the evolving role of palliative care in the health care continuum october 12, 2011 john e. barkley,...

45
The Evolving Role of Palliative Care in the Health Care Continuum October 12, 2011 John E. Barkley, MD, FCCP Chief Medical Officer Post-Acute Care Services Carolinas HealthCare System

Upload: cecily-martin

Post on 31-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Evolving Role of Palliative Care in the Health Care Continuum

October 12, 2011

John E. Barkley, MD, FCCPChief Medical Officer

Post-Acute Care ServicesCarolinas HealthCare System

2

Outline

Review the Current “Curative Model” of Care & Associated Outcomes

Learn Definitions of Palliative Care, Palliative Medicine & Hospice

Review clinical, economic, demographic data that serve as the basis for need of Palliative Care across the continuum

Learn current national standards for quality Palliative Care

Review impact of Palliative Care in select patient populations

Current State

3

4

Diagnosis of Life Threatening Illness

Death

Cure/Control/Restore/Rehabilitate Hospice

“Curative” Model Palliative care begins

Slide 5

Cancer vs. Non-Cancer IllnessTrajectories to Death

Cancer vs. Non-Cancer IllnessTrajectories to Death

Hea

lth

Sta

tus

Time

Crises

Death

Decline

Field & Cassel, 1997Field & Cassel, 1997

Cancer

End-organ disease

6

30 MONTHS

6

Patients are Suffering

The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. JAMA 1995; 274: 1591-1598.

Desbiens NA et al. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:1953-1961.

Singer et al. JAMA 1999;281(2):163-168.

Somogyi-Zalud E et al. JAGS 2000; 48:S140-145.

Nelson & Danis. Crit Care Med 2001; 29(2): N2-N9.

Nelson JE et al. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1527-1534.

Nelson JE et al. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166:1993-1999.

7

Caregivers are Suffering

Tolle et al. Oregon report card. 1999 www.ohsu.edu/ethics

Emanuel et al. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:451.

Steinhauser et al. JAMA 2000;284:2476-82.

Lee et al. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:113.

Teno et al. JAMA 2004;291:88-93.

Wright et al. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4457-64.

DEATH: RR 1.8 if care giving >9 hrs/wk for ill spouse RR 1.6 among caregivers reporting emotional strain

Definitions

8

9

Definitions of Palliative Care

Interdisciplinary care that aims to relieve suffering and improve quality of life for patients with advanced illness, and their families.

It is provided simultaneously with all other appropriate medical treatment.

www.capc.org

10

…Definitions

Palliative care means patient and family-centered care that optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. Palliative care throughout the continuum of illness involves addressing physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs and to facilitate patient autonomy, access to information, and choice.

73 FR 32204 - Medicare Hospice Conditions of Participation –Final Rule

June 5, 2008

11

…Definitions

Palliative Medicine Practitioners

• Recognized by American Board of Medical Specialties – 2006

• Major or sole clinical focus is the study and care of patients with:

– Complex medical illness

– Uncontrolled symptoms

– Limited prognosis

12

Definitions - Palliative Care vs. Hospice

Non-hospice palliative care

• Appropriate at any point in a serious illness

• Provided at the same time as life-prolonging treatment

• No prognostic requirement

Hospice

• Palliative care for the terminally ill

• Two physicians certify prognosis ≤ 6 months

• Medicare Part A “carve out”…give up traditional Medicare A & B coverage

• Must forgo “curative” treatments

12

Primary palliative care: refers to the basic skills and competencies required of all physicians and other health care professionals.

Secondary palliative care: refers to specialist clinicians that provide consultation and specialty care.

