THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

Feldman Module 14-1Santrock Chapter 16

Approaches to Learning

Direct instruction

Cognitive constructivist - Piaget

Social constructivist – Vygotsky

U.S. Schools tend to direct instruction/lock step

We Have an Expensive, Poorly-Performing School system

The United States has the second-best funded school system in the world ($7-12K student).

It has some of the most poorly-performing students in the industrialized world. We generally come out toward the bottom in international competitions.

Employers like Bill Gates argue that they must hire immigrants because of lack of qualified people in the U.S.

Last year’s SAT scores were the worst ever.

Accountability: Will testing work?

Positives: It is argued that test standards will:

improve performanceimprove confidence

Negatives: State-mandated tests drive learning objectives

No Child Left Behind 2002

State determined standards in math, English/language arts, science

All students must have standard tests in grades 3-8.

Critics say: Teaching to the test is too narrow Creativity, social skills, persistence, etc. not

measured

Getting around the test

Teach to the test

Cheat on the test

Ignore the test results

Lower the test standards

The Problem is Systemic

Schools are too bureaucratically controlled. No one size fits all Curricula come from the state, influenced by the

federal government Wrong decisions are quickly disseminated, hard to

retract (self-esteem; new math; whole language) When you pay for ideas, you will ultimately pay for

some bad ones

The Problem is Systemic

Too much competitive pressure and too little consideration of developmental maturity (brain/body readiness)

Developmentally appropriate kindergarten, for example

Child-centered Kindergarten

Education of the whole child: physical, cognitive, socio-emotional

Emphasis on the process of learningHands-on vs. paper & pencil tasksPlay is important

Study (Hart & others, 2003)

Children in developmentally inappropriate classrooms had slower growth in vocabulary, math application, and math computation.

Head Start children in developmentally appropriate programs more advanced in letter/word identification and performed better applying problems over time.

Controversy over Early Childhood Education

36 states now have standards specifying what young children should know and be able to do before they enter kindergarten

Standards focus too much on language & cognition, too little on physical, motor, socioemotional

Too much pressure on young children

Project Head Start

Model preschool programs have been linked with long-term effects such as reduced rates of placement in special education, dropout rates, grade retention, delinquency and use of welfare.

An estimated 40% of the 1400 Head Start programs are of questionable quality according to the results of one study.

Political research arena.

Complaints from Elementary School

Too much pressure to cover the curriculum – related to testing Ignores the principle that it is better to learn a

foundational skill well than repeatedly

Middle or Junior High

1989 Carnegie Foundation Report “. . Young adolescents

attend massive impersonal schools; learn from seemingly irrelevant curricula; trust few adults in school; and lack access to health care and counseling.”

Care Has Not Been Taken to Insure the Quality or Accuracy of Curriculum Materials

Allowed unqualified textbook authorsAllowed apparently biased textbook authorsPermitted “revisionist” historyUsed “artist rendition” examples for

evolutionSubstituted technical proficiency for content

in some coursesSome schools have overemphasized

peripheral subjects

Schools & Moral Development

Hidden curriculum (John Dewey,

1930)

Character education – explicit moral

code

Values clarification

Cognitive moral education

Discussion course

Service learning

Schools & Discipline

When you eliminate religion from public discourse, you eliminate the foundation for moral authority

The principal, unlike the policeman, cannot arrest you and send you to jail.

Schools Have Been Used for Indoctrination

Self-esteem movementPolitical Correctness/toleranceGlobal WarmingEvolutionPostmodernism/ whole languageEncouragement of group-dependent thinking(No doubt this has caused conflict with

“unbelieving” parents. There is an anti-parent sentiment and parent distrust of schools.)

What have been the goals of these programs?

Has there been a deliberate “dumbing down” of the curriculum?

Has there been a desire to keep people ignorant while they believed they were educated?

Has there been a discouragement of independent thinking?

Has there been bias - presentation of only one side of controversial issues as the only reasonable conclusion?