the crucial influence of thermal interface material in ... -henkel.pdf · the crucial influence of...
TRANSCRIPT
The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic
Design
Dr.-Ing. Martin Schulz, Infineon TechnologiesScott T. Allen, Henkel Electronic Materials LLCDung Phan, Henkel Electronic Materials LLCDr. Wilhelm Pohl, Hala Contec
Speaker:Giuseppe CaramellaHenkel Electronic MaterialsBelgium
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design2
Available Thermal Interface Materials (TIMs)• Thermal interface solutions for the electronics market have been available
for decades – aka generic thermal grease
• Advancements in thermal interface materials• Explosive growth in consumer electronics, early 1990’s - 2000’s• Personal computing and handheld electronics• Home entertainment, gaming and the internet
• TIM developments driven by the specific needs of the consumer market• Simplicity of application and increased performance
• Low cost labor for OEMs or home installation – overclockers• High performance greases, more elaborate filler types
• Rapidly changing designs and short term needs• Increased acceptance of disposable consumer electronics
• Numerous grease and phase change materials (vendors) emerged• “Flavor of the day” greases
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design3
TIM Selection for the Power Electronics Market• Power electronics designers and assemblers have had to rely on
commonly available thermal interface materials
• Material selection based on data sheet values• End performance doesn’t always meet expectations• Unexpected TIM performance and poor application methods• Lifetime predictions fall short due to uncertainties in the stability data
• Improvements in performance and longevity could be achieved by utilizing a TIM solution specific to the needs of the power electronics market
• Focus will be on a robust TIM pre-applied by the module manufacturer• Problems from end user application methods eliminated• Lifetime predictions ensured through rigorous testing• Enhanced thermal performance not available from off the shelf TIMs
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design4
The Challenge for the Power Module Manufacturer• Find the best thermal interface material, suitable for power electronics,
while avoiding detrimental features
Thermal Interface Materials
available to the market
SiliconebasedSuffers from
Dry-Out
Insufficient thermal range
Solid or Separates Electrically
Conductive
Ask a TIM manufacturer to fill the gap
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design5
What is so special in Power Electronics?
Chip Area [mm²] 263 190
Power Density [W/cm²] 50 100 - 200
Expected Lifetime [Years] < 5 up to 30
Cost of replacement [US$] < 200 up to 1,000,000
Ambient Temperature [°C] 20 - 40 -50 65
Case Temperature [°C] < 75 85 110
IGBT 4
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design6
Thermodynamics
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design7
Thermal Cycling - Consequences• Forced air-cooled heat sink, 2 Minute cycle, 50% duty cycle• Current tuned to achieve Tjmax~150°C
Thermal transfer remains intact only if the material stays in place
Datasheet values for thermal conductivity are no more than an indicator
Wetting ability matters
Creeping ability matters
Long term stability matters
Chip-Temperature increase of >20K due to pump-out of thermal grease within
630 cycles/32 hours test time
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design8
Basic Physics
A: Path through TIM
B: Metal-to-Metal Contact
Heat fromDevice
Dissipate to Ambient
mKW
th 10<λ
mKW
th 100>λ
• Maximize λth for TIM
• Minimize areas with path A
• Maximize areas with path B
• Achieve smallest possible bond lines
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design9
0
0,001
0,002
0,003
0,004
0,005
0,006
0,007
GPG Filler A.1 Filler A.1+B Filler A.2 Filler A.2+B
Measured results from ASTM High Pressure Testing
Ther
mal
Res
ista
nce
[K/W
]Optimizing the Filler Components
-15%
-47%
-74%
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design10
Long-Term Stability• Throughout the development, High-Temperature-Storing (HTS) was
found suitable to achieve reliable results. 125°C, 1000h
Gradual increase due to aging effects
Triggered effect after a certain time
Stable behavior as demanded
IFX-TIM with improved performance
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design11
Long-Term Stability
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design12
