the housing health and safety rating system (v2) practitioners’ course
TRANSCRIPT
The Housing Health and Safety Rating System (v2) Practitioners’ Course
© Warwick University 2005
Delegate introductions
• Name
• Job
• Employer
• Knowledge/experience of HHSRS
• Why on the course
Session 1
Background & Development of the HHSRS (v2)
© Warwick University 2005
Research Findings
• Monitoring the New Housing Fitness Standard (1993)– reported on call for arrangement, thermal efficiency,
noise, fire, radon, and environment to be added into Standard
– identified legislative anomalies
• Building regulation and health and Building regulation and safety (1995) – reported that main health and safety hazards in housing
not included in Standard– used risk assessment to rank hazards
© Warwick University 2005
Housing Health and Safety Rating System
• 1998 – Government commissioned development
• 2000 – HHSRS (Version 1) released
• 2003 – Evaluation report published
• 2003 – HHSRS & HMOs published
• 2003 – Statistical Evidence published
• 2006 – HHSRS final version released
© Warwick University 2005
Benefits of a Rating System
• Can include all serious health and safety hazards
• Can grade severity of assessed danger
• Can be applied to all dwellings
• Can be extended and updated as knowledge increases
• Can provide a more structured approach to assessment
© Warwick University 2005
Principle behind Rating System
A dwelling, including the structure and
associated outbuildings and garden, yard
and/or other amenity space, should
provide a safe and healthy environment
for the occupants and any visitors.
© Warwick University 2005
Aims and Assumptions• Be evidence based
• Be hazard based
ie, the effect, not the defect
• Rate the seriousness of the hazard
• Be practical in its application
• Be legally sound
© Warwick University 2005
Key Terminology
Ideal – what is currently perceived to be the safest performance criteria that can
be expected from an element
Element – any component or constituent part, facility or amenity of a dwelling
Deficiency – failure of an element to meet the ideal, whether a result of an inherent
(design) fault or because of disrepair or lack of maintenance
© Warwick University 2005
Key Terminology
Hazard – risk of harm to health or safety arising from a deficiency
Harm – adverse effect on the health of a person, whether permanent or temporary, and can include physical injury, illness, conditions or
symptomsHealth – includes state of physical, mental
and social well-being
© Warwick University 2005
HHSRS – The Evidence BaseTo identify hazards in dwellings• Extensive literature review• Building regulation, health and safety (BRE 2001)To compare threats and provide national benchmarks• Home accident surveillance system 1997-1999• English House Condition Survey 1996 Data• British Crime Survey• Home Office Fire Statistics• ONS Mortality Data• Hospital Episode Statistics• ACORN, RESIDATA, Neighbourhood Statistics, etc
© Warwick University 2005
Potential Housing Hazards
Arranged into four groups -
A - Physiological Requirements
B - Psychological Requirements
C - Protection Against Infection
D - Protection Against Accidents
© Warwick University 2005
Potential Housing Hazards
A. Physiological RequirementsDamp and mould growth etc Excessive coldExcessive heat Asbestos (and MMF) BiocidesCO & Fuel combustion productsLeadRadiationUncombusted fuel gasVOCs
C. Protection Against InfectionDomestic hygiene, Pests & RefuseFood SafetyPersonal Hygiene Sanitation & DrainageWater supply
B. Psychological RequirementsCrowding and SpaceEntry by intrudersLightingNoise
D. Protection Against AccidentsFalls associated with baths etcFalls on the levelFalls associated with stairs and stepsFalls between levels (e.g from windows),Electrical HazardsFireHot surfaces and materialsCollision and entrapmentExplosionsPosition and Operability of AmenitiesStructural collapse and falling elements
© Warwick University 2005
Comparison of Different Hazards
Housing hazards differ widely -
• Slow and insidious - dampness, cold
• Quick - falls
• Death very likely - Radon
• Death very unlikely - noise, poor ergonomics
© Warwick University 2005
About the HHSRS• Numbers allow comparison of
widely differing hazards
© Warwick University 2005
About the HHSRS
• Numbers allow comparison of widely differing
hazards
• Numbers used to reflect surveyor judgments
• Numbers used take account of potential
frequency of occurrence and severity of
outcome
© Warwick University 2005
HHSRS Hazard Score
Formula used to generate a Hazard Score
Three sets of figures used -
• Likelihood of an occurrence
• Spread of possible harms
• Harm weightings
© Warwick University 2005
LikelihoodThe likelihood of an occurrence over the next twelve months which could cause harm to a member of the age group vulnerable to that hazard
(‘occurrence’ is an event or period of exposure)
• Likelihood is expressed as a ratio – eg, 1 in 320, 1 in 18; or 1 in 1,000
© Warwick University 2005
Relating People & Hazards
Potential hazards assessed in relation to:
a member of the most vulnerable age
group who might typically occupy or visit
the dwelling
eg ~ potential hazard from gaps in
banisters judged in terms of young child
© Warwick University 2005
Harm
The possible health outcome(s) from an occurrence, whether temporary or permanent. That is, the adverse physical or mental effect on the health of a person, such as physical injury, illness, or other health condition or symptom.
