the routledge companion - ghent university · the routledge companion to embodied music interaction...

152

Upload: others

Post on 26-May-2020

21 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent
Page 2: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO EMBODIED MUSIC INTERACTION

The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent research focuses on the role of the human body in musical experiences. This volume brings together a broad collection of work that explores all aspects of this new approach to understanding how we interact with music, addressing the issues that have roused the curiosities of scientists for ages: to understand the complex and multi- faceted way in which music manifests itself not just as sound but also as a variety of cultural styles, not just as experience but also as awareness of that experience.

With contributions from an interdisciplinary and international array of scholars, including both empirical and theoretical perspectives, the Companion explores an equally impressive array of topics, including:

• Dynamical music interaction theories and concepts• Expressive gestural interaction• Social music interaction• Sociological and anthropological approaches• Empowering health and well-being• Modeling music interaction• Music-based interaction technologies and applications

This book is a vital resource for anyone seeking to understand human interaction with music from an embodied perspective.

Micheline Lesaffre is postdoctoral researcher in music and well- being at Ghent University, Belgium.

Pieter-Jan Maes is postdoctoral researcher in systematic musicology at Ghent University, Belgium.

Marc Leman is Methusalem research professor in systematic musicology at Ghent University, Belgium.

Page 4: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO EMBODIED MUSIC

INTERACTION

Edited by Micheline Lesaffre, Pieter-Jan Maes, and Marc Leman

Page 5: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

First published 2017 by Routledge

711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017

and by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

© 2017 Taylor & Francis

The right of the editors to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted

in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means,

now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in

writing from the publishers.

Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and

explanation without intent to infringe.

Library of Congress Cataloging- in-Publication DataNames: Leman, Marc, 1958- editor. | Lesaffre, Micheline, editor. | Maes,

Pieter-Jan, editor.Title: The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction / edited

by Marc Leman, Micheline Lesaffre, and Pieter-Jan Maes.Description: New York ; London : Routledge, 2017. | Includes

bibliographical references and index.Identifiers: LCCN 2016045972 (print) | LCCN 2016048046 (ebook) |

ISBN 9781138657403 (hardback) | ISBN 9781315621364 Subjects: LCSH: Music—Psychological aspects. | Music—Performance—

Psychological aspects.Classification: LCC ML3830 .R78 2017 (print) | LCC ML3830 (ebook) |

DDC 781.1/1—dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016045972

ISBN: 978- 1-138-65740-3 (hbk) ISBN: 978- 1-315-62136-4 (ebk)

Typeset in Bembo by Apex CoVantage, LLC

Page 6: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

v

List of Figures and Tables xNotes on Contributors xiiiAcknowledgements xxvii

Introduction: What Is Embodied Music Interaction? 1Marc Leman, Micheline Lesaffre, and Pieter- Jan Maes

PART 1 Dynamical Music Interaction Theories and Concepts 11

1 The Interactive Dialectics of Musical Meaning Formation 13Marc Leman

2 Metrically Structured Time and Entrainment 22Guy Madison, Fredrik Ullén, and Björn Merker

3 Participatory Sense- Making in Joint Musical Practice 31Andrea Schiavio and Hanne De Jaegher

4 Playing with the Beat: A Process- Oriented Approach to Studying Sensorimotor Synchronization in Early Childhood 40Ana Almeida, Katie Overy, and Dorothy Miell

5 The Merging of Musician and Musical Instrument: Incorporation, Presence, and Levels of Embodiment 49Luc Nijs

6 Music Knowledge Construction: Enactive, Ecological, and Biosemiotic Claims 58Mark Reybrouck

CONTENTS

Page 7: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Contents

vi

PART 2 Expressive Gestural Interaction 67

7 Cognitive and Sensorimotor Resources for the Encoding of Expressiveness During Music Playing 69Muzaffer Çorlu, Pieter- Jan Maes, and Marc Leman

8 Beyond Emotion: Multi-Sensory Responses to Musical Expression 78Giovanni De Poli, Maddalena Murari, Sergio Canazza, Antonio Rodà, and Emery Schubert

9 Conveying Expressivity and Individuality in Keyboard Performance 87Bruno Gingras

10 The Resilience Approach to Studying Group Interaction in Music Ensemble 96Donald Glowinski, Fabrizio Bracco, Carlo Chiorri, and Didier Grandjean

11 Agency in Embodied Music Interaction 105Nikki Moran

12 Postures and Motion Shaping Musical Experience 113Rolf Inge Godøy

13 The Communication of Emotions in Dance 122Edith Van Dyck, Birgitta Burger, and Konstantina Orlandatou

PART 3 Social Music Interaction 131

14 Group Flow 133Tom Cochrane

15 Entrainment and Mutual Adaptation in Musical Movement and Dance 141Tommi Himberg

16 Embodied Expression Through Entrainment and Co- Representation in Musical Ensemble Performance 150Jennifer MacRitchie, Manuel Varlet, and Peter E. Keller

17 Music Performance as Joint Action 160John Michael

Page 8: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Contents

vii

18 Do Jazz Improvisers Really Interact? The Score Effect in Collective Jazz Improvisation 167François Pachet, Pierre Roy, and Raphaël Foulon

19 Gestural Interactions in Ensemble Performance 177Davi Mota, Mauricio Loureiro, and Rafael Laboissière

20 Interpersonal Coordination in Dyadic Performance 186Marc R. Thompson, Georgios Diapoulis, Tommi Himberg, and Petri Toiviainen

21 Embodied Social Synchronization in Children’s Musical Development 195Leon van Noorden, Leen De Bruyn, Raven van Noorden, and Marc Leman

PART 4 Sociological and Anthropological Approaches 205

22 Embodied Interaction with “Sonic Agents”: An Anthropological Perspective 207Filippo Bonini Baraldi

23 The Ethnography of Embodied Music Interaction 215Martin Clayton

24 Combat-Dancing, Cultural Transmission, and Choreomusicology: The Globalization of Embodied Repertoires of Sound and Movement 223Paul Mason

25 The Hiplife Zone: Cultural Transformation Processes in African Music Seen from the Angle of Embodied Music Interactions 232Dominik Phyfferoen, Koenraad Stroeken, and Marc Leman

26 Crafting the Playing Body as an Infrastructure of “Immediate” and “Mediate” Embodied Music Cognition in an Academic Jazz Program 241Eitan Wilf

27 Brain-to-Brain Coupling and Culture as Prerequisites for Musical Interaction 249Elvira Brattico and Peter Vuust

Page 9: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Contents

viii

PART 5 Empowering Health and Well- Being 259

28 Coupling Music and Motion: From Special Education to Rehabilitation 261Danilo Spada and Emmanuel Bigand

29 Embodied Music Listening 269Lars Ole Bonde

30 Jymmin—The Medical Potential of Musical Euphoria 278Thomas Hans Fritz

31 Music in the Exercise and Sport Domain: Conceptual Approaches and Underlying Mechanisms 284Costas I. Karageorghis, Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Jonathan M. Bird, and Marcelo Bigliassi

32 Monitoring Music and Movement Interaction in People with Dementia 294Micheline Lesaffre, Bart Moens, and Frank Desmet

33 Synchronization to Music as a Tool for Enhancing Non- Verbal Communication in People with Neurological Diseases 304Nia Cason, Loris Schiaratura, and Séverine Samson

34 Modifying Movement Optimization Processes with Music 313Rebecca S. Schaefer and Scott T. Grafton

PART 6 Modeling Music Interaction 321

35 Modeling Music Interaction 323Denis Amelynck

36 Analyzing Complex Datasets Based on the Variability Framework, Distribution Analysis, and Generalized Linear Modeling 332Frank Desmet

37 Removing Obstacles to the Analysis of Movement in Musical Performance: Recurrence, Mixed Models, and Surrogates 341Alexander P. Demos and Roger Chaffin

38 Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Musical Interaction 350Baptiste Caramiaux, Jules Françoise, and Frédéric Bevilacqua

Page 10: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Contents

ix

39 Temporal Dependencies in the Expressive Timing of Classical Piano Performances 360Maarten Grachten and Carlos Eduardo Cancino Chacón

40 Interactions in Ensemble Music Performance: Empirical and Mathematical Accounts 370Caroline Palmer and Anna Zamm

41 Linking Movement Recurrence to Expressive Patterns in Music Performance 380Euler C. F. Teixeira, Mauricio A. Loureiro, and Hani C. Yehia

PART 7 Music-Based Interaction Technologies and Applications 389

42 Designing Action– Sound Metaphors Using Motion Sensing and Descriptor- Based Synthesis of Recorded Sound Materials 391Frédéric Bevilacqua, Norbert Schnell, Jules Françoise, Éric O. Boyer, Diemo Schwarz, and Baptiste Caramiaux

43 Designing for the Subtle: A Systematic Approach Toward Expressivity in New Musical Interfaces 402Nicolas d’Alessandro

44 Gestural Agency in Human– Machine Musical Interaction 412Juan Ignacio Mendoza and Marc R. Thompson

45 Gestural Musical Performance with Physiological Sensors, Focusing on the Electromyogram 420Atau Tanaka and Miguel Ortiz

46 Sonic Microinteraction in “the Air” 429Alexander Refsum Jensenius

47 Embodied Cognition and Digital Musical Instruments: Design and Performance 438Joseph Malloch and Marcelo M. Wanderley

Index 449

Page 11: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

x

Figures

1.1 A model of assessment. 13 2.1 Depiction of a metrical space, with time on the x- axis and the metrical

level on the y- axis. 25 4.1 Spontaneous body movements of two young children playing Ana’s Game. 45 7.1 Model of cognitive and sensorimotor resources for musical expressiveness. 73 9.1 Tripartite model of communication in musical performance. 9210.1 The resilience framework as applied to the two test cases considered

in this chapter. 9912.1 Two posture images from a series of caricatures of Franz Liszt attributed to A.

Göschl and published in the magazine Borsszem Jankó on April 6, 1873. 11814.1 A simplified schema of musical performance. 13515.1 (A) Cross- correlation lags in dyadic tapping, with uni- directional coupling

and bi- directional (mutual) coupling. (B) Two dancers’ foot movements, a windowed analysis. (C) Cross- correlation of finger movement mirroring, example from one pair. (D) The windowed analysis of the data in C. 145

16.1 Representation of coordination at multiple spatial (Panel A) and time (Panel B) scales, acknowledging constraints that affect entrainment and co-representation processes at these scales (Panel C). 151

18.1 Waveforms of the saxophone and bass tracks of the first eight bars (32-beat) played concomitantly on I Just Can’t Remember. 171

19.1 Analysis workflow. 18120.1 Summary (mean and standard deviation) of (A) Total Kinetic Energy (TKE),

(B) CanCom1 (r), and (C) CanCom2 (r). Panels D, E, and F plot canonical scores over time. 191

21.1 Amplitude and phase relation of a driven harmonic oscillator. 19721.2 Rows 1, 2, and 3 present data on tapping precision. Row 4 gives data

on mean tapping phase. 20125.1 The African hemiola style. 23325.2 A Bamaaya nyakboli melody in a larger time span. The kalamboo onbeat

is shown with a “movable one.” 234

FIGURES AND TABLES

Page 12: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Figures and Tables

xi

27.1 Schematic illustration of the analysis method applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. 251

30.1 Emotional experience arises as an interaction of arousal and expression intensity (the subjectively perceived degree to which an individual represents inner states, e.g., feelings and thoughts, by actions), so that when expression occurs over a certain arousal threshold, arousal is perceived as emotional arousal. 281

31.1 A theoretical model of the antecedents, moderators, and consequences of music use in the exercise and sport domain. 285

31.2 Hypothetical changes in the oxygenation (i.e., activation) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex across increasing levels of exercise intensity. 288

32.1 Top: Setup of the study: subjects being tested with the force plate. Bottom: Example of polar plots representing the movement of a subject in condition 1 (audio only) and condition 2 (live performance). 299

32.2 Example of the top- down analysis framework using ELAN representing video of performer and subject. 300

35.1 Correlation functions for chest markers displayed as heat maps for a musically untrained group and for a musically trained group. 328

36.1 Overview of sources of variability of human movement in systematic musicology research. 334

36.2 Examples of deviation from the normal distribution. 33737.1 Panel A shows the medio- lateral postural sway during an expressive

performance. Panel B shows the recurrence quantification plot of that sway. Panel C shows the recurrence rate and stability extracted from the recurrence quantification plot. 343

38.1 Generic representation of Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) applied to human motion modeling. 352

39.1 Sensitivity of IOI predictions to fermata, duration, and accent basis functions, for the 10 models obtained from 10- fold cross- validation. 367

41.1 Schematic diagram of the analysis method (A), computation of the motion recurrence map (B): top plot shows the tangential velocity curves; bottom plot shows the recurrence map (dark indicates high recurrence), excerpt from Brahms’ Clarinet Sonata No.1 in F minor (C), and results of the analysis for the 30 performances (D): top plot shows the clarinet bell global motion recurrence map; bottom plots show the standard deviations of the audio parameters used as expressiveness descriptors. 382

42.1 General workflow of the design of movement- based interactive applications with recorded sound materials. 393

43.1 (A) Typical playing position for the HandSketch musical instrument; (B) rationale behind the idea to curve the playing diagram: combination of A and B circular movements leads to C as a natural playing curve; (C) superimposition of several HandSketch renderings of a three- note melody exhibiting high similarities; (D) illustration of glottal source parameters from the RAMCESS model together with fundamental frequency. 405

44.1 Human and machine are agents connected by signals. The model allows for the incorporation of more agents into a network. 415

47.1 (A) Model visualization based on Rasmussen’s typology of human information processing. (B) An alternative depiction of the performer– DMI system, avoiding possible impressions that the instrument is a conduit from performer to audience. 441

Page 13: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Figures and Tables

xii

Tables

6.1 Overview of terms and their relation to the representational/ experiential dichotomy. 59

21.1 Output of Matlab ‘fitnlm’ regression. 20125.1 Model of cultural transformation processes. 23739.1 Predictive results for IOI, averaged over a 10- fold cross- validation on

the Magaloff corpus. 36646.1 Overview of the categories of spatial and temporal levels (approximate values). 43246.2 An example matrix of possible spatiotemporal combinations. 433

Page 14: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

xiii

Ana Almeida is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Institute for Music in Human and Social Development, University of Edinburgh, where she is currently working on a project investigating the impact of music on the well- being of people with dementia. Ana’s research interests focus on embod-ied musical experiences across the lifespan, in particular, on the spontaneous movement interaction of young children with music. In parallel with her academic studies, Ana is also involved in early years artistic, educational, and community projects (e.g., in schools, refugee camps) across Europe.

Denis Amelynck received the M. Eng. degree (1985) and obtained a Ph.D. degree in engineering (2014) from Ghent University, Belgium. Previously, he worked as a system and training engineer for several international companies, such as Alcatel, Honeywell, and W. R. Grace. Currently, he is involved with big data projects at the University College Ghent. Some of his projects include Association Analysis, Survival Analysis, Sentiment Analysis, and Deep Learning.

Frédéric Bevilacqua is leading the Sound Music Movement Interaction team at the Institute for Research and Coordination in Acoustics/Music (IRCAM), Paris. His research concerns modeling and design of interaction between movement and sound, and development of gesture- based interac-tive systems. He holds a master’s degree in physics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Optics from the EPFL (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne or Swiss Federal Institute of Technology). He studied music at the Berklee College of Music in Boston and has participated in different music and media arts projects. From 1999 to 2003, he was a researcher at the Beckman Laser Institute at the Univer-sity of California Irvine. In 2003 he joined IRCAM as a researcher on gesture analysis for music and performing arts.

Emmanuel Bigand is Professor of Cognitive Psychology and member of the Institut Universitaire de France at the University of Bourgogne and Franche Comté. His research deals with music cogni-tion and his main contribution was to highlight how music is perceived at syntatic and large scale level by musically trained and untrained listeners. More recently he investigated the effect of music on patients with Alzheimer disease and with deaf children. He supervised the European research program EBRAMUS (Europe, Brain, and Music) and organized the Fifth Congress of Neurosciences of Music in Dijon (2014).

NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS

Page 15: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xiv

Marcelo Bigliassi is a Ph.D. student in Sport and Exercise Psychology at Brunel University London, UK. He completed B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Physical Education at Londrina State University, Brazil. His studies included an Erasmus visit to the Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal. Marcelo has been active in the field of psychophysiology for seven years. His work integrates physiological measures to further understanding of psychological phenomena during exercise. In 2012, Marcelo developed a Facebook app to enable exercisers to use music more purposefully.

Jonathan M. Bird is a Ph.D. student in Sport and Exercise Psychology at Brunel University London, UK. He is conducting research into the efficacy and application of audiovisual stimuli in the exercise context. He has presented his work at scientific conferences and published in peer- reviewed journals. Jonathan also has a strong interest in applied sport psychology, is accredited with the British Associa-tion of Sport and Exercise Sciences, and has worked with athletes from a variety of sports.

Lars Ole Bonde is Professor in Music Therapy at Aalborg University (Denmark) and Professor in Music and Health at The Norwegian Academy of Music (Norway). His publications are on music therapy, music psychology, music education, and music theatre. He is a music therapist (DMTF), certified clinical supervisor, music producer, and associate editor of the Nordic Journal of Music Therapy.

Filippo Bonini Baraldi is researcher FCT at the Instituto de Etnomusicologia (INET-md, FCSH), Universidade Nova of Lisbon, and member of the Centre de Recherche en Ethnomusicologie (CREM-LESC), University Paris Ouest Nanterre. His researches on musical emotion in Romania, Italy, and Brazil are strongly interdisciplinary and combine methods coming from ethnomusicology, music computing, and cognitive sciences. He has been awarded with a Ph.D. prize by the Quai Branly Museum and a prize by the Charles Cros Academy (France) for the book Tsiganes, musique et empathie (2013).

Éric O. Boyer is an Audiology System Developer at Oticon A/S (Denmark). He obtained his Ph.D. in Cognitive Neuroscience on the use of continuous sonification for sensorimotor leaning from Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris (2015). His work as a postdoctoral researcher in the Sound Music Movement Interaction team at IRCAM focuses on interactive gesture sonification for move-ment training and learning.

Fabrizio Bracco is Assistant Professor in General Psychology at the Department of Education Sciences of the University of Genoa (Italy). His main research topics are concerning cognitive ergo-nomics and human factors in high- risk sociotechnical systems. He is coordinator of several research projects about human performance and cognition in technical systems, workload and situation aware-ness, interface design, simulation and training in emergency situations, and development and training of non- technical skills (communication, leadership, teamwork, decision making, situation awareness).

Elvira Brattico holds a Ph.D. degree in Psychology and two Master’s degrees, in Philosophy (1996) and Music. Currently, she is professor at the Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark, and co- director of the Center for Music in the Brain (MIB) of the Danish National Research Foundation. Using a convergence of brain imaging techniques, musicological analysis, and biological methods, she investigates the neural mechanisms for encoding, discriminating, and appreci-ating musical sounds and how these mechanisms depend on biological and cultural factors.

Birgitta Burger has a background in Systematic Musicology and Computer Science and is cur-rently a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Interdisciplinary Music Research at the University of Jyväskylä. She is interested in the role of the body in production, perception, and understanding

Page 16: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xv

of music and focuses her current research on music- induced movement and synchronization. She is also involved in a music therapy project on post- stroke rehabilitation using active music therapy and co- developing Mocap Toolbox, a Matlab Toolbox for visualizing and analyzing motion capture data.

Sergio Canazza received the degree in Electronic Engineering from the University of Padova, Italy, where he is director of the Multimedia and E- Learning Centre (CMELA) and Professor of Fundamen-tals of Computer Science at the Department of Information Engineering. His main research interests include restoration of audio documents, representation of musical information, and human– machine interaction. He is author of more than 160 publications in international journals and refereed inter-national conferences. He has been project manager in European projects.

Carlos Eduardo Cancino Chacón is a researcher at the Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence. He holds Bachelor’s degrees in Physics (National Autonomous University of Mexico) and in Piano (National Conservatory of Music of Mexico). He received the M.Sc. degree in Electri-cal Engineering and Audio Engineering at Graz University of Technology. Currently, he is pursuing the Ph.D. degree in Computer Science at the Johannes Kepler University of Linz. His research inter-ests include computational models of expressive music performance, deep learning, and probabilistic graphical models.

Baptiste Caramiaux is a Marie Skłodowska- Curie research fellow at McGill University in Montreal and IRCAM in Paris. His research in Human- Computer Interaction focuses on interaction and system design in complex human activities involving body movements, such as music performance, promot-ing motor skill acquisition, and expression. He was a research associate at Goldsmiths, University of London and a research consultant for the music technology company Mogees Ltd. He holds a master’s degree and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from University Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris and IRCAM.

Nia Cason is a postdoctoral researcher in the Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. Her main interest is synchronization and the shared neural substrates of rhythm processing in different domains (e.g., music and speech) and what this can mean for the effect of music in the context of rehabilitation.

Roger Chaffin is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Connecticut. His longitudi-nal case studies of experienced performers combine the third- person perspective of the scientist with the first- person perspective of the musician to understand how the artistry of musical performance arises from skills developed during practice.

Carlo Chiorri is Associate Professor in Psychometrics at the Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genova (Italy). His research interests include the development and validation of psycho-metric methods and psychological tests, the application of advanced statistical methods, and the assess-ment and measurement of normal and dysfunctional personality traits and of cognitive workload.

Martin Clayton is Professor in Ethnomusicology at Durham University. He studied at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London, where he obtained degrees in Music and Hindi (BA, 1988) and Ethnomusicology (Ph.D., 1993). His research interests include Hindustani (North Indian) classical music, rhythmic analysis, comparative musicology, and early field recordings, British- Asian music and Western music in India.

Tom Cochrane has been a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sheffield since 2012. He has previously held posts at Queen’s University Belfast (2010–2012) and the University of Geneva (2007–2010). His research is mainly focused on emotions, the values of art (particularly music), and

Page 17: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xvi

extended cognition. Cochrane is the lead editor of the volume The Emotional Power of Music (2013, Oxford University Press).

Muzaffer Çorlu holds an MA degree in communication, an MBA in international business, and a B.Sc. in Psychology. He is an award- winning classical guitarist and has performed at music festivals and concerts worldwide. He was Vice Chair of Music and Performing Arts at Yildiz Technical Uni-versity in Istanbul. In 2016, he obtained his Ph.D. at the Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music (IPEM), Ghent University on aspects of cognitive load during music performance.

Nicolas d’Alessandro obtained his Ph.D. in Applied Sciences from the University of Mons (Bel-gium) in 2009. From a lifelong interest in musical instruments and his acquired taste in voice process-ing, he developed a research direction that aims at using gestural control of sound in order to gain insights in voice production. He worked with Thierry Dutoit at Numediart, where he developed the HandSketch. Late in 2009, he moved to the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, for a postdoc with Sidney Fels. Since 2012, he is back in Belgium and runs a startup named Hovertone.

Leen De Bruyn obtained a Ph.D. in Musicology at Ghent University, which focused on computer- assisted learning and assessment of musical development in children. As a lecturer of Music Pedagogy, she was associated with the teacher- training program of Artevelde University College Ghent. Currently, she is project manager of education and online education platforms at the Flem-ish Institute for Audiovisual Archiving (VIAA). Responsible for the disclosure of audiovisual content intended for education, she supervises a team of editors and teachers and coordinates interaction projects in the education sector.

Hanne De Jaegher is philosopher of mind and cognitive scientist. Through the concept of partici-patory sense- making, she grapples with various issues in the interdisciplinary study of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, including embodiment, interactive experience, autism, love and intimacy, and ethical and societal issues. She received her doctorate from the University of Sussex, UK, in 2007 and has worked in various projects funded by EU Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions. She currently holds a tenure- track Ramón y Cajal research fellowship at the University of the Basque Country, San Sebas-tián, Spain.

Giovanni De Poli received the degree in Electronic Engineering from the University of Padova, Italy. He is currently a Professor of Computer Science at the Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova. His research interests include algorithms for sound synthesis, representation of musical information and knowledge, and human– machine interaction. He is a coeditor of the books Representations of Music Signals (MIT Press, 1991) and Musical Signal Processing (Swets & Zeitlinger, 1996).

Alexander P. Demos holds a Ph.D. in Cognitive Psychology from the University of Connecticut. Currently, he is a Visiting Assistant Professor at the Department of Psychology at the University of Illinois, Chicago. He is interested in the development of statistical methods for examining how musi-cians move and coordinate their actions.

Frank Desmet has a background in Chemistry and holds a Ph.D. in Musicology. He is postdoctoral researcher at IPEM, Ghent University. His research focuses on statistical analysis of complex datasets. His research targets to use nonlinear dynamics for the data related to embodied music interactions. He also gives advice and training in statistics for Ph.D. researchers.

Page 18: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xvii

Georgios Diapoulis studied Materials Science and Technology at the University of Crete. He cur-rently studies Music Psychology Training in the University of Jyväskylä, doing the Master’s Program in Music, Mind and Technology. His research interests include music perception and performance, music information retrieval, computer music, live coding, and motion capture technologies.

Panteleimon Ekkekakis is an Associate Professor of Exercise Psychology at Iowa State University in the United States. His research examines pleasure and displeasure responses to exercise, including their underlying cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms, and their implications for exercise behavior. His current research focuses on the development of a theory of the sense of exertional fatigue and a dual- process (affective-reflective) theory of physical activity and exercise behavior.

Raphaël Foulon has received a M.Sc. in Acoustics Signal Processing and Computer Science Applied to Music from Paris 6 University in 2012. His background includes signal processing, computer sci-ence, and generative design. After graduation he joined the Sony CSL lab in Paris. Currently, he is working as a software developer at Sonic Emotion (Paris).

Jules Françoise is a postdoctoral researcher at the School of Interactive Arts and Technology (SIAT) at Simon Fraser University (SFU). He holds a Master’s Degree in Acoustics and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Université Pierre et Marie Curie, which he completed in the Sound Music Move-ment Interaction team at IRCAM. His research interests intersect human– computer interaction and machine learning with a focus on expressive movement analysis and interaction. He is co- chair of the International Workshop on Movement and Computing (MOCO).

Thomas Hans Fritz is leader of the work group Music Evoked Brain Plasticity at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig and visiting professor for Empirical Music Research at the IPEM at Ghent University. He did degrees in Biology and Arts and a Ph.D. thesis in Cognitive Science. His research interest is the psychology of music, and includes the neuro-anatomy of how music is processed in the auditory pathway, how musical immersion with musical interfaces can help patients, and how music relates to human evolution.

Bruno Gingras first completed a M.Sc in Molecular Biology, before turning to music theory and graduating with a Ph.D from McGill University (Canada). Following a postdoctoral fellowship at the Department of Computing at Goldsmiths (London, UK), Bruno was a postdoctoral fellow at the Department of Cognitive Biology of the University of Vienna (Austria) from 2011 to 2014. He is currently a University Assistant at the Institute of Psychology of the University of Innsbruck (Aus-tria). His research interests include music- induced emotions, individuality and expressivity in music performance, as well as biomusicology.

Donald Glowinski is Senior Researcher in Computer Science and Neuropsychology at the Swiss Center for Affective Sciences of the University of Geneva. His research interests include the study of behavioral and brain bases of human interaction in musical contexts. He is the recipient of presti-gious awards, including Fondation Bleustein pour la Vocation 2004, Fondation de France 2005, and Swiss Institute of Rome 2016. He develops computational models of implicit non- verbal expressive, emotional, and social behavior for advanced interactive systems (virtual, smart environment) and for neuroimaging studies.

Rolf Inge Godøy is professor of Music Theory at the Department of Musicology, University of Oslo. His main interest is in phenomenological approaches to music theory, meaning taking our

Page 19: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xviii

subjective experiences of music as the point of departure for music theory. This work has been expanded to include research on music- related body motion in performance and listening, using vari-ous conceptual and technological tools to explore the relationships between sound and body motion in the experience of music.

Maarten Grachten holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science and Digital Communication (2006, Pompeu Fabra University, Spain). He is a former member of the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA, Spain), the Music Technology Group (MTG, Spain), the Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music (IPEM, Belgium), and the Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI, Aus-tria). Currently, he is a Senior Researcher at the Department of Computational Perception (Johannes Kepler University, Austria). Grachten has published in international conferences and journals, on top-ics related to machine learning, music information retrieval, affective computing, and computational musicology.

Scott T. Grafton received BAs in Mathematics and Psychobiology from the University of Cali-fornia at Santa Cruz, and his MD from the University of Southern California. He is currently the director of the Brain Imaging Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). The center uses fMRI, magnetic stimulation, and high- density EEG to characterize the neural basis of how people organize movement into goal- oriented action, using studies focusing on sequence and skill acquisition, motor simulation, sensorimotor transformation, on- line control, and action observation.

Didier Grandjean is associate professor at the Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences and at the Swiss Center for Affective Sciences at the University of Geneva. He achieved his thesis in 2005 under the direction of Klaus Scherer about the dynamic of appraisal processes using electroen-cephalographic methods. He published more than 90 peer- reviewed articles in international scientific journals in psychology and neuroscience about emotional processes related to emotional prosody per-ception and production, appraisal processes, the emergence of feelings, music and emotion, olfaction and emotion, and emotional facial expression perception and production.

Tommi Himberg has studied interaction, coordination, and entrainment in human movement, in the contexts of music, dance, and conversation. He earned his Ph.D. in the Faculty of Music, University of Cambridge, UK, and has thereafter worked in Finland at the University of Jyväskylä. Currently, he is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engi-neering at Aalto University, Denmark.

Alexander Refsum Jensenius is an Associate Professor of Music Technology at the Department of Musicology, University of Oslo. His research focuses on why music makes us move, and this is explored through empirical studies using different types of motion- sensing technologies. He also uses the knowledge and tools in the creation of new music. Alexander studied at the University of Oslo and Chalmers University of Technology and has been a visiting researcher at University of California, Berkeley and at McGill University.

Costas I. Karageorghis is a Reader in Sport Psychology in the Department of Life Sciences at Brunel University London, UK. He conducts psychophysiological research and applied work in the area of audiovisual interventions in exercise and sport. Costas’s scientific output includes more than 150 scholarly articles, 10 book chapters, and two textbooks including, most recently, Applying Music in Exercise and Sport (Human Kinetics, 2017). During his spare time, Costas enjoys playing piano in the jazz duo Blue Rondo alongside drummer Joel Shopland.

Page 20: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xix

Peter E. Keller holds degrees in Music and Psychology from the University of New South Wales in Australia. He is currently Professor of Cognitive Science and leader of the Music Cognition and Action research program in the MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development at Western Sydney University. Previously, he was at Haskins Laboratories (USA) and the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (Germany), and he has served as Editor of Empirical Musicol-ogy Review. Peter’s research examines the behavioral and brain bases of human interaction in musical contexts.

Rafael Laboissière has a background in Engineering and works currently as a researcher in Neuro-science for the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, in France. He is affiliated to the Labora-tory of Psychology and Neurocognition, at the University of Grenoble- Alpes. His current research interests are speech communication, relationships between action and perception, multimodal neural integration, and human motor behavior.

Marc Leman is Methusalem Research Professor in Systematic Musicology at Ghent University, Bel-gium. He is a pioneer in the foundations of embodied music cognition. He published more than 350 articles, and several books with MIT Press, Routledge, and Springer. He is laureate of the five- yearly FWO Excellence Award Ernest- John Solvay for Humanities (2015), and member of the advisory committee of Science Europe (since 2016). His lab is an international meeting place for researchers working on expressive interactions with music, using embodiment and action theory as a point of departure.

Micheline Lesaffre obtained her doctorate in Musicology from Ghent University, Belgium, with a thesis on Music Information Retrieval. Since 2006 she is a postdoctoral researcher at IPEM, Ghent University, where she focuses on user- oriented analysis, user experiences, and social- economic issues related to stakeholders in the Cultural and Creative Sector. Recently, this work has been expanded to Health and Well- being, with a focus on person- centered approaches to embodied music- based inter-ventions. She is co- editor of the book The Power of Music. Researching Musical Experiences: A Viewpoint from IPEM (ACCO, 2013).

Mauricio Loureiro is Engineer (Technological Institute of Aeronautics, Brazil), Bachelor in Music (Staatliche Hochschule für Musik Freiburg, Germany), and Doctor in Music (University of Iowa, USA). He was associate professor at the Institute of Arts, State University of São Paulo (1984–1992), full professor at the School of Music, Federal University of Minas Gerais— UFMG (since 1992), and director of the Institute of Advanced Transdisciplinary Studies / UFMG (2010–2014). Currently, he is head of the research group CEGeME / UFMG (Center for Studies of Musical Gesture and Expression).

Jennifer MacRitchie has a background in Engineering and Music, and completed her doctoral work in the University of Glasgow’s Science and Music Research group. Previously at the Conserva-torio della Svizzera Italiana in Lugano, Switzerland, she is now Research Lecturer in Music Perception and Cognition at the MARCS Institute for Brain, Behavior and Development at Western Sydney University, Australia. Her research focuses on the acquisition and development of motor skills in piano performance, as well as how bodily gestures are used to communicate musical information between co- performers and with audiences.

Guy Madison is Professor in Psychology at Umeå University. His research covers three broad areas. In the field of human timing, he models sequential time production, sensorimotor synchronization,

Page 21: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xx

temporal discrimination, and various aspects of the perception of rhythm. Music experience and preferences are studied mainly from functional and evolutionary perspectives, including a special emphasis on groove. The third area is creativity, cognitive performance, and expertise in general, and how genetic, personality, and motivational factors contribute to their development.

Pieter-Jan Maes holds a Ph.D. in Musicology from Ghent University, Belgium, with a thesis entitled “An empirical study of embodied music listening, and its applications in mediation technology.” He worked as a postdoctoral fellow at McGill University Montreal, Canada (2012–2013), performing research on timing in music performance. He is currently working as a postdoctoral researcher at IPEM studying the role of expressive body movement, auditory feedback, and prediction mechanisms in musical timing and entrainment.

Joseph Malloch is a researcher and instrument designer at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. His research focuses on the design and use of new interfaces for live music performance, tools for supporting collaborative design of interactive systems, and methods for enriching human– computer interactions. He is also the designer/developer of several digital musical instruments, which have appeared in public performances around the world, including performances at new music festivals, international conferences, by dancers, and by blind performers in a larger ensemble.

Paul Mason is a cultural anthropologist with experience working with arts communities in Indone-sia and Brazil, religious minorities in Brazil and India, and infectious disease patients in Australia and Vietnam. He has co- edited a volume on Southeast Asian fighting arts published by Brill and pub-lished research articles on choreomusicology in Ethnomusicology Forum and Research in Dance Education. His work on complex systems theory has influenced research in neuroscience, sports medicine, epi-genetics, animal communication, and linguistics. Paul conducts research at the University of Sydney and teaches anthropology at Monash University, Australia.

Juan Ignacio Mendoza was born in Chile in 1978, where he spent most of his life. He completed undergraduate studies in music composition in 2005 and worked as a professional composer, arranger, music educator, and entrepreneur. In 2012 he moved to Finland, where he earned a degree in Music Psychology from the University of Jyväskylä. Since 2014 he is a doctoral student at the same academy.

Björn Merker is a neuroscientist with broad interests in behavioral biology. He studied midbrain mechanisms of orienting in hamsters at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, obtaining his doctorate there in 1980. He has worked on visual neurophysiology in cats and macaques, on song development and mirror self- recognition in gibbons, and on the evolutionary and developmental background to human music. With Nils Wallin and Steven Brown, he edited the interdisciplinary volume The Origins of Music (The MIT Press, 2000).

John Michael studied philosophy at Wesleyan University (Connecticut, USA), then at the University of Tübingen (Germany), and completed his Ph.D. at the University of Vienna in 2010. After work-ing as a postdoc in cognitive science at Aarhus University and Copenhagen University (Denmark), he joined the Department of Cognitive Science at the Central European University (CEU) in Budapest as a Marie Curie Research Fellow. He is currently an assistant professor at the Warwick University philosophy department and an affiliated researcher in the CEU in Budapest. His research is supported by a European Research Council (ERC) starting grant to investigate the sense of commitment in joint action.

Dorothy Miell is Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Edinburgh, where she is also Vice Principal and Head of the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. She is a Fellow of

Page 22: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xxi

the British Psychological Society and of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. She has worked on issues of identity, relationships, and communication as they apply to creative collaborations in childhood, adolescence, and among professional artists. Some of her related publications are Learning to Collabo-rate, Collaborating to Learn (2004), Collaborative Creativity (2004), Musical Communication (2005), Musical Imaginations (2012), and Handbook of Musical Identities (2017).

Bart Moens is a doctoral student and computer scientist at IPEM, at Ghent University. His research focuses on human– computer interaction and entrainment. He developed the D- Jogger, a context- aware music player that synchronizes music to walking or running in different ways for use in rehabilitation and sports. D- Jogger is used in the European project BeatHealth for rehabilitation of Parkinson patients. He is also co- founder of the company Hangaar, which applies the interactivity paradigm to create new visuals for theater.

Nikki Moran is a Senior Lecturer in Music and Programme Director of Music— MA (Hons) at the Reid School of Music, University of Edinburgh. She specializes in the study of music as communication, through research and teaching projects that explore the relationship between musical performance and social interaction.

Davi Mota works as a doctoral researcher at the Center for Research on Gesture, Music & Expression (CEGeME) Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. His research is focusing on the analysis of musical performance. He has a Bachelor’s in Music (conducting, UFMG, Brazil, 2010) and a Master’s in Sonology (UFMG, Brazil, 2012).

Maddalena Murari received diplomas in piano and organ from the Conservatory of Padova, Italy, in 1995 and 2013, respectively. She also earned Master’s degrees in Foreign Modern Languages and Literatures and Neuroscience and Neuropsychological Rehabilitation from the University of Padova, in 2000 and 2015, and a Ph.D. degree in Linguistic, Philological and Literary Sciences in 2005. Her research interests include cross- modal aspects of music appreciation, musicology, cognitive neurosci-ence, and music performance.

Luc Nijs holds MAs in Music Performance and Philosophy and a Ph.D. in Musicology. He is currently postdoctoral researcher at IPEM (Ghent University) and lecturer in Music Educational Technology at the Royal Conservatory The Hague and Luca School of Arts Leuven. His research focuses on the musician– instrument relationship, on the role of body movement in the instrumental learning process, and on the role of technology in provoking an embodied approach to instrumen-tal music education. His Ph.D. project received the EAPRIL Best Research and Practice Project Award 2012.

Konstantina Orlandatou studied composition, music theory, piano, and accordion in the Con-servatory of Athens and multimedia composition (MA) at the University of Music and Theatre in Hamburg. In 2014 she completed her doctoral dissertation “Synaesthetic and intermodal audiovi-sual perception: an experimental research” at the University of Hamburg (Department of Systematic Musicology). As an active composer and musicologist, her research focuses mainly on audiovisual perception and the perception of non- tonal music. Currently, she is a postdoctorate scholar in the University of Music and Theatre in Hamburg.

Miguel Ortiz is a Mexican composer and sound artist based in the UK. Born in Hermosillo Sonora, he has been involved in a vast range of activities related to modern music and sound art. He has worked professionally as a composer, sound engineer, lecturer, score editor, promoter, and sound

Page 23: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xxii

designer. He graduated from the Conservatorio de las Rosas in Morelia, México before pursuing a Master’s degree and Ph.D. at the Sonic Arts Research Centre at Queen’s University Belfast.

Katie Overy graduated from the University of Edinburgh (Music) and went on to study the psychology of music with Eric Clarke at the University of Sheffield. Her doctoral research examined dyslexic chil-dren’s difficulties with musical timing. She is a Visiting Professor in Music Education, Western University ( Canada); Director of the Institute for Music in Human and Social Development, University of Edinburgh; and Senior Lecturer, Reid School of Music. Her core research interest is musical learning, with a focus on musical rhythm, which she explores from the perspectives of music psychology, pedagogy, and neuroscience.

François Pachet is director of the SONY Computer Science Laboratory Paris, where he leads the Music Research team. François Pachet has published extensively in artificial intelligence and com-puter music. His current goal, funded by an ERC Advanced Grant, is to build computational represen-tations of style from text and music corpora that can be exploited for personalized content generation. He is also an accomplished musician (guitar, composition) and has published two music albums (in jazz and pop) as composer and performer.

Caroline Palmer is a Canada Research Chair in Cognitive Neuroscience of Performance and Pro-fessor of Psychology and associate member of the Faculty of Music at McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Her early work pioneered the scientific study of expressive music performance. Her research combines behavioral, mathematical, and neuroscientific approaches to the study of how people pro-duce auditory sequences (music and speech).

Dominik Phyfferoen teaches jazz double bass and is an independent ethnomusicologist. He studied ethnomusicology in Ghana with Kwabena Nketia. For the last few years his research and writings are focused on cultural transformational processes in the urban popular music, the informal music industries, contemporary music cultures, and subcultures found in Tamale, which is in the Northern Region of Ghana. His research on traditional music and dance is based on defining the Sahelian factor in the music of Northern Ghana.

Mark Reybrouck is Professor in Musicology at the University of Leuven (KU Leuven— Belgium). His research combines psychological, biological, and semiotic approaches to musical epistemology with a major focus on musical sense- making in real- time listening situations, the related topic of music as experience, and the embodied and enactive approach to music cognition. Besides this theo-retical work, he is also involved in empirical research on representational and meta- representational competence of children in music listening tasks. He has published a lot of papers and book chapters and is author and editor of four books on musical semiotics.

Antonio Rodà received the Master’s degree in Electronic Engineering from the University of Padova, Italy (1996), and the Ph.D. degree in Audiovisual Studies from the University of Udine, Italy (2007). Since 1997 he is a member of Centro di Sonologia Computazionale (CSC), University of Padova. He is author and co- author of more than 90 papers published in national and international journals and peer- reviewed conferences. He is currently Assistant Research Professor at the Depart-ment of Information Engineering, University of Padova.

Pierre Roy is a researcher at Sony CSL Paris in the Music Research team. He graduated in Math-ematics and received a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University Paris 6. He is one of the main contributors of the FlowMachines project, which addresses the issue of boosting human creativity through interaction with computers. Pierre Roy has been active for many years in the domain of

Page 24: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xxiii

constraint satisfaction, in which he introduced Markov constraints, a framework bridging the gap between statistical Markov models and complete problem- solving techniques. He currently inves-tigates the generation of sequential content in music and text using techniques from artificial intel-ligence, graph theory, and machine learning.

Séverine Samson is a Cognitive Neuropsychologist and a Professor of Psychology at the University of Lille in France. After her Ph.D. in Experimental Psychology at the McGill University (Montreal) in 1989, she took on a faculty position at the University of Lille and was nominated in 2008 and 2014 as a senior member at the Institut Universitaire de France. She has maintained clinical activity in Neuropsychology in an Epilepsy unit (Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris). Her research focuses on percep-tion, memory, and emotion in musical and non- musical domains using methods from psychophysics, cognitive psychology, and neuroimagery.

Rebecca Schaefer has M.Sc.s in Clinical Neuropsychology and Music Cognition from the Univer-sity of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Keele University, UK, respectively, and a Ph.D. in Cognitive Neuroscience from the Donders Institute in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. She has recently joined the faculty of the Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit at the University of Leiden, The Netherlands. Her research focuses on health applications of musical interactions, specifically on the neuroscience of music listening, moving to musical rhythm and music imagery, using neuroimaging, behavioral, and cognitive measures.

Loris Schiaratura is Associate Professor in Social Experimental Psychology at the University of Lille. Her topics of research concern non- verbal communication, emotions, and social relationships. In this framework, she conducts studies that contribute to assessing the verbal and non- verbal aspects of communicative abilities of people suffering from Alzheimer’s disease.

Andrea Schiavio is a postdoctoral fellow at the Cognitive and Systematic Musicology Lab at the Ohio State University, and he is affiliated with the Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences at the same institution. He is also honorary research fellow at the University of Sheffield, UK, where he obtained his Ph.D. in Psychology of Music (2014). His work explores human musicality from early infancy through the lenses of embodied cognition, putting together empirical and theoretical research.

Norbert Schnell is a researcher and developer focusing on real- time interactive digital audio pro-cessing and interaction design. Together with his colleagues of the Sound Music Movement Interac-tion team at IRCAM, he develops technologies and interaction scenarios on the frontiers between music listening and performance. He was involved in numerous international R&D projects and artistic works in the fields of music technology and multimedia, pedagogy, and industrial design. He chaired the Sixth International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2006) and the First Web Audio Conference (WAC 2015).

Emery Schubert is Professor in Music and an Australian Research Council Future Fellow. He is co- leader of the Empirical Musicology Laboratory, and Music- Science, both at the University of New South Wales, Australia. His primary research area is in emotional responses to music. He serves on the editorial board of key journals concerned with music and psychology.

Diemo Schwarz is researcher– developer at the Sound Music Movement Interaction team at IRCAM, working on sound analysis and interactive corpus- based concatenative synthesis in multiple research and musical projects at the intersection between computer science, music technology, design, and audiovisual creation. He holds a Ph.D. in computer science applied to music from the University of

Page 25: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xxiv

Paris, awarded in 2004 for the development of a new method of concatenative musical sound synthesis by unit selection from a large database.

Danilo Spada is adjunct teacher of Psychology of Performing Arts in several European academic institutions, in particular for the Université de Bourgogne et Franche- Comté. His research is focusing on rehabilitation and special education through Music. He is a saxophonist in classic, jazz and gospel ensembles. After his degree in Philosophy and Psychology and the doctorate of research in Italy and France he centered his attention to the Neuroscience of Music.

Koenraad Stroeken is an Associate Professor in Africanist Anthropology at Ghent University. He has published about 50 articles and authored three international peer- reviewed books, of which one was a monograph (Moral Power), all largely dealing with African rural communities in transition. He coordinates the Belspo project CongoConnect on the ongoing relevance of initiatory technology in central Africa.

Atau Tanaka creates and performs with instruments using muscle sensing to capture musical ges-ture. He has worked at IRCAM, has been artistic ambassador for Apple Computer France, a mentor at NESTA UK, Artistic Co- Director of Studio for Electro Instrumental Music (STEIM) Amsterdam, and researcher at Sony Computer Science Laboratory (CSL) Paris. His work has been supported by the Daniel Langlois Foundation, Fraunhofer Institute, and the European Research Council (ERC). He is professor of Media Computing at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Euler C. F. Teixeira is a Bachelor, Master and Doctor of Electrical Engineering (Universidade Fed-eral de Minas Gerais, Brazil), postdoctoral researcher and visiting professor at the Center for Research on Speech, Acoustics, Language and Music (CEFALA, Electronics Engineering Department, Univer-sidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil) and at the Center for Studies on Musical Gesture and Expres-sion (CEGeME, School of Music, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil), visiting researcher at the Input Devices and Music Interaction Laboratory (IDMIL, Music Technology Department, McGill University, Canada, 2012– 2013), music producer, and audio engineer (Tremor Void Studios, Brazil).

Marc R. Thompson received his doctorate from the University of Jyväskylä, Finland in 2012. His dissertation focused on embodiment in musical production and perception, and consisted of studies exploring the role of the body within various musical activities including piano performance, con-ducting, and African dance. As member of the Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Music Research, his interests include entrainment in music performance, gesture- controlled musical interfaces, and university pedagogy. Employed by the University of Jyväskylä’s Department of Music, his current post is Senior Lecturer in Music, Mind & Technology.

Petri Toiviainen received the degree of M.Sc. in Theoretical Physics in 1987 and the degree of Ph.D. in Musicology in 1996, both at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. During 2008– 2013, he lead the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Music Research, located at the universities of Jyväskylä and Helsinki. Currently, he holds an Academy Professorship granted by the Academy of Finland. His research interests include music and movement, perception of rhythm and tonality, emo-tions in music, sound and music computing, and music visualization.

Fredrik Ullén is Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at Karolinska Institutet (Sweden). His research focuses on the neuropsychology of expertise and creativity (i.e., the brain mechanisms that allow us to perform at a high level within a specific field), using music as a model domain. Methodologically his team combines neuroimaging with experimental psychology and behavior genetic analyses. He

Page 26: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xxv

is also active as a professional pianist and has recorded more than 20 CDs, primarily on BIS Records. He is a lifetime fellow of the Swedish Royal Academy of Music since 2007.

Edith Van Dyck holds a Ph.D. in Musicology from IPEM, Ghent University, Belgium and cur-rently works as a postdoctoral fellow at the same institute. Since 2009, she has been focusing on action- perception coupling in musical interaction and published several papers regarding the influ-ence of music features and human emotions on music- induced movement. She is also a collaborator in the EU- project BeatHealth, which aims at exploiting the link between rhythmical auditory infor-mation and movement for boosting motor performance and enhancing health and wellness.

Leon van Noorden is Visiting Research Professor in Music and Movement at IPEM, Ghent Uni-versity, since 2005. He holds a degree in Technical Physics (1970) and a Ph.D. from the Technical University Eindhoven on “Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences” (1975). After 30 years in industry and government, he returned to his favorite activity: music perception and action research. He started learning to play the cello in 1953 and has been involved ever since with experi-mental and acousmatic music.

Raven van Noorden got a Master of Arts degree in Radio- TV-Film and a Master of Fine Arts degree in Graphic Design from Indiana State University in 2008. She worked at IPEM, Ghent Univer-sity, for four years, where she assisted in visual design for research projects, including motion capture, video and animations, and poster design. Right now she works in the Brussels edu- toys shop The Grasshopper, where her tasks include website design and managing the book collection.

Manuel Varlet is Research Lecturer at the MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development in the Music Cognition and Action group (Australia). His research focuses on the processes under-lying unintentional and intentional movement synchronization to other people and environmental rhythms using behavioral and neurophysiological methods. Before joining MARCS, Dr. Varlet was researcher at the EuroMov Centre of Montpellier University (France) and the Centre for Cognition, Action and Perception of the University of Cincinnati (USA).

Peter Vuust is director of the Center for Music in the Brain (MIB), a center of excellence of the Dan-ish National Research Foundation, and Professor at the Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Uni-versity, Denmark. His works have resulted in more than 50 original research articles in peer- reviewed international journals, several contributions to books, and a remarkable outreach effort. Furthermore, Peter Vuust is an active bass player and composer. As musician and composer, he appears on more than 85 records, six of these as bandleader, featuring international jazz stars.

Marcelo M. Wanderley is Professor of Music Technology at McGill University, Montreal, Canada, and International Chair at Inria Lille, France. His research made early contributions to the evaluation of musical interfaces, the design of mapping in digital musical instruments, and the quantification of movement in performance. He co- edited the electronic book Trends in Gestural Control of Music, 2000; co- authored the textbook New Digital Musical Instruments: Control and Interaction Beyond the Keyboard, 2006; and chaired the 2003 International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME03).

Eitan Wilf received his Ph.D. in anthropology from the University of Chicago in 2010 and is cur-rently a Senior Lecturer at the Hebrew University. He research interests focus on the institutional transformations of creative practice in the U.S. He has conducted ethnographic research on the insti-tutionalization of jazz music in academic programs, on efforts to develop art- producing computerized

Page 27: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Notes on Contributors

xxvi

algorithms, and on business innovation and organizational creativity. Wilf is the author of School for Cool: The Academic Jazz Program and the Paradox of Institutionalized Creativity (University of Chicago Press, 2014).

Hani C. Yehia is Electronics Engineer, M.Sc. (Technological Institute of Aeronautics, 1988, 1992) and Doctor of Electrical Engineering (Nagoya University, 1997). He was researcher at ATR Laboratories, Japan (1996–1998); dean of the Graduate Program in Electrical Engineering of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Brazil (2005 to 2009); head of the technology incubator INOVA- UFMG (2011–2013); and resident professor at the UFMG Institute of Advanced Transdisciplinary Studies (2013–2015). Currently, he is full Professor at the UFMG Department of Electronics Engineering and head of the Center for Research on Speech, Acoustics, Language and Music (CEFALA).

Anna Zamm is a Ph.D. candidate in Psychology at McGill University, working with Caroline Palmer. Her work focuses on identifying behavioral and neural factors that allow musicians to achieve interpersonal synchrony. She received her Bachelor of Science degree in Music and Psychology at Indiana University.

Page 28: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

xxvii

The publication of The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction has been a collective ven-ture that benefited from the input of many individuals around the world. A companion is to a large extent as good as the chapters it brings together. We have been fortunate in being able to attract outstanding contributors from a wide range of geographic locations and scientific disciplines. We are extremely grateful to all of our contributors, for their enthusiasm and ability to produce work of high quality within tight deadlines and word limits. The extent to which they succeeded in writ-ing stimulating and insightful chapters, which identify opportunities for others, is evidence of their committed scholarship toward the new field of Embodied Music Interaction. Also, we are indebted to the many anonymous reviewers who evaluated the chapters at different stages of development and provided guidance, support, and insight. Their generous donation of time and skill, and dedication to knowledge and its dissemination is reflected in the book. However, no work of this nature could be produced without the support provided by the publisher. We are very thankful to Genevieve Aoki, editor at Routledge Music, and her team, for giving us the opportunity to share our knowledge with the scientific community of music and movement and related disciplines. Obviously, we would like to express our gratitude to all our colleagues at IPEM, our home institution at Ghent University, who we consulted in the course of planning the volume. Work on the book was supported by a Methusalem grant of the Flemish Government.

Micheline Lesaffre, Pieter-Jan Maes, and Marc Leman

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Page 30: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

1

INTRODUCTIONWhat Is Embodied Music Interaction?

Marc Leman, Micheline Lesaffre, and Pieter- Jan Maes

Since the time of the Ancient Greeks, human interaction with music has roused scientists’ curiosity. People have a profound intuitive understanding of music, for example, when they play it or when they use it to enhance social activity or to regulate their emotional arousal. However, this understanding tells us little about the “whys” and “wherefores” of these interactions with music. How can we bridge this gap, and how instrumental is our scientific understanding once we have done so?

A major problem for scientists is the complex and multi- faceted way in which music manifests itself. It appears as sound but also as a variety of cultural styles; as experience but also as awareness of that experience. Music stimulates senses, enriches insight, sharpens identity, gives strength, reveals community values, and deepens social connections; it addresses the individual person as well as the social group; practicing music requires sophisticated sensorimotor skills as well as theoretical insight. In short, music appears to be inside us, outside us, and among us— a shared cultural phenomenon. An overall comprehensive understanding would focus on the fundamental principles that underlie these multiple facets.

The concept of “embodiment” has turned out to be extremely useful for our understanding of the principles underpinning music interaction. Essentially, the term refers to human action as expressed through corporeal articulations and body movements. Over the last decade or so, it has been pointed out that embodiment is a tangible property of human– music interaction. Its sensorimotor founda-tions and the role it plays in different musical contexts is one of the major sources of our understand-ing of the fundamental principles behind human– music interaction.

The basic insight is in fact rather simple. Rather than considering a listener, say, as a mind that receives input (music) and produces output (e.g., descriptions of perceived emotions or dance move-ments), the embodied way of understanding considers a listener in a closed interacting loop with her or his musical environment. This loop is constrained by the human body, hence “embodied.” It is assumed that human musical action and perception are reciprocal processes that fuel that loop, and that action and prediction are co- determined by constraints of the musical environment, as well as by those of the (corporeal) organism that interacts within it. Music is something that the listener interacts with, using sensorimotor, cognitive, emotional, and energetic abilities that optimize the interaction; it can be seen as an expression of the embodied mind. And insofar as music also appears as a materialized cultural phenomenon (e.g., in scores, recordings, and concert halls), this human mind is also extended; it reaches outside the brain into the environment, where it has created situations that afford musical interactions.

Page 31: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Marc Leman et al.

2

The focus on embodied music interaction offers a means of understanding that is based on dynamic and ecological principles. In this light, it should come as no surprise that the main concepts, empirical studies, and modeling approaches that are reviewed in this Routledge Companion stem from those principles. In what follows in this introductory chapter, we briefly discuss the major trends in our current understanding of human– music interaction. These trends can be identified along three axes of scientific understanding, called “clarification,” “evidence,” and “modeling.” Afterward, a brief sum-mary of the structure of this Companion is provided.

Clarification of Concepts

The first axis of scientific understanding concerns the clarification of concepts. Given the rapid nature of progress in science research, it is necessary to refine and develop concepts that improve under-standing and make it easier, while developing new ideas for evidence- based research and modeling. Currently in psychology and neuroscience, dynamic theories stand out as the dominant accounts to explain the brain’s functions. Music research, therefore, addresses dynamic constraints, meaning formation, and social aspects by focusing on bottom- up and top- down flows (between senses and knowledge), as well as human– music flows (between intentions and sounds).

Constraints on Embodied Interaction with Music

Embodied music interaction manifests itself through activities with sounds (listening, playing, danc-ing), with other people (as in joint action), as well as with music instruments and within the body (as a mediator for music playing). The interactions are constrained, though, by acoustical structures (both in music and in the radiation of sounds), by cognitive activities (limitations of memory, atten-tion, learning), and by body resonances, biomechanical, and metabolic and energetic restrictions. Many authors believe that musical constraints can be better understood by considering the tim-ing of embodied interactions, such as the rhythmic coordination of the human body with external musical rhythms, given the nature of music as a temporal art form. This field of study started with experiments in which subjects were asked to tap their finger along with metronomes and with music. However, different chapters in this Companion show that more complex forms of interacting, such as full- body interaction, dyadic interactions, or even the interaction of multiple musicians, have now become feasible for study. Clarification is, therefore, focused on definitions of concepts such as syn-chronization, entrainment, stable interaction, the role of variability in maintaining those interactions, and so on. These concepts provide the cornerstones for a dynamic systems approach in which con-straints delimit the arena for embodied interactions with music.

How Embodied Music Interaction Contributes to Meaning Formation

A dynamic systems approach should explain how embodied interactions might lead to musical meaning, or awareness of sense and significance, although there are different ways in which this can be understood. For example, meanings may arise from an individual’s attempt to maintain stability or joint action and collaboration in a changing musical environment. However, meanings also seem to require awareness, and therefore, attention to particular aspects of the embodied interaction. Of particular interest is the concept of musical affordance, which points to structural “meaningful” features in music that potentially match with humans’ interaction capabilities. Musical affordances, such as metrical structure, can therefore be conceived as extended meanings contained in structures outside the human brain. They facilitate embodied interactions, such as precise synchronization, and they guide attention and awareness of musical events at higher levels of meaning formation. Several chapters also point to the fact that different layers of meanings may represent different layers

Page 32: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

What Is Embodied Music Interaction?

3

of interactive awareness, from sensed qualities of sounds up to verbal summaries and narratives of lived experiences.

Why Embodied Music Interaction Is Social

The dynamic systems approach is well- suited to one of the major new directions in music research, namely the study of social music interaction (for example, in ensemble playing or dancing in a group). Several chapters in this Companion focus on entrainment and mutual adaptation between perform-ing musicians. Such dynamic embodied interactions within a group of people raise the problem of how to understand co- representations and collective goals in relation to individual sensorimotor and cognitive performing. The joint actions performed in ensemble playing could provide a controlled setting in which to investigate characteristically human social cognitive processes and social interac-tive dynamics, and within that framework, agency can help us explain the experience of interactivity.

Empirical Evidence

The second axis of understanding concerns empirical evidence for hypotheses, explanatory models, or even predictive models that make up the above conceptual framework. Gathering empirical evidence is a primary characteristic of modern music research, and reliable knowledge forms the cornerstone of the instrumental power of our understanding (as shown in modeling and its applications). A major trend is concerned with measurements of embodiment in ecological settings. Evidence is based on new tools for measurement, gathering data in ecological settings, and focusing on social interactions.

New Technologies for Gathering Empirical Evidence

Over the past decade, new measuring technologies for empirical data gathering have become avail-able for common use in research. The use of monitoring technologies (cameras and sensors) enabling corporeal articulations to be measured in the course of music interactions has been of particular importance. This work has a focus on bodily motion and physiological responses, and its goal is often to understand their relationship with sound patterns. However, data about music interaction is not restricted to work using cameras and sensors. Studies are often based on different types of measures and combinations of measures; for example, analysis might take into account people’s body move-ments during interaction with music in combination with their prior and following verbal commu-nication as well as the observation of the ongoing interaction in its social- cultural context, often using methods from anthropology.

Ecological Settings and New Ways of Getting Data

This Routledge Companion reveals a clear trend toward studying embodied music interaction in ecological settings, such as real listening, dancing, and music contexts. Ecological settings have a major advantage over the research laboratory because they allow for the study of human embodied interac-tion “in the wild,” so to speak. This is of particular relevance to the idea that the human brain (as co- controller of interaction) works differently under a brain scanner (when lying still) than it does in the wild (when involved with actions). However, in comparison with laboratory conditions, the ecological approach requires clever experimental design in order to control for added variables. New ways of dealing with these designs are often based on hypotheses that adopt the above- mentioned dynamic systems approach. For example, studying interaction among ensemble musicians, one might disturb the timing output of one member of the group in a particular way and then observe how the ensemble recovers collectively.

Page 33: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Marc Leman et al.

4

Alongside this emphasis on ecological settings, there is an agenda to simulate ecological settings in the laboratory and, even better, to bring the laboratory to the ecological setting. For dancing and ensemble playing, both options are feasible. However, the latter development, bringing the laboratory to the real world, poses many challenges to methodology, but it may turn out to be very fruitful, especially in combination with an epistemology based on dynamic systems and embodied interactions.

Incorporating Fieldwork Evidence

Besides the laboratory, and experimental work in ecological settings, this Routledge Companion also reveals an important trend of field studies. Two principal directions for these are cultural studies and studies related to human well- being. Cultural studies (in anthropology and ethnography) reveal that broader social and cultural processes provide a top- down complement to a bottom- up understanding of embodied music interactions. Worldviews, traditional idioms, expressive styles, and even narra-tives and linguistic structures provide contexts that are influential for embodied music interactions. Evidence based on fieldwork supports the idea of a bottom- up and top- down dynamic flow that connects sensorimotor activity with cultural codes, expressions, and meaning. The anthropological perspective reveals how embodied music interactions are culturally shaped, while the body is biologi-cally designed to achieve particular culturally specific goals.

Studies related to well- being offer real- world test cases for applying our understanding of embod-ied music interactions. Applications in that domain reveal that an evidence- based understanding of music can be instrumental and proactive; our understanding of embodied music interactions can effectuate changes in the field, for example, by contributing to more effective programs for training sensorimotor abilities.

Modeling and Applications

The third axis of understanding concerns modeling and applications of modeling. Modeling offers an instrumental understanding of embodied music interactions, and this understanding paves the way for applications that may have a practical impact in the domain of study.

A Dynamical, Process- Based Approach

Musical phenomena are often complex and multi- faceted. On top of that, increasing accessibility and use of new technologies confront researchers with vast amounts of data. But how can we deal with these complexities? Two important approaches tend to prevail in music science. First, musical phe-nomena are explained by analyses of constituent components and conditions, assuming that these parts are relatively independent and that individual properties add up to the whole. Second, statistical test-ing focuses on averages (average behavior, average differences, etc.) and often neglects (time-varying) change. Though both approaches have their merits, they also have their shortcomings. The former is problematic as musical phenomena often have emergent properties that are not predictable from and reducible to their parts. The latter is problematic as musical phenomena often unfold and change over time and attach great importance to deviation, surprise, and novelty.

In order to meet these challenges, process- based, dynamical system approaches offer a holistic approach— rather than to a viewpoint of parts and wholes— that takes processes of interaction at its core. This touches upon a fundamental meaning of the interaction concept, which is central to this Companion. From that perspective, form and regularity, change and evolution, emerge from dynamical interaction effects and constraints at lower levels rather than being externally imposed, as for example by a central human mind. This focus on the processes of interaction, being self- organizing and emergent,

Page 34: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

What Is Embodied Music Interaction?

5

entails focusing on time- varying aspects within music- based interactions, including temporal patterns of change (instabilities, transitions) and recurrence (stability).

Modeling Music- Based Interaction

Given the different types of interaction that are possible with music, it will be no surprise that a broad range of methods for measuring corporeal articulations is introduced in this Companion, such as mea-surement of physiological changes of arousal, of micro- movements, of gestures, and so on. Accord-ingly, different techniques are used to process and analyze the data. Various analysis and modeling methods are discussed, pertaining to the dynamical, process- based viewpoint. These include recur-rence quantification analysis, methods to deal with variability, dynamic Bayesian networks, machine learning methods, resilience models that emphasize organization processes, a dynamical systems view on synchronization, analysis methods for complexity reduction and similarity, brain hyper- scanning to analyze the coupling between individuals’ brain, and so on. These analysis and modeling methods are applied in a wide range of contexts that involve music- based interactions (music performance, dance, synchronization, etc.).

Applications for Music- Based Interaction

In combination with appropriate analysis and modeling techniques, new technologies may contribute to fundamental knowledge of the “whys” and “wherefores” of people’s interaction with music. In addition, they may facilitate the development of new applications for embodied music- based interac-tion. Typically, these allow an accurate sensing and tracking of human movements and physiologi-cal processes (for expressive control and interaction), which may be mapped to audio technologies (including audio databases, music information retrieval technology, audio synthesis and analysis, and others) so that the system can respond. Thus, interaction in these applications may range from sys-tems that accept input from humans to control specific pre- determined processes, to more advanced systems that facilitate interactions (agent–agent, agent(s)–audio processing) for the benefit of inducing specific behavior or musical output (as in sonification), or systems from which unplanned behavior and musical output may emerge. Music- based interactive systems may be useful in a multitude of domains, including the arts, education, sports, rehabilitation, and gaming. Interestingly, many of these systems allow for fruitful interaction between practice- based and research- based purposes.

An Introduction to the Chapters in This Companion

This Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction brings together state- of-the-art research in the domain of embodied music interaction research. The volume contains 47 chapters, and it is divided into seven sections, whose contents are briefly reviewed here. Each section is related to core topics within the field, and collectively, their goal is to outline theories, methods, approaches, topics, realiza-tions, and innovations that are expected to shape music research in the coming decades. Despite their structuring in separate sections, the three main axes of understanding embodied music interaction (clarification, evidence, modeling) pervade this entire structure.

Part 1: Dynamical Music Interaction Theories and Concepts

This first part outlines the dynamical perspective on embodied music interaction, focusing on the particular tension between sensorimotor principles and their potential to shape musical experiences and meanings. In his chapter, “The interactive dialectics of musical meaning formation,” Marc Leman introduces a dynamic model (based on dialectics) in which embodied music interaction states are

Page 35: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Marc Leman et al.

6

assessed and connected with reward mechanisms that provide the drive to engage in meaning forma-tion. These embodied interactions with music are constrained, as shown by Guy Madison, Fredrik Ullén, and Björn Merker in their chapter entitled “Metrically structured time and entrainment.” By focusing on metrical levels in music, they show how musical structure enables and facilitates precise embodied interactions (synchronization) for different tempi and rhythms. In line with the dynamic systems approach, Andrea Schiavio and Hanne De Jaegher argue in “Participatory sense- making in joint musical practice” that musical interactivity is a form of meaning formation, in which participants negotiate in real time their emotional, sensorimotor, and communicative skills. The basic conceptual apparatus is further explored in “Playing with the beat: A process- oriented approach to studying sensorimotor synchronization in early childhood,” by Ana Almeida, Katie Overy, and Dorothy Miell, whose focus on sensorimotor synchronization in early childhood shows how a developing child freely chooses to dynamically interact with the beat and thus to self- regulate their unique perceptual experi-ence and meanings.

Following this, Luc Nijs focuses on the musical instrument as tool for music making in his chapter entitled “The merging of musician and musical instrument: Incorporation, presence, and levels of embodiment.” He outlines a conceptual approach to the musician– instrument relationship, in which he argues that the very idea of “being one with the instrument” is not a disembodied construct of the mind but is based on the global availability of a sensorimotor experience at a deeper and unconscious level. This reconnects with the idea of meaning formation and building musical knowledge, which Mark Reybrouck develops further in his chapter, “Music knowledge construction: Enactive, ecologi-cal, and biosemiotic claims,” taking an enactive viewpoint that draws further on a distinction between representations and experiences.

Part 2: Expressive Gestural Interaction

Expressive gestures form the basis of embodied music interactions. Understanding expressive gestures in relation to musical structures, cognitive abilities, and cultural habits is a key challenge. In “Cognitive and sensorimotor resources for the encoding of expressiveness during music playing,” Muzaffer Çorlu, Pieter- Jan Maes, and Marc Leman review studies that probe the precise role of cognitive resources (needed for attention and working memory) and motor skills (needed for rapid movements) in rela-tion to the musician’s encoding of musical expression. In “Beyond emotion: Multi- sensory responses to musical expression,” Giovanni De Poli, Maddalena Murari, Sergio Canazza, Antonio Rodà, and Emery Schubert discuss how expression in music has cross- modal associations in color, temperature, and taste. The chapter shows that sensory ratings make an important, independent, and reliable con-tribution to understanding expressiveness. Bruno Gingras, in his chapter “Conveying expressivity and individuality in keyboard performance,” focuses on the specific case of how expression is communi-cated by means of keyboard performances.

