the impact of global change on air quality · photo image area measures 2” h x 6.93” w and can...
TRANSCRIPT
Darrell Winner, Ph.D. U.S. EPA; ORD/NCER/ASD [email protected]
Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage
strip of one, two or three images.
The photo image area is located 3.19” from left and 3.81” from top of page.
Each image used in collage should be reduced or cropped to a maximum of 2” high, stroked with a 1.5 pt white frame and positioned edge-to-edge with
accompanying images.
July 15, 2009
http://www.epa.gov/ncer/science/globalclimate
The Impact of Global Change on Air Quality
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Outline
• Potential impact of climate change on:
–Ozone
–Particulate matter
–Toxics
–Pollen
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Acknowledgements
• Doug Grano, OAR/OAQPS
• Anne Grambsch ORD/NCEA
• Chris Weaver ORD/NCEA
• John Dawson, AAAS fellow ORD/NCER
• Ken Mitchell, EPA Region 4
• Daniel Jacob, Harvard
• X.Z. Liang, Illinois State Water Survey
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Climate Change Science
• The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
– Established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program to assess the risk of human-induced climate change.
• The latest IPCC report is Climate Change 2007 (http://www.ipcc.ch/)
– Based on over 2500 scientific expert reviewers and 450 lead authors from over 130 countries.
– Evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
– The role of greenhouse gases is well understood and their increases are well identified.
– The net effect of human activities is now quantified and known to cause a warming at the Earth’s surface.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Human Contribution to Climate Change
• Global atmospheric
concentrations of greenhouse gases
increased markedly as a result of human activities
• In 2005, the concentration
of CO2 exceeded by far the natural range over the last
650,000 years
10,000 5,000 0
Time (before 2005)
IPCC 9-07
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Between 1970 and 2005, GHG Emissions Increased 70%
IPCC 5-07
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Ranges of predicted surface warming
IPCC 9-07
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Climate Change 2080-2099 vs. 1980-1999
(Ensemble of 20 GCMs from IPCC 4th assessment report)
Jacob and Winner, 2009
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Changes in earth’s energy balance
• Radiative forcing
– Measure of the cooling or warming (radiative) effect due to a change (forcing) in the climate system
• For example, an increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide has a warming effect
• The following chart indicates
– The relative importance of Greenhouse Gases
– Forcing from various factors over the last 250 years
– The uncertainties associated with these estimates
Greenhouse radiative forcing of climate between 1750 and 2005 [IPCC, 2007]
Referenced to forcing agent Referenced to emission
Ozone radiative forcing: 0.35 W m-2
compare to 1.6 W m-2 for CO2
…but NOx emissions have net cooling effect, due to offsetting effectson methane and nitrate
The best strategy to decrease ozone radiative forcing is to decrease methane emissions – also decreases ozone background D. Jacob, Harvard
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Impact of climate change on air quality - Ozone
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Empirical evidence suggesting climate change could affect AQ
• O3 episodes (mostly summer) are generally
what we care about
• Right combination of meteorological
conditions – e.g., high temperature, clear
skies, stagnant air – with the right blend of
precursor pollutants, e.g., NOx, VOCs
• Global climate change has the potential to
affect both regional meteorology and regional emissions
• Likely to see different degrees of change in
different regions
Example: Probability of max
daily 8-hour O3 exceeding 84
ppb as a function of max daily T
Lin et al. [2001]
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Air Quality Assessment Framework
Air Quality Modeling (NERL, Harvard, Georgia Tech, Carnegie Mellon, Illinois, Berkeley, WSU,
Harvard, Columbia, Johns Hopkins)
Regional Change
Scenarios
Regional Emissions
Regional Meteorology
Regional Boundary Conditions
Global Change Scenarios (tech change, population growth, economic activity levels…)
Global Meteorology
Global Emissions
Global Air Quality
Regional Air Quality
Global Chemistry Modeling (Harvard,
Carnegie Mellon, Illinois)
Technology Assessments with MARKAL (NRMRL)
Biogenics modeling (NERL, Forest Service, UC-
Boulder, UNC, UT-Austin, UNH)
Emissions Modeling (NRMRL, OAR, Illinois)
Intercontinental Air Pollution (OAR)
Climate Downscaling
(PNNL, Illinois, WSU, Columbia, Harvard,
Carnegie Mellon)
Climate Effects of Aerosols
(OAR)
Socio-economic scenarios (NCEA)
Regional development (Georgia Tech, UC-