© Warwick University 2005
Spread of Harms
• While there may be a most likely outcome,
there may also be a possibility of one or more
other outcomes;
e.g, below a 2nd floor window there may be
railings on one side and a flower bed on the
other; this may mean a 50% chance of death,
and a 50% chance of severe bruising.
© Warwick University 2005
Spread of Harms
The most probable and other possible
outcomes given as a percentage of the four
main Classes of Harm ~
Class I – Extreme
Class II – Severe
Class III – Serious
Class IV – Moderate
© Warwick University 2005
HHSRS Classes of Harm
Examples of Class I ~• Death• Permanent paralysis
below the neck• Malignant lung cancer• Regular and severe
pneumonia• Permanent loss of
consciousness• 80% or more burn
injuries
Examples of Class II ~• Asthma• Non-malignant respiratory
diseases• Lead poisoning• Legionnaires disease• Mild stroke• Chronic confusion• Loss of a hand or foot• Serious fractures• Loss of consciousness for
days
© Warwick University 2005
HHSRS Classes of Harm
Examples of Class III ~• Rhinitis• Hypertension• Sleep disturbance• Gastro-enteritis• Chronic severe stress• Loss of a finger• Serious puncture
wounds• Regular and severe
migraine
Examples of Class IV ~• Occasional severe discomfort• Occasional mild pneumonia• Broken finger• Slight concussion• Moderate cuts to face or body• Mental stress• Severe bruising to body• Regular serious coughs or
colds
© Warwick University 2005
Class of Harm Weightings
Class of Harm Weighting
I Extreme 10,000
II Severe 1,000
III Serious 300
IV Moderate 10
Weighting given to each Class of Harm to reflect degree of incapacity
© Warwick University 2005
HHSRS Hazard Rating Formula
Class of Harm & Weighting
Likelihood Spread of Harms (%)
Product
I 10,000 ÷ L X O1 = P1
II 1,000 ÷ L X O2 = P2
III 300 ÷ L X O3 = P3
IV 10 ÷ L X O4 = P4
Hazard Score = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4
© Warwick University 2005
Example Hazard Rating - 1
Assessment of a fall out of a window to a ground floor room -
• Likelihood - 1 in 18
• Spread of Harm Outcomes -– Class I - 0% death judged very unlikely
– Class II - 10% chance of serious fractures
– Class III - 30% chance of severe concussion
– Class IV - 60% chance of severe bruising
© Warwick University 2005
Example Hazard Rating - 1
Class of Harm Weightings
Likelihood Spread
10,000 ÷ 18 x 0 = 0
1,000 ÷ 18 x 10 = 556
300 ÷ 18 x 30 = 500
10 ÷ 18 x 60 = 34
Hazard Score = 1,090
© Warwick University 2005
Example Hazard Rating - 2
Assessment of a fall out of a window to a fifth floor room -
• Likelihood - 1 in 180
• Spread of Harm Outcomes -– Class I - 50% chance of death
– Class II - 30% chance of serious fractures
– Class III - 20% chance of severe concussion
– Class IV - 0% severe bruising very unlikely
© Warwick University 2005
Example Hazard Rating - 2
Class of Harm Weightings
Likelihood Spread
10,000 ÷ 180 x 50 = 2,778
1,000 ÷ 180 x 30 = 167
300 ÷ 180 x 20 = 34
10 ÷ 180 x 0 = 0
Hazard Score = 2,979
© Warwick University 2005
Banding of Scores
Band ScoreA 5,000 or more
B 2,000 – 4,999
C 1,000 – 1,999
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
500 – 999
200 – 499
100 – 199
50 – 99
20 – 49
10 – 19
9 or less
© Warwick University 2005
Session 2
Inspecting properties and Identifying deficiencies
© Warwick University 2005
The assessment –
• Is only concerned with deficiencies attributable to to the
design, construction and/or maintenance of the dwelling
ie, those deficiencies that are the responsibility of the
landlord or owner
• Current occupiers (if any) and behavioural issues are
disregarded
• Is based on the threat to a member of the age group
vulnerable to that hazard
The HHSRS and Enforcement
© Warwick University 2005
Survey procedure
• The quality of survey is of prime importance
• The survey is a means of gathering information (evidence) on which to base decisions
• It should be thorough and detailed
