theoretical framework science & values

29
Theoretical Framework Science & Values Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University

Upload: penha

Post on 16-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Theoretical Framework Science & Values. Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University. Questions. How should special educators make decisions about choosing practices to support student needs? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Theoretical FrameworkScience & Values

Chris Borgmeier, PhDPortland State University

Page 2: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Questions• How should special educators make decisions about choosing

practices to support student needs?

• Why are research, theoretical frameworks and data each important for guiding decision making and choosing professional practices in special education?

• How does research inform practice?

• How do I identify research based practices when I need interventions for a student challenge?

Page 3: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Research Based Theoretical Framework

• What if there isn’t really a research-based curriculum or intervention for the individual needs of my student?– No random control trials; no group research– Look to single case research

• Application of Research Based Principles• Grounding in a sound theoretical framework

Page 4: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Positivism• Positivism  is a rejection of superstition. It is the practice of empirical science. The

goal of knowledge is to describe the phenomena experienced – observe and measure. The universe is deterministic.

• Understood through a methodology of careful observation and experiments that are repeatable. We learn through the Scientific Method – Deductive – postulate theories that we can test EMPIRICALLY

• Primary Method(s): Experimentation. The methodology can be manipulation, hypothesis testing, data gathering, etc. Positivism is mostly quantitative, but qualitative methods can be used to generate hypothesis.

• Ontology: Naïve realism –there are universal laws. A thing can be true regardless of context such as time or place. The researcher attempts to be value-free, the research is pure and for it’s own value, facts and values are kept separate. However, the results can be used to promote change.

Page 5: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Post-positivism

• Post-positivism rejects the central tenets of positivism. • Primary Method(s):Modified experiment/manipulation.

The researcher attempts to falsify his or her hypothesis (not prove, proof is always elusive), mostly quantitative, but qualitative research can be used to generate hypothesis and guide new quantitative measures.

• Ontology: Critical realism – all observation is fallible and has error and all theory can be revised.

Page 6: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Constructivism• Constructivism, Many post-positivists are constructivists who believe

that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation are fallible, our constructions must be imperfect.

• Ontology: Relativism – no universal laws or absolute truths, reality is constructed. Because research is bound by the context all people’s values are important to the process because this informs the research.

• Social constructivism or socioculturalism encourages the learner to arrive at his or her version of the truth, influenced by his or her background, culture or embedded worldview.

• It is argued that the responsibility of learning should reside increasingly with the learner (Glasersfeld, 1989).

Page 7: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Learning TheoriesBehaviorist & Constructivist

Page 8: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Constructivism as a Learning Theory

• “Discovery Learning” or “Experiential Learning” - learning involves constructing one's own knowledge from one's own experiences

• Promotes a student's free exploration within a given framework or structure

• Teacher acts as a facilitator who encourages students to discover principles for themselves and to construct knowledge by working to solve realistic problems.

Page 9: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Constructivism: What the researchers say

• Based on the results of their research, these authors do not support the idea of allowing novices to interact with constructivist learning environments contexts – Paas, 1992; Moreno & Mayer, 1999; Mousavi, Low, & Sweller,

1995; Chandler and Sweller, 1992; Sweller & Cooper, 1985; Cooper & Sweller, 1987

• Ill-structured learning environments rely on the learner to discover problem solutions. Novices should be taught with "well-structured" learning environments.– Jonassen, 1997

Page 10: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

• After a half century of advocacy associated with instruction using minimal guidance, there appears no body of research supporting the technique. In so far as there is any evidence from controlled studies, it almost uniformly supports direct, strong instructional guidance rather constructivist-based minimal guidance during the instruction of novice to intermediate learners. Even for students with considerable prior knowledge, strong guidance while learning is most often found to be equally effective as unguided approaches. Not only is unguided instruction normally less effective; there is also evidence that it may have negative results when student acquire misconceptions or incomplete or disorganized knowledge”

– Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.a

Constructivism: What the researchers say

Page 11: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Behavioral or Learning TheoryAssumptions of Behavioral Theory• Behavior is Learned• Focus on the observable and measurable• Behavior is related to the environment in which it occurs• Behavior serves a purpose• Focus on how environmental variables can be manipulated to effect changes in

behavior & learning• Measure student outcomes & learning

• Educational approaches that have emerged from behaviorism include:– applied behavior analysis– Functional assessment– curriculum based measurement and progress monitoring, and– Direct instruction have emerged from this model– Discrete Trial Training– Modeling, shaping, fading, reinforcement, contract, extinction, etc.

Page 12: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

RTI & SW-PBIS

Effective Instruction PBS

Conceptual Foundations

Behaviorism

ABA

Laws of Behavior

Applied Behavioral Technology

Social Validity

All Students

Page 13: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Fad or Fact?Individualization x Learning Styles

The term learning styles refers to the view that different people learn information in different ways. Visual learners Auditory learners Kinesthetic learners

Page 14: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer & Bjork, 2008

The learning-styles view has acquired great influence within the education field, and is frequently encountered at levels ranging from kindergarten to graduate school.

There is a thriving industry devoted to publishing learning-styles tests and guidebooks for teachers, and many organizations offer professional development workshops for teachers and educators built around the concept of learning styles.

