the limits of prior restraint
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The limits of prior restraint
How far can the press go?
![Page 2: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Sedition Act of 1798
• Alexander Hamilton (left) is accused of corruption by James Thomson Callender
• Callender is imprisoned and fined
• Callender later turns on Jefferson, his benefactor
![Page 3: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The end of seditious libel
• Sedition Act helps lead to Adams’ defeat in 1800
• Jefferson (left) lets Sedition Act lapse
• Still, press is less free during wartime
![Page 4: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Abraham Lincoln
• Suspended habeas corpus to crack down on protesters
• Ohio publisher Clement Laird Vallandighambanished behind Confederate lines
• Censorship in effect
![Page 5: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Schenckv. United States (1919)
• Schenck charged with violating Espionage Act
• Holmes (right) establishes a new standard: “clear and present danger”
• Wartime is different
![Page 6: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Gitlowv. New York (1925)
• 14th Amendment extends First Amendment to the states
• Holmes now takes a more expansive view of free speech
• “Every idea is an incitement”
![Page 7: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Whitney v. California (1927)
• Brandeis (left) refines “clear and present danger”
• A “serious” and “imminent” threat —an “emergency”
• Brandeis sided with majority on technicality
![Page 8: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
• Speech can be prohibited if “directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and —
• Is “likely to incite or produce such action”
• Brandeis standard
![Page 9: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
• Classic case defining the limits of prior restraint
• History of case told by Fred Friendly in Minnesota Rag
![Page 10: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Saturday Press
• Begun by Jay Near and Howard Guilford
• Claimed Minneapolis was controlled by Jewish gangsters
• Shut down after nine issues under state’s Public Nuisance Law
![Page 11: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Near loses at state level
• Argues that Public Nuisance Law violates the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments
• Minnesota Supreme Court: “There is no constitutional right to publish a fact merely because it is true.”
![Page 12: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Unlikely allies
Roger Baldwin Col. Robt. McCormick
![Page 13: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Bad cases make bad law
• Harry Chandler, head of American Newspaper Publishers Association, was reluctant to get involved
• The Saturday Press was unsavory
• Chandler feared a defeat would set back the cause of press freedom
![Page 14: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Charles Evans Hughes
• Chief Justice replaced Justice Sanford, author of Gitlow decision
• Reaffirmed that the 14th Amendment incorporated the First Amendment
![Page 15: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Weymouth Kirkland
• “[E]very legitimate newspaper in the country regularly and customarily publishes defamation, as it has a right to in criticizing government agencies”
• Akin to saying that seditious libel is the purpose of a free press
![Page 16: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Justice Brandeis
• “Of course there was defamation; you cannot disclose evil without naming the doers of evil”
• “A newspaper cannot always wait until it gets the judgment of a court”
• Isn’t this why we have a First Amendment?
![Page 17: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Near wins, 5-4
• Near fails to re-establish himself as a newspaperman, dies in 1936
• Howard Guilford is assassinated by gangsters in 1934
• Nevertheless, they contribute to the idea of no prior restraint
![Page 18: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Key points of Near
• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint
– National security
• Obstruction of draft
• Disclosing movement of ships or troops
– Obscenity
– Fighting words (incitement)
![Page 19: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Key points of Near
• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint
• Unprotected speech may be punished after the fact
– William Blackstone
– “Criminal” speech
– Libel — certainly an issue with The Saturday Press
![Page 20: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Key points of Near
• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint
• Unprotected speech may be punished after the fact
• Minnesota’s Public Nuisance Law tantamount to prior restraint
![Page 21: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The Pentagon Papers
• Daniel Ellsberg provided them to the New York Times and the Washington Post
• Federal appeals courts ruled against the Times and for the Post
• Supreme Court takes the case
![Page 22: The Limits of Prior Restraint](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042607/55a52c4e1a28ab88678b4798/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
New York Times Co.v. United States (1971)
• Supreme Court issues nine separate decisions
• Government could prosecute after publication
• Nixon tried, but was derailed by Watergate