theory revision-mid term hrmt
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
1/123
Revision for Midterm
Purpose of the session:
To revise the theories and concepts that we have done
so far so that these can be applied in the midtermexamination.
To clarify doubts.
To give an overview of the midterm examinationpattern based on single decision case and multiplequestions that lead to decisions.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
2/123
Organization
Vision,
Mission
Strategy
Corporate
Business
Functional
Op, Fin,
Mktg, HR
STRUC-
TURE
Simple
Hierarchy
Flat
Adhocracy
Matrix
Team
SYSTEM
(Simple,
complex,
open,
close)
Mktg, Fin
HR, Ops,
MIS (ALSO
CALLEDFUNCTION
S/DEPT)
PROCESS
Output
Outcomes
Tasks
Job
Planning
Organizing
Staffing
Directing/Leading
Controlling
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
3/123
Competent people, business
(Rect & selection)
SCHEMA OF HPWS
PM Process
Reward
Learning & devpprocess
PM Process (clear goals,
resources to achieve
goals, transparency, well
rounded, fair.
Reward process(competitive rate,
equity, fairness,
sufficiency, flexible
Motivation process,
work environment,equity, challenge,
independence,
coworkers, empathy etc.
other factors seen in
various theories
Learning & devp
process(Future growth-
progress and
prosperity
L
E
A
D
E
R
S
H
I
P
High output, compadvantage
M
O
T
I
V
A
T
I
O
N
L
EA
D
E
R
S
HI
P
M
OT
I
V
A
T
IO
N
Envi
ron
and
Mkt
forc
es
Environ & Mkt forces
Environ&M
ktforces
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
4/123
Explanatory Notes: HPWS has R&S, PM, Reward, Motivation and L&D as it
processes. If you look it closely you will find that each of them is a system (e.g.
R&S system, PM system). Together they create the HPWS. HPWS operates in the
environment or market forces and hence the ext forces analysis. You can create
the HPWS based on your str and weaknesses and hence the SWOT. The ext and
int environment analysis is best done by asking its impact (so what ?) to the
problem at hand or the objective of the analysis. It is a good idea to use the
TOWS matrix used for strategy formulation (ref Koontz). Leadership impacts allprocesses. Often good leadership can pull off bad systems and vice versa. Hence
if you want to analyze a system, you are really looking at one of these. If you
have the theoretical framework on each of these, it is so much the easier to
analyze because the factors will flow automatically and then your SWOT can be
well fitted into a framework that can be analyzed. A diary with these theoretical
frameworks is a good idea. As the course progress, you will find the complexity
increasing. Diary helps to increase the speed of analysis.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
5/123
Recruitment and selection
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
6/123
Factors to be considered
Internal Factors Recruitment policy
Human resources planning
Size of the firm
Cost of recruitment Growth and expansion
External Factors Supply and demand
Labor market
Image and good will
Political, social and legal environment
Unemployment rate
Competitor
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
7/123
Human capital Theory(from Resource based theory)
5 portfolios of human capital (hc)
1. General hc
2. Strategic hc3. Industry hc
4. Relationship hc
5. Company specific hc
Most Portable
Least Portable
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
8/123
General Human Capital
Gather, cultivate and deploy financial,
technical and HR.
Leadership and DM.
Functional area expertise.
These are highly portable.
Develop skill to interact with external agencies
that affect work.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
9/123
Strategic HC
E xpertise gained in specific strategic
situations
Maneuvering in cyclic market. Driving growth
Cutting cost.
Translates well into other similar situations.
Hence highly portable.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
10/123
Industry HC
Technical, regulatory, customer and supplier
knowledge specific to industry.
Useful in the same industry but not across it. E.g. expertise in medical business not portable
to other business, expertise in handling large
business clients not portable to retail.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
11/123
Relationship HC
Moving with other team members can be
portable.
Solo players have to develop this in the newenvironment. This requires time.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
12/123
Company specific HC
Knowledge about routines, procedures,
culture, informal system, structure, process
unique to the company.
