thesis guidelines

Upload: syed-rehan-ahmed

Post on 12-Oct-2015

14 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Guidelines to write a good thesis

TRANSCRIPT

  • Organizational Behavior II & Academic Writing Skills II

    Lecture27-05-2014

  • Agenda

    - Course introduction

    - Masters thesis overview

    Agenda

  • Thesis preparation

    Theses have to be written alone

    Assessment of theses will be even stricter

    Course introduction

  • Thesis preparation

    This is a new course

    Only a limited number of hours are available

    Therefore a larger focus on structure and academic writing, content is chosen by students

    Just as with the Masters thesis, you are given a lot of responsibility

    If I can do more to help you prepare for the thesis, please let me know!

    Course introduction

  • Other courses related to thesis preparation

    Block 1

    - SQMB 1

    Block 2

    - OB & AWS 1

    Block 3

    - SQMB 2

    Block 4

    - RBA 1

    Block 6

    - MC/OB & AWS 2

    Block 7

    - RBA 2

    Course introduction

    Regarded as known

  • Course setup

    Course introduction

    Three elements

    - Individual academic paper

    - Presentation

    - Midterm

  • Course setup

    Course introduction

    Main focus of the course is an individual academic paper

    You will all have me as a supervisor (light) for this individual academic paper

  • How does supervision work

    Course introduction

    For the Masters thesis your supervisor is allocated 25 hours

    Out of these 25 hours, 6 hours are reserved for (the preparation of) the defense

    This leaves 19 hours for the remainder (including meetings and reading material)

    Even if you would argue that the paper is smaller and only 12 hours were needed forsupervision, it is impossible for me to give 109 students all that attention for this course(do the math)

  • How does supervision work

    Course introduction

    What can I do:

    - You are all entitled to a feedback session based on your draft paper (30 minutes)

    - You will all get two email opportunities (smaller questions)

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    The following is expected of the academic paper:

    - The paper has to focus on something related to organizational behavior

    - At least five concepts are included in the paper

    - One of these concepts is either a mediator or a moderator

    - The paper is written as if the research was quantitative (required for certain sections)

    - The paper includes three chapters (Introduction, Theoretical Framework, Methodology)

    - Font size 11 (your choice of font), double spacing for readability and comments

    - Correct application of APA referencing style

    I will not give you any restrictions regarding a page minimum or maximum, nor aminimum amount of A and B journals

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    Some article suggestions:

    Herrera, R., Duncan, P. A., Green, M., Ree, M., & Skaggs, S. L. (2011). The relationship betweenattitudes toward diversity management in the Southwest USA and the GLOBE study cultural preferences.The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 2629-2646.doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.588037

    Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2013). How Ethical Leadership Influences Employees Innovative Work Behavior:A Perspective of Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 441-455. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1455-7

    Kulich, C., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Where is the Romance for Women Leaders? The Effectsof Gender on Leadership Attributions and Performance-Based Pay. Applied Psychology: An InternationalReview, 56, 528-601. doi:10:1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00305.x

    Posdakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Sales UnitEffectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 351-363. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3152222

    Morhart, M., Herzog, W., & Tomczak, T. (2009). Brand-Specific Leadership: Turning Employees intoBrand Champions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 122-142. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.122

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    Please note that you are extremely free in your choice of topic, as long as it involves behavior within organizations

    If you find an interesting article, but cannot access it, I can request the library to order it

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    Introduction

    - Background to paper

    - Conceptual model (can be included after problem statement, depends on flow)

    - Aim/objective

    - Problem statement and operationalization

    - Research questions and argumentation

    - Scientific and managerial relevance

    - Structure (optional)

    Theoretical Framework

    - Introduction (optional)

    - Discussion concepts, including hypotheses

    - Refined conceptual model (optional)

    Methodology

    - Introduction (optional)

    - Respondents

    - Measures

    - Operational conceptual model (optional)

    References

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    I have prepared an example paper with comments based on a thesis from last year

    Also study the in-class exercises and midterm for what not and what to do

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    The deadline for the draft paper is Monday July 14 at 09:00

    All draft papers need to be send by email to [email protected]

    If I receive a paper at 09:01 on Monday July 14, I will regard it as not being sent. It is up to you if you hand in anything. I can only give feedback to text I have received. You can

    always use your 30 minutes of allocated feedback time for questions.

