the physics of dense baryonic matter: from hades to cbm dm2010 international workshop on high...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
The physics of dense baryonic matter:
From HADES to CBM
DM2010International Workshop on High Density MatterSTIAS, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Joachim Stroth, Goethe-University Frankfurt / GSI
Agenda
o Introductiono Dileptons from light collision systemso Vector meson productiono Strangeness productiono The future at SIS18, SIS100 and SIS300o Summary
The HADES experiment @ GSI
The HADES Mission
Phase 1 (2002 - 2008) -> Upgrade– Light collision systems (limited granularity of TOF system)
Phase 2 (2010 – 2015) – Heavy collision systems, -induced reactions
Phase 3 (FAIR/SIS100)– Excitation function up to 10 GeV/u (medium-heavy systems)
Search (in this region) for• medium-effects• partial restoration of chiral
symmetry • onset of decofinement
Beam energies of 1-2 GeV/u
p - beams
SIS 18
SIS 200T [MeV] 300
LHC
RHIC
SPS
Partial restoration of chiral symmetry
From vector manifestation of hidden local symmetry:
“... to suggest that the dileptons measured in relativistic heavy-ion collisions do not provide direct information on the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry and hence on the mechanism for mass generation of light-quark hadrons.”
Brown, Harada et al. Prog.Theor.Phys.121:1209-1236,2009
W. Weise et al.+ BR scaling (PRL 1991)
R. Pisarski, L. McLerran et al.
HADES run statistics (phase 1)
p+Nb
Ar+KCl 1.67GeV/u
pp 3.5
C+C 2 GeV/udp 1.25 GeV/u
pp 1.25 GeV/uC+C 1 GeV/u
o 6 runs between 2002 and 2008o 1010 events taken o 100 days beam on target
After upgrade in 2010:100-200 TByte in 30 days
FW > 7o
Eur.Phys.J.A41:243-277,2009
Dileptons from light collision systems
Electron pairs from C+C collisions at 1 and 2 GeV/u
Phys.
Rev. Le
tt 9
8(2
007)
05
2302
Phys.
Lett
. B
663 (
200
8)
43
Good normalization established in 0 region. Evidence for yield above contributions from
decays of long-lived hadrons. What are the sources of contributions from
the early phase?
e+
e-
*
*
e+
e-
*
e+e -
The solution to the DLS puzzle?
• HADES data in the acceptance of DLS, compared to DLS data.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.810-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.810-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
HADES
HSD: Dalitz Dalitz Dalitz Dalitz Brems. NN Brems. N All
C+C, 1.0 A GeVno medium effects
1/N
dN/d
M [
1/G
eV /c
2 ]
HSD: Dalitz Dalitz Dalitz Dalitz Brems. NN Brems. N All
M [GeV/c2]
HADES
C+C, 1.0 A GeVin-medium effects: CB+DM
1/N
dN/d
M [
1/G
eV /c
2 ]
E. Bratkovskaya et al., PLB 2008. Modified description of Bremsstrahlung in HSD inspired by Kaptari et al.
Dileptons from pp and np reactions at 1.25 GeV/u compared to HSD
Data from HADES pp and dp (tagged n) at 1.25 GeV/uCocktail from HSD calculation 2008 with revised description of Bremsstrahlung
Data: HADES collaboration, arXiv:0910.5875 [nucl-ex]
Electron pairs from C+C collisions compared to NN reference
HADES collaboration, arXiv:0910.5875 [nucl-ex]
N
N
N
N
N*, ΔN
N
N
N
N*, ΔN
N
N
N
Dileptons from Ar+KCl at 1.76 GeV/u
Electron pairs from Ar+KCl collisions at 1.76 GeV/u
First observation ofmesons in HI collisions at these (SIS) energies
HADES collaboration, Nucl.Phys.A830:483C-486C,2009
Fit: exponential + gaussian
30-40 counts In peak!
Excess radiation in Ar+KCl at 1.67 GeV/u
Compared to reference after subtraction of contributions from Indication for radiation from
the medium.
Multistep processes or multi-particle correlation.
RR
N
N
N
N
N
N
R
e-
e+
N
N
Excess yield scales stronger than linear with Apart
Data for 0 and from TAPS collaboration
Dilepton excess scales with beam energy like production
C+C (DLS)C+C (HADES)Ca+Ca (DLS)Ar+KCl (HADES)
Systematic of the excess yield
Refined HSD vacuum calculation
o Enhanced bremsstrahlung from elastic NN collisions according to “Kaptari-Kämpfer” (OBE) prescription.
o Reduced vector-meson production via the LUND string in order to better match pp exp. Data.
o Improved isospin dependence of the channels NN-> V+NN and +N-> V+N.
