the immune response to colorectal cancer: implications for ... · immune markers were identified...
TRANSCRIPT
The immune response to colorectal cancer:
Implications for prognosis
Paul Rameri Salama MBBS FRACS
School of Surgery
The University of Western Australia
This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Western Australia
The research presented in this thesis was performed at the School of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands,
The University of Western Australia, and the Pathology Laboratory at St John of God Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia
2012
– i –
Declaration
This is to certify that this thesis does not incorporate, without
acknowledgement, any material previously submitted for a degree or
diploma from any university and that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, does not contain any material previously published or written by
another person except where due reference is made in the text.
Signed Name Paul Rameri Salama
Date: 20 March 2012
– ii –
Abstract
Background
It has been known for several decades that infiltration of colorectal cancers
(CRCs) by host immune cells is beneficial. More recently it has been
demonstrated that specific immune cell subtypes have strong prognostic
significance. Some authors, however, expressed the view that tumours may
recruit inhibitory immune cells (Tregs – T regulatory cells) to suppress the
anti-tumour host response. As yet, however, measurement of immune cells
has not come into routine practice and tumour-node-metastasis (TNM)
remains the gold standard for prognostication. This generally serves us well;
however, robust markers are required for the identification of high risk stage
II CRC patients whose survival is highly variable and in whom the benefits
of adjuvant chemotherapy are uncertain.
Aims
� To identify and quantify previously examined immune cells (CD8+
and CD45RO+ T cells) within CRC that were previously known to
confer a beneficial prognostic effect.
� To identify and quantify Tregs and investigate their prognostic
significance within CRC.
� To compare the prognostic significance of Tregs with the active
component (GrB – Granzyme B) of CD8+ T cells.
� To validate the prognostic significance of tumour-infiltrating Tregs on
a separate patient cohort of stage II colon cancer.
– iii –
� To investigate the prognostic significance of immune markers within
histologically normal mucosa taken from the surgical margin of stage
II colon cancers.
Methods
Immune markers were identified with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and
quantified using digital image analysis. Aims 1-3 were performed on a
tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of tumour cores from 967 patients with
stage II and III CRC. Aims 4-5 were performed on “full face sections” from
independent cohort of 165 patients with colon cancer who did not receive
adjuvant chemotherapy.
Results
Chapter 3 (Aims 1-2)
� CD8+ and CD45RO+ T cells no longer retained prognostic
significance when the density of Tregs were assessed.
� A high density of tumour-infiltrating Tregs was an independent
prognostic marker for good prognosis.
� A high density of Tregs with the normal colonic mucosa was an
independent prognostic marker for poor prognosis.
� Prognostication of stage II cancers was significantly improved when
the density of Tregs were included in the multivariate analysis.
Chapter 4 (Aim 3)
� GrB, although associated with improved survival, was not an
independent prognostic marker. Low levels of GrB were found to be
– iv –
significantly associated with node positivity, vascular and perineural
invasion.
Chapter 5 (Aims 4-5)
� A high density of Tregs within lymphoid follicles found within the
normal colonic mucosa of the surgical margin, strongly predicted for
adverse cancer outcomes.
� A high frequency of lymphoid follicles within the normal mucosa was
an independent marker for good cancer outcomes for proximal
tumours.
� Vascular invasion in the most important standard histological marker
for stage II colon cancer.
Conclusions
This work has demonstrated that Tregs have strong prognostic significance
and can improve prognostication of stage II CRC. Furthermore, it has been
discovered that lymphoid follicles within the normal colonic mucosa
contain highly significant prognostic information. These findings support
the theory that immune parameters reflect the host’s susceptibility to the
development of metastasis and ultimately survival. Further research is
required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
– v –
Acknowledgements
The completion of this PhD thesis was dependent upon many factors and the
contributions of many people.
Heartfelt thanks go out to my Mentors and Supervisors.
My principal supervisor, Professor Barry Iacopetta, provided me with many
stimulating and enjoyable discussions. His critical appraisal of manuscripts
was pivotal in their subsequent publication.
My Co-Supervisor, Professor Cameron Platell, sets a wonderful and unique
example as a surgeon. Since the commencement of my surgical training in
2002, he has been a steady mentor, always encouraging me to go one step
further.
My sincere gratitude goes out to Fabienne Grieu and Lisa Spalding for
imparting their knowledge of IHC and their friendly help which made lab
work so enjoyable. A special thanks to Anne Marie Shearwood who showed
me the basics of image analysis.
I would also like to thank my parents for providing me with everything I
could ever need and for being so supportive over many years. I would
especially like to thank my wife Gemma and our three beautiful children for
all the love and happiness I experienced during this time.
– vi –
Statement of candidate contribution
This thesis contains published work which has been co-authored. The
bibliographical details of the work and where it appears in the thesis are
outlined below.
Chapter 1
Salama P, Platell C. Host response to colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2008;
78: 745-53.
Paul Salama retrieved and interpreted all the relevant literature. Drafting of
the manuscript was performed by Paul Salama and Prof Cameron Platell.
Chapter 3
Salama P, Phillips M, Grieu F, Morris M, Zeps N, Joseph D, Platell C,
Iacopetta B. Tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T regulatory cells show strong
prognostic significance in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 186-92.
Paul Salama was involved in the conception, design and execution of
experimental work. PS performed the IHC of the TMA with the assistance
of Fabienne Grieu. PS also performed all high resolution scanning of the
glass slides and digital image analysis, including selection and optimisation
of algorithm, and annotation of all images. PS collected, analysed and
interpreted all data. Michael Phillips (Biostatistician) was consulted for
further expert assistance. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by Paul
Salama and Professor Barry Iacopetta.
– vii –
Chapter 4
Salama P, Phillips M, Platell C, Iacopetta B. Low expression of Granzyme
B in colorectal cancer is associated with signs of early metastastic invasion.
Histopathology. 2011 Aug;59(2):207-15.
Paul Salama was involved in the conception, design and execution of
experimental work. IHC and high resolution scanning was performed by
Fabienne Grieu and Anne Goebbels. PS performed all digital image
analysis, including selection and optimisation of algorithm, and checking of
all image annotations. PS collected, analysed and interpreted all data.
Michael Phillips (Biostatistician) was consulted for further expert
assistance. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by Paul Salama and
Professor Barry Iacopetta.
Chapter 5
Salama P, Stewart C, Forrest C, Platell C, Iacopetta B. FOXP3+ cell density
in lymphoid follicles from histologically normal mucosa is a strong
prognostic factor in early stage colon cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother.
2012; 61(8):1183-90
Paul Salama was involved in the conception, design and execution of
experimental work. PS identified patients through a prospective database
and pathology records and retrieved all glass slides and blocks. PS
performed all IHC with the assistance of Lisa Spalding. PS also performed
all high resolution scanning of the glass slides and digital image analysis,
including selection and optimisation of algorithm, and annotation of all
– viii –
images. PS collected, analysed and interpreted all data. Drafting of the
manuscript was performed by Paul Salama and Prof Barry Iacopetta.
_______________________ (candidate)
Paul Rameri Salama
(Principal Supervisor)
Prof Barry Iacopetta
– ix –
Contents
Declaration................................................................................................................................................... i
Abstract....................................................................................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................................... v
Statement of candidate contribution ....................................................................................................... vi
Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... ix
List of tables.............................................................................................................................................xiii
Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... xiv
1. Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer............................................................... 1
1.1. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. The host immune response to colorectal cancer.................................................................................. 2
1.3. Innate immunity .................................................................................................................................. 3
1.3.1. Innate humoral immunity ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Innate cellular immunity........................................................................................................ 4
1.3.2.1. Neutrophils....................................................................................................................... 5
1.3.2.2. Macrophages.................................................................................................................... 5
1.3.2.3. Natural killer cells ........................................................................................................... 6
1.3.2.4. Mast cells ......................................................................................................................... 7
1.4. Acquired immunity ............................................................................................................................. 8
1.4.1. Antigen recognition ............................................................................................................... 9 1.4.2. Dendritic cells...................................................................................................................... 10 1.4.3. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes......................................................................................... 12
1.4.3.1. CD4+ T cells................................................................................................................... 13
1.4.3.2. CD45RO+ memory T cells predict the absence of invasion and metastasis ....................................................................................................................... 14
1.4.3.3. CD8+ T cells have prognostic significance .................................................................... 14
1.4.3.4. Tumour location of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and colorectal cancer prognosis ............................................................................................................ 15
1.4.3.5. CD4+CD25+ Tregs ......................................................................................................... 16
1.4.3.6. Microsatellite instability and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes...................................... 17
1.5. Prognostication of CRC .................................................................................................................... 18
1.6. Aims of this research......................................................................................................................... 19
1.6.1. Aim 1 ................................................................................................................................... 20
1.6.2. Aim 2 ................................................................................................................................... 20
1.6.3. Aim 3 ................................................................................................................................... 21
2. Methods ............................................................................................................................................. 23
2.1. Study populations.............................................................................................................................. 23
2.1.1. Study population – Cohort 1................................................................................................ 23 2.1.2. Study population – Cohort 2................................................................................................ 24
2.2. Construction of tissue microarray ..................................................................................................... 25
2.3. Immunohistochemistry...................................................................................................................... 25
– x –
2.4. High resolution scanning of glass slides ........................................................................................... 26
2.4.1. Digital image analysis – lymphocyte quantification............................................................ 31 2.4.2. Digital image analysis – Granzyme B quantification .......................................................... 34
2.5. Evaluation of full face sections – Cohort 2 (Chapter 5) .................................................................... 38
2.5.1. Pathology review of H&E slides ......................................................................................... 38 2.5.2. Immunohistochemical staining for FOXP3 ......................................................................... 38 2.5.3. Quantification of FOXP3+ Treg cell density in full face sections........................................ 38 2.5.4. Assessment of normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin........................................ 39
2.6. Statistical analysis ............................................................................................................................. 40
2.6.1. Statistical methods used in Chapter 3 .................................................................................. 40 2.6.2. Statistical methods used in Chapter 4 .................................................................................. 40 2.6.3. Statistical methods used in Chapter 5 .................................................................................. 41
2.7. Immunohistochemistry protocols ...................................................................................................... 41
2.7.1. CD8 staining of tissue microarray ....................................................................................... 41 2.7.2. CD45RO staining of tissue microarray................................................................................ 43 2.7.3. FOXP3 staining of tissue microarray and full face sections ................................................ 44
2.7.4. GrB staining of tissue microarray........................................................................................ 45
3. T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer ............................................................................................ 49
3.1. Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 49
3.2. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 50
3.3. Materials and methods ...................................................................................................................... 52
3.4. Results............................................................................................................................................... 52
3.5. Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 60
4. Granzyme B in colorectal cancer .................................................................................................... 68
4.1. Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 68
4.2. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 68
4.3. Methods............................................................................................................................................. 70
4.4. Results............................................................................................................................................... 70
4.4.1. Correlation of Granzyme B expression with T cell subtype densities...................................... 71
4.4.2. Correlation of Granzyme B expression with histopathological features and microsatellite instability status...................................................................................... 71
4.4.3. Prognostic significance of Granzyme B expression ............................................................ 73
4.5. Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 77
5. Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer.................................................................................................. 83
5.1. Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. 83
5.2. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 84
5.3. Methods............................................................................................................................................. 87
5.4. Results............................................................................................................................................... 87
5.5. Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 94
– xi –
6. General discussion.......................................................................................................................... 102
6.1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 102
6.1.1. Identification of high risk stage II colorectal cancer.......................................................... 102 6.1.2. Peritumoural inflammatory infiltrate is associated with improved
survival .............................................................................................................................. 103
6.1.3. Host immunity is important for surviving cancer .............................................................. 104 6.1.4. T helper type 1 immune cells are associated with improved survival................................ 104
6.2. Major findings................................................................................................................................. 106
6.2.1. Tumour-infiltrating Tregs have strong prognostic significance......................................... 106
6.2.2. Low expression of Granzyme B is associated with signs of early metastasis........................................................................................................................... 108
6.2.3. Immune parameters retain prognostic significance even when vascular and serosal invasion are carefully assessed ....................................................................... 108
6.2.4. Tregs within lymphoid follicles of histologically normal colonic mucosa are associated with adverse outcome.................................................................... 109
6.2.5. Lymphoid follicles within the normal colonic mucosa have a protective effect ................................................................................................................. 110
6.3. Future research................................................................................................................................ 110
6.4. Conclusions..................................................................................................................................... 112
6.4.1. Summary of major findings ............................................................................................... 112 6.4.2. Future studies emanating from this work........................................................................... 113
7. Bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 114
Appendices
– xii –
List of figures
Figure 1.1. Interactions between the immune system and the tumour cell. .............................................. 9
Figure 1.2. Presentation of tumour antigen by DCs. .............................................................................. 12
Figure 1.3. Locations of TILs................................................................................................................. 13
Figure 2.1. Example of a TMA section as displayed by ImageScope. ................................................... 25
Figure 2.2. TMA map: step 1. ................................................................................................................ 27
Figure 2.3. TMA map: step 2. ................................................................................................................ 28
Figure 2.4. The TMA work page............................................................................................................ 29
Figure 2.5. Full screen image of an individual core stained for GrB and viewed through Aperio ImageScope. ............................................................................................... 30
Figure 2.6. Example of FOXP3+ lymphocytes within a lymph follicle in the normal colonic mucosa before (left) and after (right) digital image analysis with the IHC nuclear algorithm. ............................................................................ 32
Figure 2.7. Representative area selected for analysis of GrB expression. .............................................. 35
Figure 2.8. Selected area analysed with the colour deconvolution algorithm. ....................................... 35
Figure 2.9. The colour deconvolution algorithm calibrated to detect DAB staining of GrB. ................................................................................................................................. 37
Figure 3.1. FOXP3 staining for Tregs in CRC. ...................................................................................... 54
Figure 3.2. CD8 staining of CRC. .......................................................................................................... 55
Figure 3.3. CD45RO staining of CRC.................................................................................................... 55
Figure 4.1. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for CRC subgroups............................................................76
Figure 5.1. Section of histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin.................................................................................................................................. 89
Figure 5.2. (A) Representative low power image of normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin. ............................................................................................................. 90
Figure 5.2. (B) High power image of lymphoid follicle showing immune cells stained positively for the FOXP3 marker. ........................................................................... 90
Figure 5.3. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for stage II colon cancer patient subgroups............................................................................................................................. 93
Figure 6.1. In stage II CRC with no vascular, perineural or lymphatic invasion, the density of tumour-infiltrating Tregs can further stratify patients into low and high risk groups.................................................................................................... 107
– xiii –
List of tables
Table 2.1. Output from IHC nuclear algorithm. ................................................................................... 33
Table 3.1. Median density of the T cell markers CD8+, CD45RO+ and FOXP3+ in normal colonic mucosa (N) and in colorectal tumour (T) tissues (cells/mm2)........................................................................................................................... 53
Table 3.2. Associations between T cell marker densities in normal (N) and tumour (T) tissue from CRC patients. .................................................................................. 56
Table 3.3. Univariate analysis for associations between high density of tumour-infiltrating T cell types and pathological features of CRC. ................................................. 57
Table 3.4. Univariate survival analysis for pathological features and for T cell density in normal and malignant colorectal tissue from stage II and III CRC patients. Cox proportional hazards regression method. .............................................. 58
Table 3.5. Multivariate analysis showing the significant prognostic indicators in stage II and stage III CRC (n=445)...................................................................................... 59
Table 3.6. Multivariate analysis for prognostic significance of pathological features and T cell marker density in stage II CRC. ............................................................ 60
Table 4.1. Correlations between GrB expression and the density of T cell subtypes in the normal colonic mucosa (N) and tumour (T) tissue of CRC patients................................ 71
Table 4.2. Associations between the expression of GrBT and histopathological markers in CRC. .................................................................................................................. 72
Table 4.3. Associations between GrBT/FOXP3+T and histopathological markers
in CRC. ................................................................................................................................ 74
Table 4.4. Univariate survival analysis for the prognostic significance of GrBT expression in CRC stage and MSI subgroups...................................................................... 74
Table 4.5. Multivariate analysis for the prognostic significance of histopathological and immune cell markers in CRC............................................................ 77
Table 5.1. Clinical and histopathological features of 165 stage II colon cancers. ................................ 87
Table 5.2. FOXP3+ Treg density (cells/mm2) in tumour tissue and in lymphoid follicles from histologically normal colonic mucosa at the surgical margin.................................................................................................................................. 88
Table 5.3. Univariate survival analysis for clinicopathological features and FOXP3+ Treg density in stage II colon cancer.....................................................................92
Table 5.4. Multivariate analysis for indicators of cancer-specific survival in stage II colon cancer. .................................................................................................................... 92
– xiv –
Abbreviations
CART Classification and Regression Tree
CRC Colorectal cancer
DAB Diaminobenzidine
DC Dendritic cells
EMVI Extramural vascular (venous) invasion
FOXP3 Transcription factor forkhead box P3
GrB Granzyme B
GrBT GrB in tumour tissue
HR Hazard ratio
IHC Immunohistochemistry
mGPS Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score
MHC Major histocompatibility complex
MSI Microsatellite instability
MSS Microsatellite stable
NK Natural killer
qRT-PCR Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR
TGF-β Transforming growth factor beta
Th1 T helper type 1
Th2 T helper type 2
TILs Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
TMA Tissue microarray
TNM Tumour-node-metastasis
Tregs T regulatory cells
Introduction:
The immune response to colorectal cancer
This introduction is based on a review published in the ANZ Journal of
Surgery (Salama and Platell, vol 78: p 745-53, 2008). It reflects the state of
knowledge in the literature at June 2007 just prior to undertaking the
experimental work for this study.
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 1
1. Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
1.1. Background
The prognosis for patients with CRC has traditionally been predicted by the
tumour’s histological features. Although this approach has been in use for
the last century, there is now widespread recognition that more accurate
prognostic indicators are required. While most attention has been focused
on biomarkers such as oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes, there is now
also a renewed interest in the host immune response to CRC as a prognostic
factor.
It has long been established that inflammation and immunity play critical
roles in the pathogenesis, invasion and eventual metastasis of cancers. The
advent of sophisticated animal models and immunological markers has led
to a greater understanding of the host response to cancer. Individual immune
cells are dynamic structures that have variable behaviour controlled by
complex interactions within the tumour micro-environment. In the setting of
CRC it was first observed that peritumoural inflammatory infiltrates were
associated with improved prognosis. IHC has revealed the individual cell
types within these infiltrates. It now appears that an adaptive immune
response, differentiated along the T helper type 1 (Th1) pathway, controls
tumour invasion and metastasis. Furthermore, the immune system exerts
selection pressure leading to the evolution of tumour cell variants that can
induce tolerance and disable adaptive immunity. These tumour cells then
utilise the mechanisms of innate immunity to facilitate further growth,
angiogenesis, invasion and eventual metastasis. Harnessing the immune
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 2
response to defeat CRC has been a topic of intense investigation, but has so
far proven unsuccessful. Nevertheless some researchers remain optimistic
that immunotherapy will play an important role in the treatment of this
common disease.
1.2. The host immune response to colorectal cancer
“The function of the immune system is to prevent takeover of the body by
genomes other than that encoded in the germ line. Central to this function is
the ability to kill (Nathan, 2006).”
The colon and rectum represent unique environments in the human body.
They form an important interface between the external environment and the
host’s immune system. A relatively large number of immune competent
cells line the bowel wall and interact with high concentrations of foreign
antigens in a tolerogenic but active manner. This interface is separated by
millimetres from the peritoneal cavity that is primed through its local
defence mechanisms to react aggressively to any breach in the bowel’s
continuity.
A number of early observations served to highlight the interaction between
the host and CRC. Patients who suffered post-operative sepsis (i.e.
anastomotic leaks) were found to have worse stage-adjusted prognosis from
their cancers (Law et al., 2007), suggesting that systemic inflammation may
promote the progression of metastases (Coussens et al. 2006). On the other
hand, it was observed that the presence of large numbers of lymphocytes
adjacent to the primary tumour seemed to inhibit its progression (Dunn et
al., 2002).
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 3
Clearly, the host’s immune response and the local tissue environment are
important for the development and progression of CRCs. Two current
theories serve to highlight these observations. Firstly, a “smouldering”
inflammatory environment favours the development of cancers (Balkwill et
al., 2005). Secondly, cancers actively escape the normal immune
mechanisms that serve to destroy abnormal genetic material (Dunn et al.,
2002). In other words, the selective pressure exerted by the immune system
allows the evolution of tumour cells that are able to “escape” or proliferate
undetected. These cancers are less immunogenic and hence this process has
been called immunoediting (Dunn et al., 2002).
This introduction seeks to explore the immune system and its influence on
the development and progression of CRC.
1.3. Innate immunity
The innate immune response serves to combat pathogens and exists
regardless of prior exposure (Abbas et al., 2001, Roitt, 1997). It does not
improve with repeated exposure to pathogen. The innate immune response
in the gut consists initially of physical barriers to infection (mucous,
enterocytes and the bowel wall). If pathogens succeed in penetrating these
barriers they are confronted by phagocytic cells (neutrophils and
macrophages), the inflammatory and complement pathways, and the
humoral responses (e.g. acute phase protein and cytokine production).
