the use of creative commons licenses
DESCRIPTION
send an e-mail to "[email protected]" to have the new-version paper or download the old-version at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/drmwpaper/2011-26.htmTRANSCRIPT
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses inCultural Contents
Production and Distribution
Massimiliano [email protected]
EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
March, 2012
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
The Technological Shock
The technological shock, caused by New Technologies and theInternet:
introduces digital goods, that seems to be similar tocommon goods (non-rival and non-excluable)
allows new actors to across the economic and technicalbarriers and to create new contents (“Open Video”)
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
Formal Institution
All organization structures are based on Formal Institutions:
understandable
accepted
shared
Creative Commons licenses represent the Formal Institution
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
Creative Commons licenses
These licenses allow creators to communicate which rights theyreserve, and which rights they waive for the benefit of recipients orother creators
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
Licenses
1 Attribution alone (by)
2 Attribution + Non-commercial (by-nc)
3 Attribution + NoDerivs (by-nd)
4 Attribution + ShareAlike (by-sa)
5 Attribution + Non-comm. + NoDerivs (by-nc-nd)
6 Attribution + Non-comm. + ShareAlike (by-nc-sa)
7 (Public Domain) (PD)
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
Motivations to contribute
Extrinsic Motivation
Monetary
administrative commands (Valentinov, 2007)
money (Valentinov, 2007)
Non-Monetary
reputation (Lerner and Tirole, 2002)
career concerning (Lerner and Tirole, 2002)
peer recognition (Lerner and Tirole, 2002)
sharing innovation (Harloff et al., 2003)
Intrinsic Motivation
activity itself (Lakhani and Wolf, 2005; Valentinov 2007)
ego motivation (Lerner and Tirole, 2002; Lakhani and Wolf 2005)
solve particular need (von Hippel, 1988, 2005; Johnson, 2002)
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
The extrinsic non-monetary and intrinsic motivations compensatefor a lower salary and incentivise volunteering and donations
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Introduction
For-Profituses monetary motivations
Non-Profitbenefits from extrinsic non-monetary and intrinsic motivations(Valentinov, 2007)
attracts community interest and contributions (Belleflamme et
al., 2011; Lambert and Schwienbacher, 2010; Stewart et al., 2006)
Informalnot organized
they do not have monetary ressourcesthey are not abre to use extrinsic non-monetary and intrinsicmotivations
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
results
Hypothesis 1
H1 For-Profit creators tend to use a high degree of openness inboth production and diffusion
Because of their legal status they are not able to attractinterest and contribution from community
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
results
Hypothesis 2
H2 Non-Profit creators tend to use a high degree of opennessonly in diffusion
Because of their legal status they are already able to attractinterest and contribution from the community
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
results
Hypothesis 3
H3 Informal creators tend to use a low degree of openness only indiffusion
Because they need to attract interest and contribution fromthe community, but they still keep the possibility tocommercialize the content
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Constructing The Sample
The Internet Archive
Creation of Original Database of video in CC from IA
Investigation in February 2010
Why IA? Because of CC advices (web and tool)
I drop items:
because of not detailed informations (license/creator/year)created before the 2003 (because the first CC was used inDecember 2002)
Total items analyzed: 999
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Constructing The Sample
Degree Openness in CC licenses
Degree of Openness Production Diffusion
Maximum PD PDCC by CC by
Medium CC by-sa CC by-saCC by-nc CC by-nd
CC by-nc-sa
Minimum CC by-nd CC by-ncCC by-nd-nc CC by-nc-sa
CC by-nc-nd
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Constructing The Sample
Variables
OpenProdDeg. The degree of openness in production
OpenDiffDeg. The degree of openness in production
Informal. This dummy variable checks the absence of legal stat.