The dynamics of expressive gestural interaction is explored in a chapter by Donald Glowinski, Fabrizio Bracco, Carlo Chiorri, and Didier Grandjean, called “The resilience approach to study-ing group interaction in music ensemble.” They propose the notion of resilience as a framework for understanding the dynamics of group processes in music ensemble playing. In this kind of interaction, musicians deal with the control of actions, and following this, in “Agency in embodied music interac-tion,” Nikki Moran presents an explicit definition of agency as it pertains to the study of embodied music interaction. Of particular interest in understanding gestures are postures and motions that shape expression. Rolf Inge Godøy focuses on landmarks for both motion and sound, and on how co- articulation of motion units creates coherent sound- motion objects in musical expression in his chapter “Postures and motion shaping musical experience.” This focus on expression leads in a natural way also to emotional communication. Edith Van Dyck, Birgitta Burger, and Konstantina Orlandatou review the different types of dance movements prompted by a range of emotional states in “The

Page 36: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

What Is Embodied Music Interaction?

7

communication of emotions in dance.” They conclude that people express emotional content (either felt, perceived, portrayed, or a combination of these) in their dance moves, and that these emotions can be recognized successfully.

Part 3: Social Music Interaction

The chapters in this part focus on social interaction and questions related to how humans adapt their movement to correspond to the presence of other humans while listening to and/or producing music. Issues such as spontaneous synchronization, sense of agency, joint action, shared intention, social bond-ing, and entrainment in music and movement are discussed. Tom Cochrane explains why musicians enjoy their experiences of intense interpersonal absorption, as if collectively taken over by the music, in his chapter “Group flow.” He develops a new model in which group flow is related to the loss of the usual experience of mismatch between intentions and outcome. Tommi Himberg, in “Entrain-ment and mutual adaptation in musical movement and dance,” develops an interactionist embodied theoretical framework that emphasizes the primacy of social interaction and bodily entrainment as the basis of musical cognition. Along similar lines, Jennifer MacRitchie, Manuel Varlet, and Peter Keller review how co- performers coordinate their actions through gestures that reflect expressive goals in their chapter called “Embodied expression through entrainment and co- representation in musical ensemble performance.” They consider the hypothesis that successful ensemble music performance may be supported both by dynamical entrainment of movements and task co- representation, and they discuss evidence for the contribution and interaction of both processes. Joint action is also the focus for John Michael in his chapter on “Music performance as joint action.” He sees joint action as a microcosm of human sociality in general, and as an ideal context in which to study characteristically human forms of social cognition and social interaction.

A case study is provided by François Pachet, Pierre Roy, and Raphaël Foulon in their chapter “Do jazz improvisers really interact? The score effect in collective jazz improvisation.” They show that cor-relates of acoustical content- based interaction in a typical jazz quintet are actually hard to find given the current state of the art in analysis. They argue that either content- based interaction in jazz is a myth, or that interactions do take place but at unknown musical dimensions. Davi Mota, Mauricio Loureiro, and Rafael Laboissière put their emphasis on the gestural dimension of music interaction. In “Gestural interactions in ensemble performance,” they propose that musicians exhibit signature- like gestural patterns while playing solo, and that these patterns change during ensemble interactions. Interpersonal interactions are further studied in the chapter entitled “Interpersonal coordination in dyadic performance” by Marc R. Thompson, Georgios Diapoulis, Tommi Himberg, and Petri Toiviainen. They show that dyadic musical performance provides an excellent framework for studying interper-sonal coordination, because it involves multiple agents performing matched, rhythmic, and/or inter-active behaviors. They show that normal performances are more interpersonally coordinated than deadpan and exaggerated performances. Following this, Leon van Noorden, Leen De Bruyn, Raven van Noorden, and Marc Leman show how children between two and eight years old interact with musical melodies in different tempi in “Embodied social synchronization in children’s musical devel-opment.” They present a model that consists of a harmonic oscillator with resonance frequency near 120 beats per minute (BPM) and learning curves of increasing damping and precision of synchroniza-tion between two and eight years old.

Part 4: Sociological and Anthropological Approaches

This part contains field studies and observational approaches that contribute to a better understanding of how embodied music interactions work in real contexts. In his chapter entitled “Embodied inter-action with ‘sonic agents’: An anthropological perspective,” Filippo Bonini Baraldi draws on field

Page 37: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Marc Leman et al.

8

research studies in Romania and Brazil, which suggest that strong emotional experiences with music may be related to the co- presence of two different types of embodied musical interaction— one in the social domain, among the performance participants, and the other with “sonic agents.” In “The ethnography of embodied music interaction,” Martin Clayton gives a historical overview of the study of interaction within ethnomusicology. On the basis of past research, he highlights some important approaches and theories, such as the relationship between group bonding and individual expression, the nature of hierarchy and leadership in musical ensembles, and the distinction between scripted musical encounters and performances. Thereafter, in “Combat-dancing, cultural transmission, and choreomusicology: The globalization of embodied repertoires of sound and movement,” Paul Mason argues that expressive systems that exhibit strong interactions between sound and gesture spread more robustly than systems that exhibit only modest sound- gesture relationships, on the basis of case studies in Asia and Brazil. Along similar lines, in “The Hiplife Zone: Cultural transformation processes in African music seen from the angle of embodied music interactions,” Dominik Phyfferoen, Koenraad Stroeken, and Marc Leman argue that key elements of embodied music interaction seem to play an important role in an ongoing idiomatic transformation process in Africa, due to globalization.

From a more sociological and educational perspective, Eitan Wilf ’s chapter, “Crafting the playing body as an infrastructure of ‘immediate’ and ‘mediate’ embodied music cognition in an academic jazz program,” focuses on the role of corporeal intentionality in training students to develop new musi-cal ideas while improvising. Elvira Brattico and Peter Vuust, in their chapter, “Brain-to-brain cou-pling and culture as prerequisites for musical interaction,” address neural processes underlying mutual interaction and understanding between co- performers and listeners during musical experience. They argue that musical culture influences the judgement of sounds as pleasant, beautiful, or harmonious, and that the agreement among individuals depends on prior experience and predispositions. They see brain- to-brain coupling on a common cultural ground as the key to mutual interaction between co- performers and listeners during a musical experience.

Part 5: Empowering Health and Well- being

The chapters in Part 5 review research that focuses on the reinforcing power of music- movement interaction, either as therapeutic intervention, as everyday activity, or as exercises. Many chapters emphasize that motivation is a critical element of embodied music interactions. Danilo Spada and Emmanuel Bigand review the many advantages of music for cognitive stimulation in healthy people and patients in “Coupling music and motion: From special education to rehabilitation.” They show how practicing music contributes to stimulating the potential plasticity of the brain and its func-tional properties, both in persons affected by visual sensory deficiency and in patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease. Lars Ole Bonde, in “Embodied music listening,” develops a perspective on music therapy based on guided imagery, an embodied music listening interaction that can be used for a diverse set of clinical purposes and for personal development. In “Jymmin—The medical potential of musical euphoria,” Thomas Hans Fritz demonstrates the benefits of a combination of sports activ-ity and music making. He describes how physically evoked arousal may be re- evaluated and experi-enced as emotional arousal in association with a healthy workout movement. Costas I. Karageorghis, Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Jonathan M. Bird, and Marcelo Bigliassi’s chapter, entitled “Music in the exercise and sport domain: Conceptual approaches and underlying mechanisms,” provides an over-view of the key concepts and theoretical frameworks pertaining to the study and application of music in the exercise and sport domain. Among these is a recent theoretical model that addresses the ante-cedents, moderators, and consequences of music use, the dual- mode model of exercise- related affect, and the principles of rhythmic entrainment.

In “Monitoring music and movement interaction in people with dementia,” Micheline Lesaffre, Frank Desmet, and Bart Moens discuss technologies for monitoring spontaneous movement responses

Page 38: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

What Is Embodied Music Interaction?

9

of seniors with dementia interacting with music. Although the dementia patients impose a number of constraints on the technology that can be used, it is shown that the monitoring of sensorimotor interactions may provide new opportunities for dementia studies. Nia Cason, Loris Schiaratura, and Séverine Samson point out that synchronization to music and to others can enhance interpersonal coordination, in “Synchronization to music as a tool for enhancing non- verbal communication in people with neurological diseases.” On those grounds, they argue that synchronization can improve social functioning and non- verbal communication skills, which is assumed to be highly relevant for rehabilitation in patients with communication difficulties. Movement optimization using music is discussed in Rebecca Schaefer and Scott Grafton’s chapter, “Modifying movement optimization pro-cesses with music.” Those authors focus on how energy expenditure and movement vigor may be altered when moving to music, relating this alteration to both music- structural and listener- specific characteristics.

Part 6: Modeling Music Interaction

Evidence-based work on embodied music interaction raises some important questions about mod-eling. The chapters in this part discuss specific methods for analyzing, modeling, and predicting music- based interactions. Denis Amelynck introduces the fundamentals in “Modeling music interac-tion,” and he shows why complexity reduction and similarity models are essential for handling data on embodied music interaction. In “Analyzing complex datasets based on the variability framework, distribution analysis, and generalized linear modeling,” Frank Desmet focuses on statistical thinking in relation to variation, sample distribution, and generalized linear modeling as a tool to handle com-plex datasets on embodied music interaction. Alexander Demos and Roger Chaffin, in their chap-ter, “Removing obstacles to the analysis of movement in musical performance: Recurrence, mixed models, and surrogates,” provide an overview of how recurrence quantification analysis and surrogate time- series methods can be used to compare movements across performers and performances, and to identify similarities reliably. They explain the statistical issues involved in assessing the reliability of relationships between movement and music. Baptiste Caramiaux, Jules Françoise, and Frédéric Bevilacqua show how a probabilistic Bayesian framework can handle multi- level temporal structures and variability in observed movement data, in particular for addressing important challenges in musi-cal interactions such as co- articulation and coordination in “Dynamic Bayesian networks for musical interaction.”

In “Temporal dependencies in the expressive timing of classical piano performances,” Maarten Grachten and Carlos Eduardo Cancino Chacón discuss various modeling approaches that attempt to capture how expressive timing is shaped by information present in the written score, and they show how expressive timing can be predicted. Caroline Palmer and Anna Zamm, in their chapter called “Interactions in ensemble music performance: Empirical and mathematical accounts,” focus on complex interactions arising among performers. They review empirical findings of factors that influ-ence temporal coordination in ensemble music performance and focus on mathematical theories of temporal coordination. Finally, Euler C. F. Teixeira, Mauricio Loureiro, and Hani C. Yehia show how the expressive content imposed by the music structure is reflected in clarinet playing. In “Linking movement recurrence to expressive patterns in music performance,” they show strong correlations between the clarinetists’ ancillary movements and expressive parameters.

Part 7: Music- Based Interaction Technologies and Applications

The final part, devoted to technologies and applications, illustrates how our understanding of embod-ied human– music interaction can be used proactively as an instrument to have an impact on our environment. The chapters emphasize the incorporation of electronic and digital Human- Computer

Page 39: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Marc Leman et al.

10

Interaction (HCI) technologies in the field of music performance, with a particular focus on creative and artistic applications. Frédéric Bevilacqua, Norbert Schnell, Jules Françoise, Eric Boyer, Diemo Schwarz, and Baptiste Caramiaux present a general methodology for designing musical interac-tive systems, using movement sensing and descriptor- based synthesis of recorded sound materials in “Designing action– sound metaphors using motion sensing and descriptor- based synthesis of recorded sound materials.” They focus on action– sound metaphors that can be built upon features of recorded sound materials and their possible relationships to human movement. Nicolas d’Alessandro, in his chapter entitled “Designing for the subtle: A systematic approach toward expressivity in new musical interfaces,” presents HandSketch, a digital tablet that produces an expressive artificial singing voice. He discusses how skilled motor control on a digital musical instrument can be used to study complex auditory phenomena. In “Gestural agency in human– machine musical interaction,” Juan Ignacio Mendoza and Marc R. Thompson consider how, in such music making, both the machine and the human can be modeled as embodied cognitive agents that comprise a network of musical gestures allowing mutual influence. Following this, in “Gestural musical performance with physiological sen-sors, focusing on the electromyogram,” Atau Tanaka and Miguel Ortiz show how physiological signals of muscle tension (the electromyogram or EMG) can be used as an interface for gestural music systems. They provide a historical account of the artistic use of physiological signals in human– music interac-tions. In “Sonic microinteraction in ‘the air’,” Alexander Refsum Jensenius shows how micromotion, the smallest controllable and perceivable human body motion, was used in the scientific- artistic proj-ect Sverm. Finally, Joseph Malloch and Marcelo M. Wanderley discuss different uses of digital musical instruments and investigate how theories of embodied cognition and embodied interaction might be gainfully applied to understanding them, in “Embodied cognition and digital musical instruments: Design and performance.”

Conclusions

The music community’s understanding of human interaction with music copes well with major trends in cognitive science, but music is unique, and it offers an excellent domain to explore, test, and push forward the insights of cognitive science. As mentioned, these insights are currently inspired by a dynamic systems approach that involves ecological data gathering in view of an instrumental outlook that is based on our understanding of embodiment.

The scientific challenges are huge. Traditionally, the approach to music has concentrated on music perception, cognition, and expressive communication. Currently however, the focus is broadened to a much wider range of embodied interactions afforded by music. Indeed, the extent and variety of daily life situations in which people interact with music is truly remarkable, touching upon a wide range of sensory, motor, sensorimotor, affective, cognitive, and social functions. This Routledge Com-panion to Embodied Music Interaction offers a unique insight on the state of the art of a fascinating field of research.

Page 40: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Dynamical Music Interaction Theories and Concepts Apostel, L. (1979). Logique et dialectique: Studies in action theory. Ghent, Belgium: Communication andCognition. Barsalou, L. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 716�724. Bigand, E. , Delbé, C. , Poulin-Charronnat, B. , Leman, M. , & Tillmann, B. (2014). Empirical evidence for musicalsyntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory. Frontiers inSystems Neuroscience, 8(94), 1�27. Broeckx, J. L. (1981). Muziek, ratio en affect: Over de wisselwerking van rationeel denken en affectief belevenbij voortbrengst en ontvangst van muziek. Antwerp, Belgium: Metropolis. Broeckx, J. L. (1986). Behind and beyond �reason, emotion and music�: Anxious afterthoughts of an author. In L.Apostel , H. Sabbe , & F. Vandamme (Eds.), Reason, emotion and music (pp. 153�167). Ghent, Belgium:Communication & Cognition. Broeckx, J. L. (1997). Beyond metaphor: Musical figures or �Gestalte� as expressive icons. Journal of New MusicResearch, 26(3), 266�276. Collins, T. , Tillmann, B. , Barrett, F. S. , Delbé, C. , & Janata, P. (2014). A combined model of sensory andcognitive representations underlying tonal expectations in music: From audio signals to behavior. PsychologicalReview, 121(1), 33. Engel, A. , Maye, A. , Kurthen, M. , & König, P. (2013). Where�s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitivescience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 202�209. Friston, K. , Mattout, J. , & Kilner, J. (2011). Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics,104(1�2), 137�160. Godøy, R. (2010). Gestural affordances of musical sound. In R. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures:Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 103�125). New York, NY: Routledge. Godøy, R. , & M. Leman (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on music and gesture. London, UK: Ashgate. Hollerman, J. , & Schultz, W. (1998). Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of rewardduring learning. Nature Neuroscience, 1(4), 304�309. Hughes, G. , & Cresswell, M. (1968). An introduction to modal logic. London, UK: Methuen and Co. Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kunst, J. (1978). Making sense in music: An enquiry into the formal pragmatics of art. Ghent, Belgium:Communication and Cognition. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Langner, G. (2015). The neural code of pitch and harmony. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Large, E. , & Jones, M. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106(1), 119�159. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 21 Leman, M. , Nijs, L. , Maes, P.-J. , & Van Dyck, E. (2017). What is embodied music cognition? In Bader(Ed.), Springer handbook in systematic musicology. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal pitch space. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Maes, P.-J. , & Leman, M. (2013). The influence of body movements on children�s perception of music with anambiguous expressive character. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54682. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1008), 1�14. Meyer, L. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Moens, B. , & Leman, M. (2015). Alignment strategies for the entrainment of music and movement rhythms.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 86�93. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Nozaradan, S. , Peretz, I. , & Mouraux, A. (2012). Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meterembedded in a musical rhythm. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17572�17581. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Trainor, L. (2007). Hearing what the body feels: Auditory encoding and rhythmicmovement. Cognition, 105(3), 533�546. Reybrouck, M. (2014). Musical sense-making between experience and conceptualisation: The legacy of Peirce,Dewey and James. Interdisciplinary Studies in Musicology, 14, 184�196. Salimpoor, V. N. , Zald, D. H. , Zatorre, R. J. , Dagher, A. , & McIntosh, A. R. (2015). Predictions and the brain:How musical sounds become rewarding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 86�91. Schaefer, R. S. , & Overy, K. (2015). Motor responses to a steady beat. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337(1), 40�44. Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , Moelants, D. , & Leman, M. (2007). Walking on music. Human Movement Science,26(5), 769�785. Abler, W. L. (1989). On the particulate principle of self-diversifying systems. Journal of Social and BiologicalStruc tures, 12, 1�13. Bååth, R. , & Madison, G. (2012). The subjective difficulty of tapping to a slow beat. In E. Cambouropoulos , C.Tsougras , P. Mavromatis , & K. Pastiadis (Eds.) (p. 82). Thessaloniki, Greece: 12th International Conferenceon Music Perception and Production.

Page 41: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Bengtsson, I. , & Gabrielsson, A. (1977). Rhythm research in Uppsala. In Music, room, and acoustics (17th ed.,pp. 19�56). Stockholm, Sweden: Publications issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music. Brown, S. W. , & Jordania, J. (2011). Universals in the world�s musics. Psychology of Music, 41, 229�248 Butterfield, M. (2010). Participatory discrepancies and the perception of beats in jazz. Music Perception,27,157�176. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (vols. 1�2). London, UK: John Murray. Davies, M. , Madison, G. , Silva, P. , & Gouyon, F. (2013). The effect of microtiming deviations on theperception of groove in short rhythms. Music Perception, 30, 498�511 28 Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , Begosh, K. T. , Daniels, J. R. , & Marsh, K. L. (2012). Rocking to the beat:Effects of music and partner�s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: General, 141, 49�53. Fitch, W. T. (2013). Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: Distinguishing meter and pulse perception.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 68. Frühauf, J. , Kopiez, R. , & Platz, F. (2013). Music on the timing grid: The influence of microtiming on theperceived groove quality of a simple drum pattern performance. Music Perception, 17, 246�260. Fujioka, T. , Trainor, L. J. , Large, E. W. , & Ross, B. (2009). Beta and gamma rhythms in human auditorycortex during musical beat processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 89�92. Gabrielsson, A. (1985). Interplay between analysis and synthesis in studies of music performance and musicexperience. Music Perception, 3, 59�86. Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 501�602).San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Gouyon, F. (2007). Microtiming in �Samba de Roda��Preliminary experiments with polyphonic audio. In M. H. CruzTorres (Ed.), Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music (pp. 197�203). São Paulo, Brazil:Brazilian Computing Society. Grahn, J. A. , & Rowe, J. B. (2009). Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians andnonmusicians during beat perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7540�7548. Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioural and neuroscience findings andtheoretical directions. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72, 561�582. Hagen, E. H. , & Bryant, G. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature, 14, 21�51. Halpern, A. R. , & Darwin, C. L. (1982). Duration discrimination in a series of rhythmic events. Perception &Psychophysics, 31, 86�89. Harrar, V. , & Harris, L. R. (2008). The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimuluscombinations on the perception of simultaneity. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 517�524 Harrel, T. W. (1937). Factors influencing preference and memory for auditory rhythm. Journal of GeneralPsychology, 17, 63�104. Hedenkvist, H. , & Lind, K. (2007). Det är bra! Men svänger det?�en studie i hur musikpreferens påverkar skattningav sväng i musik. PwD Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Hellmer, K. , & Madison, G. (2014). Quantifying microtiming patterning and variability in drum kit recordings: Amethod and some data. Music Perception, 33(2), 147�162. Hodges, D. (1989). Why are we musical? Speculations on the evolutionary plausibility of musical bahavior.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 99, 7�22. Hurley, B. K. , Martens, P. A. , & Janata, P. (2014). Spontaneous sensorimotor coupling with multipart music.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1679�1696. Janata, P. , Tomic, S. T. , & Haberman, J. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of thegroove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 54�75. Jongsma, M. , Desain, P. , & Honing, H. (2004). Rhythmic context influences the auditory evoked potentials ofmusicians and nonmusicians. Biological Psychology, 66, 129�152. Jongsma, M. , Eichele, T. , Jenks, K. M. , Desain, P. , & Honing, H. (2005). Expectancy effects on omissionevoked potentials in musicians and non-musicians. Psychophysiology, 42, 191�201. Kauranen, K. , & Vanharanta, H. (1996). Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance ofupper and lower extremities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 515�525 Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kohno, M. (1993). Perceptual sense unit and echoic memory. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9,13�31. Madison, G. (2001). Variability in isochronous tapping: Higher-order dependencies as a function of inter tapinterval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 411�422 Madison, G. (2004). Detection of linear temporal drift in sound sequences: Principles and empirical evaluation.Acta Psychologica, 117, 95�118. Madison, G. (2006a). Duration specificity in the long-range correlation of human serial interval production.Physica D (Nonlinear Phenomena), 216, 301�306. Madison, G. (2006b). Experiencing groove induced by music: Consistency and phenomenology. MusicPerception, 24, 201�208. Madison, G. (2009). An auditory illusion of infinite tempo change based on multiple temporal levels. PLoS ONE,4(12), e8151. Madison, G. (2011). Cause and affect. A functional perspective on music and emotion. In F. Bacci & D. Melcher(Eds.), Art and the senses (pp. 329�350). London, UK: Oxford University Press. Madison, G. (2014). Sensori-motor synchronisation variability decreases with the number of metrical levels inthe stimulus signal. Acta Psychologica, 147, 10�16.

Page 42: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

29 Madison, G. , Gouyon, F. , Ullén, F. , & Hörnström, K. (2011). Modeling the tendency for music to inducemovement in humans: First correlations with some low-level audio descriptors across music genres. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1578�1594. Madison, G. , Karampela, O. , Ullén, F. , & Holm, L. (2013). Effects of practice on variability in an isochronousserial interval production task: asymptotical levels of tapping variability after training are similar to those ofmusicians. Acta Psychologica, 143, 119�128. Madison, G. , & Merker, B. (2002). On the limits of anisynchrony in pulse attribution. Psychological Research,66, 201�207. Madison, G. , & Merker, B. (2003). Consistency in listeners� ratings as a function of listening time. In R. Bresin(Ed.), Proceedings of the Stockholm music acoustics conference (pp. 639�642). Stockholm, Sweden: RoyalCollege of Technology. Madison, G. , & Merker, B. (2004). Human sensorimotor tracking of continuous subliminal deviations fromisochrony. Neuroscience Letters, 370, 69�73. Madison, G. , & Sioros, G. (2014). What musicians do to induce the sensation of groove in simple and complexmelodies, and how listeners perceive it. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 894. Mates, J. , Radil, T. , Müller, U. , & Pöppel, E. (1994). Temporal integration in sensorimotor synchronization.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 332�340 McDougall, H. G. , & Moore, S. T. (2005). Marching to the beat of the same drummer: The spontaneous tempoof human locomotion. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 1164�1173 McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press. Merker, B. (1999). Synchronous chorusing and the origins of music. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue1999�2000, Rhythm, Musical Narrative, and Origins of Human Communication, 59�73 Merker, B. (2000). Synchronous chorusing and human origins. In N. L. Wallin , B. Merker , & S. W. Brown(Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 315�327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Merker, B. (2002). Music: The missing Humboldt system. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 3�21. Merker, B. (2006). The uneven interface between culture and biology in human music. Music Perception,24,95�98. Merker, B. (2014). Groove or swing as distributed rhythmic consonance: Introducing the groove matrix.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 454. Merker, B. , Madison, G. , & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmicentrainment. Cortex, 45, 4�17. Merker, B. , Morley, I. , & Zuidema, W. (2015). Five fundamental constraints on theories of the origin of music.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140095. Meumann, E. (1894). Untersuchungen zur Psychologie und Esthetik des Rhythmus. Philosophische Studien,10,249�322. Miller, G. F. (2000). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In N. L. Wallin , B. Merker , & S. W.Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 329�360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Miller, G. F. (2011). The mating mind (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday. Naveda, L. , Gouyon, F. , Leman, M. , & Guedes, C. (2011). Microtiming patterns and interactions with musicalproperties in Samba music. Journal of New Music Research, 40, 225�238. Nozaradan, S. , Peretz, I. , Missal, M. , & Mouraux, A. (2011). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat andmeter. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234�10240. Nozaradan, S. , Zarouali, Y. , Peretz, I. , & Mouraux, A. (2015). Capturing with EEG the neural entrainment andcoupling underlying sensorimotor synchronization to the beat. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 736�747. Pinker, S. (2003). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London, UK: Penguin Books. Repp, B. H. (1999). Detecting deviations from metronomic timing in music: Effects of perceptual structure onthe mental timekeeper. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 529�548. Repp, B. H. (2002). Phase correction in sensorimotor synchronization: Nonlinearities in voluntary andinvoluntary responses to perturbations. Human Movement Science, 21, 1�37. Repp, B. H. (2003). Rate limits in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual sequences: Thesynchronization threshold and the benefits and costs of interval subdivision. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35,355�370 Repp, B. H. (2010). Self-generated interval subdivision reduces variability of synchronization with a very slowmetronome. Music Perception, 27, 389�397 Repp, B. H. , & Doggett, R. (2007). Tapping to a very slow beat: A comparison of musicians and nonmusicians.Music Perception, 24, 367�376 Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 403�452. 30 Seashore, C. E. (1947). In search of beauty in music. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Timing in solo and duet piano performances. Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology A, 36A, 577�595. Sioros, G. , Miron, M. , Davies, M. , Gouyon, F. , & Madison, G. (2014). Syncopation creates the sensation ofgroove in synthesized music examples. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1036. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic musictherapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1185. Wallin, N. L. , Merker, B. , & Brown, S. W. (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Warner, R. M. (1992). Cyclicity of vocal activity increases during conversation: Support for a nonlinear systemsmodel of dyadic social interaction. Behavioral Science, 37, 128�138.

Page 43: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Witek, M. A. G. , Clarke, E. F. , Wallentin, M. , Kringelbach, M. L. , & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9, e94446. Badino, L. , D�Ausilio, A. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Fadiga, L. (2014). Sensorimotor communication inprofessional quartets. Neuropsychologia, 55, 98�104. Behrends, A. , Müller, S. , & Dziobek, I. (2012). Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new interventionfostering empathy through interactional movement and dance. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39(2), 107�116 Bourbousson, J. , R�Kiouak, M. , & Eccles, D. W. (2015). The dynamics of team coordination: A social networkanalysis as a window to shared awareness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5),1�19. 37 Broughton, M. , & Stevens, C. (2009). Music, movement and marimba: An investigation of the role ofmovement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience. Psychology of Music, 37(2),137�153. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clayton, M. (2013). Entrainment, ethnography and musical interaction. In M. Clayton , B. Dueck , & L. Leante(Eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance (pp. 17�47), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: MITPress. Correia, N. N. , Tahiro�lu, K. , & Espada, M. (2013). PESI: Extending mobile music instruments with socialinteraction. In S. Jordà & N. Parés (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible,Embedded and Embodied Interaction. Barcelona, Spain. Davidson, J. W. (2005). Bodily communication in musical performance in musical communication. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousnessand Cognition, 18(2), 535�542. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition.Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485�507. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2013). Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(345). De Jaegher, H. , & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior,17(5), 444�460. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Kant, V. (2014). Toward a dynamical theory of body movement in musicalperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(477). Di Paolo, E. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28, 9�21. Di Paolo, E. , & De Jaegher, H. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(163). Di Paolo, E. , & De Jaegher, H. (2016). Neither individualistic, nor interactionist. In C. Durt , T. Fuchs , & C.Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture�Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 73�82).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fantasia, V. , De Jaegher, H. , & Fasulo, A. (2014). We can work it out: An enactive look at cooperation.Frontiers in Psychology, 5(874). Favela, L. H. (2014). Radical embodied cognitive neuroscience: Addressing �grand challenges� of the mindsciences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(796). Fuchs, T. , & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutualincorpora tion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465�486. Gallagher, S. (2011). Interpretations of embodied cognition. In W. Tschacher & C. Bergomi (Eds.), Theimplications of embodiment: Cognition and communication (pp. 59�71). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic. Gallagher, S. , & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. InT. Zlatev , T. Racine , C. Sinha , & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp.17�38). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Gallagher, S. , & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind andcognitive science. London, New York: Routledge Gallagher, S. , Hutto, D. , Slaby, J. , & Cole, J. (2013). The brain as part of an enactive system. BehavioralBrain Science, 36(4), 421�422. Geeves, A. M. , McIlwain, D. J. , & Sutton, J. (2016). Seeing yellow: �Connection� and routine in professionalmusicians� experience of music performance. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 183�201. Geeves, A. M. , & Sutton, J. (2014). Embodied cognition, perception, and performance in music. EmpiricalMusicology Review, 9(3�4), 247�253 Glowinski, D. , Mancini, M. , Cowie, R. , Camurri, A. , Chiorri, C. , & Doherty, C. (2013). The movements madeby performers in a skilled quartet: A distinctive pattern, and the function that it serves. Frontiers in Psychology,4(841). Hanna, R. , & Maiese, M. (2009). Embodied minds in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Halle, Germany: Max Niemeyer. Hutto, D. , & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Page 44: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102�111. 38 Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kiverstein, J. , & Miller, M. (2015). The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(237). Koch, S. C. , & Fischman, D. (2011). Embodied enactive dance/movement therapy. American Journal of DanceTherapy, 33(1), 57�72. Krueger, J. (2014a). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1003). Krueger, J. (2014b). Emotions and the social niche. In C. von Scheve & M. Salmela (Eds.), Collective emotions(pp. 156�171). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Krueger, J. (2014c). Varieties of extended emotions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(4),533�555. Kyselo, M. (2014). The body social. An enactive approach to the self. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(986). Lahav, A. , Salztman, E. , & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognitionnetwork while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308�314. Large, E. W. (2010). Dynamics of musical tonality. In R. Huys & V. Jirsa (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in humanbehavior (pp. 193�211). New York, NY: Springer. Laroche, J. , & Kaddouch, I. (2014). Enacting teaching and learning in the interaction process: �Keys� fordeveloping skills in piano lessons through four-hand improvisations. Journal of Pedagogy, 5(1), 24�47. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , Desmet, F. , Styns, F. , Van Noorden, L. , & Moelants, D. (2009). Sharing musical expressionthrough embodied listening: A case study based on Chinese Guqin music. Music Perception, 26(3), 263�278. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1008). Maes, P.-J. , Van Dyck, E. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2014). The coupling of action and perception inmusical meaning formation. Music Perception, 32(1), 67�84. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, France: Gallimard. Moran, N. (2014a). Music, bodies and relationships: An ethnographic contribution to embodied cognitionstudies. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 5�17. Moran, N. (2014b). Social implications arise in embodied music cognition research which can countermusicological �individualism�. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(676). Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo & H. Genevois (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp.467�484). Sampzon, France: EditionsDelatour. �berg, G. K. , Normann, B. , & Gallagher, S. (2015). Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy.Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 31(4), 244�252. O�Regan, J. K. , & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral andBrain Science, 24(5), 939�973. Overy, K. , & Molnar-Szacaks, I. (2009). Being together in time: Musical experience and the mirror neuronsystem. Music Perception, 26(5), 489�504. Reddy, V. (2003). On being the object of attention: Implications for self-other consciousness. Trends inCognitive Science, 7(9), 397�402. Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reddy, V. , & Uithol, S. (2015). Engagement: Looking beyond the mirror to understand action understanding.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 101�114. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin andReview, 12(6), 969�992. Reybrouck, M. (2005). Body, mind and music: Musical semantics between experiential cognition and cognitiveeconomy. TRANS-Transcultural Music Review , 9. Retrieved from http://www.sibetrans.com/trans/ Rizzolatti, G. , & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Samaritter, R. , & Payne, H. (2013). Kinaesthetic intersubjectivity: A dance informed contribution to self-otherrelatedness and shared experience in non-verbal psychotherapy with an example from autism. The Arts inPsychotherapy, 40(1), 143�150. Schiavio, A. (2012). Constituting the musical object. A neurophenomenological perspective on musicalresearch. Teorema, 13(3), 63�80. Schiavio, A. (2014). Action, enaction, inter(en)action. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3�4), 254�262. Schiavio, A. , & Altenmüller, E. (2015). Exploring music-based rehabilitation for parkinsonism through embodiedcognitive science. Frontiers in Neurology, 6(217). Schiavio, A. , & Cummins, F. (2015). An inter(en)active approach to musical agency and learning. In R.Timmers , N. Dibben , Z. Eitan , R. Granot , T. Metcalfe , A. Schiavio , & V. Williamson (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe 17th International Conference on the Multimodal Experience of Music. Sheffield, UK: HRI OnlinePublications. 39 Schiavio, A. , & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactiveaccount of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366�388. Schiavio, A. , Menin, D. , & Matyja, J. (2014). Music in the flesh: Embodied simulation in musical understanding.Psychomusicology. Music, Mind & Brain, 24(4), 340�343. Stewart, J. , Gapenne, O. , & Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Page 45: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Thompson, E. , & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extendedmind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23�30. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. van Alphen, F. (2014). Tango and enactivism: First steps in exploring the dynamics and experience ofinteraction. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(3), 322�331. van der Schyff, D. (2015). Music as a manifestation of life: Exploring enactivism and the �eastern perspective� formusic education. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(345). Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. Varela, F. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wheeler, M. (2010). In defense of extended functionalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp.246�270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625�636. Zhang, Q. , & Miranda, E. R. (2007). Evolving expressive music performance through interaction of artificialagent performers. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Music and Artificial Life (MusicAL 2007). Lisbon,Portugal. Almeida, A. (2015). Embodied musical experiences in early childhood (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).University of Edinburgh, UK. Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J. P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44, 2288�2301 Bobin-Bègue, A. , & Provasi, J. (2008). Régulation rythmique avant 4 ans?: Effet d�un tempo auditif sur un tempomoteur. L�Année Psychologique, 108(4), 631�658. Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Influences of rhythm-andtimbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(183),1�9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Drake, C. , Jones, M. R. , & Baruch, C. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences:Attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition, 77, 251�288. 48 Eerola, T. , Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2006). An investigation of pre-schoolers� corporeal synchronizationwith music. In M. Baroni , A. R. Addessi , R. Caterina & M. Costa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th InternationalConference on Music Perception & Cognition (pp. 472�476). Italy, Bologna: Alma Mater Studiorium University ofBologna. Foglia, L. , & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 319�325. Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 149�180). New York,NY: Academy Press. Gallahue, D. L. , Ozmun, J. C. , & Goodway, J. (2012). Understanding motor development: Infants, children,adolescents, adults (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Janata, P. , Tomic, S. T. , & Haberman, J. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of thegroove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 54�75. Jones, M. R. , Boltz, M. G. , & Klein, J. M. (1993). Expected endings and judged duration. Memory andCognition, 21(5), 646�665. Kirschner, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschoolchildren. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 299�314. Kisilevsky, B. S. , Hains, S. M. J. , Jacquet, A.-Y. , Granier-Deferre, C. , & Lecanuet, J. P. (2004). Maturation offetal responses to music. Developmental Science, 7(5), 550�559. Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (1003), 1�12. Laban, R. , & Ullmann, L. (2011). Choreutics. Hampshire, UK: Dance Books Ltd. (Original work published1966). Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Madison, G. , Gouyon, F. , Ullén, F. , & Hörnström, K. (2011). Modeling the tendency for music to inducemovement in humans: First correlations with low-level audio descriptors across music genres. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1578�1594. Maes, P.-J. , & Leman, M. (2013). The influence of body movements on children�s perception of music with anambiguous expressive character. PLoS ONE, 8, e54682. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1�14. Maes, P.-J. , Van Dyck, E. , Lesaffre, M. , Leman, M. , & Kroonenberg, P. M. (2014). The coupling of action andperception in musical meaning formation. Music Perception, 32(1), 67�84. McAuley, J.-D. , Jones, M. R. , Holub, S. , Johnston, H. M. , & Miller, N. S. (2006). The time of our lives: Lifespan development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 348�367. Moog, H. (1976). The musical experience of the pre-school child. London, UK: Schott (Original work publishedin German in 1968). Noë, A. (2006). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Trainor, L. J. (2005). Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception.Science, 308, 1430. Provasi, J. , Anderson, D. I. , & Barbu-Roth, M. (2014). Rhythm perception, production and synchronizationduring the perinatal period. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 (1048), 1�16.

Page 46: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Provasi, J. , & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronization in 2 ½- and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220�231. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012). Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 403�452. Schaefer, R. S. , & Overy, K. (2015). Motor responses to a steady beat. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337, 40�44. Sims, W. L. (1985). Young children�s creative movement to music: Categories of movement, rhythmiccharacteristics, and reactions to changes. Contributions to Music Education, 12, 42�50. Thelen, E. , & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Van Noorden, L. , & De Bruyn, L. (2009). The development of synchronisation skills of children 3 to 11 yearsold. In J. Louhivuori , T. Eerola , S. Saarikallio , T. Himberg , & P. Eerola (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCOM�7thTriennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 466�472). Jyväskylä,Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Varela, F. J. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and humanexperience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Witek, M. A. G. , Clarke, E. F. , Wallentin, M. , Kringelbach, M. L. , & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94446. Zentner, M. , & Eerola, T. (2010). Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, 107, 5568�5573. Behnke, S. (1983). At the service of the sonata: Music lessons with Merleau-Ponty. Somatics, 4(2), 23�29. Biocca, F. (2001). Inserting the presence of mind into a philosophy of presence: A response to Sheridan andMantovani and Riva. Presence, 10(5), 546�556. Brandfonbrener, A. G. (2003). Musculoskeletal problems of instrumental musicians. Hand Clinics, 19(2),231�239 Chaffin, R. , Lemieux, A. F. , & Chen, C. (2005). �It is different each time I play�: Variability in highly preparedmusical performance. Music Perception, 24, 455�472. Chaffin, R. , & Logan, T. (2006). Practicing perfection: How concert soloists prepare for performance. Advancesin Cognitive Psychology, 2(2�3), 113�130. Cruse, H. , & Schilling, M. (2013). How and to what end may consciousness contribute to action? Attributingproperties of consciousness to an embodied, minimally cognitive artificial neural network. Frontiers inPsychology, 4(324). Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Damasio, A. R. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. NewYork, NY: Random House. Davidson, J. W. , & Correia, J. S. (2002). Body movement. In R. Parncutt & G. McPherson (Eds.), The scienceand psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 237�250). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Elbaum, L. (1986). Musculoskeletal problems of instrumental musicians. Journal of Orthopaedic & SportsPhysical Therapy, 8(6), 285�287. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Haans, A. , & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Embodiment and telepresence: Toward a comprehensive theoreticalframework. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 211�218. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Contextand consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103�116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Konczak, J. , vander Velden, H. , & Jaeger, L. (2009). Learning to play the violin: Motor control by freezing, notfreeing degrees of freedom. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(3), 243�252. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Lehmann, A. C. , & Ericsson, K. A. (1998). Preparation of a public piano performance: The relation betweenpractice and performance. Musicae Scientiae, 2(1), 67�94. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Massion, J. , Alexandrov, A. , & Frolov, A. (2004). Why and how are posture and movement coordinated?Progress in Brain Research, 143, 13�27. Maye, A. , & Engel, A. K. (2013). Extending sensorimotor contingency theory: Prediction, planning, and actiongeneration. Adaptive Behavior, 21(6), 423�436. Metzinger, T. (2014). First-order embodiment, second-order embodiment, third-order embodiment: Fromspatiotemporal self-location to minimal phenomenal selfhood. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook ofembodied cognition (pp. 272�286). London, UK: Routledge. Morasso, P. , Casadio, M. , Mohan, V. , Rea, F. , & Zenzeri, J. (2015). Revisiting the body-schema concept inthe context of whole-body postural-focal dynamics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 83. Nijs, L. , Coussement, P. , Moens, B. , Amelynck, D. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2012). Interacting with theMusic Paint Machine: Relating the concepts of flow experience and presence. Interacting with Computers,special issue on presence and interaction, 24(4), 237�250. Nijs, L. , & Leman, M. (2016). Performing with the Music Paint Machine: Provoking an embodied approach toeducational technology. In A. King & E. Himonides (Eds.), Music, technology & education: Critical perspectives(pp. 225�242). London, UK: Ashgate Psychology of Music Series. Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo & H. Genevois (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp. 467�484). Sampzon, France: Editions

Page 47: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Delatour. Nosulenko, V. N. , Barabanshikov, V. A. , Brushlinsky, A. V. , & Rabardel, P. (2005). Man�technology interaction:Some of the Russian approaches. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 359�383. 57 Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains.Paris, France: Armand Collin. Riecke, B. E. , Cunningham, D. W. , & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency ofvisual information. Psychological Research, 71(3), 298�313. Riva, G. (2008). Enacting interactivity: The role of presence. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa & G. Riva (Eds.),Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 97�114).Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Riva, G. , & Waterworth, J. A. (2003). Presence and the self: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Presence-Connect, 3(3), http://www.presence-connect.com. Riva, G. , Waterworth, J. A. , & Waterworth, E. L. (2004). The layers of presence: A bio-cultural approach tounderstanding presence in natural and mediated environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 402�416. Russell, J. A. (1996). Agency: Its role in mental development. Hove, UK: Erlbaum. Triberti, S. , & Riva, G. (2015). Being present in action: A theoretical model about the �interlocking� betweenintentions and environmental affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2052. Tubiana, R. , Chamagne, P. , & Brockman, R. (2005). Fundamental positions for instrumental musicians.Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 20(4), 192�194. Verrel, J. , Pologe, S. , Manselle, W. , Lindenberger, U. , & Woollacott, M. (2013). Coordination of degrees offreedom and stabilization of task variables in a complex motor skill: Expertise-related differences in cellobowing. Experimental Brain Research, 224(3), 323�334. Waterworth, J. , & Riva, G. (2014). Feeling present in the physical world and in computer-mediatedenvironments. Bas ingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Zinchenko, V. (1996). Developing activity theory: The zone of proximal development and beyond. In B. Nardi(Ed.), Context and consciousness, activity theory, and human-computer interaction (pp. 283�324). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press. Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the brain: How the body and environment shape animal and human minds. Oxford,UK: Princeton University Press. Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbols systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577�660. Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sens du mouvement. Paris, France: Odile Jacob. Bühler, K. (1965 [1934]). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart, Germany: GustavFischer. Buhrmann, T. , Di Paolo, E. A. , & Barandiaran, X. (2013). A dynamical systems account of sensorimotorcontingencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 285. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15, 181�195. Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Dewey, J. (1958 [1934]). Art as experience. New York, NY: Capricorn Books. Frayer, D. W. , & Nicolay, C. (2000). Fossil evidence for the origin of speech sounds. In N. Wallin , B. Merker ,& S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 271�300). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press. Gibbs, R. (2010). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London, UK: Allen & Unwin. Gjerdingen, R. (1994). Apparent motion in music. Music Perception, 11(4), 335�370. Godøy, R. I. (1997). Formalization and epistemology. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Godøy, R. I. (2006). Gestural-sonorous objects: Embodied extensions of Schaeffer�s conceptual apparatus.Organised Sound, 11(2), 149�157. Grisey, G. (1987). Tempus ex Machina: A composer�s reflections on musical time. Contemporary Music Review,2(1), 239�275. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (2013). New perspectives on music and gesture. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of WilliamJames�s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hirose, N. (2002). An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3,289�299. 65 Hoffmeyer, J. (1997). Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for SemioticStudies, 9(2), 2355�2376. Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. , & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): Aframework for perception and action planning. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 24(6), 849�878. Hurley, S. (2002). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hutto, D. , & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. James, W. (1976 [1912]). Essays in radical empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Krueger, J. (2011). Doing things with music. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 1�22. Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1003, 1�18.

Page 48: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Kull, K. (1998). Semiotic ecology: Different natures in the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 344�371 Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortonyi (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202�251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (1008). Michaels, C. , & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Paillard, J. (1994). L�intégration sensori-motrice et idéo-motrice. In M. Richelle , J. Requin , & M. Robert (Eds.),Traité de psychologie expérimentale (vol. 1, pp. 925�996). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. Panksepp, J. , & Bernatzky, G. (2002). Emotional sounds and the brain: The neuro-affective foundations ofmusical appreciation. Behavioural Processes, 60(2), 133�155. Pattee, H. (1995). Artificial life needs a real epistemology. In F. Moran , A. Moreno , J. Merelo , & P. Chacon(Eds.), Advances in artificial life: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (pp. 23�38). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Pecher, D. , & Zwaan, R. (2010). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, languageand thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance: Essai sur les relations entre les régulations organiques et lesprocessus cognitifs. Paris, France: Gallimard. Prinz, W. , & Chater, N. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley (Ed.), Perspectives onimitation: From neuroscience to social science. Vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals (pp.141�156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reybrouck, M. (2005). A biosemiotic and ecological approach to music cognition: Event perception betweenauditory listening and cognitive economy. Axiomathes, 15(2), 229�266. Reybrouck, M. (2012). Musical sense-making and the concept of affordance: An ecosemiotic and experientialapproach. Biosemiotics, 5(3), 391�409. Reybrouck, M. (2015). Real-time listening and the act of mental pointing: Deictic and indexical claims. Mind,Music, and Language, 2, 1�17. Reybrouck, M. , & Brattico, E. (2015). Neuroplasticity beyond sounds: Neural adaptations following long-termmusical aesthetic experiences. Brain Sciences, 5, 69�91. Ric�ur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge UniversityPress/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l�Homme. Sebeok, T. , & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (Eds.). (1992). Biosemiotics. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Stewart, J. , Gapenne, O. , & Di Paolo, E. (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stockhausen, K. (1957).� wie die Zeit vergeht� Die Reihe , 3, 13�42. Tagg, P. (2013). Music�s meanings: A modern musicology for non-musos. New York, NY & Huddersfield, UK:The Mass Media Music Scholars�s Press. Varela, F. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. von Uexküll, J. (1957 [1934]). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds.In C. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5�80). New York, NY:International Universities Press. von Uexküll, J. (1982 [1940]). The theory of meaning, Semiotica, 42(1), 25�82. Windsor, W. L. (2004). An ecological approach to semiotics. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour,34(2),179�198.

The Interactive Dialectics of Musical Meaning Formation Apostel, L. (1979). Logique et dialectique: Studies in action theory. Ghent, Belgium: Communication andCognition. Barsalou, L. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 716�724. Bigand, E. , Delbé, C. , Poulin-Charronnat, B. , Leman, M. , & Tillmann, B. (2014). Empirical evidence for musicalsyntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory. Frontiers inSystems Neuroscience, 8(94), 1�27. Broeckx, J. L. (1981). Muziek, ratio en affect: Over de wisselwerking van rationeel denken en affectief belevenbij voortbrengst en ontvangst van muziek. Antwerp, Belgium: Metropolis. Broeckx, J. L. (1986). Behind and beyond �reason, emotion and music�: Anxious afterthoughts of an author. In L.Apostel , H. Sabbe , & F. Vandamme (Eds.), Reason, emotion and music (pp. 153�167). Ghent, Belgium:Communication & Cognition. Broeckx, J. L. (1997). Beyond metaphor: Musical figures or �Gestalte� as expressive icons. Journal of New MusicResearch, 26(3), 266�276. Collins, T. , Tillmann, B. , Barrett, F. S. , Delbé, C. , & Janata, P. (2014). A combined model of sensory andcognitive representations underlying tonal expectations in music: From audio signals to behavior. PsychologicalReview, 121(1), 33.

Page 49: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Engel, A. , Maye, A. , Kurthen, M. , & König, P. (2013). Where�s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitivescience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 202�209. Friston, K. , Mattout, J. , & Kilner, J. (2011). Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics,104(1�2), 137�160. Godøy, R. (2010). Gestural affordances of musical sound. In R. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures:Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 103�125). New York, NY: Routledge. Godøy, R. , & M. Leman (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on music and gesture. London, UK: Ashgate. Hollerman, J. , & Schultz, W. (1998). Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of rewardduring learning. Nature Neuroscience, 1(4), 304�309. Hughes, G. , & Cresswell, M. (1968). An introduction to modal logic. London, UK: Methuen and Co. Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kunst, J. (1978). Making sense in music: An enquiry into the formal pragmatics of art. Ghent, Belgium:Communication and Cognition. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Langner, G. (2015). The neural code of pitch and harmony. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Large, E. , & Jones, M. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106(1), 119�159. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 21 Leman, M. , Nijs, L. , Maes, P.-J. , & Van Dyck, E. (2017). What is embodied music cognition? In Bader(Ed.), Springer handbook in systematic musicology. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal pitch space. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Maes, P.-J. , & Leman, M. (2013). The influence of body movements on children�s perception of music with anambiguous expressive character. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e54682. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1008), 1�14. Meyer, L. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Moens, B. , & Leman, M. (2015). Alignment strategies for the entrainment of music and movement rhythms.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 86�93. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Nozaradan, S. , Peretz, I. , & Mouraux, A. (2012). Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meterembedded in a musical rhythm. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17572�17581. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Trainor, L. (2007). Hearing what the body feels: Auditory encoding and rhythmicmovement. Cognition, 105(3), 533�546. Reybrouck, M. (2014). Musical sense-making between experience and conceptualisation: The legacy of Peirce,Dewey and James. Interdisciplinary Studies in Musicology, 14, 184�196. Salimpoor, V. N. , Zald, D. H. , Zatorre, R. J. , Dagher, A. , & McIntosh, A. R. (2015). Predictions and the brain:How musical sounds become rewarding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 86�91. Schaefer, R. S. , & Overy, K. (2015). Motor responses to a steady beat. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337(1), 40�44. Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , Moelants, D. , & Leman, M. (2007). Walking on music. Human Movement Science,26(5), 769�785.

Metrically Structured Time and Entrainment Abler, W. L. (1989). On the particulate principle of self-diversifying systems. Journal of Social and BiologicalStruc tures, 12, 1�13. Bååth, R. , & Madison, G. (2012). The subjective difficulty of tapping to a slow beat. In E. Cambouropoulos , C.Tsougras , P. Mavromatis , & K. Pastiadis (Eds.) (p. 82). Thessaloniki, Greece: 12th International Conferenceon Music Perception and Production. Bengtsson, I. , & Gabrielsson, A. (1977). Rhythm research in Uppsala. In Music, room, and acoustics (17th ed.,pp. 19�56). Stockholm, Sweden: Publications issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music. Brown, S. W. , & Jordania, J. (2011). Universals in the world�s musics. Psychology of Music, 41, 229�248 Butterfield, M. (2010). Participatory discrepancies and the perception of beats in jazz. Music Perception,27,157�176. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (vols. 1�2). London, UK: John Murray. Davies, M. , Madison, G. , Silva, P. , & Gouyon, F. (2013). The effect of microtiming deviations on theperception of groove in short rhythms. Music Perception, 30, 498�511 28 Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , Begosh, K. T. , Daniels, J. R. , & Marsh, K. L. (2012). Rocking to the beat:Effects of music and partner�s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: General, 141, 49�53.

Page 50: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Fitch, W. T. (2013). Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: Distinguishing meter and pulse perception.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 68. Frühauf, J. , Kopiez, R. , & Platz, F. (2013). Music on the timing grid: The influence of microtiming on theperceived groove quality of a simple drum pattern performance. Music Perception, 17, 246�260. Fujioka, T. , Trainor, L. J. , Large, E. W. , & Ross, B. (2009). Beta and gamma rhythms in human auditorycortex during musical beat processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 89�92. Gabrielsson, A. (1985). Interplay between analysis and synthesis in studies of music performance and musicexperience. Music Perception, 3, 59�86. Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 501�602).San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Gouyon, F. (2007). Microtiming in �Samba de Roda��Preliminary experiments with polyphonic audio. In M. H. CruzTorres (Ed.), Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music (pp. 197�203). São Paulo, Brazil:Brazilian Computing Society. Grahn, J. A. , & Rowe, J. B. (2009). Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians andnonmusicians during beat perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7540�7548. Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioural and neuroscience findings andtheoretical directions. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72, 561�582. Hagen, E. H. , & Bryant, G. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature, 14, 21�51. Halpern, A. R. , & Darwin, C. L. (1982). Duration discrimination in a series of rhythmic events. Perception &Psychophysics, 31, 86�89. Harrar, V. , & Harris, L. R. (2008). The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimuluscombinations on the perception of simultaneity. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 517�524 Harrel, T. W. (1937). Factors influencing preference and memory for auditory rhythm. Journal of GeneralPsychology, 17, 63�104. Hedenkvist, H. , & Lind, K. (2007). Det är bra! Men svänger det?�en studie i hur musikpreferens påverkar skattningav sväng i musik. PwD Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Hellmer, K. , & Madison, G. (2014). Quantifying microtiming patterning and variability in drum kit recordings: Amethod and some data. Music Perception, 33(2), 147�162. Hodges, D. (1989). Why are we musical? Speculations on the evolutionary plausibility of musical bahavior.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 99, 7�22. Hurley, B. K. , Martens, P. A. , & Janata, P. (2014). Spontaneous sensorimotor coupling with multipart music.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1679�1696. Janata, P. , Tomic, S. T. , & Haberman, J. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of thegroove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 54�75. Jongsma, M. , Desain, P. , & Honing, H. (2004). Rhythmic context influences the auditory evoked potentials ofmusicians and nonmusicians. Biological Psychology, 66, 129�152. Jongsma, M. , Eichele, T. , Jenks, K. M. , Desain, P. , & Honing, H. (2005). Expectancy effects on omissionevoked potentials in musicians and non-musicians. Psychophysiology, 42, 191�201. Kauranen, K. , & Vanharanta, H. (1996). Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance ofupper and lower extremities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 515�525 Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kohno, M. (1993). Perceptual sense unit and echoic memory. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9,13�31. Madison, G. (2001). Variability in isochronous tapping: Higher-order dependencies as a function of inter tapinterval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 411�422 Madison, G. (2004). Detection of linear temporal drift in sound sequences: Principles and empirical evaluation.Acta Psychologica, 117, 95�118. Madison, G. (2006a). Duration specificity in the long-range correlation of human serial interval production.Physica D (Nonlinear Phenomena), 216, 301�306. Madison, G. (2006b). Experiencing groove induced by music: Consistency and phenomenology. MusicPerception, 24, 201�208. Madison, G. (2009). An auditory illusion of infinite tempo change based on multiple temporal levels. PLoS ONE,4(12), e8151. Madison, G. (2011). Cause and affect. A functional perspective on music and emotion. In F. Bacci & D. Melcher(Eds.), Art and the senses (pp. 329�350). London, UK: Oxford University Press. Madison, G. (2014). Sensori-motor synchronisation variability decreases with the number of metrical levels inthe stimulus signal. Acta Psychologica, 147, 10�16. 29 Madison, G. , Gouyon, F. , Ullén, F. , & Hörnström, K. (2011). Modeling the tendency for music to inducemovement in humans: First correlations with some low-level audio descriptors across music genres. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1578�1594. Madison, G. , Karampela, O. , Ullén, F. , & Holm, L. (2013). Effects of practice on variability in an isochronousserial interval production task: asymptotical levels of tapping variability after training are similar to those ofmusicians. Acta Psychologica, 143, 119�128. Madison, G. , & Merker, B. (2002). On the limits of anisynchrony in pulse attribution. Psychological Research,66, 201�207. Madison, G. , & Merker, B. (2003). Consistency in listeners� ratings as a function of listening time. In R. Bresin(Ed.), Proceedings of the Stockholm music acoustics conference (pp. 639�642). Stockholm, Sweden: RoyalCollege of Technology.

Page 51: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Madison, G. , & Merker, B. (2004). Human sensorimotor tracking of continuous subliminal deviations fromisochrony. Neuroscience Letters, 370, 69�73. Madison, G. , & Sioros, G. (2014). What musicians do to induce the sensation of groove in simple and complexmelodies, and how listeners perceive it. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 894. Mates, J. , Radil, T. , Müller, U. , & Pöppel, E. (1994). Temporal integration in sensorimotor synchronization.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 332�340 McDougall, H. G. , & Moore, S. T. (2005). Marching to the beat of the same drummer: The spontaneous tempoof human locomotion. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 1164�1173 McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press. Merker, B. (1999). Synchronous chorusing and the origins of music. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue1999�2000, Rhythm, Musical Narrative, and Origins of Human Communication, 59�73 Merker, B. (2000). Synchronous chorusing and human origins. In N. L. Wallin , B. Merker , & S. W. Brown(Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 315�327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Merker, B. (2002). Music: The missing Humboldt system. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 3�21. Merker, B. (2006). The uneven interface between culture and biology in human music. Music Perception,24,95�98. Merker, B. (2014). Groove or swing as distributed rhythmic consonance: Introducing the groove matrix.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 454. Merker, B. , Madison, G. , & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmicentrainment. Cortex, 45, 4�17. Merker, B. , Morley, I. , & Zuidema, W. (2015). Five fundamental constraints on theories of the origin of music.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140095. Meumann, E. (1894). Untersuchungen zur Psychologie und Esthetik des Rhythmus. Philosophische Studien,10,249�322. Miller, G. F. (2000). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In N. L. Wallin , B. Merker , & S. W.Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 329�360). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Miller, G. F. (2011). The mating mind (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday. Naveda, L. , Gouyon, F. , Leman, M. , & Guedes, C. (2011). Microtiming patterns and interactions with musicalproperties in Samba music. Journal of New Music Research, 40, 225�238. Nozaradan, S. , Peretz, I. , Missal, M. , & Mouraux, A. (2011). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat andmeter. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234�10240. Nozaradan, S. , Zarouali, Y. , Peretz, I. , & Mouraux, A. (2015). Capturing with EEG the neural entrainment andcoupling underlying sensorimotor synchronization to the beat. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 736�747. Pinker, S. (2003). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. London, UK: Penguin Books. Repp, B. H. (1999). Detecting deviations from metronomic timing in music: Effects of perceptual structure onthe mental timekeeper. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 529�548. Repp, B. H. (2002). Phase correction in sensorimotor synchronization: Nonlinearities in voluntary andinvoluntary responses to perturbations. Human Movement Science, 21, 1�37. Repp, B. H. (2003). Rate limits in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual sequences: Thesynchronization threshold and the benefits and costs of interval subdivision. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35,355�370 Repp, B. H. (2010). Self-generated interval subdivision reduces variability of synchronization with a very slowmetronome. Music Perception, 27, 389�397 Repp, B. H. , & Doggett, R. (2007). Tapping to a very slow beat: A comparison of musicians and nonmusicians.Music Perception, 24, 367�376 Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 403�452. 30 Seashore, C. E. (1947). In search of beauty in music. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Timing in solo and duet piano performances. Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology A, 36A, 577�595. Sioros, G. , Miron, M. , Davies, M. , Gouyon, F. , & Madison, G. (2014). Syncopation creates the sensation ofgroove in synthesized music examples. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1036. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic musictherapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1185. Wallin, N. L. , Merker, B. , & Brown, S. W. (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Warner, R. M. (1992). Cyclicity of vocal activity increases during conversation: Support for a nonlinear systemsmodel of dyadic social interaction. Behavioral Science, 37, 128�138. Witek, M. A. G. , Clarke, E. F. , Wallentin, M. , Kringelbach, M. L. , & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9, e94446.

Page 52: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Participatory Sense-Making in Joint Musical Practice Badino, L. , D�Ausilio, A. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Fadiga, L. (2014). Sensorimotor communication inprofessional quartets. Neuropsychologia, 55, 98�104. Behrends, A. , Müller, S. , & Dziobek, I. (2012). Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new interventionfostering empathy through interactional movement and dance. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39(2), 107�116 Bourbousson, J. , R�Kiouak, M. , & Eccles, D. W. (2015). The dynamics of team coordination: A social networkanalysis as a window to shared awareness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5),1�19. 37 Broughton, M. , & Stevens, C. (2009). Music, movement and marimba: An investigation of the role ofmovement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience. Psychology of Music, 37(2),137�153. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clayton, M. (2013). Entrainment, ethnography and musical interaction. In M. Clayton , B. Dueck , & L. Leante(Eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance (pp. 17�47), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge, MA: MITPress. Correia, N. N. , Tahiro�lu, K. , & Espada, M. (2013). PESI: Extending mobile music instruments with socialinteraction. In S. Jordà & N. Parés (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible,Embedded and Embodied Interaction. Barcelona, Spain. Davidson, J. W. (2005). Bodily communication in musical performance in musical communication. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousnessand Cognition, 18(2), 535�542. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition.Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485�507. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2013). Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(345). De Jaegher, H. , & Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adaptive Behavior,17(5), 444�460. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Kant, V. (2014). Toward a dynamical theory of body movement in musicalperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(477). Di Paolo, E. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28, 9�21. Di Paolo, E. , & De Jaegher, H. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(163). Di Paolo, E. , & De Jaegher, H. (2016). Neither individualistic, nor interactionist. In C. Durt , T. Fuchs , & C.Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture�Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 73�82).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fantasia, V. , De Jaegher, H. , & Fasulo, A. (2014). We can work it out: An enactive look at cooperation.Frontiers in Psychology, 5(874). Favela, L. H. (2014). Radical embodied cognitive neuroscience: Addressing �grand challenges� of the mindsciences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(796). Fuchs, T. , & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutualincorpora tion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465�486. Gallagher, S. (2011). Interpretations of embodied cognition. In W. Tschacher & C. Bergomi (Eds.), Theimplications of embodiment: Cognition and communication (pp. 59�71). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic. Gallagher, S. , & Hutto, D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. InT. Zlatev , T. Racine , C. Sinha , & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp.17�38). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Gallagher, S. , & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind andcognitive science. London, New York: Routledge Gallagher, S. , Hutto, D. , Slaby, J. , & Cole, J. (2013). The brain as part of an enactive system. BehavioralBrain Science, 36(4), 421�422. Geeves, A. M. , McIlwain, D. J. , & Sutton, J. (2016). Seeing yellow: �Connection� and routine in professionalmusicians� experience of music performance. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 183�201. Geeves, A. M. , & Sutton, J. (2014). Embodied cognition, perception, and performance in music. EmpiricalMusicology Review, 9(3�4), 247�253 Glowinski, D. , Mancini, M. , Cowie, R. , Camurri, A. , Chiorri, C. , & Doherty, C. (2013). The movements madeby performers in a skilled quartet: A distinctive pattern, and the function that it serves. Frontiers in Psychology,4(841). Hanna, R. , & Maiese, M. (2009). Embodied minds in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Halle, Germany: Max Niemeyer. Hutto, D. , & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Page 53: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102�111. 38 Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Kiverstein, J. , & Miller, M. (2015). The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(237). Koch, S. C. , & Fischman, D. (2011). Embodied enactive dance/movement therapy. American Journal of DanceTherapy, 33(1), 57�72. Krueger, J. (2014a). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1003). Krueger, J. (2014b). Emotions and the social niche. In C. von Scheve & M. Salmela (Eds.), Collective emotions(pp. 156�171). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Krueger, J. (2014c). Varieties of extended emotions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(4),533�555. Kyselo, M. (2014). The body social. An enactive approach to the self. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(986). Lahav, A. , Salztman, E. , & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognitionnetwork while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308�314. Large, E. W. (2010). Dynamics of musical tonality. In R. Huys & V. Jirsa (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in humanbehavior (pp. 193�211). New York, NY: Springer. Laroche, J. , & Kaddouch, I. (2014). Enacting teaching and learning in the interaction process: �Keys� fordeveloping skills in piano lessons through four-hand improvisations. Journal of Pedagogy, 5(1), 24�47. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , Desmet, F. , Styns, F. , Van Noorden, L. , & Moelants, D. (2009). Sharing musical expressionthrough embodied listening: A case study based on Chinese Guqin music. Music Perception, 26(3), 263�278. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1008). Maes, P.-J. , Van Dyck, E. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2014). The coupling of action and perception inmusical meaning formation. Music Perception, 32(1), 67�84. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, France: Gallimard. Moran, N. (2014a). Music, bodies and relationships: An ethnographic contribution to embodied cognitionstudies. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 5�17. Moran, N. (2014b). Social implications arise in embodied music cognition research which can countermusicological �individualism�. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(676). Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo & H. Genevois (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp.467�484). Sampzon, France: EditionsDelatour. �berg, G. K. , Normann, B. , & Gallagher, S. (2015). Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy.Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 31(4), 244�252. O�Regan, J. K. , & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor approach to vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral andBrain Science, 24(5), 939�973. Overy, K. , & Molnar-Szacaks, I. (2009). Being together in time: Musical experience and the mirror neuronsystem. Music Perception, 26(5), 489�504. Reddy, V. (2003). On being the object of attention: Implications for self-other consciousness. Trends inCognitive Science, 7(9), 397�402. Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reddy, V. , & Uithol, S. (2015). Engagement: Looking beyond the mirror to understand action understanding.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 101�114. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin andReview, 12(6), 969�992. Reybrouck, M. (2005). Body, mind and music: Musical semantics between experiential cognition and cognitiveeconomy. TRANS-Transcultural Music Review , 9. Retrieved from http://www.sibetrans.com/trans/ Rizzolatti, G. , & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Samaritter, R. , & Payne, H. (2013). Kinaesthetic intersubjectivity: A dance informed contribution to self-otherrelatedness and shared experience in non-verbal psychotherapy with an example from autism. The Arts inPsychotherapy, 40(1), 143�150. Schiavio, A. (2012). Constituting the musical object. A neurophenomenological perspective on musicalresearch. Teorema, 13(3), 63�80. Schiavio, A. (2014). Action, enaction, inter(en)action. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3�4), 254�262. Schiavio, A. , & Altenmüller, E. (2015). Exploring music-based rehabilitation for parkinsonism through embodiedcognitive science. Frontiers in Neurology, 6(217). Schiavio, A. , & Cummins, F. (2015). An inter(en)active approach to musical agency and learning. In R.Timmers , N. Dibben , Z. Eitan , R. Granot , T. Metcalfe , A. Schiavio , & V. Williamson (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe 17th International Conference on the Multimodal Experience of Music. Sheffield, UK: HRI OnlinePublications. 39 Schiavio, A. , & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactiveaccount of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366�388. Schiavio, A. , Menin, D. , & Matyja, J. (2014). Music in the flesh: Embodied simulation in musical understanding.Psychomusicology. Music, Mind & Brain, 24(4), 340�343. Stewart, J. , Gapenne, O. , & Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Page 54: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Thompson, E. , & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extendedmind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23�30. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. van Alphen, F. (2014). Tango and enactivism: First steps in exploring the dynamics and experience ofinteraction. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 48(3), 322�331. van der Schyff, D. (2015). Music as a manifestation of life: Exploring enactivism and the �eastern perspective� formusic education. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(345). Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. Varela, F. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wheeler, M. (2010). In defense of extended functionalism. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp.246�270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625�636. Zhang, Q. , & Miranda, E. R. (2007). Evolving expressive music performance through interaction of artificialagent performers. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Music and Artificial Life (MusicAL 2007). Lisbon,Portugal.

