the day center epapsy dr. konstantinos papakonstantinou, psychiatrist, psychoanalyst scientific...
TRANSCRIPT
The Day CenterEPAPSY
Dr. Konstantinos Papakonstantinou,
Psychiatrist, psychoanalyst
Scientific manager of Day Center
Day Center
Founded in 2004 5th Psychiatric Sector (200.000 population approx.) Offers complete psychosocial interventions for
psychotic patients The main focus is to prevent them from relapsing,
help reduce hospitalisation and also working towards recovery and reintegration
The aim is to facilitate the recovery process and improve users’ quality of life
35 users have attended the program
Multi-disciplinary team
Psychiatrist / Scientific manager of the D.C Psychologists Social worker Occupational therapist Psychiatric nurse Administrator Assistant/cook Participation of university students and junior professionals
offering volunteer work
Users’ Entry Criteria
a/. Psychopathology (psychotic disorders) b/. Age (18-45yrs.), c/.Users should be followed by an external
collaborating Psychiatrist who will be overseeing their treatment and medication plan
d/. User’s relation with their family (which takes part in the whole process of the user’s rehabilitation)
e/. Users’ strong motivation to attend the program f/. Users with dual diagnosis are excluded
Levels of intervention
A/. Individual levelTherapeutic interventions Individual and group activities (Psychotherapeutic, educational, entertaining)
inside and outside the D.C) individualized case management Active participation of the users (Percorsi di Cura Condivisi, Co-ordination of
group activities)
B/. Social levelFamily interventions Families : individual and group support (narrow target group) SOFPSY: psycho-education and support (broader community)
C/ .Community level Creation of a community-based support network Social club Creation of KoiSPE (Social Cooperative) Creation of SOFPSY (Users’ family & friends association) Anti-stigma interventions in the community
Assessment
Users’ assessment is carried out in two levels Quantitative (scales) Qualitative (group activities, clinical meetings)
Staff assessment Staff development and assessment program
currently running Internal and External Clinical supervision Regular team meetings
Qualitative outcomesPsychodynamic approach
Psychodynamic understanding of the patient, family and dynamics.
It is also used in the professionals’ education program
External psychodynamic supervision
PSCYCHOANALYTIC TEQUNIQES ARE NOT BEEN USED FOR INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY OFFERED IN THE D.C
Qualitative outcomesImportant aspects of group activities
1. The material is been recorded and evaluated as a group and also individually over an extended period of time. Changes in users are evaluated in clinical meetings and are used to inform and adjust the individual care plan (ICP). Consideration to use material as raw data for conducting qualitative research.
2. These activities offer users alternative pathways of expressing or narrating their story and are been worked through. More subtle changes of users can be assessed.
3. Furthermore, they facilitate and reflect users’ inclinations and talents, which contributes in the users’ self integration and improves users’ thought process.
The example of Painting groups A volunteer professional of Fine Arts, after offering a basic
training on drawing and colors’ usage, s/he collaborates with the users and they all conclude on what is important and valuable to be further used in certain circumstances.
The evolution of users’ techniques is particularly interesting . However, the most significant aspect is the evolution of the users’ expressiveness and the ability to express emotions over time.
The users, though initially reluctant about the whole process, as a consequence of the group’s framing, they come to embrace being exposed and exhibiting their work.
Pictures exhibited in the Conference: Psychiatry and Art, May 2010, Chania-Crete
Qualitative OutcomesVocational Rehabilitation- KoiSPE (Social Cooperative) “Iliotropio”
Part of the Social Economy and Solidarity movement in Europe Covers the 5th Psychiatric sector (partial absence of mental health
services/units in this sector) Management of KoiSPE from Day Center staff
Present activities1/. Cleaning Services: Co-operation with School Committees 9 users have worked in the project, (October 2010)2/. Cleaning services: Collaboration with the Ministry of Labour and
Social Security (6 users), March 2011
Future activities Plan of establishing a new business (coffee shop)
Important note: Users’ training, preparation and support for the job tasks
Percorsi di Cura Condivisi Programs’ experts: -Barbara D’Avanzo (Institution Mario Negri, Milan, Program supervisor) -Renzo De Stefani (Responsible of Mental Health Service, Trento)-Pierluigi Morosini (Research Director of Insituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome)
Training in vivo, (Trento) Training of Greek professionals (psychiatrists, mental health professionals,
families, volunteers)
8 Day Center users have already joined the program and have completed the 1st verification. 7 more have also been recently introduced.