Least portable.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
13/123
Idealcandidate traced to HC theory(usea matrix)
GEN/INDL hc STRAT hc INDUSTRY hc RELATION hc FIRM
SPECIFIC hc
Recommended that you makeas single matrix as abovefor use in analysis life orexam
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
14/123
Individual 1
GEN/INDL IND RELAT, FIRM, STRAT
PRO CON PRO CON PRO CON
Similarly
crea
te
fo
rot
herindi
vidu
als in t
hes
election
pro
cess
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
15/123
Summarize to get a clear overview of
competing factors for each candidate
Candidate Broad Category (factors mentioned below are
applicable only in rect ofstarcaseand in all)
1 Good will v/s ability to adapt
2 Client v/s coworker
3 Small v/s large firm
4 Luck v/s skill
5 Develop from within v/s hire
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
16/123
Compensation comparison is an
important factor in rect and selection
Candidate Current On Joining Times Candidate
5
$ mill $ mill
1 1. .3 11 . 5 5
2 0.9 1. . 2 4
3 0.7 1 3
4 0.4 0.7 2
5 0.3 0.3 1
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
17/123
Performance management
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
18/123
Theories of Performance Goal theory set goals. Only then people will
work for it. Goals should be SMART (specific,measurable, attainable, . Goal is best when
jointly decided and aligned to org goals. Test forthese.
Control theory If goals are SMART, you canmeasure the gap of actual and agreedperformance and control for the variance.
Socialcognitive theory. States that some belief ofpeople make them achieve things. Hence positivebeliefis important.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
19/123
Meaning of Performance
Actually it is ill defined; but thinkers agree that itshould include the following:
1. Relevant performance dimensions.
2. Standards and expectations associated with differentperformance levels.
3. How situational constraints should be weighed whenevaluating performance.
4. No ofperformance levels or gradients.5. Extent to which it should be based on absolute
measure v/s relative measure.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
20/123
Goal Theory
4 mechanisms that connect goals to performanceoutcomes.
1. Direct attention to priorities.
2. Stimulateeffort
3. Challengepeople to bring their knowledgeand skill to bearto increase theirchances ofsuccess.
4. The morechallenging the goal, the morepeople will drawfrom theirrepertoire ofskills.
This theory underpins the setting and agreeing objectivesagainst which performance can be measured and managed.
By Latham and Locke (1979).
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
21/123
How does goals work? Goals pals inform individuals to achieve particular
levels of performance.
1. This enables them to direct and evaluate theiractions.
2. Perf feedback allows an individual to track how wellhe or she has been doing in relation to the goal.
3. This enables a person to adjust his effort, direction
and task strategies.
(Robertson, Smith and Cooper (1992)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
22/123
Control Theory-Role ofFeedback
Feedback is a mechanism to shape behavior.
Once they get feedback, they appreciate the
gap between what they are supposed to doand what they do.
Then they take corrective actions.
Hence feed back is crucial part of PM.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
23/123
Social Cognitive Theory
Based on Banduras Self efficacy theory.
What people believe that they can or cannot
do powerfully impacts their performance. Hence if you develop and strengthen positive
self belief in employees, performance will
improve.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
24/123
Values in PM
4 components ofValues in PM. These are basedon the ethical principles of:
1. Respect for individual2. Mutual respect
3. Procedural fairness
4. Transparency
5. Procedural accuracy
6. Procedural validity
Winstanley and Stuart-Smith (1996) + Instructor comments
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
25/123
Beliefs Based on the 4 Values
1. Mgmt has overriding responsibility to create environment for highperformance.
2. Everyone is concerned about improvement of performance.
3. Managers and their teams are mutually dependant for this.
4. People should be valued for what they are and what they achieve.
5. The need of the indl and the organization should be recognizedand respected.
6. Individuals should be given an opportunity to express their viewson the objectives they are supposed to achieve.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
26/123
Beliefs Based on the 4 Values
7. Individuals should understand and agree to the standards bywhich they are measured.
8. They should be able to track their performance.
9. They have the right to get feedback on their performance and theright to comment on the feedback.
10. Should know how and why decisions affecitng them emergingfrom the perf reviews have been made and should have right to
appeal.
11. Focus on developing performance and not merely managing it.Hence give priority to development.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
27/123
Superordinate Values
The above values are believed to be important
and NOT imposed (i.e. must develop through
discussions).
Reality check must be done i.e. behavior is
consistent with espoused values and if not
what to be done (change the value or change
the behavior) Boyett and Conn (1995)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
28/123
Influences on Performance1. Right level of
Competence
Motivation
Support
incentives
2. Work group members have strong positive or negative influenceon attitude and behavior.
3. Manager degree of support, act as role model, coach andstimulator.
4. Organization lack of a powerful vision, ineffective structure,culture, work systems, unsupportive employeerelations/policy/systems, inappropriate leadership andmanagement style.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
29/123
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
30/123
Factors Affecting Performance
Systems Factors (from systems theory of Millerand Rice (1976)
Outcome of sys = indl contribution to the team +department perf + corporate perf + central perfmgmt.