Page 15: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer & Bjork, 2008

“Although the literature on learning styles is enormous, very few studies have even used an experimental methodology capable of testing the validity of learning styles applied to education. Moreover, of those that did use an appropriate method, several found results that flatly contradict the popular meshing hypothesis. “

“We conclude therefore, that at present, there is no adequate evidence base to justify incorporating learning styles assessments into general educational practice."

Page 16: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Arter & Jenkins, 1977

Conducted a Research Review & practitioner survey re: “Learning Styles”

• "In spite of the absence of evidence that supports modality instructional matching, textbooks urge teachers to adopt this approach, and the majority of special education teachers believe in and employ this model.“

• “no one has successfully demonstrated that beginning reading instruction can be improved by modality and instructional matching” 

Page 17: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

INDIVIDUALIZATIONPSU SPED Critical Concept

A systematic and collaborative process to develop and adapt environments, supports and instruction to individual needs.

Individual considerations include the strengths, cultural and family contexts, preferences and priorities of the learner and family.

Page 18: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Response To Intervention (RTI)

Learning Disability v. Instructional Disability

Want to rule out instruction as cause for disability Assess Learning & Environment Other factors:

attendance

Page 19: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Necessary components of Assessment

When a student is experiencing difficulty, several related & complementary types of assessment should be performed

1) Assessment of the Learner (Student)

2) Assessment of Instruction (or Intervention) Curriculum and Environment

LearnerInstruction/ InterventionCurriculumEnvironment

Page 20: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Instructional Disability v. Learning Disability

The INSTRUCTION a student has received is assessed to determine whether the student’s difficulties stem from inadequate curriculum or teaching (Instructional Disability)

When instruction is found to be inadequate, the student should be given appropriate instruction to see whether it alleviates the difficulty

When appropriate instruction fails to remediate the difficulty, further assessment of the student is carried out to determine if there is a Learning Disability

Page 21: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Criteria: Double Deficit

The student is significantly below grade level when compared to grade peers

The student is not making progress toward the benchmark according to the progress monitor data (i.e., flat trajectory)

Page 22: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Instructional Challenge

For instruction to be effective, it must be possible for the learner, with reasonable effort, to master the information (facts, skills, behavior, or processes) being taught

1) Unchallenging Content teaching what is already known

2) Appropriately Challenging Content3) Overly Challenging Content

Page 23: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Individualization

What does individualization mean for a student who:

a) Is exceeding grade level and has no behavioral problems (mainstream student)

b) Is 4 grade levels behind in reading (6th grade student reading at a 2nd grade level; learning disability: reading)

c) Is at grade level academically but has significant behavioral problems

d) Is in 6th grade w/ significant cognitive deficits (IQ = 65); limited functional living skills (e.g. does not dress, clean or toilet independently)

Page 24: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Phases of Learning/TeachingAlberto & Troutman, 2009

• Acquisition – student’s ability to perform a newly learned skill/response to some criterion of accuracy

• Fluency – describe the rate at which students accurately perform a response; learner begins to build speed & efficiency in use of the skill or knowledge (but may not remember skill/knowledge over time without prompting)

• Maintenance – student is able to recall & use the skill/ knowledge with a high rate of accuracy over more extended spans of time with limited review

• Generalization – student generalizes skill or knowledge to novel contexts and as prior knowledge for learning new information

Page 25: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Acquisition Phase

• Acquisition – student’s ability to perform a newly learned skill/response to some criterion of accuracy– Strong use of reinforcers– Regular prompting & error correction– Modeling & Guided practice

• Model-Lead-Test/Model-Prompt-Check/I do-We do-You do

• Important to have critical background knowledge & prerequisite skills

A-B-C

Page 26: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Fluency• Following skill acquisition -- focus on

improving the RATE at which the learner performs the behavior

• What is an appropriate rate required for functional performance?– Reading, bus money, small talk, etc.

• Teaching Strategies– Frequent structured practice– Fading to intermittent reinforcementA-B-C

Page 27: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Maintenance

• Once learners can perform a skill fluently, it is important to maintain the skill over time– What

• Teaching Strategies– Make sure you are teaching functional/useful skills– Student access to natural reinforcers– Over-learning– Delayed reinforcement A-B-C

Page 28: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Generalization• Learners can use skill across settings other than the initial

instructional conditions– Train for generalization v. Train & Hope

• Teaching Strategies– Vary training across (Antecedent stimuli):

• Settings• People• Signals/Prompt types

– Teach the universe of examples– Intermittent reinforcement w/ link to natural reinforcers (Consequences)– Reinforce occurrences of generalization– Reinforce response across settingsA-B-C

Page 29: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Reinforcement Continuum & Phases of Teaching

Stages of Learning/TeachingAcquisition Fluency Maintenance

Continuous Intermittent…………fading…Rates of Review & Reinforcement

Continuous – provide reinforcement/corrective feedback on every occurrence of behavior – reinforcement may be tangible paired w/ verbal praise

Intermittent – fade tangible, continue w/ intermittent verbal praiseCan usually anticipate that academic success or social benefits

will continue to maintain desired behavior.

A-B-C