the maryland bridge orginal
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Maryland Bridge:
A Conservative Restoration
Alternative for Missing
Maxillary Anterior Teeth
Heather O’Dell
Brian Furukawa
![Page 2: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose: Build Confidence and
Beautiful Smiles
![Page 3: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Treatment: Crown Bridge
• Conventional full-
coverage bridge
• Abutment teeth
preparation
![Page 4: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Treatment: Crown Bridge
![Page 5: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Treatment
• Rochette Bridge
– Perforated
• Maryland Bridge
– Electrolytically etched
![Page 6: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Advantages
• Tooth preservation
• Reversible
• Esthetically pleasing
• Less chair-side time
• Cost effective
![Page 7: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Disadvantages
• Technique Sensitive
• Can’t be used on broken down teeth
• Graying
![Page 8: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Factors for Success
• Case Selection
• General Design
– Anterior Design
• Choice of Metal
• Fitting
• Placing the Bridge
• Recall/Review
![Page 9: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Case Selection
• Healthy teeth
– Free of caries
– Sufficient enamel
• Mobility of
abutment teeth
![Page 10: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Case Selection
• Occlusion
clearance of
0.5 mm
![Page 11: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
General Design: Framework
• Purpose
– Providing support for the pontic
– Limit the stresses placed on the
luting agent and bonding interface
– Increasing the enamel available for
bonding
– Provide resistance withdrawal
![Page 12: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
General Design: Pontic
Match shading of pontic
![Page 13: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
General Design: Wings
![Page 14: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
General Design: Impression
![Page 15: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
General Design: Cast with
Pontic and Bridge
![Page 16: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Receiving Site on the
Edentulous Ridge
• Purpose
– Enhance esthetic placement
• Contouring of the gum line
![Page 17: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Edentulous Ridge
Modification
![Page 18: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Flipper
Molds and Contours
![Page 19: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Edentulous Ridge
• Without
Modification
• Modification
• 4 months later
![Page 20: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Edentulous Ridge
• Without
Modification
• Modification
![Page 21: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Metal Choice
• Numerous alloys available
• Higher density metal
– Gold
• Alleviate “graying”
• Gold collar produces a better
fitting restoration
–Reduce the occurrence of
caries and gingival
inflammation
![Page 22: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Try-In
• Purpose: Ensure esthetic success
– Fitting
– Color
– Contour
– Occlusion
– Graying
![Page 23: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Placing the Bridge
• Abutment teeth are thoroughly cleaned
• The area is isolated and the abutment
teeth are air-dried
• Enamel of abutment teeth are acid-
etched
– Phosphoric acid(30-50%)
![Page 24: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Placing the Bridge
• Acid etched teeth
are rinsed
thoroughly
• Resin is applied to
enamel and internal
portion of
framework
• Followed by a
composite resin
that will adhere to
the resin
![Page 25: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Review
• Check-up
appointment
– Partial debonding
can occur without
patient noticing
looseness
– Remove calculus
– Reinforce oral
hygiene
![Page 26: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Longevity
• Barrack, 1993: Success of 80%
– Attribute failure to:
• Caries
• Learning curve
• Unplanned design
• Unaesthetic appearance
• Priest, 1998: Reported a high
retentive rate and classified Maryland
Bridge as a long-term restoration or
permanent restoration
![Page 27: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Conclusion
• Basic advantage: Conservation of
tooth structure
• Preplanned design and meticulous
attention to procedural details
• Long-term restoration for
replacement of an maxillary
anterior teeth
![Page 28: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Future of Maryland Bridges
• Reinforced fiber polymer framework
with porcelain veneer
• Main advantages
– Conservative
– Allows mobility
– High bond strength
– No “graying”
![Page 29: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Future of Maryland Bridges
![Page 30: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Thanks
• Dr. Cutbrith
• Dr. Wilson
• 3M
![Page 31: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
References
• Gerald Barrack. The Etched Cast Restoration-clinical Techniques and Long-
Term Results. Quintessence International. 1993:24:701-13.