(methods, structure, support material, equipment,customers, work culture, internal and extenvironment is factored in)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
31/123
Factors Affecting Performance
Contextualfactors situation in which people work and the wayperformance can be measured
Organizational Culture pattern of shared beliefs, norms andvalues. In general command and control, centralized, distant andtough culture is less productive.
Employeerelation climate managers, employees and tradeunions. This is based on: Parties trust each other.
Mgmt treats employees fairly.
Mgmt is open and honest about actions and intentions.
Mgmt treats employees as stake holders.
Employees are committed to interests in the organization.
What mgmt does and says are consistent.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
32/123
Factors Affecting Performance
People Top down approach works well if it involves the stake
holders.
Composition of the workforce e.g. knowledgeworkers.
Structure Highly centralized/hierarchical
Flat
Size SMEs have personalized style often with prejudices
and attitudes of the employer.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
33/123
Factors Affecting Performance
Technology and Work Practices No conclusive evidence yet.
Computerized perf monitoring (CPM) transforms a helpful,less performance oriented supervisory style into a more
coercive and production oriented. Employees trust CPM more than supervisors.
Bureaucracies will have more formal PM system.
Flat organizations usually have flexible and less formalprocess.
External environment Competitive, changing, and fluid environment will have
fluid and ad hoc PM system.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
34/123
Theories related to PM and Motivation
Reinforcement theory (Hull 1951)
Expectancy theory (Porter and Lawler 1968)- value ofreward to the indl, probability that reward will result from
the effort as perceived by individuals, indl characteresticssuch as intelligence, know-how and skill and roleperception i.e. what the indls want to do and think they arerequired to do.
Selfefficacy theory (sameas sociallearning theory )
Psychologicalcontract theory unwritten contract existsbetween the employer and the employee based on mutualexperience and this affects performance.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
35/123
Expectancy Theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
36/123
Reinforcement theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
37/123
Psychological contract theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
38/123
Theories related to PM and Motivation
Sociallearning theory(Bandura 1977). Combines the aspects ofreinforcement and expectancy. Factors in the internal psychologicalfactors especially expectations abut the values of goals and theability of individuals to reach them.
Attribution theory-Explains success or failure in terms of ability,effort, task difficulty, circumstances and luck. If explained in terms of effort, high motivation results.
If in terms of ability, high motivation for training results.
If in terms of task difficulty, circumstances or luck, low motivation willbe the result.
Role Modeling. Desire to follow an example. Managers and teamleaders act as role models and they can enhance performance bycoaching and dialogue.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
39/123
Attribution Theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
40/123
Social Learning Theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
41/123
360 degree feedback(a tool based on control theory and Johari Window)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
42/123
Johari Window
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
43/123
360 DEGREE FEEDBACK
PLUS
Gets broader perspective
Gives rounded view ofperformance (in addition topay)
Increased awareness andrelevance of competencies.
Increased awareness by seniormanagement as they too havedevelopment needs.
More valid More objective
Leads to acceptance of results
Leads to action
MINUS
Sometimes people do not givefrank and honest feedback.
Put under stress receivingfeedback.
Lack of action followingfeedback.
Overreliance on technology.
Too much bureaucracy.
Can be time consuming.
Resource intensive.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
44/123
Definition
Systemic collection and feedback of
performance data on an individual or group
derived from a member of the stakeholders on
their performance.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
45/123
Rationale
Increased self awareness
Enhanced understanding of behaviors needed
to increase indl and org performance
Creation of devp activities that are specific
Increased involvement of employee at all
hierarchical level.
Increased devolution of self devp and learning
to employees
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
46/123
Uses
71% for learning and devp only
23% to support a number of HR processes
6% use it for pay decisions.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
47/123
Advantage and disadvantages Advantages
Indl gets a broader view
More rounded view of their performance
Increased self awareness of competencies
Increased awareness of top management about the need
for their own devp. Perceived as more valid and objective.
Disadvantages Not always frank and objective
Put under stress giving and receiving feedback
Lack of action following feedback Over reliance on technology
Too bureaucratic
Time and resource consuming
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
48/123
Address the following issues
Mission and scope to be defined clearly
Adequate explanation required
Make the organization ready Make sufficient resources available
Validate the outcomes
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
49/123
Steps
Define objective.