Within the abdomen, these mechanisms are concentrated in the bowel wall,
peritoneal cavity and omentum.
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 4
1.3.1. Innate humoral immunity
Innate humoral immunity refers to a layer of defence against
microbiological agents mediated by soluble factors (Roitt, 1997). Innate
humoral immunity can act by inducing the acute inflammatory state either
by the complement cascade or activation of macrophages. Under normal
circumstances, this serves as a defence against invading organisms and
allows for the initiation of wound healing. The release of pro-inflammatory
cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) by cells of the innate immune system
has a range of effects including increased vascular permeability, the
expression of adhesion molecules, chemotaxis of inflammatory cells,
angiogenesis, influx of fibroblasts and regeneration of epithelial layers.
Macrophages are central in maintaining a chronic inflammatory state.
(Balkwill 2005) Cancers benefit from the presence an inflammatory state to
promote their own growth, invasion and metastases. (Coussens et al., 2002,
Balkwill et al., 2005) Chronic inflammation of the bowel increases the risk
of colon cancer while the use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
medications reduces the risk. (Coussens et al., 2002, Balkwill et al., 2005)
1.3.2. Innate cellular immunity
Typically around colon cancers there exists some degree of inflammatory
infiltrate. The cells that form the infiltrate tend to be within the stroma of
the tumour rather than within the epithelial component. (Banner et al., 1993,
Jackson et al., 1996) There is limited data on the individual cell types that
form this infiltrate, although the majority are lymphocytes. Svennevig et al.
reported that 47% were lymphocytes, 19% plasma cells, 15% macrophages,
15% neutrophils and 5% mast cells (Svennevig et al., 1982).
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 5
1.3.2.1. Neutrophils
Neutrophils are present in the circulation in large numbers and respond
rapidly to tissue injury (Abbas et al., 2001). They have the ability to destroy
host connective tissue and cells along with cellular structures that contain
foreign DNA (Nathan, 2006). In so doing they stimulate the inflammatory
cascade and trigger adaptive immunity by sending signals to monocytes,
dendritic cells (DCs) and lymphocytes. Importantly, by their signalling, they
influence the type of response from these various immune cells (Nathan,
2006). Neutrophils may form up to 15% of the inflammatory infiltrate
associated with CRCs and this proportion increases within areas of tumour
necrosis (Svennevig et al., 1982). In patients with rectal cancer, high
tumoural densities of neutrophils are independent predictors of improved
prognosis, especially in association with microscopic abscesses (Uehara et
al., 2007).
1.3.2.2. Macrophages
Macrophages are derived from circulating monocytes and are present within
the bowel wall (Abbas et al., 2001). They are long-lived cells that perform a
phagocytic function to defend the body from intracellular organisms and
possibly cancer cells (Abbas et al., 2001, Roitt, 1997). They also secrete
pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α). Macrophages form an
important bridge to the acquired immune response. They do this by
producing IL-12 and TNF-α that cause lymphocyte proliferation and
differentiation. Macrophages can also function as antigen presenting cells
and thereby initiate the acquired immune response.
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 6
In patients with CRC, macrophages are found particularly around necrotic
areas of tumour and the advancing tumour margin (Ambe et al., 1989).
Some studies have found that high levels of tissue macrophages are
associated with earlier disease stage, absence of nodal and lympho-vascular
metastases and an overall better prognosis (Funada et al., 2003, Tan et al.,
2005). A high level of macrophage infiltration in combination with a high
T cell infiltration was associated with even better prognosis than
macrophages alone (Funada et al., 2003).
In contrast, other authors have reported that macrophages can promote the
development of CRC based upon observations that the number of
macrophages increases with tumour stage (Dalerba et al., 2003). In theory,
macrophages play a central role in the production of a chronic inflammatory
state (Balkwill et al., 2005). Tumour-associated macrophages through
release of cytokines, promote angiogenesis and the growth of tumour stroma
while inhibiting adaptive immunity (Balkwill et al., 2005). Depending on
context, macrophages could either promote a chronic inflammatory state or
play an important supporting role for the adaptive immune response.
1.3.2.3. Natural killer cells
Natural killer (NK) cells are granule-containing lymphocytes that form part
of the innate cellular immune response. They kill cells infected with
intracellular organisms and activate macrophages by secreting interferon
gamma (Abbas et al., 2001). Cytotoxic T cells share the same cytolytic
mechanism as NK cells (described below) (Roitt, 1997). NK cells also
facilitate the maturation of DCs and thus provide an important link between
innate and adaptive immunity (Zou, 2005). In CRC, a high number of NK
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 7
cells in the inflammatory infiltrate is associated with better prognosis
(Kubota et al., 1992; Coca et al., 1997; Koda et al., 1997; Menon et al.,
2004; Tachibana et al., 2005). The number of NK cells decreases with
increasing cancer stage (Kubota et al., 1992). Similarly, low pre-operative
levels of blood NK cell activity in patients undergoing curative resections
are associated with disease recurrence (Koda et al., 1997). It has been
postulated that NK cells can rapidly eliminate tumour cells without prior
exposure, whereas cytotoxic T cells require prior sensitisation and therefore
more time to become effective (Menon et al., 2004). The NK/CD3+CD69+
ratio in the peripheral blood was found to have prognostic significance on
multivariate analysis in patients with colon cancer (Vesely et al., 2005) It is
also of interest that 5-FU based chemotherapy increases the number of NK
cells in the peripheral blood (Holcombe et al., 1999).
1.3.2.4. Mast cells
Mast cells are located predominantly in the muscularis mucosa and lamina
propria of the bowel wall. They are best known for immediate
hypersensitivity (allergic) reactions and IgE-mediated inflammatory
reactions (Abbas et al., 2001; Parslow, 2001). Mast cells interact with the
adaptive immune response by expressing surface receptors for IgE.
Degranulation of mast cells results in acute inflammation (Abbas et al.,
2001; Roitt, 1997; Parslow, 2001). This can be mediated either through
soluble factors of the complement cascade or IgE (allergic). Similar to other
immune cell types, a high number of mast cells is associated with earlier
CRC stage (Tan et al., 2005) and improved survival (Nagtegaal et al., 2001;
Nielsen et al., 1999). Interestingly, the number of mast cells progressively
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 8
decreases from normal mucosa through premalignant conditions and the
lowest numbers are seen in cancers (Lachter et al., 1995).
1.4. Acquired immunity
The acquired immune response consists of defence mechanisms that are
customised to recognise each particular pathogen (Abbas et al., 2001; Roitt,
1997). On first exposure, these mechanisms may have a weak response, but
on subsequent exposures they rapidly become more effective. This response
is dependent on the molecular recognition and presentation of both
intracellular and extracellular antigens to T cells that mediate the production
of antibodies and apoptosis of infected cells. The gut-associated lymphoid
tissue represents one of the largest immune organs in the body and so has a
major capacity for acquired immune responses.
The innate and acquired immune responses are linked. Neutrophils and the
complement cascade (innate) together with antibody production (acquired)
are important defence mechanisms against extracellular organisms. On the
other hand, macrophages, NK cells, cytokines (innate) and T cells
(acquired) are responsible for intracellular infections (Roitt, 1997). The
immune response may have dual effects against cancer, as shown in Figure
1. 1. The ongoing activation of innate immune cells may actually promote
tumour growth by producing cytokines and growth factors. In contrast, the
adaptive immune response may inhibit tumour growth by exerting direct
effects on cancer cells (Sacchi et al., 2003).
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 9
Figure 1.1. Interactions between the immune system and the tumour cell.
From Salama, 2008.
1.4.1. Antigen recognition
The critical event in the acquired immune response is the recognition of
non-self. This process is heavily dependent on what are termed “recognition
molecules”. Such molecules include the Class 1 major histocompatibility
complex (MHC) proteins that are expressed on almost all adult cells and are
important for the presentation of intracellular antigens to immune competent
cells (Roitt, 1997). Class II MHC proteins are expressed only on
macrophages, antigen presenting cells and B lymphocytes and are important
for presenting extracellular antigens to relevant cells.
One mechanism by which cancers cells can evade the acquired immune
response is by their failure to express MHC class I. CD8+ cytotoxic T cells
can only destroy target cells when antigens are presented in association with
MHC class I. It now appears that loss of MHC class I expression is an
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 10
important mechanism by which cancer cells evade cytotoxic CD8+ T cells
(Dalerba et al., 2003; Titu et al., 2002) The selection of cancer cells with
loss of antigen presenting machinery is in keeping with the theory of tumour
escape and immunoediting (Figure 1.1) (Dunn et al., 2002). Although loss
of MHC class I may protect tumour cells from attack by CD8+ T cells, it
predisposes them to lysis by NK cells. It remains unclear how the loss of
MHC class I expression influences the peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrate
and whether this has any effect on prognosis (Dalerba et al., 2003; Sandel et
al., 2005; Watson et al., 2006; van den Ingh et al., 1987).
Normal colonic epithelial cells rarely express MHC class II proteins. They
can be stimulated to do so under the influence of inflammatory cytokines,
resulting in the subsequent ability to present antigens (Dalerba et al., 2003).
In contrast to normal colonic epithelial cells, MHC class II is expressed in a
high proportion of colon cancer cells (42%). Well differentiated tumours are
more likely to express MHC class II proteins. Higher rates of lymphatic
invasion and lymph node metastases are associated with colon cancers that
lack MHC class II expression (Matsushita et al., 2006; Warabi et al., 2000).
However, no relationship has been found between the expression of MHC
class II on tumour cells and the presence of lymphocytic infiltrate. It would
appear that expression of MHC class II proteins by cancer cells allows the
host to develop a more effective immune response against the tumour.
1.4.2. Dendritic cells
DCs are the most important antigen presenting cells in the body and are
derived from the bone marrow (Abbas et al., 2001; Roitt, 1997). They are
present in the gut wall and peritoneal cavity and have characteristic thin
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 11
cytoplasmic projections that give them a stellar shape. DCs present antigens
to resting CD4+ T cells in association with MHC type II proteins, leading to
activation of the latter cells (see Figure 1.2). Once antigens have been
captured in the gut wall, DCs migrate to regional lymph nodes where they
regulate both the innate immune response (via NK cells) and the adaptive
immune response (via cytotoxic lymphocytes) (Browning et al., 1996). In
CRC, the DC forms clusters with CD4+, CD8+ and CD45RO+ T cells at the
invasive margin of the tumour (Suzuki et al., 2002).
High numbers of DCs in CRC are associated with the density of
lymphocytic infiltrate and with the degree of paracortical hyperplasia in
regional lymph nodes (Ambe et al., 1989, Dadabayev et al., 2004). This
suggests DCs regulate the immune response both at the site of the primary
cancer and in the lymph nodes (Ambe et al., 1989). The presence of DCs in
direct contact with cancer cells (ie. the intraepithelial compartment) is
associated with higher numbers of CD45+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and
with improved survival (Ambe et al., 1989). In contrast, DCs in the stroma
do not show these correlations (Sandel et al., 2005). The anti-cancer activity
of DCs is influenced by their activation status, location and the micro-
environment. Under aseptic conditions, tumour tolerance is likely to
develop if DCs capture a tumour antigen and presents it to T cells in the
draining lymph nodes. If, however, the same antigen is presented under
conditions of acute inflammation, an effective immune response is more
likely to occur (Melero et al., 2006; Sporri et al., 2005; Sakaguchi et al.,
2003). Therefore, factors in the tumour environment affect DC activation
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 12
which may then determine the nature of the immune response ie. tumour
tolerance or cytotoxic response (see Figure 1.2).
Figure 1.2. Presentation of tumour antigen by DCs. From Salama, 2008.
1.4.3. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
Lymphocytes are the most abundant cell in the immune system and tumour-
infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) appear to have the strongest impact on CRC
prognosis of all the immune cell types evaluated so far (Pagès et al., 2005;
Nagtegaal et al., 2001). T cell lymphocytes are identified by the marker
CD3. The important lymphocytic subtypes for CRC prognosis are CD4+
T cells, CD8+ T cells and CD45RO+ T cells. Not only is the function of
these cells important but also their location relative to the tumour. Three
arbitrary tumour compartments have been described: the tumour epithelium,
the tumour stroma and the advancing margin (Naito et al., 1998; Figure
1.3).
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 13
Figure 1.3. Locations of TILs.
A) advancing margin, B) tumour stroma, C) intraepithelial. (Taken from Dalerba et al., 2003).
1.4.3.1. CD4+ T cells
CD4+ T cells play an important role in driving the immune response and
determining its nature. They recognise antigens in association with MHC
class II on antigen presenting cells (eg DCs) to become T helper cells that
respond in one of two ways depending on their subsequent differentiation
(Roitt, 1997). Naïve CD4+ T helper cells differentiate into either Th1 cells
in response to intracellular pathogens or T helper type 2 (Th2) cells in
response to extracellular pathogens (Roitt, 1997). This process is controlled
by the presence of specific cytokines (Sazbo et al., 2003). Macrophages
produce IL-12 which causes differentiation of naïve T cells into Th1 cells.
NK cell derived IL-4 is responsible for differentiation of naïve CD4+ T
helper cells into Th2 cells (Roitt, 1997). Th1 cells are responsible for the
initiation of cell-mediated immunity characterised by CD8+ cytotoxic
T cells. In the setting of CRC, CD4+ T cells are thought to differentiate
along the invasive margin into Th1 cells (Musha et al., 2005). Cancer cells
are analogous to intracellular infections in that they contain “foreign” DNA
and are capable of taking over the body. The Th1 response thus promotes
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 14
CD8+ T cell mediated immunity and is therefore protective in patients with
CRC (Pagès et al., 2005, Sazbo et al., 2003, Galon et al., 2006).
1.4.3.2. CD45RO+ memory T cells predict the absence of invasion and metastasis
CD45RO+ T cells, sometimes referred to as “effector-memory” T cells
(Galon et al., 2006), mediate reactive memory in response to antigenic
stimulation (Sallusto et al., 2004). These cells are highly sensitive to
antigenic stimulation and strongly activate DCs (Sallusto et al., 2004). Once
antigenic presentation occurs they initially produce IL-2 and subsequently
proliferate and differentiate into effector cells (Sallusto et al., 2004).
Subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells persist as quiescent memory cells and
may therefore explain the phenomenon of immunosurveillance (Sallusto et
al., 2004). These cells are considered as part of the Th1 adaptive immune
response. Infiltration of CRCs with high numbers of CD45RO+ T cells has
been associated with the absence of vascular, lymphatic and perineural
invasion and lymph node metastasis (Pagès et al., 2005) These cells may
therefore play an important role at the primary tumour site to suppress
invasion and subsequent metastasis.
1.4.3.3. CD8+ T cells have prognostic significance
The CD8+ T cell response is mediated by differentiation of T cells along the
Th1 pathway. Cells and mediators of this pathway have been associated
with improved prognosis in CRC (Pagès et al., 2005; Galon et al., 2006;
Menon et al., 2004; Nagtegaal et al., 2001; Chiba et al., 2004; Naito et al.,
1998; Prall et al., 2004). CD8+ T cells recognise antigens associated with
MHC class I proteins on target cells leading to destruction through the
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 15
release of perforin and granzymes (Roitt, 1997). Perforin creates a pore in
the target cell through which granzymes enter and trigger apoptosis (Roitt,
1997). CD8+ T cells located within tumour cell nests, as opposed to the
stroma or invasive margin, are most significantly associated with improved
survival (Chiba et al., 2004; Naito et al., 1998).
CD8+ T cells appear to play an important role in immuno-surveillance. A
high CD8+/CD4+ T cell ratio and a high frequency of activated CD8+
T cells in colon cancer was associated with the presence of activated anti-
cancer T cells in the blood and bone marrow. The density of CD8+ T cell
infiltration was inversely correlated with tumour stage (Menon et al., 2004;
Naito et al., 1998; Koch et al., 2006) and was higher in tumours that did not
show early signs of invasion (Pagès et al., 2005) Increasing CRC stage has
also been correlated with deactivation of CD8+ T cells (Koch et al., 2006).
The degree of infiltration with CD8+ T cells has been claimed to have
comparable prognostic significance as Duke’s staging (Naito et al., 1998).
Some researchers have concluded these cells must therefore suppress CRC
progression (Pagès et al., 2005). Alternatively, as the tumour phenotype
develops greater invasive and metastatic potential, it simultaneously evolves
to evade and actively inhibit the immune response. This could explain why
more advanced tumours show a less pronounced immune response.
1.4.3.4. Tumour location of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and colorectal cancer prognosis
The location of TILs in relation to the tumour appears to be of importance in
predicting survival from CRC. Naito et al. demonstrated that CD8+ cells
within cancer cell nests were more important for prognosis than those at the
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 16
advancing margin or tumour stroma (Naito et al., 1998). In a much larger
study, Galon et al. used TMA to examine the immune response both at the
centre of the tumour and at the invasive margin (Galon et al., 2006).
Tumours with high numbers of adaptive immune response cells (CD8+,
CD3+, CD45RO+) in both areas showed better survival, independently of T
stage, lymph node involvement and differentiation (Galon et al., 2006).
Furthermore, the ratio of CD3+ cells in the centre of the tumour to the
invasive margin was the most significant predictor for overall survival
amongst the variables evaluated, including TNM staging.
1.4.3.5. CD4+CD25+ Tregs
Not all lymphocytes in a cancer are thought to be beneficial. Tregs are
CD4+CD25+ lymphocytes that have been reported to modulate the immune
response, in particular the Th1 response (Oldenhove et al., 2003; Curiel et
al., 2007). FOXP3 has proven to be an accurate marker for Tregs (Roncador
et al., 2005). These cells inhibit anti-tumour CD8+ and CD4+ T cells
through the production of cytokines (IL-10 and transforming growth factor
beta – TGF-β) and through cell to cell contact (Curiel et al., 2007). Tregs
have been found at elevated levels in the primary tumours and peripheral
blood of cancer patients (Zou, 2005; Curiel et al., 2007). The presence of
Tregs favours the development of immune tolerance and diminishes the
cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells (Zou, 2005). A high density of tumour-
infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs has been associated with poor outcome in
various solid tumours including ovarian (Curiel et al., 2004; Sato et al.,
2005), pancreatic (Hiraoka et al., 2006) and hepatocellular carcinoma
(Kobayashi et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2007). The failure of various anti-cancer
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 17
immunotherapies, particularly adoptive T cell transfer, has been attributed
to the inhibitory effects of Tregs (June et al., 2007). The Treg depleting
drug Denileukin difitox has been found to have some beneficial effect in
certain cancer types such as cutaneous T cell leukaemia and melanoma
(Curiel et al., 2007). There is very limited data on the role of Tregs in CRC
patients (Loddenkemper et al., 2006, Ling et al., 2007) and anti-Treg
immunotherapies have yet to be trialled in this cancer type (Correale et al.,
2005).
1.4.3.6. Microsatellite instability and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes
The microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype arises because of defects in
DNA mismatch repair genes. MSI is a hallmark of tumours from patients
with the familial cancer condition known as Lynch Syndrome. However,
most MSI CRCs arise sporadically following age-related methylation of the
MLH1 mismatch repair gene. CRC with MSI are characterised by extensive
lymphocytic infiltration in addition to a poorly differentiated and mucinous
phenotype. Clinically these tumours tend to occur in the proximal colon and
have a better prognosis than sporadic CRC (Prall et al., 2004; Phillips et al.,
2004; Dolcetti et al., 1999, Guidoboni et al., 2001). The lymphocytic
infiltrates comprise predominantly activated cytotoxic CD8+ T cells
(Phillips et al., 2004; Michael-Robinson et al., 2001) and are associated
with high rates of tumour cell apoptosis (Phillips et al., 2004; Michael-
Robinson et al., 2001). Whether MSI status is an independent prognostic
indicator for survival is controversial (Gryfe et al., 2000). Prall et al. (2004)
demonstrated that MSI positivity in combination with CD8+ T cell
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 18
infiltration was associated excellent prognosis, particularly in patients who
received 5 FU-based chemotherapy.
1.5. Prognostication of CRC
It has been established for some decades now that a peritumoral infiltrate is
associated with better survival outcomes (Jass et al., 1986). Now it appears
that a Th1 immune response, characterised by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells,
confers this advantage (Jass, 1985). Naito et al. (1998) were the first to
identify that cytotoxic CD8+ T cells have prognostic significance and their
impact on survival is similar to Dukes’ staging. Almost a decade later,
Galon et al. (2006) claimed the type, density and location of immune cells
predicted clinical outcome and were superior to currently used TNM
staging. They postulated that the Th1 immune response suppresses vascular,
lymphatic and perineural invasion (Pagès et al., 2005).
These findings by Pagès and Galon have not been widely reproduced, and
prognostication with the TNM staging system remains the standard of care.
