the discourse on quality in early childhood education: what can we agree on?
TRANSCRIPT
Hotel Sea PrincessMumbai, 20 Feb 16
Image source: www.flickr.com/photos/photojon
The Discourse on Quality in Early Childhood Education: What Can We Agree On?
jeremybwilliams.net
jeremybwilliams
profjeremybwilliams
Slides available now at: tinyurl.com/ECA2016
Comments: #ECA4
Add @jeremybwilliams for Q&A
Professor James HeckmanNobel laureate economist
• Who gets to define quality?– Bureaucrats from a
govt education dept– Auditors from a
professional association
– Academic experts– Local stakeholders– Preschool
proprietors
Can quality in ECE be decontextualised and measured with detached and objective application of universal and timeless criteria?
Can quality accommodate diversity, subjectivity, multiple perspectives, temporal and spatial context?
• Can quality be culturally specific?– British quality …– Singaporean quality …– Indian quality …
… societally/ culturally specific?
… a universal and objective norm?
The discourse on quality
Is defining quality a wild goose chase?
The United States only member country not to ratify agreement
The Quality Ratings Model
… value-free technical choices?
The physical environmenteg: • utilisation of space• furnishings & fittings• maintenance,
cleanliness• learning environment• gross/ fine motor
equipment
Health, safety & nutritioneg: • safety measures• supervision of children• fire/ emergency
measures• first aid supplies• hygiene practices• menu planning/ food
preparation
Administrationeg: • children’s particulars• parent/ guardian info• centre rules and
regulations• dispensing medicines• centre log book• staff records
Staff training/ qualificationseg: • first aid trained• staff to child ratios• % cert, dip, degree• staff trained in special
needs
Programme & curriculumeg: • philosophy of centre• programme planning• lesson/ activity plans• learning centres• progress of children• classroom management• centre-parent
partnership
dangerof rampant subjectivity
pointless precision of objectivism
Summing up …
We can probably agree on the
minimum standards
• In seeking quality, is it possible to require precise, demanding and public conditions, and not equate accountability with accounting?
• Can quality be identified studying actual practice, recognising that there may be many meanings or understandings, and not attempt to reduce it to fit preconceived criteria?
• Can quality be about the pedagogical work, documenting and making public what children are doing, and entering into dialogue about that work?
• Can quality be about ethical and philosophical choices, judgments of value, made in relation to what we want for our children today and in the future?
aicindia.in
@aicindia_in
aicindia.in