13

…Definitions

Imperatives for Palliative Care

14

15

• Almost 50% of U.S. population has at least one chronic medical condition, consuming 80% of healthcare resources

– Hypertension is the most common chronic condition, with 50M+ people in the U.S. needing treatment for high blood pressure

– 23M people have asthma, with economic costs projected at $20B in 2010

– 24M people have diabetes; one-fourth are unaware they have it

• Between 2005 and 2030, the number of Americans with chronic conditions will increaseby almost 30%

– 20% to 30% of all Americans are projected to have diabetes by 2050

Sources: Partnership for Solutions, John Hopkins University; Health Affairs, 26, no. 1 (2007): 142-153

Large and Growing Problem: People with Chronic Medical Conditions

118

125

133

141

149

157

164

171

100

120

140

160

180

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Number of People With Chronic Medical Conditions (in millions)

7000 people age 65 per day

International Comparison of Spending on Health, 1980–2006

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004

AustraliaCanadaDenmarkFranceGermanyNetherlandsNew ZealandSwedenSwitzerlandUnited KingdomUnited States

Average spending on healthper capita ($US PPP)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004

AustraliaCanadaDenmarkFranceGermanyNetherlandsNew ZealandSwedenSwitzerlandUnited KingdomUnited States

Total expenditures on healthas percent of GDP

Data: OECD Health Data June 2008

5+ chronic

conditions

66%

No chronic

conditions

1%

4 chronic

conditions

13%

1-2 chronic

conditions

10%

3 chronic

conditions

10%

Source: G. Anderson and J. Horvath, Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care. Baltimore, MD: Partnership for Solutions, December 2002.

Medicare Beneficiaries - Chronic Conditions & Spending

Distribution of Total Medicare Beneficiaries and Spending, 2005

10%

63%

37%

90%

Total Number of FFS Beneficiaries: 37.5 million

Total Medicare Spending: $265 billion

Average per capita Medicare spending (FFS only): $7,064

Average per capita Medicare spending among

top 10% (FFS only): $44,220

NOTE: FFS is fee-for-service. Includes noninstitutionalized and institutionalized Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, excluding Medicare managed care enrollees.

SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of the CMS Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Cost & Use file, 2005.

Health Care Reform

19

Health Care Reform = Clinical Integration

Clinical Integration = Care Coordination Across the Continuum

New “Rules of the Game”

Less $$$ not more

Value vs. Volume

“Zero Sum Game”

• Top quartile rewarded

• Bottom quartile pays the bill

Bundled/Grouped/Episode-specific payments

21

Patient-Centered Care Continuum

Medical Home

Data Management

Chronic Disease Management

Pharmacy

Home Care

Ancillary Providers

Long Term Care

Public Health Agencies Hospice

Hospitals

Palliative Care

LTACH & Acute Rehab

Specialists

Patients

EH

R

EHR

EH

R

Population Health

Management

National Recommendationsfor

Quality Palliative Care

22

National Consensus Project & National Quality Forum

Foundational elements

• National definition & description of high quality comprehensive palliative care

• Resource for practitioners addressing palliative care needs of patients & families

• Educational framework & blueprint for structure and provision of palliative care

Eight Domains with 38 Preferred Practices

1. Structure and Process of Care

2. Physical Aspects of Care

3. Psychological and Psychiatric Aspects of Care

4. Social Aspects of Care

5. Spiritual, Religious and Existential Aspects of Care

6. Cultural Aspects of Care

7. Care of the Imminently Dying Patient

8. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care

CAPC Consensus Panel Papers

Operational Features for Hospital Palliative Care Programs (2008)

Operational Metrics for Hospital Palliative Care Programs (2008)

Palliative Care Inpatient Unit Operational Metrics (2009)

Clinical Care & Customer Service Metrics (2010)

Identifying Patients in Need of a Palliative Care Assessment in the Hospital Setting (2011)

Practical Road Maps to Follow

26

27

28

= Primary Palliative Care

= Secondary Palliative Care

Slide 29

Early integration of palliative care with intensive care for all ICU patients, regardless of prognosis, and their families, is a clinical practice guideline. 

– Selecky PA et al. Chest 2005;128:3599-610. (American College of Chest Physicians)

– Lanken PN et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:912-27. (American Thoracic Society)

– Truog RD et al. Crit Care Med 2008;36:953-63. (American College of Critical Care Medicine).

Critical Care

Slide 30

Outcomes of Palliative Care

31

How Does Palliative Care Work?