Davis, RFF, UT-Austin, UW-Seattle, Illinois,
Johns Hopkins, Columbia)
Consequences of Global Change for Air Quality
• EPA STAR grants exploring the effect of
Climate, land use, technology, and demographic change on
Ozone, particulate matter, and precursor emissions • Modeling future impact of global changes on US air quality (6 grants, $5.4 million
FY 02)
• Future anthropogenic air pollution emissions (2 grants, $1.5 million FY 03)
• Future biogenic air pollution emissions (4 grants, $2.8 million FY 03)
• Regional development, population trend, and technology change impacts on
future air pollution emissions (8 grants, $4.9 million FY 04/05)
• Fire, climate, and air quality (3 grants, $2.2 million FY 06)
• Consequences of Global Change for Air Quality (10 grants, $9.0 million FY 07/08)
• Prequel - Consequences of interactions between human activities and a changing
climate (3 relevant grants, $4.2 million FY 00)
• http://www.epa.gov/ncer/science/globalclimate
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Disproportionately large climate-induced changes for high-O3 extremes
Mean MDA8 O3
95th Percentile MDA8 O3
Shift in Typical Duration of > 84 ppb O3 Episodes
Shift in the O3 Distribution
Wu et al. [2008]
Hogrefe et al. [2004]
Nolte et al. [2008]
Daniel J. Jacob (P.I.) and Loretta J. Mickley, HarvardJohn H. Seinfeld, CaltechDavid Rind, NASA/GISS
Joshua Fu, U. TennesseeDavid G. Streets, ANL
Daewon Byun, U. Houston
an EPA-STAR project (R830959 and R833370)
2000-2050change inclimate
2000-2050change inpollutantemissions
2000-2050 change in U.S. air quality
GISS GCM 31950-2050 transient climate
simulation
GEOS-Chem CTMglobal O3-PM-Hg
simulation
MM5 mesoscaledynamics simulation
CMAQO3-PM-Hgsimulation
boundaryconditions
met. input
met. input
boundaryconditions
2050 vs. 2000 climate
IPCC scenariosand derived emissions
greenhousegases
ozone and PM precursorsmercury
Global United States
2000 emissions
% change,2000-2050
2000 emissions
% change, 2000-2050
NOx, Tg N y-1
Anthropogenic Lightning Soils (natural)
344.96.1
+71%+18%+8%
6.00.140.35
-39%+21%+11%
NMVOCs, Tg C y-1
Anthropogenic Biogenic
46610
+150%+23%
9.340
-52%+23%
CO, Tg y-1 1020 +25% 87 -47%
Methane, ppbv 1750 2400 (+37%)
2000 emissions: GEOS-Chem, including NEI 99 for United States2000-2050 % change, anthropogenic: SRES A1B scenario2000-2050 % change, natural: GISS/GEOS-Chem
Wu et al. [2008]results from EPA STAR grant R830959, Harvard
(2050 emissions & 2000 climate) (2050 emissions & climate)
1999-2001 ozone, ppb (2000 emissions w/ 2050 climate)
Wu et al. [2008]results from EPA STAR grant R830959, Harvard
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
2000 climate with NOx emissionsreduced by 40%
2050 climate- 50% NOx
2050 climate- 60% NOx
Climate Change Penalty
Wu et al. [2008]
Harvard study
suggests that climate change in the
Northeast U.S. would necessitate a 50% NOx
reduction to achieve
the same O3 goals as a 40% reduction today
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
• Leibensperger et al. (2008), ACP
– Decreasing trend in mid-latitude cyclone frequency in US (1980-2006)
• Significant for NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (-0.15 yr-1) & NOAA maps
• Not significant for NCEP/DOE reanalysis
“We find that if mid-latitude cyclone frequency had not declined, the northeastern
US would have been largely compliant with the ozone air quality standard by 2001”
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Observed average number of summer days in the
Northeast U.S. with 8-hour O3 > 84 ppb
Interannual Variability …
Nolte et al. [2008]
From EPA NERL study,
simulated increases in
O3 in 2050 are of same
order as present-day
year-to-year variability
in some regions.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Extension of O3 Season?
Nolte et al. [2008]
EPA NERL Simulation Results: Change in MDA8 O3
from present to 2050s for September-October
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Modeling Future Changes in the Mid-Latitude Storm Tracks
2045-2052
1995-2002
Mickley et al. [2004]
MDA8 O3
change
by 2050s
Harvard Carnegie Mellon
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Key: Is isoprene nitrate
a terminal or temporary
sink for NOx in model
chemistry … ?
MDA8 O3
change
by 2050s
Harvard Carnegie Mellon
Modeling Isoprene Nitrate Chemistry
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Impact of climate change on air quality – Particulate matter
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
• Warming climate affects particulate matter
– More water vapor plus changing weather patterns
• Increasing rainout events (decreasing PM in some regions)
• Increasing drought (increasing PM in some regions)
– Increase in number and length of stagnation events
– Changing biogenic emissions
– Changing some particles to the gaseous state
– Drought-related increases in dust emissions.
– Longer wildfire seasons and larger fires.
• The net impact is unclear.
