the lav pmt performance
DESCRIPTION
Mauro Raggi Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Photon Veto WG Cern 7/2/2012. The LAV PMT PERFORMANCE. On the road to … 1500 blocks!. Analysis is based on the database data 18/01/12 So far we have processed a total of 1424 blocks : of which 1414 good blocks (hoven run) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
THE LAV PMT PERFORMANCE
Mauro RaggiLaboratori Nazionali di Frascati
Photon Veto WGCern 7/2/2012
On the road to … 1500 blocks! Analysis is based on the database data 18/01/12 So far we have processed a total of 1424 blocks:
of which 1414 good blocks (hoven run)10 blocks have been rejected for HV by hovenNone has been rejected due to rate
The blocks processed are 57.7% of the total The blocks rejected by hoven runs are only 0.7%
(to high HV at equalization 1500)
Block performance PeYPhoto electron Yield Mean = 0.330±0.0013
Sigma = 0.48Photo electron per MeV (MIPs)
Remember that this vale is 50% higher wrt the one for electrons and photons
Block performance HVEqualization high voltage
10%
41%
25%
14%10%
Block High Voltage
1000-1100
1100-1200
1200-1300
1300-1400
1400-1500
Only 10% of blocks have HV higher than 1400 VOnly 10 blocks have HV=1500 V
Rejected blocks
Performance PMT gain
The gain range spanned by 500V increase in HV is rather limited!
Performance Q at equalization
Q response average 4.48 pC Sigma is 0.09 pC only 2%!
Most part of the blocks is within ±0.3 pC <7% equalization.
PEY time stability check
No sizable slope found in the Pey vs time distribution
Different block types analysis
10%
27%
35%
28%
Block Types
11
13
14
15
Blocks are distributed in different ANTI stations. The uniformity in block performance is fundamental to guarantee a good efficiency of the detector.
The data for blocks type 13-14 are final we already processed all of them.
Block types PEYType Mean Pey
11 0.336±0.0070
13 0.329±0.0029
14 0.324±0.0024
15 0.336±0.0027
Maximum difference -3.6% on average PeY
Blocks of type 14 show a bit lower PEY.
Block types Q response The equalization quality is independent from the block type.
The blocks type 15 seem to have slightly lower spread in the charge values obtained by equalization.
Blocks type performance HV
HV in V Type 11 Type 13 Type 14 Type 15
1000-1100 19,1% 12,0% 6,9% 7,8%
1100-1200 46,1% 39,4% 39,9% 41,9%
1200-1300 17,7% 23,3% 27,8% 25,3%
1300-1400 9,2% 13,3% 16,3% 14,9%
1400-1500 7,8% 12,0% 9,1% 10,1%
Distribution of blocks between different HV intervals look quite similar in all block types
Banana database check
Banana 35 is missing
Banana 324 seem to miss 1 block
All the blocks with HV=1500 are currently not assigned to any banana
There is a strange banana number 1789
Conclusion 57.7% percent of block were already in the online
database on January the 18th 2012 The quality of blocks seem stable in time Uniformity of different block types looks very good
The analysis can be refined considering blocks in different LAV stations
The quality of the equalization is excellent