Playing with the Beat Almeida, A. (2015). Embodied musical experiences in early childhood (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).University of Edinburgh, UK. Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J. P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44, 2288�2301 Bobin-Bègue, A. , & Provasi, J. (2008). Régulation rythmique avant 4 ans?: Effet d�un tempo auditif sur un tempomoteur. L�Année Psychologique, 108(4), 631�658. Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Influences of rhythm-andtimbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(183),1�9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Drake, C. , Jones, M. R. , & Baruch, C. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences:Attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition, 77, 251�288. 48 Eerola, T. , Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2006). An investigation of pre-schoolers� corporeal synchronizationwith music. In M. Baroni , A. R. Addessi , R. Caterina & M. Costa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th InternationalConference on Music Perception & Cognition (pp. 472�476). Italy, Bologna: Alma Mater Studiorium University ofBologna. Foglia, L. , & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 319�325. Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 149�180). New York,NY: Academy Press. Gallahue, D. L. , Ozmun, J. C. , & Goodway, J. (2012). Understanding motor development: Infants, children,adolescents, adults (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Janata, P. , Tomic, S. T. , & Haberman, J. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of thegroove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 54�75. Jones, M. R. , Boltz, M. G. , & Klein, J. M. (1993). Expected endings and judged duration. Memory andCognition, 21(5), 646�665. Kirschner, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschoolchildren. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 299�314. Kisilevsky, B. S. , Hains, S. M. J. , Jacquet, A.-Y. , Granier-Deferre, C. , & Lecanuet, J. P. (2004). Maturation offetal responses to music. Developmental Science, 7(5), 550�559. Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (1003), 1�12. Laban, R. , & Ullmann, L. (2011). Choreutics. Hampshire, UK: Dance Books Ltd. (Original work published1966). Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Madison, G. , Gouyon, F. , Ullén, F. , & Hörnström, K. (2011). Modeling the tendency for music to inducemovement in humans: First correlations with low-level audio descriptors across music genres. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1578�1594. Maes, P.-J. , & Leman, M. (2013). The influence of body movements on children�s perception of music with anambiguous expressive character. PLoS ONE, 8, e54682. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1�14. Maes, P.-J. , Van Dyck, E. , Lesaffre, M. , Leman, M. , & Kroonenberg, P. M. (2014). The coupling of action andperception in musical meaning formation. Music Perception, 32(1), 67�84. McAuley, J.-D. , Jones, M. R. , Holub, S. , Johnston, H. M. , & Miller, N. S. (2006). The time of our lives: Lifespan development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 348�367.

Page 55: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Moog, H. (1976). The musical experience of the pre-school child. London, UK: Schott (Original work publishedin German in 1968). Noë, A. (2006). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Trainor, L. J. (2005). Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception.Science, 308, 1430. Provasi, J. , Anderson, D. I. , & Barbu-Roth, M. (2014). Rhythm perception, production and synchronizationduring the perinatal period. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 (1048), 1�16. Provasi, J. , & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronization in 2 ½- and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220�231. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012). Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 403�452. Schaefer, R. S. , & Overy, K. (2015). Motor responses to a steady beat. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337, 40�44. Sims, W. L. (1985). Young children�s creative movement to music: Categories of movement, rhythmiccharacteristics, and reactions to changes. Contributions to Music Education, 12, 42�50. Thelen, E. , & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Van Noorden, L. , & De Bruyn, L. (2009). The development of synchronisation skills of children 3 to 11 yearsold. In J. Louhivuori , T. Eerola , S. Saarikallio , T. Himberg , & P. Eerola (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCOM�7thTriennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 466�472). Jyväskylä,Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Varela, F. J. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and humanexperience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Witek, M. A. G. , Clarke, E. F. , Wallentin, M. , Kringelbach, M. L. , & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94446. Zentner, M. , & Eerola, T. (2010). Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, 107, 5568�5573.

The Merging of Musician and Musical Instrument Behnke, S. (1983). At the service of the sonata: Music lessons with Merleau-Ponty. Somatics, 4(2), 23�29. Biocca, F. (2001). Inserting the presence of mind into a philosophy of presence: A response to Sheridan andMantovani and Riva. Presence, 10(5), 546�556. Brandfonbrener, A. G. (2003). Musculoskeletal problems of instrumental musicians. Hand Clinics, 19(2),231�239 Chaffin, R. , Lemieux, A. F. , & Chen, C. (2005). �It is different each time I play�: Variability in highly preparedmusical performance. Music Perception, 24, 455�472. Chaffin, R. , & Logan, T. (2006). Practicing perfection: How concert soloists prepare for performance. Advancesin Cognitive Psychology, 2(2�3), 113�130. Cruse, H. , & Schilling, M. (2013). How and to what end may consciousness contribute to action? Attributingproperties of consciousness to an embodied, minimally cognitive artificial neural network. Frontiers inPsychology, 4(324). Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Damasio, A. R. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. NewYork, NY: Random House. Davidson, J. W. , & Correia, J. S. (2002). Body movement. In R. Parncutt & G. McPherson (Eds.), The scienceand psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 237�250). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Elbaum, L. (1986). Musculoskeletal problems of instrumental musicians. Journal of Orthopaedic & SportsPhysical Therapy, 8(6), 285�287. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Haans, A. , & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2012). Embodiment and telepresence: Toward a comprehensive theoreticalframework. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 211�218. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Contextand consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103�116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Konczak, J. , vander Velden, H. , & Jaeger, L. (2009). Learning to play the violin: Motor control by freezing, notfreeing degrees of freedom. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(3), 243�252. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Lehmann, A. C. , & Ericsson, K. A. (1998). Preparation of a public piano performance: The relation betweenpractice and performance. Musicae Scientiae, 2(1), 67�94. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Massion, J. , Alexandrov, A. , & Frolov, A. (2004). Why and how are posture and movement coordinated?Progress in Brain Research, 143, 13�27. Maye, A. , & Engel, A. K. (2013). Extending sensorimotor contingency theory: Prediction, planning, and actiongeneration. Adaptive Behavior, 21(6), 423�436.

Page 56: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Metzinger, T. (2014). First-order embodiment, second-order embodiment, third-order embodiment: Fromspatiotemporal self-location to minimal phenomenal selfhood. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook ofembodied cognition (pp. 272�286). London, UK: Routledge. Morasso, P. , Casadio, M. , Mohan, V. , Rea, F. , & Zenzeri, J. (2015). Revisiting the body-schema concept inthe context of whole-body postural-focal dynamics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 83. Nijs, L. , Coussement, P. , Moens, B. , Amelynck, D. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2012). Interacting with theMusic Paint Machine: Relating the concepts of flow experience and presence. Interacting with Computers,special issue on presence and interaction, 24(4), 237�250. Nijs, L. , & Leman, M. (2016). Performing with the Music Paint Machine: Provoking an embodied approach toeducational technology. In A. King & E. Himonides (Eds.), Music, technology & education: Critical perspectives(pp. 225�242). London, UK: Ashgate Psychology of Music Series. Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo & H. Genevois (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp. 467�484). Sampzon, France: EditionsDelatour. Nosulenko, V. N. , Barabanshikov, V. A. , Brushlinsky, A. V. , & Rabardel, P. (2005). Man�technology interaction:Some of the Russian approaches. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 359�383. 57 Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies: Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains.Paris, France: Armand Collin. Riecke, B. E. , Cunningham, D. W. , & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency ofvisual information. Psychological Research, 71(3), 298�313. Riva, G. (2008). Enacting interactivity: The role of presence. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa & G. Riva (Eds.),Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 97�114).Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Riva, G. , & Waterworth, J. A. (2003). Presence and the self: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Presence-Connect, 3(3), http://www.presence-connect.com. Riva, G. , Waterworth, J. A. , & Waterworth, E. L. (2004). The layers of presence: A bio-cultural approach tounderstanding presence in natural and mediated environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 402�416. Russell, J. A. (1996). Agency: Its role in mental development. Hove, UK: Erlbaum. Triberti, S. , & Riva, G. (2015). Being present in action: A theoretical model about the �interlocking� betweenintentions and environmental affordances. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2052. Tubiana, R. , Chamagne, P. , & Brockman, R. (2005). Fundamental positions for instrumental musicians.Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 20(4), 192�194. Verrel, J. , Pologe, S. , Manselle, W. , Lindenberger, U. , & Woollacott, M. (2013). Coordination of degrees offreedom and stabilization of task variables in a complex motor skill: Expertise-related differences in cellobowing. Experimental Brain Research, 224(3), 323�334. Waterworth, J. , & Riva, G. (2014). Feeling present in the physical world and in computer-mediatedenvironments. Bas ingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Zinchenko, V. (1996). Developing activity theory: The zone of proximal development and beyond. In B. Nardi(Ed.), Context and consciousness, activity theory, and human-computer interaction (pp. 283�324). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Music Knowledge Construction Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the brain: How the body and environment shape animal and human minds. Oxford,UK: Princeton University Press. Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbols systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577�660. Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sens du mouvement. Paris, France: Odile Jacob. Bühler, K. (1965 [1934]). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart, Germany: GustavFischer. Buhrmann, T. , Di Paolo, E. A. , & Barandiaran, X. (2013). A dynamical systems account of sensorimotorcontingencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 285. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15, 181�195. Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Dewey, J. (1958 [1934]). Art as experience. New York, NY: Capricorn Books. Frayer, D. W. , & Nicolay, C. (2000). Fossil evidence for the origin of speech sounds. In N. Wallin , B. Merker ,& S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 271�300). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press. Gibbs, R. (2010). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London, UK: Allen & Unwin. Gjerdingen, R. (1994). Apparent motion in music. Music Perception, 11(4), 335�370. Godøy, R. I. (1997). Formalization and epistemology. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Godøy, R. I. (2006). Gestural-sonorous objects: Embodied extensions of Schaeffer�s conceptual apparatus.Organised Sound, 11(2), 149�157. Grisey, G. (1987). Tempus ex Machina: A composer�s reflections on musical time. Contemporary Music Review,2(1), 239�275.

Page 57: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Gritten, A. , & King, E. (2013). New perspectives on music and gesture. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of WilliamJames�s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hirose, N. (2002). An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3,289�299. 65 Hoffmeyer, J. (1997). Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for SemioticStudies, 9(2), 2355�2376. Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. , & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): Aframework for perception and action planning. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 24(6), 849�878. Hurley, S. (2002). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hutto, D. , & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. James, W. (1976 [1912]). Essays in radical empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Krueger, J. (2011). Doing things with music. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 1�22. Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1003, 1�18. Kull, K. (1998). Semiotic ecology: Different natures in the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 344�371 Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortonyi (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202�251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (1008). Michaels, C. , & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Paillard, J. (1994). L�intégration sensori-motrice et idéo-motrice. In M. Richelle , J. Requin , & M. Robert (Eds.),Traité de psychologie expérimentale (vol. 1, pp. 925�996). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. Panksepp, J. , & Bernatzky, G. (2002). Emotional sounds and the brain: The neuro-affective foundations ofmusical appreciation. Behavioural Processes, 60(2), 133�155. Pattee, H. (1995). Artificial life needs a real epistemology. In F. Moran , A. Moreno , J. Merelo , & P. Chacon(Eds.), Advances in artificial life: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (pp. 23�38). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Pecher, D. , & Zwaan, R. (2010). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, languageand thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance: Essai sur les relations entre les régulations organiques et lesprocessus cognitifs. Paris, France: Gallimard. Prinz, W. , & Chater, N. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley (Ed.), Perspectives onimitation: From neuroscience to social science. Vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals (pp.141�156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Reybrouck, M. (2005). A biosemiotic and ecological approach to music cognition: Event perception betweenauditory listening and cognitive economy. Axiomathes, 15(2), 229�266. Reybrouck, M. (2012). Musical sense-making and the concept of affordance: An ecosemiotic and experientialapproach. Biosemiotics, 5(3), 391�409. Reybrouck, M. (2015). Real-time listening and the act of mental pointing: Deictic and indexical claims. Mind,Music, and Language, 2, 1�17. Reybrouck, M. , & Brattico, E. (2015). Neuroplasticity beyond sounds: Neural adaptations following long-termmusical aesthetic experiences. Brain Sciences, 5, 69�91. Ric�ur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge UniversityPress/Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l�Homme. Sebeok, T. , & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (Eds.). (1992). Biosemiotics. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Stewart, J. , Gapenne, O. , & Di Paolo, E. (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stockhausen, K. (1957).� wie die Zeit vergeht� Die Reihe , 3, 13�42. Tagg, P. (2013). Music�s meanings: A modern musicology for non-musos. New York, NY & Huddersfield, UK:The Mass Media Music Scholars�s Press. Varela, F. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. von Uexküll, J. (1957 [1934]). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds.In C. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5�80). New York, NY:International Universities Press. von Uexküll, J. (1982 [1940]). The theory of meaning, Semiotica, 42(1), 25�82. Windsor, W. L. (2004). An ecological approach to semiotics. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour,34(2),179�198.

Page 58: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Expressive Gestural Interaction Addyman, C. , French, R. M. , Mareschal, D. , & Thomas, E. (2011). Learning to perceive time: A connectionist,memory-decay model of the development of interval timing in infants. Paper presented at the Proc. of the 33rdAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI). Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formalsimilarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 362�365. Bajaj, A. (2007). Working memory involvement in stuttering: Exploring the evidence and research implications.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 32(3), 218�238. Bar-Haim, Y. , Kerem, A. , Lamy, D. , & Zakay, D. (2010). When time slows down: The influence of threat ontime perception in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 255�263. 76 Bolzinger, S. , & Risset, J. C. (1992). A preliminary study on the influence of room acoustics on pianoperformance. Journal de Physique IV, 2, 93�96. Brown, S. W. (2006). Timing and executive function: Bidirectional interference between concurrent temporalproduction and randomization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(7), 1464�1471. �orlu, M. , Maes, P.-J. , Muller, C. , Kochman, K. , & Leman, M. (2015). The impact of cognitive load on operaticsingers� timing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(429). �orlu, M. , Muller, C. , Desmet, F. , & Leman, M. (2014). The consequences of additional cognitive load onperforming musicians. Psychology of Music, 43(4), 495�510. Delignières, D. , Lemoine, L. , & Torre, K. (2004). Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion.Human Movement Science, 23(2), 87�103. Eerola, T. , Friberg, A. , & Bresin, R. (2013). Emotional expression in music: Contribution, linearity, andadditivity of primary musical cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(487). Fabian, D. , Timmers, R. , & Schubert, E. (Eds.). (2014). Expressiveness in music performance: Empiricalapproaches across styles and cultures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Furuya, S. , & Soechting, J. F. (2010). Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes duringpiano playing. Experimental Brain Research, 204(2), 223�237. Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 501�602).San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber�s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3),279. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Hopson, J. W. (2003). General learning models: Timing without a clock. In W. H. Meck (Ed.), Functional andneural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 23�60). Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press. Istók, E. , Friberg, A. , Huotilainen, M. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Expressive timing facilitates the neuralprocessing of phrase boundaries in music: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55150. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. M. , Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2010). Musical gestures. In R. I. Godøy & M.Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 12�35). New York, NY: Routledge. Kochman, K. , Demey, M. , Moelants, D. , & Leman, M. (2011). A case-study investigation of respiration inoperatic singing: An implementation of research design and applications. Journal of Interdisciplinary MusicStudies, 5(1), 41�55. Krampe, R. T. , Doumas, M. , Lavrysen, A. , & Rapp, M. (2010). The costs of taking it slowly: Fast and slowmovement timing in older age. Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 980�990. LaRue, J. (2005). Initial learning of timing in combined serial movements and a no-movement situation. MusicPerception, 22(3), 509�530. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes empowerment. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press. Maes, P.-J. , Giacofci, M. , & Leman, M. (2015). Auditory and motor contributions to the timing of melodiesunder cognitive load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5),1336�1352. Maes, P.-J. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Palmer, C. (2014). The role of working memory in the temporal control ofdiscrete and continuous movements. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 263�273 Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processinginformation. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343�352. Molnar-Szakacs, I. , & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to emotion. Social Cognitiveand Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235�241. Ornstein, R. E. (1969). On the experience of time. London, UK: Penguin Books. Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 331�346 Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006). Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in CognitivePsychology, 2(2�3), 183�198. Rattat, A.-C. (2010). Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(2), 145�162.

Page 59: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Repp, B. H. (1995). Expressive timing in Schumann�s �Träumerei�: An analysis of performances by graduatestudent pianists. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 2413�2427. Repp, B. H. (1997). Expressive timing in a Debussy prelude: A comparison of student and expert pianists.Musicae Scientiae, 1(2), 257�268. Repp, B. H. (1999). Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. MusicPerception, 16(4), 409�438. Repp, B. H. , & Keller, P. E. (2004). Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects ofintention, attention, and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(3), 499�521. 77 Rodger, M. W. M. , & Craig, C. M. (2011). Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete orcontinuous sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 214(3), 393�402. Ross, J. M. , & Balasubramaniam, R. (2014). Physical and neural entrainment to rhythm: Human sensorimotorcoordination across tasks and effector systems. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(576). Shove, P. , & Repp, B. H. (1995). Musical motion and performance: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. InJ. Rink (Ed.), The practice of performance (pp. 55�83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Torre, K. , & Balasubramaniam, R. (2009). Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization incontinuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 199(2), 157�166. Varlet, M. , Marin, L. , Issartel, J. , Schmidt, R. C. , & Bardy, B. G. (2012). Continuity of visual and auditoryrhythms influences sensorimotor coordination. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44082. Wolpert, D. M. , Diedrichsen, J. , & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 12(12), 739�751 Zelaznik, H. N. , Spencer, R. M. , & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Behavioral analysis of human movement timing. In S.Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 233�260). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J.-P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(12), 2288�2301. Baraldi, F. B. , De Poli, G. , & Rodà, A. (2006). Communicating expressive intentions with a single piano note.Journal of New Music Research, 35(3), 19�210. Bigand, E. , Vieillard, S. , Madurell, F. , Marozeau, J. , & Dacquet, A. (2005). Multidimensional scaling ofemotional responses to music: The effect of musical expertise and of the duration of the excerpts. Cognitionand Emotion, 19(8), 1113�1139. Camurri, A. , Castellano, G. , Ricchetti, M. , & Volpe, G. (2006). Subject interfaces: Measuring bodily activationduring an emotional experience of music. In S. Gibet , N. Courty , & J. F. Kamp (Eds.), Gesture in human-computer interaction and simulation (vol. 3881 of LNCS, pp. 268�279). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Canazza, S. , De Poli, G. , Rinaldin, S. , & Vidolin, A. (1997). Sonological analysis of clarinet expressivity. In M.Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt, and computing: Studies in cognitive and systematic musicology (pp. 431�440).Berlin, Germany: Springer. Canazza, S. , De Poli, G. , Rodà, A. , & Vidolin, A. (2003). An abstract control space for communication ofsensory expressive intentions in music performance. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3), 281�294. 85 Clynes, M. (1973). Sentics: Biocybernetics of emotion communication. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 220, 57�88. Clynes, M. , & Nettheim, N. (1982). The living quality of music: Neurobiologic basis of communicating feeling. InM. Clynes (Ed.), Music, mind, and brain (pp. 47�82). New York, NY: Plenum. Crisinel, A. S. , & Spence, C. (2010). As bitter as a trombone: Synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetesbetween tastes/flavors and musical notes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1994�2002. Da Pos, O. , Fiorentin, P. , Scroccaro, A. , Filippi, A. , Fontana, C. , Gardin, E. , & Guerra, D. (2013). Subjectiveassessment of unique colours as a tool to evaluate colour differences in different adaptation conditions. InProceedings of CIE Centenary Conference �Towards a New Century of Light� (p. 488). Paris, France:Commission Internationale de l�Eclairage. Da Pos, O. , & Pietto, M. (2010). Highlighting the quality of light sources. In P. Hanselaer & F. Leloup (Eds.),Proceedings of the 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on Appearance�When Appearance Meets Lighting (pp. 161�163).Ghent, Belgium: Commission Internationale de l�Eclairage. De Poli, G. , Mion, L. , & Rodà, A. (2009). Toward an action based metaphor for gestural interaction with musicalcontents. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3), 295�307. Dickie, G. (1997). Introduction to aesthetics: An analytic approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Eerola, T. , & Vuoskoski, J. K. (2011). A comparison of the discrete and dimensional models of emotion inmusic. Psychology of Music, 39, 18�49. Eitan, Z. , & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners� images of motion.Music Perception, 23(3), 221�247. Eitan, Z. , & Timmers, R. (2010). Beethoven�s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domainmappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition, 114(3), 405�422. Frances, R. , & Bruchonschweitzer, M. (1983). Musical expression and body expression. Perceptual and MotorSkills, 57(2), 587�595. Fran�k, M. , van Noorden, L. , & Režný, L. (2014). Tempo and walking speed with music in the urban context.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1361. Gabrielsson, A. , & Juslin, P. N. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer�sintention and the listener�s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68�91. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2009). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Juslin, P. N. (1997). Emotional communication in music performance: A functionalist perspective and somedata. Music Perception, 14(4), 383�418.

Page 60: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Juslin, P. N. , & Laukka, P. (2001). Impact of intended emotion intensity on cue utilization and decodingaccuracy in vocal expression of emotion. Emotion, 1(4), 381�412. Karbusicky, V. (1987). �Signification� in music: A metaphor? In T. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), The semi-otic web 1986 (pp. 430�444). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Liveright. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (vol. 11, pp.202�251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Luciani, A. (2009). Enaction and music: Anticipating a new alliance between dynamic instrumental arts. Journalof New Music Research, 38(3), 211�214. Luciani, A. , Florens, J.-L. , & Castagné, N. (2005). From action to sound: A challenging perspective for haptics.In A. Bicchi & M. Bergamasco (Eds.), World Haptics Conference 2005 (p. 5). Pisa, Italy: IEEE ComputerSociety. Marks, L. (1978). The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. New York, NY: Academic Press. Massie, T. H. , & Salisbury, J. K. (1994). The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects.Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment andTele-operator Systems, 55(1), 295�300. Mion, L. , & De Poli, G. (2008). Score-independent audio features for description of music expression. IEEETransaction on Speech, Audio and Language Process, 16(2), 458�466. Murari, M. , Rodà, A. , Canazza, S. , De Poli, G. , & Da Pos, O. (2015). Is Vivaldi smooth and takete? Non-verbalsensory scales for describing music qualities. Journal of New Music Research, 44(4), 359�372. Murari, M. , Rodà, A. , Da Pos, O. , Schubert, E. , Canazza, S. , & De Poli, G. (2015). Mozart is still blue: Acomparison of sensory and verbal scales to describe qualities in music. In J. Timoney & T. Lysaght (Eds.),Proceedings of Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 351�357). Maynooth, Ireland: MaynoothUniversity. Nielsen, F. V. (1987). Musical tension and related concepts. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), Thesemiotic web �86 (pp. 491�513). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J. , & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press. 86 Pantic, M. , & Rothkrantz, L. J. (2003). Toward an affect-sensitive multimodal human-computer interaction.Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(9), 1370�1390. Rodà, A. , Canazza, S. , & De Poli, G. (2014). Clustering affective qualities of classical music: Beyond thevalence-arousal plane. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 5(4), 364�376. Schubert, E. (1999). Measuring emotion continuously: Validity and reliability of the two-dimensional emotion-space. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51,154�165. Schubert, E. (2010). Continuous self-report methods. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of musicand emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 223�253). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Schubert, E. , & Fabian, D. (2014). A taxonomy of listeners� judgements of expressiveness in musicperformance. In D. Fabian , R. Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance:Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. 283�303). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Simner, J. , Mulvenna, C. , Sagiv, N. , Tsakanikos, E. , Witherby, S. , Fraser, C. , Scott, K. , & Ward, J. (2006).Synaesthesia: The prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception, 35(8), 1024�1033. Sloboda, J. A. , & Juslin, P. N. (2010). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,73(4),971�995. Ward, J. , & Mattingley, J. B. (2006). Synaesthesia: An overview of contemporary findings and controversies.Cortex, 42(2), 129�136. Ward, J. , & Simner, J. (2003). Lexical-gustatory synaesthesia: Linguistic and conceptual factors. Cognition,89(3), 237�261. Zbikowski, L. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor andthought (pp. 502�524). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Ashby, F. G. , & Maddox, W. T. (1992). Complex decision rules in categorization: Contrasting novice andexperienced performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 50�71 Benadon, F. (2003). Spectrographic and calligraphic cues in the identification of jazz saxophonists. In R. Kopiez, A. Lehman , I. Wolther , & C. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th ESCOM Conference (pp. 245�249). Hanover,Germany: epOs-Music, Osnabrück. Bowen, J. A. (1993). The history of remembered innovation: Tradition and its role in the relationship betweenmusical works and their performances. Journal of Musicology, 11, 139�173. Braasch, J. , & Ahrens, C. (2000). Attack transients of free reed pipes in comparison to striking reed pipes anddiapason pipes. Acustica, 86, 662�670. 94 Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21, 103�113. Dean, R. T. , & Bailes, F. (2010). Time series analysis as a method to examine acoustical influences on real-time perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review, 5, 152�175. Dean, R. T. , Bailes, F. , & Dunsmuir, W. T. M. (2014). Time series analysis of real-time music perception:Approaches to the assessment of individual and expertise differences in perception of expressed affect. Journalof Mathematics and Music, 8, 183�205.

Page 61: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Farbood, M. M. (2012). A parametric, temporal model of musical tension. Music Perception, 29, 387�428. Farbood, M. M. , & Upham, F. (2013). Interpreting expressive performance through listener judgments ofmusical tension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 998. Fletcher, N. H. (1977). Analysis of the design and performance of harpsichords. Acustica, 37, 139�147. Gabrielsson, A. , & Juslin, P. N. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer�sintention and the listener�s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68�91. Gingras, B. , Asselin, P. Y. , Goodchild, M. , & McAdams, S. (2009). Communicating voice emphasis inharpsichord performance. In J. Louhivuori , T. Eerola , S. Saarikallio , T. Himberg , & P. Eerola (Eds.),Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp.154�158). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Gingras, B. , Asselin, P.-Y. , & McAdams, S. (2013). Individuality in harpsichord performance: Disentanglingperformer-and piece-specific influences on interpretive choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 895. Gingras, B. , Lagrandeur-Ponce, T. , Giordano, B. L. , & McAdams, S. (2011). Perceiving musical individuality:Performer identification is dependent on performer expertise and expressiveness, but not on listener expertise.Perception, 40, 1206�1220. Gingras, B. , & McAdams, S. (2011). Improved score-performance matching using both structural and temporalinformation from MIDI recordings. Journal of New Music Research, 40, 43�57. Gingras, B. , McAdams, S. , & Schubert, P. (2010). The performer as analyst: A case study of J.S. Bach�s�Dorian� Fugue (BWV 538). In C. Utz (Ed.), Music Theory and Interdisciplinarity�8th Congress of the Gesellschaftfür Musiktheorie Graz 2008 (pp. 305�318). Saarbrücken, Germany: Pfau-Verlag Saarbrücken. Gingras, B. , Palmer, C. , Schubert, P. N. , & McAdams, S. (2016). Influence of melodic emphasis, texture,salience, and performer individuality on performance errors. Psychology of Music, 44, 847�863 Gingras, B. , Pearce, M. T. , Goodchild, M. , Dean, R. T. , Wiggins, G. , & McAdams, S. (2016). Linking melodicexpectation to expressive performance timing and perceived musical tension. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 594�609. Goodchild, M. , Gingras, B. , & McAdams, S. (2016). Analysis, performance, and tension perception of anunmeasured prelude for harpsichord. Music Perception, 34(1), 1�20. Hill, H. , & Pollick, F. E. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals frompoint-light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223�228 Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (2001). Music and emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Kendall, R. A. , & Carterette, E. C. (1990). The communication of musical expression. Music Perception, 8,129�164. Koren, R. , & Gingras, B. (2014). Perceiving individuality in harpsichord performance. Frontiers in Psychology,5(141). Krumhansl, C. L. (1996). A perceptual analysis of Mozart�s Piano Sonata K.282: Segmentation, tension, andmusical ideas. Music Perception, 13, 401�432. Loula, F. , Prasad, S. , Harber, K. , & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognising people from their movement. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 210�220. Madsen, C. K. , & Fredrickson, W. E. (1993). The experience of musical tension: A replication of Nielsen�sresearch using the continuous response digital interface. Journal of Music Therapy, 30, 46�63. McArdle, B. H. , & Anderson, M. J. (2001). Fitting multivariate models to community data: A comment ondistance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology, 82, 290�297. Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 15, 331�346. Palmer, C. (1996). On the assignment of structure in music performance. Music Perception, 14, 23�56. Palmer, C. , Jungers, M. K. , & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Episodic memory for musical prosody. Journal ofMemory and Language, 45, 526�545. Pearce, M. T. (2005). The construction and evaluation of statistical models of melodic structure in musicperception and composition (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Computing, City University, London, UK. Pearce, M. T. , Ruiz, M. H. , Kapasi, S. , Wiggins, G. A. , & Bhattacharya, J. (2010). Unsupervised statisticallearning underpins computational, behavioural, and neural manifestations of musical expectation. NeuroImage,50, 302�313. 95 Penttinen, H. (2006). On the dynamics of the harpsichord and its synthesis. In V. Verfaille (Ed.),Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-06) (pp. 115�120). Montreal,Canada. Repp, B. H. (1990). Patterns of expressive timing in performances of a Beethoven minuet by 19 famouspianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 622�641 Repp, B. H. (1992). Diversity and commonality in music performance�An analysis of timing microstructure inSchumann�s �Träumerei�. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2546�2568 Repp, B. H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminaryexperiments. Music Perception, 14, 419�444. Repp, B. H. , & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity: How pianists recognise their own performances.Psychological Science, 15, 604�609. Roads, C. (1996). The computer music tutorial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sloboda, J. A. (2000). Individual differences in music performance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 397�403. Stamatatos, E. , & Widmer, G. (2005). Automatic identification of musical performers with learning ensembles.Artificial Intelligence, 165, 37�56. Tsay, C. J. (2013). Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 14580�14585.

Page 62: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Vines, B. W. , Krumhansl, C. , Wanderley, M. , & Levitin, D. (2006). Cross-modal interactions in the perceptionof musical performance. Cognition, 101, 80�113. Amalberti, R. (2013). Navigating safety�Necessary compromises and trade-offs theory and practice. New York,NY: Springer. Badino, L. , D�Ausilio, A. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Fadiga, L. (2014). Sensorimotor communication inprofessional quartets. Neuropsychologia, 55(1), 98�104. Bracco, F. (2013). Promuovere la sicurezza. La gestione dei rischi nelle organizzazioni complesse [Italian:Fostering safety: Risk management in complex organizations]. Roma, Italy: Carocci. Bracco, F. , Piccinno, T. , & Dorigatti, G. (2014). Turning variability into emergent safety: The resilience matrixfor providing strong responses to weak signals. In I. Herrera , J. Maarten Schraagen , van der Vorm , & D.Woods (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Resilience Engineering (pp. 23�28). Sophia Antipolis:Resilience Engineering Association. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. Davidson, J. W. (2012). Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo andduo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 595�633. Gilboa, A. , & Tal-Shmotkin, M. (2010). String quartets as self-managed teams: An interdisciplinary perspective.Psychology of Music, 40(1), 19�41. Glowinski, D. , Baron, N. , Shirole, K. , Coll, S. Y. , Chaabi, L. , Ott, T. , Rappaz, M.-A. , Grandjean, D. (2015).Evaluating music performance and context-sensitivity with Immersive Virtual Environments. EAI EndorsedTransactions on Creative Technologies, 15(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/ct.2.2.e3. 104 Glowinski, D. , Dardard, F. , Gnecco, G. , Piana, S. , & Camurri, A. (2014). Expressive non-verbalinteraction in a string quartet: An analysis through head movements. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces,9(1), 55�68. Glowinski, D. , Mancini, M. , Cowie, R. , Camurri, A. , Chiorri, C. , & Doherty, C. (2013). The movements madeby performers in a skilled quartet: A distinctive pattern, and the function that it serves. Frontiers in Psychology,4(841). Gnecco, G. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Sanguineti, M. (2014). On the detection of the level of attention inan orchestra through head movements. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 7(4), 316�338. Graybiel, A. M. (2008). Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31(1), 359�387. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology andSystematics, 4(1), 1�23. Hollnagel, E. (2011). Epilogue: RAG-the resilience analysis grid. In E. Hollnagel , J. Pariès , D. D. Woods , & J.Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience engineering in practice: A guidebook (pp. 275�296). London, UK: Ashgate. Hollnagel, E. , Pariès, J. , Woods, D. D. , & Wreathall, J. (Eds.). (2011). Resilience engineering in practice: Aguidebook. London, UK: Ashgate. Hollnagel, E. , Woods, D. D. , & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering. London, UK: Ashgate. Hughes, V. (2012). Stress: The roots of resilience. Nature, 490(7419), 165�167. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , Dalla Bella, S. , & Koch, I. (2010). Auditory imagery shapes movement timing and kinematics:Evidence from a musical task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,36(2), 508�513 Moran, N. , Hadley, L. V. , Bader, M. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). Perception of back-channeling nonverbal feedbackin musical duo improvisation. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130070. Nakamura, J. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and thefoundations of positive psychology (pp. 239�263). New York, NY: Springer. Posner, M. I. , & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration ofpsychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1�23. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions inhuman performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257�266. Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuches & V. K. Jirsa(Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281�308). New York, NY: Springer. Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in CognitiveScience, 1(2), 353�367 Stiefelhagen, R. , & Zhu, J. (2002). Head orientation and gaze direction in meetings. In L. Terveen & D. Wixon(Eds.), Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems CHI 2002 (pp. 858�859). Minneapolis, MN:ACM. Summerfield, C. , & de Lange, F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural andcomputational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(11), 745�756. Wachs, P. , Righi, A. W. , & Saurin, T. A. (2012). Identification of non-technical skills from the resilienceengineering perspective: A case study of an electricity distributor. Work, 41(1), 3069�3076. Wrigley, W. J. , & Emmerson, S. B. (2013). The experience of the flow state in live music performance.Psychology of Music, 41(3), 292�305. Abbate, C. (1991). Unsung voices: Opera and musical narrative in the 19th century. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press.

Page 63: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Alessandri, E. , Williamson, V. J. , Eiholzer, H. , & Williamon, A. (2015). Beethoven recordings reviewed: Asystematic method for mapping the content of music performance criticism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 57. Bauman, R. (1992). Folklore, cultural performances, and popular entertainments: A communications-centeredhandbook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Clarke, E. F. (2014). Lost and found in music: Music, consciousness and subjectivity. Musicae Scientiae, 18(3),354�368. Clayton, M. (2012). What is entrainment? Definition and applications in musical research. Empirical MusicologyReview, 7(1�2), 49�56. Clayton, M. , Dueck, B. , & Leante, L. (2013). Experience and meaning in music performance. New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Collins, N. (2011). Trading faures: Virtual musicians and machine ethics. Leonardo Music Journal, 21, 35�39. Cone, E. T. (1974). The composer�s voice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cook, N. (2012). Music as performance. In M. Clayton , T. Herbert , & R. Middleton (Eds.), The cultural study ofmusic: A critical introduction (pp. 204�214). New York: Routledge. Cross, I. (2009). The nature of music and its evolution. In S. Hallam , I. Cross , & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxfordhandbook of music psychology (pp. 3�13). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Cumming, N. (1997). The subjectivities of �Erbarme Dich�. Music Analysis, 16(1), 5�44. Cumming, N. (2000). The sonic self: Musical subjectivity and signification. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UniversityPress. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense making. Phenomenology and the CognitiveSciences, 6(4),485�507. DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DeNora, T. (2011). Emotion as social emergence: Perspectives from music sociology. In P. N. Juslin & J.Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 159�183). New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Dibben, N. (2006). Subjectivity and the construction of emotion in the music of Björk. Music Analysis, 25(1�2),171�197. Ferguson, J. R. (2013). Imagined agency: Technology, unpredictability, and ambiguity. Contemporary MusicReview, 32(2�3), 135�149. Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: Evaluating popular music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Fritz, T. H. , Hardikar, S. , Demoucron, M. , Niessen, M. , Demey, M. , Giot, O. , Li, Y. , Haynes, J.-D. ,Villringer, A. , & Leman, M. (2013). Musical agency reduces perceived exertion during strenuous physicalperformance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(44), 17784�17789. Gabrielsson, A. (2011). Strong experiences with music: Music is much more than just music. New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15�31. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Green, L. (2009). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Hampshire, UK:Ashgate. Green, O. (2011). Agility and playfulness: Technology and skill in the performance ecosystem. OrganisedSound, 16(2), 134�144. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2006). Music and gesture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Herbert, R. (2011). Everyday music listening: Absorption, dissociation and trancing. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Hove, M. J. , & Risen, J. L. (2009). It�s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. SocialCognition, 27(6), 949. Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (2001). Music and emotion: Theory and research. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press. Karlsen, S. (2011). Using musical agency as a lens: Researching music education from the angle ofexperience. Research Studies in Music Education, 33(2), 107�121. Kim, J. H. , & Seifert, U. (2007). Embodiment and agency: Towards an aesthetics of interactive performativity.In C. Spyridis , A. Georgaki , G. Kouroupetroglou , & C. Anagnostopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Soundand Music Computing Conference (pp. 230�237). Lefkada, Greece: National Kapodistrian University of Athens. Kramer, L. (1995). Classical music and postmodern knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Launay, J. , Dean, R. T. , & Bailes, F. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction.Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 53�63. 112 Launay, J. , Dean, R. T. , & Bailes, F. (2014). Evidence for multiple strategies in off-beat tapping withanisochronous stimuli. Psychological Research, 78(5), 721�735. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. MacDonald, R. A. , Hargreaves, D. J. , & Miell, D. (2002). Musical identities (vol. 13). Oxford, UK: OxfordUniversity Press. McGuiness, A. , & Overy, K. (2011). Music, consciousness, and the brain: Music as shared experience of anembodied present. In D. Clarke & E. Clarke (Eds.), Music and consciousness: Philosophical, psychological, andcultural perspectives (pp. 245�261). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Molnar-Szakacs, I. , & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to �e�motion. Social Cognitiveand Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235�241.

Page 64: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Moore, A. F. (2013). Song means: Analysing and interpreting recorded popular song. Surrey, UK: Ashgate. Moran, N. (2014). Social implications arise in embodied music cognition research which can countermusicological �individualism�. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(676), 10.3389. Pacherie, E. (2010). Self-agency. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp. 440�462). Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Schiavio, A. , & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactiveaccount of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366�388. Steinbeis, N. , & Koelsch, S. (2009). Understanding the intentions behind man-made products elicits neuralactivity in areas dedicated to mental state attribution. Cerebral Cortex, 19(3), 619�623. Tomasello, M. , Carpenter, M. , Call, J. , Behne, T. , & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions:The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675�691. Tsakiris, M. , Longo, M. R. , & Haggard, P. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signaturesof agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2740�2749. Whittall, A. (2000). Subjectivity, synthesis, and hermeneutic narrative: Dissenting voices. The Musical Times,141(1873), 7�14. Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sense du mouvement. Paris, France: Odile Jacob. Bizley, J. K. , & Cohen, Y. E. (2013). The what, where and how of auditory-object perception. Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 14, 693�707. Chion, M. (1983). Guide des objets sonores. Paris, France: INA/GRM Buchet/Chastel. Elliott, D. , Helsen, W. , & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth�s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 342�357. Galantucci, B. , Fowler, C. A. , & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361�377. Gallese, V. , & Metzinger, T. (2003). Motor ontology: The representational reality of goals, actions and selves.Philosophical Psychology, 16(3), 365�388. Godøy, R. I. (2001). Imagined action, excitation, and resonance. In R. I. Godøy & H. Jorgensen (Eds.), Musicalimagery (pp. 237�250). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. 121 Godøy, R. I. (2003). Motor-mimetic music cognition. Leonardo, 36(4), 317�319. Godøy, R. I. (2006). Gestural-sonorous objects: Embodied extensions of Schaeffer�s conceptual apparatus.Organised Sound, 11(2), 149�157. Godøy, R. I. (2010). Thinking now-points in music-related movement. In R. Bader , C. Neuhaus , & U. Morgen-stern (Eds.), Concepts, experiments, and fieldwork: Studies in systematic musicology and ethnomusicology (pp.245�260). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. Godøy, R. I. (2011). Sound-action awareness in music. In D. Clarke & E. Clarke (Eds.), Music andconsciousness (pp. 231�243). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Godøy, R. I. (2013). Quantal elements in musical experience. In R. Bader (Ed.), Sound � perception � performance(pp. 113�128). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Godøy, R. I. (2014). Understanding coarticulation in musical experience. In M. Aramaki , M. Derrien , R.Kronland-Martinet , & S. Ystad (Eds.), Sound, music, and motion. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.535�547). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Godøy, R. I. , Haga, E. , & Jensenius, A. R. (2006). Playing �Air Instruments�: Mimicry of sound-producinggestures by novices and experts. In S. Gibet , N. Courty , & J.-F. Kamp (Eds.), GW2005, LNAI 3881 (pp.256�267). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Göschl, A. (1873). Caricatures of Liszt. Borsszem Jankó, 6 April 1873, p. 5. Grafton, S. T. , & Hamilton, A. F. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in thebrain. Human Movement Science, 26, 590�616 Griffiths, T. D. , & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11),887�892 Grossberg, S. , & Myers, C. W. (2000). The resonant dynamics of speech perception: Interword integration andduration-dependent backward effects. Psychological Review, 107(4), 735�767. Haken, H. , Kelso, J. , & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347�356. Hardcastle, W. J. , & Hewlett, N. (Eds.). (1999). Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Hogan, N. , & Sternad, D. (2007). On rhythmic and discrete movements: Reflections, definitions andimplications for motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 13�30. Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time, 1893�1917. English translationby John Barnett Brough . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Klapp, S. T. , & Jagacinski, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin,137(3), 443�462. Klapp, S. T. , Nelson, J. M. , & Jagacinski, R. J. (1998). Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythmsindependently? Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(4), 301�322. Küssner, M. B. , Tidhar, D. , Prior, H. M. , & Leech-Wilkinson, D. (2014). Musicians are more consistent: Gesturalcross-modal mappings of pitch, loudness and tempo in real-time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, article 789. Liberman, A. M. , & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1�36

Page 65: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Loram, I. D. , van De Kamp, C. , Lakie, M. , Gollee, H. , & Gawthrop, P. J. (2014). Does the motor system needintermittent control? Exercise and Sport Science Review, 42(3), 117�125. Nymoen, K. , Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Torresen, J. (2013). Analyzing correspondence between soundobjects and body motion. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 10(2), 9:1�9:22. Petitot, J. (1985). Morphogenèse du Sens I. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. Rosenbaum, D. (2009). Human motor control (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Rosenbaum, D. , Cohen, R. G. , Jax, S. A. , Weiss, D. J. , & van der Wel, R. (2007). The problem of serial orderin behavior: Lashley�s legacy. Human Movement Science, 26(4), 525�554. Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des objets musicaux. Paris, France: �ditions du Seuil. Thom, R. (1983). Paraboles et catastrophes. Paris, France: Flammarion. Wilson, M. , & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. PsychologicalBulletin, 131(3), 460�473. Anderson, A. N. , Kennedy, H. , DeWitt, P. , Anderson, E. , & Wamboldt, M. Z. (2014). Dance/movementtherapy impacts mood states of adolescents in a psychiatric hospital. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41, 257�262. Boone, R. T. , & Cunningham, J. G. (1998). Children�s decoding of emotion in expressive body movement: Thedevelopment of cue attunement. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 1007�1016. Brooks, D. , & Stark, A. (1989). The effect of dance/movement therapy on affect: A pilot study. AmericanJournal of Dance Therapy, 11, 101�112. Brownlow, S. , Dixon, A. R. , Egbert, C. A. , & Radcliffe, R. D. (1997). Perception of movement and dancercharacteristics from point-light displays of dance. The Psychological Record, 47(3), 411�421. Burger, B. , Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Relationships betweenperceived emotions in music and music-induced movement. Music Perception, 30, 519�535. Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013a). Influences of rhythm-andtimbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1�10 Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013b). Oh happy dance: Emotionrecognition in dance movement. In G. Luck & O. Brabant (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd InternationalConference on Music and Emotion (pp. 183�194). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Campos, J. J. , Campos, R. G. , & Barrett, K. C. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of emotionaldevelopment and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 25, 394�402. Camurri, A. , Lagerlöf, I. , & Volpe, G. (2003). Recognizing emotion from dance movement: Comparison ofspectator recognition and automated techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59,213�225. Camurri, A. , Mazzarino, B. , Ricchetti, M. , Timmers, R. , & Volpe, G. (2004). Multimodal analysis of expressivegesture in music and dance performances. In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.), Gesture-based communication inhuman computer interaction (pp. 357�358). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Clynes, M. (1973). Sentics: Biocybernetics of emotion communication. Annals of the New York Academy ofScience, 220(3), 55�131. Clynes, M. (1980). The communication of emotion: Theory of sentics. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.),Theories of emotions (vol. 1, pp. 171�216). New York, NY: Academic Press. Coulson, M. (2004). Attributing emotion to static body postures: Recognition accuracy, confusions, andviewpoint dependence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 117�139. Dahl, S. , & Friberg, A. (2007). Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians� body movements. MusicPerception, 24, 433�454. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes� error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY:Grosset/Putnam. Darwin, C. (2009). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York, NY: Oxford UniversityPress. (Original work published in 1872). de Meijer, M. (1989). The contribution of general features of body movement to the attribution of emotions.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(4), 247�268. Dittrich, W. H. , Troscianko, T. , Lea, S. E. G. , & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727�738. Donges, U.-S. , Kersting, A. , & Suslow, T. (2012). Women�s greater ability to perceive happy facial emotionautomatically: Gender differences in affective priming. PLoS ONE, 7, e41745. Eerola, T. , & Vuoskoski, J. K. (2011). A comparison of the discrete and dimensional models of emotion inmusic. Psychology of Music, 39, 18�49. Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 207�283). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Ekman, P. (Ed.). (1982). Emotions in the human face. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 129 Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 169�200. Ekman, P. , & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 29(3), 288�298. Gabrielsson, A. (2002). Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same or different? Musicae Scientiae, 5, 123�147. Gobl, C. , & Ní Chasaide, A. (2003). The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude.Speech Communication, 40, 189�212. Gross, M. M. , Crane, E. A. , & Fredrickson, B. L. (2010). Methodology for assessing bodily expression ofemotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 223�248 Jallais, C. , & Gilet, A.-L. (2010). Inducing changes in arousal and valence: Comparison of two mood inductionprocedures. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 318�325.

Page 66: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology (2 vols). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of music and emotion. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press. Kring, A. M. , & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686�703. Kuettel, T. J. (1982). Affective change in dance therapy. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 5, 56�64. Lagerlöf, I. , & Djerf, M. (2000). Communicating emotions: Expressiveness in modern dance. InternationalJournal of Psychology, 35(3�4), 225. Laukkanen, A. M. , Vilkman, E. , Alku, P. , & Oksanen, H. (1997). On the perception of emotions in speech: Therole of voice quality. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 22, 157�168. Levy, F. J. (2005). Dance movement therapy: A healing art (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: National Dance Association:American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. Likowski, K. U. , Weyers, P. , Seibt, B. , Stöhr, C. , Pauli, P. , & Mühlberger, A. (2011). Sad and lonely? Sad moodsuppresses facial mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 101�117. Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. , & Toiviainen, P. (2014). Emotion-driven encoding ofmusic preference and personality in dance. Musicae Scientiae, 18, 307�323. Lundqvist, L.-O. , & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9(3),203�211. McCann, P. , & Peppé, S. (2003). Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. International Journalof Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 325�350 Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. Montepare, J. , Goldstein, S. , & Clausen, A. (1987). The identification of emotions from gait information.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 33�42. Moody, E. J. , McIntosh, D. N. , Mann, L. J. , & Weisser, K. R. (2007). More than mere mimicry? The influenceof emotion on rapid facial reactions to faces. Emotion, 7, 447�457. Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002�1005. Niedenthal, P. M. , Barsalou, L. W. , Ric, F. , & Krauth-Gruber, S. (2005). Embodiment in the acquisition anduse of emotion knowledge. In L. F. Barrett , P. M. Niedenthal , & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion: Conscious andunconscious (pp. 21�50). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Pollick, F. E. , Paterson, H. M. , Bruderlin, A. , & Sanford, A. J. (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement.Cognition, 82(2), B51�B61. Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Dance moves reflect currentaffective state illustrative of approach-avoidance motivation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,7, 296�305. Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. PsychologicalBulletin, 99,143�165. Scherer, K. R. (2004). Which emotions can be induced by music? What are the underlying mechanisms? Andhow can we measure them? Journal of New Music Research, 33, 1�13. Schouwstra, S. J. , & Hoogstraten, J. (1995). Head position and spinal position as determinants of perceivedemotional state. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 673�674. Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York,NY: Cambridge University Press. Taga, G. (1995). A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for human locomotion: Real-time adaptabilityunder various constraints. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 113�121. Van Dyck, E. , Maes, P.-J. , Hargreaves, J. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). Expressing induced emotionsthrough free dance movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 175�190. Van Dyck, E. , Moelants, D. , Demey, M. , Deweppe, A. , Coussement, P. , & Leman, M. (2013). The impact ofthe bass drum on human dance movement. Music Perception, 30, 349�359. 130 Van Dyck, E. , Vansteenkiste, P. , Lenoir, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Leman, M. (2014). Recognizing inducedemotions of happiness and sadness from dance movement. PLoS ONE, 9, e89773. Walk, R. D. , & Homan, C. P. (1984). Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays. Bulletin of the PsychonomicSociety, 22(5), 437�440. Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 879�896. Weisfeld, G. E. , & Beresford, J. M. (1982). Erectness of posture as an indicator of dominance or success inhumans. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 113�131 Zentner, M. , Grandjean, D. , & Scherer, K. R. (2008). Emotions evoked by the sound of music:Characterization, classification, and measurement. Emotion, 8, 494�521

Cognitive and Sensorimotor Resources for the Encoding of Expressiveness DuringMusic Playing Addyman, C. , French, R. M. , Mareschal, D. , & Thomas, E. (2011). Learning to perceive time: A connectionist,memory-decay model of the development of interval timing in infants. Paper presented at the Proc. of the 33rdAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI). Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formalsimilarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 362�365.

Page 67: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Bajaj, A. (2007). Working memory involvement in stuttering: Exploring the evidence and research implications.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 32(3), 218�238. Bar-Haim, Y. , Kerem, A. , Lamy, D. , & Zakay, D. (2010). When time slows down: The influence of threat ontime perception in anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 255�263. 76 Bolzinger, S. , & Risset, J. C. (1992). A preliminary study on the influence of room acoustics on pianoperformance. Journal de Physique IV, 2, 93�96. Brown, S. W. (2006). Timing and executive function: Bidirectional interference between concurrent temporalproduction and randomization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(7), 1464�1471. �orlu, M. , Maes, P.-J. , Muller, C. , Kochman, K. , & Leman, M. (2015). The impact of cognitive load on operaticsingers� timing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(429). �orlu, M. , Muller, C. , Desmet, F. , & Leman, M. (2014). The consequences of additional cognitive load onperforming musicians. Psychology of Music, 43(4), 495�510. Delignières, D. , Lemoine, L. , & Torre, K. (2004). Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion.Human Movement Science, 23(2), 87�103. Eerola, T. , Friberg, A. , & Bresin, R. (2013). Emotional expression in music: Contribution, linearity, andadditivity of primary musical cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(487). Fabian, D. , Timmers, R. , & Schubert, E. (Eds.). (2014). Expressiveness in music performance: Empiricalapproaches across styles and cultures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Furuya, S. , & Soechting, J. F. (2010). Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes duringpiano playing. Experimental Brain Research, 204(2), 223�237. Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 501�602).San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber�s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3),279. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Hopson, J. W. (2003). General learning models: Timing without a clock. In W. H. Meck (Ed.), Functional andneural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 23�60). Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press. Istók, E. , Friberg, A. , Huotilainen, M. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Expressive timing facilitates the neuralprocessing of phrase boundaries in music: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55150. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. M. , Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2010). Musical gestures. In R. I. Godøy & M.Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 12�35). New York, NY: Routledge. Kochman, K. , Demey, M. , Moelants, D. , & Leman, M. (2011). A case-study investigation of respiration inoperatic singing: An implementation of research design and applications. Journal of Interdisciplinary MusicStudies, 5(1), 41�55. Krampe, R. T. , Doumas, M. , Lavrysen, A. , & Rapp, M. (2010). The costs of taking it slowly: Fast and slowmovement timing in older age. Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 980�990. LaRue, J. (2005). Initial learning of timing in combined serial movements and a no-movement situation. MusicPerception, 22(3), 509�530. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes empowerment. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press. Maes, P.-J. , Giacofci, M. , & Leman, M. (2015). Auditory and motor contributions to the timing of melodiesunder cognitive load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5),1336�1352. Maes, P.-J. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Palmer, C. (2014). The role of working memory in the temporal control ofdiscrete and continuous movements. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 263�273 Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processinginformation. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343�352. Molnar-Szakacs, I. , & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to emotion. Social Cognitiveand Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235�241. Ornstein, R. E. (1969). On the experience of time. London, UK: Penguin Books. Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 331�346 Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006). Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in CognitivePsychology, 2(2�3), 183�198. Rattat, A.-C. (2010). Bidirectional interference between timing and concurrent memory processing in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(2), 145�162. Repp, B. H. (1995). Expressive timing in Schumann�s �Träumerei�: An analysis of performances by graduatestudent pianists. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 2413�2427. Repp, B. H. (1997). Expressive timing in a Debussy prelude: A comparison of student and expert pianists.Musicae Scientiae, 1(2), 257�268. Repp, B. H. (1999). Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. MusicPerception, 16(4), 409�438. Repp, B. H. , & Keller, P. E. (2004). Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects ofintention, attention, and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(3), 499�521. 77 Rodger, M. W. M. , & Craig, C. M. (2011). Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete orcontinuous sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 214(3), 393�402.

Page 68: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Ross, J. M. , & Balasubramaniam, R. (2014). Physical and neural entrainment to rhythm: Human sensorimotorcoordination across tasks and effector systems. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(576). Shove, P. , & Repp, B. H. (1995). Musical motion and performance: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. InJ. Rink (Ed.), The practice of performance (pp. 55�83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Torre, K. , & Balasubramaniam, R. (2009). Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization incontinuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 199(2), 157�166. Varlet, M. , Marin, L. , Issartel, J. , Schmidt, R. C. , & Bardy, B. G. (2012). Continuity of visual and auditoryrhythms influences sensorimotor coordination. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44082. Wolpert, D. M. , Diedrichsen, J. , & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 12(12), 739�751 Zelaznik, H. N. , Spencer, R. M. , & Ivry, R. B. (2008). Behavioral analysis of human movement timing. In S.Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 233�260). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Beyond Emotion Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J.-P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(12), 2288�2301. Baraldi, F. B. , De Poli, G. , & Rodà, A. (2006). Communicating expressive intentions with a single piano note.Journal of New Music Research, 35(3), 19�210. Bigand, E. , Vieillard, S. , Madurell, F. , Marozeau, J. , & Dacquet, A. (2005). Multidimensional scaling ofemotional responses to music: The effect of musical expertise and of the duration of the excerpts. Cognitionand Emotion, 19(8), 1113�1139. Camurri, A. , Castellano, G. , Ricchetti, M. , & Volpe, G. (2006). Subject interfaces: Measuring bodily activationduring an emotional experience of music. In S. Gibet , N. Courty , & J. F. Kamp (Eds.), Gesture in human-computer interaction and simulation (vol. 3881 of LNCS, pp. 268�279). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Canazza, S. , De Poli, G. , Rinaldin, S. , & Vidolin, A. (1997). Sonological analysis of clarinet expressivity. In M.Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt, and computing: Studies in cognitive and systematic musicology (pp. 431�440).Berlin, Germany: Springer. Canazza, S. , De Poli, G. , Rodà, A. , & Vidolin, A. (2003). An abstract control space for communication ofsensory expressive intentions in music performance. Journal of New Music Research, 32(3), 281�294. 85 Clynes, M. (1973). Sentics: Biocybernetics of emotion communication. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 220, 57�88. Clynes, M. , & Nettheim, N. (1982). The living quality of music: Neurobiologic basis of communicating feeling. InM. Clynes (Ed.), Music, mind, and brain (pp. 47�82). New York, NY: Plenum. Crisinel, A. S. , & Spence, C. (2010). As bitter as a trombone: Synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetesbetween tastes/flavors and musical notes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1994�2002. Da Pos, O. , Fiorentin, P. , Scroccaro, A. , Filippi, A. , Fontana, C. , Gardin, E. , & Guerra, D. (2013). Subjectiveassessment of unique colours as a tool to evaluate colour differences in different adaptation conditions. InProceedings of CIE Centenary Conference �Towards a New Century of Light� (p. 488). Paris, France:Commission Internationale de l�Eclairage. Da Pos, O. , & Pietto, M. (2010). Highlighting the quality of light sources. In P. Hanselaer & F. Leloup (Eds.),Proceedings of the 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on Appearance�When Appearance Meets Lighting (pp. 161�163).Ghent, Belgium: Commission Internationale de l�Eclairage. De Poli, G. , Mion, L. , & Rodà, A. (2009). Toward an action based metaphor for gestural interaction with musicalcontents. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3), 295�307. Dickie, G. (1997). Introduction to aesthetics: An analytic approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Eerola, T. , & Vuoskoski, J. K. (2011). A comparison of the discrete and dimensional models of emotion inmusic. Psychology of Music, 39, 18�49. Eitan, Z. , & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners� images of motion.Music Perception, 23(3), 221�247. Eitan, Z. , & Timmers, R. (2010). Beethoven�s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domainmappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition, 114(3), 405�422. Frances, R. , & Bruchonschweitzer, M. (1983). Musical expression and body expression. Perceptual and MotorSkills, 57(2), 587�595. Fran�k, M. , van Noorden, L. , & Režný, L. (2014). Tempo and walking speed with music in the urban context.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1361. Gabrielsson, A. , & Juslin, P. N. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer�sintention and the listener�s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68�91. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2009). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Juslin, P. N. (1997). Emotional communication in music performance: A functionalist perspective and somedata. Music Perception, 14(4), 383�418. Juslin, P. N. , & Laukka, P. (2001). Impact of intended emotion intensity on cue utilization and decodingaccuracy in vocal expression of emotion. Emotion, 1(4), 381�412. Karbusicky, V. (1987). �Signification� in music: A metaphor? In T. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), The semi-otic web 1986 (pp. 430�444). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.

Page 69: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Liveright. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (vol. 11, pp.202�251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Luciani, A. (2009). Enaction and music: Anticipating a new alliance between dynamic instrumental arts. Journalof New Music Research, 38(3), 211�214. Luciani, A. , Florens, J.-L. , & Castagné, N. (2005). From action to sound: A challenging perspective for haptics.In A. Bicchi & M. Bergamasco (Eds.), World Haptics Conference 2005 (p. 5). Pisa, Italy: IEEE ComputerSociety. Marks, L. (1978). The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities. New York, NY: Academic Press. Massie, T. H. , & Salisbury, J. K. (1994). The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects.Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment andTele-operator Systems, 55(1), 295�300. Mion, L. , & De Poli, G. (2008). Score-independent audio features for description of music expression. IEEETransaction on Speech, Audio and Language Process, 16(2), 458�466. Murari, M. , Rodà, A. , Canazza, S. , De Poli, G. , & Da Pos, O. (2015). Is Vivaldi smooth and takete? Non-verbalsensory scales for describing music qualities. Journal of New Music Research, 44(4), 359�372. Murari, M. , Rodà, A. , Da Pos, O. , Schubert, E. , Canazza, S. , & De Poli, G. (2015). Mozart is still blue: Acomparison of sensory and verbal scales to describe qualities in music. In J. Timoney & T. Lysaght (Eds.),Proceedings of Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 351�357). Maynooth, Ireland: MaynoothUniversity. Nielsen, F. V. (1987). Musical tension and related concepts. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), Thesemiotic web �86 (pp. 491�513). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J. , & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press. 86 Pantic, M. , & Rothkrantz, L. J. (2003). Toward an affect-sensitive multimodal human-computer interaction.Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(9), 1370�1390. Rodà, A. , Canazza, S. , & De Poli, G. (2014). Clustering affective qualities of classical music: Beyond thevalence-arousal plane. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 5(4), 364�376. Schubert, E. (1999). Measuring emotion continuously: Validity and reliability of the two-dimensional emotion-space. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51,154�165. Schubert, E. (2010). Continuous self-report methods. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of musicand emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 223�253). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Schubert, E. , & Fabian, D. (2014). A taxonomy of listeners� judgements of expressiveness in musicperformance. In D. Fabian , R. Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance:Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. 283�303). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Simner, J. , Mulvenna, C. , Sagiv, N. , Tsakanikos, E. , Witherby, S. , Fraser, C. , Scott, K. , & Ward, J. (2006).Synaesthesia: The prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception, 35(8), 1024�1033. Sloboda, J. A. , & Juslin, P. N. (2010). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,73(4),971�995. Ward, J. , & Mattingley, J. B. (2006). Synaesthesia: An overview of contemporary findings and controversies.Cortex, 42(2), 129�136. Ward, J. , & Simner, J. (2003). Lexical-gustatory synaesthesia: Linguistic and conceptual factors. Cognition,89(3), 237�261. Zbikowski, L. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor andthought (pp. 502�524). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Conveying Expressivity and Individuality in Keyboard Performance Ashby, F. G. , & Maddox, W. T. (1992). Complex decision rules in categorization: Contrasting novice andexperienced performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 50�71 Benadon, F. (2003). Spectrographic and calligraphic cues in the identification of jazz saxophonists. In R. Kopiez, A. Lehman , I. Wolther , & C. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th ESCOM Conference (pp. 245�249). Hanover,Germany: epOs-Music, Osnabrück. Bowen, J. A. (1993). The history of remembered innovation: Tradition and its role in the relationship betweenmusical works and their performances. Journal of Musicology, 11, 139�173. Braasch, J. , & Ahrens, C. (2000). Attack transients of free reed pipes in comparison to striking reed pipes anddiapason pipes. Acustica, 86, 662�670. 94 Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21, 103�113. Dean, R. T. , & Bailes, F. (2010). Time series analysis as a method to examine acoustical influences on real-time perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review, 5, 152�175. Dean, R. T. , Bailes, F. , & Dunsmuir, W. T. M. (2014). Time series analysis of real-time music perception:Approaches to the assessment of individual and expertise differences in perception of expressed affect. Journal

Page 70: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

of Mathematics and Music, 8, 183�205. Farbood, M. M. (2012). A parametric, temporal model of musical tension. Music Perception, 29, 387�428. Farbood, M. M. , & Upham, F. (2013). Interpreting expressive performance through listener judgments ofmusical tension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 998. Fletcher, N. H. (1977). Analysis of the design and performance of harpsichords. Acustica, 37, 139�147. Gabrielsson, A. , & Juslin, P. N. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer�sintention and the listener�s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68�91. Gingras, B. , Asselin, P. Y. , Goodchild, M. , & McAdams, S. (2009). Communicating voice emphasis inharpsichord performance. In J. Louhivuori , T. Eerola , S. Saarikallio , T. Himberg , & P. Eerola (Eds.),Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp.154�158). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Gingras, B. , Asselin, P.-Y. , & McAdams, S. (2013). Individuality in harpsichord performance: Disentanglingperformer-and piece-specific influences on interpretive choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 895. Gingras, B. , Lagrandeur-Ponce, T. , Giordano, B. L. , & McAdams, S. (2011). Perceiving musical individuality:Performer identification is dependent on performer expertise and expressiveness, but not on listener expertise.Perception, 40, 1206�1220. Gingras, B. , & McAdams, S. (2011). Improved score-performance matching using both structural and temporalinformation from MIDI recordings. Journal of New Music Research, 40, 43�57. Gingras, B. , McAdams, S. , & Schubert, P. (2010). The performer as analyst: A case study of J.S. Bach�s�Dorian� Fugue (BWV 538). In C. Utz (Ed.), Music Theory and Interdisciplinarity�8th Congress of the Gesellschaftfür Musiktheorie Graz 2008 (pp. 305�318). Saarbrücken, Germany: Pfau-Verlag Saarbrücken. Gingras, B. , Palmer, C. , Schubert, P. N. , & McAdams, S. (2016). Influence of melodic emphasis, texture,salience, and performer individuality on performance errors. Psychology of Music, 44, 847�863 Gingras, B. , Pearce, M. T. , Goodchild, M. , Dean, R. T. , Wiggins, G. , & McAdams, S. (2016). Linking melodicexpectation to expressive performance timing and perceived musical tension. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 594�609. Goodchild, M. , Gingras, B. , & McAdams, S. (2016). Analysis, performance, and tension perception of anunmeasured prelude for harpsichord. Music Perception, 34(1), 1�20. Hill, H. , & Pollick, F. E. (2000). Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals frompoint-light displays. Psychological Science, 11, 223�228 Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (2001). Music and emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Kendall, R. A. , & Carterette, E. C. (1990). The communication of musical expression. Music Perception, 8,129�164. Koren, R. , & Gingras, B. (2014). Perceiving individuality in harpsichord performance. Frontiers in Psychology,5(141). Krumhansl, C. L. (1996). A perceptual analysis of Mozart�s Piano Sonata K.282: Segmentation, tension, andmusical ideas. Music Perception, 13, 401�432. Loula, F. , Prasad, S. , Harber, K. , & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognising people from their movement. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 210�220. Madsen, C. K. , & Fredrickson, W. E. (1993). The experience of musical tension: A replication of Nielsen�sresearch using the continuous response digital interface. Journal of Music Therapy, 30, 46�63. McArdle, B. H. , & Anderson, M. J. (2001). Fitting multivariate models to community data: A comment ondistance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology, 82, 290�297. Palmer, C. (1989). Mapping musical thought to musical performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 15, 331�346. Palmer, C. (1996). On the assignment of structure in music performance. Music Perception, 14, 23�56. Palmer, C. , Jungers, M. K. , & Jusczyk, P. W. (2001). Episodic memory for musical prosody. Journal ofMemory and Language, 45, 526�545. Pearce, M. T. (2005). The construction and evaluation of statistical models of melodic structure in musicperception and composition (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Computing, City University, London, UK. Pearce, M. T. , Ruiz, M. H. , Kapasi, S. , Wiggins, G. A. , & Bhattacharya, J. (2010). Unsupervised statisticallearning underpins computational, behavioural, and neural manifestations of musical expectation. NeuroImage,50, 302�313. 95 Penttinen, H. (2006). On the dynamics of the harpsichord and its synthesis. In V. Verfaille (Ed.),Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-06) (pp. 115�120). Montreal,Canada. Repp, B. H. (1990). Patterns of expressive timing in performances of a Beethoven minuet by 19 famouspianists. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 622�641 Repp, B. H. (1992). Diversity and commonality in music performance�An analysis of timing microstructure inSchumann�s �Träumerei�. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2546�2568 Repp, B. H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminaryexperiments. Music Perception, 14, 419�444. Repp, B. H. , & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity: How pianists recognise their own performances.Psychological Science, 15, 604�609. Roads, C. (1996). The computer music tutorial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sloboda, J. A. (2000). Individual differences in music performance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 397�403. Stamatatos, E. , & Widmer, G. (2005). Automatic identification of musical performers with learning ensembles.Artificial Intelligence, 165, 37�56.

Page 71: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Tsay, C. J. (2013). Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 14580�14585. Vines, B. W. , Krumhansl, C. , Wanderley, M. , & Levitin, D. (2006). Cross-modal interactions in the perceptionof musical performance. Cognition, 101, 80�113.

The Resilience Approach to Studying Group Interaction in Music Ensemble Amalberti, R. (2013). Navigating safety�Necessary compromises and trade-offs theory and practice. New York,NY: Springer. Badino, L. , D�Ausilio, A. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Fadiga, L. (2014). Sensorimotor communication inprofessional quartets. Neuropsychologia, 55(1), 98�104. Bracco, F. (2013). Promuovere la sicurezza. La gestione dei rischi nelle organizzazioni complesse [Italian:Fostering safety: Risk management in complex organizations]. Roma, Italy: Carocci. Bracco, F. , Piccinno, T. , & Dorigatti, G. (2014). Turning variability into emergent safety: The resilience matrixfor providing strong responses to weak signals. In I. Herrera , J. Maarten Schraagen , van der Vorm , & D.Woods (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Resilience Engineering (pp. 23�28). Sophia Antipolis:Resilience Engineering Association. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. Davidson, J. W. (2012). Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo andduo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 595�633. Gilboa, A. , & Tal-Shmotkin, M. (2010). String quartets as self-managed teams: An interdisciplinary perspective.Psychology of Music, 40(1), 19�41. Glowinski, D. , Baron, N. , Shirole, K. , Coll, S. Y. , Chaabi, L. , Ott, T. , Rappaz, M.-A. , Grandjean, D. (2015).Evaluating music performance and context-sensitivity with Immersive Virtual Environments. EAI EndorsedTransactions on Creative Technologies, 15(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/ct.2.2.e3. 104 Glowinski, D. , Dardard, F. , Gnecco, G. , Piana, S. , & Camurri, A. (2014). Expressive non-verbalinteraction in a string quartet: An analysis through head movements. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces,9(1), 55�68. Glowinski, D. , Mancini, M. , Cowie, R. , Camurri, A. , Chiorri, C. , & Doherty, C. (2013). The movements madeby performers in a skilled quartet: A distinctive pattern, and the function that it serves. Frontiers in Psychology,4(841). Gnecco, G. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Sanguineti, M. (2014). On the detection of the level of attention inan orchestra through head movements. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 7(4), 316�338. Graybiel, A. M. (2008). Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31(1), 359�387. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology andSystematics, 4(1), 1�23. Hollnagel, E. (2011). Epilogue: RAG-the resilience analysis grid. In E. Hollnagel , J. Pariès , D. D. Woods , & J.Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience engineering in practice: A guidebook (pp. 275�296). London, UK: Ashgate. Hollnagel, E. , Pariès, J. , Woods, D. D. , & Wreathall, J. (Eds.). (2011). Resilience engineering in practice: Aguidebook. London, UK: Ashgate. Hollnagel, E. , Woods, D. D. , & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering. London, UK: Ashgate. Hughes, V. (2012). Stress: The roots of resilience. Nature, 490(7419), 165�167. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , Dalla Bella, S. , & Koch, I. (2010). Auditory imagery shapes movement timing and kinematics:Evidence from a musical task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,36(2), 508�513 Moran, N. , Hadley, L. V. , Bader, M. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). Perception of back-channeling nonverbal feedbackin musical duo improvisation. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130070. Nakamura, J. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and thefoundations of positive psychology (pp. 239�263). New York, NY: Springer. Posner, M. I. , & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration ofpsychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1�23. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions inhuman performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257�266. Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuches & V. K. Jirsa(Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281�308). New York, NY: Springer. Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in CognitiveScience, 1(2), 353�367 Stiefelhagen, R. , & Zhu, J. (2002). Head orientation and gaze direction in meetings. In L. Terveen & D. Wixon(Eds.), Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems CHI 2002 (pp. 858�859). Minneapolis, MN:ACM.