Decide on recipients of the 360 deg.
Decide on who will give the feedback
Decide on the area of work and behavior on which 360deg will be given.
Method of data collection
Method on data analysis and presentation
Plan initial implementation program
Analyze outcomes of pilot Plan and implement
Monitor and evaluate
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
50/123
How to make it success
Active support of top mgmt
Commitment by all
Determination by all to use it
Questionnaire fit Items can be related to actual events experienced
by the indl
Communication and trg are followed
No one should feel threatened Questions easy to complete
Minimal bureaucracy
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
51/123
Implementation issues of360 deg What goes
wrong?
Mission and scope not clearly defined.
Inadequate explanation and training of theprocess leads to lack of understanding andresistance.
Org readiness for 360 not evident.
Sufficient resources not employed.
Unrealistic promises made at the implementation
stage leads to cynicism. Outcomes are not evaluated.
From Silverman, Kerrin & Carter (2005)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
52/123
People Competency Maturity Model - PCMM
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
53/123
Concept of PCMM
Based on CMM (Carnegie Mellon UniversityModel)
To manage and develop workforce.
Integrates theory and practice.
Originally meant for software professionals,now used in several organizations.
Each level achieved forms the foundation tomove to higher level (step by step continuousimprovement)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
54/123
Uses of PCMM
To establish the maturity of their HR practices.
Priorities competencies for improvement for
its workforce.
Integrate the growth of competencies with
process improvement (needs formal set up for
each, mere informal arrangement is
insufficient)
Establishes culture of workforce excellence.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
55/123
HR Practices
SW HR Practice
Turnaround time Measuring delivery effectiveness of HR,
accountability, results
Access to seniors Measuring delivery effectiveness of HR,
accountability, results
Meeting deadlines Measuring delivery effectiveness of HR,
accountability , results
Cost effective service Measuring delivery effectiveness of HR,
accountability, results
ISO to institutionalize Measuring delivery effectiveness of HR
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
56/123
HR Practices
SW HR Practice
Adequate resources To perform effectively and stress free.
No overwork
Work life balance, retreats
Bi weekly open house, but nodedicated system for innovation
Encourage innovation and Learning
Employees work like
entrepreneurs
Participation
Open door, discussions, not
taking mundane jobs, encourageto discuss with sr mgmt
Effective work environment
Work distributed by Mohotra,
done as per competency, addl
resources hired if required
Role, responsibility and authority based on
competency.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
57/123
HR Practices
SW HR Practice
OJT, open house, presentations
even by juniors
Learning to maintain competency
Open door policy, open to taking
back old employee, encourages
discussion, retreat
Trust building
Annual reviews of performance,
spot reviews, First litigation
lawyer rising to partner level.
PM, feedback and career devp
Open door, knowledge sharing,
compensation reviews, annualretreats, as and when reviews
Culture
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
58/123
People Capability Maturity Model (PCMM)
4. Predictable
Empowerand integrate
workforcecompetencies,
manage quantitatively
2. Managed
Mangers takeresponsibilityfor managing and developing
people
5.Optimizing
Continuously
improve
3. Defined
Develop workforcecompetencies and
workgroups and align with business
strategy
1. Initial
Workforcepractices employed without analysis ofimpact
Org performancealignment,
continuous capacity
improvement, continuousworkforce innovation
Mentoring, Org capability
mgmt, Quantitativeperf
mgmt, competency basedassets, empowered work
gp, competency
integration
Competencyanalysis,
workforceplanning,
participatoryculture,career development,
competency devp
workgroup devp
PerfMgmt,
communication,
compensation,
work
environment,
staffing, trg and
devp
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
59/123
PCMM Level 2 - ManagedNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
2.1 Work
Environ
Establish and maint physical
working conditions and to
provide resources that allow
individuals and work gps to
perform their tasks efficiently
and wihtout unnecessarydistractions
Stress free environ
(Seth returning), open
house,
Open door policy
Pick only intellectually
stimulating jobs
Y
2.2 Staffing Est formal process by which
committed work is matched to
unit resources and qualifiedindls are recruited selected and
transitioned into assignments
CEO ensures allocation
based on competency
and availability,adequate resources
committed
Y
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
60/123
PCMM Level 2 - ManagedNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
2.3 Commu
nication
Est timely comn across org
and to ensure that the
workforce has the skills to
share and coord their
activities effectively
Open comn, sessions
with sr mgmt, opne
houses, open door,
work life balance,
open environ thatsupport all round
comn
Y
2.4 Trg &
devp
To ensure that all indls have
the skills required to performtheir assignments and are
provided relevant devp
opportunities.
