the aviation security service of new zealand aviation security service of new zealand asia-pacific...
TRANSCRIPT
The Aviation Security Serviceof New Zealand
Asia-Pacific A VSEC 2011Canberra, Australia
29-30 March 2011
Mark T. EverittGeneral ManagerAviation Security Service New Zealand
Ensuring effective security through intelligence, international
compliance and quality systems
Ensuring effective security through intelligence,
international compliance and quality systems
Christchurch
22/02/2011
Threat Scenario Planning
The following slides highlight major areas of risk or scenarios that were developed from previous years planning sessions.
The scenarios were revisited and updated at the 2010 strategic planning session to reflect the current climate. These scenarios will be considered in the development of the current business planning
process and updating of Avsec’ s risk management profile.
Loss of key managers;Diverging views and opinions of Managers; andManagement in-sourcing / out-sourcing.
Global finance market decline / recession;New Zealand economy in decline;Change in tourist traffic;Fluctuations in global oil prices;Significant currency fluctuations;Failure of Air New Zealand or other major airline;.
Avsec action impacts on stakeholder confidence (reputational risk);Government establishes a single border agency; andAvsec subject to industrial action.
“Open borders arrangements”(at Avsec locations) between Australia and New Zealand;Cargo screening;Increased domestic aircraft screening;Increase in ICAO and other regulatory / airline requirements; andAvsec model is perceived as too expensive (Govt could force.
NZ participates in a major conflict, or tarnished by association;Deterioration in Pacific Island affairs.
Pandemic such as Spanish flu, SARS etc; and Bio security such as Foot and Mouth.
Natural disaster impacting on NZ aviation;Critical infrastructure damage; andSignificant environmental issues or disaster.
Terrorist threat in NZ;Acts of unlawful interference on a domestic flight;Acts of unlawful interference to an airport terminal or infrastructure, including front-of-house terminal areas; Acts of unlawful interference to an outbound flight;Acts of unlawful interference to an outbound maritime vessel; Continued……
scenariosscenariosscenariosscenarios
Change in Management Leadership
Significant Change in Business
Loss of Confidence in Avsec
Statutory Decisions
Global ConflictPandemic or Bio security
Natural Disaster
Terrorist Event
managementbusinesslegislative / Governanceshock
Continued…….Reconfiguration of air travel routes in NZ; Change in airport ownership (e.g. overseas ownership or resulting from Auckland super city merger);Change in funding stream;Part of Avsec role is assumed by another entity;One provider of security in the Pacific Islands; andFailure of Avsec Insurance Underwriters.
Continued…..andGovernance changes to Avsec.
Continued…..Threat due to a failure arising from security / intelligence vetting.Australia / Pacific terrorism; andAnother significant terrorism incident that impacts on air travel
scenariosscenariosscenariosscenarios
Change in Management Leadership
Significant Change in Business
Loss of Confidence in Avsec
Statutory Decisions
Global ConflictPandemic or Bio security
Natural Disaster
Terrorist Event
managementbusinesslegislative / Governanceshock
The Aviation Security drivers to the responses to the threat, must relate to the analysis of the threat itself, not because of the lack of robust
Risk Management Procedures
Risk Management Strategies
Access Control
CAA Rules
Patrols
Identity Cards
Gate Guards
Recurrent Testing
Weapons and
Explosives
ICAO Conventions
Civil Aviation Act
Audit Reports
Investigation
Prosecution
Recurrent Testing
Dangerous
Goods
ICAO
IATA
IATA Training
Recurrent Testing
Unruly Passengers
Education
Cabin Crew Training
Investigation
Prosecution
Intelligence
Risk Assessment
Deploy resources accordingly to counter the threat
Aviation Security Service Interventions
• The National Interest
• Contracting States’ obligations to ICAO
• Civil Aviation Act
• Aviation Crimes Act
• Civil Aviation Rules
• National Aviation Security ProgrammeCAR 139Airports
CAR 172 Airways
Corporation
CAR 140Aviation SecurityService
Airport Security Committees
CAR 109Air Cargo
CAR 108Airlines
Managing Risk
Quality
Annex 17, Standard 3.4.4 requires that:
Each Contracting State shall require the appropriate authority to develop, implement and maintain a national civil aviationsecurity quality control programme to determine compliancewith and validate the effectiveness of its national civil aviationsecurity programme
Avsec’s Quality and Management Systems are based on:
• ISO Certification – ISO 9001:2000
• Civil Aviation Rule Part 140
• Civil Aviation Rule Part 141
• Moving to ISO 14001 certification
• Risk Management Approach
• ISO Certification 9001:2000
- Requirements for a quality management system are set out inthe ISO standard
- For effective functioning the organisation has to identify andmanage numerous linked activities
- Based on a process approach
- Measures performance and effectiveness
Processes subject to continuous improvement
Vanuatu Supervisor Albert Nasse demonstrating the finer points of the new HBS Machine to New Zealand Aviation Security Service, General Manager, Mark Everitt and New Zealand High Commissioner, Jeff Langley
TThank youhank you