Page 72: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Summerfield, C. , & de Lange, F. P. (2014). Expectation in perceptual decision making: Neural andcomputational mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(11), 745�756. Wachs, P. , Righi, A. W. , & Saurin, T. A. (2012). Identification of non-technical skills from the resilienceengineering perspective: A case study of an electricity distributor. Work, 41(1), 3069�3076. Wrigley, W. J. , & Emmerson, S. B. (2013). The experience of the flow state in live music performance.Psychology of Music, 41(3), 292�305.

Agency in Embodied Music Interaction Abbate, C. (1991). Unsung voices: Opera and musical narrative in the 19th century. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press. Alessandri, E. , Williamson, V. J. , Eiholzer, H. , & Williamon, A. (2015). Beethoven recordings reviewed: Asystematic method for mapping the content of music performance criticism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 57. Bauman, R. (1992). Folklore, cultural performances, and popular entertainments: A communications-centeredhandbook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Clarke, E. F. (2014). Lost and found in music: Music, consciousness and subjectivity. Musicae Scientiae, 18(3),354�368. Clayton, M. (2012). What is entrainment? Definition and applications in musical research. Empirical MusicologyReview, 7(1�2), 49�56. Clayton, M. , Dueck, B. , & Leante, L. (2013). Experience and meaning in music performance. New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Collins, N. (2011). Trading faures: Virtual musicians and machine ethics. Leonardo Music Journal, 21, 35�39. Cone, E. T. (1974). The composer�s voice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Cook, N. (2012). Music as performance. In M. Clayton , T. Herbert , & R. Middleton (Eds.), The cultural study ofmusic: A critical introduction (pp. 204�214). New York: Routledge. Cross, I. (2009). The nature of music and its evolution. In S. Hallam , I. Cross , & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxfordhandbook of music psychology (pp. 3�13). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Cumming, N. (1997). The subjectivities of �Erbarme Dich�. Music Analysis, 16(1), 5�44. Cumming, N. (2000). The sonic self: Musical subjectivity and signification. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UniversityPress. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense making. Phenomenology and the CognitiveSciences, 6(4),485�507. DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DeNora, T. (2011). Emotion as social emergence: Perspectives from music sociology. In P. N. Juslin & J.Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 159�183). New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Dibben, N. (2006). Subjectivity and the construction of emotion in the music of Björk. Music Analysis, 25(1�2),171�197. Ferguson, J. R. (2013). Imagined agency: Technology, unpredictability, and ambiguity. Contemporary MusicReview, 32(2�3), 135�149. Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: Evaluating popular music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Fritz, T. H. , Hardikar, S. , Demoucron, M. , Niessen, M. , Demey, M. , Giot, O. , Li, Y. , Haynes, J.-D. ,Villringer, A. , & Leman, M. (2013). Musical agency reduces perceived exertion during strenuous physicalperformance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(44), 17784�17789. Gabrielsson, A. (2011). Strong experiences with music: Music is much more than just music. New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15�31. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Green, L. (2009). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Hampshire, UK:Ashgate. Green, O. (2011). Agility and playfulness: Technology and skill in the performance ecosystem. OrganisedSound, 16(2), 134�144. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2006). Music and gesture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Herbert, R. (2011). Everyday music listening: Absorption, dissociation and trancing. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Hove, M. J. , & Risen, J. L. (2009). It�s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. SocialCognition, 27(6), 949. Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (2001). Music and emotion: Theory and research. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press. Karlsen, S. (2011). Using musical agency as a lens: Researching music education from the angle ofexperience. Research Studies in Music Education, 33(2), 107�121. Kim, J. H. , & Seifert, U. (2007). Embodiment and agency: Towards an aesthetics of interactive performativity.In C. Spyridis , A. Georgaki , G. Kouroupetroglou , & C. Anagnostopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Sound

Page 73: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

and Music Computing Conference (pp. 230�237). Lefkada, Greece: National Kapodistrian University of Athens. Kramer, L. (1995). Classical music and postmodern knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Launay, J. , Dean, R. T. , & Bailes, F. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction.Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 53�63. 112 Launay, J. , Dean, R. T. , & Bailes, F. (2014). Evidence for multiple strategies in off-beat tapping withanisochronous stimuli. Psychological Research, 78(5), 721�735. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. MacDonald, R. A. , Hargreaves, D. J. , & Miell, D. (2002). Musical identities (vol. 13). Oxford, UK: OxfordUniversity Press. McGuiness, A. , & Overy, K. (2011). Music, consciousness, and the brain: Music as shared experience of anembodied present. In D. Clarke & E. Clarke (Eds.), Music and consciousness: Philosophical, psychological, andcultural perspectives (pp. 245�261). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Molnar-Szakacs, I. , & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to �e�motion. Social Cognitiveand Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235�241. Moore, A. F. (2013). Song means: Analysing and interpreting recorded popular song. Surrey, UK: Ashgate. Moran, N. (2014). Social implications arise in embodied music cognition research which can countermusicological �individualism�. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(676), 10.3389. Pacherie, E. (2010). Self-agency. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp. 440�462). Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Schiavio, A. , & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactiveaccount of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366�388. Steinbeis, N. , & Koelsch, S. (2009). Understanding the intentions behind man-made products elicits neuralactivity in areas dedicated to mental state attribution. Cerebral Cortex, 19(3), 619�623. Tomasello, M. , Carpenter, M. , Call, J. , Behne, T. , & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions:The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675�691. Tsakiris, M. , Longo, M. R. , & Haggard, P. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signaturesof agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2740�2749. Whittall, A. (2000). Subjectivity, synthesis, and hermeneutic narrative: Dissenting voices. The Musical Times,141(1873), 7�14.

Postures and Motion Shaping Musical Experience Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sense du mouvement. Paris, France: Odile Jacob. Bizley, J. K. , & Cohen, Y. E. (2013). The what, where and how of auditory-object perception. Nature ReviewsNeuroscience, 14, 693�707. Chion, M. (1983). Guide des objets sonores. Paris, France: INA/GRM Buchet/Chastel. Elliott, D. , Helsen, W. , & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth�s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 342�357. Galantucci, B. , Fowler, C. A. , & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361�377. Gallese, V. , & Metzinger, T. (2003). Motor ontology: The representational reality of goals, actions and selves.Philosophical Psychology, 16(3), 365�388. Godøy, R. I. (2001). Imagined action, excitation, and resonance. In R. I. Godøy & H. Jorgensen (Eds.), Musicalimagery (pp. 237�250). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. 121 Godøy, R. I. (2003). Motor-mimetic music cognition. Leonardo, 36(4), 317�319. Godøy, R. I. (2006). Gestural-sonorous objects: Embodied extensions of Schaeffer�s conceptual apparatus.Organised Sound, 11(2), 149�157. Godøy, R. I. (2010). Thinking now-points in music-related movement. In R. Bader , C. Neuhaus , & U. Morgen-stern (Eds.), Concepts, experiments, and fieldwork: Studies in systematic musicology and ethnomusicology (pp.245�260). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. Godøy, R. I. (2011). Sound-action awareness in music. In D. Clarke & E. Clarke (Eds.), Music andconsciousness (pp. 231�243). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Godøy, R. I. (2013). Quantal elements in musical experience. In R. Bader (Ed.), Sound � perception � performance(pp. 113�128). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Godøy, R. I. (2014). Understanding coarticulation in musical experience. In M. Aramaki , M. Derrien , R.Kronland-Martinet , & S. Ystad (Eds.), Sound, music, and motion. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.535�547). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Godøy, R. I. , Haga, E. , & Jensenius, A. R. (2006). Playing �Air Instruments�: Mimicry of sound-producinggestures by novices and experts. In S. Gibet , N. Courty , & J.-F. Kamp (Eds.), GW2005, LNAI 3881 (pp.256�267). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning. New York, NY:Routledge. Göschl, A. (1873). Caricatures of Liszt. Borsszem Jankó, 6 April 1873, p. 5. Grafton, S. T. , & Hamilton, A. F. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in thebrain. Human Movement Science, 26, 590�616

Page 74: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Griffiths, T. D. , & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11),887�892 Grossberg, S. , & Myers, C. W. (2000). The resonant dynamics of speech perception: Interword integration andduration-dependent backward effects. Psychological Review, 107(4), 735�767. Haken, H. , Kelso, J. , & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347�356. Hardcastle, W. J. , & Hewlett, N. (Eds.). (1999). Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Hogan, N. , & Sternad, D. (2007). On rhythmic and discrete movements: Reflections, definitions andimplications for motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 13�30. Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time, 1893�1917. English translationby John Barnett Brough . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Klapp, S. T. , & Jagacinski, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin,137(3), 443�462. Klapp, S. T. , Nelson, J. M. , & Jagacinski, R. J. (1998). Can people tap concurrent bimanual rhythmsindependently? Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(4), 301�322. Küssner, M. B. , Tidhar, D. , Prior, H. M. , & Leech-Wilkinson, D. (2014). Musicians are more consistent: Gesturalcross-modal mappings of pitch, loudness and tempo in real-time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, article 789. Liberman, A. M. , & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1�36 Loram, I. D. , van De Kamp, C. , Lakie, M. , Gollee, H. , & Gawthrop, P. J. (2014). Does the motor system needintermittent control? Exercise and Sport Science Review, 42(3), 117�125. Nymoen, K. , Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Torresen, J. (2013). Analyzing correspondence between soundobjects and body motion. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 10(2), 9:1�9:22. Petitot, J. (1985). Morphogenèse du Sens I. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. Rosenbaum, D. (2009). Human motor control (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Rosenbaum, D. , Cohen, R. G. , Jax, S. A. , Weiss, D. J. , & van der Wel, R. (2007). The problem of serial orderin behavior: Lashley�s legacy. Human Movement Science, 26(4), 525�554. Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des objets musicaux. Paris, France: �ditions du Seuil. Thom, R. (1983). Paraboles et catastrophes. Paris, France: Flammarion. Wilson, M. , & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. PsychologicalBulletin, 131(3), 460�473.

The Communication of Emotions in Dance Anderson, A. N. , Kennedy, H. , DeWitt, P. , Anderson, E. , & Wamboldt, M. Z. (2014). Dance/movementtherapy impacts mood states of adolescents in a psychiatric hospital. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41, 257�262. Boone, R. T. , & Cunningham, J. G. (1998). Children�s decoding of emotion in expressive body movement: Thedevelopment of cue attunement. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 1007�1016. Brooks, D. , & Stark, A. (1989). The effect of dance/movement therapy on affect: A pilot study. AmericanJournal of Dance Therapy, 11, 101�112. Brownlow, S. , Dixon, A. R. , Egbert, C. A. , & Radcliffe, R. D. (1997). Perception of movement and dancercharacteristics from point-light displays of dance. The Psychological Record, 47(3), 411�421. Burger, B. , Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Relationships betweenperceived emotions in music and music-induced movement. Music Perception, 30, 519�535. Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013a). Influences of rhythm-andtimbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1�10 Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013b). Oh happy dance: Emotionrecognition in dance movement. In G. Luck & O. Brabant (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd InternationalConference on Music and Emotion (pp. 183�194). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Campos, J. J. , Campos, R. G. , & Barrett, K. C. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of emotionaldevelopment and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 25, 394�402. Camurri, A. , Lagerlöf, I. , & Volpe, G. (2003). Recognizing emotion from dance movement: Comparison ofspectator recognition and automated techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59,213�225. Camurri, A. , Mazzarino, B. , Ricchetti, M. , Timmers, R. , & Volpe, G. (2004). Multimodal analysis of expressivegesture in music and dance performances. In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.), Gesture-based communication inhuman computer interaction (pp. 357�358). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Clynes, M. (1973). Sentics: Biocybernetics of emotion communication. Annals of the New York Academy ofScience, 220(3), 55�131. Clynes, M. (1980). The communication of emotion: Theory of sentics. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.),Theories of emotions (vol. 1, pp. 171�216). New York, NY: Academic Press. Coulson, M. (2004). Attributing emotion to static body postures: Recognition accuracy, confusions, andviewpoint dependence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 117�139. Dahl, S. , & Friberg, A. (2007). Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians� body movements. MusicPerception, 24, 433�454.

Page 75: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes� error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY:Grosset/Putnam. Darwin, C. (2009). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. New York, NY: Oxford UniversityPress. (Original work published in 1872). de Meijer, M. (1989). The contribution of general features of body movement to the attribution of emotions.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(4), 247�268. Dittrich, W. H. , Troscianko, T. , Lea, S. E. G. , & Morgan, D. (1996). Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception, 25, 727�738. Donges, U.-S. , Kersting, A. , & Suslow, T. (2012). Women�s greater ability to perceive happy facial emotionautomatically: Gender differences in affective priming. PLoS ONE, 7, e41745. Eerola, T. , & Vuoskoski, J. K. (2011). A comparison of the discrete and dimensional models of emotion inmusic. Psychology of Music, 39, 18�49. Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 207�283). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Ekman, P. (Ed.). (1982). Emotions in the human face. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 129 Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 169�200. Ekman, P. , & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 29(3), 288�298. Gabrielsson, A. (2002). Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same or different? Musicae Scientiae, 5, 123�147. Gobl, C. , & Ní Chasaide, A. (2003). The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude.Speech Communication, 40, 189�212. Gross, M. M. , Crane, E. A. , & Fredrickson, B. L. (2010). Methodology for assessing bodily expression ofemotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 223�248 Jallais, C. , & Gilet, A.-L. (2010). Inducing changes in arousal and valence: Comparison of two mood inductionprocedures. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 318�325. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology (2 vols). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of music and emotion. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press. Kring, A. M. , & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686�703. Kuettel, T. J. (1982). Affective change in dance therapy. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 5, 56�64. Lagerlöf, I. , & Djerf, M. (2000). Communicating emotions: Expressiveness in modern dance. InternationalJournal of Psychology, 35(3�4), 225. Laukkanen, A. M. , Vilkman, E. , Alku, P. , & Oksanen, H. (1997). On the perception of emotions in speech: Therole of voice quality. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 22, 157�168. Levy, F. J. (2005). Dance movement therapy: A healing art (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: National Dance Association:American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance. Likowski, K. U. , Weyers, P. , Seibt, B. , Stöhr, C. , Pauli, P. , & Mühlberger, A. (2011). Sad and lonely? Sad moodsuppresses facial mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35, 101�117. Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. , & Toiviainen, P. (2014). Emotion-driven encoding ofmusic preference and personality in dance. Musicae Scientiae, 18, 307�323. Lundqvist, L.-O. , & Dimberg, U. (1995). Facial expressions are contagious. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9(3),203�211. McCann, P. , & Peppé, S. (2003). Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. International Journalof Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 325�350 Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. Montepare, J. , Goldstein, S. , & Clausen, A. (1987). The identification of emotions from gait information.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 33�42. Moody, E. J. , McIntosh, D. N. , Mann, L. J. , & Weisser, K. R. (2007). More than mere mimicry? The influenceof emotion on rapid facial reactions to faces. Emotion, 7, 447�457. Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002�1005. Niedenthal, P. M. , Barsalou, L. W. , Ric, F. , & Krauth-Gruber, S. (2005). Embodiment in the acquisition anduse of emotion knowledge. In L. F. Barrett , P. M. Niedenthal , & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion: Conscious andunconscious (pp. 21�50). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Pollick, F. E. , Paterson, H. M. , Bruderlin, A. , & Sanford, A. J. (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement.Cognition, 82(2), B51�B61. Saarikallio, S. , Luck, G. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Dance moves reflect currentaffective state illustrative of approach-avoidance motivation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,7, 296�305. Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. PsychologicalBulletin, 99,143�165. Scherer, K. R. (2004). Which emotions can be induced by music? What are the underlying mechanisms? Andhow can we measure them? Journal of New Music Research, 33, 1�13. Schouwstra, S. J. , & Hoogstraten, J. (1995). Head position and spinal position as determinants of perceivedemotional state. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 673�674. Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York,NY: Cambridge University Press. Taga, G. (1995). A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for human locomotion: Real-time adaptabilityunder various constraints. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 113�121.

Page 76: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Van Dyck, E. , Maes, P.-J. , Hargreaves, J. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). Expressing induced emotionsthrough free dance movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 175�190. Van Dyck, E. , Moelants, D. , Demey, M. , Deweppe, A. , Coussement, P. , & Leman, M. (2013). The impact ofthe bass drum on human dance movement. Music Perception, 30, 349�359. 130 Van Dyck, E. , Vansteenkiste, P. , Lenoir, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Leman, M. (2014). Recognizing inducedemotions of happiness and sadness from dance movement. PLoS ONE, 9, e89773. Walk, R. D. , & Homan, C. P. (1984). Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays. Bulletin of the PsychonomicSociety, 22(5), 437�440. Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 879�896. Weisfeld, G. E. , & Beresford, J. M. (1982). Erectness of posture as an indicator of dominance or success inhumans. Motivation and Emotion, 6, 113�131 Zentner, M. , Grandjean, D. , & Scherer, K. R. (2008). Emotions evoked by the sound of music:Characterization, classification, and measurement. Emotion, 8, 494�521

Social Music Interaction Bailey, D. (1992). Improvisation: Its nature and practice in music. London, UK: The British Library SoundArchive. Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago and London: University ofChicago Press. Blum, D. (1986). The art of quartet playing: The Guarneri quartet in conversation with David Blum. London, UK:Victor Gollancz Ltd. Cochrane, T. (2009). Joint attention to music. British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(1), 59�73. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Epstein, H. (1987). Music talks: Conversations with musicians. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Hart, E. , & Di Blasi, Z. (2015). Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study. Psychology ofMusic, 43(2), 275�290. Jackson, S. A. , & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience:The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17�35. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Lamm, C. , & Silani, G. (2014). Insights into collective emotions from the social neuroscience of empathy. In M.Salmela & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology(pp. 63�77). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Noy, L. , Dekel, E. , & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two peopleimprovising motion together. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(52), 20947�20952. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music,34(2),148�165. Scherer, K. (2005). What are emotions and how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4),695�729 Schiavio, A. , & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactiveaccount of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366�388. Waddington, C. E. (2013). Co-performer empathy and peak performance in expert ensemble playing. In A.Williamon & W. Goebl (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science (pp.331�336). Brussels, Belgium: The European Association of Conservatoires (AEC). Acebrón, J. A. , Bonilla, L. L. , Vicente, C. J. P. , Ritort, F. , & Spigler, R. (2005). The Kuramoto model: A simpleparadigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(1), 137�185. Auvray, M. , Lenay, C. , & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. NewIdeas in Psychology, 27(1), 32�47. 148 Baess, P. , Zhdanov, A. , Mandel, A. , Parkkonen, L. , Hirvenkari, L. , Mäkelä, J. P. ,� Hari, R. (2012). MEGdual scanning: A procedure to study real-time auditory interaction between two persons. Frontiers in HumanNeuroscience, 6, 285�291. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1�26. Camurri, A. , Mazzarino, B. , Ricchetti, M. , Timmers, R. , & Volpe, G. (2004). Multimodal analysis of expressivegesture in music and dance performances. In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.), Gesture-based communication inhuman-computer interaction (pp. 20�39). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Camurri, A. , Varni, G. , & Volpe, G. (2010). Towards analysis of expressive gesture in groups of users:Computational models of expressive social interaction. In S. Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodiedcommunication and human-computer interaction (pp. 122�133). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Caspers, S. , Zilles, K. , Laird, A. R. , & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation andimitation in the human brain. Neuroimage, 50(3), 1148�1167 Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2004). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. ESEM CounterPoint, 1, 1�45.

Page 77: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Condon, W. S. , & Ogston, W. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5,221�235. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the CognitiveSciences, 6(4),485�507. De Jaegher, H. , Di Paolo, E. , & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441�447. Di Paolo, E. A. , Rohde, M. , & Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction?Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas in Psychology, 26(2), 278�294. Fabbri-Destro, M. , & Rizzolatti, G. (2008). Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans.Physiology, 23(3), 171�179 Fenza, D. , Mion, L. , Canazza, S. , & Roda, A. (2005). Physical movement and musical gestures: A multilevelmapping strategy. In Proceedings of Sound and Music Computing, 5. Retrieved from http://www.smc-conference. org/smc05/papers/LucaMion/mapping.pdf. Fuchs, T. , & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutualincorpora tion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465�486. Gallese, V. (2001). The shared manifold hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal ofConsciousness Studies, 8(5�7), 33�50. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Gonzales, A. L. , Hancock, J. T. , & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of socialdynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3�19. Himberg, T. (2014). Interaction in musical time (Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Music, University ofCambridge, Cambridge, UK. Himberg, T. , Niinisalo, M. , & Hari, R. (2015). Coordination of fluent hand-movements in dyads. In Proceedingsof Rhythm Production and Perception Workshop RPPW-15 (p. 24). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University ofAmsterdam. Himberg, T. , & Thompson, M. R. (2011). Learning and synchronising dance movements in South Africansongs�Cross-cultural motion-capture study. Dance Research, 29(2), 305�328. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological andneurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658). Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica,32, 101�125. Kilner, J. M. , Paulignan, Y. , & Blakemore, S.-J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movementon action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522�525. Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 2021�2031. Konvalinka, I. , Vuust, P. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutualprediction and adaptation in joint tapping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11),2220�2230. Kuhl, P. , Tsao, F.-M. , & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-termexposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. In I. M. Verma (Ed.), Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096�9101. Marsh, K. L. , Johnston, L. , Richardson, M. J. , & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied,embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1217�1225. 149 Murray, L. , & Trevarthen, C. (1986). The infant�s role in mother�infant communications. Journal of ChildLanguage, 13(1), 15�29. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2009). A cross-modal heuristic for periodic pattern analysis of samba music anddance. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3), 255�283. Nessler, J. A. , & Gilliland, S. J. (2009). Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking isinfluenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback. Human Movement Science, 28, 772�785. Noy, L. , Dekel, E. , & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two peopleimprovising motion together. In I. M. Verma (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(52),20947�20952. Oliveira, H. M. , & Melo, L. V. (2015). Huygens synchronization of two clocks. Scientific Reports, 5, 11548. Phillips-Silver, J. , Aktipis, C. A. , & Bryant, G. A. (2010). The ecology of entrainment: Foundations ofcoordinated rhythmic movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 3�14. Pikovsky, A. , Rosenblum, M. , & Kurths, J. (2001). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12(6), 969�992. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 403�452 Ricciardi, E. , Bonino, D. , Sani, L. , Vecchi, T. , Guazzelli, M. , Haxby, J. V. ,� Pietrini, P. (2009). Do we reallyneed vision? How blind people �See� the actions of others. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(31), 9719�9724. Richardson, M. J. , Marsh, K. L. , Isenhower, R. W. , Goodman, J. R. L. , & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rockingtogether: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science,26(6), 867�891.

Page 78: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Sänger, J. , Muller, V. , & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Intra-and interbrain synchronization and network propertieswhen playing guitar in duets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(312). Schmidt, R. C. , & O�Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination.Ecological Psychology, 9, 189�206. Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs & V. K. Jirsa(Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (vol. 17, pp. 281�308). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Semin, G. R. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, coordination, and co-regulation. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding�Social, cognitive, affective, andneuroscientific approaches (pp. 119�147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Shockley, K. , Baker, A. A. , Richardson, M. J. , & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonalpostural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1),201�208. Stevanovic, M. , Himberg, T. , Niinisalo, M. , Kahri, M. , Peräkylä, A. , Sams, M. , & Hari, R. (2017). Sequentiality,mutual visibility, and behavioral matching: body sway and pitch register during joint decision making. InResearch on Language and Social Interaction, DOI:10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130, 1�21. Stevens, L. T. (1886). On the time-sense. Mind, 11(43), 393�404. Thaut, M. H. , & Kenyon, G. P. (2003). Rapid motor adaptations to subliminal frequency shifts duringsyncopated rhythmic sensorimotor synchronization. Human Movement Science, 22(3), 321�338. Timmers, R. , Endo, S. , Bradbury, A. , & Wing, A. M. (2014). Synchronization and leadership in string quartetperformance: A case study of auditory and visual cues. Cognitive Science, 5, 645. Tomasello, M. , Carpenter, M. , Call, J. , Behne, T. , & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions:The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675�735. Varela, F. J. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zhou, G. , Bourguignon, M. , Parkkonen, L. , & Hari, R. (2016). Neural signatures of hand kinematics in leadersvs. followers: A dual-MEG study. NeuroImage, 125, 731�738. Alderisio, F. , Bardy, B. G. , & di Bernardo, M. (2015). Entrainment and synchronization in heterogeneousnetworks of Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) oscillators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.00753. Buck, B. , MacRitchie, J. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). The interpretive shaping of embodied musical structure inpiano performance. Empirical Musicology Review, 8(2), 92�119. Clarke, E. (1988). Generative principles in music performance. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes inmusic (pp. 1�26). Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press. 157 Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11 (ESEM Counterpoint 1), 1�82 Coey, C. A. , Varlet, M. , & Richardson, M. J. (2012). Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervoussystem. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. Dahl, S. , & Friberg, A. (2007). Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians� body movements. MusicPerception, 24, 433�454. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Tokay, S. , Aloimonos, Y. , Li, Y. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. , & Fadiga, L. (2012).Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5),e35757. Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21(2), 103�113. Davidson, J. W. (2005). Bodily communication in musical performance. In D. Miell , R. MacDonald , & D. J.Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 215�228). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Davidson, J. W. , & Correia, J. S. (2002). Body movement. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.), Thescience and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 237�250). NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press. Delignières, D. , Lemoine, L. , & Torre, K. (2004). Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion.Human Movement Science, 23(2), 87�103. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Kant, V. (2014). Toward a dynamical theory of body movement in musicalperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Fairhurst, M. T. , Janata, P. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). Leading the follower: An fMRI investigation of dynamiccooperativity and leader-follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. NeuroImage, 84,688�697. Fine, J. M. , Likens, A. D. , Amazeen, E. L. , & Amazeen, P. G. (2015). Emergent complexity matching ininterpersonal coordination: Local dynamics and global variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 41(3), 723�737. Gabrielsson, A. (2003). Music performance research at the new millennium. Psychology of Music, 31, 221�272. Ginsborg, J. , Chaffin, R. , & Nicholson, G. (2006). Shared performance cues in singing and conducting: Acontent analysis of talk during practice. Psychology of Music, 34, 167�194 Ginsborg, J. , & King, E. (2009). Gestures and glances: The effects of familiarity and expertise on singers� andpianists� bodily movements in ensemble rehearsals. In J. Louhivuori , T. Eerola , S. Saarikallio , T. Himberg , &P. Eerola (Eds.), 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp.159�164). Jyväskylä, Finland: ESCOM. Glowinski, D. , Mancini, M. , Cowie, R. , Camurri, A. , Chiorri, C. , & Doherty, C. (2013). The movements madeby performers in a skilled quartet: A distinctive pattern, and the function that it serves. Frontiers in Psychology,4, 841. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438.

Page 79: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Haken, H. , Kelso, J. S. , & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human handmovements. Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347�356 Hove, M. J. , Marie, C. , Bruce, I. C. , & Trainor, L. J. (2014). Superior time perception for lower musical pitchexplains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 111(28), 10383�10388. Huys, R. , Studenka, B. E. , Rheaume, N. L. , Zelaznik, H. N. , & Jirsa, V. K. (2008). Distinct timing mechanismsproduce discrete and continuous movements. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(4), e100061. Kawase, S. (2014a). Gazing behavior and coordination during piano duo performance. Attention, Perception &Psychophysics, 76, 527�540. Kawase, S. (2014b). Assignment of leadership role changes performers� gaze during piano duo performances.Ecological Psychology, 26(3), 198�215. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27�46. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Loehr, J. (2016). Musical ensemble performance: Representing self, other, andjoint action outcomes. In E. S. Cross & S. S. Obhi (Eds.), Shared representations: Sensorimotor foundations ofsocial life (pp. 280�310). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Kelso, J. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 158 Knoblich, G. , Butterfill, S. , & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data.In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 54, pp. 59�101). Burlington, MA: AcademicPress. Kopiez, R. (2002). Making music and making sense through music: Expressive performance andcommunication. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching andlearning (pp. 522�541). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Konvalinka, I. , Bauer, M. , Stahlhut, C. , Hansen, L. K. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2014). Frontal alphaoscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. NeuroImage,94, 79�88. Konvalinka, I. , Vuust, P. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutualprediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2220�2230. Loehr, J. D. , Kourtis, D. , Vesper, C. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint actionoutcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1049�1061. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 64, 2153�2167. Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2006). Ensemble musicians� synchronization with conductors� gestures: Anautomated feature-extraction analysis. Music Perception, 24(2), 195�206. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17, 86�108. Marmelat, V. , & Delignières, D. (2012). Strong anticipation: Complexity matching in interpersonal coordination.Experimental Brain Research, 222(1�2), 137�148 Néda, Z. , Ravasz, E. , Brechet, Y. , Vicsek, T. , & Barabási, A. L. (2000). Self-organizing processes: The sound ofmany hands clapping. Nature, 403(6772), 849�850. Novembre, G. , Sammler, D. , & Keller, P. E. (2016). Neural alpha oscillations index the balance between self-other integration and segregation in real-time joint action. Neuropsychologia, 89, 414�425. Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. F. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in jointaction. Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2894�2903 Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. F. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). Motor simulation and the coordinationof self and other in real-time joint action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1062�1068. Novembre, G. , Varlet, M. , Muawiyath, S. , Stevens, C. , & Keller, P. (2015). The E-music box: An empiricalmethod for exploring the universal capacity for musical production and for social interaction through music.Royal Society Open Science, 2(11), 1�13. Noy, L. , Dekel, E. , & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two peopleimprovising motion together. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 108, 20947�20952. Palmer, C. , & Loehr, J. (2013). Meeting of two minds in duet piano performance. In L. F. Bernstein & A. Rozin ,Musical implications: Essays in honor of Eugence Narmour (pp. 323�338). Bernstein, NY: Pendragon Press. Pecenka, N. , & Keller, P. E. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotorsynchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 505�515. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early humaninteractions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Special Research Topic: Brain and Art), 6(26). Pikovsky, A. , Rosenblum, M. , & Kurths, J. (2003). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences(vol. 12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Ragert, M. , Schroeder, T. , & Keller, P. E. (2013). Knowing too little or too much: The effects of familiarity witha co-performer�s part on interpersonal coordination in musical ensembles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 368.

Page 80: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Repp, B. H. (1998). A microcosm of musical expression: I. Quantitative analysis of pianists� timing in the initialmeasures of Chopin�s Etude in E major. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1085�1100. Richardson, M. J. , Marsh, K. L. , Isenhower, R. W. , Goodman, J. R. , & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rockingtogether: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science,26(6), 867�891. Rodger, M. W. , & Craig, C. M. (2011). Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete orcontinuous sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 214(3), 393�402. Schmidt, R. C. , Carello, C. , & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visualcoordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance, 16(2), 227. Schmidt, R. C. , Fitzpatrick, P. , Caron, R. , & Mergeche, J. (2011). Understanding social motor coordination.Human Movement Science, 30(5), 834�845. Schmidt, R. C. , & O�Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination.Ecological Psychology, 9(3), 189�206. 159 Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Coordination:Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281�308). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Schmidt, R. C. , Richardson, M. J. , Arsenault, C. , & Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment toan environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4),860. Sebanz, N. , Bekkering, H. , & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 10, 70�76. Shockley, K. , Santana, M. V. , & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved incooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2),326. Skewes, J. C. , Skewes, L. , Michael, J. , & Konvalinka, I. (2015). Synchronised and complementarycoordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 551�565. Spencer, R. M. , & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Comparison of patients with Parkinson�s disease or cerebellar lesions inthe production of periodic movements involving event-based or emergent timing. Brain and Cognition, 58(1),84�93. Stephen, D. G. , Stepp, N. , Dixon, J. A. , & Turvey, M. T. (2008). Strong anticipation: Sensitivity to long-rangecorrelations in synchronization behavior. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387(21),5271�5278. Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York, NY: Hyperion. Ternström, S. (2003). Choir acoustics: An overview of scientific research published to date. International Journalof Research in Choral Singing, 1, 3�11. Thompson, M. R. , & Luck, G. (2012). Exploring relationships between pianists� body movements, theirexpressive intentions, and structural elements of the music. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 19�40. Torre, K. , & Balasubramaniam, R. (2009). Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization incontinuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 199(2), 157�166. Torre, K. , Varlet, M. , & Marmelat, V. (2013). Predicting the biological variability of environmental rhythms:Weak or strong anticipation for sensorimotor synchronization? Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 342�350. van Ulzen, N. R. , Lamoth, C. J. , Daffertshofer, A. , Semin, G. R. , & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics ofinstructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432(2),88�93. Varlet, M. , Coey, C. A. , Schmidt, R. C. , Marin, L. , Bardy, B. G. , & Richardson, M. J. (2014a). Influence ofstimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 40(5), 1849�1860. Varlet, M. , Coey, C. A. , Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2012a). Influence of stimulus amplitude onunintended visuomotor entrainment. Human Movement Science, 31(3), 541�552. Varlet, M. , Marin, L. , Capdevielle, D. , Del-Monte, J. , Schmidt, R. C. , Salesse, R. N. , Boulenger, J.-P. ,Bardy, B.G. , & Raffard, S. (2014b). Difficulty leading interpersonal coordination: Towards an embodiedsignature of social anxiety disorder. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(8), 29. Varlet, M. , Marin, L. , Issartel, J. , Schmidt, R. C. , & Bardy, B. G. (2012b). Continuity of visual and auditoryrhythms influences sensorimotor coordination. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44082. Varlet, M. , & Richardson, M. J. (2015). What would be Usain Bolt�s 100-meter sprint world record without TysonGay? Unintentional interpersonal synchronization between the two sprinters. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 36�41. Vesper, C. , Butterfill, S. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. NeuralNetwork, 23, 998�1003. Vines, B. , Wanderley, M. , Krumhansl, C. , Nuzzo, R. , & Levitin, D. (2004). Performance gestures ofmusicians: What structural and emotional information do they convey? In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.),Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction (vol. 2915, pp. 468�478). Berlin, Germany:Springer. Williamon, A. , & Davidson, J. W. (2002). Exploring co-performer communication. Musicae Scientiae, 6(1),53�72. Wöllner, C. , & Auhagen, W. (2008). Perceiving conductors� expressive gestures from different visualperspectives. An exploratory continuous response study. Music Perception, 26(2), 129�143. Zamm, A. , Pfordresher, P. Q. , & Palmer, C. (2015). Temporal coordination in joint music performance: Effectsof endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 607�615.

Page 81: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Atmaca, S. , Sebanz, N. , Prinz, W. , & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect.Social Neuroscience, 3(3�4), 410�420 Bishop, S. , & Goebl, W. (2014). Context-specific effects of musical expertise on audiovisual integration.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1123. Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327�341. Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intentions and agency. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Butterfill, S. (2012). Joint action and development. The Philosophical Quarterly, 62(246), 23�47. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Li, Y. , Tokay, S. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. , Aloimonos, Y. , & Fadiga, L. (2012).Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5),e35757. De Bruijn, E. R. A. , Miedl, S. F. , & Bekkering, H. (2008). Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates ofresponse inhibition in competition. Cortex, 44, 580�586 Friston, K. , & Frith, C. (2015). A duet for one. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 390�405 Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15,1�14. Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 3�17. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. (2012). Mental imagery in music performance: Underlying mechanisms and potential benefits.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252(1), 206�213. Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102�111. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological andneurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394. 166 Loehr, J. D. , Kourtis, D. , Vesper, C. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and jointaction outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049�1061. Loehr, J. D. , & Vesper, C. (2016). The sound of you and me: Novices represent shared goals in joint action.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 535�547. McEllin, L. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (in press). Joint action and ostensive communication. Melis, A. P. , & Semmann, D. (2010). How is human cooperation different? Philosophical Transaction of theRoyal Society, 365, 2663�2674. Novembre, G. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). A conceptual review on action-perception coupling in the musicians�brain: What is it good for. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(603), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00603. Pezzulo, G. , & Dindo, H. (2011). What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interactionproblems. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 613�630. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musicalinteractions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(26), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00026. Ragert, M. , Schroeder, T. , & Keller, P. E. (2013). Knowing too little or too much: The effects of familiarity witha co-performer�s part on interpersonal coordination in musical ensembles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 368. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12, 969�992. Repp, B. H. , & Keller, P. E. (2010). Self versus other in piano performance: Detectability of timing perturbationsdepends on personal playing style. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 101�110. Sacheli, L. M. , Tidoni, E. , Pavone, E. F. , Aglioti, S. M. , & Candidi, M. (2013). Kinematics fingerprints of leaderand follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 473�486. Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 211�218. Searle, J. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. Cohen , J. Morgan , & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentionsin communication (pp. 401�416). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sebanz, N. , Knoblich, G. , & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus�responsemappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234�1246. Silk, J. (2009). Nepotistic cooperation in non-human primate groups. Philosophical Transactions of the RoyalSociety B, 364, 3243�3254. Skyrms, B. (2004). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UniversityPress. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Tsai, C.-C. , Kuo, W.-J. , Hung, D. L. , & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to otherhumans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015�2024. van Schie, H. T. , Mars, R. B. , Coles, M. G. H. , & Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontaland motor cortices during error observation. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 549�554. Vesper, C. , Butterfill, S. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. NeuralNetworks, 23(8/9), 998�1003. Vesper, C. , van der Wel, R. P. D. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: Reducedtemporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3�4), 517�530.

Page 82: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Wilson, M. , & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. PsychologicalBulletin, 131(3), 460�473. Wolf, T. , Vesper, C. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2014). Do you believe in Mozart? The influence of beliefs onjoint action outcomes. Poster presented at the 12th Biannual Conference of the German Cognitive ScienceSociety, 29 September�2 October 2014. Abdallah, S. , & Plumbley, M. (2009). Information dynamics: Patterns of expectation and surprise in theperception of music. Connection Science, 21, 89�117. Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19,3�11. Beyls, P. (2007). Interaction and self-organisation in a society of musical agents. In E. Miranda & J. Martins(Eds.), Proceedings of ECAL 2007 Workshop on Music and Artificial Life (MusicAL 2007). Lisbon, Portugal. Biles, J. A. (2001). GenJam: Evolution of a jazz improviser. In P. J. Bentley & D. W. Corne (Eds.), Creativeevolutionary systems (pp. 165�187). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Blackwell, T. M. (2003). Swarm music: Improvised music with multi-swarms. In Proceedings of the 2003 AISBSymposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in Arts and Science (pp. 41�49). University of Wales,Aberystwyth: The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour. Chang, S. F. , Sikora, T. , & Purl, A. (2001). Overview of the MPEG-7 standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuitsand Systems for Video Technology, 11(6), 688�695. Collins, N. (2008). Reinforcement learning for live musical agents. In Proceedings of the International ComputerMusic Conference (ICMC). Belfast, Ireland: Michigan Publishing. Dahlstedt, P. , & McBurney, P. (2006). Musical agents: Toward computer-aided music composition usingautonomous software agents. Leonardo, 39, 469�470. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Li, Y. , Tokay, S. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. , Aloimonos, Y. Fadiga, L. (2012).Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5),e35757. De Cheveigné, A. , & Kawahara, H. (2002). Yin, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. TheJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1917�1930. Donnay, G. F. , Rankin, S. K. , Lopez-Gonzalez, M. , Jiradejvong, P. , & Limb, C. J. (2014). Neural substrates ofinteractive musical improvisation: An fMRI study of trading fours in jazz. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88665. Gifford, T. , & Brown, A. R. (2009). Do androids dream of electric chimera? In A. C. Sorensen (Ed.), Improvise:The Australasian Computer Music Conference 2009 (pp. 56�63). Brisbane, Queensland: Australasian ComputerMusic Association (ACMA). Gifford, T. , & Brown, A. R. (2011). Beyond reflexivity: Mediating between imitative and intelligent action in aninteractive music system. In K. Wilkie , R. Johnson , & S. Holland (Eds.), Proceedings of 25th BCS Conferenceon Human-Computer Interaction. Swinton, UK: British Computer Society. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26, 427�438 Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424�438. Guia�u, S. (1977). Information theory with applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Hamanaka, M. , Goto, M. , & Otsu, N. (2001). Learning-based jam session system for a guitar trio. InProceedings of the 2001 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 467�470). Havana, Cuba: MichiganPublishing. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Kim, H. G. , & Sikora, T. (2004). How efficient is MPEG-7 for general sound recognition? In D. R. vonRecklinghausen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Conference: 25th InternationalConference: Metadata for Audio. London, UK: Audio Engineering Society. King, E. C. (2004). Collaboration and the study of ensemble rehearsal. In S. Lipscomb (Ed.), Proceedings ofEighth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) (pp. 11�16). Chicago, IL:Northwestern University. Limb, C. J. , & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study ofjazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679. 176 Marchini, M. , Ramirez, R. , Papiotis, P. , & Maestre, E. (2013). Inducing rules of ensemble musicperformance: A machine learning approach. In G. Luck & O. Brabant (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rdInternational Conference on Music & Emotion (ICME) (pp. 341�347). Jyväskylä, Finland: Department of Music,University of Jyväskylä; Finnish Centre of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Music Research. Monson, I. (1996). Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress. Moore, G. P. , & Chen, J. (2010). Timings and interactions of skilled musicians. Biological Cybernetics,103(5),401�414. Moran, N. , Hadley, L. V. , Bader, M. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). Perception of �back-channeling� nonverbal feedbackin musical duo improvisation. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130070. Müller, V. , Sänger, J. , & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Intra-and inter-brain synchronization during musicalimprovisation on the guitar. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73852. Murray-Rust, D. , & Smaill, A. (2011). Towards a model of musical interaction and communication. ArtificialIntelligence, 175(9�10), 1697�1721. Murray-Rust, D. , Smaill, A. , & Edwards, M. (2006). MAMA: An architecture for interactive musical agents. InG. Brewka , S. Coraeschi , A. Perini , & P. Traverso (Eds.), Proceedings of ECAI 2006 (pp. 36�40). Amsterdam,

Page 83: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

The Netherlands: IOS Press. Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action:Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2894�2903. Papiotis, P. , Marchini, M. , & Maestre, E. (2012). Computational analysis of solo versus ensemble performancein string quartets: Dynamics and intonation. In E. Cambouropoulos , C. Tsougras , P. Mavromats , & K.Pstiades (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp.778�784). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Schober, M. F. , & Spiro, N. (2013). How much do jazz players share understanding of their performance? Acase study. In A. Williamon & W. Goebl (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on PerformanceScience 2013 (pp. 257�262). Brussels, Belgium: European Association of Conservatoires. Schögler, B. (2000). Studying temporal co-ordination in jazz duets. Musicae Scientiae, 3, 75�91. Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Timing in solo and duet piano performances. The Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 36, 577�595. Wulfhorst, R. D. , Nakayama, L. , & Vicari, R. M. (2003). A multiagent approach for musical interactive systems.In J. S. Rosenschein , T. Sandholm , M. Wooldbridge , & M. Yokoo (Eds.) Proceedings of AAMAS, the SecondInternational Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 584�591). Melbourne,Australia: ACM New York. Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J. P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 44(12), 2288�2301. Cadoz, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2000). Gesture-music. Trends in Gestural Control of Music, 71�94,https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01105543. Fairhurst, M. T. , Janata, P. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). Leading the follower: An fMRI investigation of dynamiccooperativity and leader�Follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. Neuroimage, 84,688�697. Farella, E. , O�Modhrain, S. , Benini, L. , & Riccó, B. (2006). Gesture signature for ambient intelligenceapplications: A feasibility study. In K. Fishkin , B. Schiele , P. Nixon , & A. Quigley (Eds.), Pervasive Computing,3968, 288�304 Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNetherlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27�46 Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 102�111. 185 Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , & Naveda, L. (2010). Basic gestures as spatiotemporal reference frames for repetitive dance/musicpatterns in Samba and Charleston. Music Perception, 28(1), 71�91. Loula, F. , Prasad, S. , Harber, K. , & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210. Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute ofSciences, 2, 49�55. Nusseck, M. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2009). Music and motion-how music-related ancillary body movementscontribute to the experience of music. Music Perception, 26(4), 335�353. Repp, B. H. (1992). Diversity and commonality in music performance: An analysis of timing microstructure inSchumann�s �Träumerei�. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(5), 2546�2568. Repp, B. H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminaryexperiments. Music Perception, 14(4), 419�444. Seashore, C. E. (1938). Psychology of music. New York, NY: Dover publications. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. Wanderley, M. M. (2002). Quantitative analysis of non-obvious performer gestures. In I. Wachsmuth & T. Sowa(Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (vol. 2298, pp. 241�253). Berlin, Germany:Springer. Wanderley, M. M. , Vines, B. W. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97�113. Wöllner, C. (2012). Self-recognition of highly skilled actions: A study of orchestral conductors. Consciousnessand Cognition, 21(3), 1311�1321. Wöllner, C. , & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2010). Keeping an eye on the violinist: Motor experts show superior timingconsistency in a visual perception task. Psychological Research, 74(6), 579�585. Alluri, V. , Toiviainen, P. , Jääskeläinen, I. P. , Glerean, E. , Sams, M. , & Brattico, E. (2012). Large-scale brainnetworks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. Neuroimage, 59, 677�3689. 194 Burger, B. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Mocap toolbox�A Matlab toolbox for computational analysis ofmovement data. In R. Bresin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp.172�178). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

Page 84: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Schnell, N. (2010). Towards a gesture-sound cross-modal analysis. In S.Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp.158�170). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Davidson, J. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychologyof Music, 21, 103�113. Dempster, W. T. , Gabel, W. C. , & Felts, W. J. L. (1959). The anthropometry of manual work space for theseated subject. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 17, 289�317. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26, 425�427. Himberg, T. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Dyadic entrainment and interaction in African dance. In S. Demorest ,S. Morrison , & P. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference for Music Perception andCognition (ICMPC �11) (pp. 425�428). Seattle, USA: University of Washington. Himberg, T. , & Thompson, M. R. (2011). Learning and synchronizing dance movements in South Africansongs: Cross-cultural motion-capture study. Dance Research, 29(special electronic issue), 305�328. Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 28, 321�377. Huang, J. , & Krumhansl, C. L. (2011). What does seeing the performer add? It depends on musical style,amount of stage behavior, and audience expertise. Musicae Scientiae, 15, 343�364. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interaction (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28, 27�46. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Nymoen, K. , Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Torresen, J. (2013). Analyzing correspondence between soundobjects and body motion. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 10, article 9, 1�22 Palmer, C. , Koopmans, E. , Carter, C. , Loehr, J. , & Wanderley, M. (2009). Synchronization of motion andtiming in clarinet performance. In A. Williamon , S. Pretty , & R. Buck (Eds.), Proceedings of the InternationalSymposium on Performance Science (pp. 159�164). Utrecht, The Netherlands: European Association ofConservatories (AEC). Pyper, B. J. , & Peterman, R. M. (1998). Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlationanalyses of fish data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55, 2127�2140 Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 403�452. Sherry, A. , & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personalityresearch: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 37�48. Thompson, M. R. , Diapoulis, G. , Johnson, S. , Kwan, P. Y. , & Himberg, T. (2015). Effect of tempo and visionon interpersonal coordination of timing in dyadic performance. In M. Aramaki , R. Kronland-Martinet , & S.Ystad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research(pp. 16�23). Plymouth, UK: University of Plymouth. Thompson, M. R. , & Luck, G. (2012). Exploring relationships between pianists� body movements, theirexpressive intentions, and structural elements of the music. Musicae Scientiae, 16, 19�40. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28, 59�70. Vuoskoski, J. , Thompson, M. , Spence, C. , & Clarke, E. (2013). Crossmodal interactions in the perception ofexpressivity in musical performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 591�604 Wanderley, M. M. , Vines, B. W. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34, 97�113. Baer, L. H. , Thibodeau, J. L. , Gralnick, T. M. , Li, K. Z. , & Penhune, V. (2013). The role of musical training inemergent and event-based timing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14(7), 191. Berens, P. (2009). CircStat: A Matlab toolbox for circular statistics. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(10), 1�21. Bobin-Bègue, A. , & Provasi, J. (2005). Tempo discrimination in 3-and 4-year-old children: Performance andthreshold. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 16(2). Bobin-Bègue, A. , & Provasi, J. (2009). Régulation rythmique avant 4 ans: Effet d�un tempo auditif sur le tempomoteur. L�Année Psychologique, 108(4), 631. Delignières, D. , & Torre, K. (2011). Event-based and emergent timing: Dichotomy or continuum? A reply toRepp and Steinman (2010). Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(4), 311�318. Drake, C. , Jones, M. R. , & Baruch., C. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences:Attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition, 77(3), 251�288. Fran�k, M. , Van Noorden, L. , & Režný, L. (2014). Tempo and walking speed with music in the urban context.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1361. Himberg, T. (2014). Interaction in musical time (Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Music, University ofCambridge, Cambridge, UK. Kirschner, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschoolchildren. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 299�314. Kneubühl, U. (1997). Oscillations and waves. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Large, E. W. (1996). Modeling beat perception with a nonlinear oscillator. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings ofthe Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. MacDougall, H. G. , & Moore, S. T. (2005). Marching to the beat of the same drummer: The spontaneoustempo of human locomotion. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99(3), 1164�1173.

Page 85: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

McAuley, J. D. , Jones, M. R. , Holub, S. , Johnston, M. H. , & Miller, N. S. (2006). The time of our lives:Lifespan development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135(3), 348�367. 204 Moens, B. , Muller, C. , Van Noorden, L. , Fran�k., M. , Celie, B. , Boone, J. , Bourgois, J. , & Leman, M.(2014). Encouraging spontaneous synchronisation with D-Jogger, an adaptive music player that alignsmovement and music. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114234. Ozçali�kan, S. , & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Sex differences in language first appear in gesture. DevelopmentalScience, 13(5), 752�760. Provasi, J. , & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronization in 2 ½- and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220�231. Rankin, S. K. , Fink, P. W. , & Large, E. W. (2014). Fractal structure enables temporal prediction in music.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136, EL256. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 403�452. Schulze, H. H. , Cordes, A. , & Vorberg, D. (2005). Keeping synchrony while tempo changes: Accelerando andritardando. Music Perception, 22(3), 461�477. Stijns, F. , Van Noorden, L. , Moelants, D. , & Leman, M. (2007). Walking on music. Human Movement Science,26(5),769�785. Van Noorden, L. , & Moelants, D. (1999). Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. Journal of New MusicResearch, 28(1), 43�66. Winkler, I. , Háden, G. P. , Ladinig, O. , Sziller, I. , & Honing, H. (2009). Newborn infants detect the beat inmusic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(7), 2468�2471.

Group Flow Bailey, D. (1992). Improvisation: Its nature and practice in music. London, UK: The British Library SoundArchive. Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago and London: University ofChicago Press. Blum, D. (1986). The art of quartet playing: The Guarneri quartet in conversation with David Blum. London, UK:Victor Gollancz Ltd. Cochrane, T. (2009). Joint attention to music. British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(1), 59�73. Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Epstein, H. (1987). Music talks: Conversations with musicians. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Hart, E. , & Di Blasi, Z. (2015). Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study. Psychology ofMusic, 43(2), 275�290. Jackson, S. A. , & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience:The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17�35. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Lamm, C. , & Silani, G. (2014). Insights into collective emotions from the social neuroscience of empathy. In M.Salmela & C. von Scheve (Eds.), Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology(pp. 63�77). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Noy, L. , Dekel, E. , & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two peopleimprovising motion together. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(52), 20947�20952. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music,34(2),148�165. Scherer, K. (2005). What are emotions and how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4),695�729 Schiavio, A. , & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactiveaccount of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366�388. Waddington, C. E. (2013). Co-performer empathy and peak performance in expert ensemble playing. In A.Williamon & W. Goebl (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science (pp.331�336). Brussels, Belgium: The European Association of Conservatoires (AEC).

Entrainment and Mutual Adaptation in Musical Movement and Dance Acebrón, J. A. , Bonilla, L. L. , Vicente, C. J. P. , Ritort, F. , & Spigler, R. (2005). The Kuramoto model: A simpleparadigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(1), 137�185. Auvray, M. , Lenay, C. , & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. NewIdeas in Psychology, 27(1), 32�47.

Page 86: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

148 Baess, P. , Zhdanov, A. , Mandel, A. , Parkkonen, L. , Hirvenkari, L. , Mäkelä, J. P. ,� Hari, R. (2012). MEGdual scanning: A procedure to study real-time auditory interaction between two persons. Frontiers in HumanNeuroscience, 6, 285�291. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1�26. Camurri, A. , Mazzarino, B. , Ricchetti, M. , Timmers, R. , & Volpe, G. (2004). Multimodal analysis of expressivegesture in music and dance performances. In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.), Gesture-based communication inhuman-computer interaction (pp. 20�39). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Camurri, A. , Varni, G. , & Volpe, G. (2010). Towards analysis of expressive gesture in groups of users:Computational models of expressive social interaction. In S. Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodiedcommunication and human-computer interaction (pp. 122�133). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Caspers, S. , Zilles, K. , Laird, A. R. , & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation andimitation in the human brain. Neuroimage, 50(3), 1148�1167 Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2004). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. ESEM CounterPoint, 1, 1�45. Condon, W. S. , & Ogston, W. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5,221�235. De Jaegher, H. , & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the CognitiveSciences, 6(4),485�507. De Jaegher, H. , Di Paolo, E. , & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 441�447. Di Paolo, E. A. , Rohde, M. , & Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction?Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas in Psychology, 26(2), 278�294. Fabbri-Destro, M. , & Rizzolatti, G. (2008). Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans.Physiology, 23(3), 171�179 Fenza, D. , Mion, L. , Canazza, S. , & Roda, A. (2005). Physical movement and musical gestures: A multilevelmapping strategy. In Proceedings of Sound and Music Computing, 5. Retrieved from http://www.smc-conference. org/smc05/papers/LucaMion/mapping.pdf. Fuchs, T. , & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutualincorpora tion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465�486. Gallese, V. (2001). The shared manifold hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal ofConsciousness Studies, 8(5�7), 33�50. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Gonzales, A. L. , Hancock, J. T. , & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of socialdynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3�19. Himberg, T. (2014). Interaction in musical time (Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Music, University ofCambridge, Cambridge, UK. Himberg, T. , Niinisalo, M. , & Hari, R. (2015). Coordination of fluent hand-movements in dyads. In Proceedingsof Rhythm Production and Perception Workshop RPPW-15 (p. 24). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University ofAmsterdam. Himberg, T. , & Thompson, M. R. (2011). Learning and synchronising dance movements in South Africansongs�Cross-cultural motion-capture study. Dance Research, 29(2), 305�328. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological andneurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658). Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica,32, 101�125. Kilner, J. M. , Paulignan, Y. , & Blakemore, S.-J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movementon action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522�525. Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 2021�2031. Konvalinka, I. , Vuust, P. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutualprediction and adaptation in joint tapping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11),2220�2230. Kuhl, P. , Tsao, F.-M. , & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-termexposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. In I. M. Verma (Ed.), Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096�9101. Marsh, K. L. , Johnston, L. , Richardson, M. J. , & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied,embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1217�1225. 149 Murray, L. , & Trevarthen, C. (1986). The infant�s role in mother�infant communications. Journal of ChildLanguage, 13(1), 15�29. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2009). A cross-modal heuristic for periodic pattern analysis of samba music anddance. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3), 255�283. Nessler, J. A. , & Gilliland, S. J. (2009). Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking isinfluenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback. Human Movement Science, 28, 772�785. Noy, L. , Dekel, E. , & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two peopleimprovising motion together. In I. M. Verma (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(52),20947�20952.

Page 87: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Oliveira, H. M. , & Melo, L. V. (2015). Huygens synchronization of two clocks. Scientific Reports, 5, 11548. Phillips-Silver, J. , Aktipis, C. A. , & Bryant, G. A. (2010). The ecology of entrainment: Foundations ofcoordinated rhythmic movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 3�14. Pikovsky, A. , Rosenblum, M. , & Kurths, J. (2001). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12(6), 969�992. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 403�452 Ricciardi, E. , Bonino, D. , Sani, L. , Vecchi, T. , Guazzelli, M. , Haxby, J. V. ,� Pietrini, P. (2009). Do we reallyneed vision? How blind people �See� the actions of others. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(31), 9719�9724. Richardson, M. J. , Marsh, K. L. , Isenhower, R. W. , Goodman, J. R. L. , & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rockingtogether: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science,26(6), 867�891. Sänger, J. , Muller, V. , & Lindenberger, U. (2012). Intra-and interbrain synchronization and network propertieswhen playing guitar in duets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(312). Schmidt, R. C. , & O�Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination.Ecological Psychology, 9, 189�206. Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs & V. K. Jirsa(Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (vol. 17, pp. 281�308). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Semin, G. R. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, coordination, and co-regulation. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding�Social, cognitive, affective, andneuroscientific approaches (pp. 119�147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Shockley, K. , Baker, A. A. , Richardson, M. J. , & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonalpostural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1),201�208. Stevanovic, M. , Himberg, T. , Niinisalo, M. , Kahri, M. , Peräkylä, A. , Sams, M. , & Hari, R. (2017). Sequentiality,mutual visibility, and behavioral matching: body sway and pitch register during joint decision making. InResearch on Language and Social Interaction, DOI:10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130, 1�21. Stevens, L. T. (1886). On the time-sense. Mind, 11(43), 393�404. Thaut, M. H. , & Kenyon, G. P. (2003). Rapid motor adaptations to subliminal frequency shifts duringsyncopated rhythmic sensorimotor synchronization. Human Movement Science, 22(3), 321�338. Timmers, R. , Endo, S. , Bradbury, A. , & Wing, A. M. (2014). Synchronization and leadership in string quartetperformance: A case study of auditory and visual cues. Cognitive Science, 5, 645. Tomasello, M. , Carpenter, M. , Call, J. , Behne, T. , & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions:The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675�735. Varela, F. J. , Thompson, E. , & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zhou, G. , Bourguignon, M. , Parkkonen, L. , & Hari, R. (2016). Neural signatures of hand kinematics in leadersvs. followers: A dual-MEG study. NeuroImage, 125, 731�738.

Embodied Expression Through Entrainment and Co-Representation in MusicalEnsemble Performance Alderisio, F. , Bardy, B. G. , & di Bernardo, M. (2015). Entrainment and synchronization in heterogeneousnetworks of Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) oscillators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.00753. Buck, B. , MacRitchie, J. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). The interpretive shaping of embodied musical structure inpiano performance. Empirical Musicology Review, 8(2), 92�119. Clarke, E. (1988). Generative principles in music performance. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes inmusic (pp. 1�26). Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press. 157 Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11 (ESEM Counterpoint 1), 1�82 Coey, C. A. , Varlet, M. , & Richardson, M. J. (2012). Coordination dynamics in a socially situated nervoussystem. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. Dahl, S. , & Friberg, A. (2007). Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians� body movements. MusicPerception, 24, 433�454. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Tokay, S. , Aloimonos, Y. , Li, Y. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. , & Fadiga, L. (2012).Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5),e35757. Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21(2), 103�113. Davidson, J. W. (2005). Bodily communication in musical performance. In D. Miell , R. MacDonald , & D. J.Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 215�228). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Davidson, J. W. , & Correia, J. S. (2002). Body movement. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.), Thescience and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 237�250). NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.

Page 88: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Delignières, D. , Lemoine, L. , & Torre, K. (2004). Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion.Human Movement Science, 23(2), 87�103. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Kant, V. (2014). Toward a dynamical theory of body movement in musicalperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Fairhurst, M. T. , Janata, P. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). Leading the follower: An fMRI investigation of dynamiccooperativity and leader-follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. NeuroImage, 84,688�697. Fine, J. M. , Likens, A. D. , Amazeen, E. L. , & Amazeen, P. G. (2015). Emergent complexity matching ininterpersonal coordination: Local dynamics and global variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 41(3), 723�737. Gabrielsson, A. (2003). Music performance research at the new millennium. Psychology of Music, 31, 221�272. Ginsborg, J. , Chaffin, R. , & Nicholson, G. (2006). Shared performance cues in singing and conducting: Acontent analysis of talk during practice. Psychology of Music, 34, 167�194 Ginsborg, J. , & King, E. (2009). Gestures and glances: The effects of familiarity and expertise on singers� andpianists� bodily movements in ensemble rehearsals. In J. Louhivuori , T. Eerola , S. Saarikallio , T. Himberg , &P. Eerola (Eds.), 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp.159�164). Jyväskylä, Finland: ESCOM. Glowinski, D. , Mancini, M. , Cowie, R. , Camurri, A. , Chiorri, C. , & Doherty, C. (2013). The movements madeby performers in a skilled quartet: A distinctive pattern, and the function that it serves. Frontiers in Psychology,4, 841. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Haken, H. , Kelso, J. S. , & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human handmovements. Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347�356 Hove, M. J. , Marie, C. , Bruce, I. C. , & Trainor, L. J. (2014). Superior time perception for lower musical pitchexplains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 111(28), 10383�10388. Huys, R. , Studenka, B. E. , Rheaume, N. L. , Zelaznik, H. N. , & Jirsa, V. K. (2008). Distinct timing mechanismsproduce discrete and continuous movements. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(4), e100061. Kawase, S. (2014a). Gazing behavior and coordination during piano duo performance. Attention, Perception &Psychophysics, 76, 527�540. Kawase, S. (2014b). Assignment of leadership role changes performers� gaze during piano duo performances.Ecological Psychology, 26(3), 198�215. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27�46. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Loehr, J. (2016). Musical ensemble performance: Representing self, other, andjoint action outcomes. In E. S. Cross & S. S. Obhi (Eds.), Shared representations: Sensorimotor foundations ofsocial life (pp. 280�310). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Kelso, J. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 158 Knoblich, G. , Butterfill, S. , & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data.In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 54, pp. 59�101). Burlington, MA: AcademicPress. Kopiez, R. (2002). Making music and making sense through music: Expressive performance andcommunication. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching andlearning (pp. 522�541). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Konvalinka, I. , Bauer, M. , Stahlhut, C. , Hansen, L. K. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2014). Frontal alphaoscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. NeuroImage,94, 79�88. Konvalinka, I. , Vuust, P. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutualprediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2220�2230. Loehr, J. D. , Kourtis, D. , Vesper, C. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint actionoutcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1049�1061. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 64, 2153�2167. Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2006). Ensemble musicians� synchronization with conductors� gestures: Anautomated feature-extraction analysis. Music Perception, 24(2), 195�206. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17, 86�108. Marmelat, V. , & Delignières, D. (2012). Strong anticipation: Complexity matching in interpersonal coordination.Experimental Brain Research, 222(1�2), 137�148 Néda, Z. , Ravasz, E. , Brechet, Y. , Vicsek, T. , & Barabási, A. L. (2000). Self-organizing processes: The sound ofmany hands clapping. Nature, 403(6772), 849�850. Novembre, G. , Sammler, D. , & Keller, P. E. (2016). Neural alpha oscillations index the balance between self-other integration and segregation in real-time joint action. Neuropsychologia, 89, 414�425.

Page 89: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. F. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in jointaction. Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2894�2903 Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. F. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). Motor simulation and the coordinationof self and other in real-time joint action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1062�1068. Novembre, G. , Varlet, M. , Muawiyath, S. , Stevens, C. , & Keller, P. (2015). The E-music box: An empiricalmethod for exploring the universal capacity for musical production and for social interaction through music.Royal Society Open Science, 2(11), 1�13. Noy, L. , Dekel, E. , & Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two peopleimprovising motion together. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 108, 20947�20952. Palmer, C. , & Loehr, J. (2013). Meeting of two minds in duet piano performance. In L. F. Bernstein & A. Rozin ,Musical implications: Essays in honor of Eugence Narmour (pp. 323�338). Bernstein, NY: Pendragon Press. Pecenka, N. , & Keller, P. E. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotorsynchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 505�515. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early humaninteractions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Special Research Topic: Brain and Art), 6(26). Pikovsky, A. , Rosenblum, M. , & Kurths, J. (2003). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences(vol. 12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Ragert, M. , Schroeder, T. , & Keller, P. E. (2013). Knowing too little or too much: The effects of familiarity witha co-performer�s part on interpersonal coordination in musical ensembles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 368. Repp, B. H. (1998). A microcosm of musical expression: I. Quantitative analysis of pianists� timing in the initialmeasures of Chopin�s Etude in E major. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1085�1100. Richardson, M. J. , Marsh, K. L. , Isenhower, R. W. , Goodman, J. R. , & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rockingtogether: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science,26(6), 867�891. Rodger, M. W. , & Craig, C. M. (2011). Timing movements to interval durations specified by discrete orcontinuous sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 214(3), 393�402. Schmidt, R. C. , Carello, C. , & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visualcoordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance, 16(2), 227. Schmidt, R. C. , Fitzpatrick, P. , Caron, R. , & Mergeche, J. (2011). Understanding social motor coordination.Human Movement Science, 30(5), 834�845. Schmidt, R. C. , & O�Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination.Ecological Psychology, 9(3), 189�206. 159 Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In Coordination:Neural, behavioral and social dynamics (pp. 281�308). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Schmidt, R. C. , Richardson, M. J. , Arsenault, C. , & Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment toan environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4),860. Sebanz, N. , Bekkering, H. , & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 10, 70�76. Shockley, K. , Santana, M. V. , & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved incooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2),326. Skewes, J. C. , Skewes, L. , Michael, J. , & Konvalinka, I. (2015). Synchronised and complementarycoordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 551�565. Spencer, R. M. , & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Comparison of patients with Parkinson�s disease or cerebellar lesions inthe production of periodic movements involving event-based or emergent timing. Brain and Cognition, 58(1),84�93. Stephen, D. G. , Stepp, N. , Dixon, J. A. , & Turvey, M. T. (2008). Strong anticipation: Sensitivity to long-rangecorrelations in synchronization behavior. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387(21),5271�5278. Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York, NY: Hyperion. Ternström, S. (2003). Choir acoustics: An overview of scientific research published to date. International Journalof Research in Choral Singing, 1, 3�11. Thompson, M. R. , & Luck, G. (2012). Exploring relationships between pianists� body movements, theirexpressive intentions, and structural elements of the music. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 19�40. Torre, K. , & Balasubramaniam, R. (2009). Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization incontinuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 199(2), 157�166. Torre, K. , Varlet, M. , & Marmelat, V. (2013). Predicting the biological variability of environmental rhythms:Weak or strong anticipation for sensorimotor synchronization? Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 342�350. van Ulzen, N. R. , Lamoth, C. J. , Daffertshofer, A. , Semin, G. R. , & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics ofinstructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432(2),88�93. Varlet, M. , Coey, C. A. , Schmidt, R. C. , Marin, L. , Bardy, B. G. , & Richardson, M. J. (2014a). Influence ofstimulus velocity profile on rhythmic visuomotor coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HumanPerception and Performance, 40(5), 1849�1860. Varlet, M. , Coey, C. A. , Schmidt, R. C. , & Richardson, M. J. (2012a). Influence of stimulus amplitude onunintended visuomotor entrainment. Human Movement Science, 31(3), 541�552.