HSD, November 2009 release
“It’s a bingo”
17
Dileptons from pp at 3.5 GeV
HSD, Nov. 09 release K. Schmidt, et al. Phys. Rev. C 79, 064908 (2009)
Normalized to π peak
Dilepton production in pp at 3.5 GeV
Particle productionLUND string fragmentation
Particle productionthrough baryonic resonances
Slope parameters in mass bins
Mee = 0.35 – 0.50 0.50 – 0.65 >0.65 GeV
Strong increase of slope parameter with increasing pair mass.No explanation yet.
strangeness
Strangeness production in 1.75 GeV/u Ar+KCl reactions
Λ
0s
-
High-statistics measurement of and
but also:0
s →
→ p -
→
-→ -
HADES collaboration:Phys.Rev.Lett.103:132301,2009Eur.Phys.J.A40:45-59,2009Phys.Rev.C80:025209,2009
HADES data and the SHM
Particle multiplicities largely in accordance with SHM o yield explained (non-strange particle )o− underestimated by SM
■ Ar+KCl at 1.76 GeV/u THERMUS fitS.Wheaton and J.Cleymans,J.Phys.G31(2005)S1069
T= 73T= 736 6 bb=770=77043 43 (MeV)(MeV)
RC =2.4 0.8 fmRfireball =4.9 1.4 fm 2=2.1 (no - )
J.Cleymans priv. communication
/-ratio
M (→ K+K-) : (2.6 ± 0.7) ·10-4
M (→ e+e-) : (6.7 ± 2.7) ·10-3
In accordance with SHM.
No OZI suppression in the production.
038.0013.0/ 043.0R
Multi-strange baryons
€
MΞ − ≈ 0.1 × Mss
2
Probability (Mss) to produce in Ar+KCl collisions a strange quark pair is ≈ 5 × 10-2.
qqq q
qq qqq
q qqqqqqqqqq
q
qqq
Bag fusion quarkyonic matter?
Strange quarks “trapped” in bubbles?
The HADES upgrade …
… from 8 /day (Ar+KCl) to 170 /day (Ag+Ag) and dilepton statistics like NA60
The RPC time-of-flight system
Full-system test results: • t 78 ps• x 8 mm• ~ 97%
D. Belver et al . NIM A602(2008) 687, 788E. Blanco et al. NIM A602(2008) 691
RPC
D. Belver et al . NIM A602(2008) 687, 788E. Blanco et al. NIM A602(2008) 691
Leading institute:Coimbra, Portugal
CTS
VME CPUMU
...
RPC
F. Wall
MDC
RICH
Shower
VULOM3
Start, Veto
TOF
Ethernet
HADES DAQ System Overview
To the F
ront End E
lectronics
Fröhlich et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl.Sci. Vol. 55, Issue 1 (2008) 59
Average data rate 150 Mbyte/s. Trigger rate up to 20 KHz.
Current proposalCurrent proposal
2010-2012 (2-3 campaigns). Main emphasis on:
Dielectron & strangeness production in heavy systems
• low mass (0.15<Me+e- <0.5) excess studies
• vector meson spectroscopy
• /K production: differential distributions,
y, pt (increased acceptance due to RPC !) , flow
• - production characteristics
Two HI collision systems : medium size ,eg. Ag+Ag, and Au+Au at maximal beam
energies of 1.65, 1.25 AGeV, respectively.
The Future at FAIR
SIS18Upgraded HADES (20 kHz reaction rate) Au+Au and Ag+Ag, pion induced reactions from 2010 on.SIS100:Joint running of HADES and preCBM,multistrange particle and lepton pair excitation function,charm production in proton induced reactionsSIS300:Full exploitation of rare probes a high B;
fluctuations, flow
Mission:Systematics and sensitivity!Phase boundary and critical point.
Towards FAIR
The Quest for the highest densities
J. Randrup and J. Cleymans, hep-ph/0607065
Freeze-out configurations for HI collisions!
Density in the centre of the collision zone
UrQMD
The CBM detector
o More than one million reactions / second (no trigger)o Fast high resolution tracking in a compact dipole field directly after the targeto High speed DAQ and triggero Excellent particle identificationo Flexible arrangement of PID detectors and calorimeters:
Dilepton production
Thermal dilepton rate ...
oVT ,, 00
isentropic expansion
...or from transport
3 4
0
( ), ( ), ( ),..B coll
t t
d N dT x x v x dx
dMdydp dp
In future: combine the best of the two worlds!
Charm production
o How are the produced charm quarks propagating in the dense phase, quark-like or (pre-) hadron-like?
◊ Hidden over open charm as indicator (J/ψ, ψ', D0, D)◊ Charmed baryons important for a complete picture (c, Ξc)
◊ Are there indicators of collectivity
[HSD: O. Linnyk et al., Int.J.Mod.Phys.E17, 1367 (2008)] [SHM: A. Andronic et al., Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 149]
Charm detection in CBMo Challenge:
◊ Find displaced decay vertex in an environment of hundreds of charged tracks
◊ Event selection:real-time vertex finding in 20Gbyte/s
o Needs vertex detector with:◊ High resolution◊ Minimal material budget◊ Radiation tolerance
o Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors, also foreseen in ILC, STAR
c = 312 m
35
Diamond 300 µm
~ 60 µm Si
< 200 µm Si
~ 60 µm Si
< 320 µm SiFactor 4-5 thinner than conventional solution
IMEC, Strasbourg, Frankfurt
Summary
– „Long-lived“ states of dense nuclear matter are produced in collisions of heavy ion at energies of a few GeV/u.
