven to be as reliable as they are simple.I hope you enjoy reading COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

I hope you enjoy reading it allows you to transform your organization, whether it is a corpora-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

it allows you to transform your organization, whether it is a corpora-NOT FOR R

ESALEbenefit from a narrative approach to a specific topic, I make reference

NOT FOR RESALE

benefit from a narrative approach to a specific topic, I make reference

Because I’m not a quantitative researcher, the conclusions I draw

NOT FOR RESALEBecause I’m not a quantitative researcher, the conclusions I draw

here are not based on reams of statistics or finely crunched data, but

NOT FOR RESALE

here are not based on reams of statistics or finely crunched data, but rather on my observations as a consultant over the past twenty years.

NOT FOR RESALE

rather on my observations as a consultant over the past twenty years. But as Jim Collins, the research giant, once told me, qualitative field

NOT FOR RESALE

But as Jim Collins, the research giant, once told me, qualitative field research is just as reliable as the quantitative kind, as long as clients and

NOT FOR RESALE

research is just as reliable as the quantitative kind, as long as clients and readers attest to its validity. And I’m happy to say that based on my

NOT FOR RESALE

readers attest to its validity. And I’m happy to say that based on my experience with executives and their organizations, the principles in this

NOT FOR RESALE

experience with executives and their organizations, the principles in this book have proven to be as reliable as they are simple.NOT FOR R

ESALE

book have proven to be as reliable as they are simple.I hope you enjoy reading NOT FOR R

ESALE

I hope you enjoy reading


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

The Advantage


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

1

The Case for Organizational Health

The single greatest advantage any company can achieve is organiza-tional health. Yet it is ignored by most leaders even though it is simple,

free, and available to anyone who wants it.That is the premise of this book—not to mention my career—and

I am utterly convinced that it is true. If it sounds absurd, it should. After all, why in the world would intelligent human beings ignore something that is powerful and readily accessible?

That question was finally answered for me on July 28, 2010.

Stooping to greatneSS

I was attending a client’s leadership conference, sitting next to the CEO. This wasn’t just any company. It was, and still is, one of the healthiest organizations I have ever known and one of the most successful American enterprises of the past fifty years. In an industry plagued with

Lencioni_1522_c01_main.indd 1 1/17/2012 1:46:44 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The Case for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The Case for

Organizational

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Organizational Health

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Health

he single greatest advantage any company can achieve is organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

he single greatest advantage any company can achieve is organiza-tional health. Yet it is ignored by most leaders even though it is simple,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tional health. Yet it is ignored by most leaders even though it is simple, free, and available to anyone who wants it.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

free, and available to anyone who wants it.That is the premise of this book—not to mention my career—and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That is the premise of this book—not to mention my career—and I am utterly convinced that it is true. If it sounds absurd, it should. COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

I am utterly convinced that it is true. If it sounds absurd, it should. After all, why in the world would intelligent human beings ignore COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

After all, why in the world would intelligent human beings ignore NOT FOR R

ESALE

he single greatest advantage any company can achieve is organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

he single greatest advantage any company can achieve is organiza-tional health. Yet it is ignored by most leaders even though it is simple,

NOT FOR RESALE

tional health. Yet it is ignored by most leaders even though it is simple, free, and available to anyone who wants it.

NOT FOR RESALE

free, and available to anyone who wants it.That is the premise of this book—not to mention my career—and NOT FOR R

ESALE

That is the premise of this book—not to mention my career—and I am utterly convinced that it is true. If it sounds absurd, it should. NOT FOR R

ESALE

I am utterly convinced that it is true. If it sounds absurd, it should.


La

The Advantage

2

financial woes, customer fury, and labor strife, this amazing company has a long history of growth and economic success, not to mention fanatical customer loyalty. Moreover, its employees love their jobs, their customers, and their leaders. When compared to others in the same industry, what this company has accomplished seems almost baffling.

As I sat there at the conference listening to one presentation after another highlighting the remarkable and unorthodox activities that have made this organization so healthy, I leaned over and quietly asked the CEO a semirhetorical question: “Why in the world don’t your competitors do any of this?”

After a few seconds, he whispered, almost sadly, “You know, I honestly believe they think it’s beneath them.”

And there it was.

the three BiaSeS

In spite of its undeniable power, so many leaders struggle to embrace organizational health (which I’ll be defining shortly) because they quietly believe they are too sophisticated, too busy, or too analytical to bother with it. In other words, they think it’s beneath them.

And in some ways, it’s hard to blame them. After years of off-site meetings filled with ropes courses and trust-falling exercises, even the most open-minded executives have come to be suspicious of anything that looks or sounds touchy-feely. Combine that with the notion that corporate culture has been reduced to surface-level artifacts like funky office furniture, employee yoga classes, and bring-your-dog-to-work policies, and it’s no wonder that so many leaders have become cynical, even condescending, toward most things related to organizational development.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another highlighting the remarkable and unorthodox activities that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another highlighting the remarkable and unorthodox activities that have made this organization so healthy, I leaned over and quietly asked

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL have made this organization so healthy, I leaned over and quietly asked

the CEO a semirhetorical question: “Why in the world don’t your

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the CEO a semirhetorical question: “Why in the world don’t your

After a few seconds, he whispered, almost sadly, “You know, I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

After a few seconds, he whispered, almost sadly, “You know, I honestly believe they think it’s beneath them.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

honestly believe they think it’s beneath them.”

spite of its undeniable power, so many leaders struggle to embrace

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

spite of its undeniable power, so many leaders struggle to embrace organizational health (which I’ll be defining shortly) because

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational health (which I’ll be defining shortly) because they quietly believe they are too sophisticated, too busy, or too

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they quietly believe they are too sophisticated, too busy, or too

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

analytical to bother with it. In other words, they think it’s beneath

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


And in some ways, it’s hard to blame them. After years of off-site COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And in some ways, it’s hard to blame them. After years of off-site NOT FOR R

ESALEAfter a few seconds, he whispered, almost sadly, “You know, I

NOT FOR RESALE

After a few seconds, he whispered, almost sadly, “You know, I

spite of its undeniable power, so many leaders struggle to embrace

NOT FOR RESALE

spite of its undeniable power, so many leaders struggle to embrace organizational health (which I’ll be defining shortly) because

NOT FOR RESALE

organizational health (which I’ll be defining shortly) because they quietly believe they are too sophisticated, too busy, or too

NOT FOR RESALE

they quietly believe they are too sophisticated, too busy, or too

NOT FOR RESALE

analytical to bother with it. In other words, they think it’s beneath NOT FOR RESALE



La


3

This is a shame because organizational health is different. It’s not at all touchy-feely, and it’s far bigger and more important than mere culture. More than a side dish or a flavor enhancer for the real meat and potatoes of business, it is the very plate on which the meat and potatoes sit.

The health of an organization provides the context for strategy, finance, marketing, technology, and everything else that happens within it, which is why it is the single greatest factor determining an organiza-tion’s success. More than talent. More than knowledge. More than innovation.

But before leaders can tap into the power of organizational health, they must humble themselves enough to overcome the three biases that prevent them from embracing it.

• The Sophistication Bias: Organizational health is so simple and accessible that many leaders have a hard time seeing it as a real opportunity for meaningful advantage. After all, it doesn’t require great intelligence or sophistication, just uncommon levels of discipline, courage, persistence, and common sense. In an age where we have come to believe that differentiation and dramatic improvement can be found only in complexity, it’s hard for well-educated executives to embrace something so simple and straightforward.

• The Adrenaline Bias: Becoming a healthy organization takes a little time. Unfortunately, many of the leaders I’ve worked with suffer from a chronic case of adrenaline addiction, seemingly hooked on the daily rush of activity and firefighting within their organizations. It’s as though they’re afraid to slow down and deal with issues that are critical but don’t seem particularly urgent. As simple as this may seem, it remains a serious obstacle for many dysfunctional organizations led by executives who don’t


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it, which is why it is the single greatest factor determining an organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it, which is why it is the single greatest factor determining an organiza-tion’s success. More than talent. More than knowledge. More than

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL tion’s success. More than talent. More than knowledge. More than

But before leaders can tap into the power of organizational health,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

But before leaders can tap into the power of organizational health, they must humble themselves enough to overcome the three biases that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they must humble themselves enough to overcome the three biases that

ophistication Bias:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ophistication Bias: Organizational health is so simple

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Organizational health is so simple and accessible that many leaders have a hard time seeing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and accessible that many leaders have a hard time seeing it as a real opportunity for meaningful advantage. After all, it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it as a real opportunity for meaningful advantage. After all, it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

doesn’t require great intelligence or sophistication, just

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

doesn’t require great intelligence or sophistication, just uncommon levels of discipline, courage, persistence, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

uncommon levels of discipline, courage, persistence, and common sense. In an age where we have come to believe

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

common sense. In an age where we have come to believe that differentiation and dramatic improvement can be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that differentiation and dramatic improvement can be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

found only in complexity, it’s hard for well-educated COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

found only in complexity, it’s hard for well-educated executives to embrace something so simple and straightforward.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

executives to embrace something so simple and straightforward.NOT FOR R

ESALEthey must humble themselves enough to overcome the three biases that

NOT FOR RESALE

they must humble themselves enough to overcome the three biases that

Organizational health is so simple

NOT FOR RESALE

Organizational health is so simple and accessible that many leaders have a hard time seeing

NOT FOR RESALE

and accessible that many leaders have a hard time seeing it as a real opportunity for meaningful advantage. After all, it

NOT FOR RESALE

it as a real opportunity for meaningful advantage. After all, it

NOT FOR RESALE

doesn’t require great intelligence or sophistication, just

NOT FOR RESALE

doesn’t require great intelligence or sophistication, just uncommon levels of discipline, courage, persistence, and

NOT FOR RESALE

uncommon levels of discipline, courage, persistence, and common sense. In an age where we have come to believe

NOT FOR RESALE

common sense. In an age where we have come to believe that differentiation and dramatic improvement can be NOT FOR R

ESALE

that differentiation and dramatic improvement can be found only in complexity, it’s hard for well-educated NOT FOR R

ESALE

found only in complexity, it’s hard for well-educated


La

The Advantage

4

understand that old race-car drivers’ axiom: you have to slow down in order to go fast.

• The Quantification Bias: The benefits of becoming a healthy organization, as powerful as they are, are difficult to accurately quantify. Organizational health permeates so many aspects of a company that isolating any one variable and measuring its financial impact is almost impossible to do in a precise way. That certainly doesn’t mean the impact isn’t real, tangible, and massive; it just requires a level of conviction and intuition that many overly analytical leaders have a hard time accepting.

Of course, I suppose that even if leaders were able to humble themselves enough to overcome each of these biases, there is yet

another reason that might prevent them from tapping into the power of organi-zational health, and that is what provoked me to write this book: it has never been presented as a simple, integrated, and practical discipline.

I am convinced that once organizational health is properly understood and placed into the right context,

it will surpass all other disciplines in business as the greatest opportu-nity for im provement and competitive advantage. Really.

So what exactly is organizational health?I thought you’d never ask.

Once organizational health is

properly understood and

placed into the right context,

it will surpass all other

disciplines in business as the

greatest opportunity for

improvement and competitive

advantage. Really.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That certainly doesn’t mean the impact isn’t real, tangible,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That certainly doesn’t mean the impact isn’t real, tangible, and massive; it just requires a level of conviction and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL and massive; it just requires a level of conviction and

intuition that many overly analytical leaders have a hard time

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

intuition that many overly analytical leaders have a hard time

Of course, I suppose that even if leaders were able to humble

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, I suppose that even if leaders were able to humble themselves enough to overcome each of these biases, there is yet

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

themselves enough to overcome each of these biases, there is yet

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

greatest opportunity for COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


improvement and competitive COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

improvement and competitive NOT FOR R

ESALEOf course, I suppose that even if leaders were able to humble

NOT FOR RESALEOf course, I suppose that even if leaders were able to humble

themselves enough to overcome each of these biases, there is yet

NOT FOR RESALEthemselves enough to overcome each of these biases, there is yet

another reason that might

NOT FOR RESALE

another reason that might prevent them from tapping

NOT FOR RESALE

prevent them from tapping into the power of organi

NOT FOR RESALE

into the power of organi

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


greatest opportunity for NOT FOR RESALE



La


5

UnderStanding organizational health

At its core, organizational health is about integrity, but not in the ethical or moral way that integrity is defined so often today. An organization has integrity—is healthy—when it is whole, consistent, and complete, that is, when its management, operations, strategy, and culture fit together and make sense.

If that’s a little too vague for you (it would be for me), think about it this way. Whenever I present organizational health to a prospective client or a roomful of executives, I start by contrasting it with some-thing more familiar to them. I explain that any organization that really wants to maximize its success must come to embody two basic qualities: it must be smart, and it must be healthy.

Smart Versus HealthySmart organizations are good at those classic fundamentals of business—subjects like strategy, marketing, finance, and technology—which I consider to be decision sciences.

When I started my career at the management consulting firm Bain & Company, we did research and analysis to help clients make smarter, better decisions in these areas. No one with any experience in business will tell you that these pursuits are not critical to the success of an organization, nor should they.

But being smart is only half the equation. Yet somehow it occupies almost all the time, energy, and attention of most executives. The other half of the equation, the one that is largely neglected, is about being healthy.

A good way to recognize health is to look for the signs that indicate an organization has it. These include minimal politics and confusion, high degrees of morale and productivity, and very low turnover among good employees.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL it this way. Whenever I present organizational health to a prospective

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL it this way. Whenever I present organizational health to a prospective

client or a roomful of executives, I start by contrasting it with some-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL client or a roomful of executives, I start by contrasting it with some-

thing more familiar to them. I explain that any organization that really

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thing more familiar to them. I explain that any organization that really wants to maximize its success must come to embody two basic qualities:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

wants to maximize its success must come to embody two basic qualities: it must be smart, and it must be healthy.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it must be smart, and it must be healthy.

Smart organizations are good at those classic fundamentals of business—

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Smart organizations are good at those classic fundamentals of business—subjects like strategy, marketing, finance, and technology—which I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

subjects like strategy, marketing, finance, and technology—which I consider to be decision sciences.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

consider to be decision sciences.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When I started my career at the management consulting firm Bain

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When I started my career at the management consulting firm Bain & Company, we did research and analysis to help clients make smarter,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

& Company, we did research and analysis to help clients make smarter, better decisions in these areas. No one with any experience in business

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

better decisions in these areas. No one with any experience in business will tell you that these pursuits are not critical to the success of an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

will tell you that these pursuits are not critical to the success of an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization, nor should they.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization, nor should they.NOT FOR RESALE

wants to maximize its success must come to embody two basic qualities:

NOT FOR RESALE

wants to maximize its success must come to embody two basic qualities:

Smart organizations are good at those classic fundamentals of business—

NOT FOR RESALE

Smart organizations are good at those classic fundamentals of business—subjects like strategy, marketing, finance, and technology—which I

NOT FOR RESALE

subjects like strategy, marketing, finance, and technology—which I consider to be decision sciences.

NOT FOR RESALE

consider to be decision sciences.

NOT FOR RESALE

When I started my career at the management consulting firm Bain

NOT FOR RESALE

When I started my career at the management consulting firm Bain & Company, we did research and analysis to help clients make smarter,

NOT FOR RESALE

& Company, we did research and analysis to help clients make smarter, better decisions in these areas. No one with any experience in business

NOT FOR RESALE

better decisions in these areas. No one with any experience in business will tell you that these pursuits are not critical to the success of an NOT FOR R

ESALE

will tell you that these pursuits are not critical to the success of an organization, nor should they.NOT FOR R

ESALE

organization, nor should they.


La

The Advantage

6

Whenever I list these qualities for leaders, I usually get one of the following reactions, and sometimes both. Often they laugh quietly, in a nervous, almost guilty kind of way. Or they barely sigh, like parents do when they hear about a family where the kids do what they’re told the first time they’re asked. In either case, it’s as though they’re thinking, “Wouldn’t that be nice?” or, “Can you imagine?”

What I find particularly amazing is that none of the leaders I present to, even the most cynical ones, deny that their companies would be transformed if they could achieve the characteristics of a healthy organization. They never dismiss it as being soft or touchy-feely, and they immediately recognize the practical connection between a lack of health and overall performance. So it would be natural to assume that those executives would then march back to their companies and focus a large portion of their time, energy, and attention on making their organizations healthier.

Well, I’ve come to learn that even well-intentioned leaders usually return to work and gravitate right back to the “smart” side of the equation, spending their time tweaking the dials in marketing, strategy, finance, and so forth. Why would they do something so absurd?

• Strategy

Smart Healthy

• Marketing

• Minimal Politics

• Minimal Confusion

• Finance • High Morale

• Technology • High Productivity

• Low Turnover

Two Requirements for Success


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Whenever I list these qualities for leaders, I usually get one of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Whenever I list these qualities for leaders, I usually get one of the following reactions, and sometimes both. Often they laugh

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the following reactions, and sometimes both. Often they laugh quietly, in a nervous, almost guilty kind of way. Or they barely sigh,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

quietly, in a nervous, almost guilty kind of way. Or they barely sigh, like parents do when they hear about a family where the kids do

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

like parents do when they hear about a family where the kids do what they’re told the first time they’re asked. In either case, it’s as

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what they’re told the first time they’re asked. In either case, it’s as though they’re thinking, “Wouldn’t that be nice?” or, “Can you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

though they’re thinking, “Wouldn’t that be nice?” or, “Can you

What I find particularly amazing is that none of the leaders I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What I find particularly amazing is that none of the leaders I present to, even the most cynical ones, deny that their companies would

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

present to, even the most cynical ones, deny that their companies would

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be transformed if they could achieve the characteristics of a healthy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be transformed if they could achieve the characteristics of a healthy organization. They never dismiss it as being soft or touchy-feely, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization. They never dismiss it as being soft or touchy-feely, and they immediately recognize the practical connection between a lack of COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

they immediately recognize the practical connection between a lack of health and overall performance. So it would be natural to assume that COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

health and overall performance. So it would be natural to assume that

• Low Turnover

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL • Low Turnover

NOT FOR RESALE

the following reactions, and sometimes both. Often they laugh

NOT FOR RESALE

the following reactions, and sometimes both. Often they laugh quietly, in a nervous, almost guilty kind of way. Or they barely sigh,

NOT FOR RESALEquietly, in a nervous, almost guilty kind of way. Or they barely sigh,

like parents do when they hear about a family where the kids do

NOT FOR RESALE

like parents do when they hear about a family where the kids do what they’re told the first time they’re asked. In either case, it’s as

NOT FOR RESALE

what they’re told the first time they’re asked. In either case, it’s as though they’re thinking, “Wouldn’t that be nice?” or, “Can you

NOT FOR RESALE

though they’re thinking, “Wouldn’t that be nice?” or, “Can you

What I find particularly amazing is that none of the leaders I

NOT FOR RESALE

What I find particularly amazing is that none of the leaders I present to, even the most cynical ones, deny that their companies would

NOT FOR RESALE

present to, even the most cynical ones, deny that their companies would

NOT FOR RESALE

be transformed if they could achieve the characteristics of a healthy

NOT FOR RESALE

be transformed if they could achieve the characteristics of a healthy organization. They never dismiss it as being soft or touchy-feely, and NOT FOR R

ESALE

organization. They never dismiss it as being soft or touchy-feely, and they immediately recognize the practical connection between a lack of NOT FOR R

ESALE

they immediately recognize the practical connection between a lack of


La


7

Better LightOne of the best explanations for this strange phenomenon comes from a comedy sketch I saw as a child. I remember it being part of an old episode of I Love Lucy.

Ricky, Lucy’s husband, comes home from work one day to find his wife crawling around the living room on her hands and knees. He asks her what she’s doing.

“I’m looking for my earrings,” Lucy responds.Ricky asks her, “You lost your earrings in the living room?”She shakes her head. “No, I lost them in the bedroom. But the

light out here is much better.”And there it is.Most leaders prefer to look for answers where the light is better,

where they are more comfortable. And the light is certainly better in the measurable, objective, and data-driven world of organizational intelligence (the smart side of the equation) than it is in the messier, more unpredictable world of organizational health.

Studying spreadsheets and Gantt charts and financial statements is relatively safe and predictable, which most executives prefer. That’s how they’ve been trained, and that’s where they’re comfortable. What they usually want to avoid at all costs are subjective conversations that can easily become emotional and awkward. And organizational health is certainly fraught with the potential for subjective and awkward conversations.

That’s why so many leaders, even when they acknowledge the pain that politics and confusion are causing their organizations, continue to spend their time tweaking the dials in more traditional discip lines. Unfortunately, the opportunities for improvement and competitive advantage they find in those areas are incremental and fleeting at best.

That’s right. The advantages to be found in the classic areas of business—finance, marketing, strategy—in spite of all the attention


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Ricky asks her, “You lost your earrings in the living room?”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Ricky asks her, “You lost your earrings in the living room?”

She shakes her head. “No, I lost them in the bedroom. But the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

She shakes her head. “No, I lost them in the bedroom. But the

Most leaders prefer to look for answers where the light is better,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Most leaders prefer to look for answers where the light is better, where they are more comfortable. And the light is certainly better in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

where they are more comfortable. And the light is certainly better in the measurable, objective, and data-driven world of organizational

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the measurable, objective, and data-driven world of organizational intelligence (the smart side of the equation) than it is in the messier,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

intelligence (the smart side of the equation) than it is in the messier, more unpredictable world of organizational health.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more unpredictable world of organizational health.Studying spreadsheets and Gantt charts and financial statements is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Studying spreadsheets and Gantt charts and financial statements is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

relatively safe and predictable, which most executives prefer. That’s how

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

relatively safe and predictable, which most executives prefer. That’s how they’ve been trained, and that’s where they’re comfortable. What they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they’ve been trained, and that’s where they’re comfortable. What they usually want to avoid at all costs are subjective conversations that can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

usually want to avoid at all costs are subjective conversations that can easily become emotional and awkward. And organizational health is COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

easily become emotional and awkward. And organizational health is certainly fraught with the potential for subjective and awkward COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

certainly fraught with the potential for subjective and awkward NOT FOR R

ESALEMost leaders prefer to look for answers where the light is better,

NOT FOR RESALEMost leaders prefer to look for answers where the light is better,

where they are more comfortable. And the light is certainly better in

NOT FOR RESALEwhere they are more comfortable. And the light is certainly better in

the measurable, objective, and data-driven world of organizational

NOT FOR RESALE

the measurable, objective, and data-driven world of organizational intelligence (the smart side of the equation) than it is in the messier,

NOT FOR RESALE

intelligence (the smart side of the equation) than it is in the messier, more unpredictable world of organizational health.

NOT FOR RESALE

more unpredictable world of organizational health.Studying spreadsheets and Gantt charts and financial statements is

NOT FOR RESALE

Studying spreadsheets and Gantt charts and financial statements is

NOT FOR RESALE

relatively safe and predictable, which most executives prefer. That’s how

NOT FOR RESALE

relatively safe and predictable, which most executives prefer. That’s how they’ve been trained, and that’s where they’re comfortable. What they

NOT FOR RESALE

they’ve been trained, and that’s where they’re comfortable. What they usually want to avoid at all costs are subjective conversations that can NOT FOR R

ESALE

usually want to avoid at all costs are subjective conversations that can easily become emotional and awkward. And organizational health is NOT FOR R

ESALE

easily become emotional and awkward. And organizational health is


La

The Advantage

8

they receive, are incremental and fleeting. In this world of ubiquitous information and nanosecond technology exchange, it’s harder than it has ever been in history to maintain a competitive advantage based on intelligence or knowledge. Information just changes hands too rapidly today. Companies, even entire industries, come and go faster than we could have imagined even a decade ago.

Permission to PlayAnd so, being smart—as critical as it is—has become something of a commodity. It is simply permission to play, a minimum standard required for having even a possibility of success. It’s certainly not enough to achieve a meaningful, sustainable competitive advantage over any length of time.

In fact, I’d have to say that a lack of intelligence, domain expertise, or industry knowledge is almost never the problem I see in organiza-

tions. In twenty years of con-sulting to clients in virtually every industry, I have yet to meet a group of leaders who made me think, Wow, these people just don’t know enough about their business to succeed. Really. The vast majority of organizations today have more than enough intelli-gence, expertise, and know-ledge to be successful. What they lack is organizational health.

This point is worth restating.After two decades of working with CEOs and their teams of senior

executives, I’ve become absolutely convinced that the seminal difference

I’ve become absolutely

convinced that the seminal

difference between successful

companies and mediocre or

unsuccessful ones has little, if

anything, to do with what they

know or how smart they are;

it has everything to do with

how healthy they are.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL And so, being smart—as critical as it is—has become something of a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL And so, being smart—as critical as it is—has become something of a

commodity. It is simply permission to play, a minimum standard

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

commodity. It is simply permission to play, a minimum standard required for having even a possibility of success. It’s certainly not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

required for having even a possibility of success. It’s certainly not enough to achieve a meaningful, sustainable competitive advantage

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enough to achieve a meaningful, sustainable competitive advantage

In fact, I’d have to say that a lack of intelligence, domain expertise,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In fact, I’d have to say that a lack of intelligence, domain expertise, or industry knowledge is almost never the problem I see in organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or industry knowledge is almost never the problem I see in organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


unsuccessful ones has little, if COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


anything, to do with what they COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

anything, to do with what they NOT FOR R

ESALEenough to achieve a meaningful, sustainable competitive advantage

NOT FOR RESALE

enough to achieve a meaningful, sustainable competitive advantage

In fact, I’d have to say that a lack of intelligence, domain expertise,

NOT FOR RESALEIn fact, I’d have to say that a lack of intelligence, domain expertise,

or industry knowledge is almost never the problem I see in organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

or industry knowledge is almost never the problem I see in organiza-tions. In twenty years of con-

NOT FOR RESALE

tions. In twenty years of con-sulting to clients in virtually

NOT FOR RESALE

sulting to clients in virtually

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


unsuccessful ones has little, if NOT FOR RESALE



La


9

between successful companies and mediocre or unsuccessful ones has little, if anything, to do with what they know or how smart they are; it has everything to do with how healthy they are.

If you’re tempted to dismiss that idea, consider this. Though I made the statement just a few paragraphs ago that I’ve not yet met a group of leaders whom I thought lacked the knowledge, expertise, or intel-ligence to succeed, I’ve met plenty who made me think, Uh-oh. The culture within this team and this organization is way too unhealthy to sustain a successful business. And time after time I’ve seen smart compa-nies find a way to fail in spite of their sizable intellectual and strategic assets.

Again, that’s not to say that being smart isn’t important. It is. But if someone were to press me on which of the two characteristics of an organization, intelligence or health, should receive first priority, I would say without hesitation that health comes out a clear number one. Here’s why.

Health Begets—and Trumps—IntelligenceAn organization that is healthy will inevitably get smarter over time. That’s because people in a healthy organization, beginning with the leaders, learn from one another, identify critical issues, and recover quickly from mistakes. Without politics and confusion getting in their way, they cycle through problems and rally around solutions much faster than their dysfunctional and political rivals do. Moreover, they create environments in which employees do the same.

In contrast, smart organizations don’t seem to have any greater chance of getting healthier by virtue of their intelligence. In fact, the reverse may actually be true because leaders who pride themselves on expertise and intelligence often struggle to acknowledge their flaws and learn from peers. They aren’t as easily open and transparent with one another, which delays recovery from mistakes and exacerbates poli-tics and confusion. That’s certainly not to say that being smart isn’t


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

culture within this team and this organization is way too unhealthy to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

culture within this team and this organization is way too unhealthy to And time after time I’ve seen smart compa-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL And time after time I’ve seen smart compa-

nies find a way to fail in spite of their sizable intellectual and strategic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nies find a way to fail in spite of their sizable intellectual and strategic

Again, that’s not to say that being smart isn’t important. It is. But

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Again, that’s not to say that being smart isn’t important. It is. But if someone were to press me on which of the two characteristics of an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

if someone were to press me on which of the two characteristics of an organization, intelligence or health, should receive first priority, I would

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization, intelligence or health, should receive first priority, I would say without hesitation that health comes out a clear number one. Here’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

say without hesitation that health comes out a clear number one. Here’s

Health Begets—and Trumps—Intelligence

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

An organization that is healthy will inevitably get smarter over time.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

An organization that is healthy will inevitably get smarter over time. That’s because people in a healthy organization, beginning with the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That’s because people in a healthy organization, beginning with the leaders, learn from one another, identify critical issues, and recover

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders, learn from one another, identify critical issues, and recover quickly from mistakes. Without politics and confusion getting in their COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

quickly from mistakes. Without politics and confusion getting in their way, they cycle through problems and rally around solutions much COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

way, they cycle through problems and rally around solutions much NOT FOR R

ESALEAgain, that’s not to say that being smart isn’t important. It is. But

NOT FOR RESALE

Again, that’s not to say that being smart isn’t important. It is. But if someone were to press me on which of the two characteristics of an

NOT FOR RESALEif someone were to press me on which of the two characteristics of an

organization, intelligence or health, should receive first priority, I would

NOT FOR RESALEorganization, intelligence or health, should receive first priority, I would


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

An organization that is healthy will inevitably get smarter over time.

NOT FOR RESALE

An organization that is healthy will inevitably get smarter over time. That’s because people in a healthy organization, beginning with the

NOT FOR RESALE

That’s because people in a healthy organization, beginning with the leaders, learn from one another, identify critical issues, and recover

NOT FOR RESALE

leaders, learn from one another, identify critical issues, and recover quickly from mistakes. Without politics and confusion getting in their NOT FOR R

ESALE

quickly from mistakes. Without politics and confusion getting in their


La

The Advantage

10

desirable, just that it provides no inherent advantages for becoming healthy.

The same phenomenon can be seen in families. Healthy families—the ones where parents give their children discipline, affection, and time—almost always improve over the years, even when they lack many of the advantages and resources that money can buy. Unhealthy fami-lies, the ones without discipline and unconditional love, will always struggle, even if they have all the money, tutors, coaches, and technol-ogy they could ever want.

The key ingredient for improvement and success is not access to knowledge or resources, as helpful as those things may be. It’s really about the health of the environment. And consider this: if you had to bet on the future of one of two kids, one raised by loving parents in a solid home and the other a product of apathy and dysfunction, you’d always take the former regardless of the resources surrounding them. Well, the same is true in organizations.

The Multiplier EffectHere is another testament to the superiority of organizational health over intelligence. In my career as a consultant, I’ve worked with a number of great, healthy companies that were led by men and women who attended relatively modest colleges—people who would admit to being just a little above average in intellectual capacity. When those companies made wise decisions that set them apart from their competi-tion, journalists and industry analysts incorrectly attributed their success to their intellectual prowess. The truth of the matter was that those companies weren’t smarter than their competitors; they simply tapped into the adequate intelligence they had and didn’t allow dys-function, ego, and politics to get in the way.

On the flip side, I’ve seen all too many companies whose leaders earned the best grades at the top universities, who possessed tremen-dous intellectual capacity and had extraordinary experience and indus-


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

struggle, even if they have all the money, tutors, coaches, and technol-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

struggle, even if they have all the money, tutors, coaches, and technol-

The key ingredient for improvement and success is not access to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The key ingredient for improvement and success is not access to knowledge or resources, as helpful as those things may be. It’s really

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

knowledge or resources, as helpful as those things may be. It’s really about the health of the environment. And consider this: if you had to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

about the health of the environment. And consider this: if you had to bet on the future of one of two kids, one raised by loving parents in a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

bet on the future of one of two kids, one raised by loving parents in a solid home and the other a product of apathy and dysfunction, you’d

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

solid home and the other a product of apathy and dysfunction, you’d always take the former regardless of the resources surrounding them.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

always take the former regardless of the resources surrounding them. Well, the same is true in organizations.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Well, the same is true in organizations.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Multiplier Effect

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Multiplier EffectHere is another testament to the superiority of organizational health

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Here is another testament to the superiority of organizational health over intelligence. In my career as a consultant, I’ve worked with a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

over intelligence. In my career as a consultant, I’ve worked with a number of great, healthy companies that were led by men and women

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

number of great, healthy companies that were led by men and women

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who attended relatively modest colleges—people who would admit to COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who attended relatively modest colleges—people who would admit to being just a little above average in intellectual capacity. When those COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

being just a little above average in intellectual capacity. When those NOT FOR R

ESALEabout the health of the environment. And consider this: if you had to

NOT FOR RESALE

about the health of the environment. And consider this: if you had to bet on the future of one of two kids, one raised by loving parents in a

NOT FOR RESALEbet on the future of one of two kids, one raised by loving parents in a

solid home and the other a product of apathy and dysfunction, you’d

NOT FOR RESALEsolid home and the other a product of apathy and dysfunction, you’d

always take the former regardless of the resources surrounding them.

NOT FOR RESALE

always take the former regardless of the resources surrounding them. Well, the same is true in organizations.

NOT FOR RESALE

Well, the same is true in organizations.

NOT FOR RESALE

Here is another testament to the superiority of organizational health

NOT FOR RESALE

Here is another testament to the superiority of organizational health over intelligence. In my career as a consultant, I’ve worked with a

NOT FOR RESALE

over intelligence. In my career as a consultant, I’ve worked with a number of great, healthy companies that were led by men and women

NOT FOR RESALE

number of great, healthy companies that were led by men and women who attended relatively modest colleges—people who would admit to NOT FOR R

ESALE

who attended relatively modest colleges—people who would admit to


La


11

try knowledge, yet still managed to fail because they couldn’t tap into much of it. In almost every situation, it was politics, behavioral mis-alignment, and inconsistency that did them in, leading them to make what seemed in retrospect like obvious tactical and strategic mistakes. Journalists and analysts always seem perplexed by how those executives “could have been so dumb.” But again, they miss the point by attribut-ing the bad decisions to intellectual deficiencies. They fail to see that the real deficiency, the one that makes it possible for smart people to make dumb decisions, is a lack of organizational health.

And so a good way to look at organizational health —and one that executives seem to respond to readily—is to see it as the multiplier of intelligence. The healthier an organization is, the more of its intelligence it is able to tap into and use. Most organizations exploit only a fraction of the knowledge, experience, and intellectual capital that is available to them. But the healthy ones tap into almost all of it. That, as much as anything else, is why they have such an advantage over their unhealthy competitors.

Okay, I’ve already add ressed the biases that pre vent so many leaders from embracing the power of organizational health. Another worthwhile question that needs to be answered is this: Why haven’t more business scholars and journalists embraced it?

Media and AcademiaFirst, organizational health just isn’t very sexy, so journalists aren’t ter-ribly excited to talk or write about it. No magazine or newspaper wants to run a story about a humble leader who continues to run her

Most organizations exploit only

a fraction of the knowledge,

experience, and intellectual

capital that is available to them.

But the healthy ones tap into

almost all of it.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the real deficiency, the one that makes it possible for smart people to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the real deficiency, the one that makes it possible for smart people to make dumb decisions, is a lack of organizational health.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL make dumb decisions, is a lack of organizational health.

an organization is, the more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

an organization is, the more of its intelligence it is able

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of its intelligence it is able to tap into and use. Most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to tap into and use. Most organizations exploit only a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizations exploit only a fraction of the knowledge,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fraction of the knowledge, experience, and intellectual capital that is available to them. But the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

experience, and intellectual capital that is available to them. But the healthy ones tap into almost all of it. That, as much as anything else, COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

healthy ones tap into almost all of it. That, as much as anything else, is why they have such an advantage over their unhealthy competitors.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

is why they have such an advantage over their unhealthy competitors.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEexperience, and intellectual

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

to tap into and use. Most

NOT FOR RESALE

to tap into and use. Most organizations exploit only a

NOT FOR RESALE

organizations exploit only a fraction of the knowledge,

NOT FOR RESALE

fraction of the knowledge, experience, and intellectual capital that is available to them. But the NOT FOR R

ESALE

experience, and intellectual capital that is available to them. But the healthy ones tap into almost all of it. That, as much as anything else, NOT FOR R

ESALE

healthy ones tap into almost all of it. That, as much as anything else, NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

almost all of it.

NOT FOR RESALE

almost all of it.


La

The Advantage

12

medium-sized company with discipline, common sense, and consis-tency. They would rather tell you about how a brash young entrepre-neur is trying to set the world on fire—and maybe himself—with a disruptive new piece of technology or a revolutionary new service. And that makes sense given that they’re trying to sell magazines and lure more advertisers. But it certainly doesn’t mean their eye-catching stories are more instructive or practical.

Another reason that organizational health has been overlooked by academia and the media has to do with the difficulty of measuring its impact. As I mentioned earlier, trying to identify exactly how much a company’s health affects its bottom line is next to impossible; there are just too many variables to isolate it from the myriad of other factors. But again, that doesn’t make the impact of organizational health any less real, just harder for journalists and academics to justify in a defini-tive, quantitative way.

Finally, organizational health gets overlooked because the elements that make it up don’t seem to be anything new. And in many ways, they aren’t. The basic components—leadership, teamwork, culture, strategy, meetings—have been a subject of discussion within academia for a long time. The problem is that we’ve been looking at those ele-ments in isolated, discreet, and theoretical ways instead of as an inte-grated, practical discipline.

It’s tempting to downplay this oversight of organizational health by media and academia and, for that matter, leaders, as just another interesting and unfortunate phenomenon of modern business culture. However, the cost of that oversight is extraordinarily high and cannot be overstated.

The Price of Poor HealthAnyone who has ever worked in an unhealthy organization—and almost everyone has—knows the misery of dealing with politics, dys-function, confusion, and bureaucracy. As much as we enjoy making


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Another reason that organizational health has been overlooked by

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Another reason that organizational health has been overlooked by academia and the media has to do with the difficulty of measuring its

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL academia and the media has to do with the difficulty of measuring its

impact. As I mentioned earlier, trying to identify exactly how much a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

impact. As I mentioned earlier, trying to identify exactly how much a company’s health affects its bottom line is next to impossible; there are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

company’s health affects its bottom line is next to impossible; there are just too many variables to isolate it from the myriad of other factors.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

just too many variables to isolate it from the myriad of other factors. But again, that doesn’t make the impact of organizational health any

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

But again, that doesn’t make the impact of organizational health any less real, just harder for journalists and academics to justify in a defini-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

less real, just harder for journalists and academics to justify in a defini-

Finally, organizational health gets overlooked because the elements

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that make it up don’t seem to be anything new. And in many ways,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that make it up don’t seem to be anything new. And in many ways, they aren’t. The basic components—leadership, teamwork, culture,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they aren’t. The basic components—leadership, teamwork, culture, strategy, meetings—have been a subject of discussion within academia

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

strategy, meetings—have been a subject of discussion within academia for a long time. The problem is that we’ve been looking at those ele-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for a long time. The problem is that we’ve been looking at those ele-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ments in isolated, discreet, and theoretical ways instead of as an inte-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ments in isolated, discreet, and theoretical ways instead of as an inte-grated, practical discipline.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

grated, practical discipline.It’s tempting to downplay this oversight of organizational health COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

It’s tempting to downplay this oversight of organizational health NOT FOR R

ESALEjust too many variables to isolate it from the myriad of other factors.

NOT FOR RESALE

just too many variables to isolate it from the myriad of other factors. But again, that doesn’t make the impact of organizational health any

NOT FOR RESALEBut again, that doesn’t make the impact of organizational health any

less real, just harder for journalists and academics to justify in a defini-

NOT FOR RESALEless real, just harder for journalists and academics to justify in a defini-


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

that make it up don’t seem to be anything new. And in many ways,

NOT FOR RESALE

that make it up don’t seem to be anything new. And in many ways, they aren’t. The basic components—leadership, teamwork, culture,

NOT FOR RESALE

they aren’t. The basic components—leadership, teamwork, culture, strategy, meetings—have been a subject of discussion within academia

NOT FOR RESALE

strategy, meetings—have been a subject of discussion within academia for a long time. The problem is that we’ve been looking at those ele-

NOT FOR RESALE

for a long time. The problem is that we’ve been looking at those ele-

NOT FOR RESALE

ments in isolated, discreet, and theoretical ways instead of as an inte-NOT FOR RESALE

ments in isolated, discreet, and theoretical ways instead of as an inte-grated, practical discipline.NOT FOR R

ESALE

grated, practical discipline.


La


13

jokes about these artifacts of organizational plight, there is no denying that they exact a significant toll.

The financial cost of having an unhealthy organization is undeni-able: wasted resources and time, decreased productivity, increased employee turnover, and customer attrition. The money an organization loses as a result of these problems, and the money it has to spend to recover from them, is staggering.

And that’s only the beginning of the problem. When leaders of an organization are less than honest with one another, when they put the needs of their departments or their careers ahead of the needs of the greater organization, when they are misaligned, confused, and inconsistent about what is important, they create real anguish for real human beings. And they experience that anguish themselves too.

Aside from the obvious impact this has within the organization, there is a larger social cost. People who work in unhealthy organizations eventually come to see work as drudgery. They view success as being unlikely or, even worse, out of their control. This leads to a diminished sense of hope and lower self-esteem, which leaks beyond the walls of the companies where they work, into their families where it often contrib-utes to deep personal problems, the effects of which may be felt for years. This is nothing short of a tragedy, and a completely avoidable one.

I point all this out only so that we don’t underestimate the cost of allowing our organizations to remain unhealthy, and, more important, so that we fully grasp the opportunity that lies before us. Turning an unhealthy company into a healthy one will not only create a massive competitive advantage and improved bottom line, it will also make a real difference in the lives of the people who work there. And for the leaders who spearhead those efforts, it will be one of the most meaning-ful and rewarding endeavors they will ever pursue.

Okay, here is the next question that has to be answered, the one that will occupy the rest of this book: What does an organization have to do to become healthy? There are four required disciplines.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And that’s only the beginning of the problem. When leaders of an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And that’s only the beginning of the problem. When leaders of an organization are less than honest with one another, when they put the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL organization are less than honest with one another, when they put the

needs of their departments or their careers ahead of the needs of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

needs of their departments or their careers ahead of the needs of the greater organization, when they are misaligned, confused, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the greater organization, when they are misaligned, confused, and inconsistent about what is important, they create real anguish for real

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inconsistent about what is important, they create real anguish for real human beings. And they experience that anguish themselves too.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

human beings. And they experience that anguish themselves too.Aside from the obvious impact this has within the organization,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Aside from the obvious impact this has within the organization, there is a larger social cost. People who work in unhealthy organizations

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

there is a larger social cost. People who work in unhealthy organizations eventually come to see work as drudgery. They view success as being

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

eventually come to see work as drudgery. They view success as being unlikely or, even worse, out of their control. This leads to a diminished

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

unlikely or, even worse, out of their control. This leads to a diminished sense of hope and lower self-esteem, which leaks beyond the walls of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sense of hope and lower self-esteem, which leaks beyond the walls of the companies where they work, into their families where it often contrib-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

companies where they work, into their families where it often contrib-utes to deep personal problems, the effects of which may be felt for years.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

utes to deep personal problems, the effects of which may be felt for years. This is nothing short of a tragedy, and a completely avoidable one.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This is nothing short of a tragedy, and a completely avoidable one.I point all this out only so that we don’t underestimate the cost of COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

I point all this out only so that we don’t underestimate the cost of allowing our organizations to remain unhealthy, and, more important, COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

allowing our organizations to remain unhealthy, and, more important, NOT FOR R

ESALEinconsistent about what is important, they create real anguish for real

NOT FOR RESALE

inconsistent about what is important, they create real anguish for real human beings. And they experience that anguish themselves too.

NOT FOR RESALEhuman beings. And they experience that anguish themselves too.

Aside from the obvious impact this has within the organization,

NOT FOR RESALEAside from the obvious impact this has within the organization,

there is a larger social cost. People who work in unhealthy organizations

NOT FOR RESALE

there is a larger social cost. People who work in unhealthy organizations eventually come to see work as drudgery. They view success as being

NOT FOR RESALE

eventually come to see work as drudgery. They view success as being unlikely or, even worse, out of their control. This leads to a diminished

NOT FOR RESALE

unlikely or, even worse, out of their control. This leads to a diminished sense of hope and lower self-esteem, which leaks beyond the walls of the

NOT FOR RESALE

sense of hope and lower self-esteem, which leaks beyond the walls of the companies where they work, into their families where it often contrib-

NOT FOR RESALE

companies where they work, into their families where it often contrib-utes to deep personal problems, the effects of which may be felt for years.

NOT FOR RESALE

utes to deep personal problems, the effects of which may be felt for years. This is nothing short of a tragedy, and a completely avoidable one.NOT FOR R

ESALE

This is nothing short of a tragedy, and a completely avoidable one.I point all this out only so that we don’t underestimate the cost of NOT FOR R

ESALE

I point all this out only so that we don’t underestimate the cost of


La

ORGANIZATIONAL HEALTH

3. Overcommunicate

Clarity

4. Reinforce

Clarity

1. Build a

Cohesive Leadership

Team

2. CreateClarity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Overcommunicate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcommunicate

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


3.

NOT FOR RESALE3.

Overcommunicate

NOT FOR RESALEOvercommunicate

Clarity

NOT FOR RESALE

Clarity


La

15

An organization doesn’t become healthy in a linear, tidy fashion. Like building a strong marriage or family, it’s a messy process that involves doing a few things at once, and it must be maintained on an ongoing basis in order to be preserved. Still, that messy process can be broken down into four simple disciplines.

Discipline 1: BuilD a cohesive leaDership Team

An organization simply cannot be healthy if the people who are char-tered with running it are not behaviorally cohesive in five fundamental ways. In any kind of organization, from a corporation to a department within that corporation, from a small, entrepreneurial company to a church or a school, dysfunction and lack of cohesion at the top inevi-tably lead to a lack of health throughout.

Discipline 2: creaTe clariTy

In addition to being behaviorally cohesive, the leadership team of a healthy organization must be intellectually aligned and committed to the same answers to six simple but critical questions. There can be no daylight between leaders around these fundamental issues.

Discipline 3: overcommunicaTe clariTy

Once a leadership team has established behavioral cohesion and created clarity around the answers to those questions, it must then communi-cate those answers to employees clearly, repeatedly, enthusiastically, and repeatedly (that’s not a typo). When it comes to reinforcing clarity, there is no such thing as too much communication.

The Four Disciplines Model


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ea

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

eaD

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Der

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ership Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ship Team

An organization simply cannot be healthy if the people who are char-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

An organization simply cannot be healthy if the people who are char-tered with running it are not behaviorally cohesive in five fundamental

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tered with running it are not behaviorally cohesive in five fundamental ways. In any kind of organization, from a corporation to a department

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ways. In any kind of organization, from a corporation to a department within that corporation, from a small, entrepreneurial company to a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

within that corporation, from a small, entrepreneurial company to a church or a school, dysfunction and lack of cohesion at the top inevi-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

church or a school, dysfunction and lack of cohesion at the top inevi-tably lead to a lack of health throughout.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tably lead to a lack of health throughout.

Discipline 2:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Discipline 2: c

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cre

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

re

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

addition to being behaviorally cohesive, the leadership team of a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

addition to being behaviorally cohesive, the leadership team of a healthy organization must be intellectually aligned and committed to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

healthy organization must be intellectually aligned and committed to the same answers to six simple but critical questions. There can be no COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

the same answers to six simple but critical questions. There can be no NOT FOR R

ESALEAn organization simply cannot be healthy if the people who are char-

NOT FOR RESALE

An organization simply cannot be healthy if the people who are char-tered with running it are not behaviorally cohesive in five fundamental

NOT FOR RESALE

tered with running it are not behaviorally cohesive in five fundamental ways. In any kind of organization, from a corporation to a department

NOT FOR RESALEways. In any kind of organization, from a corporation to a department

within that corporation, from a small, entrepreneurial company to a

NOT FOR RESALE

within that corporation, from a small, entrepreneurial company to a church or a school, dysfunction and lack of cohesion at the top inevi-

NOT FOR RESALE

church or a school, dysfunction and lack of cohesion at the top inevi-tably lead to a lack of health throughout.

NOT FOR RESALE

tably lead to a lack of health throughout.

re

NOT FOR RESALE

rea

NOT FOR RESALE

aT

NOT FOR RESALE

TaTa

NOT FOR RESALE

aTa e

NOT FOR RESALE

e

NOT FOR RESALE

c

NOT FOR RESALE

c

addition to being behaviorally cohesive, the leadership team of a

NOT FOR RESALE

addition to being behaviorally cohesive, the leadership team of a healthy organization must be intellectually aligned and committed to NOT FOR R

ESALE

healthy organization must be intellectually aligned and committed to


La

The Advantage

16

Discipline 4: reinforce clariTy

Finally, in order for an organization to remain healthy over time, its leaders must establish a few critical, nonbureaucratic systems to rein-force clarity in every process that involves people. Every policy, every program, every activity should be designed to remind employees what is really most important.

Is this model foolproof?Pretty much. When an organization’s leaders are cohesive, when

they are unambiguously aligned around a common set of answers to a few critical questions, when they communicate those answers again and again and again, and when they put effective processes in place to reinforce those answers, they create an environment in which success is almost impossible to prevent. Really.

Sure, if those leaders make a catastrophic, completely boneheaded mistake in strategy, finance, or marketing they could sink the organiza-tion. But people in healthy organizations rarely make those kinds of mistakes. That’s because cohesive leadership teams prevent groupthink, learn from mistakes, and call each other on potential problems before they get out of hand. And so it makes sense that this is the first of the four disciplines that should be taken on: building a cohesive leadership team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Pretty much. When an organization’s leaders are cohesive, when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Pretty much. When an organization’s leaders are cohesive, when they are unambiguously aligned around a common set of answers to a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they are unambiguously aligned around a common set of answers to a few critical questions, when they communicate those answers again and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

few critical questions, when they communicate those answers again and again and again, and when they put effective processes in place to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

again and again, and when they put effective processes in place to reinforce those answers, they create an environment in which success

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reinforce those answers, they create an environment in which success is almost impossible to prevent. Really.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is almost impossible to prevent. Really.Sure, if those leaders make a catastrophic, completely boneheaded

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Sure, if those leaders make a catastrophic, completely boneheaded mistake in strategy, finance, or marketing they could sink the organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mistake in strategy, finance, or marketing they could sink the organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion. But people in healthy organizations rarely make those kinds of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion. But people in healthy organizations rarely make those kinds of mistakes. That’s because cohesive leadership teams prevent groupthink,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mistakes. That’s because cohesive leadership teams prevent groupthink, learn from mistakes, and call each other on potential problems before

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

learn from mistakes, and call each other on potential problems before they get out of hand. And so it makes sense that this is the first of COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

they get out of hand. And so it makes sense that this is the first of the four disciplines that should be taken on: building a cohesive COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

the four disciplines that should be taken on: building a cohesive NOT FOR R

ESALEthey are unambiguously aligned around a common set of answers to a

NOT FOR RESALE

they are unambiguously aligned around a common set of answers to a few critical questions, when they communicate those answers again and

NOT FOR RESALEfew critical questions, when they communicate those answers again and

again and again, and when they put effective processes in place to

NOT FOR RESALEagain and again, and when they put effective processes in place to

reinforce those answers, they create an environment in which success

NOT FOR RESALE

reinforce those answers, they create an environment in which success is almost impossible to prevent. Really.

NOT FOR RESALE

is almost impossible to prevent. Really.Sure, if those leaders make a catastrophic, completely boneheaded

NOT FOR RESALE

Sure, if those leaders make a catastrophic, completely boneheaded mistake in strategy, finance, or marketing they could sink the organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

mistake in strategy, finance, or marketing they could sink the organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

tion. But people in healthy organizations rarely make those kinds of

NOT FOR RESALE

tion. But people in healthy organizations rarely make those kinds of mistakes. That’s because cohesive leadership teams prevent groupthink,

NOT FOR RESALE

mistakes. That’s because cohesive leadership teams prevent groupthink, learn from mistakes, and call each other on potential problems before

NOT FOR RESALE

learn from mistakes, and call each other on potential problems before they get out of hand. And so it makes sense that this is the first of NOT FOR R

ESALE

they get out of hand. And so it makes sense that this is the first of


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

WHAT’S IT WORTH TO YOU?

Imagine two organizations.

The first is led by a leadership team whose members are open with one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear decisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when their behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their attention on the collective good of the organization.

The second is led by a leadership team whose members are guarded and less than honest with one another. They hold back during difficult conversations, feign commitment, and hesitate to call one another on unproductive behaviors. Often they pursue their own agendas rather than those of the greater organization.

The question: What kind of advantage would the first organization have over the second, and how much time and energy would it be worth investing to make this advantage a reality?


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first is led by a leadership team whose members are open with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first is led by a leadership team whose members are open with one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear decisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

decisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when decisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

decisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when their behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their attention on the collective good of the organization.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

attention on the collective good of the organization.

The second is led by a leadership team whose members are guarded

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and less than honest with one another. They hold back during difficult

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and less than honest with one another. They hold back during difficult conversations, feign commitment, and hesitate to call one another on

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

conversations, feign commitment, and hesitate to call one another on unproductive behaviors. Often they pursue their own agendas rather

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

unproductive behaviors. Often they pursue their own agendas rather than those of the greater organization.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

than those of the greater organization.

The question:COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The question:NOT FOR R

ESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear

NOT FOR RESALE

one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear decisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when

NOT FOR RESALEdecisions even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when

their behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their

NOT FOR RESALEtheir behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their their behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their

NOT FOR RESALEtheir behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their


NOT FOR RESALE

attention on the collective good of the organization.attention on the collective good of the organization.

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

and less than honest with one another. They hold back during difficult

NOT FOR RESALE

and less than honest with one another. They hold back during difficult conversations, feign commitment, and hesitate to call one another on

NOT FOR RESALE

conversations, feign commitment, and hesitate to call one another on unproductive behaviors. Often they pursue their own agendas rather

NOT FOR RESALE

unproductive behaviors. Often they pursue their own agendas rather than those of the greater organization.NOT FOR R

ESALE

than those of the greater organization.


La

19

D I S C I P L I N E 1

Build a Cohesive Leadership Team

The first step a leadership team has to take if it wants the organization it leads to be healthy—

and to achieve the advantages that go with it—is to make itself cohesive. There’s just no way around it. If an organization is led by a team that is not behaviorally unified, there is no chance that it will become healthy.

It’s kind of like a family. If the parents’ relation-ship is dysfunctional, the family will be too. That’s not to say that some good things can’t come out of it; it’s just that the family/company will not come anywhere close to realizing its full potential.

The importance of leadership team cohesion is almost never overtly disputed, even by the most cynical executives. But somehow, few organizations


3. Overcommunicate

Clarity

4. Reinforce

Clarity

1. Build a

Cohesive Leadership

Team

2. CreateClarity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Build a Cohesive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Build a Cohesive

Leadership Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Leadership Team

T

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first step a leadership team has to take if it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

he first step a leadership team has to take if it

and to achieve the advantages that go with it—is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

he first step a leadership team has to take if it

NOT FOR RESALE

he first step a leadership team has to take if it wants the organization it leads to be healthy—

NOT FOR RESALE

wants the organization it leads to be healthy—and to achieve the advantages that go with it—is

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

to make itself cohesive. There’s just no way around NOT FOR RESALE

to make itself cohesive. There’s just no way around it. If an organization is led by a team that is not NOT FOR R

ESALE

it. If an organization is led by a team that is not


La

The Advantage

20

invest nearly enough time and energy in it, and certainly not with the level of rigor that building a cohesive team requires and deserves. So it’s

difficult to avoid coming to the conclusion that most organizations either give lip-service to the idea that team-work at the top is critical, or they underestimate what it takes to achieve it. Whatever the case, it’s clear that a better approach needs to be taken if they are to eradicate dysfunc-tion from their teams.

I should mention here that I wrote a book that addresses this topic. It’s called The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, and it’s a fable about a leader who takes over a political, dysfunctional team and works to turn it around. That book provides a fictional but thorough and realistic case study about how a team needs to wrestle with dysfunction in order to improve. I’ve also written a field guide, Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team, which provides detailed instructions for how to implement many of the exercises and tools we use in our consulting practice.1

What I’ll do in this section is present a comprehensive overview of the model and provide advice about addressing the five dysfunctions and embrac-ing the positive behaviors that are at the heart of any cohesive leadership team. I’ll also use real stories to draw on what I’ve learned from clients and readers since those books came out ten and seven years before this one, respectively.

But first, we need to get clear on what a leadership team really is.

DefInIng A LeADeRSHIp “TeAm”

The word team has been so overused and misused in society that it has lost much of its impact. The truth is, few groups of leaders actually work

Few organizations invest

nearly enough time and

energy in making their

leadership teams cohesive,

and certainly not with the

level of rigor that it requires

and deserves.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they underestimate what it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they underestimate what it takes to achieve it. Whatever

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL takes to achieve it. Whatever

the case, it’s clear that a better

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the case, it’s clear that a better approach needs to be taken if

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

approach needs to be taken if they are to eradicate dysfunc-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they are to eradicate dysfunc-tion from their teams.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion from their teams.I should mention here that I wrote a book that addresses this topic.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I should mention here that I wrote a book that addresses this topic. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, and it’s a fable about a leader

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, and it’s a fable about a leader who takes over a political, dysfunctional team and works to turn it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who takes over a political, dysfunctional team and works to turn it around. That book provides a fictional but thorough and realistic case

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

around. That book provides a fictional but thorough and realistic case study about how a team needs to wrestle with dysfunction in order to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

study about how a team needs to wrestle with dysfunction in order to improve. I’ve also written a field guide,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

improve. I’ve also written a field guide, which provides detailed instructions for how to implement

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

which provides detailed instructions for how to implement many of the exercises and tools we use in our consulting practice.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

many of the exercises and tools we use in our consulting practice.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What I’ll do in this section is present a comprehensive overview of the COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What I’ll do in this section is present a comprehensive overview of the model and provide advice about addressing the five dysfunctions and embrac-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

model and provide advice about addressing the five dysfunctions and embrac-NOT FOR R

ESALEthey are to eradicate dysfunc-

NOT FOR RESALE

they are to eradicate dysfunc-tion from their teams.

NOT FOR RESALEtion from their teams.

I should mention here that I wrote a book that addresses this topic.

NOT FOR RESALEI should mention here that I wrote a book that addresses this topic.

, and it’s a fable about a leader

NOT FOR RESALE

, and it’s a fable about a leader who takes over a political, dysfunctional team and works to turn it

NOT FOR RESALE

who takes over a political, dysfunctional team and works to turn it around. That book provides a fictional but thorough and realistic case

NOT FOR RESALE

around. That book provides a fictional but thorough and realistic case study about how a team needs to wrestle with dysfunction in order to

NOT FOR RESALE

study about how a team needs to wrestle with dysfunction in order to improve. I’ve also written a field guide,

NOT FOR RESALE

improve. I’ve also written a field guide, which provides detailed instructions for how to implement

NOT FOR RESALE

which provides detailed instructions for how to implement many of the exercises and tools we use in our consulting practice.NOT FOR R

ESALE

many of the exercises and tools we use in our consulting practice.What I’ll do in this section is present a comprehensive overview of the NOT FOR R

ESALE

What I’ll do in this section is present a comprehensive overview of the


La

Discipline 1: Build a Cohesive Leadership Team

21

like a team, at least not the kind that is required to lead a healthy orga-nization. Most of them resemble what Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith, authors of the book, The Wisdom of Teams, call a “working group.”2

A good way to understand a working group is to think of it like a golf team, where players go off and play on their own and then get together and add up their scores at the end of the day. A real team is more like a basketball team, one that plays together simultaneously, in an interactive, mutually dependent, and often interchangeable way. Most working groups reflexively call themselves teams because that’s the word society uses to describe any group of people who are affiliated in their work.

Becoming a real team requires an intentional decision on the part of its members. I like to say that teamwork is not a virtue. It is a choice—and a strategic one. That means leaders who choose to operate as a real team willingly accept the work and the sacrifices that are necessary for any group that wants to reap the benefits of true teamwork. But before they can do that, they should understand and agree on a common definition of what a leadership team really is.

A leadership team is a small group of people who are collectively respon-sible for achieving a common objective for their organiza tion.

Any concise definition of such a broadly defined and widely used term is going to need some clarification and further definition of terms. Here goes.

A small group of peopleSo many teams I’ve encountered struggle simply because they’re too large. This is a big problem and a common one. A leadership team should be made up of somewhere between three and twelve people,

Teamwork is not a virtue. It is

a choice—and a strategic one.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mutually dependent, and often interchangeable way. Most working

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mutually dependent, and often interchangeable way. Most working groups reflexively call themselves teams because that’s the word society

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL groups reflexively call themselves teams because that’s the word society

uses to describe any group of people who are affiliated in their work.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

uses to describe any group of people who are affiliated in their work.Becoming a real team requires an intentional decision on the part

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Becoming a real team requires an intentional decision on the part of its members. I like to say that teamwork is not a virtue. It is a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of its members. I like to say that teamwork is not a virtue. It is a

team willingly accept the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team willingly accept the work and the sacrifices that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

work and the sacrifices that are necessary for any group

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are necessary for any group that wants to reap the benefits of true teamwork. But before they can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that wants to reap the benefits of true teamwork. But before they can do that, they should understand and agree on a common definition of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

do that, they should understand and agree on a common definition of what a leadership team really is.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what a leadership team really is.

A leadership team is a small group of people who are collectively respon-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A leadership team is a small group of people who are collectively respon-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

are necessary for any group

NOT FOR RESALE

are necessary for any group that wants to reap the benefits of true teamwork. But before they can

NOT FOR RESALE

that wants to reap the benefits of true teamwork. But before they can do that, they should understand and agree on a common definition of

NOT FOR RESALE

do that, they should understand and agree on a common definition of what a leadership team really is.NOT FOR R

ESALE

what a leadership team really is.NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

22

though anything over eight or nine is usually problematic. There is nothing dogmatic about this size limit. It is just a practical reality.

Having too many people on a team can cause a variety of logistical challenges, but the primary problem has to do with communication. When it comes to discussions and decision making, there are two criti-cal ways that members of effective teams must communicate: advocacy and inquiry. A professor at Harvard, Chris Argyris, introduced this idea.3

Advocacy is the kind of communication that most people are accustomed to, and it is all about stating your case or making your point. I think we should change our advertising approach. Or, I recom-mend that we cut costs.

Inquiry is rarer and more important than advocacy. It happens when people ask questions to seek clarity about another person’s statement of advocacy. Why do you think the advertising approach is wrong? And which aspects of it are you referring to? Or, What evidence do you have that our expenses are too high? And how certain are you of this?

What does this have to do with the size of a team? Plenty. When more than eight or nine people are on a team, members tend to advo-cate a heck of a lot more than they inquire. This makes sense because they aren’t confident that they’re going to get the opportunity to speak again soon, so they use their scarce floor time to announce their posi-tion or make a point. When a team is small, members are more likely to use much of their time asking questions and seeking clarity, confi-dent that they’ll be able to regain the floor and share their ideas or opinions when necessary.

If this isn’t clear, consider an institution like the U.S. Congress or the United Nations, where members use their precious time at the podium making declarations and statements. The same is true in large committees or on task forces within organizations, where people rarely take the opportunity to probe for understanding and clarity, but instead


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Advocacy is the kind of communication that most people are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Advocacy is the kind of communication that most people are

accustomed to, and it is all about stating your case or making your

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accustomed to, and it is all about stating your case or making your I think we should change our advertising approach.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I think we should change our advertising approach.

Inquiry is rarer and more important than advocacy. It happens

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Inquiry is rarer and more important than advocacy. It happens when people ask questions to seek clarity about another person’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

when people ask questions to seek clarity about another person’s Why do you think the advertising approach

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why do you think the advertising approach is wrong? And which aspects of it are you referring to?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is wrong? And which aspects of it are you referring to?do you have that our expenses are too high? And how certain are you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

do you have that our expenses are too high? And how certain are you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What does this have to do with the size of a team? Plenty. When

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What does this have to do with the size of a team? Plenty. When more than eight or nine people are on a team, members tend to advo-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more than eight or nine people are on a team, members tend to advo-cate a heck of a lot more than they inquire. This makes sense because

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cate a heck of a lot more than they inquire. This makes sense because they aren’t confident that they’re going to get the opportunity to speak COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

they aren’t confident that they’re going to get the opportunity to speak again soon, so they use their scarce floor time to announce their posi-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

again soon, so they use their scarce floor time to announce their posi-NOT FOR R

ESALEInquiry is rarer and more important than advocacy. It happens

NOT FOR RESALEInquiry is rarer and more important than advocacy. It happens

when people ask questions to seek clarity about another person’s

NOT FOR RESALEwhen people ask questions to seek clarity about another person’s

Why do you think the advertising approach

NOT FOR RESALE

Why do you think the advertising approach is wrong? And which aspects of it are you referring to?

NOT FOR RESALE

is wrong? And which aspects of it are you referring to?do you have that our expenses are too high? And how certain are you

NOT FOR RESALE

do you have that our expenses are too high? And how certain are you

NOT FOR RESALE

What does this have to do with the size of a team? Plenty. When

NOT FOR RESALE

What does this have to do with the size of a team? Plenty. When more than eight or nine people are on a team, members tend to advo-

NOT FOR RESALE

more than eight or nine people are on a team, members tend to advo-cate a heck of a lot more than they inquire. This makes sense because NOT FOR R

ESALE

cate a heck of a lot more than they inquire. This makes sense because they aren’t confident that they’re going to get the opportunity to speak NOT FOR R

ESALE

they aren’t confident that they’re going to get the opportunity to speak


La


23

merely pile opinion upon opinion. This inevitably leads to misunder-standing and poor decision making.

If this phenomenon is so compelling—and based on the evidence I’ve seen over the years in my work with leaders and their teams, I’m convinced it is—then it begs the question, Why do so many organizations still have too many people on their leadership teams?

Often it’s because they want to be “inclusive,” a politically correct way of saying they want to portray themselves as welcoming input from as many people as possible. And as nice as it may sound on a bumper sticker or a flowery poster, it is an ineffective and inefficient way to optimize deci-sion making within an organization. Inclusivity, or the basic idea behind it, should be achieved by ensuring that the members of a leadership team are adequately representing and tapping into the opinions of the people who work for them, not by maximizing the size of the team.

Another reason that leadership teams are often too large is the lack of wisdom and courage on the part of the executives in charge who put people on their teams as a reward or as an enticement to join the company. I can’t give Bill a raise or a promotion, but I think he’ll be happy if I make him part of the executive team. Or maybe, If you come to work for my company, I’ll have you report directly to me. These are bad reasons to add staff to a leadership team.

The noah’s Ark management Team

A smallish telecommunications company purchased one of

its equal-sized competitors, and in order to placate the

execu tives of the acquired company, the CEO agreed to

merge the two groups of leaders into what I call the “Noah’s

Ark” management team. For every position on the executive

team, there were two leaders, each representing one side of

the merger. Two heads of marketing, two heads of sales, two

heads of . . . you get it. As ridiculous as that sounds, they

were convinced it was the best thing to do.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of saying they want to portray themselves as welcoming input from as

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of saying they want to portray themselves as welcoming input from as many people as possible. And as nice as it may sound on a bumper sticker

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL many people as possible. And as nice as it may sound on a bumper sticker

or a flowery poster, it is an ineffective and inefficient way to optimize deci-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or a flowery poster, it is an ineffective and inefficient way to optimize deci-sion making within an organization. Inclusivity, or the basic idea behind

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sion making within an organization. Inclusivity, or the basic idea behind it, should be achieved by ensuring that the members of a leadership team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it, should be achieved by ensuring that the members of a leadership team are adequately representing and tapping into the opinions of the people

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are adequately representing and tapping into the opinions of the people who work for them, not by maximizing the size of the team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who work for them, not by maximizing the size of the team.Another reason that leadership teams are often too large is the lack

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Another reason that leadership teams are often too large is the lack

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of wisdom and courage on the part of the executives in charge who put

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of wisdom and courage on the part of the executives in charge who put people on their teams as a reward or as an enticement to join the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people on their teams as a reward or as an enticement to join the I can’t give Bill a raise or a promotion, but I think he’ll be happy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I can’t give Bill a raise or a promotion, but I think he’ll be happy if I make him part of the executive team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

if I make him part of the executive team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for my company, I’ll have you report directly to me.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for my company, I’ll have you report directly to me.to add staff to a leadership team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to add staff to a leadership team.NOT FOR RESALE

it, should be achieved by ensuring that the members of a leadership team

NOT FOR RESALE

it, should be achieved by ensuring that the members of a leadership team are adequately representing and tapping into the opinions of the people

NOT FOR RESALEare adequately representing and tapping into the opinions of the people

who work for them, not by maximizing the size of the team.

NOT FOR RESALEwho work for them, not by maximizing the size of the team.


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

of wisdom and courage on the part of the executives in charge who put

NOT FOR RESALE

of wisdom and courage on the part of the executives in charge who put people on their teams as a reward or as an enticement to join the

NOT FOR RESALE

people on their teams as a reward or as an enticement to join the I can’t give Bill a raise or a promotion, but I think he’ll be happy

NOT FOR RESALE

I can’t give Bill a raise or a promotion, but I think he’ll be happy if I make him part of the executive team.

NOT FOR RESALE

if I make him part of the executive team.

NOT FOR RESALE

for my company, I’ll have you report directly to me.

NOT FOR RESALE

for my company, I’ll have you report directly to me.to add staff to a leadership team.NOT FOR R

ESALE

to add staff to a leadership team.


La

The Advantage

24

When executives put people on their leadership teams for the wrong reasons, they muddy the criteria for why the team exists at all. The only reason that a person should be on a team is that she represents a key part of the organization or brings truly critical talent or insight to the table. If someone is unhappy with his pay or status or wavering about accepting a job offer, the leader should deal with that issue head-on, not compound it by making the executive team larger and less productive.

It amazes me that intelligent people will sacrifice the effectiveness and manageability of their team for a tactical victory. This is undeni-able evidence that many executives, in spite of what they might say, don’t really understand the importance of leadership team cohesiveness.

With so many people on the leadership team—I believe

it peaked at seventeen—meetings became a mess. The

group’s ability to be decisive and come to closure around

decisions diminished, as you would expect, and executives

grew so bored that a few would actually sleep during staff

meetings (I kid you not.).

Aside from the comedy of it all, what made this situation

so fascinating to me was the way in which it was resolved.

Executives eventually became so frustrated by the bureau-

cracy and wasted time that they started asking the CEO to

take them off the team! They were willing to sacrifice their

coveted place at the table, and report to a peer, just to avoid

having to waste their time and energy working on such a

large and unruly team.

Ironically, the ultimate impact of the Noah’s Ark approach

was not an improvement in the morale of the people in the

newly acquired company, but rather a prolonged period of

transition, denial, and frustration.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Executives eventually became so frustrated by the bureau-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Executives eventually became so frustrated by the bureau-

cracy and wasted time that they started asking the CEO to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL cracy and wasted time that they started asking the CEO to


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When executives put people on their leadership teams for the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When executives put people on their leadership teams for the wrong reasons, they muddy the criteria for why the team exists at all.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

wrong reasons, they muddy the criteria for why the team exists at all. The only reason that a person should be on a team is that she represents

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The only reason that a person should be on a team is that she represents a key part of the organization or brings truly critical talent or insight COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

a key part of the organization or brings truly critical talent or insight to the table. If someone is unhappy with his pay or status or wavering COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

to the table. If someone is unhappy with his pay or status or wavering


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEIronically, the ultimate impact of the Noah’s Ark approach


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

When executives put people on their leadership teams for the

NOT FOR RESALE

When executives put people on their leadership teams for the wrong reasons, they muddy the criteria for why the team exists at all.

NOT FOR RESALE

wrong reasons, they muddy the criteria for why the team exists at all. The only reason that a person should be on a team is that she represents

NOT FOR RESALE

The only reason that a person should be on a team is that she represents a key part of the organization or brings truly critical talent or insight NOT FOR R

ESALE

a key part of the organization or brings truly critical talent or insight


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


25

collectively ResponsibleThis is perhaps the most important distinction between a working group and a real leadership team. Collective responsibility implies, more than anything else, selflessness and shared sacrifices from team members.

What kind of sacrifices am I talking about? Well, first are the tangible, literal sacrifices. These include standard things like budget allocations or head count, resources that need to be shifted from one suborganization or department to another. Making these kinds of sacrifices is much easier to commit to in theory than in practice, because no leader likes to go back to his or her department and announce that bonuses are going to be smaller or head count is going to be reduced in order to help out another department that needs it more. But that’s what members of real teams do.

There are other sacrifices that team members have to make beyond these tangible ones, and they come about on a much more regular basis—often daily. Two big ones are time and emotion.

Members of cohesive teams spend many hours working together on issues and topics that often don’t fall directly within their formal areas of responsibility. They go to meetings to help their team members solve problems even when those problems have nothing to do with their departments. And perhaps most challenging of all, they enter into dif-ficult, uncomfortable discussions, even bringing up thorny issues with colleagues about their shortcomings, in order to solve problems that might prevent the team from achieving its objectives. They do this even when they’re tempted to avoid it all and go back to the relative safety of their offices to do what I refer to as their “day jobs,” that is, the work of their department.

common ObjectivesThough this is pretty straightforward, it’s worth stating that most of a leadership team’s objectives should be collective ones. If the most


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one suborganization or department to another. Making these kinds

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one suborganization or department to another. Making these kinds of sacrifices is much easier to commit to in theory than in practice,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL of sacrifices is much easier to commit to in theory than in practice,

because no leader likes to go back to his or her department and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

because no leader likes to go back to his or her department and announce that bonuses are going to be smaller or head count is going

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

announce that bonuses are going to be smaller or head count is going to be reduced in order to help out another department that needs it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to be reduced in order to help out another department that needs it more. But that’s what members of real teams do.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more. But that’s what members of real teams do.There are other sacrifices that team members have to make beyond

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

There are other sacrifices that team members have to make beyond these tangible ones, and they come about on a much more regular

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

these tangible ones, and they come about on a much more regular basis—often daily. Two big ones are time and emotion.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

basis—often daily. Two big ones are time and emotion.Members of cohesive teams spend many hours working together

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Members of cohesive teams spend many hours working together on issues and topics that often don’t fall directly within their formal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on issues and topics that often don’t fall directly within their formal areas of responsibility. They go to meetings to help their team members

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

areas of responsibility. They go to meetings to help their team members solve problems even when those problems have nothing to do with their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

solve problems even when those problems have nothing to do with their departments. And perhaps most challenging of all, they enter into dif-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

departments. And perhaps most challenging of all, they enter into dif-ficult, uncomfortable discussions, even bringing up thorny issues with COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

ficult, uncomfortable discussions, even bringing up thorny issues with colleagues about their shortcomings, in order to solve problems that COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

colleagues about their shortcomings, in order to solve problems that NOT FOR R

ESALEto be reduced in order to help out another department that needs it

NOT FOR RESALE

to be reduced in order to help out another department that needs it more. But that’s what members of real teams do.

NOT FOR RESALEmore. But that’s what members of real teams do.

There are other sacrifices that team members have to make beyond

NOT FOR RESALEThere are other sacrifices that team members have to make beyond

these tangible ones, and they come about on a much more regular

NOT FOR RESALE

these tangible ones, and they come about on a much more regular basis—often daily. Two big ones are time and emotion.

NOT FOR RESALE

basis—often daily. Two big ones are time and emotion.Members of cohesive teams spend many hours working together

NOT FOR RESALE

Members of cohesive teams spend many hours working together on issues and topics that often don’t fall directly within their formal

NOT FOR RESALE

on issues and topics that often don’t fall directly within their formal areas of responsibility. They go to meetings to help their team members

NOT FOR RESALE

areas of responsibility. They go to meetings to help their team members solve problems even when those problems have nothing to do with their

NOT FOR RESALE

solve problems even when those problems have nothing to do with their departments. And perhaps most challenging of all, they enter into dif-NOT FOR R

ESALE

departments. And perhaps most challenging of all, they enter into dif-ficult, uncomfortable discussions, even bringing up thorny issues with NOT FOR R

ESALE

ficult, uncomfortable discussions, even bringing up thorny issues with


La

The Advantage

26

important goal within the organization is to increase sales, then every member of the team shares that goal. It isn’t just the responsibility of the head of sales. No one on a cohesive team can say, Well, I did my job. Our failure isn’t my fault.