• It should include the whole of the dwelling including paths, yards, gardens, rights of way
• For flats or bedsits it should include rooms, passageways, circulation areas and facilities that are shared or used in common
© Warwick University 2005
Application to block of flatsHHSRS applies to -Unit of accommodation (i.e the flat)
+ Shared facilities (e.g. refuse chutes)
+ Means of access (e.g. common stairs and lifts)
+ Common structure (e.g. roof, structural walls, entrance to building)
+ Shared space (e.g. yard or garden and refuse storage)
Top floor flat
Ground floor
Assessing the top floor flat
© Warwick University 2005
Application to HMOs is similar
HHSRS applies to -Unit of accommodation (letting))
+ Shared facilities (eg kitchens & bathrooms)
+ Means of access (eg all common stairs)
+ Common structure (eg roof & structural walls)
+ Shared space (eg yard or garden)
Attic bedsit
Basement letting
Ground floor
1st Floor
X Shared bathroom
2nd Floor
Assessing the attic bedsit
© Warwick University 2005
Session 3
Introduction to the guidance and its use
© Warwick University 2005
© Warwick University 2005
• It is very helpful guidance
• Averages are national averages based on analysis of national statistics and are a reference point
• Research on the housing and health is a continuing process – users need to keep up-to-date on current evidence
• HHSRS concentrates on threats to health and safety
• Quality, comfort and convenience can be considered if there is a potential impact on physical or mental health
Status of guidance
© Warwick University 2005
HHSRS & Location• The dwelling should be able to meet the
underlying principles regardless of location
• Some hazards may be more likely or have greater impact in some areas, reflecting location e.g. – areas of high rainfall increase risk of dampness, just as
some areas are more affected by radon; – cold may be a greater problem depending on latitude or
elevation; – rat infestations are more likely near watercourses etc– entry by intruders may be more of a problem in HMOs
• Thus, some hazards may score higher in some areas than others but the method of assessment will be consistent
© Warwick University 2005
1. Introduction
2. Terminology
3. Overview of rating
4. Assessment of conditions using HHSRS
5. Flats and multi-occupied buildings
6. Annexes
Arrangement of Guidance
© Warwick University 2005
A. Landlord’s responsibility
B. Suggested Survey Procedure
C. Examples of the Four HHSRS Classes of Harm
D. Hazard Profiles
E. Selected References and Sources of Further Information
The Annexes
© Warwick University 2005
The 29 HazardsA. Physiological RequirementsDamp and mould growth etc Excess coldExcess heat Asbestos (and MMF) BiocidesCO & Fuel combustion productsLeadRadiationUncombusted fuel gasVOCs
C. Protection Against InfectionDomestic hygiene, Pests & RefuseFood SafetyPersonal Hygiene Sanitation & DrainageWater supply
B. Psychological RequirementsCrowding and SpaceEntry by intrudersLightingNoise
D. Protection Against AccidentsFalls associated with baths etcFalls on the levelFalls associated with stairs and stepsFalls between levels (e.g from windows),Electrical HazardsFireHot surfaces and materialsCollision and entrapmentExplosionsPosition and Operability of AmenitiesStructural collapse and falling elements
© Warwick University 2005
• Description of the Hazard• Potential for harm
– Vulnerable age group– National averages– Health effects
• Causes• Preventive measures and the ideal• Relevant matters affecting likelihood and harm• Hazard assessment
The Hazard Profiles (Annex D)
© Warwick University 2005
Session 4
Rating hazards and the procedure
© Warwick University 2005
• Be aware of the basic functions of the dwelling elements (structure and facilities)
• A single deficiency may to a greater or lesser extent contribute to more than one hazard
• Several deficiencies may contribute to one hazard
• After inspection allocate deficiencies to hazard(s)