– The phase in the high-density region might be much more exotic then a hadron/resonance gas.
– Unfortunately, there is no smoking gun, but:• Fast equillibration• „Sub-threshold“ production• Strong broadening of in-medium states
– Close collaboration with, and novel approaches in theory are necessary to make the case.
The HADES collaboration LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas , 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschunm, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany Institut für Strahlenphysik, Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia Institut für Kernphysik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany II.Physikalisches Institut, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia Physik Department E12 & Excellence Cluster Universe, TUM, 85748 München, Germany Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus Institut de Physique Nucléaire (UMR 8608), CNRS/IN2P3 - Université Paris Sud, F-91406 Orsay Cedex, France Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic Departamento de Física de Partículas, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de C.a, Spain
The CBM collaborationChina:Tsinghua Univ., BeijingUSTC, HefeiCCNU, WuhanCroatia: University of SplitRBI, Zagreb Czech Republic:Techn. Univ., PragueCAS, RezFrance:IPHC StrasbourgGermany: GSI, DarmstadtFZ Dresden-RossendorfUniv. Heidelberg, Phys. Inst.Univ. HD, Kirchhoff Inst. Univ. Heidelberg, ZITI
Univ. of Kashmir, SrinagarBanaras Hindu Univ., VaranasiKorea:Korea Univ. SeoulPusan National Univ.Norway:University of BergenPoland:Silesia Univ. KatowiceAGH Univ. KrakowJagiellonian Univ., KrakowWarsaw Univ.Portugal: LIP CoimbraRomania: NIPNE, BucharestBucharest University
Univ. Frankfurt, IKFUniv. Frankfurt, Inst.Comp.Sc.Univ. MünsterUniv. WuppertalHungaria:KFKI, BudapestEötvös Univ. BudapestIndia:Aligarh Muslim Univ., AligarhIOP, BhubaneswarPanjab Univ., ChandigarhGauhati Univ., GuwahatiUniv. of Rajasthan, JaipurUniv. of Jammu, JammuIIT, KharagpurSAHA, KolkataUniv. of Calcutta, KolkataVECC, Kolkata
Russia:VBLHE, JINR, DubnaLIT, JINR, DubnaLPP, JINR, DubnaPNPI, GatchinaITEP, MoscowMEPhI, MoscowKurchatov Inst. MoscowSINP, Moscow State Univ. Obninsk State Univ.IHEP, ProtvinoKRI, St. PetersburgSt. Petersburg Polytec. U.INR TroitzkUkraine: INR, KievShevchenko Univ. , Kiev
Split, 2009 56 institutions> 400 members
Thank you
Exclusive electron pair production inpp collisions at 1.25 GeV
Three particle missing mass (MX)
pppe+e-X
200 eventsfor Me+e- > 140 MeV/c2
pp p+ppe+e-
HADES data
Mee>140 MeV/c2
Prelim
inary
MX(GeV/c2)Mee(GeV/c2)
Electron pair invariant missing mass (Mee)
HSD in-medium calculations
Phi to omega ratio
... vector manifestation of hidden local symmetry ... to suggest that the dileptons measured in relativistic heavy-ion collisions do not provide direct information on the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry and hence on the mechanism for mass generation of light-quark hadrons.
XXI HADES Coll. Meet. March 2010 43
Systematics of slopes at 1.76 GeV/u
Why are slopes of ρ/ω and so different ?
π0 and η from TAPS
HADES has a two level trigger system
• LVL1 trigger Multiplicity34% more central events of events
• LVL2 trigger
at least one electron candidate
GEANT simulation with UrQMD events
2.1× 109 triggered LVL1 events in the Ar+KCl run!
Trigger
Effenberger, Giessen
Dileptons from pp and np reactions at 1.25 GeV/u
PLUTO: resonance: production: fixed to 0 by N() = 3/2 N(0), decay: Krivoruchenko et al.,
EM form-factor: QED, Krivoruchenko, GM=3, GE=GC=0 or VMD-like, Wan & Iachello, int. J. Mod. Phys. A20(2005) 1846 meson: constrained by CELSIUS/WASA data, H. Calén et al. PRC 58, 1998 NN Bremsstrahlung: is currently implemented a-lá Kaptari and assuming isotropic emission
p+p data: results from OBE (coherent sum of and NN terms) seems to be too high (already cross section is too high (factor 2-4), NN Bremsstrahlung also?)
n+p data: not explained by theory, clear contribution of additional sources
HADES collaboration, arXiv:0910.5875 [nucl-ex]