On job trg ,
knowledge sharingsessions,
presentations
Y
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
61/123
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
62/123
PCMM Level 3 - DefinedNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
3.1 Compete
ncy
analysis
Iden the Knowledge, skill and
process ability required to
perform the orgs business
activities so that they may be
developed and used as a basis
for workforce practices
Knowledge sharing
sessions based on
needs of the employees
Y
3.2 Workforc
e
planning
Coord workforce activities with
current and future business
needs at organization and unit
level
Handled by CEO in
consultation Ser mgmt,
Schedules employee
assignments based on
their competencyavailability, employee
sourcing decisions
taken jointly by mgmt
Y
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
63/123
PCMM Level 3 - DefinedNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
3.3 Participat
ory
culure
To exploit the full capability of
the workforce for making
decisions that affect he perf of
business activities.
Bi weekly open house,
weekly sr mgmt
sessions, needs of emp
kept in mind while
picking up assignments
(eg LPO), open door,open to rehiring the old
employee shows
openness, annual
retreats
Y
3.4 Career
devp
To ensure that indls are
provided opportunities to devpworkforce competencies that
enable them to achieve career
objectives
OJT, bi weekly
knowledge sharing, flatorg, career path based
on performance.
Y
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
64/123
PCMM Level 3 - DefinedNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
3.5 Competency devp
To constantly enhance thecapability of the workforce to
perform their assigned tasks
and responsibilities.
Hiring of first litigationlawyer (proactive
competency devp),
Done through OJT and
knowledge sharing
based on needs of the
project and employees
Y
3.6 Compete
ncy
based
practices
To ensure that tall workforce
practices are based I part on
developing competencies of the
workforce.
Assignment based on
competencies, if
competency is not
available in house, it is
sources
Y
3.7 Work
groups
devp
To org work around competency
based abilities.
As in a consulting org,
delivery done by project
teams, teams made by
Sr Management based
on the project needs
Y
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
65/123
PCMM Level 4 - PredictableNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
4.1 Mentorin
g
To transfer the lesson of greater
experience to improve the
capability of other indls and
workforce
?/N
4.2 Organizin
g
capabilit
y Mgmt
To quantify and mange the
capability of the workforce and
of the critical competency
based processes they perform.
Hiring first litigation
lawyer shows mgmt
knows the future needs
?/Y
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
66/123
PCMM Level 4 - PredictableNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
4.3 Quantita
tive perf
Mgmt
Predict and manage the
capability competency based
processes for achieving
measureable perf objectives
Turnaround time,
access to sr members,
meeting deadlines, cost
effective service, and
systems built around
these.
Y
4.4 Compete
ncy
based
assets
To capture knowledge,
experience and artifacts
developed in performing
competency based processes
for use in enhancing capability
and performance.
OJT and knowledge
sharing is done, but no
formal mechanism to
capture knowledge
N
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
67/123
PCMM Level 4 - PredictableNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
4.5 Empowe
red
workgro
up
To invest workgroups with with
the responsibility and authority
for determining how to conduct
their business activity most
effectively.
In consulting projects
are delivered by
independent teams
responsible for the
deliverables and
business objectives
?/N
4.6 Compete
ncy
integrati
on
To improve the efficiency and
agility of interdependent work
by integrating the process
abilities of different workforce
competencies.
?/N
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
68/123
PCMM Level 5 - OptimizedNo Factor Purpose Indicators Y/N
5.1 Continuo
us
capabilit
y
improve
ment
To provide a foundation for indl
and workgroups to continuously
improve their capability for
performing competency based
processes.
Happens throughOJT,
knowledge sharing and
new hires. But no
formal method
?/N
5.2 Continuo
us
workforc
e
innovatio
n
To identify and evaluate
improved or innovative
workforce practices and
technologies and implement the
most promising ones
throughout the org.
Knowledge sharing
sessions, but nothing
else
?/N
5.3 Organiza
tional
perf
Alignmen
t
To enhance the alignment of
perf results across indls,
workgroups and units with org
perf and business objectives
Turnaround and
feedback from clients is
used but how indl perf
is aligned using this is
not formalised.