Page 90: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Varlet, M. , Marin, L. , Capdevielle, D. , Del-Monte, J. , Schmidt, R. C. , Salesse, R. N. , Boulenger, J.-P. ,Bardy, B.G. , & Raffard, S. (2014b). Difficulty leading interpersonal coordination: Towards an embodiedsignature of social anxiety disorder. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(8), 29. Varlet, M. , Marin, L. , Issartel, J. , Schmidt, R. C. , & Bardy, B. G. (2012b). Continuity of visual and auditoryrhythms influences sensorimotor coordination. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44082. Varlet, M. , & Richardson, M. J. (2015). What would be Usain Bolt�s 100-meter sprint world record without TysonGay? Unintentional interpersonal synchronization between the two sprinters. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 36�41. Vesper, C. , Butterfill, S. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. NeuralNetwork, 23, 998�1003. Vines, B. , Wanderley, M. , Krumhansl, C. , Nuzzo, R. , & Levitin, D. (2004). Performance gestures ofmusicians: What structural and emotional information do they convey? In A. Camurri & G. Volpe (Eds.),Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction (vol. 2915, pp. 468�478). Berlin, Germany:Springer. Williamon, A. , & Davidson, J. W. (2002). Exploring co-performer communication. Musicae Scientiae, 6(1),53�72. Wöllner, C. , & Auhagen, W. (2008). Perceiving conductors� expressive gestures from different visualperspectives. An exploratory continuous response study. Music Perception, 26(2), 129�143. Zamm, A. , Pfordresher, P. Q. , & Palmer, C. (2015). Temporal coordination in joint music performance: Effectsof endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 607�615.

Music Performance as Joint Action Atmaca, S. , Sebanz, N. , Prinz, W. , & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect.Social Neuroscience, 3(3�4), 410�420 Bishop, S. , & Goebl, W. (2014). Context-specific effects of musical expertise on audiovisual integration.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1123. Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327�341. Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intentions and agency. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Butterfill, S. (2012). Joint action and development. The Philosophical Quarterly, 62(246), 23�47. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Li, Y. , Tokay, S. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. , Aloimonos, Y. , & Fadiga, L. (2012).Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5),e35757. De Bruijn, E. R. A. , Miedl, S. F. , & Bekkering, H. (2008). Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates ofresponse inhibition in competition. Cortex, 44, 580�586 Friston, K. , & Frith, C. (2015). A duet for one. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 390�405 Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15,1�14. Gilbert, M. (2006). Rationality in collective action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 3�17. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. (2012). Mental imagery in music performance: Underlying mechanisms and potential benefits.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252(1), 206�213. Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102�111. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological andneurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394. 166 Loehr, J. D. , Kourtis, D. , Vesper, C. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and jointaction outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049�1061. Loehr, J. D. , & Vesper, C. (2016). The sound of you and me: Novices represent shared goals in joint action.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 535�547. McEllin, L. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (in press). Joint action and ostensive communication. Melis, A. P. , & Semmann, D. (2010). How is human cooperation different? Philosophical Transaction of theRoyal Society, 365, 2663�2674. Novembre, G. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). A conceptual review on action-perception coupling in the musicians�brain: What is it good for. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(603), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00603. Pezzulo, G. , & Dindo, H. (2011). What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interactionproblems. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 613�630. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musicalinteractions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(26), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00026. Ragert, M. , Schroeder, T. , & Keller, P. E. (2013). Knowing too little or too much: The effects of familiarity witha co-performer�s part on interpersonal coordination in musical ensembles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 368.

Page 91: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12, 969�992. Repp, B. H. , & Keller, P. E. (2010). Self versus other in piano performance: Detectability of timing perturbationsdepends on personal playing style. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 101�110. Sacheli, L. M. , Tidoni, E. , Pavone, E. F. , Aglioti, S. M. , & Candidi, M. (2013). Kinematics fingerprints of leaderand follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 473�486. Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 211�218. Searle, J. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. Cohen , J. Morgan , & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentionsin communication (pp. 401�416). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Sebanz, N. , Knoblich, G. , & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus�responsemappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234�1246. Silk, J. (2009). Nepotistic cooperation in non-human primate groups. Philosophical Transactions of the RoyalSociety B, 364, 3243�3254. Skyrms, B. (2004). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UniversityPress. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Tsai, C.-C. , Kuo, W.-J. , Hung, D. L. , & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to otherhumans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015�2024. van Schie, H. T. , Mars, R. B. , Coles, M. G. H. , & Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontaland motor cortices during error observation. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 549�554. Vesper, C. , Butterfill, S. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. NeuralNetworks, 23(8/9), 998�1003. Vesper, C. , van der Wel, R. P. D. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2011). Making oneself predictable: Reducedtemporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3�4), 517�530. Wilson, M. , & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. PsychologicalBulletin, 131(3), 460�473. Wolf, T. , Vesper, C. , Knoblich, G. , & Sebanz, N. (2014). Do you believe in Mozart? The influence of beliefs onjoint action outcomes. Poster presented at the 12th Biannual Conference of the German Cognitive ScienceSociety, 29 September�2 October 2014.

Do Jazz Improvisers Really Interact? Abdallah, S. , & Plumbley, M. (2009). Information dynamics: Patterns of expectation and surprise in theperception of music. Connection Science, 21, 89�117. Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19,3�11. Beyls, P. (2007). Interaction and self-organisation in a society of musical agents. In E. Miranda & J. Martins(Eds.), Proceedings of ECAL 2007 Workshop on Music and Artificial Life (MusicAL 2007). Lisbon, Portugal. Biles, J. A. (2001). GenJam: Evolution of a jazz improviser. In P. J. Bentley & D. W. Corne (Eds.), Creativeevolutionary systems (pp. 165�187). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Blackwell, T. M. (2003). Swarm music: Improvised music with multi-swarms. In Proceedings of the 2003 AISBSymposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in Arts and Science (pp. 41�49). University of Wales,Aberystwyth: The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour. Chang, S. F. , Sikora, T. , & Purl, A. (2001). Overview of the MPEG-7 standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuitsand Systems for Video Technology, 11(6), 688�695. Collins, N. (2008). Reinforcement learning for live musical agents. In Proceedings of the International ComputerMusic Conference (ICMC). Belfast, Ireland: Michigan Publishing. Dahlstedt, P. , & McBurney, P. (2006). Musical agents: Toward computer-aided music composition usingautonomous software agents. Leonardo, 39, 469�470. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Li, Y. , Tokay, S. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. , Aloimonos, Y. Fadiga, L. (2012).Leadership in orchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5),e35757. De Cheveigné, A. , & Kawahara, H. (2002). Yin, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. TheJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1917�1930. Donnay, G. F. , Rankin, S. K. , Lopez-Gonzalez, M. , Jiradejvong, P. , & Limb, C. J. (2014). Neural substrates ofinteractive musical improvisation: An fMRI study of trading fours in jazz. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88665. Gifford, T. , & Brown, A. R. (2009). Do androids dream of electric chimera? In A. C. Sorensen (Ed.), Improvise:The Australasian Computer Music Conference 2009 (pp. 56�63). Brisbane, Queensland: Australasian ComputerMusic Association (ACMA). Gifford, T. , & Brown, A. R. (2011). Beyond reflexivity: Mediating between imitative and intelligent action in aninteractive music system. In K. Wilkie , R. Johnson , & S. Holland (Eds.), Proceedings of 25th BCS Conferenceon Human-Computer Interaction. Swinton, UK: British Computer Society. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26, 427�438

Page 92: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424�438. Guia�u, S. (1977). Information theory with applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Hamanaka, M. , Goto, M. , & Otsu, N. (2001). Learning-based jam session system for a guitar trio. InProceedings of the 2001 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 467�470). Havana, Cuba: MichiganPublishing. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Kim, H. G. , & Sikora, T. (2004). How efficient is MPEG-7 for general sound recognition? In D. R. vonRecklinghausen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Conference: 25th InternationalConference: Metadata for Audio. London, UK: Audio Engineering Society. King, E. C. (2004). Collaboration and the study of ensemble rehearsal. In S. Lipscomb (Ed.), Proceedings ofEighth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) (pp. 11�16). Chicago, IL:Northwestern University. Limb, C. J. , & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study ofjazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679. 176 Marchini, M. , Ramirez, R. , Papiotis, P. , & Maestre, E. (2013). Inducing rules of ensemble musicperformance: A machine learning approach. In G. Luck & O. Brabant (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rdInternational Conference on Music & Emotion (ICME) (pp. 341�347). Jyväskylä, Finland: Department of Music,University of Jyväskylä; Finnish Centre of Excellence in Interdisciplinary Music Research. Monson, I. (1996). Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress. Moore, G. P. , & Chen, J. (2010). Timings and interactions of skilled musicians. Biological Cybernetics,103(5),401�414. Moran, N. , Hadley, L. V. , Bader, M. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). Perception of �back-channeling� nonverbal feedbackin musical duo improvisation. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130070. Müller, V. , Sänger, J. , & Lindenberger, U. (2013). Intra-and inter-brain synchronization during musicalimprovisation on the guitar. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73852. Murray-Rust, D. , & Smaill, A. (2011). Towards a model of musical interaction and communication. ArtificialIntelligence, 175(9�10), 1697�1721. Murray-Rust, D. , Smaill, A. , & Edwards, M. (2006). MAMA: An architecture for interactive musical agents. InG. Brewka , S. Coraeschi , A. Perini , & P. Traverso (Eds.), Proceedings of ECAI 2006 (pp. 36�40). Amsterdam,The Netherlands: IOS Press. Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in joint action:Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2894�2903. Papiotis, P. , Marchini, M. , & Maestre, E. (2012). Computational analysis of solo versus ensemble performancein string quartets: Dynamics and intonation. In E. Cambouropoulos , C. Tsougras , P. Mavromats , & K.Pstiades (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp.778�784). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Schober, M. F. , & Spiro, N. (2013). How much do jazz players share understanding of their performance? Acase study. In A. Williamon & W. Goebl (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on PerformanceScience 2013 (pp. 257�262). Brussels, Belgium: European Association of Conservatoires. Schögler, B. (2000). Studying temporal co-ordination in jazz duets. Musicae Scientiae, 3, 75�91. Shaffer, L. H. (1984). Timing in solo and duet piano performances. The Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 36, 577�595. Wulfhorst, R. D. , Nakayama, L. , & Vicari, R. M. (2003). A multiagent approach for musical interactive systems.In J. S. Rosenschein , T. Sandholm , M. Wooldbridge , & M. Yokoo (Eds.) Proceedings of AAMAS, the SecondInternational Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 584�591). Melbourne,Australia: ACM New York.

Gestural Interactions in Ensemble Performance Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J. P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 44(12), 2288�2301. Cadoz, C. , & Wanderley, M. (2000). Gesture-music. Trends in Gestural Control of Music, 71�94,https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01105543. Fairhurst, M. T. , Janata, P. , & Keller, P. E. (2014). Leading the follower: An fMRI investigation of dynamiccooperativity and leader�Follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner. Neuroimage, 84,688�697. Farella, E. , O�Modhrain, S. , Benini, L. , & Riccó, B. (2006). Gesture signature for ambient intelligenceapplications: A feasibility study. In K. Fishkin , B. Schiele , P. Nixon , & A. Quigley (Eds.), Pervasive Computing,3968, 288�304 Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective to the study of interactions (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, The

Page 93: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Netherlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In D. Fabian , R.Timmers , & E. Schubert (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across stylesand cultures (pp. 260�282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27�46 Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 102�111. 185 Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , & Naveda, L. (2010). Basic gestures as spatiotemporal reference frames for repetitive dance/musicpatterns in Samba and Charleston. Music Perception, 28(1), 71�91. Loula, F. , Prasad, S. , Harber, K. , & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210. Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute ofSciences, 2, 49�55. Nusseck, M. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2009). Music and motion-how music-related ancillary body movementscontribute to the experience of music. Music Perception, 26(4), 335�353. Repp, B. H. (1992). Diversity and commonality in music performance: An analysis of timing microstructure inSchumann�s �Träumerei�. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(5), 2546�2568. Repp, B. H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminaryexperiments. Music Perception, 14(4), 419�444. Seashore, C. E. (1938). Psychology of music. New York, NY: Dover publications. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. Wanderley, M. M. (2002). Quantitative analysis of non-obvious performer gestures. In I. Wachsmuth & T. Sowa(Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (vol. 2298, pp. 241�253). Berlin, Germany:Springer. Wanderley, M. M. , Vines, B. W. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97�113. Wöllner, C. (2012). Self-recognition of highly skilled actions: A study of orchestral conductors. Consciousnessand Cognition, 21(3), 1311�1321. Wöllner, C. , & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2010). Keeping an eye on the violinist: Motor experts show superior timingconsistency in a visual perception task. Psychological Research, 74(6), 579�585.

Interpersonal Coordination in Dyadic Performance Alluri, V. , Toiviainen, P. , Jääskeläinen, I. P. , Glerean, E. , Sams, M. , & Brattico, E. (2012). Large-scale brainnetworks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. Neuroimage, 59, 677�3689. 194 Burger, B. , & Toiviainen, P. (2013). Mocap toolbox�A Matlab toolbox for computational analysis ofmovement data. In R. Bresin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp.172�178). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Schnell, N. (2010). Towards a gesture-sound cross-modal analysis. In S.Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp.158�170). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Davidson, J. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians. Psychologyof Music, 21, 103�113. Dempster, W. T. , Gabel, W. C. , & Felts, W. J. L. (1959). The anthropometry of manual work space for theseated subject. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 17, 289�317. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26, 425�427. Himberg, T. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Dyadic entrainment and interaction in African dance. In S. Demorest ,S. Morrison , & P. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference for Music Perception andCognition (ICMPC �11) (pp. 425�428). Seattle, USA: University of Washington. Himberg, T. , & Thompson, M. R. (2011). Learning and synchronizing dance movements in South Africansongs: Cross-cultural motion-capture study. Dance Research, 29(special electronic issue), 305�328. Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 28, 321�377. Huang, J. , & Krumhansl, C. L. (2011). What does seeing the performer add? It depends on musical style,amount of stage behavior, and audience expertise. Musicae Scientiae, 15, 343�364. Keller, P. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti , A. Carassa , & G. Riva (Eds.), Enactingintersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interaction (pp. 205�221). Amsterdam, TheNeth erlands: IOS Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28, 27�46. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Nymoen, K. , Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Torresen, J. (2013). Analyzing correspondence between soundobjects and body motion. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 10, article 9, 1�22

Page 94: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Palmer, C. , Koopmans, E. , Carter, C. , Loehr, J. , & Wanderley, M. (2009). Synchronization of motion andtiming in clarinet performance. In A. Williamon , S. Pretty , & R. Buck (Eds.), Proceedings of the InternationalSymposium on Performance Science (pp. 159�164). Utrecht, The Netherlands: European Association ofConservatories (AEC). Pyper, B. J. , & Peterman, R. M. (1998). Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlationanalyses of fish data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55, 2127�2140 Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 403�452. Sherry, A. , & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personalityresearch: A user-friendly primer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 37�48. Thompson, M. R. , Diapoulis, G. , Johnson, S. , Kwan, P. Y. , & Himberg, T. (2015). Effect of tempo and visionon interpersonal coordination of timing in dyadic performance. In M. Aramaki , R. Kronland-Martinet , & S.Ystad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research(pp. 16�23). Plymouth, UK: University of Plymouth. Thompson, M. R. , & Luck, G. (2012). Exploring relationships between pianists� body movements, theirexpressive intentions, and structural elements of the music. Musicae Scientiae, 16, 19�40. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28, 59�70. Vuoskoski, J. , Thompson, M. , Spence, C. , & Clarke, E. (2013). Crossmodal interactions in the perception ofexpressivity in musical performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 591�604 Wanderley, M. M. , Vines, B. W. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34, 97�113.

Embodied Social Synchronization in Children�s Musical Development Baer, L. H. , Thibodeau, J. L. , Gralnick, T. M. , Li, K. Z. , & Penhune, V. (2013). The role of musical training inemergent and event-based timing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14(7), 191. Berens, P. (2009). CircStat: A Matlab toolbox for circular statistics. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(10), 1�21. Bobin-Bègue, A. , & Provasi, J. (2005). Tempo discrimination in 3-and 4-year-old children: Performance andthreshold. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 16(2). Bobin-Bègue, A. , & Provasi, J. (2009). Régulation rythmique avant 4 ans: Effet d�un tempo auditif sur le tempomoteur. L�Année Psychologique, 108(4), 631. Delignières, D. , & Torre, K. (2011). Event-based and emergent timing: Dichotomy or continuum? A reply toRepp and Steinman (2010). Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(4), 311�318. Drake, C. , Jones, M. R. , & Baruch., C. (2000). The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences:Attunement, referent period, focal attending. Cognition, 77(3), 251�288. Fran�k, M. , Van Noorden, L. , & Režný, L. (2014). Tempo and walking speed with music in the urban context.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1361. Himberg, T. (2014). Interaction in musical time (Doctoral Dissertation). Faculty of Music, University ofCambridge, Cambridge, UK. Kirschner, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschoolchildren. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 299�314. Kneubühl, U. (1997). Oscillations and waves. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Large, E. W. (1996). Modeling beat perception with a nonlinear oscillator. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings ofthe Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. MacDougall, H. G. , & Moore, S. T. (2005). Marching to the beat of the same drummer: The spontaneoustempo of human locomotion. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99(3), 1164�1173. McAuley, J. D. , Jones, M. R. , Holub, S. , Johnston, M. H. , & Miller, N. S. (2006). The time of our lives:Lifespan development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135(3), 348�367. 204 Moens, B. , Muller, C. , Van Noorden, L. , Fran�k., M. , Celie, B. , Boone, J. , Bourgois, J. , & Leman, M.(2014). Encouraging spontaneous synchronisation with D-Jogger, an adaptive music player that alignsmovement and music. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114234. Ozçali�kan, S. , & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Sex differences in language first appear in gesture. DevelopmentalScience, 13(5), 752�760. Provasi, J. , & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronization in 2 ½- and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220�231. Rankin, S. K. , Fink, P. W. , & Large, E. W. (2014). Fractal structure enables temporal prediction in music.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136, EL256. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 403�452. Schulze, H. H. , Cordes, A. , & Vorberg, D. (2005). Keeping synchrony while tempo changes: Accelerando andritardando. Music Perception, 22(3), 461�477. Stijns, F. , Van Noorden, L. , Moelants, D. , & Leman, M. (2007). Walking on music. Human Movement Science,26(5),769�785. Van Noorden, L. , & Moelants, D. (1999). Resonance in the perception of musical pulse. Journal of New MusicResearch, 28(1), 43�66.

Page 95: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Winkler, I. , Háden, G. P. , Ladinig, O. , Sziller, I. , & Honing, H. (2009). Newborn infants detect the beat inmusic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(7), 2468�2471.

Sociological and Anthropological Approaches Baily, J. (1985). Music structure and human movement. In P. Howell , I. Cross , & R. West (Eds.), Musicalstructure and cognition (pp. 237�259). London, UK: Academic Press. Baily, J. (1995). Music and the body. The World of Music, 37(2), 11�30. Bastide, R. (1958/2001). Le Candomblé de Bahia. Paris, France: Plon. Becker, J. O. (2004). Deep listeners: Music, emotion and trancing. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Blacking, J. (Ed.). (1977). The anthropology of the body. London, UK: Academic Press. Bonini Baraldi, F. (2008). L�expérience de la musique instrumentale dans les veillées funéraires des Tsiganes deTransylvanie. Frontières, 20(2), 67�70. 214 Bonini Baraldi, F. (2009). All the pain and joy of the world in a single melody: A Transylvanian case-studyon music and emotion. Music Perception, 26(3), 257�261 Bonini Baraldi, F. (2010). Jouer aux noces, puis entre soi. Le cycle de l�émotion chez les musiciens tsiganes deTransylvanie. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 23, 85�102. Bonini Baraldi, F. (2013). Tsiganes, musique et empathie. Paris, France: �ditions de la Maison des Sciences del�Homme. Bonini Baraldi, F. (2015). La douceur, critère d�appréciation musicale chez les Tsiganes de Transylvanie. Cahiersd�Ethnomusicologie, 28, 23�41. Bonini Baraldi, F. , Bigand, E. , & Pozzo, T. (2015). Measuring aksak rhythm and synchronization inTransylvanian village music by using motion capture. Empirical Musicology Review, 10(4), 265�291. Bouët, J. , Lortat-Jacob, B. , & R�dulescu, S. (2002). � tue-tête: Chant et violon au Pays de l�Oach. Nanterre, France:Société d�Ethnologie. Brabec de Mori, B. , & Seeger, A. (2013). Introduction: Considering music, humans, and non-humans.Ethnomusicology Forum, 22(3), 269�286. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 14. (2001). Le geste musical. Cler, J. (2010). Anti-pathos: L�affect proprement musical dans une société d�ascendance nomade, en Turquieméridionale. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 23, 101�111. Davies, J. B. (1978). The psychology of music. London, UK: Hutchinson. De Martino, E. (1966/2005). The land of remorse: A study of Southern Italian tarantism. London, UK: FreeAssociation Books. Desroches, M. , Stévance, S. , & Lacasse, S. (Eds.). (2014). Quand la musique prend corps. Québec, Canada:Les Presses de l�Université de Montréal. Empirical Musicology Review, 10(1�2). (2015). Special issue: Music and empathy. Estival, J.-P. , Bigand, E. , & Matallah, F. (2013). Para uma cooperação da escuta e do movimento: Estudointercultural sobre a percepção dos ritmos tradicionais do culto xangô (Olinda, PE). Claves, 8, 75�98. Feld, S. (1982). Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics, and song in Kaluli expression. Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Giurchescu, A. (2001). Le danseur et le musicien, une connivence nécessaire. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 14,79�94. Gutierrez Choquevilca, A.-L. (2010). Imaginaire acoustique et apprentissage d�une ontologie animiste. Ateliersdu LESC, 34. Retrieved from http://ateliers.revues.org/8553. Helmlinger, A. (2010). Memorizing together: Group effect experiments in steelbands (Trinidad and Tobago).Annales Fyssen, 24, 216�235. Juslin, P. N. , & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559�575 Kaeppler, A. L. (2000). Dance ethnology and the anthropology of dance. Dance Research Journal, 32(1),116�125. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. (2010). An embodied approach to music semantics. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 43�67. Lucas, G. , Clayton, M. , & Leante, L. (2011). Inter-group entrainment in Afro-Brazilian Congado ritual. EmpiricalMusicology Review, 6, 75�102. Martínez, R. (2001). Autour du geste musical andin. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 14, 167�180. Mateo Dieste, J. L. (2012). Health and ritual in Morocco: Conceptions of the body and healing practices.Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Mauss, M. (1936/1950). Les techniques du corps. In M. Mauss (Ed.), Sociologie et anthropologie (pp. 365�386).Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. Prévôt, N. (2014). Music, spirits & spirit in Bastar, central India. In T. Otten & U. Skoda (Eds.), Dialogues withGods: Possession in Middle Indian rituals (pp. 229�246). Berlin, Germany: Wei�ensee Verlag. Rappoport, D. (1999). Chanter sans être ensemble: Des musiques juxtaposées pour un public invisible. L�Homme,152, 143�162. Rouget, G. (1985). Music and trance: A theory of the relations between music and possession. Chicago, IL: TheUniversity of Chicago Press.

Page 96: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Sárosi, B. (1971). Gypsy music. Budapest, Hungary: Corvina Press. Seeger, A. (1987). Why Suyá sing: A musical anthropology of an Amazonian people. Cambridge, MA: UniversityPress. Stewart, M. C. (1997). The time of the Gypsies. Oxford, UK: Westview. Surrallès, A. (2003). Au coeur du sens: Perception, affectivité, action chez les Candoshi. Paris, France: CNRSand �ditions de la Maison des Sciences de l�Homme. Vatin, X. (2006). Musique et possession dans les Candomblés de Bahia: Pluralisme rituel et comportemental.Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 19, 191�209. Bauman, R. (1984 [1977]). Verbal art as performance. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc. Béhague, G. (Ed.). (1984). Performance practice: Ethnomusicological perspectives. Westport, CT: GreenwoodPress. Bithell, C. (2007). Transported by song: Corsican voices from oral tradition to world stage. Lanham, MD:Scarecrow Press. Blacking, J. (Ed.). (1981). Ethnography of musical performance. In D. Heartz & B. C. Wade (Eds.), Report ofthe Twelfth [IMS] Congress Berkeley 1977 (pp. 383�401). Kassel, Germany: Bärenreiter Kassel. 222 Brinner, B. E. (1995). Knowing music, making music: Javanese gamelan and the theory of musicalcompetence and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Clayton, M. (2007). Observing entrainment in Indian music performance: Video-based observational analysis oftanpura playing and beat marking. Musicae Scientiae, 11(1), 27�60. Clayton, M. (2013). Entrainment, ethnography and musical interaction. In M. Clayton , B. Dueck , & L. Leante(Eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance (pp. 17�39). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Clayton, M. , & Leante, L. (2015). Role, status and hierarchy in the performance of north Indian classical music.Ethnomusicology Forum, 24(3), 414�442. Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11(ESEM Counterpoint 1), 1�82. Cross, I. (2006). Four issues in the study of music in evolution. The World of Music, 48(3), 55�63. Doffman, M. (2013). Groove: Temporality, awareness and the feeling of entrainment in jazz performance. In M.Clayton , B. Dueck , & L. Leante (Eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance (pp. 62�85). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Dueck, B. (2013). Musical intimacies and indigenous imaginaries in Manitoba. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Feld, S. (1984). Sound structure as social structure. Ethnomusicology, 28(3), 383�409. Glowinski, D. , Badino, L. , Ausilio, A. , Camurri, A. , & Fadiga, L. (2012). Analysis of leadership in a stringquartet. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Social Behaviour in Music at ACM ICMI 2012(pp 763�774). Santa Monica, CA. Henry, E. O. (1976). The variety of music in a North Indian village: Reassessing cantometrics.Ethnomusicology, 20(1), 49�66. Lomax, A. (1968). Folk song style and culture. New Brunswick, Canada and London, UK: TransactionPublishers. Lucas, G. , Clayton, M. , & Leante, L. (2011). Inter-group entrainment in Afro-Brazilian Congado ritual. EmpiricalMusicology Review, 6(2), 75�102. McLeod, N. , & Herndon, M. (Eds.). (1980). The ethnography of musical performance. Norwood, PA: NorwoodEditions. Monson, I. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress. Moore, A. F. (2012). Song means: Analysing and interpreting recorded popular song. Farnham & Burlington,UK: Ashgate. Napier, J. (2006). A �failed� unison or conscious differentiation: The notion of �heterophony� in North Indian vocalperformance. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 37(1), 85�108. Napier, J. (2007). The distribution of authority in the performance of North Indian vocal music. EthnomusicologyForum, 16(2), 271�301. Polak, R. (2007). Performing audience: On the social constitution of focused interaction at celebrations in Mali.Anthropos, 102(1), 3�18. Qureshi, R. B. (1995 [1986]). Sufi music of India and Pakistan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Ridgeway, C. A. , & Roberts, J. M. (1976). Urban popular music and interaction: A semantic relationship. Ethno-musicology, 20(2), 233�251. Stone, R. (1982). Let the inside be sweet: The interpretation of music event among the Kpelle of Liberia.Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press. Wiltermuth, S. S. , & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1�5. Cordes, H. T. (1992). Pencak Silat. Die Kampfkunst der Minangkabau und ihr kulturelles Umfeld (DoctoralDissertation). Universität zu Köln 1990. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Afra-Verlag. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Downey, G. (2002). Domesticating an urban menace: Reforming Capoeira as a Brazilian national sport. TheInternational Journal of the History of Sport, 19(4), 1�32. Downey, G. (2005). Learning capoeira: Lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian art. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press. Downey, G. , Dalidowicz, M. , & Mason, P. H. (2015). Apprenticeship as method: Embodied learning in ethno-graphic practice. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 183�200.

Page 97: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Grau, A. (1983). Sing a dance. Dance a song: The relationships between two types of formalized movementsand music among the Tiwi of Melville and Bathurst Islands, North Australia. Dance Research: The Journal ofthe Society for Dance Research, 1, 32�44. Hodgins, P. (1992). Relationships between score and choreography in twentieth-century dance: Music,movement and metaphor. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press. Jordan, S. (1994). Matching music and dance. Dance Chronicle, 17(2), 217�221. Lewis, J. L. (1992). Ring of liberation: A deceptive discourse in Brazilian capoeira. Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Press. 231 Lewis, J. L. (1995). Genre and embodiment. Cultural Anthropology, 10(2), 221�243. Lewis, J. L. (1999). Sex and violence in Brazil: �Carnaval, capoeira�, and the problem of everyday life. AmericanEthnologist, 26(3), 539�557. Mason, P. H. (2011). Modes of transmission: Traditional West Sumatran and contemporary West Javanesepractices of indigenous martial arts. In M. A. Md Nor (Ed.), Hybridity in the Performing Arts of Southeast Asia:Proceedings of the ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of Southeast Asia (pp. 113�117). Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia: NusPARC. Mason, P. H. (2012). Music, dance and the total art work: Choreomusicology in theory and practice. Researchin Dance Education, 13(1), 5�24. Mason, P. H. (2013). Intracultural and intercultural dynamics of capoeira. Global Ethnographic, 1, 1�8. Mason, P. H. (2016a). Pencak Silat Seni in West Java, Indonesia. In U. U. Pätzold & P. H. Mason (Eds.), Thefighting art of Pencak Silat and its music�From Southeast Asian village to global movement (pp. 235�264).Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Mason, P. H. (2016b). Silek Minang in West Sumatra, Indonesia. In U. U. Pätzold & P. H. Mason (Eds.), Thefighting art of Pencak Silat and its music�From Southeast Asian village to global movement (pp. 205�234).Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Mason, P. H. , Domínguez D. J. F. , Winter, B. , & Grignolio, A. (2015). Hidden in plain view: Degeneracy incomplex systems. Biosystems, 128, 1�8. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2010). The spatiotemporal representation of dance and music gestures using topo-graphical gesture analysis (TGA). Music Perception, 28(1), 93�111. Pätzold, U. U. (2000). Blüte, Frucht und Kern: Bewegungsformen und musikstile im bereich des Pencak Silat inWest-Java und West-Sumatra. Bonn, Germany: Holos-Verlag. Wilson, I. D. (2002). The politics of inner power: The practice of Pencak Silat in West Java (UnpublishedDoctoral Dissertation). Perth, Western Australia: Murdoch University. Wilson, L. (2015). Martial arts and the body politic in Indonesia. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Agawu, K. (2016). The African imagination in music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Bhabha, H. (2011). Our neighbours, ourselves: Contemporary reflections on survival. In E. Cancik-Kirschbauw ,E. Fischer-Lichte , K. W. Hempfer , & J. Küpper (Eds.), Hegel lectures (pp. 1�19). Berlin, Germany: Walter deGruyter GmbH & Co. KG. Brandel, R. (1961). The music of Central Africa: An ethnomusicological study. The Hague, The Netherlands:Springer. Clayton, M. , Dueck, B. , & Leante, L. (Eds.). (2013). Experience and meaning in music performance. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Collins, J. (1989). The early history of West African highlife music. Popular Music, 8(3), 221�230. Collins, J. (1991). The highlife zone. In E. Graeme (Ed.), Africa O�Ye!. A celebration of African music (pp.80�107). London, UK: Sango Publications. DjeDje, J. C. (2008a). Fiddling in West Africa: Touching the spirit in Fuble, Hausa, and Dagbamba cultures.Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press. DjeDje, J. C. (2008b). Fiddling in West Africa (1950s�1990s): The songbook: Ethnomusicology archive series(vol. 2). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Ethnomusicology Publications. Emielu, A. (2010). The concept of change and genre development: A case study of highlife music. Journal ofAfrican Literature and the Arts, 6, 93�108. Kubik, G. (2010). Theory of African music (vol. 2). Chicago, IL: University Press. Lange, K. R. (2006). Dagbani proverbs. Tamale, Ghana: Tamale Institute of Cross-Cultural Studies: CyberSystems. Locke, D. (2011). The metric matrix: Simultaneous multidimensionality in African music. Analytical Approachesto World Music, 1, 48�72. Locke, D. (2014). Dagomba dance drumming. Tufts University. Retrieved fromhttp://sites.tufts.edu/dagomba/the-repertory/baamaaya-baamaaya-2/ Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London, UK: Sage. Merriam, A. P. (1962). The African idiom in music. Journal of American Folklore, 75(296), 120�130. Nii-Yartey, F. (2011). The performing arts: Identity and the new social paradigm. In H. Lauren , N. A. A. Amfo ,& J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Identity meets nationality: Voices from the humanities (pp. 197�282). Ghana, Ghana:Ghana Saharon Publishers. Nketia, K. (1963a). Folksongs of Ghana. Accra, Ghana: University of Ghana. Nketia, K. (1963b). Drumming in Akan community of Ghana. London, UK: Thomas Nelson and Sons. Nketia, K. (1974). The music of Africa. New York, NY: Norton. Phyfferoen, D. (2004). Field recording: MR.2005.1.39�1. Retrieved fromhttp://music.africamuseum.be/instruments/english/ghana/ashanti/ashanti.html. Phyfferoen, D. (2012). Hiplife. In L. R. Koos (Ed.), Hidden cities (pp. 237�247). Oxford, UK: Inter�DisciplinaryPress.

Page 98: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformations. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Staniland, M. (1975). The lions of Dagbon: Political change in Northern Ghana. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press. Stone, R. (1983). The times of African music. Unpublished manuscript. University of Ghana Legon. Ake, D. (2002). Jazz �traning: John Coltrane and the conservatory. In Jazz Cultures (pp. 112�145). Berkeley, CA:University of California Press. Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70�88. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge. Monson, I. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress. Wilf, E. (2010). Swinging within the Iron Cage: Modernity, creativity, and embodied practice in American post-secondary jazz education. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 563�582. Wilf, E. (2012). Rituals of creativity: Tradition, modernity, and the �acoustic unconscious� in an Americancollegiate jazz music program. American Anthropologist, 114(1), 32�44. Wilf, E. (2013). Sociable robots, jazz music, and divination: Contingency as a cultural resource for negotiatingproblems of intentionality. American Ethnologist, 40(4), 605�618. Wilf, E. (2014). School for cool: The academic jazz program and the paradox of institutionalized creativity.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Wilf, E. (2015). Modernity, cultural anesthesia, and sensory agency: Technologies of the listening self in a U.S.collegiate jazz music program. Ethnos, 80(1), 1�22. Abrams, D. A. , Ryali, S. , Chen, T. , Chordia, P. , Khouzam, A. , Levitin, D. J. , & Menon, V. (2013). Inter-subject synchronization of brain responses during natural music listening. European Journal of Neuroscience,37(9), 1458�1469. Alluri, V. , Toiviainen, P. , Jaaskelainen, I. P. , Glerean, E. , Sams, M. , & Brattico, E. (2012). Large-scale brainnetworks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3677�3689. Babiloni, C. , Buffo, P. , Vecchio, F. , Marzano, N. , Del Percio, C. , Spada, D. , � Perani, D. (2011). Brains �inconcert�: Frontal oscillatory alpha rhythms and empathy in professional musicians. NeuroImage, 60(1), 105�116. Bianco, R. , Novembre, G. , Keller, P. E. , Scharf, F. , Friederici, A. D. , Villringer, A. , & Sammler, D. (2016).Syntax in action has priority over movement selection in piano playing: An ERP study. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience, 28(1), 41�54. Brattico, E. , Bogert, B. , & Jacobsen, T. (2013). Toward a neural chronometry for the aesthetic experience ofmusic. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 206. Brattico, E. , Pallesen, K. J. , Varyagina, O. , Bailey, C. , Anourova, I. , Jarvenpaa, M. , � Tervaniemi, M. (2009).Neural discrimination of nonprototypical chords in music experts and laymen: An MEG study. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2230�2244. Brattico, E. , Tupala, T. , Glerean, E. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Modulated neural processing of Westernharmony in folk musicians. Psychophysiology, 50(7), 653�663. Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Social neuroscience: Understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole andvice versa. American Psychologist, 57(11), 819�831. Caclin, A. , Brattico, E. , Smith, B. , Tervaniemi, M. , Naatanen, R. , Giard, M. H. , & McAdams, S. (2003). MMNresponses to timbre changes. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Mismatch Negativity andAuditory Functions and Dysfunctions, Lyon, France. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263�287. Doja, A. (2015). From the native point of view: An insider/outsider perspective on folkloric archaism and modernanthropology in Albania. History of the Human Sciences, 28(4), 44�75. Ericsson, K. A. , & Towne, T. J. (2010). Expertise. Cognitive Science, 1(3), 404�416. Garza Villarreal, E. A. , Brattico, E. , Leino, S. , Ostergaard, L. , & Vuust, P. (2011). Distinct neural responses tochord violations: A multiple source analysis study. Brain Research, 1389, 103�114. Hasson, U. , & Frith, C. D. (2016). Mirroring and beyond: Coupled dynamics as a generalized framework formodelling social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: BiologicalSciences, 371(1693). Hasson, U. , Ghazanfar, A. A. , Galantucci, B. , Garrod, S. , & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: Amechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(2), 114�121. Hasson, U. , Nir, Y. , Levy, I. , Fuhrmann, G. , & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of corticalactivity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634�1640. Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London, UK: Routledge. 256 Keller, M. S. (2012). What makes music European: Looking beyond sound. Lanham�Toronto�Plymouth, UK:The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Koelsch, S. (2006). Significance of Broca�s area and ventral premotor cortex for music-syntactic processing.Cortex, 42(4), 518�520. Koelsch, S. , Grossmann, T. , Gunter, T. C. , Hahne, A. , Schroger, E. , & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Childrenprocessing music: Electric brain responses reveal musical competence and gender differences. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 683�693.

Page 99: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Koelsch, S. , Schmidt, B.-H. , & Kansok, J. (2002). Effects of musical expertise on the early right anteriornegativity: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 39, 657�663. Konvalinka, I. , Bauer, M. , Stahlhut, C. , Hansen, L. K. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2014). Frontal alphaoscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. NeuroImage,94, 79�88. Konvalinka, I. , & Roepstorff, A. (2012). The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach ussomething about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 215. Lillywhite, A. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Pollick, A. (2015). An fMRI study investigating the contribution ofvisual features to an intersubject correlation (ISC) of brain activity during observation of a string quartet.Perception, 44, 347�348. Maess, B. , Koelsch, S. , Gunter, T. C. , & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca�s area:An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 540�545. Majno, M. (2012). From the model of El Sistema in Venezuela to current applications: Learning and integrationthrough collective music education. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 56�64. Mandel, A. , Bourguignon, M. , Parkkonen, L. , & Hari, R. (2016). Sensorimotor activation related to speaker vs.listener role during natural conversation. Neuroscience Letters, 614, 99�104. Merrett, D. L. , Peretz, I. , & Wilson, S. J. (2013). Moderating variables of music training-induced neuroplasticity:A review and discussion. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 606. Nettl, B. (2008). The music of the other: New challenges for ethnomusicology in a global age. World of Music,50(2), 121�123. Nettl, B. (2015). What are the great discoveries of your field? Informal comments on the contributions of ethno-musicology. Muzikoloski Zbornik, 51(2), 163�174. Nummenmaa, L. , Glerean, E. , Viinikainen, M. , Jaaskelainen, I. P. , Hari, R. , & Sams, M. (2012). Emotionspromote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the USA, 109(24), 9599�9604. Pantev, C. , Paraskevopoulos, E. , Kuchenbuch, A. , Lu, Y. , & Herholz, S. C. (2015). Musical expertise isrelated to neuroplastic changes of multisensory nature within the auditory cortex. European Journal ofNeuroscience, 41(5), 709�717. Peretz, I. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition, 100, 1�32. Peretz, I. , Brattico, E. , Jarvenpaa, M. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2009). The amusic brain: In tune, out of key, andunaware. Brain, 132(Pt 5), 1277�1286. Peretz, I. , & Coltheart, M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688�691. Putkinen, V. , Tervaniemi, M. , Saarikivi, K. , & Huotilainen, M. (2015). Promises of formal and informal musicalactivities in advancing neurocognitive development throughout childhood. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337, 153�162. Repp, B. H. (2003). Phase attraction in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory sequences: Effects of singleand periodic distractors on synchronization accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performence, 29(2), 290�309. Reybrouck, M. , & Brattico, E. (2015). Neuroplasticity beyond sounds: Neural adaptations following long-termmusical aesthetic experiences. Brain Science, 5(1), 69�91. Rizzolatti, G. , Fadiga, L. , Gallese, V. , & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motoractions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131�141. Roepstorff, A. (2013). Why am I not just lovin� cultural neuroscience? Toward a slow science of culturaldifference. Psychological Inquiry, 24(1), 61�63. Silbert, L. J. , Honey, C. J. , Simony, E. , Poeppel, D. , & Hasson, U. (2014). Coupled neural systems underliethe production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the USA, 111(43), E4687�4696. Trainor, L. J. (2005). Are there critical periods for musical development? Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3),262�278. Ukkola, L. T. , Onkamo, P. , Raijas, P. , Karma, K. , & Jarvela, I. (2009). Musical aptitude is associated withAVPR1A-haplotypes. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5534. 257 Vuust, P. , Brattico, E. , Seppanen, M. , Naatanen, R. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2012). The sound of music:Differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm. Neuropsychologia,50(7), 1432�1443. Vuust, P. , Gebauerac, L. , Hansenb, N. L. , Jørgensenac, S. R. , Møllerac, A. , & Linnet, J. (2010). Personalityinfluences career choice: Sensation seeking in professional musicians. Music Education Research, 12, 219�230. Vuust, P. , Pallesen, K. J. , Bailey, C. , van Zuijen, T. L. , Gjedde, A. , Roepstorff, A. , & Ostergaard, L. (2005).To musicians, the message is in the meter pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. NeuroImage, 24(2), 560�564. Vuust, P. , Roepstorff, A. , Wallentin, M. , Mouridsen, K. , & Ostergaard, L. (2006). It don�t mean a thing� Keepingthe rhythm during polyrhythmic tension, activates language areas (BA47). NeuroImage, 31(2), 832�841. Zhdanov, A. , Nurminen, J. , Baess, P. , Hirvenkari, L. , Jousmaki, V. , Makela, J. P. , � Parkkonen, L. (2015). Aninternet-based real-time audiovisual link for dual MEG recordings. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128485. Zhou, G. , Bourguignon, M. , Parkkonen, L. , & Hari, R. (2016). Neural signatures of hand kinematics in leadersvs. followers: A dual-MEG study. NeuroImage, 125, 731�738.

Page 100: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Embodied Interaction with �Sonic Agents� Baily, J. (1985). Music structure and human movement. In P. Howell , I. Cross , & R. West (Eds.), Musicalstructure and cognition (pp. 237�259). London, UK: Academic Press. Baily, J. (1995). Music and the body. The World of Music, 37(2), 11�30. Bastide, R. (1958/2001). Le Candomblé de Bahia. Paris, France: Plon. Becker, J. O. (2004). Deep listeners: Music, emotion and trancing. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Blacking, J. (Ed.). (1977). The anthropology of the body. London, UK: Academic Press. Bonini Baraldi, F. (2008). L�expérience de la musique instrumentale dans les veillées funéraires des Tsiganes deTransylvanie. Frontières, 20(2), 67�70. 214 Bonini Baraldi, F. (2009). All the pain and joy of the world in a single melody: A Transylvanian case-studyon music and emotion. Music Perception, 26(3), 257�261 Bonini Baraldi, F. (2010). Jouer aux noces, puis entre soi. Le cycle de l�émotion chez les musiciens tsiganes deTransylvanie. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 23, 85�102. Bonini Baraldi, F. (2013). Tsiganes, musique et empathie. Paris, France: �ditions de la Maison des Sciences del�Homme. Bonini Baraldi, F. (2015). La douceur, critère d�appréciation musicale chez les Tsiganes de Transylvanie. Cahiersd�Ethnomusicologie, 28, 23�41. Bonini Baraldi, F. , Bigand, E. , & Pozzo, T. (2015). Measuring aksak rhythm and synchronization inTransylvanian village music by using motion capture. Empirical Musicology Review, 10(4), 265�291. Bouët, J. , Lortat-Jacob, B. , & R�dulescu, S. (2002). � tue-tête: Chant et violon au Pays de l�Oach. Nanterre, France:Société d�Ethnologie. Brabec de Mori, B. , & Seeger, A. (2013). Introduction: Considering music, humans, and non-humans.Ethnomusicology Forum, 22(3), 269�286. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 14. (2001). Le geste musical. Cler, J. (2010). Anti-pathos: L�affect proprement musical dans une société d�ascendance nomade, en Turquieméridionale. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 23, 101�111. Davies, J. B. (1978). The psychology of music. London, UK: Hutchinson. De Martino, E. (1966/2005). The land of remorse: A study of Southern Italian tarantism. London, UK: FreeAssociation Books. Desroches, M. , Stévance, S. , & Lacasse, S. (Eds.). (2014). Quand la musique prend corps. Québec, Canada:Les Presses de l�Université de Montréal. Empirical Musicology Review, 10(1�2). (2015). Special issue: Music and empathy. Estival, J.-P. , Bigand, E. , & Matallah, F. (2013). Para uma cooperação da escuta e do movimento: Estudointercultural sobre a percepção dos ritmos tradicionais do culto xangô (Olinda, PE). Claves, 8, 75�98. Feld, S. (1982). Sound and sentiment: Birds, weeping, poetics, and song in Kaluli expression. Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Giurchescu, A. (2001). Le danseur et le musicien, une connivence nécessaire. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 14,79�94. Gutierrez Choquevilca, A.-L. (2010). Imaginaire acoustique et apprentissage d�une ontologie animiste. Ateliersdu LESC, 34. Retrieved from http://ateliers.revues.org/8553. Helmlinger, A. (2010). Memorizing together: Group effect experiments in steelbands (Trinidad and Tobago).Annales Fyssen, 24, 216�235. Juslin, P. N. , & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559�575 Kaeppler, A. L. (2000). Dance ethnology and the anthropology of dance. Dance Research Journal, 32(1),116�125. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. (2010). An embodied approach to music semantics. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 43�67. Lucas, G. , Clayton, M. , & Leante, L. (2011). Inter-group entrainment in Afro-Brazilian Congado ritual. EmpiricalMusicology Review, 6, 75�102. Martínez, R. (2001). Autour du geste musical andin. Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 14, 167�180. Mateo Dieste, J. L. (2012). Health and ritual in Morocco: Conceptions of the body and healing practices.Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Mauss, M. (1936/1950). Les techniques du corps. In M. Mauss (Ed.), Sociologie et anthropologie (pp. 365�386).Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. Prévôt, N. (2014). Music, spirits & spirit in Bastar, central India. In T. Otten & U. Skoda (Eds.), Dialogues withGods: Possession in Middle Indian rituals (pp. 229�246). Berlin, Germany: Wei�ensee Verlag. Rappoport, D. (1999). Chanter sans être ensemble: Des musiques juxtaposées pour un public invisible. L�Homme,152, 143�162. Rouget, G. (1985). Music and trance: A theory of the relations between music and possession. Chicago, IL: TheUniversity of Chicago Press. Sárosi, B. (1971). Gypsy music. Budapest, Hungary: Corvina Press.

Page 101: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Seeger, A. (1987). Why Suyá sing: A musical anthropology of an Amazonian people. Cambridge, MA: UniversityPress. Stewart, M. C. (1997). The time of the Gypsies. Oxford, UK: Westview. Surrallès, A. (2003). Au coeur du sens: Perception, affectivité, action chez les Candoshi. Paris, France: CNRSand �ditions de la Maison des Sciences de l�Homme. Vatin, X. (2006). Musique et possession dans les Candomblés de Bahia: Pluralisme rituel et comportemental.Cahiers d�Ethnomusicologie, 19, 191�209.

The Ethnography of Embodied Music Interaction Bauman, R. (1984 [1977]). Verbal art as performance. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc. Béhague, G. (Ed.). (1984). Performance practice: Ethnomusicological perspectives. Westport, CT: GreenwoodPress. Bithell, C. (2007). Transported by song: Corsican voices from oral tradition to world stage. Lanham, MD:Scarecrow Press. Blacking, J. (Ed.). (1981). Ethnography of musical performance. In D. Heartz & B. C. Wade (Eds.), Report ofthe Twelfth [IMS] Congress Berkeley 1977 (pp. 383�401). Kassel, Germany: Bärenreiter Kassel. 222 Brinner, B. E. (1995). Knowing music, making music: Javanese gamelan and the theory of musicalcompetence and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Clayton, M. (2007). Observing entrainment in Indian music performance: Video-based observational analysis oftanpura playing and beat marking. Musicae Scientiae, 11(1), 27�60. Clayton, M. (2013). Entrainment, ethnography and musical interaction. In M. Clayton , B. Dueck , & L. Leante(Eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance (pp. 17�39). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Clayton, M. , & Leante, L. (2015). Role, status and hierarchy in the performance of north Indian classical music.Ethnomusicology Forum, 24(3), 414�442. Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11(ESEM Counterpoint 1), 1�82. Cross, I. (2006). Four issues in the study of music in evolution. The World of Music, 48(3), 55�63. Doffman, M. (2013). Groove: Temporality, awareness and the feeling of entrainment in jazz performance. In M.Clayton , B. Dueck , & L. Leante (Eds.), Experience and meaning in music performance (pp. 62�85). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Dueck, B. (2013). Musical intimacies and indigenous imaginaries in Manitoba. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Feld, S. (1984). Sound structure as social structure. Ethnomusicology, 28(3), 383�409. Glowinski, D. , Badino, L. , Ausilio, A. , Camurri, A. , & Fadiga, L. (2012). Analysis of leadership in a stringquartet. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Social Behaviour in Music at ACM ICMI 2012(pp 763�774). Santa Monica, CA. Henry, E. O. (1976). The variety of music in a North Indian village: Reassessing cantometrics.Ethnomusicology, 20(1), 49�66. Lomax, A. (1968). Folk song style and culture. New Brunswick, Canada and London, UK: TransactionPublishers. Lucas, G. , Clayton, M. , & Leante, L. (2011). Inter-group entrainment in Afro-Brazilian Congado ritual. EmpiricalMusicology Review, 6(2), 75�102. McLeod, N. , & Herndon, M. (Eds.). (1980). The ethnography of musical performance. Norwood, PA: NorwoodEditions. Monson, I. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress. Moore, A. F. (2012). Song means: Analysing and interpreting recorded popular song. Farnham & Burlington,UK: Ashgate. Napier, J. (2006). A �failed� unison or conscious differentiation: The notion of �heterophony� in North Indian vocalperformance. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 37(1), 85�108. Napier, J. (2007). The distribution of authority in the performance of North Indian vocal music. EthnomusicologyForum, 16(2), 271�301. Polak, R. (2007). Performing audience: On the social constitution of focused interaction at celebrations in Mali.Anthropos, 102(1), 3�18. Qureshi, R. B. (1995 [1986]). Sufi music of India and Pakistan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Ridgeway, C. A. , & Roberts, J. M. (1976). Urban popular music and interaction: A semantic relationship. Ethno-musicology, 20(2), 233�251. Stone, R. (1982). Let the inside be sweet: The interpretation of music event among the Kpelle of Liberia.Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press. Wiltermuth, S. S. , & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1�5.

Page 102: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Combat-Dancing, Cultural Transmission, and Choreomusicology Cordes, H. T. (1992). Pencak Silat. Die Kampfkunst der Minangkabau und ihr kulturelles Umfeld (DoctoralDissertation). Universität zu Köln 1990. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Afra-Verlag. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Downey, G. (2002). Domesticating an urban menace: Reforming Capoeira as a Brazilian national sport. TheInternational Journal of the History of Sport, 19(4), 1�32. Downey, G. (2005). Learning capoeira: Lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian art. New York, NY: OxfordUniversity Press. Downey, G. , Dalidowicz, M. , & Mason, P. H. (2015). Apprenticeship as method: Embodied learning in ethno-graphic practice. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 183�200. Grau, A. (1983). Sing a dance. Dance a song: The relationships between two types of formalized movementsand music among the Tiwi of Melville and Bathurst Islands, North Australia. Dance Research: The Journal ofthe Society for Dance Research, 1, 32�44. Hodgins, P. (1992). Relationships between score and choreography in twentieth-century dance: Music,movement and metaphor. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press. Jordan, S. (1994). Matching music and dance. Dance Chronicle, 17(2), 217�221. Lewis, J. L. (1992). Ring of liberation: A deceptive discourse in Brazilian capoeira. Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Press. 231 Lewis, J. L. (1995). Genre and embodiment. Cultural Anthropology, 10(2), 221�243. Lewis, J. L. (1999). Sex and violence in Brazil: �Carnaval, capoeira�, and the problem of everyday life. AmericanEthnologist, 26(3), 539�557. Mason, P. H. (2011). Modes of transmission: Traditional West Sumatran and contemporary West Javanesepractices of indigenous martial arts. In M. A. Md Nor (Ed.), Hybridity in the Performing Arts of Southeast Asia:Proceedings of the ICTM Study Group on Performing Arts of Southeast Asia (pp. 113�117). Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia: NusPARC. Mason, P. H. (2012). Music, dance and the total art work: Choreomusicology in theory and practice. Researchin Dance Education, 13(1), 5�24. Mason, P. H. (2013). Intracultural and intercultural dynamics of capoeira. Global Ethnographic, 1, 1�8. Mason, P. H. (2016a). Pencak Silat Seni in West Java, Indonesia. In U. U. Pätzold & P. H. Mason (Eds.), Thefighting art of Pencak Silat and its music�From Southeast Asian village to global movement (pp. 235�264).Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Mason, P. H. (2016b). Silek Minang in West Sumatra, Indonesia. In U. U. Pätzold & P. H. Mason (Eds.), Thefighting art of Pencak Silat and its music�From Southeast Asian village to global movement (pp. 205�234).Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Mason, P. H. , Domínguez D. J. F. , Winter, B. , & Grignolio, A. (2015). Hidden in plain view: Degeneracy incomplex systems. Biosystems, 128, 1�8. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2010). The spatiotemporal representation of dance and music gestures using topo-graphical gesture analysis (TGA). Music Perception, 28(1), 93�111. Pätzold, U. U. (2000). Blüte, Frucht und Kern: Bewegungsformen und musikstile im bereich des Pencak Silat inWest-Java und West-Sumatra. Bonn, Germany: Holos-Verlag. Wilson, I. D. (2002). The politics of inner power: The practice of Pencak Silat in West Java (UnpublishedDoctoral Dissertation). Perth, Western Australia: Murdoch University. Wilson, L. (2015). Martial arts and the body politic in Indonesia. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

The Hiplife Zone Agawu, K. (2016). The African imagination in music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Bhabha, H. (2011). Our neighbours, ourselves: Contemporary reflections on survival. In E. Cancik-Kirschbauw ,E. Fischer-Lichte , K. W. Hempfer , & J. Küpper (Eds.), Hegel lectures (pp. 1�19). Berlin, Germany: Walter deGruyter GmbH & Co. KG. Brandel, R. (1961). The music of Central Africa: An ethnomusicological study. The Hague, The Netherlands:Springer. Clayton, M. , Dueck, B. , & Leante, L. (Eds.). (2013). Experience and meaning in music performance. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. Collins, J. (1989). The early history of West African highlife music. Popular Music, 8(3), 221�230. Collins, J. (1991). The highlife zone. In E. Graeme (Ed.), Africa O�Ye!. A celebration of African music (pp.80�107). London, UK: Sango Publications. DjeDje, J. C. (2008a). Fiddling in West Africa: Touching the spirit in Fuble, Hausa, and Dagbamba cultures.Indiana, IN: Indiana University Press. DjeDje, J. C. (2008b). Fiddling in West Africa (1950s�1990s): The songbook: Ethnomusicology archive series(vol. 2). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Ethnomusicology Publications.

Page 103: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Emielu, A. (2010). The concept of change and genre development: A case study of highlife music. Journal ofAfrican Literature and the Arts, 6, 93�108. Kubik, G. (2010). Theory of African music (vol. 2). Chicago, IL: University Press. Lange, K. R. (2006). Dagbani proverbs. Tamale, Ghana: Tamale Institute of Cross-Cultural Studies: CyberSystems. Locke, D. (2011). The metric matrix: Simultaneous multidimensionality in African music. Analytical Approachesto World Music, 1, 48�72. Locke, D. (2014). Dagomba dance drumming. Tufts University. Retrieved fromhttp://sites.tufts.edu/dagomba/the-repertory/baamaaya-baamaaya-2/ Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London, UK: Sage. Merriam, A. P. (1962). The African idiom in music. Journal of American Folklore, 75(296), 120�130. Nii-Yartey, F. (2011). The performing arts: Identity and the new social paradigm. In H. Lauren , N. A. A. Amfo ,& J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Identity meets nationality: Voices from the humanities (pp. 197�282). Ghana, Ghana:Ghana Saharon Publishers. Nketia, K. (1963a). Folksongs of Ghana. Accra, Ghana: University of Ghana. Nketia, K. (1963b). Drumming in Akan community of Ghana. London, UK: Thomas Nelson and Sons. Nketia, K. (1974). The music of Africa. New York, NY: Norton. Phyfferoen, D. (2004). Field recording: MR.2005.1.39�1. Retrieved fromhttp://music.africamuseum.be/instruments/english/ghana/ashanti/ashanti.html. Phyfferoen, D. (2012). Hiplife. In L. R. Koos (Ed.), Hidden cities (pp. 237�247). Oxford, UK: Inter�DisciplinaryPress. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformations. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Staniland, M. (1975). The lions of Dagbon: Political change in Northern Ghana. New York, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press. Stone, R. (1983). The times of African music. Unpublished manuscript. University of Ghana Legon.

Crafting the Playing Body as an Infrastructure of �Immediate� and �Mediate� EmbodiedMusic Cognition in an Academic Jazz Program Ake, D. (2002). Jazz �traning: John Coltrane and the conservatory. In Jazz Cultures (pp. 112�145). Berkeley, CA:University of California Press. Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70�88. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge. Monson, I. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPress. Wilf, E. (2010). Swinging within the Iron Cage: Modernity, creativity, and embodied practice in American post-secondary jazz education. American Ethnologist, 37(3), 563�582. Wilf, E. (2012). Rituals of creativity: Tradition, modernity, and the �acoustic unconscious� in an Americancollegiate jazz music program. American Anthropologist, 114(1), 32�44. Wilf, E. (2013). Sociable robots, jazz music, and divination: Contingency as a cultural resource for negotiatingproblems of intentionality. American Ethnologist, 40(4), 605�618. Wilf, E. (2014). School for cool: The academic jazz program and the paradox of institutionalized creativity.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Wilf, E. (2015). Modernity, cultural anesthesia, and sensory agency: Technologies of the listening self in a U.S.collegiate jazz music program. Ethnos, 80(1), 1�22.

Brain-to-Brain Coupling and Culture as Prerequisites for Musical Interaction Abrams, D. A. , Ryali, S. , Chen, T. , Chordia, P. , Khouzam, A. , Levitin, D. J. , & Menon, V. (2013). Inter-subject synchronization of brain responses during natural music listening. European Journal of Neuroscience,37(9), 1458�1469. Alluri, V. , Toiviainen, P. , Jaaskelainen, I. P. , Glerean, E. , Sams, M. , & Brattico, E. (2012). Large-scale brainnetworks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3677�3689. Babiloni, C. , Buffo, P. , Vecchio, F. , Marzano, N. , Del Percio, C. , Spada, D. , � Perani, D. (2011). Brains �inconcert�: Frontal oscillatory alpha rhythms and empathy in professional musicians. NeuroImage, 60(1), 105�116. Bianco, R. , Novembre, G. , Keller, P. E. , Scharf, F. , Friederici, A. D. , Villringer, A. , & Sammler, D. (2016).Syntax in action has priority over movement selection in piano playing: An ERP study. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience, 28(1), 41�54.

Page 104: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Brattico, E. , Bogert, B. , & Jacobsen, T. (2013). Toward a neural chronometry for the aesthetic experience ofmusic. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 206. Brattico, E. , Pallesen, K. J. , Varyagina, O. , Bailey, C. , Anourova, I. , Jarvenpaa, M. , � Tervaniemi, M. (2009).Neural discrimination of nonprototypical chords in music experts and laymen: An MEG study. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2230�2244. Brattico, E. , Tupala, T. , Glerean, E. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Modulated neural processing of Westernharmony in folk musicians. Psychophysiology, 50(7), 653�663. Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Social neuroscience: Understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole andvice versa. American Psychologist, 57(11), 819�831. Caclin, A. , Brattico, E. , Smith, B. , Tervaniemi, M. , Naatanen, R. , Giard, M. H. , & McAdams, S. (2003). MMNresponses to timbre changes. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Mismatch Negativity andAuditory Functions and Dysfunctions, Lyon, France. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263�287. Doja, A. (2015). From the native point of view: An insider/outsider perspective on folkloric archaism and modernanthropology in Albania. History of the Human Sciences, 28(4), 44�75. Ericsson, K. A. , & Towne, T. J. (2010). Expertise. Cognitive Science, 1(3), 404�416. Garza Villarreal, E. A. , Brattico, E. , Leino, S. , Ostergaard, L. , & Vuust, P. (2011). Distinct neural responses tochord violations: A multiple source analysis study. Brain Research, 1389, 103�114. Hasson, U. , & Frith, C. D. (2016). Mirroring and beyond: Coupled dynamics as a generalized framework formodelling social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: BiologicalSciences, 371(1693). Hasson, U. , Ghazanfar, A. A. , Galantucci, B. , Garrod, S. , & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: Amechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(2), 114�121. Hasson, U. , Nir, Y. , Levy, I. , Fuhrmann, G. , & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of corticalactivity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634�1640. Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London, UK: Routledge. 256 Keller, M. S. (2012). What makes music European: Looking beyond sound. Lanham�Toronto�Plymouth, UK:The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Koelsch, S. (2006). Significance of Broca�s area and ventral premotor cortex for music-syntactic processing.Cortex, 42(4), 518�520. Koelsch, S. , Grossmann, T. , Gunter, T. C. , Hahne, A. , Schroger, E. , & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Childrenprocessing music: Electric brain responses reveal musical competence and gender differences. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 683�693. Koelsch, S. , Schmidt, B.-H. , & Kansok, J. (2002). Effects of musical expertise on the early right anteriornegativity: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 39, 657�663. Konvalinka, I. , Bauer, M. , Stahlhut, C. , Hansen, L. K. , Roepstorff, A. , & Frith, C. D. (2014). Frontal alphaoscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. NeuroImage,94, 79�88. Konvalinka, I. , & Roepstorff, A. (2012). The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach ussomething about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 215. Lillywhite, A. , Glowinski, D. , Camurri, A. , & Pollick, A. (2015). An fMRI study investigating the contribution ofvisual features to an intersubject correlation (ISC) of brain activity during observation of a string quartet.Perception, 44, 347�348. Maess, B. , Koelsch, S. , Gunter, T. C. , & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca�s area:An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 540�545. Majno, M. (2012). From the model of El Sistema in Venezuela to current applications: Learning and integrationthrough collective music education. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 56�64. Mandel, A. , Bourguignon, M. , Parkkonen, L. , & Hari, R. (2016). Sensorimotor activation related to speaker vs.listener role during natural conversation. Neuroscience Letters, 614, 99�104. Merrett, D. L. , Peretz, I. , & Wilson, S. J. (2013). Moderating variables of music training-induced neuroplasticity:A review and discussion. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 606. Nettl, B. (2008). The music of the other: New challenges for ethnomusicology in a global age. World of Music,50(2), 121�123. Nettl, B. (2015). What are the great discoveries of your field? Informal comments on the contributions of ethno-musicology. Muzikoloski Zbornik, 51(2), 163�174. Nummenmaa, L. , Glerean, E. , Viinikainen, M. , Jaaskelainen, I. P. , Hari, R. , & Sams, M. (2012). Emotionspromote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the USA, 109(24), 9599�9604. Pantev, C. , Paraskevopoulos, E. , Kuchenbuch, A. , Lu, Y. , & Herholz, S. C. (2015). Musical expertise isrelated to neuroplastic changes of multisensory nature within the auditory cortex. European Journal ofNeuroscience, 41(5), 709�717. Peretz, I. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition, 100, 1�32. Peretz, I. , Brattico, E. , Jarvenpaa, M. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2009). The amusic brain: In tune, out of key, andunaware. Brain, 132(Pt 5), 1277�1286. Peretz, I. , & Coltheart, M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688�691. Putkinen, V. , Tervaniemi, M. , Saarikivi, K. , & Huotilainen, M. (2015). Promises of formal and informal musicalactivities in advancing neurocognitive development throughout childhood. Annals of the New York Academy of

Page 105: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Sciences, 1337, 153�162. Repp, B. H. (2003). Phase attraction in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory sequences: Effects of singleand periodic distractors on synchronization accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performence, 29(2), 290�309. Reybrouck, M. , & Brattico, E. (2015). Neuroplasticity beyond sounds: Neural adaptations following long-termmusical aesthetic experiences. Brain Science, 5(1), 69�91. Rizzolatti, G. , Fadiga, L. , Gallese, V. , & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motoractions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131�141. Roepstorff, A. (2013). Why am I not just lovin� cultural neuroscience? Toward a slow science of culturaldifference. Psychological Inquiry, 24(1), 61�63. Silbert, L. J. , Honey, C. J. , Simony, E. , Poeppel, D. , & Hasson, U. (2014). Coupled neural systems underliethe production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the USA, 111(43), E4687�4696. Trainor, L. J. (2005). Are there critical periods for musical development? Developmental Psychobiology, 46(3),262�278. Ukkola, L. T. , Onkamo, P. , Raijas, P. , Karma, K. , & Jarvela, I. (2009). Musical aptitude is associated withAVPR1A-haplotypes. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5534. 257 Vuust, P. , Brattico, E. , Seppanen, M. , Naatanen, R. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2012). The sound of music:Differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm. Neuropsychologia,50(7), 1432�1443. Vuust, P. , Gebauerac, L. , Hansenb, N. L. , Jørgensenac, S. R. , Møllerac, A. , & Linnet, J. (2010). Personalityinfluences career choice: Sensation seeking in professional musicians. Music Education Research, 12, 219�230. Vuust, P. , Pallesen, K. J. , Bailey, C. , van Zuijen, T. L. , Gjedde, A. , Roepstorff, A. , & Ostergaard, L. (2005).To musicians, the message is in the meter pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. NeuroImage, 24(2), 560�564. Vuust, P. , Roepstorff, A. , Wallentin, M. , Mouridsen, K. , & Ostergaard, L. (2006). It don�t mean a thing� Keepingthe rhythm during polyrhythmic tension, activates language areas (BA47). NeuroImage, 31(2), 832�841. Zhdanov, A. , Nurminen, J. , Baess, P. , Hirvenkari, L. , Jousmaki, V. , Makela, J. P. , � Parkkonen, L. (2015). Aninternet-based real-time audiovisual link for dual MEG recordings. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128485. Zhou, G. , Bourguignon, M. , Parkkonen, L. , & Hari, R. (2016). Neural signatures of hand kinematics in leadersvs. followers: A dual-MEG study. NeuroImage, 125, 731�738.

Empowering Health and Well-Being Albers, M. W. , Gilmore, G. C. , Kaye, J. , Murphy, C. , Wingfield, A. , Bennett, D. A. ,� Zhang, L. I. (2015). At theinterface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer�s disease. Alzheimer�s & Dementia, 11(1), 70�98. Arab, L. , & Sabbagh, M. (2010). Are certain lifestyle habits associated with lower Alzheimer�s disease risk?Journal of Alzheimer�s Disease, 20(3), 785�794. Arroyo-Anlló, E. M. , Díaz, J. P. , & Gil, R. (2013). Familiar music as an enhancer of self-consciousness inpatients with Alzheimer�s disease. BioMed Research International, 2013, article 752965. Bachmann, M. (1991). Dalcroze today: An education through and into music. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall. Bigand, E. , & Tillmann, B. (2015). Introduction to the neurosciences and music V: Cognitive stimulation andrehabilitation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), vii�vix. 267 Bisio, A. , Casteran, M. , Ballay, Y. , Manckoundia, P. , Mourey, F. , & Pozzo, T. (2012). Motor resonancemechanisms are preserved in Alzheimer�s disease patients. Neuroscience, 222, 58�68. Cattaneo, Z. , Vecchi, T. , Cornoldi, C. , Mammarella, I. , Bonino, D. , Ricciardi, E. , & Pietrini, P. (2008).Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,32(8), 1346�1360. Coates, R. (2010). Noisemakers to music makers: Developing a school band for students who are visuallyimpaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104(1), 8�11. Dayanim, S. (2009). The acute effects of a specialized movement program on the verbal abilities of patientswith late-stage dementia. Alzheimer�s Care Today, 10(2), 93�98. Dick, M. B. , Hsieh, S. , Dick-Muehlke, C. , Davis, D. S. , & Cotman, C. W. (2000). The variability of practicehypothesis in motor learning: Does it apply to Alzheimer�s disease? Brain and Cognition, 44(3), 470�489. Eggermont, L. , Swaab, D. , Luiten, P. , & Scherder, E. (2006). Exercise, cognition and Alzheimer�s disease:More is not necessarily better. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(4), 562�575. Eichenbaum, H. , Otto, T. , & Cohen, N. J. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memorysystem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449�518. Eustache, M.-L. , Laisney, M. , Juskenaite, A. , Letortu, O. , Platel, H. , Eustache, F. , & Desgranges, B. (2013).Sense of identity in advanced Alzheimer�s dementia: A cognitive dissociation between sameness and selfhood?Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1456�1467. Fazzi, E. , Lanners, J. , Ferrari-Ginevra, O. , Achille, C. , Luparia, A. , Signorini, S. , & Lanzi, G. (2002). Grossmotor development and reach on sound as critical tools for the development of the blind child. Brain &Development, 24(5), 269�275.