  • Feedback on academic paper

    Course introduction

    You will need to signup for feedback on the portal

    Feedback sessions draft paper OB&AWSII and MC&AWSII

    You can only register one time-slot

    Feedback is not mandatory, but show up if you sign up

  • Feedback on academic paper

    Course introduction

    August 7, 18:30 22:30

    August 8, 18:30 22:30

    August 11, 18:30 22:30

    August 12, 18:30 22:30

    August 13, 18:30 22:30

    August 14, 18:30 22:30

    August 25, 18:30 22:30

    August 27, 19:00 22:30

    August 28, 18:30 22:30

    August 29, 18:30 22:30

    September 3, 18:30 22:30

    September 4, 18:30 22:30

    September 8, 18:30 22:30

    September 9, 18:30 22:30

  • Content of academic paper

    Course introduction

    Final deadline for the individual academic paper is Tuesday September 16 at 24:00

    All final papers must be uploaded to the portal for an Ephorus check

    If the paper is uploaded on Wednesday September 17 at 00:01, it is moved to the retake

    Deadline retake: Tuesday December 2 at 24:00

    Deadline overall: Friday January 9 at 24:00

  • Grading of academic paper

    Course introduction

    Grading is based on thesis score card

    Grading is just as strict as with a normal thesis

  • You cannot start without a proper basis

    Course introduction

    For this reason all students have to present 3 slides:

    - Background of the paper including references

    - Conceptual model including references

    - Problem statement and research questions

    The maximum time for the presentation is 4 minutes

    The maximum time for feedback is 4 minutes

    A template and an example presentation have been uploaded to the portal

  • Background of paperDiscuss the background of your paper based on literature

    Context / Argument (Reference)

    Context / Argument (Reference)

    Context / Argument (Reference)

  • Conceptual Model (Shape depends on project. Discuss model based on literature)

    C1 C2

    C3

    C4

    C5

    Ref1

    Ref2

    Ref3

    Ref4

    Ref5

    Ref6

    Ref9

    Ref8

    Ref7

  • Problem statement and research questionsBriefly discuss the problem statement and chosen research questions

    Academically sound problem statement

    Academically sound research question

    Academically sound research question

    Academically sound research question

  • Background of paper

    Testing is becoming more important for selection, yet there is controversy (e.g. Sackett,Borneman, & Connelly, 2009)

    Testing has been proven to be a good predictor of the short-term (e.g. Lakin, 2012)

    Personality, motivation and cognitive ability are often used in selection tests and seen aspredictors of academic performance (Poropat, 2009)

    Little research has been done regarding the long-term prediction of selection tests, whichfocuses on career success (Judge, Higgens, Thoresen, & Barrick, 1999)

    There is also a lack of studies that investigate the predictive power of academicperformance on career success (Judge et al., 1999)

  • Conceptual Model

    Personality

    Poropat, 2009

    CognitiveAbility

    Motivation

    Wigfield, 2002

    Sackett & Yang, 2000

    Academic Performance

    CareerSuccess

    Judge et al., 1999

    Lakin, 2012

    Lakin, 2012

    Judge et al., 1999

    Ryan & Deci, 2000

    NG & Feldman, 2000

    Judge et al., 1999

  • Problem statement and research questions

    To what extent are cognitive ability, personality and motivation directly related toacademic performance and career success, and to what extent are cognitiveability, personality and motivation indirectly related to career success?

    What is career success and how can it be measured?

    What is academic performance and how can it be measured?

    What is personality and how can it be measured?

    What is motivation and how can it be measured?

    What is cognitive ability and how can it be measured?

    What is the relation between personality and academic performance?

    What is the relation between motivation and academic performance?

    What is the relation between cognitive ability and academic performance?

    What is the relation between personality and career success?

    What is the relation between motivation and career success?

    What is the relation between cognitive ability and career success?

    To what extent are cognitive ability, personality and motivation indirectly related to careersuccess?

  • The presentation

    Course introduction

    Score card

    - The presenter is in control of the material (i.e. had command of the literaturepresented and discussed and is easy to follow

    - The problem statement and research questions are formulated correctly andacademically sound

    - The conceptual model is academically sound

    - The APA rules have been correctly applied

    Annamaria Beasley-Suffolk is present at the presentations to help me with grading. Inprinciple grades cannot be lower than 5.5 or higher than 8 (just like with the thesisdefense), but if elements are missing no points can be awarded for a section of the scorecard. If no presentation is given a 0 is awarded.

