the proton radius puzzle and the prad experiment at jlab
DESCRIPTION
The Proton Radius Puzzle and the PRad experiment at JLab. Outline The puzzle Methods of radius measurements ep-elastic scattering hydrogen spectroscopy muonic hydrogen spectroscopy The PRad experiment at JLab. A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC USA - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Proton Radius Puzzleand the PRad experiment at JLab
A. GasparianNC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC USA
(for the PRad collaboration)
Outline The puzzle Methods of radius measurements
ep-elastic scattering hydrogen spectroscopy muonic hydrogen spectroscopy
The PRad experiment at JLab
The Proton Charge Radius: the Current Status
2MENU2013
Proton radius is one of the most fundamental quantities in physics:
critically important for atomic physics in precision spectroscopy of atom (Rydberg constant) precision test of nuclear/particle models connects atomic and subatomic physics
~ 8 σ discrepancy between the new muonic- hydrogen measurements and all previous results
The Proton Radius Puzzle
New muonic-hdrogen resultR. Pohl et al., Nature 466, 213 (2010).
A. Gasparian
The Proton Charge Radius Puzzle
3
Recent muonic deuterium experiment at PSIA. Antognini et al., Science 339, 417 (2013).
MENU2013A. Gasparian
In the limit of first Born approximation the elastic ep scattering (one photon exchange):
e- e-
p p Structure less proton:
GE and GM were extracted using the Rosenbluth separations (or at extreme low Q2 the GM can be ignored, like in the PRad experiment) Definition of the Proton Radius:
(m.s. charge radius given by the slope):
4
GE ,GM
MENU2013
The Taylor expansion at low Q2:
A. Gasparian
J. Bernauer, PRL 105,242001, 2010
5
Recent Mainz ep-Experiment (2010)
MENU2013
Q2 = [0.004 – 1.0] (GeV/c)2 range Large amount of overlapping data sets (~1400) Statistical error ≤ 0.2% Luminosity monitoring with spectrometer Additional beam current measurements
rp =0.879(5)stat(4)sys(2)mod(4)group
Confirms the previous results from ep→ep scattering;Consistent with CODATA06 value: (rp=0.8768(69) fm)
A. Gasparian
Proton Radius Extracted From e-p Scattering Experiments
More different analysis results than actual experiments Started with: rp ≈ 0.81 fm in 1963 Reached to: rp ≈ 0.88 fm by 2011
6MENU2013A. Gasparian
Spectroscopic Transition Measurements in Hydrogen Atom
7MENU2013
The Lamb shift: effect of quantization of EM field (polarization of physical vacuum) sensitive to proton size!
Hyperfine structure, interaction of e- and p magnetic dipole moments
A. Gasparian
Proton Size and Hydrogen Energy Spectrum
8MENU2013
A simple demonstration in Quantum Mechanics
A. Gasparian
9MENU2013
Proton Radius Extracted From eH Spectroscopy
New muonic-hdrogen resultR. Pohl et al., Nature 466, 213 (2010).
A. Gasparian
Proton Radius from the Muonic-Hydrogen
10MENU2013A. Gasparian
New Results from Muonic Hydrogen Experiments (2010, 2013)
Muonic hydrogen Lamb shift experiment at PSI rp = 0.84184(67) fm Unprecedented less than 0.1% precision
Different from most of previous experimental results and analysis
11MENU2013A. Gasparian
Spectroscopic Transition Measurements(Lamb Shifts in Hydrogen Atom)
12MENU2013A. Gasparian
New PSI Results for μD Atom(Recently Published in Science Journal, 2013)
13MENU2013
A.Antognini et al., Science 339, 417 (2013)
A. Gasparian
The Proton Charge Radius Puzzle Again
14
Recent muonic deuterium experiment at PSIA. Antognini et al., Science 339, 417 (2013).