• Thomas L. Berekally. Post-Insertion Sensitivity With a Bonded Etched Cast
Metal Prosthesis. Case report. Australian dental Journal. 1990:35(5):413-5
• Ronald Berger. The Maryland Bridge Signals a “New Era” in Restorative
Dentistry. National Association of Dental Laboratories Journal.
1982:29(9):11-13
• Christian Besimo. Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Denture Technique: Results of
medium-Term clinical Follow Investigation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
1993:69(2):144-148.
• John Burgess, James Mccartney. Anterior Retainer Design for Resin-Bonded
Acid-Etched Fixed Partial Denture. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
1989:61:433-36.
• Huan-Kong Chang, Omar Zidan, et al. Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures:
A Recall Study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1991:65:778-81.
![Page 32: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
References
• Brady T. Doukaoudakis, A. ramussen ST. Experimental Comparison
Between Perforated and Etched-Metal Resin-Bonded Retainers. Journal of
Prosthetic Dentistry. 1985:54:361-5
• G.F. Priest, H.A. Donatelli. A Four_Year clinical Revaluation of Resin-Bonded
Fixed Partial Dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998 May:59(5):542-
6.
• Richard E. Boyd. The Resin-Bonded Pontic. Clinical Impressions.
1996:5(4):18-27.
• Ellen Roberta Dietz. The Maryland Bridge as Restoration Alternative. Dental
Assisting. 1983 Mar/Apr:2(4):30-1,38.
• Andrew M. Flood. Resin-Bonded Prosthesis”�: Clinical Guidelines.
Australian Dental Journal. 1989:34(3):209-18.
• Howe DF, Denehy GE. Anterior Fixed Partial Dentures utilizing the Acid-Etch
Technique and a Cast Metal framework. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
1977:37:28-31.
![Page 33: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
References
• Greg Libby, Michael Arcuri, et al. Longevity of Fixed Partial Dentures. The
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997:78:127-31.
• Livaditis, Gj. Cast Metal Resin-Bonded Retainers For Posterior Teeth.
Journal of American Dental Association. 1980:101:926-29.
• Livaditis Gj, Thompson VP. Etched Casting: An Improved Retentive
Mechanism for Resin-Bonded Retainers. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
1982:47:52-8.
• Paul S. Olin, Elaine M.E. Hill, James L. Donahue. Clinical Revaluation of
Resin-Bonded Bridges: A Retrospective Study. Quintessence International.
1991:22(11):873-876.
• Sanford Plainfield, Vincent Wood, and Ralph Podesta. A Stress-Relived
Resin-Bonded Fixed Partial denture. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
1989:61:291-3.
• Rochete AL. Attachment of a Splint to Enamel of Lower Anterior Teeth.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1973:30:418-423.
![Page 34: The Maryland Bridge Orginal](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022050720/547f36eb5906b5a1718b4797/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
References
• Stephen M. Roser. Prosthodontics-Replacing Missing Teeth. The Columbia
University College of Physicians and Surgeons Complete Home Medical
Guide. 3rd ed. NY. Crown Publishers Inc:1995.
• James F. Simon, Robert Gartrell, Anthena Grogono. Improved retention of
Acid-Etched Fixed Partial Dentures: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of
Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992:68:611-15.
• Frank M. Spear, David M. Mathew, and Vincent G. Kokich. Interdisciplinary
Management of Single-Tooth Implants. Seminar in Orthodontics.
1997:3(1):45-72.
• Paul Van Wijlen. A Modified Technique for Direct Fiber-Reinforced, Resin-
Bonded Bridges: Clinical Case Reports. Journal of Canadian Dental
Association. 2000:66:267-271.
• G. Mohl, R. Mehra, A. Ford. Clinical Evaluation of Etched-Metal Resin-
Bonded Fixed Partial Dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
1988:59(4)403-4.
• J.W. Brooks, Bob Twyman, et al. The Maryland Bridge: Is it Here to Stay?
Dental Laboratory Review. 1983:58(5):16-19.