Deficiencies to Hazards
© Warwick University 2005
• Similar deficiencies in different locations in the dwelling may contribute to the same hazarde.g. dampness and mould in several rooms
• It is the cumulative contribution of the deficiencies to the hazard that should be assessed
• It is a whole dwelling assessment for each hazard
Deficiencies to Hazards
© Warwick University 2005
Disrepair to an internal wall can lead to hazards from ~– Excess cold– Fire– Structural failure– Domestic hygiene, pests etc– Noise
Which hazards may depend on the form of construction and the nature, location and extent of the disrepair
Deficiencies to Hazards
© Warwick University 2005
Disrepair to a floor can lead to hazards from ~– Falls on the level– Excess cold– Fire– Structural collapse etc– Radiation– Domestic hygiene, pests etc – Noise
Which hazards may depend on the form of construction and the nature and extent of the disrepair
Deficiencies to Hazards
© Warwick University 2005
• Falls between levels• Excessive cold• Fire• Carbon monoxide etc• Lead• Structural failure• Entrapment or collision
Deficiencies to Hazards Size or design faults to a window can lead to hazards from ~
• Damp and mould growth• Domestic hygiene, pests
etc• Entry by intruders• Lighting• Position and operability of
amenities
Which hazards may depend on the nature of the deficiency
© Warwick University 2005
What are the deficiencies and possible hazards?
Rear bedroom wall and ceiling Front bedroom wall and ceiling
© Warwick University 2005
What are the deficiencies and possible hazards?
Rear extension to bungalow Front and side elevation of bungalow
© Warwick University 2005
What are the deficiencies and possible hazards?
Staircase and landing in single family house
© Warwick University 2005
What are the deficiencies and possible hazards?
Staircase Staircase looking up
© Warwick University 2005
1. Having inspected the dwelling and
identified deficiencies
2. Allocate deficiencies hazard(s)
3. Now score the Hazard(s) –
Based on the evidence from inspection
a. Judge the likelihood range; and
b. Judge the outcome range for each Class
of Harm
Procedure for Rating a hazard
© Warwick University 2005
Remember hazards assessed in relation to:
• People in the age range of those for whom the risk
arising from a hazard is greater than for any other
age group in the population
• When using the HHSRS consideration of
vulnerability to particular hazards is restricted to
age groups. It does not extend to vulnerability for
other reasons
Relating People & Hazards
© Warwick University 2005
Example Hazard Rating
Class of Harm Weightings
Likelihood Spread
10,000 ÷ 180 x 50 = 2,778
1,000 ÷ 180 x 30 = 167
300 ÷ 180 x 20 = 34
10 ÷ 180 x 0 = 0
Hazard Score = 2,979
© Warwick University 2005
Options for calculating and recording the Likelihood and Outcome judgments and for calculating the Hazard Score
a paper scoring form
scoring program for handheld computers (PDAs – Palm OS and PocketPC); and
a scoring programme for desk top PCs
Options for producing a score
© Warwick University 2005
Page 1 of the Paper Scoring Sheet
© Warwick University 2005
Remember:
The numbers in the boxes are Representative Scale Points – eg, 32 represents a scale of 24 to 42
HHSRS V2 SCORING SHEETADDRESS
Survey date Surveyor
DWELLING House or flat hse flat Non HMO Age of dwelling 20-45 46-79 80+
HAZARDS Physiological Psychological Safety Falls in baths etc 19
Cold 01 Crowding & space 11 Falls on the level 20
Damp & mould etc 02 Entry by intruders 12 Falls on stairs etc 21Heat 03 Lighting 13 Falls from windows 22
Asbestos (& MMFs) 04 Noise 14 Electrical hazards 23
Biocides 05 Fire hazards 24Carbon monoxide etc 06 Infection Hot surfaces etc 25
Lead 07 Domestic hygiene etc 15 Collision/entrapment 26
Radiation 08 Food safety 16 Ergonomics 27
Uncombusted fuel 09 Personal hygiene etc 17 Explosions 28
VOCs 10 Water supply 18 Structural collapse 29
HAZARD & No.