The major use of staging is to determine risk of recurrence and therefore
which patients should have adjuvant therapies. The Australian NHMRC
2005 guidelines recommend that all stage III patients receive adjuvant
chemotherapy. The guidelines state that adjuvant chemotherapy should not
be given for stage II disease except for selected high risk cases who should
be entered into a clinical trial. Unfortunately there are no guidelines to
identify high risk stage II patients despite the 5-year disease free survival for
this group ranging between 51-73% (Gill et al., 2004).
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 19
A recent population based study of patients with stage II CRC revealed that
T4 stage and vascular invasion were the only histopathological prognostic
markers for cancer specific mortality (Morris et al., 2006). It was also
demonstrated in the same population that chemotherapy conferred a survival
advantage for stage II patients (Morris et al., 2007) Unfortunately, these
histopathological prognostic markers tend to be under-reported even though
their presence reflects the risk of disease specific mortality (Stewart et al.,
2007).
In the study populations by Naito (1998), Pagès (2005) and Galon (2006),
pathology sections were not re-evaluated for vascular and serosal invasion,
therefore it is not known if immune markers are indeed better than careful
histopathological assessment. In addition, a variety of molecular markers
(eg MSI, thymidylate synthase, MSI, p53, Kras and deleted in colon cancer)
have been developed. Again, there appears insufficient evidence for their
use as routine prognostic markers (Duffy et al., 2007). It remains, however,
that more accurate methods are required for prognostication of stage II
patients.
1.6. Aims of this research
It is now clear that the host attempts to mount an immune response against
CRC. The strength of this response can be measured and has prognostic
value. It remains to be established whether the immune response suppresses
metastases and invasion or whether the occurrence of these phenomena
coincide with the cancer cells’ evolution to evade the host response through
active inhibition of cytotoxic cells and the induction of tolerance. Current
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 20
literature would suggest that cancers in general can inhibit host immunity
through the release of cytokines and the recruitment of Tregs.
1.6.1. Aim 1
Several studies have demonstrated that the lymphocytic response has
prognostic significance in CRC. The published data suggests that CD8+ and
CD45RO+ lymphocytes are the cells of greatest importance. As yet, the
prognostic significance of FOXP3+ Tregs has not been determined.
Aim 1: Do FOXP3+ Tregs have prognostic significance in CRC?
This aim was addressed in Chapter 3. The results from this work were
published in: Paul Salama, Fabienne Grieu, Melinda Morris, Michael
Phillips, Nik Zeps, David Joseph, Cameron Platell, Barry Iacopetta.
Tumour-infiltrating T regulatory cells show strong prognostic significance
in colorectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009; 27: 186-192.
1.6.2. Aim 2
FOXP3+ Tregs were demonstrated to have strong prognostic significance in
CRC. In addition, high concentrations were associated with improved
survivial which was in contrast to other solid tumourtypes. The mechanism
underlying this observation has not been determined. GrB (the effector
molecule) is utilised by the cytotoxic T cells of the adaptive immune
response to facilitate target cell killing.
Aim 2: Does the level of GrB within the tumour explain the prognostic
significance of FOXP3+ Tregs?
Introduction: The immune response to colorectal cancer
– – 21
This aim was addressed in Chapter 4. The results of this work were
published in: Salama P, Phillips M, Platell C, Iacopetta B. Low expression
of Granzyme B in colorectal cancer is associated with signs of early
metastastic invasion. Histopathology. 2011; 59: 207-15.
1.6.3. Aim 3
The results from Chapter 3 revealed that measurement of FOXP3+ Treg
density allowed for more accurate prognostication of stage II CRC.
Furthermore, the density of FOXP3+ Tregs within the normal colonic
mucosa had strong prognostic significance.
Aim 3.1: Does the quantification of FOXP3+ Tregs give any further
prognostic information after careful assessment of vascular and serosal
invasion?
Aim 3.2: What is the prognostic significance of immune parameters within
the normal colonic mucosa taken from the surgical margin?
This aim was addressed in Chapter 5. The results of this work have been
published in: Paul Salama, Colin Stewart, Cynthia Forrest, Cameron Platell,
Barry Iacopetta. FOXP3+ cell density in lymphoid follicles from
histologically normal mucosa is a strong prognostic factor in early stage
colon cancer. Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy. 2012; 61: 1183-90
Chapter 2: Methods
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 23
2. Methods
2.1. Study populations
2.1.1. Study population – Cohort 1 Cohort 1 comprised of 967 consecutive patients with stage II and stage III
colon and rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection at the Sir Charles
Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, between 1991 and 1999. Normal and
tumour tissue blocks from this CRC population were used to construct the
TMA used in Chapters 3 and 4. Information on patient demographics (sex
and age) and the tumour features (shown in Table 3.3) were obtained from
the pathology record of each case. Tumour site was classified as proximal to
and including, or distal, to the splenic flexure. A total of 593 AJCC stage II
and 374 AJCC stage III CRC comprised the total of 967 cases. Information
on T stage, anatomical site, histological grade, vascular invasion, lymphatic
invasion, perineural invasion, lymphocytic response and MSI determined
using the BAT-26 marker was available for 100, 96, 65, 76, 72, 70, 91 and
95% of cases, respectively. Compared with the five panel marker, BAT-26
has been shown to have a high sensitivity for the detection of MSI tumours
(Loukola et al., 2001).
Information on disease-specific survival was obtained from the Cancer
Registry of Western Australia. The median follow-up time for patients with
AJCC stage II disease was 69.7 months and for patients with stage III it was
52.4 months. Information on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-
FU/leucovorin-based regimens was obtained from hospital medical records.
Seven percent of stage II and 37% of stage III cases received 5FU. At the
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 24
end of the study period, 31% of patients had died of disease recurrence and
25% from other causes. Ethics approval was obtained from the Sir Charles
Gairdner Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee.
2.1.2. Study population – Cohort 2
Patients with stage II colon cancer (n=165) who underwent curative
resection between 1996 and 2006 at the Fremantle and St John of God
hospitals were identified from a prospectively maintained clinical database
and corresponding pathology records. This CRC cohort was used in the
studies described in Chapter 5.
Exclusion criteria were positive surgical margins and the use of adjuvant
chemotherapy. Surgery was performed by four specialist colorectal
surgeons in a standardised manner to ensure adequate resection margins and
lymph node harvest. There were no significant differences between
surgeons for either lymph node harvest (mean=16.8, SD=7.7) or patient
survival. Tumour site was classified as proximal or distal according to
location relative to the splenic flexure. Information on patient demographics
and tumour features were obtained from the pathology report. Cancer-
specific survival information was obtained from the Cancer Registry of
Western Australia and from medical records. The median length of follow-
up time was 72 months. At the end of the study period 27 patients (16%)
had died from recurrence of their cancer and a further 37 patients (22%) had
died from other causes. Ethics approval for the project was obtained from
the Human Research Ethics Committees of the Fremantle and St John of
God hospitals.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 25
2.2. Construction of tissue microarray
Construction of the TMA for Cohort 1 has been described elsewhere (Chai
et al., 2004). Briefly, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks
and the corresponding H&E stained slides were retrieved from pathology
archives. A pathologist marked on the H&E glass slide the area of tissue to
be cored from the corresponding block. One tissue core was taken from
normal colonic mucosa – usually from the surgical margin – while two
cores were taken at random from the tumour. Each core was 1mm in
diameter and was placed into a recipient paraffin block. The histology
(normal or tumour) along with the pathology specimen number,
histopathological details and clinical outcome were recorded by way of an
“x-y” coordinate system. Thin sections for IHC were cut from the paraffin
blocks containing the tissue cores (Figure 2.1).
Figure 2.1. Example of a TMA section as displayed by ImageScope.
2.3. Immunohistochemistry
IHC of TMA sections (Cohort 1) was performed at the School of Surgery
QEII Medical Centre, University of Western Australia, while IHC of full
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 26
face sections (Cohort 2) was carried out at St John of God Hospital,
Subiaco, WA. The CD8, CD45RO, and GrB antibodies were purchased
commercially from Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark and the FOXP3 antibody
was purchased from Abcam, United Kingdom. Detailed IHC protocols for
these antigens are shown in Section 2.7.
2.4. High resolution scanning of glass slides
Glass slides were scanned with a high resolution scanner [ScanScope XT,
Aperio] at 40X magnification. This created virtual slides upon which digital
image analysis was performed.
Each TMA slide was segmented into x and y coordinates with the
specialised software TMA lab v8.0 [Aperio] for results described in Chapter
3, and Spectrum v10 [Aperio] for results described in Chapter 4. Each TMA
core was assigned an x-y coordinate which allowed matching of patient data
to the core and for a score to be assigned by the digital image analysis
software (see Figures 2.2-2.4). Figures 2.2 - 2.4 are screen saves from
Spectrum v10.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 27
Figure 2.2. TMA map: step 1.
A TMA map is created by determining the number of rows and columns. The x-y coordinates are placed accordingly.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 28
Figure 2.3. TMA map: step 2.
The TMA map created in step 1 is placed over the digitised image of the TMA section, thus allowing each core to be assigned an x-y coordinate.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 29
Figure 2.4. The TMA work page.
The top left corner displays the identifying coordinates by row and column with a visual representation. A thumbnail of the core is displayed bottom left. The results of analysis are displayed at the bottom right of page.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 30
A full screen image of each individual core was viewed through an
accompanying software package [ImageScope version 9]. This provided
high resolution of the image with zooming, thus allowing careful annotation
of individual cores (Figure 2.5).
Figure 2.5. Full screen image of an individual core stained for GrB and viewed through Aperio ImageScope.
The green line is a manual annotation which marks the area to be analysed.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 31
2.4.1. Digital image analysis – lymphocyte quantification
Included in the Aperio package were digital image analysis algorithms
which allowed objective quantification of positive diaminobenzidine (DAB)
stain within a defined area. The IHC nuclear algorithm v9 [Aperio] was
initially designed to quantify nuclear staining; however, it was also
successfully used to calculate the number of positively staining
lymphocytes. With minimal adjustment of the algorithm parameters,
positively staining lymphocytes were accurately quantified (Figure 2.6).
Integral to this process was annotation of the digital image. The area of
interest was manually annotated using a mouse or Wacom Tablet pen tool.
The density of the individual cell types for each core was calculated by
dividing the cell count (as quantified by the algorithm) by the area. The
algorithm creates an output table (example shown in Table 2.1) from which
data can be collected and analysed.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 32
Figure 2.6. Example of FOXP3+ lymphocytes within a lymph follicle in the normal colonic mucosa before (left) and after (right) digital image analysis with the IHC nuclear algorithm.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 33
The post digital image analysis was: Red 3+, strong staining; Orange 2+,
medium staining; Yellow 1+, weak staining; Blue 0+, no stain. The
algorithm output is shown in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1. Output from IHC nuclear algorithm.
Percent positive nuclei 25.5435
Intensity score 3
(3+) percent nuclei 22.9097
(2+) percent nuclei 1.75585
(1+) percent nuclei 0.877926
(0+) percent nuclei 74.4565
Average positive intensity 131.771
Average negative intensity 239.317
(3+) nuclei 548
(2+) nuclei 42
(1+) nuclei 21
(0+) nuclei 1781
Total nuclei 2392
Average nuclear RGB intensity 160.813
Average nuclear size (pixels) 1042.31
Average nuclear size (um2) 66.0331
Area of analysis (pixels) 8293288
Area of analysis (mm2) 0.52540382
FOXP3+ lymphocyte density is calculated by dividing the total number of
positively staining (3+, 2+ and 1+ nuclei) lymphocytes by the analysed area.
Density = total lymphocytes / area
= (548 + 42 + 21) / (0.52540382)
= 1162.92 FOXP3+ cells per mm2
The densities of CD8+, CD45+ and FOXP3+ lymphocytes were calculated in
the same way.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 34
In Chapter 3, the evaluation of T cell marker density was carried out blinded
to clinicopathological information. Individual cores were examined by one
observer [PS] and annotated to ensure that only normal colonic epithelium
or viable tumour tissue was included in the area of analysis. No attempt was
made to evaluate the various tumour compartments separately (eg. stroma,
tumour cell nests). Results for cell density were exported into an Excel file
and individual cores were matched to corresponding clinicopathogical data.
2.4.2. Digital image analysis – Granzyme B quantification
Quantification of GrB expression was carried out using the colour
deconvolution algorithm [Aperio]. The GrB stain appeared as fine granules
within the cytoplasm of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells and NK cells (Figures 2.7
and 2.8). The nuclear algorithm described above was inadequate at
quantifying such small granules. The colour deconvolution algorithm
(Figure 2.9) separates the image into three channels depending on the stains
used (Colour Deconvolution Algorithm User’s Guide, 2007). The default
colour channels are Colour 1 haematoxylin; Colour 2 Eosin; and Colour 3
DAB. Each colour channel is calibrated by determining the Red Green Blue
(RGB) component of each stain. The algorithm can be calibrated to detect
any stain by calibrating the RGB component of the Colour Channel. Since
GrB was stained with DAB, only Colour Channel 3 was used.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 35
Figure 2.7. Representative area selected for analysis of GrB expression.
Figure 2.8. Selected area analysed with the colour deconvolution algorithm.
Red = strong staining, Orange = moderate staining, Yellow = weak staining, Blue = no stain.
Rather than counting the number of positively staining cells for GrB, a score
(0-300) was calculated by the colour deconvolution algorithm.
• % Weak = % of analysed area with weak staining
• % Medium = % of analysed area with moderate staining
• % Strong = % of analysed area with strong staining
Score = 1.0*(%Weak) +2.0*(%Medium) + 3.0*(%Strong)
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 36
The intensity (detection) thresholds (weak, moderate or strong staining)
were calculated by the colour deconvolution algorithm as calibrated by the
user. The Threshold Intensity scale ranged from 0 (Black) to 240 (Clear
Area). The critical step was to determine the “weak” threshold at which the
algorithm would reject light background non-specific staining but still
detect weak but positively staining GrB granules. The “weak” threshold was
set after a process of careful trial and error. Areas of obvious or gross non-
specific staining were excluded from analysis by careful manual annotation.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 37
Figure 2.9. The colour deconvolution algorithm calibrated to detect DAB staining of GrB.
The Thresholds determine the staining intensity as weak, moderate or strong.
Colour 3 is calibrated to detect DAB staining through its RGB components.
Positive Colour Channel indicates the colour the algorithm is detecting
The Threshold Intensity scale ranges from 0 (Black) to 240 (Clear Area).
Colour 1 and Colour 2 have been calibrated to detect haematoxylin and eosin respectively.
The algorithm can be calibrated to detect any stain by calibrating the RGB component of the Colour Channel.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 38
2.5. Evaluation of full face sections – Cohort 2 (Chapter 5)
2.5.1. Pathology review of H&E slides
For Cohort 2, the original H&E slides were retrieved and reviewed by a
pathologist (Dr Colin Stewart) for the presence of serosal invasion and
extramural vascular venous invasion (EMVI) as described previously
(Stewart et al., 2007). EMVI was diagnosed only when there was
unequivocal involvement of muscularised vessels in the pericolic fat.
Serosal invasion was defined as a breach of the serosal surface by tumour
cells. The pathologist was blinded to the original pathology report.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue blocks that optimally
demonstrated the invasive tumour margin, together with histologically
normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin were retrieved for IHC
analysis of FOXP3+ cell density.
2.5.2. Immunohistochemical staining for FOXP3
Refer to section 2.7 for full IHC staining protocol.
2.5.3. Quantification of FOXP3+ Treg cell density in full face sections
Following IHC staining for FOXP3, slides were scanned with a high-
resolution scanner [ScanScope XT; Aperio] at 40X magnification. Image
analysis software [Spectrum v10] was used to calculate the density of
stained cells (cells per mm2) as described in Chapter 2.5.1. The images
were examined by one observer [PS] who was blinded to the
clinicopathological data and were annotated to ensure that only normal
colonic epithelium or viable tumour tissue was included in the area of
analysis. Initial attempts to analyse the whole tumour section were not
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 39
feasible due to multiple software failures resulting from the large size of the
images. The density of FOXP3+ lymphocytes was measured at the tumour
core and at the invasive margin. The tumour core was defined as solid areas
of tumour excluding areas of necrosis, stroma or advancing margin. Using
digital image analysis (Chapter 2.4.1) the number of FOXP3+ lymphocytes
was evaluated in five representative areas (each 1mm2) and an average
density was obtained. The invasive margin was defined as the most
advanced front of the tumour beyond the muscularis propria and can be
considered as the interface between tumour and surrounding tissue. Five
representative areas (each 0.25mm2) were used to calculate the average
density of FOXP3+ lymphocytes at the invasive margin. Results for
FOXP3+ Treg density were exported into an Excel file and matched to
corresponding clinicopathologic data for each case.
2.5.4. Assessment of normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin
Normal colonic mucosa at the surgical margin was assessed for the total
number of lymphoid follicles per centimetre. For proximal colon tumours
the normal sample was always from the distal margin, while for distal
tumours it was from either the proximal or distal ends of the resection. The
length of muscularis mucosa was measured with a pen tool and image
analysis software was used to calculate the number of lymphoid follicles per
centimetre of normal colonic mucosa.
The density of FOXP3+ Tregs within each lymphoid follicle present in or
just below the mucosa was evaluated by digital image analysis in the same
way as for the tumour sections. The perimeter of individual lymphoid
follicles was annotated to determine their area in mm2 and the number of
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 40
FOXP3+ Tregs within that area was determined using the algorithm
described in Chapter 2.4.1. In cases where multiple follicles were present,
the average FOXP3+ cell density was determined.
2.6. Statistical analysis
2.6.1. Statistical methods used in Chapter 3
The normality and log-normality of the distributions of continuous variables
was examined using the Shapiro-Wilks test. Variables with a log-normal
distribution were transformed using a natural logarithm. Analysis of the
association between variables was conducted using the Pearson correlation
coefficient, t-test and one-way ANOVA for transformed variables where
appropriate. The family-wise error rate was controlled by use of the Holm
adjustment for multiple comparisons. T cell densities were classified as
“high” or “low” in relation to the median value. Associations with survival
were explored using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Multivariate models were constructed according to methods described by
Harrell and assessed using Harrell’s concordance statistic C (Harrell et al.,
1996). The analysis was conducted using the Stata statistical package
[Version 9, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, 2005].
2.6.2. Statistical methods used in Chapter 4
Analysis of the associations between GrB scores and other immune cell
densities and histopathological markers (AJCC stage, vascular invasion,
etc.) was performed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (non-
parametric test). Associations with cancer-specific survival were explored
using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards regression
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 41
model. Cut-off values were determined by the median or by Classification
and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to identify high risk groups. The
analyses were performed using SPSS version 17 and STATA version 9
statistical packages [StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA].
2.6.3. Statistical methods used in Chapter 5
Statistical analysis for cancer-specific survival was performed using Cox
proportional hazards regression modelling [STATA version 11 statistical
package, STATA Corp, College station, TX]. The parameters of FOXP3+
cell density and number of lymphoid follicles per centimetre of mucosal
length were classified as high or low in relation to the median value.
Logistic regression was used to explore associations between
clinicopathological variables and the density of FOXP3+ cells in tumour and
normal tissues. For the multivariate analysis, all variables with a P value of
<0.1 in univariate analysis were initially included. Non-significant variables
were removed sequentially. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank
values were generated for selected variables.
2.7. Immunohistochemistry protocols
2.7.1. CD8 staining of tissue microarray
Protocol for Dako Monoclonal Mouse Anti-Human CD8: Clone C8/144B:
• Affix sections (3-4µm) to charged slides and air-dry over night at
37oC.
• Incubation in oven at 60oC for 20 min.
• Dewax and rehydrate sections through descending alcohols to
distilled water.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 42
• Transfer to Dako Target Retrieval Sol pH 6 (S1699) and heat at
121oC for 5 min in Decloaker pressure cooker.
• Allow slides to cool down to 90oC then remove container of slides
from Decloaker and allow cooling for a further 20 min before
transferring to TBS pH 7.3.
• Endogenous peroxidise activity is blocked by incubating the sections
with Dako-Real Peroxidase block Solution for 5 min.
• Wash sections twice in TBS for 5 min, the second containing 0.1%
Tween 20.
• Non-specific antibody binding is inhibited by incubating the sections
with Dako Protein Block Solution for 10 min.
• Decant excess blocking solution from the sections and apply the
primary antibody N 1592 (ready to use) for 10 min.
• Wash in 2 changes of TBS-T.
• Incubate sections with Labeled Polymer HRP Rabbit/mouse for 15
min.
• Wash sections in 2 changes of TBS-T.
• WEAR GLOVES
• Incubate sections with Dako-Chromogen Solution for 8 min.
• Wash sections in 2 changes of deionised water.
• Sections are lightly counterstained in Mayers haematoxylin, then
dehydrated through ascending graded alcohols, cleared in xylene and
mounted using Depex.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 43
2.7.2. CD45RO staining of tissue microarray
Protocol for Dako Monoclonal Mouse Anti-Human CD45RO: Clone
UCHL1
• Affix sections (3-4µm) to charged slides and air-dry over night at
37oC.