This is another concept that plenty of leadership teams say they believe in but that few really embrace. Most of them rely far too heavily on people working exclusively within their areas of expertise, handing out different objectives to different team members based on their titles and management responsibilities. And while there will always be a need for division of labor and departmental expertise, leadership team members must see their goals as collective and shared when it comes to managing the top priorities of the greater organization.

Finally, if a team shares a common objective, a good portion of their compensation or reward structure, though not necessarily all of it, should be based on the achievement of that common objective. When leaders preach teamwork but exclusively reward individual achievement, they are confusing their people and creating an obstacle to true team behavior.

Okay, now that I’ve put forward a general definition of what I mean by a leadership team, let’s focus on the steps for building a cohesive one. At the heart of the process lie five behavioral principles that every team must embrace:

Results

Accountability

Commitment

Conflict

Trust


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

out different objectives to different team members based on their titles

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

out different objectives to different team members based on their titles and management responsibilities. And while there will always be a need

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL and management responsibilities. And while there will always be a need

for division of labor and departmental expertise, leadership team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for division of labor and departmental expertise, leadership team members must see their goals as collective and shared when it comes

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

members must see their goals as collective and shared when it comes to managing the top priorities of the greater organization.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to managing the top priorities of the greater organization.Finally, if a team shares a common objective, a good portion of their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, if a team shares a common objective, a good portion of their compensation or reward structure, though not necessarily all of it, should

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

compensation or reward structure, though not necessarily all of it, should be based on the achievement of that common objective. When leaders

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be based on the achievement of that common objective. When leaders

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

preach teamwork but exclusively reward individual achievement, they are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

preach teamwork but exclusively reward individual achievement, they are confusing their people and creating an obstacle to true team behavior.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

confusing their people and creating an obstacle to true team behavior.Okay, now that I’ve put forward a general definition of what I mean by

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Okay, now that I’ve put forward a general definition of what I mean by a leadership team, let’s focus on the steps for building a cohesive one. At the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a leadership team, let’s focus on the steps for building a cohesive one. At the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

heart of the process lie five behavioral principles that every team must embrace:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

to managing the top priorities of the greater organization.

NOT FOR RESALE

to managing the top priorities of the greater organization.Finally, if a team shares a common objective, a good portion of their

NOT FOR RESALEFinally, if a team shares a common objective, a good portion of their

compensation or reward structure, though not necessarily all of it, should

NOT FOR RESALEcompensation or reward structure, though not necessarily all of it, should


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

preach teamwork but exclusively reward individual achievement, they are

NOT FOR RESALE

preach teamwork but exclusively reward individual achievement, they are confusing their people and creating an obstacle to true team behavior.

NOT FOR RESALE

confusing their people and creating an obstacle to true team behavior.Okay, now that I’ve put forward a general definition of what I mean by

NOT FOR RESALE

Okay, now that I’ve put forward a general definition of what I mean by a leadership team, let’s focus on the steps for building a cohesive one. At the

NOT FOR RESALE

a leadership team, let’s focus on the steps for building a cohesive one. At the

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La


27

BeHAvIOR 1: BUILDIng TRUST

Members of a truly cohesive team must trust one another. I realize that sounds like the most patently obvious statement ever made, something that every organization understands and values. As a result, you’d think that most leadership teams would be pretty good at building trust. As it turns out, they aren’t, and I think a big part of it is that they have the wrong idea about what trust is.

Many people think of trust in a predictive sense; if you can come to know how a person will behave in a given situation, you can trust her. I’ve known Sarah for years, and I can trust that when she says she’s going to do something, she’ll follow through. As laudable as that might be, it’s not the kind of trust that lies at the foundation of building a great team.

The kind of trust that is necessary to build a great team is what I call vulnerability-based trust. This is what happens when members get to a point where they are completely comfortable being transparent, honest, and naked with one another, where they say and genuinely mean things like “I screwed up,” “I need help,” “Your idea is better than mine,” “I wish I could learn to do that as well as you do,” and even, “I’m sorry.”

When everyone on a team knows that everyone else is vulnerable enough to say and mean those things, and that no one is going to hide his or her weaknesses or mistakes, they develop a deep and uncommon sense of trust. They speak more freely and fearlessly with one another and don’t waste time and energy putting on airs or pretending to be someone they’re not. Over time, this creates a bond that exceeds what many people ever experience in their lives and, sometimes, unfortuna tely, even in their families.

At the heart of vulnerability lies the willingness of people to abandon their pride and their fear, to sacrifice their egos for the collec-tive good of the team. While this can be a little threatening and uncom-fortable at first, ultimately it becomes liberating for people who are


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Many people think of trust in a predictive sense; if you can come to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Many people think of trust in a predictive sense; if you can come to

know how a person will behave in a given situation, you can trust her.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

know how a person will behave in a given situation, you can trust her. I’ve known Sarah for years, and I can trust that when she says she’s going to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I’ve known Sarah for years, and I can trust that when she says she’s going to As laudable as that might be, it’s not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As laudable as that might be, it’s not the kind of trust that lies at the foundation of building a great team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the kind of trust that lies at the foundation of building a great team.The kind of trust that is necessary to build a great team is what I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The kind of trust that is necessary to build a great team is what I This is what happens when members get

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This is what happens when members get to a point where they are completely comfortable being transparent,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to a point where they are completely comfortable being transparent,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

honest, and naked with one another, where they say and genuinely

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

honest, and naked with one another, where they say and genuinely mean things like “I screwed up,” “I need help,” “Your idea is better than

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mean things like “I screwed up,” “I need help,” “Your idea is better than mine,” “I wish I could learn to do that as well as you do,” and even, “I’m

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mine,” “I wish I could learn to do that as well as you do,” and even, “I’m

When everyone on a team knows that everyone else is vulnerable

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When everyone on a team knows that everyone else is vulnerable

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enough to say and mean those things, and that no one is going to hide COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enough to say and mean those things, and that no one is going to hide his or her weaknesses or mistakes, they develop a deep and uncommon COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

his or her weaknesses or mistakes, they develop a deep and uncommon NOT FOR R

ESALE As laudable as that might be, it’s not

NOT FOR RESALE

As laudable as that might be, it’s not the kind of trust that lies at the foundation of building a great team.

NOT FOR RESALEthe kind of trust that lies at the foundation of building a great team.

The kind of trust that is necessary to build a great team is what I

NOT FOR RESALEThe kind of trust that is necessary to build a great team is what I

This is what happens when members get

NOT FOR RESALE

This is what happens when members get to a point where they are completely comfortable being transparent,

NOT FOR RESALE

to a point where they are completely comfortable being transparent,

NOT FOR RESALE

honest, and naked with one another, where they say and genuinely

NOT FOR RESALE

honest, and naked with one another, where they say and genuinely mean things like “I screwed up,” “I need help,” “Your idea is better than

NOT FOR RESALE

mean things like “I screwed up,” “I need help,” “Your idea is better than mine,” “I wish I could learn to do that as well as you do,” and even, “I’m

NOT FOR RESALE

mine,” “I wish I could learn to do that as well as you do,” and even, “I’m

When everyone on a team knows that everyone else is vulnerable NOT FOR R

ESALE

When everyone on a team knows that everyone else is vulnerable enough to say and mean those things, and that no one is going to hide NOT FOR R

ESALE

enough to say and mean those things, and that no one is going to hide


La

The Advantage

28

tired of spending time and energy overthinking their actions and man-aging interpersonal politics at work.

If this is starting to sound at all touchy-feely, rest assured that it’s nothing of the sort. It’s not about holding hands and singing songs and getting in touch with your inner child. It’s ultimately about the practical goal of maximizing the performance of a group of people. And it’s entirely achievable for both teams that are just coming together for the first time and those that have been working in a less-than-trusting environment for years.

personal HistoriesThe first part of learning to build vulnerability-based trust is a small step that is necessary because to ask people to get too vulnerable too quickly is unrealistic and unproductive. While truly vulnerable team

members eventually have to get comfortable revealing who they are, they need to start in a nonthreatening way. That’s why, during an off-site session, we take teams through a quick exercise where we ask them to tell everyone, briefly, a few things about their lives. In particu-

lar, we have them say where they were born, how many siblings they have, where they fall in the order of children, and finally, what the most interesting or difficult challenge was for them as a kid. Again, we’re not interested in their inner childhoods, just what was uniquely chal-lenging for them growing up.

This discussion takes just fifteen to twenty minutes, and it always works. No matter how many times I’ve done it with a group of leaders, I expect them to say, “Come on, Pat, we already know all about one

At the heart of vulnerability

lies the willingness of people

to abandon their pride and

their fear, to sacrifice their

egos for the collective good

of the team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

first time and those that have been working in a less-than-trusting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

first time and those that have been working in a less-than-trusting

The first part of learning to build vulnerability-based trust is a small

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first part of learning to build vulnerability-based trust is a small step that is necessary because to ask people to get too vulnerable too

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

step that is necessary because to ask people to get too vulnerable too quickly is unrealistic and unproductive. While truly vulnerable team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

quickly is unrealistic and unproductive. While truly vulnerable team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


of the team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of the team. NOT FOR RESALE

The first part of learning to build vulnerability-based trust is a small

NOT FOR RESALE

The first part of learning to build vulnerability-based trust is a small step that is necessary because to ask people to get too vulnerable too

NOT FOR RESALEstep that is necessary because to ask people to get too vulnerable too

quickly is unrealistic and unproductive. While truly vulnerable team

NOT FOR RESALEquickly is unrealistic and unproductive. While truly vulnerable team

members eventually have to

NOT FOR RESALE

members eventually have to get comfortable revealing

NOT FOR RESALE

get comfortable revealing who they are, they need to

NOT FOR RESALE

who they are, they need to

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


29

another.” And yet that has never, ever happened. Some of the people may know one or two people on the team well, but every time I’ve done this with a leadership team, people sitting around the table are genuinely surprised at what they didn’t know about their colleagues’ backgrounds.

This inevitably leads to a newly found sense of respect because of the admiration that comes when someone realizes that one of their peers endured and overcame a hardship or accomplished something remarkable. More important, team members begin the process of getting comfortable with vulnerability when they realize that it is okay, even gratifying, to tell their peers something about themselves that they had never mentioned or been asked about before.

In addition to making people feel more comfortable being vulner-able, this discussion serves to level the playing field on the team. There is something powerful and disarming about hearing the CEO of a company talk about being bullied because he was a chubby kid or that his family struggled with grave poverty. As a consultant, I always find it amazing to witness how quickly the dynamic of a team can change after a simple twenty-minute exercise as people who thought they knew one another develop a whole new level of respect, admiration, and understanding, regardless of their job title, age, or experience.

Backstories

Members of an executive team at a large insurance company

were struggling with their CFO, a relatively older guy who

didn’t give his colleagues much freedom when it came to

managing their budgets. The consensus was that he didn’t

trust the people on the team to make decisions, so he felt

the need to micromanage them in any situation involving

expenditures. The level of frustration among the team,

directed at the CFO, had been building for years and didn’t

seem likely to diminish.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

peers endured and overcame a hardship or accomplished something

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

peers endured and overcame a hardship or accomplished something remarkable. More important, team members begin the process of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL remarkable. More important, team members begin the process of

getting comfortable with vulnerability when they realize that it is okay,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

getting comfortable with vulnerability when they realize that it is okay, even gratifying, to tell their peers something about themselves that they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

even gratifying, to tell their peers something about themselves that they had never mentioned or been asked about before.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

had never mentioned or been asked about before.In addition to making people feel more comfortable being vulner-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In addition to making people feel more comfortable being vulner-able, this discussion serves to level the playing field on the team. There

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

able, this discussion serves to level the playing field on the team. There is something powerful and disarming about hearing the CEO of a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is something powerful and disarming about hearing the CEO of a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

company talk about being bullied because he was a chubby kid or that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

company talk about being bullied because he was a chubby kid or that his family struggled with grave poverty. As a consultant, I always find

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

his family struggled with grave poverty. As a consultant, I always find it amazing to witness how quickly the dynamic of a team can change

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it amazing to witness how quickly the dynamic of a team can change after a simple twenty-minute exercise as people who thought they knew

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

after a simple twenty-minute exercise as people who thought they knew

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one another develop a whole new level of respect, admiration, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one another develop a whole new level of respect, admiration, and understanding, regardless of their job title, age, or experience.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

understanding, regardless of their job title, age, or experience.NOT FOR RESALEIn addition to making people feel more comfortable being vulner-

NOT FOR RESALEIn addition to making people feel more comfortable being vulner-

able, this discussion serves to level the playing field on the team. There

NOT FOR RESALEable, this discussion serves to level the playing field on the team. There


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

company talk about being bullied because he was a chubby kid or that

NOT FOR RESALE

company talk about being bullied because he was a chubby kid or that his family struggled with grave poverty. As a consultant, I always find

NOT FOR RESALE

his family struggled with grave poverty. As a consultant, I always find it amazing to witness how quickly the dynamic of a team can change

NOT FOR RESALE

it amazing to witness how quickly the dynamic of a team can change after a simple twenty-minute exercise as people who thought they knew

NOT FOR RESALE

after a simple twenty-minute exercise as people who thought they knew

NOT FOR RESALE

one another develop a whole new level of respect, admiration, and

NOT FOR RESALE

one another develop a whole new level of respect, admiration, and understanding, regardless of their job title, age, or experience.NOT FOR R

ESALE

understanding, regardless of their job title, age, or experience.


La

The Advantage

30

Of course, stopping there would only ensure that the trust level of a team would quickly recede to its original level after a few hours or days. The personal histories discussion is merely the first step in helping a team get more vulnerable with one another.

profilingThe next stage, though deeper than the first one, is still largely non-threatening. It involves using a behavioral profiling tool that can give team members deeper insights into themselves and their peers. We prefer the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, because it is widely used and understood, and seems remarkably accurate. However, there are other workable tools out there as well.

Then the team did the personal histories exercise. When

it came time for the CFO to describe his family situation and

childhood, he explained that he grew up in Chicago in the

1950s and that his family was really, really poor. He had no

indoor plumbing during part of his childhood, and the electri-

cal service in his home was inconsistent at best. You’d have

thought the guy grew up during the 1850s.

After he finished explaining what it was like for him

growing up, he did his best to make the following comment

in a matter-of-fact way, though his underlying emotion was

undeniable: “So that’s probably why I’m so tight with the

money. I don’t ever want to be poor like that again.”

The room was silent as everyone digested the subtle

magnitude of that statement. It was amazing to watch the

executives immediately begin to reassess their attitudes

toward the CFO, and a new level of dialogue quickly ensued

about the way that they discussed expenses. That would not

have happened had they not taken the time to understand

one another from a basic human perspective.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL growing up, he did his best to make the following comment

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL growing up, he did his best to make the following comment

in a matter-of-fact way, though his underlying emotion was

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL in a matter-of-fact way, though his underlying emotion was


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, stopping there would only ensure that the trust level of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, stopping there would only ensure that the trust level of a team would quickly recede to its original level after a few hours or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a team would quickly recede to its original level after a few hours or days. The personal histories discussion is merely the first step in helping COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

days. The personal histories discussion is merely the first step in helping a team get more vulnerable with one another.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

a team get more vulnerable with one another.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEmagnitude of that statement. It was amazing to watch the


NOT FOR RESALEexecutives immediately begin to reassess their attitudes


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

Of course, stopping there would only ensure that the trust level of

NOT FOR RESALE

Of course, stopping there would only ensure that the trust level of a team would quickly recede to its original level after a few hours or

NOT FOR RESALE

a team would quickly recede to its original level after a few hours or days. The personal histories discussion is merely the first step in helping NOT FOR R

ESALE

days. The personal histories discussion is merely the first step in helping


NOT FOR RESALE



La


31

The key to the usefulness of profiling tools is that the information that is uncovered is neutral; in other words, there are no good or bad types. Everything is valid, and every type of team member is as useful as the next. That may sound like something a kindergarten teacher would tell her students, but it’s both true and important. Every person has many natural tendencies that are useful and helpful to a team and a few that are not.

The goal is to get everyone on the team to identify and reveal those tendencies to their peers, both for the practical purpose of having them understand one another and to help them get comfortable being transparent and vulnerable about their shortcomings and limitations. When members of a leadership team willingly acknowledge their weak-nesses to one another, they give their peers tacit permission to call them on those weaknesses. Of course, it also serves to validate their strengths.

Sometimes it’s during the process of coming clean about weak-nesses that the biggest breakthroughs happen among team members.

myers-Briggs Breakthrough

I was working with the leadership team of a consulting firm.

I didn’t know it at the time, but two of the executives didn’t

enjoy working together, and they had a track record of not

trusting one another. As we were going through the Myers-

Briggs discussion, something amazing happened.

One of the two executives, Barry, read the one-page

description of his Myers-Briggs type aloud to the team. Part

of that description included the fact that he was a perfec-

tionist, which made him procrastinate whenever he couldn’t

do something precisely the way he thought was best.

The colleague he didn’t get along with, Tom, interrupted.

“Go back and read that again.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The goal is to get everyone on the team to identify and reveal those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The goal is to get everyone on the team to identify and reveal those tendencies to their peers, both for the practical purpose of having them

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL tendencies to their peers, both for the practical purpose of having them

understand one another and to help them get comfortable being

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

understand one another and to help them get comfortable being transparent and vulnerable about their shortcomings and limitations.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

transparent and vulnerable about their shortcomings and limitations. When members of a leadership team willingly acknowledge their weak-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When members of a leadership team willingly acknowledge their weak-nesses to one another, they give their peers tacit permission to call

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nesses to one another, they give their peers tacit permission to call them on those weaknesses. Of course, it also serves to validate their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

them on those weaknesses. Of course, it also serves to validate their

Sometimes it’s during the process of coming clean about weak-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nesses that the biggest breakthroughs happen among team members.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


m

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

myers-Briggs Breakthrough

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

yers-Briggs Breakthrough


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


enjoy working together, and they had a track record of not COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enjoy working together, and they had a track record of not NOT FOR R

ESALEWhen members of a leadership team willingly acknowledge their weak-

NOT FOR RESALE

When members of a leadership team willingly acknowledge their weak-nesses to one another, they give their peers tacit permission to call

NOT FOR RESALEnesses to one another, they give their peers tacit permission to call

them on those weaknesses. Of course, it also serves to validate their

NOT FOR RESALEthem on those weaknesses. Of course, it also serves to validate their


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

I didn’t know it at the time, but two of the executives didn’t NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

32

The Fundamental Attribution ErrorThis story speaks to a fascinating phenomenon that prevents people who don’t know one another well from building trust. It’s called the fundamental attribution error.4 As sophisticated and complex as it may sound, it’s really quite simple.

At the heart of the fundamental attribution error is the tendency of human beings to attribute the negative or frustrating behaviors of their colleagues to their intentions and personalities, while attribut-ing their own negative or frustrating behaviors to environmental factors. For instance, if I see a dad at the grocery store scowling at his five-year-

Barry read the description a second time, and Tom

seemed dumbfounded.

Finally, Tom said, “So, that’s part of your personality?”

Barry nodded. “Yeah, I’m like that at home too. I don’t

want to procrastinate; it’s just that I struggle when I can’t do

something perfectly.”

“I thought you were just being disrespectful to me when

you didn’t turn things around until the last minute.” Tom was

being remarkably honest. “I had no idea . . . ” He didn’t need

to finish the sentence.

The two of them just sat there, digesting the impact of

this simple but profound revelation. I could swear that both

had the first indication of tears in their eyes.

Finally, Tom said, “You know, I could help you with that

if you wanted.”

Barry seemed legitimately relieved by both the offer of

help and the breakthrough in his relationship with Tom. “That

would be great.”

And then they stood up, hugged one another, and wept

like babies.

No, just kidding. But everything before the hugging part

is true.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL He didn’t need

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL He didn’t need


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Fundamental Attribution ErrorCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Fundamental Attribution Error


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALEFinally, Tom said, “You know, I could help you with that

NOT FOR RESALEFinally, Tom said, “You know, I could help you with that


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


33

old daughter and wagging his finger in her face, I’m likely to conclude that the guy has an anger problem and needs some counseling. If I find myself scowling and wagging my finger at my own five-year-old, I’m likely to conclude that my behavior is caused by my unruly child or that I’m just having a tough day.

Of course, this kind of misattribution, where we give ourselves the benefit of the doubt but assume the worst about others, breaks down trust on a team. The best way to combat it is to help team members understand one another on a fundamental level and to give them as much information as possible about who a person is and why this person might act the way he or she does. By doing this, we greatly increase the likelihood that people will replace their unfair judgments with insight and empathy, qualities that allow a team to build trust and goodwill with one another. Or as the prayer of St. Francis goes, we must seek to understand more than to be understood. Though that is not always the case, the benefits of greater understanding can sometimes be staggering and immediate.

Avoiding a Costly misattribution

I was doing a two-day off-site for the executive team at a

large and geographically dispersed technology company.

Team members had flown in from around the country for the

meeting, something they did every few months.

After I finished my opening lecture about organizational

health and teamwork, we took a break. The CEO pulled me

aside and pointed out his sales vice president, Carl, and said

quietly, “I’m probably going to fire him after this off-site is

over.”

To say the least, I was surprised. The CEO didn’t go into

much detail, only to tell me he didn’t think Carl was a team

player and that he was more interested in himself than the

rest of the organization.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

trust on a team. The best way to combat it is to help team members

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

trust on a team. The best way to combat it is to help team members understand one another on a fundamental level and to give them as

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL understand one another on a fundamental level and to give them as

much information as possible about who a person is and why this

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

much information as possible about who a person is and why this person might act the way he or she does. By doing this, we greatly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

person might act the way he or she does. By doing this, we greatly increase the likelihood that people will replace their unfair judgments

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

increase the likelihood that people will replace their unfair judgments with insight and empathy, qualities that allow a team to build trust and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

with insight and empathy, qualities that allow a team to build trust and goodwill with one another. Or as the prayer of St. Francis goes, we

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

goodwill with one another. Or as the prayer of St. Francis goes, we seek to understand more than to be understood.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

seek to understand more than to be understood.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

always the case, the benefits of greater understanding can sometimes

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

always the case, the benefits of greater understanding can sometimes be staggering and immediate.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be staggering and immediate.

Avoiding a Costly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Avoiding a Costly


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Team members had flown in from around the country for the COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Team members had flown in from around the country for the NOT FOR R

ESALEincrease the likelihood that people will replace their unfair judgments

NOT FOR RESALE

increase the likelihood that people will replace their unfair judgments with insight and empathy, qualities that allow a team to build trust and

NOT FOR RESALEwith insight and empathy, qualities that allow a team to build trust and

goodwill with one another. Or as the prayer of St. Francis goes, we

NOT FOR RESALEgoodwill with one another. Or as the prayer of St. Francis goes, we


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


Avoiding a Costly

NOT FOR RESALE

Avoiding a Costly


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

large and geographically dispersed technology company. NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

34

After the break, we did the Myers-Briggs session, and

Carl announced to the team that he was an ESTP. Having

shared a bedroom with a brother who was an ESTP, I was

able to describe his type fairly well: “So, I’m guessing that

you don’t like protocol, and you tend to blow off meetings

and break the rules when you don’t think it helps you succeed.

You somehow always find a way to make your numbers, but

you sometimes piss people off along the way. Your team in

the field probably likes you a lot, but the people at corporate

think you’re kind of a rebel.”

People in the room started to laugh nervously at the

accuracy of my description. I pushed on.

I looked at the CEO’s Myers-Briggs type, ESTJ, and noted

that one of the things that bothered his type the most was

broken rules and lack of respect for the system. I looked over

at Carl and then back at the CEO. “He must really make you

mad sometimes.”

Carl and the CEO looked at me as if I was a fortune-teller,

and now the rest of the room broke out into robust laughter.

Based only on my basic understanding of their behavioral

preferences, I was able to describe the likely dynamic

between these two executives. Carl didn’t deny any of what

I had said, and the CEO suddenly had a whole new under-

standing of his relationship with his sales VP. Most important,

he could now attribute Carl’s behavior to the way he was

wired rather than to some attitudinal defect. That didn’t give

Carl permission to do whatever he wanted, but it certainly

allowed the CEO to take a more empathic approach to

working with him.

At the end of the meeting, the CEO pulled me aside and

said he was not going to fire Carl, a testament to the power

of using vulnerability to overcome the fundamental attribu-

tion error and build trust.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL the field probably likes you a lot, but the people at corporate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL the field probably likes you a lot, but the people at corporate


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


standing of his relationship with his sales VP. Most important, COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

standing of his relationship with his sales VP. Most important, NOT FOR R

ESALEI looked at the CEO’s Myers-Briggs type, ESTJ, and noted

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEthat one of the things that bothered his type the most was


NOT FOR RESALEbroken rules and lack of respect for the system. I looked over


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

I had said, and the CEO suddenly had a whole new under-NOT FOR RESALE


standing of his relationship with his sales VP. Most important, NOT FOR R

ESALE

standing of his relationship with his sales VP. Most important,


La


35

Too Much Vulnerability?Some people ask me if it’s possible for team members to be too vulner-able with one another, to leave themselves open to being hurt. My answer is no.

To believe that a person on a team can be too vulner-able is really to suggest that she would be wise to with-hold information about her weaknesses, mistakes, or need for help. This is almost never a good idea. Perhaps during the initial stages of team development, complete vulnerability is not a realistic expectation. But soon after, the only way for teams to build real trust is for team members to come clean about who they are, warts and all.

I suppose that if a team member were to come to every meeting with a laundry list of mistakes and weaknesses, that could certainly be a problem. But the problem, in fact, would be a lack of competence rather than too much vulnerability. Ouch.

Finally, it’s worth pointing out that vulnerability is not about a team member using the team as his own private therapy group. There is something uncomfortable and weird about a team member airing all of his dirty laundry in front of the team. A measure of judgment and emotional intelligence is always required, and I’ve found that the vast majority of leaders understand where to draw the line.

The Leader goes FirstAs important as it is for all members of a leadership team to commit to being vulnerable, that is not going to happen if the leader of the team, whether that person is the CEO, department head, pastor, or school principal, does not go first. If the team leader is reluctant to acknowledge his or her mistakes or fails to admit to a weakness that is

The only way for teams to

build real trust is for team

members to come clean about

who they are, warts and all.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for help. This is almost never a good idea. Perhaps during the initial

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for help. This is almost never a good idea. Perhaps during the initial stages of team development, complete vulnerability is not a realistic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

stages of team development, complete vulnerability is not a realistic expectation. But soon after, the only way for teams to build real trust

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

expectation. But soon after, the only way for teams to build real trust is for team members to come clean about who they are, warts and all.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is for team members to come clean about who they are, warts and all.I suppose that if a team member were to come to every meeting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I suppose that if a team member were to come to every meeting with a laundry list of mistakes and weaknesses, that could certainly be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

with a laundry list of mistakes and weaknesses, that could certainly be a problem. But the problem, in fact, would be a lack of competence

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a problem. But the problem, in fact, would be a lack of competence rather than too much vulnerability. Ouch.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rather than too much vulnerability. Ouch.Finally, it’s worth pointing out that vulnerability is not about a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, it’s worth pointing out that vulnerability is not about a team member using the team as his own private therapy group. There

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team member using the team as his own private therapy group. There is something uncomfortable and weird about a team member airing all

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is something uncomfortable and weird about a team member airing all of his dirty laundry in front of the team. A measure of judgment and COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

of his dirty laundry in front of the team. A measure of judgment and emotional intelligence is always required, and I’ve found that the vast COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

emotional intelligence is always required, and I’ve found that the vast COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

stages of team development, complete vulnerability is not a realistic

NOT FOR RESALE

stages of team development, complete vulnerability is not a realistic expectation. But soon after, the only way for teams to build real trust

NOT FOR RESALEexpectation. But soon after, the only way for teams to build real trust

is for team members to come clean about who they are, warts and all.

NOT FOR RESALEis for team members to come clean about who they are, warts and all.

I suppose that if a team member were to come to every meeting

NOT FOR RESALE

I suppose that if a team member were to come to every meeting with a laundry list of mistakes and weaknesses, that could certainly be

NOT FOR RESALE

with a laundry list of mistakes and weaknesses, that could certainly be a problem. But the problem, in fact, would be a lack of competence

NOT FOR RESALE

a problem. But the problem, in fact, would be a lack of competence rather than too much vulnerability. Ouch.

NOT FOR RESALE

rather than too much vulnerability. Ouch.Finally, it’s worth pointing out that vulnerability is not about a

NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, it’s worth pointing out that vulnerability is not about a team member using the team as his own private therapy group. There

NOT FOR RESALE

team member using the team as his own private therapy group. There is something uncomfortable and weird about a team member airing all NOT FOR R

ESALE

is something uncomfortable and weird about a team member airing all of his dirty laundry in front of the team. A measure of judgment and NOT FOR R

ESALE

of his dirty laundry in front of the team. A measure of judgment and


La

The Advantage

36

An Invulnerable Leader

I once worked with an intimidating CEO who rarely received

unfiltered or honest feedback from the members of his lead-

ership team. At the urging of his head of human resources,

he solicited formal feedback from his team in an anonymous

survey and then failed to share the results with them for

months. Finally, the head of HR convinced him to reveal the

findings at his next staff meeting.

At that meeting, he started by reading aloud his greatest

weakness according to the survey data. He then paused, with

a slightly puzzled look on his face, and said “Hmm. What do

you guys think?” Awkwardly, the execs sitting around the table

took turns denying that it was a problem, even though the data

had been generated by their input alone. Then the CEO read

his next weakness and asked the team again what they thought.

Once again, the timid leaders, one by one, failed to own up

to the data that they had provided. It was astounding!

Finally, one brave member of the team acknowledged

that he agreed with one of the weaknesses in the report

and that he had responded to the survey in a way that

was consistent with the data. After an uncomfortable pause,

one of the other members of the team announced that

he just didn’t see the problem, and he was joined by a

chorus of other executives who left their one honest col-

league by himself to incur the disapproval of his defensive

boss.

Aside from the disappointing spectacle of weakness that

took place there, the real impact of that meeting was a clear

evident to everyone else, there is little hope that other members of the team are going to take that step themselves. In fact, it probably wouldn’t be advisable for them to do so because there is a good chance that their vulnerability would be neither encouraged nor rewarded.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL unfiltered or honest feedback from the members of his lead-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL unfiltered or honest feedback from the members of his lead-

ership team. At the urging of his head of human resources,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ership team. At the urging of his head of human resources,


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Finally, one brave member of the team acknowledged COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, one brave member of the team acknowledged NOT FOR R

ESALEsurvey and then failed to share the results with them for

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


to the data that they had provided. It was astounding!NOT FOR RESALE



La


37

The only way for the leader of a team to create a safe environment for his team members to be vulnerable is by stepping up and doing something that feels unsafe and uncomfortable first. By getting naked before anyone else, by taking the risk of making himself vulnerable with no guarantee that other members of the team will respond in kind, a leader demonstrates an extraordinary level of selflessness and dedication to the team. And that gives him the right, and the confidence, to ask others to do the same.

Trust is just one of five behaviors that cohesive teams must establish to build a healthy organization. However, it is by far the most impor-tant of the five because it is the foundation for the others. Simply stated, it makes teamwork possible. Only when teams build vulnerability-based trust do they put themselves in a position to embrace the other four behaviors, the next of which is the mastery of conflict.

message from the CEO to his team: I’m not going to admit

my weaknesses, so you probably shouldn’t either. From that

moment on, team members avoided admitting their mistakes

and asking one another for help. The company eventually

spiraled and was sold for a fraction of its previous value. And

while journalists and industry analysts attributed its demise

to bad decisions around strategy and products, the members

of the team knew that those were mere symptoms of the

real problem: a lack of trust that began with their CEO.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The only way for the leader of a team to create a safe environment

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The only way for the leader of a team to create a safe environment for his team members to be vulnerable is by stepping up and doing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for his team members to be vulnerable is by stepping up and doing something that feels unsafe and uncomfortable first. By getting naked

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

something that feels unsafe and uncomfortable first. By getting naked before anyone else, by taking the risk of making himself vulnerable with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

before anyone else, by taking the risk of making himself vulnerable with no guarantee that other members of the team will respond in kind, a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

no guarantee that other members of the team will respond in kind, a leader demonstrates an extraordinary level of selflessness and dedication

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leader demonstrates an extraordinary level of selflessness and dedication to the team. And that gives him the right, and the confidence, to ask

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to the team. And that gives him the right, and the confidence, to ask others to do the same.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

others to do the same.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Trust is just one of five behaviors that cohesive teams must establish

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Trust is just one of five behaviors that cohesive teams must establish to build a healthy organization. However, it is by far the most impor-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to build a healthy organization. However, it is by far the most impor-tant of the five because it is the foundation for the others. Simply stated,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tant of the five because it is the foundation for the others. Simply stated, it makes teamwork possible. Only when teams build vulnerability-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it makes teamwork possible. Only when teams build vulnerability-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

based trust do they put themselves in a position to embrace the other COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

based trust do they put themselves in a position to embrace the other

real problem: a lack of trust that began with their CEO.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL real problem: a lack of trust that began with their CEO.

NOT FOR RESALE

for his team members to be vulnerable is by stepping up and doing

NOT FOR RESALE

for his team members to be vulnerable is by stepping up and doing something that feels unsafe and uncomfortable first. By getting naked

NOT FOR RESALE

something that feels unsafe and uncomfortable first. By getting naked before anyone else, by taking the risk of making himself vulnerable with

NOT FOR RESALEbefore anyone else, by taking the risk of making himself vulnerable with

no guarantee that other members of the team will respond in kind, a

NOT FOR RESALE

no guarantee that other members of the team will respond in kind, a leader demonstrates an extraordinary level of selflessness and dedication

NOT FOR RESALE

leader demonstrates an extraordinary level of selflessness and dedication to the team. And that gives him the right, and the confidence, to ask

NOT FOR RESALE

to the team. And that gives him the right, and the confidence, to ask

NOT FOR RESALE

Trust is just one of five behaviors that cohesive teams must establish

NOT FOR RESALE

Trust is just one of five behaviors that cohesive teams must establish to build a healthy organization. However, it is by far the most impor-

NOT FOR RESALE

to build a healthy organization. However, it is by far the most impor-tant of the five because it is the foundation for the others. Simply stated,

NOT FOR RESALE

tant of the five because it is the foundation for the others. Simply stated, it makes teamwork possible. Only when teams build vulnerability-NOT FOR R

ESALE

it makes teamwork possible. Only when teams build vulnerability-based trust do they put themselves in a position to embrace the other NOT FOR R

ESALE

based trust do they put themselves in a position to embrace the other


La

The Advantage

38

BeHAvIOR 2: mASTeRIng COnfLICT

Contrary to popular wisdom and behavior, conflict is not a bad thing for a team. In fact, the fear of conflict is almost always a sign of problems.

Of course, the kind of conflict I’m referring to here is not the nasty kind that centers around people or personalities. Rather, it is what I call productive ideological conflict, the willingness to disagree, even passionately when necessary, around important issues and decisions that must be made. But this can only happen when there is trust.

When team members trust one another, when they know that everyone on the team is capable of admitting when they don’t have the right answer, and when they’re willing to acknowl-

edge when someone else’s idea is better than theirs, the fear of conflict and the discomfort it entails is greatly diminished. When there is trust, conflict becomes nothing but the pursuit of truth, an attempt to find the best possible answer. It is not only okay but desirable. Conflict without trust, however, is politics, an attempt to manipulate others in order to win an argument regardless of the truth.

DiscomfortBut that’s not to say that even productive conflict isn’t a little uncom-fortable. Even among the most trusting team members, there will always be a certain level of discomfort associated with disagreement. But it will be a healthy discomfort, a sign that there is productive tension around an issue that warrants discussion and debate.

Overcoming the tendency to run from discomfort is one of the most important requirements for any leadership team—in fact, for any

When there is trust, conflict

becomes nothing but the

pursuit of truth, an attempt to

find the best possible answer.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

call productive ideological conflict, the willingness to disagree, even

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

call productive ideological conflict, the willingness to disagree, even passionately when necessary, around important issues and decisions

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL passionately when necessary, around important issues and decisions

that must be made. But this can only happen when there is trust.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that must be made. But this can only happen when there is trust.When team members

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When team members trust one another, when they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

trust one another, when they know that everyone on the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

know that everyone on the team is capable of admitting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team is capable of admitting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

edge when someone else’s idea is better than theirs, the fear of conflict

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

edge when someone else’s idea is better than theirs, the fear of conflict and the discomfort it entails is greatly diminished. When there is trust,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and the discomfort it entails is greatly diminished. When there is trust, conflict becomes nothing but the pursuit of truth, an attempt to find

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

conflict becomes nothing but the pursuit of truth, an attempt to find the best possible answer. It is not only okay but desirable. Conflict

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the best possible answer. It is not only okay but desirable. Conflict without trust, however, is politics, an attempt to manipulate others in COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

without trust, however, is politics, an attempt to manipulate others in order to win an argument regardless of the truth.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

order to win an argument regardless of the truth.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

trust one another, when they

NOT FOR RESALE

trust one another, when they know that everyone on the

NOT FOR RESALEknow that everyone on the

team is capable of admitting

NOT FOR RESALEteam is capable of admitting

when they don’t have the

NOT FOR RESALE

when they don’t have the right answer, and when

NOT FOR RESALE

right answer, and when they’re willing to acknowl-

NOT FOR RESALE

they’re willing to acknowl-edge when someone else’s idea is better than theirs, the fear of conflict

NOT FOR RESALE

edge when someone else’s idea is better than theirs, the fear of conflict and the discomfort it entails is greatly diminished. When there is trust,

NOT FOR RESALE

and the discomfort it entails is greatly diminished. When there is trust, conflict becomes nothing but the pursuit of truth, an attempt to find

NOT FOR RESALE

conflict becomes nothing but the pursuit of truth, an attempt to find the best possible answer. It is not only okay but desirable. Conflict

NOT FOR RESALE

the best possible answer. It is not only okay but desirable. Conflict without trust, however, is politics, an attempt to manipulate others in NOT FOR R

ESALE

without trust, however, is politics, an attempt to manipulate others in NOT FOR RESALE


La


39

Conflict Intolerance

Early in my career, I worked on a team with a CEO who

couldn’t tolerate and, in fact, actively discouraged conflict.

As a result, his staff meetings were generally boring and not

terribly useful.

One day a few of the members of the executive team

started to argue. I remember it well because it was the

most interesting thing I’d seen happen at a meeting, and

because people were finally digging into issues that

needed to be discussed. It was uncomfortable, no doubt,

as people were finally airing their frustrations with one

another about the direction of the organization. But it was

real.

Suddenly the CEO pushed back his chair, stood up, and

announced, “I don’t have time for this.” And he walked out

of the room.

His message could not have been clearer: I would rather

have boring, ineffective meetings that avoid the real issues

than have to endure the discomfort of conflict. From then

on, meetings continued to be a struggle, resulting in poor

decisions being made.

One of those decisions, a critical one about product

direction, probably didn’t get more than a few minutes

of discussion at an executive staff meeting. It turned out to

be a backbreaker, resulting in hundreds of lost jobs, lost

customers, and ultimately a greatly diminished stock price.

More than a decade later, industry analysts and former

leader. Every endeavor of importance in life, whether it is creative, athletic, interpersonal, or academic, brings with it a measure of discom-fort, calling to mind the old saying, “No pain, no gain.” And when we avoid necessary pain, we not only fail to experience the gain, we also end up making the pain worse in the long run.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Early in my career, I worked on a team with a CEO who

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Early in my career, I worked on a team with a CEO who

couldn’t tolerate and, in fact, actively discouraged conflict.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL couldn’t tolerate and, in fact, actively discouraged conflict.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of the room.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of the room.

His message could not have been clearer: COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

His message could not have been clearer: NOT FOR R

ESALEOne day a few of the members of the executive team

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEstarted to argue. I remember it well because it was the


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

40

conflict AvoidanceAvoiding conflict creates problems even beyond boring meetings and poorly vetted decisions, as bad as those things are. When leadership team members avoid discomfort among themselves, they only transfer

it in far greater quantities to larger groups of people throughout the organization they’re supposed to be serv-ing. In essence, they leave it to others below them to try to resolve issues that really must be addressed at the top. This contributes to employee angst and job misery as much as anything else in organiza-tional life.

As critical as conflict is, it’s important to understand that different people, different families, and different cultures participate in conflict in different ways. All other things being equal (and they almost never are), an organization in Japan will look very different from one in Italy when it comes to how it engages in conflict. And for that matter, a team in New York City may look quite different from one in Los Angeles. And that’s okay, because there is more than one way to engage in healthy conflict. What’s not okay is for team members to avoid disagreement,

When leadership team

members avoid discomfort

among themselves, they only

transfer it in far greater

quantities to larger groups

of people throughout the

organization they’re supposed

to be serving.

employees shake their heads at the apparent stupidity of

the decision. What they don’t know is that it wasn’t the

result of any intellectual deficiency, but rather the unwilling-

ness of the leader to endure the discomfort of healthy con-

flict and allow his direct reports to get to the heart of critical

issues.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Avoiding conflict creates problems even beyond boring meetings and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Avoiding conflict creates problems even beyond boring meetings and

poorly vetted decisions, as bad as those things are. When leadership

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

poorly vetted decisions, as bad as those things are. When leadership team members avoid discomfort among themselves, they only transfer

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team members avoid discomfort among themselves, they only transfer it in far greater quantities

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it in far greater quantities to larger groups of people

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to larger groups of people throughout the organization

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

throughout the organization

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


to be serving.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to be serving.

NOT FOR RESALE

it in far greater quantities

NOT FOR RESALE

it in far greater quantities to larger groups of people

NOT FOR RESALEto larger groups of people

throughout the organization

NOT FOR RESALEthroughout the organization

they’re supposed to be serv

NOT FOR RESALE

they’re supposed to be serving. I

NOT FOR RESALE

ing. Ito others below them to try

NOT FOR RESALE

to others below them to try

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La


41

hold back their opinions on important matters, and choose their battles carefully based on the likely cost of disagreement. That is a recipe for both bad decision making and interpersonal resentment.

Why would team members who don’t engage in conflict start to resent one another? When people fail to be honest with one another about an issue they disagree on, their disagreement around that issue festers and ferments over time until it transforms into frustration around that person.

When someone comes to a meeting and states an opinion or makes a suggestion that his teammates don’t agree with, those teammates have a choice: they can explain their disagreement and work through it, or they can withhold their opinion and allow themselves to quietly lose respect for their colleague. When team members get used to choosing the latter option—withholding their opinions—frustration inevitably sets in. Essen-tially, they’re deciding to tolerate their colleague rather than trust him.

As time goes on, they barely conceal their eye-rolling or sighs of exasperation whenever that colleague speaks. For the employee who is being merely tolerated, the treatment starts to feel hurtful and dis-respectful, which is hard for that person to understand. It isn’t difficult to see how this behavior erodes the cohesiveness of a team.

As an Irish-Italian-American, I seem to have come out of the womb ready for passionate conflict, and I was certainly able to practice it regularly during childhood. However, some of the members of my team at work came from families that rarely shouted or demonstrated outward disapproval with one another. This creates a potential problem. To mitigate it, team members have to be open and vulnerable enough to explain their conflict tendencies to one another and then find common ground. Using a profiling assessment like the Myers-Briggs can be helpful in this process because people’s attitudes toward conflict can be shaped by their personalities and behavioral preferences as much as by their families and cultural backgrounds.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL When someone comes to a meeting and states an opinion or makes a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL When someone comes to a meeting and states an opinion or makes a

suggestion that his teammates don’t agree with, those teammates have a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

suggestion that his teammates don’t agree with, those teammates have a choice: they can explain their disagreement and work through it, or they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

choice: they can explain their disagreement and work through it, or they can withhold their opinion and allow themselves to quietly lose respect for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

can withhold their opinion and allow themselves to quietly lose respect for their colleague. When team members get used to choosing the latter

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their colleague. When team members get used to choosing the latter option—withholding their opinions—frustration inevitably sets in. Essen-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

option—withholding their opinions—frustration inevitably sets in. Essen-tially, they’re deciding to tolerate their colleague rather than trust him.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tially, they’re deciding to tolerate their colleague rather than trust him.As time goes on, they barely conceal their eye-rolling or sighs of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As time goes on, they barely conceal their eye-rolling or sighs of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

exasperation whenever that colleague speaks. For the employee who is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

exasperation whenever that colleague speaks. For the employee who is being merely tolerated, the treatment starts to feel hurtful and dis

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

being merely tolerated, the treatment starts to feel hurtful and diswhich is hard for that person to understand. It isn’t difficult

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

which is hard for that person to understand. It isn’t difficult to see how this behavior erodes the cohesiveness of a team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to see how this behavior erodes the cohesiveness of a team.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As an Irish-Italian-American, I seem to have come out of the womb

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As an Irish-Italian-American, I seem to have come out of the womb ready for passionate conflict, and I was certainly able to practice it COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

ready for passionate conflict, and I was certainly able to practice it regularly during childhood. However, some of the members of my team COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

regularly during childhood. However, some of the members of my team NOT FOR R

ESALEcan withhold their opinion and allow themselves to quietly lose respect for

NOT FOR RESALE

can withhold their opinion and allow themselves to quietly lose respect for their colleague. When team members get used to choosing the latter

NOT FOR RESALEtheir colleague. When team members get used to choosing the latter

option—withholding their opinions—frustration inevitably sets in. Essen-

NOT FOR RESALEoption—withholding their opinions—frustration inevitably sets in. Essen-

tially, they’re deciding to tolerate their colleague rather than trust him.

NOT FOR RESALE

tially, they’re deciding to tolerate their colleague rather than trust him.As time goes on, they barely conceal their eye-rolling or sighs of

NOT FOR RESALE

As time goes on, they barely conceal their eye-rolling or sighs of

NOT FOR RESALE

exasperation whenever that colleague speaks. For the employee who is

NOT FOR RESALE

exasperation whenever that colleague speaks. For the employee who is being merely tolerated, the treatment starts to feel hurtful and dis

NOT FOR RESALE

being merely tolerated, the treatment starts to feel hurtful and diswhich is hard for that person to understand. It isn’t difficult

NOT FOR RESALE

which is hard for that person to understand. It isn’t difficult to see how this behavior erodes the cohesiveness of a team.

NOT FOR RESALE

to see how this behavior erodes the cohesiveness of a team.

NOT FOR RESALE

As an Irish-Italian-American, I seem to have come out of the womb NOT FOR RESALE

As an Irish-Italian-American, I seem to have come out of the womb ready for passionate conflict, and I was certainly able to practice it NOT FOR R

ESALE

ready for passionate conflict, and I was certainly able to practice it


La

The Advantage

42

conflict continuumWhen it comes to the range of different conflict dynamics in an organiza-tion, I’ve found there is a continuum of sorts. At one end of that continuum is no conflict at all. I call this artificial harmony, because it is marked by a lot of false smiling and disingenuous agreement around just about everything, at least publicly. At the other end of the continuum is relentless, nasty, and destructive conflict, with people constantly at one another’s throats. As you move away from the extreme of artificial harmony, you encounter more and more constructive conflict. Some-where in the middle of those two extremes is the demarcation line where good, constructive conflict crosses over into the destructive kind.

The Conflict Continuum

Constructive Destructive

Ideal Conflict Point

ArtificialHarmony

Mean-SpiritedPersonal Attacks

Contrary to what we see in movies and on television, where people go to meetings and argue like battle-tested generals, most organizations live somewhere fairly close to the artificial harmony end of this con-tinuum. They go out of their way to avoid direct, uncomfortable dis-agreement during meetings or doing anything that would suggest moving away from their comfortable end of the scale. Why? Because whenever they move down the line toward the middle, to that place where they’re having more and more constructive conflict, they see themselves one step closer to conflict Armageddon. So they run back to the world of passive, indirect communication and artificial agreement.

The optimal place to be on this continuum is just to the left of the demarcation line (the Ideal Conflict Point). That would be the point


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another’s throats. As you move away from the extreme of artificial

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another’s throats. As you move away from the extreme of artificial harmony, you encounter more and more constructive conflict. Some-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL harmony, you encounter more and more constructive conflict. Some-

where in the middle of those two extremes is the demarcation line where

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

where in the middle of those two extremes is the demarcation line where good, constructive conflict crosses over into the destructive kind.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

good, constructive conflict crosses over into the destructive kind.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Contrary to what we see in movies and on television, where people

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Contrary to what we see in movies and on television, where people go to meetings and argue like battle-tested generals, most organizations COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

go to meetings and argue like battle-tested generals, most organizations live somewhere fairly close to the artificial harmony end of this con-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

live somewhere fairly close to the artificial harmony end of this con-NOT FOR R

ESALE

Destructive

NOT FOR RESALE

Destructive

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Contrary to what we see in movies and on television, where people NOT FOR RESALE

Contrary to what we see in movies and on television, where people go to meetings and argue like battle-tested generals, most organizations NOT FOR R

ESALE

go to meetings and argue like battle-tested generals, most organizations


La


43

The Benefits of Surviving Conflict

One of our consultants experienced the benefits of stepping

over the line when he was working with a leasing company.

He was helping the CEO, president, and other executives

deal with some issues relating to compensation and equity.

Evidently, changes had recently been made that weren’t

popular among many members of the team.

At one point during the awkward conversation, one of

the top sales execs looked at the president and exploded:

“You know, the real reason we’re here is that you have simply

become greedy and we’ve become nothing but highly com-

pensated laborers!”

A long, uncomfortable pause followed. The president

seemed to be in shock and the other executives were looking

at the consultant to see what he would do to salvage the situ-

ation. Resisting the temptation to dive in, he let the moment

continue so that the team would eventually reengage.

where a team is engaged in all the constructive conflict they could pos-sibly have, but never stepping over the line into destructive territory. Of course, this is impossible. In any team, and for that matter, in any family or marriage, someone at some point is going to step over the line and say or do something that isn’t constructive. But rather than fearing this, teams need to accept that it will happen and learn to manage it. They must be willing to live through the messiness of recov-ering from slightly inappropriate conflict, so that they will have the courage to go back to the best place again and again. Eventually they’ll develop the confidence that they can survive an occasional step over the line and can even get stronger and build greater trust with one another when they do. But this will never happen if executives are clinging to the side at the shallow end of the pool in the world of artificial harmony.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ering from slightly inappropriate conflict, so that they will have the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ering from slightly inappropriate conflict, so that they will have the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL courage to go back to the best place again and again. Eventually they’ll

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL courage to go back to the best place again and again. Eventually they’ll

develop the confidence that they can survive an occasional step over

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

develop the confidence that they can survive an occasional step over the line and can even get stronger and build greater trust with one

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the line and can even get stronger and build greater trust with one another when they do. But this will never happen if executives are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another when they do. But this will never happen if executives are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


popular among many members of the team.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

popular among many members of the team.

clinging to the side at the shallow end of the pool in the world of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


Evidently, changes had recently been made that weren’t NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEclinging to the side at the shallow end of the pool in the world of


La

The Advantage

44

Nowhere does this tendency toward artificial harmony show itself more than in mission-driven nonprofit organizations, most notably churches. People who work in those organizations tend to have a mis-guided idea that they cannot be frustrated or disagreeable with one another. What they’re doing is confusing being nice with being kind.

Two people who trust and care about one another and are engaged in something important (that sure sounds like a mission-driven non-profit to me) should feel com-pelled to disagree with one another, sometimes passion-ately, when they see things differently. After all, the con-

Two people who trust and

care about one another and

are engaged in something

important should feel

compelled to disagree, and

sometimes passionately, when

they see things differently.

Finally, after a ten- or fifteen-second pause (which felt

like two minutes to our consultant), the angry sales exec

spoke again: “Wait a minute. That wasn’t fair. I can’t allow a

seven-year relationship to go over the cliff because I lost my

cool. So let me apologize and try that again. You guys

changed the equity policy without telling us why. It was a

change in the rules halfway through the game, and it has led

to a lot of hard feelings.”

The president accepted the apology, and suddenly the

rest of the team started airing some of the concerns that

they had been withholding for a long time. At the end of the

meeting—and this time I’m not joking—the sales exec went

over to the president and gave him a hug. It was a break-

through for the team, and it would not have happened had

someone not stepped over the line—and if the consultant

had not allowed them to work through it.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The president accepted the apology, and suddenly the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The president accepted the apology, and suddenly the

rest of the team started airing some of the concerns that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL rest of the team started airing some of the concerns that


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Nowhere does this tendency toward artificial harmony show itself

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Nowhere does this tendency toward artificial harmony show itself more than in mission-driven nonprofit organizations, most notably

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more than in mission-driven nonprofit organizations, most notably churches. People who work in those organizations tend to have a mis-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

churches. People who work in those organizations tend to have a mis-guided idea that they cannot be frustrated or disagreeable with one

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

guided idea that they cannot be frustrated or disagreeable with one another. What they’re doing is confusing being nice with being kind.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another. What they’re doing is confusing being nice with being kind.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Two people who trust and COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Two people who trust and


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEthrough for the team, and it would not have happened had

NOT FOR RESALE

Nowhere does this tendency toward artificial harmony show itself

NOT FOR RESALE

Nowhere does this tendency toward artificial harmony show itself more than in mission-driven nonprofit organizations, most notably

NOT FOR RESALE

more than in mission-driven nonprofit organizations, most notably churches. People who work in those organizations tend to have a mis-

NOT FOR RESALE

churches. People who work in those organizations tend to have a mis-guided idea that they cannot be frustrated or disagreeable with one

NOT FOR RESALE

guided idea that they cannot be frustrated or disagreeable with one another. What they’re doing is confusing being nice with being kind.NOT FOR R

ESALE

another. What they’re doing is confusing being nice with being kind.


NOT FOR RESALEsomeone not stepped over the line—and if the consultant


NOT FOR RESALE



La


45

sequences of making bad decisions are great. When leader ship team members fail to disagree around issues, not only are they increasing the likelihood of losing respect for one another and encountering destructive conflict later when people start griping in the hallways, they’re also making bad decisions and letting down the people they’re supposed to be serving. And they do this all in the name of being “nice.”

conflict ToolsEven when teams understand the importance of conflict, it is frequently difficult to get them to engage in it. That’s how powerful our cultural aversion is to discomfort. In order to break through that aversion, there are a few things that a team leader can do.

One of the best ways for leaders to raise the level of healthy conflict on a team is by mining for conflict during meetings. This happens when they suspect that unearthed disagreement is lurking in the room and gently demand that people come clean. At first, mining for conflict might seem like stirring the pot and looking for trouble. But it is quite the opposite. By looking for and exposing potential and even subtle disagreements that have not come to the surface, team leaders—and, heck, team members can do it too—avoid the destructive hallway conversations that inevitably result when people are reluctant to engage in direct, productive debate.

Another tool for increasing conflict is something I refer to as real-time permission. The idea here is that people need to get immediate feedback, the positive kind, when they start to try out this approach to conflict. And no matter how minor the nature of that initial conflict might seem, it is going to be uncomfortable.

So when a leader sees her people engaging in disagreement during a meeting, even over something relatively innocuous, she should do something that may seem counterintuitive but is remarkably helpful: interrupt. That’s right. Just as people are beginning to challenge one


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Even when teams understand the importance of conflict, it is frequently

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Even when teams understand the importance of conflict, it is frequently

difficult to get them to engage in it. That’s how powerful our cultural

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

difficult to get them to engage in it. That’s how powerful our cultural aversion is to discomfort. In order to break through that aversion, there

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

aversion is to discomfort. In order to break through that aversion, there are a few things that a team leader can do.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are a few things that a team leader can do.One of the best ways for leaders to raise the level of healthy conflict

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

One of the best ways for leaders to raise the level of healthy conflict mining for conflict

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mining for conflict during meetings. This happens when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

during meetings. This happens when mining for conflict during meetings. This happens when mining for conflict

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mining for conflict during meetings. This happens when mining for conflictthey suspect that unearthed disagreement is lurking in the room and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they suspect that unearthed disagreement is lurking in the room and gently demand that people come clean. At first, mining for conflict

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

gently demand that people come clean. At first, mining for conflict might seem like stirring the pot and looking for trouble. But it is quite

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

might seem like stirring the pot and looking for trouble. But it is quite the opposite. By looking for and exposing potential and even subtle

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the opposite. By looking for and exposing potential and even subtle disagreements that have not come to the surface, team leaders—and,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

disagreements that have not come to the surface, team leaders—and, heck, team members can do it too—avoid the destructive hallway

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

heck, team members can do it too—avoid the destructive hallway conversations that inevitably result when people are reluctant to engage

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

conversations that inevitably result when people are reluctant to engage in direct, productive debate.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

in direct, productive debate.Another tool for increasing conflict is something I refer to as COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Another tool for increasing conflict is something I refer to as NOT FOR R

ESALEOne of the best ways for leaders to raise the level of healthy conflict

NOT FOR RESALEOne of the best ways for leaders to raise the level of healthy conflict

during meetings. This happens when

NOT FOR RESALE during meetings. This happens when

they suspect that unearthed disagreement is lurking in the room and

NOT FOR RESALE

they suspect that unearthed disagreement is lurking in the room and gently demand that people come clean. At first, mining for conflict

NOT FOR RESALE

gently demand that people come clean. At first, mining for conflict might seem like stirring the pot and looking for trouble. But it is quite

NOT FOR RESALE

might seem like stirring the pot and looking for trouble. But it is quite the opposite. By looking for and exposing potential and even subtle

NOT FOR RESALE

the opposite. By looking for and exposing potential and even subtle disagreements that have not come to the surface, team leaders—and,

NOT FOR RESALE

disagreements that have not come to the surface, team leaders—and, heck, team members can do it too—avoid the destructive hallway

NOT FOR RESALE

heck, team members can do it too—avoid the destructive hallway conversations that inevitably result when people are reluctant to engage NOT FOR R

ESALE

conversations that inevitably result when people are reluctant to engage in direct, productive debate.NOT FOR R

ESALE

in direct, productive debate.


La

The Advantage

46

Rules of engagement

One of our consultants worked with the leadership team of

a division within a large beverage company. He convinced

the VP of that division that more conflict was necessary on

the team. Unfortunately, they were having a hard time getting

people to engage in it. This is typical.

So the VP put in place two formal rules.

First, if people remained silent during discussions, he

would interpret that as disagreement. People quickly realized

that if they didn’t weigh in, a decision could not be made.

Second, at the end of every discussion, the VP would go

around the room and ask every member of his team for a

formal commitment to the decision.

These simple rules changed the nature of their meetings

and increased healthy conflict almost immediately. This

another, she should stop them for a moment to remind them that what they are doing is good.

That may sound a little patronizing, even childish, but it won’t come across that way. What it will do is give people the permission they need to overcome their guilt—and they’ll definitely be fighting off feelings of guilt—and continue to engage in healthy but uncomfortable conflict without unnecessary and distracting tension. I’ve done this with many of the teams I work with, and they are always genuinely relieved to have someone remind them, right in that moment, that they are actually helping the team by disagreeing, not hurting it. Their tension seems to melt away and they’re able to focus on resolving the issue at hand.

Another way that leaders can help their teams overcome their aver-sion to conflict is by creating clear expectations and guidelines around what it should entail.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

with many of the teams I work with, and they are always genuinely

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

with many of the teams I work with, and they are always genuinely

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL relieved to have someone remind them, right in that moment, that they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL relieved to have someone remind them, right in that moment, that they

are actually helping the team by disagreeing, not hurting it. Their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are actually helping the team by disagreeing, not hurting it. Their tension seems to melt away and they’re able to focus on resolving the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tension seems to melt away and they’re able to focus on resolving the

Another way that leaders can help their teams overcome their aver-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Another way that leaders can help their teams overcome their aver-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Rules of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Rules of


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


the team. Unfortunately, they were having a hard time getting COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the team. Unfortunately, they were having a hard time getting

sion to conflict is by creating clear expectations and guidelines around

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALEAnother way that leaders can help their teams overcome their aver-

NOT FOR RESALEAnother way that leaders can help their teams overcome their aver-

NOT FOR RESALE

Rules of

NOT FOR RESALE

Rules of e

NOT FOR RESALE

engagement

NOT FOR RESALE

ngagement


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


the VP of that division that more conflict was necessary on NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEsion to conflict is by creating clear expectations and guidelines around


La


47

Finally, it’s important to remember that the reluctance to engage in conflict is not always a problem of conflict per se. In many cases, and perhaps in most of them, the real problem goes back to a lack of trust. Remember that when team members aren’t comfortable being vulnerable, they aren’t going to feel comfortable or safe engaging in conflict. If that’s the case, then no amount of training or discussion around conflict is going to bring it about. Trust must be established if real conflict is to occur.

In a similar way that trust enables conflict, conflict allows a team to move on to the next critical behavior of a cohesive team: achieving commitment.

would not have happened had the VP simply told his team

that they should engage in more conflict.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL the case, then no amount of training or discussion around conflict is going

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL the case, then no amount of training or discussion around conflict is going

to bring it about. Trust must be established if real conflict is to occur.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to bring it about. Trust must be established if real conflict is to occur.

In a similar way that trust enables conflict, conflict allows a team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In a similar way that trust enables conflict, conflict allows a team to move on to the next critical behavior of a cohesive team: achieving

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to move on to the next critical behavior of a cohesive team: achieving

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

48

BeHAvIOR 3: ACHIevIng COmmITmenT

The reason that conflict is so important is that a team cannot achieve commitment without it. People will not actively commit to a decision if they have not had the opportunity to provide input, ask questions, and understand the rationale behind it. Another way to say this is, “If people don’t weigh in, they can’t buy in.”

This is a critical point and needs to be clarified because it should not be misinterpreted as an argument for consensus. When leadership

teams wait for con sensus before taking action, they usually end up with decisions that are made too late and are mildly disagreeable to every-one. This is a recipe for medi-ocrity and frustration.

Great teams avoid the consensus trap by embrac-ing a concept that Intel, the legendary microchip manu-facturer, calls “disagree and commit.” Basically they

believe that even when people can’t come to an agreement around an issue, they must still leave the room unambiguously committed to a common course of action. Most executives who hear about this disagree-and-commit philosophy are immediately convinced that it is something they want. But they need to remember that it requires a willingness on the part of the leader to invite the discomfort of conflict. After all, the principle of disagree and commit can’t happen without the disagree part.

See, it’s only when colleagues speak up and put their opinions on the table, without holding back, that the leader can confidently fulfill

When leadership teams wait

for consensus before taking

action, they usually end up

with decisions that are made

too late and are mildly

disagreeable to everyone. This

is a recipe for mediocrity and

frustration.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This is a critical point and needs to be clarified because it should not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This is a critical point and needs to be clarified because it should not be misinterpreted as an argument for consensus. When leadership

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL be misinterpreted as an argument for consensus. When leadership

teams wait for con

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

teams wait for conbefore taking action, they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

before taking action, they usually end up with decisions

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

usually end up with decisions that are made too late and are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that are made too late and are mildly disagreeable to every-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mildly disagreeable to every-

believe that even when people can’t come to an agreement around an COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

believe that even when people can’t come to an agreement around an COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

usually end up with decisions

NOT FOR RESALE

usually end up with decisions that are made too late and are

NOT FOR RESALEthat are made too late and are

mildly disagreeable to every-

NOT FOR RESALEmildly disagreeable to every-

one. This is a recipe for medi-

NOT FOR RESALE

one. This is a recipe for medi-ocrity and frustration.

NOT FOR RESALE

ocrity and frustration.

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


49

one of his most important responsibilities: breaking ties. When a leader knows that everyone on the team has weighed in and provided every possible perspective needed for a fully informed decision, he can then bring a discussion to a clear and unambiguous close and expect team members to rally around the final decision even if they initially dis-agreed with it.

Some leaders have a hard time believing this. They feel that if they entertain disagreement around a contentious topic, they’ll make it less likely that they’ll be able to gain commitment. But this is selling their employees short. The truth is, very few people in the world are incapable of supporting a decision merely because they had a different idea. Most people are generally reasonable and can rally around an idea that wasn’t their own as long as they know they’ve had a chance to weigh in. But when there has been no conflict, when dif-ferent opinions have not been aired and debated, it becomes virtually impossible for team members to commit to a decision, at least not actively.

When people leave a meeting without active commitment around a decision, they don’t go back to their offices and design a plan to sabo-tage the idea. That happens only on television and in the movies, and it makes for great theater. In real life, what actually happens is far more boring—and more dangerous.

Most leaders have learned the art of passive agreement: going to a meeting, smiling and nodding their heads when a decision is made that they don’t agree with. They then go back to their offices and do as little as possible to support that idea. They don’t promote it on their own team, and they certainly aren’t willing to run out onto the tracks waving their arms to prevent a train wreck. Instead, they sit back and watch problems develop, quietly looking forward to the day when things go badly and they can say, “Well, I never really liked that idea in the first place.” The impact of this is often embarrassing and costly for the organization.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they entertain disagreement around a contentious topic, they’ll

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they entertain disagreement around a contentious topic, they’ll make it less likely that they’ll be able to gain commitment. But this

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL make it less likely that they’ll be able to gain commitment. But this

is selling their employees short. The truth is, very few people in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is selling their employees short. The truth is, very few people in the world are incapable of supporting a decision merely because they had

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

world are incapable of supporting a decision merely because they had a different idea. Most people are generally reasonable and can rally

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a different idea. Most people are generally reasonable and can rally around an idea that wasn’t their own as long as they know they’ve had

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

around an idea that wasn’t their own as long as they know they’ve had a chance to weigh in. But when there has been no conflict, when dif-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a chance to weigh in. But when there has been no conflict, when dif-ferent opinions have not been aired and debated, it becomes virtually

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ferent opinions have not been aired and debated, it becomes virtually

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

impossible for team members to commit to a decision, at least not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


When people leave a meeting without active commitment around

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When people leave a meeting without active commitment around a decision, they don’t go back to their offices and design a plan to sabo-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a decision, they don’t go back to their offices and design a plan to sabo-tage the idea. That happens only on television and in the movies, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tage the idea. That happens only on television and in the movies, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it makes for great theater. In real life, what actually happens is far more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it makes for great theater. In real life, what actually happens is far more boring—and more dangerous.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

boring—and more dangerous.Most leaders have learned the art of passive agreement: going to a COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Most leaders have learned the art of passive agreement: going to a NOT FOR R

ESALEa different idea. Most people are generally reasonable and can rally

NOT FOR RESALE

a different idea. Most people are generally reasonable and can rally around an idea that wasn’t their own as long as they know they’ve had

NOT FOR RESALEaround an idea that wasn’t their own as long as they know they’ve had

a chance to weigh in. But when there has been no conflict, when dif-

NOT FOR RESALEa chance to weigh in. But when there has been no conflict, when dif-


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


When people leave a meeting without active commitment around

NOT FOR RESALE

When people leave a meeting without active commitment around a decision, they don’t go back to their offices and design a plan to sabo-

NOT FOR RESALE

a decision, they don’t go back to their offices and design a plan to sabo-tage the idea. That happens only on television and in the movies, and

NOT FOR RESALE

tage the idea. That happens only on television and in the movies, and

NOT FOR RESALE

it makes for great theater. In real life, what actually happens is far more NOT FOR RESALE

it makes for great theater. In real life, what actually happens is far more boring—and more dangerous.NOT FOR R

ESALE

boring—and more dangerous.


La

The Advantage

50

The price of passivity

The leadership team at an international pharmaceutical

company realized that its sales were beginning to decline

and that its expenses were heading in the opposite direction.

During a staff meeting, the CEO decided that in an effort to

curb costs, a moratorium would be placed on all first-class

and business-class air travel. This would not be easy for

people who traveled frequently and far.

As usual, no debate was encouraged among the

team. Executives simply nodded their heads in agreement,

something the CEO was all too happy to accept as

commitment.

Well, half of the executives at the meeting went to their

teams and gave them the unpopular order to change the

way they traveled. The other half told their staff members to

ignore the decree. When people in the organization started

to notice the discrepancy in behavior among departments,

anger and frustration broke out.

Employees in the obedient departments were upset at

their respective leaders for holding them to a higher and

more difficult standard than their peers in other parts of

the organization. Those leaders were mad at their colleagues

on the executive team who had ignored the supposed

agreement.

The cost of not achieving real commitment—a result of

not engaging in healthy conflict—was undeniable. Forget

about the financial cost of people continuing to fly business

class. It pales in comparison to the loss in credibility that

executives encountered and the internal politics that they

created because they failed to achieve real, active commit-

ment around a decision.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL As usual, no debate was encouraged among the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL As usual, no debate was encouraged among the


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


on the executive team who had ignored the supposed COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


agreement.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

agreement.

NOT FOR RESALEWell, half of the executives at the meeting went to their

NOT FOR RESALEWell, half of the executives at the meeting went to their


NOT FOR RESALEteams and gave them the unpopular order to change the


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

the organization. Those leaders were mad at their colleagues NOT FOR RESALE


on the executive team who had ignored the supposed NOT FOR RESALE



La


51

The only way to prevent passive sabotage is for leaders to demand conflict from their team members and to let them know that they are going to be held accountable for doing whatever the team ultimately decides.

specific AgreementsI’ve always been amazed that even teams that embrace conflict and honest debate can still struggle with commitment. That’s because they fall short of arriving at specific agreements at the end of their discus-sions. Although they are sitting in the same room and speaking the same language, they often leave with different ideas about what was just decided. There is only one way I know to prevent this.

At the end of every meeting, cohesive teams must take a few minutes to ensure that everyone sitting at the table is walking away with the same understanding about what has been agreed to and what they are committed to do. Unfortunately, people are usually eager to leave the room when a meeting is coming to a close, and so they are more than susceptible to tolerating a little ambiguity. That’s why functional teams maintain the discipline to review their commit-ments and stick around long enough to clarify anything that isn’t crystal clear.

A good way to ensure that people take this process seriously is to demand that they go back to their teams after the meeting and com-municate exactly what was agreed on. When team members know that they are going to have to stand in front of the people they lead and vouch for a decision, they are much more likely to push back on that decision if they don’t understand it or don’t agree with it. As painful as this may be to a group of executives who are more than ready to get out of a meeting, the only thing more painful than taking additional time to get clarity and commitment is going out into the organization with a confusing and misaligned message.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

honest debate can still struggle with commitment. That’s because they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

honest debate can still struggle with commitment. That’s because they fall short of arriving at specific agreements at the end of their discus-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL fall short of arriving at specific agreements at the end of their discus-

sions. Although they are sitting in the same room and speaking the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sions. Although they are sitting in the same room and speaking the same language, they often leave with different ideas about what was

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

same language, they often leave with different ideas about what was just decided. There is only one way I know to prevent this.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

just decided. There is only one way I know to prevent this.At the end of every meeting, cohesive teams must take a few

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

At the end of every meeting, cohesive teams must take a few minutes to ensure that everyone sitting at the table is walking away

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

minutes to ensure that everyone sitting at the table is walking away with the same understanding about what has been agreed to and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

with the same understanding about what has been agreed to and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what they are committed to do. Unfortunately, people are usually

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what they are committed to do. Unfortunately, people are usually eager to leave the room when a meeting is coming to a close, and so

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

eager to leave the room when a meeting is coming to a close, and so they are more than susceptible to tolerating a little ambiguity. That’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they are more than susceptible to tolerating a little ambiguity. That’s why functional teams maintain the discipline to review their commit-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

why functional teams maintain the discipline to review their commit-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ments and stick around long enough to clarify anything that isn’t crystal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


A good way to ensure that people take this process seriously is to COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A good way to ensure that people take this process seriously is to demand that they go back to their teams after the meeting and com-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

demand that they go back to their teams after the meeting and com-NOT FOR R

ESALEjust decided. There is only one way I know to prevent this.

NOT FOR RESALE

just decided. There is only one way I know to prevent this.At the end of every meeting, cohesive teams must take a few

NOT FOR RESALEAt the end of every meeting, cohesive teams must take a few

minutes to ensure that everyone sitting at the table is walking away

NOT FOR RESALEminutes to ensure that everyone sitting at the table is walking away


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

what they are committed to do. Unfortunately, people are usually

NOT FOR RESALE

what they are committed to do. Unfortunately, people are usually eager to leave the room when a meeting is coming to a close, and so

NOT FOR RESALE

eager to leave the room when a meeting is coming to a close, and so they are more than susceptible to tolerating a little ambiguity. That’s

NOT FOR RESALE

they are more than susceptible to tolerating a little ambiguity. That’s why functional teams maintain the discipline to review their commit-

NOT FOR RESALE

why functional teams maintain the discipline to review their commit-

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


A good way to ensure that people take this process seriously is to NOT FOR RESALE

A good way to ensure that people take this process seriously is to


La

The Advantage

52

misalignment nightmare


an information technology organization to clarify the depart-

ment’s core purpose and values. After the meeting, the con-

sultant encouraged the team to keep working until they were

crystal clear with one another about the purpose and values

before doing any communication to the rest of the

organization.

The team promised to meet again later to iron out any

possible inconsistencies. Unfortunately, they never got

around to doing that and decided to go ahead and have a

big rollout meeting to unveil the new purpose and values to

the more than fifty managers who worked for them.

At that meeting, a handful of leaders from the executive

team began the presentation and were quickly met with

push-back around their ideas. Unfortunately, that push-back

came not from one of the fifty managers but from a member

of the executive team who decided to announce that he never

really liked or bought into what was being presented.

The people in the room were dumbfounded. Not only did

the executive team’s failure to get commitment negate the

impact of the work they had done, it also caused them to

lose credibility among the people they were trying to lead.

“We looked foolish, and rightly so,” admitted the leader of the

executive team. “We couldn’t even agree among ourselves,

and we were out there asking the rest of the organization to

get on board. I vowed that it would never happen again.”

After the next executive off-site meeting, the team

insisted on getting completely clear about the commitments

they were making. And when they communicated to the

larger group, not only did they demonstrate alignment, but

they modeled vulnerability by acknowledging the dysfunc-

tion of what had happened before and the steps they would

take to prevent it in the future.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The team promised to meet again later to iron out any

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The team promised to meet again later to iron out any


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


lose credibility among the people they were trying to lead. COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


“We looked foolish, and rightly so,” admitted the leader of the COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“We looked foolish, and rightly so,” admitted the leader of the

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEthe more than fifty managers who worked for them.


NOT FOR RESALEAt that meeting, a handful of leaders from the executive


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


impact of the work they had done, it also caused them to NOT FOR RESALE


lose credibility among the people they were trying to lead. NOT FOR RESALE



La


53

Although few would doubt the importance of achieving active and clear commitment at the end of a discussion, many don’t really think about the practical reason that that is so critical. It’s only when people know that their peers have completely bought in to a decision that they will have the courage to embrace the fourth and most difficult behavior of a cohesive team: accountability.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

The Advantage

54

BeHAvIOR 4: emBRACIng ACCOUnTABILITY

Even well-intentioned members of a team need to be held accountable if a team is going to stick to its decisions and accomplish its goals. In some cases, people will deviate from a plan or a decision knowingly, tempted to do something that is in their individual best interest but not that of the team. In other cases, people will stray without realizing it, getting distracted or caught up in the pushes and pulls of daily work. In either case, it’s the job of the team to call those people out and keep them in line.

Of course, people aren’t going to be willing to do this if they have doubts about whether their peers bought into—really bought into—the decisions that were made. That’s why commitment is so important. When colleagues know that there has been only passive commitment around a decision, they aren’t going to feel good about confronting a peer about their behavior. Nor should they. After all, if a person never really bought into something, why would she heed a reminder from a peer who points out her deviation?

peer pressureNotice that I’m focused here on peers. That’s because peer-to-peer accountability is the primary and most effective source of accountability

on the leadership team of a healthy organization. Most people assume that the leader of an executive team should be the primary source of accountability—and that’s the norm in most unhealthy

organizations—but it isn’t efficient or practical, and it makes little sense.

Peer-to-peer accountability is

the primary and most effective

source of accountability on

a leadership team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it, getting distracted or caught up in the pushes and pulls of daily work.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it, getting distracted or caught up in the pushes and pulls of daily work. In either case, it’s the job of the team to call those people out and keep

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL In either case, it’s the job of the team to call those people out and keep

Of course, people aren’t going to be willing to do this if they have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, people aren’t going to be willing to do this if they have doubts about whether their peers bought into—really bought into—

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

doubts about whether their peers bought into—really bought into—the decisions that were made. That’s why commitment is so important.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the decisions that were made. That’s why commitment is so important. When colleagues know that there has been only passive commitment

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When colleagues know that there has been only passive commitment around a decision, they aren’t going to feel good about confronting a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

around a decision, they aren’t going to feel good about confronting a peer about their behavior. Nor should they. After all, if a person never

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

peer about their behavior. Nor should they. After all, if a person never really bought into something, why would she heed a reminder from a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

really bought into something, why would she heed a reminder from a peer who points out her deviation?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

peer who points out her deviation?

essure

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

essureNotice that I’m focused here on peers. That’s because peer-to-peer

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Notice that I’m focused here on peers. That’s because peer-to-peer accountability is the primary and most effective source of accountability COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

accountability is the primary and most effective source of accountability NOT FOR RESALE

doubts about whether their peers bought into—really bought into—

NOT FOR RESALE

doubts about whether their peers bought into—really bought into—the decisions that were made. That’s why commitment is so important.