LIKELIHOOD 5600 3200 1800 1000 560 320 180 100 56 32 18 10 6 2 1
Justification
OUTCOMES Class I 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.6 10.0 21.5 31.6 46.4 Class IV
Class II 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.6 10.0 21.5 31.6 46.4 100-(I+II+III)
Class III 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.6 10.0 21.5 31.6 46.4
Justification
RATING A B C D E F G H I J Score (if calculated)
HAZARD & No.
LIKELIHOOD 5600 3200 1800 1000 560 320 180 100 56 32 18 10 6 2 1
Justification
OUTCOMES Class I 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.6 10.0 21.5 31.6 46.4 Class IV
Class II 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.6 10.0 21.5 31.6 46.4 100-(I+II+III)
Class III 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.2 4.6 10.0 21.5 31.6 46.4
Justification
RATING A B C D E F G H I J Score (if calculated)
<5000 2000 1000 500 200 100 50 20 10 >
HMO
< 0.05 0.15 0.3 0.7 1.5 3 7 15 26 38 >
< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130 75 42 24 13 7.5 4 2.5 1.5 >
< 0.05 0.15 0.3 0.7 1.5 3 7 15 26 38 >
<5000 2000 1000 500 200 100 50 20 10 >
3
< 4200 2400 1300 750 420 240 130 75 42 24 13 7.5 4 2.5 1.5 >
< 0.05 0.15 0.3 0.7 1.5 3 7 15 26 38 >
Pre 1920
< 0.05 0.15 0.3 0.7 1.5 3 7 15 26 38 >
3
Item/s
Item/s
© Warwick University 2005
Pocket PC scoring screen
No score After assessment
© Warwick University 2005
• It should not be necessary to review and assess every potential hazard - just those that are significant
• The inspection is a snapshot at a particular time
• Where further investigation and measurement are necessary - make a preliminary assessment with the proviso that verification or investigation is required
Matters to note
© Warwick University 2005
Take into account –
• The vulnerable age group for the hazard
• Relevant factors affecting the likelihood (see Guidance)
• How different is the condition from Ideal
• What is average likelihood for this type and age of dwelling
(see Guidance & program)?
• Consider site of the deficiencies and hazard
Judging the likelihood
© Warwick University 2005
Take into account –
• Relevant factors affecting the outcomes (see Guidance)
• How different is the condition from Ideal
• What is average spread of harms for this type and age of dwelling (see Guidance & programme)?
• Consider site of deficiencies and hazard
Judging the outcomes
© Warwick University 2005
Ask yourself:
• What factors increase the likelihood?
• What factors affect the spread of harm?
A couple of examples to consider
© Warwick University 2005
Electrical hazards (23)
Dwelling: Mid-terraced house built 1920-1945
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD
Meter and main fuse
Single socket in main bedroom
The house has not been modernised and the electrical installation is that installed in 1970. There is no socket in the front bedroom and no obvious earthing of the installation. The meter and main fuse has been installed in the rear living room. There are two sockets in each room of the ground floor including the kitchen which also contains an additional socket as part of the cooker supply unit
Front elevation
© Warwick University 2005
Fire (24.1)
Front elevation Rear elevation
Dwelling: First floor front left bedsit, in a 1900, two storey + attic, terraced HMO.
Background: There are seven bedsits in the house; three on two floors plus the attic. floor. There is a common combined bathroom/wc to the first floor and a common kitchen to the ground floor. There is a whb (with h&c) and a micro-wave cooker in each bedsit. There is a gas fire in each bedsit.
Fire Precautions and Means of Escape: All internal doors are standard panel doors. The staircase is not enclosed. There are no smoke or heat detectors and no fire alarms. Fire extinguishers (water) are provided. The electric wiring is not to current standards.
DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD
© Warwick University 2005
Session 5
The computer scoring programmes and paper-based scoring form and uploading scores
© Warwick University 2005
In this session we will:-
• Show how to use the paper scoring sheet
• Show how to use the scoring programme whether on PC or handheld computer
© Warwick University 2005
Remember:
The numbers in the boxes are Representative Scale Points – eg, 32 represents a scale of 24 to 42
© Warwick University 2005
Remember:
The numbers in the boxes are Representative Scale Points – eg, 32 represents a scale of 24 to 42