• Incubation in oven at 60oC for 20 min.
• Dewax and rehydrate sections through descending alcohols to
distilled water.
• Transfer to Dako Target Retrieval Sol pH 6 (S1699) and heat at
121oC for 5 min in Decloaker pressure cooker.
• Allow slides to cool down to 900C then remove container of slides
from Decloaker and allow cooling for a further 20 min before
transferring to TBS pH 7.3.
• Endogenous peroxidise activity is blocked by incubating the sections
with Dako-Real Peroxidase block Solution for 5 min.
• Wash sections twice in TBS, the second containing 0.1 % Tween 20
for 5 min.
• Nonspecific antibody binding is inhibited by incubating the sections
with Dako Protein Block Solution for 10 min.
• Decant excess blocking solution from the sections and apply the
primary antibody N 1592 (ready to use) for 8 min.
• Wash in 2 changes of TBS-T.
• Incubate sections with Labelled Polymer HRP Rabbit/mouse for 15
min.
• Wash sections in 2 changes of TBS-T.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 44
• WEAR GLOVES
• Incubate sections with Dako-Chromogen Solution for 4 min.
• Wash sections in 2 changes of deionised water.
• Sections are lightly counterstained in Mayers haematoxylin, then
dehydrated through ascending graded alcohols, cleared in xylene and
mounted using Depex.
2.7.3. FOXP3 staining of tissue microarray and full face sections
Protocol for Abcam Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Human FoxP3 antibody:
Clone 236A/E7
• Affix sections (3-4µm) to charged slides and air dry overnight at
37oC.
• Incubate in oven at 60oC for 20 minutes.
• Dewax and rehydrate sections through descending alcohols to
distilled water.
• Transfer to Dako Target Retrieval Sol pH 9 and heat at 121oC for 4
minutes for TMA or 6 minutes for full face sections in Decloaker
pressure cooker
• Allow slides to cool down to 90oC.
• Allow to cool for a further 20 minutes in water bath.
• Transfer to TBS
• Endogenous peroxidise activity is blocked by incubating sections for
5 minutes with Dako Real Peroxidase Block solution.
• TBS wash for 5 minutes and wash again in TBS-Tween for 5
minutes
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 45
• Incubate with Dako Protein Block Solution for 10 min to inhibit
non-specific protein binding.
• Decant excess blocking solution
• Apply the primary antibody (1:100 dilution) and incubate for 60
minutes.
• Wash in two changes of TBS-T
• Incubate sections with labelled Polymer HRP Rabbit/mouse for
30min
• Wash in 2 changes of TBS-T.
• WEAR GLOVES
• Incubate sections with Dako-Chromogen Solution for 8 minutes.
• Wash sections in 2 changes of deionised water.
• Sections are lightly counterstained in Meyer’s haematoxylin for 30
seconds then dehydrated through ascending graded alcohols, cleared
in xylene and mounted using Depex.
2.7.4. GrB staining of tissue microarray
• Affix sections (4-5µm) to charged slides and air-dry overnight at
37oC.
• Incubation in oven at 60oC for 20 minutes.
• Dewax and rehydrate sections through descending alcohols to
distilled water.
• Transfer to Dako Target Retrieval Solution pH 9.9 (S3308) and heat
at 121oC for 5 minutes in Decloaker pressure cooker.
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 46
• Allow slides to cool down to 90oC then remove contained of slides
from Decloaker and allow to cool for a further 20 minutes before
transferring to TBS pH 7.3 for 5 minutes.
• Endogenous peroxidise activity is blocked by incubating the sections
with Dako Real Peroxiase Block Solution for 5 minutes.
• Wash Sections in two changes of TBS, the last one containing 0.1%
Tween 20 (TBS-T) for 5 minutes.
• Non-specific antibody binding is inhibited by incubating the sections
with Dako Protein Block Solution for 10 minutes.
• Decant excess blocking solution from the sections and apply the
primary antibody M 7235 for 30 minutes (dilute 1:50 with antibody
diluent).
• Wash in two changes of TBS-T.
• Incubate sections with Biocare MACH3 mouse probe for 20
minutes.
• Wash in two changes of TBS-T.
• Incubate sections with Biocare MACH3 polymer- HRP for 10
minutes.
• Wash in two changes of TBS-T.
• WEAR GLOVES
• Incubate Sections with Dako Chromogen Solution (20 µl Bottle C
for 1ml Bottle B) for 8 minutes.
• Wash sections in 2 changes of deionised water
Chapter 2: Methods
– – 47
• Sections are lightly counterstained in Mayers haematoxylin (15sec)
then dehydrated through ascending alcohols, cleared in xylene and
mounted using depex.
Chapter 3: Tregs in CRC
The work described in this chapter was published in:
Salama P, Phillips M, Grieu F, Morris M, Zeps N, Joseph D, Platell C,
Iacopetta B. Tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ T regulatory cells show strong
prognostic significance in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 186-92.
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 49
3. T-regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
3.1. Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to determine the prognostic significance of
FOXP3+ lymphocyte (Treg) density in CRC compared with conventional
histopathologic features and with CD8+ and CD45RO+ lymphocyte
densities. TMA and IHC were used to assess the densities of CD8+,
CD45RO+, and FOXP3+ lymphocytes in tumour tissue and normal colonic
mucosa from 967 stage II and stage III CRCs. These were evaluated for
associations with histopathologic features and patient survival.
FOXP3(+) Treg density was higher in tumour tissue compared with normal
colonic mucosa, whereas CD8+ and CD45RO+ cell densities were lower.
FOXP3+ Tregs were not associated with any histopathologic features, with
the exception of tumour stage. Multivariate analysis showed that stage,
vascular invasion, and FOXP3+ Treg density in normal and tumour tissue
were independent prognostic indicators, but not CD8+ and CD45RO+. High
FOXP3+ Treg density in normal mucosa was associated with worse
prognosis (hazard ratio [HR]=1.51; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.13; P=.019). In
contrast, a high density of FOXP3+ Tregs in tumour tissue was associated
with improved survival (HR=0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.77; P=.001).
FOXP3+ Treg density in normal and tumour tissue had stronger prognostic
significance in CRC compared with CD8+ and CD45RO+ lymphocytes. The
finding of improved survival associated with a high density of tumour-
infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs in CRC contrasts with several other solid cancer
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 50
types. The inclusion of FOXP3+ Treg density may help to improve the
prognostication of early stage CRC.
3.2. Introduction
It has been known for many years that lymphocytic infiltrate surrounding
primary CRC is associated with improved prognosis (House et al., 1979;
Svennevig et al., 1984; Jass et al., 1986; Halvorsen et al., 1989; Murphy et
al., 2000; Ohtani et al., 2007). Although the mechanism remains unclear,
the adaptive immune system is thought to play an important role in
suppressing the progression of this disease. Naito et al. were the first to
demonstrate that infiltrating CD8+ cytotoxic T cells were a prognostic
factor in CRC (Naito et al., 1998). These findings have since been
supported by the work of other groups (Nagtegaal et al., 2001; Menon et al.,
2004; Prall et al., 2004; Chiba et al., 2004). A high density of CD8+ T cells
has been associated with the absence of tumour invasion, earlier stage and
improved patient survival (Pagès et al., 2005; Koch et al., 2006). Using
CD3 as a universal marker of T cells, the ratio of T cell density at the
advancing tumour margin compared to the central core was recently
proposed as having stronger prognostic significance than conventional TNM
staging (Galon et al., 2006).
Another T cell subtype shown to have prognostic significance in CRC was
CD45RO+ (Pagès et al., 2005; Oberg et al., 2002). These cells include both
CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes that have been exposed to antigen. Oberg et
al. (2002) reported that a high density of CD45RO+ cells in lymph node
metastases of CRC was associated with improved prognosis, while Pagès et
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 51
al. (2005) subsequently demonstrated that a high density of CD45RO+ cells
within the tumour was associated with decreased invasiveness, lower stage
and improved survival. The above findings provide clear evidence that the
host immune response plays an important role in determining the outcome
from CRC.
Tregs were initially characterised by the CD4+CD25+ phenotype and are
thought to modulate the anti-tumour immune response (Curiel, 2007; Zou,
2006). Tregs can suppress the activity of cytotoxic T cells through direct
cell to cell contact or via the release of cytokines, especially TGF-β.
Depletion of intra-tumoural Tregs enhances anti-tumour immunity and
tumour rejection in mouse models (Needham et al., 2006). Similarly,
depletion of Tregs in the peripheral blood of CRC patients was recently
shown to unmask CD4+ T cell responses to tumour antigens (Clarke et al.,
2006). The most specific Treg cell marker identified to date is the nuclear
transcription factor known as FOXP3 (Fontenot et al., 2003; Hori et al.,
2003). A high density of tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs has been
associated with poor outcome in various solid tumours including ovarian
(Curiel et al., 2004; Sato et al., 2005), pancreatic (Hiraoka et al., 2006) and
hepatocellular carcinoma (Kobayashi et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2007).
Two groups have investigated infiltrating Tregs in CRC using FOXP3
staining. In a study of 40 patients, Loddenkemper et al. (2006) reported that
Treg density was lower in node positive disease but was not associated with
survival. Ling et al. (2007) found no significant difference in Treg density
between advanced and early stage disease, but did not evaluate the
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 52
association with patient survival. The aim of the present study was therefore
to compare the prognostic value of FOXP3+ Treg cell density with that of
the established T cell markers CD8+ and CD45RO+ in a large cohort of
stage II and III CRC with long follow-up information.
3.3. Materials and methods
The patient cohort studied in this Chapter, together with the
immunohistochemical techniques, image analysis and statistical techniques
are described in Chapter 2.
3.4. Results
Examples of immunohistochemical staining using the CRC TMA are shown
for Tregs in Figure 3.1, CD8 in Figure 3.2 and CD45RO in Figure 3.3. The
densities of these cell types in tumour and adjacent normal mucosal areas
were quantified following high resolution scanning and image analysis at
40x magnification as described in Chapter 2.
A total of 6,202 images of normal and tumour tissue cores were used for the
analysis of T cell marker density in 593 stage II and 374 stage III CRC. A
log normal distribution was observed for the density of each marker. The
densities of CD8+ and CD45RO+ cells in tumour tissue (denoted CD8+T
and CD45RO+T) were lower compared to those of normal tissue (CD8+N
and CD45RO+N), whereas the FOXP3+ cell density was higher in tumour
tissue (Table 3.1). This observation was made for both the median and
geometric mean.
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 53
Table 3.1. Median density of the T cell markers CD8+, CD45RO+ and
FOXP3+ in normal colonic mucosa (N) and in colorectal tumour (T) tissues
(cells/mm2).
Marker Normal (N) Tumour (T) Tumour/Normal ratio P
CD8+ 322 (704) 147 (910) 0.46 <0.0001
CD45RO+ 1287 (686) 935 (912) 0.73 <0.0001
FOXP3+ 44 (644) 116 (905) 2.64 <0.0001
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 54
Figure 3.1. FOXP3 staining for Tregs in CRC.
The upper panel shows a 1mm tumour core from the TMA, while the lower panel
is a 40x magnification. The cells showing brown reaction product in their nucleus
with the FOXP3 antibody are Tregs.
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 55
Figure 3.2. CD8 staining of CRC.
Magnification 40X.
Figure 3.3. CD45RO staining of CRC.
Magnification 40X.
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 56
Correlations between the T cell markers are shown in Table 3.2. The
densities of markers were strongly associated with each other in normal and
in tumour tissues. The densities of CD8+T and CD45RO+T also correlated
with those of CD8+N and CD45RO+N from the same patient. However,
only a very weak correlation was observed between FOXP3+T and
FOXP3+N (r=0.041).
Table 3.2. Associations between T cell marker densities in normal (N) and tumour (T) tissue from CRC patients.
Correlation coefficient (r) P
Normal tissue
CD8+N vs CD45RO+
N 0.510 <0.0001
CD8+N vs FOXP3+
N 0.273 <0.0001
CD45RO+N vs FOXP3+
N 0.446 <0.0001
Tumour tissue
CD8+T vs CD45RO+
T 0.516 <0.0001
CD8+T vs FOXP3+
T 0.446 <0.0001
CD45RO+T vs FOXP3+
T 0.439 <0.0001
Normal vs tumour
CD8+N vs CD8+
T 0.306 <0.0001
CD45RO+N vs CD45RO+
T 0.164 <0.0001
FOXP3+N vs FOXP3+
T 0.041 0.011
Associations between the density of tumour-infiltrating T cells and
pathological features are shown in Table 3.3. Tumours with higher AJCC or
T stage were found to have lower densities of all three markers. The density
of CD45RO+T was significantly lower in tumours showing early signs of
metastasis (vascular and perineural invasion); however, this was not
observed for CD8+T or FOXP3+T. As expected, CD8+T and CD45RO+T
cell densities were higher in tumours reported as showing a lymphocytic
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 57
response or MSI. In contrast, FOXP3+T was not associated with either of
these features. No significant associations were observed between the
density of T cell markers in CRC and patient age or gender (results not
shown).
Table 3.3. Univariate analysis for associations between high density of tumour-infiltrating T cell types and pathological features of CRC.
CD8+T CD45RO+
T FOXP3+T
Feature OR P OR P OR P
AJCC
Stage II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Stage III 0.60 <0.0001 0.57 <0.0001 0.86 0.0004
T stage
1+2 1.00 1.00 1.00
3+4 0.80 NS 0.61 0.002 0.51 0.007
Tumour site
Proximal 1.00 1.00 1.00
Distal 0.86 0.017 0.84 0.031 1.07 NS
Histological grade
Well/moderate 1 1 1
Poor 1.06 NS 1.21 NS 0.87 NS
Vascular invasion
Absent 1.00 1.00 1.00
Present 1.01 NS 0.77 0.009 0.94 NS
Lymphatic invasion
Absent 1.00 1.00 1.00
Present 0.96 NS 0.93 NS 1.13 NS
Perineural invasion
Absent 1.00 1.00 1.00
Present 0.80 NS 0.67 0.013 0.81 NS
Lymphocytic response
Absent 1.00 1.00 1.00
Present 1.42 <0.0001 1.24 NS 1.10 NS
MSI
Absent 1.00 1.00 1.00
Present 1.99 <0.0001 2.52 <0.0001 1.10 NS
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 58
T cell densities were classified as “high” or “low” in relation to the median value.
Table 3.4 shows the results of univariate survival analysis for the major
pathological features and for T cell marker density in normal and tumour
tissue. Higher stage and the presence of vascular or perineural invasion were
strongly associated with worse patient outcome. A high density of CD8+N
was associated with better survival, whereas a high density of FOXP3+N was
associated with significantly worse outcome. High densities for each of the
T cell markers in tumour tissue were associated with good patient outcome,
including that of FOXP3+T. In exploratory subgroup analysis of stage III
patients, the good prognosis associated with high T cell marker density in
tumour tissue appeared to be limited to patients treated by surgery alone.
Table 3.4. Univariate survival analysis for pathological features and for T cell density in normal and malignant colorectal tissue from stage II and III CRC patients. Cox proportional hazards regression method.
Feature HR 95% CI P
Tumour feature
AJCC (III vs II) 3.07 2.44-3.88 <0.0001
Site (distal vs proximal) 1.04 0.82-1.31 NS
Grade (poor vs well/moderate) 1.73 1.17-2.57 0.006
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 2.49 1.90-3.26 <0.0001
Lymphatic invasion (yes vs no) 2.39 1.50-3.86 0.0009
Perineural invasion (yes vs no) 1.99 1.32-3.00 0.001
Lymphocytic response (yes vs no) 0.64 0.44-0.95 0.026
Microsatellite instability (yes vs no) 0.60 0.38-0.94 0.027
T cell density (high vs low)
CD8+N 0.81 0.71-0.91 0.001
CD45RO+N 1.01 0.83-1.22 NS
FOXP3+N 1.19 1.05-1.36 0.007
CD8+T 0.74 0.67-0.82 <0.0001
CD45RO+T 0.74 0.65-0.84 <0.0001
FOXP3+T 0.78 0.70-0.87 <0.0001
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 59
A multivariate model was used to identify independent prognostic factors in
the combined stage II and III CRC cohort (Table 3.5). The model included
all histopathological variables and T cell markers found to have significant
prognostic value in univariate analysis (Table 3.4). This analysis revealed
that tumour stage, vascular invasion, FOXP3+N and FOXP3+T were the only
markers to show independent prognostic significance. It also confirmed that
high densities of FOXP3+N and FOXP3+T were associated with opposite
effects on patient outcome. FOXP3+:CD8+ and FOXP3+:CD45RO+ ratios in
normal and tumour tissues were also examined and found not to be
significant in multivariate analysis.
Table 3.5. Multivariate analysis showing the significant prognostic indicators in stage II and stage III CRC (n=445).
NOTE: Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Feature HR 95% CI P
AJCC stage (III vs II) 3.29 2.25-4.81 <0.001
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 1.98 1.39-2.83 <0.001
FOXP3+N (high vs low) 1.51 1.07-2.13 0.019
FOXP3+T (high vs low) 0.54 0.38-0.77 0.001
Accurate prognostic markers are of most importance clinically for the
stratification of stage II CRC. A multivariate model was therefore
developed to test for independent prognostic significance of pathological
features and of T cell densities in stage II cases (Table 3.6). In the first
model (A), only the major pathological features were included. This
revealed that vascular invasion and perineural invasion had the strongest
prognostic values. The second model (B) included these two features
together with the densities of each T cell marker in normal and tumour
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 60
tissues except CD45RO+N, which had previously shown no prognostic value
in univariate analysis (Table 3.4). This model revealed that vascular
invasion, perineural invasion, FOXP3+N and FOXP3+T were the strongest
prognostic features. When these four features were included in a third model
(C), all were found to have independent prognostic value in stage II CRC.
As with the overall patient cohort, high FOXP3+N and FOXP3+T cell
densities showed opposite associations with cancer-specific patient survival.
Table 3.6. Multivariate analysis for prognostic significance of pathological features and T cell marker density in stage II CRC.
Prognostic feature HR 95% CI P
Model A (n=360)
Vascular invasion 1.88 0.77-4.63 0.17
Lymphatic invasion 0.82 0.29-2.32 0.70
Perineural invasion 2.73 1.13-6.56 0.02
Lymphocytic response 0.94 0.47-1.87 0.86
MSI 0.92 0.37-2.27 0.85
Model B (n=337)
Vascular invasion 2.08 0.83-5.25 0.12
Perineural invasion 2.54 0.71-9.08 0.15
CD8+N 0.82 0.53-1.28 0.38
CD8+T 1.04 0.63-1.71 0.88
CD45RO+T 0.95 0.50-1.84 0.89
FOXP3+N 1.41 1.00-2.01 0.05
FOXP3+T 0.74 0.44-1.24 0.25
Model C (n=381)
Vascular invasion 2.16 1.03-4.51 0.041
Perineural invasion 3.53 1.34-9.33 0.011
FOXP3+N 1.42 1.05-1.92 0.023
FOXP3+T 0.65 0.48-0.89 0.007
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 61
3.5. Discussion
The CD8+ and CD45RO+ markers of cytotoxic immune response have
previously been associated with improved prognosis in CRC patients
(House et al., 1979; Svennevig et al., 1984; Jass et al., 1986; Halvorsen et
al., 1989; Murphy et al., 2000; Ohtani et al., 2007, Naito et al., 1998). In
agreement with these earlier reports, the current study confirmed the
importance of CD8+T and CD45RO+T cell density as prognostic factors. The
novelty of this study was that FOXP3+ was examined in parallel to CD8+
and CD45RO+ in both normal and malignant tissues. Tregs are generally
considered to be immunosuppressive and have been linked to poor outcome
in several types of solid tumour (Curiel et al., 2004; Sato et al., 2005;
Hiraoka et al., 2006; Kobayashi et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2007). The major
original findings of the present study were that FOXP3+T Tregs are
associated with better survival and show stronger prognostic significance
than CD8+T and CD45RO+T. Furthermore, FOXP3+N Tregs were associated
with worse prognosis.
T cell markers were assessed objectively and quantitatively using digitised,
high resolution images and specialised software, thus limiting observer bias.
The finding of a higher FOXP3+T Treg density compared to FOXP3+
N
(Table 3.1) is in agreement with previous studies (Loddenkemper et al.,
2006; Ling et al., 2007). The tumour/normal ratio for Treg density observed
here (2.64) was also very similar to that reported by Ling et al. (2007). In
contrast to FOXP3+, the CD8+ and CD45RO+ cell densities were lower in
tumour compared to normal colonic mucosa, suggesting these T cell types
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 62
play a different role to Tregs. Supporting this notion, the correlation
between FOXP3+N and FOXP3+T densities was weaker than that observed
for CD8+ or CD45RO+ (Table 3.2).