NOT FOR RESALEthe decisions that were made. That’s why commitment is so important.

When colleagues know that there has been only passive commitment

NOT FOR RESALEWhen colleagues know that there has been only passive commitment

around a decision, they aren’t going to feel good about confronting a

NOT FOR RESALE

around a decision, they aren’t going to feel good about confronting a peer about their behavior. Nor should they. After all, if a person never

NOT FOR RESALE

peer about their behavior. Nor should they. After all, if a person never really bought into something, why would she heed a reminder from a

NOT FOR RESALE

really bought into something, why would she heed a reminder from a peer who points out her deviation?

NOT FOR RESALE

peer who points out her deviation?

Notice that I’m focused here on peers. That’s because peer-to-peer NOT FOR R

ESALE

Notice that I’m focused here on peers. That’s because peer-to-peer accountability is the primary and most effective source of accountability NOT FOR R

ESALE

accountability is the primary and most effective source of accountability


La


55

When members of a team go to their leader whenever they see a peer deviate from a commitment that was made, they create a perfect environment for distraction and politics. Colleagues start to wonder who ratted them out, they get resentful of one another, and the team leader finds herself being constantly pulled into situations that could be more quickly and productively solved without her.

When team members know that their colleagues are truly com mitted to something, they can confront one another about issues without fearing defensiveness or backlash. After all, they’re merely helping someone get back on track or seeking clarity about something that doesn’t seem right. And the person being questioned about her behavior or performance will be willing to admit that she has inadvertently lost her way—after all, she’s vulnerable—and adjust her behavior accordingly.

I realize that people who are used to working on noncohesive teams will think all of this sounds like a fairy tale. To those who have expe-rienced the reality of cohesive teams, it is simply the most effective way to keep one another focused on what matters most.

Accountability in Action

One of our consultants was working with a leadership team

that had been together for less than a year and had not met

in person with one another for a number of months. Inevita-

bly, things were a little rocky.

During an off-site meeting, our consultant led them

through an accountability exercise that calls for team

members to confront one another about each other’s behav-

iors. The exercise, which isn’t as scary as it sounds, usually

takes about an hour. But in this case, because the team had

not been together for so long and because they had made

a major commitment to holding one another accountable,

the session lasted three hours.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to something, they can confront one another about issues without fearing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to something, they can confront one another about issues without fearing defensiveness or backlash. After all, they’re merely helping someone get

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL defensiveness or backlash. After all, they’re merely helping someone get

back on track or seeking clarity about something that doesn’t seem right.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

back on track or seeking clarity about something that doesn’t seem right. And the person being questioned about her behavior or performance will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And the person being questioned about her behavior or performance will be willing to admit that she has inadvertently lost her way—after all, she’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be willing to admit that she has inadvertently lost her way—after all, she’s vulnerable—and adjust her behavior accordingly.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

vulnerable—and adjust her behavior accordingly.I realize that people who are used to working on noncohesive teams

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I realize that people who are used to working on noncohesive teams will think all of this sounds like a fairy tale. To those who have expe-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

will think all of this sounds like a fairy tale. To those who have expe-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rienced the reality of cohesive teams, it is simply the most effective way

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rienced the reality of cohesive teams, it is simply the most effective way to keep one another focused on what matters most.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to keep one another focused on what matters most.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


in person with one another for a number of months. Inevita-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in person with one another for a number of months. Inevita-NOT FOR R

ESALEbe willing to admit that she has inadvertently lost her way—after all, she’s

NOT FOR RESALE

be willing to admit that she has inadvertently lost her way—after all, she’s vulnerable—and adjust her behavior accordingly.

NOT FOR RESALEvulnerable—and adjust her behavior accordingly.

I realize that people who are used to working on noncohesive teams

NOT FOR RESALEI realize that people who are used to working on noncohesive teams


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

rienced the reality of cohesive teams, it is simply the most effective way

NOT FOR RESALE

rienced the reality of cohesive teams, it is simply the most effective way to keep one another focused on what matters most.

NOT FOR RESALE

to keep one another focused on what matters most.


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

that had been together for less than a year and had not met NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

56

Overcoming the “Wuss” FactorThe irony of all this is that the only way for a team to develop a true culture of peer-to-peer accountability is for the leader to demonstrate that she is willing to confront difficult situations and hold people accountable herself. That’s right. The leader of the team, though not the primary source of accountability, will always be the ultimate arbiter of it. If she is reluctant to play that role—if she is a wuss who constantly balks when it’s time to call someone on their behavior or performance—then the rest of the team is not going to do their part. This makes sense. Why would a team member want to confront a colleague about an issue when the team leader isn’t willing to and is probably going to let them off the hook anyway?

Among the comments made during the exercise were

these: “You need to keep standing up to the CEO and not

letting him off the hook when he resorts to unilateral decision

making.” “You’re involving me in conversations that I don’t

need to be involved in. Just go directly to my reports and

get what you need.” “Your reports are not telling you this,

but your sarcastic humor is offensive to them and it’s hurting

your team.” “You’re complaining about me to your peers, but

you’re not coming to me directly. That’s hurting all of us.”

“Watch out for your self-righteous attitude. It shuts down our

brainstorming.”

During those three hours, there was some tension,

no doubt. But there was also a lot of listening, and even

laughter. Most important, there was no hesitation in

speaking up. And though the session took a long time,

the team was able to repair much of the trust that they

had lost over the months that they hadn’t been together,

and they proved to themselves that they were committed

to working together as a functional team going

forward.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL you’re not coming to me directly. That’s hurting all of us.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL you’re not coming to me directly. That’s hurting all of us.”

“Watch out for your self-righteous attitude. It shuts down our

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL “Watch out for your self-righteous attitude. It shuts down our


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcoming the “Wuss” Factor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcoming the “Wuss” FactorThe irony of all this is that the only way for a team to develop a true COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

The irony of all this is that the only way for a team to develop a true culture of peer-to-peer accountability is for the leader to demonstrate COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

culture of peer-to-peer accountability is for the leader to demonstrate


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALElaughter. Most important, there was no hesitation in

NOT FOR RESALEspeaking up. And though the session took a long time,

NOT FOR RESALEspeaking up. And though the session took a long time,


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

Overcoming the “Wuss” Factor

NOT FOR RESALE

Overcoming the “Wuss” FactorThe irony of all this is that the only way for a team to develop a true NOT FOR R

ESALE

The irony of all this is that the only way for a team to develop a true


NOT FOR RESALE



La


57

So—and here is the irony—the more comfortable a leader is holding people on a team accountable, the less likely she is to be asked to do so. The less likely she is to confront people, the more she’ll be called on to do it by subordinates who aren’t willing to do her dirty work for her. I know this because I struggle with holding people accountable, and I am fully aware that the reluctance of my staff members to do so with one another is a simple function of my behavior. (I’m working on it.)

Many leaders struggle with accountability but don’t know it. Some will tell me that since they aren’t afraid to fire people, they must not have an accountability problem. Of course, this is misguided. Firing someone is not necessarily a sign of accountability, but is often the last act of cowardice for a leader who doesn’t know how or isn’t willing to hold people accountable.

At its core, accountability is about having the courage to confront someone about their deficiencies and then to stand in the moment and deal with their reaction, which may not be pleasant. It is a selfless act, one rooted in a word that I don’t use lightly in a business book: love. To hold someone accountable is to care about them enough to risk having them blame you for pointing out their deficiencies.

Unfortunately, it is far more natural, and common, for leaders to avoid holding people accountable. It is one of the biggest obstacles I find preventing teams, and the companies they lead, from reaching their full potential. It’s no surprise that among the teams that complete our Five Dysfunctions of a Team Assessment (see “The Universal Challenge of Peer Account-ability” sidebar), the lowest scores are usually found in the area of accountability.

To hold someone accountable

is to care about them enough

to risk having them blame you

for pointing out their

deficiencies.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Many leaders struggle with accountability but don’t know it. Some

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Many leaders struggle with accountability but don’t know it. Some

will tell me that since they aren’t afraid to fire people, they must not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

will tell me that since they aren’t afraid to fire people, they must not have an accountability problem. Of course, this is misguided. Firing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

have an accountability problem. Of course, this is misguided. Firing someone is not necessarily a sign of accountability, but is often the last

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

someone is not necessarily a sign of accountability, but is often the last act of cowardice for a leader who doesn’t know how or isn’t willing to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

act of cowardice for a leader who doesn’t know how or isn’t willing to

At its core, accountability is about having the courage to confront

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

At its core, accountability is about having the courage to confront someone about their deficiencies and then to stand in the moment and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

someone about their deficiencies and then to stand in the moment and deal with their reaction, which may not be pleasant. It is a selfless act,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

deal with their reaction, which may not be pleasant. It is a selfless act, one rooted in a word that I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one rooted in a word that I don’t use lightly in a business

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

don’t use lightly in a business To hold someone

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

To hold someone accountable is to care about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accountable is to care about them enough to risk having COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

them enough to risk having them blame you for pointing COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

them blame you for pointing NOT FOR R

ESALEsomeone is not necessarily a sign of accountability, but is often the last

NOT FOR RESALE

someone is not necessarily a sign of accountability, but is often the last act of cowardice for a leader who doesn’t know how or isn’t willing to

NOT FOR RESALEact of cowardice for a leader who doesn’t know how or isn’t willing to

At its core, accountability is about having the courage to confront

NOT FOR RESALE

At its core, accountability is about having the courage to confront someone about their deficiencies and then to stand in the moment and

NOT FOR RESALE

someone about their deficiencies and then to stand in the moment and deal with their reaction, which may not be pleasant. It is a selfless act,

NOT FOR RESALE

deal with their reaction, which may not be pleasant. It is a selfless act,

don’t use lightly in a business

NOT FOR RESALE

don’t use lightly in a business To hold someone

NOT FOR RESALE

To hold someone accountable is to care about NOT FOR R

ESALE

accountable is to care about them enough to risk having NOT FOR R

ESALE

them enough to risk having NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

58

THe UnIveRSAL CHALLenge Of peeR ACCOUnTABILITY

The Table Group has identified a major trend plaguing teams

today: team members readily avoid holding their peers account-

able for both their performance and behaviors that might hurt

the team. The trend is a conclusion based on data collected

from The Table Group’s Online Team Assessment, a thirty-eight-

question online tool that measures a team’s likely susceptibility

to the five dysfunctions. In reviewing the 12,000 teams who

have taken the online assessment, data shows a full 65% of

teams scored “red” on accountability—or lowest on The Table

Group’s three-tiered rating scale of green-yellow-red. Other red

scores for the remaining four behaviors include trust (40%),

conflict (36%), commitment (22%), and results (27%).

Percentage of Teams Scoring in Lowest Category

40%

36%

22%

65%

27%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

% of Teams

Trust Conflict Commitment Accountability Results


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL question online tool that measures a team’s likely susceptibility

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL question online tool that measures a team’s likely susceptibility

to the five dysfunctions. In reviewing the 12,000 teams who

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to the five dysfunctions. In reviewing the 12,000 teams who


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

40%COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

40%40 COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

40 NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEscores for the remaining four behaviors include trust (40%),


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


La


59

Many leaders who struggle with this (again, I’m one of them) will try to convince themselves that their reluctance is a product of their kindness; they just don’t want to make their employees feel bad. But an honest reassessment of their motivation will allow them to admit that they are the ones who don’t want to feel bad and that failing to hold someone accountable is ultimately an act of selfishness.

After all, there is nothing noble about withholding information that can help an employee improve. Eventually that employee’s lack of improvement is going to come back to haunt him in a performance review or when he is let go. And I’m pretty sure there is nothing kind about firing someone who has not been confronted about his performance.

Behaviors Versus MeasurablesSome leaders don’t realize they have an accountability problem because they are more than comfortable confronting people about issues regard-ing measurable performance. For instance, when a direct report misses his sales target four quarters in a row or doesn’t deliver a product on time and according to specifications, leaders have no problem telling him and taking action. That is indeed one form of accountability, but it’s not the most important kind. The kind that is more fundamental, important, and difficult is about behavior.

After all, even the most reluctant, fearful leaders can usually summon the courage to tell someone that he missed his number. That is a relatively objective, nonjudgmental act, which makes it safe and free from emotion. Confronting someone about their behavior is a different matter. It involves a judgment call that is more likely to provoke a defensive response.

The reason that behavioral accountability is more important than the quantitative, results-related kind has nothing to do with the fact that it is harder. It is due to the fact that behavioral problems almost always precede—and cause—a downturn in performance and results.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that can help an employee improve. Eventually that employee’s lack of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that can help an employee improve. Eventually that employee’s lack of improvement is going to come back to haunt him in a performance

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL improvement is going to come back to haunt him in a performance

review or when he is let go. And I’m pretty sure there is nothing kind

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

review or when he is let go. And I’m pretty sure there is nothing kind about firing someone who has not been confronted about his

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

about firing someone who has not been confronted about his

Behaviors Versus Measurables

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Behaviors Versus MeasurablesSome leaders don’t realize they have an accountability problem because

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Some leaders don’t realize they have an accountability problem because they are more than comfortable confronting people about issues regard-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they are more than comfortable confronting people about issues regard-ing measurable performance. For instance, when a direct report misses

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing measurable performance. For instance, when a direct report misses

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

his sales target four quarters in a row or doesn’t deliver a product on

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

his sales target four quarters in a row or doesn’t deliver a product on time and according to specifications, leaders have no problem telling

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

time and according to specifications, leaders have no problem telling him and taking action. That is indeed one form of accountability, but

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

him and taking action. That is indeed one form of accountability, but it’s not the most important kind. The kind that is more fundamental,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it’s not the most important kind. The kind that is more fundamental,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

important, and difficult is about behavior.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

important, and difficult is about behavior.After all, even the most reluctant, fearful leaders can usually COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

After all, even the most reluctant, fearful leaders can usually NOT FOR R

ESALESome leaders don’t realize they have an accountability problem because

NOT FOR RESALE

Some leaders don’t realize they have an accountability problem because they are more than comfortable confronting people about issues regard-

NOT FOR RESALE

they are more than comfortable confronting people about issues regard-ing measurable performance. For instance, when a direct report misses

NOT FOR RESALE

ing measurable performance. For instance, when a direct report misses

NOT FOR RESALE

his sales target four quarters in a row or doesn’t deliver a product on

NOT FOR RESALE

his sales target four quarters in a row or doesn’t deliver a product on time and according to specifications, leaders have no problem telling

NOT FOR RESALE

time and according to specifications, leaders have no problem telling him and taking action. That is indeed one form of accountability, but

NOT FOR RESALE

him and taking action. That is indeed one form of accountability, but it’s not the most important kind. The kind that is more fundamental,

NOT FOR RESALE

it’s not the most important kind. The kind that is more fundamental, important, and difficult is about behavior.NOT FOR R

ESALE

important, and difficult is about behavior.


La

The Advantage

60

Whether we’re talking about a football team, a sales department, or an elementary school, a meaningful drop in measurable performance can almost always be traced back to behavioral issues that made the drop possible. Lack of attention to details at practice, decreased discipline about cold-calling, poor preparation of lesson plans: all of these are behavioral problems that occur long before any decrease in measurable results is apparent. Great leaders and great team members confront one another about those behaviors early because they see the connection between the two and care enough about the team to take that risk before the results begin to suffer.

It’s difficult to overstate the competitive advantage that an accountability-friendly organization has over one where leaders don’t hold one another accountable. More than anything else, problems are identified and solved earlier and without the collateral damage of poli-tics. Whether you measure that in terms of greater revenue, higher productivity, or reduced turnover, the benefits are massive and real.

It’s worth pointing out here that people often confuse account-ability with conflict because both involve discomfort and emotion. But there is an enormous difference between the two. Conflict is about issues and ideas, while accountability is about performance and behav-ior. As difficult as it is for many people to engage in conflict, at least it is somewhat objective, removed from a person’s behavior. It is much harder for most people to hold one another accountable because it involves something of a personal, behavioral judgment.

Team Effectiveness ExerciseA good tool for teams that want to improve their ability to hold one another accountable is something we call the team effectiveness exer-cise. I’ll explain it here in some detail because it’s pretty simple, it requires only an hour or two, and it can transform how team members go about holding each other to higher standards of performance. It’s just that powerful.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another about those behaviors early because they see the connection

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

another about those behaviors early because they see the connection between the two and care enough about the team to take that risk

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL between the two and care enough about the team to take that risk

It’s difficult to overstate the competitive advantage that an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s difficult to overstate the competitive advantage that an accountability-friendly organization has over one where leaders don’t

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accountability-friendly organization has over one where leaders don’t hold one another accountable. More than anything else, problems are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

hold one another accountable. More than anything else, problems are identified and solved earlier and without the collateral damage of poli-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

identified and solved earlier and without the collateral damage of poli-tics. Whether you measure that in terms of greater revenue, higher

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tics. Whether you measure that in terms of greater revenue, higher productivity, or reduced turnover, the benefits are massive and real.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

productivity, or reduced turnover, the benefits are massive and real.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s worth pointing out here that people often confuse account-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s worth pointing out here that people often confuse account-ability with conflict because both involve discomfort and emotion. But

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ability with conflict because both involve discomfort and emotion. But there is an enormous difference between the two. Conflict is about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

there is an enormous difference between the two. Conflict is about issues and ideas, while accountability is about performance and behav-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

issues and ideas, while accountability is about performance and behav-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ior. As difficult as it is for many people to engage in conflict, at least it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ior. As difficult as it is for many people to engage in conflict, at least it is somewhat objective, removed from a person’s behavior. It is much COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

is somewhat objective, removed from a person’s behavior. It is much harder for most people to hold one another accountable because it COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

harder for most people to hold one another accountable because it NOT FOR R

ESALEaccountability-friendly organization has over one where leaders don’t

NOT FOR RESALE

accountability-friendly organization has over one where leaders don’t hold one another accountable. More than anything else, problems are

NOT FOR RESALEhold one another accountable. More than anything else, problems are

identified and solved earlier and without the collateral damage of poli-

NOT FOR RESALEidentified and solved earlier and without the collateral damage of poli-

tics. Whether you measure that in terms of greater revenue, higher

NOT FOR RESALE

tics. Whether you measure that in terms of greater revenue, higher productivity, or reduced turnover, the benefits are massive and real.

NOT FOR RESALE

productivity, or reduced turnover, the benefits are massive and real.

NOT FOR RESALE

It’s worth pointing out here that people often confuse account-

NOT FOR RESALE

It’s worth pointing out here that people often confuse account-ability with conflict because both involve discomfort and emotion. But

NOT FOR RESALE

ability with conflict because both involve discomfort and emotion. But there is an enormous difference between the two. Conflict is about

NOT FOR RESALE

there is an enormous difference between the two. Conflict is about issues and ideas, while accountability is about performance and behav-

NOT FOR RESALE

issues and ideas, while accountability is about performance and behav-

NOT FOR RESALE

ior. As difficult as it is for many people to engage in conflict, at least it NOT FOR RESALE

ior. As difficult as it is for many people to engage in conflict, at least it is somewhat objective, removed from a person’s behavior. It is much NOT FOR R

ESALE

is somewhat objective, removed from a person’s behavior. It is much


La


61

We usually do this exercise at the end of a two-day off-site meeting, but only when we believe the team has a decent foundation of trust (they usually do). If team members aren’t capable of being vulnerable with one another, there is no point in doing it.

We start the exercise by having everyone write down one thing that each of the other team members does that makes the team better. In other words, they write down, for everyone other than them-selves, the single biggest area of strength as it pertains to the impact on the group. We’re interested not in their technical skills, but in the way they behave when the team is together that makes the team stronger.

Then we ask them to do the same thing, except this time focusing on the one aspect of each person that sometimes hurts the team. After ten or fifteen minutes of thoughtful consideration and note taking, everyone is usually done.

Then, starting with the leader, we go around the room asking everyone to report on the leader’s one positive characteristic. We then allow the leader to provide his general, one-sentence reaction. In most cases, the leader is quite humbled by the positive feedback, sometimes even surprised by it. Then we go around the room again, asking people to report on the one characteristic that the leader needs to improve on. Again, we let the leader provide a brief reaction—not a rebuttal, but simply a reaction—to the feedback after everyone has pro-vided their input. In virtually every case, there is acceptance and appreciation.

And then we do the same exercise for every other member of the team. It takes about ten minutes for each person to receive both the positive and constructive feedback from peers and to provide his or her simple reactions. After an hour or two, depending on the size of the team, the exercise is complete. It’s usually at this point that people are sitting around the table in a state of mild amazement at the direct, honest, and helpful feedback that they’ve just shared.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

selves, the single biggest area of strength as it pertains to the impact

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

selves, the single biggest area of strength as it pertains to the impact on the group. We’re interested not in their technical skills, but in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL on the group. We’re interested not in their technical skills, but in the

way they behave when the team is together that makes the team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

way they behave when the team is together that makes the team

Then we ask them to do the same thing, except this time focusing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Then we ask them to do the same thing, except this time focusing on the one aspect of each person that sometimes hurts the team. After

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on the one aspect of each person that sometimes hurts the team. After ten or fifteen minutes of thoughtful consideration and note taking,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ten or fifteen minutes of thoughtful consideration and note taking,

Then, starting with the leader, we go around the room asking

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Then, starting with the leader, we go around the room asking everyone to report on the leader’s one positive characteristic. We then

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

everyone to report on the leader’s one positive characteristic. We then

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allow the leader to provide his general, one-sentence reaction. In

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allow the leader to provide his general, one-sentence reaction. In most cases, the leader is quite humbled by the positive feedback,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

most cases, the leader is quite humbled by the positive feedback, sometimes even surprised by it. Then we go around the room again,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sometimes even surprised by it. Then we go around the room again, asking people to report on the one characteristic that the leader needs to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

asking people to report on the one characteristic that the leader needs to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

improve on. Again, we let the leader provide a brief reaction—not a COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

improve on. Again, we let the leader provide a brief reaction—not a rebuttal, but simply a reaction—to the feedback after everyone has pro-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

rebuttal, but simply a reaction—to the feedback after everyone has pro-NOT FOR R

ESALEThen we ask them to do the same thing, except this time focusing

NOT FOR RESALE

Then we ask them to do the same thing, except this time focusing on the one aspect of each person that sometimes hurts the team. After

NOT FOR RESALEon the one aspect of each person that sometimes hurts the team. After

ten or fifteen minutes of thoughtful consideration and note taking,

NOT FOR RESALEten or fifteen minutes of thoughtful consideration and note taking,

Then, starting with the leader, we go around the room asking

NOT FOR RESALE

Then, starting with the leader, we go around the room asking everyone to report on the leader’s one positive characteristic. We then

NOT FOR RESALE

everyone to report on the leader’s one positive characteristic. We then

NOT FOR RESALE

allow the leader to provide his general, one-sentence reaction. In

NOT FOR RESALE

allow the leader to provide his general, one-sentence reaction. In most cases, the leader is quite humbled by the positive feedback,

NOT FOR RESALE

most cases, the leader is quite humbled by the positive feedback, sometimes even surprised by it. Then we go around the room again,

NOT FOR RESALE

sometimes even surprised by it. Then we go around the room again, asking people to report on the one characteristic that the leader needs to NOT FOR R

ESALE

asking people to report on the one characteristic that the leader needs to improve on. Again, we let the leader provide a brief reaction—not a NOT FOR R

ESALE

improve on. Again, we let the leader provide a brief reaction—not a


La

The Advantage

62

voluntary Turnover

One of our consultants was working with the leadership

team of a large company’s information technology depart-

ment. Many members of the team were struggling with the

behavior of one of their peers, Fred, who had a close relation-

ship with the CIO who was in charge of the team. They didn’t

believe that the CIO was holding Fred accountable for his

destructive behavior, that he was playing favorites. The CIO

would later admit that he valued Fred’s technical expertise

and was reluctant to do anything that might cause him to

leave.

During an off-site meeting, the team confronted the CIO

about his lack of consistent accountability across the team,

in particular, with Fred. The CIO acknowledged the issue and

announced that he would work on it.

Over the course of the following months, the CIO started

to hold Fred more accountable. Just as important, the team

followed suit, engaging with Fred more directly about his

behavior. Without the protection that he had grown accus-

tomed to getting from his boss, Fred eventually decided that

he didn’t want to be a part of the team, and he left the

company.

Contrary to his fears about losing Fred, the CIO found

that the performance of the rest of his team improved. He

attributed that to Fred’s absence and the new culture of

accountability that the team had embraced.

The benefit of this exercise goes far beyond the mere sharing of information, as important as that is. The greatest impact is the realization on the part of leadership team members that holding one another accountable is a survivable and productive activity, and it will make them likely to continue doing it going forward. And in some situations, the eventual result is particularly powerful.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL One of our consultants was working with the leadership

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL One of our consultants was working with the leadership


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Over the course of the following months, the CIO started COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Over the course of the following months, the CIO started NOT FOR R

ESALEment. Many members of the team were struggling with the

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEship with the CIO who was in charge of the team. They didn’t


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

announced that he would work on it.NOT FOR RESALE



La


63

Losing a team member is not at all a common outcome of building a culture of accountability. In most cases, team members simply learn to demand more of one another and watch their collective performance improve. In some cases, though, the only way for them to do that is by losing someone from the team. But again, that’s certainly not the norm.

No matter what the situation, there will always be some discomfort as team members confront one another about their behavior. In the end, however, the level of cohesion and personal satisfaction among team members who embrace the new philosophy overwhelms any temporary discomfort.

public Versus privateI’m often asked whether leaders should hold their people accountable privately during one-on-one sessions or in more public forums with the whole team, like during meetings. Although every case is a little differ-ent, generally I believe that on cohesive teams, accountability is best handled with the entire team. I say this because when leaders and team members call one another on issues in front of team members, they get benefits that don’t occur when it takes place individually.

First, when accountability is handled during a meeting, every member of the team receives the message simultaneously and doesn’t have to make the same mistakes in order to learn the lesson of the person being held accountable. Second, they know that the leader is holding their colleague accountable, which avoids their wondering whether the boss is doing his job. Finally, it serves to reinforce the culture of accountability, which increases the likelihood that team members will do the same for one another. When leaders—and peers—limit their accountability discussions to private conversations, they leave people wondering whether those discussions are happening. This often leads to unproductive hallway conversations and conjecture about who knows what about whom.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as team members confront one another about their behavior. In the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as team members confront one another about their behavior. In the end, however, the level of cohesion and personal satisfaction among

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL end, however, the level of cohesion and personal satisfaction among

team members who embrace the new philosophy overwhelms any

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team members who embrace the new philosophy overwhelms any

I’m often asked whether leaders should hold their people accountable

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I’m often asked whether leaders should hold their people accountable privately during one-on-one sessions or in more public forums with the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

privately during one-on-one sessions or in more public forums with the whole team, like during meetings. Although every case is a little differ-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

whole team, like during meetings. Although every case is a little differ-ent, generally I believe that on cohesive teams, accountability is best

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ent, generally I believe that on cohesive teams, accountability is best handled with the entire team. I say this because when leaders and team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

handled with the entire team. I say this because when leaders and team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

members call one another on issues in front of team members, they get

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

members call one another on issues in front of team members, they get benefits that don’t occur when it takes place individually.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

benefits that don’t occur when it takes place individually.First, when accountability is handled during a meeting, every

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

First, when accountability is handled during a meeting, every member of the team receives the message simultaneously and doesn’t COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

member of the team receives the message simultaneously and doesn’t have to make the same mistakes in order to learn the lesson of the COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

have to make the same mistakes in order to learn the lesson of the NOT FOR R

ESALEI’m often asked whether leaders should hold their people accountable

NOT FOR RESALEI’m often asked whether leaders should hold their people accountable

privately during one-on-one sessions or in more public forums with the

NOT FOR RESALE

privately during one-on-one sessions or in more public forums with the whole team, like during meetings. Although every case is a little differ-

NOT FOR RESALE

whole team, like during meetings. Although every case is a little differ-ent, generally I believe that on cohesive teams, accountability is best

NOT FOR RESALE

ent, generally I believe that on cohesive teams, accountability is best handled with the entire team. I say this because when leaders and team

NOT FOR RESALE

handled with the entire team. I say this because when leaders and team

NOT FOR RESALE

members call one another on issues in front of team members, they get

NOT FOR RESALE

members call one another on issues in front of team members, they get benefits that don’t occur when it takes place individually.

NOT FOR RESALE

benefits that don’t occur when it takes place individually.First, when accountability is handled during a meeting, every NOT FOR R

ESALE

First, when accountability is handled during a meeting, every member of the team receives the message simultaneously and doesn’t NOT FOR R

ESALE

member of the team receives the message simultaneously and doesn’t


La

The Advantage

64

Having said all that, when it comes to addressing relatively serious issues, or matters of corrective action in which a leader is wondering whether a member of the team might not be worthy to be on the team anymore, then everything changes. These are best handled privately, in a one-on-one situation, to respect the dignity of the person being held accountable. However, and this can be dicey, the leader is often well advised to let her people know that she is addressing the situation to avoid unproductive and dangerous speculation.

As uncomfortable and difficult as it can often be, accountability helps a team and an organization avoid far more costly and difficult situations later. It also allows a team to embrace the last behavior that is critical for a cohesive team: the focus on results.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL As uncomfortable and difficult as it can often be, accountability

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL As uncomfortable and difficult as it can often be, accountability

helps a team and an organization avoid far more costly and difficult

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

helps a team and an organization avoid far more costly and difficult situations later. It also allows a team to embrace the last behavior that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

situations later. It also allows a team to embrace the last behavior that is critical for a cohesive team: the focus on results.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is critical for a cohesive team: the focus on results.

NOT FOR RESALE


La


65

BeHAvIOR 5: fOCUSIng On ReSULTS

The ultimate point of building greater trust, conflict, commitment, and accountability is one thing: the achievement of results. That certainly seems obvious, but as it turns out, one of the greatest challenges to team success is the inattention to results. What would members of an executive team be focused on if not the results of their organization? Well, for one, the results of their department. Too many leaders seem to have a greater affinity for and loyalty to the department they lead rather than the team they’re a member of and the organization they are supposed to be collectively serving. Other distractions include a concern for individual career development, budget allocations, status, and ego, all of them common distractions that prevent teams from being obsessed with achieving results.

Some people find this extreme emphasis on results to be a little cold and unin-spiring. But there is no getting around the fact that the only measure of a great team—or a great organization—is whether it accomplishes what it sets out to accomplish. Some leaders of teams that don’t regularly succeed will still insist that they have a great team because team members care about one other and no one ever leaves the team. A more accurate description of their situation would be to say that they have a mediocre team that enjoys being together and isn’t terribly bothered by failure. See, no matter how good a leadership team feels about itself, and how noble its mission might be, if the organization it leads rarely achieves its goals, then, by definition, it’s simply not a good team.

No matter how good a

leadership team feels about

itself, and how noble its

mission might be, if the

organization it leads rarely

achieves its goals, then, by

definition, it’s simply not a

good team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Well, for one, the results of their department. Too many leaders seem

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Well, for one, the results of their department. Too many leaders seem to have a greater affinity for and loyalty to the department they lead

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to have a greater affinity for and loyalty to the department they lead

rather than the team they’re a member of and the organization they are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rather than the team they’re a member of and the organization they are supposed to be collectively serving. Other distractions include a concern

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

supposed to be collectively serving. Other distractions include a concern for individual career development, budget allocations, status, and ego,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for individual career development, budget allocations, status, and ego, all of them common distractions that prevent teams from being obsessed

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

all of them common distractions that prevent teams from being obsessed

extreme emphasis on results

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

extreme emphasis on results to be a little cold and unin-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to be a little cold and unin-spiring. But there is no

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

spiring. But there is no getting around the fact

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

getting around the fact that the only measure of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that the only measure of a great team—or a great

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a great team—or a great organization—is whether it COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

organization—is whether it accomplishes what it sets out COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

accomplishes what it sets out COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

for individual career development, budget allocations, status, and ego,

NOT FOR RESALE

for individual career development, budget allocations, status, and ego, all of them common distractions that prevent teams from being obsessed

NOT FOR RESALEall of them common distractions that prevent teams from being obsessed

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

spiring. But there is no

NOT FOR RESALE

spiring. But there is no getting around the fact

NOT FOR RESALE

getting around the fact that the only measure of

NOT FOR RESALE

that the only measure of a great team—or a great NOT FOR R

ESALE

a great team—or a great organization—is whether it NOT FOR R

ESALE

organization—is whether it NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

66

Keep in mind that revenue and profitability are not the only mea-sures of achievement, even in for-profit organizations (though they are certainly critical ones). The definition of results and achievement will vary from one organization to another depending on the reason that a given organization exists. A football team most likely will measure itself in terms of wins and losses, a school in terms of how well it prepares students for their next step in education, and a church based on how many parish-ioners are growing in their faith. That’s not to say that all of those orga-nizations will not have financial measurements; it’s just that finances are probably not going to be their primary measure of results.

In traditional for-profit companies, financial metrics are certainly going to take a more prominent place in the hierarchy of goals, as they should. After all, they are the indicator of how well a company is serving its customers and fulfilling its mission. However, even in these organiza-tions, other measures will often be just as important as, if not more important than, profit. Plenty of businesses, usually smaller, privately held ones, make decisions every day to do something for customers that may never benefit them financially. They do it because they think it’s the right thing to do, or because they think it might eventually help them become more influential in the market. Regardless of their ratio-nale, if they make that decision consciously, knowing what they want to achieve, then they are still focusing on results.

collective goalsWhen it comes to how a cohesive team measures its performance, one criterion sets it apart from noncohesive ones: its goals are shared across the entire team. This is not just a theoretical way of saying that people should help one another. It’s far more specific, and far more difficult too.

In most organizations, results are compartmentalized by depart-ment. Executives see themselves as having little or no responsibility for goals that fall outside their functional areas of expertise. This, of course,


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ioners are growing in their faith. That’s not to say that all of those orga-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ioners are growing in their faith. That’s not to say that all of those orga-nizations will not have financial measurements; it’s just that finances are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL nizations will not have financial measurements; it’s just that finances are

probably not going to be their primary measure of results.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

probably not going to be their primary measure of results.In traditional for-profit companies, financial metrics are certainly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In traditional for-profit companies, financial metrics are certainly going to take a more prominent place in the hierarchy of goals, as they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

going to take a more prominent place in the hierarchy of goals, as they should. After all, they are the indicator of how well a company is serving

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

should. After all, they are the indicator of how well a company is serving its customers and fulfilling its mission. However, even in these organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

its customers and fulfilling its mission. However, even in these organiza-tions, other measures will often be just as important as, if not more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tions, other measures will often be just as important as, if not more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

important than, profit. Plenty of businesses, usually smaller, privately

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

important than, profit. Plenty of businesses, usually smaller, privately held ones, make decisions every day to do something for customers that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

held ones, make decisions every day to do something for customers that may never benefit them financially. They do it because they think it’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

may never benefit them financially. They do it because they think it’s the right thing to do, or because they think it might eventually help

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the right thing to do, or because they think it might eventually help

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

them become more influential in the market. Regardless of their ratio-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

them become more influential in the market. Regardless of their ratio-nale, if they make that decision consciously, knowing what they want

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nale, if they make that decision consciously, knowing what they want

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to achieve, then they are still focusing on results.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to achieve, then they are still focusing on results.NOT FOR RESALE

going to take a more prominent place in the hierarchy of goals, as they

NOT FOR RESALE

going to take a more prominent place in the hierarchy of goals, as they should. After all, they are the indicator of how well a company is serving

NOT FOR RESALEshould. After all, they are the indicator of how well a company is serving

its customers and fulfilling its mission. However, even in these organiza-

NOT FOR RESALEits customers and fulfilling its mission. However, even in these organiza-


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

important than, profit. Plenty of businesses, usually smaller, privately

NOT FOR RESALE

important than, profit. Plenty of businesses, usually smaller, privately held ones, make decisions every day to do something for customers that

NOT FOR RESALE

held ones, make decisions every day to do something for customers that may never benefit them financially. They do it because they think it’s

NOT FOR RESALE

may never benefit them financially. They do it because they think it’s the right thing to do, or because they think it might eventually help

NOT FOR RESALE

the right thing to do, or because they think it might eventually help

NOT FOR RESALE

them become more influential in the market. Regardless of their ratio-

NOT FOR RESALE

them become more influential in the market. Regardless of their ratio-nale, if they make that decision consciously, knowing what they want NOT FOR R

ESALE

nale, if they make that decision consciously, knowing what they want to achieve, then they are still focusing on results.NOT FOR R

ESALE

to achieve, then they are still focusing on results.


La


67

One Team, One Score

After a recent loss, a thirteen-year-old boy on my son’s

soccer team said to me, “Well, I don’t feel like I lost.”

“Really?” I asked him. “How do you figure?”

He proudly announced, “Well, I’m a forward, and we

forwards did our part by scoring three goals. It’s really the

defense that lost the game because they gave up too many

goals. They’re the losers.”

I kindly pointed out to him how absurd his reasoning

was, not only because there is only one score for the team,

but because every player on the field plays defense, though

perhaps on different parts of the field. Even a forward plays

a role in preventing the other team from scoring by making

it difficult for the opponent’s defense to organize an attack.

To be fair, the kid smiled and acknowledged the ridicu-

lousness of his original remark.

is the antithesis of teamwork, though somehow it doesn’t deter many leaders from calling themselves teams and preaching the importance of working together across functions.

The only way for a team to really be a team and to maximize its output is to ensure that everyone is focused on the same priorities—rowing in the same direction, if you will. When the marketing depart-ment defines itself by how well it does marketing and the other departments do the same in their functional areas, there is no reason to expect synergy within the team. As simple as that may sound, most leadership teams still do not seem to understand this.

I wish I could say that it was that easy to convince leadership team members. Too many of them don’t see a connection between the decisions they make and the impact they have on other parts of the business. They don’t seem to understand that the way they spend their


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

departments do the same in their functional areas, there is no reason

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

departments do the same in their functional areas, there is no reason to expect synergy within the team. As simple as that may sound, most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to expect synergy within the team. As simple as that may sound, most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

One Team, One Score

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

One Team, One Score


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


but because every player on the field plays defense, though COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


perhaps on different parts of the field. Even a forward plays COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

perhaps on different parts of the field. Even a forward plays

leadership teams still do not seem to understand this.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leadership teams still do not seem to understand this.

NOT FOR RESALE

One Team, One Score

NOT FOR RESALE

One Team, One Score


NOT FOR RESALEAfter a recent loss, a thirteen-year-old boy on my son’s


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


was, not only because there is only one score for the team, NOT FOR RESALE


but because every player on the field plays defense, though NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

68

time, energy, and resources can influence the overall performance of the organization. All too often they embrace the attitude embodied by the fisherman who looks at the guy sitting at the other end of the boat and announces, “Hey, your side of the boat is sinking.”

Great teams ensure that all members, in spite of their individual responsibilities and areas of expertise, are doing whatever they can to help the team accomplish its goals. That means they need to be asking difficult questions about what is happening in other departments and volunteering, in any way they can, to help those parts of the business that might be struggling and might jeopardize the success of the entire organization.

Team Number OneThe only way for a leader to establish this collective mentality on a team is by ensuring that all members place a higher priority on the team they’re a member of than the team they lead in their departments. A good way to go about this is simply to ask them which team is their first priority. I’ve found that many well-intentioned executives will admit that in spite of their commitment to the team that they’re a member of, the team they lead is their first priority. They’ll point out that they hired their direct reports, they sit near them and spend more time with them every day, and they enjoy being the leader of that team. Moreover, they feel a sense of loyalty to the people they manage, and feel that those people want and need their protection.

This is absolutely natural, common, and understandable. And dangerous.

When members of a leadership team feel a stronger sense of com-mitment and loyalty to the team they lead than the one they’re a member of, then the team they’re a member of becomes like the U.S. Congress or the United Nations: it’s just a place where people come together to lobby for their constituents. Teams that lead healthy organizations reject this model and come to terms with the difficult but critical requirement


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

difficult questions about what is happening in other departments and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

difficult questions about what is happening in other departments and volunteering, in any way they can, to help those parts of the business

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL volunteering, in any way they can, to help those parts of the business

that might be struggling and might jeopardize the success of the entire

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that might be struggling and might jeopardize the success of the entire

The only way for a leader to establish this collective mentality on a team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The only way for a leader to establish this collective mentality on a team is by ensuring that all members place a higher priority on the team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is by ensuring that all members place a higher priority on the team they’re a member of than the team they lead in their departments. A

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they’re a member of than the team they lead in their departments. A good way to go about this is simply to ask them which team is their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

good way to go about this is simply to ask them which team is their first priority. I’ve found that many well-intentioned executives will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

first priority. I’ve found that many well-intentioned executives will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

admit that in spite of their commitment to the team that they’re a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

admit that in spite of their commitment to the team that they’re a member of, the team they lead is their first priority. They’ll point out

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

member of, the team they lead is their first priority. They’ll point out that they hired their direct reports, they sit near them and spend more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that they hired their direct reports, they sit near them and spend more time with them every day, and they enjoy being the leader of that team. COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

time with them every day, and they enjoy being the leader of that team. Moreover, they feel a sense of loyalty to the people they manage, and COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Moreover, they feel a sense of loyalty to the people they manage, and NOT FOR R

ESALEThe only way for a leader to establish this collective mentality on a team

NOT FOR RESALEThe only way for a leader to establish this collective mentality on a team

is by ensuring that all members place a higher priority on the team

NOT FOR RESALE

is by ensuring that all members place a higher priority on the team they’re a member of than the team they lead in their departments. A

NOT FOR RESALE

they’re a member of than the team they lead in their departments. A good way to go about this is simply to ask them which team is their

NOT FOR RESALE

good way to go about this is simply to ask them which team is their first priority. I’ve found that many well-intentioned executives will

NOT FOR RESALE

first priority. I’ve found that many well-intentioned executives will

NOT FOR RESALE

admit that in spite of their commitment to the team that they’re a

NOT FOR RESALE

admit that in spite of their commitment to the team that they’re a member of, the team they lead is their first priority. They’ll point out

NOT FOR RESALE

member of, the team they lead is their first priority. They’ll point out that they hired their direct reports, they sit near them and spend more NOT FOR R

ESALE

that they hired their direct reports, they sit near them and spend more time with them every day, and they enjoy being the leader of that team. NOT FOR R

ESALE

time with them every day, and they enjoy being the leader of that team.


La


69

that executives must put the needs of the higher team ahead of the needs of their departments. That is the only way that good deci-sions can be made about how best to serve the entire organization and maximize its performance.

The advantage that can be achieved by shifting a team’s priorities from indi-vidual to collective ones, and thus demonstrating a true commitment to team number one, is undeniable.

Teams that lead healthy

organizations come to

terms with the difficult but

critical requirement that its

members must put the

needs of the higher team

ahead of the needs of their

departments.

first Team

We worked with the CIO of a massive corporation. She was

struggling with team members who seemed to be working

almost exclusively on their own priorities, with little concern

for what was happening with their peers in other depart-

ments. As a result, there was minimal cooperation and

synergy, and the overall performance and reputation of the

IT organization had suffered.

Confronting the problem with the team, the CIO

announced that they would be taking specific and difficult

measures to refocus the staff on their team number one.

Those steps included moving each of her direct reports away

from their departments and onto the same floor in the same

building of the company’s sprawling campus. She would also

pull the team together every morning for a five-minute infor-

mal gathering to begin building the kind of professional and

personal relationships that would be necessary to turn the

organization around and thus better serve the company.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

commitment to team number one, is undeniable.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

commitment to team number one, is undeniable.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


ahead of the needs of their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ahead of the needs of their

departments.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

departments.

f

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

first Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

irst Team


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

IT organization had suffered.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

IT organization had suffered.NOT FOR R

ESALEcommitment to team number one, is undeniable.

NOT FOR RESALEcommitment to team number one, is undeniable.

NOT FOR RESALE

irst Team

NOT FOR RESALE

irst Team


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


synergy, and the overall performance and reputation of the NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

70

Testament to Unity

One of our consultants was working with the CEO of a

mental health hospital who was tired of his staff members’

pursuing their own agendas. Over a period of a few months,

the two of them worked to shift the team’s focus to the col-

lective good of the organization.

The CEO’s reaction to what happened says it all: “The

concept of team number one has created a common lan-

guage and sense of identity for our team. It provides the

mind-set that individual goals, issues, and interests are set

aside to focus on what’s best for the organization. I truly

believe it is the one thing that keeps us from busting apart

at the seams as we deal with the challenging issues of man-

aging in a complex business environment.”

The surprising power of embracing team number one is one of the most gratifying and powerful things we witness in the work we do with leaders.

At first, her direct reports resisted. They didn’t want to leave the

physical and emotional comfort of their departments and were con-

cerned that their own direct reports would feel abandoned as a

result. But because she was their boss, they complied.

Within just a few months, the behavior of the executives, the

synergy within the team, and the overall performance of the orga-

nization had improved dramatically. “Somehow we became a new

team with a collective focus, instead of a bunch of subdepartments

doing their own thing. We can’t imagine going back to the old way,”

remarked one of the CIO’s reports. “And even the people in my

department benefited when they saw how aligned and focused we

had become as leaders.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL doing their own thing. We can’t imagine going back to the old way,”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL doing their own thing. We can’t imagine going back to the old way,”

remarked one of the CIO’s reports. “And even the people in my

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL remarked one of the CIO’s reports. “And even the people in my

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Testament to Unity

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Testament to Unity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


lective good of the organization.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


The surprising power of embracing team number one is one of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The surprising power of embracing team number one is one of the most gratifying and powerful things we witness in the work we do with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

most gratifying and powerful things we witness in the work we do with


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

Testament to Unity

NOT FOR RESALE

Testament to Unity


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


the two of them worked to shift the team’s focus to the col-NOT FOR RESALE


lective good of the organization.NOT FOR RESALE


The surprising power of embracing team number one is one of the

NOT FOR RESALEThe surprising power of embracing team number one is one of the


NOT FOR RESALE



La


71

CHeCkLIST fOR DISCIpLIne 1: BUILD A COHeSIve LeADeRSHIp TeAm

Members of a leadership team can be confident that they’ve

mastered this discipline when they can affirm the following

statements:

⎯ The leadership team is small enough (three to ten people)

to be effective.

⎯ Members of the team trust one another and can be genu-

inely vulnerable with each other.

⎯ Team members regularly engage in productive, unfiltered

conflict around important issues.

⎯ The team leaves meetings with clear-cut, active, and

specific agreements around decisions.

⎯ Team members hold one another accountable to commit-

ments and behaviors.

⎯ Members of the leadership team are focused on team

number one. They put the collective priorities and needs of

the larger organization ahead of their own departments.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mbers of the team trust one another and can be genu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mbers of the team trust one another and can be genu-

am members regularly engage in productive, unfiltered

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

e team leaves meetings with clear-cut, active, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


am members hold one another accountable to commit-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mbers of the leadership team are focused on team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La


Again, let’s imagine two different organizations.

The first is led by a team whose members share a common passion for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of values. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they differ from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member of the team contributes to achieving that priority.

The second is run by a group of well-intentioned executives who have a good understanding of the details of their business. But they don’t spend much time thinking or talking about why their organiza-tion exists or what values should drive their behaviors. Though they talk about being more strategic, they can’t really articulate a simple, clear strategy, and they don’t have a consistent method for evaluating decisions. The leadership team is constantly managing against a long list of eclectic goals, some of which may not be compatible and most of which pertain to only a few members of the team. Moreover, most team members have somewhat limited knowledge about and interest in the specific responsibilities of their peers.



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first is led by a team whose members share a common passion

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first is led by a team whose members share a common passion for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of values. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they values. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they differ from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

differ from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member of the team contributes to achieving that priority.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of the team contributes to achieving that priority.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The second is run by a group of well-intentioned executives who

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The second is run by a group of well-intentioned executives who have a good understanding of the details of their business. But they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

have a good understanding of the details of their business. But they don’t spend much time thinking or talking about why their organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

don’t spend much time thinking or talking about why their organiza-tion exists or what values should drive their behaviors. Though they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion exists or what values should drive their behaviors. Though they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

talk about being more strategic, they can’t really articulate a simple, COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

talk about being more strategic, they can’t really articulate a simple, clear strategy, and they don’t have a consistent method for evaluating COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

clear strategy, and they don’t have a consistent method for evaluating NOT FOR R

ESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of

NOT FOR RESALE

for what they do and are committed to abiding by the same set of values. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they

NOT FOR RESALEvalues. They have a clear plan for success and know exactly how they

differ from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate

NOT FOR RESALEdiffer from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate differ from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate

NOT FOR RESALEdiffer from their competition. At any given moment, they can articulate

their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member

NOT FOR RESALE

their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member

NOT FOR RESALE

their top, collective priority, and they understand how every member of the team contributes to achieving that priority.

NOT FOR RESALE

of the team contributes to achieving that priority.of the team contributes to achieving that priority.

NOT FOR RESALE

of the team contributes to achieving that priority.

NOT FOR RESALE

The second is run by a group of well-intentioned executives who

NOT FOR RESALE

The second is run by a group of well-intentioned executives who have a good understanding of the details of their business. But they

NOT FOR RESALE

have a good understanding of the details of their business. But they don’t spend much time thinking or talking about why their organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

don’t spend much time thinking or talking about why their organiza-tion exists or what values should drive their behaviors. Though they NOT FOR R

ESALE

tion exists or what values should drive their behaviors. Though they talk about being more strategic, they can’t really articulate a simple, NOT FOR R

ESALE

talk about being more strategic, they can’t really articulate a simple,


La

73


Create Clarity

The second requirement for building a healthy organization—creating clarity—is all about

achieving alignment. This is a word that is used incessantly by leaders, consultants, and organiza-tional theorists, and yet for all the attention it gets, real alignment remains frustratingly rare. Most executives who run organizations—and certainly the employees who work for them—will readily attest to this.

A big part of the reason for the failure to gain alignment has to do with the fact that, like so many other popular terms, people use it without being specific about what they mean. Within the context of making an organization healthy, alignment is about creating so much clarity that there is as little room as possible for confusion, disorder, and infight ing


3. Overcommunicate

Clarity

4. Reinforce

Clarity

1. Build a

Cohesive Leadership

Team

2. CreateClarity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Create Clarity

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Create Clarity

T

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The second requirement for building a healthy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

he second requirement for building a healthy organization—creating clarity—is all about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization—creating clarity—is all about achieving alignment. This is a word that is used

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

achieving alignment. This is a word that is used incessantly by leaders, consultants, and organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

incessantly by leaders, consultants, and organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE

he second requirement for building a healthy

NOT FOR RESALE

he second requirement for building a healthy organization—creating clarity—is all about

NOT FOR RESALE

organization—creating clarity—is all about achieving alignment. This is a word that is used

NOT FOR RESALE

achieving alignment. This is a word that is used incessantly by leaders, consultants, and organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

incessantly by leaders, consultants, and organiza-tional theorists, and yet for all the attention it gets, NOT FOR R

ESALE

tional theorists, and yet for all the attention it gets, real alignment remains frustratingly rare. Most NOT FOR R

ESALE

real alignment remains frustratingly rare. Most


La

The Advantage

74

to set in. Of course, the responsibility for creating that clarity lies squarely with the leadership team.

Unfortunately, most of the leaders I’ve worked with who complain about a lack of alignment mistakenly see it primarily as a behavioral or attitudinal problem. In their minds, it’s a function of the fact that employ-ees below them do not want to work together. What those executives don’t realize is that there cannot be alignment deeper in the organization, even when employees want to cooperate, if the leaders at the top aren’t in lock-step with one another around a few very specific things.

Of course, few execu-tives will dispute this. It’s hard to argue with the idea that egregious and funda-mental differences among leadership team members create obstacles to alignment and success. But all too often —and this is critical— leaders underestimate the impact of even subtle mis-

alignment at the top, and the damage caused to the rest of the organiza-tion by small gaps among members of the executive team.

Thinking they’re being mature, leaders often agree to disagree with one another around seemingly minor issues, thereby avoiding what they see as unnecessary contentiousness and conflict. After all, from their vantage point, the gaps in their opinions and decisions seem small and innocuous. What they don’t understand is that by failing to eliminate even those small gaps, they are leaving employees below them to fight bloody, unwinnable battles with their peers in other departments. This leads to the antithesis of (oh, I hate to use this word) empowerment.

No matter how many times executives preach about the “e” word in their speeches, there is no way that their employees can be

All too often leaders

underestimate the impact of

even subtle misalignment at

the top and the damage

caused by small gaps among

members of the executive

team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

when employees want to cooperate, if the leaders at the top aren’t in lock-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

when employees want to cooperate, if the leaders at the top aren’t in lock-step with one another around a few very specific things.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL step with one another around a few very specific things.

Of course, few execu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, few execu-tives will dispute this. It’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tives will dispute this. It’s hard to argue with the idea

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

hard to argue with the idea that egregious and funda-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that egregious and funda-mental differences among

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mental differences among

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

alignment at the top, and the damage caused to the rest of the organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

alignment at the top, and the damage caused to the rest of the organiza-tion by small gaps among members of the executive team.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

tion by small gaps among members of the executive team.Thinking they’re being mature, leaders often agree to disagree with COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Thinking they’re being mature, leaders often agree to disagree with COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

hard to argue with the idea

NOT FOR RESALE

hard to argue with the idea that egregious and funda-

NOT FOR RESALEthat egregious and funda-

mental differences among

NOT FOR RESALEmental differences among

leadership team members

NOT FOR RESALE

leadership team members create obstacles to alignment

NOT FOR RESALE

create obstacles to alignment and success. But all too often

NOT FOR RESALE

and success. But all too often

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

alignment at the top, and the damage caused to the rest of the organiza-NOT FOR RESALE

alignment at the top, and the damage caused to the rest of the organiza-tion by small gaps among members of the executive team.NOT FOR R

ESALE

tion by small gaps among members of the executive team.NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


La

Discipline 2: Create Clarity

75

empowered to fully execute their responsibilities if they don’t receive clear and consistent messages about what is important from their leaders across the organization. There is probably no greater frustration for employees than having to constantly navigate the politics and con-fusion caused by leaders who are misaligned. That’s because just a little daylight between members of a leadership team becomes blinding and overwhelming to employees one or two levels below. I’ve heard this referred to as the “vortex effect.” Whatever you call it, it’s real, it’s a big problem, and it makes deep organizational alignment impossible.

Okay, assuming that there is agreement around the benefits of clarity and alignment, the next logical question would be, How do we go about achieving it? Before answering that question, I think it might be helpful to take a look at an example of how not to do it.

BlATHeR

Since the 1980s, many organizations have centered their clarity and alignment efforts around a singular tool that has been a major disap-pointment. What I’m referring to is the mission statement.

Though I can’t be sure, I suspect that at some point about thirty years ago a cleverly sadistic and antibusiness consultant decided that the best way to really screw up companies was to convince them that what they needed was a convoluted, jargony, and all-encompassing declaration of intent. The more times those declarations used phrases like “world class,” “shareholder value,” and “adding value,” the better. And if companies would actually print those declarations and hang them in their lobbies and break rooms for public viewing, well, that would be a real coup.

Even if my historical suspicions are untrue, it can’t be denied that most mission statements have neither inspired people to change the world nor provided them with an accurate description of what an organization actually does for a living. They certainly haven’t created


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

” Whatever you call it, it’s real, it’s a big

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

” Whatever you call it, it’s real, it’s a big problem, and it makes deep organizational alignment impossible.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL problem, and it makes deep organizational alignment impossible.

Okay, assuming that there is agreement around the benefits of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Okay, assuming that there is agreement around the benefits of clarity and alignment, the next logical question would be,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

clarity and alignment, the next logical question would be, Before answering that question, I think it might

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Before answering that question, I think it might be helpful to take a look at an example of how not to do it.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be helpful to take a look at an example of how not to do it.

the 1980s, many organizations have centered their clarity and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the 1980s, many organizations have centered their clarity and alignment efforts around a singular tool that has been a major disap-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

alignment efforts around a singular tool that has been a major disap-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

pointment. What I’m referring to is the mission statement.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

pointment. What I’m referring to is the mission statement.Though I can’t be sure, I suspect that at some point about thirty

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Though I can’t be sure, I suspect that at some point about thirty years ago a cleverly sadistic and antibusiness consultant decided that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

years ago a cleverly sadistic and antibusiness consultant decided that the best way to really screw up companies was to convince them that COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

the best way to really screw up companies was to convince them that what they needed was a convoluted, jargony, and all-encompassing COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

what they needed was a convoluted, jargony, and all-encompassing NOT FOR R

ESALE Before answering that question, I think it might

NOT FOR RESALE

Before answering that question, I think it might be helpful to take a look at an example of how not to do it.

NOT FOR RESALEbe helpful to take a look at an example of how not to do it.

the 1980s, many organizations have centered their clarity and

NOT FOR RESALE

the 1980s, many organizations have centered their clarity and alignment efforts around a singular tool that has been a major disap-

NOT FOR RESALE

alignment efforts around a singular tool that has been a major disap-

NOT FOR RESALE

pointment. What I’m referring to is the mission statement.

NOT FOR RESALE

pointment. What I’m referring to is the mission statement.Though I can’t be sure, I suspect that at some point about thirty

NOT FOR RESALE

Though I can’t be sure, I suspect that at some point about thirty years ago a cleverly sadistic and antibusiness consultant decided that NOT FOR R

ESALE

years ago a cleverly sadistic and antibusiness consultant decided that the best way to really screw up companies was to convince them that NOT FOR R

ESALE

the best way to really screw up companies was to convince them that


La

The Advantage

76

As bad as it is, it’s hard to deny that this statement seems fairly ordinary, like so many others that we’ve come across in our careers. And yet what makes this one particularly notewor-thy is that it is meant to be a joke. You see, this is the mission statement of Dunder Mifflin, the fictional paper company featured on the timeless sitcom, The Office.

alignment and clarity among employees. What they have done is make many leadership teams look foolish.

Just in case you’re not convinced of this, take a look at the follow-ing mission statement I’ve lifted from the T-shirt of a company that most people know fairly well. I’ve redacted the name of the organization and just one word that might give away its industry. See if you can guess which company it is.

that we’ve come across in our careers. And yet what makes this one particularly notewor-thy is that it is meant to be a joke. You see, this is the mission statement of Dunder Mifflin, the fictional paper company featured on the timeless sitcom,

Alignment and clarity cannot

be achieved in one fell swoop

with a series of buzzwords and

aspirational phrases crammed

together. It requires a much

more rigorous and

unpretentious approach.

Mission stateMent

__________ Incorporated provides its customers with

quality __________ products and the expertise

required for making informed buying decisions. We

provide our products and services with a dedication to

the highest degree of integrity and quality of customer

satisfaction, developing long-term professional rela-

tionships with employees that develop pride, creating

a stable working environment and company spirit.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Incorporated provides its customers with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


products and the expertise

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As bad as it is, it’s hard to deny that this statement seems fairly COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As bad as it is, it’s hard to deny that this statement seems fairly COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALErequired for making informed buying decisions. We

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

As bad as it is, it’s hard to deny that this statement seems fairly NOT FOR RESALE

As bad as it is, it’s hard to deny that this statement seems fairly NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La


77

That’s right. It’s a spoof. And yet it sounds like so many of the mission statements we’ve seen hanging in the lobbies of companies where we do business.

The point here is that alignment and clarity cannot be achieved in one fell swoop with a series of generic buzzwords and aspirational phrases cram med together. Leaders simply can not inspire, inform, motivate, market, and position their companies in the context of a T-shirt or lucite tschotske. Clarity requires a much more rigorous and unpretentious approach.

SIx CRITICAl QUeSTIOnS

What leaders must do to give employees the clarity they need is agree on the answers to six simple but critical questions and thereby eliminate even small discrepancies in their thinking. None of these questions is novel per se. What is new is the realization that none of them can be addressed in isolation; they must be answered together. Failing to achieve alignment around any one of them can prevent an organization from attaining the level of clarity necessary to become healthy.

These are the six questions:

1. Why do we exist?2. How do we behave?3. What do we do?4. How will we succeed?5. What is most important, right now?6. Who must do what?

If members of a leadership team can rally around clear answers to these fundamental questions—without using jargon and shmarmy language—they will drastically increase the likelihood of creating a healthy organization. This may well be the most important step of all in achieving the advantage of organizational health.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

T-shirt or lucite tschotske. Clarity requires a much more rigorous and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

T-shirt or lucite tschotske. Clarity requires a much more rigorous and

must do to give employees the clarity they need is agree

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

must do to give employees the clarity they need is agree on the answers to six simple but critical questions and thereby eliminate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on the answers to six simple but critical questions and thereby eliminate even small discrepancies in their thinking. None of these questions is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

even small discrepancies in their thinking. None of these questions is novel per se. What is new is the realization that none of them can be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

novel per se. What is new is the realization that none of them can be addressed in isolation; they must be answered together. Failing to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

addressed in isolation; they must be answered together. Failing to achieve alignment around any one of them can prevent an organization

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

achieve alignment around any one of them can prevent an organization from attaining the level of clarity necessary to become healthy.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

from attaining the level of clarity necessary to become healthy.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Wh

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why do we exist?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

y do we exist?2. COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

2. HoCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Ho NOT FOR RESALEmust do to give employees the clarity they need is agree

NOT FOR RESALEmust do to give employees the clarity they need is agree

on the answers to six simple but critical questions and thereby eliminate

NOT FOR RESALEon the answers to six simple but critical questions and thereby eliminate

even small discrepancies in their thinking. None of these questions is

NOT FOR RESALE

even small discrepancies in their thinking. None of these questions is novel per se. What is new is the realization that none of them can be

NOT FOR RESALE

novel per se. What is new is the realization that none of them can be addressed in isolation; they must be answered together. Failing to

NOT FOR RESALE

addressed in isolation; they must be answered together. Failing to achieve alignment around any one of them can prevent an organization

NOT FOR RESALE

achieve alignment around any one of them can prevent an organization from attaining the level of clarity necessary to become healthy.

NOT FOR RESALE

from attaining the level of clarity necessary to become healthy.

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


y do we exist?NOT FOR RESALE

y do we exist?w do we behave?NOT FOR R

ESALE

w do we behave?


La

The Advantage

78

Answering these questions, like everything else in this book, is as difficult as it is theoretically simple. It’s simple in that it doesn’t require great intellectual capacity or cleverness; every leadership team has more than enough information and experience to achieve clarity. It can be difficult, however, for a variety of reasons.

First, as we explored in the last chapter, it requires cohesion at the top. A team that isn’t behaviorally cohesive won’t be able to engage in the level of passionate, messy dialogue that is required to achieve real buy-in around these questions.

Second—and this is a big one—it’s often tempting for leaders to slip into a marketing or sloganizing mind-set when answering these questions, trying to come up with catchy phrases or impressive-sounding statements. This is a sign that the team is missing the boat and has been distracted from its real purpose: establishing true clarity and alignment.

Finally, answering these questions requires time. Not months, but certainly a few days up front followed by a little more time in the fol-lowing weeks to fully bake the answers. Taking time to sit with the questions and ensure that all members of the leadership team understand what they mean and are truly aligned around the answers is essential.

But what if the answers they come up with are wrong? Here’s the thing: there are no right or wrong answers. I mean, who’s to say what is right and wrong when it comes to setting the direction of an organization? After all, there’s more than one way to skin a cat, or so I’ve been told. More than getting the right answer, it is important to

simply have an answer—one that is directionally correct and around which all team members can commit.

More than getting the right

answer, it’s often more

important to simply have an

answer—one that is

directionally correct and

around which all team

members can commit.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the level of passionate, messy dialogue that is required to achieve real

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the level of passionate, messy dialogue that is required to achieve real

Second—and this is a big one—it’s often tempting for leaders to slip

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Second—and this is a big one—it’s often tempting for leaders to slip into a marketing or sloganizing mind-set when answering these questions,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

into a marketing or sloganizing mind-set when answering these questions, trying to come up with catchy phrases or impressive-sounding statements.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

trying to come up with catchy phrases or impressive-sounding statements. This is a sign that the team is missing the boat and has been distracted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This is a sign that the team is missing the boat and has been distracted from its real purpose: establishing true clarity and alignment.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

from its real purpose: establishing true clarity and alignment.Finally, answering these questions requires time. Not months, but

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, answering these questions requires time. Not months, but certainly a few days up front followed by a little more time in the fol-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

certainly a few days up front followed by a little more time in the fol-lowing weeks to fully bake the answers. Taking time to sit with the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lowing weeks to fully bake the answers. Taking time to sit with the questions and ensure that all members of the leadership team understand

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

questions and ensure that all members of the leadership team understand what they mean and are truly aligned around the answers is essential.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what they mean and are truly aligned around the answers is essential.But what if the answers they come up with are wrong? Here’s the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

But what if the answers they come up with are wrong? Here’s the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

More than getting the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

More than getting the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

answer, it’s often more COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

answer, it’s often more NOT FOR R

ESALEtrying to come up with catchy phrases or impressive-sounding statements.

NOT FOR RESALE

trying to come up with catchy phrases or impressive-sounding statements. This is a sign that the team is missing the boat and has been distracted

NOT FOR RESALEThis is a sign that the team is missing the boat and has been distracted

from its real purpose: establishing true clarity and alignment.

NOT FOR RESALEfrom its real purpose: establishing true clarity and alignment.

Finally, answering these questions requires time. Not months, but

NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, answering these questions requires time. Not months, but certainly a few days up front followed by a little more time in the fol-

NOT FOR RESALE

certainly a few days up front followed by a little more time in the fol-lowing weeks to fully bake the answers. Taking time to sit with the

NOT FOR RESALE

lowing weeks to fully bake the answers. Taking time to sit with the questions and ensure that all members of the leadership team understand

NOT FOR RESALE

questions and ensure that all members of the leadership team understand what they mean and are truly aligned around the answers is essential.

NOT FOR RESALE

what they mean and are truly aligned around the answers is essential.But what if the answers they come up with are wrong? Here’s the

NOT FOR RESALE

But what if the answers they come up with are wrong? Here’s the

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

More than getting the NOT FOR RESALE

More than getting the rightNOT FOR RESALE

right


La


79

Wait for It . . .

The head of marketing for a large company I once worked

for complained incessantly about the CEO’s lack of decisive-

ness. “When is this guy going to announce a strategic direc-

tion for the company?” was his mantra-like rhetorical question.

He was relentless, and to be fair, many of us agreed with him

even if we didn’t like his dismissive attitude toward his boss.

Well, the board finally removed the CEO and, wouldn’t

you know it, put the head of marketing in charge of the

company. Though we liked the previous chief executive, we

PeRfeCTIOn PARAlYSIS

So many organizations struggle with this idea that there are no right answers. I think they’ve been influenced by academics, analysts, and industry pundits who falsely attribute business success to intellectual precision and accuracy in decision making. The stories journalists write always seem to conclude that a company succeeded because it came up with the right strategic answers, even though the leaders of those orga-nizations will almost always tell you that what they were really good at was not necessarily having the right answer, but rather being able to rally around the best answer they could find at the time. This tendency to apply twenty-twenty hindsight to success falsely leads people to think that intelligence and precision, rather than clarity, are key.

Plenty of euphemisms attest to this idea that implementation science is more important than decision science. One I heard years ago comes from the military: a plan is better than no plan. And it was General Patton who once said, “A good plan violently executed today is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” Those adages attest to something I’ve seen among too many leadership teams: a simple failure to achieve clarity because executives are waiting for perfection. In the meantime, confusion reigns, leaders lose credibility, and the organization suffers.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL nizations will almost always tell you that what they were really good at

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL nizations will almost always tell you that what they were really good at

was not necessarily having the right answer, but rather being able to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL was not necessarily having the right answer, but rather being able to

rally around the best answer they could find at the time. This tendency

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rally around the best answer they could find at the time. This tendency to apply twenty-twenty hindsight to success falsely leads people to think

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to apply twenty-twenty hindsight to success falsely leads people to think that intelligence and precision, rather than clarity, are key.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that intelligence and precision, rather than clarity, are key.Plenty of euphemisms attest to this idea that implementation

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Plenty of euphemisms attest to this idea that implementation science is more important than decision science. One I heard years ago

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

science is more important than decision science. One I heard years ago

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

plan is better than

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

plan is better than General Patton who once said, “A good plan violently executed today

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

General Patton who once said, “A good plan violently executed today is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” Those adages attest

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” Those adages attest to something I’ve seen among too many leadership teams: a simple

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to something I’ve seen among too many leadership teams: a simple

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

failure to achieve clarity because executives are waiting for perfection.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

failure to achieve clarity because executives are waiting for perfection. In the meantime, confusion reigns, leaders lose credibility, and the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In the meantime, confusion reigns, leaders lose credibility, and the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization suffers.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization suffers.NOT FOR RESALE

to apply twenty-twenty hindsight to success falsely leads people to think

NOT FOR RESALE

to apply twenty-twenty hindsight to success falsely leads people to think that intelligence and precision, rather than clarity, are key.

NOT FOR RESALE

that intelligence and precision, rather than clarity, are key.Plenty of euphemisms attest to this idea that implementation

NOT FOR RESALEPlenty of euphemisms attest to this idea that implementation


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

plan is better than

NOT FOR RESALE

plan is better than General Patton who once said, “A good plan violently executed today

NOT FOR RESALE

General Patton who once said, “A good plan violently executed today is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” Those adages attest

NOT FOR RESALE

is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” Those adages attest to something I’ve seen among too many leadership teams: a simple

NOT FOR RESALE

to something I’ve seen among too many leadership teams: a simple

NOT FOR RESALE

failure to achieve clarity because executives are waiting for perfection.

NOT FOR RESALE

failure to achieve clarity because executives are waiting for perfection. In the meantime, confusion reigns, leaders lose credibility, and the

NOT FOR RESALE

In the meantime, confusion reigns, leaders lose credibility, and the organization suffers.NOT FOR R

ESALE

organization suffers.


La

The Advantage

80

Of course, that’s not to say that leaders should just come up with any answer to these questions without regard to whether or not they are directionally correct. That would be ridiculous. It’s just to say that waiting for clear confirmation that a decision is exactly right is a recipe for mediocrity and almost a guarantee of eventual failure. That’s because organizations learn by making decisions, even bad ones. By being deci-sive, leaders allow themselves to get clear, immediate data from their actions. As a result, they are often able to change course and defeat their indecisive competitors who, while congratulating themselves for not making a mistake, are too mired in theoretical analysis paralysis to rally around any clear plan.

were excited by the prospect that the organization now had

a leader who was finally going to declare a position in the

market and chart a course for the future.

For the first few weeks of the new CEO’s tenure, we

gently asked him if he was ready to communicate the com-

pany’s new direction.

“Not yet,” he assured us. “I’m waiting for a few things to

take shape first.”

That seemed reasonable for a new leader, so we decided

to give him time. But for the next few months, he kept

putting us off. “The market is changing,” he would say as we

encouraged him to set the course for the company. Mean-

while, employees grumbled, competitors outflanked us, and

paralysis set in, all because the leader wanted to find the

perfect plan.

Nine months later—I promise that this actually happened—

we were still operating without a clear statement of direction.

The only thing the CEO was willing to commit to, in terms

of anything new regarding clarity, was a three-word slogan

to be used for marketing purposes (and yes, the three words

rhymed).


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL That seemed reasonable for a new leader, so we decided

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL That seemed reasonable for a new leader, so we decided

to give him time. But for the next few months, he kept

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to give him time. But for the next few months, he kept


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, that’s not to say that leaders should just come up with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, that’s not to say that leaders should just come up with any answer to these questions without regard to whether or not they COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

any answer to these questions without regard to whether or not they


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEparalysis set in, all because the leader wanted to find the

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

Of course, that’s not to say that leaders should just come up with NOT FOR RESALE

Of course, that’s not to say that leaders should just come up with


NOT FOR RESALE



La


81

Now that we’ve acknowledged the danger of seeking perfection at the expense of decisiveness, let’s take on each of the six critical questions that leaders must answer in order to create clarity and build a healthy organization.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

The Advantage

82

QUeSTIOn 1: WHY DO We exIST?

Answering this question requires a leadership team to identify its underly-ing reason for being, also known as its core purpose. Jim Collins and Jerry Porras introduced the idea of core purpose in their great book, Built to Last.1 They asserted that successful, enduring organizations understand the fundamental reason they were founded and why they exist, and they stay true to that reason. This helps them avoid losing their way.

I certainly believe that Collins and Porras were right. Unfortu-nately, too many of the teams I’ve come across in my consulting work fail to properly capture what the authors intended. Instead, they end up with uninspiring and mediocre mission statements that are neither lofty enough nor descriptive enough to be helpful (see the Dunder Mifflin example in the previous “Blather” section).

An organization’s core purpose—why it exists—has to be completely idealistic. I can’t reiterate this point enough. Many leadership teams struggle with this, afraid that what they come up with will seem too grand

or aspirational. Of course, that’s the whole point. Employees in every organization, and at every level, need to know that at the heart of what they do lies something grand and aspirational. They’re well aware that ultimately it will boil down to tangible, tactical activities.

In order to successfully identify their organization’s purpose, leaders must accept the notion that all organizations exist to make people’s lives better. Again, that sounds idealistic, but every enterprise—every last one—ultimately should exist to do just that. To aspire to anything less would be foolish. After all, no one doubts that every company must have some sort of value proposition—a compelling reason that custom-

Employees in every

organization, and at every level,

need to know that at the heart

of what they do lies something

grand and aspirational.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

stay true to that reason. This helps them avoid losing their way.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

stay true to that reason. This helps them avoid losing their way.I certainly believe that Collins and Porras were right. Unfortu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL I certainly believe that Collins and Porras were right. Unfortu-

nately, too many of the teams I’ve come across in my consulting work

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nately, too many of the teams I’ve come across in my consulting work fail to properly capture what the authors intended. Instead, they end

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fail to properly capture what the authors intended. Instead, they end up with uninspiring and mediocre mission statements that are neither

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

up with uninspiring and mediocre mission statements that are neither lofty enough nor descriptive enough to be helpful (see the Dunder

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lofty enough nor descriptive enough to be helpful (see the Dunder Mifflin example in the previous “Blather” section).

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Mifflin example in the previous “Blather” section).

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or aspirational. Of course, that’s the whole point. Employees in every COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or aspirational. Of course, that’s the whole point. Employees in every COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

up with uninspiring and mediocre mission statements that are neither

NOT FOR RESALE

up with uninspiring and mediocre mission statements that are neither lofty enough nor descriptive enough to be helpful (see the Dunder

NOT FOR RESALElofty enough nor descriptive enough to be helpful (see the Dunder

Mifflin example in the previous “Blather” section).

NOT FOR RESALEMifflin example in the previous “Blather” section).An organization’s core

NOT FOR RESALEAn organization’s core

purpose—why it exists—has

NOT FOR RESALE

purpose—why it exists—has to be completely idealistic.

NOT FOR RESALE

to be completely idealistic.

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


83

ers or constituents want to interact with it. And at the heart of that interaction is the expectation of a better life.

Now that doesn’t mean that all organizations make people’s lives better in major, transformational ways. Most do so in relatively small, subtle ways. And it doesn’t mean that they make all people’s lives better; usually it’s a relatively small subset of the population. Nonetheless, every organization must contribute in some way to a better world for some group of people, because if it doesn’t, it will, and should, go out of business.

Assuming that a given organization does, in fact, have the potential for identifying an underlying reason for being—I’ve yet to meet one that doesn’t—the challenge then is to identify and articulate that reason. If leaders can’t do that, they cannot rightfully expect employees to get out of bed every morning with any sense of purpose beyond completing tasks and keeping their jobs.

There is a darn good chance that your company—in fact, any given company—has not yet identified its purpose. I’ve found that most have not, at least not adequately. And I’ve come to realize that even organiza-tions that think they have usually haven’t done so with the degree of rigor and specificity that is necessary. This leads to two problems.

