the international congress 2012 feedback report
DESCRIPTION
The official feedback report on delivery of IC 2012 from AIESEC International.TRANSCRIPT
INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS 2012
IN RUSSIA FEEDBACK REPORT
Introduction Another Interna+onal Congress is behind us and in the following short document we are summarizing the learning from this conference based on the feedback from the physical delegates. As AIESEC Interna+onal we are really sa+sfied that this years IC was so successful. Especially because this year we have taken a courageous decision of running this congress completely in a different way. Basing the whole conference on our yearly plan and the purpose which we believe is not just a plan of 21 people in RoGerdam but the plan and the purpose of the whole genera+on. That is why Believe. Together we Achieve was the main moGo of the conference. We are ready to learn from Interna+onal Congress and also to make all the plans and promises reality. One of the most sa+sfying things for us was to see how many people have been bringing IC back home and replica+ng the ways we have delivered sessions by back in their conferences home. We would like to thank all the delegates who have filled the feedback survey and allowed us to learn from this amazing experience and realize what were the key successes and which things we can make even beGer for our next conferences. We will be launching next survey in January to evaluate the real impact IC have brought. We hope you enjoy this report!
AIESEC Interna+onal
Amount of physical delegates on IC 2012 527
Amount of physical delegates who have filled the feedback survey 233
Percentage of physical delegates filling the feedback 44.21%
Amount of enFFes covered by feedback survey 95
Top contributors Germany 9 Russia 8 Lebanon 6 Brazil 5 Slovakia 5 Southern Cone 5 Bosnia & Herzegovina 4 Cambodia 4 Colombia 4 Czech Republic 4 Finland 4 India 4 Indonesia 4 Italy 4 Qatar 4 Serbia 4 Slovenia 4 Switzerland 4 Turkey 4 Ukraine 4
Current role MCP 69 MCVP 114 LCP 50
FuncFonal area GIP (ICX, OGX) 42 GCDP (ICX, OGX) 21 TMP/TLP 13 Business Development (External rela+ons, sales..) 11 Organisa+onal Development, LC Development 10 Brand Experience (PR, Communica+on, Marke+ng...) 8 Finance 6 Other 3
PROFILE OF DELEGATES FILLING THE FEEDBACK SURVEY
Your overall saFsfacFon with IC 4.41 How useful / relevant was the content of the agenda for you 4.07
What were the agenda elements you liked the most?
1. Session delivery 173 2. Objec+ves & messages 148 3. Agenda flow 147 4. Session content 103 5. Conference output 78 6. Agenda +me management 60
What were the agenda elements you think could be even beOer and improved?
1. Session content 88 2. Agenda +me management 83 3. Session delivery 35 4. Conference output 31 5. Objec+ves & messages 29 6. Agenda flow 29
SATISFACTION WITH AGENDA EvaluaFon (1 -‐ not saFsfied, 5 -‐ very saFsfied)
Sessions evaluaFon (1 -‐ not saFsfied, 5 -‐ very saFsfied)
Opening plenary 4.37 Why to believe… 4.49 All you needed to know to believe… 4.23 The story of last year 3.88 Collabora+on spaces 3.78 Innova+on spaces 3.63 Evening plenaries 4.04 Our story 4.29 Make it bigger with right focus 4.31 Make it bigger by process op+miza+on 4.18 Make it bigger by expansion of our units 4.37 Make it beGer by quality of the customer experience 4.30 Make it beGer by integrated experience 4.08 LEAD for MCPs 4.20
LEAD for MCVPs and LCPs 3.62 LEAD common part 4.00 Func+onal Connec+on GIP 3.95 Func+onal Connec+on Business Development 3.54 Func+onal Connec+on GCDP 3.82 Func+onal Connec+on Brand Experience 3.53 Func+onal Connec+on LCP 3.67 Func+onal Connec+on TMP/TLP 3.48 Alumni Hall of Fame 3.51 Make it stronger by expanding of our reach 4.15 Make it stronger using amplifiers 3.99 What do I do back home 4.15 Commitment 4.17 MCPs business and legisla+on 3.88
SATISFACTION WITH SESSIONS
How would you rate the overall performance of the CC of the conference? 4.32 How would you rate the Delegate servicing at the conference? 4.17 How would you rate the LogisFcs of the conference? 4.06 How would you rate the Special events of the conference? [Opening Ceremony] 4.07
How would you rate the Special events of the conference? [Symposium "World a]er 2020"] 3.29
How would you rate the Special events of the conference? [Global Village in park Sokolniki] 4.10
How would you rate the Special events of the conference? [Russian FesFval] 4.14
SATISFACTION WITH CONGRESS COMMITTEE
Company How would you rate the partnership
launches?
Would you be interested in applying to aOend following company in the future?
No Yes
Vale 3.71 74 159 HULT 3.80 83 150 EducaFon First 3.77 113 120 PwC 3.62 100 133 Electrolux 3.85 76 157 DP DHL 4.18 38 195 Alcatel Lucent 3.64 79 154 edge 3.96 69 164 TCS 3.69 128 105 UBS Awards Ceremony 3.97 N/A N/A
SATISFACTION WITH GLOBAL PARTNERS
It was really inspiring on how businesses can benefit the society and make posi+ve changes.
I really iden+fied with them because we have the same
values!
I've never seen a partner talking with so much passion about
AIESEC!
Where diversity and
opportuni+es meet…
The value of PwC inves+ng in rela+onships is something we
observe every year working with this amazing company, and we experience on our own example how much it means for them -‐-‐ that really great to see that
company actually stays close to its values.
I was impressed by their aGude to work, by atmosphere. They doing great things. And now I have a
dream to work in DHL.
Innova+on, innova+on, innova+on
The whole idea of the company is impressive.
So proud that they actually
admire AIESEC.
Vale HULT
EF
Vale Electrolux
Alcatel Lucent
TCS
DP DHL
PwC
SATISFACTION WITH GLOBAL PARTNERS
Thank you!