the immediate feedback assessment technique (if-at) in a

5
1 THE IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE (IF-AT) IN A LARGE ENROLMENT INTRODUCTORY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY COURSE Stephen L. MacNeil Department of Chemistry Wilfrid Laurier University 2 PRESENTATION OUTLINE INTRODUCTION → CH203 → IF-AT RESULTS → effect of marking scheme on grades → effect on information retention → student reaction CONCLUSIONS INTRODUCTION TO CH203 ~200 enrolled in winter term of 2011 3 Faculty of Science service course prior to 2011 → primarily lecture based starting in 2011 → “blended” approach CH203 assessment scheme, 2011 → in-class clicker questions → on-line homework → midterm test → final exam → laboratory work 10% 10% 20% 35% 25% NEED FOR FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT THE IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE (IF-AT) “answer until correct” response card for multiple choice tests 4 developed by Drs. M. L. and B. B. Epstein, Rider University → fairness of standard multiple choice tests → benefit of immediate feedback to learning → last response given is the one typically learned epsteineducation.com 5 WHAT ARE THE DRAWBACKS OF USING IF-AT? no commercially available optical scanning device item analysis laborious and time-consuming may increase risk that cheating will occur test construction takes more time IF-AT forms are more expensive than Scantron IF-AT IMPLEMENTATION Midterm Test (20%) 6 Final Exam (35%) → 15 multiple choice questions 60% 1 scratch = 2pts 2 scratches = 1pt 3 scratches = 0.5pt → Short/Descriptive Answer Section 40% → 50 multiple choice questions ~66% 1 scratch = 1pts 2 scratches = 0.5pt 3 scratches = 0.25pt → Short/Descriptive Answer Section ~33%

Upload: others

Post on 19-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT) in a

1

THE IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE (IF-AT) IN A LARGE ENROLMENT INTRODUCTORY

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY COURSE

Stephen L. MacNeil Department of Chemistry Wilfrid Laurier University

2

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

INTRODUCTION

→ CH203

→ IF-AT

RESULTS

→ effect of marking scheme on grades

→ effect on information retention

→ student reaction

CONCLUSIONS

INTRODUCTION TO CH203

~200 enrolled in winter term of 2011

3

Faculty of Science service course prior to 2011 → primarily lecture based starting in 2011 → “blended” approach CH203 assessment scheme, 2011

→ in-class clicker questions → on-line homework → midterm test → final exam → laboratory work

10% 10% 20% 35% 25%

NEED FOR FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

THE IMMEDIATE FEEDBACK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE (IF-AT)

“answer until correct” response card for multiple choice tests

4

developed by Drs. M. L. and B. B. Epstein, Rider University

→ fairness of standard multiple choice tests

→ benefit of immediate feedback to learning

→ last response given is the one typically learned

epsteineducation.com

5

WHAT ARE THE DRAWBACKS OF USING IF-AT?

no commercially available optical scanning device

item analysis laborious and time-consuming

may increase risk that cheating will occur

test construction takes more time

IF-AT forms are more expensive than Scantron

IF-AT IMPLEMENTATION

Midterm Test (20%)

6

Final Exam (35%)

→ 15 multiple choice questions 60% 1 scratch = 2pts 2 scratches = 1pt 3 scratches = 0.5pt

→ Short/Descriptive Answer Section 40%

→ 50 multiple choice questions ~66%

1 scratch = 1pts 2 scratches = 0.5pt 3 scratches = 0.25pt

→ Short/Descriptive Answer Section ~33%

Page 2: The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT) in a

2

IF-AT IN CH203 - QUESTIONS

What is the effect of IF-AT marking scheme on grades?

7

Does IF-AT affect information retention?

What do my students think of IF-AT?

8

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF IF-AT MARKING SCHEME ON GRADES?

AVERAGE NUMBER OF ATTEMPTS – MIDTERM TEST 9

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Av

er

ag

e #

of

Att

em

pts

Multiple Choice Questions 1-15

12 of 15 questions required, on average, 1-2 attempts

10

AVERAGE NUMBER OF ATTEMPTS – FINAL EXAM

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50A

ve

ra

ge

# o

f A

tte

mp

ts

Multiple Choice Questions 1-50

34 of 50 questions required, on average, 1-2 attempts

EFFECT OF MARKING SCHEME ON GRADES 11

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

1/0/0 1/0.5/0 1/0.5/0.1 1/0.5/0.25 1/0.75

64.14

72.14 73.11 74.55 76.14

51.56

63.04 64.45 66.56 68.79

Av

e (

MC

Se

cti

on

)

Midterm Test Final Exam

Marking Scheme

Effect on MC Section, % Midterm Final

Overall Effect on Course, % Midterm Final Total

1/0.5/0 +8.00 +11.49 +0.96 +2.68 +3.64

1/0.5/0.1 +8.96 +12.89 +1.08 +3.01 +4.09

1/0.5/0.25 +10.41 +15.00 +1.25 +3.50 +4.75

1/0.75 +12.00 +17.23 +1.44 +4.02 +5.46

IF-AT resulted in a ~5% increase in the course average

WHO BENEFITS THE MOST FROM IF-AT? 12

0

2

4

6

8

10

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

% I

nc

re

ase

fr

om

IF

-AT

Course Grade (without IF-AT)