The finding of lower CD8+T and CD45RO+T densities in more advanced
tumours (Table 3.3) agrees with the findings of several other groups
(Svennevig et al., 1984; Jass et al., 1986; Halvorsen et al., 1989; Murphy et
al., 2000; Ohtani et al., 2007). Previously reported associations between
high CD45RO+T cell density and signs of early metastasis (vascular and
perineural invasion; Pagès et al., 2005) were also confirmed in the present
study. As expected, tumours reported to show a lymphocytic response or
MSI also had higher densities of CD8+T and CD45RO+T. In keeping with the
suggestion of a different role for Tregs, FOXP3+T cell density was not
associated with early signs of metastasis, lymphocytic response or MSI.
Although not as pronounced as for CD8+T and CD45RO+T, the FOXP3+T
Treg density was lower in stage III tumours, confirming a recent report by
Loddenkemper et al. (2006).
Univariate survival analysis confirmed the poor prognosis associated with
the conventional histopathological markers of adverse outcome (Table 3.4).
To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the prognostic
significance of T cell markers in normal colonic mucosa from CRC patients.
Similar to CD8+T, CD8+N could be expected to have anti-tumour reactivity,
thus explaining their association with better prognosis. The better prognosis
associated with high densities of CD8+T and CD45RO+T (Table 3.4) agrees
with earlier studies (Pagès et al., 2005; Oberg et al., 2002). High densities
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 63
of these cells have been linked to the suppression of metastasis (Pagès et al.,
2005; Galon et al., 2006). Alternatively, they could also signal the existence
of a more antigenic tumour phenotype that has yet to acquire the ability to
evade immunosurveillance.
One of the original and intriguing findings of this study was the opposite
prognostic significance observed for high densities of FOXP3+T and
FOXP3+N Tregs (Tables 3.4 and 3.5). The worse outcome observed for CRC
patients with high FOXP3+N might be explained by the proposed role for
these cells in suppressing anti-tumour immunity (Curiel, 2007). However,
the observation of better survival for patients with a high density of
FOXP3+T Tregs is counter-intuitive and contrasts with what has been
reported for other solid tumour types including melanoma (Miracco et al.,
2007) and breast (Bates et al., 2006), ovarian (Curiel et al., 2004),
hepatocellular (Kobayashi et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2007) and pancreatic
(Hiraoka et al., 2006) cancers. Functional studies of FOXP3+T and
FOXP3+N Tregs may shed more light on their role in the anti-tumour
response and help to explain the observed associations with prognosis.
Current recommendations for the treatment of CRC are that patients with
stage III disease receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The discovery and
validation of novel prognostic indicators are therefore of greatest
importance for the management of stage II disease. Of the three T cell
markers investigated in this study, only FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N Tregs
showed independent prognostic value in a multivariate model of stage II
CRC (Table 3.6). The other significant prognostic factors in this model were
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 64
vascular and perineural invasion, both of which are indicators of early
metastasis and have been reported previously (Quirke et al., 2007; Morris et
al., 2006). As discussed earlier, the CD45RO+T cell density was inversely
related to the presence of vascular and perineural invasion, whereas
FOXP3+T Tregs showed no association (Table 3.3). This is likely to explain
why CD45RO+T failed to show independent prognostic value in a
multivariate model that included these pathological features. The Harrell’s
concordance statistic C (Harrell et al., 1996) using stage together with
vascular invasion was 69. This improved to 74 with the addition of
FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N Treg densities. The present results indicate that
FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N Treg densities, in combination with vascular and
perineural invasion, could provide clinically useful prognostic stratification
for early stage CRC.
One of the limitations of this study was that much of the histopathological
information was obtained from a period that predated the introduction of
synoptic reporting. The presence of vascular and perineural invasion are
therefore likely to have been under-reported at the initial diagnosis (Stewart
et al., 2007). Another limitation was the evaluation of T cell marker density
in 1mm diameter cores from tissue arrays. Although tissue arrays allow for
large cohorts to be assessed quickly, the relatively small area investigated
represents only a small proportion of the total tumour volume. Furthermore,
the cores were taken at random from within the tumour block face and their
location relative to the tumour margin was not recorded. In combination
with T cell type and density, the location of TILs relative to the invading
margin and central tumour area has recently been reported to have
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 65
prognostic value (Galon et al., 2006). To address the above limitations,
further studies are underway in stage II CRC that use full block face tissue
sections to assess FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N Treg densities and where the
presence of vascular and perineural invasion are reviewed by a pathologist
(see Chapter 5).
While there have been several publications using FOXP3 to identify
tumour-infiltrating Tregs (Gao et al., 2007; Loddenkemper et al. 2006; Ling
et al., 2007; Bates et al., 2006; Alvaro et al., 2006), some workers have
questioned the validity of this marker for defining Tregs in humans
(Roncarolo et al., 2008). FOXP3+ Tregs were identified in the current study
by IHC using the monoclonal antibody clone 236A/E7. This antibody has
previously undergone extensive evaluation by Roncador et al. (2005). Based
on this study and other supporting evidence in the literature (Clarke et al.,
2006; Walker et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007), the vast majority of FOXP3+
cells identified by mAb 236A/E7 are CD4+CD25+ Tregs. Although a small
proportion of FOXP3+ cells may also be CD8+ or CD25- (Roncador et al.,
2005), it remains that FOXP3+ lymphocyte density showed strong and
independent prognostic significance in CRC (Table 3.6).
In conclusion, the present study is the first to report on the prognostic
significance of FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N Treg densities in CRC patients.
Multivariate models showed these markers had stronger prognostic value
than CD8+T or CD45RO+T. Although further studies are required before
changes in clinical practice can be recommended, the present results suggest
that assessment of FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N Treg densities in combination
Chapter 3: T regulatory cells in colorectal cancer
– – 66
with vascular and perineural invasion should improve the prognostic
stratification of early stage CRC. The better survival associated with a high
density of FOXP3+T Tregs in CRC is in marked contrast to observations in
other solid tumour types.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
This work was published in:Salama P, Phillips M, Platell C, Iacopetta B.
Low expression of Granzyme B in colorectal cancer is associated with signs
of early metastastic invasion. Histopathology 2011 59(2):207-15.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 68
4. Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
4.1. Abstract
In Chapter 3 it was found that tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs have
stronger prognostic significance than cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in CRC. Since
there is evidence that some tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells may be
inactive, the present study was aimed at investigating the prognostic
significance of GrB, one of the major effecter molecules of T cells.
A TMA containing 963 CRCs was stained immunohistochemically for GrB
and the level of expression quantified by digital image analysis.
GrB expression was higher in tumours with MSI (p<0.0001), a dense
lymphocytic infiltrate (p<0.0001) and location in the proximal colon
(p=0.009), but lower in tumours with vascular invasion (p=0.007),
perineural invasion (p=0.041) and positive nodal status (p<0.001). Elevated
expression of GrB was associated with improved survival in univariate
analysis (HR=0.65; 95%CI: 0.51-0.84; p=0.001), but not in a multivariate
model that included stage, vascular invasion and FOXP3+ Treg cell density.
Low expression of GrB was associated with early signs of metastasis in
CRC. The stronger prognostic significance of FOXP3+ Tregs is in keeping
with animal models that suggest these cells act as gatekeepers for the release
of GrB from CD8+ T cells.
4.2. Introduction
It has been known for several decades that a peri-tumoural infiltrate around
CRC is associated with better survival outcomes (House et al., 1979).
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 69
Currently, it appears this survival advantage is conferred by a Th1 immune
response characterised by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Naito et al. first reported
that cytotoxic CD8+ T cell density has prognostic significance of similar
value to Dukes’ staging (Naito et al., 1998). More recently, Galon and co-
workers claimed the type, density and location of tumour-infiltrating
immune cells was strongly predictive of clinical outcome and was even
superior to the currently used TNM staging system (Galon et al., 2006;
Pagès et al., 2005). These workers suggested the Th1 immune response was
protective against early metastatic invasion as defined by vascular,
lymphatic and perineural invasion.
The work described in Chapter 3 found that a high density of tumour-
infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs could be used in conjunction with the absence of
vascular and perineural invasion to more accurately identify stage II CRC
patients with a low risk of recurrence (Salama et al., 2009). An independent
study has confirmed that high FOXP3+ Treg cell density shows strong
prognostic significance for better outcome of CRC patients (Frey et al.,
2010). The above findings were somewhat unexpected since FOXP3+ Tregs
are widely believed to suppress the anti-tumour immune response (Zou,
2005). A possible explanation for the relatively weaker prognostic
significance of CD8+ cell density compared to FOXP3+ cell density is that
many of the former cells may be inactive. There is evidence to suggest that
some tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in CRC may be functionally inactive,
as revealed by low expression of activation markers (Koch et al., 2006) and
of the effecter molecule GrB (Mulder et al., 1997). GrB is contained mostly
within the granules of cytotoxic T cells and enables the destruction of target
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 70
cells in a perforin-dependent manner (Peters et al., 1991; Cullen et al.,
2008; Chowdhury et al., 2008). Since tumour-infiltrating cytotoxic CD8+
T cells may be inactive, it could be more informative to evaluate the
expression of GrB. The primary aim of the work described in this Chapter
was therefore to evaluate the prognostic significance of GrB in CRC.
Secondary aims were to correlate the expression of GrB with the densities
of several of the major immune cell subtypes (CD8+, CD45RO+ and
FOXP3+) and with other established histopathological markers of prognosis.
4.3. Methods
The methods used in this Chapter were described in Chapter 2.
4.4. Results
GrB was expressed mainly in granules within lymphocytes present in
tumour and normal tissues. A representative example of GrB expression in
CRC is shown in Chapter 2, Figure 2.7. The expression of GrB in tumour
tissue (GrBT) demonstrated a log normal distribution (results not shown)
and was higher than in normal colonic mucosa (GrBN; median values 8.16
vs 3.26; P<0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). In Chapter 3 it was
demonstrated that CD8+ T cell density was higher in normal colonic mucosa
compared with tumour tissue (Salama et al., 2009). These findings would
suggest that CD8+ T cells with the normal colonic mucosa are inactive,
since the expression of GrB is much lower.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 71
4.4.1. Correlation of Granzyme B expression with T cell subtype densities
Correlations between GrB expression and the density of T cell subtypes in
normal (N) and tumour (T) tissues are shown in Table 4.1. GrBN expression
was positively correlated with CD8+N and CD45RO+N, but only weakly with
FOXP3+N. Stronger correlations were seen between GrBT expression and
the densities of each of the three T cell subtypes in tumour tissue. The
GrBT/CD8+T ratio was used as an estimate of the relative cytotoxic activity
of tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells. As expected in view of the postulated
immunosuppressive role of Tregs, a negative correlation was observed
between GrBT/CD8+T and the FOXP3+T cell density.
4.4.2. Correlation of Granzyme B expression with histopathological features and microsatellite instability status
Associations between GrBT expression and histopathological markers were
explored using logistic regression (Table 4.2). GrBT expression was lower in
more advanced tumours and those with vascular or perineural invasion, but
higher in tumours with positive MSI status, the presence of TILS or location
in the proximal colon.
Table 4.1. Correlations between GrB expression and the density of T cell subtypes in the normal colonic mucosa (N) and tumour (T) tissue of CRC patients.
Correlation coefficient (r) P Normal tissue
GrBN vs CD8+N 0.239 <0.0001
GrBN vs CD45RO+N 0.196 <0.0001
GrBN vs FOXP3+N 0.137 0.012
Tumour tissue
GrBT vs CD8+T 0.516 <0.0001
GrBT vs CD45RO+T 0.446 <0.0001
GrBT vs FOXP3+T 0.439 <0.0001
GrBT/CD8+T vs FOXP3+
T -0.204 <0.0001
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 72
r=Spearman’s Rho; P values are two tailed.
Table 4.2. Associations between the expression of GrBT and histopathological markers in CRC.
GrBT
Feature (n) OR 95%CI P
AJCC stage
II (488) 1 – –
III (317) 0.61 0.46-0.81 <0.001
T stage
1+2 (15) 1 – –
3+4 (788) 1.14 0.41-3.17 NS
Vascular invasion
Absent (470) 1 – –
Present (155) 0.6 0.42-0.87 0.007
Lymphatic invasion
Absent (333) 1 – –
Present (60) 0.71 0.41-1.23 NS
Perineural invasion
Absent (536) 1 – –
Present (44) 0.52 0.28-0.97 0.041
MSI
Absent (687) 1 – –
Present (82) 3.8 2.23-6.49 <0.0001
TILS
Absent (119) 1 – –
Present (83) 3.45 1.81-6.57 <0.0001
Tumour site
Distal (489) 1 – –
Proximal (332) 1.46 1.10-1.95 0.009
The balance of effecter to regulatory molecules has been reported to have
prognostic significance in various tumour types (Alvaro et al., 2005; Kelley
et al., 2007; Gao et al., 2007; Sato et al., 2005). In the present study the
GrBT/FOXP3+T ratio was used to represent this balance. Associations
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 73
between this ratio and commonly reported histopathological factors are
shown in Table 4.3. The GrBT/FOXP3+T ratio was significantly lower in
tumours with positive nodal status and vascular invasion, whereas positive
MSI status, presence of TILS and proximal location were strongly
associated with a high GrBT/FoxP3+T ratio. The GrBT/CD8+T ratio and GrBN
were not significantly associated with any of the histopathological markers
examined here (results not shown).
4.4.3. Prognostic significance of Granzyme B expression
The prognostic significance of various T cell subtype densities and
histopathological features have been reported previously for this tumour
cohort (Salama et al., 2009). In the present study, Kaplan-Meier and Cox
regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of
GrBT (Table 4.4, Figure 4.1A) and of GrBT/FOXP3+T (Figure 4.1B) and
GrBT/CD8+T (Figure 4.1C) ratios. High levels of GrBT expression were
associated with better cancer-specific survival in the overall cohort and in
both the stage II and III subgroups. The better outcome associated with high
GrBT expression appeared to be restricted to microsatellite stable (MSS)
tumours (Table 4.4).
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 74
Table 4.3. Associations between GrBT/FOXP3+T and histopathological
markers in CRC.
GrBT/FOXP3+T
Feature (n) OR 95%CI P
AJCC stage
II (463) 1 – –
III (310) 0.69 0.52-0.92 0.012
T stage
1+2 (15) 1 – –
3+4 (756) 2.03 0.69-6.00 0.2
Vascular invasion
Absent (447) 1 – –
Present (149) 0.64 0.44-0.94 0.02
Lymphatic invasion
Absent (314) 1 – –
Present (57) 0.65 0.37-1.15 0.14
Perineural invasion
Absent (509) 1 – –
Present (43) 0.64 0.34-1.19 0.16
MSI
Absent (662) 1 – –
Present (79) 3.17 1.88-5.35 <0.0001
TILS
Absent (111) 1 – –
Present (79) 2.07 1.12-3.82 0.02
Tumour site
Distal (425) 1 – –
Proximal (315) 1.59 1.18-2.13 0.002
Table 4.4. Univariate survival analysis for the prognostic significance of GrB T expression in CRC stage and MSI subgroups.
Feature (n) HR 1 95% CI P
Total (780) 0.65 0.51-0.84 0.001
Stage II (475) 0.74 0.49-1.12 0.159
Stage III (305) 0.75 0.54-1.04 0.08
MSS (667) 0.66 0.50-0.86 0.002
MSI (78) 1.26 0.36-4.44 0.72 1 High vs low expression of GrBT
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 75
The prognostic significance of the ratio of GrBT to immune cell density was
also examined. High GrBT/FOXP3+T was associated with a trend for
improved cancer-specific survival (Figure 4.2B). When analysed as a
continuous variable by Cox regression modelling, GrBT/CD8+T showed
strong prognostic significance in both univariate and multivariate analysis.
CART analysis identified a high risk subgroup (n=32) that was not
associated with any of the established histopathological markers of poor
prognosis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve generated using the optimal
cut-off value identified by CART analysis is shown in Figure 4.2C. Digital
images of tumour cores from this high risk group were individually
reviewed to exclude non-specific GrB staining as a possible cause for their
elevated GrBT/CD8+T values.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 76
Figure 4.1. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for CRC subgroups.
Stratified according to (A) GrB expression, (B) GrB/POXP3+ ratio and (C) GrB/CD8+ ratio.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 77
Multivariate analysis revealed that GrBT, GrBN and GrBT/FOXP3+T were
not significant prognostic variables in a model that included vascular
invasion, perineural invasion, FOXP3+T and FOXP3+N (Table 4.5).
Although the GrBT/CD8+T ratio was an independent prognostic factor in this
model, it did not improve the prognostic accuracy as determined by the
Harrell’s C statistical coefficient, probably due to the small size of the
GrBT/CD8+T high subgroup (n=32).
Table 4.5. Multivariate analysis for the prognostic significance of histopathological and immune cell markers in CRC.
Feature HR 95% CI P
AJCC stage (III vs II) 3.34 2.22-5.03 <0.0001
Vascular invasion (yes vs no) 2.29 1.56-3.37 <0.0001
FOXP3+N (high vs low) 1.72 1.17-2.52 0.006
FOXP3+T (high vs low) 0.52 0.36-0.76 0.001
GrBT/CD8+T (high vs low) 3.16 1.56-6.39 0.001
4.5. Discussion
The major finding of this study is that low levels of GrB expression in CRC
was associated with pathological evidence of early metastasis such as
vascular and perineural invasion. To our knowledge, this is the first report
on the prognostic significance of GrB expression in CRC. The strengths of
this study included the objective quantification of GrB expression using
digital image analysis and the long period of patient follow-up. The large
sample size also allowed correlation of GrB expression with T cell subtype
density and with commonly reported histopathological features and MSI
status.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 78
Similar to previous reports in CRC (Mulder et al., 1997; Le Gouvello et al.,
2008), GrB expression was elevated in tumour tissue compared to normal
colonic mucosa. This suggests that CD8+ T cells within normal colonic
mucosa are inactive. In keeping with the work of Mulder et al. (1997), an
inverse relationship was observed between GrBT expression and tumour
stage (Table 4.2). As expected, GrBT expression was significantly elevated
in tumours with high levels of TILS (Table 4.2) and with high CD8+ and
CD45RO+ cell densities (Table 4.1). In addition, the 3.8-fold higher
expression of GrB observed in MSI compared to MSS tumours (Table 4.2)
was almost identical to the 3.7-fold higher level reported in an earlier study
using IHC (Phillips et al., 2004), but less than the 9-fold higher level
reported by Dolcetti et al. (1999). Le Gouvello et al. (2008) also found
higher mRNA expression of GrB in MSI+ tumours using quantitative
reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).
Tumours with vascular or perineural invasion demonstrated significantly
lower levels of GrB expression (Table 4.2). These results are in agreement
with those of Pagès et al. who used qRT-PCR to demonstrate that GrB
mRNA levels were lower in CRC that showed signs of early metastasis
(Pagès et al., 2005). These workers defined early metastasis as pathological
evidence of vascular, lymphatic or perineural invasion. Together, the above
results support the notion that invasion and metastasis may be inhibited by
an active anti-tumour immune response, thereby impacting upon survival
outcomes.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 79
A novel finding from this study was that high GrBT expression was
prognostic for better cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis (Figure
4.1A and Table 4.4). This was not unexpected in view of the inverse
association between GrBT expression and pathological signs of early
metastasis. Interestingly, the prognostic significance of GrBT appeared to be
restricted to MSS tumours. The reason for the apparent lack of prognostic
significance in MSI tumours is unclear and requires confirmation in further
studies. GrBT did not retain prognostic significance in multivariate analysis,
presumably due to its strong associations with stage, early metastasis and
T cell subtype densities (Tables 4.1 and 4.2). The stronger prognostic
significance of FOXP3+ cell density may be explained by the observation in
animal models that Tregs control the release of GrB from CD8+ cells.
In several cancer types, the ratio of effecter to regulatory immune cell
markers has been reported to show stronger prognostic significance than
individual markers (Alvaro et al., 2005; Kelley et al., 2007; Gao et al.,
2007; Sato et al., 2005). A high GrBT/FOXP3+T ratio was associated with
improved prognosis in Hodgkin’s lymphoma (Kelley et al., 2007) and in
hepatocellular carcinoma (Gao et al., 2007). In the present study of CRC,
high GrBT/FOXP3+T was also associated with features of good prognosis
(Table 4.3) and a trend for better cancer-specific survival in univariate
analysis (Figure 4.1B). This is not surprising since high GrBT/FOXP3+T
would indicate the overall balance of the immune response is tipped towards
effector molecules that are responsible for the destruction of target tumour
cells.
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 80
CD8+T cells may be present within tumours but inactive. The GrBT/
CD8+T ratio was therefore used as a surrogate marker for the cytotoxicity
of these cells. This ratio was not associated with clinical or
histopathological features of CRC; however, an inverse relationship was
observed between GrBT/CD8+T and the density of FOXP3+T Tregs. This
suggests that FOXP3+T cells might down-regulate the expression of GrB in
CD8+ cells, thus reducing their functional capacity. Despite retaining
prognostic significance in multivariate analysis (Table 4.5), the
GrBT/CD8+T ratio did not improve overall prognostic accuracy, probably
due to the small proportion of patients classified as being high risk (n=32, or
3% of the study population).
