the good, the efficient and the open - changing research workflows and the need to move from open...

32
(except logo’s) The good, the efficient, and the open changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman , Utrecht University Library Geneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015 @MsPhelps @jeroenbosman

Upload: bianca-kramer

Post on 04-Aug-2015

889 views

Category:

Science


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

(except logo’s)

The good, the efficient, and the open changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science

Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman , Utrecht University LibraryGeneva Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 18, 2015

@MsPhelps@jeroenbosman

analysis

outreach assessmentpublication

writingdiscovery

Simple cyclic model of the research workflow

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

Multi-cyclic model of the research workflow, with loops

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

A multi-cyclic, multi-orderedmodel of the research workflow, with loops

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

Rounds of grant writing and application

Iterations of search and reading

Drafting, receiving comments,rewriting

Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting

Rounds of experiments and measurements

Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)

• declaring competing interests• replication & reproducibility• meaningful assessment• effective quality checks• credit where it is due• no fraud, plagiarism

• connected tools & platforms• no publ. size restrictions• null result publishing• speed of publication• (web)standards, IDs• semantic discovery• re-useability• versioning

open peer review •open (lab)notes •

plain language •open drafting •

open access •CC-0/BY •

good

efficient open

technical changes & standards

research governance

changes

economic & copyright

changes

researcher

funder

publisher

public

government library

good

efficient open

Ongoing discussions

researcher

funder

publisher

public

government library

2005

2010

Discovery

Analysis

WritingPublication

Out

reac

h

Assessm

ent

Changing research workflows

Open Science

Survey: scholarly communication tools

Survey: scholarly communication tools

Survey: 1st 1000 results

What is you research role? What discipline are you working in?

Survey: 1st 1000 results

64 countries1 300

Breakdown examples

What tools do you use to get access to literature etc.?

Breakdown examples

What tools do you use to archive/share data &code ?

Tool combinations in workflows

ResearchGate(share pub + researcher

profile)

SPSSLaTeX

1000

0

Distribution across Good-Efficient-Open

Good Efficient Open

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

Make these data work for you

?

Make these data work for you

Do Asian postdocs look more to impact factors to select a journal to publish in than

their Latin American counterparts?

Make these data work for you

Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and

if so, what platforms are used?

Make these data work for you

Which tools are used in multiple research phases, and are they leading tools

in any of these phases?

Policy applications

Policy applications

“Focus shifting from ‘journals’ to individual publishable units

(articles, but also other research output)”

“Clear(er) shift towards open science / open access, leading to a diminishing importance of traditional journals”

Call to action

[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]

http://101innovations.wordpress.com

Call to action

[Tussenslide (of transitie in slide) over custom URL?]

http://101innovations.wordpress.com

custom URL

Call to action

Thank you!