Program Outline: The user, a family member, the key-person, the psychiatrist and a guarantor have regular joint meetings every 6 months, and assess as a group the user’s progress in the following areas:
a)Psychopathology, b)Functioning, c) Social skillsAnd set goals to be met until the next verification meeting as a part of their
follow up)Users: -active participation in the therapeutic process (empowerment)-Acknowledgement for their need for help,-More effective management of symptoms during relapse ( realization of the
psychotic dimension of their omnipotence during a psychotic relapse-Reality testing & healthy aspect of self vs. Psychotic omnipotence
Quantitative AssessmentAssessment tools
Tests are administered to users a month after signing in the therapeutic program
PANSS (1/year psychiatrist) COTE (1/6months, Occupational Therapist) WHO-QuoL(1/year, self-administered) Family practices (1/year, facilitator&user) Family burden (1/year, administered to the
family)
Results-PANSS Year 1: 22 Valid (Mean 94,18) Year 2: 14 Valid (Mean 87,64) Year 3: 10 Valid (Mean 85,30) Year 4 : 7 Valid (Mean 74,86),
1 2 3 40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Table1.Mean PANSS score per year
PANSS- Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Year 1Year 2Year3Year4
Positive Negative
General Psychopathology
Aggression
Total Score
Table 2. PANSS Mean scores in 3 sub-scales& total score
Results- COTE
1st semester Ν=152nd semester Ν=153rd semester Ν=154th semester Ν=115th semester Ν=96th semester Ν=57th semester Ν=48th semester Ν=39th semester Ν=1
Table 3. COTE Means of Interpersonal Relationships and total score
0= no difficulty, 1= little difficulty, 2= some difficulty, 3= serious difficulty, 4= very serious difficulty
1 2 3 4 5 6 70
10
20
30
40
50
60
Interpersonal relations
Total score
Results-Family Burden Scale
1 2 3 4 5
10
20
30
Mean sum of family burden
Mean sum of aggressive behaviour
Year 1&2 N=17, Year 3 N=13, Year 4 N= 6 , Year 5 N=3
Table 4. Family Burden Scale Means of total FB score and Means of aggressive behaviour
Results- Family Practices Scale
Year 1 N=20, Year 2 N=18, Year 3 N=11,
Year 4 N=8, Year 5 N=4, Year 6 N=4
1 2 3 4 5 623
24
25
26
27
28
29
Total Family practices score
Table 6. Mean Scores of Family Practices Scale
Implications…concerning the users
Because of the fragmented continuity of care, users typically stay longer in the Day Center. Although this extended stay causes difficulties, such as institutionalisation phenomena and prolonging new user intake, there is evidence (both qualitative and quantitative) that the existing users continue to benefit from the program for more than the average 2-3 years. Efforts are made to assure extended care pathways, by developing a post- Day Center program and the Social Co-operative. DiscussionIs it good practice to extend the therapeutic contract with the DC(?) and extend the users’ dependence on services(?) narrowing their autonomy (?)
Implications… concerning the staffThe Day Center staff operate in many levels
(different roles, goals). This happens due to the lack of established care pathways. However, there needs to be an effort to concentrate on more specific and strategic priorities in the near future.
Subject for discussion
Is this enriching the Day Center’s services or distract the staff from their role (?) and cause confusion and burn out (?)
Which priorities(?)