While several interesting observations were made here regarding GrB
expression in CRC, there are several limitations with this work that should
be highlighted. Firstly, the histopathological information was obtained from
original reports and it is likely that the features of vascular, perineural and
serosal invasion were under-reported (Stewart et al., 2007; Liebig et al.,
2009). Secondly, measurement of GrB expression from multiple tumour
cores or full face sections may have led to stronger associations with
histopathological features. Thirdly, although the expression of GrB occurs
predominately in cytotoxic T cells and NK cells, we cannot be certain that it
was restricted to these cells. GrB expression has also been reported in DCs,
mast cells and murine Tregs (Chowdhury et al., 2008). Additional
experiments using double staining techniques are required to determine the
full range of cell types in which GrB is expressed in CRC. Furthermore, the
evaluation of other cytotoxic markers such as perforin and FasL (Vermijlen
Chapter 4: Granzyme B in colorectal cancer
– – 81
et al. 2001) would increase our understanding of the host response. Future
efforts should also be directed at the tumour-host interface in order to assess
the concentration of various immune markers and how these impact upon
tumour growth patterns and response to adjuvant therapies (Zlobec et al.,
2009).
In conclusion, the density of tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ Treg cells was
found in this study of CRC to have stronger prognostic value than
expression of the effecter molecule GrB. This is of particular importance for
stage II CRC, where robust prognostic factors are needed to assist with
decisions regarding the use of adjuvant therapies. There is now solid
evidence to support the hypothesis that quantitative measures of immune
cell infiltration (Galon et al., 2006; Pagès et al., 2005; Salama et al., 2009;
Frey et al., 2010; Pagès et al., 2010), in combination with accurate
assessment of vascular, serosal and perineural invasion by tumour cells
(Morris et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2002; Morris et al., 2006; Stewart et al.,
2007; Littleford et al., 2009; Shepherd et al., 1997; Liebig et al., 2009), will
allow early stage CRC patients to be stratified into clinically useful
prognostic subgroups. Although requiring validation in prospective studies,
this approach may prove to be simpler, less expensive and more robust than
the use of recently described gene expression signatures (Wang et al., 2004;
Barrier et al., 2006; Watanabe et al., 2009).
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
The work described in this chapter was published in:Salama P, Stewart C,
Forrest C, Platell C, Iacopetta B. FOXP3+ cell density in lymphoid follicles
from histologically normal mucosa is a strong prognostic factor in early
stage colon cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012; 61(8): 1183-90
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 83
5. Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
5.1. Abstract
There are few clearly established prognostic factors available to guide the
use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage colon cancer patients. Some of
the most promising candidates include the invasion of extramural blood
vessels by tumour cells and the densities of FOXP3+ Tregs in tumour and
adjacent normal colonic mucosal tissue. The aim of the study described in
this chapter was to evaluate the prognostic significance of these markers in
AJCC stage II colon cancer, with particular reference to lymphoid follicles
in the mucosa.
Histopathological review for the presence of vascular and serosal invasion
was conducted on a series of 165 stage II colon cancers treated by surgery
alone. Immunohistochemical staining for FOXP3 was performed on tumour
tissue and on histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical
margin. Image analysis software was used to evaluate the density of
FOXP3+ cells in the tumour core, invading margin and lymphoid follicles
from the colonic mucosa. For the analysis of patient survival, cases were
classified into high or low density FOXP3+ cells according to the median
value.
The mean density of FOXP3+ Tregs in lymphoid follicles was 2-fold and 5-
fold higher than in the invading margin and tumour core, respectively.
Multivariate analysis identified EMVI (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.00-6.07, p=0.05)
and high FOXP3+ cell density in lymphoid follicles (HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.49-
11.91, p=0.007) as independent factors for worse survival, whereas a high
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 84
frequency of lymphoid follicles in histologically normal colonic mucosa
was associated with better survival (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.79, p=0.014).
These results suggest that host factors related to the immune system have
major prognostic significance in early stage colon cancer. The density of
FOXP3+ cells within lymphoid follicles and the frequency of these
structures in normal colonic mucosa represent novel and independent
prognostic factors.
5.2. Introduction
The prognosis of CRC has traditionally been estimated using the TNM
staging system (Sobin et al., 1997). The additional histopathological
features of tumour cell invasion into extramural vascular and perineural
spaces have also proven to be strong and independent risk factors for poor
outcome (Quirke et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2002).
The need for robust and accurate prognostic indicators is especially
important for AJCC stage II (T3 or T4, N0, M0), or node-negative colon
cancer patients, comprising approximately one-third of all newly diagnosed
cases. Better prognostication would allow patients with more aggressive
tumours to be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year disease-
free survival of stage II colon cancer patients is approximately 70-80%
(Morris et al., 2006). This varies markedly, however, depending upon the
presence or absence of serosal invasion (T3/T4) and the presence of EMVI
and perineural invasion by tumour cells (Quirke et al., 2007; Peterson et al.,
2002; Morris et al., 2006; Stewart et al., 2007; Desolneux et al., 2010;
Courtney et al. 2009).
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 85
In addition to TNM staging and vascular/perineural tumour invasion, the
presence of a dense lymphocytic infiltrate has consistently been shown to
have prognostic value in colon cancer (Naito et al., 1998; Ropponen et al.,
1997; Prall et al., 2004; Chiba et al., 2004; Ohtani, 2007). Indeed, some
workers have proposed that the density of CD3+ TILs may be a more
accurate predictor of outcome for CRC than the TNM system (Galon et al.,
2006; Pagès et al., 2005). However, a subsequent study found the
prognostic value of TILs was restricted to node-negative cancer (Laghi et
al., 2009), thus ruling out replacement of a TNM-based system with one
based upon the anti-tumour immune reaction. Furthermore, these studies did
not review the original pathology slides for assessment of important,
standard histological markers such as EMVI that may be under-reported. It
therefore remains to be established whether the immune response has
independent prognostic value in the context of accurate reporting of nodal
involvement and of vascular and serosal invasion.
Tregs are thought to play a major role in cancer through the suppression of
anti-tumour immune responses (Sakaguchi et al., 2010). The FOXP3 is a
specific nuclear marker for Tregs that allows these cells to be distinguished
from other T cell types. In Chapter 3 it was demonstrated that the density of
tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs, together with vascular and perineural
invasion, were independent prognostic factors in a study of 381 stage II
CRCs (Chapter 3; Salama et al., 2009). In contrast to other cancer types in
which high Treg density is associated with poor prognosis, several groups
have subsequently confirmed our initial observation of an association with
favourable outcome for CRC (Frey et al., 2010; Correale et al., 2010; Nosho
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 86
et al., 2010). These results also concur with an earlier report that Treg
infiltration was significantly higher in CRC with limited disease stage
(UICC I and II) compared to those with more advanced stage (UICC III and
IV) (Loddenkemper et al., 2006). The paradoxical findings for CRC may be
due to the suppression by Tregs of a tumour-promoting, inflammatory
immune response generated by translocation of bacteria across the mucosal
barrier (Loddenkemper et al., 2006; Ladoire et al., 2011).
An additional observation from the work described in Chapter 3 was that
high FOXP3+ Treg density in histologically normal colonic mucosa from
the surgical margin was associated with poor prognosis (Salama et al.,
2009). This original finding has yet to be validated in an independent patient
cohort. Our earlier study used TMA and histological information obtained
from the initial pathology report. The use of full face sections would yield a
greater area of tumour for analysis and would allow investigation of
whether FOXP3+ Tregs at the invasive margin have greater prognostic
significance than those within the tumour core. The aim of work in this
Chapter was therefore to investigate the prognostic significance of FOXP3+
cell densities in neoplastic and normal colonic mucosa from an independent
series of stage II colon cancers that were carefully reviewed for the presence
of EMVI and serosal invasion. Full face tissue sections, which are larger
and therefore more representative than the cores used in TMA, were
analysed to determine FOXP3+ Treg density in tumour tissue and in
histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin.
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 87
5.3. Methods
All methods used in this Chapter were described in Chapter 2.
5.4. Results
The clinical and histopathological features of the 165 stage II colon cancers
investigated in this study are shown in Table 5.1. The proportion of cases
that showed EMVI or serosal invasion upon histological review was 25%
and 32%, respectively. Tumours with EMVI were significantly more likely
to show serosal invasion (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.33-7.39, p=0.009).
Table 5.1. Clinical and histopathological features of 165 stage II colon cancers.
Feature n (%) *
Age (years, mean [SD]) 71.5 (10-8)
Sex
Male 80 (48)
Female 85 (52)
Tumour site
Proximal 95 (58)
Distal 69 (42)
EMVI
No 118 (75)
Yes 40 (25)
Serosal invasion
No 107 (68)
Yes 51 (32)
Perforation
No 148 (91)
Yes 14 (9)
* Information on tumour site, EMVI, serosal invasion and perforation was not available for 1, 7, 7 and 3 cases, respectively.
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 88
Immunohistochemical analysis for the FOXP3 marker specific to Tregs was
performed on tumour tissue and on matched normal colonic mucosa from
the surgical margin as described in Chapter 3. Representative images for
normal colonic mucosa are shown in Figure 5.1. Sections were of adequate
quality to allow the density of FOXP3+ Tregs in the tumour core and
invading margin to be quantified in 145 and 133 cases, respectively (Table
5.2). The FOXP3+ cell density was 2-3_fold higher at the invading margin
compared to the tumour core (p<0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Tumours
with a high density of FOXP3+ Tregs at the invading margin were less likely
to show EMVI (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.94, p=0.035), in keeping with the
good prognosis associated with this feature (Salama et al., 2009).
Table 5.2. FOXP3+ Treg density (cells/mm2) in tumour tissue and in lymphoid follicles from histologically normal colonic mucosa at the surgical margin.
Site (n) Median Mean (SD) Range
Tumour core (145) 152 196 (150) 6-1,026
Tumour invasive margin (133) 435 475 (274) 40-1,696
Normal mucosa lymphoid follicle (137) 885 958 (412) 166-2,152
In histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin, the
highest density of FOXP3+ Tregs was found in lymphoid follicles and
particularly in the mantle zone surrounding the germinal centres (Figure
5.2). The FOXP3+ cell density in lymphoid follicles was 2-fold higher than
at the invasive tumour margin (Table 5.2; p<0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum
test).
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 89
Figure 5.1. Section of histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin.
Lymphoid follicles (arrows) were evaluated for both their frequency per centimetre
of mucosal length and the density of FOXP3+ T regulatory lymphocytes within
these structures.
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 90
Figure 5.2. (A) Representative low power image of normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin.
Three lymphoid follicles are delineated for measurement of the FOXP3+ cell
density within these structures.
Figure 5.2. (B) High power image of lymphoid follicle showing immune cells stained positively for the FOXP3 marker.
Most FOXP3+ cells are located within the peripheral mantle zone.
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 91
No correlations were observed between FOXP3+ cell densities in the
lymphoid follicles and tumour tissue from the same patient, nor with age,
gender, tumour site, EMVI or serosal invasion (results not shown). No
attempt was made to measure the FOXP3+ cell density in the area of normal
colonic mucosa adjacent to the lymphoid follicles.
The median length of normal colonic mucosa assessed for the presence of
lymphoid follicles in each patient was 4.61 cm (mean ± SD, 5.16 ± 2.59).
The median frequency of lymphoid follicles from 138 cases for which
there was suitable histological material to conduct analysis was 1.12
follicles per cm of mucosal length (mean ± SD, 1.35 ± 1.02; range, 0-
5.88). Higher frequencies were found in patients with distal tumours
(mean ± SD, 1.67 ± 1.11) compared to those with proximal tumours (1.07
± 0.87; p=0.0004, Wilcoxon rank sum test). No significant associations
were found with FOXP3+ cell density or with any other clinical or
histopathological features.
The results of univariate survival analysis for the variables described above
are shown in Table 5.3. As expected, EMVI and serosal invasion were
associated with significantly worse patient survival. High FOXP3+ cell
density in tumour tissue was associated with better survival, although this
failed to reach significance. Patients with a high frequency of lymphoid
follicles showed a trend for better survival (p=0.07), but those with a high
density of FOXP3+ cells in these structures showed significantly worse
survival (p=0.007).
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 92
Table 5.3. Univariate survival analysis for clinicopathological features and FOXP3+ Treg density in stage II colon cancer.
Feature HR 95% CI P
Sex (male vs female) 0.80 0.36-1.77 0.58
Tumour site (proximal vs distal) 0.93 0.42-2.04 0.85
EMVI (yes vs no) 2.99 1.36-6.58 0.006
Serosal invasion (yes vs no) 2.36 1.07-5.20 0.033
Perforation (yes vs no) 2.61 0.89-7.66 0.08
Normal mucosa LF density (high vs low) * 0.43 0.17-1.07 0.07
FOXP3+ cells: tumour core (high vs low) 0.73 0.31-1.74 0.48
FOXP3+ cells: tumour IM (high vs low) 0.63 0.26-1.50 0.30
FOXP3+ cells: normal mucosa LF (high vs low) 4.02 1.47-11.01 0.007
* LF density is the number of lymphoid follicles per cm of colon mucosa. EMVI; LF, lymphoid follicles in the normal mucosa from the surgical margin; IM, invasive margin.
A multivariate model was used to identify independent prognostic factors.
This model included all variables that showed a p-value <0.1 in univariate
survival analysis (EMVI, serosal invasion, perforation, lymphoid follicle
frequency in normal mucosa, FOXP3+ cell density in lymphoid follicles).
Forward stepwise regression was performed to retain variables at a
significance level of 0.05. The significant variables identified by
multivariate analysis were EMVI, lymphoid follicle frequency and FOXP3+
cell density in lymphoid follicles (Table 5.4). Kaplan-Meier survival curves
for these independent prognostic factors are shown in Figure 5.3.
Table 5.4. Multivariate analysis for indicators of cancer-specific survival in stage II colon cancer.
Feature HR 95% CI P
EMVI (yes vs no) 2.46 1.00-6.07 0.050
Normal mucosa LF frequency (high vs low) 0.31 0.12-0.79 0.014
FOXP3+ cell density in LF (high vs low) 4.22 1.49-11.91 0.007
EMVI; LF, lymphoid follicle in histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin.
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 93
Figure 5.3. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for stage II colon cancer patient subgroups.
These are presented according to (A), the presence or absence of EMVI, (B) lymphoid follicle frequency in histologically normal colonic mucosa from the surgical
margin, or (C) the density of FOXP3+ staining immune cells in lymphoid follicles. P values shown are from the log-rank test.
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 94
5.5. Discussion
Prognostic factors in colon cancer are of greatest clinical relevance for
AJCC/UICC stage II disease (T3 or T4, N0, M0). The identification,
validation and routine application of robust prognostic markers would allow
node-negative patients with poorer survival prospects to be considered for
adjuvant chemotherapy, while sparing many others the toxicity and expense
of such treatment. This study found a strong association between EMVI and
worse outcome (Table 5.4 and Figure 5.3), thus confirming several previous
reports showing independent prognostic value for this feature in CRC
(Quirke et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2002; Morris et al., 2006; Desolneux et
al., 2010; Courtney et al., 2009; Betge et al., 2011). Although not reaching
statistical significance, the present results also confirm the prognostic value
of tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ Tregs (Salama et al., 2009; Frey et al., 2010;
Correale et al., 2010; Nosho et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010). Furthermore, the
results support the finding described in Chapter 3 that high FOXP3+ Treg
density in the normal colonic mucosa was associated with poor survival
(Salama et al., 2009). This earlier observation has now been confirmed and
extended in a separate patient cohort where high FOXP3+ cell density within
mucosal lymphoid follicles was found to be a strong and independent factor
for unfavourable outcome (Table 5.4). Moreover, we report for the first time
that the frequency of these lymphoid follicles in the colonic mucosa also
showed prognostic value.
The need for careful evaluation of EMVI has been highlighted by several
groups over the past decade (Quirke et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2007;
Peterson et al., 2002; Stewart et al., 2007; Desolneux et al., 2010; Betge et
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 95
al., 2011). Approximately 10-15% of CRCs were reported to show EMVI in
routine practice in the UK (Quirke et al., 2007) and Australia (Morris et al.,
2006). However, it has been argued that proper specimen preparation and
more thorough evaluation by pathologists increases this frequency to around
25-30% (Quirke et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2007). All cases in the present
study were reviewed, resulting in a frequency of 25% for EMVI. The HR
associated with EMVI was 2.46 in a multivariate analysis that included the
FOXP3+ marker (Table 5.4). This result compares with a HR of 2.16 in our
previous study of 381 stage II colon cancers that also included FOXP3+ cell
density but in which the pathology was not reviewed (Chapter 3; Salama et
al., 2009). An earlier population-based study of 1,306 stage II colon cancer
patients found a HR of 1.63 for vascular invasion; however, again the
pathology was not reviewed and the reported frequency was only 12%
(Morris et al., 2006). This latter result is similar to another study of 362
node-negative CRCs in which the HR for venous invasion was reported to
be 1.96, but its frequency was just 13% (Desolneux et al., 2010). The
importance of careful histological review was recently highlighted in a
study of 381 node-negative CRCs which showed the HR associated with
venous invasion (23% frequency) was 4.45 following review, but only 1.05
based on routine reporting (Betge et al., 2011). Taken together, the above
findings demonstrate that EMVI, providing it is carefully evaluated, should
be a key factor in future algorithms for the prognostic stratification of stage
II colon cancer patients.
A large volume of literature clearly demonstrates that a strong TILs reaction
is associated with favourable prognosis in CRC (Naito et al., 1998;
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 96
Ropponen et al., 1997; Prall et al., 2004; Chiba et al., 2004; Ohtani, 2007;
Galon et al., 2006; Pagès et al., 2005). This is likely to be due to the
suppression of early metastatic invasion by a local immune response
involving activated T cells (Galon et al., 2006; Pagès et al., 2005).
Importantly, the good prognosis associated with a high density of CD3+
TILs appears to be confined to patients with node-negative disease (Laghi et
al., 2009). In Chapter 3 it was shown that the density of FOXP3+ Tregs in
CRC shows stronger prognostic significance than the density of CD8+ and
CD45RO+ cell markers associated with the cytotoxic immune response
(Salama et al., 2009). In most cancer types, Tregs suppress anti-tumour
immune responses and high densities of these cells are associated with
worse patient outcome (Ladoire et al., 2011). However, several studies have
now shown that a high density of FOXP3+ Tregs in CRC correlates with
better survival (Salama et al., 2009; Frey et al., 2010; Correale et al., 2010;
Nosho et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010). Ladoire et al. have argued that the
paradoxical result observed for CRC could be due to Treg-mediated
suppression of a tumour-promoting, inflammatory immune response that is
generated by translocation of bacteria across the mucosal barrier (Ladoire et
al., 2011). Most cancers occur in relatively sterile environments, whereas
colon cancers occur in a highly contaminated environment in which the
immune system is geared towards tolerance of the bacteria.
The good prognosis associated with a high density of FOXP3+ Tregs in the
tumour core (HR 0.73) and invasive margin (HR 0.63) did not reach
statistical significance in the present study of 165 stage II colon cancers
(Table 5.3). However, these HR values were similar to those reported in our
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 97
earlier study of 967 stage II and III CRCs (HR 0.78; Chapter 3; Salama et
al., 2009) and to other large studies of 613 mismatch repair-proficient and
223 mismatch repair-deficient CRC (HR 0.70 and HR 0.63, respectively;
Frey et al., 2010) and of 768 stage I-IV CRCs (HR 0.48; Nosho et al.,
2010). It is likely that the low number of cancer-related deaths (n=26) in the
present cohort of early stage colon cancer patients prevented the density of
tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ cells from reaching significance as a prognostic
marker for favourable outcome. Further work is required to determine
whether the density of tumour-infiltrating FOXP3+ cells is an independent
prognostic marker in stage II colon cancers in which EMVI has been
carefully evaluated.
It was previously reported that high FOXP3+ cell density in the normal
colonic mucosa from the surgical margin was associated with worse patient
outcome (Chapter 3; Salama et al., 2009). In the present work this original
finding was confirmed and extended in a separate cohort by showing that
high FOXP3+ cell density in the lymphoid follicles was a strong (HR 4.22)
and independent factor for poor survival (Table 5.4). An unexpected and
novel observation from the current study was that the frequency of
lymphoid follicles in the colonic mucosa was also an independent
prognostic factor. The total number of lymphoid follicles in the human large
bowel has been estimated from autopsy specimens to range from 12,000-
18,000 (Langman et al., 1986). Their number and diameter have been
shown to increase in inflammatory conditions (Nascimbeni et al., 2005),
while some workers have proposed that lymphoid follicles are intimately
involved in mucosal regeneration as well as in immune surveillance (Sipos
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 98
et al., 2011). The density of intratumoural lymphoid structures has been
associated with improved survival in non-small cell lung cancer (Dieu-
Nosjean et al., 2008). Another study has reported the incidence of lymphoid
follicles associated with early colorectal neoplasms varies according to
patient gender and to tumour site and histology (Fu et al., 2005).
