the european organisation for the safety of air navigation dynamic demand capacity balancing wp 07...
TRANSCRIPT
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
dynamic Demand Capacity Balancing
WP 07 06 05
Marcel RICHARDExpert ATFCM
Operational Specifications & Requirements
SESAR
Traffic Prediction (Occupancy Count) is the cornerstone to take decision with confidence
MUAC Occupancy counts prediction error compared to entry counts prediction error
-25.00%
-20.00%
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
-100-80-60-40-20020406080100120140160180200220240260280300
Time to prediction [min]
Pre
dic
tio
n E
rro
r [%
]
Occupancy counts
Entry Counts
Entry Counts + Std Dev
Entry Counts - Std Dev
MUAC entry sample: 14000 entries
MUAC occupancy sample: 5000 occupancies
What is dDCB?
Entry Counts
What is dDCB?
Occupancy counts
Entry versus Occupancy
Network View
Network View
Network View
Network View
Network View
Concept Clarification Occupancy Monitoring
Concept ClarificationNetwork view: Hotspots
Hotspot
Concept ClarificationNew roles and responsibilities
Concept ClarificationNetwork View for Airspace Users
Hotspots
15
Actors and role
STAM Coordination: Actors
Concept ClarificationNew roles and responsibilities
STAM
Measures and Coordination
17
Coordination
Hourly Capacity Versus dDCB
Capa Regulation
Co
mp
lexity
Capacity
Concept ClarificationNew process and procedures
19
Monitor Entry/Occupancy
DE
TE
CT
ION
CO
OR
DIN
AT
ION
IMP
LE
ME
NT
AT
ION
AN
AL
YS
IS a
nd
P
RE
PA
RA
TIO
N
Hot Spot Confirmed
Monitor and Analyse Traffic
Complexity
Define STAMMeasures
Coordinate STAM
MeasuresCoordinate
Verify Hot Spot
Capture Hot Spots
Network View
Verify Hot Spot Cancel Hot
Spot
PromulgateSTAM
Measures
Clear Hot Spot
Network View
Scenario
Criterias to idendify Hotspot
Criterias to define
Measures
STAM Notification
STAM Promulgation
Assess STAM Coordination effectiveness
Critical Events
STAM Coordination
Cancel Hot Spot
Intent
Ready
Proposed
Interrupted
Interrupted
Coordinated
Implemented
Cleared
Hot Spot Detected
Criterias to confirm Hotspot
Hot Spot Proposed
Cancel Hot Spot
Interrupted
Finished
AbandonedEscalate
Cancel STAM Measures
Cancel STAM Measures
Abandoned
STAMMeasuresFinished
Trial 8, 9 and 10 November 2011Validation Objectives
20
Concept ClarificationRAW DATA
21
Feedback Questionnaire for FMP
11%
13%
11%
11%
25%
29%
33%
11%
22%
38%
22%
25%
29%
33%
33%
25%
11%
22%
25%
33%
38%
29%
33%
44%
63%
44%
78%
38%
22%
13%
14%
11%
11%
T1. It’s easy to detect an over-over delivery
T2. I find it easy to create a hotspot.
T3. I find it easy to delete a hotspot.
T4. I find it easy to modify a hotspot.
T5. The available information in the flight list is enough to take an efficient decision.
T6. The available information in the flight list easily allows the interference of a STAM measure to be detected
T7. I find it easy to coordinate a STAM Measure.
T8. The available information for coordination is enough to take an efficient decision
T9. The response time of the system is efficient.
Strongly disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly agree
11%
13%
11%
11%
25%
29%
33%
11%
22%
38%
22%
25%
29%
33%
33%
25%
11%
22%
25%
33%
38%
29%
33%
44%
63%
44%
78%
38%
22%
13%
14%
11%
11%
T1. It’s easy to detect an over-over delivery
T2. I find it easy to create a hotspot.
T3. I find it easy to delete a hotspot.
T4. I find it easy to modify a hotspot.
T5. The available information in the flight list is enough to take an efficient decision.
T6. The available information in the flight list easily allows the interference of a STAM measure to be detected
T7. I find it easy to coordinate a STAM Measure.
T8. The available information for coordination is enough to take an efficient decision
T9. The response time of the system is efficient.
Strongly disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly agreeStrongly disagreeStrongly disagree DisagreeDisagree UndecidedUndecided AgreeAgree Strongly agreeStrongly agree
Concept ClarificationNew roles and responsibilities
23
Assessment of the new roles and responsibilities
Subsidiarity principle : local decisions are efficient (FMP, AO)- Notification : Information sharing to allow the transparency of the decision taken- Negotiation : Coordination support take part to the negotiation
Network Manager role and support tool• Notification will allow to build the picture of the Network• Issue
- To clarify and define the NM role and responsibility- To define a NM Supervision tool support
Issues to investigate
Network Manager role and support tool
Concept ClarificationConclusion
24
Concept ClarificationConclusion
25
Human Performance
Cost-effectiveness is improved through an increased controller productivity
With the introduction of STAM technics, the FMP is becoming a real job !• Staffing issue• Training Package : Dissemination of new working method in Europe• FMP qualification or license • (operative FMP are not at the same level in Europe)
Is dependant of the support tool qualityIt needs to re-invent the dDCB working position (as we made for the Controller Working Position 20 years ago – ODID,
FASTI, ….)
With the introduction of STAM coordination, the AO is involvedStaffing issue
Network Manager role, responsibilities and working method need to be re-designed
26
SESAR Release 3 Trial Spring 2013 More participants
Training Package : Dissemination of new working method in Europe
New Tools
More involvement of Airlines
Network Manager