the reference interview betsy spackman & leticia camacho brigham young university nla annual...
TRANSCRIPT
The Reference Interview
Betsy Spackman & Leticia CamachoBrigham Young University
NLA Annual ConferenceOctober 20, 2005
Overview
Definition and stepsWhy reference negotiation is importantALA’s Behavioral GuidelinesGames
What is the reference interview?
Finding out what patrons really want and helping them find resources to meet their goals
“Reference librarians are mediators between the user and the resources he or she needs or wants”
Steps of the reference interview
Build rapport and trust
Ask questions Listen and remember Answer and find
resources Follow up
Why is reference negotiation important?
Users don’t ask for what they really wantLanguage is ambiguousAnomalous states of knowledgeEvaluation of reference—55% rule
Guidelines for Behavioral Performance of Reference and Information Service Providers
Approachability Interest Listening/Inquiring Searching Follow up
What our users think…
Approachability Activity
We are going to show you a few slides, look at the slides, then answer the following question:
Which Librarian would you ask?
Which Librarian Would You Ask?
Approachability Activity
The first librarian is working on the computer and the second is talking on the telephone. Viewer selects the librarian on the computer as the one that they will approach. Patrons will avoid the one in the phone.
The same two reference assistants are reading, but have changed places. Either is likely selected.
The first librarian is standing in front of the desk and the second is in the usual position at the desk. While the person in front is closer to the patron, he is almost too close and may be blocked to some
viewers.
The man on the right is using the computer, while the woman on the left is reading. Most likely patrons will select the man on the computer before they will interrupt the reading woman.
The female librarian is already helping someone, while the male librarian is not busy. Most likely the patron will ask the male librarian rather than wait for the female librarian to finish.
Both librarians are standing, making eye contact, and are ready to help the patron-- however the librarian on the left is also smiling. Over 90% of viewers select the smiling
librarian over the non smiling librarian.
In this image, the two librarians are talking to each other and neither is acknowledging the patrons. Most viewers (over 70%) selected the woman, because she is the one doing the
talking and her body language is more active than that of the man’s.
Hierarchy of Reference Approachability: According to the results of a survey similar to the activity that you just completed, patrons choose the librarian they will approach based on the following patterns:
Approachable Behaviors in Order of Preference
(% Selected)
Standing and Eye Contact – and Smiling!
93
Standing and Eye Contact 90
Helping Another patron 12
Standing and Writing 11
Sitting and Eye contact 10
Using the Computer 10
Reading 5
Talking on the Phone 1
Finding Out What They Really Want to Know
Some common problems
Open and Closed questions
Paraphrasing and Summarizing
Closure Follow-up
Some Common Problems
Failure to establish contact Bypassing the reference Interview An unmonitored referralFailure to pay attentionLack of knowledge of appropriate
sources
Open Questions
Allows people to respond in their own terms
Begins with Who, What, Why, Where, When, or How
It works best in situations in which there may be many options that can’t be known in advance – the usual case at the reference desk
Closed Questions
Questions that require a yes/no, this/that response.
It works best in circumstances in which there exists only a small set of options known in advance
Sense-Making QuestionsA special kind of open question that asks specifically about situations, or gaps, or helps
1. Know the situation the person is in What are you working on? How did this question arise? What happened that you need to know this?
2. The gaps in his or her understanding What kind of help would you like What are you trying to understand? What would you like to know about X?
3. The uses or helps How do you plan to use this information? What would you like to see happen in this situation? What are you trying to do in this situation?
Paraphrasing
Feeds back what has been said in the previous comment So you’re looking for … What you need is . . . You mean . . . As I understand you . . .
Tips: Be concise, do not add or change the meaning, use a checkout (Is that what you wanted? Was that it?)
Summarizing
Is like paraphrasing except that is covers a larger span of conversation and requires you to distill the essence of what was said over the course of a longer series of questions and answers.
Tips: Synthesize, condense and go for the big picture
Closure
The art of tactful ending Indicate that discussion has been completed Focus on what has been achieved in the
discussion Established a good communication climate Use a follow up question
Follow-up
It allows you to discover, and repair, communication accidents before the user leaves the library
Two types: Those that invite the user to ask for additional help
if needed Those that allow users to tell you whether they got
the kind of help they were really hoping to get
Game: Twenty Questions
Several volunteers: A patron and a librarian Someone to keep time Someone to count questions
First two minutes: only closed questionsAfter that: any questionsCompare
Questions?
Analyze this Reference Transaction:
User: I checked the catalog but couldn’t find what I was looking for.
Librarian: Not on the shelf?User: No.Librarian: What is that you wanted? User: The books.Librarian: Yes but what type of information User: It’s on body work.Librarian: OK User: I’m helping a friend.
Analyze this Reference Transaction:
User: I checked the catalog but couldn’t find what I was looking for.
Librarian: Not on the shelf? (acknowledgment)User: No.Librarian: What is that you wanted? (open question)User: The books.Librarian: Yes but what type of information? (open
question)User: It’s on body work.Librarian: OK (encourager)User: I’m helping a friend.
What does the patron really want?
Where are the nutrition journals?Information about the latest fad dietWhere are books about Nixon?Text of Checker’s SpeechWhere are the book reviews?A review of Women by Booth TarkingtonWhere are the old magazines?Origins of the TV dinner
Analyze this Reference Transaction
User: Excuse me, but I’m looking for some poems Librarian: Some poems? What poems are you looking
for? User: Love poems. Librarian: Love poems? Ok. Is there anything in
particular? By anybody—American, Canadian, British—does it matter?
User: No, just a project on love poems. Librarian: Ok, do you know how to use the catalog here? User: No. Librarian: Ok. [Explains the catalog.] Did you want books
that you can take home, or is it alright to work here? User: Mm-hmm. No.
Analyze this Reference Transaction
User: Excuse me, but I’m looking for some poems Librarian: Some poems? What poems are you looking for?
(acknowledgement followed by an open question) User: Love poems. Librarian: Love poems? (acknowledgement) Ok. Is there anything
in particular? By anybody—American, Canadian, British—does it matter? (a question that is open in its function, but gets turned into a closed question)
User: No, just a project on love poems. Librarian: Ok, do you know how to use the catalog here? (system
question) User: No. Librarian: Ok. [Explains the catalog.] Did you want books that you
can take home, or is it alright to work here? (closed question) User: Mm-hmm. No.
References
Ross, Catherine Sheldrick, Kristi Nilsen, and Patricia Dewdney. 2002. Conducting the Reference Interview: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc., 241 p.
Dervin, Brenda and Patricia Dewdney. 1986. Neutral Questioning: A New Approach to the Reference Interview. RQ (Summer): 506-513.
Dewdney, Patricia and Catherine Sheldrick Ross. 1994. “Flying a Light Aircraft: Reference Service Evaluation from a User’s Viewpoint.” RQ 34 (Winter): 217-230.
References
Durrance, Joan C. 1995. “Factors That Influence Reference Success: What Makes Questioners Willing to Return?” The Reference Librarian 49/50: 243-265.
Fine, Sara. 1995. “Reference and Resources: The Human Side.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship (Jan): 17-20.
Howze, Philip C. and Felix E. Unaeze. 1997. “All in the Name of Service: Mediation, Client Self-Determination, and Reference Practice in Academic Libraries.” RQ 36 (Spring): 430-437.
RUSA online course: The Reference Interview http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaevents/onlinereferenceinterviewcourse/refinterview.htm
Contact Information
Betsy Spackman Life Sciences Librarian/Science Reference
Specialist [email protected]; (801) 422-6777
Leticia Camacho Management/Economics Librarian [email protected]; (801) 422-1970