First, those teams don’t achieve a real sense of collective commit-ment from their members. Too often busy executives who want nothing to do with what they see as ethereal, metaphysical conversations simply nod their heads and agree with whatever the team comes up with for a statement of purpose. This is a recipe for jargony, empty declarations.

Second, and this is certainly related, those executives don’t see the company’s reason for existing as having any practical implications for the way they make decisions and run the organization. As a result of having no real idealistic boundaries, they operate in a largely reactive, shortsighted way, being overly tactical and opportunistic. And they often lose their way by getting involved in a variety of random pursuits


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

some group of people, because if it doesn’t, it will, and should, go out

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

some group of people, because if it doesn’t, it will, and should, go out

Assuming that a given organization does, in fact, have the potential

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Assuming that a given organization does, in fact, have the potential for identifying an underlying reason for being—I’ve yet to meet one

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for identifying an underlying reason for being—I’ve yet to meet one that doesn’t—the challenge then is to identify and articulate that reason.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that doesn’t—the challenge then is to identify and articulate that reason. If leaders can’t do that, they cannot rightfully expect employees to get

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

If leaders can’t do that, they cannot rightfully expect employees to get out of bed every morning with any sense of purpose beyond completing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

out of bed every morning with any sense of purpose beyond completing

There is a darn good chance that your company—in fact, any given

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

There is a darn good chance that your company—in fact, any given company—has not yet identified its purpose. I’ve found that most have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

company—has not yet identified its purpose. I’ve found that most have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not, at least not adequately. And I’ve come to realize that even organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not, at least not adequately. And I’ve come to realize that even organiza-tions that think they have usually haven’t done so with the degree of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tions that think they have usually haven’t done so with the degree of rigor and specificity that is necessary. This leads to two problems.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rigor and specificity that is necessary. This leads to two problems.First, those teams don’t achieve a real sense of collective commit-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

First, those teams don’t achieve a real sense of collective commit-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ment from their members. Too often busy executives who want nothing COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ment from their members. Too often busy executives who want nothing to do with what they see as ethereal, metaphysical conversations COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

to do with what they see as ethereal, metaphysical conversations NOT FOR R

ESALEthat doesn’t—the challenge then is to identify and articulate that reason.

NOT FOR RESALE

that doesn’t—the challenge then is to identify and articulate that reason. If leaders can’t do that, they cannot rightfully expect employees to get

NOT FOR RESALEIf leaders can’t do that, they cannot rightfully expect employees to get

out of bed every morning with any sense of purpose beyond completing

NOT FOR RESALEout of bed every morning with any sense of purpose beyond completing

There is a darn good chance that your company—in fact, any given

NOT FOR RESALE

There is a darn good chance that your company—in fact, any given company—has not yet identified its purpose. I’ve found that most have

NOT FOR RESALE

company—has not yet identified its purpose. I’ve found that most have

NOT FOR RESALE

not, at least not adequately. And I’ve come to realize that even organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

not, at least not adequately. And I’ve come to realize that even organiza-tions that think they have usually haven’t done so with the degree of

NOT FOR RESALE

tions that think they have usually haven’t done so with the degree of rigor and specificity that is necessary. This leads to two problems.

NOT FOR RESALE

rigor and specificity that is necessary. This leads to two problems.First, those teams don’t achieve a real sense of collective commit-NOT FOR R

ESALE

First, those teams don’t achieve a real sense of collective commit-ment from their members. Too often busy executives who want nothing NOT FOR R

ESALE

ment from their members. Too often busy executives who want nothing


La

The Advantage

84

and projects that might be financially justifiable in the short term but don’t really fit together. This tends to dilute the focus and passion that employees look for when they’re coming to work.

Some executives, especially those who are a little cynical about all this purpose stuff, will say that their company exists simply to make money for owners or shareholders. That is almost never a purpose, but rather an important indicator of success. It’s how an organization knows that it is effectively fulfilling its purpose, but it falls far short of providing the organization with a guide to what ultimately matters most.

In those rare companies where business owners really do believe that the organization’s underlying purpose is to provide themselves with financial windfalls, it is best that leaders are up front about that purpose. Otherwise they’ll create confusion, cynicism, and a sense of betrayal among employees who almost always prefer a more idealistic reason for coming to work.

Finding Your Reason for ExistingWhen leaders set about identifying the purpose of their organization, there are a few critical factors they must keep in mind to give them a good chance at success.

First, they must be clear that answering this question is not the end of the clarity process. They will have the opportunity, in short order, to clarify more tactical areas of focus for the organization in a less idealistic, more practical way. Knowing this gives them the confidence they need to be purely idealistic in their momentary pursuit of address-ing this question and to avoid the guilt-driven temptation to include too many practical concepts that are of a more tactical nature.

Second, an organization’s reason for existence, its purpose, has to be true. It must be based on the real motivations of the people who founded or are running the organization, not something that simply sounds good on paper. Identifying an organization’s true purpose becomes difficult


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

knows that it is effectively fulfilling its purpose, but it falls far short of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

knows that it is effectively fulfilling its purpose, but it falls far short of providing the organization with a guide to what ultimately matters

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL providing the organization with a guide to what ultimately matters

In those rare companies where business owners really do believe

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In those rare companies where business owners really do believe that the organization’s underlying purpose is to provide themselves with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that the organization’s underlying purpose is to provide themselves with financial windfalls, it is best that leaders are up front about that purpose.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

financial windfalls, it is best that leaders are up front about that purpose. Otherwise they’ll create confusion, cynicism, and a sense of betrayal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Otherwise they’ll create confusion, cynicism, and a sense of betrayal among employees who almost always prefer a more idealistic reason for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

among employees who almost always prefer a more idealistic reason for

Finding Your Reason for Existing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When leaders set about identifying the purpose of their organization,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When leaders set about identifying the purpose of their organization, there are a few critical factors they must keep in mind to give them a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

there are a few critical factors they must keep in mind to give them a good chance at success.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

good chance at success.First, they must be clear that answering this question is not the end COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

First, they must be clear that answering this question is not the end of the clarity process. They will have the opportunity, in short order, COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

of the clarity process. They will have the opportunity, in short order, NOT FOR R

ESALEthat the organization’s underlying purpose is to provide themselves with

NOT FOR RESALE

that the organization’s underlying purpose is to provide themselves with financial windfalls, it is best that leaders are up front about that purpose.

NOT FOR RESALEfinancial windfalls, it is best that leaders are up front about that purpose.

Otherwise they’ll create confusion, cynicism, and a sense of betrayal

NOT FOR RESALEOtherwise they’ll create confusion, cynicism, and a sense of betrayal


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

When leaders set about identifying the purpose of their organization,

NOT FOR RESALE

When leaders set about identifying the purpose of their organization, there are a few critical factors they must keep in mind to give them a

NOT FOR RESALE

there are a few critical factors they must keep in mind to give them a good chance at success.

NOT FOR RESALE

good chance at success.First, they must be clear that answering this question is not the end NOT FOR R

ESALE

First, they must be clear that answering this question is not the end


La


85

when that organization has been around for a long time, sometimes for decades, and has never really clarified its underlying reason for being. In those cases, leaders have to go back and try to understand why its founders started the organization or, at the very least, to connect their current motivations to the organization’s history. If this isn’t doable, then those leaders need to go about this process as though they were rebirth-ing the company themselves, and they must be prepared to stick with their answer for as long as the organization exists.

Third, the process of determining an organization’s purpose cannot be confused with marketing, external or internal. It must be all about clarity and alignment. Certainly it will be important to eventually com-municate the answer to the entire organization, and maybe even to integrate it into external communication when appropriate. But a real danger, and a common one, occurs when leaders confuse their motiva-tion for identifying their purpose with trying to come up with some-thing that will sound impressive on a billboard, in an annual report, or on an employee sweatshirt.

When leaders do this, confusing marketing with creating clarity, they often commit the subsequent error of making a big, formal announcement about the company’s purpose. This only provokes cyni-cism. I try to remind them that even if they never wrote it down or formally communicated their core purpose (not that I would ever rec-ommend this), if it lived only in the hearts and minds of the leadership team, it could still do its job by guiding their decisions and actions and keeping the company grounded. Eventually it would become apparent to employees and customers alike, even without billboards and sweatshirts.

So how does an organization go about figuring out why it exists? It starts by asking this question: “How do we contribute to a better world?” Again, skeptics who think this sounds soft or ethereal need to remember that this is not the end of the clarity process and that it is critical to create a framework for more tactical decisions.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Third, the process of determining an organization’s purpose cannot

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Third, the process of determining an organization’s purpose cannot

be confused with marketing, external or internal. It must be all about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be confused with marketing, external or internal. It must be all about clarity and alignment. Certainly it will be important to eventually com-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

clarity and alignment. Certainly it will be important to eventually com-municate the answer to the entire organization, and maybe even to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

municate the answer to the entire organization, and maybe even to integrate it into external communication when appropriate. But a real

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

integrate it into external communication when appropriate. But a real danger, and a common one, occurs when leaders confuse their motiva-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

danger, and a common one, occurs when leaders confuse their motiva-tion for identifying their purpose with trying to come up with some-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion for identifying their purpose with trying to come up with some-thing that will sound impressive on a billboard, in an annual report, or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thing that will sound impressive on a billboard, in an annual report, or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on an employee sweatshirt.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on an employee sweatshirt.When leaders do this, confusing marketing with creating clarity,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When leaders do this, confusing marketing with creating clarity, they often commit the subsequent error of making a big, formal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they often commit the subsequent error of making a big, formal announcement about the company’s purpose. This only provokes cyni-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

announcement about the company’s purpose. This only provokes cyni-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cism. I try to remind them that even if they never wrote it down or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cism. I try to remind them that even if they never wrote it down or formally communicated their core purpose (not that I would ever rec-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

formally communicated their core purpose (not that I would ever rec-ommend this), if it lived only in the hearts and minds of the leadership COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

ommend this), if it lived only in the hearts and minds of the leadership NOT FOR R

ESALEmunicate the answer to the entire organization, and maybe even to

NOT FOR RESALE

municate the answer to the entire organization, and maybe even to integrate it into external communication when appropriate. But a real

NOT FOR RESALEintegrate it into external communication when appropriate. But a real

danger, and a common one, occurs when leaders confuse their motiva-

NOT FOR RESALEdanger, and a common one, occurs when leaders confuse their motiva-

tion for identifying their purpose with trying to come up with some-

NOT FOR RESALE

tion for identifying their purpose with trying to come up with some-thing that will sound impressive on a billboard, in an annual report, or

NOT FOR RESALE

thing that will sound impressive on a billboard, in an annual report, or

NOT FOR RESALE

When leaders do this, confusing marketing with creating clarity,

NOT FOR RESALE

When leaders do this, confusing marketing with creating clarity, they often commit the subsequent error of making a big, formal

NOT FOR RESALE

they often commit the subsequent error of making a big, formal announcement about the company’s purpose. This only provokes cyni-

NOT FOR RESALE

announcement about the company’s purpose. This only provokes cyni-

NOT FOR RESALE

cism. I try to remind them that even if they never wrote it down or NOT FOR RESALE

cism. I try to remind them that even if they never wrote it down or formally communicated their core purpose (not that I would ever rec-NOT FOR R

ESALE

formally communicated their core purpose (not that I would ever rec-


La

The Advantage

86

Usually the first answer that leaders come up with is not ideal enough—for example: We help companies use technology to do more busi-ness with their partners. We pave driveways so people can get in and out of their houses and go places. We teach kids how to do their homework better.

Those are a start, but they’re certainly not lofty enough. As Porras and Collins say, the next question that needs to be asked, and asked again and again until it leads to the highest purpose or reason for exis-tence, is Why? Why do we do that? Why do we help companies use technol-ogy to do more business with their partners? Why do we pave driveways? Why do we teach kids how to do their homework better?

Eventually, by answering that question again and again, a leader-ship team will get to a point where they’ve identified the most idealistic reason for their business. That point will be somewhere just shy of to make the world a better place. That’s how they’ll know they’re done.

“Why Do We Exist?” CategoriesA tricky part of this is understanding that there are a number of very different categories of purpose, any of which can be valid. Identifying which category fits your organization’s purpose can be very helpful in focusing your discussion of why your organization exists because it better clarifies who the organization ultimately serves.

Customer: This purpose is directly related to serving the needs of an organization’s customer or primary constituent. For instance, a hotel might exist simply because its founder always believed in serving customers. In other words, it’s about pleasing the human beings who walk through its doors. How does that inform the leaders? Well, if customers have a need, the hotel should try to fill it, because that would be true to its purpose. And the hotel shouldn’t hire people who don’t love to serve customers.

The department store Nordstrom is a good example of this. Their underlying motivation for everything they do is about serving custom-


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why? Why do we do that? Why do we help companies use technol-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why? Why do we do that? Why do we help companies use technol-ogy to do more business with their partners? Why do we pave driveways?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ogy to do more business with their partners? Why do we pave driveways?

Why do we teach kids how to do their homework better?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why do we teach kids how to do their homework better?Eventually, by answering that question again and again, a leader-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Eventually, by answering that question again and again, a leader-ship team will get to a point where they’ve identified the most idealistic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ship team will get to a point where they’ve identified the most idealistic reason for their business. That point will be somewhere just shy of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reason for their business. That point will be somewhere just shy of That’s how they’ll know they’re done.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That’s how they’ll know they’re done.

“Why Do We Exist?” Categories

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“Why Do We Exist?” Categories

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A tricky part of this is understanding that there are a number of very

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A tricky part of this is understanding that there are a number of very different categories of purpose, any of which can be valid. Identifying

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

different categories of purpose, any of which can be valid. Identifying which category fits your organization’s purpose can be very helpful in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

which category fits your organization’s purpose can be very helpful in focusing your discussion of why your organization exists because it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

focusing your discussion of why your organization exists because it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

better clarifies who the organization ultimately serves.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Customer: COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Customer: This purpose is directly related to serving the needs of an COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This purpose is directly related to serving the needs of an NOT FOR R

ESALEship team will get to a point where they’ve identified the most idealistic

NOT FOR RESALE

ship team will get to a point where they’ve identified the most idealistic reason for their business. That point will be somewhere just shy of

NOT FOR RESALEreason for their business. That point will be somewhere just shy of

That’s how they’ll know they’re done.

NOT FOR RESALE That’s how they’ll know they’re done.

NOT FOR RESALE

A tricky part of this is understanding that there are a number of very

NOT FOR RESALE

A tricky part of this is understanding that there are a number of very different categories of purpose, any of which can be valid. Identifying

NOT FOR RESALE

different categories of purpose, any of which can be valid. Identifying which category fits your organization’s purpose can be very helpful in

NOT FOR RESALE

which category fits your organization’s purpose can be very helpful in focusing your discussion of why your organization exists because it

NOT FOR RESALE

focusing your discussion of why your organization exists because it

NOT FOR RESALE

better clarifies who the organization ultimately serves.NOT FOR R

ESALE



La


87

ers. Period. It’s not really about fashion, though they certainly need to be good at that; it’s about giving people what they’re looking for, no matter what.

Industry: This purpose is all about being immersed in a given industry. Getting back to the hotel example, maybe it exists because its owners just love the hotel business. It isn’t going to try to get into other lines of business that are not central to hotels, and it isn’t going to hire people who don’t think that hotels are cool.

Many smaller businesses and entrepreneurial ventures fall into this category: they simply love the nature of their industry. That’s why its founders started their business in the first place: to do what they love.

One that comes to mind is a horse-training company one of our consultants has worked with in Texas. The founder and CEO grew up on a ranch in Australia and loves everything to do with horses. So his stated purpose is “to inspire the dreams of horsemen.” Everything his company does is born out of a love for horses and the people who share that love.

Greater Cause: This kind of purpose is not necessarily about what the organization does, but about something connected to it. For instance, a hotel might exist because its owner is a fanatic about vacations. Or maybe it’s all about allowing people to experience luxury. Or the importance of special occasions. It’s not about hotels per se, and it’s not simply about making any customer happy. The hotel exists because it believes in something that a hotel can play a role in making a reality. Ideally employees ought to buy into, if not share, a passion for vacations, luxury, celebrating special occasions, or whatever else it is that drives the owners or leaders of the organization.

The reason that Southwest Airlines exists is to democratize air travel in America. It believes that flying on airplanes shouldn’t be reserved for the wealthy and that all people should be able to attend a family


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of business that are not central to hotels, and it isn’t going to hire people

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of business that are not central to hotels, and it isn’t going to hire people

Many smaller businesses and entrepreneurial ventures fall into this

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Many smaller businesses and entrepreneurial ventures fall into this category: they simply love the nature of their industry. That’s why its

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

category: they simply love the nature of their industry. That’s why its founders started their business in the first place: to do what they love.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

founders started their business in the first place: to do what they love.One that comes to mind is a horse-training company one of our

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

One that comes to mind is a horse-training company one of our consultants has worked with in Texas. The founder and CEO grew up

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

consultants has worked with in Texas. The founder and CEO grew up on a ranch in Australia and loves everything to do with horses. So his

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on a ranch in Australia and loves everything to do with horses. So his stated purpose is “to inspire the dreams of horsemen.” Everything his

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

stated purpose is “to inspire the dreams of horsemen.” Everything his

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

company does is born out of a love for horses and the people who share

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Greater Cause:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Greater Cause: This kind of purpose is not necessarily about what the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This kind of purpose is not necessarily about what the organization does, but about something connected to it. For instance,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization does, but about something connected to it. For instance,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a hotel might exist because its owner is a fanatic about vacations. Or COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a hotel might exist because its owner is a fanatic about vacations. Or maybe it’s all about allowing people to experience luxury. Or the COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

maybe it’s all about allowing people to experience luxury. Or the NOT FOR R

ESALEfounders started their business in the first place: to do what they love.

NOT FOR RESALE

founders started their business in the first place: to do what they love.One that comes to mind is a horse-training company one of our

NOT FOR RESALEOne that comes to mind is a horse-training company one of our

consultants has worked with in Texas. The founder and CEO grew up

NOT FOR RESALEconsultants has worked with in Texas. The founder and CEO grew up

on a ranch in Australia and loves everything to do with horses. So his

NOT FOR RESALE

on a ranch in Australia and loves everything to do with horses. So his stated purpose is “to inspire the dreams of horsemen.” Everything his

NOT FOR RESALE

stated purpose is “to inspire the dreams of horsemen.” Everything his

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


This kind of purpose is not necessarily about what the

NOT FOR RESALE

This kind of purpose is not necessarily about what the organization does, but about something connected to it. For instance, NOT FOR R

ESALE

organization does, but about something connected to it. For instance, a hotel might exist because its owner is a fanatic about vacations. Or NOT FOR R

ESALE

a hotel might exist because its owner is a fanatic about vacations. Or


La

The Advantage

88

reunion, go on vacation, or do business with clients in another city without sacrificing their financial security. That’s why the airline was started. Does it serve customers? Sure. Do they enjoy aviation? Yeah. But those are not the fundamental reasons that Southwest is in business. Its leaders have a larger cause associated with that service, and that cause informs every decision they make. For instance, they are committed to low prices. To violate that commitment would be to violate their purpose because democratizing travel can’t happen if large numbers of customers are priced out of the market.

Community: This purpose is about doing something that makes a specific geographical place better. For instance, our fictional hotel might exist simply to provide a city or region with a nice place for visitors, events, or business. It’s about pride in a community. The hotel will do whatever else it can to contribute to that community, and employees who share a love for and commitment to the area will thrive there.

The head of a youth soccer club near my office told me that his underlying purpose is not really about soccer itself (of course, he loves soccer too), but about serving his local town. He grew up in that com-munity and returned there to run the club even though there are other clubs with more money and better facilities nearby. His commit-ment to the community is why he insists on drawing mostly local talent and partnering with civic groups. And yes, like the neighboring clubs, he wants to win. But that’s akin to a company wanting to make money: it’s an indication of success, not the underlying reason for existing.

Employees: This purpose is not about serving the customer, the industry, or the region, but rather about the employees. Our fictional hotel might be all about giving employees a great work experience or providing a


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

purpose because democratizing travel can’t happen if large numbers of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

purpose because democratizing travel can’t happen if large numbers of

This purpose is about doing something that makes a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This purpose is about doing something that makes a specific geographical place better. For instance, our fictional hotel

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

specific geographical place better. For instance, our fictional hotel might exist simply to provide a city or region with a nice place for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

might exist simply to provide a city or region with a nice place for visitors, events, or business. It’s about pride in a community. The hotel

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

visitors, events, or business. It’s about pride in a community. The hotel will do whatever else it can to contribute to that community, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

will do whatever else it can to contribute to that community, and employees who share a love for and commitment to the area will thrive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

employees who share a love for and commitment to the area will thrive

The head of a youth soccer club near my office told me that his

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

underlying purpose is not really about soccer itself (of course, he loves

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

underlying purpose is not really about soccer itself (of course, he loves soccer too), but about serving his local town. He grew up in that com-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

soccer too), but about serving his local town. He grew up in that com-munity and returned there to run the club even though there are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

munity and returned there to run the club even though there are other clubs with more money and better facilities nearby. His commit-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

other clubs with more money and better facilities nearby. His commit-ment to the community is why he insists on drawing mostly local COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

ment to the community is why he insists on drawing mostly local NOT FOR R

ESALEspecific geographical place better. For instance, our fictional hotel

NOT FOR RESALE

specific geographical place better. For instance, our fictional hotel might exist simply to provide a city or region with a nice place for

NOT FOR RESALEmight exist simply to provide a city or region with a nice place for

visitors, events, or business. It’s about pride in a community. The hotel

NOT FOR RESALEvisitors, events, or business. It’s about pride in a community. The hotel

will do whatever else it can to contribute to that community, and

NOT FOR RESALE

will do whatever else it can to contribute to that community, and employees who share a love for and commitment to the area will thrive

NOT FOR RESALE

employees who share a love for and commitment to the area will thrive


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

underlying purpose is not really about soccer itself (of course, he loves

NOT FOR RESALE

underlying purpose is not really about soccer itself (of course, he loves soccer too), but about serving his local town. He grew up in that com-

NOT FOR RESALE

soccer too), but about serving his local town. He grew up in that com-munity and returned there to run the club even though there are NOT FOR R

ESALE

munity and returned there to run the club even though there are other clubs with more money and better facilities nearby. His commit-NOT FOR R

ESALE

other clubs with more money and better facilities nearby. His commit-


La


89

place to work for low-income people in the area. It will not make decisions or hire people who will jeopardize the well-being of employees.

A paving company I worked with struggled with identifying its fundamental purpose. After coming up with a few uninspiring ideas having to do with keeping driveways safe and making it possible for people to park their vehicles, the CEO/founder finally had an epiphany. He announced to his somewhat surprised executive team that his initial reason for starting the business had nothing to do with paving, but was really about helping poor, first-generation Americans find good jobs so they could buy their first homes and send their kids to college. To make his point clear, he explained that if the paving market tanked, he’d be fine going into roofing, or painting, or whatever other business would allow him to keep his employees working and their families moving forward in their lives.

Wealth: This purpose is about wealth for the owners. It’s possible that our hotel exists simply because the person who owns it thinks it’s a good way to make money for himself and his co-owners. This will and should inform the decisions that they make, with everything seen through a financial lens.

We don’t run across many companies in this category (they prob-ably don’t come to us for help), although a number of venture capitalists and law firms we’ve seen would probably fit. Ultimately they aren’t going to do anything that will reduce their near-term earnings potential or financial return, and they see customers, clients, and employees simply as a means to achieving that. If this is the real reason for exist-ing, it’s important for leaders to be clear about it, with themselves and the people who work for them. Otherwise they’re going to waste a lot of time doing meaningless exercises and having fruitless conversations that only create confusion and cynicism among employees who are best served by knowing the clear truth.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reason for starting the business had nothing to do with paving, but was

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reason for starting the business had nothing to do with paving, but was really about helping poor, first-generation Americans find good jobs so

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL really about helping poor, first-generation Americans find good jobs so

they could buy their first homes and send their kids to college. To make

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they could buy their first homes and send their kids to college. To make his point clear, he explained that if the paving market tanked, he’d be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

his point clear, he explained that if the paving market tanked, he’d be fine going into roofing, or painting, or whatever other business would

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fine going into roofing, or painting, or whatever other business would allow him to keep his employees working and their families moving

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allow him to keep his employees working and their families moving

This purpose is about wealth for the owners. It’s possible that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This purpose is about wealth for the owners. It’s possible that our hotel exists simply because the person who owns it thinks it’s a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

our hotel exists simply because the person who owns it thinks it’s a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

good way to make money for himself and his co-owners. This will and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

good way to make money for himself and his co-owners. This will and should inform the decisions that they make, with everything seen

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

should inform the decisions that they make, with everything seen through a financial lens.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

through a financial lens.We don’t run across many companies in this category (they prob-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

We don’t run across many companies in this category (they prob-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ably don’t come to us for help), although a number of venture capitalists COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ably don’t come to us for help), although a number of venture capitalists and law firms we’ve seen would probably fit. Ultimately they aren’t COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

and law firms we’ve seen would probably fit. Ultimately they aren’t NOT FOR R

ESALEfine going into roofing, or painting, or whatever other business would

NOT FOR RESALE

fine going into roofing, or painting, or whatever other business would allow him to keep his employees working and their families moving

NOT FOR RESALEallow him to keep his employees working and their families moving

This purpose is about wealth for the owners. It’s possible that

NOT FOR RESALE

This purpose is about wealth for the owners. It’s possible that our hotel exists simply because the person who owns it thinks it’s a

NOT FOR RESALE

our hotel exists simply because the person who owns it thinks it’s a

NOT FOR RESALE

good way to make money for himself and his co-owners. This will and

NOT FOR RESALE

good way to make money for himself and his co-owners. This will and should inform the decisions that they make, with everything seen

NOT FOR RESALE

should inform the decisions that they make, with everything seen through a financial lens.

NOT FOR RESALE

through a financial lens.We don’t run across many companies in this category (they prob-NOT FOR R

ESALE

We don’t run across many companies in this category (they prob-ably don’t come to us for help), although a number of venture capitalists NOT FOR R

ESALE

ably don’t come to us for help), although a number of venture capitalists


La

The Advantage

90

Not a DifferentiatorAs we can see by using the example of the hotel, two companies that are in the same industry will often have different reasons for existing. That makes sense. However, it’s also interesting to understand that two companies in completely different industries can share the same purpose. For instance, both a hospital and a masseuse could very well exist to alleviate pain and suffering in the world. Or a gardener and an artist might exist to help people appreciate beauty.

The point here is that an organization’s reason for existing is not meant to be a differentiator and that the purpose for identifying it is only to clarify what is true in order to guide the business. When leaders try to use their purpose as a strategic differentiator, they usually fail to fully tap into the real reason for having one, and then find themselves disappointed when they learn that another company, perhaps even within their industry, shares theirs. They need to remember that it is simply about getting clarity.

It’s important to keep in mind that the process of identifying why an organization exists is often a messy one. Because it’s more of an art than a science, it’s going to require a little time and plenty of fluid, unstructured discussion. And that’s okay. The goal is not to get to an answer in the shortest amount of time possible, but rather to untap the true reason for the organization’s existence. Of course leaders need to remember that it is only the first of six elements of organizational clarity.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The point here is that an organization’s reason for existing is not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The point here is that an organization’s reason for existing is not

meant to be a differentiator and that the purpose for identifying it is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meant to be a differentiator and that the purpose for identifying it is only to clarify what is true in order to guide the business. When leaders

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

only to clarify what is true in order to guide the business. When leaders try to use their purpose as a strategic differentiator, they usually fail to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

try to use their purpose as a strategic differentiator, they usually fail to fully tap into the real reason for having one, and then find themselves

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fully tap into the real reason for having one, and then find themselves disappointed when they learn that another company, perhaps even

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

disappointed when they learn that another company, perhaps even within their industry, shares theirs. They need to remember that it is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

within their industry, shares theirs. They need to remember that it is

It’s important to keep in mind that the process of identifying why

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

an organization exists is often a messy one. Because it’s more of an art

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

an organization exists is often a messy one. Because it’s more of an art than a science, it’s going to require a little time and plenty of fluid,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

than a science, it’s going to require a little time and plenty of fluid, unstructured discussion. And that’s okay. The goal is not to get to an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

unstructured discussion. And that’s okay. The goal is not to get to an answer in the shortest amount of time possible, but rather to untap the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

answer in the shortest amount of time possible, but rather to untap the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

true reason for the organization’s existence. Of course leaders need to COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

true reason for the organization’s existence. Of course leaders need to remember that it is only the first of six elements of organizational COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

remember that it is only the first of six elements of organizational NOT FOR R

ESALEtry to use their purpose as a strategic differentiator, they usually fail to

NOT FOR RESALE

try to use their purpose as a strategic differentiator, they usually fail to fully tap into the real reason for having one, and then find themselves

NOT FOR RESALEfully tap into the real reason for having one, and then find themselves

disappointed when they learn that another company, perhaps even

NOT FOR RESALEdisappointed when they learn that another company, perhaps even


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

an organization exists is often a messy one. Because it’s more of an art

NOT FOR RESALE

an organization exists is often a messy one. Because it’s more of an art than a science, it’s going to require a little time and plenty of fluid,

NOT FOR RESALE

than a science, it’s going to require a little time and plenty of fluid, unstructured discussion. And that’s okay. The goal is not to get to an

NOT FOR RESALE

unstructured discussion. And that’s okay. The goal is not to get to an answer in the shortest amount of time possible, but rather to untap the NOT FOR R

ESALE

answer in the shortest amount of time possible, but rather to untap the true reason for the organization’s existence. Of course leaders need to NOT FOR R

ESALE

true reason for the organization’s existence. Of course leaders need to


La


91

QUeSTIOn 2: HOW DO We BeHAve?

The word intolerance isn’t often used in a positive way in society. And yet when it comes to creating organizational cla-rity and alignment, intoler-ance is essential. After all, if an organization is tolerant of everything, it will stand for nothing.

The answer to the question, How do we behave?, is embodied in an organization’s core values, which should provide the ultimate guide for employee behavior at all levels. This too is an area that Collins and Porras addressed in Built to Last. In their research, they found that enduring, successful companies adhered strictly to a fundamental set of principles that guided their behaviors and decisions over time, pre-serving the essence of the organization.

The importance of values in creating clarity and enabling a company to become healthy cannot be overstated. More than anything else, values are critical because they define a company’s personality. They provide employees with clarity about how to behave, which reduces the need for inefficient and demoralizing micromanagement.

That alone makes values worthwhile. But beyond that, an organiza-tion that has properly identified its values and adheres to them will naturally attract the right employees and repel the wrong ones. This makes recruiting exponentially easier and more effective, and it drasti-cally reduces turnover.

The impact of values goes beyond employees. Clear values can also serve to attract and repel the right customers who want to do business with an organization that reflects what they value, and not just in some cause-related, theoretical sense. People who value creativity, for instance, often choose an organization that builds its culture around creativity.

If an organization is tolerant of

everything, it will stand for

nothing.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

How do we behave?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

How do we behave?, is embodied in an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, is embodied in an How do we behave?, is embodied in an How do we behave?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

How do we behave?, is embodied in an How do we behave?organization’s core values, which should provide the ultimate guide for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization’s core values, which should provide the ultimate guide for employee behavior at all levels. This too is an area that Collins and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

employee behavior at all levels. This too is an area that Collins and Built to Last.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Built to Last. In their research, they found that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In their research, they found that enduring, successful companies adhered strictly to a fundamental set

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enduring, successful companies adhered strictly to a fundamental set of principles that guided their behaviors and decisions over time, pre-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of principles that guided their behaviors and decisions over time, pre-serving the essence of the organization.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

serving the essence of the organization.The importance of values in creating clarity and enabling a company

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The importance of values in creating clarity and enabling a company to become healthy cannot be overstated. More than anything else,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to become healthy cannot be overstated. More than anything else, values are critical because they define a company’s personality. They

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values are critical because they define a company’s personality. They provide employees with clarity about how to behave, which reduces the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

provide employees with clarity about how to behave, which reduces the need for inefficient and demoralizing micromanagement.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

need for inefficient and demoralizing micromanagement.That alone makes values worthwhile. But beyond that, an organiza-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

That alone makes values worthwhile. But beyond that, an organiza-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE

organization’s core values, which should provide the ultimate guide for

NOT FOR RESALE

organization’s core values, which should provide the ultimate guide for employee behavior at all levels. This too is an area that Collins and

NOT FOR RESALEemployee behavior at all levels. This too is an area that Collins and

In their research, they found that

NOT FOR RESALE In their research, they found that

enduring, successful companies adhered strictly to a fundamental set

NOT FOR RESALE

enduring, successful companies adhered strictly to a fundamental set of principles that guided their behaviors and decisions over time, pre-

NOT FOR RESALE

of principles that guided their behaviors and decisions over time, pre-serving the essence of the organization.

NOT FOR RESALE

serving the essence of the organization.The importance of values in creating clarity and enabling a company

NOT FOR RESALE

The importance of values in creating clarity and enabling a company to become healthy cannot be overstated. More than anything else,

NOT FOR RESALE

to become healthy cannot be overstated. More than anything else, values are critical because they define a company’s personality. They

NOT FOR RESALE

values are critical because they define a company’s personality. They provide employees with clarity about how to behave, which reduces the NOT FOR R

ESALE

provide employees with clarity about how to behave, which reduces the need for inefficient and demoralizing micromanagement.NOT FOR R

ESALE

need for inefficient and demoralizing micromanagement.


La

The Advantage

92

Often this is a more effective means of marketing than expensive and easy-to-ignore programs around advertising, PR, and lead generation. Companies that are serious about their values find that the right cus-tomers eventually start to seek them out naturally.

Values StampedeCollins and Porras made such a compelling case in their book that they set off a stampede of executives determined to find some core values of their own. Unfortunately, many of those executives missed the authors’ point and came home from their off-site meetings with a long list of generic and uninspiring words that they then plastered onto posters, T-shirts, and Web sites. All too often, the result was an organization full of confused, frustrated, and cynical employees (and sometimes customers too).

The mistake those leaders made was trying to be all things to all people, which led them to make their values statements as broad and inclusive as possible. In many cases, this comes about because leaders conduct a survey asking employees to vote on which values they want, and then they try to accommodate all of the input they receive. Let me be very clear: this is a terrible process for identifying core values, for reasons that will become obvious later in this section.

When an organization announces that it has nine core values including customer service, innovation, quality, honesty, integrity, envi-ronmental responsibility, work-life balance, financial responsibility, and respect for the individual, it makes it impossible to use those values to make decisions, hire employees, or enact policies. After all, no action, person, or policy can meet all of those criteria.

This creates its own set of problems. When leaders who adopt too many values finally realize what they’ve done and that there is no hope for actually putting their many values to practical use, they often end up ignoring them altogether. In their heart of hearts, they come to see their value statement as a piece of internal marketing, even propaganda.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

set off a stampede of executives determined to find some core values of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

set off a stampede of executives determined to find some core values of their own. Unfortunately, many of those executives missed the authors’

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL their own. Unfortunately, many of those executives missed the authors’

point and came home from their off-site meetings with a long list of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

point and came home from their off-site meetings with a long list of generic and uninspiring words that they then plastered onto posters,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

generic and uninspiring words that they then plastered onto posters, T-shirts, and Web sites. All too often, the result was an organization

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

T-shirts, and Web sites. All too often, the result was an organization full of confused, frustrated, and cynical employees (and sometimes

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

full of confused, frustrated, and cynical employees (and sometimes

The mistake those leaders made was trying to be all things to all

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The mistake those leaders made was trying to be all things to all people, which led them to make their values statements as broad and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people, which led them to make their values statements as broad and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inclusive as possible. In many cases, this comes about because leaders

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inclusive as possible. In many cases, this comes about because leaders conduct a survey asking employees to vote on which values they want,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

conduct a survey asking employees to vote on which values they want, and then they try to accommodate all of the input they receive. Let me

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and then they try to accommodate all of the input they receive. Let me be very clear: this is a terrible process for identifying core values, for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be very clear: this is a terrible process for identifying core values, for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reasons that will become obvious later in this section.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reasons that will become obvious later in this section.When an organization announces that it has nine core values COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

When an organization announces that it has nine core values including customer service, innovation, quality, honesty, integrity, envi-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

including customer service, innovation, quality, honesty, integrity, envi-NOT FOR R

ESALET-shirts, and Web sites. All too often, the result was an organization

NOT FOR RESALE

T-shirts, and Web sites. All too often, the result was an organization full of confused, frustrated, and cynical employees (and sometimes

NOT FOR RESALEfull of confused, frustrated, and cynical employees (and sometimes

The mistake those leaders made was trying to be all things to all

NOT FOR RESALE

The mistake those leaders made was trying to be all things to all people, which led them to make their values statements as broad and

NOT FOR RESALE

people, which led them to make their values statements as broad and

NOT FOR RESALE

inclusive as possible. In many cases, this comes about because leaders

NOT FOR RESALE

inclusive as possible. In many cases, this comes about because leaders conduct a survey asking employees to vote on which values they want,

NOT FOR RESALE

conduct a survey asking employees to vote on which values they want, and then they try to accommodate all of the input they receive. Let me

NOT FOR RESALE

and then they try to accommodate all of the input they receive. Let me be very clear: this is a terrible process for identifying core values, for

NOT FOR RESALE

be very clear: this is a terrible process for identifying core values, for

NOT FOR RESALE

reasons that will become obvious later in this section.NOT FOR RESALE

reasons that will become obvious later in this section.When an organization announces that it has nine core values NOT FOR R

ESALE

When an organization announces that it has nine core values


La


93

So they resign themselves to operating their companies in a pragmatic, valueless way, leaving employees and customers unsure of what the organization really stands for. When employees complain that the com-pany’s values are being violated, leaders just shrug their shoulders and focus on something more tangible.

Different Kinds of ValuesAn important key to identifying the right, small set of behavioral values is understanding that there are different kinds of values (something I wrote about a number of years ago in the Harvard Business Review).2

Among these, core values are by far the most important and must not be confused with the others. Let’s define the different types now so we don’t get them confused:

Accidental

Permission-to-Play

Core

Asp

iratio

nal

Core ValuesThese are the few—just two or three—behavioral traits that are inher-ent in an organization. Core values lie at the heart of the organization’s


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

An important key to identifying the right, small set of behavioral values

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

An important key to identifying the right, small set of behavioral values is understanding that there are different kinds of values (something I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL is understanding that there are different kinds of values (something I

Harvard Business Review

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Harvard Business ReviewAmong these, core values are by far the most important and must not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Among these, core values are by far the most important and must not be confused with the others. Let’s define the different types now so we

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be confused with the others. Let’s define the different types now so we

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Asp

iratio

nal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Asp

iratio

nal

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Asp

iratio

nal

NOT FOR RESALE

Asp

iratio

nal


La

The Advantage

94

not for everyone

We worked with an airline that is fanatical about its culture.

It had three core values, one of which had to do with humor.

What testifies to the fact that this is a true core value is

that the company refuses to hire people in any job, at any

level, who don’t have a sense of humor about themselves as

well as life. Its leaders even go so far as to encourage and

defend the humorous behaviors of their employees on the

rare occasion when a customer doesn’t appreciate it.

A great example of this occurred when a frequent flyer

wrote to the company’s CEO complaining that a flight atten-

dant was making jokes during the preflight safety check. She

was upset that the employee was trying to be funny while

he was talking about something as serious and important as

safety.

Now, most CEOs would respond to that complaint by

thanking the customer for her time and her loyalty to the

airline and assuring her that safety was, indeed, important to

the organization. They would then promise to look into the

matter to make sure that the flight attendant adjusts his

behavior to avoid offending any other passengers who could

identity, do not change over time, and must already exist. In other words, they cannot be contrived.

An organization knows that it has identified its core values correctly when it will allow itself to be punished for living those values and when it accepts the fact that employees will sometimes take those values too far. Core values are not a matter of convenience. They cannot be extracted from an organization any more than a human being’s con-science can be extracted from his or her person. As a result, they should be used to guide every aspect of an organization, from hiring and firing to strategy and performance management.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


wrote to the company’s CEO complaining that a flight atten-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


dant was making jokes during the preflight safety check. She COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dant was making jokes during the preflight safety check. She

science can be extracted from his or her person. As a result, they should

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

science can be extracted from his or her person. As a result, they should be used to guide every aspect of an organization, from hiring and firing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL be used to guide every aspect of an organization, from hiring and firing

NOT FOR RESALEWe worked with an airline that is fanatical about its culture.

NOT FOR RESALEWe worked with an airline that is fanatical about its culture.


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


A great example of this occurred when a frequent flyer NOT FOR RESALE


wrote to the company’s CEO complaining that a flight atten-NOT FOR RESALE



La


95

Wishful Thinking

I once worked with a CEO to identify the core values of his

company. When I asked him what he thought one of the

values might be, without hesitation he said “sense of urgency.”

I was a little surprised because the limited exposure I’d had

with the employees at the company didn’t mesh with that

description. When I asked him if he believed that urgency

was evident in the organization, he responded “Heck no.

Aspirational ValuesThese are the characteristics that an organization wants to have, wishes it already had, and believes it must develop in order to maximize its success in its current market environment. Aspirational values are the qualities that an organization is aspiring to adopt and will do its best to manage intentionally into the organization. However, they are neither natural nor inherent, which is why they must be purposefully inserted into the culture. But they should not be confused with core values, which, again, do not change over time and do not come and go with the needs of the business.

be uncomfortable with the jokes. That would be reasonable

enough, I suppose, unless your core values have to do with

humor.

Well, the CEO of this company took a different approach.

Rather than apologizing to the customer and asking the

flight attendant to moderate his behavior, he wrote her a

short note with three words on it: “We’ll miss you.” There can

be little doubt that the company believed that humor was a

core value.

(Rest assured that this company, like all good airlines,

takes safety very, very seriously.)


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

These are the characteristics that an organization wants to have, wishes

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

These are the characteristics that an organization wants to have, wishes it already had, and believes it must develop in order to maximize its

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it already had, and believes it must develop in order to maximize its success in its current market environment. Aspirational values are the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

success in its current market environment. Aspirational values are the qualities that an organization is aspiring to adopt and will do its best

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

qualities that an organization is aspiring to adopt and will do its best to manage intentionally into the organization. However, they are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to manage intentionally into the organization. However, they are neither natural nor inherent, which is why they must be purposefully

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

neither natural nor inherent, which is why they must be purposefully inserted into the culture. But they should not be confused with core

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inserted into the culture. But they should not be confused with core values, which, again, do not change over time and do not come and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values, which, again, do not change over time and do not come and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

go with the needs of the business.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

go with the needs of the business.

(Rest assured that this company, like all good airlines,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL (Rest assured that this company, like all good airlines,

NOT FOR RESALEThese are the characteristics that an organization wants to have, wishes

NOT FOR RESALEThese are the characteristics that an organization wants to have, wishes

it already had, and believes it must develop in order to maximize its

NOT FOR RESALE

it already had, and believes it must develop in order to maximize its success in its current market environment. Aspirational values are the

NOT FOR RESALE

success in its current market environment. Aspirational values are the qualities that an organization is aspiring to adopt and will do its best

NOT FOR RESALE

qualities that an organization is aspiring to adopt and will do its best to manage intentionally into the organization. However, they are

NOT FOR RESALE

to manage intentionally into the organization. However, they are neither natural nor inherent, which is why they must be purposefully

NOT FOR RESALE

neither natural nor inherent, which is why they must be purposefully inserted into the culture. But they should not be confused with core

NOT FOR RESALE

inserted into the culture. But they should not be confused with core values, which, again, do not change over time and do not come and

NOT FOR RESALE

values, which, again, do not change over time and do not come and

NOT FOR RESALE

go with the needs of the business.NOT FOR RESALE

go with the needs of the business.


La

The Advantage

96

Aspirations

A small consulting firm I know was founded on the values of

humility and passion. Every potential new hire had to pass

the screening for those values, and every decision the firm

made was scrutinized, to a certain extent, against whether it

reflected humility and passion.

As the firm started to experience increased demand for

its services, it realized that its informal, scrappy approach to

serving clients wasn’t scalable and needed to change. Essen-

tially, it needed to instill a greater sense of professionalism

and systematization in its operations.

Knowing that this was not inherent in its passionate,

entrepreneurial culture, the founders decided to make “pro-

fessionalism” one of the firm’s aspirational values. That meant

they would intentionally hire someone who had experience

building a more mature and organized consulting practice.

Of course, that person would have to embody the firm’s core

values too, because, as the president said, “To hire someone

who wasn’t humble and passionate would be like selling our

soul.”

We’re complacent as hell. That’s why it needs to be a core

value.”

What we advised that client to do was make “sense of

urgency” an aspirational value and do everything it could to

intentionally instill it in the organization. But they needed

to avoid falsely claiming it as a core value, because that

would only incite cynicism among employees who knew

better.

Confusing core and aspirational values is a frequent mistake that companies make. It is critical that leaders understand the difference.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Aspirations

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Aspirations


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


tially, it needed to instill a greater sense of professionalism COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tially, it needed to instill a greater sense of professionalism

Confusing core and aspirational values is a frequent mistake

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Confusing core and aspirational values is a frequent mistake

that companies make. It is critical that leaders understand the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that companies make. It is critical that leaders understand the

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

serving clients wasn’t scalable and needed to change. Essen-NOT FOR RESALE



La


97

Permission-to-Play ValuesThese values are the minimum behavioral standards that are required in an organization. Although they are extremely important, permission-to-play values don’t serve to clearly define or differentiate an organiza-tion from others. Values that commonly fit into this category include honesty, integrity, and respect for others. If those sound generic, some-thing you’ve seen on virtually all of the values statements plastered on the walls of every mediocre company you’ve ever visited, then you understand the problem. Permission-to-play values must be delineated from the core to avoid dilution and genericism (I don’t think that’s a word, but you get the point).

The firm hired a new VP who met the core values criteria

and brought a new level of professionalism to the firm. But

they were careful to remind themselves that this was not

something that came naturally to them and that they would

always have to work at it so that the firm could continue

growing.

Integrity About Integrity

An executive team at a technology start-up we worked with

insisted that integrity was a core value of their company

(many of our clients do this).

They justified this by explaining that they would never

hire someone who lied during an interview or put false infor-

mation on a résumé. We explained that most organizations

had similar policies and that unless they were willing to adopt

clearly higher standards for integrity than most other com-

panies, and then stand by those standards even in the face

of serious market pressure, they should classify integrity as

a permission-to-play value.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL These values are the minimum behavioral standards that are required

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL These values are the minimum behavioral standards that are required

in an organization. Although they are extremely important, permission-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in an organization. Although they are extremely important, permission-to-play values don’t serve to clearly define or differentiate an organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to-play values don’t serve to clearly define or differentiate an organiza-tion from others. Values that commonly fit into this category include

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion from others. Values that commonly fit into this category include honesty, integrity, and respect for others. If those sound generic, some-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

honesty, integrity, and respect for others. If those sound generic, some-thing you’ve seen on virtually all of the values statements plastered on

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thing you’ve seen on virtually all of the values statements plastered on the walls of every mediocre company you’ve ever visited, then you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the walls of every mediocre company you’ve ever visited, then you understand the problem. Permission-to-play values must be delineated

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

understand the problem. Permission-to-play values must be delineated

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

from the core to avoid dilution and genericism (I don’t think that’s a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

from the core to avoid dilution and genericism (I don’t think that’s a word, but you get the point).

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

word, but you get the point).

An executive team at a technology start-up we worked with COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

An executive team at a technology start-up we worked with NOT FOR R

ESALEto-play values don’t serve to clearly define or differentiate an organiza-

NOT FOR RESALE

to-play values don’t serve to clearly define or differentiate an organiza-tion from others. Values that commonly fit into this category include

NOT FOR RESALE

tion from others. Values that commonly fit into this category include honesty, integrity, and respect for others. If those sound generic, some-

NOT FOR RESALEhonesty, integrity, and respect for others. If those sound generic, some-

thing you’ve seen on virtually all of the values statements plastered on

NOT FOR RESALE

thing you’ve seen on virtually all of the values statements plastered on the walls of every mediocre company you’ve ever visited, then you

NOT FOR RESALE

the walls of every mediocre company you’ve ever visited, then you understand the problem. Permission-to-play values must be delineated

NOT FOR RESALE

understand the problem. Permission-to-play values must be delineated

NOT FOR RESALE

from the core to avoid dilution and genericism (I don’t think that’s a

NOT FOR RESALE

from the core to avoid dilution and genericism (I don’t think that’s a word, but you get the point).

NOT FOR RESALE

word, but you get the point).

Integrity About IntegrityNOT FOR RESALE

Integrity About Integrity


La

The Advantage

98

Accidental ValuesThese values are the traits that are evident in an organization but have come about unintentionally and don’t necessarily serve the good of the organization. In many companies, behavioral tendencies develop over time because of history, or because people start to hire employees who come from similar backgrounds. One day everyone looks around and realizes that just about every employee who works in the organization shares some quality: socioeconomic status, intro-version, or good looks. The question that needs to be asked is whether being middle class, introverted, or good looking is something that the company has cultivated for a purpose, or whether it came about accidentally. It’s important that leaders guard against accidental values taking root because they can prevent new ideas and people from flourishing in an organization. Sometimes they even sabotage its success by shutting out new perspectives and even potential customers.

Unintended Consequences

A fashion accessory company we worked with during its

founding adopted a strong set of three core values that it

carefully built its operations around.

They initially refused, saying, “But if we don’t have integ-

rity as one of our core values, then people will think we don’t

care about it.”

During a subsequent meeting, executives discussed the

possibility of doing some competitive intelligence gathering

in a manner that could easily appear to be unethical to some

people. We reminded them about their insistence on includ-

ing integrity as a core value. They relented and reclassified

it as permission-to-play.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

These values are the traits that are evident in an organization but

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

These values are the traits that are evident in an organization but have come about unintentionally and don’t necessarily serve the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

have come about unintentionally and don’t necessarily serve the good of the organization. In many companies, behavioral tendencies

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

good of the organization. In many companies, behavioral tendencies develop over time because of history, or because people start to hire

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

develop over time because of history, or because people start to hire employees who come from similar backgrounds. One day everyone

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

employees who come from similar backgrounds. One day everyone looks around and realizes that just about every employee who works

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

looks around and realizes that just about every employee who works in the organization shares some quality: socioeconomic status, intro

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in the organization shares some quality: socioeconomic status, introor good looks. The question that needs to be asked is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or good looks. The question that needs to be asked is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

whether being middle class, introverted, or good looking is something

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

whether being middle class, introverted, or good looking is something that the company has cultivated for a purpose, or whether it came

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that the company has cultivated for a purpose, or whether it came about accidentally. It’s important that leaders guard against accidental

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

about accidentally. It’s important that leaders guard against accidental values taking root because they can prevent new ideas and people COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

values taking root because they can prevent new ideas and people NOT FOR R

ESALEThese values are the traits that are evident in an organization but

NOT FOR RESALE

These values are the traits that are evident in an organization but have come about unintentionally and don’t necessarily serve the

NOT FOR RESALEhave come about unintentionally and don’t necessarily serve the

good of the organization. In many companies, behavioral tendencies

NOT FOR RESALEgood of the organization. In many companies, behavioral tendencies

develop over time because of history, or because people start to hire

NOT FOR RESALE

develop over time because of history, or because people start to hire employees who come from similar backgrounds. One day everyone

NOT FOR RESALE

employees who come from similar backgrounds. One day everyone looks around and realizes that just about every employee who works

NOT FOR RESALE

looks around and realizes that just about every employee who works in the organization shares some quality: socioeconomic status, intro

NOT FOR RESALE

in the organization shares some quality: socioeconomic status, introor good looks. The question that needs to be asked is

NOT FOR RESALE

or good looks. The question that needs to be asked is

NOT FOR RESALE

whether being middle class, introverted, or good looking is something

NOT FOR RESALE

whether being middle class, introverted, or good looking is something that the company has cultivated for a purpose, or whether it came

NOT FOR RESALE

that the company has cultivated for a purpose, or whether it came about accidentally. It’s important that leaders guard against accidental NOT FOR R

ESALE

about accidentally. It’s important that leaders guard against accidental


La


99

Isolating the CoreThe key to sifting core values from the others, especially aspirational and permission-to-play values, is to ask a few difficult questions. For instance, separating core from aspirational values can be done by asking the questions, Is this trait inherent and natural for us, and has it been apparent in the organization for a long time? Or, is it something that we have to work hard to cultivate? A core value will have been apparent for a long time and requires little intentional provocation.

Permission-to-play values are also often confused with core. The best way to differentiate them is to ask, Would our organization be able to credibly claim that we are more committed to this value than 99 percent of the companies in our industry? If so, then maybe it really is core. If not, then it’s probably a candidate for permission-to-play; it’s still important and should be used as a filter in hiring, but it’s not what sets the organization apart and uniquely defines it.

A few years later, we visited the company’s headquarters

after not having seen them for quite some time. They had

grown considerably and had hired dozens of new employees.

But something struck me about the new hires: they all

seemed to be in their early twenties and were wearing the

same kind of mod, hip, black clothes.

I asked the CEO, “When did you adopt a new core value?”

He seemed confused, so I pointed out that the company

seemed to be hiring people who fit a common demographic

and stylistic profile. It was only then that he realized that they

had accidentally adopted a certain youthful, hip culture, one

that had nothing to do with their customer base and that

could potentially limit the appeal of their company to pro-

spective candidates. They took steps to revisit their hiring

methods and their decision making.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL seemed to be hiring people who fit a common demographic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL seemed to be hiring people who fit a common demographic

and stylistic profile. It was only then that he realized that they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL and stylistic profile. It was only then that he realized that they


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The key to sifting core values from the others, especially aspirational

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The key to sifting core values from the others, especially aspirational and permission-to-play values, is to ask a few difficult questions.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and permission-to-play values, is to ask a few difficult questions. For instance, separating core from aspirational values can be done

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

For instance, separating core from aspirational values can be done by asking the questions,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

by asking the questions, has it been apparent in the organization for a long time? Or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

has it been apparent in the organization for a long time? Orsomething that we have to work hard to cultivate?COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

something that we have to work hard to cultivate?have been apparent for a long time and requires little intentional COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

have been apparent for a long time and requires little intentional


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

The key to sifting core values from the others, especially aspirational

NOT FOR RESALE

The key to sifting core values from the others, especially aspirational and permission-to-play values, is to ask a few difficult questions.

NOT FOR RESALE

and permission-to-play values, is to ask a few difficult questions. For instance, separating core from aspirational values can be done

NOT FOR RESALE

For instance, separating core from aspirational values can be done by asking the questions,

NOT FOR RESALE

by asking the questions, Is this trait inherent and natural for us, and

NOT FOR RESALE

Is this trait inherent and natural for us, and has it been apparent in the organization for a long time? OrNOT FOR R

ESALE

has it been apparent in the organization for a long time? Orsomething that we have to work hard to cultivate?NOT FOR R

ESALE

something that we have to work hard to cultivate?


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEspective candidates. They took steps to revisit their hiring


La

The Advantage

100

It’s worth restating that the reason organizations need to under-stand the various kinds of values is to prevent them from getting con-fused with and diluting the core. Core values are what matters most.

Choosing a NameAnother key to successfully undertaking the core value process is decid-ing what to call a core value once you’ve identified it. The key is to avoid excessive wordsmithing while at the same time finding the most descriptive and effective phrase. I find it helpful for leaders to choose a unique, nontraditional word or phrase—something that doesn’t already have such a worn legacy in society that everyone assumes they know what it means. Of course, once a name or a term has been chosen, it will be important for the leadership team to define that term with the most vivid and behavioral description possible. And the best way to do that is to write a description of what that value looks like in action.

floor Sweeper

One start-up client I worked with described one of its core

values as “willing to sweep floors.” Most companies would

have described it simply as “hard work,” and few people

outside the organization knew exactly what it meant. But

that was a good thing because it gave the company the

opportunity to define the phrase in its own way.

In their case, the leaders described “willing to sweep

floors” as having no concerns about status and ego and

willing to do whatever was necessary to help the company

succeed. No job was beneath any employee, and even the

highest-level executive had to be willing to do the most

menial work if that’s what was needed.

The value was so powerful that the day after the leader-

ship team established it, one of its members decided to quit


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

avoid excessive wordsmithing while at the same time finding the most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

avoid excessive wordsmithing while at the same time finding the most descriptive and effective phrase. I find it helpful for leaders to choose

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL descriptive and effective phrase. I find it helpful for leaders to choose

a unique, nontraditional word or phrase—something that doesn’t

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a unique, nontraditional word or phrase—something that doesn’t already have such a worn legacy in society that everyone assumes they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

already have such a worn legacy in society that everyone assumes they know what it means. Of course, once a name or a term has been chosen,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

know what it means. Of course, once a name or a term has been chosen, it will be important for the leadership team to define that term with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it will be important for the leadership team to define that term with the most vivid and behavioral description possible. And the best way

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the most vivid and behavioral description possible. And the best way to do that is to write a description of what that value looks like in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to do that is to write a description of what that value looks like in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

f

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

floor Sweeper

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

loor Sweeper


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


outside the organization knew exactly what it meant. But COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

outside the organization knew exactly what it meant. But NOT FOR R

ESALEknow what it means. Of course, once a name or a term has been chosen,

NOT FOR RESALE

know what it means. Of course, once a name or a term has been chosen, it will be important for the leadership team to define that term with

NOT FOR RESALEit will be important for the leadership team to define that term with

the most vivid and behavioral description possible. And the best way

NOT FOR RESALEthe most vivid and behavioral description possible. And the best way


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

loor Sweeper

NOT FOR RESALE

loor Sweeper


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

have described it simply as “hard work,” and few people NOT FOR RESALE



La


101

The problem for organizations that choose common words like innovation or quality is that everyone has their own understanding of those terms. That makes it a little more difficult for leaders to estab-lish their own definition. Of course, none of this matters if the values that an organization adopts are not real ones. When leaders choose elaborate and unique phrases for their values but don’t adhere to them, they generate more cynicism and distrust than if they said nothing at all.

Once an organization successfully identifies and describes its core values and separates them from the other kinds, it must then do its best to be intolerant of violations of those values. It must ensure that every activity it undertakes, every employee it hires, and every policy it enacts reflects those core values. Few organizations actually take this important step, instead allowing their values to be minimized as mere idealism rather than real building blocks of operations and culture. For those who are serious about their values, this is why it’s so important not to dilute the power of core values or nullify it altogether by having too many. Later in the book, when I discuss reinforcing clarity, I’ll get into the various ways that healthy organizations can build their values into their processes that revolve around people.

because he just didn’t see himself as being a floor sweeper.

Without bitterness, he acknowledged that he had an ego and

that a big part of his career was building a résumé. He didn’t

want to hold the team back by being a misfit.

The CEO gladly accepted his resignation with no hard

feelings, relieved to have addressed the cultural discrepancy

before it became a bigger problem. A few years later, the

executive who left the start-up called our consulting firm to

have us work with his new company. He appreciated the

clarity that we had helped the start-up achieve and wanted

to build a similarly clear and strong culture in his new firm.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL have us work with his new company. He appreciated the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL have us work with his new company. He appreciated the

clarity that we had helped the start-up achieve and wanted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL clarity that we had helped the start-up achieve and wanted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The problem for organizations that choose common words like

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The problem for organizations that choose common words like is that everyone has their own understanding

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is that everyone has their own understanding of those terms. That makes it a little more difficult for leaders to estab-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of those terms. That makes it a little more difficult for leaders to estab-lish their own definition. Of course, none of this matters if the values

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lish their own definition. Of course, none of this matters if the values that an organization adopts are not real ones. When leaders choose

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that an organization adopts are not real ones. When leaders choose elaborate and unique phrases for their values but don’t adhere to them,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

elaborate and unique phrases for their values but don’t adhere to them, they generate more cynicism and distrust than if they said nothing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they generate more cynicism and distrust than if they said nothing

Once an organization successfully identifies and describes its core

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once an organization successfully identifies and describes its core

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values and separates them from the other kinds, it must then do its best COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values and separates them from the other kinds, it must then do its best to be intolerant of violations of those values. It must ensure that every COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

to be intolerant of violations of those values. It must ensure that every


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALEThe problem for organizations that choose common words like

NOT FOR RESALEThe problem for organizations that choose common words like

is that everyone has their own understanding

NOT FOR RESALE is that everyone has their own understanding

of those terms. That makes it a little more difficult for leaders to estab-

NOT FOR RESALE

of those terms. That makes it a little more difficult for leaders to estab-lish their own definition. Of course, none of this matters if the values

NOT FOR RESALE

lish their own definition. Of course, none of this matters if the values that an organization adopts are not real ones. When leaders choose

NOT FOR RESALE

that an organization adopts are not real ones. When leaders choose elaborate and unique phrases for their values but don’t adhere to them,

NOT FOR RESALE

elaborate and unique phrases for their values but don’t adhere to them, they generate more cynicism and distrust than if they said nothing

NOT FOR RESALE

they generate more cynicism and distrust than if they said nothing

Once an organization successfully identifies and describes its core NOT FOR RESALE

Once an organization successfully identifies and describes its core values and separates them from the other kinds, it must then do its best NOT FOR R

ESALE

values and separates them from the other kinds, it must then do its best


La

The Advantage

102

Identifying Core ValuesOne of the best ways to go about identifying an organization’s core values is to undertake a three-step process as an executive team. The first step is to identify the employees in the organization who already embody what is best about the company and to dissect them, answering what is true about those people that makes them so admired by the leadership team. Those qualities form the initial pool of potential core values.

Next, leaders must identify employees who, though talented, were or are no longer a good fit for the organization. These are people who, in spite of their technical abilities, drive others around them crazy and would add value to the organization by being absent. Once those people are identified—sadly, this is usually a little easier than the first step—they need to be dissected in the same way. What is it about them that makes them a distraction and a problem? It is the opposite of those annoying traits that provide yet another set of potential candidates for core values.

Finally, leaders need to be honest about themselves and whether or not they embody the values in that pool.

Mirror, Mirror

The leadership team of a fast-growing high-tech start-up

asked me to help them identify their core values. After dis-

secting a handful of wonderful employees in the organization

and then doing the same for some of the more difficult ones,

the team was left with a few values that seemed like natural

candidates for the core.

One of those values was friendliness. As simple as that

may sound, the executives were convinced that it was what

the best employees in the organization shared and what the

difficult ones lacked. They decided that they would figure


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Next, leaders must identify employees who, though talented, were

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Next, leaders must identify employees who, though talented, were

or are no longer a good fit for the organization. These are people who,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or are no longer a good fit for the organization. These are people who, in spite of their technical abilities, drive others around them crazy and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in spite of their technical abilities, drive others around them crazy and would add value to the organization by being absent. Once those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

would add value to the organization by being absent. Once those people are identified—sadly, this is usually a little easier than the first

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people are identified—sadly, this is usually a little easier than the first step—they need to be dissected in the same way. What is it about them

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

step—they need to be dissected in the same way. What is it about them that makes them a distraction and a problem? It is the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that makes them a distraction and a problem? It is the annoying traits that provide yet another set of potential candidates for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

annoying traits that provide yet another set of potential candidates for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, leaders need to be honest about themselves and whether or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not they embody the values in that pool.

The leadership team of a fast-growing high-tech start-up COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The leadership team of a fast-growing high-tech start-up NOT FOR R

ESALEwould add value to the organization by being absent. Once those

NOT FOR RESALE

would add value to the organization by being absent. Once those people are identified—sadly, this is usually a little easier than the first

NOT FOR RESALEpeople are identified—sadly, this is usually a little easier than the first

step—they need to be dissected in the same way. What is it about them

NOT FOR RESALEstep—they need to be dissected in the same way. What is it about them

that makes them a distraction and a problem? It is the

NOT FOR RESALE

that makes them a distraction and a problem? It is the annoying traits that provide yet another set of potential candidates for

NOT FOR RESALE

annoying traits that provide yet another set of potential candidates for

NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, leaders need to be honest about themselves and whether or

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

not they embody the values in that pool.

Mirror, MirrorNOT FOR RESALE

Mirror, Mirror


La


103

This three-step process is obviously not scientific, but it is neverthe-less a reliable way of informing the judgment of leaders as they wrestle with what is core to the organization’s culture. Settling on core values rarely happens in one sitting, and for good reason. It usually requires extended discussion and review among leaders who must be confident that their cultural building blocks are solid.

out a better way to describe friendliness in a way that would

be more meaningful, but essentially, that was the concept

they settled on.

It was then that I had to ask them to take the third step

and ensure that their suggested core values, including friend-

liness, applied to them too. When I put the question to them,

“So, would you say that this leadership team embodies

friendliness?” the executives in the room hesitated a little and

looked at one another. Without thinking too hard about it, I

continued, “Because compared to the other teams I work

with, I wouldn’t say that you guys seem particularly friendly.”

After a short pause, the executives laughed and agreed

that they didn’t really see themselves as overly friendly

people either. And they quickly eliminated that from the list

of core values. To call it part of their core would be to invite

accusations of hypocrisy from employees. Imagine those

executives standing up and touting the inherent friendliness

of the company and building everything from performance

reviews to hiring profiles around a concept that they did not

exhibit naturally.

At the same time, the executives agreed that they

needed to work on becoming more approachable and

friendly, because it was something that many others in the

organization valued. It would become an aspirational, but

certainly not a core, value.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL looked at one another. Without thinking too hard about it, I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL looked at one another. Without thinking too hard about it, I

continued, “Because compared to the other teams I work

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL continued, “Because compared to the other teams I work


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


exhibit naturally.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

exhibit naturally.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


organization valued. It would become an aspirational, but COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization valued. It would become an aspirational, but NOT FOR R

ESALEthat they didn’t really see themselves as overly friendly

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEpeople either. And they quickly eliminated that from the list


NOT FOR RESALEof core values. To call it part of their core would be to invite


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


friendly, because it was something that many others in the NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

104

Having answered the first two questions, Why do we exist? and How do we behave?, a leadership team can then come down the mountain, so to speak, and begin answering the next four, which are a bit more concrete and tangible.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La


105

QUeSTIOn 3: WHAT DO We DO?

This question is the simplest of the six and takes the least amount of time and energy to address. The answer lies at the opposite end of the idealism scale from why an organization exists and is nothing more than a descrip-tion of what an organization actually does. No flowery adjectives or adverbs here. Nothing ethereal or abstract. Just an unsexy, one-sentence definition—something your grandmother can understand (no offense to grandmas). The answer to this question is something we call an orga-nization’s business definition (but never a mission statement!).

If an organization’s reason for existence answers the question, Why?, then its business definition answers the question, What? It’s critical that it be clear and straightforward. It should not be crafted so that it can also be used in marketing material. The point is just to make sure that the leadership team is crystal clear about, and can accurately describe, the nature of the organization’s business so that they don’t create confu-sion within the rest of the company or, for that matter, in the market. It’s as simple as that.

Coming up with a good business definition is usually not terribly difficult and often doesn’t take much more than ten, maybe twenty minutes. Unlike the core purpose, most leaders have a good idea of the basic activities of the organizations they lead. Nevertheless, I’m always surprised when I ask members of a leadership team to quietly write down a sentence or two about what they think the organization does, and I find that there is more discrepancy than I or, more important, they had thought. Taking a few minutes to make sure everyone is on the same page is always worthwhile.

Here are a few examples from organizations we’ve worked with. They are not particularly interesting, and I suppose that’s part of the point. They are simply concrete, detailed descriptions that, when com-bined with the reason for existing, describe what an organization does and why it does it:


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

definition—something your grandmother can understand (no offense

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

definition—something your grandmother can understand (no offense to grandmas). The answer to this question is something we call an orga-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to grandmas). The answer to this question is something we call an orga-

nization’s business definition (but never a mission statement!).

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nization’s business definition (but never a mission statement!).If an organization’s reason for existence answers the question,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

If an organization’s reason for existence answers the question, then its business definition answers the question,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

then its business definition answers the question, it be clear and straightforward. It should not be crafted so that it can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it be clear and straightforward. It should not be crafted so that it can also be used in marketing material. The point is just to make sure that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

also be used in marketing material. The point is just to make sure that the leadership team is crystal clear about, and can accurately describe,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the leadership team is crystal clear about, and can accurately describe, the nature of the organization’s business so that they don’t create confu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the nature of the organization’s business so that they don’t create confu-sion within the rest of the company or, for that matter, in the market.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sion within the rest of the company or, for that matter, in the market. It’s as simple as that.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s as simple as that.Coming up with a good business definition is usually not terribly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Coming up with a good business definition is usually not terribly difficult and often doesn’t take much more than ten, maybe twenty

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

difficult and often doesn’t take much more than ten, maybe twenty minutes. Unlike the core purpose, most leaders have a good idea of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

minutes. Unlike the core purpose, most leaders have a good idea of the basic activities of the organizations they lead. Nevertheless, I’m always COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

basic activities of the organizations they lead. Nevertheless, I’m always surprised when I ask members of a leadership team to quietly write COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

surprised when I ask members of a leadership team to quietly write NOT FOR R

ESALEWhat?

NOT FOR RESALE

What?it be clear and straightforward. It should not be crafted so that it can

NOT FOR RESALEit be clear and straightforward. It should not be crafted so that it can

also be used in marketing material. The point is just to make sure that

NOT FOR RESALEalso be used in marketing material. The point is just to make sure that

the leadership team is crystal clear about, and can accurately describe,

NOT FOR RESALE

the leadership team is crystal clear about, and can accurately describe, the nature of the organization’s business so that they don’t create confu-

NOT FOR RESALE

the nature of the organization’s business so that they don’t create confu-sion within the rest of the company or, for that matter, in the market.

NOT FOR RESALE

sion within the rest of the company or, for that matter, in the market.

Coming up with a good business definition is usually not terribly

NOT FOR RESALE

Coming up with a good business definition is usually not terribly difficult and often doesn’t take much more than ten, maybe twenty

NOT FOR RESALE

difficult and often doesn’t take much more than ten, maybe twenty minutes. Unlike the core purpose, most leaders have a good idea of the

NOT FOR RESALE

minutes. Unlike the core purpose, most leaders have a good idea of the basic activities of the organizations they lead. Nevertheless, I’m always NOT FOR R

ESALE

basic activities of the organizations they lead. Nevertheless, I’m always


La

The Advantage

106

• A power company: “We generate and deliver electrical and natural gas products and services to people throughout the state.”

• A credit card company: “We provide payment products and extend credit to consumers.”

• A technology hardware company: “We develop, manufacture, and market hard drives, solid-state drives, and storage subsystems for consumers, OEMs, and enterprises.”

• A biopharmaceutical company: “We discover, develop, make, and commercialize better medicines through integrated sciences.”

• A Catholic church: “We provide Sacraments, outreach services, counseling, and religious education for people in our parish.”

Again, no adverbs or qualifiers, and no unnecessarily detailed descriptions of sales channels or pricing. That kind of information comes in the next section, when we get into strategy.

It should be noted that an organization’s business definition can change over time, but only when the market changes and calls for a meaningful shift in the fundamental activity of the organization. In the course of my consulting firm’s fifteen years as a company, we’ve changed our business definition three times. Keep in mind that our core values and reason for existing have never changed.

That’s all that needs to be said about answering question 3, so that’s all I’ll say. The next question that needs to be answered is much more interesting and important.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“We discover, develop, make, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“We discover, develop, make, and commercialize better medicines through integrated sciences.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL commercialize better medicines through integrated sciences.”

“We provide Sacraments, outreach services,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“We provide Sacraments, outreach services, counseling, and religious education for people in our parish.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

counseling, and religious education for people in our parish.”

Again, no adverbs or qualifiers, and no unnecessarily detailed

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Again, no adverbs or qualifiers, and no unnecessarily detailed descriptions of sales channels or pricing. That kind of information

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

descriptions of sales channels or pricing. That kind of information comes in the next section, when we get into strategy.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

comes in the next section, when we get into strategy.It should be noted that an organization’s business definition can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It should be noted that an organization’s business definition can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

change over time, but only when the market changes and calls for a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

change over time, but only when the market changes and calls for a meaningful shift in the fundamental activity of the organization. In the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meaningful shift in the fundamental activity of the organization. In the course of my consulting firm’s fifteen years as a company, we’ve changed

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

course of my consulting firm’s fifteen years as a company, we’ve changed our business definition three times. Keep in mind that our core values

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

our business definition three times. Keep in mind that our core values

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and reason for existing have never changed.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and reason for existing have never changed.That’s all that needs to be said about answering question 3, so that’s COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

That’s all that needs to be said about answering question 3, so that’s all I’ll say. The next question that needs to be answered is much more COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

all I’ll say. The next question that needs to be answered is much more NOT FOR R

ESALEAgain, no adverbs or qualifiers, and no unnecessarily detailed

NOT FOR RESALEAgain, no adverbs or qualifiers, and no unnecessarily detailed

descriptions of sales channels or pricing. That kind of information

NOT FOR RESALEdescriptions of sales channels or pricing. That kind of information

comes in the next section, when we get into strategy.

NOT FOR RESALE

comes in the next section, when we get into strategy.It should be noted that an organization’s business definition can

NOT FOR RESALE

It should be noted that an organization’s business definition can

NOT FOR RESALE

change over time, but only when the market changes and calls for a

NOT FOR RESALE

change over time, but only when the market changes and calls for a meaningful shift in the fundamental activity of the organization. In the

NOT FOR RESALE

meaningful shift in the fundamental activity of the organization. In the course of my consulting firm’s fifteen years as a company, we’ve changed

NOT FOR RESALE

course of my consulting firm’s fifteen years as a company, we’ve changed our business definition three times. Keep in mind that our core values

NOT FOR RESALE

our business definition three times. Keep in mind that our core values

NOT FOR RESALE

and reason for existing have never changed.NOT FOR R

ESALE

and reason for existing have never changed.That’s all that needs to be said about answering question 3, so that’s NOT FOR R

ESALE

That’s all that needs to be said about answering question 3, so that’s


La


107

QUeSTIOn 4: HOW WIll We SUCCeeD?

When team leaders answer this question, essentially they are determin-ing their strategy. Unfortunately, more than any word in the business lexicon, strategy is one of the most widely employed and poorly defined. Executives, consultants, and scholars use it to mean so many different things that it has become almost meaningless without a clarifying defi-nition each time it is cited.

Years ago, not long after I started my consulting firm, a client asked me to help his team with its strategy, and I froze. I thought to myself, What exactly is a strategy? This was particularly troubling because I had spent two years working for a strategic management consulting firm. I wondered, Did I sleep through the day they taught us the definition of strategy?

So I went and did some research, reading and rereading a few books about strategy. And they were mostly confusing. Michael Porter’s book, Competitive Strategy, was by far the most helpful, and using that and some of our own ideas based on companies we had worked with, we came up with our own defi-nition and process for iden-tifying strategy.3 We were relieved, and a little sur-prised, to learn that clients found it to be so helpful, and that we weren’t the only ones who were confused by the “S” word.

Strategic AnchorsEssentially we decided that an organization’s strategy is simply its plan for success. It’s nothing more than the collection of intentional decisions a company makes to give itself the best chance to thrive and differentiate

An organization’s strategy is

nothing more than the

collection of intentional

decisions a company makes to

give itself the best chance to

thrive and differentiate from

competitors.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Years ago, not long after I started my consulting firm, a client asked

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Years ago, not long after I started my consulting firm, a client asked

me to help his team with its strategy, and I froze. I thought to myself,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

me to help his team with its strategy, and I froze. I thought to myself, This was particularly troubling because I had

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This was particularly troubling because I had spent two years working for a strategic management consulting firm. I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

spent two years working for a strategic management consulting firm. I Did I sleep through the day they taught us the definition of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Did I sleep through the day they taught us the definition of

So I went and did some research, reading and rereading a few books

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

So I went and did some research, reading and rereading a few books about strategy. And they were mostly confusing. Michael Porter’s book,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

about strategy. And they were mostly confusing. Michael Porter’s book, , was by far the most helpful, and using that and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, was by far the most helpful, and using that and some of our own ideas based on companies we had worked with, we

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

some of our own ideas based on companies we had worked with, we came up with our own defi-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

came up with our own defi-nition and process for iden-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nition and process for iden-tifying strategy.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tifying strategy.3

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

3

relieved, and a little sur-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

relieved, and a little sur-prised, to learn that clients COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

prised, to learn that clients NOT FOR R

ESALEspent two years working for a strategic management consulting firm. I

NOT FOR RESALE

spent two years working for a strategic management consulting firm. I Did I sleep through the day they taught us the definition of

NOT FOR RESALEDid I sleep through the day they taught us the definition of

So I went and did some research, reading and rereading a few books

NOT FOR RESALE

So I went and did some research, reading and rereading a few books about strategy. And they were mostly confusing. Michael Porter’s book,

NOT FOR RESALE

about strategy. And they were mostly confusing. Michael Porter’s book, , was by far the most helpful, and using that and

NOT FOR RESALE

, was by far the most helpful, and using that and some of our own ideas based on companies we had worked with, we

NOT FOR RESALE

some of our own ideas based on companies we had worked with, we came up with our own defi-

NOT FOR RESALE

came up with our own defi-nition and process for iden-

NOT FOR RESALE

nition and process for iden- We were

NOT FOR RESALE

We were relieved, and a little sur-NOT FOR R

ESALE

relieved, and a little sur-


La

The Advantage

108

from competitors. That means every single decision, if it is made inten-tionally and consistently, will be part of the overall strategy.

