the relevance of algorithms
DESCRIPTION
Tarleton Gillespie wrote an excellent article on "the relevance of algorithms". I presented a summary of his paper at the weekly so called "journal club" of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society in Berlin. These are the slides that summarize the talk and his paper.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Tarleton Gillespie The Relevance of Algorithms
Julian Ausserhofer24.07.13, HIIG Journal Club
![Page 2: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
- Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 14.07.13, S. 17- http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2013/jul/01/
how-algorithms-rule-world-nsa- http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/max-
mosley-sues-google-in-landmark-battle-over-digital-rights-a-853008.html- http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/
2009/10/19/the-robots-are-coming-oh-theyre-here/
![Page 4: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
"What we need is an interrogation of algorithms as a key feature of our information ecosystem [… &]
of the cultural forms emerging in their shadows [… &]
attention to […] political ramifications." p. 2
![Page 5: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
"public relevance algorithms" p. 2
![Page 6: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
![Page 7: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
What makes it into an index and what is excluded?
- algorithms work on top of databases
- data must be collected, processed & made "algorithm ready"
- data is designed to be fit for collection
- criteria for in- or exclusion are usually not transparent
![Page 8: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Screenshots: http://amaditalks.tumblr.com/post/13513981784/siriIdea: http://vimeo.com/channels/551921/69641358
![Page 9: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Attempts to know and predict users
- "second index " (Stalder & Mayer, 2009)
- "not just provide information to users, […] also providing users to their algorithms" (Gillespie, 2013, p. 7)
- questions of privacy, representation & access
- example: real-time bidding
![Page 10: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Evaluation signals are opaque
- every algorithmic decision is based on inscribed criteria or signals, that are mostly kept secret
- a "black boxed" technology, but not stable (Latour, 1987)
- the role of the "inscriber"
![Page 11: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
ConclusionScreenshots, 24.07.13Idea: http://vimeo.com/channels/551921/69641358
![Page 12: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
The assurance of impartiality
- objectivity has been a disputed concept, long before public relevance algorithms
- algorithms work as "stabilizers of trust " p. 13
- a way to deflect responsibility? (Morozov, 2011)
![Page 13: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Screenshot: http://www.businessinsider.com/google-pulls-out-of-china-2010-3
![Page 14: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Users reshape their practices to suit the algorithms
- algorithms "induce subtle reorientations of […] practices" p. 18
- content is shaped to make it algorithmically recognizable
- testing and reverse engineering of algorithms
- users "domesticate" algorithms, changes lead to critique
![Page 15: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Screenshot: https://www.facebook.com/derziegelstein
![Page 16: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Algorithmic presentations of publics shape a public's sense of itself
- "algorithms are a key technological component " of mediated publics p. 22
- "calculated publics"? p. 23
- the representations of public get again taken up by users or authorities
![Page 17: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Screenshot: http://www.amazon.com/Software-Command-International-Critical-Aesthetics/dp/1623567459/ref=pd_ys_ir_all_2
![Page 18: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
Ausserhofer & Maireder, 2013
![Page 19: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Conclusion
- "[…] thinking not simply about how they [algorithms] work, where they are deployed, or what animates them financially" p. 25
- "not just as codes with consequences, but […] a new knowledge logic" p. 26
- "[…] algorithms remain outside our grasp and they are designed to be." p. 26
![Page 20: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
Discussion
- How can we turn algorithms "into an object of productive inquiry"? Barocas et al., 2013, p.1
![Page 21: The Relevance of Algorithms](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052301/5497000bac795925288b53e0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
1. Patterns of inclusion
2. Cycles of anticipation
3. The evaluation of relevance
4. The promise of algorithmic objectivity
5. Entanglement with practice
6. The production of calculated publics
References
- Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National Politics on Twitter: Structures and Topics of a Networked Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
- Barocas, S., Hood, S., & Ziewitz, M. (2013). Governing Algorithms: A Provocation Piece. Presented at the Governing Algorithms Conference, New York. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2245322
- Gillespie, T. (forthcoming). The Relevance of Algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Paths Forward in Social Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.tarletongillespie.org/essays/Gillespie%20-%20The%20Relevance%20of%20Algorithms.pdf
- Morozov, E. (2011, July 13). Don’t Be Evil. The New Republic. Retrieved from http://www.newrepublic.com/article/books/magazine/91916/google-schmidt-obama-gates-technocrats
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Stalder, F., & Mayer, C. (2009). The Second Index: Search Engines, Personalization and Surveillance. In K. Becker & F. Stalder (Eds.), Deep Search: The Politics of Search beyond Google (pp. 98–115). London: Transaction Publishers. Retrieved from http://felix.openflows.com/node/113