Page 106: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Fazzi, E. , Signorini, S. G. , Bomba, M. , Luparia, A. , Lanners, J. , & Balottin, U. (2011). Reach on sound: A keyto object permanence in visually impaired children. Early Human Development, 87(4), 289�296. Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Golby, A. , Silverberg, G. , Race, E. , Gabrieli, S. , O�Shea, J. , Knierim, K. , Stebbins, G. , & Gabrieli, J. (2005).Memory encoding in Alzheimer�s disease: An fMRI study of explicit and implicit memory. Brain, 128(4), 773�787. Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. , & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding: A framework forperception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 869�878. Houwen, S. , Visscher, C. , Lemmink, K. A. P. M. , & Hartman, E. (2009). Motor skill performance of childrenand adolescents with visual impairments: A review. Exceptional Children, 75(4), 464�492. Ihsen, E. , Troester, H. , & Brambring, M. (2010). The role of sound in encouraging infants with congenitalblindness to reach for objects. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104(8), 478�488. Jaques-Dalcroze, E. (1930). Eurhythmics, art and education. ( F. Roswell , Trans.). London, UK: Chatto &Windus. Jelicic, M. , Bonebakker, A. E. , & Bonke, B. (1995). Implicit memory performance of patients with Alzheimer�sdisease: A brief review. International Psychogeriatrics, 7(3), 385�392. Kalish-Weiss, B. I. (1988). Born blind and visually handicapped infants: Movement psychotherapy andassessment. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 15, 101�108. Kozub, F. M. , & Oh, Hyun-Kyoung . (2004). An exploratory study of physical activity levels in children andadolescents with visual impairments. Clinical Kinesiology, 58(3), 1�7. Larsson, L. , & Frändin, K. (2006). Body awareness and dance-based training for persons with acquiredblindness�Effects on balance and gait speed. Visual Impairment Research, 8(1�2), 25�40. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Levtzion-Korach, O. , Tennenbaum, A. , Schnitzer, R. , & Ornoy, A. (2000). Early motor development of blindchildren. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 36(3), 226�229. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(January), 1�14. Melorose, J. , Perroy, R. , & Careas, S. (2015). Sensory substitution: Closing the gap between basic researchand widespread practical visual rehabilitation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 41(2014), 3�15. Moussard, A. , Bigand, E. , Belleville, S. , & Peretz, I. (2012). Music as an aid to learn new verbal information inAlzheimer�s disease. Music Perception, 29(5), 521�532. Moussard, A. , Bigand, E. , Belleville, S. , & Peretz, I. (2014). Learning sung lyrics aids retention in normalageing and Alzheimer�s disease. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(6), 894�917. Mozaz, M. , Garaigordobil, M. , Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. , Anderson, J. , Crucian, G. P. , & Heilman, K. M. (2006).Posture recognition in Alzheimer�s disease. Brain and Cognition, 62(3), 241�245. Palleschi, L. , Vetta, F. , De Gennaro, E. , Idone, G. , Sottosanti, G. , Gianni, W. , & Marigliano, V. (1996). Effectof aerobic training on the cognitive performance of elderly patients with senile dementia of Alzheimer type.Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 22(Suppl 1), 47�50. Paxton, S. , & Kilcoyne, A. (1993). On the braille in the body: An account of the touchdown dance integratedworkshops with the visually impaired and the sighted. Dance Research, 11(1), 3�51. 268 Penescu, G. (2015). Psychomotricity development in visually impaired children through synchronous groupdance�Work strategy. Palestrica of the Third Millennium�Civilization and Sport, 16(2), 132�137. Prechtl, H. F. , Cioni, G. , Einspieler, C. , Bos, A. F. , & Ferrari, F. (2001). Role of vision on early motordevelopment: Lessons from the blind. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43(3), 198�201. Robert, P. H. , König, A. , Amieva, H. , Andrieu, S. , Bremond, F. , Bullock, R. ,� Manera, V. (2014).Recommendations for the use of serious games in people with Alzheimer�s Disease, related disorders andfrailty. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 54. Sacks, S. Z. , & Silberman, R. K. (2000). Social skills. In A. J. Keoeing & M. C. M. Holbrook (Eds.), Foundationof education: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youth with visual impairment (pp. 616�652). NewYork, NY: AFB Press, American Foundation for the Blind . Sacks, S. Z. , & Wolffe, K. E. (2006). Teaching social skills to students with visual impairment: From theory topractice. New York, NY: AFB Press, American Foundation for the Blind . Sapp, W. (2011). Somebody�s jumping on the floor: Incorporating music into orientation and mobility for pre-schoolers with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105, 715�719. Takahashi, H. (2015). Dance/movement therapy with blind and visually impaired children in Nepal.Dance/Movement Therapy Thesis. Paper 8. Thompson, R. G. , Moulin, C. J. , Hayre, S. , & Jones, R. W. (2006). Music enhances category fluency inhealthy older adults and Alzheimer�s disease patients. Experimental Aging Research, 31, 91�99. van de Winckel, A. , Feys, H. , De Weerdt, W. , & Dom, R. (2004). Cognitive and behavioural effects of music-based exercises in patients with dementia. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(3), 253�260. Weiner, M. W. , Veitch, D. P. , Aisen, P. S. , Beckett, L. A. , Cairns, N. J. , Cedarbaum, J. ,� Trojanowski, J. Q.(2015). 2014 Update of the Alzheimer�s disease neuroimaging initiative: A review of papers published since itsinception. Alzheimer�s & Dementia, 11(6), e1�e120. Wittwer, J. E. , Webster, K. E. , & Hill, K. (2013). Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on gait in people withAlzheimer disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 718�724. Zatorre, R. J. , Chen, J. L. , & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory�motor interactions inmusic perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547�558. Abrams, B. (2002). Transpersonal dimensions of the Bonny Method. In K. Bruscia & D. Grocke (Eds.), Guidedimagery and music: The Bonny method and beyond (pp. 339�358). Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.

Page 107: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Bonde, L. O. (2000). Metaphor and narrative in guided imagery and music. Journal of the Association for Musicand Imagery, 7, 59�76. Bonde, L. O. (2004).To draw from bits and pieces a more supportable narrative. Canadian Journal of MusicTherapy, 11, 31�56. Bonde, L. O. (2005). The Bonny Method of Guided Imagery and music with cancer survivors: A psychosocialstudy with focus on the influence of BMGIM on mood and quality of life (Doctoral Dissertation). Aalborg,Denmark: Aalborg University: Retrieved from http://www.mt-phd.aau.dk/phd-theses/ Bonde, L. O. (2006). Music as metaphor and analogy: A literature essay. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 16,57�78. Bonde, L. O. (2007). Imagery, metaphor and perceived outcomes in six cancer survivors� BMGIM therapy. In A.Meadows (Ed.), Qualitative inquiries in music therapy (vol. 3, pp. 132�164). Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers. Bonde, L. O. (2011). Health musicing�Music therapy or music and health? A model, empirical examples andpersonal reflections. Music & Arts in Action, 3(2), 120�140. 277 Bonde, L. O. , & Blom, K. M. (2016). Music listening and the experience of surrender: An exploration ofimagery experiences evoked by selected classical music from the Western tradition. In H. Klempe (Ed.),Cultural psychology of musical experience (pp. 207�234). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Bonny, H. (2002). Music and consciousness: The evolution of guided imagery and music. Gilsum, NH:Barcelona Publishers. Ekholm, O. , Juel, K. , & Bonde, L. O. (2015). Music and public health: An empirical study of the use of music inthe daily life of the adult Danish citizens and the health implications of musical participation. Arts & Health, 8(2),154�168. Fachner, J. , Ala-Ruona, E. , & Bonde, L. O. (2015). Guided imagery in music�A neurometric EEG/LORETAcase study. In J. Ginsborg , A. Lamont , M. Phillips , & S. Bramley (Eds), Proceedings from Ninth TriennialConference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. Manchester, UK: ESCOM. Farah, M. J. (2000). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitiveneurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 965�974). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ganis, G. , Thompson, W. L. , Mast, F. , & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). The brain�s mind images: The cognitiveneuroscience of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 931�941).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gärdenfors, P. (2003). How homo became sapiens: On the evolution of thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co. Grocke, D. (2010). An overview of research in the Bonny Method of guided imagery and music. Voices: AWorld Forum for Music Therapy, 10(3). Grocke, D. , & Moe, T. (Eds.). (2015). Guided imagery and music: A spectrum of approach. London, UK:Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Hevner, K. (1936). Experimental studies of the elements of expression in music. American Journal ofPsychology, 48, 246�268. Horowitz, M. (1983). Image formation and psychotherapy (revised ed.). New York, NY: Jason Aronson. Hunt, A. M. (2011). A neurophenomenological description of the guided imagery and music experience.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University. Hunt, A. M. (2015). Boundaries and potentials of traditional and alternative neuroscience research methods inmusic therapy research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 342. Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: ChicagoUniversity Press. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of music and emotion. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Juslin, P. N. , & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559. Kosslyn, S. M. , Thompson, W. L. , & Gais, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. Oxford, UK: OxfordUniversity Press. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , & Maes, P.-J. (2014). The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical MusicologyReview, 9(3�4), 236�246. Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. London, UK: Routledge. Ruud, E. (2003). Burning scripts: Self psychology, affect consciousness, script theory and the BMGIM. NordicJournal of Music Therapy, 12(2), 115�123. Stige, B. , & Aarø, L. E. (2012). Invitation to community music therapy. New York, NY: Routledge. Summer, L. (2009). Client perspectives on the music in guided imagery and music (GIM) (DoctoralDissertation). Aal-borg University: Retrieved from http://www.mt-phd.aau.dk/phd-theses/ Wärja, M. , & Bonde, L. O. (2014). Music as co-therapist: Towards a taxonomy of music in therapeutic music andimagery. Music & Medicine, 6(2), 16�27. Becker, J. (2007). Music, trancing, and the absence of pain. Pain and Its Transformations: The Interface ofBiology and Culture, 4, 166�194. Becker-Blease, K. A. (2004). Dissociative states through new age and electronic trance music. Journal ofTrauma & Dissociation, 5(2), 89�100.

Page 108: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Boutcher, S. H. , & Trenske, M. (1990). The effects of sensory deprivation and music on perceived exertion andaffect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 167�176. Buecher, K. (1896). Arbeit und rhythmus. Leipzig, Germany: S. Hirzel. Damasio, A. R. (1995). Descartes� error. New York, NY: Avon Books. Duchenne, G. (1862). Mecanisme de la Physiologie Humaine. Archives générales de médecine, 1, 29�47, 152�174. Fritz, T. H. , Halfpaap, J. , Grahl, S. , Kirkland, A. , & Villringer, A. (2013). Musical feedback during exercisemachine workout enhances mood. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 921. Fritz, T. H. , Hardikar, S. , Demoucron, M. , Niessen, M. , Demey, M. , Giot, O. ,� Leman, M. (2013). Musicalagency reduces perceived exertion during strenuous physical performance. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(44), 17784�17789. Fritz, T. H. , Jentschke, S. , Gosselin, N. , Sammler, D. , Peretz, I. , Turner, R. ,� Koelsch, S. (2009). Universalrecognition of three basic emotions in music. Current Biology, 19(7), 573�576. Fritz, T. , Vogt, M. , Lederer, A. , Schneider, L. , Fomicheva, E. , Schneider, M. , & Villringer, A. (2015). Benefitsof listening to a recording of euphoric joint music making in polydrug abusers. Frontiers in HumanNeuroscience, 9(300). Herbert, R. (2011). Reconsidering music and trance: Cross-cultural differences and cross-disciplinaryperspectives. Ethnomusicology Forum, 20(2), 201�227. Holstege, G. , Bandler, R. , & Saper, C. B. (1996). The emotional motor system. Progress in Brain Research,107, 3�6. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt, 2. Karageorghis, C. I. , Terry, P. C. , & Lane, A. M. (1999). Development and initial validation of an instrument toassess the motivational qualities of music in exercise and sport: The brunel music rating inventory. Journal ofSports Sciences, 17, 713�724. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lim, H. B. T. , Atkinson, G. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Eubank, M. R. (2009). Effects of differentiated music oncycling time trial. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 30, 435�442. Rejeski, W. J. (1985). Perceived exertion: An active or passive process. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(4),371�378. Rouget, G. (1985). Music and trance: A theory of the relations between music and possession. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Simpson, S. D. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2006). The effects of synchronous music on 400-m sprint performance.Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(10), 1095�1102. Szmedra, L. , & Bacharach, D. (1998). Effect of music on perceived exertion, plasma lactate, norepinephrineand cardiovascular hemodynamics during treadmill running. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(1),32�37. Terry, P. C. , Karageorghis, C. I. , Saha, A. M. , & D�Auria, S. (2012). Effects of synchronous music on treadmillrunning among elite triathletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 15(1), 52�57. Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,4(4), 400. Bacon, C. J. , Myers, T. R. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2012). Effect of music-movement synchrony on exerciseoxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 52, 359�365. Bigliassi, M. , Karageorghis, C. I. , Nowicky, A. V. , Orgs, G. , & Wright, M. J. (2016). Cerebral mechanismsunderlying the effects of music during a fatiguing isometric ankle-dorsiflexion task. Psychophysiology, 53,1472�1483. Bigliassi, M. , León-Domínguez, U. , Buzzachera, C. F. , Barreto-Silva, V. , & Altimari, L. R. (2015). How doesmusic aid 5 km of running? Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29, 305�314. Bishop, D. T. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Loizou, G. (2007). A grounded theory of young tennis players� use ofmusic to manipulate emotional state. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 584�607. Bishop, D. T. , Wright, M. J. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2014). Tempo and intensity of pre-task music modulateneural activity during reactive task performance. Psychology of Music, 42, 714�727. Conrad, C. , Niess, H. , Jauch, K.-W. , Bruns, C. J. , Hartl, W. H. , & Welker, L. (2007). Overture for growthhormone: Requiem for interleukin-6? Critical Care Medicine, 35, 2709�2713. Dunckley, P. , Aziz, Q. , Wise, R. G. , Brooks, J. , Tracey, I. , & Chang, L. (2007). Attentional modulation ofvisceral and somatic pain. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 19, 569�577. Ekkekakis, P. (2003). Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition andEmotion, 17, 213�239. 292 Ekkekakis, P. (2005). The study of affective responses to acute exercise: The dual-mode model. In R.Stelter & K. K. Roessler (Eds.), New approaches to sport and exercise psychology (pp. 119�146). Oxford, UK:Meyer & Meyer Sport. Ekkekakis, P. (2009). Illuminating the black box: Investigating prefrontal cortical hemodynamics during exercisewith near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 505�553. Eliakim, M. , Bodner, E. , Eliakim, A. , Nemet, D. , & Meckel, Y. (2012). Effect of motivational music on lactatelevels during recovery from intense exercise. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26, 80�86. Elliott, D. , Carr, S. , & Savage, D. (2004). Effects of motivational music on work output and affective responsesduring sub-maximal cycling of a standardized perceived intensity. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27, 134�147. Higashimoto, Y. , Honda, N. , Yamagata, T. , Matsuoka, T. , Maeda, K. , Satoh, R. ,� Fukuda, K. (2011).Activation of the prefrontal cortex is associated with exertional dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease. Respiration, 82, 492�500.

Page 109: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Hutchinson, J. C. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2013). Moderating influence of dominant attentional style andexercise intensity on responses to asynchronous music. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35, 625�643. Hutchinson, J. C. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Jones, L. (2015). See hear: Psychological effects of music andmusic-video during treadmill running. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 199�211. Jing, L. , & Xudong, W. (2008). Evaluation on the effects of relaxing music on the recovery from aerobicexercise-induced fatigue. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 48, 102�106. Jones, L. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Ekkekakis, P. (2014). Can high-intensity exercise be more pleasant?Attentional dissociation using music and video. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 528�541. Juslin, P. N. (2009). Emotion in music performance. In S. Hallam , I. Cross , & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxfordhandbook of music psychology (pp. 377�389). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Karageorghis, C. I. (2016). The scientific application of music in exercise and sport: Towards a new theoreticalmodel. In A. M. Lane (Ed.), Sport and exercise psychology (2nd ed., pp. 274�320). London, UK: Routledge. Karageorghis, C. I. (2017). Applying music in exercise and sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Karageorghis, C. I. , & Jones, L. (2014). On the stability and relevance of the exercise heart rate�music-tempopreference relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 299�310. Karageorghis, C. I. , Jones, L. , Priest, D. L. , Akers, R. I. , Clarke, A. , Perry, J. M. ,� Lim, H. B. T. (2011).Revisiting the relationship between exercise heart rate and music tempo preference. Research Quarterly forExercise and Sport, 82, 274�284. Karageorghis, C. I. , & Priest, D. L. (2012). Music in the exercise domain: A review and synthesis (Part I).International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 44�66. Kornysheva, K. , von Cramon, D. Y. , Jacobsen, T. , & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Tuning-in to the beat: Aestheticappreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 48�64. Large, E. W. , & Snyder, J. S. (2009). Pulse and meter as neural resonance. Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences, 1169, 46�57. Lee, A. L. , Desveaux, L. , Goldstein, R. S. , & Brooks, D. (2015). Distractive auditory stimuli in the form ofmusic in individuals with COPD: A systematic review. Chest, 148, 417�429. Leman, M. , Moelants, D. , Varewyck, M. , Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , & Martens, J.-P. (2013). Activating andrelaxing music entrains the speed of beat synchronized walking. PLoS ONE, 8, e67932. Leon-Carrion, J. , Damas, J. , Izzetoglu, K. , Pourrezai, K. , Martín-Rodríguez, J. F. , Barroso y Martin, J. M. , &Dominguez-Morales, M. R. (2006). Differential time course and intensity of PFC activation for men and womenin response to emotional stimuli: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Neuroscience Letters,403, 90�95. Lim, H. B. T. , Karageorghis, C. I. , Romer, L. M. , & Bishop, D. T. (2014). Psychophysiological effects ofsynchronous versus asynchronous music during cycling. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46, 407�413. Loizou, G. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2015). Effects of psychological priming, video, and music on anaerobicexercise performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25, 909�920. Rejeski, W. J. (1985). Perceived exertion: An active or passive process? Journal of Sport Psychology, 7,371�378. Schneider, S. , Askew, C. D. , Abel, T. , & Strüder, H. K. (2010). Exercise, music, and the brain: Is there a centralpattern generator? Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 1337�1343. Tenenbaum, G. (2001). A social-cognitive perspective of perceived exertion and exertion tolerance. In R. N.Singer , H. A. Hausenblas , & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 810�822). NewYork, NY: Wiley. Thaut, M. H. (2008). Rhythm, music and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York,NY: Routledge. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic musictherapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1185. 293 Trost, W. , & Vuilleumier, P. (2013). Rhythmic entrainment as a mechanism for emotion induction by music:A neurophysiological perspective. In T. Cochrane , B. Fantini , & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The emotional power ofmusic: Multidisciplinary perspectives on musical arousal, expression, and social control (pp. 213�225). NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press. Van Dyck, E. , Moens, B. , Buhmann, J. , Demey, M. , Coorevits, E. , Dalla Bella, S. , & Leman, M. (2015).Spontaneous entrainment of running cadence to music tempo. Sports Medicine�Open, 1, 1�15. Zatorre, R. J. , & Salimpoor, V. N. (2013). From perception to pleasure: Music and its neural substrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10430�10437. Chung, K. A. , Lobb, B. M. , Nutt, J. G. , McNames, J. , & Horak, F. (2010). Objective measurement ofdyskinesia in Parkinson�s disease using a force plate. Movement Disorders Journal, 25(5), 602�608. Desmet, F. , Nijs, L. , Demey, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Martens, J.-P. , & Leman, M. (2012). Assessing a clarinetplayer�s performer gestures in relation to locally intended musical targets. Journal of New Music Research,41(1), 31�48. Galna, B. , Barry, G. , Jackson, D. , Mhoropiri, D. , Olivier, P. , & Rochester, L. (2014). Accuracy of theMicrosoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson�s disease. Gait & Posture, 39(4),1062�1068. Götell, E. , Brown, S. , & Ekman, S. (2009). The influence of caregiver singing and background music on vocallyexpressed emotions and moods in dementia care: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of NursingStudies, 46(4), 422�430. Guzmán-García, A. , Hughes, J. , James, I. , & Rochester, L. (2013). Dancing as a psychosocial intervention incare homes: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(9), 914�924.

Page 110: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Jackson, K. (2014). Expressive therapies for people with Alzheimer�s and related dementia. Social Work Today14(1), 10�11. Katz, S. (2013). Dementia, personhood and embodiment: What can we learn from the medieval history ofmemory? Dementia: Journal of Social Research and Practice, 12(3), 303�314. Kontos, P. , & Martin, W. (2013). Embodiment and dementia: Exploring critical narratives of selfhood, surveil-lance, and dementia care. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 2(3), 288�302. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mansfield, A. , & Inness, E. L. (2015). Force plate assessment of quiet standing balance control: Perspectiveson clinical application within stroke rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Process and Outcome, 4, 7�15. McDermott, O. , Crellin, N. , Ridder, H. M. , & Orell, M. (2012). Music therapy in dementia: A narrative synthesissystematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(8), 781�794. Meelberg, V. (2011). Moving to become better: The embodied performance of musical groove. Journal forArtistic Research, 1, https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/11612/11613. Mitchell, G. J. , Dupuis, S. L. , & Kontos, P. C. (2013). Dementia discourse: From impose suffering to knowingotherwise. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, June, 1�19. Nombela, C. , Hughes, L. E. , Owen, A. M. , & Grahn, J. A. (2013). Into the groove: Can rhythm influenceParkinson�s disease? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2564�2570. Raglio, A. , Filippi, S. , Bellandi, D. , & Stramba-Badiale, M. (2014). Global music approach to persons withdementia: Evidence and practice. Journal of Clinical Interventions in Aging, 9, 1669�1676. Sherratt, K. , Thornton, A. , & Hatton, G. (2004). Music interventions for people with dementia: A review of theliterature. Aging & Mental Health, 8, 3�12. Sung, H. C. , & Chang, A. M. (2005). Use of preferred music to decrease agitated behaviours in older peoplewith dementia: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(9), 1133�1140. Sung, H. C. , Chang, A. M. , & Abbey, J. (2006). The effects of preferred music on agitation of older people withdementia in Taiwan. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 999�1000. 303 Szczepa�ska-Gieracha, J. , Cie�lik, B. , Chamela-Bili�ska, D. , & Kuczy�ski, M. (2016). Postural stability ofelderly people with cognitive impairments. American Journal of Alzheimer�s Disorders and Other Dementias,31(3), 241�246. van der Vleuten, M. , Visser, A. , & Meeuwesen, L. (2012). The contribution of intimate live music performancesto the quality of life for persons with dementia. Patient Education and Counseling, 89, 484�488. Vink, A. C. , Bruinsma, M. S. , & Scholten, R. J. S. (2011). Music therapy for people with dementia (updatedCochrane Review). Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 3, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub2. Wiltermuth, S. S. , & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1�5. Wittenburg, P. , Brugman, H. , Russel, A. , Klassmann, A. , & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professionalframework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006 (pp. 1556�1559). Genova, Italy. Yiannopoulou, K. G. , & Papageorgiou, S. G. (2013). Current and future treatments for Alzheimer�s disease.Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 6(1), 19�33. Acton, G. J. , Yauk, S. , Hopkins, B. A. , & Mayhew, P. A. (2007). Increasing social communication in personswith dementia. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 21(1), 32�44. Aldridge, D. (1993). Music and Alzheimer�s disease�Assessment and therapy: Discussion paper. Journal of theRoyal Society of Medicine, 86(2), 93. 310 Baird, A. , & Samson, S. (2015). Music and dementia. Progress in Brain Research, 217, 207�235. Bernieri, F. J. , & Rosenthal, R. (1991). 11. Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactionalsynchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rimé (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401�433). Cambridge,NY: Cambridge University Press. Bispham, J. (2006). Rhythm in music: What is it? Who has it? And why?. Music Perception, 24(2), 125�134. Caddell, L. S. , & Clare, L. (2010). The impact of dementia on self and identity: A systematic review. ClinicalPsychology Review, 30(1), 113�126. Calvo-Merino, B. , Glaser, D. E. , Grèzes, J. , Passingham, R. E. , & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation andacquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243�1249. Cason, N. , Schiaratura, L. , Clément, S. , Narme, P. , Ehrlé, N. , Munsch, F. ,� Samson, S. (in preparation). Non-pharmacological complementary interventions in dementia treatment. Chartrand, T. L. , Kawada, C. L. K. , & Bargh, J. A. (2002). It takes one to know one: When your own behaviorinfluences your judgment of others. Unpublished manuscript. Chartrand, T. L. , Maddux, W. W. , & Lakin, J. L. (2005). Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitousutility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In R. R. Hassin , J. S. Uleman , & J. A. Borgh(Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 334�361). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008a). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions ofthe brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844�2854. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008b). Moving on time: Brain network for auditory-motorsynchronization is modulated by rhythm complexity and musical training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,20(2), 226�239. Christensen, H. , Griffiths, K. , MacKinnon, A. , & Jacomb, P. (1997). A quantitative review of cognitive deficitsin depression and Alzheimer-type dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(6),631�651. Clément, S. , Tonini, A. , Khatir, F. , Schiaratura, L. , & Samson, S. (2012). Short and longer term effects ofmusical intervention in severe Alzheimer�s disease. Music Perception, 29(5), 533�541.

Page 111: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Cohen-Mansfield, J. , & Mintzer, J. E. (2005). Time for change: the role of nonpharmacological interventions intreating behavior problems in nursing home residents with dementia. Alzheimer Disease & AssociatedDisorders, 19(1), 37�40. Cohen-Mansfield, J. , & Werner, P. (1997). Management of verbally disruptive behaviors in nursing homeresidents. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 52(6), M369�M377. Colling, K. B. (2000). A taxonomy of passive behaviors in people with Alzheimer�s disease. Journal of NursingScholarship, 32(3), 239�244. Condon, W. S. (1980). The relation of interactional synchrony to cognitive and emotional processes. In M. R.Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 49�65). The Hague, The Netherlands:Mouton Publishers. De Bruyn, L. , Leman, M. , Demey, M. , Desmet, F. , & Moelants, D. (2008). Measuring and quantifying theimpact of social interaction on listeners� movements to music. In K. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008Computers in Music Modeling and Retrieval and Network for Cross-Disciplinary Studies of Music and MeaningConference (pp. 298�305). Aalborg, Denmark: New Digital Arts forum. Demey, M. , Leman, M. , Bossuyt, F. , & Vanfleteren, J. (2008). The Musical Synchrotron: Using wirelessmotion sensors to study how social interaction affects synchronization with musical tempo. In 8th InternationalConference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 372�373). Genova, Italy. De Nies, T. , Vervust, T. , Demey, M. , Leman, M. , Vanfleteren, J. , & Van de Walle, R. (2012). Synchronizingmusic and movement with BeatLED: An interactive musical social game. Journal of New Music Research,41(4), 351�363. Dijksterhuis, A. , & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of socialperception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1�40. Gallese, V. , Eagle, M. N. , & Migone, P. (2007). Intentional attunement: Mirror neurons and the neuralunderpinnings of interpersonal relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55(1), 131�175. Haidt, J. , Seder, J. P. , & Kesebir, S. (2008). Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. The Journal ofLegal Studies, 37(S2), 133�156. Hasson, U. , Malach, R. , & Heeger, D. J. (2010). Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 40�48. Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253�261. Hickok, G. (2014). The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. NewYork, NY: Norton. Hove, M. J. , & Risen, J. L. (2009). It�s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. SocialCognition, 27(6), 949�960. 311 Hurley, S. (2005). The shared circuits hypothesis: A unified functional architecture for control, imitation, andsimulation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation (pp. 177�193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653�670. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27�46. Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 102�111. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological andneurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394. Kilner, J. M. , Vargas, C. , Duval, S. , Blakemore, S. J. , & Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observationof a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7(12), 1299�1301. Kirschner, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children.Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354�364. Knoblich, G. , Butterfill, S. , & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data.Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 54, 59. Knoblich, G. , & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action.Psychological Science, 12(6), 467�472. Lakin, J. , & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport.Psychological Science, 14, 334�339. Large, E. W. , & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106(1), 119. Large, E. W. , & Snyder, J. S. (2009). Pulse and meter as neural resonance. Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences, 1169(1), 46�57. Livingstone, S. R. , Thompson, W. F. , & Russo, F. A. (2009). Facial expressions and emotional singing: Astudy of perception and production with motion capture and electromyography. Music Perception, 26, 475�488. Loehr, J. D. , Kourtis, D. , Vesper, C. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint actionoutcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049�1061. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. The QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153�2167. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1008. McNeill, W. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.

Page 112: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Molnar-Szakacs, I. , & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to �e�motion. Social Cognitiveand Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235�241. Müller, N. , & Guendouzi, J. A. (2005). Order and disorder in conversation: Encounters with dementia of theAlzheimer�s type. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(5), 393�404. Narme, P. , Clément, S. , Ehrlé, N. , Schiaratura, L. , Vachez, S. , Courtaigne, B. ,� Samson, S. (2014). Efficacy ofmusical interventions in dementia: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Alzheimer�s Disease,38(2), 359�369. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2010). The spatiotemporal representation of dance and music gestures usingtopological gesture analysis (TGA). Music Perception, 28(1), 93�111. Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. F. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in jointaction: Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2894�2903. Oullier, O. , De Guzman, G. C. , Jantzen, K. J. , Lagarde, J. , & Scott Kelso, J. A. (2008). Social coordinationdynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 178�192. Overy, K. , & Molnar-Szakacs, I. (2009). Being together in time: Musical experience and the mirror neuronsystem. Music Perception, 26(5), 489�504. Pacherie, E. (2012). The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. joint-agency. In A. Seemann (Ed.),Joint Attention: New Developments (pp. 343�389). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musicalinteractions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(26). Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403�452. Rizzolatti, G. , & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169�192. 312 Ruys, K. I. , & Aarts, H. (2010). When competition merges people�s behavior: Interdependency activatesshared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1130�1133. Samson, S. , Clément, S. , Narme, P. , Schiaratura, L. , & Ehrlé, N. (2015). Efficacy of musical interventions indementia: Methodological requirements of nonpharmacological trials. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337(1), 249�255. Samson, S. , Dellacherie, D. , & Platel, H. (2009). Emotional power of music in patients with memory disorders.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), 245�255. Särkämö, T. , Tervaniemi, M. , Laitinen, S. , Numminen, A. , Kurki, M. , Johnson, J. K. , & Rantanen, P. (2014).Cognitive, emotional, and social benefits of regular musical activities in early dementia: Randomized controlledstudy. The Gerontologist, 54(4), 634�650. Sebanz, N. , Bekkering, H. , & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 10, 70� 76. Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in CognitiveScience, 1(2), 353�367. Sebanz, N. , Knoblich, G. , & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others� actions: Just like one�s own? Cognition, 88,11� 21. Sebanz, N. , Knoblich, G. , Prinz, W. , & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning andcontrol in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859�870. Shimokawa, A. , Yatomi, N. , Anamizu, S. , Torii, S. , Isono, H. , Sugai, Y. , & Kohno, M. (2001). Influence ofdeteriorating ability of emotional comprehension on interpersonal behavior in Alzheimer-type dementia. Brainand Cognition, 47(3), 423�433. Small, J. A. , Geldart, K. , Gutman, G. , & Scot, M. A. C. (1998). The discourse of self in dementia. Ageing andSociety, 18(3), 291�316. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. Trost, W. , Frühholz, S. , Schön, D. , Labbé, C. , Pichon, S. , Grandjean, D. , & Vuilleumier, P. (2014). Getting thebeat: Entrainment of brain activity by musical rhythm and pleasantness. NeuroImage, 103, 55�64. Tsai, C. C. , Kuo, W. J. , Hung, D. L. , & Tzeng, O. J. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to otherhumans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015�2024. Tzortzis, C. , Goldblum, M. C. , Dang, M. , Forette, F. , & Boller, F. (2000). Absence of amusia and preservednaming of musical instruments in an aphasic composer. Cortex, 36, 227�242. Vuust, P. , & Witek, M. A. (2014). Rhythmic complexity and predictive coding: A novel approach to modelingrhythm and meter perception in music. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1111. Warren, J. D. , Warren, J. E. , Fox, N. C. , & Warrington, E. K. (2003). Nothing to say, something to sing:Primary progressive dynamic aphasia. Neurocase, 9, 140�155. Wiltermuth, S. S. , & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1�5. Witek, M. A. , Clarke, E. F. , Wallentin, M. , Kringelbach, M. L. , & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94446. Anzak, A. , Tan, H. L. , Pogosyan, A. , & Brown, P. (2011). Doing better than your best: Loud auditorystimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force. Experimental Brain Research, 208(2), 237�243. Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. New York, NY: Pergamon Press. Bood, R. J. , Nijssen, M. , van der Kamp, J. , & Roerdink, M. (2013). The power of auditory-motorsynchronization in sports: Enhancing running performance by coupling cadence with the right beats. PloS ONE,8(8), e70758. Brown, M. , Hislop, H. J. , Waters, R. L. , & Porell, D. (1980). Walking efficiency before and after total hipreplacement. Physical Therapy, 60(10), 1259�1263.

Page 113: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Brown, S. , Martinez, M. J. , & Parsons, L. M. (2006). The neural basis of human dance. Cerebral Cortex, 16(8),1157�1167. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of thebrain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844�2854. de Dreu, M. J. , van der Wilk, A. S. D. , Poppe, E. , Kwakkel, G. , & van Wegen, E. E. H. (2012). Rehabilitation,exercise therapy and music in patients with Parkinson�s disease: A meta-analysis of the effects of music-basedmovement therapy on walking ability, balance and quality of life. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 18(1),S114�S119. Desmurget, M. , Grafton, S. T. , Vindras, P. , Gréa, H. , & Turner, R. S. (2003). Basal ganglia network mediatesthe control of movement amplitude. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 197�209. Desmurget, M. , Grafton, S. T. , Vindras, P. , Gréa, H. , & Turner, R. S. (2004). The basal ganglia networkmediates the planning of movement amplitude. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(10), 2871�2880. Desrochers, T. M. , Amemori, K.-I. , & Graybiel, A. M. (2015). Habit learning by naive macaques is marked byresponse sharpening of striatal neurons representing the cost and outcome of acquired action sequences.Neuron, 87, 853�868. Diedrichsen, J. , Shadmehr, R. , & Ivry, R. B. (2010). The coordination of movement: Optimal feedback controland beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 31�39. Ganesh, G. , Haruno, M. , Kawato, M. , & Burdet, E. (2010). Motor memory and local minimization of error andeffort, not global optimization, determine motor behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 382�390. Grahn, J. A. , & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience, 19(5), 893�906. Harris, C. M. , & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394,780�784. Houweling, S. , Daffertshofer, A. , van Dijk, B. W. , & Beek, P. J. (2008). Neural changes induced by learning achallenging perceptual-motor task. NeuroImage, 41, 1395�1407. Kafri, M. , Myslinski, M. J. , Gade, V. K. , & Deutsch, J. E. (2014). High metabolic cost and low energyexpenditure for typical motor activities among individuals in the chronic phase after stroke. Journal ofNeurologic Physical Therapy, 38, 226�232. 319 Karageorghis, C. I. , & Priest, D. (2012). Music in the exercise domain: A review and synthesis (Part I).International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(1), 44�66. Leman, M. , Moelants, D. , Varewyck, M. , Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , & Martens, J.-P. (2013). Activating andrelaxing music entrains the speed of beat synchronized walking. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67932. Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2010). Effects of the Big Five andmusical genre on music-induced movement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(6), 714�720. Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2014). Emotion-driven encoding ofmusic preference and personality in dance. Musicae Scientiae, 18(3), 307�323. Macdonald, R. A. R. (2013). Music, health, and well-being: A review. International Journal of Qualitative Studieson Health and Well-Being, 8, 20635. Moore, E. V. , Schaefer, R. S. , Bastin, M. E. , Roberts, N. , & Overy, K. (2015). Musically cued motor traininginduces structural change in the Arcuate Fasciculus. Proceedings of the European Society of MagneticResonance in Medicine and Biology Annual Meeting 2015, Edinburgh, UK. Nantais, K. M. , & Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference. PsychologicalScience, 10(4), 370�373. Nombela, C. , Hughes, L. E. , Owen, A. M. , & Grahn, J. A. (2013). Into the groove: Can rhythm influenceParkinson�s disease? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2564�2570. Nombela, C. , Rae, C. L. , Grahn, J. A. , Barker, R. A. , Owen, A. M. , & Rowe, J. B. (2013). How often doesmusic and rhythm improve patients� perception of motor symptoms in Parkinson�s disease? Journal ofNeurology, 260(5), 1404�1405. Palmer, C. , Lidji, P. , & Peretz, I. (2014). Losing the beat: Deficits in temporal coordination. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658): 20130405. Pecenka, N. , & Keller, P. E. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotorsynchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3�4), 505�515. Peper, C. L. E. , Oorthuizen, J. K. , & Roerdink, M. (2012). Attentional demands of cued walking in healthyyoung and elderly adults. Gait & Posture, 36(3), 378�382. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12(6), 969�992. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403�452. Schaefer, R. S. (2014). Auditory rhythmic cueing in movement rehabilitation: Findings and possiblemechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658):20130402. Schaefer, R. S. , Morcom, A. M. , Roberts, N. , & Overy, K. (2014). Moving to music: Effects of heard andimagined musical cues on movement-related brain activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 774. Schaefer, R. S. , & Overy, K. (2015). Motor responses to a steady beat. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337(1), 40�44. Shadmehr, R. , Smith, M. A. , & Krakauer, J. W. (2010). Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation inmotor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 89�108. Sowi�ski, J. , & Dalla Bella, S. (2013). Poor synchronization to the beat may result from deficient auditory-motormapping. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 1952�1963.

Page 114: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Thaut, M. H. (2005). Rhythm, music and the brain. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Thaut, M. H. , & Abiru, M. (2010). Rhythmic auditory stimulation in rehabilitation of movement disorders: Areview of current research. Music Perception, 27(4), 263�270. Thaut, M. H. , Kenyon, G. P. , Hurt, C. P. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2002). Kinematic optimization ofspatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients. Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 1073�1081. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic musictherapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1185. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , Rice, R. R. , Miller, R. A. , Rathbun, J. , & Brault, J. M. (1996). Rhythmicauditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson�s disease patients. Movement Disorders, 11(2), 193�200. Tierney, A. , & Kraus, N. (2013). The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responsesto sound. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(38), 14981�14988. Tran, D. A. , Pajaro-Blazquez, M. , Daneault, J.-F. , Gallegos, J. G. , Pons, J. , Fregni, F. ,� Zafonte, R. (2016).Combining dopaminergic facilitation with robot-assisted upper limb therapy in stroke survivors: A focusedreview. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(6), 459�474. Turner, R. S. , & Desmurget, M. (2010). Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: A vigorous tutor. CurrentOpinion in Neurobiology, 20, 704�716. Turner, R. S. , Desmurget, M. , Grethe, J. , Crutcher, M. D. , & Grafton, S. T. (2003). Motor subcircuitsmediating the control of movement extent and speed. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(6), 3958�3966. 320 Umberger, B. R. , & Martin, P. E. (2007). Mechanical power and efficiency of level walking with differentstride rates. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 210(18), 3255�3265. van den Bogert, A. J. , Hupperets, M. , Schlarb, H. , & Krabbe, B. (2012). Predictive musculoskeletal simulationusing optimal control: Effects of added limb mass on energy cost and kinematics of walking and running.Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 226(2), 123�133. van den Bosch, I. , Salimpoor, V. N. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2013). Familiarity mediates the relationship betweenemotional arousal and pleasure during music listening. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 534. Whitall, J. , Waller, S. M. , Silver, K. H. C. , & Macko, R. F. (2000). Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmicauditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke, 31, 2390�2395. Wittwer, J. E. , Webster, K. E. , & Hill, K. (2013). Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on gait in people withAlzheimer disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 718�724.

Coupling Music and Motion Albers, M. W. , Gilmore, G. C. , Kaye, J. , Murphy, C. , Wingfield, A. , Bennett, D. A. ,� Zhang, L. I. (2015). At theinterface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer�s disease. Alzheimer�s & Dementia, 11(1), 70�98. Arab, L. , & Sabbagh, M. (2010). Are certain lifestyle habits associated with lower Alzheimer�s disease risk?Journal of Alzheimer�s Disease, 20(3), 785�794. Arroyo-Anlló, E. M. , Díaz, J. P. , & Gil, R. (2013). Familiar music as an enhancer of self-consciousness inpatients with Alzheimer�s disease. BioMed Research International, 2013, article 752965. Bachmann, M. (1991). Dalcroze today: An education through and into music. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall. Bigand, E. , & Tillmann, B. (2015). Introduction to the neurosciences and music V: Cognitive stimulation andrehabilitation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), vii�vix. 267 Bisio, A. , Casteran, M. , Ballay, Y. , Manckoundia, P. , Mourey, F. , & Pozzo, T. (2012). Motor resonancemechanisms are preserved in Alzheimer�s disease patients. Neuroscience, 222, 58�68. Cattaneo, Z. , Vecchi, T. , Cornoldi, C. , Mammarella, I. , Bonino, D. , Ricciardi, E. , & Pietrini, P. (2008).Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,32(8), 1346�1360. Coates, R. (2010). Noisemakers to music makers: Developing a school band for students who are visuallyimpaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104(1), 8�11. Dayanim, S. (2009). The acute effects of a specialized movement program on the verbal abilities of patientswith late-stage dementia. Alzheimer�s Care Today, 10(2), 93�98. Dick, M. B. , Hsieh, S. , Dick-Muehlke, C. , Davis, D. S. , & Cotman, C. W. (2000). The variability of practicehypothesis in motor learning: Does it apply to Alzheimer�s disease? Brain and Cognition, 44(3), 470�489. Eggermont, L. , Swaab, D. , Luiten, P. , & Scherder, E. (2006). Exercise, cognition and Alzheimer�s disease:More is not necessarily better. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(4), 562�575. Eichenbaum, H. , Otto, T. , & Cohen, N. J. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memorysystem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 449�518. Eustache, M.-L. , Laisney, M. , Juskenaite, A. , Letortu, O. , Platel, H. , Eustache, F. , & Desgranges, B. (2013).Sense of identity in advanced Alzheimer�s dementia: A cognitive dissociation between sameness and selfhood?Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1456�1467. Fazzi, E. , Lanners, J. , Ferrari-Ginevra, O. , Achille, C. , Luparia, A. , Signorini, S. , & Lanzi, G. (2002). Grossmotor development and reach on sound as critical tools for the development of the blind child. Brain &Development, 24(5), 269�275. Fazzi, E. , Signorini, S. G. , Bomba, M. , Luparia, A. , Lanners, J. , & Balottin, U. (2011). Reach on sound: A keyto object permanence in visually impaired children. Early Human Development, 87(4), 289�296.

Page 115: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Golby, A. , Silverberg, G. , Race, E. , Gabrieli, S. , O�Shea, J. , Knierim, K. , Stebbins, G. , & Gabrieli, J. (2005).Memory encoding in Alzheimer�s disease: An fMRI study of explicit and implicit memory. Brain, 128(4), 773�787. Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. , & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding: A framework forperception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 869�878. Houwen, S. , Visscher, C. , Lemmink, K. A. P. M. , & Hartman, E. (2009). Motor skill performance of childrenand adolescents with visual impairments: A review. Exceptional Children, 75(4), 464�492. Ihsen, E. , Troester, H. , & Brambring, M. (2010). The role of sound in encouraging infants with congenitalblindness to reach for objects. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 104(8), 478�488. Jaques-Dalcroze, E. (1930). Eurhythmics, art and education. ( F. Roswell , Trans.). London, UK: Chatto &Windus. Jelicic, M. , Bonebakker, A. E. , & Bonke, B. (1995). Implicit memory performance of patients with Alzheimer�sdisease: A brief review. International Psychogeriatrics, 7(3), 385�392. Kalish-Weiss, B. I. (1988). Born blind and visually handicapped infants: Movement psychotherapy andassessment. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 15, 101�108. Kozub, F. M. , & Oh, Hyun-Kyoung . (2004). An exploratory study of physical activity levels in children andadolescents with visual impairments. Clinical Kinesiology, 58(3), 1�7. Larsson, L. , & Frändin, K. (2006). Body awareness and dance-based training for persons with acquiredblindness�Effects on balance and gait speed. Visual Impairment Research, 8(1�2), 25�40. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Levtzion-Korach, O. , Tennenbaum, A. , Schnitzer, R. , & Ornoy, A. (2000). Early motor development of blindchildren. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 36(3), 226�229. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(January), 1�14. Melorose, J. , Perroy, R. , & Careas, S. (2015). Sensory substitution: Closing the gap between basic researchand widespread practical visual rehabilitation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 41(2014), 3�15. Moussard, A. , Bigand, E. , Belleville, S. , & Peretz, I. (2012). Music as an aid to learn new verbal information inAlzheimer�s disease. Music Perception, 29(5), 521�532. Moussard, A. , Bigand, E. , Belleville, S. , & Peretz, I. (2014). Learning sung lyrics aids retention in normalageing and Alzheimer�s disease. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(6), 894�917. Mozaz, M. , Garaigordobil, M. , Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. , Anderson, J. , Crucian, G. P. , & Heilman, K. M. (2006).Posture recognition in Alzheimer�s disease. Brain and Cognition, 62(3), 241�245. Palleschi, L. , Vetta, F. , De Gennaro, E. , Idone, G. , Sottosanti, G. , Gianni, W. , & Marigliano, V. (1996). Effectof aerobic training on the cognitive performance of elderly patients with senile dementia of Alzheimer type.Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 22(Suppl 1), 47�50. Paxton, S. , & Kilcoyne, A. (1993). On the braille in the body: An account of the touchdown dance integratedworkshops with the visually impaired and the sighted. Dance Research, 11(1), 3�51. 268 Penescu, G. (2015). Psychomotricity development in visually impaired children through synchronous groupdance�Work strategy. Palestrica of the Third Millennium�Civilization and Sport, 16(2), 132�137. Prechtl, H. F. , Cioni, G. , Einspieler, C. , Bos, A. F. , & Ferrari, F. (2001). Role of vision on early motordevelopment: Lessons from the blind. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43(3), 198�201. Robert, P. H. , König, A. , Amieva, H. , Andrieu, S. , Bremond, F. , Bullock, R. ,� Manera, V. (2014).Recommendations for the use of serious games in people with Alzheimer�s Disease, related disorders andfrailty. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 54. Sacks, S. Z. , & Silberman, R. K. (2000). Social skills. In A. J. Keoeing & M. C. M. Holbrook (Eds.), Foundationof education: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youth with visual impairment (pp. 616�652). NewYork, NY: AFB Press, American Foundation for the Blind . Sacks, S. Z. , & Wolffe, K. E. (2006). Teaching social skills to students with visual impairment: From theory topractice. New York, NY: AFB Press, American Foundation for the Blind . Sapp, W. (2011). Somebody�s jumping on the floor: Incorporating music into orientation and mobility for pre-schoolers with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105, 715�719. Takahashi, H. (2015). Dance/movement therapy with blind and visually impaired children in Nepal.Dance/Movement Therapy Thesis. Paper 8. Thompson, R. G. , Moulin, C. J. , Hayre, S. , & Jones, R. W. (2006). Music enhances category fluency inhealthy older adults and Alzheimer�s disease patients. Experimental Aging Research, 31, 91�99. van de Winckel, A. , Feys, H. , De Weerdt, W. , & Dom, R. (2004). Cognitive and behavioural effects of music-based exercises in patients with dementia. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(3), 253�260. Weiner, M. W. , Veitch, D. P. , Aisen, P. S. , Beckett, L. A. , Cairns, N. J. , Cedarbaum, J. ,� Trojanowski, J. Q.(2015). 2014 Update of the Alzheimer�s disease neuroimaging initiative: A review of papers published since itsinception. Alzheimer�s & Dementia, 11(6), e1�e120. Wittwer, J. E. , Webster, K. E. , & Hill, K. (2013). Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on gait in people withAlzheimer disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 718�724. Zatorre, R. J. , Chen, J. L. , & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory�motor interactions inmusic perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547�558.

Page 116: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Embodied Music Listening Abrams, B. (2002). Transpersonal dimensions of the Bonny Method. In K. Bruscia & D. Grocke (Eds.), Guidedimagery and music: The Bonny method and beyond (pp. 339�358). Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers. Bonde, L. O. (2000). Metaphor and narrative in guided imagery and music. Journal of the Association for Musicand Imagery, 7, 59�76. Bonde, L. O. (2004).To draw from bits and pieces a more supportable narrative. Canadian Journal of MusicTherapy, 11, 31�56. Bonde, L. O. (2005). The Bonny Method of Guided Imagery and music with cancer survivors: A psychosocialstudy with focus on the influence of BMGIM on mood and quality of life (Doctoral Dissertation). Aalborg,Denmark: Aalborg University: Retrieved from http://www.mt-phd.aau.dk/phd-theses/ Bonde, L. O. (2006). Music as metaphor and analogy: A literature essay. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 16,57�78. Bonde, L. O. (2007). Imagery, metaphor and perceived outcomes in six cancer survivors� BMGIM therapy. In A.Meadows (Ed.), Qualitative inquiries in music therapy (vol. 3, pp. 132�164). Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers. Bonde, L. O. (2011). Health musicing�Music therapy or music and health? A model, empirical examples andpersonal reflections. Music & Arts in Action, 3(2), 120�140. 277 Bonde, L. O. , & Blom, K. M. (2016). Music listening and the experience of surrender: An exploration ofimagery experiences evoked by selected classical music from the Western tradition. In H. Klempe (Ed.),Cultural psychology of musical experience (pp. 207�234). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Bonny, H. (2002). Music and consciousness: The evolution of guided imagery and music. Gilsum, NH:Barcelona Publishers. Ekholm, O. , Juel, K. , & Bonde, L. O. (2015). Music and public health: An empirical study of the use of music inthe daily life of the adult Danish citizens and the health implications of musical participation. Arts & Health, 8(2),154�168. Fachner, J. , Ala-Ruona, E. , & Bonde, L. O. (2015). Guided imagery in music�A neurometric EEG/LORETAcase study. In J. Ginsborg , A. Lamont , M. Phillips , & S. Bramley (Eds), Proceedings from Ninth TriennialConference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. Manchester, UK: ESCOM. Farah, M. J. (2000). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitiveneurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 965�974). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ganis, G. , Thompson, W. L. , Mast, F. , & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004). The brain�s mind images: The cognitiveneuroscience of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 931�941).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gärdenfors, P. (2003). How homo became sapiens: On the evolution of thinking. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co. Grocke, D. (2010). An overview of research in the Bonny Method of guided imagery and music. Voices: AWorld Forum for Music Therapy, 10(3). Grocke, D. , & Moe, T. (Eds.). (2015). Guided imagery and music: A spectrum of approach. London, UK:Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Hevner, K. (1936). Experimental studies of the elements of expression in music. American Journal ofPsychology, 48, 246�268. Horowitz, M. (1983). Image formation and psychotherapy (revised ed.). New York, NY: Jason Aronson. Hunt, A. M. (2011). A neurophenomenological description of the guided imagery and music experience.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University. Hunt, A. M. (2015). Boundaries and potentials of traditional and alternative neuroscience research methods inmusic therapy research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 342. Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: ChicagoUniversity Press. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of music and emotion. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversityPress. Juslin, P. N. , & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559. Kosslyn, S. M. , Thompson, W. L. , & Gais, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. Oxford, UK: OxfordUniversity Press. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , & Maes, P.-J. (2014). The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical MusicologyReview, 9(3�4), 236�246. Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. London, UK: Routledge. Ruud, E. (2003). Burning scripts: Self psychology, affect consciousness, script theory and the BMGIM. NordicJournal of Music Therapy, 12(2), 115�123.

Page 117: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Stige, B. , & Aarø, L. E. (2012). Invitation to community music therapy. New York, NY: Routledge. Summer, L. (2009). Client perspectives on the music in guided imagery and music (GIM) (DoctoralDissertation). Aal-borg University: Retrieved from http://www.mt-phd.aau.dk/phd-theses/ Wärja, M. , & Bonde, L. O. (2014). Music as co-therapist: Towards a taxonomy of music in therapeutic music andimagery. Music & Medicine, 6(2), 16�27.

Jymmin�the Medical Potential of Musical Euphoria Becker, J. (2007). Music, trancing, and the absence of pain. Pain and Its Transformations: The Interface ofBiology and Culture, 4, 166�194. Becker-Blease, K. A. (2004). Dissociative states through new age and electronic trance music. Journal ofTrauma & Dissociation, 5(2), 89�100. Boutcher, S. H. , & Trenske, M. (1990). The effects of sensory deprivation and music on perceived exertion andaffect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(2), 167�176. Buecher, K. (1896). Arbeit und rhythmus. Leipzig, Germany: S. Hirzel. Damasio, A. R. (1995). Descartes� error. New York, NY: Avon Books. Duchenne, G. (1862). Mecanisme de la Physiologie Humaine. Archives générales de médecine, 1, 29�47, 152�174. Fritz, T. H. , Halfpaap, J. , Grahl, S. , Kirkland, A. , & Villringer, A. (2013). Musical feedback during exercisemachine workout enhances mood. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 921. Fritz, T. H. , Hardikar, S. , Demoucron, M. , Niessen, M. , Demey, M. , Giot, O. ,� Leman, M. (2013). Musicalagency reduces perceived exertion during strenuous physical performance. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(44), 17784�17789. Fritz, T. H. , Jentschke, S. , Gosselin, N. , Sammler, D. , Peretz, I. , Turner, R. ,� Koelsch, S. (2009). Universalrecognition of three basic emotions in music. Current Biology, 19(7), 573�576. Fritz, T. , Vogt, M. , Lederer, A. , Schneider, L. , Fomicheva, E. , Schneider, M. , & Villringer, A. (2015). Benefitsof listening to a recording of euphoric joint music making in polydrug abusers. Frontiers in HumanNeuroscience, 9(300). Herbert, R. (2011). Reconsidering music and trance: Cross-cultural differences and cross-disciplinaryperspectives. Ethnomusicology Forum, 20(2), 201�227. Holstege, G. , Bandler, R. , & Saper, C. B. (1996). The emotional motor system. Progress in Brain Research,107, 3�6. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt, 2. Karageorghis, C. I. , Terry, P. C. , & Lane, A. M. (1999). Development and initial validation of an instrument toassess the motivational qualities of music in exercise and sport: The brunel music rating inventory. Journal ofSports Sciences, 17, 713�724. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lim, H. B. T. , Atkinson, G. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Eubank, M. R. (2009). Effects of differentiated music oncycling time trial. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 30, 435�442. Rejeski, W. J. (1985). Perceived exertion: An active or passive process. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(4),371�378. Rouget, G. (1985). Music and trance: A theory of the relations between music and possession. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Simpson, S. D. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2006). The effects of synchronous music on 400-m sprint performance.Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(10), 1095�1102. Szmedra, L. , & Bacharach, D. (1998). Effect of music on perceived exertion, plasma lactate, norepinephrineand cardiovascular hemodynamics during treadmill running. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(1),32�37. Terry, P. C. , Karageorghis, C. I. , Saha, A. M. , & D�Auria, S. (2012). Effects of synchronous music on treadmillrunning among elite triathletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 15(1), 52�57. Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,4(4), 400.

Music in the Exercise and Sport Domain Bacon, C. J. , Myers, T. R. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2012). Effect of music-movement synchrony on exerciseoxygen consumption. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 52, 359�365. Bigliassi, M. , Karageorghis, C. I. , Nowicky, A. V. , Orgs, G. , & Wright, M. J. (2016). Cerebral mechanismsunderlying the effects of music during a fatiguing isometric ankle-dorsiflexion task. Psychophysiology, 53,1472�1483. Bigliassi, M. , León-Domínguez, U. , Buzzachera, C. F. , Barreto-Silva, V. , & Altimari, L. R. (2015). How doesmusic aid 5 km of running? Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29, 305�314.

Page 118: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Bishop, D. T. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Loizou, G. (2007). A grounded theory of young tennis players� use ofmusic to manipulate emotional state. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 584�607. Bishop, D. T. , Wright, M. J. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2014). Tempo and intensity of pre-task music modulateneural activity during reactive task performance. Psychology of Music, 42, 714�727. Conrad, C. , Niess, H. , Jauch, K.-W. , Bruns, C. J. , Hartl, W. H. , & Welker, L. (2007). Overture for growthhormone: Requiem for interleukin-6? Critical Care Medicine, 35, 2709�2713. Dunckley, P. , Aziz, Q. , Wise, R. G. , Brooks, J. , Tracey, I. , & Chang, L. (2007). Attentional modulation ofvisceral and somatic pain. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 19, 569�577. Ekkekakis, P. (2003). Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition andEmotion, 17, 213�239. 292 Ekkekakis, P. (2005). The study of affective responses to acute exercise: The dual-mode model. In R.Stelter & K. K. Roessler (Eds.), New approaches to sport and exercise psychology (pp. 119�146). Oxford, UK:Meyer & Meyer Sport. Ekkekakis, P. (2009). Illuminating the black box: Investigating prefrontal cortical hemodynamics during exercisewith near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 505�553. Eliakim, M. , Bodner, E. , Eliakim, A. , Nemet, D. , & Meckel, Y. (2012). Effect of motivational music on lactatelevels during recovery from intense exercise. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26, 80�86. Elliott, D. , Carr, S. , & Savage, D. (2004). Effects of motivational music on work output and affective responsesduring sub-maximal cycling of a standardized perceived intensity. Journal of Sport Behavior, 27, 134�147. Higashimoto, Y. , Honda, N. , Yamagata, T. , Matsuoka, T. , Maeda, K. , Satoh, R. ,� Fukuda, K. (2011).Activation of the prefrontal cortex is associated with exertional dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease. Respiration, 82, 492�500. Hutchinson, J. C. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2013). Moderating influence of dominant attentional style andexercise intensity on responses to asynchronous music. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35, 625�643. Hutchinson, J. C. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Jones, L. (2015). See hear: Psychological effects of music andmusic-video during treadmill running. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 199�211. Jing, L. , & Xudong, W. (2008). Evaluation on the effects of relaxing music on the recovery from aerobicexercise-induced fatigue. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 48, 102�106. Jones, L. , Karageorghis, C. I. , & Ekkekakis, P. (2014). Can high-intensity exercise be more pleasant?Attentional dissociation using music and video. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 528�541. Juslin, P. N. (2009). Emotion in music performance. In S. Hallam , I. Cross , & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxfordhandbook of music psychology (pp. 377�389). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Karageorghis, C. I. (2016). The scientific application of music in exercise and sport: Towards a new theoreticalmodel. In A. M. Lane (Ed.), Sport and exercise psychology (2nd ed., pp. 274�320). London, UK: Routledge. Karageorghis, C. I. (2017). Applying music in exercise and sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Karageorghis, C. I. , & Jones, L. (2014). On the stability and relevance of the exercise heart rate�music-tempopreference relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 299�310. Karageorghis, C. I. , Jones, L. , Priest, D. L. , Akers, R. I. , Clarke, A. , Perry, J. M. ,� Lim, H. B. T. (2011).Revisiting the relationship between exercise heart rate and music tempo preference. Research Quarterly forExercise and Sport, 82, 274�284. Karageorghis, C. I. , & Priest, D. L. (2012). Music in the exercise domain: A review and synthesis (Part I).International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 44�66. Kornysheva, K. , von Cramon, D. Y. , Jacobsen, T. , & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Tuning-in to the beat: Aestheticappreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 48�64. Large, E. W. , & Snyder, J. S. (2009). Pulse and meter as neural resonance. Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences, 1169, 46�57. Lee, A. L. , Desveaux, L. , Goldstein, R. S. , & Brooks, D. (2015). Distractive auditory stimuli in the form ofmusic in individuals with COPD: A systematic review. Chest, 148, 417�429. Leman, M. , Moelants, D. , Varewyck, M. , Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , & Martens, J.-P. (2013). Activating andrelaxing music entrains the speed of beat synchronized walking. PLoS ONE, 8, e67932. Leon-Carrion, J. , Damas, J. , Izzetoglu, K. , Pourrezai, K. , Martín-Rodríguez, J. F. , Barroso y Martin, J. M. , &Dominguez-Morales, M. R. (2006). Differential time course and intensity of PFC activation for men and womenin response to emotional stimuli: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Neuroscience Letters,403, 90�95. Lim, H. B. T. , Karageorghis, C. I. , Romer, L. M. , & Bishop, D. T. (2014). Psychophysiological effects ofsynchronous versus asynchronous music during cycling. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46, 407�413. Loizou, G. , & Karageorghis, C. I. (2015). Effects of psychological priming, video, and music on anaerobicexercise performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25, 909�920. Rejeski, W. J. (1985). Perceived exertion: An active or passive process? Journal of Sport Psychology, 7,371�378. Schneider, S. , Askew, C. D. , Abel, T. , & Strüder, H. K. (2010). Exercise, music, and the brain: Is there a centralpattern generator? Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 1337�1343. Tenenbaum, G. (2001). A social-cognitive perspective of perceived exertion and exertion tolerance. In R. N.Singer , H. A. Hausenblas , & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 810�822). NewYork, NY: Wiley. Thaut, M. H. (2008). Rhythm, music and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York,NY: Routledge. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic musictherapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1185.

Page 119: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

293 Trost, W. , & Vuilleumier, P. (2013). Rhythmic entrainment as a mechanism for emotion induction by music:A neurophysiological perspective. In T. Cochrane , B. Fantini , & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The emotional power ofmusic: Multidisciplinary perspectives on musical arousal, expression, and social control (pp. 213�225). NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press. Van Dyck, E. , Moens, B. , Buhmann, J. , Demey, M. , Coorevits, E. , Dalla Bella, S. , & Leman, M. (2015).Spontaneous entrainment of running cadence to music tempo. Sports Medicine�Open, 1, 1�15. Zatorre, R. J. , & Salimpoor, V. N. (2013). From perception to pleasure: Music and its neural substrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 10430�10437.

Monitoring Music and Movement Interaction in People with Dementia Chung, K. A. , Lobb, B. M. , Nutt, J. G. , McNames, J. , & Horak, F. (2010). Objective measurement ofdyskinesia in Parkinson�s disease using a force plate. Movement Disorders Journal, 25(5), 602�608. Desmet, F. , Nijs, L. , Demey, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Martens, J.-P. , & Leman, M. (2012). Assessing a clarinetplayer�s performer gestures in relation to locally intended musical targets. Journal of New Music Research,41(1), 31�48. Galna, B. , Barry, G. , Jackson, D. , Mhoropiri, D. , Olivier, P. , & Rochester, L. (2014). Accuracy of theMicrosoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson�s disease. Gait & Posture, 39(4),1062�1068. Götell, E. , Brown, S. , & Ekman, S. (2009). The influence of caregiver singing and background music on vocallyexpressed emotions and moods in dementia care: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of NursingStudies, 46(4), 422�430. Guzmán-García, A. , Hughes, J. , James, I. , & Rochester, L. (2013). Dancing as a psychosocial intervention incare homes: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(9), 914�924. Jackson, K. (2014). Expressive therapies for people with Alzheimer�s and related dementia. Social Work Today14(1), 10�11. Katz, S. (2013). Dementia, personhood and embodiment: What can we learn from the medieval history ofmemory? Dementia: Journal of Social Research and Practice, 12(3), 303�314. Kontos, P. , & Martin, W. (2013). Embodiment and dementia: Exploring critical narratives of selfhood, surveil-lance, and dementia care. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 2(3), 288�302. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mansfield, A. , & Inness, E. L. (2015). Force plate assessment of quiet standing balance control: Perspectiveson clinical application within stroke rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Process and Outcome, 4, 7�15. McDermott, O. , Crellin, N. , Ridder, H. M. , & Orell, M. (2012). Music therapy in dementia: A narrative synthesissystematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(8), 781�794. Meelberg, V. (2011). Moving to become better: The embodied performance of musical groove. Journal forArtistic Research, 1, https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/11612/11613. Mitchell, G. J. , Dupuis, S. L. , & Kontos, P. C. (2013). Dementia discourse: From impose suffering to knowingotherwise. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, June, 1�19. Nombela, C. , Hughes, L. E. , Owen, A. M. , & Grahn, J. A. (2013). Into the groove: Can rhythm influenceParkinson�s disease? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2564�2570. Raglio, A. , Filippi, S. , Bellandi, D. , & Stramba-Badiale, M. (2014). Global music approach to persons withdementia: Evidence and practice. Journal of Clinical Interventions in Aging, 9, 1669�1676. Sherratt, K. , Thornton, A. , & Hatton, G. (2004). Music interventions for people with dementia: A review of theliterature. Aging & Mental Health, 8, 3�12. Sung, H. C. , & Chang, A. M. (2005). Use of preferred music to decrease agitated behaviours in older peoplewith dementia: A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(9), 1133�1140. Sung, H. C. , Chang, A. M. , & Abbey, J. (2006). The effects of preferred music on agitation of older people withdementia in Taiwan. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 999�1000. 303 Szczepa�ska-Gieracha, J. , Cie�lik, B. , Chamela-Bili�ska, D. , & Kuczy�ski, M. (2016). Postural stability ofelderly people with cognitive impairments. American Journal of Alzheimer�s Disorders and Other Dementias,31(3), 241�246. van der Vleuten, M. , Visser, A. , & Meeuwesen, L. (2012). The contribution of intimate live music performancesto the quality of life for persons with dementia. Patient Education and Counseling, 89, 484�488. Vink, A. C. , Bruinsma, M. S. , & Scholten, R. J. S. (2011). Music therapy for people with dementia (updatedCochrane Review). Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 3, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub2. Wiltermuth, S. S. , & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1�5. Wittenburg, P. , Brugman, H. , Russel, A. , Klassmann, A. , & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professionalframework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006 (pp. 1556�1559). Genova, Italy. Yiannopoulou, K. G. , & Papageorgiou, S. G. (2013). Current and future treatments for Alzheimer�s disease.Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 6(1), 19�33.