The present study is the first to investigate the prognostic significance of
FOXP3+ Treg density in lymphoid follicles from normal colonic mucosa
(Table 5.4). The worse outcome of patients with high Treg density is an
intriguing finding and we hypothesise this could be an indicator of increased
systemic susceptibility to metastasis. It will be interesting to determine
whether other immune cell subtypes present in follicles also have prognostic
significance and whether the density of FOXP3+ cells in follicles correlates
with their level in circulation. The predominant localisation of FOXP3+
Tregs to the mantle zone (Fig. 5.2A and 5.2B) is similar to the report by
Lim et al. in tonsil sections (Lim et al., 2005). Although not investigated
here, lymphoid follicles with small germinal centres (Treg poor) would thus
be expected to show higher FOXP3+ cell densities compared to those with
relatively larger centres. The apparently worse outcome associated with
high Treg density in mucosal lymphoid follicles (Table 5.4) could therefore
be a function of impaired B-cell reaction, as observed by a smaller germinal
centre response, rather than a direct effect of Tregs.
To our knowledge, the present study is also the first to investigate the
prognostic significance of lymphoid follicle frequency in the adjacent non-
tumour tissue of any cancer type. The observation of better outcome for
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 99
patients with a high frequency of lymphoid follicles (HR 0.31) could be a
potentially important finding if confirmed by further studies. This factor is
relatively straightforward to quantify and provides prognostic information
that appears to be independent of both EMVI and FOXP3+ cell density
(Table 5.4). In exploratory subgroup analysis, the lymphoid follicle
frequency appeared to have stronger prognostic significance for patients
with proximal tumours (HR=0.13; 95%CI: 0.02-1.00, p=0.051) compared to
those with distal tumours (HR=0.64, 95%CI: 0.18-2.27, p=0.488). It is
currently unclear why this factor has prognostic significance; however, we
suspect that it could reflect the status of the alimentary or systemic immune
system, including its ability to respond to neoplasia.
Based on the present work and on earlier studies discussed above, there is
now abundant evidence that EMVI and TILs can provide clinically useful
information for the prognostic stratification of stage II colon cancer patients.
For EMVI, the need for high-quality pathology reporting and optimal
specimen preparation has already been emphasised (Quirke et al., 2007;
Williams et al., 2007; Betge et al., 2011). For TILs, further work is required
to determine the immune parameter(s) that provide the strongest and most
robust prognostic information. The work described in this Chapter and in
Chapter 3 suggests that histologically normal colonic mucosa should not be
overlooked as a potential source of clinically relevant markers. In particular,
the density of FOXP3+ cells within lymphoid follicles and the frequency of
these in the mucosa represent novel and independent prognostic factors.
These should now be validated in additional, large cohorts of stage II colon
cancers in which a minimum number of lymph nodes have been examined,
Chapter 5: Lymphoid follicles in colon cancer
– – 100
EMVI has been carefully reviewed and patients have not received adjuvant
chemotherapy.
Chapter 6: General discussion
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 102
6. General discussion
6.1. Background
Cancer of the colon and rectum is the second most commonly diagnosed
cancer in Australia and the second leading cause of cancer-related death
(AIHW, 2008). In 2007 there were 14,234 diagnoses of bowel cancer and
4,047 deaths from bowel cancer. Currently prognosis and recommendation
for adjuvant therapy is determined by TNM stage. Patients with stage I, II,
III and IV disease have progressively worse 5-year survival rates of 88%,
70%, 43% and 7% respectively (NH&MRC Guidelines). Adjuvant
chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage III disease but not for
stage II disease, despite significant cancer related mortality in the latter
group. In stage II CRC, adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a small
(3-5%) but statistically significant survival benefit (NH&MRC Guidelines;
Quasar, 2007). The NHMRC guidelines therefore state that “high risk sub-
groups” are more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, but without
explicitly defining these groups.
6.1.1. Identification of high risk stage II colorectal cancer
The Peterson Index was developed to assist with risk stratification of stage
II colon cancer (Peterson et al., 2002). It is based on four standard
histopathological markers: vascular invasion, peritoneal involvement,
positive margins and tumour perforation. The Peterson score is calculated
by assigning one point for each risk factor except perforation, which
represents two points. Patients with a score of zero have a 5-year survival
rate of 94%, compared to 30% for patients with a score of three or more.
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 103
The Peterson Index has been validated in a separate cohort (Roxburgh et al.,
2009); although this follow-up study found that all four histopathological
markers were only reported in 23.3% of cases. The survival difference
between high and low risk groups, although not as large as in the original
report, was statistically significant.
Newly released international guidelines (NCCN, 2012) recommend
chemotherapy for patients with high risk stage II colon cancer as defined by
high tumour grade, T4 status, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, bowel
obstruction, perforation, less than 12 nodes examined and indeterminate or
positive margins. These standard histological markers, in particular EMVI
and serosal invasion, are essential for accurate prognostication but are often
under-reported and suffer from inter-observer variation (Morris et al., 2007;
Stewart et al., 2007; Littleford et al., 2009).
6.1.2. Peritumoural inflammatory infiltrate is associated with improved survival
The focus of the current system of prognostication is the degree of invasion
and metastasis of the primary tumour. However, the host immune response
may be equally important. McCarty initially reported the good prognosis
imparted by a peritumoural inflammatory infiltrate (McCarty, 1931) and this
has since been supported by other authors and brought to prominence by
Jass (1986). Building on this work, Murphy et al. (2000) demonstrated that
the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate was associated with the clearance
of micrometastases from the bone marrow and improved survival. Klintrup
et al. (2005) classified peritumoural inflammation into either high or low
grade and claimed that high grade inflammation at the invasive margin was
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 104
the most important prognostic factor for Dukes’ stage A and B CRC. This
finding was later “validated” by an independent group (Roxburgh et al.,
2009). Unfortunately, neither of these two studies documented vascular
invasion and T4N0 tumours were either excluded (Klintrup et al., 2005) or
not mentioned (Roxburgh et al., 2009). Furthermore, the Klintrup method of
classification of the peritumoural inflammatory response into either low or
high grade is subjective, requiring interpretation by a pathologist and
therefore prone to inter-observer variation.
6.1.3. Host immunity is important for surviving cancer
Despite the above-mentioned methodological shortcomings, other
observations suggest that a deficient host response contributes to the
development and progression of CRC. Chronic immunosuppression is
associated with significantly worse disease-free survival compared with
immunocompetent matched controls (Khoury et al., 2011). Renal
transplantation, which requires immunosuppression, is associated with a
twofold-increased risk of developing colonic cancer (Parnaby et al., 2010).
In addition kidney and liver transplant patients tend to present at an earlier
age and have worse survival (Johnson et al., 2007). Patients with HIV tend
to have earlier age of CRC onset and more advanced disease at presentation
(Alfa-Wali et al., 2011).
6.1.4. T helper type 1 immune cells are associated with improved survival
As discussed in Chapter 1, specific cells and molecules within the
inflammatory infiltrate have been examined using a variety of specialised
techniques. It has been widely claimed that the Th1 arm of the adaptive
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 105
immune response confers the protective effect associated with the
surrounding inflammatory (Pagès et al., 2005, Sazbo et al., 2003, Galon et
al., 2006). Previous studies have demonstrated that increasing densities of
cells and molecules of the Th1 response are associated with improved
outcomes, but they are also associated with early stage tumours and the
absence of early invasion (Naito et al., 1998, Pagès et al., 2005, Galon et
al., 2006). This raises the question of whether the immune response seen
around the tumour has a protective effect, or whether it is simply reflective
of a more favourable tumour phenotype. Efforts to harness the immune
system to fight cancer have so far proven largely unsuccessful (Rosenberg
et al., 2004). This has been ascribed to the ability of the tumour to evade
detection (“tumour escape”) and to create a state of immune suppression by
the release of inhibitory cytokines and the recruitment of Tregs (Zou, 2005).
The purpose of the work in this thesis was therefore to determine whether
individual cell types of the immune response, identified by
immunohistochemical staining and quantified by digital image analysis, had
prognostic significance in stage II CRC. One of the novel features of this
study was the strong focus on the prognostic significance of FOXP3+Tregs
in CRC. In addition, these investigations sought to evaluate the anti-tumour
immune response in conjunction with accurate assessment of standard
histopathological markers, hitherto not previously performed. The final and
novel area of investigation was to examine immununological markers
within histologically normal colonic mucosa taken from the surgical margin.
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 106
6.2. Major findings
The experimental work within this thesis utilised digital image analysis to
objectively measure immune parameters in the setting of CRC. Image
analysis algorithms were carefully calibrated [PS] to ensure optimal stain
detection and cell counting. Internal measures within the data, such as
higher immune cell densities within MSI tumours, revealed this to be a
robust system. One of the limitations of this thesis was that a validation
study assessing agreement between digital image analysis and manual
counting by the pathologist was not formerly performed. There is, however,
extensive literature demonstrating the accuracy of digital image analysis
(Krann et al., 2000; Haringman et al., 2005; Laurinaviciene et al., 2011;
Tuominen et al., 2012).
6.2.1. Tumour-infiltrating Tregs have strong prognostic significance
The density of Tregs within the tumour tissue was a strong and significant
prognostic marker (Table 3.5). In contrast to several other tumour types, a
high density of tumour-infiltrating Tregs was associated with better
prognosis in CRC. The addition of Treg density to vascular and perineural
invasion in multivariate analysis significantly improved the prognostication
of stage II CRC (Table 3.6). Furthermore, in patients who would normally
be considered as having low risk stage II CRC as determined by the absence
of vascular or perineural invasion, tumour-infiltrating Tregs could stratify
patients into high and low risk groups (Figure 6.1). Normally, such patients
would not be offered adjuvant therapy despite there being a significant
cancer-specific mortality rate.
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 107
Figure 6.1. In stage II CRC with no vascular, perineural or lymphatic invasion, the density of tumour-infiltrating Tregs can further stratify patients into low and high risk groups.
Log-rank P value=0.002.
Since publication of the work described in Chapter 3, other groups have
independently confirmed the prognostic significance of tumour-infiltrating
Tregs in CRC (Frey et al., 2010; Correale et al., 2010; Nosho et al., 2010;
Lee et al., 2010). It has now been shown consistently that high densities of
tumour-infiltrating Tregs are associated with improved outcomes for CRC
patients. The mechanism behind this paradoxical finding remains to be
elucidated; however, it has been speculated that Tregs could suppress
bacterial-driven inflammation and in this manner slow the rate of tumour
growth (Ladoire et al., 2011).
An unexpected and novel finding from this study was that a high density of
Tregs within histologically normal colonic mucosa taken from the surgical
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 108
margin was associated with adverse prognosis (Table 3.5). This finding was
confirmed in a separate cohort described in Chapter 5, although further
research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanism.
6.2.2. Low expression of Granzyme B is associated with signs of early metastasis
Although the CD8+ T cell density was measured in the work described in
Chapter 3, the cytotoxicity or activity of these cells was not evaluated. This
was investigated in the Chapter 4 by evaluating the expression of the
effector molecule, GrB, which facilitates target cell destruction. In keeping
with the earlier results of Pagès et al. (2005), low levels of GrB were
associated with vascular, perineural and lymph node metastasis. High levels
of GrB on the other hand were associated with location of the tumour in the
proximal colon, TILs, MSI+ tumours and better survival on univariate
analysis. On multivariate analysis that included standard histopathological
markers and Treg density, GrB expression was not a significant prognostic
marker.
6.2.3. Immune parameters retain prognostic significance even when vascular and serosal invasion are carefully assessed
As mentioned earlier, standard histological risk factors such as serosal and
vascular invasion are often under-reported and suffer from inter-observer
variability (Morris et al., 2007; Stewart et al., 2007; Littleford et al., 2009).
It therefore remained to be determined whether measurement of immune
cell parameters such as Treg density would retain prognostic significance in
the presence of careful and accurate pathological assessment. Furthermore,
the work described in Chapter 3 measured the density of immune cells in
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 109
1mm cores from a random area within the tumour and the normal colonic
mucosa.
Hence, it was important to assess a larger tissue area from both the tumour
core and the advancing margin. In addition, the finding that a high Treg
density within the histologically normal colonic mucosa taken from the
surgical margin was associated with poor cancer specific outcomes (Table
3.5) required validation in an independent cohort. These issues lead to the
experimental work described in Chapter 5. Pathology review confirmed that
vascular and serosal invasion were the most important standard
histopathological markers for stage II colon cancer. High densities of Tregs
at the advancing margin of the tumour were associated with better survival,
but this did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to the low number
of cancer-related events and the relatively small study population. Of major
interest, however, was that immune parameters within the normal colonic
mucosa were highly significant for prognostic relevance on multivariate
analysis.
6.2.4. Tregs within lymphoid follicles of histologically normal colonic mucosa are associated with adverse outcome
A high density of Tregs within the normal colonic mucosa was associated
with worse prognosis (Table 3.5). In Chapter 5, this finding was expanded
further by measuring the density of Tregs with lymphoid follicles of the
normal colonic mucosa from the surgical margin. A high density of FOXP3+
cells within the lymphoid follicles was strongly associated with adverse
survival and appeared to be the strongest prognostic marker on multivariate
analysis (Table 5.4). This observation may be an indicator of the host’s
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 110
ability to suppress metastasis. The predominant site of metastasis from
colon cancer is the liver and hence future studies could be directed at
exploring immune parameters within this organ.
6.2.5. Lymphoid follicles within the normal colonic mucosa have a protective effect
A high frequency of lymphoid follicles per length of histologically normal
colonic mucosa from the surgical margin was associated with better cancer-
specific survival (Table 5.4), particularly for patients with proximal colon
tumours. Similar to the density of FOXP3+ Tregs within the mantle zone of
these structures, the lymphoid follicle frequency may reflect the presence of
local or possibly even systemic factors that control invasion and metastasis.
Future research should explore for possible associations between the
frequency of lymphoid follicles and systemic immune parameters.
6.3. Future research
A significant amount of literature has been published regarding the
prognostic significance of two hepatic proteins: albumin and C-Reactive
Protein. The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is thought to be a
measure of systemic inflammation and higher scores are associated with
worse cancer-specific outcomes (McMillan et al., 2007). The systemic
inflammatory response as measured by the mGPS was not found to be
associated with the Klintrup classification of peritumoral infiltrate, but both
parameters showed prognostic significance (Roxburgh et al., 2009). A
future topic of research would be to investigate for associations between the
density tumour-infiltrating Tregs with systemic markers of inflammation.
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 111
The “seed and soil hypothesis” first proposed by Paget in 1889 states that
particular organs are more susceptible to metastasis from different cancer
types (Fidler, 2008). In this model the “soil” was the organ susceptible to
the development of metastasis. This hypothesis could be expanded to
include the patient as a whole and their propensity to develop metastasis as
there is mounting evidence that systemic factors (comorbidity, physiological
status) influence cancer specific survival (Jenkins et al., 2007; Richards et
al., 2010). It is therefore likely that patients with significant co-morbidity
have weakened anti-tumour immune responses. This idea could be
investigated further by searching for an association between immune
parameters in the histologically normal colonic mucosa and measures of co-
morbidity.
Tumour factors such as those described as the Peterson Index represent the
“seed” where as immune parameters along with measures of systemic
inflammation and physiology represents the “soil.” Neither is truly
independent of each other, rather there is a complex interplay between the
host and tumour both locally and systemically. Factors traditionally
associated with the tumour such as vascular invasion may actually reflect
the host’s susceptibility to invasion and metastasis. Furthermore, a cancer
cell can only arise from a host that has accumulated sufficient mutations due
to both genetic predisposition and environmental factors. Once this has
occurred the tumour cell must avoid elimination by the immune system.
Although the adaptive immune response is protective, the cancer may
induce immunosuppression (Heriot et al., 2000) and chronic inflammation
may further predispose and assist with tumour growth (Coussens 2002).
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 112
6.4. Conclusions
Although the TNM staging system is generally effective in the
prognostication of CRC, the reliable identification of high risk stage II
patients remains a concern. Standard histological markers, in particular
vascular and serosal invasion, are very effective at identifying high risk
patients but are widely under-reported and suffer from inter-observer
variability. The assessment of host factors, in particular immunological
parameters, can improve prognostication even when standard histological
markers are accurately reported. The use of IHC and digital image analysis
provide objective measures of the host response and can thereby reliably
assist with prognostication. Immunological parameters seen at the tumour
site and within histologically normal colon are likely to reflect systemic
factors important for the development of metastasis.
6.4.1. Summary of major findings
• Tumour-infiltrating Tregs are associated with good prognosis in
CRC.
• Tregs within the lymphoid follicles of the normal colonic mucosa
are associated with poor prognosis.
• A higher frequency of lymphoid follicles in histologically normal
colonic mucosa at the surgical margin appears to have a protective
effect.
• Vascular and serosal invasion are the most important standard
histological markers for stage II colon cancer.
Chapter 6: General discussion
– – 113
6.4.2. Future studies emanating from this work
• Investigate the relationship between tumour-infiltrating Tregs and
� circulating Tregs
� systemic markers of inflammation
� co-morbidity
• Investigate the relationship between the density of Tregs within
lymphoid follicles and systemic markers of inflammation and co-
morbidity.
• Investigate if the presence of an immune response is predictive for
response to chemotherapy.
• Investigate whether the profile of circulating lymphocytes (including
Tregs) changes with chemotherapy and if this is prognostic.
• Validate the prognostic value of FOXP3+ Treg density in tumour
tissue and in lymphoid follicles from normal colonic mucosa. This
should be carried out by independent, prospective studies of stage II
colorectal cancer.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 114
7. Bibliography
Abbas AK, Lichtman AH. Basic Immunology. W.B. Saunders Company. 2001.
AIHW, CA (Cancer Australia) & AACR (Australasian Association of Cancer Registries) 2008. Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: cancers diagnosed from 1982 to 2004. Cancer series no. 42. Cat. No. CAN 38. Canberra: AIHW (http://www.aihw.gov.au/cancer/).
Alfa-Wali M, Tait D, Allen-Mersh T, et al. Colorectal cancer in HIV positive individuals: The immunological effects of treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2011. [Epub ahead of print].
Alvaro T, Lejeune M, Salvadó MT et al. Outcome in Hodgkin’s lymphoma can be predicted from the presence of accompanying cytotoxic and regulatory T cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005; 11; 1467-1473.
Alvaro T, Lejeune M, Salvadó MT, et al. Immunohistochemical patterns of reactive microenvironment are associated with clinicobiologic behavior in follicular lymphoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 5350-7.
Ambe K, Mori M, Enjoji M. S-100 protein-positive dendritic cells in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Distribution and relation to the clinical prognosis. Cancer. 1989; 63: 496-503.
Bacus S, Flowers JL, Press MF, Bacus JW, McCarty KS Jr. The evaluation of estrogen receptor in primary breast carcinoma by computer-assisted image analysis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1988; 90; 233-239.
Balkwill F, Charles KA, Mantovani A. Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease. Cancer Cell. 2005; 7: 211-17.
Banner BF, Sonmez-Alpan E, Yousem SA. An immunophenotypic study of the inflammatory cell populations in colon adenomas and carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 1993; 6: 295-301.
Barrier A, Boelle P, Roser F, et al. Stage II colon cancer prognosis prediction by tumor gene expression profiling. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006; 24; 4685-4691.
Bates GJ, Fox SB, Han C, et al. Quantification of regulatory T cells enables the identification of high-risk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 5373-80.
Betge J, Pollheimer MJ, Lindtner RA, et al. Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer: prognostic significance and quality of pathology reporting. Cancer. 2012; 118: 628-38.
Browning M, Petronzelli F, Bicknell D, et al. Mechanisms of loss of HLA class I expression on colorectal tumor cells. Tissue Antigens. 1996; 47: 364-71.
Chai SM, Zeps N, Shearwood AM, et al. Screening for defective DNA mismatch repair in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2: 1017-25.
Chiba T, Ohtani H, Mizoi T, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ T-cell-count becomes a prognostic factor after a longer follow-up period in human colorectal carcinoma: possible association with suppression of micrometastasis. Br J Cancer. 2004; 9: 1711-7.
Chiba T, Ohtani H, Mizoi T, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ T-cell-count become a prognostic factor after a longer follow-up period in human colorectal carcinoma: possible association with suppression of micrometastasis. Br J Cancer. 2004. 91:1711-1717.
Chowdhury D, Lieberman J. Death by a thousand cuts: granzyme pathways of programmed cell death. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008; 26; 389-420.
Clarke SL, Betts GJ, Plant A, et al. CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells suppress anti-tumor immune responses in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2006 Dec 27;1:e129.
Coca S, Perez-Piqueras J, Martinez D, et al. The prognostic significance of intratumoral natural killer cells in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1997; 79: 2320-8.
Colour Deconvolution Algorithm User’s Guide, Aperio Technologies, Inc. 2007.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 115
Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2000; 124; 979-994.