% Grade Increase from IF-AT vs Course Grade

pass rate without IF-AT = 176/189 = 93%; pass rate with IF-AT = 186/189 = 98%

Page 3: The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT) in a

3

y = 0.7682x - 14.367 R² = 0.3508

0

20

40

60

80

100

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Sho

rt A

nsw

er S

core

s, %

Multiple Choice Scores (with IF-AT), %

Short Answer vs Multiple Choice Section Scores - Midterm

ARE SOME BENEFITING MORE THAN THEY SHOULD? 13

y = 1.5089x - 43.917 R² = 0.5844

0

20

40

60

80

100

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Sho

rt A

nsw

er S

core

s, %

Multiple Choice Scores (with IF-AT), %

Short Answer vs Multiple Choice Section Scores – Final Exam

• Midterm Test: MC Ave → 74%; Short Answer → 43% • Final Exam: MC Ave → 66%; Short Answer → 56%

14

“It is a great idea, however use only in spaced out environments. Rooms like BA201 and N1001 are too easy to cheat…it is discouraging hearing how many people cheat on these IF-AT cards…I think its fair during exam times when everyone is spaced out at the AC, there will be no cheating and it will be completely fair.”

SOME FEEDBACK FROM THE END-OF-TERM SURVEY

15

DOES IF-AT AFFECT INFORMATION RETENTION?

16

COMPARISON OF COMMON MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS – MIDTERM VS FINAL

Midterm Test Final Exam

% correct ave # attempts

% correct ave # attempts

mistakes corrected

new mistakes

1 88 1.19 82 1.23 19/22 (86%)

30/163 (18%)

2 79 1.28 74 1.36 23/38 (61%)

34/147 (20%)

3 42 2.32 52 1.88 44/106 (42%)

28/79 (35%)

4 82 1.24 84 1.22 24/34 (71%)

20/151 (13%)

5 71 1.58 64 1.71 23/53 (43%)

37/132 (28%)

17

WHAT DO STUDENTS THINK OF IF-AT?

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS 18

• overall like of / dislike for IF-AT

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I like using IF-AT more than Scantron.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I would like to see IF-AT used in other courses.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

The grading scheme used for IF-AT was fair.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I did not like IF-AT and prefer not to use it again.

agree + strongly agree: 98% agree + strongly agree: 97%

disagree + strongly disagree: 98% agree + strongly agree: 97%

Page 4: The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT) in a

4

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS 19

• possible reasons for liking IF-AT

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I like that IF-AT allows me to get part marks.

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Even without part marks, I’d like to use IF-AT.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I like that IF-AT lets me know correct answers.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I like that IF-AT lets me figure out my mark.

agree + strongly agree: 98% agree + strongly agree: 64%

agree + strongly agree: 98% agree + strongly agree: 98%

disagree + strongly disagree: 26%

20

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS

• possible reasons for liking IF-AT

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

IF-AT better reflects my level of understanding.

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

IF-AT makes the test feel a bit like a game.

agree + strongly agree: 87% agree + strongly agree: 56%

disagree + strongly disagree: 15%

21

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS

• possible reasons for disliking IF-AT

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I don’t like that the IF-AT doesn’t allow me to change answers.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

The IF-AT form is confusing and difficult to use.

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

It takes more time to complete the multiple choice section using IF-AT.

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Getting immediate feedback interfered with my test performance.

disagree + strongly disagree: 98%

disagree + strongly disagree: 62%

agree + strongly agree: 21%

disagree + strongly disagree: 54%

agree + strongly agree: 26%

agree + strongly agree: 43% disagree + strongly disagree: 34%

22

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS

• negative effects of IF-AT?

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Using IF-AT made me feel more anxious compared to Scantron multiple choice tests.

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Choosing an incorrect answer distracted me and made it harder to concentrate on the test.

disagree + strongly disagree: 61%

agree + strongly agree: 23%

disagree + strongly disagree: 52%

agree + strongly agree: 29%

23

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS

• perceived learning

0

20

40

60

80

100

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

Knowing right away when I was wrong helped me to correct misconceptions.

0

20

40

60

80

100

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

I learn more using IF-AT than using Scantron for multiple choice tests.

agree + strongly agree: 90% agree + strongly agree: 93%

24

END-OF-TERM SURVEY RESULTS

• new test-taking strategies?

0

10

20

30

40

50

StronglyDisagree

Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree

IF-AT changed my typical strategy for completing multiple choice tests.

A - I would work through multiple-choice questions recording answers on the test but wait until late in the test period to scratch the IF-AT card.

B - I would scratch the IF-AT card for questions for which I was confident in my answer, but postpone scratching the IF-AT card for questions I was unsure about.

C - I would work through the multiple-choice questions in order, choosing an answer and immediately scratching the IF-AT card to see if I was correct.

D - When my first answer was wrong, I would immediately reconsider the question and answer again. E - When my first answer was wrong, I would move on to the next question and wait till later to reconsider questions that were answered incorrectly.

0

20

40

60

80

100

A B C D E

Which of the following strategies did you use?

agree + strongly agree: 50%

disagree + strongly disagree: 27%

52% 49%

25%

75%

20%

Page 5: The Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT) in a

5

25

CONCLUSIONS

IF-AT allows awarding of part marks for multiple choice tests without unreasonably inflating course grades

IF-AT likely improves information retention and overall learning

students are big proponents of IF-AT

→ part marks → perceived learning

26

OVERALL IMPRESSIONS

“IF-AT IS AMAZING AND SHOULD BE USED IN EVERY COURSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”