the framing challenge

71
The Framing Challenge Trish Hennessy Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives www.policyalternatives.ca

Upload: kalei

Post on 23-Feb-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Framing Challenge. Trish Hennessy Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives www.policyalternatives.ca. Why can’t progressives connect?. Neurological science findings. Reason vs. emotion – which one wins?. Research on emotions. Thinking = processed feelings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Framing Challenge

The Framing ChallengeTrish Hennessy

Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

www.policyalternatives.ca

Page 2: The Framing Challenge

Why can’t progressives connect?

Page 3: The Framing Challenge

Neurological science findings

Reason vs. emotion – which one wins?

Page 4: The Framing Challenge
Page 5: The Framing Challenge
Page 6: The Framing Challenge
Page 7: The Framing Challenge
Page 8: The Framing Challenge
Page 9: The Framing Challenge
Page 10: The Framing Challenge
Page 11: The Framing Challenge
Page 12: The Framing Challenge
Page 13: The Framing Challenge
Page 14: The Framing Challenge
Page 15: The Framing Challenge
Page 16: The Framing Challenge
Page 17: The Framing Challenge

Research on emotionsThinking = processed feelings

Emotions affect decision-making

Important finding for framing

Page 18: The Framing Challenge

How framing worksEvery word and idea exists within a

frame. Surface frames touch surface emotionsDeep frames tap into deeply-held values, principles, beliefs--morality.

-- George LakoffRockridge Institute

Page 19: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about spinSpin taps into surface frames

Not enough to use better wordsNeed to re-hardwire how we think

Page 20: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal

Page 21: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal Stop laundry list approach

Page 22: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal Stop laundry list approach People vote based on values,

connection, authenticity, trust, identity

Page 23: The Framing Challenge

It’s not about ‘the’ issue

Federal poll post-sponsorship scandal Stop laundry list approach People vote based on values,

connection, authenticity, trust, identity

They rarely vote for a single issue

Page 24: The Framing Challenge

It’s about values…and Conservatives are better at messages that tap into their values

than progressives are.

Page 25: The Framing Challenge

Conservative frame

Father knows best

Page 26: The Framing Challenge

Conservative frame

Page 27: The Framing Challenge

Progressive frame

Nurturant parent family

Page 28: The Framing Challenge

The power of repetitionRepetition tricks the brain into

believing myths and false statements are true-- Norbert SchwarzUniversity of Michigan

Page 29: The Framing Challenge

Staying out of their frame

Negating the frame reinforces the frame-- George Lakoff Don’t think of an elephant

Page 30: The Framing Challenge

Putting it to the test

Case study: Income inquality

RichPoor

Middle class

Page 31: The Framing Challenge

The rich are like cartoon characters

Page 32: The Framing Challenge
Page 33: The Framing Challenge
Page 34: The Framing Challenge
Page 35: The Framing Challenge
Page 36: The Framing Challenge
Page 37: The Framing Challenge
Page 38: The Framing Challenge
Page 39: The Framing Challenge
Page 40: The Framing Challenge
Page 41: The Framing Challenge
Page 42: The Framing Challenge

What Canadians think

Canada is a middle class nation Middle class is as much a state of mind

as it is an income category Middle class is the holy grail Aspirational notion

Page 43: The Framing Challenge

Summary of focus groups

Sketchy, stereotypical view of rich/poor

Gaze is on the middle class Middle class proxy for the good life Sense of middle class struggle, worry No anger toward rich Some anger toward poor

Page 44: The Framing Challenge

Othering Middle class rationality helps them

disengage Talking about people they don’t know A spectator sport (explains online

newspaper comments)

Page 45: The Framing Challenge

Empathy blocks/myths Family influence (children learn to be poor) Vicious cycle (poverty a way of life, a choice) Bad decisions, (too many kids, big TVs) Lack of work ethic, education Stubborn myth: Some people choose to be

poor & won’t be helped Can never eliminate poverty

Page 46: The Framing Challenge

Conservative frame dominates

Poor people need ‘tough love’

We need rich people to succeed

Reward the winners, punish the losers

Page 47: The Framing Challenge

Growing gap reframeThe rich and the rest of us

The majority vs. the elite few

We put the promise of prosperity on trial

Page 48: The Framing Challenge
Page 49: The Framing Challenge

Use of repetitionOur message box:

The rich are getting richer

The middle is being squeezed

The poor are getting left behind

Page 50: The Framing Challenge

Use of emotion & factFocus group gut check:

What would it be like to live on $23,000 or less (poorest 20%)

Page 51: The Framing Challenge

Holding the lens on worry

Struggle helps middle disconnect with poverty

Affirming the struggle, and showing commonalities, helps tap social responsibility

Solution: We’re in it together

Page 52: The Framing Challenge

Triggering moral outrage

Highlight contrast between rich/poor (CEO and the teller inspiration); show

absurdities

Page 53: The Framing Challenge

Pride

Canadians don’t like that poverty exists in Canada and, within limits,

they support moves to reduce it

Page 54: The Framing Challenge

Best defense a good offense

It’s time to move away from critique and move towards change that feels

do-able.

Page 55: The Framing Challenge

Make the case for change

Hold lens on what and why before solutions

Page 56: The Framing Challenge

Avoid impossibility theorems(or try to)

Solutions are brief, focused, pragmaticExample: complexity of poverty

Page 57: The Framing Challenge

The quiet limits of facts

We use big numbers to shock but know numbers alone don’t move people

Page 58: The Framing Challenge

A serious challenge

Trust issues with government

Page 59: The Framing Challenge

Another serious challenge

People are disengaged, ill informed

Page 60: The Framing Challenge
Page 61: The Framing Challenge

Second federal budget poll slide (60%)

Page 62: The Framing Challenge

Second federal budget poll slide (60%)

Page 63: The Framing Challenge

Second federal budget poll slide (60%)

Page 64: The Framing Challenge
Page 65: The Framing Challenge
Page 66: The Framing Challenge
Page 67: The Framing Challenge

The apathy trapCanadians think they want rational,

reasoned political leadership but respond emotionally

“Conservative fear frame” keeps getting tapped

Page 68: The Framing Challenge

http://www.conferenceboard.ca/HCP/Details/society/voter-turnout.aspx

Page 69: The Framing Challenge

Get excited about your democracy

“I Am Canadian” ad writer: 30% of the people are with you 30% are against you 20% are in the middle – the deciders

Page 70: The Framing Challenge

Show, don’t tell

Human stories that tap into emotions, values

Page 71: The Framing Challenge

Emotions, message

The ball’s in your court