Page 120: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Synchronization to Music as a Tool for Enhancing Non-Verbal Communication inPeople with Neurological Diseases Acton, G. J. , Yauk, S. , Hopkins, B. A. , & Mayhew, P. A. (2007). Increasing social communication in personswith dementia. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 21(1), 32�44. Aldridge, D. (1993). Music and Alzheimer�s disease�Assessment and therapy: Discussion paper. Journal of theRoyal Society of Medicine, 86(2), 93. 310 Baird, A. , & Samson, S. (2015). Music and dementia. Progress in Brain Research, 217, 207�235. Bernieri, F. J. , & Rosenthal, R. (1991). 11. Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactionalsynchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rimé (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401�433). Cambridge,NY: Cambridge University Press. Bispham, J. (2006). Rhythm in music: What is it? Who has it? And why?. Music Perception, 24(2), 125�134. Caddell, L. S. , & Clare, L. (2010). The impact of dementia on self and identity: A systematic review. ClinicalPsychology Review, 30(1), 113�126. Calvo-Merino, B. , Glaser, D. E. , Grèzes, J. , Passingham, R. E. , & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation andacquired motor skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243�1249. Cason, N. , Schiaratura, L. , Clément, S. , Narme, P. , Ehrlé, N. , Munsch, F. ,� Samson, S. (in preparation). Non-pharmacological complementary interventions in dementia treatment. Chartrand, T. L. , Kawada, C. L. K. , & Bargh, J. A. (2002). It takes one to know one: When your own behaviorinfluences your judgment of others. Unpublished manuscript. Chartrand, T. L. , Maddux, W. W. , & Lakin, J. L. (2005). Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitousutility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In R. R. Hassin , J. S. Uleman , & J. A. Borgh(Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 334�361). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008a). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions ofthe brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844�2854. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008b). Moving on time: Brain network for auditory-motorsynchronization is modulated by rhythm complexity and musical training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,20(2), 226�239. Christensen, H. , Griffiths, K. , MacKinnon, A. , & Jacomb, P. (1997). A quantitative review of cognitive deficitsin depression and Alzheimer-type dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(6),631�651. Clément, S. , Tonini, A. , Khatir, F. , Schiaratura, L. , & Samson, S. (2012). Short and longer term effects ofmusical intervention in severe Alzheimer�s disease. Music Perception, 29(5), 533�541. Cohen-Mansfield, J. , & Mintzer, J. E. (2005). Time for change: the role of nonpharmacological interventions intreating behavior problems in nursing home residents with dementia. Alzheimer Disease & AssociatedDisorders, 19(1), 37�40. Cohen-Mansfield, J. , & Werner, P. (1997). Management of verbally disruptive behaviors in nursing homeresidents. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 52(6), M369�M377. Colling, K. B. (2000). A taxonomy of passive behaviors in people with Alzheimer�s disease. Journal of NursingScholarship, 32(3), 239�244. Condon, W. S. (1980). The relation of interactional synchrony to cognitive and emotional processes. In M. R.Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 49�65). The Hague, The Netherlands:Mouton Publishers. De Bruyn, L. , Leman, M. , Demey, M. , Desmet, F. , & Moelants, D. (2008). Measuring and quantifying theimpact of social interaction on listeners� movements to music. In K. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008Computers in Music Modeling and Retrieval and Network for Cross-Disciplinary Studies of Music and MeaningConference (pp. 298�305). Aalborg, Denmark: New Digital Arts forum. Demey, M. , Leman, M. , Bossuyt, F. , & Vanfleteren, J. (2008). The Musical Synchrotron: Using wirelessmotion sensors to study how social interaction affects synchronization with musical tempo. In 8th InternationalConference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 372�373). Genova, Italy. De Nies, T. , Vervust, T. , Demey, M. , Leman, M. , Vanfleteren, J. , & Van de Walle, R. (2012). Synchronizingmusic and movement with BeatLED: An interactive musical social game. Journal of New Music Research,41(4), 351�363. Dijksterhuis, A. , & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of socialperception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1�40. Gallese, V. , Eagle, M. N. , & Migone, P. (2007). Intentional attunement: Mirror neurons and the neuralunderpinnings of interpersonal relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55(1), 131�175. Haidt, J. , Seder, J. P. , & Kesebir, S. (2008). Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. The Journal ofLegal Studies, 37(S2), 133�156. Hasson, U. , Malach, R. , & Heeger, D. J. (2010). Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 40�48. Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253�261. Hickok, G. (2014). The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. NewYork, NY: Norton. Hove, M. J. , & Risen, J. L. (2009). It�s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. SocialCognition, 27(6), 949�960. 311 Hurley, S. (2005). The shared circuits hypothesis: A unified functional architecture for control, imitation, andsimulation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation (pp. 177�193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Page 121: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653�670. Juslin, P. N. , & Sloboda, J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Keller, P. E. , & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of bodymovements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28(1), 27�46. Keller, P. E. , Knoblich, G. , & Repp, B. H. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On thepossible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 102�111. Keller, P. E. , Novembre, G. , & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological andneurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394. Kilner, J. M. , Vargas, C. , Duval, S. , Blakemore, S. J. , & Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observationof a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7(12), 1299�1301. Kirschner, S. , & Tomasello, M. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children.Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354�364. Knoblich, G. , Butterfill, S. , & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data.Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 54, 59. Knoblich, G. , & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action.Psychological Science, 12(6), 467�472. Lakin, J. , & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport.Psychological Science, 14, 334�339. Large, E. W. , & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106(1), 119. Large, E. W. , & Snyder, J. S. (2009). Pulse and meter as neural resonance. Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences, 1169(1), 46�57. Livingstone, S. R. , Thompson, W. F. , & Russo, F. A. (2009). Facial expressions and emotional singing: Astudy of perception and production with motion capture and electromyography. Music Perception, 26, 475�488. Loehr, J. D. , Kourtis, D. , Vesper, C. , Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint actionoutcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049�1061. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. The QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153�2167. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Palmer, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). Action-based effects on music perception.Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1008. McNeill, W. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press. Molnar-Szakacs, I. , & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to �e�motion. Social Cognitiveand Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235�241. Müller, N. , & Guendouzi, J. A. (2005). Order and disorder in conversation: Encounters with dementia of theAlzheimer�s type. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(5), 393�404. Narme, P. , Clément, S. , Ehrlé, N. , Schiaratura, L. , Vachez, S. , Courtaigne, B. ,� Samson, S. (2014). Efficacy ofmusical interventions in dementia: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Alzheimer�s Disease,38(2), 359�369. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2010). The spatiotemporal representation of dance and music gestures usingtopological gesture analysis (TGA). Music Perception, 28(1), 93�111. Novembre, G. , Ticini, L. F. , Schütz-Bosbach, S. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Distinguishing self and other in jointaction: Evidence from a musical paradigm. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2894�2903. Oullier, O. , De Guzman, G. C. , Jantzen, K. J. , Lagarde, J. , & Scott Kelso, J. A. (2008). Social coordinationdynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 178�192. Overy, K. , & Molnar-Szakacs, I. (2009). Being together in time: Musical experience and the mirror neuronsystem. Music Perception, 26(5), 489�504. Pacherie, E. (2012). The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. joint-agency. In A. Seemann (Ed.),Joint Attention: New Developments (pp. 343�389). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Phillips-Silver, J. , & Keller, P. E. (2012). Searching for roots of entrainment and joint action in early musicalinteractions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(26). Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403�452. Rizzolatti, G. , & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169�192. 312 Ruys, K. I. , & Aarts, H. (2010). When competition merges people�s behavior: Interdependency activatesshared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1130�1133. Samson, S. , Clément, S. , Narme, P. , Schiaratura, L. , & Ehrlé, N. (2015). Efficacy of musical interventions indementia: Methodological requirements of nonpharmacological trials. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337(1), 249�255. Samson, S. , Dellacherie, D. , & Platel, H. (2009). Emotional power of music in patients with memory disorders.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169(1), 245�255. Särkämö, T. , Tervaniemi, M. , Laitinen, S. , Numminen, A. , Kurki, M. , Johnson, J. K. , & Rantanen, P. (2014).Cognitive, emotional, and social benefits of regular musical activities in early dementia: Randomized controlledstudy. The Gerontologist, 54(4), 634�650. Sebanz, N. , Bekkering, H. , & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends inCognitive Sciences, 10, 70� 76.

Page 122: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Sebanz, N. , & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in CognitiveScience, 1(2), 353�367. Sebanz, N. , Knoblich, G. , & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others� actions: Just like one�s own? Cognition, 88,11� 21. Sebanz, N. , Knoblich, G. , Prinz, W. , & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning andcontrol in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859�870. Shimokawa, A. , Yatomi, N. , Anamizu, S. , Torii, S. , Isono, H. , Sugai, Y. , & Kohno, M. (2001). Influence ofdeteriorating ability of emotional comprehension on interpersonal behavior in Alzheimer-type dementia. Brainand Cognition, 47(3), 423�433. Small, J. A. , Geldart, K. , Gutman, G. , & Scot, M. A. C. (1998). The discourse of self in dementia. Ageing andSociety, 18(3), 291�316. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. Trost, W. , Frühholz, S. , Schön, D. , Labbé, C. , Pichon, S. , Grandjean, D. , & Vuilleumier, P. (2014). Getting thebeat: Entrainment of brain activity by musical rhythm and pleasantness. NeuroImage, 103, 55�64. Tsai, C. C. , Kuo, W. J. , Hung, D. L. , & Tzeng, O. J. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to otherhumans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015�2024. Tzortzis, C. , Goldblum, M. C. , Dang, M. , Forette, F. , & Boller, F. (2000). Absence of amusia and preservednaming of musical instruments in an aphasic composer. Cortex, 36, 227�242. Vuust, P. , & Witek, M. A. (2014). Rhythmic complexity and predictive coding: A novel approach to modelingrhythm and meter perception in music. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1111. Warren, J. D. , Warren, J. E. , Fox, N. C. , & Warrington, E. K. (2003). Nothing to say, something to sing:Primary progressive dynamic aphasia. Neurocase, 9, 140�155. Wiltermuth, S. S. , & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1�5. Witek, M. A. , Clarke, E. F. , Wallentin, M. , Kringelbach, M. L. , & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94446.

Modifying Movement Optimization Processes with Music Anzak, A. , Tan, H. L. , Pogosyan, A. , & Brown, P. (2011). Doing better than your best: Loud auditorystimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force. Experimental Brain Research, 208(2), 237�243. Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. New York, NY: Pergamon Press. Bood, R. J. , Nijssen, M. , van der Kamp, J. , & Roerdink, M. (2013). The power of auditory-motorsynchronization in sports: Enhancing running performance by coupling cadence with the right beats. PloS ONE,8(8), e70758. Brown, M. , Hislop, H. J. , Waters, R. L. , & Porell, D. (1980). Walking efficiency before and after total hipreplacement. Physical Therapy, 60(10), 1259�1263. Brown, S. , Martinez, M. J. , & Parsons, L. M. (2006). The neural basis of human dance. Cerebral Cortex, 16(8),1157�1167. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of thebrain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844�2854. de Dreu, M. J. , van der Wilk, A. S. D. , Poppe, E. , Kwakkel, G. , & van Wegen, E. E. H. (2012). Rehabilitation,exercise therapy and music in patients with Parkinson�s disease: A meta-analysis of the effects of music-basedmovement therapy on walking ability, balance and quality of life. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 18(1),S114�S119. Desmurget, M. , Grafton, S. T. , Vindras, P. , Gréa, H. , & Turner, R. S. (2003). Basal ganglia network mediatesthe control of movement amplitude. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 197�209. Desmurget, M. , Grafton, S. T. , Vindras, P. , Gréa, H. , & Turner, R. S. (2004). The basal ganglia networkmediates the planning of movement amplitude. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(10), 2871�2880. Desrochers, T. M. , Amemori, K.-I. , & Graybiel, A. M. (2015). Habit learning by naive macaques is marked byresponse sharpening of striatal neurons representing the cost and outcome of acquired action sequences.Neuron, 87, 853�868. Diedrichsen, J. , Shadmehr, R. , & Ivry, R. B. (2010). The coordination of movement: Optimal feedback controland beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 31�39. Ganesh, G. , Haruno, M. , Kawato, M. , & Burdet, E. (2010). Motor memory and local minimization of error andeffort, not global optimization, determine motor behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 382�390. Grahn, J. A. , & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience, 19(5), 893�906. Harris, C. M. , & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394,780�784. Houweling, S. , Daffertshofer, A. , van Dijk, B. W. , & Beek, P. J. (2008). Neural changes induced by learning achallenging perceptual-motor task. NeuroImage, 41, 1395�1407. Kafri, M. , Myslinski, M. J. , Gade, V. K. , & Deutsch, J. E. (2014). High metabolic cost and low energyexpenditure for typical motor activities among individuals in the chronic phase after stroke. Journal ofNeurologic Physical Therapy, 38, 226�232.

Page 123: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

319 Karageorghis, C. I. , & Priest, D. (2012). Music in the exercise domain: A review and synthesis (Part I).International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(1), 44�66. Leman, M. , Moelants, D. , Varewyck, M. , Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , & Martens, J.-P. (2013). Activating andrelaxing music entrains the speed of beat synchronized walking. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67932. Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2010). Effects of the Big Five andmusical genre on music-induced movement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(6), 714�720. Luck, G. , Saarikallio, S. , Burger, B. , Thompson, M. R. , & Toiviainen, P. (2014). Emotion-driven encoding ofmusic preference and personality in dance. Musicae Scientiae, 18(3), 307�323. Macdonald, R. A. R. (2013). Music, health, and well-being: A review. International Journal of Qualitative Studieson Health and Well-Being, 8, 20635. Moore, E. V. , Schaefer, R. S. , Bastin, M. E. , Roberts, N. , & Overy, K. (2015). Musically cued motor traininginduces structural change in the Arcuate Fasciculus. Proceedings of the European Society of MagneticResonance in Medicine and Biology Annual Meeting 2015, Edinburgh, UK. Nantais, K. M. , & Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference. PsychologicalScience, 10(4), 370�373. Nombela, C. , Hughes, L. E. , Owen, A. M. , & Grahn, J. A. (2013). Into the groove: Can rhythm influenceParkinson�s disease? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2564�2570. Nombela, C. , Rae, C. L. , Grahn, J. A. , Barker, R. A. , Owen, A. M. , & Rowe, J. B. (2013). How often doesmusic and rhythm improve patients� perception of motor symptoms in Parkinson�s disease? Journal ofNeurology, 260(5), 1404�1405. Palmer, C. , Lidji, P. , & Peretz, I. (2014). Losing the beat: Deficits in temporal coordination. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658): 20130405. Pecenka, N. , & Keller, P. E. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotorsynchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3�4), 505�515. Peper, C. L. E. , Oorthuizen, J. K. , & Roerdink, M. (2012). Attentional demands of cued walking in healthyyoung and elderly adults. Gait & Posture, 36(3), 378�382. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin &Review, 12(6), 969�992. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403�452. Schaefer, R. S. (2014). Auditory rhythmic cueing in movement rehabilitation: Findings and possiblemechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658):20130402. Schaefer, R. S. , Morcom, A. M. , Roberts, N. , & Overy, K. (2014). Moving to music: Effects of heard andimagined musical cues on movement-related brain activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 774. Schaefer, R. S. , & Overy, K. (2015). Motor responses to a steady beat. Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences, 1337(1), 40�44. Shadmehr, R. , Smith, M. A. , & Krakauer, J. W. (2010). Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation inmotor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 89�108. Sowi�ski, J. , & Dalla Bella, S. (2013). Poor synchronization to the beat may result from deficient auditory-motormapping. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 1952�1963. Thaut, M. H. (2005). Rhythm, music and the brain. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Thaut, M. H. , & Abiru, M. (2010). Rhythmic auditory stimulation in rehabilitation of movement disorders: Areview of current research. Music Perception, 27(4), 263�270. Thaut, M. H. , Kenyon, G. P. , Hurt, C. P. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2002). Kinematic optimization ofspatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients. Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 1073�1081. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic musictherapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1185. Thaut, M. H. , McIntosh, G. C. , Rice, R. R. , Miller, R. A. , Rathbun, J. , & Brault, J. M. (1996). Rhythmicauditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson�s disease patients. Movement Disorders, 11(2), 193�200. Tierney, A. , & Kraus, N. (2013). The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responsesto sound. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(38), 14981�14988. Tran, D. A. , Pajaro-Blazquez, M. , Daneault, J.-F. , Gallegos, J. G. , Pons, J. , Fregni, F. ,� Zafonte, R. (2016).Combining dopaminergic facilitation with robot-assisted upper limb therapy in stroke survivors: A focusedreview. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(6), 459�474. Turner, R. S. , & Desmurget, M. (2010). Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: A vigorous tutor. CurrentOpinion in Neurobiology, 20, 704�716. Turner, R. S. , Desmurget, M. , Grethe, J. , Crutcher, M. D. , & Grafton, S. T. (2003). Motor subcircuitsmediating the control of movement extent and speed. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(6), 3958�3966. 320 Umberger, B. R. , & Martin, P. E. (2007). Mechanical power and efficiency of level walking with differentstride rates. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 210(18), 3255�3265. van den Bogert, A. J. , Hupperets, M. , Schlarb, H. , & Krabbe, B. (2012). Predictive musculoskeletal simulationusing optimal control: Effects of added limb mass on energy cost and kinematics of walking and running.Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 226(2), 123�133. van den Bosch, I. , Salimpoor, V. N. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2013). Familiarity mediates the relationship betweenemotional arousal and pleasure during music listening. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 534. Whitall, J. , Waller, S. M. , Silver, K. H. C. , & Macko, R. F. (2000). Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmicauditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke, 31, 2390�2395.

Page 124: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Wittwer, J. E. , Webster, K. E. , & Hill, K. (2013). Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on gait in people withAlzheimer disease. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 718�724.

Modeling Music Interaction Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , & Martens, J. P. (2016). The surprising character of music: A searchfor sparsity in music-evoked body movements. In W. Adalbert & H. Kestler (Eds.), ECDA Conference 2014Bremen: Analysis of Large and Complex Data (pp. 425�435). Cham, Switzerland: Springer InternationalPublishing. Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J. P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. Transactions on Cybernetics, IEEE, 44(12), 2288�2301. Bevilacqua, F. , Zamborlin, B. , Sypniewski, A. , Schnell, N. , Guédy, F. , & Rasamimanana, N. (2010).Continuous realtime gesture following and recognition. In R. Goebel , J. Siekmann , & W. Wahlster (Eds.),Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp. 73�84). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Box, G. E. , & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces (Vol. 424). New York:Wiley. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Schnell, N. (2009). Towards a gesture-sound cross-modal analysis. In S.Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp.158�170). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Caramiaux, B. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). Segmenting and parsing instrumentalists� gestures.Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 13�29. Eck, D. , & Schmidhuber, J. (2002). Finding temporal structure in music: Blues improvisation with LSTMrecurrent networks. In H. Bourlard , T. Adali , S. Bengio , J. Larsen , & S. Douglas (Eds.), Neural Networks forSignal Processing, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002 12th IEEE Workshop (pp. 747�756). Piscataway, NY: IEEE. Elmore, K. L. , & Richman, M. B. (2001). Euclidean distance as a similarity metric for principal componentanalysis. Monthly Weather Review, 129(3), 540�549. Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2008). Production and perception of goal-points andcoarticulations in music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 3657�3657. Gómez, E. M. (2009). Modeling instrumental gestures: An analysis/synthesis framework for violin bowing(Doctoral Dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Retrieved from http://www.mtg.upf.edu/node/1570. Lee, H. , Pham, P. , Largman, Y. , & Ng, A. Y. (2009). Unsupervised feature learning for audio classificationusing convolutional deep belief networks. In S. A. Solla , Y. LeCun , & M. I. Jordan (Eds.), Advances in neuralinformation processing systems (pp. 1096�1104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lefebvre, G. , Berlemont, S. , Mamalet, F. , & Garcia, C. (2013). BLSTM-RNN based 3D gesture classification.In V. Mladenov , P. Kovrinkova-Hristova , A. Villa , B. Appollini , & N. Kasabov (Eds.), Artificial Neural Networksand Machine Learning�ICANN 2013 (pp. 381�388). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , Moelants, D. , Varewyck, M. , Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , & Martens, J. P. (2013). Activating andrelaxing music entrains the speed of beat synchronized walking. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67932. Leman, M. , & Naveda, L. (2010). Basic gestures as spatiotemporal reference frames for repetitive dance/musicpatterns in Samba and Charleston. Music Perception, 28(1), 71�91. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17(1), 86�108. Maes, P.-J. , Amelynck, D. , & Leman, M. (2012). Dance-the-music: An educational platform for the modeling,recognition and audiovisual monitoring of dance steps using spatiotemporal motion templates. EURASIPJournal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012(1), 1�16. Mikolov, T. , Chen, K. , Corrado, G. , & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vectorspace. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781. 331 Nijs, L. , Coussement, P. , Moens, B. , Amelinck, D. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2012). Interacting withthe Music Paint Machine: Relating the constructs of flow experience and presence. Interacting with Computers,24(4), 237�250. Noyce, G. L. , Küssner, M. B. , & Sollich, P. (2013). Quantifying shapes: Mathematical techniques for analysingvisual representations of sound and music. Empirical Musicology Review, 8(2), 128�154. Ramsay, J. O. (2006). Functional data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Schmidhuber, J. , & Hochreiter, S. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 7(8), 1735�1780. Baghban, A. A. , Younespour, S. , Jambarsang, S. , Yousefi, M. , Zayeri, F. , & Jalilian, F. A. (2013). How totest normality distribution for a variable: A real example and a simulation study. Journal of ParamedicalSciences, 4(1), 73�77. 340 Brewer, M. B. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook ofresearch methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 11�26). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress. Buhmann, J. , Desmet, F. , Moens, B. , Van Dyck, E. , & Leman, M. (2016). Spontaneous velocity effect ofmusical expression on self-paced walking. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154414. Dobson, A. J. , & Barnett, A. (2008). An introduction to generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Freedman, D. , & Diaconis, P. (1981). On the histogram as a density estimator: L 2 theory. Probability Theoryand Related Fields, 57(4), 453�476.

Page 125: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Goos, P. , & Jones, B. (2011). Optimal design of experiments: A case study approach. Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons. Gould, R. (2011). Variability: One statistician�s view. Statistics Education Journal, 3(2), 3�15. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lesaffre, M. (2013). The power of music and movement to reinforce well-being. In M. Lesaffre & M. Leman(Eds.), The power of music. Researching musical experiences: A viewpoint from IPEM (pp. 85�96). Leuven,Belgium: Acco Academic. Lim, T.-S. , & Loh, W.-Y. (1996). A comparison of tests of equality of variances. Computational Statistics & DataAnalysis, 22(3), 287�301. Lindsey, J. K. (1997). Applying generalized linear models. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Maes, L. (2009). Sound sculptures and installations as potential new instruments. In S. Carter (Ed.), Abstractsof the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Musical Instrument Society (p. 14). Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan. Massey Jr, F. J. (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation, 46(253), 68�78. McCullagh, P. , & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Nelder, J. A. , & Wedderburn, W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series A (General), 135(3), 370�384. Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo , H. Genevois , & J.-M. Bardez (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp. 467�484). Editions Dela-tour France. Quételet, A. (1835). Sur l�homme et le developpement de ses facultés ou essai de physique sociale. Paris, France:Bachelier. Scott, D. W. (1979). On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika, 66(3), 605�610. Stergiou, N. (2004). Innovative analyses of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers. Sturges, H. A. (1926). The choice of a class interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 21(153),65�66. Tweedie, M. C. K. (1984). An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. In J. K.Ghosh & J. Roy (Eds.), Statistics: Applications and new directions. Proceedings of the Indian Statistical InstituteGolden Jubilee International Conference (pp. 579�604). Calcutta, India: Indian Statistical Institute. Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 21,293�297. Weinberg, G. M. , & Weinberg, D. (1979). On the design of stable systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Worthy, G. (2015). Statistical analysis and reporting: Common errors found during peer review and how toavoid them. Swiss Medical Weekly, 145, w14076. Abarbanel, H. D. I. (1995). Analysis of observed chaotic data. New York, NY: Springer. Balasubramaniam, R. , Riley, M. A. , & Turvey, M. (2000). Specificity of postural sway to the demands of aprecision task. Gait Posture, 11(1), 12�24. Dale, R. , & Spivey, M. J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns ofsyntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56(3), 391�430. Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21(2), 103�113. Davidson, J. W. (1994). What type of information is conveyed in the body movements of solo musicianperformers. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 6, 279�301. Davidson, J. W. (2007). Qualitative insights into the use of expressive body movement in solo pianoperformance: A case study approach. Psychology of Music, 35(3), 381�401. Davidson, J. W. (2012). Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo andduo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 595�633. de Bruin, L. C. , & Kästner, L. (2012). Dynamic embodied cognition. Phenomenology and the CognitiveSciences, 11(4), 541�563. Demos, A. P. (2013). The perception of movement through musical sound: Towards a dynamical systemstheory of music performance (Doctoral Dissertations). Paper 155, University of Connecticut. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Kant, V. (2014). Toward a dynamical theory of body movement in musicalperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 477. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Logan, T. (2017). Musicians body sway embodies musical structure andexpression: A recurrence-based approach. Musicae Scientiae. Demos, A. P. , Frank, T. , & Chaffin, R. (2011). Understanding movement during performance: A recurrencequantization approach. In A. Williamon , D. Edwards , & L. Bartel (Eds.), International Symposium onPerformance Science (pp. 259�264). Utrecht, The Netherlands: European Association of Conservatoires. Efron, B. , & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Hargreaves, D. , MacDonald, R. , & Miell, D. (2005). How do people communicate using music? In D. Miell , R.MacDonald , & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 1�25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. , Godøy, R. E. , & Leman, M. (2010). Musical gestures: Concepts and methodsin research. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 12�35).New York, NY: Routledge. 349 Kelso, J. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior: Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Page 126: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Large, E. W. (2000). On synchronizing movements to music. Human Movement Science, 19(4), 527�566. Latash, M. L. (2008). Synergy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Leman, M. , & Godøy, R. I. (2010). Why study musical gestures. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.). Musicalgestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 3�11). New York, NY: Routledge. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17(1), 86�108. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1967). How long is the coast of Britain. Science, 156(3775), 636�638. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature (vol. 173). San Francisco, CA: Freeman. Marsh, K. L. (2010). Sociality from an ecological, dynamical perspective. In G. R. Semin & G. Echterhoff (Eds.),Grounding sociality: Neurons, minds, and culture (pp. 43�71). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Marwan, N. (2008). A historical review of recurrence plots. The European Physical Journal Special Topics,164(1), 3�12. Marwan, N. , Carmenromano, M. , Thiel, M. , & Kurths, J. (2007). Recurrence plots for the analysis of complexsystems. Physics Reports, 438(5�6), 237�329. Marwan, N. , & Kurths, J. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. PhysicsLetters A, 302(5), 299�307. Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Abingdon, UK: CRC Press. Nusseck, M. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2009). Music and motion�How music-related ancillary body movementscontribute to the experience of music. Music Perception, 26(4), 335�353. Palmer, C. , Koopmans, E. , Loehr, J. D. , & Carter, C. (2009). Movement-related feedback and temporalaccuracy in clarinet performance. Music Perception, 26(5), 439�449. Pinheiro, J. , & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer. Ramsay, J. O. (2006). Functional data analysis. Wiley Online Library. Rankin, S. K. , Large, E. W. , & Fink, P. W. (2009). Fractal tempo fluctuation and pulse prediction. MusicPerception, 26(5), 401�413. Richardson, D. C. , & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers� and listeners�eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045�1060. Rochut, J. (1928). Melodious etudes for trombone. New York: Carl Fischer Music. (Original work by MarcoBordogni ). Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Music and conversation. In D. Miell , R. MacDonald , & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), MusicalCommunication (pp. 45�60). New York, NY: Oxford. Schreiber, T. , & Schmitz, A. (2000). Surrogate time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 142, 346�382. Shaffer, L. H. , & Todd, N. (1987). The interpretive component in musical performance. In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.),Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 139�152), Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy ofMusic. Shockley, K. , Richardson, D. C. , & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics inCognitive Science, 1(2), 305�319. Shockley, K. , & Riley, M. A. (2015). Interpersonal couplings in human interactions. In C. L. Webber & N. Maran(Eds.), Recurrence Quantification Analysis (pp. 399�421). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Singer, J. D. , & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and eventoccurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Strogatz, S. H. (2014). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, andengineering. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Takens, F. (1981). Dynamical systems and turbulence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 898(9), 366. Teixeira, E. C. , Loureiro, M. A. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Yehia, H. C. (2015). Motion analysis of clarinetperformers. Journal of New Music Research, 44(2), 97�111. Teixeira, E. C. , Yehia, H. C. , & Loureiro, M. A. (2015). Relating movement recurrence and expressive timingpatterns in music performances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3). Thiel, J. , Eubank, S. , Longtin, A. , Galdrikian, B. , & Farmer, J. D. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in timeseries: The method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58, 77�94. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2009). Embodied metre: Hierarchical eigenmodes inspontaneous movement to music. Cognitive Processing, 10(Suppl 2), S325�S327. Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5),615�628. Van Orden, G. C. , Holden, J. G. , & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journalof Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331�350. Wanderley, M. M. , Vines, B. W. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97�113. Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358. Artières, T. , Marukatat, S. , & Gallinari, P. (2007). Online handwritten shape recognition using segmental hiddenMarkov models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(2), 205�217. Arulampalam, M. S. , Maskell, S. , Gordon, N. , & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for onlinenonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2), 174�188. Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain andCognition, 48(1), 66�79. Bevilacqua, F. , Baschet, F. , & Lemouton, S. (2012). The augmented string quartet: Experiments and gesturefollowing. Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 103�119. Bevilacqua, F. , Caramiaux, B. , & Françoise, J. (2016). Perspectives on real-time computation of movementcoarticulation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing, 35. New York,

Page 127: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

NY: ACM. Bevilacqua, F. , Fels, S. , Jensenius, A. R. , Lyons, M. J. , Schnell, N. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). SIG NIME: Music,technology, and human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factorsin Computing Systems�CHI EA �13 (pp. 2529�2532). New York, NY: ACM. Bevilacqua, F. , Zamborlin, B. , Sypniewski, A. , Schnell, N. , Guédy, F. , & Rasamimanana, N. (2010).Continuous realtime gesture following and recognition. In S. Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), EmbodiedCommunication and Human-Computer Interaction, volume 5934 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.73�84). Berlin, Germany: Springer. 359 Brand, M. , Oliver, N. , & Pentland, A. (1997). Coupled hidden Markov models for complex actionrecognition. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp.994�999). New York, NY: IEEE. Braun, D. A. , Mehring, C. , & Wolpert, D. M. (2010). Structure learning in action. Behavioural Brain Research,206(2), 157�165. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Beyond recognition: Using gesture variation forcontinuous interaction. In Proceedings of CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in ComputingSystems�CHI EA �13 (pp. 2109�2118). New York, NY: ACM. Caramiaux, B. , Montecchio, N. , Tanaka, A. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Adaptive gesture recognition withvariation estimation for interactive systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 4(4), 1�34. Caramiaux, B. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). Segmenting and parsing instrumentalists� gestures.Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 13�29. Fiebrink, R. , & Caramiaux, B. (2016). The machine learning algorithm as creative musical tool. In Handbook ofalgorithmic music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00379. Fine, S. , Singer, Y. , & Tishby, N. (1998). The hierarchical hidden Markov model: Analysis and applications.Machine Learning, 32(1), 41�62. Françoise, J. , Caramiaux, B. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). A hierarchical approach for the design of gesture-to-sound mappings. In B. L. Sturm , S. Dahl , & J. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference OnSound and Music Computing (pp. 233�240). Copenhagen, Denmark. Françoise, J. , Roby-Brami, A. , Riboud, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2015). Movement sequence analysis using hiddenMarkov models: A case study in Tai Chi performance. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop onMovement and Computing (pp. 29�36). New York, NY: ACM. Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2010). Chunking in music by coarticulation. Acta Acustica Unitedwith Acustica, 96(4), 690�700. Janata, P. , & Grafton, S. T. (2003). Swinging in the brain: Shared neural substrates for behaviors related tosequencing and music. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 682�687. Körding, K. P. , & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in CognitiveSciences, 10(7), 319�326. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2007). Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists� finger tapping.Experimental Brain Research, 178(4), 518�528. Murphy, K. P. (2002). Dynamic Bayesian networks: Representation, inference and learning (DoctoralDissertation). University of California, Berkely. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 115�138. Schnell, N. (2013). Playing (with) sound�of the animation of digitized sounds and their reenactment by playfulscenarios in the design of interactive audio applications (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Music andPerforming Arts Graz, Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics. van Vugt, F. T. , & Tillmann, B. (2014). Thresholds of auditory-motor coupling measured with a simple task inmusicians and non-musicians: Was the sound simultaneous to the key press? PLoS ONE, 9(2), 1�8. Wanderley, M. M. , & Depalle, P. (2004). Gestural control of sound synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(4),632�644. Zatorre, R. J. , Chen, J. L. , & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory�motor interactions inmusic perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547�558. Cancino Chacón, C. E. , & Grachten, M. (2015). An evaluation of score descriptors combined with non-linearmodels of expressive dynamics in music. In N. Japkowicz & S. Matwin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18thInternational Conference on Discovery Science (DS 2015), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 48�62).Banff, Canada: Springer. Clarke, E. F. (1988). Generative principles in music. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: Thepsychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 1�26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Flossmann, S. , Goebl, W. , Grachten, M. , Niedermayer, B. , & Widmer, G. (2010). The Magaloff project: Aninterim report. Journal of New Music Research, 39(4), 363�377. Friberg, A. , & Sundberg, J. (1999). Does music performance allude to locomotion? A model of final ritardandiderived from measurements of stopping runners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(3),1469�1484. Gabrielsson, A. (2001). Emotions in strong experiences with music. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.),Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 431�449). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Gabrielsson, A. , Bengtsson, I. , & Gabrielsson, B. (1983). Performance of musical rhythm in 3/4 and 6/8 meter.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 193�213. Grachten, M. , & Widmer, G. (2012). Linear basis models for prediction and analysis of musical expression.Journal of New Music Research, 41(4), 311�322. Grindlay, G. , & Helmbold, D. (2006). Modeling, analyzing, and synthesizing expressive piano performance withgraphical models. Machine Learning, 65(2�3), 361�387.

Page 128: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Istók, E. , Friberg, A. , Huotilainen, M. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Expressive timing facilitates the neuralprocessing of phrase boundaries in music: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS ONE, 8(1), 1�11. Juslin, P. N. , & Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and aquestionnaire study of everyday listening. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 217�238. Kendall, R. , & Carterette, E. (1990). The communication of musical expression. Music Perception, 8(2),129�163. Kirke, A. , & Miranda, E. R. (2009). A survey of computer systems for expressive music performance. ACMComputing Surveys (CSUR), 42(1), 3. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lindström, E. (1992). 5 � �Oh, my darling Clementine�. The influence of expressive intention on music performance(Bachelor�s thesis). Department of Psychology, Uppsala University. Lipton, Z. C. , Berkowitz, J. , & Elkan, C. (2015). A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequencelearning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019. 369 Rumelhart, D. E. , Hinton, G. E. , & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagatingerrors. Nature, 323(9), 533�536. Sloboda, J. A. (1983). The communication of musical metre in piano performance. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 35A, 377�396. Teramura, K. , Okuma, H. , Taniguchi, Y. , & Makimoto, S. (2008). Gaussian process regression for renderingmusic performance. In K. Miyazaki , M. Adachi , Y. Hiraga , Y. Nakajima , & M. Tsuzaki (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) (pp. 167�172). Sapporo, Japan:ICMPC. Todd, N. (1989). A computational model of rubato. Contemporary Music Review, 3(1), 69�88. Truslit, A. (1938). Gestaltung und Bewegung in der Musik. Berlin, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner. Widmer, G. (2002). Machine discoveries: A few simple, robust local expression principles. Journal of NewMusic Research, 31(1), 37�50. Bunning, E. (1956). Endogenous rhythms in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 7(1), 71�90. Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11, 3�142. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Li, Y. , Tokay, S. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. ,� Fadiga, L. (2012). Leadership inorchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e35757. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. Demos, A. P. , Wanderley, M. , & Palmer, C. (2015). Auditory feedback perturbations disrupt synchrony inensemble music performance. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 161�162. Drew, D. , Dolch, K. , & Castro, M. (2015). A model for tempo synchronization in music performance. SiamJournal on Applied Mathematics, 75(6), 2540�2561. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438. Jacoby, N. , Tishby, N. , Repp, B. H. , Ahissar, M. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). Parameter estimation of linearsensorimotor synchronization methods: Phase correction, period correction, and ensemble synchronization.Timing & Time Perception, 3, 52�87. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MITPress. Kuramoto, Y. (1984). Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence. New York, NY: Springer. Kuramoto, Y. (1997). Phase-and center-manifold reductions for large populations of coupled oscillators withapplication to non-locally coupled systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 7(4), 789�805. Large, E. W. , & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106(1), 119�159. Large, E. W. , & Kolen, J. F. (1994). Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Connection Science,6(2�3), 177�208. Large, E. W. , & Palmer, C. (2002). Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 1�37. Loehr, J. D. , Large, E. W. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination and adaptation to rate change in musicperformance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37(4), 1292�1309. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Subdividing the beat: Auditory and motor contributions to synchronization.Music Perception, 26(5), 415�425. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153�2167. Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2006). Ensemble musicians� synchronization with conductors� gestures: Anautomated feature-extraction analysis. Music Perception, 24(2), 189�200. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 115�138. Palmer, C. , & Loehr, J. D. (2013). Meeting of two minds in duet piano performance. In L. Bernstein & A. Rozin(Eds.), Musical implications: Essays in honor of Eugene Narmour (pp. 323�338). Hillsdale, NY: PendragonPress. Palmer, C. , Spidle, F. , Koopmans, E. , & Schubert, P. (2013). Temporal coordination in vocal duetperformances of musical rounds. In R. Bresin & A. Askenfelt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Stockholm MusicAcoustics Conference (pp. 678�682). Berlin, Germany: Logos. Polak, R. , London, J. , & Jacoby, N. (2016). Both isochronous and non-isochronous metrical subdivision affordprecise and stable ensemble entrainment: A corpus study of Malian jembe drumming. Frontiers in AuditoryCognitive Neuroscience, 10(285).

Page 129: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Pyragas, K. (1992). Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Physics Letters A, 170(6),421�428. Pyragas, K. (1998). Synchronization of coupled time-delay systems: Analytical estimations. Physical Review E,58(3), 3067�3071. Pyragas, K. (2008). Coupling design for a long-term anticipating synchronization of chaos. Physical Review E,78(4), article 046217. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403�452. Schöner, G. , & Kelso, F. A. S. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science,239(4847), 1513�1520. 379 Schulze, H.-H. , Cordes, A. , & Vorberg, D. (2005). Keeping synchrony while tempo changes: Accelerandoand ritardando. Music Perception, 22(3), 461�477. Stepp, N. , & Turvey, M. (2010). On strong anticipation. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(2), 148�164. Timmers, R. , Endo, S. , Bradbury, A. , & Wing, A. M. (2014). Synchronization and leadership in string quartetperformance: A case study of auditory and visual cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 645. von Holst, E. (1929). The behavioural physiology of animals and man: The collected papers of Erich von Holst(vol. 1). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press. Vorberg, D. , & Wing, A. M. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In H. Heuer & S. Keele(Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (vol. 2, pp. 181�262). New York, NY: Academic Press. Wing, A. M. , Endo, S. , Bradbury, A. , & Vorberg, D. (2014). Optimal feedback correction in string quartetsynchronization. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(93), 20131125. Wing, A. M. , & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics,13(3), 455�460. Zamm, A. , Pfordresher, P. Q. , & Palmer, C. (2015). Temporal coordination in joint music performance: Effectsof endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 607�615. Zamm, A. , Wellman, C. , & Palmer, C. (2016). Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 42(5), 611�616. Barbosa, A. , Dechaine, R. , Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. , & Yehia, H. (2012). Quantifying time-varying coordinationof multimodal speech signals using correlation map analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,131(3), 2162�2172. Campolina, T. , Loureiro, M. , & Mota, D. (2009). Expan: A tool for musical expressiveness analysis. In L.Naveda (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology (pp.24�27). Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Caramiaux, B. , Wanderley, M. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). Segmenting and parsing instrumentalists� gestures.Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 13�29. Dahl, S. , & Friberg, A. (2007). Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians� body movements. MusicPerception, 24(5), 433�454. Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception and performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21(2), 103�113. 387 Desmet, F. , Nijs, L. , Demey, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Martens, J. , & Leman, M. (2012). Assessing a clarinetplayer�s performer gestures in relation to locally intended musical targets. Journal of New Music Research,41(1), 31�48. Gabrielsson, A. , & Juslin, P. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer�sintention and the listener�s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68�91. Godøy, R. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement and meaning. London, UK:Routledge. Juslin, P. (2000). Cue utilization in communication of emotion in music performance: Relating performance toperception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(6), 1797�1813. McNeill, D. (2007). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2009). A cross-modal heuristic for periodic pattern analysis of samba music anddance. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3), 255�283. Senin, P. (2008). Dynamic time warping algorithm review (Tech. Rep.). Honolulu, USA: Information andComputer Science Department, University of Hawaii. Teixeira, E. , Loureiro, M. , Wanderley, M. , & Yehia, H. (2015). Motion analysis of clarinet performers. Journalof New Music Research, 44(2), 97�111. Teixeira, E. , Loureiro, M. , Yehia, H. , & Wanderley, M. (2013). Motion recurrence analysis in musicperformances. In R. Bresin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 317�322).Berlin, Germany: Logos. Wanderley, M. , Vines, B. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97�113.

Page 130: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Modeling Music Interaction Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , & Martens, J. P. (2016). The surprising character of music: A searchfor sparsity in music-evoked body movements. In W. Adalbert & H. Kestler (Eds.), ECDA Conference 2014Bremen: Analysis of Large and Complex Data (pp. 425�435). Cham, Switzerland: Springer InternationalPublishing. Amelynck, D. , Maes, P.-J. , Martens, J. P. , & Leman, M. (2014). Expressive body movement responses tomusic are coherent, consistent, and low dimensional. Transactions on Cybernetics, IEEE, 44(12), 2288�2301. Bevilacqua, F. , Zamborlin, B. , Sypniewski, A. , Schnell, N. , Guédy, F. , & Rasamimanana, N. (2010).Continuous realtime gesture following and recognition. In R. Goebel , J. Siekmann , & W. Wahlster (Eds.),Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp. 73�84). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Box, G. E. , & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces (Vol. 424). New York:Wiley. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Schnell, N. (2009). Towards a gesture-sound cross-modal analysis. In S.Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp.158�170). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Caramiaux, B. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). Segmenting and parsing instrumentalists� gestures.Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 13�29. Eck, D. , & Schmidhuber, J. (2002). Finding temporal structure in music: Blues improvisation with LSTMrecurrent networks. In H. Bourlard , T. Adali , S. Bengio , J. Larsen , & S. Douglas (Eds.), Neural Networks forSignal Processing, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002 12th IEEE Workshop (pp. 747�756). Piscataway, NY: IEEE. Elmore, K. L. , & Richman, M. B. (2001). Euclidean distance as a similarity metric for principal componentanalysis. Monthly Weather Review, 129(3), 540�549. Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2008). Production and perception of goal-points andcoarticulations in music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 3657�3657. Gómez, E. M. (2009). Modeling instrumental gestures: An analysis/synthesis framework for violin bowing(Doctoral Dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Retrieved from http://www.mtg.upf.edu/node/1570. Lee, H. , Pham, P. , Largman, Y. , & Ng, A. Y. (2009). Unsupervised feature learning for audio classificationusing convolutional deep belief networks. In S. A. Solla , Y. LeCun , & M. I. Jordan (Eds.), Advances in neuralinformation processing systems (pp. 1096�1104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lefebvre, G. , Berlemont, S. , Mamalet, F. , & Garcia, C. (2013). BLSTM-RNN based 3D gesture classification.In V. Mladenov , P. Kovrinkova-Hristova , A. Villa , B. Appollini , & N. Kasabov (Eds.), Artificial Neural Networksand Machine Learning�ICANN 2013 (pp. 381�388). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leman, M. , Moelants, D. , Varewyck, M. , Styns, F. , van Noorden, L. , & Martens, J. P. (2013). Activating andrelaxing music entrains the speed of beat synchronized walking. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67932. Leman, M. , & Naveda, L. (2010). Basic gestures as spatiotemporal reference frames for repetitive dance/musicpatterns in Samba and Charleston. Music Perception, 28(1), 71�91. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17(1), 86�108. Maes, P.-J. , Amelynck, D. , & Leman, M. (2012). Dance-the-music: An educational platform for the modeling,recognition and audiovisual monitoring of dance steps using spatiotemporal motion templates. EURASIPJournal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012(1), 1�16. Mikolov, T. , Chen, K. , Corrado, G. , & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vectorspace. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781. 331 Nijs, L. , Coussement, P. , Moens, B. , Amelinck, D. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2012). Interacting withthe Music Paint Machine: Relating the constructs of flow experience and presence. Interacting with Computers,24(4), 237�250. Noyce, G. L. , Küssner, M. B. , & Sollich, P. (2013). Quantifying shapes: Mathematical techniques for analysingvisual representations of sound and music. Empirical Musicology Review, 8(2), 128�154. Ramsay, J. O. (2006). Functional data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Schmidhuber, J. , & Hochreiter, S. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 7(8), 1735�1780.

Analyzing Complex Datasets Based on the Variability Framework, DistributionAnalysis, and Generalized Linear Modeling Baghban, A. A. , Younespour, S. , Jambarsang, S. , Yousefi, M. , Zayeri, F. , & Jalilian, F. A. (2013). How totest normality distribution for a variable: A real example and a simulation study. Journal of ParamedicalSciences, 4(1), 73�77. 340 Brewer, M. B. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook ofresearch methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 11�26). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress. Buhmann, J. , Desmet, F. , Moens, B. , Van Dyck, E. , & Leman, M. (2016). Spontaneous velocity effect ofmusical expression on self-paced walking. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154414. Dobson, A. J. , & Barnett, A. (2008). An introduction to generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Freedman, D. , & Diaconis, P. (1981). On the histogram as a density estimator: L 2 theory. Probability Theoryand Related Fields, 57(4), 453�476.

Page 131: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Goos, P. , & Jones, B. (2011). Optimal design of experiments: A case study approach. Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons. Gould, R. (2011). Variability: One statistician�s view. Statistics Education Journal, 3(2), 3�15. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lesaffre, M. (2013). The power of music and movement to reinforce well-being. In M. Lesaffre & M. Leman(Eds.), The power of music. Researching musical experiences: A viewpoint from IPEM (pp. 85�96). Leuven,Belgium: Acco Academic. Lim, T.-S. , & Loh, W.-Y. (1996). A comparison of tests of equality of variances. Computational Statistics & DataAnalysis, 22(3), 287�301. Lindsey, J. K. (1997). Applying generalized linear models. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Maes, L. (2009). Sound sculptures and installations as potential new instruments. In S. Carter (Ed.), Abstractsof the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Musical Instrument Society (p. 14). Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan. Massey Jr, F. J. (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation, 46(253), 68�78. McCullagh, P. , & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Nelder, J. A. , & Wedderburn, W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series A (General), 135(3), 370�384. Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo , H. Genevois , & J.-M. Bardez (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp. 467�484). Editions Dela-tour France. Quételet, A. (1835). Sur l�homme et le developpement de ses facultés ou essai de physique sociale. Paris, France:Bachelier. Scott, D. W. (1979). On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika, 66(3), 605�610. Stergiou, N. (2004). Innovative analyses of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers. Sturges, H. A. (1926). The choice of a class interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 21(153),65�66. Tweedie, M. C. K. (1984). An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. In J. K.Ghosh & J. Roy (Eds.), Statistics: Applications and new directions. Proceedings of the Indian Statistical InstituteGolden Jubilee International Conference (pp. 579�604). Calcutta, India: Indian Statistical Institute. Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 21,293�297. Weinberg, G. M. , & Weinberg, D. (1979). On the design of stable systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Worthy, G. (2015). Statistical analysis and reporting: Common errors found during peer review and how toavoid them. Swiss Medical Weekly, 145, w14076.

Removing Obstacles to the Analysis of Movement in Musical Performance Abarbanel, H. D. I. (1995). Analysis of observed chaotic data. New York, NY: Springer. Balasubramaniam, R. , Riley, M. A. , & Turvey, M. (2000). Specificity of postural sway to the demands of aprecision task. Gait Posture, 11(1), 12�24. Dale, R. , & Spivey, M. J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns ofsyntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56(3), 391�430. Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception of performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21(2), 103�113. Davidson, J. W. (1994). What type of information is conveyed in the body movements of solo musicianperformers. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 6, 279�301. Davidson, J. W. (2007). Qualitative insights into the use of expressive body movement in solo pianoperformance: A case study approach. Psychology of Music, 35(3), 381�401. Davidson, J. W. (2012). Bodily movement and facial actions in expressive musical performance by solo andduo instrumentalists: Two distinctive case studies. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 595�633. de Bruin, L. C. , & Kästner, L. (2012). Dynamic embodied cognition. Phenomenology and the CognitiveSciences, 11(4), 541�563. Demos, A. P. (2013). The perception of movement through musical sound: Towards a dynamical systemstheory of music performance (Doctoral Dissertations). Paper 155, University of Connecticut. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Kant, V. (2014). Toward a dynamical theory of body movement in musicalperformance. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 477. Demos, A. P. , Chaffin, R. , & Logan, T. (2017). Musicians body sway embodies musical structure andexpression: A recurrence-based approach. Musicae Scientiae. Demos, A. P. , Frank, T. , & Chaffin, R. (2011). Understanding movement during performance: A recurrencequantization approach. In A. Williamon , D. Edwards , & L. Bartel (Eds.), International Symposium onPerformance Science (pp. 259�264). Utrecht, The Netherlands: European Association of Conservatoires. Efron, B. , & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Hargreaves, D. , MacDonald, R. , & Miell, D. (2005). How do people communicate using music? In D. Miell , R.MacDonald , & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 1�25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Page 132: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. , Godøy, R. E. , & Leman, M. (2010). Musical gestures: Concepts and methodsin research. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.). Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 12�35).New York, NY: Routledge. 349 Kelso, J. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior: Cambridge, MA: MITPress. Large, E. W. (2000). On synchronizing movements to music. Human Movement Science, 19(4), 527�566. Latash, M. L. (2008). Synergy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Leman, M. , & Godøy, R. I. (2010). Why study musical gestures. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.). Musicalgestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 3�11). New York, NY: Routledge. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17(1), 86�108. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1967). How long is the coast of Britain. Science, 156(3775), 636�638. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature (vol. 173). San Francisco, CA: Freeman. Marsh, K. L. (2010). Sociality from an ecological, dynamical perspective. In G. R. Semin & G. Echterhoff (Eds.),Grounding sociality: Neurons, minds, and culture (pp. 43�71). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Marwan, N. (2008). A historical review of recurrence plots. The European Physical Journal Special Topics,164(1), 3�12. Marwan, N. , Carmenromano, M. , Thiel, M. , & Kurths, J. (2007). Recurrence plots for the analysis of complexsystems. Physics Reports, 438(5�6), 237�329. Marwan, N. , & Kurths, J. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. PhysicsLetters A, 302(5), 299�307. Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Abingdon, UK: CRC Press. Nusseck, M. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2009). Music and motion�How music-related ancillary body movementscontribute to the experience of music. Music Perception, 26(4), 335�353. Palmer, C. , Koopmans, E. , Loehr, J. D. , & Carter, C. (2009). Movement-related feedback and temporalaccuracy in clarinet performance. Music Perception, 26(5), 439�449. Pinheiro, J. , & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer. Ramsay, J. O. (2006). Functional data analysis. Wiley Online Library. Rankin, S. K. , Large, E. W. , & Fink, P. W. (2009). Fractal tempo fluctuation and pulse prediction. MusicPerception, 26(5), 401�413. Richardson, D. C. , & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers� and listeners�eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045�1060. Rochut, J. (1928). Melodious etudes for trombone. New York: Carl Fischer Music. (Original work by MarcoBordogni ). Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Music and conversation. In D. Miell , R. MacDonald , & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), MusicalCommunication (pp. 45�60). New York, NY: Oxford. Schreiber, T. , & Schmitz, A. (2000). Surrogate time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 142, 346�382. Shaffer, L. H. , & Todd, N. (1987). The interpretive component in musical performance. In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.),Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 139�152), Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy ofMusic. Shockley, K. , Richardson, D. C. , & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics inCognitive Science, 1(2), 305�319. Shockley, K. , & Riley, M. A. (2015). Interpersonal couplings in human interactions. In C. L. Webber & N. Maran(Eds.), Recurrence Quantification Analysis (pp. 399�421). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Singer, J. D. , & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and eventoccurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Strogatz, S. H. (2014). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, andengineering. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Takens, F. (1981). Dynamical systems and turbulence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 898(9), 366. Teixeira, E. C. , Loureiro, M. A. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Yehia, H. C. (2015). Motion analysis of clarinetperformers. Journal of New Music Research, 44(2), 97�111. Teixeira, E. C. , Yehia, H. C. , & Loureiro, M. A. (2015). Relating movement recurrence and expressive timingpatterns in music performances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3). Thiel, J. , Eubank, S. , Longtin, A. , Galdrikian, B. , & Farmer, J. D. (1992). Testing for nonlinearity in timeseries: The method of surrogate data. Physica D, 58, 77�94. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2009). Embodied metre: Hierarchical eigenmodes inspontaneous movement to music. Cognitive Processing, 10(Suppl 2), S325�S327. Van Gelder, T. (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5),615�628. Van Orden, G. C. , Holden, J. G. , & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journalof Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 331�350. Wanderley, M. M. , Vines, B. W. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97�113. Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358.

Page 133: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Musical Interaction Artières, T. , Marukatat, S. , & Gallinari, P. (2007). Online handwritten shape recognition using segmental hiddenMarkov models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(2), 205�217. Arulampalam, M. S. , Maskell, S. , Gordon, N. , & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for onlinenonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2), 174�188. Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain andCognition, 48(1), 66�79. Bevilacqua, F. , Baschet, F. , & Lemouton, S. (2012). The augmented string quartet: Experiments and gesturefollowing. Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 103�119. Bevilacqua, F. , Caramiaux, B. , & Françoise, J. (2016). Perspectives on real-time computation of movementcoarticulation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing, 35. New York,NY: ACM. Bevilacqua, F. , Fels, S. , Jensenius, A. R. , Lyons, M. J. , Schnell, N. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). SIG NIME: Music,technology, and human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factorsin Computing Systems�CHI EA �13 (pp. 2529�2532). New York, NY: ACM. Bevilacqua, F. , Zamborlin, B. , Sypniewski, A. , Schnell, N. , Guédy, F. , & Rasamimanana, N. (2010).Continuous realtime gesture following and recognition. In S. Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), EmbodiedCommunication and Human-Computer Interaction, volume 5934 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.73�84). Berlin, Germany: Springer. 359 Brand, M. , Oliver, N. , & Pentland, A. (1997). Coupled hidden Markov models for complex actionrecognition. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp.994�999). New York, NY: IEEE. Braun, D. A. , Mehring, C. , & Wolpert, D. M. (2010). Structure learning in action. Behavioural Brain Research,206(2), 157�165. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Beyond recognition: Using gesture variation forcontinuous interaction. In Proceedings of CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in ComputingSystems�CHI EA �13 (pp. 2109�2118). New York, NY: ACM. Caramiaux, B. , Montecchio, N. , Tanaka, A. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Adaptive gesture recognition withvariation estimation for interactive systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 4(4), 1�34. Caramiaux, B. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). Segmenting and parsing instrumentalists� gestures.Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 13�29. Fiebrink, R. , & Caramiaux, B. (2016). The machine learning algorithm as creative musical tool. In Handbook ofalgorithmic music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00379. Fine, S. , Singer, Y. , & Tishby, N. (1998). The hierarchical hidden Markov model: Analysis and applications.Machine Learning, 32(1), 41�62. Françoise, J. , Caramiaux, B. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). A hierarchical approach for the design of gesture-to-sound mappings. In B. L. Sturm , S. Dahl , & J. Larsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference OnSound and Music Computing (pp. 233�240). Copenhagen, Denmark. Françoise, J. , Roby-Brami, A. , Riboud, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2015). Movement sequence analysis using hiddenMarkov models: A case study in Tai Chi performance. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop onMovement and Computing (pp. 29�36). New York, NY: ACM. Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2010). Chunking in music by coarticulation. Acta Acustica Unitedwith Acustica, 96(4), 690�700. Janata, P. , & Grafton, S. T. (2003). Swinging in the brain: Shared neural substrates for behaviors related tosequencing and music. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 682�687. Körding, K. P. , & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in CognitiveSciences, 10(7), 319�326. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2007). Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists� finger tapping.Experimental Brain Research, 178(4), 518�528. Murphy, K. P. (2002). Dynamic Bayesian networks: Representation, inference and learning (DoctoralDissertation). University of California, Berkely. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 115�138. Schnell, N. (2013). Playing (with) sound�of the animation of digitized sounds and their reenactment by playfulscenarios in the design of interactive audio applications (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Music andPerforming Arts Graz, Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics. van Vugt, F. T. , & Tillmann, B. (2014). Thresholds of auditory-motor coupling measured with a simple task inmusicians and non-musicians: Was the sound simultaneous to the key press? PLoS ONE, 9(2), 1�8. Wanderley, M. M. , & Depalle, P. (2004). Gestural control of sound synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(4),632�644. Zatorre, R. J. , Chen, J. L. , & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory�motor interactions inmusic perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547�558.

Page 134: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Temporal Dependencies in the Expressive Timing of Classical Piano Performances Cancino Chacón, C. E. , & Grachten, M. (2015). An evaluation of score descriptors combined with non-linearmodels of expressive dynamics in music. In N. Japkowicz & S. Matwin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18thInternational Conference on Discovery Science (DS 2015), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 48�62).Banff, Canada: Springer. Clarke, E. F. (1988). Generative principles in music. In J. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: Thepsychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 1�26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Flossmann, S. , Goebl, W. , Grachten, M. , Niedermayer, B. , & Widmer, G. (2010). The Magaloff project: Aninterim report. Journal of New Music Research, 39(4), 363�377. Friberg, A. , & Sundberg, J. (1999). Does music performance allude to locomotion? A model of final ritardandiderived from measurements of stopping runners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(3),1469�1484. Gabrielsson, A. (2001). Emotions in strong experiences with music. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.),Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 431�449). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Gabrielsson, A. , Bengtsson, I. , & Gabrielsson, B. (1983). Performance of musical rhythm in 3/4 and 6/8 meter.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 193�213. Grachten, M. , & Widmer, G. (2012). Linear basis models for prediction and analysis of musical expression.Journal of New Music Research, 41(4), 311�322. Grindlay, G. , & Helmbold, D. (2006). Modeling, analyzing, and synthesizing expressive piano performance withgraphical models. Machine Learning, 65(2�3), 361�387. Istók, E. , Friberg, A. , Huotilainen, M. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Expressive timing facilitates the neuralprocessing of phrase boundaries in music: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS ONE, 8(1), 1�11. Juslin, P. N. , & Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and aquestionnaire study of everyday listening. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 217�238. Kendall, R. , & Carterette, E. (1990). The communication of musical expression. Music Perception, 8(2),129�163. Kirke, A. , & Miranda, E. R. (2009). A survey of computer systems for expressive music performance. ACMComputing Surveys (CSUR), 42(1), 3. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lindström, E. (1992). 5 � �Oh, my darling Clementine�. The influence of expressive intention on music performance(Bachelor�s thesis). Department of Psychology, Uppsala University. Lipton, Z. C. , Berkowitz, J. , & Elkan, C. (2015). A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequencelearning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019. 369 Rumelhart, D. E. , Hinton, G. E. , & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagatingerrors. Nature, 323(9), 533�536. Sloboda, J. A. (1983). The communication of musical metre in piano performance. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 35A, 377�396. Teramura, K. , Okuma, H. , Taniguchi, Y. , & Makimoto, S. (2008). Gaussian process regression for renderingmusic performance. In K. Miyazaki , M. Adachi , Y. Hiraga , Y. Nakajima , & M. Tsuzaki (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) (pp. 167�172). Sapporo, Japan:ICMPC. Todd, N. (1989). A computational model of rubato. Contemporary Music Review, 3(1), 69�88. Truslit, A. (1938). Gestaltung und Bewegung in der Musik. Berlin, Germany: Vieweg+Teubner. Widmer, G. (2002). Machine discoveries: A few simple, robust local expression principles. Journal of NewMusic Research, 31(1), 37�50.

Interactions in Ensemble Music Performance Bunning, E. (1956). Endogenous rhythms in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 7(1), 71�90. Clayton, M. , Sager, R. , & Will, U. (2005). In time with the music: The concept of entrainment and itssignificance for ethnomusicology. European Meetings in Ethnomusicology, 11, 3�142. D�Ausilio, A. , Badino, L. , Li, Y. , Tokay, S. , Craighero, L. , Canto, R. ,� Fadiga, L. (2012). Leadership inorchestra emerges from the causal relationships of movement kinematics. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e35757. D�Ausilio, A. , Novembre, G. , Fadiga, L. , & Keller, P. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111�114. Demos, A. P. , Wanderley, M. , & Palmer, C. (2015). Auditory feedback perturbations disrupt synchrony inensemble music performance. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 161�162. Drew, D. , Dolch, K. , & Castro, M. (2015). A model for tempo synchronization in music performance. SiamJournal on Applied Mathematics, 75(6), 2540�2561. Goebl, W. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. MusicPerception, 26(5), 427�438.

Page 135: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Jacoby, N. , Tishby, N. , Repp, B. H. , Ahissar, M. , & Keller, P. E. (2015). Parameter estimation of linearsensorimotor synchronization methods: Phase correction, period correction, and ensemble synchronization.Timing & Time Perception, 3, 52�87. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MITPress. Kuramoto, Y. (1984). Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence. New York, NY: Springer. Kuramoto, Y. (1997). Phase-and center-manifold reductions for large populations of coupled oscillators withapplication to non-locally coupled systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 7(4), 789�805. Large, E. W. , & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events.Psychological Review, 106(1), 119�159. Large, E. W. , & Kolen, J. F. (1994). Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Connection Science,6(2�3), 177�208. Large, E. W. , & Palmer, C. (2002). Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 1�37. Loehr, J. D. , Large, E. W. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination and adaptation to rate change in musicperformance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37(4), 1292�1309. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2009). Subdividing the beat: Auditory and motor contributions to synchronization.Music Perception, 26(5), 415�425. Loehr, J. D. , & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153�2167. Luck, G. , & Toiviainen, P. (2006). Ensemble musicians� synchronization with conductors� gestures: Anautomated feature-extraction analysis. Music Perception, 24(2), 189�200. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 115�138. Palmer, C. , & Loehr, J. D. (2013). Meeting of two minds in duet piano performance. In L. Bernstein & A. Rozin(Eds.), Musical implications: Essays in honor of Eugene Narmour (pp. 323�338). Hillsdale, NY: PendragonPress. Palmer, C. , Spidle, F. , Koopmans, E. , & Schubert, P. (2013). Temporal coordination in vocal duetperformances of musical rounds. In R. Bresin & A. Askenfelt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Stockholm MusicAcoustics Conference (pp. 678�682). Berlin, Germany: Logos. Polak, R. , London, J. , & Jacoby, N. (2016). Both isochronous and non-isochronous metrical subdivision affordprecise and stable ensemble entrainment: A corpus study of Malian jembe drumming. Frontiers in AuditoryCognitive Neuroscience, 10(285). Pyragas, K. (1992). Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback. Physics Letters A, 170(6),421�428. Pyragas, K. (1998). Synchronization of coupled time-delay systems: Analytical estimations. Physical Review E,58(3), 3067�3071. Pyragas, K. (2008). Coupling design for a long-term anticipating synchronization of chaos. Physical Review E,78(4), article 046217. Repp, B. H. , & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006�2012).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403�452. Schöner, G. , & Kelso, F. A. S. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science,239(4847), 1513�1520. 379 Schulze, H.-H. , Cordes, A. , & Vorberg, D. (2005). Keeping synchrony while tempo changes: Accelerandoand ritardando. Music Perception, 22(3), 461�477. Stepp, N. , & Turvey, M. (2010). On strong anticipation. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(2), 148�164. Timmers, R. , Endo, S. , Bradbury, A. , & Wing, A. M. (2014). Synchronization and leadership in string quartetperformance: A case study of auditory and visual cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 645. von Holst, E. (1929). The behavioural physiology of animals and man: The collected papers of Erich von Holst(vol. 1). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press. Vorberg, D. , & Wing, A. M. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In H. Heuer & S. Keele(Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (vol. 2, pp. 181�262). New York, NY: Academic Press. Wing, A. M. , Endo, S. , Bradbury, A. , & Vorberg, D. (2014). Optimal feedback correction in string quartetsynchronization. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(93), 20131125. Wing, A. M. , & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics,13(3), 455�460. Zamm, A. , Pfordresher, P. Q. , & Palmer, C. (2015). Temporal coordination in joint music performance: Effectsof endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 607�615. Zamm, A. , Wellman, C. , & Palmer, C. (2016). Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 42(5), 611�616.

Linking Movement Recurrence to Expressive Patterns in Music Performance Barbosa, A. , Dechaine, R. , Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. , & Yehia, H. (2012). Quantifying time-varying coordinationof multimodal speech signals using correlation map analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,131(3), 2162�2172. Campolina, T. , Loureiro, M. , & Mota, D. (2009). Expan: A tool for musical expressiveness analysis. In L.Naveda (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology (pp.

Page 136: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

24�27). Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University. Caramiaux, B. , Wanderley, M. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2012). Segmenting and parsing instrumentalists� gestures.Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 13�29. Dahl, S. , & Friberg, A. (2007). Visual perception of expressiveness in musicians� body movements. MusicPerception, 24(5), 433�454. Davidson, J. W. (1993). Visual perception and performance manner in the movements of solo musicians.Psychology of Music, 21(2), 103�113. 387 Desmet, F. , Nijs, L. , Demey, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Martens, J. , & Leman, M. (2012). Assessing a clarinetplayer�s performer gestures in relation to locally intended musical targets. Journal of New Music Research,41(1), 31�48. Gabrielsson, A. , & Juslin, P. (1996). Emotional expression in music performance: Between the performer�sintention and the listener�s experience. Psychology of Music, 24(1), 68�91. Godøy, R. , & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2010). Musical gestures: Sound, movement and meaning. London, UK:Routledge. Juslin, P. (2000). Cue utilization in communication of emotion in music performance: Relating performance toperception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(6), 1797�1813. McNeill, D. (2007). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Naveda, L. , & Leman, M. (2009). A cross-modal heuristic for periodic pattern analysis of samba music anddance. Journal of New Music Research, 38(3), 255�283. Senin, P. (2008). Dynamic time warping algorithm review (Tech. Rep.). Honolulu, USA: Information andComputer Science Department, University of Hawaii. Teixeira, E. , Loureiro, M. , Wanderley, M. , & Yehia, H. (2015). Motion analysis of clarinet performers. Journalof New Music Research, 44(2), 97�111. Teixeira, E. , Loureiro, M. , Yehia, H. , & Wanderley, M. (2013). Motion recurrence analysis in musicperformances. In R. Bresin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 317�322).Berlin, Germany: Logos. Wanderley, M. , Vines, B. , Middleton, N. , McKay, C. , & Hatch, W. (2005). The musical significance ofclarinetists� ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97�113.