But that definition is not particularly actionable or useful for guiding the decisions of leaders and employees. We came to realize that the best way for an organization to make strategy practical is to boil it down to three strategic anchors that will be used to inform every deci-sion the organization makes and provide the filter or lens through which decisions must be evaluated to ensure consistency. Strategic anchors provide the context for all decision making and help companies avoid the temptation to make purely pragmatic and opportunistic deci-sions that so often end up diminishing a company’s plan for success.

Strategic Branding

We worked with a fresh produce company that decided that

one of its three strategic anchors was about maintaining “a

premium, high-quality brand.” As a result, the leaders mar-

keted their products aggressively using the company name

and they went to great lengths in stores to merchandise and

present their higher-quality products in an attractive way to

justify the higher prices that they commanded.

But sometimes the company’s produce didn’t come off

the farm as attractive and delicious as they wanted it to be.

Resisting the temptation to mix it in with the higher-quality

product and hope that consumers wouldn’t notice, the

leaders decided to sell their slightly lower-quality produce

through different channels and under a different brand and,

of course, at a different price. And in those rare instances

when they couldn’t grow any premium-quality produce in a

given category, the company simply refused to provide

stores with products. Its leaders would rather forfeit short-

term revenue than diminish the brand that they believed was

critical to their differentiation and long-term success.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

which decisions must be evaluated to ensure consistency. Strategic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

which decisions must be evaluated to ensure consistency. Strategic anchors provide the context for all decision making and help companies

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL anchors provide the context for all decision making and help companies

avoid the temptation to make purely pragmatic and opportunistic deci-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

avoid the temptation to make purely pragmatic and opportunistic deci-sions that so often end up diminishing a company’s plan for success.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sions that so often end up diminishing a company’s plan for success.

Strategic Branding

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Strategic Branding


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


the farm as attractive and delicious as they wanted it to be. COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the farm as attractive and delicious as they wanted it to be. NOT FOR R

ESALEStrategic Branding

NOT FOR RESALEStrategic Branding


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

But sometimes the company’s produce didn’t come off NOT FOR RESALE



La


109

Identifying AnchorsThe best way for leaders to go about finding their strategic anchors is to take a reverse-engineering approach and extract them from every-thing that they know to be true about their organization. They need to start by creating an exhaustive list of all the decisions and realities that form the context of their current situation. This will include anything beyond the organization’s reason for existence, core values, and business definition.

To understand how this works, let’s dissect a (mostly) fictional small, regional chain of sporting goods stores.

We’ll assume that the company has already answered the questions, Why do we exist?, How do we behave?, and What do we do? Let’s say their reason for existing is “to enable people to enjoy being outdoors,” their core values are “enthusiasm for helping people, personal responsibility, and pride of ownership,” and their business definition is, “We provide recreational and sports-related goods and equipment to people in the greater metropolitan area.”

Having identified those critical components, the next question the leaders would need to answer, and the one at the heart of the strategic anchor activity, is, How will we succeed? Or put another way, How will we make decisions in a purposeful, intentional, and unique way that allow us to maximize our success and differentiate us from our competitors?

To create their exhaustive list, the leaders would consider every-thing imaginable related to their business. And I mean everything —topics like pricing, hiring, site selection, marketing, advertising,

Keep in mind that another company with a different set

of strategic anchors—namely, without a premium brand

being one of them—would probably handle that situation

differently. And that would be okay as long as it was inten-

tional and consistent with what they believed would enable

their success.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The best way for leaders to go about finding their strategic anchors is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The best way for leaders to go about finding their strategic anchors is

to take a reverse-engineering approach and extract them from every-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to take a reverse-engineering approach and extract them from every-thing that they know to be true about their organization. They need to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thing that they know to be true about their organization. They need to start by creating an exhaustive list of all the decisions and realities that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

start by creating an exhaustive list of all the decisions and realities that form the context of their current situation. This will include anything

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

form the context of their current situation. This will include anything beyond the organization’s reason for existence, core values, and business

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

beyond the organization’s reason for existence, core values, and business

To understand how this works, let’s dissect a (mostly) fictional

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

small, regional chain of sporting goods stores.We’ll assume that the company has already answered the questions,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

We’ll assume that the company has already answered the questions, Why do we exist?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why do we exist?,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, Why do we exist?, Why do we exist?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Why do we exist?, Why do we exist? How do we behave?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

How do we behave?reason for existing is “to enable people to enjoy being outdoors,” their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reason for existing is “to enable people to enjoy being outdoors,” their core values are “enthusiasm for helping people, personal responsibility,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

core values are “enthusiasm for helping people, personal responsibility, and pride of ownership,” and their business definition is, “We provide COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

and pride of ownership,” and their business definition is, “We provide recreational and sports-related goods and equipment to people in the COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

recreational and sports-related goods and equipment to people in the NOT FOR R

ESALEstart by creating an exhaustive list of all the decisions and realities that

NOT FOR RESALE

start by creating an exhaustive list of all the decisions and realities that form the context of their current situation. This will include anything

NOT FOR RESALEform the context of their current situation. This will include anything

beyond the organization’s reason for existence, core values, and business

NOT FOR RESALEbeyond the organization’s reason for existence, core values, and business

To understand how this works, let’s dissect a (mostly) fictional

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

small, regional chain of sporting goods stores.We’ll assume that the company has already answered the questions,

NOT FOR RESALE

We’ll assume that the company has already answered the questions, How do we behave?

NOT FOR RESALE

How do we behave?reason for existing is “to enable people to enjoy being outdoors,” their

NOT FOR RESALE

reason for existing is “to enable people to enjoy being outdoors,” their core values are “enthusiasm for helping people, personal responsibility, NOT FOR R

ESALE

core values are “enthusiasm for helping people, personal responsibility, and pride of ownership,” and their business definition is, “We provide NOT FOR R

ESALE

and pride of ownership,” and their business definition is, “We provide


La

The Advantage

110

branding, merchandising, sourcing, partnering, product selection, in-store experience, service offerings, promotions, decor, and more. I’m sure I’ve left a few things off that list.

Here’s what their list looks like:

• Huge selection of products• Competitive/low prices• Nontraditional sports categories• Seasonal focus of merchandise• Informal, homemade signage in the stores• Minimalistic displays and no glossy merchandising• Free CPR and other medical classes• Free meeting space for scouts and local sports teams• Pet-related products• Warehouse-like locations• Easy access and parking• Employee training and development opportunities

• Hire for attitude and cultural t• Seasonal employees• Ski-lift tickets at cost• Employee discounts• Store stays open late• Minimal advertising• Active local event sponsorship• Liberal return policy• Flexible employment policies and hours• Slightly better than industry- competitive wages and bene ts• Six stores in the metropolitan area• High cooperation among stores• Equipment rentals

That’s a long and exhaustive list, and it needs to be. It’s impossible not to notice that some of the items are slightly redundant and that there is no clear or consistent taxonomy. In other words, it includes apples, oranges, monkeys, and Cadillacs, which is fine. It’s better to be redundant and a little inconsistent than to leave something out. The purpose is just to get everything out on the table (actually the flip chart) so that leadership team members can gain a sense of the whole messy picture. And it’s worth noting that when we work with clients we don’t write these items as a linear list. We draw a big amoeba-like shape on a flip chart and just start filling it in with terms and phrases. This makes


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Easy access and parking

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Easy access and parking• Employee training and development

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Employee training and development

• Employee discounts

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL • Employee discounts

• Store stays open late

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL • Store stays open late

• Minimal advertising

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Minimal advertising• Active local event sponsorship

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Active local event sponsorship• Liberal return policy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Liberal return policy• Flexible employment policies

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Flexible employment policies and hours

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and hours• Slightly better than industry-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

• Slightly better than industry-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That’s a long and exhaustive list, and it needs to be. It’s impossible COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That’s a long and exhaustive list, and it needs to be. It’s impossible not to notice that some of the items are slightly redundant and that COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

not to notice that some of the items are slightly redundant and that NOT FOR R

ESALE• Active local event sponsorship

NOT FOR RESALE

• Active local event sponsorship• Liberal return policy

NOT FOR RESALE

• Liberal return policy• Flexible employment policies

NOT FOR RESALE• Flexible employment policies

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


and hours

NOT FOR RESALE

and hours• Slightly better than industry-

NOT FOR RESALE

• Slightly better than industry- competitive wages and bene ts

NOT FOR RESALE

competitive wages and bene ts• Six stores in the metropolitan area

NOT FOR RESALE

• Six stores in the metropolitan area• High cooperation among stores

NOT FOR RESALE

• High cooperation among stores

That’s a long and exhaustive list, and it needs to be. It’s impossible NOT FOR RESALE

That’s a long and exhaustive list, and it needs to be. It’s impossible


La


111

it easier to see relationships between terms, which becomes important in the next step.

That next step is a little chaotic, difficult, unscientific, and fun. Leaders must search for patterns that would indicate the organization’s strategic direction and anchors. Put another way, they need to identify the items, or collections of items, that fit together to form a theme or category. Michael Porter has a similar process called activity system maps.4

In the case of the sporting goods chain, there seems to be some-thing common about having stores in large, low-rent buildings; spend-ing minimal money on merchandising and signage; engaging in minimal advertising and traditional marketing; and charging relatively low prices. A leadership team might label this potential anchor, “keep prices low by being frugal whenever we can” or “reduce fixed costs as much as possible.” Whatever they call it, it will speak to the idea of low prices and low costs.

Similarly, they would certainly see a connection between offering free CPR classes, free meeting space for local sports teams and scouts, easy access and ample parking, and sponsorship of local sporting events as something like “build local loyalty and become a community destination.”

Finally, the competitive wages and benefits, investment in training, hiring for behavioral values, flexible hours and policies, employee discounts, and even the liberal return policy would suggest that “create a positive, flexible environment for employees” might be another anchor. (See “The Strategy Amoeba”.)

Remember, this process will always be a little messy and organic. It requires judgment, reflection, and, at times, intuitive synthesis on the part of the members of a leadership team. Nonetheless, it is a reli-able process that should lead to an outcome that will resonate with the team and inspire confidence in how decisions can be made in an inten-tional, strategic way.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In the case of the sporting goods chain, there seems to be some-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In the case of the sporting goods chain, there seems to be some-thing common about having stores in large, low-rent buildings; spend-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL thing common about having stores in large, low-rent buildings; spend-

ing minimal money on merchandising and signage; engaging in minimal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing minimal money on merchandising and signage; engaging in minimal advertising and traditional marketing; and charging relatively low

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

advertising and traditional marketing; and charging relatively low prices. A leadership team might label this potential anchor, “keep prices

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

prices. A leadership team might label this potential anchor, “keep prices low by being frugal whenever we can” or “reduce fixed costs as much

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

low by being frugal whenever we can” or “reduce fixed costs as much as possible.” Whatever they call it, it will speak to the idea of low prices

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as possible.” Whatever they call it, it will speak to the idea of low prices

Similarly, they would certainly see a connection between offering

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

free CPR classes, free meeting space for local sports teams and scouts,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

free CPR classes, free meeting space for local sports teams and scouts, easy access and ample parking, and sponsorship of local sporting events

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

easy access and ample parking, and sponsorship of local sporting events as something like “build local loyalty and become a community

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as something like “build local loyalty and become a community

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, the competitive wages and benefits, investment in training,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, the competitive wages and benefits, investment in training, hiring for behavioral values, flexible hours and policies, employee COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

hiring for behavioral values, flexible hours and policies, employee discounts, and even the liberal return policy would suggest that “create COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

discounts, and even the liberal return policy would suggest that “create NOT FOR R

ESALEprices. A leadership team might label this potential anchor, “keep prices

NOT FOR RESALE

prices. A leadership team might label this potential anchor, “keep prices low by being frugal whenever we can” or “reduce fixed costs as much

NOT FOR RESALElow by being frugal whenever we can” or “reduce fixed costs as much

as possible.” Whatever they call it, it will speak to the idea of low prices

NOT FOR RESALEas possible.” Whatever they call it, it will speak to the idea of low prices


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

free CPR classes, free meeting space for local sports teams and scouts,

NOT FOR RESALE

free CPR classes, free meeting space for local sports teams and scouts, easy access and ample parking, and sponsorship of local sporting events

NOT FOR RESALE

easy access and ample parking, and sponsorship of local sporting events as something like “build local loyalty and become a community

NOT FOR RESALE

as something like “build local loyalty and become a community

NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, the competitive wages and benefits, investment in training, NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, the competitive wages and benefits, investment in training, hiring for behavioral values, flexible hours and policies, employee NOT FOR R

ESALE

hiring for behavioral values, flexible hours and policies, employee


La

The Advantage

112

The Strategy Amoeba


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


La


113

Every organization’s process for identifying strategic anchors will be different, though similarly messy.

Strategic food

I was working with the confections division of a large food

company. We started our strategy discussion by putting

together an exhaustive list of truths about their business:

integrated direct-to-store shipping model, a strong brand,

customer-centricity, innovation, product quality (taste),

leverage being part of a big company, operations as com-

petitive advantage, compete against private label, part of

parent company, superpremium brand, fun place to work,

low margins, headquarters in New York, seven U.S. factories,

high quality, U.S. market focus, complexity of operations,

superior products, use of in-store marketing, multiple brands,

consumer driven, and aggressive use of technology.

Next, the executives looked over the flip chart with all

the items on it and searched for the potential anchors. To

help them, we asked, “Which of these are so fundamental

that they should be used as filters to inform every other

decision?” The answers didn’t leap off the page immediately,

but, as usual, within five or ten minutes a few strong candi-

dates began to emerge, as well as a few that were obviously

not going to be strategic anchors (for example, headquarters

in New York).

As people started to discuss the possible candidates for

anchors, they came up with new and better ways to describe

what they had originally put on the list, which was fine. We

reminded them that this was a messy, nonlinear process, and

that’s the way it needs to be.

Whenever anyone made a recommendation for a pos-

sible anchor, we asked the team if that was fundamental, or

if it was merely a function of something else on the list that


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL integrated direct-to-store shipping model, a strong brand,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL integrated direct-to-store shipping model, a strong brand,

customer-centricity, innovation, product quality (taste),

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL customer-centricity, innovation, product quality (taste),


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


dates began to emerge, as well as a few that were obviously COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dates began to emerge, as well as a few that were obviously NOT FOR R

ESALEparent company, superpremium brand, fun place to work,

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALElow margins, headquarters in New York, seven U.S. factories,


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


but, as usual, within five or ten minutes a few strong candi-NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

114

was even more fundamental. In the end, the team came up

with the following strategic anchors: product superiority,

in-store market execution, and predictable financial

performance.

The team was saying that their success would be depen-

dent on (1) continuing to make better-tasting and higher-

quality products than their competitors, (2) being great at

in-store merchandising and placement, and (3) delivering

consistent and conservative financial results to their parent

company. Every decision they made would need to be evalu-

ated in light of and informed by these anchors.

For example, if a company emerged as a potential acqui-

sition candidate, the team would evaluate that decision

against the three criteria: (1) Does the acquisition candidate

have products that are or could be of superior quality to

those of their competition? (2) Can we merchandise those

products in stores in a way that meets our high standards?

(3) Is there a reasonable chance of seeing a profit in the

not-too-distant future? If the answer to these questions is

yes, it’s probably a strategic fit. If the answers are no, going

forward with the acquisition would probably not be a stra-

tegically aligned decision, regardless of how tempting it

might be.

Now, in rare instances every organization will find itself in situa-tions where it will have to make small, tactical short-term decisions that don’t conform to its strategic anchors. It is critical that leaders be com-pletely up front about the fact that such a decision is off-strategy and is a rare exception.

Unlike a company’s reason for existing and core values, which never change, and the business definition, which changes fairly infrequently, an organization’s strategic anchors should change whenever its competi-tive landscape shifts and market conditions call for a different approach.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL consistent and conservative financial results to their parent

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL consistent and conservative financial results to their parent

company. Every decision they made would need to be evalu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL company. Every decision they made would need to be evalu-


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


might be.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

might be. NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEagainst the three criteria: (1) Does the acquisition candidate


NOT FOR RESALEhave products that are or could be of superior quality to


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


115

STRATegIC DURABIlITY

How often will your organization need to change its strategic anchors?

Well, that will depend largely on two industry traits: the barriers

to entry in a given market and the rate of innovation.

When barriers to entry are high and innovation is relatively

low, strategic anchors will be very durable and require less

change over time. Airlines certainly fall into this category.

When barriers to entry are low and innovation is high, strate-

gic anchors will need to be reviewed and revised much more

frequently. Online software applications companies would fit

this one.

When barriers to entry are high and innovation is high—

something that would apply to pharmaceutical companies—

strategic durability would fall somewhere in between. The same

would be true when barriers to entry and innovation are both

low, as is seen in many smaller services firms, including law,

consulting, and advertising.

MediumDurability

MediumDurability

High

LowDurability(StrategyChanges

Frequently)

Rate ofInnovation

HighDurability(StrategyChanges

Infrequently)

Barriers toEntry

HighLow

Low

How often this happens will vary depending on the nature of a given organization’s market or industry (see the “Strategic Durability” sidebar below).


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Well, that will depend largely on two industry traits: the barriers

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Well, that will depend largely on two industry traits: the barriers


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

low, as is seen in many smaller services firms, including law, COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


consulting, and advertising.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

consulting, and advertising.NOT FOR R

ESALElow, strategic anchors will be very durable and require less

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEchange over time. Airlines certainly fall into this category.


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

low, as is seen in many smaller services firms, including law, NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

116

In some cases, one of an organization’s strategic anchors may not yet be on the list because it isn’t part of what the organization is currently doing, so it needs to be added. That’s why it’s important for an organization to realize that the process of identifying strategic anchors should not be completely reactive or historical. Sometimes it is the very process of identifying strategic anchors that alerts an organization to the fact that what it is currently doing isn’t right or isn’t enough to ensure success and differentiation, and so a change is needed.

Another outcome of establishing strategic anchors is making it easier to agree on what an organization should not be doing.

Strategic Schools

We worked with an organization that runs charter schools.

As is true in many mission-driven organizations, there is a

real temptation in schools for leaders to want to be all things

to all people. Of course, with limited resources and high

stakes, the cost of not being strategic is great.

The team started by creating an exhaustive list of every-

thing that was currently true about the organization: focus

on kindergarten through fifth grade, standardize core pro-

cesses across all schools, headquarters in Texas, slightly

lower staff pay than average public schools, emphasis on

student safety, no transportation services provided, perfor-

mance driven, data driven, no special education programs,

emphasis on parent volunteerism and involvement, internal

promotion of leaders, formative assessments, focus on

benefit to kids, low cost, minimal branding and marketing,

character-focused education, state-controlled pricing, dis-

tributed leadership model, local principal autonomy, no frills,

employees passionate about mission.

After an hour of brainstorming and passionate debate,

they arrived at the following strategic anchors: standardiza-


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

isn’t enough to ensure success and differentiation, and so a change is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

isn’t enough to ensure success and differentiation, and so a change is

Another outcome of establishing strategic anchors is making it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Another outcome of establishing strategic anchors is making it easier to agree on what an organization should

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

easier to agree on what an organization should not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not be doing.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be doing.not be doing.not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not be doing.not

Strategic Schools

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Strategic Schools


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


lower staff pay than average public schools, emphasis on COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lower staff pay than average public schools, emphasis on NOT FOR R

ESALEWe worked with an organization that runs charter schools.

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


cesses across all schools, headquarters in Texas, slightly NOT FOR RESALE



La


117

Many leadership teams struggle with not wanting to walk away from opportunities that seem basically good and easily justifiable outside the context of having a strategy, but which would distract the

organization and pull it away from its stated intent. Strate-gic anchors give a leadership team the clarity and courage to overcome these distrac-tions and stay on course.

Some people ask why there are three strategic anchors and not four or two or fifteen. Years ago I would have said, “Well, if you think

having four or five works better for your organization, then go for it.” But I’ve come to learn over the years, with the encouragement of clients and con sultants who found it to be true, that there should be three

tion of operations, selective marketing, performance and

measurement driven. They decided that the way to ensure

their success and differentiate from their competition was to

ensure that every decision they made reflected (1) the ability

to leverage standardized processes for efficiency and low

cost, (2) to do only cost-effective, targeted marketing to

parents in the micromarkets they served, and (3) to focus

relentlessly on student achievement and parents’ return on

investment.

Those anchors also gave them the clarity about what

they shouldn’t do like provide transportation services and

special education. As unhappy as they initially felt about

those decisions, the leaders of the company knew that their

ability to succeed in a competitive world meant they had to

make difficult, strategic trade-offs.

Many leadership teams

struggle with not wanting to

walk away from opportunities.

Strategic anchors give them

the clarity and courage to

overcome these distractions

and stay on course.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Many leadership teams struggle with not wanting to walk away

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Many leadership teams struggle with not wanting to walk away from opportunities that seem basically good and easily justifiable

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

from opportunities that seem basically good and easily justifiable outside the context of having a strategy, but which would distract the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

outside the context of having a strategy, but which would distract the

Those anchors also gave them the clarity about what

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Those anchors also gave them the clarity about what


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


walk away from opportunities. COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

walk away from opportunities. NOT FOR RESALE

Many leadership teams struggle with not wanting to walk away

NOT FOR RESALE

Many leadership teams struggle with not wanting to walk away from opportunities that seem basically good and easily justifiable

NOT FOR RESALE

from opportunities that seem basically good and easily justifiable outside the context of having a strategy, but which would distract the

NOT FOR RESALE

outside the context of having a strategy, but which would distract the


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEability to succeed in a competitive world meant they had to

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


struggle with not wanting to NOT FOR RESALE


walk away from opportunities. NOT FOR RESALE

walk away from opportunities.


La

The Advantage

118

anchors. I suppose there is something about the idea of triangulation that is at play here or the concept of the three legs of a stool. Maybe three is just the number of things that people can remember or keep in mind at any given time. Whatever the case, I’m convinced that three is almost always the right number of filters that an organization should establish to make their decision making as intentional as possible.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La


119

QUeSTIOn 5: WHAT IS MOST IMPORTAnT, RIgHT nOW?

More than any of the other questions, answering this one will have the most immediate and tangible impact on an organization, probably because it addresses two of the most maddening day-to-day challenges companies face: organizational A.D.D. and silos.

Most organizations I’ve worked with have too many top priorities to achieve the level of focus they need to succeed. Wanting to cover all their bases, they establish a long list of disparate objectives and spread their scarce time, energy, and resources across them all. The result is almost always a lot of initiatives being done in a mediocre way and a failure to accomplish what matters most. This phenomenon is best captured in that wonderful adage, “If everything is important, nothing is.”

When a CEO announces that her company’s top priorities for the year are to grow revenue, improve customer service, introduce more innovative products, cut expenses, and improve market share (we’ve all seen lists like this before), she is almost guaranteeing that none of those objectives is going to get the attention it deserves. And there is an additional consequence beyond the distraction, diffusion, and dilution that this causes: the emergence of departmental silos.

By communicating that the organization has five or seven top priorities, leaders put their well-intentioned employees in the inevit-able position of getting pulled in different directions, sometimes polar opposite ones. Wanting only to succeed, they often find themselves working at cross-purposes with their colleagues in other departments who are left to make their own decisions about which of the many priorities is most important. Leaders should not be surprised to find that the various departments within the organiza-tion are operating as independent units without alignment and cooperation.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Most organizations I’ve worked with have too many top priorities

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Most organizations I’ve worked with have too many top priorities to achieve the level of focus they need to succeed. Wanting to cover

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL to achieve the level of focus they need to succeed. Wanting to cover

all their bases, they establish a long list of disparate objectives and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

all their bases, they establish a long list of disparate objectives and spread their scarce time, energy, and resources across them all. The

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

spread their scarce time, energy, and resources across them all. The result is almost always a lot of initiatives being done in a mediocre way

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

result is almost always a lot of initiatives being done in a mediocre way and a failure to accomplish what matters most. This phenomenon is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and a failure to accomplish what matters most. This phenomenon is best captured in that wonderful adage, “If everything is important,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

best captured in that wonderful adage, “If everything is important,

When a CEO announces that her company’s top priorities for the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

year are to grow revenue, improve customer service, introduce more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

year are to grow revenue, improve customer service, introduce more innovative products, cut expenses, and improve market share (we’ve all

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

innovative products, cut expenses, and improve market share (we’ve all seen lists like this before), she is almost guaranteeing that none of those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

seen lists like this before), she is almost guaranteeing that none of those objectives is going to get the attention it deserves. And there is an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

objectives is going to get the attention it deserves. And there is an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

additional consequence beyond the distraction, diffusion, and dilution

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

additional consequence beyond the distraction, diffusion, and dilution that this causes: the emergence of departmental silos.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

that this causes: the emergence of departmental silos.By communicating that the organization has five or seven top COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

By communicating that the organization has five or seven top NOT FOR R

ESALEresult is almost always a lot of initiatives being done in a mediocre way

NOT FOR RESALE

result is almost always a lot of initiatives being done in a mediocre way and a failure to accomplish what matters most. This phenomenon is

NOT FOR RESALEand a failure to accomplish what matters most. This phenomenon is

best captured in that wonderful adage, “If everything is important,

NOT FOR RESALEbest captured in that wonderful adage, “If everything is important,


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

year are to grow revenue, improve customer service, introduce more

NOT FOR RESALE

year are to grow revenue, improve customer service, introduce more innovative products, cut expenses, and improve market share (we’ve all

NOT FOR RESALE

innovative products, cut expenses, and improve market share (we’ve all seen lists like this before), she is almost guaranteeing that none of those

NOT FOR RESALE

seen lists like this before), she is almost guaranteeing that none of those objectives is going to get the attention it deserves. And there is an

NOT FOR RESALE

objectives is going to get the attention it deserves. And there is an

NOT FOR RESALE

additional consequence beyond the distraction, diffusion, and dilution NOT FOR R

ESALE

additional consequence beyond the distraction, diffusion, and dilution that this causes: the emergence of departmental silos.NOT FOR R

ESALE

that this causes: the emergence of departmental silos.


La

The Advantage

120

One ThingOf course, to say that there are too many top priorities is something of an oxymoron. After all, for something to be the top priority, it has

to be more important than everything else. And even if there are multiple big priori-ties, ultimately one of those has to be at the very top. The point here is that every orga-nization, if it wants to create a sense of alignment and

focus, must have a single top priority within a given period of time.I came to realize this somewhat by accident. I had been hearing so

many of my clients complain about the silos within their organizations that I decided I should try to solve that problem. So I went out in search of companies where silos were not an issue to learn from them. It was a dry search.

Then I realized that there was a certain category of organization that seemed to rise above the silo problem: emergency responders. These include firefighters on the scene of a fire, emergency room doctors and nurses, soldiers on a rescue mission, and even police officers in the midst of a dangerous situation. Silos just didn’t seem to exist in these groups.

Think about it. You never see two firefighters standing in front of a burning building and arguing about which one of them should be respon-sible for climbing up and saving a child’s life based on the departmental jurisdiction of their respective divisions. And you aren’t going to find two nurses debating which cost center to bill for gauze while a patient in the ER is hemorrhaging blood. And in the midst of a battle, you aren’t going to hear a Marine say, “I’m not going to risk my life. This is a Navy problem.”

Of course, what these groups have in common is a crisis—a clear and present situation of great and immediate consequence. What a crisis provides for an organization, whether that organization is an

Every organization, if it wants

to create a sense of alignment

and focus, must have a single

top priority within a given

period of time.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

has to be at the very top. The

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

has to be at the very top. The point here is that every orga-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL point here is that every orga-

nization, if it wants to create

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nization, if it wants to create a sense of alignment and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a sense of alignment and focus, must have a single top priority within a given period of time.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I came to realize this somewhat by accident. I had been hearing so many of my clients complain about the silos within their organizations

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

many of my clients complain about the silos within their organizations that I decided I should try to solve that problem. So I went out in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that I decided I should try to solve that problem. So I went out in search of companies where silos were not an issue to learn from them.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

search of companies where silos were not an issue to learn from them.

Then I realized that there was a certain category of organization that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Then I realized that there was a certain category of organization that seemed to rise above the silo problem: emergency responders. These

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

seemed to rise above the silo problem: emergency responders. These include firefighters on the scene of a fire, emergency room doctors and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

include firefighters on the scene of a fire, emergency room doctors and nurses, soldiers on a rescue mission, and even police officers in the midst

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nurses, soldiers on a rescue mission, and even police officers in the midst of a dangerous situation. Silos just didn’t seem to exist in these groups.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

of a dangerous situation. Silos just didn’t seem to exist in these groups.Think about it. You never see two firefighters standing in front of a COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Think about it. You never see two firefighters standing in front of a NOT FOR R

ESALEfocus, must have a single top priority within a given period of time.

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALEI came to realize this somewhat by accident. I had been hearing so

many of my clients complain about the silos within their organizations

NOT FOR RESALEmany of my clients complain about the silos within their organizations

that I decided I should try to solve that problem. So I went out in

NOT FOR RESALE

that I decided I should try to solve that problem. So I went out in search of companies where silos were not an issue to learn from them.

NOT FOR RESALE

search of companies where silos were not an issue to learn from them.

Then I realized that there was a certain category of organization that

NOT FOR RESALE

Then I realized that there was a certain category of organization that seemed to rise above the silo problem: emergency responders. These

NOT FOR RESALE

seemed to rise above the silo problem: emergency responders. These include firefighters on the scene of a fire, emergency room doctors and

NOT FOR RESALE

include firefighters on the scene of a fire, emergency room doctors and nurses, soldiers on a rescue mission, and even police officers in the midst NOT FOR R

ESALE

nurses, soldiers on a rescue mission, and even police officers in the midst of a dangerous situation. Silos just didn’t seem to exist in these groups.NOT FOR R

ESALE

of a dangerous situation. Silos just didn’t seem to exist in these groups.


La


121

emergency responder accustomed to dealing with crises or a more tra-ditional organization that finds itself temporarily in the midst of one, is a rallying cry, a single area of focus around which there is no confu-sion or disagreement.

The Thematic Goal (a.k.a. The Rallying Cry)As I thought about the power of a rallying cry, I wondered why all orga-nizations couldn’t replicate the benefits of achieving that kind of focus (short of creating false crises, which is never a good idea). And I decided that there is no reason that every organization couldn’t have a rallying cry, even when it is not in crisis. I called this rallying cry “a thematic goal” because it needs to be understood within the context of the orga-nization’s other goals, at the top of the list. And so, the thematic goal is the answer to our question, What is most important, right now?

I introduced this concept in one of my business fables, Silos, Poli-tics, and Turf Wars, which may be helpful for readers wanting to see a thorough and vivid description of the thematic goal concept.5 Before I provide a few real world examples, I’ll clearly define what a thematic goal is so that all of this makes sense:

A thematic goal is . . . • Singular. One thing has to be most important, even if there are

other worthy goals under consideration.• Qualitative. The thematic goal should almost never be

established with specific numbers attached to it. The opportunity for putting quantitative measures around a thematic goal comes later, and it should not be done too early because it can too narrowly prescribe what needs to be achieved and limit people’s ability to rally around it.

• Temporary. A thematic goal must be achievable within a clear time boundary, almost always between three and twelve months. Anything shorter than three months feels like a fire drill, and


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nizations couldn’t replicate the benefits of achieving that kind of focus

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nizations couldn’t replicate the benefits of achieving that kind of focus (short of creating false crises, which is never a good idea). And I decided

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL (short of creating false crises, which is never a good idea). And I decided

that there is no reason that every organization couldn’t have a rallying

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that there is no reason that every organization couldn’t have a rallying cry, even when it is not in crisis. I called this rallying cry “a thematic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cry, even when it is not in crisis. I called this rallying cry “a thematic goal” because it needs to be understood within the context of the orga-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

goal” because it needs to be understood within the context of the orga-nization’s other goals, at the top of the list. And so, the thematic goal is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nization’s other goals, at the top of the list. And so, the thematic goal is What is most important, right now?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What is most important, right now?I introduced this concept in one of my business fables,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I introduced this concept in one of my business fables, , which may be helpful for readers wanting to see a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, which may be helpful for readers wanting to see a thorough and vivid description of the thematic goal concept.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thorough and vivid description of the thematic goal concept.provide a few real world examples, I’ll clearly define what a thematic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

provide a few real world examples, I’ll clearly define what a thematic goal is so that all of this makes sense:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

goal is so that all of this makes sense:

A thematic goal is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A thematic goal is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

SingularCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Singularother worthy goals under consideration.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

other worthy goals under consideration.NOT FOR R

ESALEgoal” because it needs to be understood within the context of the orga-

NOT FOR RESALE

goal” because it needs to be understood within the context of the orga-nization’s other goals, at the top of the list. And so, the thematic goal is

NOT FOR RESALEnization’s other goals, at the top of the list. And so, the thematic goal is

What is most important, right now?

NOT FOR RESALEWhat is most important, right now?

I introduced this concept in one of my business fables,

NOT FOR RESALE

I introduced this concept in one of my business fables, , which may be helpful for readers wanting to see a

NOT FOR RESALE

, which may be helpful for readers wanting to see a thorough and vivid description of the thematic goal concept.

NOT FOR RESALE

thorough and vivid description of the thematic goal concept.provide a few real world examples, I’ll clearly define what a thematic

NOT FOR RESALE

provide a few real world examples, I’ll clearly define what a thematic goal is so that all of this makes sense:

NOT FOR RESALE

goal is so that all of this makes sense:

.NOT FOR R

ESALE

. .NOT FOR R

ESALE

.One thing has to be NOT FOR R

ESALE

One thing has to be


La

The Advantage

122

anything longer than twelve invites procrastination and skepticism about whether the goal will endure. (I’ll wait a few months to focus on that because it will probably change, and, who knows, I might not even be working here then.)

• Shared across the leadership team. When executives agree on their top priority, they must take collective responsibility for achieving it, even if it seems that the nature of the goal falls within one or two of the executives’ regular areas of ownership.

The best way to identify a thematic goal is to answer the question, If we accomplish only one thing during the next x months, what would it be? In other words, What must be true x months from now for us to be able to look back and say with any credibility that we had a good period? These questions provide a critical level of focus for leaders who are being pulled in numerous directions.

Once a team has agreed on its thematic goal, it should resist the temptation to run out and communicate that goal right away or make a big announcement about it. For one, the thematic goal alone is not enough. It needs further detail or it will come across as an empty cam-paign slogan. I’ll get to that shortly.

Second, the primary purpose of the thematic goal is not necessarily to rally all the troops within the organization, as helpful as that may seem. More than anything else, it is to provide the leadership team itself with clarity around how to spend its time, energy, and resources. Yes, in most cases, it will be appropriate for leaders to eventually commu-nicate that goal to employees at large or to some subgroup of them. In rare cases, when the thematic goal revolves around a confidential matter like a potential merger or layoff, it will not. That will depend on the nature of the goal and the extent to which it involves a concerted, wide-reaching effort throughout the company. But even if the leader-ship team never announces the thematic goal to anyone and uses it only to guide its own actions, it will have served its purpose.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

within one or two of the executives’ regular areas of ownership.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

within one or two of the executives’ regular areas of ownership.

The best way to identify a thematic goal is to answer the question,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The best way to identify a thematic goal is to answer the question, If we accomplish only one thing during the next x months, what would it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

If we accomplish only one thing during the next x months, what would it What must be true x months from now for us to be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What must be true x months from now for us to be able to look back and say with any credibility that we had a good period?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

able to look back and say with any credibility that we had a good period?These questions provide a critical level of focus for leaders who are being

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

These questions provide a critical level of focus for leaders who are being

Once a team has agreed on its thematic goal, it should resist the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once a team has agreed on its thematic goal, it should resist the temptation to run out and communicate that goal right away or make

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

temptation to run out and communicate that goal right away or make

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a big announcement about it. For one, the thematic goal alone is not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a big announcement about it. For one, the thematic goal alone is not enough. It needs further detail or it will come across as an empty cam-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enough. It needs further detail or it will come across as an empty cam-paign slogan. I’ll get to that shortly.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

paign slogan. I’ll get to that shortly.Second, the primary purpose of the thematic goal is not necessarily

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Second, the primary purpose of the thematic goal is not necessarily

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to rally all the troops within the organization, as helpful as that may COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to rally all the troops within the organization, as helpful as that may seem. More than anything else, it is to provide the leadership team itself COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

seem. More than anything else, it is to provide the leadership team itself NOT FOR R

ESALEWhat must be true x months from now for us to be

NOT FOR RESALE

What must be true x months from now for us to be able to look back and say with any credibility that we had a good period?

NOT FOR RESALEable to look back and say with any credibility that we had a good period?

These questions provide a critical level of focus for leaders who are being

NOT FOR RESALEThese questions provide a critical level of focus for leaders who are being

Once a team has agreed on its thematic goal, it should resist the

NOT FOR RESALE

Once a team has agreed on its thematic goal, it should resist the temptation to run out and communicate that goal right away or make

NOT FOR RESALE

temptation to run out and communicate that goal right away or make

NOT FOR RESALE

a big announcement about it. For one, the thematic goal alone is not

NOT FOR RESALE

a big announcement about it. For one, the thematic goal alone is not enough. It needs further detail or it will come across as an empty cam-

NOT FOR RESALE

enough. It needs further detail or it will come across as an empty cam-paign slogan. I’ll get to that shortly.

NOT FOR RESALE

paign slogan. I’ll get to that shortly.Second, the primary purpose of the thematic goal is not necessarily NOT FOR R

ESALE

Second, the primary purpose of the thematic goal is not necessarily to rally all the troops within the organization, as helpful as that may NOT FOR R

ESALE

to rally all the troops within the organization, as helpful as that may


La


123

Leaders Without HatsRegardless of how it is communicated within the larger organization, it’s worth repeating that every thematic goal must become the collective responsibility of the leadership team. This is true even if the goal doesn’t seem to directly involve the departments that some of those executives lead. To understand what this means, it’s helpful to think about members of the executive team going into each of their meetings without their departmental titles. Or as I like to say, they need to take off their departmental hats and put on generic corporate ones. I explored this basic idea in my description of team number one in the “Build a Cohesive Leadership Team” section, but it’s certainly worth repeating here.

On a cohesive team, leaders are not there simply to represent the departments that they lead and manage but rather to solve problems that stand in the way of achieving success for the whole organization. That means they’ll readily offer up their departments’ resources when it serves the greater good of the team, and they’ll take an active interest in the thematic goal regardless of how closely related it is to their func-tional area. And while individual team members will certainly have expertise and responsibility in different parts of the business, they will not limit their input and participation to those areas alone. Unfortu-nately, on many teams, this happens regularly.

Like the representatives of Congress or the United Nations, too many leaders come to meetings with the unspoken assumption that they are there to lobby for and defend their constituents. When they see that the agenda for a staff meeting has little if anything pertaining to their world, they do their best to avoid conversation in the hope that the meeting will end quickly. Or they try to sneak in some busywork to attend to or perhaps even shift the focus of the meeting to something that involves them and their department.

This is a perfect recipe for dysfunction and mediocrity. And while I’ll address the subject of meetings later in this book, let me make it clear that


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

without their departmental titles. Or as I like to say, they need to take

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

without their departmental titles. Or as I like to say, they need to take off their departmental hats and put on generic corporate ones. I explored

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL off their departmental hats and put on generic corporate ones. I explored

this basic idea in my description of team number one in the “Build a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

this basic idea in my description of team number one in the “Build a Cohesive Leadership Team” section, but it’s certainly worth repeating

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Cohesive Leadership Team” section, but it’s certainly worth repeating

On a cohesive team, leaders are not there simply to represent the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

On a cohesive team, leaders are not there simply to represent the departments that they lead and manage but rather to solve problems

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

departments that they lead and manage but rather to solve problems that stand in the way of achieving success for the whole organization.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that stand in the way of achieving success for the whole organization. That means they’ll readily offer up their departments’ resources when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That means they’ll readily offer up their departments’ resources when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it serves the greater good of the team, and they’ll take an active interest

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it serves the greater good of the team, and they’ll take an active interest in the thematic goal regardless of how closely related it is to their func-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in the thematic goal regardless of how closely related it is to their func-tional area. And while individual team members will certainly have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tional area. And while individual team members will certainly have expertise and responsibility in different parts of the business, they will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

expertise and responsibility in different parts of the business, they will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not limit their input and participation to those areas alone. Unfortu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not limit their input and participation to those areas alone. Unfortu-nately, on many teams, this happens regularly.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

nately, on many teams, this happens regularly.Like the representatives of Congress or the United Nations, too COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Like the representatives of Congress or the United Nations, too NOT FOR R

ESALEOn a cohesive team, leaders are not there simply to represent the

NOT FOR RESALEOn a cohesive team, leaders are not there simply to represent the

departments that they lead and manage but rather to solve problems

NOT FOR RESALEdepartments that they lead and manage but rather to solve problems

that stand in the way of achieving success for the whole organization.

NOT FOR RESALE

that stand in the way of achieving success for the whole organization. That means they’ll readily offer up their departments’ resources when

NOT FOR RESALE

That means they’ll readily offer up their departments’ resources when

NOT FOR RESALE

it serves the greater good of the team, and they’ll take an active interest

NOT FOR RESALE

it serves the greater good of the team, and they’ll take an active interest in the thematic goal regardless of how closely related it is to their func-

NOT FOR RESALE

in the thematic goal regardless of how closely related it is to their func-tional area. And while individual team members will certainly have

NOT FOR RESALE

tional area. And while individual team members will certainly have expertise and responsibility in different parts of the business, they will

NOT FOR RESALE

expertise and responsibility in different parts of the business, they will

NOT FOR RESALE

not limit their input and participation to those areas alone. Unfortu-NOT FOR RESALE

not limit their input and participation to those areas alone. Unfortu-nately, on many teams, this happens regularly.NOT FOR R

ESALE

nately, on many teams, this happens regularly.


La

The Advantage

124

it is the lack of a defined, compelling rallying cry or thematic goal that allows most bad staff meetings to happen, which enables poor decision making.

The benefits of establishing an overarching thematic goal are enor-mous. Divisional rivalry and infighting become much less likely as leaders stop seeing their primary responsibility as solely running their own departments. Focus during meetings gets easier as unimportant and ancillary topics are guiltlessly cast aside. Paralysis around resource allocation can be broken due to clarity around what deserves the most energy and attention. And the need to referee political battles, not only at the executive level but deeper in the organization, diminishes greatly as people better understand the trade-offs that need to be made and the rationale for them.

Defining ObjectivesRealizing the benefits of having a clear and collective focus requires more than merely identifying the thematic goal. That goal must then be further clarified by defining the objectives which will make accom-plishing it possible. I call these, for obvious reasons, defining objectives. (I originally wanted to call them “big buckets of stuff” but was over-ruled by my wiser colleagues.)

Defining objectives are the general categories of activity required to achieve the thematic goal. Like the thematic goal, defining objectives must be qualitative, temporary, and shared by the leadership team. They provide a level of specificity so that the thematic goal isn’t merely a slogan but rather a specific and understandable call to action. In most cases, there are between four and six defining objectives, depending on the nature of the goal itself.

Mail Priorities

We were working with the leadership team of a large freight

and logistics company that was doing very well. However,

among the various challenges that the leaders were discuss-


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allocation can be broken due to clarity around what deserves the most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allocation can be broken due to clarity around what deserves the most energy and attention. And the need to referee political battles, not only

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL energy and attention. And the need to referee political battles, not only

at the executive level but deeper in the organization, diminishes greatly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

at the executive level but deeper in the organization, diminishes greatly as people better understand the trade-offs that need to be made and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as people better understand the trade-offs that need to be made and

Realizing the benefits of having a clear and collective focus requires

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Realizing the benefits of having a clear and collective focus requires more than merely identifying the thematic goal. That goal must then

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more than merely identifying the thematic goal. That goal must then be further clarified by defining the objectives which will make accom-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be further clarified by defining the objectives which will make accom-plishing it possible. I call these, for obvious reasons, defining objectives.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

plishing it possible. I call these, for obvious reasons, defining objectives.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

(I originally wanted to call them “big buckets of stuff” but was over-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

(I originally wanted to call them “big buckets of stuff” but was over-ruled by my wiser colleagues.)

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ruled by my wiser colleagues.)Defining objectives

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Defining objectives

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

achieve the thematic goal. Like the thematic goal, defining objectives COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

achieve the thematic goal. Like the thematic goal, defining objectives must be qualitative, temporary, and shared by the leadership team. They COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

must be qualitative, temporary, and shared by the leadership team. They NOT FOR R

ESALERealizing the benefits of having a clear and collective focus requires

NOT FOR RESALE

Realizing the benefits of having a clear and collective focus requires more than merely identifying the thematic goal. That goal must then

NOT FOR RESALE

more than merely identifying the thematic goal. That goal must then be further clarified by defining the objectives which will make accom-

NOT FOR RESALE

be further clarified by defining the objectives which will make accom-plishing it possible. I call these, for obvious reasons, defining objectives.

NOT FOR RESALE

plishing it possible. I call these, for obvious reasons, defining objectives.

NOT FOR RESALE

(I originally wanted to call them “big buckets of stuff” but was over-

NOT FOR RESALE

(I originally wanted to call them “big buckets of stuff” but was over-ruled by my wiser colleagues.)

NOT FOR RESALE

ruled by my wiser colleagues.)Defining objectives

NOT FOR RESALE

Defining objectives are the general categories of activity required to NOT FOR R

ESALE

are the general categories of activity required to Defining objectives are the general categories of activity required to Defining objectivesNOT FOR R

ESALE

Defining objectives are the general categories of activity required to Defining objectivesachieve the thematic goal. Like the thematic goal, defining objectives NOT FOR R

ESALE

achieve the thematic goal. Like the thematic goal, defining objectives


La


125

ing was a problem with having no excess capacity to take

on the growing volume of business that was coming their

way. After discussing this and various other topics compet-

ing for their attention, we posed the big question: If you

accomplish just one thing in the next nine months, what

should it be?

Within just a few minutes, the team agreed that “if we

don’t solve the capacity issue, we’re in huge trouble.”

So “solve the capacity problem” became their thematic

goal. Not sexy, but clear and correct. And just as important,

there was no ambiguity that this thematic goal would become

the top priority of every team member, regardless of their

specific functional responsibilities.

The next step was to define exactly what they would

need to do to address the problem and achieve the thematic

goal. After less than an hour of discussion and debate, they

came up with the following defining objectives:

Thematic Goal

Defining ObjectivesAccurately assessand forecast thecapacity shortfall

Hire and trainmore employees

Solve the capacity problem

Acquire additionalequipment

Expand and modifycurrent facilities

Better utilizesystems and

software

(We use the graphic above to depict thematic goals and

defining objectives because it is easier for leaders to remem-

ber and display for future reference.)


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL So “solve the capacity problem” became their thematic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL So “solve the capacity problem” became their thematic

goal. Not sexy, but clear and correct. And just as important,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL goal. Not sexy, but clear and correct. And just as important,


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Thematic Goal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Thematic Goal

NOT FOR RESALEThe next step was to define exactly what they would

NOT FOR RESALEThe next step was to define exactly what they would


NOT FOR RESALEneed to do to address the problem and achieve the thematic


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Thematic Goal

NOT FOR RESALE

Thematic Goal


La

The Advantage

126

Standard Operating ObjectivesOnce teams identify their defining objectives, they have to take on the next, and last, step in the thematic goal process: identifying their stan-dard operating objectives. These are the ongoing and relatively straight-forward metrics and areas of responsibility that any leadership team must maintain in order to keep the organization afloat. I like to refer to these responsibilities as the “leaders’ day jobs.”

Coming up with standard operating objectives is not terribly difficult because they are usually somewhat obvious. In for-profit companies, they usually include categories like revenue, expenses, cus-tomer retention or satisfaction, product quality, cash flow, morale, or any other issues specific to a given industry. In a hotel, it would certainly include room occupancy, in a school it would include graduation rates and test scores, and in a church it might well include attendance and financial giving. Whatever the case, few leadership teams need more than fifteen minutes to identify and agree on their standard operating objectives, which are already a big part of their daily focus.

In the previous example, the freight company’s standard operating objectives would include revenue, expenses, on-time deliveries, cus-tomer satisfaction, new customer acquisition, safety, and morale.

As obvious as this may seem in retrospect, had the

executive team not had this conversation, they would have

gone back to work and continued working on whatever

projects and responsibilities they usually attended to, treat-

ing the capacity problem as just another of a long list of

important objectives. Instead, they ended the conversation

ready to talk about what they should stop working on, and

how they would reallocate less-critical resources in the orga-

nization to accomplish the thematic goal.

But the team wasn’t done.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once teams identify their defining objectives, they have to take on the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once teams identify their defining objectives, they have to take on the next, and last, step in the thematic goal process: identifying their stan-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

next, and last, step in the thematic goal process: identifying their stan-dard operating objectives. These are the ongoing and relatively straight-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dard operating objectives. These are the ongoing and relatively straight-forward metrics and areas of responsibility that any leadership team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

forward metrics and areas of responsibility that any leadership team must maintain in order to keep the organization afloat. I like to refer

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

must maintain in order to keep the organization afloat. I like to refer to these responsibilities as the “leaders’ day jobs.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to these responsibilities as the “leaders’ day jobs.”Coming up with standard operating objectives is not terribly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Coming up with standard operating objectives is not terribly difficult because they are usually somewhat obvious. In for-profit

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

difficult because they are usually somewhat obvious. In for-profit

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

companies, they usually include categories like revenue, expenses, cus-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

companies, they usually include categories like revenue, expenses, cus-tomer retention or satisfaction, product quality, cash flow, morale, COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

tomer retention or satisfaction, product quality, cash flow, morale, or any other issues specific to a given industry. In a hotel, it would COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

or any other issues specific to a given industry. In a hotel, it would NOT FOR R

ESALEOnce teams identify their defining objectives, they have to take on the

NOT FOR RESALEOnce teams identify their defining objectives, they have to take on the

next, and last, step in the thematic goal process: identifying their stan-

NOT FOR RESALEnext, and last, step in the thematic goal process: identifying their stan-

dard operating objectives. These are the ongoing and relatively straight-

NOT FOR RESALE

dard operating objectives. These are the ongoing and relatively straight-forward metrics and areas of responsibility that any leadership team

NOT FOR RESALE

forward metrics and areas of responsibility that any leadership team must maintain in order to keep the organization afloat. I like to refer

NOT FOR RESALE

must maintain in order to keep the organization afloat. I like to refer to these responsibilities as the “leaders’ day jobs.”

NOT FOR RESALE

to these responsibilities as the “leaders’ day jobs.”Coming up with standard operating objectives is not terribly

NOT FOR RESALE

Coming up with standard operating objectives is not terribly difficult because they are usually somewhat obvious. In for-profit

NOT FOR RESALE

difficult because they are usually somewhat obvious. In for-profit

NOT FOR RESALE

companies, they usually include categories like revenue, expenses, cus-NOT FOR RESALE

companies, they usually include categories like revenue, expenses, cus-tomer retention or satisfaction, product quality, cash flow, morale, NOT FOR R

ESALE

tomer retention or satisfaction, product quality, cash flow, morale,


La


127

My small consulting firm tracks the following standard operating objec-tives: financial strength (revenue and expenses are included), staff morale, book sales, product sales, consulting pipeline, speaking pipe-line, client satisfaction, and stewardship. Every company will have a slightly different set of standard objectives that it tracks, but it will be relatively predictable and consistent depending on the industry and it won’t change much over time.

It’s important to note that sometimes a company’s thematic goal will be one of the items that appears on its standard operating list. For instance, a hotel will regularly track occupancy, but in a given period that issue may become its most critical challenge. So the leaders would elevate it to the top of their list and make “increase occupancy” their thematic goal for a period of time. And if the freight company we worked with found that accidents and workers’ compensation claims were affecting its financial viability, the leaders might well make “improve safety” their thematic goal for a period of time, even though it is always on their standard operating objec tives list.

That’s not to say that most thematic goals come from the standard list, just that it is sometimes what is called for. And, of course, once the thematic goal has been achieved, the item goes back on the standard list.

The One-Page ModelDifferent kinds of organizations have different thematic goals, defining objectives, and standard operating objectives for a variety of reasons. However, what they all have in common is that their goals fit on a single sheet of paper.

Credit Card focus

One of our consultants worked with an affiliate credit card

company that was constantly developing partnerships with


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s important to note that sometimes a company’s thematic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s important to note that sometimes a company’s thematic goal will be one of the items that appears on its standard operating

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL goal will be one of the items that appears on its standard operating

list. For instance, a hotel will regularly track occupancy, but in a given

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

list. For instance, a hotel will regularly track occupancy, but in a given period that issue may become its most critical challenge. So the leaders

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

period that issue may become its most critical challenge. So the leaders would elevate it to the top of their list and make “increase occupancy”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

would elevate it to the top of their list and make “increase occupancy” their thematic goal for a period of time. And if the freight company

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their thematic goal for a period of time. And if the freight company we worked with found that accidents and workers’ compensation claims

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

we worked with found that accidents and workers’ compensation claims were affecting its financial viability, the leaders might well make

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

were affecting its financial viability, the leaders might well make

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“improve safety” their thematic goal for a period of time, even though

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“improve safety” their thematic goal for a period of time, even though it is always on their standard operating objec

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it is always on their standard operating objecThat’s not to say that most thematic goals come from the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

That’s not to say that most thematic goals come from the standard list, just that it is sometimes what is called for. And, of course,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

standard list, just that it is sometimes what is called for. And, of course,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

once the thematic goal has been achieved, the item goes back on the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

once the thematic goal has been achieved, the item goes back on the standard list.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

standard list.

The One-Page ModelCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The One-Page ModelNOT FOR R

ESALEwould elevate it to the top of their list and make “increase occupancy”

NOT FOR RESALE

would elevate it to the top of their list and make “increase occupancy” their thematic goal for a period of time. And if the freight company

NOT FOR RESALEtheir thematic goal for a period of time. And if the freight company

we worked with found that accidents and workers’ compensation claims

NOT FOR RESALEwe worked with found that accidents and workers’ compensation claims


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

“improve safety” their thematic goal for a period of time, even though

NOT FOR RESALE

“improve safety” their thematic goal for a period of time, even though it is always on their standard operating objec

NOT FOR RESALE

it is always on their standard operating objecThat’s not to say that most thematic goals come from the

NOT FOR RESALE

That’s not to say that most thematic goals come from the standard list, just that it is sometimes what is called for. And, of course,

NOT FOR RESALE

standard list, just that it is sometimes what is called for. And, of course,

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

128

organizations to co-brand their credit cards with them. They

brought on a large and strategically critical new partner, an

airline that was going to try to migrate as many of its fre-

quent flyer mileage credit cards over to our client.

The executives felt themselves being pulled in various

directions and pressured to constantly bring in new business,

even while they lamented the possibility of failing to ade-

quately service the new airline partner. Finally, they agreed

on a thematic goal that would provide them with the focus

and alignment they needed:

Thematic Goal

Defining Objectives

Make the newairline partnership work

Hire an executiveto focus exclusivelyon airline partner

Train airlineemployees

and other channelsto promote new card

Develop and marketnew credit card toairline customers

Establish airline-specific weekly

progress update

Refocus executivetime and attention

on airline

Partnersatisfaction

Accountsreceivable/default

rate

Standard OperatingObjectives

CustomersatisfactionAccount retentionRevenue/

expenses

Walking away with a single sheet of paper that lists a team’s the-matic goal, the defining objectives, and the standard objectives would give leaders the clear focus they need to align their actions and avoid distraction.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL on a thematic goal that would provide them with the focus

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL on a thematic goal that would provide them with the focus

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Make the new

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Make the newairline partnership work

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

airline partnership work

Refocus executive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Refocus executiveRefocus executive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Refocus executivetime and attention

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

time and attentionon airline

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on airline

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Standard OperatingCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Standard Operating

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALEairline partnership work

NOT FOR RESALEairline partnership work

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Train airline

NOT FOR RESALE

Train airline

and other channels

NOT FOR RESALE

and other channelsand other channels

NOT FOR RESALE

and other channelsand other channels

NOT FOR RESALE

and other channels

Establish airline-

NOT FOR RESALE

Establish airline-specific weekly

NOT FOR RESALE

specific weeklyprogress update

NOT FOR RESALE

progress update

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


La


129

Thematic Goal

Defining Objectives

Rebuild credibilitywithin the business

Improve proactivecommunication withkey stakeholders,

within and outside IT

Eliminateintradepartmental

silos and confusion

Identify plan fornew strategic

initiatives

Deliver on currentkey commitments

Budget withinplan

On-time projectdelivery


Business unitsatisfaction and

alignmentNetwork securitySystem reliability

and uptime

Staff moraleand development

Shedding a Reputation

We worked with the leadership team of an IT organization

in a huge health care company. For years, IT had been

viewed poorly within the organization, despite the efforts of

the CIO and her team to avoid mistakes and defend the

department when things didn’t go well. The department had

been criticized for failing to deliver projects on time, not

providing levels of service adequate for the lines of business,

and being generally unresponsive to the needs of the

company.

When the team learned about the thematic goal concept,

they decided that it was time to rally around the goal of

finally shedding their reputation for underperformance. Their

thematic goal image looked like this:


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


and being generally unresponsive to the needs of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL and being generally unresponsive to the needs of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Thematic Goal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Thematic Goal

Defining Objectives

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Defining Objectives


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Defining ObjectivesNOT FOR RESALE

Defining Objectives

Rebuild credibility

NOT FOR RESALE

Rebuild credibility

Deliver on currentNOT FOR RESALE

Deliver on currentDeliver on currentNOT FOR RESALE






Deliver on current


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEfinally shedding their reputation for underperformance. Their


La

The Advantage

130

The length of time that a thematic goal should live (within the 3–12 month time frame) is up to the leadership team and depends on the reality of how much time a given issue requires addressing. Having said that, the size of the organization and the nature of its business will have a big impact on the time period during which a thematic goal endures. Small companies and start-ups usually find that shorter time periods are more appropriate because they can get more done in less time and they have less cushion and permission to make mistakes. On the other side of the equation, large organizations, especially schools and government entities, usually have longer planning cycles and tend toward lengthier thematic goals.

As the time frame for accomplishing a thematic goal grows near, a leadership team will want to start thinking about the next one. Of course, a measure of flexibility is important. If a team makes faster progress than expected toward a thematic goal, then they should come up with their next one sooner. And if, after a few weeks or months, they decide that the thematic goal is no longer appropriate or that something else has become more important, they should certainly shift to a new one.

Remember, the purpose of having a thematic goal is not to restrict the organization’s flexibility but rather to rally its leaders around what they decide they want to achieve.

Within a year of establishing this thematic goal frame-

work, the team turned around its reputation internally, as

measured by customer surveys and stakeholder feedback

from executives. What is more, for the subsequent eight

years, the department has been able to maintain its new

reputation as successful and reliable. The CIO explained, “It

wasn’t until we made this our explicit top priority and got

clear about exactly what we had to do that we were able to

rally together and turn things around.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The length of time that a thematic goal should live (within the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The length of time that a thematic goal should live (within the 3–12 month time frame) is up to the leadership team and depends on

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

3–12 month time frame) is up to the leadership team and depends on the reality of how much time a given issue requires addressing. Having

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the reality of how much time a given issue requires addressing. Having said that, the size of the organization and the nature of its business will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

said that, the size of the organization and the nature of its business will have a big impact on the time period during which a thematic goal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

have a big impact on the time period during which a thematic goal endures. Small companies and start-ups usually find that shorter time

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

endures. Small companies and start-ups usually find that shorter time periods are more appropriate because they can get more done in less

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

periods are more appropriate because they can get more done in less time and they have less cushion and permission to make mistakes. On

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

time and they have less cushion and permission to make mistakes. On

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the other side of the equation, large organizations, especially schools

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the other side of the equation, large organizations, especially schools and government entities, usually have longer planning cycles and tend

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and government entities, usually have longer planning cycles and tend toward lengthier thematic goals.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

toward lengthier thematic goals.As the time frame for accomplishing a thematic goal grows near, a COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

As the time frame for accomplishing a thematic goal grows near, a leadership team will want to start thinking about the next one. Of COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

leadership team will want to start thinking about the next one. Of NOT FOR R

ESALE3–12 month time frame) is up to the leadership team and depends on

NOT FOR RESALE

3–12 month time frame) is up to the leadership team and depends on the reality of how much time a given issue requires addressing. Having

NOT FOR RESALEthe reality of how much time a given issue requires addressing. Having

said that, the size of the organization and the nature of its business will

NOT FOR RESALEsaid that, the size of the organization and the nature of its business will

have a big impact on the time period during which a thematic goal

NOT FOR RESALE

have a big impact on the time period during which a thematic goal endures. Small companies and start-ups usually find that shorter time

NOT FOR RESALE

endures. Small companies and start-ups usually find that shorter time periods are more appropriate because they can get more done in less

NOT FOR RESALE

periods are more appropriate because they can get more done in less time and they have less cushion and permission to make mistakes. On

NOT FOR RESALE

time and they have less cushion and permission to make mistakes. On

NOT FOR RESALE

the other side of the equation, large organizations, especially schools

NOT FOR RESALE

the other side of the equation, large organizations, especially schools and government entities, usually have longer planning cycles and tend

NOT FOR RESALE

and government entities, usually have longer planning cycles and tend toward lengthier thematic goals.

NOT FOR RESALE

toward lengthier thematic goals.As the time frame for accomplishing a thematic goal grows near, a NOT FOR R

ESALE

As the time frame for accomplishing a thematic goal grows near, a


La


131

Once a leadership team has identified its thematic goal, defining objectives, and standard operating objectives, it has one last question to answer, and it’s probably the easiest of them all.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

The Advantage

132

QUeSTIOn 6: WHO MUST DO WHAT?

Although I just made it clear that executives must come to meetings without their departmental hats on and that they must be prepared to engage in achieving the thematic goal of the team regardless of their areas of expertise, at some point the leaders need to clearly and unam-biguously stipulate what their respective responsibilities are when they go back to work to do their day jobs. The fact is, every organization of any size needs some division of labor, and that begins at the very top. Without clarity around that division of labor, the potential for politics and infighting, even among well-intentioned people, is great.

There is not a great deal to be said about this particular question, aside from warning leadership teams not to take it for granted. Although there is often clarity among executives in most organizations about who does what on the team, making assumptions about that clarity can lead to surprising and unnecessary problems.

Part of the challenge is that most organizations have adopted conventional titles for their various departments. Depending on the industry, most have some combination of many of the following roles: head of sales, marketing, finance, operations, human resources, engi-neering, IT, customer service, and legal. And while those functional descriptions are pretty good indicators of the general responsibilities of members of the leadership team, I’m always a little surprised when I ask them all to quietly write down their descriptions in some level of detail.

Often members of the team will be surprised at what they learn from their colleagues during this short exercise. Sometimes two people claim to be responsible for the same task or discipline: “Hey, I have business development on my list too!” In other cases, there will be a gap: “How come no one has strategic planning on their list?”

In many cases, it’s the leader of the executive team, often the CEO, who presents the biggest problem. Many of these leaders take on active


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

go back to work to do their day jobs. The fact is, every organization of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

go back to work to do their day jobs. The fact is, every organization of any size needs some division of labor, and that begins at the very top.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL any size needs some division of labor, and that begins at the very top.

Without clarity around that division of labor, the potential for politics

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Without clarity around that division of labor, the potential for politics and infighting, even among well-intentioned people, is great.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and infighting, even among well-intentioned people, is great.There is not a great deal to be said about this particular question,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

There is not a great deal to be said about this particular question, aside from warning leadership teams not to take it for granted. Although

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

aside from warning leadership teams not to take it for granted. Although there is often clarity among executives in most organizations about who

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

there is often clarity among executives in most organizations about who does what on the team, making assumptions about that clarity can lead

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

does what on the team, making assumptions about that clarity can lead to surprising and unnecessary problems.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to surprising and unnecessary problems.Part of the challenge is that most organizations have adopted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Part of the challenge is that most organizations have adopted conventional titles for their various departments. Depending on the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

conventional titles for their various departments. Depending on the industry, most have some combination of many of the following roles:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

industry, most have some combination of many of the following roles: head of sales, marketing, finance, operations, human resources, engi-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

head of sales, marketing, finance, operations, human resources, engi-neering, IT, customer service, and legal. And while those functional

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

neering, IT, customer service, and legal. And while those functional descriptions are pretty good indicators of the general responsibilities of COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

descriptions are pretty good indicators of the general responsibilities of members of the leadership team, I’m always a little surprised when I COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

members of the leadership team, I’m always a little surprised when I NOT FOR R

ESALEThere is not a great deal to be said about this particular question,

NOT FOR RESALE

There is not a great deal to be said about this particular question, aside from warning leadership teams not to take it for granted. Although

NOT FOR RESALEaside from warning leadership teams not to take it for granted. Although

there is often clarity among executives in most organizations about who

NOT FOR RESALEthere is often clarity among executives in most organizations about who

does what on the team, making assumptions about that clarity can lead

NOT FOR RESALE

does what on the team, making assumptions about that clarity can lead to surprising and unnecessary problems.

NOT FOR RESALE

to surprising and unnecessary problems.Part of the challenge is that most organizations have adopted

NOT FOR RESALE

Part of the challenge is that most organizations have adopted conventional titles for their various departments. Depending on the

NOT FOR RESALE

conventional titles for their various departments. Depending on the industry, most have some combination of many of the following roles:

NOT FOR RESALE

industry, most have some combination of many of the following roles: head of sales, marketing, finance, operations, human resources, engi-

NOT FOR RESALE

head of sales, marketing, finance, operations, human resources, engi-neering, IT, customer service, and legal. And while those functional

NOT FOR RESALE

neering, IT, customer service, and legal. And while those functional descriptions are pretty good indicators of the general responsibilities of NOT FOR R

ESALE

descriptions are pretty good indicators of the general responsibilities of


La


133

The Two-Headed CeO

One of the first organizations I consulted to was a start-

up fashion apparel company that operated out of a small

warehouse with five employees. The CEO was the original

product designer. As the company experienced rapid

growth and market acceptance, he promoted one of his

earliest employees to be head of products (the guy

was actually the company’s original shipping admini-

strator and janitor who turned out to be a remarkable

designer).

The problem, of course, was that the CEO continued to

function as the chief product specialist, which had the poten-

tial for creating confusion for everyone on the team, not the

least of which was the new head of products. During meet-

ings, when the CEO weighed in on product issues, team

members didn’t push back much because they mistakenly

assumed he was speaking as the CEO and declaring his

intention to make a final decision. In reality, he was just

weighing in as a product designer and hoping to encourage

discussion.

Realizing that he was inadvertently squelching debate

and overriding the authority of his head of product deve-

lopment, the CEO decided he had to be more explicit

with his team during meetings about which role he was

playing and whether his intention was to contribute to the

conver sation or drive closure as the organization’s chief

executive.

roles beyond their responsibility of managing the leadership team, and this can create confusion. For instance, in many smaller organizations, the founder and CEO occupies two separate roles: leader of the execu-tive team and functional specialist.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL up fashion apparel company that operated out of a small

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL up fashion apparel company that operated out of a small

warehouse with five employees. The CEO was the original

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL warehouse with five employees. The CEO was the original


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


was actually the company’s original shipping admini

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


rator and janitor who turned out to be a remarkable

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

intention to make a final decision. In reality, he was just COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

intention to make a final decision. In reality, he was just NOT FOR R

ESALEearliest employees to be head of products (the guy

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEwas actually the company’s original shipping admini


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


assumed he was speaking as the CEO and declaring his NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

134

It’s tempting for leaders, especially those at the top of organizations, to temporarily step into roles where they are talented or comfortable. What they often don’t realize, however, is that others in the organiza-tion, even on their team, aren’t as clear as they are about where lines of responsibility ultimately lie.

Regardless of how clear or confusing a company’s “org” chart may be, it is always worthwhile to take a little time to clarify so that everyone on the leadership team knows and agrees on what everyone else does and that all critical areas are covered.

Okay, let’s assume a team has successfully answered each of the six critical questions. They can still fail to benefit from the clarity they’ve achieved if they don’t capture that clarity effectively.

THe PlAYBOOk

Once the leadership team has answered each of the six critical ques-tions, it is absolutely critical for them to capture those answers in a concise, actionable way so that they can use them for communication, decision making, and planning going forward.

Leaders usually make one of two mistakes after leaving an off-site meeting or a strategy session where they’ve agreed on something important. Often they capture their decisions in a glossy, bound docu-ment and then place it on a shelf to gather dust. Or they do nothing to capture their ideas, assuming that the people in the room will natu-rally glean the ideas that are important or relevant for their departments.

The best alternative to these extremes and the most effective tool for keeping key decisions alive is the creation of something we refer to as a playbook: a simple document summarizing the answers to the six critical questions. While every organization will, and should, create a playbook that is customized to their needs, there are two things that the leaders of any organization should do to make their playbook work.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on the leadership team knows and agrees on what everyone else does

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on the leadership team knows and agrees on what everyone else does

Okay, let’s assume a team has successfully answered each of the six

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Okay, let’s assume a team has successfully answered each of the six critical questions. They can still fail to benefit from the clarity they’ve

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

critical questions. They can still fail to benefit from the clarity they’ve achieved if they don’t capture that clarity effectively.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

achieved if they don’t capture that clarity effectively.

the leadership team has answered each of the six critical ques-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the leadership team has answered each of the six critical ques-tions, it is absolutely critical for them to capture those answers in a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tions, it is absolutely critical for them to capture those answers in a concise, actionable way so that they can use them for communication,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

concise, actionable way so that they can use them for communication, decision making, and planning going forward.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

decision making, and planning going forward.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Leaders usually make one of two mistakes after leaving an off-site

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Leaders usually make one of two mistakes after leaving an off-site meeting or a strategy session where they’ve agreed on something

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meeting or a strategy session where they’ve agreed on something important. Often they capture their decisions in a glossy, bound docu-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

important. Often they capture their decisions in a glossy, bound docu-ment and then place it on a shelf to gather dust. Or they do nothing COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

ment and then place it on a shelf to gather dust. Or they do nothing NOT FOR R

ESALE

the leadership team has answered each of the six critical ques-

NOT FOR RESALE

the leadership team has answered each of the six critical ques-tions, it is absolutely critical for them to capture those answers in a

NOT FOR RESALE

tions, it is absolutely critical for them to capture those answers in a concise, actionable way so that they can use them for communication,

NOT FOR RESALE

concise, actionable way so that they can use them for communication, decision making, and planning going forward.

NOT FOR RESALE

decision making, and planning going forward.

NOT FOR RESALE

Leaders usually make one of two mistakes after leaving an off-site

NOT FOR RESALE

Leaders usually make one of two mistakes after leaving an off-site meeting or a strategy session where they’ve agreed on something

NOT FOR RESALE

meeting or a strategy session where they’ve agreed on something important. Often they capture their decisions in a glossy, bound docu-NOT FOR R

ESALE

important. Often they capture their decisions in a glossy, bound docu-


La


135

First, they must keep it short. Anything more than a few pages is unnecessary and discourages people from reviewing the playbook. In most cases, the answers to the six questions can be captured on a single page—two at the most. And even if a team wants to add information from Discipline 1 (build a cohesive leadership team), like team member profiles and results from the team effectiveness exercise, no more than three pages will be needed.

Second, leadership team members should keep their playbook with them at all times. And not buried in a briefcase. They should keep it on their desks, bring it to staff meetings, and have it available for quick reference and as a tool for communicating to employees.

The following is an example of a company playbook. But remember that whatever form it takes, the key is to keep the answers to the six critical questions alive and accessible. By doing this, a leadership team will drastically improve the odds of running the organization in an aligned, consistent, and intentional way.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Second, leadership team members should keep their playbook

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Second, leadership team members should keep their playbook with them at all times. And not buried in a briefcase. They

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL with them at all times. And not buried in a briefcase. They

should keep it on their desks, bring it to staff meetings, and have it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

should keep it on their desks, bring it to staff meetings, and have it available for quick reference and as a tool for communicating to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

available for quick reference and as a tool for communicating to

The following is an example of a company playbook. But remember

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The following is an example of a company playbook. But remember that whatever form it takes, the key is to keep the answers to the six

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that whatever form it takes, the key is to keep the answers to the six critical questions alive and accessible. By doing this, a leadership team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

critical questions alive and accessible. By doing this, a leadership team will drastically improve the odds of running the organization in an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

will drastically improve the odds of running the organization in an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

aligned, consistent, and intentional way.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALEThe following is an example of a company playbook. But remember

NOT FOR RESALEThe following is an example of a company playbook. But remember

that whatever form it takes, the key is to keep the answers to the six

NOT FOR RESALEthat whatever form it takes, the key is to keep the answers to the six

critical questions alive and accessible. By doing this, a leadership team

NOT FOR RESALE

critical questions alive and accessible. By doing this, a leadership team will drastically improve the odds of running the organization in an

NOT FOR RESALE

will drastically improve the odds of running the organization in an

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

136

Thematic Goal

Defining Objectives

Expand our consulting practice

Solicit morereferrals from

previous clients

Increaseadvertising

for consulting

Hire more greatconsultants

Start doingfree seminars

Improve qualityof consulting

materials


Revenue ExpensesClientsatisfaction

Clientretention

Strengthof pipeline

Staffmorale Lead flow

Playbook ExampleLighthouse Consulting

Why do we exist? We exist because we believe the world

needs more great leaders.

How do we behave? We behave with passion, humility, and

emotional intelligence.

What do we do? We provide services and resources for

leaders who want to make their organizations more

effective.

How will we succeed? We will differentiate ourselves by

providing extremely high-touch service, staying relatively

small and protecting our unique culture, and leveraging the

ideas of world-class subject matter experts.



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL leaders who want to make their organizations more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL leaders who want to make their organizations more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

We will differentiate ourselves by

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

We will differentiate ourselves by


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Thematic Goal

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Thematic Goal

Defining Objectives

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Defining Objectives


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Defining Objectives NOT FOR RESALE

Defining Objectives


NOT FOR RESALE

Expand our consulting practiceExpand our consulting practice

NOT FOR RESALE


Hire more greatNOT FOR RESALE

Hire more greatconsultantsNOT FOR R

ESALE

consultants


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEideas of world-class subject matter experts.


La


137

Who must do what?

Name Title General Responsibilities

Michael CEO Executive team leadership,

company strategy, key sales

support

Dick Consulting Ops Consultant and project

management, content

development

Amy CFO Finances, IT, legal, general

administration

Matt Sales Standard sales, partnerships

Tom Marketing Standard marketing, customer

education, events

Christa HR Training, benefits, compensation

Team profile

Name Type Areas for Improvement

Michael ENTJ Interrupt less; follow through on

commitments

Dick INTP Engage more with peers; respond more

quickly to inquiries/e-mails

Amy ISTJ Explain things more thoroughly; speak up

during meetings

Matt ENFP Stay focused and on-topic during

meetings; follow through

Tom INFJ Don’t be afraid to disagree; be tougher on

your staff

Christa ESTJ Flex more to business needs; don’t be

defensive about department


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Finances, IT, legal, general

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Finances, IT, legal, general

Standard sales, partnerships

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Standard sales, partnerships


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


education, events

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

education, events

Training, benefits, compensation

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Amy ISTJ Explain things more thoroughly; speak up COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Amy ISTJ Explain things more thoroughly; speak up NOT FOR R

ESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


education, events

NOT FOR RESALEeducation, events


NOT FOR RESALETraining, benefits, compensation

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


commitments

NOT FOR RESALE

commitments


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

138

CHeCklIST fOR DISCIPlIne 2: CReATe ClARITY



statements:

⎯ Members of the leadership team know, agree on, and are

passionate about the reason that the organization exists.

