the fmri evidence of emotional engagement in moral judgments
DESCRIPTION
The fMRI Evidence of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgments . Billy Chen. Consider these 2 scenarios. Trolley dilemma Footbridge dilemma Which scenario do you find easier to make judgments?. Why did you pick scenario 1 ?. Emotional Salience is the Key!. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Billy Chen
The fMRI Evidence of Emotional Engagement in Moral
Judgments
Consider these 2 scenariosTrolley dilemmaFootbridge dilemmaWhich scenario do you find easier to make
judgments?
Why did you pick scenario 1?
Emotional Salience is the Key!Make quicker/automatic decisionsNo contemplation No conscious processing
HypothesisWe make judgments differently based on
the number of emotional engagementIndividuals would have more active brain
activities with areas associated with emotions during contemplation of dilemmas like the footbridge vs trolley.
Footbridge scenarios will also require more time to make the judgment since it will not be as automatic ->idea is from stroop task
Stroop Task
Helps to demonstrate the cognitive load a footbridge dilemma would have on us -> longer reaction time when making inconsistent judgment with the emotional interference.
MethodPool of 60 dilemma questions
- Moral (personal)ie. Footbridge- Moral (impersonal)ie. Trolley- Non-moralie. Train or Bus
9 participantsfMRI scan
Results – brain activities
Results – reaction timeEmotional congruency
ImplicationsPsychological puzzlesPersonal vs ImpersonalWhat is better?
Questions?