Correale P, Cusi MG, Tsang KY, et al. Chemo-immunotherapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma with gemcitabine plus FOLFOX 4 followed by subcutaneous granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 induces strong immunologic and antitumor activity in metastatic colon cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 8950-8.
Correale P, Rotundo MS, Del Vecchio MT, et al. Regulatory (FoxP3+) T-cell tumor infiltration is a favorable prognostic factor in advanced colon cancer patients undergoing chemo or chemoimmunotherapy. J Immunother. 2010; 33: 435-441.
Courtney ED, West NJ, Kaur C, et al. Extramural vascular invasion is an adverse prognostic indicator of survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11:150-156.
Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002; 420: 860-67.
Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Mechanisms of granule-dependent killing. Cell Death Differ. 2008; 15; 251-262.
Cunningham JM, Christensen E, Tester DJ, et al. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Cancer Research 1998; 58:3455–3460
Curiel TJ, Coukos G, Zou L, et al. Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 942-949.
Curiel TJ. Tregs and rethinking cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117: 1167-74.
Dadabayev AR, Sandel MH, Menon AG, et al. Dendritic cells in colorectal cancer correlate with other tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004 Nov;53(11):978-86.
Dalerba P, Maccalli C, Casati C, et al. Immunology and immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003; 46: 33-57.
Desolneux G, Burtin P, Lermite E, et al. Prognostic factors in node-negative colorectal cancer: a retrospective study from a prospective database. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010; 25: 829-834.
Dieu-Nosjean MC, Antoine M, Danel C, et al. Long-term survival for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with intra-tumoural lymphoid structures. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 4410-4417.
Dolcetti R, Viel A, Doglioni C, et al. High prevalence of activated intraepithelial cytotoxic T lymphocytes and increased neoplastic cell apoptosis in colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol. 1999; 154: 1805-13.
Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43: 1348-60.
Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, et al. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat. Immunol. 2002; 3: 991-8.
Evans C, Morrison I, Heriot AG, Bartlett et al. The correlation between colorectal cancer rates of proliferation and apoptosis and systemic cytokine levels; plus their influence upon survival. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94: 1412-9.
Fidler IJ, Poste G. The "seed and soil" hypothesis revisited. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9: 808.
Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003; 4: 330-6.
Frey DM, Droeser RA, Viehl CT et al. High frequency of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells predicts improved survival in mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer. 2010; 126; 2635-2643.
Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, Fujii et al. Incidence and localization of lymphoid follicles in early colorectal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11:6863-6866.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 116
Funada Y, Noguchi T, Kikuchi R, et al. Prognostic significance of CD8+ T cell and macrophage peritumoral infiltration in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2003; 10: 309-13.
Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006; 313: 1960-4.
Gao Q, Qiu SJ, Fan J, et al. Intratumoral balance of regulatory and cytotoxic T cells is associated with prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 2586-2593.
Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1797-806.
Gryfe R, Kim H, Hsieh ET, Aronson et al. Tumor microsatellite instability and clinical outcome in young patients with colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 69-77.
Guidoboni M, Gafa R, Viel A, et al. Microsatellite instability and high content of activated cytotoxic lymphocytes identify colon cancer patients with a favorable prognosis. Am J Pathol. 2001 Jul;159(1):297-304.
Halvorsen TB, Seim E. Association between invasiveness, inflammatory reaction, desmoplasia and survival in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1989; 42: 162-6.
Haringman JJ, Vinkenoog M, Gerlag DM, et al. Reliability of computerized image analysis for the evaluation of serial synovial biopsies in randomized controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005; 7: R862-7.
Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15: 361-87.
Heriot AG, Marriott JB, Cookson S, et al. Reduction in cytokine production in colorectal cancer patients: association with stage and reversal by resection. Br J Cancer. 2000; 82: 1009-12.
Hiraoka N, Onozato K, Kosuge T, et al. Prevalence of FOXP3 regulatory T cells increases during the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its premalignant lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12: 5423-5434.
Holcombe RF, Jacobson J, Dakhil SR, et al. Association of immune parameters with clinical outcome in stage III colon cancer: results of Southwest Oncology Group Protocol 9009. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1999; 48: 533-9.
Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003; 299: 1057-61.
House AK, Watt AG. Survival and the immune response in patients with carcinoma of the colorectum. Gut. 1979; 20: 868-74.
Issa JP, Ottaviano YL, Celano P, Hamilton SR, Davidson NE, Baylin SB. Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon. Nat Genet. 1994;7:536-40.
Jackson PA, Green MA, Marks CG, King et al. Lymphocyte subset infiltration patterns and HLA antigen status in colorectal carcinomas and adenomas. Gut. 1996; 38: 85-9.
Jass JR. Lymphocytic infiltration and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1986; 39: 585-9.
Jenkins JT, O'Neill G, Morran CG. The relationship between patient physiology and cancer-specific survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007; 96: 213-7.
Johnson EE, Leverson GE, Pirsch JD, Heise CP. A 30-year analysis of colorectal adenocarcinoma in transplant recipients and proposal for altered screening. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11: 272-9.
June CH. Adoptive T cell therapy for cancer in the clinic. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117: 1466-76.
June CH. Principles of adoptive T cell cancer therapy. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117: 1204-12.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 117
Kelley TW, Pohlman B, Elson P, et al. The ratio of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells to granzyme B+ cytotoxic T/NK cells predicts prognosis in classical Hodgkin lymphoma and is independent of bcl-2 and MAL expression. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007; 128; 958-965.
Khoury W, Lavery IC, Kiran RP. Effects of chronic immunosuppression on long-term oncologic outcomes for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery. Ann Surg. 2011; 253: 323-7.
Klintrup K, Mäkinen JM, Kauppila S, et al. Inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 41: 2645-54.
Kobayashi N, Hiraoka N, Yamagami W, et al. FOXP3 regulatory T cells affect the development and progression of hepatocarcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13: 902-911.
Koch M, Beckhove P, Op den Winkel J, et al. Tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes in colorectal cancer: Tumor-selective activation and cytotoxic activity in situ. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 986-92.
Koda K, Saito N, Takiguchi N, Oda et al. Preoperative natural killer cell activity: correlation with distant metastases in curatively research colorectal carcinomas. Int. Surg. 1997; 82: 190-93.
Kraan MC, Haringman JJ, Ahern MJ, Breedveld FC, Smith MD, Tak PP. Quantification of the cell infiltrate in synovial tissue by digital image analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000; 39: 43-9.
Krajewska M, Smith LH, Rong J et al. Image analysis algorithms for immunohistochemical assessment of cell death events and fibrosis in tissue sections. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2009; 57; 649-663.
Kubota Y, Sunouchi K, Ono M, et al. Local immunity and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Dis. Colon Rectum. 1992; 35: 645-50.
Lachter J, Stein M, Lichtig C, et al. Mast cells in colorectal neoplasias and premalignant disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38: 290-3.
Ladoire S, Martin F, Ghiringhelli F. Prognostic role of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells infiltrating human carcinomas: the paradox of colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011; 60: 909-18.
Ladoire S, Martin F, Ghiringhelli F. Prognostic role of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells infiltrating human carcinomas: the paradox of colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011; 60:909-918.
Laghi L, Bianchi P, Miranda E, et al. CD3+ cells at the invasive margin of deeply invading (pT3-T4) colorectal cancer and risk of post-surgical metastasis: a longitudinal study. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10: 877-884.
Langman JM, Rowland R. The number and distribution of lymphoid follicles in the human large intestine. J Anat. 1986; 149: 189-194.
Laurinaviciene A, Dasevicius D, Ostapenko V, et al. Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays. Diagn Pathol. 2011; 6: 87.
Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, et al. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11: 8-15.
Le Gouvello S, Bastuji-Garin S, Aloulou N et al. High prevalence of Foxp3 and IL17 in MMR-proficient colorectal carcinomas. Gut. 2008; 57; 772-779.
Lee WS, Park S, Lee WY, Yun SH, Chun HK. Clinical impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for survival in stage II colon cancer. Cancer. 2010; 116: 5188-5199
Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks J, et al. Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27; 5131-5137.
Lim HW, Hillsamer P, Banham AH, Kim CH. Direct suppression of B cells by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2005; 175: 4180-4183.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 118
Ling KL, Pratap SE, Bates GJ, et al. Increased frequency of regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Immun. 2007; 7:7.
Littleford SE, Baird A, Rotimi O, et al. Interobserver variation in the reporting of local peritoneal involvement and extramural venous invasion in colonic cancer. Histopathology. 2009; 55: 407-13.
Littleford SE, Baird A, Rotimi O, et al. Interobserver variation in the reporting of local peritoneal involvement and extramural venous invasion in colonic cancer. Histopathology. 2009; 55: 407-413.
Loddenkemper C, Schernus M, Noutsias M, et al. In situ analysis of FOXP3 regulatory T cells in human colorectal cancer. J Transl Med. 2006; 4: 52.
Loukola A, Eklin K, Laiho P, et al. Microsatellite marker analysis in screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 4545-9.
Matsushita K, Takenouchi T, Shimada H, et al. Strong HLA-DR antigen expression on cancer cells relates to better prognosis of colorectal cancer patients: Possible involvement of c-myc suppression by interferon-gamma in situ. Cancer Sci. 2006; 97: 57-63.
McCarty M. Principles of prognosis in cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 1931; 96: 30-3.
McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22: 881-6.
Melero I, Arina A, Murillo O, et al. Immunogenic cell death and cross-priming are reaching the clinical immunotherapy arena. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12: 2385-9.
Mempel TR, Pittet MJ, Khazaie K, et al. Regulatory T cells reversibly suppress cytotoxic T cell function independent of effector differentiation. Immunity. 2006; 25; 129-141.
Menon AG, Janssen-van Rhijn CM, Morreau H et al. Immune system and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a detailed immunohistochemical analysis. Lab. Invest. 2004; 84: 493-501.
Michael-Robinson JM, Biemer-Huttmann A, Purdie DM, et al. Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and apoptosis are independent features in colorectal cancer stratified according to microsatellite instability status. Gut.. 2001; 48: 360-6.
Miracco C, Mourmouras V, Biagioli M, et al. Utility of tumour-infiltrating CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cell evaluation in predicting local recurrence in vertical growth phase cutaneous melanoma. Oncol Rep. 2007; 18: 1115-22.
Morris EJ, Maughan NJ, Forman D, Quirke P. Who to treat with adjuvant therapy in Dukes B/stage II colorectal cancer? The need for high quality pathology. Gut. 2007; 56: 1419-25.
Morris M, Platell C, de Boer B, McCaul K, Iacopetta B. Population-based study of prognostic factors in stage II colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 866-871.
Morris M, Platell C, McCaul K, et al. Survival rates for stage II colon cancer patients treated with or without chemotherapy in a population-based setting. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22: 887-95.
Mulder WM, Bloemena E, Stukart MJ, Kummer et al. T cell receptor-zeta and granzyme B expression in mononuclear cell infiltrates in normal colon mucosa and colon carcinoma. Gut. 1997; 40: 113-119.
Murphy J, O’Sullivan GC, Lee G, et al. The inflammatory response within Dukes' B colorectal cancers: implications for progression of micrometastases and patient survival. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 3607-14.
Musha H, Ohtani H, Mizoi T, et al. Selective infiltration of CCR5(+)CXCR3(+) T lymphocytes in human colorectal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2005; 116: 949-56.
Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al. Local and distant recurrences in rectal cancer patients are predicted by the nonspecific immune response; specific immune response has only a systemic effect--a histopathological and immunohistochemical study. BMC Cancer. 2001; 1: 7.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 119
Naito Y, Saito K, Shiiba K, et al. CD8+ T cells infiltrated within cancer cell nests as a prognostic factor in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998; 58: 3491-4.
Nascimbeni R, Di Fabio F, Di Betta E, et al. Morphology of colorectal lymphoid aggregates in cancer, diverticular and inflammatory bowel diseases. Mod Pathol. 2005; 18: 681-685.
Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006; 6: 173-82.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Colon Cancer. Version 3.2012. 2011;National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf
Needham DJ, Lee JX, Beilharz MW. Intra-tumoural regulatory T cells: a potential new target in cancer immunotherapy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 343: 684-91.
NH&MRC: Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee. Guidelines for the Prevention, Early Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer. The Cancer Council Australia and the Australian Cancer Network, Sydney 2005.
Nielsen HJ, Hansen U, Christensen IJ, et al. Independent prognostic value of eosinophil and mast cell infiltration in colorectal cancer tissue. J Pathol. 1999; 189: 487-95.
Nosho K, Baba Y, Tanaka N, et al. Tumour-infiltrating T-cell subsets, molecular changes in colorectal cancer, and prognosis: cohort study and literature review. J Pathol. 2010; 222: 350-366.
Oberg A, Samii S, Stenling R, Lindmark G. Different occurrence of CD8+, CD45RO+, and CD68+ immune cells in regional lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer as potential prognostic predictors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002 Jan;17(1):25-9.
Ohtani H. Focus on TILs: prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Immun. 2007; 7: 4.
Oldenhove G, de Heusch M, Urbain-Vansanten G, et al. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells control T helper cell type 1 responses to foreign antigens induced by mature dendritic cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 2003; 198: 259-66.
Pagès F, Berger A, Camus M et al. Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 353; 2654-2666.
Pagès F, Galon J, Dieu-Nosjean MC, et al. Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that should not be ignored. Oncogene. 2010; 29; 1093-1102.
Parnaby C, Barrow EJ, Edirimanne SB, Parrott NR, Frizelle FA, Watson AJ. Colorectal complications of end-stage renal failure and renal transplantation: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Nov 4. [Epub ahead of print]
Parslow TG, Stites DP, Terr AI, Imboden JB. Medical Immunology, 10th edn. McGraw Hill 2001.
Peters PJ, Borst J, Oorschot V et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte granules are secretory lysosomes, containing both perforin and granzymes. J Exp Med. 1991; 173; 1099-1109.
Petersen VC, Baxter KJ, Love SB, Shepherd NA. Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes' B colon cancer. Gut. 2002; 51: 65-9.
Petersen VC, Baxter KJ, Love SB, Shepherd NA. Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes’ B colon cancer. Gut. 2002; 51: 65-69.
Phillips SM, Banerjea A, Feakins R, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability are activated and cytotoxic. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 469-75.
Prall F, Duhrkop T, Weirich V, et al. Prognostic role of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in stage III colorectal cancer with and without microsatellite instability. Hum Pathol. 2004; 35: 808-16.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 120
Quasar Collaborative Group, Gray R, Barnwell J, McConkey C, Hills RK, Williams NS, Kerr DJ. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet. 2007; 370: 2020-9.
Quirke P, Morris E. Reporting colorectal cancer. Histopathology. 2007; 50:103-112.
Richards CH, Leitch EF, Horgan PG, et al. The relationship between patient physiology, the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010; 103: 1356-61.
Roitt I. Essential Immunology, 9th edn. Blackwell Science 1997.
Roncador G, Brown PJ, Maestre L, et al. Analysis of FOXP3 protein expression in human CD4CD25 regulatory T cells at the single-cell level. Eur J Immunol. 2005; 35: 1681-1691.
Roncarolo MG, Gregori S. Is FOXP3 a bona fide marker for human regulatory T cells? Eur J Immunol. 2008; 38: 925-7.
Ropponen KM, Eskelinen MJ, Lipponen PK, et al. Prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 1997; 182: 318-324.
Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Restifo NP. Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines. Nat. Med. 2004; 10: 909-15.
Roxburgh CS, Salmond JM, Horgan PG, Oien KA, McMillan DC. Tumour inflammatory infiltrate predicts survival following curative resection for node-negative colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 2138-45.
Roxburgh CS, Salmond JM, Horgan PG, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based pathologic and biochemical criteria in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 249: 788-93.
Sacchi G, Weber E, Agliano M, et al. Lymphatic vessels in colorectal cancer and their relation with inflammatory infiltrate. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46: 40-7.
Sakaguchi S, Miyara M, Costantino CM, Hafler DA. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010; 10: 490-500.
Sakaguchi S. Control of immune responses by naturally arising CD4+ regulatory T cells that express toll-like receptors. J Exp Med. 2003; 197: 397-401.
Salama P, Phillips M, Grieu F, et al. Tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T regulatory cells show strong prognostic significance in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27; 186-192.
Sallusto F, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22: 745-63.
Sandel MH, Dadabayev AR, Menon AG, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells in colorectal cancer: role of maturation status and intratumoral localization. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11: 2576-82.
Sandel MH, Speetjens FM, Menon AG, et al. Natural killer cells infiltrating colorectal cancer and MHC class I expression. Mol Immunol. 2005; 42: 541-6.
Sato E, Olson SH, Ahn J, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA. 2005; 102; 18538-18543.
Schofield L, Watson N, Grieu F, Li WQ, Zeps N, et al. Population-based detection of Lynch syndrome in young colorectal cancer patients using microsatellite instability as the initial test. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 1097-102
Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB. The prognostic significance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology. 1997; 112; 1096-1102.
Sipos F, Muzes G. Isolated lymphoid follicles in colon: switch points between inflammation and colorectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17:1666-1673.
Sobin LH, Wittekind C. International union against cancer TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken.
Sporri R, Reis e Sousa C. Inflammatory mediators are insufficient for full dendritic cell activation and promote expansion of CD4+ T cell populations lacking helper function. Nat Immunol. 2005; 6: 163-70.
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 121
Stewart C J R, Morris M, de Boer B, Iacopetta B. Identification of serosal invasion and extramural venous invasion on review of Dukes’ stage B colonic carcinomas and correlation with survival. Histopathology. 2007; 51; 372-378.
Stewart CJ, Morris M, de Boer B, Iacopetta B. Identification of serosal invasion and extramural venous invasion on review of Dukes' stage B colonic carcinomas and correlation with survival. Histopathology. 2007;51: 372-8.
Suzuki A, Masuda A, Nagata H, et al. Mature dendritic cells make clusters with T cells in the invasive margin of colorectal carcinoma. J Pathol. 2002; 196: 37-43.
Svennevig JL, Lunde OC, Holter J, Bjørgsvik D. Lymphoid infiltration and prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1984; 49: 375-7.
Svennevig JL, Lunde OC, Holter J. In situ analysis of the inflammatory cell infiltrates in colon carcinomas and in the normal colon wall. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A. 1982; 90: 131-7.
Szabo SJ, Sullivan BM, Peng SL, Glimcher LH. Molecular mechanisms regulating Th1 immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003; 21: 713-58.
Tachibana T, Onodera H, Tsuruyama T et al. Increased intratumor Valpha24-positive natural killer T cells: a prognostic factor for primary colorectal carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11: 7322-7.
Tan SY, Fan Y, Luo HS, et al. Prognostic significance of cell infiltrations of immunosurveillance in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 1210-4.
Titu LV, Monson JR, Greenman J. The role of CD8(+) T cells in immune responses to colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2002; 51: 235-47.
Tuominen VJ, Tolonen TT, Isola J. ImmunoMembrane: a publicly available web application for digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry. Histopathology. 2012 Feb 1. [Epub ahead of print].
Uehara K, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, et al. Clinicopathological significance of microscopic abscess formation at the invasive margin of advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 239-43.
van den Ingh HF, Ruiter DJ, Griffioen G, et al. HLA antigens in colorectal tumours--low expression of HLA class I antigens in mucinous colorectal carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 1987; 55: 125-30.
Vermijlen D, Froelich CJ, Luo D, et al. Perforin and granzyme B induce apoptosis in FasL-resistant colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2001; 50; 212-217.
Vesely P, Touskova M, Melichar B. Phenotype of peripheral blood leukocytes and survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2005; 20: 126-33.
Walker MR, Carson BD, Nepom GT, et al. De novo generation of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from human CD4+CD25- cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 4103-8.
Wang J, Ioan-Facsinay A, van der Voort EI, et al. Transient expression of FOXP3 in human activated nonregulatory CD4+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2007; 37: 129-38.
Wang Y, Jatkoe T, Zhang Y, et al. Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes’ B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1564-1571.
Warabi M, Kitagawa M, Hirokawa K. Loss of MHC class II expression is associated with a decrease of tumor-infiltrating T cells and an increase of metastatic potential of colorectal cancer: immunohistological and histopathological analyses as compared with normal colonic mucosa and adenomas. Pathol Res Pract. 2000; 196: 807-15.
Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Tanaka T, et al. Gene expression signature and the prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer by DNA microarray. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52: 1941-1948.
Watson NF, Ramage JM, Madjd Z, et al. Immunosurveillance is active in colorectal cancer as down regulation but not complete loss of MHC class I expression correlates with a poor prognosis. Int J Cancer. 2006;118: 6-10.
Williams GT, Quirke P, Shepherd NA. Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Dataset for colorectal cancer, 2nd edn. Royal College of Pathologists, London. (2007)
Chapter 7: Bibliography
– – 122
Zlobec I, Lugli A. Invasive front of colorectal cancer: dynamic interface of pro-/anti-tumor factors. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 15; 5898-5906.
Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005; 5: 263-74.
Zou W. Regulatory T cells, tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006; 6: 295-307.