For-profit. This dummy variable checks the FP legal status
Non-profit. This dummy variable checks the NP legal status
Public. This dummy variable checks if is a PA
...Public Administrations tend to use the higter degree of openness, beacuse of law
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Impact of Legal Status on Openness in Produciton
Table: Ordered Logistic Regression and Marginal Effects Results (1)
(Dep. Var.) (Marginal Effects)OpenProdDeg Maximum Medium Minimum
Informal (d) -1.085∗∗∗ -0.231∗∗∗ 0.0611∗∗∗ 0.170∗∗∗
(0.158) (0.0292) (0.0110) (0.0305)
For Profit (d) -0.609∗∗∗ -0.135∗∗∗ 0.0443∗∗∗ 0.0904∗∗∗
(0.138) (0.0289) (0.00884) (0.0230)
Non Profit (d) -1.370∗∗∗ -0.262∗∗∗ 0.0159 0.246∗∗∗
(0.241) (0.0334) (0.0259) (0.0551)N 999 999 999 999Log lik. -989.3 -989.3 -989.3 -989.3Chi-squared 67.28 67.28 67.28 67.28p 1.64e-14 1.64e-14 1.64e-14 1.64e-14
Marginal effects; Standard errors in parentheses
(d) for discrete change of dummy variable from 0 to 1∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001
Public is dopped to avoid the multicollinearity problem
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Impact of Legal Status on Openness in Produciton
For-Profit and Informal tend to adopt a degree of openness in production highter that Non-Profit
This supports H1, H2 and H3
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Impact of Legal Status on Openness in Diffusion
Table: Ordered Logistic Regression and Marginal Effects Results (2)
(Dep. Var.) (Marginal Effects)OpenDiffDeg Maximum Medium Minimum
Informal (d) -1.233∗∗∗ -0.259∗∗∗ 0.0693∗∗∗ 0.190∗∗∗
(0.166) (0.0292) (0.0126) (0.0329)
For Profit (d) -0.760∗∗∗ -0.166∗∗∗ 0.0548∗∗∗ 0.111∗∗∗
(0.147) (0.0296) (0.00907) (0.0256)
Non Profit (d) -0.830∗∗∗ -0.174∗∗∗ 0.0441∗∗∗ 0.130∗∗∗
(0.183) (0.0334) (0.00909) (0.0350)N 999 999 999 999Log lik. -983.5 -983.5 -983.5 -983.5Chi-squared 68.76 68.76 68.76 68.76p 7.88e-15 7.88e-15 7.88e-15 7.88e-15
Marginal effects; Standard errors in parentheses
(d) for discrete change of dummy variable from 0 to 1∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001
Public is dopped to avoid the multicollinearity problem
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Impact of Legal Status on Openness in Diffusion
For-Profit and Non-Profit tends to adopt a high degree of openness in diffusion higher than Informal
This supports H1, H2 and H3
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Hypotheses
Hypothesis 1 is confirmedFor-Profit creators are more likely to adopt a high degree ofopenness in both production and diffusionWe interpret this founding as the result of the intent:
to be more attractive sharing the control of the productionprocess and than to benefit from contribution of people whoare motivated by extrinsic non-monetary and intrinsicmotivationsto maximize the diffusion in order to increase the contributions
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Hypotheses
Hypothesis 2 is confirmedNon-Profit creators are more likely to adopt a high degree ofopenness only in diffusionWe interpret this founding as the result of the intent:
to maximize only the diffusion in order to increase thecontributions, because they are already able to attractcommunity contribution because of their legal status
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Hypotheses
Hypothesis 3 is confirmedInformal creators:
production: tend to adopt a degree of openness less open thanFor-Profit, but more open than Non-Profitdiffusion: tend to adopt a low degree of openness
We interpret this founding as the result of the intent:
to share part of the production process to attract contributorskeep the diffusion process to commercialize
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution
Background Hypotheses Database Analysis Conclusions
Merci!
Thank youfor your attention!
Comments? Questions?
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA
EconomiX, University Paris [email protected]
This document is under Creative Commons license 3.0 Attribution -
*picture undercc-by-nd 2.0
Massimiliano GAMBARDELLA [email protected] EconomiX, University Paris Ouest
The Use of Creative Commons Licenses in Cultural Contents Production and Distribution