  • The presentation

    Course introduction

    If an element of the presentation is not good enough (for example the conceptual model), you will need to send an updated presentation via email for approval

    Please note that this will make you lose one of your feedback opportunities (in other words, you only have one email opportunity left instead of two)

  • The presentation

    Course introduction

    The schedule for the presentations is uploaded on the portal

    Swapping is allowed, but I need to be informed at least one day in advance

    You need to be present for one hour (mandatory) in order to provide possible feedback

  • The presentation

    Course introduction

    Wednesday June 4, 13:30 16:30, AHG

    Thursday June 12, 13:00 16:00, AHG

  • The midterm

    Course introduction

    Midterm

    - Comprised of an old thesis, in which questions are asked about portions of the text

    - These questions can pertain to academic issues, academic writing and referencing

    - The midterm is multiple choice (18 questions), closed book, and you have 3 hours

    - Per mistake 0.75 is deducted from the grade, until 1 (for showing up)

    The second part of this lecture will help you prepare for the midterm

    An example midterm has been provided on the portal

  • Assessment

    Presentation 20%

    Midterm 20%

    Individual academic paper 60%

    Final Grade 100%

    Course introduction

  • Literature and attendance

    No literature prescribed, but suggestions are given. Students are responsible for content

    Attendance is not mandatory, yet strongly recommended for the lecture and feedback session

    Attendance is mandatory during the 1 hour in which your segment presents

    Course introduction

  • Agenda

    - Course introduction

    - Masters thesis overview

    Agenda

  • Background to (management) problem

    Masters thesis overview

  • Background to (management) problem

    Masters thesis overview

    - Start broad. It does not have to be scientific in nature, you can include real life events

    - Work your way to the issue at hand

    - If relevant, only mention the sponsor company briefly as a case. It is not necessary toknow how many FTE work there, or how high their gross-margin is, unless it is relevantfor the study (always ask yourself, how does this help answer the problem statement). Itis not forbidden to mention a company (i.e. also other companies besides the sponsorcompany can be mentioned).

  • Background to (management) problem

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 1

  • Background to (management) problem

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 2

  • Background to (management) problem

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 2

    Question X

    With regard to the introduction text provided (Thisquestion), could you indicate the issue(s) with

    starting a paper in this manner:

    A The opening paragraph does not start in a broader manner, introducing the context

    B The opening paragraph talks about the context (Japanese), which is not allowed

    C The opening paragraph does not mention the sponsor company

    D Answers A and C are both correct

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    - Everything discussed during RBA1 is regarded as known for midterm

    - Main focus in paper is proper introduction of conceptual model

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 3

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 3

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 4

  • Masters thesis overview

    Example 4

    Question X

    With regard to the paragraph above (Inthesis), could you indicate the issue(s) with the

    conceptual model:

    A The conceptual model is not academically sound

    B The figure is not referred to properly in the text

    C The conceptual model includes elements not discussed in the text

    D Answers A and C are both correct

    Conceptual model

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    Enhanced/Refined and operational model are optional

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    Coherence!

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

  • Conceptual model

    Masters thesis overview

    Hypotheses are drafted in the theoretical framework

  • Aim

    Masters thesis overview

  • Aim

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 5

  • Masters thesis overview

    Problem statement

  • Problem statement

    Masters thesis overview

    Everything discussed during RBA 1 is regarded as known

    Focus on coherence (with text, conceptual model, aim, and research questions)

    Focus on the presence of operationalization!

  • Problem statement

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 5 Continued

  • Research questions

    Masters thesis overview

  • Research questions

    Masters thesis overview

    Everything discussed during RBA 1 is regarded as known

    Focus on coherence (with conceptual model, problem statement, text)

    Make sure that research questions do not appear out of nowhere!

    Research questions are not allowed to fully overlap the problem statement

    Always provide a brief argumentation for the inclusion of the research questions

  • Research questions

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 5 Continued

  • Research questions

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 6

  • Research questions

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 6

  • Masters thesis overview

    Example 6

    Research questions

    Question X

    With regard to the text (Basedmodel), could you indicate the issue(s) with the research

    questions:

    A The research questions are not in line with the conceptual model

    B The concepts included in the research questions are not properly introduced

    C No argumentation is provided for the inclusion of the research questions

    D All of the above

  • (Managerial and scientific) Relevance

    Masters thesis overview

  • (Managerial and scientific) Relevance

    Masters thesis overview

    Both managerial and scientific relevance must be discussed in the introduction

    Should be able to link this to discussion (final thesis, not the paper)

    See the slides from RBA 1 for some tips

  • (Managerial and scientific) Relevance

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 7

  • (Managerial and scientific) Relevance

    Masters thesis overview

  • Structure

    Masters thesis overview

    Optional

  • Structure

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 8

  • Headers in introduction chapter

    Masters thesis overview

    In general, only the following headers are included in the introduction chapter:

    - Introduction (title of chapter)

    - Scientific and Managerial Relevance

    - Structure

  • Introduction

    Masters thesis overview

    Optional

  • Introduction

    Masters thesis overview

    Make sure the order of your chapter is logical

    If you cannot put in down on paper, there is probably an issue

  • Constructs (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

  • Constructs (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

    Only discuss concepts that are relevant for the paper/thesis

    These concepts should be in line with the conceptual model and problem statement

    Make sure it is an actual synthesis!