⎯ The leadership team has clarified and embraced a small,

specific set of behavioral values.

⎯ Leaders are clear and aligned around a strategy that helps

them define success and differentiate from competitors.

⎯ The leadership team has a clear, current goal around which

they rally. They feel a collective sense of ownership for

that goal.

⎯ Members of the leadership team understand one another’s

roles and responsibilities. They are comfortable asking

questions about one another’s work.

⎯ The elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely

summarized and regularly referenced and reviewed by the

leadership team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL passionate about the reason that the organization exists.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL passionate about the reason that the organization exists.

e leadership team has clarified and embraced a small,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

e leadership team has clarified and embraced a small,

aders are clear and aligned around a strategy that helps

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


e leadership team has a clear, current goal around which

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


mbers of the leadership team understand one another’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


e elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leadership team.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leadership team.NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEthem define success and differentiate from competitors.


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


leadership team.NOT FOR RESALE

leadership team.


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La


Back to those two organizations.

The first is run by a leadership team whose members regularly remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core values, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about what they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can represent and consider them when making decisions.

The second has a leadership team that limits its communication to a few events each year, and even then the focus is mainly on tactical goals and initiatives. Their messaging after meetings is often sparse and inconsistent, and they aren’t particularly aware of the opinions of the employees deeper in their organizations.



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first is run by a leadership team whose members regularly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first is run by a leadership team whose members regularly remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core values, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about values, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about what they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

represent and consider them when making decisions.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


The second has a leadership team that limits its communication to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The second has a leadership team that limits its communication to a few events each year, and even then the focus is mainly on tactical

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a few events each year, and even then the focus is mainly on tactical goals and initiatives. Their messaging after meetings is often sparse and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

goals and initiatives. Their messaging after meetings is often sparse and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inconsistent, and they aren’t particularly aware of the opinions of the COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inconsistent, and they aren’t particularly aware of the opinions of the employees deeper in their organizations.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

employees deeper in their organizations.NOT FOR R

ESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core

NOT FOR RESALE

remind employees about the company’s reason for existence, its core values, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about

NOT FOR RESALEvalues, its strategy, and its top priority. They leave meetings clear about

what they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell

NOT FOR RESALEwhat they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell what they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell

NOT FOR RESALEwhat they’ve agreed to do and what they’re going to go back and tell

their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the

NOT FOR RESALE

their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the

NOT FOR RESALE

their employees. They also take steps to ensure that they know the concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can

NOT FOR RESALE

concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can

NOT FOR RESALE

concerns and ideas of the people in their organizations so that they can

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


The second has a leadership team that limits its communication to

NOT FOR RESALE

The second has a leadership team that limits its communication to a few events each year, and even then the focus is mainly on tactical

NOT FOR RESALE

a few events each year, and even then the focus is mainly on tactical goals and initiatives. Their messaging after meetings is often sparse and NOT FOR R

ESALE

goals and initiatives. Their messaging after meetings is often sparse and inconsistent, and they aren’t particularly aware of the opinions of the NOT FOR R

ESALE

inconsistent, and they aren’t particularly aware of the opinions of the


La

141


Once a leadership team has become cohesive and worked to establish clarity and align-

ment around the answers to the six critical ques-tions, then, and only then, can they effectively move on to the next step: communicating those answers. Or better yet, overcommunicating those answers—over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

That’s right. Seven times. I’ve heard claims that employees won’t believe what leaders are commu-nicating to them until they’ve heard it seven times. Whether the real number is five, seven, or seventy-seven, the point is that people are skeptical about what they’re being told unless they hear it consis-tently over time.

That need for repetition is not a testament to undue cynicism on the part of employees; it is the


3. Overcommunicate

Clarity

4. Reinforce

Clarity

1. Build a

Cohesive Leadership

Team

2. CreateClarity

Overcommunicate Clarity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

O

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once a leadership team has become cohesive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nce a leadership team has become cohesive and worked to establish clarity and align-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and worked to establish clarity and align-ment around the answers to the six critical ques-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ment around the answers to the six critical ques-tions, then, and only then, can they effectively move

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tions, then, and only then, can they effectively move on to the next step: communicating those answers.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on to the next step: communicating those answers.

Overcommunicate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Overcommunicate

NOT FOR RESALE

nce a leadership team has become cohesive

NOT FOR RESALE

nce a leadership team has become cohesive and worked to establish clarity and align-

NOT FOR RESALE

and worked to establish clarity and align-ment around the answers to the six critical ques-

NOT FOR RESALE

ment around the answers to the six critical ques-tions, then, and only then, can they effectively move

NOT FOR RESALE

tions, then, and only then, can they effectively move on to the next step: communicating those answers.

NOT FOR RESALE

on to the next step: communicating those answers.

NOT FOR RESALE

Or better yet, overcommunicating those answers—NOT FOR RESALE

Or better yet, overcommunicating those answers—over and over and over and over and over and over NOT FOR R

ESALE

over and over and over and over and over and over


La

The Advantage

142

result of the generic, almost spoof-like communication that takes place within so many organizations. Scott Adams and his Dilbert character have built a cottage industry around highlighting the clichés at the heart of this phenomenon, and I wish I could say that the comic strip was way off base.

After all, just about every leader says that quality is job number one, the customer is king, and employees are the organization’s greatest asset. It’s almost comical how rote these messages have become. And so it’s not surprising that employees give little credence to executive pronounce-ments and instead wait to see how serious those executives are. One of the best tests of seriousness is whether they continue to repeat them-selves over a prolonged period of time.

Unfortunately, most leaders I’ve worked with are hesitant to repeat themselves. They call to mind that old wives’ tale (it really is a wives’ tale), where a woman asks her husband, “Why don’t you tell me you love me anymore?” The husband seems a little surprised by the question and after considering it for a moment replies, “Well, I told you I loved you when we got married. I’ll let you know if it changes.”

Leaders inadvertently do the same thing when they walk away from an annual all-hands meeting and think that they’ve done their job of communicating by giving a speech outlining the organization’s strategy or priorities. And they think they’ve been especially thorough when they announce that the slides for the presentation can be found on the company’s intranet site. But then they seem surprised when they learn, a few weeks later, that employees aren’t acting on what they were told and that most of those employees can’t even repeat the organization’s new strategy accurately.

The problem is that lead ers confuse the mere transfer of infor mation to an audience with the audience’s ability to under stand, internalize, and emb race the message that is being communicated. The only way for people to embrace a message is to hear it over a period of time, in a variety of different situations, and preferably from different people. That’s why great leaders see themselves as Chief Reminding Officers as


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

surprising that employees give little credence to executive pronounce-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

surprising that employees give little credence to executive pronounce-ments and instead wait to see how serious those executives are. One of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ments and instead wait to see how serious those executives are. One of

the best tests of seriousness is whether they continue to repeat them-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the best tests of seriousness is whether they continue to repeat them-

Unfortunately, most leaders I’ve worked with are hesitant to repeat

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Unfortunately, most leaders I’ve worked with are hesitant to repeat themselves. They call to mind that old wives’ tale (it really is a wives’

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

themselves. They call to mind that old wives’ tale (it really is a wives’ tale), where a woman asks her husband, “Why don’t you tell me you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tale), where a woman asks her husband, “Why don’t you tell me you love me anymore?” The husband seems a little surprised by the question

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

love me anymore?” The husband seems a little surprised by the question and after considering it for a moment replies, “Well, I told you I loved

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and after considering it for a moment replies, “Well, I told you I loved

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

you when we got married. I’ll let you know if it changes.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

you when we got married. I’ll let you know if it changes.”Leaders inadvertently do the same thing when they walk away from

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Leaders inadvertently do the same thing when they walk away from an annual all-hands meeting and think that they’ve done their job of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

an annual all-hands meeting and think that they’ve done their job of communicating by giving a speech outlining the organization’s strategy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communicating by giving a speech outlining the organization’s strategy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or priorities. And they think they’ve been especially thorough when

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or priorities. And they think they’ve been especially thorough when they announce that the slides for the presentation can be found on the COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

they announce that the slides for the presentation can be found on the company’s intranet site. But then they seem surprised when they learn, COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

company’s intranet site. But then they seem surprised when they learn, NOT FOR R

ESALEUnfortunately, most leaders I’ve worked with are hesitant to repeat

NOT FOR RESALE

Unfortunately, most leaders I’ve worked with are hesitant to repeat themselves. They call to mind that old wives’ tale (it really is a wives’

NOT FOR RESALEthemselves. They call to mind that old wives’ tale (it really is a wives’

tale), where a woman asks her husband, “Why don’t you tell me you

NOT FOR RESALEtale), where a woman asks her husband, “Why don’t you tell me you

love me anymore?” The husband seems a little surprised by the question

NOT FOR RESALE

love me anymore?” The husband seems a little surprised by the question and after considering it for a moment replies, “Well, I told you I loved

NOT FOR RESALE

and after considering it for a moment replies, “Well, I told you I loved

NOT FOR RESALE

you when we got married. I’ll let you know if it changes.”

NOT FOR RESALE

you when we got married. I’ll let you know if it changes.”Leaders inadvertently do the same thing when they walk away from

NOT FOR RESALE

Leaders inadvertently do the same thing when they walk away from an annual all-hands meeting and think that they’ve done their job of

NOT FOR RESALE

an annual all-hands meeting and think that they’ve done their job of communicating by giving a speech outlining the organization’s strategy

NOT FOR RESALE

communicating by giving a speech outlining the organization’s strategy

NOT FOR RESALE

or priorities. And they think they’ve been especially thorough when NOT FOR RESALE

or priorities. And they think they’ve been especially thorough when they announce that the slides for the presentation can be found on the NOT FOR R

ESALE

they announce that the slides for the presentation can be found on the


La

Discipline 3: Overcommunicate Clarity

143

much as anything else. Their top two priorities are to set the direction of the organization and then to ensure that people are reminded of it on a regular basis. So why do so many leaders fail to do this?

Many don’t enjoy the reminding role because it seems wasteful and ineffi-cient to them. They’ve been trained to avoid redundancy in virtually every aspect of their work, so embracing it in communication isn’t easy for them. But some leaders aren’t so much worried about the wastefulness of overcommunication; they fear that repeating a message might be insulting to their audience. They assume that employees don’t need to be told something more than once and that they’ll feel patronized if they are.

What those leaders fail to realize is that employees understand the need for repetition. They know that messaging is not so much an intel-lectual process as an emotional one. Employees are not analyzing what leaders are saying based solely on whether it is intellectually novel or compelling, but more than anything else on whether they believe the leaders are serious, authentic, and committed to what they are saying. Again, that means repetition is a must.

Finally, many leaders fail to overcommunicate because they get bored saying the same things over and over again. This is understand-able. Intelligent people want to be challenged with new messages and new problems to solve, and they get tired of revisiting the same topics. But that doesn’t matter. The point of leadership is not to keep the leader entertained, but to mobilize people around what is most important. When that calls for repetition and reinforcement, which it almost always does, a good leader relishes that responsibility.

Repetition is more than just a matter of communicating something again and again in the same way. Effective communication requires

Great leaders see themselves

as Chief Reminding Officers as

much as anything else.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in communication isn’t easy for them. But some leaders aren’t so much

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in communication isn’t easy for them. But some leaders aren’t so much worried about the wastefulness of overcommunication; they fear that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

worried about the wastefulness of overcommunication; they fear that repeating a message might be insulting to their audience. They assume

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

repeating a message might be insulting to their audience. They assume that employees don’t need to be told something more than once and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that employees don’t need to be told something more than once and that they’ll feel patronized if they are.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that they’ll feel patronized if they are.What those leaders fail to realize is that employees understand the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What those leaders fail to realize is that employees understand the need for repetition. They know that messaging is not so much an intel-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

need for repetition. They know that messaging is not so much an intel-lectual process as an emotional one. Employees are not analyzing what

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lectual process as an emotional one. Employees are not analyzing what leaders are saying based solely on whether it is intellectually novel or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders are saying based solely on whether it is intellectually novel or compelling, but more than anything else on whether they believe the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

compelling, but more than anything else on whether they believe the leaders are serious, authentic, and committed to what they are saying.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders are serious, authentic, and committed to what they are saying. Again, that means repetition is a must.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Again, that means repetition is a must.Finally, many leaders fail to overcommunicate because they get COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Finally, many leaders fail to overcommunicate because they get COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE

worried about the wastefulness of overcommunication; they fear that

NOT FOR RESALE

worried about the wastefulness of overcommunication; they fear that repeating a message might be insulting to their audience. They assume

NOT FOR RESALErepeating a message might be insulting to their audience. They assume

that employees don’t need to be told something more than once and

NOT FOR RESALEthat employees don’t need to be told something more than once and

What those leaders fail to realize is that employees understand the

NOT FOR RESALE

What those leaders fail to realize is that employees understand the need for repetition. They know that messaging is not so much an intel-

NOT FOR RESALE

need for repetition. They know that messaging is not so much an intel-lectual process as an emotional one. Employees are not analyzing what

NOT FOR RESALE

lectual process as an emotional one. Employees are not analyzing what leaders are saying based solely on whether it is intellectually novel or

NOT FOR RESALE

leaders are saying based solely on whether it is intellectually novel or compelling, but more than anything else on whether they believe the

NOT FOR RESALE

compelling, but more than anything else on whether they believe the leaders are serious, authentic, and committed to what they are saying. NOT FOR R

ESALE

leaders are serious, authentic, and committed to what they are saying. Again, that means repetition is a must.NOT FOR R

ESALE

Again, that means repetition is a must.


La

The Advantage

144

that key messages come from different sources and through various channels, using a variety of tools. This includes assorted electronic media, from e-mail to videoconferencing to whatever funky new com-munication technology is being introduced to the market when this book goes to print. However, the most effective means of communicat-ing a message, even in a large and far-flung organization, has nothing to do with technology and has been around since the beginning of time. What I’m referring to is word of mouth.

CASCAdIng COmmUnICATIOn

Someone once told me that the best way to ensure that a message gets communicated throughout an organization is to spread rumors about it. Therefore, they concluded, leaders simply ought to go out and tell

“true rumors.” As silly as that may sound, it is the basis for the most important means of communication within a healthy organization.

The most reliable and effective way to get an organi-zation moving in the same direction is for members of a leadership team to come out of their meetings with a clear

message about what was decided, promptly communicate that message to their direct reports, and have those direct reports do the same for their own direct reports. We call this “cascading communication” because it begins the structured but interpersonal process of rolling key messages down through the organization directly from the leadership team.

If this sounds ridiculously simple, that’s because it is. And yet it doesn’t happen in the vast majority of companies in spite of the fact

If the best way to ensure

that a message gets

communicated throughout an

organization is to spread

rumors about it, then leaders

simply ought to go out and

tell “true rumors.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

once told me that the best way to ensure that a message gets

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

once told me that the best way to ensure that a message gets communicated throughout an organization is to spread rumors about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communicated throughout an organization is to spread rumors about it. Therefore, they concluded, leaders simply ought to go out and tell

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it. Therefore, they concluded, leaders simply ought to go out and tell

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tell “true rumors.”COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tell “true rumors.”NOT FOR R

ESALEonce told me that the best way to ensure that a message gets

NOT FOR RESALE

once told me that the best way to ensure that a message gets communicated throughout an organization is to spread rumors about

NOT FOR RESALEcommunicated throughout an organization is to spread rumors about

it. Therefore, they concluded, leaders simply ought to go out and tell

NOT FOR RESALEit. Therefore, they concluded, leaders simply ought to go out and tell

“true rumors.” As silly as that

NOT FOR RESALE

“true rumors.” As silly as that may sound, it is the basis for

NOT FOR RESALE

may sound, it is the basis for the most important means

NOT FOR RESALE

the most important means

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


simply ought to go out and NOT FOR RESALE



La


145

that it is so effective. Part of the reason for its effectiveness has to do with its contrast to more formal means of communication. Over the past fifteen or twenty years, employees have grown accustomed to inconsistent, untimely, and manufactured electronic communication from their leaders. That’s not meant to sound cynical; it’s just a reality. Most leadership teams are more than adept at sending out e-mail mes-sages and giving presentations, and yet they still struggle with effective communication because employees wonder about the authenticity of what they are reading and hearing.

Cascading communication provides a great opportunity to change all that. Amazingly, when employees in different parts of an organization hear their leaders saying the same things after meet-ings, they actually start to believe that alignment and clarity might be possible. This allows a leadership team to get a quick and meaningful win, one that creates momentum for executives and employees alike.

Consistent messaging

One of my earliest clients was a global software company

that had offices in just about every part of the world. Unsur-

prisingly, employees in different offices felt disconnected

from one another, regardless of how many e-mail announce-

ments, videoconference messages, and company T-shirts

they received.

And then the executive team started doing cascading

communication, leaving their meetings and going back to

their direct reports with a common set of messages. Those

direct reports were then charged with relaying those same

messages to their teams.

I remember the day that the woman who headed HR in

Australia called her colleague in Germany to tell him about

something her boss had just told her that was happening at


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communication because employees wonder about the authenticity of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communication because employees wonder about the authenticity of

Cascading communication provides a great opportunity to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Cascading communication provides a great opportunity to change all that. Amazingly, when employees in different parts of an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

change all that. Amazingly, when employees in different parts of an organization hear their leaders saying the same things after meet

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization hear their leaders saying the same things after meetactually start to believe that alignment and clarity might

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

actually start to believe that alignment and clarity might be possible. This allows a leadership team to get a quick and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be possible. This allows a leadership team to get a quick and meaningful win, one that creates momentum for executives and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meaningful win, one that creates momentum for executives and

Consistent

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Consistent

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


from one another, regardless of how many e-mail announce-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

from one another, regardless of how many e-mail announce-NOT FOR R

ESALEorganization hear their leaders saying the same things after meet

NOT FOR RESALE

organization hear their leaders saying the same things after meetactually start to believe that alignment and clarity might

NOT FOR RESALEactually start to believe that alignment and clarity might

be possible. This allows a leadership team to get a quick and

NOT FOR RESALEbe possible. This allows a leadership team to get a quick and


NOT FOR RESALE


Consistent

NOT FOR RESALE

Consistent

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


prisingly, employees in different offices felt disconnected NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

146

There are three keys to cascading communication: message consis-tency from one leader to another, timeliness of delivery, and live, real-time communication. This starts toward the end of leadership team meetings, a time when executives are usually trying their best to get out the door. That’s when someone needs to ask the sixty-four-thousand-dollar question: “Hey, what are we going to go back and tell our people?”

For the next few minutes, sometimes longer, leaders need to review their discussions from the meeting and decide which of their decisions are ready to be communicated and which are not. We refer to this as “commitment clarification,” for obvious reasons. Often it’s during this process that they discover that they were not on the same page about what they thought they had decided. Only then can they get real clarity by settling on the decisions they’ve made and agreeing to go out and spread true rumors about them. This will certainly take more time, but the cost of not doing it is often great.

Postmeeting Confusion

I worked for a company early in my career that was strug-

gling and needed to cut costs. After a long executive staff

meeting, it was decided that there would be a freeze in hiring

new employees until the revenue situation at the company

had been improved.

The head of human resources left the staff meeting and

sent out a worldwide e-mail message announcing the hiring

freeze. Within five minutes, two of her peers who had been

in the meeting were in her office protesting the new policy.

corporate. Shocked, her German colleague said, “Hey, my

boss just told me the same thing!” They felt a greater sense

of alignment because of that one simple instance of consis-

tent, informal messaging than they did after receiving any of

the other more produced forms of communication.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tency from one leader to another, timeliness of delivery, and live, real-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tency from one leader to another, timeliness of delivery, and live, real-time communication. This starts toward the end of leadership team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL time communication. This starts toward the end of leadership team

meetings, a time when executives are usually trying their best to get out

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meetings, a time when executives are usually trying their best to get out the door. That’s when someone needs to ask the sixty-four-thousand-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the door. That’s when someone needs to ask the sixty-four-thousand-dollar question: “Hey, what are we going to go back and tell our people?”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dollar question: “Hey, what are we going to go back and tell our people?”For the next few minutes, sometimes longer, leaders need to review

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

For the next few minutes, sometimes longer, leaders need to review their discussions from the meeting and decide which of their decisions

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their discussions from the meeting and decide which of their decisions are ready to be communicated and which are not. We refer to this as

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are ready to be communicated and which are not. We refer to this as

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“commitment clarification,” for obvious reasons. Often it’s during this

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

“commitment clarification,” for obvious reasons. Often it’s during this process that they discover that they were not on the same page about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

process that they discover that they were not on the same page about what they thought they had decided. Only then can they get real clarity

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what they thought they had decided. Only then can they get real clarity by settling on the decisions they’ve made and agreeing to go out and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

by settling on the decisions they’ve made and agreeing to go out and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

spread true rumors about them. This will certainly take more time, but

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

spread true rumors about them. This will certainly take more time, but the cost of not doing it is often great.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the cost of not doing it is often great.NOT FOR R

ESALEdollar question: “Hey, what are we going to go back and tell our people?”

NOT FOR RESALE

dollar question: “Hey, what are we going to go back and tell our people?”For the next few minutes, sometimes longer, leaders need to review

NOT FOR RESALEFor the next few minutes, sometimes longer, leaders need to review

their discussions from the meeting and decide which of their decisions

NOT FOR RESALEtheir discussions from the meeting and decide which of their decisions


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

“commitment clarification,” for obvious reasons. Often it’s during this

NOT FOR RESALE

“commitment clarification,” for obvious reasons. Often it’s during this process that they discover that they were not on the same page about

NOT FOR RESALE

process that they discover that they were not on the same page about what they thought they had decided. Only then can they get real clarity

NOT FOR RESALE

what they thought they had decided. Only then can they get real clarity by settling on the decisions they’ve made and agreeing to go out and

NOT FOR RESALE

by settling on the decisions they’ve made and agreeing to go out and

NOT FOR RESALE

spread true rumors about them. This will certainly take more time, but

NOT FOR RESALE

spread true rumors about them. This will certainly take more time, but the cost of not doing it is often great.

NOT FOR RESALE

the cost of not doing it is often great.


La


147

As important as alignment is, what teams shouldn’t do is word-smith those messages to death and make themselves sound like robotic leaders going out to read from the same exact script. Instead, they need to get clear on the main points to communicate and then go to their teams to explain those points in their own words.

It’s critical that leaders do this during a short and consistent time frame. If one member of the team goes back to her staff to convey the messages right after the meeting and someone else waits a week to do so, there will be understandable confusion and disappointment among employees. That’s not to say that it has to happen in the same moment. However, a twenty-four-hour period following a meeting is not a bad standard.

Many executives ask if they can communicate the results of a meeting using e-mail or even voice mail. The answer is no. Although these tools are certainly more efficient than having to communicate live, they are drastically less effective. For one, employees don’t have a chance to ask questions for clarification. Moreover, when employees read an e-mail or listen to a voice mail, they can’t help but wonder how the message was edited, and they try to read between the lines to discern the underlying meaning.

The best way to do cascading communication is face-to-face and live. Seeing a leader and hearing the tone of his or her voice is critical for employees, as is being able to ask a question or two. Having said

“I didn’t think the freeze applied to sales!” pleaded one

executive. The other executive chimed in. “And there’s no

way that we’re going to cut back on engineers, are we?”

The team was put in the position of having to retract its

announcement and amend its policy, which created tension

among team members, not to mention a loss of credibility

in the eyes of employees. All of this because they didn’t take

a few minutes to get clear about what they were really com-

mitting to at the end of a staff meeting.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As important as alignment is, what teams shouldn’t do is word-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As important as alignment is, what teams shouldn’t do is word-smith those messages to death and make themselves sound like robotic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

smith those messages to death and make themselves sound like robotic leaders going out to read from the same exact script. Instead, they need

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders going out to read from the same exact script. Instead, they need to get clear on the main points to communicate and then go to their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to get clear on the main points to communicate and then go to their teams to explain those points in their own words.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

teams to explain those points in their own words.It’s critical that leaders do this during a short and consistent time frame.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s critical that leaders do this during a short and consistent time frame. If one member of the team goes back to her staff to convey the messages

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

If one member of the team goes back to her staff to convey the messages right after the meeting and someone else waits a week to do so, there will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

right after the meeting and someone else waits a week to do so, there will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be understandable confusion and disappointment among employees. That’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

be understandable confusion and disappointment among employees. That’s not to say that it has to happen in the same moment. However, a twenty-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not to say that it has to happen in the same moment. However, a twenty-four-hour period following a meeting is not a bad standard.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

four-hour period following a meeting is not a bad standard.Many executives ask if they can communicate the results of a COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Many executives ask if they can communicate the results of a meeting using e-mail or even voice mail. The answer is no. Although COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

meeting using e-mail or even voice mail. The answer is no. Although NOT FOR R

ESALEsmith those messages to death and make themselves sound like robotic

NOT FOR RESALE

smith those messages to death and make themselves sound like robotic leaders going out to read from the same exact script. Instead, they need

NOT FOR RESALEleaders going out to read from the same exact script. Instead, they need

to get clear on the main points to communicate and then go to their

NOT FOR RESALEto get clear on the main points to communicate and then go to their

teams to explain those points in their own words.

NOT FOR RESALE

teams to explain those points in their own words.It’s critical that leaders do this during a short and consistent time frame.

NOT FOR RESALE

It’s critical that leaders do this during a short and consistent time frame. If one member of the team goes back to her staff to convey the messages

NOT FOR RESALE

If one member of the team goes back to her staff to convey the messages right after the meeting and someone else waits a week to do so, there will

NOT FOR RESALE

right after the meeting and someone else waits a week to do so, there will

NOT FOR RESALE

be understandable confusion and disappointment among employees. That’s

NOT FOR RESALE

be understandable confusion and disappointment among employees. That’s not to say that it has to happen in the same moment. However, a twenty-

NOT FOR RESALE

not to say that it has to happen in the same moment. However, a twenty-four-hour period following a meeting is not a bad standard.NOT FOR R

ESALE

four-hour period following a meeting is not a bad standard.Many executives ask if they can communicate the results of a NOT FOR R

ESALE

Many executives ask if they can communicate the results of a


La

The Advantage

148

that, the realities of virtual teams and geographically dispersed employ-ees sometimes make face-to-face communication impossible. That’s when a telephone call or a videoconference is a good idea. The key is that the discussion is live and interactive.

Another good idea when doing cascading communication, when-ever it’s possible, is to do it with an entire group of direct reports at the same time instead of one by one. Aside from being more efficient, it ensures that they hear the same message at the same time and benefit from one another’s questions and observations.

As I write this, I’m all too aware that the advice I’m giving might sound extremely basic. But then again, most organizations are unhealthy precisely because they aren’t doing the basic things, which require discipline, persis-tence, and follow-through more than sophistication or intelligence.

Beyond the simple discipline of doing cascading communication after every leadership team meeting, leaders can ensure that key mes-sages are effectively disseminated throughout an organization in a few other ways. The first and most important is to incorporate the answers to the six critical questions in any situation that calls for leaders to be communicating with employees—everything from recruiting, inter-viewing, orienting, managing, rewarding, training, to even dismissing people from the organization. We’ll cover many of these in the next chapter on reinforcing clarity.

But before doing that, let’s review a simple framework for under-standing the various ways in which communication flows in a healthy organization.

TOP-dOWn COmmUnICATIOn

This is the most common direction that critical information travels in an organization, and the various tools used to do it include all-hands meetings, employee newsletters, regular e-mail announcements, social media, and, of course, cascading communication. I won’t go into detail


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ensures that they hear the same message at the same time and benefit

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ensures that they hear the same message at the same time and benefit

As I write this, I’m all too aware that the advice I’m giving might sound

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As I write this, I’m all too aware that the advice I’m giving might sound extremely basic. But then again, most organizations are unhealthy precisely

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

extremely basic. But then again, most organizations are unhealthy precisely because they aren’t doing the basic things, which require discipline, persis-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

because they aren’t doing the basic things, which require discipline, persis-tence, and follow-through more than sophistication or intelligence.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tence, and follow-through more than sophistication or intelligence.Beyond the simple discipline of doing cascading communication

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Beyond the simple discipline of doing cascading communication after every leadership team meeting, leaders can ensure that key mes-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

after every leadership team meeting, leaders can ensure that key mes-sages are effectively disseminated throughout an organization in a few

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sages are effectively disseminated throughout an organization in a few

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

other ways. The first and most important is to incorporate the answers

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

other ways. The first and most important is to incorporate the answers to the six critical questions in any situation that calls for leaders to be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to the six critical questions in any situation that calls for leaders to be communicating with employees—everything from recruiting, inter-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communicating with employees—everything from recruiting, inter-viewing, orienting, managing, rewarding, training, to even dismissing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

viewing, orienting, managing, rewarding, training, to even dismissing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people from the organization. We’ll cover many of these in the next

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people from the organization. We’ll cover many of these in the next chapter on reinforcing clarity.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

chapter on reinforcing clarity.But before doing that, let’s review a simple framework for under-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

But before doing that, let’s review a simple framework for under-NOT FOR R

ESALEbecause they aren’t doing the basic things, which require discipline, persis-

NOT FOR RESALE

because they aren’t doing the basic things, which require discipline, persis-tence, and follow-through more than sophistication or intelligence.

NOT FOR RESALEtence, and follow-through more than sophistication or intelligence.

Beyond the simple discipline of doing cascading communication

NOT FOR RESALEBeyond the simple discipline of doing cascading communication

after every leadership team meeting, leaders can ensure that key mes-

NOT FOR RESALE

after every leadership team meeting, leaders can ensure that key mes-sages are effectively disseminated throughout an organization in a few

NOT FOR RESALE

sages are effectively disseminated throughout an organization in a few

NOT FOR RESALE

other ways. The first and most important is to incorporate the answers

NOT FOR RESALE

other ways. The first and most important is to incorporate the answers to the six critical questions in any situation that calls for leaders to be

NOT FOR RESALE

to the six critical questions in any situation that calls for leaders to be communicating with employees—everything from recruiting, inter-

NOT FOR RESALE

communicating with employees—everything from recruiting, inter-viewing, orienting, managing, rewarding, training, to even dismissing

NOT FOR RESALE

viewing, orienting, managing, rewarding, training, to even dismissing

NOT FOR RESALE

people from the organization. We’ll cover many of these in the next NOT FOR RESALE

people from the organization. We’ll cover many of these in the next chapter on reinforcing clarity.NOT FOR R

ESALE

chapter on reinforcing clarity.


La


149

about these here, because there are plenty of books and articles, not to mention consulting firms, that have more information and knowledge than I do about these various forms of basic communication.

What I will say is that the reason most organizations fail to com-municate to employees is not that they don’t know how to build an intranet site or write a blog or design a Power-Point presentation, but that they don’t achieve clarity around key messages and stick with them. The world is full of organizations where employees feel uninformed and in the dark even though they have access to more glossy newsletters, interac-tive Web sites, and overly produced employee meetings than they need or want. What they don’t get is consistent, authentic, and relevant communication.

The world is full of

organizations where

employees feel uninformed

and in the dark even though

they have access to more

glossy newsletters, interactive

Web sites, and overly

produced employee meetings

than they need or want.

Keeping It Real

One of the best exemplars of effective top-down communi-

cation that I’ve seen was the CEO of a large health care

company who sent out a one- to three-page e-mail message

to all employees every Friday. What was particularly amazing

was not the volume of his communication but the authentic-

ity, directness, and relevance of his messages.

As the organization went into a difficult period, the CEO

used those Friday e-mail messages to keep employees

focused and motivated around the difficult job ahead of

them. Any employee at the company, regardless of their


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they have access to more glossy newsletters, interac-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

glossy newsletters, interac-tive Web sites, and overly produced employee meetings than they need

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tive Web sites, and overly produced employee meetings than they need or want. What they don’t get is consistent, authentic, and relevant

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or want. What they don’t get is consistent, authentic, and relevant communication.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communication.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


and in the dark even though

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL and in the dark even though


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

tive Web sites, and overly produced employee meetings than they need

NOT FOR RESALE

tive Web sites, and overly produced employee meetings than they need or want. What they don’t get is consistent, authentic, and relevant

NOT FOR RESALE

or want. What they don’t get is consistent, authentic, and relevant

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEWeb sites, and overly


NOT FOR RESALEproduced employee meetings


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

150

Of course, it’s worth repeating that the success of top-down com-munication starts with Discipline 1 (build a cohesive leadership team) and Discipline 2 (create clarity). Without these, no amount of com-munication is going to be effective.

UPWARd And LATeRAL COmmUnICATIOn

Providing employees with a means of communicating upward to their leaders is important in any organization. However, it’s not the panacea it’s often presented to be. That’s because noncohesive leadership teams that have not aligned themselves around common answers to critical questions are not in a position to respond adequately to employee input and requests. In fact, getting more input from employees often only exacerbates frustra-tion in an organization when that input cannot be digested and used.

Still, there is something to be said for providing people in an orga-nization with channels for upward communication, whether that takes the form of employee surveys or roundtable discussion forums. What is key to making these effective is that leaders not give the impression that they are abdicating responsibility for decision making by giving employees a vote. Great organizations, unlike countries, are never run like a democracy.

It’s also critical for leaders to realize that no upward communication program will ever take the place of a manager who understands and rep-resents the views of his or her employees. It shouldn’t be used to overcome the shortcomings of leaders who are out of touch with their people.

One of the most common complaints in unhealthy organizations has to do with breakdowns in communication across departments or

department or level, had access to the unedited and often

vulnerable insights of their leader. The company was able to

weather the storms they faced, and the overcommunication

of their CEO was a big reason for this success.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

(create clarity). Without these, no amount of com-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

(create clarity). Without these, no amount of com-

n

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nIC

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ICATIO

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ATIO

oviding employees with a means of communicating upward to their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

oviding employees with a means of communicating upward to their leaders is important in any organization. However, it’s not the panacea it’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders is important in any organization. However, it’s not the panacea it’s often presented to be. That’s because noncohesive leadership teams that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

often presented to be. That’s because noncohesive leadership teams that have not aligned themselves around common answers to critical questions

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

have not aligned themselves around common answers to critical questions are not in a position to respond adequately to employee input and requests.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are not in a position to respond adequately to employee input and requests. In fact, getting more input from employees often only exacerbates frustra-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In fact, getting more input from employees often only exacerbates frustra-tion in an organization when that input cannot be digested and used.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion in an organization when that input cannot be digested and used.Still, there is something to be said for providing people in an orga-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Still, there is something to be said for providing people in an orga-nization with channels for upward communication, whether that takes

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nization with channels for upward communication, whether that takes the form of employee surveys or roundtable discussion forums. What COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

the form of employee surveys or roundtable discussion forums. What is key to making these effective is that leaders not give the impression COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

is key to making these effective is that leaders not give the impression NOT FOR R

ESALEATIO

NOT FOR RESALE

ATIO

oviding employees with a means of communicating upward to their

NOT FOR RESALEoviding employees with a means of communicating upward to their

leaders is important in any organization. However, it’s not the panacea it’s

NOT FOR RESALEleaders is important in any organization. However, it’s not the panacea it’s

often presented to be. That’s because noncohesive leadership teams that

NOT FOR RESALE

often presented to be. That’s because noncohesive leadership teams that have not aligned themselves around common answers to critical questions

NOT FOR RESALE

have not aligned themselves around common answers to critical questions are not in a position to respond adequately to employee input and requests.

NOT FOR RESALE

are not in a position to respond adequately to employee input and requests. In fact, getting more input from employees often only exacerbates frustra-

NOT FOR RESALE

In fact, getting more input from employees often only exacerbates frustra-tion in an organization when that input cannot be digested and used.

NOT FOR RESALE

tion in an organization when that input cannot be digested and used.Still, there is something to be said for providing people in an orga-

NOT FOR RESALE

Still, there is something to be said for providing people in an orga-nization with channels for upward communication, whether that takes NOT FOR R

ESALE

nization with channels for upward communication, whether that takes the form of employee surveys or roundtable discussion forums. What NOT FOR R

ESALE

the form of employee surveys or roundtable discussion forums. What


La


151

divisions. And as much as leaders might want to implement special communication programs to alleviate this, the only good way to address it is to attack the root cause: unresolved issues among the leaders of those divisions. The most well-intentioned, well-designed departmental communication program will not tear down silos unless the people who created those silos want them torn down.

Finally, it’s worth noting here that some of the healthiest organizations I’ve known don’t do a lot of formal upward or lateral communication, and some of the least healthy ones are mired in employee surveys, executive listening forums, and departmental conferences. This is a testament to the fact that without cohesiveness and clarity at the top, no amount of com-munication will suffice, and that with true clarity and cohesiveness, even a little formal communication will go a long, long way.

CHeCKLIST fOR dISCIPLIne 3: OveRCOmmUnICATe CLARITY



statements:

⎯ The leadership team has clearly communicated the six

aspects of clarity to all employees.

⎯ Team members regularly remind the people in their depart-

ments about those aspects of clarity.

⎯ The team leaves meetings with clear and specific agree-

ments about what to communicate to their employees, and

they cascade those messages quickly after meetings.

⎯ Employees are able to accurately articulate the organization’s

reason for existence, values, strategic anchors, and goals.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I’ve known don’t do a lot of formal upward or lateral communication, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I’ve known don’t do a lot of formal upward or lateral communication, and some of the least healthy ones are mired in employee surveys, executive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL some of the least healthy ones are mired in employee surveys, executive

listening forums, and departmental conferences. This is a testament to the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

listening forums, and departmental conferences. This is a testament to the fact that without cohesiveness and clarity at the top, no amount of com-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fact that without cohesiveness and clarity at the top, no amount of com-munication will suffice, and that with true clarity and cohesiveness, even

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

munication will suffice, and that with true clarity and cohesiveness, even a little formal communication will go a long, long way.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a little formal communication will go a long, long way.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

CKLIST

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

CKLIST f

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fOve

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

OveRC

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

RC

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

O

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Omm

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mm


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


statements:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

statements:

ThCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The leadership team has clearly communicated the six COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

e leadership team has clearly communicated the six NOT FOR R

ESALEmunication will suffice, and that with true clarity and cohesiveness, even

NOT FOR RESALE

munication will suffice, and that with true clarity and cohesiveness, even a little formal communication will go a long, long way.

NOT FOR RESALEa little formal communication will go a long, long way.

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

OR

NOT FOR RESALE

OR dISCIPLI

NOT FOR RESALE

dISCIPLI

NOT FOR RESALE

mm

NOT FOR RESALE

mmU

NOT FOR RESALE

Un

NOT FOR RESALE

nICA

NOT FOR RESALE

ICA


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



La


Those two organizations one final time.

The first has simple, practical processes for recruiting, hiring, and orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those people’s performance around the organization’s most important priorities, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.

The second has plenty of processes and human systems, but most of those are generic and cumbersome and not customized to the unique culture and operations of the company. As a result, managers find them largely frustrating and irrelevant to their work.



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first has simple, practical processes for recruiting, hiring, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first has simple, practical processes for recruiting, hiring, and orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those people’s performance around the organization’s most important priori

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people’s performance around the organization’s most important prioripeople’s performance around the organization’s most important priori

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

people’s performance around the organization’s most important priorities, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ties, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.

The second has plenty of processes and human systems, but most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The second has plenty of processes and human systems, but most of those are generic and cumbersome and not customized to the unique

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of those are generic and cumbersome and not customized to the unique culture and operations of the company. As a result, managers find them

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

culture and operations of the company. As a result, managers find them largely frustrating and irrelevant to their work.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

largely frustrating and irrelevant to their work.

The question:COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The question:NOT FOR R

ESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those

NOT FOR RESALE

orienting the right people based on its core values, for managing those people’s performance around the organization’s most important priori

NOT FOR RESALEpeople’s performance around the organization’s most important priori

ties, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s

NOT FOR RESALEties, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s ties, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s

NOT FOR RESALEties, and for rewarding and training them based on the company’s

culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those

NOT FOR RESALE

culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those

NOT FOR RESALE

culture, strategy, and operations. Moreover, managers embrace those processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.

NOT FOR RESALE

processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.

NOT FOR RESALE

processes and find them to be helpful tools for succeeding in their jobs.

The second has plenty of processes and human systems, but most

NOT FOR RESALE

The second has plenty of processes and human systems, but most of those are generic and cumbersome and not customized to the unique

NOT FOR RESALE

of those are generic and cumbersome and not customized to the unique culture and operations of the company. As a result, managers find them

NOT FOR RESALE

culture and operations of the company. As a result, managers find them largely frustrating and irrelevant to their work.NOT FOR R

ESALE

largely frustrating and irrelevant to their work.


La

153


Reinforce Clarity

As important as overcommunication is, leaders of a healthy organization cannot always be

around to remind employees about the company’s reason for existing, its values, and so on. In order to ensure that the answers to the six critical questions become embedded in the fabric of the organization, leaders must do everything they can to reinforce them structurally as well. The way to do that is to make sure that every human system—every process that involves people—from hiring and people management to training and compensation, is designed to reinforce the answers to those questions.

The challenge is to do this without adding too much structure. Or as someone once said to me, “An organization has to institutionalize its culture


3. Overcommunicate

Clarity

4. Reinforce

Clarity

1. Build a

Cohesive Leadership

Team

2. CreateClarity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Reinforce

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Reinforce

A

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As important as overcommunication is, leaders

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

s important as overcommunication is, leaders of a healthy organization cannot always be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of a healthy organization cannot always be around to remind employees about the company’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

around to remind employees about the company’s reason for existing, its values, and so on. In order

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reason for existing, its values, and so on. In order

NOT FOR RESALE

s important as overcommunication is, leaders

NOT FOR RESALE

s important as overcommunication is, leaders of a healthy organization cannot always be

NOT FOR RESALE

of a healthy organization cannot always be around to remind employees about the company’s

NOT FOR RESALE

around to remind employees about the company’s reason for existing, its values, and so on. In order

NOT FOR RESALE

reason for existing, its values, and so on. In order

NOT FOR RESALE

to ensure that the answers to the six critical quesNOT FOR RESALE

to ensure that the answers to the six critical questions become embedded in the fabric of the orgaNOT FOR R

ESALE

tions become embedded in the fabric of the orga


La

The Advantage

154

without bureaucratizing it.” There is a delicate but critical balance between too much and too little structure in an organization, and the people responsible for creating that balance are its leaders.

Unfortunately, all too often leaders don’t take an active role in designing human systems. Instead, they delegate responsibility to others in the organization, usually to their HR department

or legal staff. It amazes me that they later complain about the bureaucracy in their organizations, like having to do onerous and tedious performance reviews.

Blaming HR and legal for all this is neither fair nor helpful. The problem can be solved only by the leadership team taking an active role in building human systems that reflect and reinforce the uniqueness of the organization’s culture and operations. They must ensure that hiring profiles, performance management processes, training programs, and compensation systems are relevant, and the only way to do that is to design them specifically around the answers to the six questions.

NON-geNeRIcS

Many wellintentioned executives will argue that HR professionals have more expertise and experience in building human systems than members of the leadership team do, and therefore they should take responsibility for it. While that is true, those HR folks can’t be expected to fill the role that their leaders must perform in these areas.

Don’t get me wrong. HR and legal professionals play important roles in the creation and administration of human systems. But the initial design of those systems must be driven by the people who set the direction for the organization in the first place and have the author

An organization has to

institutionalize its culture

without bureaucratizing it.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

delegate responsibility to oth

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

delegate responsibility to others in the organization, usu

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ers in the organization, usu

ally to their HR department

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ally to their HR department or legal staff. It amazes me that they later complain about the bureau

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or legal staff. It amazes me that they later complain about the bureaucracy in their organizations, like having to do onerous and tedious

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cracy in their organizations, like having to do onerous and tedious

Blaming HR and legal for all this is neither fair nor helpful. The

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Blaming HR and legal for all this is neither fair nor helpful. The problem can be solved only by the leadership team taking an active role

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

problem can be solved only by the leadership team taking an active role in building human systems that reflect and reinforce the uniqueness of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in building human systems that reflect and reinforce the uniqueness of the organization’s culture and operations. They must ensure that hiring

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the organization’s culture and operations. They must ensure that hiring profiles, performance management processes, training programs, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

profiles, performance management processes, training programs, and compensation systems are relevant, and the only way to do that is to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

compensation systems are relevant, and the only way to do that is to design them specifically around the answers to the six questions.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

design them specifically around the answers to the six questions.

-g COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

-geCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

eNCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NeCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

eNOT FOR R

ESALEcracy in their organizations, like having to do onerous and tedious

NOT FOR RESALE

cracy in their organizations, like having to do onerous and tedious

Blaming HR and legal for all this is neither fair nor helpful. The

NOT FOR RESALEBlaming HR and legal for all this is neither fair nor helpful. The

problem can be solved only by the leadership team taking an active role

NOT FOR RESALE

problem can be solved only by the leadership team taking an active role in building human systems that reflect and reinforce the uniqueness of

NOT FOR RESALE

in building human systems that reflect and reinforce the uniqueness of the organization’s culture and operations. They must ensure that hiring

NOT FOR RESALE

the organization’s culture and operations. They must ensure that hiring profiles, performance management processes, training programs, and

NOT FOR RESALE

profiles, performance management processes, training programs, and compensation systems are relevant, and the only way to do that is to

NOT FOR RESALE

compensation systems are relevant, and the only way to do that is to design them specifically around the answers to the six questions.

NOT FOR RESALE

design them specifically around the answers to the six questions.


La

Discipline 4: Reinforce Clarity

155

ity to guard against the bureaucracy that turns a useful human system into an administrative distraction. When leadership team members abdicate responsibility for this, they are often left with more generic, rote systems and processes than they wanted.

Some leaders actually embrace this in the name of efficiency and standardization, believing that if a performance review system or compensation plan “is good enough for General Electric or PepsiCo, then it’s good enough for us.” The problem is, they aren’t leading GE or Pepsi. (Anyone working for GE or Pepsi can ignore this.)

The fact is that the best human systems are often the simplest and least sophisticated ones. Their primary purpose is not to avoid lawsuits or emulate what other companies are doing but rather to keep managers and employees focused on what the organization believes is important. That’s why a onepage, customized performance review form that managers embrace and take seriously is always better than a sevenpage, sophisticated one designed by an organizational psychologist from the National Institute for Human Transformation and Bureaucracy (there is no such thing).

This point cannot be overstated. Human systems are tools for reinforcement of clarity. They give an organization a structure for tying its operations, culture, and management together, even when leaders aren’t around to remind people. And because each company is different, there are no generic systems that can be downloaded from the Internet.

Let’s take a quick look at the most important human systems that an organization needs, according to the logical life cycle of an employee.

Human systems give an

organization a structure for

tying its operations, culture,

and management together,

even when leaders aren’t

around to remind people.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it’s good enough for us.” The problem is, they aren’t leading GE or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it’s good enough for us.” The problem is, they aren’t leading GE or Pepsi. (Anyone working for GE or Pepsi can ignore this.)

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Pepsi. (Anyone working for GE or Pepsi can ignore this.)

The fact is that the best human systems are often the simplest and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The fact is that the best human systems are often the simplest and least sophisticated ones. Their primary purpose is not to avoid lawsuits

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

least sophisticated ones. Their primary purpose is not to avoid lawsuits or emulate what other companies are doing but rather to keep managers

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or emulate what other companies are doing but rather to keep managers and employees focused on what the organization believes is important.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and employees focused on what the organization believes is important. customized performance review form that man

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

customized performance review form that managers embrace and take seriously is always better than a seven

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

agers embrace and take seriously is always better than a sevenone designed by an organizational psychologist from the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

one designed by an organizational psychologist from the National Institute for Human Transformation and Bureaucracy (there

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

National Institute for Human Transformation and Bureaucracy (there

This point cannot be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

This point cannot be overstated. Human systems

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

overstated. Human systems are tools for reinforcement of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

are tools for reinforcement of clarity. They give an organiCOPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

clarity. They give an organization a structure for tying COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

zation a structure for tying NOT FOR R

ESALEor emulate what other companies are doing but rather to keep managers

NOT FOR RESALE

or emulate what other companies are doing but rather to keep managers and employees focused on what the organization believes is important.

NOT FOR RESALEand employees focused on what the organization believes is important.

customized performance review form that man

NOT FOR RESALEcustomized performance review form that man

agers embrace and take seriously is always better than a seven

NOT FOR RESALE

agers embrace and take seriously is always better than a sevenone designed by an organizational psychologist from the

NOT FOR RESALE

one designed by an organizational psychologist from the National Institute for Human Transformation and Bureaucracy (there

NOT FOR RESALE

National Institute for Human Transformation and Bureaucracy (there

This point cannot be

NOT FOR RESALE

This point cannot be overstated. Human systems

NOT FOR RESALE

overstated. Human systems are tools for reinforcement of NOT FOR R

ESALE

are tools for reinforcement of clarity. They give an organiNOT FOR R

ESALE

clarity. They give an organi


La

The Advantage

156

RecRUITINg ANd HIRINg

Bringing the right people into an organization, and keeping the wrong ones out, is as important as any activity that a leadership team must oversee. Though few leaders will dispute this, not many organizations are good at doing it, for a variety of reasons.

First and foremost, too many organizations have not defined exactly what the right and wrong people look like; that is, they haven’t clarified a meaningful set of behavioral values that they can use to screen potential employees. I addressed this when I discussed core values, but it’s worth repeating. Hiring without clear and strict criteria for cultural fit greatly hampers the potential for success of any organization. And even for organizations that have identified the right set of behavioral values, a host of other problems keep many of them from hiring well.

For all the talk about hiring for fit, there is still too much emphasis on technical skills and experience when it comes to interviewing and selection. And this happens at all levels. When push comes to shove, most executives get enamored with what candidates know and have done in their careers and allow those things to overshadow more important behavioral issues. They don’t seem to buy into the notion that you can teach skill but not attitude.

And even organizations that have defined their core values and really do believe that those values should trump everything else sometimes lose their way when it comes to ensuring cultural fit because they don’t have the right kind of process for hiring. I’ve found that most companies fall into one of two categories on opposite sides of the structural scale for hiring.

Gut Feel Versus Structure

Many leaders, especially those who run smaller organizations, believe that they have the natural skills they need to choose good people


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

exactly what the right and wrong people look like; that is, they haven’t

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

exactly what the right and wrong people look like; that is, they haven’t clarified a meaningful set of behavioral values that they can use to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL clarified a meaningful set of behavioral values that they can use to

screen potential employees. I addressed this when I discussed core

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL screen potential employees. I addressed this when I discussed core

values, but it’s worth repeating. Hiring without clear and strict criteria

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

values, but it’s worth repeating. Hiring without clear and strict criteria for cultural fit greatly hampers the potential for success of any organiza

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for cultural fit greatly hampers the potential for success of any organization. And even for organizations that have identified the right set of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion. And even for organizations that have identified the right set of behavioral values, a host of other problems keep many of them from

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

behavioral values, a host of other problems keep many of them from

For all the talk about hiring for fit, there is still too much emphasis

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on technical skills and experience when it comes to interviewing and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on technical skills and experience when it comes to interviewing and selection. And this happens at all levels. When push comes to shove,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

selection. And this happens at all levels. When push comes to shove, most executives get enamored with what candidates know and have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

most executives get enamored with what candidates know and have done in their careers and allow those things to overshadow more impor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

done in their careers and allow those things to overshadow more impor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tant behavioral issues. They don’t seem to buy into the notion that you

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tant behavioral issues. They don’t seem to buy into the notion that you can teach skill but not attitude.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

can teach skill but not attitude.And even organizations that have defined their core values and COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

And even organizations that have defined their core values and NOT FOR R

ESALEfor cultural fit greatly hampers the potential for success of any organiza

NOT FOR RESALE

for cultural fit greatly hampers the potential for success of any organization. And even for organizations that have identified the right set of

NOT FOR RESALEtion. And even for organizations that have identified the right set of

behavioral values, a host of other problems keep many of them from

NOT FOR RESALEbehavioral values, a host of other problems keep many of them from


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

on technical skills and experience when it comes to interviewing and

NOT FOR RESALE

on technical skills and experience when it comes to interviewing and selection. And this happens at all levels. When push comes to shove,

NOT FOR RESALE

selection. And this happens at all levels. When push comes to shove, most executives get enamored with what candidates know and have

NOT FOR RESALE

most executives get enamored with what candidates know and have done in their careers and allow those things to overshadow more impor

NOT FOR RESALE

done in their careers and allow those things to overshadow more impor

NOT FOR RESALE

tant behavioral issues. They don’t seem to buy into the notion that you

NOT FOR RESALE

tant behavioral issues. They don’t seem to buy into the notion that you can teach skill but not attitude.NOT FOR R

ESALE

can teach skill but not attitude.


La


157

without any real process. They look back at their careers and remember the good employees they’ve hired and give themselves credit for having recognized those people’s potential. However, they seem to block out the memories of the unsuccessful hires they’ve made, or they justify those mistakes based on the hidden behavioral deficiencies in the people they later had to fire. Whatever the case, they persist in the belief that they know a good person when they see one and that they can go about the hiring process without much structure.

The screening, interviewing, and evaluation process that exists in these leaders’ organizations tends to be not much of a process at all. Although résumés may be closely scrutinized before bringing a candidate in for interviews, the interviews themselves are often unstructured and unplanned. There is little preparation, if any, and no real strategy for identifying the critical signs that indicate a candidate will be successful.

It’s truly stupefying to think that the most important decision a leader can make—who to invite to become a part of the organization—is often handled in such a cavalier way. One of the reasons this persists, I think, has to do with the considerable time lag between when a bad hiring decision is made and when everyone realizes the problem. Somehow leaders fail to make a causeandeffect connection between their initial lack of a rigorous interviewing process and the spotty record of quality hiring that comes about as a result. I’ve become convinced of this because I’ve seen too many leaders who, even after admitting that they made a bad hire, fail to change their approach.

The other extreme, though slightly less common, doesn’t yield much better results. When organizations overstructure their hiring process by adding layers of bureaucratic forms and approvals and analysis, they often diminish the role that judgment must play in the selection of good people. This is more common in larger organizations, where an overemphasis on administrative processes seems to hinder the ability or desire of hiring managers to use common sense and


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The screening, interviewing, and evaluation process that exists in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The screening, interviewing, and evaluation process that exists in

these leaders’ organizations tends to be not much of a process at all.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

these leaders’ organizations tends to be not much of a process at all. Although résumés may be closely scrutinized before bringing a candi

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Although résumés may be closely scrutinized before bringing a candidate in for interviews, the interviews themselves are often unstructured

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

date in for interviews, the interviews themselves are often unstructured and unplanned. There is little preparation, if any, and no real strategy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and unplanned. There is little preparation, if any, and no real strategy for identifying the critical signs that indicate a candidate will be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for identifying the critical signs that indicate a candidate will be

It’s truly stupefying to think that the most important decision a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s truly stupefying to think that the most important decision a leader can make—who to invite to become a part of the organization—

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leader can make—who to invite to become a part of the organization—

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is often handled in such a cavalier way. One of the reasons this persists,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is often handled in such a cavalier way. One of the reasons this persists, I think, has to do with the considerable time lag between when a bad

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I think, has to do with the considerable time lag between when a bad hiring decision is made and when everyone realizes the problem.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

hiring decision is made and when everyone realizes the problem. Somehow leaders fail to make a cause

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Somehow leaders fail to make a cause

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their initial lack of a rigorous interviewing process and the spotty record COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their initial lack of a rigorous interviewing process and the spotty record of quality hiring that comes about as a result. I’ve become convinced COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

of quality hiring that comes about as a result. I’ve become convinced NOT FOR R

ESALEdate in for interviews, the interviews themselves are often unstructured

NOT FOR RESALE

date in for interviews, the interviews themselves are often unstructured and unplanned. There is little preparation, if any, and no real strategy

NOT FOR RESALEand unplanned. There is little preparation, if any, and no real strategy

for identifying the critical signs that indicate a candidate will be

NOT FOR RESALEfor identifying the critical signs that indicate a candidate will be

It’s truly stupefying to think that the most important decision a

NOT FOR RESALE

It’s truly stupefying to think that the most important decision a leader can make—who to invite to become a part of the organization—

NOT FOR RESALE

leader can make—who to invite to become a part of the organization—

NOT FOR RESALE

is often handled in such a cavalier way. One of the reasons this persists,

NOT FOR RESALE

is often handled in such a cavalier way. One of the reasons this persists, I think, has to do with the considerable time lag between when a bad

NOT FOR RESALE

I think, has to do with the considerable time lag between when a bad hiring decision is made and when everyone realizes the problem.

NOT FOR RESALE

hiring decision is made and when everyone realizes the problem. Somehow leaders fail to make a causeNOT FOR R

ESALE

Somehow leaders fail to make a causetheir initial lack of a rigorous interviewing process and the spotty record NOT FOR R

ESALE

their initial lack of a rigorous interviewing process and the spotty record


La

The Advantage

158

discernment. Often it is a wellintentioned human resource or legal department that drives these efforts.

Like all subject matter experts, HR departments often try to employ the most sophisticated, stateoftheart processes, which often leads them to adopt an overly complicated or academic approach to hiring. This might make sense theoretically, but it is usually difficult to teach managers to adhere to such a process on a large scale. Legal departments, for their part, are usually and understandably focused on avoiding lawsuits that can arise as a result of the interview process or even afterward in the event that an employee is terminated. So they do their best to eliminate subjectivity, which often means judgment, by adding more and more structure. In both cases, the insistence on too much process overshadows the real goal of any effective hiring program: finding people who fit the culture and have the best chance at success.

The best approach to hiring is to put just enough structure in place to ensure a measure of consistency and adherence to core values—and no more. That’s right. When it comes to the continuum of hiring, ironically, I find that it is better to be somewhere closer to having a little less structure than more. I believe this because too much structure almost always interferes with a person’s ability to use their common sense, and because it is far easier to add a little structure later to a fairly bare system than it is to deconstruct an already overcomplicated process.

What might this more balanced approach look like? First, it should probably take no more than one page, front and back, to describe and apply. One side explains the process, along with a description of the core values and related behaviors that indicate a person is a good fit for the organization. This provides interviewers and hiring managers with a list of the observable and discernible traits that must be confirmed or denied in the interview and selection process. The other side of the page can be used for taking notes about the candidate during the interview.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ments, for their part, are usually and understandably focused on avoid

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ments, for their part, are usually and understandably focused on avoiding lawsuits that can arise as a result of the interview process or even

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ing lawsuits that can arise as a result of the interview process or even

afterward in the event that an employee is terminated. So they do their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

afterward in the event that an employee is terminated. So they do their best to eliminate subjectivity, which often means judgment, by adding

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

best to eliminate subjectivity, which often means judgment, by adding more and more structure. In both cases, the insistence on too much

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more and more structure. In both cases, the insistence on too much process overshadows the real goal of any effective hiring program:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

process overshadows the real goal of any effective hiring program: finding people who fit the culture and have the best chance at success.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

finding people who fit the culture and have the best chance at success.The best approach to hiring is to put just enough structure in place

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The best approach to hiring is to put just enough structure in place to ensure a measure of consistency and adherence to core values—and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to ensure a measure of consistency and adherence to core values—and no more. That’s right. When it comes to the continuum of hiring,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

no more. That’s right. When it comes to the continuum of hiring, ironically, I find that it is better to be somewhere closer to having a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ironically, I find that it is better to be somewhere closer to having a little less structure than more. I believe this because too much structure

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

little less structure than more. I believe this because too much structure almost always interferes with a person’s ability to use their common

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

almost always interferes with a person’s ability to use their common sense, and because it is far easier to add a little structure later to a fairly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sense, and because it is far easier to add a little structure later to a fairly bare system than it is to deconstruct an already overcomplicated process.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

bare system than it is to deconstruct an already overcomplicated process.What might this more balanced approach look like? First, it should COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

What might this more balanced approach look like? First, it should NOT FOR R

ESALEmore and more structure. In both cases, the insistence on too much

NOT FOR RESALE

more and more structure. In both cases, the insistence on too much process overshadows the real goal of any effective hiring program:

NOT FOR RESALEprocess overshadows the real goal of any effective hiring program:

finding people who fit the culture and have the best chance at success.

NOT FOR RESALEfinding people who fit the culture and have the best chance at success.

The best approach to hiring is to put just enough structure in place

NOT FOR RESALE

The best approach to hiring is to put just enough structure in place to ensure a measure of consistency and adherence to core values—and

NOT FOR RESALE

to ensure a measure of consistency and adherence to core values—and no more. That’s right. When it comes to the continuum of hiring,

NOT FOR RESALE

no more. That’s right. When it comes to the continuum of hiring, ironically, I find that it is better to be somewhere closer to having a

NOT FOR RESALE

ironically, I find that it is better to be somewhere closer to having a little less structure than more. I believe this because too much structure

NOT FOR RESALE

little less structure than more. I believe this because too much structure almost always interferes with a person’s ability to use their common

NOT FOR RESALE

almost always interferes with a person’s ability to use their common sense, and because it is far easier to add a little structure later to a fairly NOT FOR R

ESALE

sense, and because it is far easier to add a little structure later to a fairly bare system than it is to deconstruct an already overcomplicated process.NOT FOR R

ESALE

bare system than it is to deconstruct an already overcomplicated process.


La


159

Second, all of this should be consistent across departments within an organization. Sure, engineers and marketers and sales people are going to have different technical requirements for employees in their areas, which may require them to have another page or two for their unique criteria. But when it comes to overall cultural fit—by far the most important hiring priority for the leaders of any organization—using a single, simple, consistent process across departments is critical.

InterviewingOnce the values and the forms and any other simple collateral have been created, a process must be put in place for using them. And again, that process must have some structure for the sake of consistency, but more important, it must be simple and flexible.

When it comes to the actual practice of interviewing, many leaders still make the same mistakes that they did forty years ago. First, they have the candidate sit across a desk from them while they ask questions about their résumé. Second, they don’t do enough joint planning with other interviewers and end up asking many of the same questions that everyone else is going to ask. Third, they don’t debrief thoroughly with the other interviewers but instead just send a vague and cursory “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to whoever is organizing the process.

Because the purpose of an interview should be to best simulate a situation that will give evaluators the most accurate view of how a candidate really behaves, it seems to me that getting them out of the office and doing something slightly more natural and unconventional would be a better idea. Heck, even taking a walk or going shopping is better than sitting behind a desk. The key is to do something that provides evaluators with a real sense of whether the person is going to thrive in the culture of the organization and whether other people are going to enjoy working with him or her.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once the values and the forms and any other simple collateral have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Once the values and the forms and any other simple collateral have been created, a process must be put in place for using them. And again,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

been created, a process must be put in place for using them. And again, that process must have some structure for the sake of consistency, but

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that process must have some structure for the sake of consistency, but more important, it must be simple and flexible.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more important, it must be simple and flexible.When it comes to the actual practice of interviewing, many

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When it comes to the actual practice of interviewing, many leaders still make the same mistakes that they did forty years ago. First,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders still make the same mistakes that they did forty years ago. First, they have the candidate sit across a desk from them while they ask

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they have the candidate sit across a desk from them while they ask questions about their résumé. Second, they don’t do enough joint plan

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

questions about their résumé. Second, they don’t do enough joint plan

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ning with other interviewers and end up asking many of the same

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ning with other interviewers and end up asking many of the same questions that everyone else is going to ask. Third, they don’t debrief

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

questions that everyone else is going to ask. Third, they don’t debrief thoroughly with the other interviewers but instead just send a vague

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thoroughly with the other interviewers but instead just send a vague and cursory “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to whoever is organizing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and cursory “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to whoever is organizing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the process.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the process.Because the purpose of an interview should be to best simulate a COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Because the purpose of an interview should be to best simulate a NOT FOR R

ESALEthat process must have some structure for the sake of consistency, but

NOT FOR RESALE

that process must have some structure for the sake of consistency, but more important, it must be simple and flexible.

NOT FOR RESALEmore important, it must be simple and flexible.

When it comes to the actual practice of interviewing, many

NOT FOR RESALEWhen it comes to the actual practice of interviewing, many

leaders still make the same mistakes that they did forty years ago. First,

NOT FOR RESALE

leaders still make the same mistakes that they did forty years ago. First, they have the candidate sit across a desk from them while they ask

NOT FOR RESALE

they have the candidate sit across a desk from them while they ask questions about their résumé. Second, they don’t do enough joint plan

NOT FOR RESALE

questions about their résumé. Second, they don’t do enough joint plan

NOT FOR RESALE

ning with other interviewers and end up asking many of the same

NOT FOR RESALE

ning with other interviewers and end up asking many of the same questions that everyone else is going to ask. Third, they don’t debrief

NOT FOR RESALE

questions that everyone else is going to ask. Third, they don’t debrief thoroughly with the other interviewers but instead just send a vague

NOT FOR RESALE

thoroughly with the other interviewers but instead just send a vague and cursory “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to whoever is organizing NOT FOR R

ESALE

and cursory “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to whoever is organizing


La

The Advantage

160

Hiring for Fit

One large company that is legendary in its hiring practices,

as evidenced by its bottom-line performance and the long

line of candidates who want to work there, took a unique

approach to weeding out people who wouldn’t fit the culture.

That culture was built around a healthy sense of self-

deprecation and humility.

In the process of interviewing a group of people for a

job that requires great responsibility and technical ability, the

candidates (all of whom happened to be men) were asked

to exchange their formal suit pants for a pair of khaki shorts.

This meant they would be spending the rest of the day

walking around the corporation’s headquarters wearing suit

jackets, ties, dress shoes, dark socks, and shorts! They looked

silly, to say the least.

A handful of those candidates found the situation

beneath them and insulting. Some were visibly uncomfort-

able, and a few others decided to leave and opt out of the

process. The company’s reaction to all this was relief; they

had successfully identified those people who, though techni-

cally qualified, did not fit the culture. While some might

consider this process to be humorously cruel, it is actually a

great service to the job candidates and the organization. It

prevented a number of people from having to endure a

painful and unsuccessful employment experience, and it pre-

vented the happy employees who already worked at the

organization from seeing the culture they love diluted. And

that’s to say nothing of the money it saved the organization

by avoiding unnecessary turnover.

Of course, the only way to make all this work is for evaluators to get together after interviewing candidates to hash out what they observed and what collective conclusions they’ve come to.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


job that requires great responsibility and technical ability, the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL job that requires great responsibility and technical ability, the


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


great service to the job candidates and the organization. It COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


prevented a number of people from having to endure a COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

prevented a number of people from having to endure a

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEwalking around the corporation’s headquarters wearing suit


NOT FOR RESALEjackets, ties, dress shoes, dark socks, and shorts! They looked


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


consider this process to be humorously cruel, it is actually a NOT FOR RESALE


great service to the job candidates and the organization. It NOT FOR RESALE



La


161

There are plenty of books that delve into specifics about hiring and interviewing, so I don’t need to go into any more detail here. However, I will repeat, yet again, that without a clear understanding of what a cultural fit—or misfit—looks like, without a proper mix of consistency and flexibility, and without the active involvement of the leadership team, even the most sophisticated hiring process will fail.

ORIeNTATION

The most memorable time of an employee’s career, and the time with the biggest impact, are his or her first days and weeks on a new job. The impact of first impressions is just that powerful, and healthy companies take advantage of that to move new employees in the right direction. That means orientation shouldn’t revolve around lengthy explanations of benefits and administration but rather around reinforcing the answers to the six critical questions.

When employees get the opportunity to hear their leaders talk about why the organization they joined exists, what behavioral values were used to select them during the hiring process, how the organization plans to succeed, what its top priority is, and who does what at the executive level, they can immediately see how they will contribute to the greater good of that organization. This often sets the tone for their behavior and attitude during their entire tenure with the company and sends them home from work boasting about the professionalism and promise of the company they’re now a part of.

Without a clear understanding

of what a cultural fit or misfit

looks like, and without the

active involvement of the

leadership team, even the

most sophisticated hiring

process will fail.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL leadership team, even the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL leadership team, even the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

memorable time of an employee’s career, and the time with

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

memorable time of an employee’s career, and the time with the biggest impact, are his or her first days and weeks on a new job.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the biggest impact, are his or her first days and weeks on a new job. The impact of first impressions is just that powerful, and healthy com

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The impact of first impressions is just that powerful, and healthy companies take advantage of that to move new employees in the right

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

panies take advantage of that to move new employees in the right direction. That means orientation shouldn’t revolve around lengthy

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

direction. That means orientation shouldn’t revolve around lengthy explanations of benefits and administration but rather around reinforc

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

explanations of benefits and administration but rather around reinforcing the answers to the six critical questions.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

ing the answers to the six critical questions.When employees get the opportunity to hear their leaders COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

When employees get the opportunity to hear their leaders COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL most sophisticated hiring

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL most sophisticated hiring

process will fail.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

process will fail.

NOT FOR RESALE

memorable time of an employee’s career, and the time with

NOT FOR RESALE

memorable time of an employee’s career, and the time with the biggest impact, are his or her first days and weeks on a new job.

NOT FOR RESALE

the biggest impact, are his or her first days and weeks on a new job. The impact of first impressions is just that powerful, and healthy com

NOT FOR RESALE

The impact of first impressions is just that powerful, and healthy companies take advantage of that to move new employees in the right

NOT FOR RESALE

panies take advantage of that to move new employees in the right direction. That means orientation shouldn’t revolve around lengthy

NOT FOR RESALE

direction. That means orientation shouldn’t revolve around lengthy explanations of benefits and administration but rather around reinforcNOT FOR R

ESALE

explanations of benefits and administration but rather around reinforcing the answers to the six critical questions.NOT FOR R

ESALE

ing the answers to the six critical questions.NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


La

The Advantage

162

Contrast this with the way so many organizations handle orientation. Rather than seeing it as the first opportunity to reinforce the most important messages of the firm, they delegate responsibility to administrative functions that will naturally focus on, well, administrative functions. And while that may help the new employee understand how to fill out insurance paperwork and use the new email system (both of which are surely helpful), it tends to be a disappointment to anyone who joins an organization because they’re excited about having the opportunity to make a real difference in some way.

Leaders of organizations, even very large organizations, need to understand the value of bringing in new employees with clarity, enthusiasm, and a sense of their importance. It is an opportunity that disappears within days or weeks of a new employee’s arrival and should never be wasted.

There are many ways to handle orientation, and I don’t need to go into them here because there is no one right way to do it. What is key is that it is built around the six questions and that leaders take an active role in its design and delivery. That’s probably enough about orientation.

PeRFORmANce mANAgemeNT

Nothing has the potential for bureaucracy and wonkiness like performance management systems. Even the term itself is fuzzy and generic enough to send a busy manager into a process coma. And so I suppose it needs to be defined.

Essentially performance management is the series of activities that ensures that managers provide employees with clarity about what is expected of them, as well as regular feedback about whether or not they are adequately meeting those expectations. That may be a bit simple, but that’s the heart of the idea, and it really ought to be simple. Unfortunately, few organizations are good at performance management,


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who joins an organization because they’re excited about having the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who joins an organization because they’re excited about having the

Leaders of organizations, even very large organizations, need to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Leaders of organizations, even very large organizations, need to understand the value of bringing in new employees with clarity, enthu

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

understand the value of bringing in new employees with clarity, enthusiasm, and a sense of their importance. It is an opportunity that disap

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

siasm, and a sense of their importance. It is an opportunity that disappears within days or weeks of a new employee’s arrival and should never

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

pears within days or weeks of a new employee’s arrival and should never

There are many ways to handle orientation, and I don’t need to go

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

There are many ways to handle orientation, and I don’t need to go into them here because there is no one right way to do it. What is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

into them here because there is no one right way to do it. What is key is that it is built around the six questions and that leaders take an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

key is that it is built around the six questions and that leaders take an active role in its design and delivery. That’s probably enough about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

active role in its design and delivery. That’s probably enough about

OR

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ORm

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mAN

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

AN

has the potential for bureaucracy and wonkiness like perforCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

has the potential for bureaucracy and wonkiness like perforNOT FOR R

ESALEsiasm, and a sense of their importance. It is an opportunity that disap

NOT FOR RESALE

siasm, and a sense of their importance. It is an opportunity that disappears within days or weeks of a new employee’s arrival and should never

NOT FOR RESALEpears within days or weeks of a new employee’s arrival and should never

There are many ways to handle orientation, and I don’t need to go

NOT FOR RESALE

There are many ways to handle orientation, and I don’t need to go into them here because there is no one right way to do it. What is

NOT FOR RESALE

into them here because there is no one right way to do it. What is key is that it is built around the six questions and that leaders take an

NOT FOR RESALE

key is that it is built around the six questions and that leaders take an active role in its design and delivery. That’s probably enough about

NOT FOR RESALE

active role in its design and delivery. That’s probably enough about

ce NOT FOR RESALE

ce mANOT FOR RESALE

mANANOT FOR RESALE

NA


La


163

mostly because they are confused and inconsistent about why they do it in the first place.

Over the years, as the litigiousness of society has grown, leaders have become more fearful that employees who are fired will sue the company and bleed them of scarce financial resources. This is understandable when we consider the exorbitant cost, in time and money, of having to mount a legal defense, even if we eventually win. So legal departments have tried to use the performance management process to protect the company legally. They’ve insisted that managers master the art of detailed documentation and record keeping, something that can be used to derail a lawsuit before it gets too expensive.

As logical as this might seem, the unintended consequences have been devastating. Most important, employees and managers alike have come to see the performance management process as a largely adversarial activity, fraught with nervous negotiation rather than clear communication. Ironically, this has probably exacerbated the legal problems of organizations more than mitigated them. When employees focus more on the official “grades” they receive from managers, and managers focus on documentation more than coaching, inevitably trust is diminished and management and communication suffer.

Healthy organizations believe that performance management is almost exclusively about eliminating confusion. They realize that most of their employees want to succeed, and that the best way to allow them to do that is to give them clear direction, regular information about how they’re doing, and access to the coaching they need. Healthy organizations also realize that even the most rigorous systems cannot prevent all lawsuits and that sacrificing the real purpose of their performance management system to prevent them, even if that were possible, is a bad tradeoff.

The best performance management programs—you guessed it—are simple. Above all else, they are desi gned to stimulate the right kinds


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

win. So legal departments have tried to use the performance manage

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

win. So legal departments have tried to use the performance management process to protect the company legally. They’ve insisted that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ment process to protect the company legally. They’ve insisted that

managers master the art of detailed documentation and record keeping,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

managers master the art of detailed documentation and record keeping, something that can be used to derail a lawsuit before it gets too

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

something that can be used to derail a lawsuit before it gets too

As logical as this might seem, the unintended consequences have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As logical as this might seem, the unintended consequences have been devastating. Most important, employees and managers alike have

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

been devastating. Most important, employees and managers alike have come to see the performance management process as a largely adver

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

come to see the performance management process as a largely adversarial activity, fraught with nervous negotiation rather than clear com

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sarial activity, fraught with nervous negotiation rather than clear com

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

munication. Ironically, this has probably exacerbated the legal problems

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

munication. Ironically, this has probably exacerbated the legal problems of organizations more than mitigated them. When employees focus

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of organizations more than mitigated them. When employees focus more on the official “grades” they receive from managers, and managers

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

more on the official “grades” they receive from managers, and managers focus on documentation more than coaching, inevitably trust is dimin

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

focus on documentation more than coaching, inevitably trust is dimin

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ished and management and communication suffer.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ished and management and communication suffer.Healthy organizations believe that performance management is COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Healthy organizations believe that performance management is almost exclusively about eliminating confusion. They realize that most COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

almost exclusively about eliminating confusion. They realize that most NOT FOR R

ESALEAs logical as this might seem, the unintended consequences have

NOT FOR RESALEAs logical as this might seem, the unintended consequences have

been devastating. Most important, employees and managers alike have

NOT FOR RESALEbeen devastating. Most important, employees and managers alike have

come to see the performance management process as a largely adver

NOT FOR RESALE

come to see the performance management process as a largely adversarial activity, fraught with nervous negotiation rather than clear com

NOT FOR RESALE

sarial activity, fraught with nervous negotiation rather than clear com

NOT FOR RESALE

munication. Ironically, this has probably exacerbated the legal problems

NOT FOR RESALE

munication. Ironically, this has probably exacerbated the legal problems of organizations more than mitigated them. When employees focus

NOT FOR RESALE

of organizations more than mitigated them. When employees focus more on the official “grades” they receive from managers, and managers

NOT FOR RESALE

more on the official “grades” they receive from managers, and managers focus on documentation more than coaching, inevitably trust is dimin

NOT FOR RESALE

focus on documentation more than coaching, inevitably trust is dimin

NOT FOR RESALE

ished and management and communication suffer.NOT FOR RESALE

ished and management and communication suffer.Healthy organizations believe that performance management is NOT FOR R

ESALE

Healthy organizations believe that performance management is


La

The Advantage

164

of conversations around the right topics. Those topics are some of the same ones I have addressed in achieving organizational clarity:

goals, values, and roles and responsibilities. When organizations build simple, straightfor ward performance management programs, they make it much easier for managers to use them more frequently. This is a good thing because it provides regular reminders for empl

oyees about what is important and builds greater trust by preventing too much time from passing between meaningful conversations.