Convincing 3rd Party Results
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
0 1k 2k 3k 4k
Chip Te
mp. [°C]
Test time [h]
Highly Accelerated EoL‐Test
General Purpose Grease 1 General Purpose Grease 2 New IFX-TIM
1000h Test 20 years of lifetime=̂
End of life if 150°C is reached
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design13
Lifetime Considerations• Predicted module lifetime relies on thermal performance stability• Changes in junction temperature can lead to unexpected failures
At end of test, MOD-3 yielded ΔTvjof 100K with predicted lifetime of 7.4·104 cycles
Improved TIM gave 30K reduction at end of test, for a predicted lifetime of 2.5·105 cycles
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design14
In Thermal Testing on LonGwin LW-9389
Casting a layer of material on a polymer film (release liner)Dry in 125°C oven for 1 hour
Cutting to the testing size 2.54 cm2 and peel of the release liner
Samples are ready for testing(0.195-0.120mm and
0.145-0.155mm)
LonGwin TIM tester
In House Thermal Testing
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design15
Starting thickness might affect thermal resistant at lower temperature and lower pressureIt looks like the material reaches to the saturated point at the pressures from 552 to 690 kPaLower starting thickness seems to have consistent thermal reaction ;and at 70, 85, and 100°C
material shows same thermal resistant range
Comparison of Thermal Resistant at Different Operating Temperatures and Starting Bonding Thickness
Thermal Resistant versus PressureStarting Thickness 0.150mm
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Pressure (kPa)
Ther
mal
Res
ista
nt (°
C/W
)
55°C 70°C85°C 100°C
Thermal Resistant versus PressureStarting Thickness 0.2mm
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Pressure (kPa)
Ther
mal
Res
ista
nt (°
C/W
)
55°C 70°C85°C 100°C
Comparison of Bondline vs Temperature
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design16
A Quick Look at Starting Assembly Thickness
Material shows same trend of melting rate and with corresponding thermal resistant. However, with thinner starting thickness seems transfer heat better.
Thermal Resistant versus BondlineAt 100°C
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.050
0.055
0.060
0.065
0.070
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08
Bond-line (mm)
Ther
mal
Res
ista
nt (°
C/W
)
starting thickness 0.200mm
starting thickness 0.150mm
Comparison of Bondline vs Start thickness
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design17
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
Bond-line (mm)
Pres
sure
(kPa
)
0.200
0.220
0.240
0.260
0.280
0.300
0.320
0.340
0.360
Ther
mal
Im
peda
nce(
°C*c
m2 /W
)
Pressure-BondlineThermal Impedance-Bondline
At 100°CStarting thickness 0.150mm
A Quick Look on Thermal Profile at 100°C Operating Temperature
Comparison of Bondline vs Start thickness
With a starting thickness of 0.15mm, material can reach to the bond-line thickness of ~ 0.02mm at 100°C and 700kPa to have a thermal impedance of ~ 0.24 °C*cm2/W
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design18
Thermal Conductivity at Different Operating Temperatures Sample thickness ~ 200µm, tested at different pressures 138, 276, & 552kPa ( or 20, 40, and 80psi)
At higher operating temperature (or high temperature makes material thinner with same operating press) Change in slope observed with higher temperature likely due to tighter packing of filler.
At 55°C material is around at melting point which is not completely melt and forming a thicker bond-line range contributing to a thermal conductivity of 2.94 W/(m°C).
Thermal Impedance versus BondlineCalculating Apparent Thermal Conductivity
y = 3.4054x + 0.04
y = 2.8072x + 0.1166
y = 1.9707x + 0.1203
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140
Bond-line (mm)
Ther
mal
Impe
danc
e (°
C*c
m2 /W
)
@55°C _ K=2.94 W/m*C@70°C _ K=3.56 W/m*C@85°C _ K=5.04 W/m*C
Affects of bondline on Conductivity
March 21, 2013 The Crucial Influence of Thermal Interface Material in Power Electronic Design19
Conclusions regarding TIM• Acceptable TIM performance on a CPU does not mean the same will
be seen on an IGBT module
• Datasheet values may seem like a good indicator, but they do noteliminate proper verification in your actual application
• A dedicated, optimized thermal interface material outperforms general purpose solutions that are available to end users of power modules
Thank you!