  • Relations (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

  • Relations (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

    When discussing relations, it is common to draft hypotheses (quantitative project)

    These hypotheses must be clearly based on the theory presented before

    These hypotheses must have a clear direction

    These hypotheses should not be double-barreled

    Hypothesis 1: Transformational leadership is related to job satisfaction and commitment

    Hypothesis1: Transformational leadership is positively related to job satisfaction (A) and commitment (B)

  • Relations (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 9

  • Relations (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 10

  • Masters thesis overview

    Relations (part of synthesis)

    Example 10

    Question X

    With regard to the text (BasedNetherlands), could you indicate the issue(s) with the hypotheses?

    A The hypotheses lack a theoretical foundation

    B The hypotheses do not indicate a clear direction

    C Some hypotheses are double-barreled

    D Both answers A and B are correct

  • Relations (part of synthesis)

    Masters thesis overview

    It is not allowed to draft hypotheses in the introduction!

    Null hypotheses are allowed, but very uncommon

  • Enhanced (conceptual) model

    Masters thesis overview

    Optional

  • Introduction

    Masters thesis overview

    Optional

  • Data collection method

    Masters thesis overview

    Not required for paper, will be surveys

  • Research subjects

    Masters thesis overview

  • Research subjects

    Masters thesis overview

    You have to describe your respondents (survey) or interviewees (interviews)

    For your full thesis this includes demographic data (age, education, and so on)

    For your full thesis this also includes response rate (when applicable)

    You must indicate why these respondents or interviewees are chosen (when applicable)

  • Research subjects

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 11

  • Instruments

    Masters thesis overview

  • Instruments

    Masters thesis overview

    Attempt to use previously validated questionnaires (mandatory for paper)

    If you draft questions yourself, always clearly describe them (thesis)

    Always indicate the number of items (questions) and the Likert-scale used

    You are allowed to list some sample questions

    In your thesis you will need to list your Cronbachs alphas (quantitative)

  • Instruments

    Masters thesis overview

    Finding good scales:

    Find an article that measures the concept

    Go to the methods section and see which scale is used (refers to other article)

    Find that article and investigate the scale

    It is always recommended to use scales that are widely used in contemporary research

    It is always recommended to investigate substitute scales

    See whether the Cronbachs alphas in studies that used the scales are sufficient (>.6)

  • Instruments

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 12

  • Instruments

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 13

  • Masters thesis overview

    Example 13

    Instruments

    Question X

    With regard to the text (Inappendix), could you indicate the issue(s) with this section?

    A More detail should be provided regarding the literature review

    B The survey should be discussed here, not in the appendix

    C No information is provided regarding the respondents of the survey

    D Both answers A and B are correct

  • Reliability and validity

    Masters thesis overview

    Not part of the paper

  • Operational (conceptual) model

    Masters thesis overview

    Optional

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    The reference list itself is not tested

    You do need to know about in-text citations and quotations

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    Always refer to tables and figures in the text

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    Table X.

    Title of table

    Note. Here would be relevant information for reading the table

    Cell 1 Cell 2

    Cell 3 Cell 4

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    Figure 1. Relevant text explaining picture.

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    Author 1 and author 2 (2014) state that

    This is stated (Author 1 & Author 2, 2014)

    Author 1, Author 2 and Author 3 (2014) state that (First reference)

    This is stated (Author 1, Author 2, & Author 3, 2014) (First reference)

    Author 1 et al. (2014) state that (Second reference)

    This is stated (Author 1 et al., 2014) (Second reference)

    Immediately use et al. when there are more than five authors

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    When the quote has fewer than 40 words, quote can be in-text

    Author 1 (2014) states that important quote (p. x), which proves everything.

    It is stated that important quote (Author 1, 2014, p. x).

    Note. Use pp when the quote is spread over two pages.

    Use . . . if you omit a part of the quote.

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    When the quote has more than 40 words, a freestanding block must be made

    Basic text, following this awesome quote:

    Important quote. (Author 1, 2014, p. x)

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    Example 14

  • APA Referencing Standard

    Masters thesis overview

    Do not overuse quotes!

  • Remaining questions?

    Masters thesis overview

    Remaining questions?

  • Thanks!

    Masters thesis overview

    Thank you!