Round tables on the green architecture of the CAP

Brussels, 12 November 2018

Gregorio DÁVILA DÍAZDG Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentEuropean Commission

The CAP after 2020

#FutureofCAP

EU Specific objectives

Set of common IndicatorsEU

Broad types of interventions

Identification of needs in MS's CAP Plan

Tailor CAP interventions to their needs

Implementation / Progress towards targets

MEMBER STATES

THE NEW DELIVERY MODEL OF THE CAP

2

Common Output IndicatorsAnnual Performance Clearance

Linking expenditure to outputAssurance

Monitoring Common Result IndicatorsAnnual Performance Review

Checking progress towards targets

Policy performance Common Impact Indicators

Interim Evaluation

Assessing performance towards objectives

Multi-annual programming approach for the whole CAP

COMMON OBJECTIVES INDICATORS TYPES OF INTERVENTIONS

FOCUS ON PERFORMANCE

3

4

PLANNING – REPORTING – ASSURANCE - PERFORMANCE

CAP Strategic Plan

Annual performance report

Annual accounts

Management declaration

Annual performance clearance

Annual performance review

Annual financial clearance

Performance&

Assurance

0 1 2

Certification Body opinion

5

ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE

CLEARANCE AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW

• Correspondence of outputs and expenditure

Annual performance clearance (art 52)OUTPUTS

• Possible action plans in cases of deviations >25%

Annual performance review (art 121(8)&(9) SPR and 39 HZR)

RESULTS• Completeness,

accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts

Annual financial clearance (art 51)EXPENDITURE

2

NB: Impacts are only assessed through evaluation – not annually!

INDICATORS IN THE CAP STRATEGIC PLANS

Common Output Indicators

The output indicators serve thepurpose of counting what isimmediately generated by anintervention

Output counts each interventiononce, but one intervention cancontribute to several results

Common Result Indicators

Result indicators serve the purpose of linking interventions to their policy objectives

Result indicators are used for target setting in CAP plans and monitoring progress towards those targets

To be planned in CAP Strategic Plan and reported in AnnualPerformance Report (APR)

Common Impact Indicators

CAP Policy Performance

Impact indicators are used to evaluate policy performance at the level of overall objectives

Not to beset as targets in CAP Strategic Plan

and reported in APR

7

Deviation <25%. Situation back to normal: suspension is lifted

> 25% deviation. MS does not implement the AP. No progress: suspension

> 25% deviation. Slow progress: Commission asks

for an AP

> 25% deviation. MS has implemented an AP. Situation

improves

18%

1% 4% 8% 12% 15% 16% 18% 18%

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

> 25% deviation. MS provides explanations: no problem

Planned

Realised

Deviation <25%: no action

REPORTING ON PROGRESS TOWARDS TARGETS

0,5% 0,8% 1% 7% 11,5% 14% 18%

8

9

ANNEX

Ensure fair incomeIncrease Competitiveness

Rebalance power in food chains

FOSTER A BOLSTER STRENGTHENRESILIENT FARM SECTOR ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE FABRIC IN RURAL AREAS

10

WHAT FOR: THE NEW ARCHITECTURE OF CAP OBJECTIVES

SPECIFIC CAP OBJECTIVES

BROADER CAP OBJECTIVES

Generational renewalVibrant rural areas

Food and health quality

Climate change actionEnvironmental care

Landscapes and biodiversity

Economic Environment & ClimateEnvironment & Climate Social

CROSS-CUTTING CAP OBJECTIVES

ModernisationSustainability Simplification

OVERVIEW OF THE NEW DIRECT PAYMENTS

Con

dit

ion

alit

y ru

les

•Enh

ance

d w

ith

rega

rd t

o en

viro

nmen

t an

d cl

imat

e

Basic Income support for sustainability• If with payment entitlements (PEs):

- further internal convergence (no PE value < 75% average by 2026 at latest)- maximum value of PE

• Payment per eligible hectare• Possibly differentiated by groups of

territories facing similar socio-economic or agronomic conditions

• Minimum requirements (min. farm size)

• Additional amount per hectare• not exceeding national average• From bigger to smaller and

medium-sized farms

• Amount(s) per hectare, ranges of hectares and max number of hectares to be determined by MS

Complementary income support for young farmers

• Additional payment per hectare• For young farmers who are newly set

up for the 1st time

• For practices beneficial to environment and climate

• Requirements and amount per hectare to be determined by MS

Round–sum payment for

small farmers

• Round sum payment to be determined by MS

• Replacing all DPs

• Optional for farmers

Coupled support• Wide range of sectors (new: non-food products with potential to replace fossil

material in the bio-economy)• Up to 10% (+ 2 % for protein crops) of DP envelope (with exceptions)

Eco-schemes

Reduction of all direct paymentsAbove EUR 60 000 and capping at 100 000

Complementary redistributive income support for sustainability

To RD and/or to DP (with priority for redistributive income support for sustainability)

Definitions (specified by MS): Genuine farmers, young farmers, agricultural activity, eligible hectare, agricultural area (arable land, permanent crops, permanent grassland)

8 broad EU interventions to be tailored and defined by Member States

(replacing around 70 measures and sub-measures)

area-specific disadvantages resulting from certain

mandatory requirements

natural or other area-specific constraints

environmental, climate and other management

commitments

investments

cooperation

risk management tools

installation of young farmers and rural business start-up

knowledge exchange and information

FUTURE OF RURAL AREAS

Mandatory to programme risk

management tools(no minimum budget

requirements)

Minimum budget ring-fencing of total EAFRD contribution:• 30% for interventions

addressing the three environmental/climate objectives

• 5% for LEADER

Possibility to enhance synergies with and fund

LIFE projects and Erasmus-type

exchanges for young farmers

Overview of the coordination,

demarcation and complementarities

between EAFRD and other EU funds in rural areas in the CAP Plan

Possibility of using financial instruments (incl. working capital),

also in combination with grants

Increase of the maximum amount of

aid for the installation of young farmers

(up to EUR 100 000)

HIGHLIGHTS

Sectoral inter-

ventions

Wine

Fruit & Vegetables

Olive oil and table olives

Apiculture

Hops

Other sectors

Internal market

Rules on wine

Marketing standards

Producer organisation

s

Quota schemes

Geographical indications

Trade

Licences (import/ export)

TRQs

Export refunds

Import duties

Safety net

Public Intervention

Private Storage Aid

Exceptional measures

Competition

State aid

Antitrust

Other schemes

School Fruit & Milk

POSEI and SmallerAegeanIslands

Reg. 1151/2012, 251/2014 and amendments

Reg. 1308/2013 (CMO) and

amendments

Reg. 228/2013, 229/2013 and amendments

NEW: CAP plan Reg.

A COMMON FRAMEWORK FOR MARKETSIntegrated in the

CAP plan regulation

• Reinforced environmental and climate action (min. 20% of the spending);

• Research and development min. 5%;• New additional objective "increasing

consumption" with top up;• Boosted transnational POs and APOs.

Increasedallocation

Possibility to support other sectors

(up to 3% of DP)