Interdisciplinary team (MD, NP, RN, MSW, Pastoral Care, others) with patient-centered, family focused care approach

• Addresses physical symptoms and emotional suffering

• Clarifies goals of care with patients and families

• Helps patients & families select medical treatments and care settings that match their goals

• Improves patient-physician-family communication and decision-making

• Provides practical and emotional support for exhausted family caregivers

• Enhances transitions and continuity of care across settings

31

“Right Care, Right Time, Right Place”

32

Temel JS et al. NEJM 2010; 363(8): 733-742.

Early PC + Oncology vs. Oncology

FACT-L 98.0 vs. 91.5 (p=.03)

Depression 16% vs. 38% (p= .01)

Resuscitation preferences documented 53% vs. 28% (p = .05)

“Aggressive Care” 33% vs. 54% (p = .05)

33

Temel JS et al. NEJM 2010; 363(8): 733-742.

34

P = .02; HR 1.7

Median Survival 11.6 vs. 8.9

“Coping with Cancer”

“Do you recall having a discussion with your treating MD about care preferences at EOL”

NCI funded study

7 outpatient sites from 2002-2008

638 patients with Advanced/Metastatic Cancer

37% reported having EOL discussions before baseline

Wright, A.A. et al. JAMA, 2008; 300(14): 1665-1673.

Zhang, B. et al. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169(5): 480-488.

Mack, J.W. et al. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(7): 1203-1208.

Wright, A.A. et al. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(29): 4457-4463.

“Coping with Cancer”

Patient Impact

EOL discussions ≠ higher rates of major depressive disorder or more worry

68% received EOL care that was consistent with baseline preferences

Less likely to receive “aggressive care”

• Mechanical ventilation

• Attempted resuscitation

• ICU admission

QOL lowest and physical distress highest with more “aggressive care”

More enrolled in hospice & had longer LOS

No survival differences

“Aggressive care” resulted in 36% higher costs

“Coping With Cancer”

Caregiver Impact

ICU or hospital deaths = psychiatric illness in bereaved caregivers

Worse QOL

More regret

Higher risk of a major depressive disorder

37

Live Discharges Hospital Deaths

Costs Usual Care

Palliative Care Δ Usual

Care Palliative

Care Δ Per Day $830 $666 $174* $1,484 $1,110 $374*

Per Admission $11,140 $9,445 $1,696** $22,674 $17,765 $4,908**

Laboratory $1,227 $803 $424* $2,765 $1,838 $926*

ICU $7,096 $1,917 $5,178* $14,542 $7,929 $7,776*

Pharmacy $2,190 $2,001 $190 $5,625 $4,081 $1,544***

Imaging $890 $949 ($58)*** $1,673 $1,540 $133

Died in ICU X X X 18% 4% 14%*

*P<.001 **P<.01 ***P<.05

Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(16):1783-1790

39

Health Affairs 2011; 30(3): 454-563

40

Health Affairs 2011; 30(3): 454-563

41

Health Affairs 2011; 30(3): 454-563

Hospital “X”

Consult Volume – 765

Length of Stay

• Mean Day of Consult – 7.4

• Mean Days to Discharge- 6.3

• Mean LOS – 13.7

Direct Variable Cost Savings - $1,865,146.00

Clinical Revenue - $110,847.00

HPCCR Invoices - $271,089.00

Net Cost Savings for Hospital “X” – $1,704,904 .00

Net Savings/Case - $2229.00 ($354/day)

43

Conceptual Shift from “Curative Model”

Medicare Medicare Hospice Hospice BenefitBenefit

Life Prolonging CareLife Prolonging Care OldOld

Palliative CarePalliative Care

Bereavement

Hospice CareHospice CareLife ProlongingLife Prolonging

CareCareNewNew

Diagnosis Death

How to Proceed?

System-based approach

• “Top down & bottom up”

• Development & full integration of Primary & Secondary PC into all care including chronic disease management programs

Primary palliative care: refers to the basic skills and competencies required of all physicians and other health care professionals.

Secondary palliative care: refers to specialist clinicians that provide consultation and specialty care.

44

Summary

Patient & Caregivers are suffering under current model

Many imperatives for Palliative Care making it an essential strategy going forward

National recommendations exist

Positive impact of Palliative Care well documented

Complete integration across the continuum requires:

• Top down + bottom up approach

• Development of Primary & Secondary Palliative Care

• Evidence-based practices

• QA/PI

45