Major predicted climate effects on PM
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Carnegie Mellon modeling setup
• Models
– GISS II’ GCM/CTM
– MM5
– PMCAMx
• 5 present and 5 2050s climate (IPCC A2)
• Present-day PM/precursor emissions
GCM/CTM
(GISS II’)
Regional
met model
(MM5)
Regional
CTM
(PMCAMx)
Meteorology
Meteorology
Chemical
boundary
conditions
Climate / emissions
scenario
Regional-
scale air
quality
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
July PM2.5 Future – Present,
A2 climate change, present day emissions
• Mix of species/met effects: Largely sulfate
• Stagnation
• Mixing height
• Precipitation?
• Temperature?
PM2.5 (μg m-3)
Land-cell average = +2.2 μg m-3
Dawson et al. (2009)
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Important processes not well-represented
• Organics?
• Wildfires?
• Feedback effects?
• Global transport?
Insights into the effect of climate change on air quality
Ozone PM (aerosol)
Stagnation
Temperature
Mixing depth
Precipitation
Cloud cover
Humidity
Effect of climate change
=
=?
?=?
? (relative)
Jacob and Winner, AE 2009
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Impact of climate change on air quality - Toxics
Courtesy of Sustaining the Environment and Resources for Canadians
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Climate Impacts on Toxics-General
• Mitigation measures in response to climate change
may alter air toxic emissions from a variety of
sources
– Reformulation of vehicle fuels
• E85 will increase two major carcinogens, acetaldehyde and formaldehyde while slightly reducing another, butadiene, and reducing a fourth, benzene. (E85 subject of STAR grant)
– Less fossil fuel combustion as other fuels are developed
– More geothermal production, waste incineration, and woodstove use?
• Higher temperatures indicate greater evaporative emissions
– Mobile sources evaporative emissions, including benzene
– Stationary sources evaporative emissions, including solvents
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Example….Climate Impacts on Mercury
• Mercury chemistry and emission rates are affected by temperature
– Increased rates of re-emission of mercury from land and ocean are associated with increased temperatures.
– Temperature increases in the North Atlantic are projected to increase rates of mercury methylation in fish and marine mammals, thus increasing human exposure via consumption.
• Mercury in biomass (plants and litter) and soil carbon pools are
affected by climate change and in turn can affect mercury uptake,
sequestration and emission.
– Plant growth may be initially enhanced by increased CO2 levels.
– Increases in wildfires may release more biomass/soil mercury to the atmosphere.
[IPCC 2007 WGII Adaptation]
[Obrist STAR grant]
[Jacob STAR grant]
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Mercury-Climate Change Research
• Several EPA grants are underway to explore Hg chemistry and transport as
a function of climate and emissions changes through the use of both
models and observational datasets
• Climate change can potentially impact a number of atmospheric processes
that help determine the fate of Hg
– heterogeneous oxidation of gas-phase Hg
– dry deposition of elemental
– reactive gas-phase and particulate Hg
– Hg chemistry in the presence of fog, clouds, and photochemical smog.
• Focus on present and future Hg distribution for the U.S. as a whole, as well
as for particular regions (e.g., Great Lakes, Florida)
• Work aimed at improving Hg chemistry in linked climate and air quality
modeling systems by incorporating additional reactions and refining
existing representations
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Impact of climate change on air quality - Pollen
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Climate impacts on pollen
• Warming and climate extremes are likely
to increase respiratory illness, including
exposure to pollen (IPCC 2007)
• Climate change has caused an earlier
onset of the spring pollen season in the
Northern Hemisphere.
– It is unclear whether the allergenic content of these pollen types has changed (pollen content remaining the
same or increasing would imply increased exposure)
• A doubling of the atmospheric CO2
concentration stimulated ragweed-pollen
production by over 50%.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Research
Using air quality results in health impact studies
• Combine air quality results with tools used to calculate health impacts of air pollution (e.g. Benmap)
• Pat Kinney (Columbia) and his team have led the way (you will hear from him this afternoon)
• Brand new results from Ted Russell (Georgia Tech) and his group: Potential Impact of Climate Change on Air Pollution-Related Human Health Effects (2009) E. Tagaris, K.-J. Liao, A. J. DeLucia, L. Deck, P. Amar, A. G. Russell, Environmental Science & Technology 43 (13), 4979-4988
– Results suggest that climate change driven air quality-related health effects will be adversely affected in more than 2/3 of the continental U.S.
– Changes in health effects induced by PM2.5 dominate compared to those caused by ozone.
– PM2.5-induced premature mortality is about 15 times higher than that due to ozone. Nationally the analysis suggests approximately 4000 additional annual premature deaths due to climate change impacts on PM2.5 vs 300 due to climate change-induced ozone changes.
– High uncertainty
• Expect more studies soon…