Music-Based Interaction Technologies and Applications Altavilla, A. , Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Towards gestural sonic affordances. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME�13) (pp. 61�64). Dajeon, Seoul, Korea:Graduate School of Culture Technology KAIST. Anderson, M. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91�130. 400 Bevilacqua, F. , Schnell, N. , Rasamimanana, N. , Bloit, J. , Fléty, E. , Caramiaux, B. ,� Boyer, E. (2013). De-MO: Designing action-sound relationships with the MO interfaces. In CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on HumanFactors in Computing Systems (pp. 2907�2910). New York, NY: ACM. Bevilacqua, F. , Schnell, N. , Rasamimanana, N. , Zamborlin, B. , & Guédy, F. (2011). Online gesture analysisand control of audio processing. In J. Solis & K. Ng (Eds.), Musical robots and interactive multimodal systems(pp. 127�142). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Boyer, E. O. (2015). Continuous auditory feedback for sensorimotor learning (Doctoral Dissertation). UniversitéPierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Boyer, E. O. , Pyanet, Q. , Hanneton, S. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Learning movement kinematics with atargeted sound. In M. Aramaki , O. Derrien , R. Kronland-Martinet , & S. Ystad (Eds.), Sound, music & motion(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 8905) (pp. 218�233). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Boyer, E. O. , Vandervoorde, L. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Hanneton, S. (2015). Touching sounds: Audio virtualsurfaces. In SIVE 2015, IEEE 2nd VR Workshop on Sonic Interactions for Virtual Environments (pp. 1�5). Arles,France: IEEE. Caramiaux, B. , Altavilla, A. , Pobiner, S. G. , & Tanaka, A. (2015). Form follows sound: Designing interactionsfrom sonic memories. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in ComputingSystems (pp. 3943�3952). New York, NY: ACM. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , Bianco, T. , Schnell, N. , Houix, O. , & Susini, P. (2014). The role of soundsource perception in gestural sound description. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(1), 1�19. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Schnell, N. (2010). Towards a gesture-sound cross-modal analysis. In S.Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (vol. 5934,pp. 158�170). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Caramiaux, B. , Schnell, N. , Françoise, J. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Mapping through listening. Computer MusicJournal, 38, 34�48. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of thebrain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844�2854. Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fails, J. A. , & Olsen, D. R. (2003). Interactive machine learning. In Proceedings of the 8th InternationalConference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 39�45). New York, NY: ACM. Fiebrink, R. , Cook, P. R. , & Trueman, D. (2011). Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning.In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 147). Vancouver,

Page 137: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Canada: ACM. Françoise, J. (2015). Motion-sound mapping by demonstration (Doctoral Dissertation). Université Pierre et MarieCurie, Paris, France. Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). MaD: Mapping by demonstration for continuous sonification.In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Emerging Technologies (p. 16). Vancouver, Canada: ACM. Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , Borghesi, R. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Probabilistic models for designing motion andsound relationships. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 287�292). London, UK. Franinovi�, K. , & Serafin, S. (2013). Sonic interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Godøy, R. I. (2003). Motor-mimetic music cognition. Leonardo, 36(4), 317�319. Godøy, R. I. , Haga, E. , & Jensenius, A. R. (2006a). Exploring music-related gestures by sound-tracing�Apreliminary study. In 2nd ConGAS International Symposium on Gesture Interfaces for Multimedia Systems (pp.9�10). Leeds, UK. Godøy, R. I. , Haga, E. , & Jensenius, A. (2006b). Playing �Air instruments�: Mimicry of sound-producing gesturesby novices and experts. In N. Courty , S. Gibet , & J. Kamp (Eds.), Gesture in human-computer interaction andsimulation (vol. 3881, pp. 256�267). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Haueisen, J. , & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 786�792. Jensenius, A. R. (2007). Action-sound: Developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement(Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions onComputer-Human Interaction, 20(111), 3:1�3:30. Lahav, A. , Boulanger, A. , Schlaug, G. , & Saltzman, E. (2005). The power of listening: Auditory-motorinteractions in musical training. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060(1), 189�194. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Lallemand, I. , & Schwarz, D. (2011). Interaction-optimized sound database representation. In G. Peeters (Ed.),Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx) (pp. 292�299). Paris, France:IRCAM-Centre Pompidou. 401 Lazier, A. , & Cook, P. (2003). MOSIEVIUS: Feature driven interactive audio mosaicing. In Proceedings ofthe 6th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx). London, UK. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leslie, G. , Zamborlin, B. , Jodlowski, P. , & Schnell, N. (2010). Grainstick: A collaborative, interactive soundinstallation. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) (pp. 123�126). New York:ACM. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Demey, M. , & Moelants, D. (2010). From expressive gesture to sound.Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 3(1), 67�78. Miranda, E. , & Wanderley, M. (2006). New digital musical instruments: Control and interaction beyond thekeyboard. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions. O�Regan, J. K. , & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. The Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 24, 939�973; discussion 973�1031. Peeters, G. (2004). A large set of audio features for sound description (similarity and classification) in theCUIDADO project. Report. Rasamimanana, N. , Bevilacqua, F. , Schnell, N. , Fléty, E. , & Zamborlin, B. (2011). Modular musical objectstowards embodied control of digital music real time musical interactions. In Proceedings of the FifthInternational Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 9�12). Funchal, Portugal:ACM. Savary, M. , Schwarz, D. , Pellerin, D. , Massin, F. , Jacquemin, C. , & Cahen, R. (2013). Dirty tangibleinterfaces: Expressive control of computers with true grit. In CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors inComputing Systems on (p. 2991�2994). Paris, France: ACM. Schnell, N. (2011). Real-time audio mosaicing. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://imtr.ircam.fr/imtr/Real-Time_Audio_Mosaicing. Schnell, N. (2013). Playing (with) sound�Of the animation of digitized sounds and their reenactment by playfulscenarios in the design of interactive audio applications (Doctoral Dissertation). Institute of Electronic Music andAcoustics, University of Music and Performing Arts Graz, Graz, Austria. Schnell, N. , Borghesi, R. , Schwarz, D. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Muller, R. (2005). FTM�Complex data structures forMax. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC). Barcelona, Spain. Schnell, N. , Röbel, A. , Schwarz, D. , Peeters, G. , & Borghesi, R. (2009). Mubu & friends�Assembling tools forcontent based real-time interactive audio processing in max/msp. In Proceedings of International ComputerMusic Conference (pp. 423�426). Montreal, Canada. Schnell, N. , & Schwarz, D. (2005). Gabor, multi-representation real-time analysis/synthesis. In Proceedings ofthe 8th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx�05) (pp. 121�126). Madrid, Spain: ETSI. Schwarz, D. (2007). Corpus-based concatenative synthesis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(2), 92�104. Schwarz, D. , Schnell, N. , & Gulluni, S. (2009). Scalability in content-based navigation of sound databases. InProceedings of ICMC2009 (pp. 13�16). Montreal, Canada. Tajadura-Jimenez, A. , Bianchi-Berthouze, N. , Furfaro, E. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2015). Sonification of surfacetapping changes behavior, surface perception, and emotion. MultiMedia, IEEE, 22(1), 48�57. Tanaka, A. , Caramiaux, B. , & Schnell, N. (2013). MubuFunkScatShare: Gestural energy and sharedinteractive music. In CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2999�3002).

Page 138: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Paris, France: ACM. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. TheComputer Music Journal, 26(3), 11�22. Zatorre, R. J. , Chen, J. L. , & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory-motor interactionsin music perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547�558. Abromont, C. (2001). Guide de la théorie de la musique. Paris, France: Editions Henry Lemoine. Arfib, D. , Couturier, J. M. , & Kessous, L. (2005). Expressiveness and digital musical instrument design.Journal of New Music Research, Special Issue on Expressive Gesture in Performing Arts and New Media,34(1), 125�136. Bell, C. G. , Fujisaki, H. , Heinz, J. M. , Stevens, K. N. , & House, A. S. (1961). Reduction of speech spectra byAnalysis-by-Synthesis technique. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 33(12), 1725�1736. Bozkurt, B. , Couvreur, L. , & Dutoit, T. (2007). Chirp group delay analysis of speech signals. SpeechCommunications, 49(3), 159�176. d�Alessandro, N. , Babacan, O. , Bozkurt, B. , Dubuisson, T. , Holzapfel, A. , Kessous, L. ,� Vlieghe, M. (2008).Expressive voice analysis for real-time and accurate synthesis of singing. Journal on Multimodal UserInterfaces, 2(2), 133�144. d�Alessandro, N. , d�Alessandro, C. , Le Beux, S. , & Doval, B. (2006). Real-time CALM synthesizer: Newapproaches in hands-controlled voice synthesis. In N. Schnell & F. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 266�271). Paris, France: IRCAM. d�Alessandro, N. , & Dutoit, T. (2007). HandSketch bi-manual controller: Investigation on expressive controlissues of an augmented tablet. In C. Parkinson & E. Singer (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conferenceon New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 78�81). New York: New York University. d�Alessandro, N. , & Dutoit, T. (2009). Advanced techniques for vertical tablet playing: An overview of two yearsof practicing the HandSketch 1.x. In N. Schnell & F. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Proceedings of the InternationalConference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 173�174). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie MellonUniversity. d�Alessandro, N. , Ooge, C. , Dutoit, T. , & Fels, S. (2011). Analysis-by-performance: Gesturally-controlled voicesynthesis as an input for modeling of vibrato in singing. In P.-A. Tremblay & M. Adkins (Eds.) Proceedings ofthe International Computer Music Conference (pp. 189�196). Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield. Fels, S. (2000). Intimacy and embodiment: Implications for art and technology. In S. Ghandeharizadeh (Ed.),Proceedings of ACM Workshops on Multimedia (pp. 13�16). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Fels, S. (2001). Using radial basis functions to map hand gestures to speech. In R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain(Eds.), Radial Basis Function Networks 2, New Advances in Design (pp. 59�101). Heidelberg, Germany:Physica-Verlag. Feugère, L. , & d�Alessandro, C. (2014). Rule-based performative synthesis of sung syllables, In B. Caramiaux ,K. Tahiro�lu , R. Fiebrink , & A. Tananka (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfacesfor Musical Expression (pp. 86�87). London, UK: Goldsmiths University of London. Fiebrink, R. , Cook, P. R. , & Trueman, D. (2011). Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning.In D. Tan (Ed.), Proceedings of ACM CHI (pp. 147�156). Vancouver, BC: ACM SIGCHI. Greenberg, S. , Carpendale, S. , Marquardt, N. , & Buxton, B. (2011). Sketching user experiences: Theworkbook. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. Hommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen , W. Prinz , & G. Roth (Eds.),Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 34�48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 411 Hunt, A. , & Kirk, R. (2000). Mapping strategies for musical performance. Trends in Gestural Control ofMusic, 1, 231�258. Kessous, L. (2002). Bi-manual mapping experimentation, with angular fundamental frequency control andsound color navigation. In J. Paradiso & S. O�Modhrain (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference onNew Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 113�114). Dublin, Ireland: Media Lab Europe. Kjelland, J. (2004). Orchestral bowing: Style and function. Los Angeles, CA: Alfred Publishing Company. Leman, M. (1989). Introduction to models of musical communication and cognition. Interface�Journal of NewMusic Research, 18(1�2), 3�7. Liberman, A. M. (1970). Some characteristics of perception in the speech mode. Perception and Its Disorders,Cognitive Psychology, 2, 131�157. Liberman, A. M. , Cooper, F. S. , Shankweiler, D. P. , & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speechcode. Psychological Review, 74, 431�461. Lowry, D. (1986). Bokken: Art of the Japanese sword. Burbank, CA: Ohara Publications. Momeni, A. , & Wessel, D. (2003). Characterizing and controlling musical material intuitively with geometricmodels. In M. M. Wanderley , P. Depalle , & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conferenceon New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 54�62). Montreal, QC: McGill University. Moore, F. R. (1988). The dysfunctions of MIDI. Computer Music Journal, 12(1), 19�28. Newport, E. L. (1982). Task specificity in language learning? Evidence from speech perception in ASL. In E.Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: State of the art (pp. 450�485). Cambridge, MA: CambridgeUniversity Press. O�Regan, J. K. , & Noë, A. (2001). What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience.Synthese, 129(1), 79�103. Perrotin, O. , & d�Alessandro, C. (2014). Visualizing gestures in the control of a digital musical instrument. In B.Caramiaux , K. Tahiro�lu , R. Fiebrink , & A. Tananka (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference onNew Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 605�608). London, UK: Goldsmiths University of London.

Page 139: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Pritchard, B. , & Fels, S. (2006). GRASSP: Gesturally-realized audio, speech and song performance. In N.Schnell & F. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 272�276). Paris, France: IRCAM. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. Roy, S. (2010). Step-by-Step guide to dance: Trisha Brown. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttp://www.theguardian.com. Sexton, R. B. , & Haussner, D. (1996). Method for the Theremin Bk. I. Austin, TX: Tactus Press. Titze, I. , & Story, B. (2002). A reflex resonance model of vocal vibrato. Journal of Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 111(5), 2272�2282. Traube, C. , & Depalle, P. (2004). Phonetic gestures underlying guitar timbre description. In S. D. Lipscomb , R.Ashley , R. O. Gjerdingen , & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Music Perceptionand Cognition (pp. 658�661). Evanston, IL: Causal Productions. Verfaille, V. , Guastavino, C. , & Depalle, P. (2005). Perceptual evaluation of vibrato models. In C. Traube & S.Lacasse (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (pp. 1�19). Montreal, QC:University of Montreal. Vincent, D. , Rosec, O. , & Chonavel, T. (2007). A new method for speech synthesis and transformation basedon an ARX-LF source-filter decomposition and HNM modeling. In K. J. Ray Liu & T. Reed (Eds.), Proceedingsof ICASSP (pp. 525�528). Honolulu, Hawaii: IEEE. Wanderley, M. M. , Orio, N. , & Schnell, N. (2002). Evaluation of input devices for musical expression:Borrowing tools from HCI. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 62�76. Wright, M. , & Freed, A. (1997). Open sound control: A new protocol for communication with soundsynthesizers. In A. Bakalakos (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp.101�104). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University. Wright, M. , Wessel, D. , & Freed, A. (1997). New musical control structures from standard gestural controllers.In A. Bakalakos (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 387�390).Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University. Zbyszynski, M. , Wright, M. , Momeni, A. , & Cullen, D. (2007). Ten years of tablet musical interfaces atCNMAT. In C. Parkinson & E. Singer (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces forMusical Expression (pp. 100�105). New York: New York University. Altavilla, A. , Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Towards gestural sonic affordances. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 61�64). Daejeon, Republic of Korea:Graduate School of Culture Technology, KAIST. Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91�130. Arfib, D. , Couturier, J. M. , Kessous, L. , & Verfaille, V. (2002). Strategies of mapping between gesture dataand synthesis model parameters using perceptual spaces. Organised Sound, 7(2), 127�144. Armstrong, N. (2006). An enactive approach to digital musical instrument design (Doctoral Dissertation).Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download. Bown, O. , Eldridge, A. , & McCormack, J. (2009). Understanding interaction in contemporary digital music:From instruments to behavioural objects. Organised Sound, 14(2), 188�196. Cadoz, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2000). Gesture-music. In M. M. Wanderley & M. Battier (Eds.), Trends ingestural control of music (pp. 71�94). Paris, France: IRCAM�Centre Pompidou. Caramiaux, B. , Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Mapping through listening. Computer MusicJournal, 38(3), 34�48. Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Machine learning of musical gestures. In Proceedings of the InternationalConference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 513�518). Daejeon, Republic of Korea: GraduateSchool of Culture Technology, KAIST. Chadabe, J. (2002). The limitations of mapping as a structural descriptive in electronic instruments. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 38�42). Dublin,Ireland. Choi, I. , Bargar, R. , & Goudeseune, C. (1995). A manifold interface for a high dimensional control space. InProceedings of the 1995 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 385�392). Banff, Canada: Banff Centerfor the Arts. Cox, A. (2011). Embodying music: Principles of the mimetic hypothesis. Music Theory Online, 17(2). Cumming, N. (2000). The sonic self: Musical subjectivity and signification. Bloomington, IA: Indiana UniversityPress. de Campo, A. (2014). Lose control, gain influence � Concepts for Metacontrol. In Proceedings of the 2014International Computer Music Conference, Athens, Greece (pp. 217�222). Di Scipio, A. (2003). �Sound is the interface�: From interactive to ecosystemic signal processing. OrganisedSound, 8(3), 269�277. Fabiani, M. , Friberg, A. , & Bresin, R. (2013). Systems for interactive control of computer generated musicperformance. In A. Kirke & E. Miranda (Eds.), Guide to computing for expressive music performance (pp.49�73). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. Fiebrink, R. , Trueman, D. , Britt, C. , Nagai, M. , Kaczmarek, K. , Early, M. , � Cook, P. (2010). Towardunderstanding human-computer interaction in composing the instrument. In Proceedings of the 2010International Computer Music Conference (pp. 135�142). New York, NY. Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2013). A multimodal probabilistic model for gesture-based controlof sound synthesis. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Barcelona, Spain(pp. 705�708). New York, NY: ACM. Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2010). Chunking in music by coarticulation. Acta Acustica Unitedwith Acustica, 96(4), 690�700.

Page 140: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Gurevich, M. , & Treviño, J. (2007). Expression and its discontents: Toward an ecology of musical creation. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 106�111). New YorkCity, NY. Haga, E. (2008). Correspondences between music and body movement (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved fromhttps://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/26916. Haikonen, P. O. (2007). Robot brains: Circuits and systems for conscious machines. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & Sons. Hatten, R. (2012). Musical forces and agential energies: An expansion of Steve Larson�s model. Music TheoryOnline, 18(3). 419 Holland, O. (2007). A strongly embodied approach to machine consciousness. Journal of ConsciousnessStudies, 14(7), 97�110. Hunt, A. , Kirk, R. , & Neighbour, M. (2004). Multiple media interfaces for music therapy. IEEE MultiMedia,11(3), 50�58. Hurley, S. L. (2002). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. M. , Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2009). Musical gestures. In R. I. Godøy & M.Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 12�35). New York, NY: Routledge. Kaipainen, M. , Ravaja, N. , Tikka, P. , Vuori, R. , Pugliese, R. , Rapino, M. , & Takala, T. (2011). Enactivesystems and enactive media: Embodied human-machine coupling beyond interfaces. Leonardo, 44(5), 433�438. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Levitin, D. J. , McAdams, S. , & Adams, R. L. (2002). Control parameters for musical instruments: A foundationfor new mappings of gesture to sound. Organised Sound, 7(2), 171�189. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17(1), 86�108. Magnusson, T. (2010). Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems.Computer Music Journal, 34(4), 62�73. Matyja, J. R. , & Schiavio, A. (2013). Enactive music cognition: Background and research themes.Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 351�357. Mazzola, G. , & Andreatta, M. (2007). Diagrams, gestures and formulae in music. Journal of Mathematics andMusic, 1(1), 23�46. McDermott, J. , Gifford, T. , Bouwer, A. , & Wagy, M. (2013). Should music interaction be easy?. In S. Holland(Ed.), Music and human-computer interaction (pp. 29�47). London, UK: Springer. Nakamura, J. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and thefoundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 239�263). Dordrecht,The Netherlands: Springer. Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo , H. Genevois , & J.-M. Bardez (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp. 467�484). Editions DelatourFrance. Robb, H. J. (2015). Imagined, supplemental sound in nineteenth-century piano music: Towards a fullerunderstanding of musical embodiment. Music Theory Online, 21(3). Schnell, N. , & Battier, M. (2002). Introducing composed instruments, technical and musicological implications.In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 156�160). Dublin,Ireland. Schwarz, D. (2012). The sound space as musical instrument: Playing corpus-based concatenative synthesis. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 250�253). AnnArbor, MI: University of Michigan. Simoens, V. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Musician�instrument relationship as a candidate index for professionalwell-being in musicians. In R. Reiter-Palmen & P. Tinio (Eds.), Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and theArts, 7(2), 171�180. Smith, B. D. , & Garnett, G. E. (2012). Reinforcement learning and the creative, automated music improviser. InP. Machado , J. McDermott , & A. Carballal (Eds.), Evolutionary and biologically inspired music, sound, art anddesign (pp. 223�234). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. Tubb, R. , & Dixon, S. (2015). An evaluation of multidimensional controllers for sound design tasks. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republicof Korea (pp. 47�56). New York, NY: ACM. Van Nort, D. (2011). Human: Machine: Human: Gesture, sound and embodiment. Kybernetes, 40(7/8),1179�1188. Van Nort, D. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Depalle, P. (2014). Mapping control structures for sound synthesis:Functional and topological perspectives. Computer Music Journal, 38(3), 6�22. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Gestural control of music. In International workshop human supervision and control inengineering and music, Kassel, Germany. Retrieved from http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/analyse-synthese/wanderle/pub/kassel/ Wanderley, M. M. , & Orio, N. (2002). Evaluation of input devices for musical expression: Borrowing tools fromHCI. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 62�76. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. ComputerMusic Journal, 26(3), 11�22. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive world: The next step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Page 141: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Zappi, V. , & McPherson, A. (2014). Dimensionality and appropriation in digital musical instrument design. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 455�460). London,United Kingdom: Goldsmiths, University of London. Brouse, B. , Castet, A. , Filatriau, J. , Lehembre, J. J. , Noirhomme, R. , & Simon, Q. (2005). From biologicalsignals to music. In 2nd International Conference on Enactive Interfaces, Genoa Italy. Caramiaux, B. , Donnarumma, M. , & Tanaka, A. (2015). Understanding gesture expressivity through musclesensing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 21(6), 1�26. 428 De Luca, C. J. , & Van Dyk, E. J. (1975). Derivation of some parameters of myoelectric signals recordedduring sustained constant force isometric contractions. Biophysical Journal, 15(12), 1167�1180. Donnarumma, M. (2011). Xth sense: A study of muscle sounds for an experimental paradigm of musicalperformance. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2011 (pp. 243�248). Huddersfield,UK: University of Huddersfield. Donnarumma, M. , Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Body and space: Combining modalities for musicalexpression. In Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI). Barcelona, Spain: ACM. Eaton, M. L. (1974). Bio-music. Chelsea, NY: Something Else Press. Hermens, H. J. , Freriks, B. , Disselhorst-Klug, C. , & Rau, G. (2000). Development of recommendations forSEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 10(5),361�374. Hofmann, D. , Jiang, N. , Vujaklija, I. , & Farina, D. (2016). Bayesian filtering of surface EMG for accuratesimultaneous and proportional prosthetic control. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and RehabilitationEngineering, 24(12), 1333�1341. Hunt, A. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2003). Mapping performer parameters to synthesis engines. Organised Sound,7(2), 97�108. Knapp, R. B. , & Lusted, H. S. (1988). Biomuse: Musical performance generated by human bioelectric signals.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(S1), S179. Marrin, T. , & Picard, R. (1998). The �Conductors Jacket�: A device for recording expressive musical gestures. InProceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 215�219). Ann Arbor, MI: MichiganPublishing. Nagashima, Y. (2003). Bio-sensing systems and bio-feedback systems for interactive media arts. In F. Thibault(Ed.), New Interfaces for Musical Expression Conference (pp. 48�53). Montreal, Canada. Ortiz, M. (2012). A brief history biosignal-driven art: From biofeedback to biophysical performance. eContact!,14(2). Phinyomark, A. , Quaine, F. , Charbonnier, S. , Serviere, C. , Tarpin-Bernard, F. , & Laurillau, Y. (2013). EMGfeature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness. Expert Systems with Applications,40(12), 4832�4840. Rosenboom, D. (1976). Biofeedback and the arts: Results of early experiments. Vancouver, Canada: AestheticResearch Centre of Canada, A.R.C. Saponas, T. S. , Tan, D. S. , Morris, D. , Balakrishnan, R. , Turner, J. , & Landay, J. A. (2009). Enabling always-available input with muscle-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on UserInterface Software and Technology (pp. 167�176). Victoria, Canada: ACM. Silang Maranan, D. , Fdili Alaoui, S. , Schiphorst, T. , Pasquier, P. , Subyen, P. , & Bartram, L. (2014).Designing for movement: Evaluating computational models using LMA effort qualities. In Proceedings of the32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 991�1000). Toronto, Canada:ACM. Tanaka, A. , & Fistre, J. (2008). Method and apparatus for analysing gestures produced in free space, e.g. forcommanding apparatus by gesture recognition. Unites States Patent. Tanaka, A. , & Knapp, R. B. (2016). Multimodal interaction in music using the electromyogram and relativeposition sensing. In M. Lyons & A. R. Jensenius (Eds.), A NIME reader (pp. 39�51). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Ward, N. , Ortiz, M. , Bernardo, F. , & Tanaka, A. (2016). Designing and measuring gesture using labanmovement analysis and electromyogram. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference onPervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 995�1000). ACM. Ashbrook, D. L. (2007). Supporting mobile microinteractions (Doctoral Dissertation). Georgia Institute ofTechnology, Atlanta. Baars, B. J. (1993). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Collins, J. J. , & De Luca, C. J. (1994). Random walking during quiet standing. Physical Review Letters, 73(5),764. Di Scipio, A. (2003). �Sound is the interface�: From interactive to ecosystemic signal processing. OrganisedSound, 8(3), 269�277. Dobrian, C. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2003). Gestural control of music using the Vicon 8 motion capture system. In M.M. Wanderley , R. McKenzie , & L. Ostiguy (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on NewInterfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 161�163). Montreal, Canada: McGill University. Ekman, P. , & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavioral categories. Semiotica, 1(1), 49�98. Godøy, R. I. (2001). Imagined action, excitation, and resonance. In R. I. Godøy & H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Musicalimagery (pp. 237�250). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press ofHarvard University Press. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2006). Music and gesture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on music and gesture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.

Page 142: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Hermann, T. , Hunt, A. , & Neuhoff, J. G. (2011). The sonification handbook. Berlin, Germany: Logos. Jensenius, A. R. (2013). An action-sound approach to teaching interactive music. Organised Sound, 18(2),178�189. Jensenius, A. R. (2014). To gesture or not? An analysis of terminology. In B. Caramiaux , K. Tahiroglu , R.Fiebrink , & A. Tanaka (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 217�220). London, UK: Goldsmiths, University of London. Jensenius, A. R. , & Bjerkestrand, K. A. V. (2012). Exploring micromovements with motion capture andsonification. In A. L. Brooks (Ed.), Arts and technology: Revised selected papers (vol. 101 of LNICST, pp.100�107). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Jensenius, A. R. , Bjerkestrand, K. A. V. , & Johnson, V. (2014). How still is still? Exploring human standstill forartistic applications. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 7(2/3), 207�222. Jensenius, A. R. , Nymoen, K. , Skogstad, S. , & Voldsund, A. (2012). A study of the noise level in two infraredmarker�based motion-capture systems. In S. Serafin & D. Overholt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sound and MusicComputing Conference (pp. 258�263). Copenhagen, Denmark: Aalborg University. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. M. , Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2010). Musical gestures: Concepts andmethods in research. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp.12�35). New York, NY: Routledge. Jones, R. , Driessen, P. , Schloss, A. , & Tzanetakis, G. (2009). A force-sensitive surface for intimate control. InN. Zahler , R. B. Dannenberg , & T. Sullivan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on NewInterfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 236�241). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Laeng, B. , & Teodorescu, D. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of thesame visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 207�231. Lamb, R. , & Robertson, A. (2011). Seaboard: A new piano keyboard-related interface combining discrete andcontinuous control. In A. R. Jensenius , A. Tveit , R. I. Godøy , & D. Overholt (Eds.), Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 503�506). Oslo, Norway: University ofOslo. Loram, I. D. , & Lakie, M. (2002). Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: Theintrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability. Journal of Physiology, 545(3), 1041�1053. Loy, G. (1985). Musicians make a standard: The MIDI phenomenon. Computer Music Journal, 9(4), 8�26. 437 Martinez-Conde, S. , & Macknik, S. L. (2007). Windows on the mind. Scientific American, 297(2), 56�63. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Moore, F. R. (1988). The dysfunctions of MIDI. Computer Music Journal, 12(1), 19�28. Oulasvirta, A. , Tamminen, S. , Roto, V. , & Kuorelahti, J. (2005). Interaction in 4-second bursts: Thefragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In W. Kellogg , S. Zhai , G. van der Veer , & C. Gale(Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 919�928). NewYork, NY: ACM. Pulkki, V. (1997). Virtual sound source positioning using vector base amplitude panning. Journal of the AudioEngineering Society, 45(6), 456�466. Roads, C. (2004). Microsound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Schnell, N. , Borghesi, R. , Schwarz, D. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Müller, R. (2005). FTM�Complex data structures forMax. In X. Serra (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 9�12).Barcelona, Spain: International Computer Music Association. Serafin, S. (2004). The sound of friction: Real-time models, playability and musical applications (DoctoralDissertation). Stanford University. Skogstad, S. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2010). Using IR optical marker based motion capture forexploring musical interaction. In K. Beilharz , B. Bongers , A. Johnston , & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 407�410). Sydney, Australia:University of Technology, Sydney. Verplank, B. , Gurevich, M. , & Mathews, M. (2002). The plank: Designing a simple haptic controller. In B.Gillespie , M. Gurevich , & S. O�Modhrain (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on NewInterfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 177�180). Dublin, Ireland: MIT Media Lab Europe. Wanderley, M. M. , & Battier, M. (Eds.). (2000). Trends in gestural control of music. Paris, France:IRCAM�Centre Pompidou. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. ComputerMusic Journal, 26(3), 11�22. Wright, M. , Freed, A. , & Momeni, A. (2003). Opensound control: State of the art 2003. In M. M. Wanderley , R.McKenzie , & L. Ostiguy (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 153�159). Montreal, Canada: McGill University. Bevilacqua, F. , Müller, R. , & Schnell, N. (2005). MnM: A Max/MSP mapping toolbox. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 85�88). Vancouver, Canada: Universityof British Columbia. Bowers, J. , & Archer, P. (2005). Not hyper, not meta, not cyber but infra-instruments. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 5�10). Vancouver, Canada: University ofBritish Columbia. Buxton, B. (1997). Artists and the art of the luthier. Computer Graphics: The SIGGRAPH Quarterly, 31(1), 10�11. Cariou, B. (1994). The aXiO MIDI controller. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference(pp. 163�166). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.

Page 143: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Chadabe, J. (2002). The limitations of mapping as a structural descriptive in electronic instruments. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 38�42). Dublin,Ireland: Media Lab Europe. Clarke, E. F. (1988). Generative principles in music performance. In J. A. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processesin music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 1�26). Oxford, UK: ClarendonPress. Cook, P. R. (2001). Principles for designing computer music controllers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHIWorkshop on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 3�6). Seattle, WA: ACM. de Laubier, S. (1998). The meta-instrument. Computer Music Journal, 22(1), 25�29. Dobrian, C. , & Koppelman, D. (2006). The �E� in NIME: Musical expression with new computer interfaces. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 277�282). Paris,France: IRCAM. Edgar, R. (1993). Ray Edgar�Sweatstick. In M. Waisvisz , J. Ryan , & N. Collins (Eds.), STEIM: dezoetgevooisde BLIKSEM (p. 18). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: STEIM. Fiebrink, R. , & Cook, P. (2009). Play-along mapping of musical controllers. In Proceedings of the InternationalComputer Music Conference (pp. 61�64). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association. Ghazala, R. (2005). Circuit bending: Build your own alien instruments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Gurevich, M. , Stapleton, P. , & Marquez-Borbon, A. (2010). Style and constraint in electronic musicalinstruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp.106�111). Sydney, Australia: University of Technology Sydney. Jacob, R. J. K. , Sibert, L. E. , McFarlane, D. C. , & Mullen, M. P. J. (1994). Integrality and separability of inputdevices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1), 3�26. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mackay, W. (1990). Users and customizable software: A co-adaptive phenomenon (Ph.D. Thesis).Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. Malloch, J. (2013). A framework and tools for mapping of digital musical instruments (Ph.D. Thesis). McGillUniversity, Canada. Malloch, J. , Birnbaum, D. , Sinyor, E. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2006). Towards a new conceptual framework fordigital musical instruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (pp. 49�52).Montreal, Canada: McGill University. Malloch, J. , Sinclair, S. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2015). Distributed tools for interactive design of heterogeneoussignal networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(15), 5683�5707. Malloch, J. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2007). The T-Stick: From musical interface to musical instrument. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 66�69). New York:New York University. Mann, S. (2007). Natural interfaces for musical expression: Physiphones and a physics-based organology. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 118�123). New York,NY: New York University. 447 Medeiros, C. B. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). A comprehensive review of sensors and instrumentationmethods in devices for musical expression. Sensors, 14, 13556�13591. Miranda, E. R. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2006). New digital instruments: Control and interaction beyond thekeyboard. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions. Morreale, F. , De Angeli, A. , & O�Modhrain, S. (2014). Musical interface design: An experience-orientedframework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp.467�472). London, UK: Goldsmiths, University of London. Mulder, A. G. E. (1998). Design of virtual three-dimensional instruments for sound control (Ph.D. Thesis).Simon Fraser University, Canada. Overholt, D. (2009). The musical interface technology design space. Organised Sound, 14(2), 217�226. Pressing, J. (1990). Cybernetic issues in interactive performance systems. Computer Music Journal, 14(1),12�25. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitiveengineering. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Inc. Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In M. C. Stone (Ed.),Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 25�34).New York, NY: ACM. Roads, C. , & Mathews, M. (1980). An interview with Max Mathews. Computer Music Journal, 4(4), 15�22. Rovan, J. B. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Battier, M. (2000). Round table: Electronic controllers in music performanceand composition. In M. M. Wanderley & M. Battier (Eds.), Trends in gestural control of music (pp. 415�438).Paris, France: IRCAM. Rowe, R. (1993). Interactive music systems�Machine listening and composing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stewart, D. A. , & Malloch, J. (2010). The 2010 T-Stick composition workshops. [Web site]. Retrieved fromhttp://tcw2010.wordpress.com/ Vercoe, B. L. (1984). The synthetic performer in the context of live performance. In Proceedings of theInternational Computer Music Conference (pp. 199�200). San Francisco, CA: International Computer MusicAssociation. von Hornbostel, E. M. , & Sachs, C. (1961). Classification of musical instruments. The Galpin Society Journal,14, 3�29. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Performer-instrument interaction: Applications to gestural control of sound synthesis(Ph.D. Thesis). Ircam�Université Paris 6, France.

Page 144: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate control of computers. Computer MusicJournal, 26(3), 11�22. Zappi, V. , & McPherson, A. P. (2014). Dimensionality and appropriation in digital musical instrument design. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 455�460). London,UK: Goldsmiths, University of London.

Designing Action�Sound Metaphors Using Motion Sensing and Descriptor-BasedSynthesis of Recorded Sound Materials Altavilla, A. , Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Towards gestural sonic affordances. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME�13) (pp. 61�64). Dajeon, Seoul, Korea:Graduate School of Culture Technology KAIST. Anderson, M. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91�130. 400 Bevilacqua, F. , Schnell, N. , Rasamimanana, N. , Bloit, J. , Fléty, E. , Caramiaux, B. ,� Boyer, E. (2013). De-MO: Designing action-sound relationships with the MO interfaces. In CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on HumanFactors in Computing Systems (pp. 2907�2910). New York, NY: ACM. Bevilacqua, F. , Schnell, N. , Rasamimanana, N. , Zamborlin, B. , & Guédy, F. (2011). Online gesture analysisand control of audio processing. In J. Solis & K. Ng (Eds.), Musical robots and interactive multimodal systems(pp. 127�142). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Boyer, E. O. (2015). Continuous auditory feedback for sensorimotor learning (Doctoral Dissertation). UniversitéPierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Boyer, E. O. , Pyanet, Q. , Hanneton, S. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Learning movement kinematics with atargeted sound. In M. Aramaki , O. Derrien , R. Kronland-Martinet , & S. Ystad (Eds.), Sound, music & motion(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 8905) (pp. 218�233). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Boyer, E. O. , Vandervoorde, L. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Hanneton, S. (2015). Touching sounds: Audio virtualsurfaces. In SIVE 2015, IEEE 2nd VR Workshop on Sonic Interactions for Virtual Environments (pp. 1�5). Arles,France: IEEE. Caramiaux, B. , Altavilla, A. , Pobiner, S. G. , & Tanaka, A. (2015). Form follows sound: Designing interactionsfrom sonic memories. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in ComputingSystems (pp. 3943�3952). New York, NY: ACM. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , Bianco, T. , Schnell, N. , Houix, O. , & Susini, P. (2014). The role of soundsource perception in gestural sound description. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(1), 1�19. Caramiaux, B. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Schnell, N. (2010). Towards a gesture-sound cross-modal analysis. In S.Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (vol. 5934,pp. 158�170). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Caramiaux, B. , Schnell, N. , Françoise, J. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Mapping through listening. Computer MusicJournal, 38, 34�48. Chen, J. L. , Penhune, V. B. , & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of thebrain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844�2854. Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fails, J. A. , & Olsen, D. R. (2003). Interactive machine learning. In Proceedings of the 8th InternationalConference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 39�45). New York, NY: ACM. Fiebrink, R. , Cook, P. R. , & Trueman, D. (2011). Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning.In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 147). Vancouver,Canada: ACM. Françoise, J. (2015). Motion-sound mapping by demonstration (Doctoral Dissertation). Université Pierre et MarieCurie, Paris, France. Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). MaD: Mapping by demonstration for continuous sonification.In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Emerging Technologies (p. 16). Vancouver, Canada: ACM. Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , Borghesi, R. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Probabilistic models for designing motion andsound relationships. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 287�292). London, UK. Franinovi�, K. , & Serafin, S. (2013). Sonic interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Godøy, R. I. (2003). Motor-mimetic music cognition. Leonardo, 36(4), 317�319. Godøy, R. I. , Haga, E. , & Jensenius, A. R. (2006a). Exploring music-related gestures by sound-tracing�Apreliminary study. In 2nd ConGAS International Symposium on Gesture Interfaces for Multimedia Systems (pp.9�10). Leeds, UK. Godøy, R. I. , Haga, E. , & Jensenius, A. (2006b). Playing �Air instruments�: Mimicry of sound-producing gesturesby novices and experts. In N. Courty , S. Gibet , & J. Kamp (Eds.), Gesture in human-computer interaction andsimulation (vol. 3881, pp. 256�267). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Haueisen, J. , & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 786�792. Jensenius, A. R. (2007). Action-sound: Developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement(Doctoral Dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions onComputer-Human Interaction, 20(111), 3:1�3:30.

Page 145: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Lahav, A. , Boulanger, A. , Schlaug, G. , & Saltzman, E. (2005). The power of listening: Auditory-motorinteractions in musical training. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060(1), 189�194. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Westernthought. New York, NY: Basic Books. Lallemand, I. , & Schwarz, D. (2011). Interaction-optimized sound database representation. In G. Peeters (Ed.),Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx) (pp. 292�299). Paris, France:IRCAM-Centre Pompidou. 401 Lazier, A. , & Cook, P. (2003). MOSIEVIUS: Feature driven interactive audio mosaicing. In Proceedings ofthe 6th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx). London, UK. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Leslie, G. , Zamborlin, B. , Jodlowski, P. , & Schnell, N. (2010). Grainstick: A collaborative, interactive soundinstallation. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) (pp. 123�126). New York:ACM. Maes, P.-J. , Leman, M. , Lesaffre, M. , Demey, M. , & Moelants, D. (2010). From expressive gesture to sound.Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 3(1), 67�78. Miranda, E. , & Wanderley, M. (2006). New digital musical instruments: Control and interaction beyond thekeyboard. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions. O�Regan, J. K. , & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. The Behavioraland Brain Sciences, 24, 939�973; discussion 973�1031. Peeters, G. (2004). A large set of audio features for sound description (similarity and classification) in theCUIDADO project. Report. Rasamimanana, N. , Bevilacqua, F. , Schnell, N. , Fléty, E. , & Zamborlin, B. (2011). Modular musical objectstowards embodied control of digital music real time musical interactions. In Proceedings of the FifthInternational Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 9�12). Funchal, Portugal:ACM. Savary, M. , Schwarz, D. , Pellerin, D. , Massin, F. , Jacquemin, C. , & Cahen, R. (2013). Dirty tangibleinterfaces: Expressive control of computers with true grit. In CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors inComputing Systems on (p. 2991�2994). Paris, France: ACM. Schnell, N. (2011). Real-time audio mosaicing. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://imtr.ircam.fr/imtr/Real-Time_Audio_Mosaicing. Schnell, N. (2013). Playing (with) sound�Of the animation of digitized sounds and their reenactment by playfulscenarios in the design of interactive audio applications (Doctoral Dissertation). Institute of Electronic Music andAcoustics, University of Music and Performing Arts Graz, Graz, Austria. Schnell, N. , Borghesi, R. , Schwarz, D. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Muller, R. (2005). FTM�Complex data structures forMax. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC). Barcelona, Spain. Schnell, N. , Röbel, A. , Schwarz, D. , Peeters, G. , & Borghesi, R. (2009). Mubu & friends�Assembling tools forcontent based real-time interactive audio processing in max/msp. In Proceedings of International ComputerMusic Conference (pp. 423�426). Montreal, Canada. Schnell, N. , & Schwarz, D. (2005). Gabor, multi-representation real-time analysis/synthesis. In Proceedings ofthe 8th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx�05) (pp. 121�126). Madrid, Spain: ETSI. Schwarz, D. (2007). Corpus-based concatenative synthesis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(2), 92�104. Schwarz, D. , Schnell, N. , & Gulluni, S. (2009). Scalability in content-based navigation of sound databases. InProceedings of ICMC2009 (pp. 13�16). Montreal, Canada. Tajadura-Jimenez, A. , Bianchi-Berthouze, N. , Furfaro, E. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2015). Sonification of surfacetapping changes behavior, surface perception, and emotion. MultiMedia, IEEE, 22(1), 48�57. Tanaka, A. , Caramiaux, B. , & Schnell, N. (2013). MubuFunkScatShare: Gestural energy and sharedinteractive music. In CHI �13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2999�3002).Paris, France: ACM. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. TheComputer Music Journal, 26(3), 11�22. Zatorre, R. J. , Chen, J. L. , & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory-motor interactionsin music perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547�558.

Designing for the Subtle Abromont, C. (2001). Guide de la théorie de la musique. Paris, France: Editions Henry Lemoine. Arfib, D. , Couturier, J. M. , & Kessous, L. (2005). Expressiveness and digital musical instrument design.Journal of New Music Research, Special Issue on Expressive Gesture in Performing Arts and New Media,34(1), 125�136. Bell, C. G. , Fujisaki, H. , Heinz, J. M. , Stevens, K. N. , & House, A. S. (1961). Reduction of speech spectra byAnalysis-by-Synthesis technique. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 33(12), 1725�1736. Bozkurt, B. , Couvreur, L. , & Dutoit, T. (2007). Chirp group delay analysis of speech signals. SpeechCommunications, 49(3), 159�176. d�Alessandro, N. , Babacan, O. , Bozkurt, B. , Dubuisson, T. , Holzapfel, A. , Kessous, L. ,� Vlieghe, M. (2008).Expressive voice analysis for real-time and accurate synthesis of singing. Journal on Multimodal UserInterfaces, 2(2), 133�144.

Page 146: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

d�Alessandro, N. , d�Alessandro, C. , Le Beux, S. , & Doval, B. (2006). Real-time CALM synthesizer: Newapproaches in hands-controlled voice synthesis. In N. Schnell & F. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 266�271). Paris, France: IRCAM. d�Alessandro, N. , & Dutoit, T. (2007). HandSketch bi-manual controller: Investigation on expressive controlissues of an augmented tablet. In C. Parkinson & E. Singer (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conferenceon New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 78�81). New York: New York University. d�Alessandro, N. , & Dutoit, T. (2009). Advanced techniques for vertical tablet playing: An overview of two yearsof practicing the HandSketch 1.x. In N. Schnell & F. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Proceedings of the InternationalConference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 173�174). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie MellonUniversity. d�Alessandro, N. , Ooge, C. , Dutoit, T. , & Fels, S. (2011). Analysis-by-performance: Gesturally-controlled voicesynthesis as an input for modeling of vibrato in singing. In P.-A. Tremblay & M. Adkins (Eds.) Proceedings ofthe International Computer Music Conference (pp. 189�196). Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield. Fels, S. (2000). Intimacy and embodiment: Implications for art and technology. In S. Ghandeharizadeh (Ed.),Proceedings of ACM Workshops on Multimedia (pp. 13�16). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Fels, S. (2001). Using radial basis functions to map hand gestures to speech. In R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain(Eds.), Radial Basis Function Networks 2, New Advances in Design (pp. 59�101). Heidelberg, Germany:Physica-Verlag. Feugère, L. , & d�Alessandro, C. (2014). Rule-based performative synthesis of sung syllables, In B. Caramiaux ,K. Tahiro�lu , R. Fiebrink , & A. Tananka (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfacesfor Musical Expression (pp. 86�87). London, UK: Goldsmiths University of London. Fiebrink, R. , Cook, P. R. , & Trueman, D. (2011). Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning.In D. Tan (Ed.), Proceedings of ACM CHI (pp. 147�156). Vancouver, BC: ACM SIGCHI. Greenberg, S. , Carpendale, S. , Marquardt, N. , & Buxton, B. (2011). Sketching user experiences: Theworkbook. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. Hommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen , W. Prinz , & G. Roth (Eds.),Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 34�48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 411 Hunt, A. , & Kirk, R. (2000). Mapping strategies for musical performance. Trends in Gestural Control ofMusic, 1, 231�258. Kessous, L. (2002). Bi-manual mapping experimentation, with angular fundamental frequency control andsound color navigation. In J. Paradiso & S. O�Modhrain (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference onNew Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 113�114). Dublin, Ireland: Media Lab Europe. Kjelland, J. (2004). Orchestral bowing: Style and function. Los Angeles, CA: Alfred Publishing Company. Leman, M. (1989). Introduction to models of musical communication and cognition. Interface�Journal of NewMusic Research, 18(1�2), 3�7. Liberman, A. M. (1970). Some characteristics of perception in the speech mode. Perception and Its Disorders,Cognitive Psychology, 2, 131�157. Liberman, A. M. , Cooper, F. S. , Shankweiler, D. P. , & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speechcode. Psychological Review, 74, 431�461. Lowry, D. (1986). Bokken: Art of the Japanese sword. Burbank, CA: Ohara Publications. Momeni, A. , & Wessel, D. (2003). Characterizing and controlling musical material intuitively with geometricmodels. In M. M. Wanderley , P. Depalle , & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conferenceon New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 54�62). Montreal, QC: McGill University. Moore, F. R. (1988). The dysfunctions of MIDI. Computer Music Journal, 12(1), 19�28. Newport, E. L. (1982). Task specificity in language learning? Evidence from speech perception in ASL. In E.Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: State of the art (pp. 450�485). Cambridge, MA: CambridgeUniversity Press. O�Regan, J. K. , & Noë, A. (2001). What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience.Synthese, 129(1), 79�103. Perrotin, O. , & d�Alessandro, C. (2014). Visualizing gestures in the control of a digital musical instrument. In B.Caramiaux , K. Tahiro�lu , R. Fiebrink , & A. Tananka (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference onNew Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 605�608). London, UK: Goldsmiths University of London. Pritchard, B. , & Fels, S. (2006). GRASSP: Gesturally-realized audio, speech and song performance. In N.Schnell & F. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 272�276). Paris, France: IRCAM. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. Roy, S. (2010). Step-by-Step guide to dance: Trisha Brown. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttp://www.theguardian.com. Sexton, R. B. , & Haussner, D. (1996). Method for the Theremin Bk. I. Austin, TX: Tactus Press. Titze, I. , & Story, B. (2002). A reflex resonance model of vocal vibrato. Journal of Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 111(5), 2272�2282. Traube, C. , & Depalle, P. (2004). Phonetic gestures underlying guitar timbre description. In S. D. Lipscomb , R.Ashley , R. O. Gjerdingen , & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Music Perceptionand Cognition (pp. 658�661). Evanston, IL: Causal Productions. Verfaille, V. , Guastavino, C. , & Depalle, P. (2005). Perceptual evaluation of vibrato models. In C. Traube & S.Lacasse (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (pp. 1�19). Montreal, QC:University of Montreal. Vincent, D. , Rosec, O. , & Chonavel, T. (2007). A new method for speech synthesis and transformation basedon an ARX-LF source-filter decomposition and HNM modeling. In K. J. Ray Liu & T. Reed (Eds.), Proceedingsof ICASSP (pp. 525�528). Honolulu, Hawaii: IEEE.

Page 147: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Wanderley, M. M. , Orio, N. , & Schnell, N. (2002). Evaluation of input devices for musical expression:Borrowing tools from HCI. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 62�76. Wright, M. , & Freed, A. (1997). Open sound control: A new protocol for communication with soundsynthesizers. In A. Bakalakos (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp.101�104). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University. Wright, M. , Wessel, D. , & Freed, A. (1997). New musical control structures from standard gestural controllers.In A. Bakalakos (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 387�390).Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University. Zbyszynski, M. , Wright, M. , Momeni, A. , & Cullen, D. (2007). Ten years of tablet musical interfaces atCNMAT. In C. Parkinson & E. Singer (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces forMusical Expression (pp. 100�105). New York: New York University.

Gestural Agency in Human�Machine Musical Interaction Altavilla, A. , Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Towards gestural sonic affordances. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 61�64). Daejeon, Republic of Korea:Graduate School of Culture Technology, KAIST. Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91�130. Arfib, D. , Couturier, J. M. , Kessous, L. , & Verfaille, V. (2002). Strategies of mapping between gesture dataand synthesis model parameters using perceptual spaces. Organised Sound, 7(2), 127�144. Armstrong, N. (2006). An enactive approach to digital musical instrument design (Doctoral Dissertation).Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download. Bown, O. , Eldridge, A. , & McCormack, J. (2009). Understanding interaction in contemporary digital music:From instruments to behavioural objects. Organised Sound, 14(2), 188�196. Cadoz, C. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2000). Gesture-music. In M. M. Wanderley & M. Battier (Eds.), Trends ingestural control of music (pp. 71�94). Paris, France: IRCAM�Centre Pompidou. Caramiaux, B. , Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2014). Mapping through listening. Computer MusicJournal, 38(3), 34�48. Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Machine learning of musical gestures. In Proceedings of the InternationalConference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 513�518). Daejeon, Republic of Korea: GraduateSchool of Culture Technology, KAIST. Chadabe, J. (2002). The limitations of mapping as a structural descriptive in electronic instruments. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 38�42). Dublin,Ireland. Choi, I. , Bargar, R. , & Goudeseune, C. (1995). A manifold interface for a high dimensional control space. InProceedings of the 1995 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 385�392). Banff, Canada: Banff Centerfor the Arts. Cox, A. (2011). Embodying music: Principles of the mimetic hypothesis. Music Theory Online, 17(2). Cumming, N. (2000). The sonic self: Musical subjectivity and signification. Bloomington, IA: Indiana UniversityPress. de Campo, A. (2014). Lose control, gain influence � Concepts for Metacontrol. In Proceedings of the 2014International Computer Music Conference, Athens, Greece (pp. 217�222). Di Scipio, A. (2003). �Sound is the interface�: From interactive to ecosystemic signal processing. OrganisedSound, 8(3), 269�277. Fabiani, M. , Friberg, A. , & Bresin, R. (2013). Systems for interactive control of computer generated musicperformance. In A. Kirke & E. Miranda (Eds.), Guide to computing for expressive music performance (pp.49�73). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. Fiebrink, R. , Trueman, D. , Britt, C. , Nagai, M. , Kaczmarek, K. , Early, M. , � Cook, P. (2010). Towardunderstanding human-computer interaction in composing the instrument. In Proceedings of the 2010International Computer Music Conference (pp. 135�142). New York, NY. Françoise, J. , Schnell, N. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2013). A multimodal probabilistic model for gesture-based controlof sound synthesis. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Barcelona, Spain(pp. 705�708). New York, NY: ACM. Godøy, R. I. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2010). Chunking in music by coarticulation. Acta Acustica Unitedwith Acustica, 96(4), 690�700. Gurevich, M. , & Treviño, J. (2007). Expression and its discontents: Toward an ecology of musical creation. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 106�111). New YorkCity, NY. Haga, E. (2008). Correspondences between music and body movement (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved fromhttps://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/26916. Haikonen, P. O. (2007). Robot brains: Circuits and systems for conscious machines. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & Sons. Hatten, R. (2012). Musical forces and agential energies: An expansion of Steve Larson�s model. Music TheoryOnline, 18(3). 419 Holland, O. (2007). A strongly embodied approach to machine consciousness. Journal of ConsciousnessStudies, 14(7), 97�110.

Page 148: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Hunt, A. , Kirk, R. , & Neighbour, M. (2004). Multiple media interfaces for music therapy. IEEE MultiMedia,11(3), 50�58. Hurley, S. L. (2002). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. M. , Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2009). Musical gestures. In R. I. Godøy & M.Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 12�35). New York, NY: Routledge. Kaipainen, M. , Ravaja, N. , Tikka, P. , Vuori, R. , Pugliese, R. , Rapino, M. , & Takala, T. (2011). Enactivesystems and enactive media: Embodied human-machine coupling beyond interfaces. Leonardo, 44(5), 433�438. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Levitin, D. J. , McAdams, S. , & Adams, R. L. (2002). Control parameters for musical instruments: A foundationfor new mappings of gesture to sound. Organised Sound, 7(2), 171�189. MacRitchie, J. , Buck, B. , & Bailey, N. J. (2013). Inferring musical structure through bodily gestures. MusicaeScientiae, 17(1), 86�108. Magnusson, T. (2010). Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems.Computer Music Journal, 34(4), 62�73. Matyja, J. R. , & Schiavio, A. (2013). Enactive music cognition: Background and research themes.Constructivist Foundations, 8(3), 351�357. Mazzola, G. , & Andreatta, M. (2007). Diagrams, gestures and formulae in music. Journal of Mathematics andMusic, 1(1), 23�46. McDermott, J. , Gifford, T. , Bouwer, A. , & Wagy, M. (2013). Should music interaction be easy?. In S. Holland(Ed.), Music and human-computer interaction (pp. 29�47). London, UK: Springer. Nakamura, J. , & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and thefoundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 239�263). Dordrecht,The Netherlands: Springer. Nijs, L. , Lesaffre, M. , & Leman, M. (2013). The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. InM. Castellengo , H. Genevois , & J.-M. Bardez (Eds.), Music and its instruments (pp. 467�484). Editions DelatourFrance. Robb, H. J. (2015). Imagined, supplemental sound in nineteenth-century piano music: Towards a fullerunderstanding of musical embodiment. Music Theory Online, 21(3). Schnell, N. , & Battier, M. (2002). Introducing composed instruments, technical and musicological implications.In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 156�160). Dublin,Ireland. Schwarz, D. (2012). The sound space as musical instrument: Playing corpus-based concatenative synthesis. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 250�253). AnnArbor, MI: University of Michigan. Simoens, V. , & Tervaniemi, M. (2013). Musician�instrument relationship as a candidate index for professionalwell-being in musicians. In R. Reiter-Palmen & P. Tinio (Eds.), Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and theArts, 7(2), 171�180. Smith, B. D. , & Garnett, G. E. (2012). Reinforcement learning and the creative, automated music improviser. InP. Machado , J. McDermott , & A. Carballal (Eds.), Evolutionary and biologically inspired music, sound, art anddesign (pp. 223�234). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Toiviainen, P. , Luck, G. , & Thompson, M. R. (2010). Embodied meter: Hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 59�70. Tubb, R. , & Dixon, S. (2015). An evaluation of multidimensional controllers for sound design tasks. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republicof Korea (pp. 47�56). New York, NY: ACM. Van Nort, D. (2011). Human: Machine: Human: Gesture, sound and embodiment. Kybernetes, 40(7/8),1179�1188. Van Nort, D. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Depalle, P. (2014). Mapping control structures for sound synthesis:Functional and topological perspectives. Computer Music Journal, 38(3), 6�22. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Gestural control of music. In International workshop human supervision and control inengineering and music, Kassel, Germany. Retrieved from http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/analyse-synthese/wanderle/pub/kassel/ Wanderley, M. M. , & Orio, N. (2002). Evaluation of input devices for musical expression: Borrowing tools fromHCI. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 62�76. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. ComputerMusic Journal, 26(3), 11�22. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive world: The next step. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zappi, V. , & McPherson, A. (2014). Dimensionality and appropriation in digital musical instrument design. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 455�460). London,United Kingdom: Goldsmiths, University of London.

Page 149: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Gestural Musical Performance with Physiological Sensors, Focusing on theElectromyogram Brouse, B. , Castet, A. , Filatriau, J. , Lehembre, J. J. , Noirhomme, R. , & Simon, Q. (2005). From biologicalsignals to music. In 2nd International Conference on Enactive Interfaces, Genoa Italy. Caramiaux, B. , Donnarumma, M. , & Tanaka, A. (2015). Understanding gesture expressivity through musclesensing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 21(6), 1�26. 428 De Luca, C. J. , & Van Dyk, E. J. (1975). Derivation of some parameters of myoelectric signals recordedduring sustained constant force isometric contractions. Biophysical Journal, 15(12), 1167�1180. Donnarumma, M. (2011). Xth sense: A study of muscle sounds for an experimental paradigm of musicalperformance. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2011 (pp. 243�248). Huddersfield,UK: University of Huddersfield. Donnarumma, M. , Caramiaux, B. , & Tanaka, A. (2013). Body and space: Combining modalities for musicalexpression. In Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI). Barcelona, Spain: ACM. Eaton, M. L. (1974). Bio-music. Chelsea, NY: Something Else Press. Hermens, H. J. , Freriks, B. , Disselhorst-Klug, C. , & Rau, G. (2000). Development of recommendations forSEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 10(5),361�374. Hofmann, D. , Jiang, N. , Vujaklija, I. , & Farina, D. (2016). Bayesian filtering of surface EMG for accuratesimultaneous and proportional prosthetic control. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and RehabilitationEngineering, 24(12), 1333�1341. Hunt, A. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2003). Mapping performer parameters to synthesis engines. Organised Sound,7(2), 97�108. Knapp, R. B. , & Lusted, H. S. (1988). Biomuse: Musical performance generated by human bioelectric signals.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(S1), S179. Marrin, T. , & Picard, R. (1998). The �Conductors Jacket�: A device for recording expressive musical gestures. InProceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 215�219). Ann Arbor, MI: MichiganPublishing. Nagashima, Y. (2003). Bio-sensing systems and bio-feedback systems for interactive media arts. In F. Thibault(Ed.), New Interfaces for Musical Expression Conference (pp. 48�53). Montreal, Canada. Ortiz, M. (2012). A brief history biosignal-driven art: From biofeedback to biophysical performance. eContact!,14(2). Phinyomark, A. , Quaine, F. , Charbonnier, S. , Serviere, C. , Tarpin-Bernard, F. , & Laurillau, Y. (2013). EMGfeature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness. Expert Systems with Applications,40(12), 4832�4840. Rosenboom, D. (1976). Biofeedback and the arts: Results of early experiments. Vancouver, Canada: AestheticResearch Centre of Canada, A.R.C. Saponas, T. S. , Tan, D. S. , Morris, D. , Balakrishnan, R. , Turner, J. , & Landay, J. A. (2009). Enabling always-available input with muscle-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on UserInterface Software and Technology (pp. 167�176). Victoria, Canada: ACM. Silang Maranan, D. , Fdili Alaoui, S. , Schiphorst, T. , Pasquier, P. , Subyen, P. , & Bartram, L. (2014).Designing for movement: Evaluating computational models using LMA effort qualities. In Proceedings of the32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 991�1000). Toronto, Canada:ACM. Tanaka, A. , & Fistre, J. (2008). Method and apparatus for analysing gestures produced in free space, e.g. forcommanding apparatus by gesture recognition. Unites States Patent. Tanaka, A. , & Knapp, R. B. (2016). Multimodal interaction in music using the electromyogram and relativeposition sensing. In M. Lyons & A. R. Jensenius (Eds.), A NIME reader (pp. 39�51). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Ward, N. , Ortiz, M. , Bernardo, F. , & Tanaka, A. (2016). Designing and measuring gesture using labanmovement analysis and electromyogram. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference onPervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (pp. 995�1000). ACM.

Sonic Microinteraction in �the Air� Ashbrook, D. L. (2007). Supporting mobile microinteractions (Doctoral Dissertation). Georgia Institute ofTechnology, Atlanta. Baars, B. J. (1993). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Collins, J. J. , & De Luca, C. J. (1994). Random walking during quiet standing. Physical Review Letters, 73(5),764. Di Scipio, A. (2003). �Sound is the interface�: From interactive to ecosystemic signal processing. OrganisedSound, 8(3), 269�277. Dobrian, C. , & Bevilacqua, F. (2003). Gestural control of music using the Vicon 8 motion capture system. In M.M. Wanderley , R. McKenzie , & L. Ostiguy (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on NewInterfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 161�163). Montreal, Canada: McGill University. Ekman, P. , & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavioral categories. Semiotica, 1(1), 49�98. Godøy, R. I. (2001). Imagined action, excitation, and resonance. In R. I. Godøy & H. Jørgensen (Eds.), Musicalimagery (pp. 237�250). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Page 150: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press ofHarvard University Press. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2006). Music and gesture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Gritten, A. , & King, E. (Eds.). (2011). New perspectives on music and gesture. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Hermann, T. , Hunt, A. , & Neuhoff, J. G. (2011). The sonification handbook. Berlin, Germany: Logos. Jensenius, A. R. (2013). An action-sound approach to teaching interactive music. Organised Sound, 18(2),178�189. Jensenius, A. R. (2014). To gesture or not? An analysis of terminology. In B. Caramiaux , K. Tahiroglu , R.Fiebrink , & A. Tanaka (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 217�220). London, UK: Goldsmiths, University of London. Jensenius, A. R. , & Bjerkestrand, K. A. V. (2012). Exploring micromovements with motion capture andsonification. In A. L. Brooks (Ed.), Arts and technology: Revised selected papers (vol. 101 of LNICST, pp.100�107). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Jensenius, A. R. , Bjerkestrand, K. A. V. , & Johnson, V. (2014). How still is still? Exploring human standstill forartistic applications. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 7(2/3), 207�222. Jensenius, A. R. , Nymoen, K. , Skogstad, S. , & Voldsund, A. (2012). A study of the noise level in two infraredmarker�based motion-capture systems. In S. Serafin & D. Overholt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sound and MusicComputing Conference (pp. 258�263). Copenhagen, Denmark: Aalborg University. Jensenius, A. R. , Wanderley, M. M. , Godøy, R. I. , & Leman, M. (2010). Musical gestures: Concepts andmethods in research. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp.12�35). New York, NY: Routledge. Jones, R. , Driessen, P. , Schloss, A. , & Tzanetakis, G. (2009). A force-sensitive surface for intimate control. InN. Zahler , R. B. Dannenberg , & T. Sullivan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on NewInterfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 236�241). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Laeng, B. , & Teodorescu, D. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of thesame visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 207�231. Lamb, R. , & Robertson, A. (2011). Seaboard: A new piano keyboard-related interface combining discrete andcontinuous control. In A. R. Jensenius , A. Tveit , R. I. Godøy , & D. Overholt (Eds.), Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 503�506). Oslo, Norway: University ofOslo. Loram, I. D. , & Lakie, M. (2002). Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: Theintrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability. Journal of Physiology, 545(3), 1041�1053. Loy, G. (1985). Musicians make a standard: The MIDI phenomenon. Computer Music Journal, 9(4), 8�26. 437 Martinez-Conde, S. , & Macknik, S. L. (2007). Windows on the mind. Scientific American, 297(2), 56�63. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Moore, F. R. (1988). The dysfunctions of MIDI. Computer Music Journal, 12(1), 19�28. Oulasvirta, A. , Tamminen, S. , Roto, V. , & Kuorelahti, J. (2005). Interaction in 4-second bursts: Thefragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In W. Kellogg , S. Zhai , G. van der Veer , & C. Gale(Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 919�928). NewYork, NY: ACM. Pulkki, V. (1997). Virtual sound source positioning using vector base amplitude panning. Journal of the AudioEngineering Society, 45(6), 456�466. Roads, C. (2004). Microsound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Schnell, N. , Borghesi, R. , Schwarz, D. , Bevilacqua, F. , & Müller, R. (2005). FTM�Complex data structures forMax. In X. Serra (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 9�12).Barcelona, Spain: International Computer Music Association. Serafin, S. (2004). The sound of friction: Real-time models, playability and musical applications (DoctoralDissertation). Stanford University. Skogstad, S. , Jensenius, A. R. , & Nymoen, K. (2010). Using IR optical marker based motion capture forexploring musical interaction. In K. Beilharz , B. Bongers , A. Johnston , & S. Ferguson (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 407�410). Sydney, Australia:University of Technology, Sydney. Verplank, B. , Gurevich, M. , & Mathews, M. (2002). The plank: Designing a simple haptic controller. In B.Gillespie , M. Gurevich , & S. O�Modhrain (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on NewInterfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 177�180). Dublin, Ireland: MIT Media Lab Europe. Wanderley, M. M. , & Battier, M. (Eds.). (2000). Trends in gestural control of music. Paris, France:IRCAM�Centre Pompidou. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. ComputerMusic Journal, 26(3), 11�22. Wright, M. , Freed, A. , & Momeni, A. (2003). Opensound control: State of the art 2003. In M. M. Wanderley , R.McKenzie , & L. Ostiguy (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for MusicalExpression (pp. 153�159). Montreal, Canada: McGill University.

Page 151: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Embodied Cognition and Digital Musical Instruments Bevilacqua, F. , Müller, R. , & Schnell, N. (2005). MnM: A Max/MSP mapping toolbox. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 85�88). Vancouver, Canada: Universityof British Columbia. Bowers, J. , & Archer, P. (2005). Not hyper, not meta, not cyber but infra-instruments. In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 5�10). Vancouver, Canada: University ofBritish Columbia. Buxton, B. (1997). Artists and the art of the luthier. Computer Graphics: The SIGGRAPH Quarterly, 31(1), 10�11. Cariou, B. (1994). The aXiO MIDI controller. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference(pp. 163�166). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association. Chadabe, J. (2002). The limitations of mapping as a structural descriptive in electronic instruments. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 38�42). Dublin,Ireland: Media Lab Europe. Clarke, E. F. (1988). Generative principles in music performance. In J. A. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processesin music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 1�26). Oxford, UK: ClarendonPress. Cook, P. R. (2001). Principles for designing computer music controllers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHIWorkshop on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 3�6). Seattle, WA: ACM. de Laubier, S. (1998). The meta-instrument. Computer Music Journal, 22(1), 25�29. Dobrian, C. , & Koppelman, D. (2006). The �E� in NIME: Musical expression with new computer interfaces. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 277�282). Paris,France: IRCAM. Edgar, R. (1993). Ray Edgar�Sweatstick. In M. Waisvisz , J. Ryan , & N. Collins (Eds.), STEIM: dezoetgevooisde BLIKSEM (p. 18). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: STEIM. Fiebrink, R. , & Cook, P. (2009). Play-along mapping of musical controllers. In Proceedings of the InternationalComputer Music Conference (pp. 61�64). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association. Ghazala, R. (2005). Circuit bending: Build your own alien instruments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Gurevich, M. , Stapleton, P. , & Marquez-Borbon, A. (2010). Style and constraint in electronic musicalinstruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp.106�111). Sydney, Australia: University of Technology Sydney. Jacob, R. J. K. , Sibert, L. E. , McFarlane, D. C. , & Mullen, M. P. J. (1994). Integrality and separability of inputdevices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1), 3�26. Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Mackay, W. (1990). Users and customizable software: A co-adaptive phenomenon (Ph.D. Thesis).Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. Malloch, J. (2013). A framework and tools for mapping of digital musical instruments (Ph.D. Thesis). McGillUniversity, Canada. Malloch, J. , Birnbaum, D. , Sinyor, E. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2006). Towards a new conceptual framework fordigital musical instruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (pp. 49�52).Montreal, Canada: McGill University. Malloch, J. , Sinclair, S. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2015). Distributed tools for interactive design of heterogeneoussignal networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(15), 5683�5707. Malloch, J. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2007). The T-Stick: From musical interface to musical instrument. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 66�69). New York:New York University. Mann, S. (2007). Natural interfaces for musical expression: Physiphones and a physics-based organology. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 118�123). New York,NY: New York University. 447 Medeiros, C. B. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2014). A comprehensive review of sensors and instrumentationmethods in devices for musical expression. Sensors, 14, 13556�13591. Miranda, E. R. , & Wanderley, M. M. (2006). New digital instruments: Control and interaction beyond thekeyboard. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions. Morreale, F. , De Angeli, A. , & O�Modhrain, S. (2014). Musical interface design: An experience-orientedframework. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp.467�472). London, UK: Goldsmiths, University of London. Mulder, A. G. E. (1998). Design of virtual three-dimensional instruments for sound control (Ph.D. Thesis).Simon Fraser University, Canada. Overholt, D. (2009). The musical interface technology design space. Organised Sound, 14(2), 217�226. Pressing, J. (1990). Cybernetic issues in interactive performance systems. Computer Music Journal, 14(1),12�25. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitiveengineering. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Inc. Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In M. C. Stone (Ed.),Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 25�34).New York, NY: ACM. Roads, C. , & Mathews, M. (1980). An interview with Max Mathews. Computer Music Journal, 4(4), 15�22. Rovan, J. B. , Wanderley, M. M. , & Battier, M. (2000). Round table: Electronic controllers in music performanceand composition. In M. M. Wanderley & M. Battier (Eds.), Trends in gestural control of music (pp. 415�438).Paris, France: IRCAM.

Page 152: THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION - Ghent University · The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction captures a new paradigm in the study of music interaction, as a wave of recent

Rowe, R. (1993). Interactive music systems�Machine listening and composing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stewart, D. A. , & Malloch, J. (2010). The 2010 T-Stick composition workshops. [Web site]. Retrieved fromhttp://tcw2010.wordpress.com/ Vercoe, B. L. (1984). The synthetic performer in the context of live performance. In Proceedings of theInternational Computer Music Conference (pp. 199�200). San Francisco, CA: International Computer MusicAssociation. von Hornbostel, E. M. , & Sachs, C. (1961). Classification of musical instruments. The Galpin Society Journal,14, 3�29. Wanderley, M. M. (2001). Performer-instrument interaction: Applications to gestural control of sound synthesis(Ph.D. Thesis). Ircam�Université Paris 6, France. Wessel, D. , & Wright, M. (2002). Problems and prospects for intimate control of computers. Computer MusicJournal, 26(3), 11�22. Zappi, V. , & McPherson, A. P. (2014). Dimensionality and appropriation in digital musical instrument design. InProceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 455�460). London,UK: Goldsmiths, University of London.