Another part of the overall performance management system has to do with corrective action and documentation of warnings before an employee can be terminated. This is messy and nasty and, unfortunately, necessary. I’ll leave this topic for the lawyers and HR folks who understand it best. However, I will say that it is critical that organizations separate corrective action processes from the regular performance management system, because the last thing an organization wants is for its good employees to feel as if they’re being interrogated and prepared for dismissal.

cOmPeNSATION ANd ReWARdS

Don’t worry. I’m not going to go into much detail about this subject. Again, there are many books on the topic and consultants who know much, much more about the technical aspects of compensation and rewards systems than I do. The point that needs to be made here is that the single most important reason to reward people is to provide them with an incentive for doing what is best for the organization.

The best performance

management programs are

designed to stimulate the right

kinds of conversations around

the right topics. That’s all.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

make it much easier for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

make it much easier for managers to use them more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL managers to use them more

frequently. This is a good

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

frequently. This is a good thing because it provides

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thing because it provides regular reminders for empl

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

regular reminders for employees about what is important and builds greater trust by preventing

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

oyees about what is important and builds greater trust by preventing too much time from passing between meaningful conversations.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

too much time from passing between meaningful conversations.Another part of the overall performance management system has

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Another part of the overall performance management system has to do with corrective action and documentation of warnings before an

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to do with corrective action and documentation of warnings before an employee can be terminated. This is messy and nasty and, unfortu

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

employee can be terminated. This is messy and nasty and, unfortunately, necessary. I’ll leave this topic for the lawyers and HR folks who

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nately, necessary. I’ll leave this topic for the lawyers and HR folks who understand it best. However, I will say that it is critical that organiza

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

understand it best. However, I will say that it is critical that organizations separate corrective action processes from the regular performance

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tions separate corrective action processes from the regular performance management system, because the last thing an organization wants is for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

management system, because the last thing an organization wants is for its good employees to feel as if they’re being interrogated and prepared COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

its good employees to feel as if they’re being interrogated and prepared for dismissal.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

for dismissal.NOT FOR R

ESALEregular reminders for empl

NOT FOR RESALE

regular reminders for employees about what is important and builds greater trust by preventing

NOT FOR RESALEoyees about what is important and builds greater trust by preventing

too much time from passing between meaningful conversations.

NOT FOR RESALEtoo much time from passing between meaningful conversations.

Another part of the overall performance management system has

NOT FOR RESALE

Another part of the overall performance management system has to do with corrective action and documentation of warnings before an

NOT FOR RESALE

to do with corrective action and documentation of warnings before an employee can be terminated. This is messy and nasty and, unfortu

NOT FOR RESALE

employee can be terminated. This is messy and nasty and, unfortunately, necessary. I’ll leave this topic for the lawyers and HR folks who

NOT FOR RESALE

nately, necessary. I’ll leave this topic for the lawyers and HR folks who understand it best. However, I will say that it is critical that organiza

NOT FOR RESALE

understand it best. However, I will say that it is critical that organizations separate corrective action processes from the regular performance

NOT FOR RESALE

tions separate corrective action processes from the regular performance management system, because the last thing an organization wants is for NOT FOR R

ESALE

management system, because the last thing an organization wants is for its good employees to feel as if they’re being interrogated and prepared NOT FOR R

ESALE

its good employees to feel as if they’re being interrogated and prepared


La


165

Yes, this sounds patently obvious, but somehow most companies’ compensation and rewards programs get divorced from this purpose, and take on a disconnected life of their own. When that happens, they lose their value and actually become sources of distraction rather than tools of focus and motivation.

Members of a leadership team must take responsibility for ensuring that compensation and rewards programs are simple, understandable, and, most important of all, clearly designed to remind employees what is most important. This is especially true at the executive level because the way that leaders themselves are rewarded and compensated will inevitably have an impact on how they motivate their people.

At the core of any of these systems must lie the answers to the six critical questions. For instance, when employees are given a raise, they need to understand that they are being rewarded for behaving or performing in a way that is consistent with the organization’s reason for existing, core values, strategic anchors, or thematic goal. And when employees are denied a raise or a bonus, they need to understand that it is because they did not behave or perform in a way that is consistent with all those things. These are great moments of truth for leaders to demonstrate that they are really committed to what they say is important. To fail to make the connection between compensation and rewards and one or more of the six big questions is to waste one of the best opportunities for motivation and management.

I realize that not every compensation decision is easy to connect to a specific performance or behavior that ties to one of the six big questions. And I realize that sometimes an employee gets a two percent raise because that’s all that his or her manager could get for that person. In those situations, it is critical that leaders are clear with employees about the disconnect between performance and financial reward and that they work to eliminate that disconnect.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

able, and, most important of all, clearly designed to remind employees

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

able, and, most important of all, clearly designed to remind employees what is most important. This is especially true at the executive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL what is most important. This is especially true at the executive

level because the way that leaders themselves are rewarded and com

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

level because the way that leaders themselves are rewarded and compensated will inevitably have an impact on how they motivate their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

pensated will inevitably have an impact on how they motivate their

At the core of any of these systems must lie the answers to the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

At the core of any of these systems must lie the answers to the six critical questions. For instance, when employees are given a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

six critical questions. For instance, when employees are given a raise, they need to understand that they are being rewarded for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

raise, they need to understand that they are being rewarded for behaving or performing in a way that is consistent with the organiza

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

behaving or performing in a way that is consistent with the organiza

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion’s reason for existing, core values, strategic anchors, or thematic

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tion’s reason for existing, core values, strategic anchors, or thematic goal. And when employees are denied a raise or a bonus, they need

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

goal. And when employees are denied a raise or a bonus, they need to understand that it is because they did not behave or perform in a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to understand that it is because they did not behave or perform in a way that is consistent with all those things. These are great moments

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

way that is consistent with all those things. These are great moments

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of truth for leaders to demonstrate that they are really committed to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of truth for leaders to demonstrate that they are really committed to what they say is important. To fail to make the connection between COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

what they say is important. To fail to make the connection between compensation and rewards and one or more of the six big questions COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

compensation and rewards and one or more of the six big questions NOT FOR R

ESALEAt the core of any of these systems must lie the answers to the

NOT FOR RESALEAt the core of any of these systems must lie the answers to the

six critical questions. For instance, when employees are given a

NOT FOR RESALEsix critical questions. For instance, when employees are given a

raise, they need to understand that they are being rewarded for

NOT FOR RESALE

raise, they need to understand that they are being rewarded for behaving or performing in a way that is consistent with the organiza

NOT FOR RESALE

behaving or performing in a way that is consistent with the organiza

NOT FOR RESALE

tion’s reason for existing, core values, strategic anchors, or thematic

NOT FOR RESALE

tion’s reason for existing, core values, strategic anchors, or thematic goal. And when employees are denied a raise or a bonus, they need

NOT FOR RESALE

goal. And when employees are denied a raise or a bonus, they need to understand that it is because they did not behave or perform in a

NOT FOR RESALE

to understand that it is because they did not behave or perform in a way that is consistent with all those things. These are great moments

NOT FOR RESALE

way that is consistent with all those things. These are great moments

NOT FOR RESALE

of truth for leaders to demonstrate that they are really committed to NOT FOR RESALE

of truth for leaders to demonstrate that they are really committed to what they say is important. To fail to make the connection between NOT FOR R

ESALE

what they say is important. To fail to make the connection between


La

The Advantage

166

Real-Time Recognition

One of our consultants was working with the leadership

team of a nonprofit company that was focused on finding

ways to reinforce the company’s values through rewards and

recognition, both formal and informal. As the leaders were

discussing the various employees in the organization, one

woman, a very junior employee, was mentioned for her

amazing work on a big project and how she had clearly

demonstrated the company’s values.

Our consultant asked the company’s leadership team,

“So, have you told this woman that she’s doing a great job

and that you think of her as an example of what you want

from other employees?” Much to the consultant’s surprise,

the executives sheepishly shook their heads.

“Okay, let’s bring her in here.” The executives in the room

wondered if he meant what he said, so he continued. “I’m

serious. Go get her right now, and tell her the things that you

just told me about her.”

A few minutes later, the woman came into the room

where the executive team was meeting. She seemed con-

fused, and even a little petrified, about why her presence

had been so urgently requested, especially when they asked

her to take a seat in the front of the room facing the

entire team.

For the next few minutes, the team asked her questions

about what she had done and gave her a chance to explain

the project and her role in it. Then they began telling her how

RecOgNITION

As important as compensation and rewards are, they aren’t the most effective or important means of motivating people in a healthy organization.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL team of a nonprofit company that was focused on finding

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL team of a nonprofit company that was focused on finding

ways to reinforce the company’s values through rewards and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ways to reinforce the company’s values through rewards and


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


just told me about her.”COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

just told me about her.”NOT FOR R

ESALEwoman, a very junior employee, was mentioned for her

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEamazing work on a big project and how she had clearly


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


serious. Go get her right now, and tell her the things that you NOT FOR RESALE



La


167

I like to explain to clients that when leaders fail to tell employees that they’re doing a great job, they might as well be taking money out of their pockets and throwing it into a fire, because they are wasting opportunities to give people the recognition they crave more than anything else. Direct, personal feedback really is the simplest and most effective form of motivation.

So why isn’t this more common? For one, many leaders convince themselves that employees are motivated primarily by money. As a result, they discount the impact of authentic and specific expressions of appreciation and focus instead on financial rewards like raises and bonuses. Additionally, I think many leaders are a little embarrassed by giving praise and are afraid that employees will discount it as a cheap replacement for financial rewards.

What leaders need to under stand is that the vast majority of employees, at all levels of an organization, see financial

much they appreciated her actions and how she had been

a real role model for the rest of the organization in living the

values.

Clearly emotional, the woman almost cried. After she

collected herself, thanked the team, and left, our consultant

didn’t need to say much. He just asked the leaders if they

thought that woman would continue to be a champion of

the values. Of course, they agreed she would, and they

committed to doing more direct, informal recognition in the

future.

Many leaders convince them-

selves that employees are

motivated primarily by money.

As a result, they discount the

impact of authentic and

specific expressions of

appreciation.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I like to explain to clients that when leaders fail to tell employees

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I like to explain to clients that when leaders fail to tell employees that they’re doing a great job, they might as well be taking money out

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that they’re doing a great job, they might as well be taking money out of their pockets and throwing it into a fire, because they are wasting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of their pockets and throwing it into a fire, because they are wasting opportunities to give people the recognition they crave more than

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

opportunities to give people the recognition they crave more than anything else. Direct, personal feedback really is the simplest and most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

anything else. Direct, personal feedback really is the simplest and most effective form of motivation.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

effective form of motivation.So why isn’t this more common? For one, many leaders convince

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

So why isn’t this more common? For one, many leaders convince themselves that employees are motivated primarily by money. As a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

themselves that employees are motivated primarily by money. As a result, they discount the impact of authentic and specific expressions

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

result, they discount the impact of authentic and specific expressions of appreciation and focus

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of appreciation and focus instead on financial rewards

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

instead on financial rewards like raises and bonuses. COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

like raises and bonuses. Additionally, I think many COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Additionally, I think many

committed to doing more direct, informal recognition in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL committed to doing more direct, informal recognition in the

NOT FOR RESALE

that they’re doing a great job, they might as well be taking money out

NOT FOR RESALE

that they’re doing a great job, they might as well be taking money out of their pockets and throwing it into a fire, because they are wasting

NOT FOR RESALEof their pockets and throwing it into a fire, because they are wasting

opportunities to give people the recognition they crave more than

NOT FOR RESALEopportunities to give people the recognition they crave more than

anything else. Direct, personal feedback really is the simplest and most

NOT FOR RESALE

anything else. Direct, personal feedback really is the simplest and most

So why isn’t this more common? For one, many leaders convince

NOT FOR RESALE

So why isn’t this more common? For one, many leaders convince themselves that employees are motivated primarily by money. As a

NOT FOR RESALE

themselves that employees are motivated primarily by money. As a result, they discount the impact of authentic and specific expressions

NOT FOR RESALE

result, they discount the impact of authentic and specific expressions of appreciation and focus

NOT FOR RESALE

of appreciation and focus instead on financial rewards NOT FOR R

ESALE

instead on financial rewards like raises and bonuses. NOT FOR R

ESALE

like raises and bonuses.


La

The Advantage

168

rewards as a satisfier, not a driver. That means they want to receive enough compensation to make them feel good about their job, but additional money doesn’t yield proportionate increases in their job satisfaction. And while they’re not going to turn down an offer of more money, that is not what they’re really looking for. In fact, gratitude, recognition, increased responsibilities, and other forms of genuine appreciation are drivers. That means an employee can never really get enough of those and will always welcome more.

Most organizations simply assign too much importance to financial compensation and too little to the other side of the equation. They often do this because they believe that people who leave their organizations are doing so because they want more money. This is an understandable mistake because that is what many employees say during exit interviews when they’ve already made up their mind to leave. However, almost no employees willingly leave an organization where they are getting the levels of gratitude and appreciation that they deserve just to make a little more money, unless, of course, they are so grossly underpaid that they can’t justify staying in the job for the sake of their livelihood.

Anything for Retention

A friend of mine worked for a management consulting firm

for about six years. He was paid well, but after putting up

with as much neglect and politics as he could stand, he finally

decided to leave.

When he was called in for his exit interview with a senior

manager who had never taken an interest in him before, he

was asked, “What could we have done to keep you here

longer?”

My friend was a little stunned by the hollowness of the

question. After a moment, he just smiled and replied,

“Anything.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Most organizations simply assign too much importance to financial

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Most organizations simply assign too much importance to financial

compensation and too little to the other side of the equation. They

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

compensation and too little to the other side of the equation. They often do this because they believe that people who leave their organiza

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

often do this because they believe that people who leave their organizations are doing so because they want more money. This is an under

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tions are doing so because they want more money. This is an understandable mistake because that is what many employees say during exit

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

standable mistake because that is what many employees say during exit interviews when they’ve already made up their mind to leave. However,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

interviews when they’ve already made up their mind to leave. However, almost no employees willingly leave an organization where they are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

almost no employees willingly leave an organization where they are getting the levels of gratitude and appreciation that they deserve just

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

getting the levels of gratitude and appreciation that they deserve just

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to make a little more money, unless, of course, they are so grossly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to make a little more money, unless, of course, they are so grossly underpaid that they can’t justify staying in the job for the sake of their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

underpaid that they can’t justify staying in the job for the sake of their

A friend of mine worked for a management consulting firm COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A friend of mine worked for a management consulting firm NOT FOR R

ESALEtions are doing so because they want more money. This is an under

NOT FOR RESALE

tions are doing so because they want more money. This is an understandable mistake because that is what many employees say during exit

NOT FOR RESALEstandable mistake because that is what many employees say during exit

interviews when they’ve already made up their mind to leave. However,

NOT FOR RESALEinterviews when they’ve already made up their mind to leave. However,

almost no employees willingly leave an organization where they are

NOT FOR RESALE

almost no employees willingly leave an organization where they are getting the levels of gratitude and appreciation that they deserve just

NOT FOR RESALE

getting the levels of gratitude and appreciation that they deserve just

NOT FOR RESALE

to make a little more money, unless, of course, they are so grossly

NOT FOR RESALE

to make a little more money, unless, of course, they are so grossly underpaid that they can’t justify staying in the job for the sake of their

NOT FOR RESALE

underpaid that they can’t justify staying in the job for the sake of their

Anything for RetentionNOT FOR RESALE

Anything for Retention


La


169

The lesson for leaders is not that they should be cheap, but rather that they understand that the healthiest organizations in the world are not necessarily the highestpaying ones and that throwing money at a problem that would be better solved through improved management is a true waste of resources. What is more, unsatisfied employees who receive greater financial compensation as an incentive to stay in an unhealthy organization feel cheapened by the gesture. And they are usually just as determined to eventually find a better place to work.

FIRINg

When I think about firing as a human system, I’m not thinking about it so much in terms of the administrative process that an organization goes through to let someone go. That’s not to say that this isn’t important; the way people are treated as they leave an organization is critical because of how it affects their life and because of the message it sends to the rest of the organization about how its leaders view people.

But when it comes to building a healthy organization, the most important part of the firing process is the very decision to let someone go. That decision needs to be driven, more than anything else, by an organization’s values.

In a healthy organization, a leader who is thinking about letting someone go will evaluate that person against the entirety of the company’s values, paying special attention to the core and permissiontoplay varieties. If an employee’s behavior is consistent with the core and permissiontoplay values, there is a good chance that it would be a mistake to let him go. Essentially he has the raw material to fit into

I tell this story not only because it demonstrates the

importance of nonfinancial factors in job satisfaction, but

also because I think it’s funny.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

at a problem that would be better solved through improved man

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

at a problem that would be better solved through improved management is a true waste of resources. What is more, unsatisfied employ

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL agement is a true waste of resources. What is more, unsatisfied employ

ees who receive greater financial compensation as an incentive to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ees who receive greater financial compensation as an incentive to stay in an unhealthy organization feel cheapened by the gesture. And

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

stay in an unhealthy organization feel cheapened by the gesture. And they are usually just as determined to eventually find a better place

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they are usually just as determined to eventually find a better place

think about firing as a human system, I’m not thinking about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

think about firing as a human system, I’m not thinking about it so much in terms of the administrative process that an organization

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it so much in terms of the administrative process that an organization goes through to let someone go. That’s not to say that this isn’t impor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

goes through to let someone go. That’s not to say that this isn’t impor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tant; the way people are treated as they leave an organization is critical

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tant; the way people are treated as they leave an organization is critical because of how it affects their life and because of the message it sends

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

because of how it affects their life and because of the message it sends to the rest of the organization about how its leaders view people.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

to the rest of the organization about how its leaders view people.But when it comes to building a healthy organization, the most COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

But when it comes to building a healthy organization, the most NOT FOR R

ESALEthey are usually just as determined to eventually find a better place

NOT FOR RESALE

they are usually just as determined to eventually find a better place

think about firing as a human system, I’m not thinking about

NOT FOR RESALE

think about firing as a human system, I’m not thinking about it so much in terms of the administrative process that an organization

NOT FOR RESALE

it so much in terms of the administrative process that an organization goes through to let someone go. That’s not to say that this isn’t impor

NOT FOR RESALE

goes through to let someone go. That’s not to say that this isn’t impor

NOT FOR RESALE

tant; the way people are treated as they leave an organization is critical

NOT FOR RESALE

tant; the way people are treated as they leave an organization is critical because of how it affects their life and because of the message it sends NOT FOR R

ESALE

because of how it affects their life and because of the message it sends to the rest of the organization about how its leaders view people.NOT FOR R

ESALE

to the rest of the organization about how its leaders view people.


La

The Advantage

170

the organization and be successful. Instead of firing him, the company should take a closer look at how he is being managed and find a way to give him a chance to succeed.

But if the leaders of an organization are clearly convinced that an employee does not fit the core or permissiontoplay values, even if he meets basic performance criteria, they would be advised to gracefully help that person find employment elsewhere.

Keeping a relatively strong performer who is not a cultural fit creates a variety of problems. Most important of all, it sends a loud and

clear message to employees that the organization isn’t all that serious about what it says it believes. Tolerating behavior that flies in the face of core values inspires cynicism and becomes almost impossible to reverse over time. When leaders take the difficult step of letting a strong performer go because of a values mismatch, they

not only send a powerful message about their commitment to their values, they also usually find that the performance of the remaining employees improves because they are no longer being stifled by the behavior of their former colleague.

Keeping a relatively strong

performer who is not a cultural

fit sends a loud and clear

message to employees that the

organization isn’t all that

serious about what it says it

believes.

Addition by Subtraction

Years ago before I started my own consulting firm, I hired a talented

guy to join my department. My staff and I were overwhelmed with

projects, and I was relieved to have found someone who could lighten

the load. He proved to be both competent and hard working, but it


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Keeping a relatively strong performer who is not a cultural fit

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Keeping a relatively strong performer who is not a cultural fit creates a variety of problems. Most important of all, it sends a loud and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL creates a variety of problems. Most important of all, it sends a loud and

clear message to employees

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

clear message to employees that the organization isn’t all

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that the organization isn’t all that serious about what it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that serious about what it says it believes. Tolerating

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

says it believes. Tolerating behavior that flies in the face

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

behavior that flies in the face

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not only send a powerful message about their commitment to their COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

not only send a powerful message about their commitment to their values, they also usually find that the performance of the remaining COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

values, they also usually find that the performance of the remaining COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

that serious about what it

NOT FOR RESALE

that serious about what it says it believes. Tolerating

NOT FOR RESALEsays it believes. Tolerating

behavior that flies in the face

NOT FOR RESALEbehavior that flies in the face

of core values inspires cyni

NOT FOR RESALE

of core values inspires cynicism and becomes almost

NOT FOR RESALE

cism and becomes almost impossible to reverse over

NOT FOR RESALE

impossible to reverse over

not only send a powerful message about their commitment to their NOT FOR RESALE

not only send a powerful message about their commitment to their NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


La


171

was apparent that he didn’t share my department’s values

of teamwork and selflessness. Still, buried with work, I made

one of the worst mistakes of my career: I promoted him!

Fortunately, my staff members weren’t afraid to tell me

that I had blatantly violated our values by rewarding someone

who wasn’t a cultural fit. I couldn’t deny the boneheadedness

of what I had done, and decided that I would have to manage

the guy to become a better team player.

In just a few weeks, it became clear that he just wasn’t

interested and that his need for attention was a fundamental

part of his personality. Still, he was a talented and productive

worker. So I helped him find another job within the larger

organization, in a department where his personality and

values would be a fit.

Beyond restoring my credibility with my staff members,

something very powerful happened: the performance of my

team improved substantially. Without that one colleague,

someone who clearly didn’t fit the department’s humble,

selfless culture, the rest of the team’s excitement and com-

mitment soared. It was a profound lesson, one that I won’t

forget.

Finally, keeping someone who clearly doesn’t fit culturally is almost always a disservice to that person, who knows that he doesn’t belong and is usually as frustrated as his colleagues are. Letting him go is putting him in a position to find an organization where he does belong and where he’ll be able to thrive.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL In just a few weeks, it became clear that he just wasn’t

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL In just a few weeks, it became clear that he just wasn’t

interested and that his need for attention was a fundamental

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL interested and that his need for attention was a fundamental


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Finally, keeping someone who clearly doesn’t fit culturally is almost COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, keeping someone who clearly doesn’t fit culturally is almost always a disservice to that person, who knows that he doesn’t belong COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

always a disservice to that person, who knows that he doesn’t belong NOT FOR R

ESALEorganization, in a department where his personality and

NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEBeyond restoring my credibility with my staff members,


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


Finally, keeping someone who clearly doesn’t fit culturally is almost NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, keeping someone who clearly doesn’t fit culturally is almost


La

The Advantage

172

cHecklIST FOR dIScIPlINe 4: ReINFORce clARITY



statements:

⎯ The organization has a simple way to ensure that new hires

are carefully selected based on the company’s values.

⎯ New people are brought into the organization by thor-

oughly teaching them about the six elements of clarity.

⎯ Managers throughout the organization have a simple, con-

sistent, and nonbureaucratic system for setting goals and

reviewing progress with employees. That system is custom-

ized around the elements of clarity.

⎯ Employees who don’t fit the values are managed out of the

organization. Poor performers who do fit the values are

given the coaching and assistance they need to succeed.

⎯ Compensation and reward systems are built around the

values and goals of the organization.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL are carefully selected based on the company’s values.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL are carefully selected based on the company’s values.

w people are brought into the organization by thor-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

w people are brought into the organization by thor-


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


nagers throughout the organization have a simple, con-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


ployees who don’t fit the values are managed out of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


mpensation and reward systems are built around the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALEsistent, and nonbureaucratic system for setting goals and


NOT FOR RESALEreviewing progress with employees. That system is custom-


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

173

The Centrality of Great Meetings

An organization that has embraced each of the four disciplines will certainly become healthy, making success highly likely. But one

activity, more than any other, will be central to maintaining those disciplines, and sustaining health, over time.

No action, activity, or process is more central to a healthy organiza-tion than the meeting. As dreaded as the “m” word is, as maligned as it has become, there is no better way to have a fundamental impact on an organization than by changing the way it does meetings.

In fact, if someone were to offer me one single piece of evidence to evaluate the health of an organization, I would not ask to see its financial statements, review its product line, or even talk to its employees or customers; I would want to observe the leadership team during a meeting. This is where values are established, discussed, and lived and where decisions around strategy and tactics are vetted, made, and reviewed. Bad meetings are the birthplace of unhealthy


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The Centrality

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The Centrality

of Great

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of Great Meetings

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Meetings

n organization that has embraced each of the four disciplines will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

n organization that has embraced each of the four disciplines will certainly become healthy, making success highly likely. But one

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

certainly become healthy, making success highly likely. But one activity, more than any other, will be central to maintaining those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

activity, more than any other, will be central to maintaining those disciplines, and sustaining health, over time.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

disciplines, and sustaining health, over time.No action, activity, or process is more central to a healthy organiza-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

No action, activity, or process is more central to a healthy organiza-tion than the meeting. As dreaded as the “m” word is, as maligned as COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

tion than the meeting. As dreaded as the “m” word is, as maligned as NOT FOR R

ESALEMeetings

NOT FOR RESALE

Meetings

n organization that has embraced each of the four disciplines will

NOT FOR RESALE

n organization that has embraced each of the four disciplines will certainly become healthy, making success highly likely. But one

NOT FOR RESALE

certainly become healthy, making success highly likely. But one activity, more than any other, will be central to maintaining those

NOT FOR RESALE

activity, more than any other, will be central to maintaining those disciplines, and sustaining health, over time.NOT FOR R

ESALE

disciplines, and sustaining health, over time.No action, activity, or process is more central to a healthy organiza-NOT FOR R

ESALE

No action, activity, or process is more central to a healthy organiza-


La

The Advantage

174

organizations, and good meetings are the origin of cohesion, clarity, and communication.

So why in the world do we hate meetings? Probably because they are usually awful. More often than not they are boring, unfocused, wasteful, and frustrating. Somehow we’ve come to accept this—to believe that there is just something inher-

ently wrong with the whole idea of meetings. It’s almost as though we see them as a form of corporate penance, something that is inevitable and must be endured.

Well, I am utterly convinced that there is nothing inherently bad about meetings, nothing that can’t be fixed if we confront the problems we’ve allowed to grow and calcify over the years. I wrote about those problems in a fictional way in my book Death by Meeting.1 In that book I addressed a concept at the heart of the problem with meetings, some-thing I call “meeting stew.”

Meeting Stew

A good way to understand meeting stew is to imagine a clueless cook taking all of the ingredients out of the pantry and the refrigerator and throwing them into one big pot, and then wondering why his concoc-tion doesn’t taste very good. Leaders do the same thing when they put all of their issues into one big discussion, usually called a “staff meeting.” All too often they combine administrative issues and tactical decisions and creative brainstorming and strategic analysis and personnel discus-sions into one exhausting meeting. And like that cook, somehow they are surprised when the result doesn’t turn out so well.

If someone were to offer me

one single piece of evidence to

evaluate the health of an

organization, I would want to

observe the leadership team

during a meeting.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

wasteful, and frustrating.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

wasteful, and frustrating. Somehow we’ve come to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Somehow we’ve come to

accept this—to believe that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accept this—to believe that there is just something inher-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

there is just something inher-ently wrong with the whole idea of meetings. It’s almost as though we

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ently wrong with the whole idea of meetings. It’s almost as though we see them as a form of corporate penance, something that is inevitable

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

see them as a form of corporate penance, something that is inevitable

Well, I am utterly convinced that there is nothing inherently bad

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Well, I am utterly convinced that there is nothing inherently bad about meetings, nothing that can’t be fixed if we confront the problems

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

about meetings, nothing that can’t be fixed if we confront the problems we’ve allowed to grow and calcify over the years. I wrote about those

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

we’ve allowed to grow and calcify over the years. I wrote about those problems in a fictional way in my book

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

problems in a fictional way in my book I addressed a concept at the heart of the problem with meetings, some-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I addressed a concept at the heart of the problem with meetings, some-thing I call “meeting stew.”

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thing I call “meeting stew.”

Meeting StewCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Meeting StewNOT FOR R

ESALEently wrong with the whole idea of meetings. It’s almost as though we

NOT FOR RESALE

ently wrong with the whole idea of meetings. It’s almost as though we see them as a form of corporate penance, something that is inevitable

NOT FOR RESALEsee them as a form of corporate penance, something that is inevitable

Well, I am utterly convinced that there is nothing inherently bad

NOT FOR RESALE

Well, I am utterly convinced that there is nothing inherently bad about meetings, nothing that can’t be fixed if we confront the problems

NOT FOR RESALE

about meetings, nothing that can’t be fixed if we confront the problems we’ve allowed to grow and calcify over the years. I wrote about those

NOT FOR RESALE

we’ve allowed to grow and calcify over the years. I wrote about those problems in a fictional way in my book

NOT FOR RESALE

problems in a fictional way in my book Death by Meeting.

NOT FOR RESALE

Death by Meeting.I addressed a concept at the heart of the problem with meetings, some-

NOT FOR RESALE

I addressed a concept at the heart of the problem with meetings, some-thing I call “meeting stew.”

NOT FOR RESALE

thing I call “meeting stew.”


La


175

The fact is that the human brain isn’t meant to process so many disparate topics in one sitting. There needs to be greater clarity and focus, which means that there needs to be different kinds of meetings for different kinds of issues. And, yes, that means there will be more meetings, not fewer.

That’s right. Leaders who want healthy organizations cannot try to eliminate or reduce time spent in meetings by combining them or cutting them short. Instead, they have to make sure that they are having the right kinds of meetings, and then they must make those meetings effective. As a result—and trust me when I say this—leaders actually come to look forward to their meetings, even enjoy them. In fact, they get real work done during those meetings which makes their lives, and the lives of their employees, better as a result.

the Four MeetingS

So what kinds of meetings does the leadership team of a healthy orga-nization have? There are four basic types:

Content Timing

Administrative 5−10 minutesDaily

Check-In

WeeklyStaff

AdhocTopical

QuarterlyOff-Site Review

Tactical 45−90 minutes

Strategic 2−4 hours

1−2 daysDevelopmental


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cutting them short. Instead, they have to make sure that they are having

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cutting them short. Instead, they have to make sure that they are having the right kinds of meetings, and then they must make those meetings

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL the right kinds of meetings, and then they must make those meetings

effective. As a result—and trust me when I say this—leaders actually

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

effective. As a result—and trust me when I say this—leaders actually come to look forward to their meetings, even enjoy them. In fact, they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

come to look forward to their meetings, even enjoy them. In fact, they get real work done during those meetings which makes their lives, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

get real work done during those meetings which makes their lives, and the lives of their employees, better as a result.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the lives of their employees, better as a result.

S

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

S

what kinds of meetings does the leadership team of a healthy orga-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

nization have? There are four basic types:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


ContentCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Content NOT FOR RESALE

get real work done during those meetings which makes their lives, and

NOT FOR RESALE

get real work done during those meetings which makes their lives, and


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

The Advantage

176

1. Daily Check-InsThe first category of meetings is the least important but certainly worth doing when it is practically possible. Essentially, it’s about the team getting into the habit of gathering once a day, for no more than ten minutes, to clear the air about anything administrative that would be helpful to know. Schedules. Events. Issue alerts. That kind of stuff.

There are no agendas and no resolution of issues, just an exchange of information. To make sure that these meetings don’t morph into something they shouldn’t, it’s even best if people don’t sit down. The purpose of these daily administrative check-ins is simply to get the team accustomed to talking on a regular basis and to provide a forum for addressing the uber-tactical kinds of issues that get in the way of more important issues at staff meetings.

Plenty of leadership teams will protest having to do daily check-ins. Some of their reasons are valid, others not.

A good reason not to do daily check-ins is that members of the team are so spread out geographically that it isn’t practical to expect them to get together every day. That’s not to say that some virtual teams don’t find a way to do this by phone. But when it takes heroic efforts on the part of people in multiple time zones to make a daily conference call work, it can become just another form of drudgery. In those cases, not doing them is fine.

When team members work in the same location, there are no good reasons for rejecting the daily check-in. But what if some team members are out of the office? Have the session without them and let them know they can call in if they’re able. No pressure. What if people have other meetings during that time? First, don’t schedule meetings during that ten-minute period, but in the odd event that it is inevitable, don’t worry about it. Everyone else can meet. What if people feel they are too busy? That’s a bad excuse. Here’s why.

The most powerful impact of having teams meet every day is the quick resolution of minor issues that might otherwise fester and create


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of information. To make sure that these meetings don’t morph into

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of information. To make sure that these meetings don’t morph into something they shouldn’t, it’s even best if people don’t sit down. The

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL something they shouldn’t, it’s even best if people don’t sit down. The

purpose of these daily administrative check-ins is simply to get the team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

purpose of these daily administrative check-ins is simply to get the team accustomed to talking on a regular basis and to provide a forum for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accustomed to talking on a regular basis and to provide a forum for addressing the uber-tactical kinds of issues that get in the way of more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

addressing the uber-tactical kinds of issues that get in the way of more

Plenty of leadership teams will protest having to do daily check-ins.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Plenty of leadership teams will protest having to do daily check-ins. Some of their reasons are valid, others not.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Some of their reasons are valid, others not. to do daily check-ins is that members of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to do daily check-ins is that members of the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team are so spread out geographically that it isn’t practical to expect

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

team are so spread out geographically that it isn’t practical to expect them to get together every day. That’s not to say that some virtual teams

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

them to get together every day. That’s not to say that some virtual teams don’t find a way to do this by phone. But when it takes heroic efforts

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

don’t find a way to do this by phone. But when it takes heroic efforts on the part of people in multiple time zones to make a daily conference

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

on the part of people in multiple time zones to make a daily conference

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

call work, it can become just another form of drudgery. In those cases,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

call work, it can become just another form of drudgery. In those cases, not doing them is fine.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

not doing them is fine.When team members work in the same location, there are no good COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

When team members work in the same location, there are no good NOT FOR R

ESALEaddressing the uber-tactical kinds of issues that get in the way of more

NOT FOR RESALE

addressing the uber-tactical kinds of issues that get in the way of more

Plenty of leadership teams will protest having to do daily check-ins.

NOT FOR RESALEPlenty of leadership teams will protest having to do daily check-ins.

Some of their reasons are valid, others not.

NOT FOR RESALE

Some of their reasons are valid, others not. to do daily check-ins is that members of the

NOT FOR RESALE

to do daily check-ins is that members of the

NOT FOR RESALE

team are so spread out geographically that it isn’t practical to expect

NOT FOR RESALE

team are so spread out geographically that it isn’t practical to expect them to get together every day. That’s not to say that some virtual teams

NOT FOR RESALE

them to get together every day. That’s not to say that some virtual teams don’t find a way to do this by phone. But when it takes heroic efforts

NOT FOR RESALE

don’t find a way to do this by phone. But when it takes heroic efforts on the part of people in multiple time zones to make a daily conference

NOT FOR RESALE

on the part of people in multiple time zones to make a daily conference

NOT FOR RESALE

call work, it can become just another form of drudgery. In those cases, NOT FOR RESALE

call work, it can become just another form of drudgery. In those cases, not doing them is fine.NOT FOR R

ESALE

not doing them is fine.


La


177

unnecessary busywork for the team. For instance, when teams members don’t see each other more than once a week, or even less often, they end up trying to resolve the endless administrative issues that surface every day with an e-mail here and a voice mail there and a hallway conversation in between. That sets off a flurry of more e-mails, voice mails, and hallway stops as the situation changes and more people on the team need or want to be looped in. It would be fascinating to actually track and calculate the amount of time and energy that leaders spend chasing down issues that could be sorted out in a thirty-second conversation if everyone were in the same room for a few minutes every day.

A big part of the beauty of the daily check-in is that leaders know they’re going to see their colleagues within twenty-four hours, so rather than firing off an e-mail or a voice mail or interrupting someone in the course of their day, they simply make a note to bring up a small issue at the next day’s meeting. There is something undeniably efficient and liberating about this, which makes the protests I hear from execu-tives all that much more absurd. It’s as though they’re saying, Do you realize how busy we are trying to solve problems that result from our lack of communication? We can’t possibly spend ten minutes every day preventing them!

Once teams get used to the daily check-in, they’re hooked.

Disconnected

The leadership team at a Silicon Valley company imple-

mented the daily check-in begrudgingly at first. Then, after

a few weeks, they got used to the activity and did it gladly

without complaint. Still, they didn’t completely understand

the value of it.

Then, during one particular period when a large

number of leadership team members were on vacation, the

daily check-ins came to a halt. As so often happens, when


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

actually track and calculate the amount of time and energy that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

actually track and calculate the amount of time and energy that leaders spend chasing down issues that could be sorted out in a thirty-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL leaders spend chasing down issues that could be sorted out in a thirty-

second conversation if everyone were in the same room for a few

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

second conversation if everyone were in the same room for a few

A big part of the beauty of the daily check-in is that leaders know

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

A big part of the beauty of the daily check-in is that leaders know they’re going to see their colleagues within twenty-four hours, so rather

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they’re going to see their colleagues within twenty-four hours, so rather than firing off an e-mail or a voice mail or interrupting someone in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

than firing off an e-mail or a voice mail or interrupting someone in the course of their day, they simply make a note to bring up a small

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the course of their day, they simply make a note to bring up a small issue at the next day’s meeting. There is something undeniably efficient

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

issue at the next day’s meeting. There is something undeniably efficient

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and liberating about this, which makes the protests I hear from execu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and liberating about this, which makes the protests I hear from execu-tives all that much more absurd. It’s as though they’re saying,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tives all that much more absurd. It’s as though they’re saying, realize how busy we are trying to solve problems that result from our lack

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

realize how busy we are trying to solve problems that result from our lack of communication? We can’t possibly spend ten minutes every day prevent

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of communication? We can’t possibly spend ten minutes every day prevent

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing them!

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing them!Once teams get used to the daily check-in, they’re hooked.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Once teams get used to the daily check-in, they’re hooked.NOT FOR RESALE

A big part of the beauty of the daily check-in is that leaders know

NOT FOR RESALE

A big part of the beauty of the daily check-in is that leaders know they’re going to see their colleagues within twenty-four hours, so rather

NOT FOR RESALEthey’re going to see their colleagues within twenty-four hours, so rather

than firing off an e-mail or a voice mail or interrupting someone in

NOT FOR RESALEthan firing off an e-mail or a voice mail or interrupting someone in

the course of their day, they simply make a note to bring up a small

NOT FOR RESALE

the course of their day, they simply make a note to bring up a small issue at the next day’s meeting. There is something undeniably efficient

NOT FOR RESALE

issue at the next day’s meeting. There is something undeniably efficient

NOT FOR RESALE

and liberating about this, which makes the protests I hear from execu-

NOT FOR RESALE

and liberating about this, which makes the protests I hear from execu-tives all that much more absurd. It’s as though they’re saying,

NOT FOR RESALE

tives all that much more absurd. It’s as though they’re saying, realize how busy we are trying to solve problems that result from our lack

NOT FOR RESALE

realize how busy we are trying to solve problems that result from our lack of communication? We can’t possibly spend ten minutes every day prevent

NOT FOR RESALE

of communication? We can’t possibly spend ten minutes every day prevent

Once teams get used to the daily check-in, they’re hooked.NOT FOR RESALE

Once teams get used to the daily check-in, they’re hooked.


La

The Advantage

178

Getting used to doing the daily meeting will probably take a few weeks or a month. But once it happens, leaders find that they’re build-ing stronger relationships with their peers much more quickly than they thought was possible. Moreover, they’re able to address minor issues quickly so they can be more focused on the right topics during the other three kinds of meetings they need to have.

2. Tactical Staff MeetingsWhen executives complain about meetings, many of them are probably thinking about their weekly or biweekly or monthly staff meetings. This is where meeting stew is usually served.

The truth is, there is no more valuable activity in any organization than the regular staff meeting of a leadership team. But if they are not effective, there is little or no chance of building a cohesive team or a healthy organization.

There are a few critical keys to making staff meetings work, many of which I’ve already discussed in this book. For instance, if there are too many people on a team, or if the people in the room don’t trust each other and aren’t willing to engage in productive conflict, then no matter how you reorganize your meetings you won’t see much impact.

everyone came back to work, the discipline of the daily

meeting didn’t get reestablished.

After a few weeks, team members felt strangely discon-

nected, and after talking about it, they realized that the cause

was not having the daily sessions. The president of the

company explained what happened: “We never realized how

much closer we were to each other, and how much we were

able to avoid wasting time and energy, until we stopped

having the daily check-ins.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Getting used to doing the daily meeting will probably take a few

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Getting used to doing the daily meeting will probably take a few weeks or a month. But once it happens, leaders find that they’re build-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

weeks or a month. But once it happens, leaders find that they’re build-ing stronger relationships with their peers much more quickly than they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing stronger relationships with their peers much more quickly than they thought was possible. Moreover, they’re able to address minor issues

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thought was possible. Moreover, they’re able to address minor issues quickly so they can be more focused on the right topics during the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

quickly so they can be more focused on the right topics during the other three kinds of meetings they need to have.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

other three kinds of meetings they need to have.

2. Tactical Staff Meetings

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

2. Tactical Staff MeetingsWhen executives complain about meetings, many of them are probably

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

When executives complain about meetings, many of them are probably

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thinking about their weekly or biweekly or monthly staff meetings. This

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

thinking about their weekly or biweekly or monthly staff meetings. This is where meeting stew is usually served.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is where meeting stew is usually served.The truth is, there is no more valuable activity in any organization COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

The truth is, there is no more valuable activity in any organization than the regular staff meeting of a leadership team. But if they are not COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

than the regular staff meeting of a leadership team. But if they are not NOT FOR R

ESALEweeks or a month. But once it happens, leaders find that they’re build-

NOT FOR RESALE

weeks or a month. But once it happens, leaders find that they’re build-ing stronger relationships with their peers much more quickly than they

NOT FOR RESALEing stronger relationships with their peers much more quickly than they

thought was possible. Moreover, they’re able to address minor issues

NOT FOR RESALEthought was possible. Moreover, they’re able to address minor issues

quickly so they can be more focused on the right topics during the

NOT FOR RESALE

quickly so they can be more focused on the right topics during the other three kinds of meetings they need to have.

NOT FOR RESALE

other three kinds of meetings they need to have.


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

thinking about their weekly or biweekly or monthly staff meetings. This

NOT FOR RESALE

thinking about their weekly or biweekly or monthly staff meetings. This is where meeting stew is usually served.NOT FOR R

ESALE

is where meeting stew is usually served.The truth is, there is no more valuable activity in any organization NOT FOR R

ESALE

The truth is, there is no more valuable activity in any organization


La


179

However, assuming that a leadership team has bought into and is working on making their team small enough and behaviorally cohesive, they then need to change a few things about what they do before and during their staff meetings to make them compelling, useful, and yes, even enjoyable.

Real-Time AgendaThe first thing a team must do to improve their staff meetings is really about what they should stop doing before the meeting. I’m referring to the dreaded agenda. Putting together an agenda before a staff meeting is like a marriage counselor deciding what issues she’s going to cover with a couple prior to meeting with them. The fact is, you don’t know what you need to discuss until you’ve come together and assessed the situation.

Instead of putting together an agenda ahead of time, team members need to come together and spend their first ten minutes of a meeting creating a real-time agenda. That involves two steps.

First, the leader needs to go around the room and ask every member of the team to take thirty seconds to report on the two or three key activities that they believe are their top priorities for the week. Notice that I said “that they believe are their top priorities.” See, it’s possible that after everyone explains what they’re doing and the team assesses what’s going on in the organization, people are going to have to reorder their priorities.

Once everyone has taken their thirty seconds to list off, not expound on, their top priorities—most will use only ten or fifteen seconds—the leader moves on to the second part of creating a real-time agenda. This entails reviewing the one-page scorecard or chart that the team created—the one that includes their thematic goal, their defining objectives, and their standard operating objectives. I covered that simple structure in discipline 2 when I discussed the question, What is most important, right now?


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first thing a team must do to improve their staff meetings is really

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first thing a team must do to improve their staff meetings is really about what they should stop doing before the meeting. I’m referring to the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL about what they should stop doing before the meeting. I’m referring to the

dreaded agenda. Putting together an agenda before a staff meeting is like

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dreaded agenda. Putting together an agenda before a staff meeting is like a marriage counselor deciding what issues she’s going to cover with a couple

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a marriage counselor deciding what issues she’s going to cover with a couple prior to meeting with them. The fact is, you don’t know what you need to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

prior to meeting with them. The fact is, you don’t know what you need to discuss until you’ve come together and assessed the situation.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

discuss until you’ve come together and assessed the situation.Instead of putting together an agenda ahead of time, team members

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Instead of putting together an agenda ahead of time, team members need to come together and spend their first ten minutes of a meeting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

need to come together and spend their first ten minutes of a meeting creating a real-time agenda. That involves two steps.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

creating a real-time agenda. That involves two steps.First, the leader needs to go around the room and ask every member

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

First, the leader needs to go around the room and ask every member of the team to take thirty seconds to report on the two or three

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of the team to take thirty seconds to report on the two or three key activities that they believe are their top priorities for the week.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

key activities that they believe are their top priorities for the week. Notice that I said “that they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Notice that I said “that they possible that after everyone explains what they’re doing and the team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

possible that after everyone explains what they’re doing and the team assesses what’s going on in the organization, people are going to have COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

assesses what’s going on in the organization, people are going to have to reorder their priorities.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

to reorder their priorities.NOT FOR R

ESALEprior to meeting with them. The fact is, you don’t know what you need to

NOT FOR RESALE

prior to meeting with them. The fact is, you don’t know what you need to discuss until you’ve come together and assessed the situation.

NOT FOR RESALEdiscuss until you’ve come together and assessed the situation.

Instead of putting together an agenda ahead of time, team members

NOT FOR RESALEInstead of putting together an agenda ahead of time, team members

need to come together and spend their first ten minutes of a meeting

NOT FOR RESALE

need to come together and spend their first ten minutes of a meeting creating a real-time agenda. That involves two steps.

NOT FOR RESALE

creating a real-time agenda. That involves two steps.First, the leader needs to go around the room and ask every member

NOT FOR RESALE

First, the leader needs to go around the room and ask every member of the team to take thirty seconds to report on the two or three

NOT FOR RESALE

of the team to take thirty seconds to report on the two or three key activities that they believe are their top priorities for the week.

NOT FOR RESALE

key activities that they believe are their top priorities for the week. Notice that I said “that they

NOT FOR RESALE

Notice that I said “that they possible that after everyone explains what they’re doing and the team NOT FOR R

ESALE

possible that after everyone explains what they’re doing and the team assesses what’s going on in the organization, people are going to have NOT FOR R

ESALE

assesses what’s going on in the organization, people are going to have


La

The Advantage

180

Essentially this part of the meeting is about stepping back and asking, How are we doing against the things we said are most important? And the way teams evaluate themselves is by using an easy and digest-ible means of assessing progress: colors. That’s right. No matter how much data an organization has at its disposal, no matter how intelligent and sophisticated the members of a team may be, the key to quickly sizing up the organization’s progress and deciding where to spend scarce resources is by keeping the evaluation process as simple as possible. I don’t know of a better system than green for “things are good, we’re ahead of schedule,” yellow for “we’re doing okay, but we’re not yet where we ought to be,” and red for “we’re way behind on this one.” (Okay, we allow teams to use lime green and orange for those in-between evaluations.)

It should take a team only five or ten minutes to go through the items on their scorecard, assigning a color to each item. Different people will influence each decision based on their perspective, and that’s good. In fact, leaders always learn a great deal about what is happening when they hear their colleagues’ assessments. “I’d give us a green on

Thematic GoalRebuild credibility

within the business

Defining ObjectivesDeliver on

currentcommitments

Systemreliability

Green = open circle Yellow = medium-shaded circle Red = dark-filled circleLime green = light-dotted circle Orange = heavy-dotted circle

Networksecurity

Businessunit

satisfaction

On-timeprojectdelivery

Staffmorale

Identifystrategicinitiatives

Eliminateintradepartmental

silos

Improvecommunication

with stakeholders


Tactical Meeting Scorecard


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Essentially this part of the meeting is about stepping back and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Essentially this part of the meeting is about stepping back and How are we doing against the things we said are most important?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

How are we doing against the things we said are most important?And the way teams evaluate themselves is by using an easy and digest-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And the way teams evaluate themselves is by using an easy and digest-ible means of assessing progress: colors. That’s right. No matter how

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ible means of assessing progress: colors. That’s right. No matter how much data an organization has at its disposal, no matter how intelligent

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

much data an organization has at its disposal, no matter how intelligent and sophisticated the members of a team may be, the key to quickly

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and sophisticated the members of a team may be, the key to quickly sizing up the organization’s progress and deciding where to spend scarce

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sizing up the organization’s progress and deciding where to spend scarce resources is by keeping the evaluation process as simple as possible. I COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

resources is by keeping the evaluation process as simple as possible. I don’t know of a better system than green for “things are good, we’re COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

don’t know of a better system than green for “things are good, we’re

Green = open circle Yellow = medium-shaded circle Red = dark-filled circle

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Green = open circle Yellow = medium-shaded circle Red = dark-filled circleLime green = light-dotted circle Orange = heavy-dotted circle

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Lime green = light-dotted circle Orange = heavy-dotted circle

On-time

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL On-time

project

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

projectdelivery

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

delivery

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

Essentially this part of the meeting is about stepping back and

NOT FOR RESALE

Essentially this part of the meeting is about stepping back and How are we doing against the things we said are most important?

NOT FOR RESALE

How are we doing against the things we said are most important?And the way teams evaluate themselves is by using an easy and digest-

NOT FOR RESALE

And the way teams evaluate themselves is by using an easy and digest-ible means of assessing progress: colors. That’s right. No matter how

NOT FOR RESALE

ible means of assessing progress: colors. That’s right. No matter how much data an organization has at its disposal, no matter how intelligent

NOT FOR RESALE

much data an organization has at its disposal, no matter how intelligent and sophisticated the members of a team may be, the key to quickly

NOT FOR RESALE

and sophisticated the members of a team may be, the key to quickly sizing up the organization’s progress and deciding where to spend scarce NOT FOR R

ESALE

sizing up the organization’s progress and deciding where to spend scarce resources is by keeping the evaluation process as simple as possible. I NOT FOR R

ESALE

resources is by keeping the evaluation process as simple as possible. I NOT FOR RESALEGreen = open circle Yellow = medium-shaded circle Red = dark-filled circle

NOT FOR RESALEGreen = open circle Yellow = medium-shaded circle Red = dark-filled circle

Lime green = light-dotted circle Orange = heavy-dotted circle

NOT FOR RESALELime green = light-dotted circle Orange = heavy-dotted circle


La


181

revamping our marketing message,” says one executive. “Are you kidding?” says another. “did you see the results of that focus group last week?” The first executive’s eyes go wide. “No, I didn’t. What did they say?” The second exec explains, “They threw up all over our ideas. We’re back to square one.” And everyone agrees that the color is red.

After the team has assigned their colors—a process that really is as enjoyable as it is informative—then and only then can they agree on what their agenda should be. Basically they will probably focus on the areas on the chart that are red or orange or perhaps one or two others that are particularly critical.

The beauty of this real-time agenda system is that the team will avoid the all-too-common problem of sitting through a presentation or a discussion of something that everyone knows is of little importance to the organization. When leaders put together agendas ahead of time, they’re often influenced by people in the organization who do a good job lobbying them for face time at the next staff meeting. Before anyone knows what’s happening, they’re sitting in a forty-five-minute multi-media presentation about how the HR department selected a vendor for the benefits program, even when the company’s benefits program is nowhere near being worthy of making it on the scorecard. Of course, if the company is experiencing employee turnover because of benefits and that is one of the critical issues facing the team, then by all means they should bring in the director of benefits. But leaders must make that decision because it warrants the time and energy of the leadership team, not because it seemed like a considerate thing to do for someone who wanted some extra attention.

A challenge that many leadership teams struggle with during staff meetings is the distraction that occurs when someone raises a compelling and important topic that shouldn’t be taken on during tactical meetings. While this may seem like a relief to executives who are always thirsty for something new and interesting, it presents two problems.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what their agenda should be. Basically they will probably focus on the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

what their agenda should be. Basically they will probably focus on the areas on the chart that are red or orange or perhaps one or two others

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL areas on the chart that are red or orange or perhaps one or two others

The beauty of this real-time agenda system is that the team will

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The beauty of this real-time agenda system is that the team will avoid the all-too-common problem of sitting through a presentation or

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

avoid the all-too-common problem of sitting through a presentation or a discussion of something that everyone knows is of little importance

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a discussion of something that everyone knows is of little importance to the organization. When leaders put together agendas ahead of time,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to the organization. When leaders put together agendas ahead of time, they’re often influenced by people in the organization who do a good

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they’re often influenced by people in the organization who do a good job lobbying them for face time at the next staff meeting. Before anyone

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

job lobbying them for face time at the next staff meeting. Before anyone

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

knows what’s happening, they’re sitting in a forty-five-minute multi-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

knows what’s happening, they’re sitting in a forty-five-minute multi-media presentation about how the HR department selected a vendor

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

media presentation about how the HR department selected a vendor for the benefits program, even when the company’s benefits program

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for the benefits program, even when the company’s benefits program is nowhere near being worthy of making it on the scorecard. Of course,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is nowhere near being worthy of making it on the scorecard. Of course,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

if the company is experiencing employee turnover because of benefits

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

if the company is experiencing employee turnover because of benefits and that is one of the critical issues facing the team, then by all means COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

and that is one of the critical issues facing the team, then by all means they should bring in the director of benefits. But leaders must make COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

they should bring in the director of benefits. But leaders must make NOT FOR R

ESALEavoid the all-too-common problem of sitting through a presentation or

NOT FOR RESALE

avoid the all-too-common problem of sitting through a presentation or a discussion of something that everyone knows is of little importance

NOT FOR RESALEa discussion of something that everyone knows is of little importance

to the organization. When leaders put together agendas ahead of time,

NOT FOR RESALEto the organization. When leaders put together agendas ahead of time,

they’re often influenced by people in the organization who do a good

NOT FOR RESALE

they’re often influenced by people in the organization who do a good job lobbying them for face time at the next staff meeting. Before anyone

NOT FOR RESALE

job lobbying them for face time at the next staff meeting. Before anyone

NOT FOR RESALE

knows what’s happening, they’re sitting in a forty-five-minute multi-

NOT FOR RESALE

knows what’s happening, they’re sitting in a forty-five-minute multi-media presentation about how the HR department selected a vendor

NOT FOR RESALE

media presentation about how the HR department selected a vendor for the benefits program, even when the company’s benefits program

NOT FOR RESALE

for the benefits program, even when the company’s benefits program is nowhere near being worthy of making it on the scorecard. Of course,

NOT FOR RESALE

is nowhere near being worthy of making it on the scorecard. Of course,

NOT FOR RESALE

if the company is experiencing employee turnover because of benefits NOT FOR RESALE

if the company is experiencing employee turnover because of benefits and that is one of the critical issues facing the team, then by all means NOT FOR R

ESALE

and that is one of the critical issues facing the team, then by all means


La

The Advantage

182

First, it derails the discussion of the more tactical issues that must be addressed during staff meetings. Second, it causes the team to take on critical topics in an environment where they don’t have enough time to achieve resolution and when they are not as informed or prepared as they need to be. That’s why leaders of a healthy organization must also have a third kind of meeting.

3. Adhoc Topical MeetingsProbably the most interesting and compelling of all meetings is the third type: the adhoc topical meeting. In fact, it may be the most fun that leaders can have at work.

The purpose of this kind of meeting is to dig into the critical issues that can have a long-term impact on an organization or that require significant time and energy to resolve: a major competitive threat, a disruptive industry change, a substantial shift in revenue, a significant product or service deficiency, or even a troubling drop in morale, among many others. Any of these issues would warrant more time, energy, and preparation than could ever be given during a regular staff meeting. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine addressing any of them in less than a few hours. It easily takes that much time to frame up an issue, present even a cursory overview of basic research, brainstorm possible solutions, debate the merits of those solutions, and then come to a decision with real commitment.

And yet leadership teams rarely carve out enough time for this. Instead, they try to resolve important issues in fifteen-minute incre-ments in between more tactical and administrative topics during a staff meeting. The result is not only suboptimal decisions, but an immense sense of frustration among leaders. That frustration is most directly the result of knowing that they’re making bad decisions, but also a vague sense that they’re not getting to do what they thought they were going to be doing when they chose their careers in the first place.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Probably the most interesting and compelling of all meetings is the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Probably the most interesting and compelling of all meetings is the

third type: the adhoc topical meeting. In fact, it may be the most fun

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

third type: the adhoc topical meeting. In fact, it may be the most fun

The purpose of this kind of meeting is to dig into the critical issues

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The purpose of this kind of meeting is to dig into the critical issues that can have a long-term impact on an organization or that require

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that can have a long-term impact on an organization or that require significant time and energy to resolve: a major competitive threat, a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

significant time and energy to resolve: a major competitive threat, a disruptive industry change, a substantial shift in revenue, a significant

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

disruptive industry change, a substantial shift in revenue, a significant product or service deficiency, or even a troubling drop in morale,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

product or service deficiency, or even a troubling drop in morale, among many others. Any of these issues would warrant more time,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

among many others. Any of these issues would warrant more time,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

energy, and preparation than could ever be given during a regular staff

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

energy, and preparation than could ever be given during a regular staff meeting. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine addressing any of them in less

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meeting. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine addressing any of them in less than a few hours. It easily takes that much time to frame up an issue,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

than a few hours. It easily takes that much time to frame up an issue, present even a cursory overview of basic research, brainstorm possible

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

present even a cursory overview of basic research, brainstorm possible

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

solutions, debate the merits of those solutions, and then come to a COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

solutions, debate the merits of those solutions, and then come to a decision with real commitment.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

decision with real commitment.NOT FOR R

ESALEThe purpose of this kind of meeting is to dig into the critical issues

NOT FOR RESALE

The purpose of this kind of meeting is to dig into the critical issues that can have a long-term impact on an organization or that require

NOT FOR RESALEthat can have a long-term impact on an organization or that require

significant time and energy to resolve: a major competitive threat, a

NOT FOR RESALEsignificant time and energy to resolve: a major competitive threat, a

disruptive industry change, a substantial shift in revenue, a significant

NOT FOR RESALE

disruptive industry change, a substantial shift in revenue, a significant product or service deficiency, or even a troubling drop in morale,

NOT FOR RESALE

product or service deficiency, or even a troubling drop in morale, among many others. Any of these issues would warrant more time,

NOT FOR RESALE

among many others. Any of these issues would warrant more time,

NOT FOR RESALE

energy, and preparation than could ever be given during a regular staff

NOT FOR RESALE

energy, and preparation than could ever be given during a regular staff meeting. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine addressing any of them in less

NOT FOR RESALE

meeting. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine addressing any of them in less than a few hours. It easily takes that much time to frame up an issue,

NOT FOR RESALE

than a few hours. It easily takes that much time to frame up an issue, present even a cursory overview of basic research, brainstorm possible NOT FOR R

ESALE

present even a cursory overview of basic research, brainstorm possible solutions, debate the merits of those solutions, and then come to a NOT FOR R

ESALE

solutions, debate the merits of those solutions, and then come to a


La


183

Let me make this a little clearer. When most people decide to go into business, they envision themselves sitting around a table with a group of colleagues, wrestling with difficult issues, and doing their best to make the right decisions by tapping into everyone’s knowledge, experience, and intuition. This is what happens during case studies in business school, and there’s no denying that it’s fun. The only problem with case studies is that they’re not real, and they leave people looking forward to the day when they can take on real issues and make real decisions with real consequences.

And then something bizarre happens: executives in the real world find themselves so inundated with daily e-mail and voice mail and administrative requirements that they rarely, if ever, set aside enough time for thorough, challenging, tense, dramatic, and fun conversations. It’s really quite absurd.

It’s like a baseball player working all his life and finally making it to the Major Leagues, and then spending all his time at batting practice without ever stepping up to the plate during a game. Or better yet, when he finally does come to bat in a game, he rushes through it so he can get done quickly and get back to batting practice. The high point of being a baseball player is playing in the games, and the high point of being a leader in an organiza-tion is wrestling with diffi-cult decisions and situations. Truncating those high points just doesn’t make sense.

What makes this partic-ularly tragic is that it is simply the result of execu-tives mistakenly convincing themselves that meetings are inherently bad. Thinking they’re being efficient, they reduce the time they spend in meetings by cramming every discussion into one big staff meeting. What they’re really doing

The high point of being a

leader in an organization is

wrestling with difficult

decisions and situations.

Truncating those high points

just doesn’t make sense.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

forward to the day when they can take on real issues and make real

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

forward to the day when they can take on real issues and make real

And then something bizarre happens: executives in the real world

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And then something bizarre happens: executives in the real world find themselves so inundated with daily e-mail and voice mail and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

find themselves so inundated with daily e-mail and voice mail and administrative requirements that they rarely, if ever, set aside enough

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

administrative requirements that they rarely, if ever, set aside enough time for thorough, challenging, tense, dramatic, and fun conversations.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

time for thorough, challenging, tense, dramatic, and fun conversations.

It’s like a baseball player working all his life and finally making it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s like a baseball player working all his life and finally making it to the Major Leagues, and then spending all his time at batting practice

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to the Major Leagues, and then spending all his time at batting practice without ever stepping up to the plate during a game. Or better yet,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

without ever stepping up to the plate during a game. Or better yet, when he finally does come to bat in a game, he rushes through it so he

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

when he finally does come to bat in a game, he rushes through it so he can get done quickly and get back to batting practice. The high point

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

can get done quickly and get back to batting practice. The high point of being a baseball player is playing in the games, and the high point of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of being a baseball player is playing in the games, and the high point of being a leader in an organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

being a leader in an organiza-tion is wrestling with diffi-COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

tion is wrestling with diffi-cult decisions and situations. COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

cult decisions and situations. NOT FOR R

ESALEadministrative requirements that they rarely, if ever, set aside enough

NOT FOR RESALE

administrative requirements that they rarely, if ever, set aside enough time for thorough, challenging, tense, dramatic, and fun conversations.

NOT FOR RESALEtime for thorough, challenging, tense, dramatic, and fun conversations.

It’s like a baseball player working all his life and finally making it

NOT FOR RESALE

It’s like a baseball player working all his life and finally making it to the Major Leagues, and then spending all his time at batting practice

NOT FOR RESALE

to the Major Leagues, and then spending all his time at batting practice without ever stepping up to the plate during a game. Or better yet,

NOT FOR RESALE

without ever stepping up to the plate during a game. Or better yet, when he finally does come to bat in a game, he rushes through it so he

NOT FOR RESALE

when he finally does come to bat in a game, he rushes through it so he can get done quickly and get back to batting practice. The high point

NOT FOR RESALE

can get done quickly and get back to batting practice. The high point of being a baseball player is playing in the games, and the high point of

NOT FOR RESALE

of being a baseball player is playing in the games, and the high point of being a leader in an organiza-NOT FOR R

ESALE

being a leader in an organiza-tion is wrestling with diffi-NOT FOR R

ESALE

tion is wrestling with diffi-


La

The Advantage

184

is ensuring that those staff meetings are going to be ineffective and that the most important conversations they should be having—topical, strategic ones—are cut short.

What leadership teams need to do—and this may be the single most important piece of advice for them when it comes to meetings—is separate their tactical conversations from their strategic ones. Combin-ing the two just doesn’t work and leaves both sets of issues inadequately addressed.

As for the timing of topical meetings, there is no prescriptive answer. After all, critical issues don’t come up on any schedule. However, if a leadership team goes more than a month without a strategic meeting, something is probably wrong. Of course, when a team first adopts this new model of having separate meetings for specific strategic topics, there will almost always be a big backlog of issues that need to be addressed, so there will be an initial flurry of these kinds of meetings. Which is okay because, by definition, the topics warrant attention. And besides, no one is going to complain about spending too much time discussing critical issues.

4. Quarterly Off-Site ReviewsThe fourth type of meeting that every leadership team needs to have is often known as the “off-site.” The problem with these meetings is that too often they are nothing more than an expensive and extended version of the unproductive staff meeting. The purpose of them, like each of the others, should be unique and focused. In this case, that focus is all about stepping back from the business to get a fresh perspec-tive, which is why it is best done away from the office.

Activities that should be addressed during these meetings include reviewing the organization’s strategic anchors and thematic goal, assess-ing the performance of key employees, discussing industry changes and competitive threats, and of course, reviewing the behaviors of the team members in regard to cohesiveness. In essence, the off-site review


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL As for the timing of topical meetings, there is no prescriptive

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL As for the timing of topical meetings, there is no prescriptive

answer. After all, critical issues don’t come up on any schedule. However,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

answer. After all, critical issues don’t come up on any schedule. However, if a leadership team goes more than a month without a strategic meeting,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

if a leadership team goes more than a month without a strategic meeting, something is probably wrong. Of course, when a team first adopts this

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

something is probably wrong. Of course, when a team first adopts this new model of having separate meetings for specific strategic topics,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

new model of having separate meetings for specific strategic topics, there will almost always be a big backlog of issues that need to be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

there will almost always be a big backlog of issues that need to be addressed, so there will be an initial flurry of these kinds of meetings.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

addressed, so there will be an initial flurry of these kinds of meetings. Which is okay because, by definition, the topics warrant attention. And

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Which is okay because, by definition, the topics warrant attention. And

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

besides, no one is going to complain about spending too much time

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

besides, no one is going to complain about spending too much time discussing critical issues.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

discussing critical issues.

4. Quarterly Off-Site Reviews

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

4. Quarterly Off-Site ReviewsThe fourth type of meeting that every leadership team needs to have is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The fourth type of meeting that every leadership team needs to have is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

often known as the “off-site.” The problem with these meetings is that COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

often known as the “off-site.” The problem with these meetings is that too often they are nothing more than an expensive and extended COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

too often they are nothing more than an expensive and extended NOT FOR R

ESALEsomething is probably wrong. Of course, when a team first adopts this

NOT FOR RESALE

something is probably wrong. Of course, when a team first adopts this new model of having separate meetings for specific strategic topics,

NOT FOR RESALEnew model of having separate meetings for specific strategic topics,

there will almost always be a big backlog of issues that need to be

NOT FOR RESALEthere will almost always be a big backlog of issues that need to be

addressed, so there will be an initial flurry of these kinds of meetings.

NOT FOR RESALE

addressed, so there will be an initial flurry of these kinds of meetings. Which is okay because, by definition, the topics warrant attention. And

NOT FOR RESALE

Which is okay because, by definition, the topics warrant attention. And

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


4. Quarterly Off-Site Reviews

NOT FOR RESALE

4. Quarterly Off-Site ReviewsThe fourth type of meeting that every leadership team needs to have is

NOT FOR RESALE

The fourth type of meeting that every leadership team needs to have is often known as the “off-site.” The problem with these meetings is that NOT FOR R

ESALE

often known as the “off-site.” The problem with these meetings is that


La


185

is where the leadership team needs to step back and revisit the four disciplines covered in this book: team, clarity, communication, and human systems.

The timing of these meetings, unlike the others, is not really nego-tiable. Unlike the tactical staff meetings, which might take place weekly or biweekly, or the topical ones, which need to happen whenever an issue arises, off-site review meetings should occur quarterly. There is just something about doing this four times a year that makes sense. More frequently than that doesn’t give a team enough time to make progress on critical issues and identify meaningful trends in the market or in the company. Less frequently usually means that people are going to forget about what they talked about at the previous meeting, which makes continuity difficult and progress unlikely.

Finally, of the four types of meetings, the quarterly review is probably the one that might call for the use of an outside consultant. It’s often nice for the leader of the executive team to participate as a member and leave the organizing and facilitating to a trusted consultant.

too Much tiMe in MeetingS?

Whenever executives challenge me about the practicality of having four different meetings on a regular basis, I ask them to add up all the time that they would spend in those meetings in a given month.

If we apply the model in the most time-intensive way possible (a full 10 minutes each day in check-in meetings, 2 hours each week in tactical staff meetings, 6 hours each month in topical meetings, and 2 days each quarter in developmental review meetings), the grand total of time amounts to about 1,560 minutes, or 12 hours per month.

Assuming a 50-hour workweek, that amounts to just 13 percent of our time. If you work just 45 hours per week, then it’s 14 percent. That means even when we’re spending the maximum amount of time


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

just something about doing this four times a year that makes sense.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

just something about doing this four times a year that makes sense. More frequently than that doesn’t give a team enough time to make

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL More frequently than that doesn’t give a team enough time to make

progress on critical issues and identify meaningful trends in the market

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

progress on critical issues and identify meaningful trends in the market or in the company. Less frequently usually means that people are going

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

or in the company. Less frequently usually means that people are going to forget about what they talked about at the previous meeting, which

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to forget about what they talked about at the previous meeting, which makes continuity difficult and progress unlikely.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

makes continuity difficult and progress unlikely.Finally, of the four types of meetings, the quarterly review is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, of the four types of meetings, the quarterly review is probably the one that might call for the use of an outside consultant.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

probably the one that might call for the use of an outside consultant. It’s often nice for the leader of the executive team to participate as

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

It’s often nice for the leader of the executive team to participate as a member and leave the organizing and facilitating to a trusted

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a member and leave the organizing and facilitating to a trusted

Much

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Much t

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ti

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

i

WhenevCOPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Whenever executives challenge me about the practicality of having four COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

er executives challenge me about the practicality of having four different meetings on a regular basis, I ask them to add up all the time COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

different meetings on a regular basis, I ask them to add up all the time NOT FOR R

ESALEto forget about what they talked about at the previous meeting, which

NOT FOR RESALE

to forget about what they talked about at the previous meeting, which makes continuity difficult and progress unlikely.

NOT FOR RESALEmakes continuity difficult and progress unlikely.

Finally, of the four types of meetings, the quarterly review is

NOT FOR RESALEFinally, of the four types of meetings, the quarterly review is

probably the one that might call for the use of an outside consultant.

NOT FOR RESALE

probably the one that might call for the use of an outside consultant. It’s often nice for the leader of the executive team to participate as

NOT FOR RESALE

It’s often nice for the leader of the executive team to participate as a member and leave the organizing and facilitating to a trusted

NOT FOR RESALE

a member and leave the organizing and facilitating to a trusted

M

NOT FOR RESALE

Me

NOT FOR RESALE

e in Meeting

NOT FOR RESALE

in Meeting

er executives challenge me about the practicality of having four NOT FOR RESALE

er executives challenge me about the practicality of having four


La

The Advantage

186

at each meeting, something few teams need to do, more than 85 percent of our time is still available for whatever else we do.

Some leaders will point out that they are often on more than one team, which they believe would make this kind of model unworkable. Well, even if a person were on as many as three teams and if all three of those teams spent the maximum amount of time in their meetings (something that is highly unlikely), that would still amount to less than half their time. And when we factor in the amount of time they’ll avoid wasting because they are actually focused on the right issues during their meetings, and eliminating all the interruptions that happen because they’re out of sync with one another, the value they get from having more meetings, not less, increases.

Finally, it’s worth asking, What else should leaders be doing besides going to meetings? E-mail? Analysis? Customer visits? Okay, there are certainly times and places for those activities. But a leader’s first priority is to create an environment where others can do these things and that cannot happen if they are not having effective meetings.

But what about management? don’t leaders need to allocate a lot of their time to managing their people? While it’s true that the single most important activity that a leader must do (outside of being a good team member) is managing his or her direct reports, much of that actually happens during meetings. Sure, they need to do some one-on-one men-toring, but that isn’t usually what executives are hoping to do when they’re arguing about having to spend too much time in meetings. The truth is, if executives are having the right kind of meetings, if they’re driving issues to closure and holding one another accountable, then there is much less to do outside meetings, including managing their direct reports.

The thesis behind all of this is worth repeating: a great deal of the time that leaders spend every day is a result of having to address issues that come about because they aren’t being resolved during meetings in the first place. That’s why it’s really hard for executives to make a credible case for spending less time in meetings, assuming those meetings are good ones.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

half their time. And when we factor in the amount of time they’ll avoid

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

half their time. And when we factor in the amount of time they’ll avoid wasting because they are actually focused on the right issues during their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL wasting because they are actually focused on the right issues during their

meetings, and eliminating all the interruptions that happen because

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meetings, and eliminating all the interruptions that happen because they’re out of sync with one another, the value they get from having more

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

they’re out of sync with one another, the value they get from having more

What else should leaders be doing besides

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

What else should leaders be doing besides E-mail? Analysis? Customer visits? Okay, there are

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

E-mail? Analysis? Customer visits? Okay, there are certainly times and places for those activities. But a leader’s first priority

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

certainly times and places for those activities. But a leader’s first priority is to create an environment where others can do these things and that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is to create an environment where others can do these things and that cannot happen if they are not having effective meetings.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

cannot happen if they are not having effective meetings.But what about management?

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

But what about management? their time to managing their people? While it’s true that the single most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their time to managing their people? While it’s true that the single most important activity that a leader must do (outside of being a good team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

important activity that a leader must do (outside of being a good team member) is managing his or her direct reports, much of that actually

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

member) is managing his or her direct reports, much of that actually

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

happens during meetings. Sure, they need to do some one-on-one men-COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

happens during meetings. Sure, they need to do some one-on-one men-toring, but that isn’t usually what executives are hoping to do when they’re COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

toring, but that isn’t usually what executives are hoping to do when they’re NOT FOR R

ESALEWhat else should leaders be doing besides

NOT FOR RESALEWhat else should leaders be doing besides

E-mail? Analysis? Customer visits? Okay, there are

NOT FOR RESALE E-mail? Analysis? Customer visits? Okay, there are

certainly times and places for those activities. But a leader’s first priority

NOT FOR RESALE

certainly times and places for those activities. But a leader’s first priority is to create an environment where others can do these things and that

NOT FOR RESALE

is to create an environment where others can do these things and that cannot happen if they are not having effective meetings.

NOT FOR RESALE

cannot happen if they are not having effective meetings.But what about management?

NOT FOR RESALE

But what about management? d

NOT FOR RESALE

don

NOT FOR RESALE

on’t leaders need to allocate a lot of

NOT FOR RESALE

’t leaders need to allocate a lot of on’t leaders need to allocate a lot of on

NOT FOR RESALE

on’t leaders need to allocate a lot of ontheir time to managing their people? While it’s true that the single most

NOT FOR RESALE

their time to managing their people? While it’s true that the single most important activity that a leader must do (outside of being a good team

NOT FOR RESALE

important activity that a leader must do (outside of being a good team member) is managing his or her direct reports, much of that actually NOT FOR R

ESALE

member) is managing his or her direct reports, much of that actually happens during meetings. Sure, they need to do some one-on-one men-NOT FOR R

ESALE

happens during meetings. Sure, they need to do some one-on-one men-


La


187

Of all the recommendations my firm makes to clients, the one that is most consistently embraced and touted as having an immediate impact on an organization is the adoption of the meetings model out-lined here.

Finally, it’s important to remember that at the end of every meeting, with the exception of the daily check-ins, team members must stop and clarify what they’ve agreed to and what they will go back and com-municate to their teams. This is called Cascading Communication and it is covered in detail in the discipline 3 section.

old Dog, new tricks

A church-related services organization was experiencing

problems internally and seeing that those problems were

affecting their clients. Among the many things the leader did

to make his organization healthier, he cited the restructuring

of his leadership team’s meetings as a key part of their overall

organizational transformation.