MENU2013A. Gasparian
Open Questions and Potential Solutions
15MENU2013
Potential solutions: Need new high precision and high accuracy experiments:
ep-scattering experiments: reaching extremely low Q2 range (10-4 Gev/c2) possibly with new independent methods PRad experiment at JLab measure absolute cross sections
ordinary hydrogen spectroscopy new experiments at York University, Canada and Paris, and more new projects
Check lepton universality: e-p to μp ratio experiment at PSI (MUSE) Search in K-decays (KEK project)
Possible new Physics beyond the Standard Model !!!A. Gasparian
16MENU2013
Can the Data Quality from eH-Spectroscopy be the Solution?muonic-hdrogen (deuterium) results
A. Gasparian
May be, but the ep-scattering avarage is still at 0.879 fm level
Designing a New ep-Scattering Experiment(Difficulties of Previous Experiments with Standard Magnetic Spectrometers)
Suggested solutions by PRad experiment at JLab: Non-magnetic-spectrometer method ! No target windows ! Calibrate with other well-known QED processes
17MENU2013
J. Bernauer, PRL 105,242001, 2010
A. Gasparian
The Proposed New Experiment at JLab (PRad, E12-11-106)
Two beam energies: E0 = 1.1 GeV and 2.2 GeV to increase Q2 range Will reach sub-percent precision in rp extraction (~ 0.5% total) Approved by PAC39 (June, 2012) with high “A” scientific rating
18
Experimental goals: reach to very low Q2 range (~ 10 times less than the Mainz experiment) reach to sub-percent precision in rp extraction
Suggested solutions: Non-magnetic-spectrometer method: use high resolution high acceptance crystal calorimeter
reach smaller scattering angles: (Θ = 0.70 – 3.80 ) (Q2 = 2x10-4 – 2x10-2 ) GeV/c2 essentially, model independent rp extraction Simultaneous detection of ee → ee Moller scattering
(best known control of systematics) Use high density windowless H2 gas flow target:
beam background fully under control with high quality CEBAF beam minimize experimental background
MENU2013
Mainz low Q2 data set
A. Gasparian
Proposed PRad Experimental Setup in Hall B at JLab
HyCal
19MENU2013
High resolution, large acceptance HyCal calorimeter (including PbWO4 crystals)
Windowless H2 gas flow target XY – veto counters Vacuum box, one thin window at HyCal only
A. Gasparian
Windowless H2 Gas Flow Target
20MENU2013A. Gasparian
Control of Systematic Errors Major improvements over previous experiments:
1) Simultaneous detection of two processes ep → ep ee → ee Moller scattering Tight control of systematic errors
2) Windowless H2 gas target Low beam background
3) Very low Q2 range: [2x10-4 – 2x10-2] (GeV/c)2 Model independent rp extraction
Extracted yield for ep → ep … and for ee → ee, Moller
Then, ep cross section is related to Moller:
Two major sources of systematic errors, Ne and Ntgt, typical for all previous experiments, cancel out.
Moller scattering will be detected in coincident mode inside the HyCal acceptance.
21MENU2013A. Gasparian
Extraction of the Proton Charge Radius
Estimated systematic uncertainty (with radiative corrections) < 0.3% Estimated total error in rp extraction ~ 0.6%
22MENU2013
Extraction of rp from MC pseudo-data with and without radiation (single parameter fit)
A. Gasparian
Expected Result from PRad Experiment
23MENU2013A. Gasparian
Summary and Outlook
The “Proton Radius Puzzle” is still with us after more than three years! All theory corrections failed to explain the current ~ 4.5% (~ 8 σ) difference in rp so far
New magnetic-spectrometer-free ep-scattering experiment at JLab (PRad, E12-11-106) with tight control of systematic errors:
reach very low Q2 range for the first time: [2x10-4 – 2x10-2] GeV2 ep→ep cross sections normalized to Moller scattering windowless hydrogen gas flow target to control the experimental backgrounds
PRad expected timeline: preparation of experimental setup: 2013-14 experiment ready to run in Hall B at JLab: Fall, 2014
24MENU2013
New high accuracy experiments are critically needed to address this puzzle:
ep-scattering experiments with new independent methods ordinary hydrogen spectroscopy experiments to check lepton universality in SM
A. Gasparian
Thank You!
25MENU2013A. Gasparian
Estimated Errors
Contributions Estimated Error (%)
Statistical error 0.2
Acceptance (including Q2 determination)
0.4
Detection efficiency 0.1
Radiative corrections 0.3
Background and PID 0.1
Fitting error 0.2
Total Error 0.6%
Estimated error budget (added quadratically)
26
Simultaneous detection of two processes: ep → ep ee → ee Moller scattering
and windowless H2 gas target
will significantly reduce major systematic errors typical for all previous ep-scattering experiments
High rates will provide good statistical errors (~0.2% for all Q2 bins)
Extraction of proton charge radius was always limited by systematics and fitting uncertainties
MENU2013A. Gasparian
27MENU2013
Electromagnetic Calorimeter (HyCal)
A. Gasparian
Overlap of Ee' spectra of radiated events Calorimeter detects a good part of the hard radiated photons
28
Separation of ep-Elastic from Moller Events
MENU2013A. Gasparian