?/N
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
69/123
Decide the level an organization is in
Example based on Singhania case
L 3 Yes.
L4 Has some processes but not formal.
L5 Has some processes but not formal.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
70/123
How to scale to L 4(These become options and action plan)
Mentoring Formal mentoring.
Define objectives and knowledge to be transferred.
Hold seniors or knowledge holders accountable forthis.
Organizational Capability Management Now it is informal.
Define it and make a process.
Clients confidentiality to be maintained. Hence typical competency integration and
competency based assets may not be feasible.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
71/123
Scale to L 5
(These become options and action plan)
CurrentlyNil.
Continuous capability improvement Now only OJT and knowledge sharing. Define a new process and objectives.
Continuous workforce innovation- related to Channels for recruiting Selection methods Pperf mgmt methods
Alternative career choices Innovative compensation New technologies for developing knowledge and skills Innovative communication technologies Ways of organizing and empowering workforce.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
72/123
Scale to L 5(These become options and action plan)
Organizational perf Alignment
Currently nothing much
Manage impact quantitatively
Institutionalize the methods.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
73/123
Types of decision making
Experience
Experimentation
Research and Analysis
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
74/123
Motivation Theories
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
75/123
Traditional Theories
Maslow
Herzberg
X and Y
Vrooms Expectancy Goal theory
Equity
Modern MLT Direction giving, empathetic, meaning making.
Nohria Model Defend, Acquire, bond, comprehend
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
76/123
Equity
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
77/123
Vrooms Expectancy Theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
78/123
Herzbergs two factor theory
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
79/123
Maslows
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
80/123
Theory x and y
Motivating language model with standardized path
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
81/123
Direction-
Giving
Empathetic
JS
Job Performance
Meaning making
MotivatingLanguage
0.93
0.92
0.68
0.67
0.22
Motivating language model with standardized path
coefficients
Sullivan JJ, (1988), AMR Vol 13
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
82/123
NEW MODELNohria, Groysberg & Linda Lee
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
83/123
4 Drivers
Drive to acquire
Drive to bond
Drive to comprehend Drive to defend
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
84/123
Drive to acquire
Acquire our needs.
Acquire things which are not strictly needs.
Comparison with others about what is needed.
How companies handle it:
Reward system.
People perform to gain reward to acquire.
Hence individual is important. Group reward is important if that increases the
individual reward (at least in general).
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
85/123
Drive to bond
All of us need our family, parents etc.
In work place we need departments, area etc.
Gets attached to closes cohorts. How companies handle it:
Creates culture.
Uniforms, teams, quality circles.
Informal groups.
Team work, collaborations, openness, friendship.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
86/123
Drive to comprehend
Want to make sense of the world around us.
Understand the phenomenon.
Meaning in work.
Making meaningful contribution.
Demoralized by monotonous work.
How companies handle it:
Job design Foster sense of contribution.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
87/123
Drive to defend
Tend to defend ourselves.
We create justice system, self help groups,security system, etc. to overcome negative
emotions like fear and resentment. How Companies Handle it.
Performance management and resourceallocation.
Fairness, transparency.
Day care, transport etc.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
88/123
Importance of new model
Organizations ability to meet the fourfundamental drives explain 60% of theemployees variance in motivation.
Individual managers can also contributetowards these.
Employees understand where the individualmanager can help and cannot.
Dissatisfaction with immediate manager isbased on this understanding.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
89/123
Key Leadership Theory
Country Club LeadershipHigh People/Low Production
Team Leadership High
Production/High People (9 9)
Team Leadership High
Production/High People (9 9)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
90/123
High People/Low Production
(1,9)
Production/High People (9,9)Production/High People (9,9)
I
impoverished LeadershipLow Production/Low People
(1,1)Produce or Perish Leadership
High Production/Low People(9,1)
Middle-of-the-Road Leadership
Medium Production/Medium
People (5,5)
Low Concern for Task/Production High
Low
Co
ncernforPeople
High
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
91/123
Competencies that peoplerequire
Di ti f t i G l
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
92/123
Dictionary ofcompetencies General
Leadership competencies
Establishing Focus.
Providing Motivational
Support.
Fostering Teamwork.
Empowering Others.
Managing Change.
Developing Others.
Managing Performance.
Fostering Diversity.
Managing Self
SelfConfidence.
Stress Management.
Personal Credibility.