“I’m fifty-eight years old, and I would never have thought

that having more meetings would help productivity, but it

actually did. The meetings have made converts out of us all.”


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of all the recommendations my firm makes to clients, the one that

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of all the recommendations my firm makes to clients, the one that is most consistently embraced and touted as having an immediate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is most consistently embraced and touted as having an immediate impact on an organization is the adoption of the meetings model out-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

impact on an organization is the adoption of the meetings model out-

Finally, it’s important to remember that at the end of every meeting,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Finally, it’s important to remember that at the end of every meeting, with the exception of the daily check-ins, team members must stop and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

with the exception of the daily check-ins, team members must stop and clarify what they’ve agreed to and what they will go back and com-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

clarify what they’ve agreed to and what they will go back and com-municate to their teams. This is called Cascading Communication and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

municate to their teams. This is called Cascading Communication and it is covered in detail in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

it is covered in detail in the


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


that having more meetings would help productivity, but it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL that having more meetings would help productivity, but it


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

Of all the recommendations my firm makes to clients, the one that

NOT FOR RESALE

Of all the recommendations my firm makes to clients, the one that is most consistently embraced and touted as having an immediate

NOT FOR RESALEis most consistently embraced and touted as having an immediate


NOT FOR RESALE


Finally, it’s important to remember that at the end of every meeting,

NOT FOR RESALE

Finally, it’s important to remember that at the end of every meeting, with the exception of the daily check-ins, team members must stop and

NOT FOR RESALE

with the exception of the daily check-ins, team members must stop and clarify what they’ve agreed to and what they will go back and com-

NOT FOR RESALE

clarify what they’ve agreed to and what they will go back and com-municate to their teams. This is called Cascading Communication and

NOT FOR RESALE

municate to their teams. This is called Cascading Communication and it is covered in detail in the

NOT FOR RESALE

it is covered in detail in the d

NOT FOR RESALE

d


La

The Advantage

188

checkliSt For MeetingS


mastered meetings when they can affirm the following

statements:

⎯ Tactical and strategic discussions are addressed in separate

meetings.

⎯ During tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after

the team has reviewed its progress against goals. Noncriti-

cal administrative topics are easily discarded.

⎯ During topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major

issues to allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.

⎯ The team meets quarterly away from the office to review

what is happening in the industry, in the organization, and

on the team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ring tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL ring tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


ring topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


e team meets quarterly away from the office to review

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALEissues to allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.

NOT FOR RESALEissues to allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE



La

189

Seizing the Advantage

The power of organizational health is undeniable. Even the most skeptical executives I meet don’t dispute the advantage they could

achieve if they could make their leadership teams more cohesive, align them around the answers to the six questions, and get them to com-municate and reinforce those answers incessantly. Indeed a number of healthy organizations have already proven this. Yet the fact remains that organizational health is largely untapped in most companies. But that’s going to change.

As more and more leaders come to the realization that the last frontier of competitive advantage will be the transformation of unhealthy organizations into healthy ones, there will be a shift in the mind-set of executives away from more technical pursuits that can be delegated to others and toward the disciplines outlined in this book. Whether that takes place over the next five, ten, or twenty years, I don’t know. But it’s coming.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Seizing the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Advantage

he power of organizational health is undeniable. Even the most

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

he power of organizational health is undeniable. Even the most skeptical executives I meet don’t dispute the advantage they could

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

skeptical executives I meet don’t dispute the advantage they could achieve if they could make their leadership teams more cohesive, align

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

achieve if they could make their leadership teams more cohesive, align them around the answers to the six questions, and get them to com-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

them around the answers to the six questions, and get them to com-municate and reinforce those answers incessantly. Indeed a number of COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

municate and reinforce those answers incessantly. Indeed a number of healthy organizations have already proven this. Yet the fact remains that COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

healthy organizations have already proven this. Yet the fact remains that NOT FOR R

ESALE

he power of organizational health is undeniable. Even the most

NOT FOR RESALE

he power of organizational health is undeniable. Even the most skeptical executives I meet don’t dispute the advantage they could

NOT FOR RESALE

skeptical executives I meet don’t dispute the advantage they could achieve if they could make their leadership teams more cohesive, align

NOT FOR RESALE

achieve if they could make their leadership teams more cohesive, align them around the answers to the six questions, and get them to com-

NOT FOR RESALE

them around the answers to the six questions, and get them to com-municate and reinforce those answers incessantly. Indeed a number of NOT FOR R

ESALE

municate and reinforce those answers incessantly. Indeed a number of


La

The Advantage

190190

For the early adopters of organizational health, the advantages that they will reap will be amplified as they achieve even greater differentia-tion from their lagging competitors. But there are a couple of factors that they must embrace in order to avoid experiencing false starts and undue cynicism. For one, they’ll have to begin the process with a few activities that will give them the initial momentum they’ll need to see it through. Even more important, the individuals who lead this process will have to understand exactly what’s in store for them.

The Leader’s sacrifice

By now I’ve made the point numerous times that many of the ideas I advocate in this book are simple. Well, this next statement will rank right up there with the most obvious piece of advice yet: the person in charge of an organization’s leadership team is crucial to the success of any effort to build a healthy organization.

As ridiculously simple as that may sound, I can’t help but believe that many leaders still don’t fully understand it. All too often they see the tasks related to organizational health as a set of activities that others can handle. Some do this because they want to demonstrate to their staff members that they trust them to do their jobs. That is noble. Others do it because they’d prefer spending time on things that they enjoy more. That’s not so noble. In either case, the result is the same: an unhealthy organization.

There is just no escaping the fact that the single biggest factor determining whether an organization is going to get healthier—or not—is the genuine commitment and active involvement of the person in charge. For a company, that’s the CEO. For a small business, it’s the owner. For a school, it’s the principal. For a church, it’s the pastor. For a department within a company, it’s the department head.

At every step in the process, the leader must be out front, not as a cheerleader or a figurehead, but as an active, tenacious driver.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

By now I’ve made the point numerous times that many of the ideas I

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

By now I’ve made the point numerous times that many of the ideas I advocate in this book are simple. Well, this next statement will rank

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

advocate in this book are simple. Well, this next statement will rank right up there with the most obvious piece of advice yet: the person in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

right up there with the most obvious piece of advice yet: the person in charge of an organization’s leadership team is crucial to the success of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

charge of an organization’s leadership team is crucial to the success of any effort to build a healthy organization.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

any effort to build a healthy organization.As ridiculously simple as that may sound, I can’t help but believe

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As ridiculously simple as that may sound, I can’t help but believe that many leaders still don’t fully understand it. All too often they see

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

that many leaders still don’t fully understand it. All too often they see the tasks related to organizational health as a set of activities that others

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the tasks related to organizational health as a set of activities that others

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

can handle. Some do this because they want to demonstrate to their staff

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

can handle. Some do this because they want to demonstrate to their staff members that they trust them to do their jobs. That is noble. Others do

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

members that they trust them to do their jobs. That is noble. Others do it because they’d prefer spending time on things that they enjoy more. COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

it because they’d prefer spending time on things that they enjoy more. That’s not so noble. In either case, the result is the same: an unhealthy COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

That’s not so noble. In either case, the result is the same: an unhealthy NOT FOR R

ESALEBy now I’ve made the point numerous times that many of the ideas I

NOT FOR RESALE

By now I’ve made the point numerous times that many of the ideas I advocate in this book are simple. Well, this next statement will rank

NOT FOR RESALEadvocate in this book are simple. Well, this next statement will rank

right up there with the most obvious piece of advice yet: the person in

NOT FOR RESALEright up there with the most obvious piece of advice yet: the person in

charge of an organization’s leadership team is crucial to the success of

NOT FOR RESALE

charge of an organization’s leadership team is crucial to the success of any effort to build a healthy organization.

NOT FOR RESALE

any effort to build a healthy organization.As ridiculously simple as that may sound, I can’t help but believe

NOT FOR RESALE

As ridiculously simple as that may sound, I can’t help but believe that many leaders still don’t fully understand it. All too often they see

NOT FOR RESALE

that many leaders still don’t fully understand it. All too often they see the tasks related to organizational health as a set of activities that others

NOT FOR RESALE

the tasks related to organizational health as a set of activities that others

NOT FOR RESALE

can handle. Some do this because they want to demonstrate to their staff

NOT FOR RESALE

can handle. Some do this because they want to demonstrate to their staff members that they trust them to do their jobs. That is noble. Others do NOT FOR R

ESALE

members that they trust them to do their jobs. That is noble. Others do it because they’d prefer spending time on things that they enjoy more. NOT FOR R

ESALE

it because they’d prefer spending time on things that they enjoy more.


La


191

When it comes to building a cohesive team, leaders must drive the process even when their direct reports are less than excited about it initially. And they must be the first to do the hardest things, like demonstrating vulnerabil-ity, provoking conflict, con-fronting people about their behavior, or calling their direct reports out when they’re putting themselves ahead of the team.

The leader must also be the driving force behind demanding clear answers to the six big questions, even when everyone else wants to end the discussion and just agree to disagree. They must be constant, incessant reminders to the leadership team about those answers, chal-lenging them about everything from their behaviors in relation to the organization’s values to their commitment to the team’s rallying cry.

As tempting as it may be, leaders must not abdicate or delegate responsibility for communication and reinforcement of clarity. Instead, they have to play the tireless role of ensuring that employees throughout the organization are continually and repeatedly reminded about what is important. And they must be on guard against contradictory and inconsistent processes that can confuse employees and against bureaucracy that can creep into an organization when people get complacent.

If all of this sounds daunting, that’s because it is. People who lead healthy organizations sign up for a monumental task—and a very self-less one. That is why they need to relinquish their more technical responsibilities, or even their favorite roles, that others can handle. Because when an organization is healthy (when the leader at the top is

There is just no escaping the

fact that the single biggest

factor determining whether

an organization is going to

get healthier—or not—is the

genuine commitment and


person in charge.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL an organization is going to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL an organization is going to

or not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL or not


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL



COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to end the discussion and just agree to disagree. They must be constant,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to end the discussion and just agree to disagree. They must be constant, incessant reminders to the leadership team about those answers, chal-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

incessant reminders to the leadership team about those answers, chal-lenging them about everything from their behaviors in relation to the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

lenging them about everything from their behaviors in relation to the organization’s values to their commitment to the team’s rallying cry.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization’s values to their commitment to the team’s rallying cry.As tempting as it may be, leaders must not abdicate or delegate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

As tempting as it may be, leaders must not abdicate or delegate responsibility for communication and reinforcement of clarity. Instead,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

responsibility for communication and reinforcement of clarity. Instead, they have to play the tireless role of ensuring that employees throughout COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

they have to play the tireless role of ensuring that employees throughout the organization are continually and repeatedly reminded about COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

the organization are continually and repeatedly reminded about COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

person in charge.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

person in charge.

NOT FOR RESALE

to end the discussion and just agree to disagree. They must be constant,

NOT FOR RESALE

to end the discussion and just agree to disagree. They must be constant, incessant reminders to the leadership team about those answers, chal-

NOT FOR RESALE

incessant reminders to the leadership team about those answers, chal-lenging them about everything from their behaviors in relation to the

NOT FOR RESALE

lenging them about everything from their behaviors in relation to the organization’s values to their commitment to the team’s rallying cry.

NOT FOR RESALE

organization’s values to their commitment to the team’s rallying cry.As tempting as it may be, leaders must not abdicate or delegate

NOT FOR RESALE

As tempting as it may be, leaders must not abdicate or delegate responsibility for communication and reinforcement of clarity. Instead, NOT FOR R

ESALE

responsibility for communication and reinforcement of clarity. Instead, they have to play the tireless role of ensuring that employees throughout NOT FOR R

ESALE

they have to play the tireless role of ensuring that employees throughout NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


person in charge.

NOT FOR RESALEperson in charge.


La

The Advantage

192

doing his or her most important job), people find a way to get things done. When an organization is unhealthy, no amount of heroism or technical expertise is going to make up for the confusion and politics that take root.

The truth is, being the leader of a healthy organization is just plain hard. But in the end, it is undeniably worth it.

firsT criTicaL sTeps

In order to give their organizations the best possible chance of succeed-ing in these efforts, a team must engage in a few vital initial steps to get momentum started.

The first of those is setting aside time to launch the process. What I’m talking about is an initial off-site, a couple of days away from the office—productive, intense, non-touchy-feely days—working on the first two disciplines of building team cohesion and creating clarity. At the end of those days, the team will emerge with a heightened sense of trust and collaboration (trust me, they will), as well as some solid, if not completely refined, answers to the six critical questions.

After that initial off-site, the team will need to put together a play-book, a short summary of those answers and a few other items related to how the team behaves and how it will go about working together going forward. And once the information in the playbook has been finalized and the answers fully agreed on by the team, the next step will be to properly communicate it to the rest of the organization. This will require some kind of initial communication, followed by ongoing reminders from leaders using every form of communication at their disposal. And finally, the leadership team will need to spend time, probably a fair amount of time, designing systems to reinforce the infor-mation from the playbook by embedding it into every process that involves people.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In order to give their organizations the best possible chance of succeed-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

In order to give their organizations the best possible chance of succeed-ing in these efforts, a team must engage in a few vital initial steps to

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing in these efforts, a team must engage in a few vital initial steps to

The first of those is setting aside time to launch the process. What

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The first of those is setting aside time to launch the process. What initial off-site,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

initial off-site, a couple of days away from the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

a couple of days away from the office—productive, intense, non-touchy-feely days—working on the first

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

office—productive, intense, non-touchy-feely days—working on the first two disciplines of building team cohesion and creating clarity. At the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

two disciplines of building team cohesion and creating clarity. At the end of those days, the team will emerge with a heightened sense of trust

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

end of those days, the team will emerge with a heightened sense of trust

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and collaboration (trust me, they will), as well as some solid, if not

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and collaboration (trust me, they will), as well as some solid, if not completely refined, answers to the six critical questions.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

completely refined, answers to the six critical questions.After that initial off-site, the team will need to put together a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

After that initial off-site, the team will need to put together a , a short summary of those answers and a few other items related

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, a short summary of those answers and a few other items related

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to how the team behaves and how it will go about working together COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to how the team behaves and how it will go about working together going forward. And once the information in the playbook has been COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

going forward. And once the information in the playbook has been NOT FOR R

ESALEThe first of those is setting aside time to launch the process. What

NOT FOR RESALEThe first of those is setting aside time to launch the process. What

a couple of days away from the

NOT FOR RESALE a couple of days away from the

office—productive, intense, non-touchy-feely days—working on the first

NOT FOR RESALE

office—productive, intense, non-touchy-feely days—working on the first two disciplines of building team cohesion and creating clarity. At the

NOT FOR RESALE

two disciplines of building team cohesion and creating clarity. At the end of those days, the team will emerge with a heightened sense of trust

NOT FOR RESALE

end of those days, the team will emerge with a heightened sense of trust

NOT FOR RESALE

and collaboration (trust me, they will), as well as some solid, if not

NOT FOR RESALE

and collaboration (trust me, they will), as well as some solid, if not completely refined, answers to the six critical questions.

NOT FOR RESALE

completely refined, answers to the six critical questions.After that initial off-site, the team will need to put together a

NOT FOR RESALE

After that initial off-site, the team will need to put together a , a short summary of those answers and a few other items related NOT FOR R

ESALE

, a short summary of those answers and a few other items related to how the team behaves and how it will go about working together NOT FOR R

ESALE

to how the team behaves and how it will go about working together


La


193

Every team, every organization, will go about the organizational health process in slightly different ways. And that’s a good thing. A rigid, one-size-fits-all approach usually ends up fitting no one and makes it likely that teams will abandon a program because it becomes too onerous. However, these initial steps, which take anywhere from one to six months depending on how much time and energy leaders allocate, are absolutely essential. Once the leaders get through these steps, they will have created so much momentum that it will be hard for them to grow complacent and let the process atrophy.

Of course, their work is not over. It never is. Like a marriage, it requires ongoing attention and effort: maintaining a cohesive team, revisiting the answers to the six questions, overcommunicating and reinforcing them. But leaders in healthy organizations rarely lament having to invest time and energy in that effort. In fact, they almost always come to enjoy it because they see the extraordinary benefits it produces regardless of how simple or unsophisticated it may seem at first glance.

ULTimaTe impacT

Finally, it’s certainly worth acknowledging that the impact of organiza-tional health goes far beyond the walls of a company, extending to customers and vendors, even to spouses and children. It sends people to work in the morning with clarity, hope, and anticipation and brings them home at night with a greater sense of accomplishment, contribu-tion, and self-esteem. The impact of this is as important as it is impos-sible to measure.

At the end of the day, at the end of our careers, when we look back at the many initiatives that we poured ourselves into, few other activi-ties will seem more worthy of our effort and more impactful on the lives of others, than making our organizations healthy.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

steps, they will have created so much momentum that it will be hard

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

steps, they will have created so much momentum that it will be hard for them to grow complacent and let the process atrophy.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL for them to grow complacent and let the process atrophy.

Of course, their work is not over. It never is. Like a marriage, it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Of course, their work is not over. It never is. Like a marriage, it requires ongoing attention and effort: maintaining a cohesive team,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

requires ongoing attention and effort: maintaining a cohesive team, revisiting the answers to the six questions, overcommunicating and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

revisiting the answers to the six questions, overcommunicating and reinforcing them. But leaders in healthy organizations rarely lament

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reinforcing them. But leaders in healthy organizations rarely lament having to invest time and energy in that effort. In fact, they almost

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

having to invest time and energy in that effort. In fact, they almost always come to enjoy it because they see the extraordinary benefits it

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

always come to enjoy it because they see the extraordinary benefits it produces regardless of how simple or unsophisticated it may seem at

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

produces regardless of how simple or unsophisticated it may seem at

i

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

imp

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mpac

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

acmpacmp

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

mpacmp

, it’s certainly worth acknowledging that the impact of organiza-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, it’s certainly worth acknowledging that the impact of organiza-tional health goes far beyond the walls of a company, extending to COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

tional health goes far beyond the walls of a company, extending to customers and vendors, even to spouses and children. It sends people COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

customers and vendors, even to spouses and children. It sends people NOT FOR R

ESALErevisiting the answers to the six questions, overcommunicating and

NOT FOR RESALE

revisiting the answers to the six questions, overcommunicating and reinforcing them. But leaders in healthy organizations rarely lament

NOT FOR RESALEreinforcing them. But leaders in healthy organizations rarely lament

having to invest time and energy in that effort. In fact, they almost

NOT FOR RESALEhaving to invest time and energy in that effort. In fact, they almost

always come to enjoy it because they see the extraordinary benefits it

NOT FOR RESALE

always come to enjoy it because they see the extraordinary benefits it produces regardless of how simple or unsophisticated it may seem at

NOT FOR RESALE

produces regardless of how simple or unsophisticated it may seem at

T

NOT FOR RESALE

T

, it’s certainly worth acknowledging that the impact of organiza-NOT FOR RESALE

, it’s certainly worth acknowledging that the impact of organiza-tional health goes far beyond the walls of a company, extending to NOT FOR R

ESALE

tional health goes far beyond the walls of a company, extending to


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

Members of a leadership team can gain a general sense of their organization’s health and, more important, identify specific

opportunities for improvement by completing the following checklist.


⎯ The leadership team is small enough (three to ten people) to be effective.

⎯ Members of the team trust one another and can be genuinely vulnerable with each other.

⎯ Team members regularly engage in productive, unfiltered conflict around important issues.

⎯ The team leaves meetings with clear-cut, active, and specific agreements around decisions.

⎯ Team members hold one another accountable to commitments and behaviors.

⎯ Members of the leadership team are focused on team number one. They put the collective priorities and needs of the larger organization ahead of their own departments.

C h e C k l i s t f o r o r g a n i z a t i o n a l h e a l t h

195

Lencioni_1522_both01_main.indd 195 1/17/2012 1:46:42 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

embers of a leadership team can gain a general sense of their

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

embers of a leadership team can gain a general sense of their organization’s health and, more important, identify specific

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organization’s health and, more important, identify specific opportunities for improvement by completing the following

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

opportunities for improvement by completing the following


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


The leadership team is small enough (three to ten people) to be

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The leadership team is small enough (three to ten people) to be effectiv

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

effective.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

e.Members of the team trust one another and can be genuinely COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Members of the team trust one another and can be genuinely vulnerable COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

vulnerable NOT FOR R

ESALEembers of a leadership team can gain a general sense of their

NOT FOR RESALE

embers of a leadership team can gain a general sense of their organization’s health and, more important, identify specific

NOT FOR RESALEorganization’s health and, more important, identify specific


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


Members of the team trust one another and can be genuinely NOT FOR RESALE

Members of the team trust one another and can be genuinely


La

Checklist for Organizational Health

196


⎯ Members of the leadership team know, agree on, and are passionate about the reason that the organization exists.

⎯ The leadership team has clarified and embraced a small, specific set of behavioral values.

⎯ Leaders are clear and aligned around a strategy that helps them define success and differentiate from competitors.

⎯ The leadership team has a clear, current goal around which they rally. They feel a collective sense of ownership for that goal.

⎯ Members of the leadership team understand one another’s roles and responsibilities. They are comfortable asking questions about one another’s work.

⎯ The elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely summarized and regularly referenced and reviewed by the leadership team.


⎯ The leadership team has clearly communicated the six aspects of clarity to all employees.

⎯ Team members regularly remind the people in their departments about those aspects of clarity.

⎯ The team leaves meetings with clear and specific agreements about what to communicate to their employees, and they cascade those messages quickly after meetings.

⎯ Employees are able to accurately articulate the organization’s reason for existence, values, strategic anchors, and goals.


⎯ The organization has a simple way to ensure that new hires are carefully selected based on the company’s values.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The leadership team has a clear, current goal around which they

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL The leadership team has a clear, current goal around which they

. They feel a collective sense of ownership for that goal.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL . They feel a collective sense of ownership for that goal.

Members of the leadership team understand one another’s roles

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Members of the leadership team understand one another’s roles responsibilities. They are comfortable asking questions about

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

responsibilities. They are comfortable asking questions about

The elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely ummarized and regularly referenced and reviewed by the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ummarized and regularly referenced and reviewed by the


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


The leadership team has clearly communicated the six aspects of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to all employees.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to all employees.Team members regularly remind the people in their departments

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Team members regularly remind the people in their departments about COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

about those aspects of clarity.COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

those aspects of clarity.NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


The elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely

NOT FOR RESALEThe elements of the organization’s clarity are concisely


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

to all employees.

NOT FOR RESALE

to all employees.Team members regularly remind the people in their departments NOT FOR R

ESALE

Team members regularly remind the people in their departments those aspects of clarity.NOT FOR R

ESALE

those aspects of clarity.


La

Checklist for Organizational Health

197

⎯ New people are brought into the organization by thoroughly teaching them about the six elements of clarity.

⎯ Managers throughout the organization have a simple, consistent, and nonbureaucratic system for setting goals and reviewing progress with employees. That system is customized around the elements of clarity.

⎯ Employees who don’t fit the values are managed out of the organization. Poor performers who do fit the values are given the coaching and assistance they need to succeed.

⎯ Compensation and reward systems are built around the values and goals of the organization.

Meetings

⎯ Tactical and strategic discussions are addressed in separate meetings.

⎯ During tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after the team has reviewed its progress against goals. Noncritical administrative topics are easily discarded.

⎯ During topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major issues to allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.

⎯ The team meets quarterly away from the office to review what is happening in the industry, in the organization, and on the team.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Poor performers who do fit the values are given the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Poor performers who do fit the values are given the

reward systems are built around the values

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reward systems are built around the values

Tactical and strategic discussions are addressed in separate

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


During tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after the team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

During tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after the team reviewed its progress against goals. Noncritical administrative

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

reviewed its progress against goals. Noncritical administrative topics are easily discarded.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

topics are easily discarded.During topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major issues

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

During topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major issues

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.The team meets quarterly away from the office to review what is COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

The team meets quarterly away from the office to review what is appening in the industry, in the organization, and on the team.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

appening in the industry, in the organization, and on the team.NOT FOR R

ESALETactical and strategic discussions are addressed in separate

NOT FOR RESALE


During tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after the team

NOT FOR RESALE

During tactical staff meetings, agendas are set only after the team reviewed its progress against goals. Noncritical administrative

NOT FOR RESALE

reviewed its progress against goals. Noncritical administrative topics are easily discarded.

NOT FOR RESALE

topics are easily discarded.During topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major issues

NOT FOR RESALE

During topical meetings, enough time is allocated to major issues

NOT FOR RESALE

allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.NOT FOR R

ESALE

allow for clarification, debate, and resolution.The team meets quarterly away from the office to review what is NOT FOR R

ESALE

The team meets quarterly away from the office to review what is


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

M o r e r e s o u r c e s

199

If you’d like more information about the advantage of organizational health, visit our Web site at www.tablegroup.com/theadvantage.

You’ll find the following resources there:

• Video clips about organizational health• Complimentary organizational health survey• Glossary of key terms• Downloadable images for reference• Road map for implementation• Other dynamic tools and resources

If you’d like someone to help you implement any of the concepts in this book, please contact us at The Table Group by calling 925–299–9700, or visit www.tablegroup.com.


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

f you’d like more information about the advantage of organizational

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

f you’d like more information about the advantage of organizational health, visit our Web site at www.tablegroup.com/theadvantage.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

health, visit our Web site at www.tablegroup.com/theadvantage. You’ll find the following resources there:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

You’ll find the following resources there:

clips about organizational health

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

clips about organizational healthorganizational health survey

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational health surveyy of key terms

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

y of key termswnloadable images for reference

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

wnloadable images for referencemap for implementation

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

map for implementation

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

dynamic tools and resources

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


If you’d like someone to help you implement any of the con

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

If you’d like someone to help you implement any of the concepts in this book, please contact us at The Table Group by calling COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

cepts in this book, please contact us at The Table Group by calling 925–299–9700, or visit www.tablegroup.com.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

925–299–9700, or visit www.tablegroup.com.NOT FOR R

ESALEclips about organizational health

NOT FOR RESALE

clips about organizational healthorganizational health survey

NOT FOR RESALE

organizational health survey

wnloadable images for reference

NOT FOR RESALE

wnloadable images for referencemap for implementation

NOT FOR RESALE

map for implementation

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


If you’d like someone to help you implement any of the conNOT FOR RESALE

If you’d like someone to help you implement any of the concepts in this book, please contact us at The Table Group by calling NOT FOR R

ESALE

cepts in this book, please contact us at The Table Group by calling


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

N o t e s

201

Introduction

1. The Five Temptations of a CEO, 1998; The Four Obsessions of an Extraordi-nary Executive, 2000; The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, 2002; Death by Meeting, 2004; Silos, Politics, and Turf Wars, 2006; The Three Signs of a Miserable Job, 2007; The Three Big Questions for a Frantic Family, 2008; and Getting Naked, 2010 (all San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).


1. P. Lencioni, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team (2002) and Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team (2005) (both San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

2. J. Katzenbach and D. Smith, The Wisdom of Team (Harper Business, 1994).3. C. Argyris and D. Schön, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action

Perspective (Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1978).4. E. E. Jones and V. A. Harris, “The Attribution of Attitudes,” Journal of

Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 3, 1–24; L. Ross, “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process,” in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press, 1977).


1. J. Collins and J. Porras, Built to Last (Harper Paperbacks, 2002).2. P. Lencioni, “Make Your Values Mean Something,” Harvard Business Review

(July 2002).

Lencioni_1522_bnotes_main.indd 201 1/17/2012 1:46:41 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Four Obsessions of an Extraordi-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Four Obsessions of an Extraordi- The Five Dysfunctions of a Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Five Dysfunctions of a TeamSilos, Politics, and Turf Wars

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Silos, Politics, and Turf WarsThe Three Big Questions for a Frantic Family

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Three Big Questions for a Frantic Family, 2010 (all San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

, 2010 (all San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


The Five Dysfunctions of a Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

The Five Dysfunctions of a TeamFive Dysfunctions of a Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Five Dysfunctions of a Teamenbach and D. Smith,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

enbach and D. Smith, C. Argyris

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

C. Argyris and D. Schön,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and D. Schön, PerspectiveCOPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Perspective (Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1978).COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

(Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1978).Jones and V. A. Harris, “The Attribution of Attitudes,” COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Jones and V. A. Harris, “The Attribution of Attitudes,”

NOT FOR RESALE

The Four Obsessions of an Extraordi-

NOT FOR RESALE

The Four Obsessions of an Extraordi- The Five Dysfunctions of a Team

NOT FOR RESALE

The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, 2002;

NOT FOR RESALE

, 2002; , 2006;

NOT FOR RESALE, 2006; The Three Signs of a

NOT FOR RESALEThe Three Signs of a


NOT FOR RESALE

The Three Big Questions for a Frantic Family, 2010 (all San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

NOT FOR RESALE

, 2010 (all San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).


NOT FOR RESALE


The Five Dysfunctions of a Team

NOT FOR RESALE

The Five Dysfunctions of a TeamFive Dysfunctions of a Team

NOT FOR RESALE

Five Dysfunctions of a Team (2005) (both San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

NOT FOR RESALE

(2005) (both San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).enbach and D. Smith,

NOT FOR RESALE

enbach and D. Smith, and D. Schön, NOT FOR R

ESALE

and D. Schön, (Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1978).NOT FOR R

ESALE

(Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1978).


La

Notes

202

3. M. Porter, Competitive Strategy (Free Press, 1998).4. M. Porter, “What Is Strategy?,” Harvard Business Review, 1996.5. P. Lencioni, Silos, Politics, and Turf Wars (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006).


1. P. Lencioni, Death by Meeting (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004).

Lencioni_1522_bnotes_main.indd 202 1/17/2012 1:46:41 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s

203

The first person I want to acknowledge here is Tracy Noble, who has been deeply involved in shaping this book from day one. Your

ability to jump from the big picture to the tiniest detail and back again is astounding, and your complete dedication is as appreciated as it is constant.

I also want to thank the rest of my colleagues and friends at The Table Group—Amy Hiett, Karen Amador, Jeff Gibson, Lynne Fiorindo, Alison Knox, Jackie Collins, Michele Rango, and Kim Loureiro—for their involvement, support, and passion. Working with you every day is a blessing in so many ways. And I want to acknowledge the Table Group Principal Consultants who add so much to our experience and to the impact that our firm is having in the world. You blow me away every time I see you and learn what you’re doing out there.

Of course, most of all, I thank my wife, Laura, for her tireless dedication and commitment to me and our four boys. As the years go by, managing the family seems to get more challenging, and yet somehow you keep rising to that challenge. I really love you for that and for so many other reasons.

And I thank my four sons—Michael, Casey, Connor, and Matthew. I am so proud of the young men you’re becoming, and I pray that I am being the dad you need and deserve.

I thank our many clients and customers who allow us to come into their organizations. Whether we’re facilitating an executive off-site,

Lencioni_1522_back_main.indd 203 1/17/2012 1:46:38 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

he first person I want to acknowledge here is Tracy Noble, who

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

he first person I want to acknowledge here is Tracy Noble, who has been deeply involved in shaping this book from day one. Your

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

has been deeply involved in shaping this book from day one. Your ability to jump from the big picture to the tiniest detail and back again

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ability to jump from the big picture to the tiniest detail and back again is astounding, and your complete dedication is as appreciated as it is

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is astounding, and your complete dedication is as appreciated as it is

I also want to thank the rest of my colleagues and friends at The

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I also want to thank the rest of my colleagues and friends at The Table Group—Amy Hiett, Karen Amador, Jeff Gibson, Lynne Fiorindo,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Table Group—Amy Hiett, Karen Amador, Jeff Gibson, Lynne Fiorindo, Alison Knox, Jackie Collins, Michele Rango, and Kim Loureiro—for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Alison Knox, Jackie Collins, Michele Rango, and Kim Loureiro—for their involvement, support, and passion. Working with you every day

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

their involvement, support, and passion. Working with you every day

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is a blessing in so many ways. And I want to acknowledge the Table

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

is a blessing in so many ways. And I want to acknowledge the Table Group Principal Consultants who add so much to our experience and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Group Principal Consultants who add so much to our experience and to the impact that our firm is having in the world. You blow me away

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to the impact that our firm is having in the world. You blow me away every time I see you and learn what you’re doing out there.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

every time I see you and learn what you’re doing out there.Of course, most of all, I thank my wife, Laura, for her tireless COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Of course, most of all, I thank my wife, Laura, for her tireless NOT FOR R

ESALEability to jump from the big picture to the tiniest detail and back again

NOT FOR RESALE

ability to jump from the big picture to the tiniest detail and back again is astounding, and your complete dedication is as appreciated as it is

NOT FOR RESALEis astounding, and your complete dedication is as appreciated as it is

I also want to thank the rest of my colleagues and friends at The

NOT FOR RESALE

I also want to thank the rest of my colleagues and friends at The Table Group—Amy Hiett, Karen Amador, Jeff Gibson, Lynne Fiorindo,

NOT FOR RESALE

Table Group—Amy Hiett, Karen Amador, Jeff Gibson, Lynne Fiorindo, Alison Knox, Jackie Collins, Michele Rango, and Kim Loureiro—for

NOT FOR RESALE

Alison Knox, Jackie Collins, Michele Rango, and Kim Loureiro—for their involvement, support, and passion. Working with you every day

NOT FOR RESALE

their involvement, support, and passion. Working with you every day

NOT FOR RESALE

is a blessing in so many ways. And I want to acknowledge the Table

NOT FOR RESALE

is a blessing in so many ways. And I want to acknowledge the Table Group Principal Consultants who add so much to our experience and

NOT FOR RESALE

Group Principal Consultants who add so much to our experience and to the impact that our firm is having in the world. You blow me away NOT FOR R

ESALE

to the impact that our firm is having in the world. You blow me away every time I see you and learn what you’re doing out there.NOT FOR R

ESALE

every time I see you and learn what you’re doing out there.


La

Acknowledgments

204

delivering a speech, providing advice, or shipping you a product, know that we appreciate the trust you show us and honor what you are doing to improve your organizations.

A big thanks to my wonderful agent, Jim Levine, for your immer-sion in our world and your unsolicited ideas and suggestions that make us better every time we talk to you.

Thanks to my long-time editor, Susan Williams, and all her col-leagues at Jossey-Bass and Wiley who have entered the fray with us again and again over the past fifteen years to ensure that we’re delivering the best books we can.

I thank my many friends, especially John Beans, Father Daniel Massick, Jeff Gibson, Father Paulson Mundanmani, Matthew Kelly, Daniel Harkavy, and Ken Blanchard, for investing yourselves in me without counting the cost.

And of course, I thank my mom, for the birth thing and for still being a mom after so many years.

But above and beneath, around, and through all of this, I thank God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—for blessing me in so many ways and bringing me ever closer year after year. Your mercy endures forever.

Lencioni_1522_back_main.indd 204 1/17/2012 1:46:38 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leagues at Jossey-Bass and Wiley who have entered the fray with us

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leagues at Jossey-Bass and Wiley who have entered the fray with us again and again over the past fifteen years to ensure that we’re delivering

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL again and again over the past fifteen years to ensure that we’re delivering

I thank my many friends, especially John Beans, Father Daniel

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

I thank my many friends, especially John Beans, Father Daniel Massick, Jeff Gibson, Father Paulson Mundanmani, Matthew Kelly,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Massick, Jeff Gibson, Father Paulson Mundanmani, Matthew Kelly, Daniel Harkavy, and Ken Blanchard, for investing yourselves in me

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Daniel Harkavy, and Ken Blanchard, for investing yourselves in me

And of course, I thank my mom, for the birth thing and for still

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

And of course, I thank my mom, for the birth thing and for still being a mom after so many years.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

being a mom after so many years.But above and beneath, around, and through all of this, I thank

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

But above and beneath, around, and through all of this, I thank

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—for blessing me in so many ways

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—for blessing me in so many ways and bringing me ever closer year after year. Your mercy endures forever.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and bringing me ever closer year after year. Your mercy endures forever.

NOT FOR RESALE

Massick, Jeff Gibson, Father Paulson Mundanmani, Matthew Kelly,

NOT FOR RESALE

Massick, Jeff Gibson, Father Paulson Mundanmani, Matthew Kelly, Daniel Harkavy, and Ken Blanchard, for investing yourselves in me

NOT FOR RESALEDaniel Harkavy, and Ken Blanchard, for investing yourselves in me


NOT FOR RESALE



NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—for blessing me in so many ways

NOT FOR RESALE

God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—for blessing me in so many ways and bringing me ever closer year after year. Your mercy endures forever.

NOT FOR RESALE

and bringing me ever closer year after year. Your mercy endures forever.


La

A b o u t t h e A u t h o r

205

Patrick Lencioni is founder and president of The Table Group, a firm dedicated to helping leaders improve their organizations’

health since 1997. His principles have been embraced by leaders around the world and adopted by organizations of virtually every kind includ-ing multinational corporations, entrepreneurial ventures, professional sports teams, the military, nonprofits, schools, and churches.

Lencioni is the author of nine business books with over three million copies sold worldwide. His work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, Fortune, Bloomberg Businessweek, and USA Today.

Prior to founding The Table Group, Lencioni served on the execu-tive team at Sybase, Inc. He started his career at Bain & Company and later worked at Oracle Corporation.

Lencioni lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with his wife and their four sons.

To learn more about Patrick and The Table Group, please visit www.tablegroup.com.

Lencioni_1522_babout_main.indd 205 1/17/2012 1:46:37 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

atrick Lencioni is founder and president of The Table Group, a

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

atrick Lencioni is founder and president of The Table Group, a firm dedicated to helping leaders improve their organizations’

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

firm dedicated to helping leaders improve their organizations’ health since 1997. His principles have been embraced by leaders around

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

health since 1997. His principles have been embraced by leaders around the world and adopted by organizations of virtually every kind includ-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

the world and adopted by organizations of virtually every kind includ-ing multinational corporations, entrepreneurial ventures, professional

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

ing multinational corporations, entrepreneurial ventures, professional sports teams, the military, nonprofits, schools, and churches.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

sports teams, the military, nonprofits, schools, and churches.Lencioni is the author of nine business books with over three

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Lencioni is the author of nine business books with over three million copies sold worldwide. His work has appeared in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

million copies sold worldwide. His work has appeared in the

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Prior to founding The Table Group, Lencioni served on the execu-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tive team at Sybase, Inc. He started his career at Bain & Company and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

tive team at Sybase, Inc. He started his career at Bain & Company and later worked at Oracle Corporation.COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

later worked at Oracle Corporation.Lencioni lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with his wife and their COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Lencioni lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with his wife and their NOT FOR R

ESALEhealth since 1997. His principles have been embraced by leaders around

NOT FOR RESALE

health since 1997. His principles have been embraced by leaders around the world and adopted by organizations of virtually every kind includ-

NOT FOR RESALEthe world and adopted by organizations of virtually every kind includ-

ing multinational corporations, entrepreneurial ventures, professional

NOT FOR RESALE

ing multinational corporations, entrepreneurial ventures, professional sports teams, the military, nonprofits, schools, and churches.

NOT FOR RESALE

sports teams, the military, nonprofits, schools, and churches.Lencioni is the author of nine business books with over three

NOT FOR RESALE

Lencioni is the author of nine business books with over three million copies sold worldwide. His work has appeared in the

NOT FOR RESALE

million copies sold worldwide. His work has appeared in the

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

Harvard Business Review,

NOT FOR RESALE

, Fortune

NOT FOR RESALE

Fortune


NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

tive team at Sybase, Inc. He started his career at Bain & Company and NOT FOR RESALE

tive team at Sybase, Inc. He started his career at Bain & Company and later worked at Oracle Corporation.NOT FOR R

ESALE

later worked at Oracle Corporation.


La

Lencioni_1522_babout_main.indd 206 1/17/2012 1:46:37 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE


La

AAccidental values, 93, 98–99Accountability, 54–64; about, 54;

behaviors vs. measurable, 59–60; challenges in peer, 58; conflict vs., 60; exercises for, 55–56, 60–62; as key behavioral principle, 26; leaders modeling, 56–58; peer-to-peer, 54–55; public vs. private meetings about, 63–64; team members’ resistance to, 62–63

Activity system mapping, 111Advantages: contributed by

leadership teams, 72; created with organizational health, 18, 189–190; of meetings, 185–187; of organizational clarity, 140; of overcommunicating clarity, 152; undermining organization’s, 8–10

I n d e x

207

Advocacy, 22Alignment: defining thematic goals,

121–122; determining defining objectives, 124–126, 128; developing priorities, 120–121; identifying standard operating objectives, 126–127, 128; requirements for, 76–77. See also Thematic goals

Argyris, Chris, 22Artificial harmony: conflict

continuum and, 42, 43; negative impact on decision making, 44–45

Aspirational values: confusing core and, 95–96; illustrated, 93; using, 96–97

Avoiding conflict: effects of, 39–40, 43; techniques to overcome, 46; trust vs., 38, 43–45, 47

Lencioni_1522_bindex_main.indd 207 1/17/2012 1:46:40 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Accountability, 54–64; about, 54;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Accountability, 54–64; about, 54; behaviors vs. measurable, 59–60;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

behaviors vs. measurable, 59–60; challenges in peer, 58; conflict vs.,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

challenges in peer, 58; conflict vs., 60; exercises for, 55–56, 60–62;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

60; exercises for, 55–56, 60–62; as key behavioral principle, 26;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as key behavioral principle, 26; leaders modeling, 56–58;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leaders modeling, 56–58; peer-to-peer, 54–55; public vs.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

peer-to-peer, 54–55; public vs. private meetings about, 63–64; COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

private meetings about, 63–64;

Advocacy, 22

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Alignment: defining thematic goals,

NOT FOR RESALE

behaviors vs. measurable, 59–60;

NOT FOR RESALE

behaviors vs. measurable, 59–60; challenges in peer, 58; conflict vs.,

NOT FOR RESALE

challenges in peer, 58; conflict vs., 60; exercises for, 55–56, 60–62;

NOT FOR RESALE

60; exercises for, 55–56, 60–62; as key behavioral principle, 26;

NOT FOR RESALE

as key behavioral principle, 26; leaders modeling, 56–58;

NOT FOR RESALE

leaders modeling, 56–58; peer-to-peer, 54–55; public vs. NOT FOR R

ESALE

peer-to-peer, 54–55; public vs.

Advocacy, 22

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE

Alignment: defining thematic goals, 121–122; determining defining

NOT FOR RESALE

121–122; determining defining objectives, 124–126, 128;

NOT FOR RESALE

objectives, 124–126, 128;


La

Index

208

BBain & Company, 5Barriers to entry, 115Behavior: determining

organizational values for, 91–92; difficulties addressing personal, 59–60; principles of cohesive team, 26; profiling tools illuminating, 30–32. See also Values; and specific behaviors

Biases against organizational health: adrenaline, 3–4; quantification, 4; sophistication, 3

Building leadership teams: accountability in, 54–64; achieving commitment, 48–53; advantages in, 72; checklist for, 71, 195; commitment to vulnerability in, 35–37; errors in inclusivity when, 23; focusing on results, 65–70; importance of, 19–20; mastering conflict, 38–47; overview, 15; sharing common objectives, 25–26; sharing responsibility collectively, 25, 123–124; trust building and, 27–37; using behavior profiling tools, 30–32

Built to Last (Collins and Porras), 82, 91

CCascading communication:

including in meetings, 187; live

and face-to-face, 147–148; using, 144–146; when to implement, 147

CEOs: defining role in leadership team for, 133–134; sacrifice made by, 190–192. See also Leaders

Checklists: building leadership teams, 71, 195; creating clarity, 138, 196; meeting, 188, 197; overcommunicating clarity, 151, 196; reinforcing clarity, 172, 196–197; summary, 195–197

Clarity. See Creating clarity; Overcommunicating clarity; Reinforcing clarity

Cohesive leadership. See Building leadership teams

Collins, Jim, 82, 86, 91, 92Commitment, 48–53;

acknowledging dysfunction in meetings, 52; answering critical questions for team, 77–78; as key behavioral principle, 26; needed to identify corporate purpose, 83–84; passivity undermining, 48–51; reviewing and clarifying group, 51; to vulnerability by leaders, 35–37

Commitment clarification, 146Communication: cascading,

144–148; initiating cohesive team, 192–193; need to repeat, 141–144; top-down, 148–150; upward and lateral, 150–151. See also Overcommunicating clarity


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

advantages in, 72; checklist for,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

advantages in, 72; checklist for,

vulnerability in, 35–37; errors in

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

vulnerability in, 35–37; errors in inclusivity when, 23; focusing on

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

inclusivity when, 23; focusing on results, 65–70; importance of,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

results, 65–70; importance of, 19–20; mastering conflict, 38–47;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

19–20; mastering conflict, 38–47; overview, 15; sharing common

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

overview, 15; sharing common objectives, 25–26; sharing COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

objectives, 25–26; sharing

overcommunicating clarity, 151,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL overcommunicating clarity, 151,

196; reinforcing clarity, 172,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL 196; reinforcing clarity, 172,

196–197; summary, 195–197

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

196–197; summary, 195–197See

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

See Creating clarity;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Creating clarity; See Creating clarity; See

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

See Creating clarity; SeeOvercommunicating clarity;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcommunicating clarity; Reinforcing clarity

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Reinforcing clarityCohesive leadership.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Cohesive leadership. leadership teams

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

leadership teamsCollins, Jim, 82, 86, 91, 92

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Collins, Jim, 82, 86, 91, 92

NOT FOR RESALE

Overcommunicating clarity;

NOT FOR RESALE

Overcommunicating clarity; Reinforcing clarity

NOT FOR RESALEReinforcing clarity

Cohesive leadership.

NOT FOR RESALECohesive leadership.

leadership teams

NOT FOR RESALE

leadership teams

NOT FOR RESALE

vulnerability in, 35–37; errors in

NOT FOR RESALE

vulnerability in, 35–37; errors in inclusivity when, 23; focusing on

NOT FOR RESALE

inclusivity when, 23; focusing on results, 65–70; importance of,

NOT FOR RESALE

results, 65–70; importance of, 19–20; mastering conflict, 38–47;

NOT FOR RESALE

19–20; mastering conflict, 38–47; overview, 15; sharing common NOT FOR R

ESALE

overview, 15; sharing common objectives, 25–26; sharing NOT FOR R

ESALE

objectives, 25–26; sharing

Collins, Jim, 82, 86, 91, 92

NOT FOR RESALE

Collins, Jim, 82, 86, 91, 92Commitment, 48–53;

NOT FOR RESALE

Commitment, 48–53; acknowledging dysfunction in

NOT FOR RESALE

acknowledging dysfunction in


La

Index

209

Community-focused purpose, 88Compensation and rewards,

164–165Competitive Strategy (Porter), 107Conflict: accountability confused

with, 60; achieving commitment with, 48–49; allowing in trusting environment, 38, 43–45, 47; continuum in, 42–43; demanding from team members, 51; discomfort caused by, 38–40; effects of avoiding, 39–40, 43; integral in disagree-and-commit philosophy, 48; as key behavioral principle, 26; mining for, 45–46; rules encouraging, 46; trust building and, 38, 43–45, 47

Core values: about, 93–95; confusing aspirational and, 95–96; identifying, 102–104; isolating, 99–100; naming, 100–101; permission-to-play vs., 97, 99

Corporate culture: clarifying performance management, 162–164; compensation and rewards in, 164–165; determining organizational values for behavior, 91–92; difficulties addressing behavioral accountability, 59–60; firing employees who don’t fit, 169–171; leadership teams’ creation of, 161; orientation to, 161–162; recruiting and hiring

for cultural fit, 156–161; testing applicant’s fit in, 160. See also Human systems

Courage, 57, 59Creating clarity: aligning

organizational goals, 119–131; avoiding perfection paralysis, 79–80; categories for analyzing purpose, 86–89; checklist for, 138, 196; critical questions for, 77–78; defining reason for existing, 84–90; delineating division of labor, 132–137; determining behavioral values, 91–92; developing company playbook, 134–137; difficulties developing values, 92–93; finding corporate purpose, 83–84; focusing organization’s purpose, 82–90; mission statements vs., 75–77; overview, 15, 73–75; requirements for, 76–77; strategic anchors for, 109–118; thematic goals for, 121–131; weighing advantages in, 140. See also Overcommunicating clarity; Questions for clarity; Reinforcing clarity

Customer-focused purpose, 86–87

DDaily check-ins, 175, 176–178Death by Meeting (Lencioni), 174


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

building and, 38, 43–45, 47

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

building and, 38, 43–45, 47Core values: about, 93–95;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Core values: about, 93–95; confusing aspirational and,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

confusing aspirational and, 95–96; identifying, 102–104;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

95–96; identifying, 102–104; isolating, 99–100; naming,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

isolating, 99–100; naming, 100–101; permission-to-play vs.,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

100–101; permission-to-play vs., 97, 99

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

97, 99Corporate culture: clarifying COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Corporate culture: clarifying

purpose, 86–89; checklist for,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL purpose, 86–89; checklist for,

138, 196; critical questions for,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL 138, 196; critical questions for,

77–78; defining reason for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

77–78; defining reason for existing, 84–90; delineating

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

existing, 84–90; delineating division of labor, 132–137;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

division of labor, 132–137; determining behavioral values,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

determining behavioral values, 91–92; developing company

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

91–92; developing company

NOT FOR RESALE

division of labor, 132–137;

NOT FOR RESALE

division of labor, 132–137; determining behavioral values,

NOT FOR RESALEdetermining behavioral values,

91–92; developing company

NOT FOR RESALE91–92; developing company

NOT FOR RESALE

95–96; identifying, 102–104;

NOT FOR RESALE

95–96; identifying, 102–104; isolating, 99–100; naming,

NOT FOR RESALE

isolating, 99–100; naming, 100–101; permission-to-play vs.,

NOT FOR RESALE

100–101; permission-to-play vs.,

Corporate culture: clarifying NOT FOR RESALE

Corporate culture: clarifying

playbook, 134–137; difficulties

NOT FOR RESALE

playbook, 134–137; difficulties developing values, 92–93; finding

NOT FOR RESALE

developing values, 92–93; finding corporate purpose, 83–84;

NOT FOR RESALE

corporate purpose, 83–84;


La

Index

210

Decision making: allowing conflict in, 44–45; avoiding misalignment in, 52; effects of avoiding conflict in, 39–40; passive agreements and effect on, 49, 50–51; strategic anchors influencing, 108–109; using classic business signs, 6, 7–8; waiting for consensus in, 48

Defining objectives, 124–126, 128Disagree-and-commit philosophy, 48Dunder Mifflin, 76, 82

EEmployees: adding to leadership

teams, 23–24; allowing upward and lateral communication among, 150–151; clarifying organizational purpose for, 82–90; communicating clearly to, 148–149; compensation and rewards for, 164–165; effect of organizational health on, 13; face-to-face communication with, 147–148; firing, 169–171; focusing purpose on, 88–89; impact of conflict avoidance in, 40–41; internalizing company priorities, 142–143; interviewing potential, 159–160; making passive agreements, 49, 50–51; misalignment’s effect on empowerment of, 74–75; orienting new, 161–162; participating in meeting agendas,

179–182; performance management for, 162–164; providing clarity for, 77–78; recognizing work of, 166–168; recruiting and hiring policies for, 156–161; retaining, 168–169; testing fit in culture, 160

Empowerment, 74–75

FFear: of confronting people, 57, 59;

difficulties addressing behavioral accountability, 59–60

Firing employees: leader’s fear of confronting vs., 57, 59; who don’t fit, 169–171

Five Dysfunction of a Team Assessment, 57–58

Five Dysfunctions of a Team, The (Lencioni), 20

Four disciplines model: about, 14–16; building cohesive leadership team, 15; creating clarity, 15, 73–140; illustrated, 14; overcommunicating clarity, 15, 141–152; reinforcing clarity, 16, 153–172. See also Checklists; and individual disciplines

GGoals: achieving team, 65–66;

aligning organizational, 119–131; setting collective, 66–68. See also Thematic goals


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational purpose for,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational purpose for, 82–90; communicating clearly to,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

82–90; communicating clearly to, 148–149; compensation and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

148–149; compensation and rewards for, 164–165; effect of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rewards for, 164–165; effect of organizational health on, 13;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational health on, 13; face-to-face communication with,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

face-to-face communication with, 147–148; firing, 169–171; COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

147–148; firing, 169–171;

Fear: of confronting people, 57, 59;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Fear: of confronting people, 57, 59; difficulties addressing behavioral

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

difficulties addressing behavioral accountability, 59–60

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accountability, 59–60Firing employees: leader’s fear of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Firing employees: leader’s fear of confronting vs., 57, 59; who don’t

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

confronting vs., 57, 59; who don’t fit, 169–171

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

fit, 169–171Five Dysfunction of a Team

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Five Dysfunction of a Team

NOT FOR RESALE

82–90; communicating clearly to,

NOT FOR RESALE

82–90; communicating clearly to,

rewards for, 164–165; effect of

NOT FOR RESALE

rewards for, 164–165; effect of organizational health on, 13;

NOT FOR RESALE

organizational health on, 13; face-to-face communication with, NOT FOR R

ESALE

face-to-face communication with, 147–148; firing, 169–171; NOT FOR R

ESALE

147–148; firing, 169–171;

accountability, 59–60

NOT FOR RESALE

accountability, 59–60Firing employees: leader’s fear of

NOT FOR RESALEFiring employees: leader’s fear of

confronting vs., 57, 59; who don’t

NOT FOR RESALEconfronting vs., 57, 59; who don’t

fit, 169–171

NOT FOR RESALE

fit, 169–171Five Dysfunction of a Team

NOT FOR RESALE

Five Dysfunction of a Team Assessment, 57–58

NOT FOR RESALE

Assessment, 57–58Five Dysfunctions of a Team, The

NOT FOR RESALE

Five Dysfunctions of a Team, The


La

Index

211

Greater cause as organizational focus, 87–88

Guilt, 46

HHarvard Business Review, 93Hiring employees, 156–161How do we behave?, 91–105How will we succeed?, 107–118Human Resources: developing

human systems, 153–154; separating corrective action from performance management, 164. See also Human systems

Human systems: clarifying performance management, 162–164; clarifying recruiting and hiring policies, 156–161; developing, 153–154; financial rewards and motivation in, 167–168, 169; firing employees who don’t fit, 169–171; initial design of, 192; orientation of new employees, 161–162; recognizing work of employees, 166–168; retaining employees, 168–169; simplicity in, 154–155; structuring interviews for, 159–160; testing applicant’s cultural fit, 160

IIdeal Conflict Point, 42–43Industry: assessing strategic durability

in, 115; focusing purpose on, 87

Innovation and strategic anchors, 115

Inquiry, 22Integrity: organizational, 5; as

permission-to-play value, 97–98Intel, 48Intolerance in organizations, 91

KKatzenbach, Jon, 21

LLeaders: addressing behavioral

accountability, 59–60; avoiding perfection paralysis, 79–80; benefits of surviving conflict, 43–45; biases against organizational health, 2–4; clarifying and communicating commitments, 147–148; commitment to vulnerability by, 35–37; delineating roles among, 132–137; demonstrating accountability for others, 56–58; effects of avoiding conflict, 39–40, 43; faith in classic business signs, 6, 7–8; handling hiring decisions, 156–161; hiding weaknesses from others, 36–37; identifying core values embodied by, 102, 103; identifying corporate purpose, 83–84; impact of misalignments among, 73–75; mining for conflict, 45–46;


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

162–164; clarifying recruiting

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

162–164; clarifying recruiting and hiring policies, 156–161;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

and hiring policies, 156–161; developing, 153–154; financial

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

developing, 153–154; financial rewards and motivation in,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

rewards and motivation in, 167–168, 169; firing employees

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

167–168, 169; firing employees who don’t fit, 169–171; initial

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

who don’t fit, 169–171; initial design of, 192; orientation of new

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

design of, 192; orientation of new employees, 161–162; recognizing COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

employees, 161–162; recognizing

Katzenbach, Jon, 21

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Katzenbach, Jon, 21

Leaders: addressing behavioral

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Leaders: addressing behavioral accountability, 59–60; avoiding

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accountability, 59–60; avoiding perfection paralysis, 79–80;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

perfection paralysis, 79–80;

NOT FOR RESALE

Leaders: addressing behavioral

NOT FOR RESALE

Leaders: addressing behavioral accountability, 59–60; avoiding

NOT FOR RESALEaccountability, 59–60; avoiding

perfection paralysis, 79–80;

NOT FOR RESALEperfection paralysis, 79–80;

NOT FOR RESALE

developing, 153–154; financial

NOT FOR RESALE

developing, 153–154; financial rewards and motivation in,

NOT FOR RESALE

rewards and motivation in, 167–168, 169; firing employees

NOT FOR RESALE

167–168, 169; firing employees who don’t fit, 169–171; initial

NOT FOR RESALE

who don’t fit, 169–171; initial design of, 192; orientation of new NOT FOR R

ESALE

design of, 192; orientation of new employees, 161–162; recognizing NOT FOR R

ESALE

employees, 161–162; recognizing

benefits of surviving conflict,

NOT FOR RESALE

benefits of surviving conflict, 43–45; biases against

NOT FOR RESALE

43–45; biases against organizational health, 2–4;

NOT FOR RESALE

organizational health, 2–4;


La

Index

212

multiplying organizational intelligence, 10–11; need for repetitive communications by, 141–144; providing employee clarity, 77–78; revealing tendencies with behavior profiling tools, 30–32; sacrifice made by, 190–192; telling own personal history, 28–30; wrestling with difficult decisions, 182–184. See also Leadership teams; Team members

Leadership teams: accountability exercises for, 55–56, 60–62; acknowledging dysfunction among, 52; advocacy and inquiry in, 22; agreeing on top priorities, 122; avoiding meeting stew, 174–175; behavior profiling tools for, 30–32; creating company playbook, 134–137; critical questions for, 77–78; daily check-ins by, 175, 176–178; defined, 21; defining business done by organization, 105–106; defining reason for corporate existence, 84–90; delineating roles within, 132–137; determining defining objectives, 124–126, 128; developing collective mentality of, 68–69; developing synergy in, 69–70; employee recognition by, 166–168; errors of inclusivity on, 23; hiring and

interviewing by, 161; identifying core values, 102–104; identifying standard operating objectives, 126–127; initiating off-site meetings, 192–193; leading orientation to culture, 161–162; measuring achievements, 65–66; misalignment among, 52–53; misconceptions of, 20–21; Noah’s Ark approach to, 23–24; organizational advantages contributed by, 72; peer-to-peer accountability in, 54–55; performance management by, 162–164; public vs. private accountability meetings for, 63–64; quarterly off-site reviews by, 175, 184–185; resistance to accountability, 62–63; reviewing and clarifying commitments of, 51; setting collective goals, 66–68; sharing common objectives, 25–26; sharing personal histories in, 28–30; sharing responsibility collectively, 25, 123–124; size of, 21–23; vulnerability required in trust building, 27–28. See also Team members

Love, 57

MMarketing, 85Meeting stew, 174–175, 183–184


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

among, 52; advocacy and inquiry

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

among, 52; advocacy and inquiry in, 22; agreeing on top priorities,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

in, 22; agreeing on top priorities, 122; avoiding meeting stew,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

122; avoiding meeting stew, 174–175; behavior profiling tools

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

174–175; behavior profiling tools for, 30–32; creating company

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

for, 30–32; creating company playbook, 134–137; critical

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

playbook, 134–137; critical questions for, 77–78; daily

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

questions for, 77–78; daily check-ins by, 175, 176–178;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

check-ins by, 175, 176–178; defined, 21; defining business COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

defined, 21; defining business

misconceptions of, 20–21; Noah’s

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL misconceptions of, 20–21; Noah’s

Ark approach to, 23–24;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Ark approach to, 23–24;

organizational advantages

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational advantages contributed by, 72; peer-to-peer

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

contributed by, 72; peer-to-peer accountability in, 54–55;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accountability in, 54–55; performance management by,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

performance management by, 162–164; public vs. private

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

162–164; public vs. private accountability meetings for,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

accountability meetings for,

NOT FOR RESALE

accountability in, 54–55;

NOT FOR RESALE

accountability in, 54–55; performance management by,

NOT FOR RESALEperformance management by,

162–164; public vs. private

NOT FOR RESALE162–164; public vs. private

NOT FOR RESALE

174–175; behavior profiling tools

NOT FOR RESALE

174–175; behavior profiling tools for, 30–32; creating company

NOT FOR RESALE

for, 30–32; creating company playbook, 134–137; critical

NOT FOR RESALE

playbook, 134–137; critical questions for, 77–78; daily

NOT FOR RESALE

questions for, 77–78; daily check-ins by, 175, 176–178; NOT FOR R

ESALE

check-ins by, 175, 176–178; defined, 21; defining business NOT FOR R

ESALE

defined, 21; defining business

accountability meetings for,

NOT FOR RESALE

accountability meetings for, 63–64; quarterly off-site reviews

NOT FOR RESALE

63–64; quarterly off-site reviews by, 175, 184–185; resistance to

NOT FOR RESALE

by, 175, 184–185; resistance to accountability, 62–63; reviewing

NOT FOR RESALE

accountability, 62–63; reviewing


La

Index

213

Meetings: acknowledging dysfunction in, 52; advantages of, 185–187; checklist for, 188, 197; clarifying commitment at end of, 146–147; daily check-ins, 175, 176–178; initial off-site, 192–193; meeting stew, 174–175, 183–184; observing organizational health in, 173–174; quarterly off-site reviews, 175, 184–185; rules encouraging conflict, 46; tactical staff, 175, 178–182, 185; topical strategic, 175, 182–184; types of, 175

Mining for conflict, 45–46Misalignment, 52–53Mission statements, 75–77Motivation: direct feedback as, 167;

financial rewards and, 167–168, 169; recognition as form of, 166–168

Multiplying organizational intelligence, 10–11

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 30, 31, 34

NNaming core values, 100–101Noah’s Ark management teams,

23–24

OOff-site reviews: initiating, 192–

193; quarterly, 175, 184–185

Office, The, 76Organizational health: advantage of

creating, 18, 189–190; biases against, 2–4; contributions by leadership teams to, 72; costs of poor, 12–13; developing collective mentality for, 68–69; first steps toward, 192–193; four disciplines model of, 14–16; impact of, 193; importance of, 4; multiplying organizational intelligence, 10–11; overlooked by media, 11–12; reflecting in meetings, 173–174; smart and healthy signs required for, 5–6; successes based on, 8–11; summary checklist for, 195–197

Organizations: acquiring accidental values, 98–99; aligning goals of, 119–131; aspirational values of, 93, 95–97; avoiding silos in, 120; cascading communication within, 144–148; changing strategic anchors, 114–116; clarifying tasks of, 116–117; conflict avoidance in, 39–40; core values of, 93–95; costs of poor health, 12–13; creating company playbook, 134–137; defining business of, 105–106; delineating leadership roles in, 133–134; developing human systems for, 153–155; difficulties developing and applying values, 92–93; finding


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Motivation: direct feedback as, 167;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Motivation: direct feedback as, 167; financial rewards and, 167–168,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

financial rewards and, 167–168, 169; recognition as form of,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

169; recognition as form of,

Multiplying organizational

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Multiplying organizational intelligence, 10–11

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

intelligence, 10–11Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 30, 31, COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 30, 31,

model of, 14–16; impact of, 193;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL model of, 14–16; impact of, 193;

importance of, 4; multiplying

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL importance of, 4; multiplying

organizational intelligence,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational intelligence, 10–11; overlooked by media,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

10–11; overlooked by media, 11–12; reflecting in meetings,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

11–12; reflecting in meetings, 173–174; smart and healthy signs

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

173–174; smart and healthy signs required for, 5–6; successes based

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

required for, 5–6; successes based

NOT FOR RESALE

Motivation: direct feedback as, 167;

NOT FOR RESALE

Motivation: direct feedback as, 167; financial rewards and, 167–168,

NOT FOR RESALE

financial rewards and, 167–168, 169; recognition as form of,

NOT FOR RESALE

169; recognition as form of,

Multiplying organizational

NOT FOR RESALE

Multiplying organizational intelligence, 10–11 NOT FOR R

ESALE

intelligence, 10–11Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 30, 31, NOT FOR R

ESALE

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 30, 31,

11–12; reflecting in meetings,

NOT FOR RESALE

11–12; reflecting in meetings, 173–174; smart and healthy signs

NOT FOR RESALE173–174; smart and healthy signs

required for, 5–6; successes based

NOT FOR RESALErequired for, 5–6; successes based

on, 8–11; summary checklist for,

NOT FOR RESALE

on, 8–11; summary checklist for, 195–197

NOT FOR RESALE

195–197Organizations: acquiring accidental

NOT FOR RESALE

Organizations: acquiring accidental


La

Index

214

purpose of, 83–84; focusing purpose of, 82–90; identifying strategic anchors, 107–114; impact of organizational health on, 193; intolerance required in, 91; making classic business decisions, 6, 7–8; naming core values, 100–101; permission-to-play values of, 97–98; result of passive agreements within, 49–51; size of leadership teams for, 21–23; stating reason for existing, 84–90; success in healthy, 8–11; undermining advantages in dysfunctional, 8–10. See also Corporate culture

Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team (Lencioni), 20

Overcommunicating clarity: allowing upward and lateral communication, 150–151; checklist for, 151, 196; overview, 15; repetition in communications, 141–144; taking time to clarify commitments, 146; top-down communication, 148–150; using cascading communication, 144–146; weighing advantages of, 152

PPassive agreements, 49–51Patton, Gen. George, 79Peer-to-peer accountability, 54–55

Perfection paralysis, 79–80Performance: addressing behavioral

vs. measurable, 59–60; passivity undermining, 48–51; public vs. private addresses to, 63–64. See also Results

Performance management, 162–164

Permission to play, 8–9Permission-to-play values: about,

97–98; confusing core and, 99; illustrated, 93

Porras, Jerry, 82, 86, 91, 92Porter, Michael, 107, 111Praising employees, 166–167Profiles: including in playbook, 137;

revealing tendencies with, 30–32Purpose, 82–90; defining reason for

existing, 84–90; finding corporate, 83–84; types of, 86–89. See also Goals

QQuestions for clarity: about, 77–78;

applying to compensation and rewards, 165; demanding answers to, 191; how do we behave?, 91–105; how will we succeed?, 107–118; including in company playbook, 136; what do we do?, 105–106; what is most important, right now?, 119–131; who must do what, 132–137; why do we exist?, 82–90


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of

Overcommunicating clarity:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Overcommunicating clarity: allowing upward and lateral

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

allowing upward and lateral communication, 150–151;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

communication, 150–151; checklist for, 151, 196; overview,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

checklist for, 151, 196; overview, 15; repetition in communications,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

15; repetition in communications, 141–144; taking time to clarify COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

141–144; taking time to clarify

Permission to play, 8–9

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Permission to play, 8–9

Permission-to-play values: about,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Permission-to-play values: about,

97–98; confusing core and, 99;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

97–98; confusing core and, 99; illustrated, 93

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

illustrated, 93Porras, Jerry, 82, 86, 91, 92

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Porras, Jerry, 82, 86, 91, 92Porter, Michael, 107, 111

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Porter, Michael, 107, 111Praising employees, 166–167

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Praising employees, 166–167Profiles: including in playbook, 137;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Profiles: including in playbook, 137;

NOT FOR RESALE

Porras, Jerry, 82, 86, 91, 92

NOT FOR RESALE

Porras, Jerry, 82, 86, 91, 92Porter, Michael, 107, 111

NOT FOR RESALEPorter, Michael, 107, 111

Praising employees, 166–167

NOT FOR RESALEPraising employees, 166–167

Profiles: including in playbook, 137;

NOT FOR RESALE

Profiles: including in playbook, 137; revealing tendencies with, 30–32

NOT FOR RESALE

revealing tendencies with, 30–32

NOT FOR RESALE

communication, 150–151;

NOT FOR RESALE

communication, 150–151; checklist for, 151, 196; overview,

NOT FOR RESALE

checklist for, 151, 196; overview, 15; repetition in communications, NOT FOR R

ESALE

15; repetition in communications, 141–144; taking time to clarify NOT FOR R

ESALE

141–144; taking time to clarify

Purpose, 82–90; defining reason for

NOT FOR RESALE

Purpose, 82–90; defining reason for existing, 84–90; finding

NOT FOR RESALE

existing, 84–90; finding


La

Index

215

RReal-time permission, 45Recognition, 166–168Recruiting and hiring policies,

156–161Reinforcing clarity: checklist for,

172, 196–197; compensation and rewards, 164–165; developing human systems for, 153–154; firing employees who don’t fit, 169–171; leader’s role in, 191; orientation policies, 161–162; overview, 16; performance management, 162–164; providing recognition, 166–168; recruiting and hiring policies, 156–161; retaining employees, 168–169; simplicity in human systems, 154–155

Repetition in communications, 141–144

Resentment, 40–41Resignations: due to accountability

building, 62–63; resulting from core value clarification, 100–101

Responsibilities: defining, 132–133; listing in playbook, 137; sharing collectively, 25, 123–124

Results: creating from collective mentality, 68–69; developing from team synergy, 69–70; as key behavioral principle, 26; measuring achievements with,

65–66; setting collective goals, 66–68

Retaining employees, 168–169Rewards, 164–165

SSilos, 120Silos, Politics, and Turf Wars

(Lencioni), 121Smart vs. healthy equation, 6, 7–10Smith, Douglas, 21Southwest Airlines, 87–88Standard operating objectives,

126–127Strategic anchors: changing,

114–116; clarifying organizational strategies, 107; delineating tasks and agreements with, 116–117; identifying, 109–114; making decisions using, 108–109; reason for three, 117–118; Strategic Amoeba for outlining, 110, 112

Success: based on organizational health, 8–11; clarifying strategies for, 107–118

TTable Group, 58, 199Tactical staff meetings, 175,

178–182, 185Team members: building trust

among, 35; conflict among, 38, 45–46, 51; effect of conflict avoidance in, 40–41; impact of


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

retaining employees, 168–169;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

retaining employees, 168–169; simplicity in human systems,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

simplicity in human systems,

Repetition in communications,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


Resentment, 40–41

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Resentment, 40–41Resignations: due to accountability

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Resignations: due to accountability building, 62–63; resulting COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

building, 62–63; resulting

Smart vs. healthy equation, 6, 7–10

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL Smart vs. healthy equation, 6, 7–10

Smith, Douglas, 21

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Smith, Douglas, 21Southwest Airlines, 87–88

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Southwest Airlines, 87–88Standard operating objectives,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Standard operating objectives, 126–127

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

126–127Strategic anchors: changing,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Strategic anchors: changing,

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


Resignations: due to accountability NOT FOR RESALE

Resignations: due to accountability building, 62–63; resulting NOT FOR R

ESALE

building, 62–63; resulting

Standard operating objectives,

NOT FOR RESALE

Standard operating objectives, 126–127

NOT FOR RESALE126–127

Strategic anchors: changing,

NOT FOR RESALEStrategic anchors: changing,

114–116; clarifying organizational

NOT FOR RESALE

114–116; clarifying organizational strategies, 107; delineating tasks

NOT FOR RESALE

strategies, 107; delineating tasks and agreements with, 116–117;

NOT FOR RESALE

and agreements with, 116–117;


La

Index

216

common objectives on, 25–26; peer-to-peer accountability among, 54–55; recognizing conflict continuum, 42–43; sacrifices made by, 25

Teams: defining, 20–21; size of, 21–24; working groups vs., 21, 25. See also Leadership teams

Thematic goals: defining objectives for, 124–126, 128; examples of, 127–130; identifying standard operating objectives, 126–127, 128; illustrated, 125; isolating, 121–122; purpose of, 131; setting meeting priorities with, 179–180; as team’s collective responsibility, 123–124; time frame for, 130–131

Top-down communication, 148–150

Topical strategic meetings, 175, 182–184

Trust: exercise for building, 55–56; as key behavioral principle, 26; overcoming fundamental attribution errors, 32–34; revealing personal tendencies, 30–32; role of conflict in, 38, 43–45, 47; sharing personal history with team, 28–30; vulnerability required in, 27–28, 35–37

UUpward and lateral communication,

150–151

VValues: accidental, 93, 98–99;

aspirational, 93, 95–97; clarifying personal and professional, 91–92; core, 93–95; difficulties developing, 92–93; permission-to-play, 97–98; steps for identifying core, 102–104; types of, 93

Vulnerability: allowing in peer-to-peer accountability, 54–55; conflict requiring, 41; heart of, 28; leader’s commitment to, 35–37; overcoming fundamental attribution errors with, 32–34; required in trust building, 27–28, 35–37; sharing personal histories, 28–30; too much, 35

WWealth-focused purpose, 89What do we do?, 105–106What is most important, right

now?, 119–131Who must do what, 132–137Why do we exist?, 82–90Wisdom of Teams, The (Katzenbach

and Douglas), 21Working groups, 21, 25


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meeting priorities with, 179–180;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

meeting priorities with, 179–180; as team’s collective responsibility,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

as team’s collective responsibility,

Top-down communication,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Top-down communication,

Topical strategic meetings, 175,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Topical strategic meetings, 175, 182–184

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

182–184Trust: exercise for building, 55–56; COPYRIG

HTED MATERIA

L

Trust: exercise for building, 55–56;

core, 93–95; difficulties

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL core, 93–95; difficulties

developing, 92–93; permission-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL developing, 92–93; permission-

to-play, 97–98; steps for

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

to-play, 97–98; steps for identifying core, 102–104; types

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

identifying core, 102–104; types of, 93

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of, 93Vulnerability: allowing in peer-to-

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Vulnerability: allowing in peer-to-peer accountability, 54–55;

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

peer accountability, 54–55; conflict requiring, 41; heart of,

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

conflict requiring, 41; heart of,

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


Trust: exercise for building, 55–56; NOT FOR RESALE

Trust: exercise for building, 55–56;

Vulnerability: allowing in peer-to-

NOT FOR RESALEVulnerability: allowing in peer-to-

peer accountability, 54–55;

NOT FOR RESALEpeer accountability, 54–55;

conflict requiring, 41; heart of,

NOT FOR RESALE

conflict requiring, 41; heart of, 28; leader’s commitment to,

NOT FOR RESALE

28; leader’s commitment to, 35–37; overcoming fundamental

NOT FOR RESALE

35–37; overcoming fundamental attribution errors with, 32–34;

NOT FOR RESALE

attribution errors with, 32–34;


La

Consulting: Table Group Consultants provide practical, fast-paced consulting and training sessions to leaders and their teams.

Speaking: Patrick Lencioni brings his models on teamwork, leadership, and organizational health to tens of thousands of leaders each year.

Books: Patrick Lencioni’s nine best- selling books have sold over 3 million copies worldwide and tackle topics surrounding organizational health, leadership, and teams.

Products: The Five Dysfunctions of a Team and The Three Signs of a Miserable Job products were developed to help managers, leaders, and their teams address issues around teamwork and job fulfillment.

The Table Group is dedicated to helping organizations of all kinds function more effectively through better leadership,

teamwork, and overall health.

www.tablegroup.com 925.299.9700

Visit our website, and explore:

Lencioni_1522_badvert_main.indd 217 1/17/2012 1:54:59 PM

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Table Group Consultants

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Table Group Consultants provide practical, fast-paced consulting and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

provide practical, fast-paced consulting and training sessions to leaders and their teams.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

training sessions to leaders and their teams.

Speaking:

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

Speaking:his models on teamwork, leadership, and

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

his models on teamwork, leadership, and organizational health to tens of thousands

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

organizational health to tens of thousands of leaders each year.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

of leaders each year.

COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL


NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE

NOT FOR RESALE


NOT FOR RESALE


Speaking:

NOT FOR RESALE

Speaking: Patrick Lencioni brings

NOT FOR RESALE

Patrick Lencioni brings his models on teamwork, leadership, and

NOT FOR RESALE

his models on teamwork, leadership, and organizational health to tens of thousands

NOT FOR RESALE

organizational health to tens of thousands of leaders each year.

NOT FOR RESALE

of leaders each year.

Books:

NOT FOR RESALE

Books:selling books have sold over 3 million NOT FOR R

ESALE

selling books have sold over 3 million


La


COPYRIGHTED M

ATERIAL

NOT FOR RESALE

the advantage

Documents

material tional health

organizational healthtrumps

organizational transformation

years of work

organizational health

organizacopyrighted

senior vice president

best copyrighted materialafter