Flexibility.
Communicating and
Influencing.
Attention To Communication
PersuasiveOral
Communication and written
communication.
Interpersonal Effectiveness
Influencing Others
Building Collaborative
Relationships
CustomerOrientation
Preventing and Solving
Problems
Diagnostic Information
Gathering
Analytical Thinking
Forward Thinking
Conceptual Thinking
Strategic Thinking
Technical Expertise
Achieving Results
Initiative
EntrepreneurialOrientation
Fostering Innovation
Results Orientation
Thoroughness
Decisiveness
Business Acumen
Global Perspective
Dictionary ofcompetencies from leadership
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
93/123
y p p
perspective
CORE COMPETENCIES FUNDAMENTAL COMP SYNERGIZING COMP
Leadership
Establishing Focus.
Providing Motivational
Support.
Fostering Teamwork.
Empowering Others.
Managing Change.
Developing Others.
Managing Performance.
Fostering Diversity.
Managing Self
SelfConfidence.
Stress Management.
Personal Credibility.
Flexibility.
Communicating and
Influencing.
Attention To Communication
PersuasiveOral
Communication and written
communication.
Interpersonal Effectiveness
Influencing Others
Building Collaborative
Relationships
CustomerOrientation
Preventing and Solving
Problems
Diagnostic Information
Gathering
Analytical Thinking
Forward Thinking
Conceptual Thinking
Strategic Thinking
Technical Expertise
Achieving Results
Initiative
EntrepreneurialOrientation
Fostering Innovation
Results Orientation
Thoroughness
Decisiveness
Business Acumen
Global Perspective
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
94/123
Techniqueforproblem detection(fixing thelevel)
Where is the problem?
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
95/123
Where is theproblem?
Vision,
Mission
Strategy
Corporate
Business
Functional
Op, Fin,
Mktg, HR
STRUC-
TURE
Simple
Hierarchy
Flat
Adhocracy
Matrix
Team
SYSTEM
(Simple,
complex,
open,
close)
Mktg, Fin
HR, Ops,
MIS (ALSO
CALLED
FUNCTION
S/DEPT)
PROCESS
Output
Outcomes
Tasks
Job
Planning
Organizing
Staffing
Directing/
Leading
Controlling
Where is the problem? Delimit
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
96/123
Where is theproblem? Delimit(Delete those which you are sure are not the problem)
Vision,
Mission
Strategy
Corporate
Business
Functional
Op, Fin,
Mktg, HR
STRUC-
TURE
Simple
Hierarchy
Flat
Adhocracy
Matrix
Team
SYSTEM
(Simple,
complex,
open,
close)
Mktg, Fin
HR, Ops,
MIS (ALSO
CALLED
FUNCTION
S/DEPT)
PROCESS
Output
Outcomes
Tasks
Job
Planning
OrganizingStaffing
Directing/
Leading
Controlling
Focus on the delimited list
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
97/123
Focus on the delimited list
SYSTEM
(Simple, complex, open,
close)
HR SYS
PERF MGMT, MOTIVATION
PROCESS
Output
Outcomes
Tasks
Job
Planning
OrganizingStaffing
Directing/
Leading
Controlling
HR SYS
RECT & SELECTION
COMPENSATION
L&D
MOTIVATION
Isolate the specific systems
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
98/123
Isolate the specific systems,
processes, jobs, taks, individuals
HR SYS
PERF MGMT, MOTIVATION
PROCESS
Output
Outcomes
Tasks
Job
Directing/
Leading
Controlling
Identify thelinkages between specific systems,
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
99/123
y g p y ,
processes, jobs, tasks, individuals
HR SYS
PERF MGMT, MOTIVATION
PROCESS
Output
Outcomes
Tasks
Job
Directing/
Leading
Controlling
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
100/123
How to define
Identify the level
Identify the component from the HPWS.
Define.
Since you have identified the component fromthe HPWS, quickly go to the theory. Theyautomatically give you the factors.
Now do the SWOT keeping in mind theproblem and the component of HPWS inquestion.
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
101/123
How to define factors
From the SWOT or TOWS matrix, come to thefactors. While doing so, use the terms from thetheory. Do NOT qualify at this stage i.e. do not saythat something is existent or not.
Now analyze each factor. To do this, write thefactor, then an example from the SWOT, thenargue what theory it violated or supported. Then
write the implications. By now the contours ofthe options would be emerging. Give pros andcons so that your mind is clear.
d h
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
102/123
Decide the constraints
Do not create too many of them. We are
looking at macro constraints and NOT
constraints as in an operations problem.
Usually only a key resource is a limitation money, time, availability of competencies.
l h
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
103/123
Evolve the options
Keep your eye on the analysis and the pros
and cons. This will make it easy to evolve
options.
d
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
104/123
Recommend
Be brief. Name the recommendation e.g.
Option 2 is recommended. Then write one or
two key reasons for it
E.g. Option 2 is recommended because of thebenefits mentioned under options and in
particular 1) ------- and 2) ----------
W i h l
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
105/123
Write the plan
To execute the recommended options follwing
steps should be followed.
Take action xx by Mr ---- by ----
(go on.till the end)
T ki d i i
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
106/123
Taking decision
We use 3 methods take decision.1. Experience
2. Experimentation
3. Research and analysis
Case should be based on the third.
H f d C l l Di i
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
107/123
Hofstedes Cultural Dimensions
Individualism-collectivism
Masculinity-femininity
Power distance
Uncertainty avoidance
Structured - unstructured
Hofstedes Cultural Dimensions
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
108/123
Hofstede s Cultural imensions
(contd)
Work-related value dimensions
Most influential effort to group by cultural
values Surveyed over 116,000 employees in more
than 70 countries
Created maps of pairs of dimensions
I di id li C ll ti i
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
109/123
Individualism-Collectivism
Self-perception as individual or part of a group
Most widely studied
Most complex
Dimensions different across cultures
i.e., Asian vs Latin American collectivism
I di id li C ll ti i ( td)
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
110/123
Individualism-Collectivism (contd)
Individualism
High value on
autonomy
Individual achievement
Privacy
Collectivism
High value on group
Family, clan, organization
Loyalty
Devotion
Conformity
Masculinity-Femininity
D ib I t f
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
111/123
Describes Importance of
Achievement versus Relationships Success
Assertive acquisition of
money/power
achievement
Equality of genders
Caring for
disadvantaged
harmony
Power Distance
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
112/123
Acceptance of differences in power
High-Power Distance
Accept position
Follow authority
Concentrated & centralized
authority
Hierarchical
Low-Power Distance
Avoid concentration of
authority
Decentralized
Fewer layers of
management
Uncertainty Avoidance
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
113/123
Low Uncertainty
Avoidance
Embrace unpredictable
Less adherence to rules,procedures, orhierarchies
Risk taking desirable
High Uncertainty
Avoidance
Threatened by
ambiguity Need stable &
predictable workplace
Reliance on rules
y
Reaction to ambiguous events
C lt r l M ps
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
114/123
Cultural Maps
Individualism-Collectivism & Power Distance
Uncertainty Avoidance & Masculinity-
Femininity
Uncertainty Avoidance & Power Distance
Individualism-Collectivism & Power
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
115/123
Distance
Large power distance and collectivism
Asia and Latin America
Small power distance and individualism Northern Europe and Anglo countries
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
116/123
Culture
Map forPower
Distanceand
Individualis
m
Uncertainty Avoidance &
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
117/123
y
Masculinity-Femininity Achievement oriented-weak uncertainty avoidance &
masculine values
Security Motivation-high uncertainty avoidance &
masculinity
Social Motivation-feminine values & high uncertainty
avoidance
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
118/123
Culture Map
for
Uncertainty
Avoidanceand
Masculinity-
Femininity
Uncertainty Avoidance & Power
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
119/123
Distance Family-large power distance & weak uncertainty
avoidance
Pyramid of People-large power distance & strong
uncertainty avoidance
Well-Oiled Machine-small power distance & strong
uncertainty avoidance
Village Market-small power distance & lowuncertainty avoidance
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
120/123
Culture
Map forPower
Distance
and
Uncertainty
Orientation
Limitation of Hofstedes
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
121/123
Dimensions
Missing countries
Estimates values
Ignores differences within clusters
Trompenaarss Alternative
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
122/123
Dimensions
Focus on values and relationships
Survey of
15,000 managers Over 10-year period
From 28 countries
Bipolar cultural dimensions
Trompenaarss Alternative
-
8/3/2019 Theory Revision-Mid Term HRMT
123/123
Dimensions (contd)
Outer-directedInner-directed
UniversalismParticularism
NeutralEmotional
SpecificDiffuse
AchievementAscription
IndividualismCommunitarianism