thomas dautermann, thomas ludwig, robert ... - atm seminar · gls approaches using sbas: a sbas to...

31
GLS Approaches using SBAS: a SBAS to GBAS converter Thomas Dautermann, Thomas Ludwig, Robert Geister, Lutz Ehmke, Max Fermor, Matthew Bruce, Markus Schwendener > Lecture > Author Document > Date DLR.de Chart 1

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • GLS Approaches using SBAS: a SBAS to GBAS converter

    Thomas Dautermann, Thomas Ludwig, Robert Geister, Lutz Ehmke, Max Fermor, Matthew Bruce, Markus Schwendener

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 1

  • Structure of this Presentation

    • PBN Approach Navigation• Who uses What system and Why• The GLASS approach to 3D approaches• Integrity in Approach Navigation• The GLASS processing chain• Flight Inspection • Conclusions

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 2

  • Differential GPS (GNSS) Principle

    GPS is a ranging system, position (x,y,z,t) is determined by triangulation

    Receivers at fixed and known location can determine ranging error

    True range – measured range= range correction

    Correction can be sent to user near the fixed receiver

    User applies correction and gets better position accuracy

    But what about integrity, continuity, availabilty

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 3

    GPS receiver

    correction transmitter

  • Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS)

    Differential GPS for aviation with multiple antennasand receivers (three to four)Cross checking of measurements from different

    receiversAveraging mitigates uncorrelated errorsRedundancy of hardwareMulti day calibration of station noise & multipath

    valuesIntegrity data provided to user locally using VHF linkFinal Approach Segment Data Blocks (up to 49)Known as GLS

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 4

  • Final Approach Segment Data Block

    • Localizer and glidepath computed from augmented GNSS data

    • Uses local augmentation system (GBAS, LAAS)• ILS like guidance

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 5

  • > Lecture > Author • Document > Date

    • 6

    Localizer

    Glide Path

    Glide Path

    Localizer

  • Final Approach Segment Data Block

    • Localizer and glidepath computed from augmented GNSS data

    • Uses local augmentation system (GBAS, LAAS)• ILS like guidance

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 7

    • 7

    LocalizerReference(GARP)

    GlideReference(GERP)

  • Final Approach Segment Data Block

    • Localizer and glidepath computed from augmented GNSS data

    • Uses local augmentation system (GBAS, LAAS)• ILS like guidance

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 8

  • Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)

    • Differential GPS intended to serve a large area.

    • Known reference station distributedacross a continent

    • Corrections are split into individual constituents

    • There are fast correction, long term corrections and ionosphere corrections as well as satellite position corrections as part of the long term corrections

    • Correction and integrity data provided tothe user on GPS frequency via geostationary satellite

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 9

    ( )corrected i CSC i i ofAPRC tρ ρ, ,= + + ( ) ( )i ofA ofA i sv corr iRRC t t t TC c t IC,× − + ∆ +

  • Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)

    • Differential GPS intended to serve a large area.

    • Known reference station distributedacross a continent

    • Corrections are split into individual constituents

    • There are fast correction, long term corrections and ionosphere corrections as well as satellite position corrections as part of the long term corrections

    • Correction and integrity data provided tothe user on GPS frequency via geostationary satellite

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 10

    ( )corrected i CSC i i ofAPRC tρ ρ, ,= + + ( ) ( )i ofA ofA i sv corr iRRC t t t TC c t IC,× − + ∆ +http://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/egnos_ops/sites/all/images/SYSMAPESSP_light.jpg

  • RNP Approach to LPV Minima

    Provides ILS like guidance on final of RNP approach Localizer and glidepath computed from augmented GNSS data Uses Satellite Based Augmentation System (EGNOS, WAAS) Can enable decision heights as low as 200ft AGL, normal is 250 ft Final approach segement data block is stored in aircraft navigation

    database

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 11

  • Thomas Ludwig • GLASS Overview • 06.05.2019DLR.de • Folie 12

    Augmentation Systems and main Users

    What is the reason for this allocation?

    GBAS Commercial Air Transport

    SBAS General Aviation & Regional

  • Thomas Ludwig • GLASS Overview • 06.05.2019DLR.de • Folie 13

    SBAS not for Commercial Air Transport? – “Historical view”

    SBAS

    GBAS Commercial Airtransport

    General Aviation & Regional

    Large Airports & Hubs

    Small and Regional Airports

    Manufacturers say: „Large airports and hubs have xLS anyway, for our customers SBAS is not necessarily to be added, those retro fit certification are not worth the

    cash.”

  • > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 14

    No Mandate ... “Chicken-and-Egg Problem”

    Airframers& Avionics Suppliers

    ATCAirlines

    Only build new functionality

    IFthe Airlines will

    buy it!

    Only provide benefits

    IF the Airframershave built it!

    Only buy new functionality

    IF ATC gives

    benefits for it!

  • Dautermann/Ludwig • GLASS_SBAS_GBAS • 15.02.2017DLR.de • Folie 15

    Augmentation Systems and Users

    SBAS

    GBAS Commercial Air Transport

    General Aviation & Regionals

  • Integrity Data (Protection Levels)

    • Each GBAS and SBAS receiver computes protection levels

    • Protection levels are the position uncertainties at 99.999998%

    • Protection levels are compared to a maximum allowed value, the Alert Limit which is dependent on approach operation type

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 16

  • Stanford Integrity Plot

    • Graphical representation of integrity

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 17

    Unavailable

    Hazardously Misleading Information

    Misleading Information

  • Stanford Integrity Plot

    • Graphical representation of integrity

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 18

    Unavailable

    Hazardously Misleading Information

    Misleading Information

  • Technical: SBAS to GBAS Differences

    • 4 dimensional covariance position error ellipse(horizontal shown)

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 19

    approach direction

  • Technical: SBAS to GBAS Differences

    • 4 dimensional covariance position error ellipse(horizontal shown)

    • SBAS bounds horizontal error

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 20

    approach direction

  • Technical: SBAS to GBAS Differences

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 21

    approach direction

    • 4 dimensional covariance position error ellipse(horizontal shown)

    • SBAS bounds horizontal error• GBAS bounds lateral error

  • Technical: SBAS to GBAS Differences

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 22

    approach direction

    • 4 dimensional covariance position error ellipse (horizontal shown)

    • SBAS bounds horizontal error• GBAS bounds lateral error

    SBAS HPL is larger than GBAS LPL

    • Inflate GBAS lateral error by adding factor F to error distribution

    = F

  • = FGLASS Technical Flow

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 23

    ( )corrected i CSC i i ofAPRC tρ ρ, ,= + + ( ) ( )i ofA ofA i sv corr iRRC t t t TC c t IC,× − + ∆ +

  • GLASS Results: Ground Testing

    • VAL limited to 25.4 due to bit allocation in VDB, normal FASVAL is 50m

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 24

  • One Week Testing on Ground

    • Data recorded at the SBAS receiver location• Inflator consistency• Vertical inflation much higher due to

    lateral/horizontal mapping

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 25

  • One Week Testing on Ground

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 26

  • Flight Validation

    • Flight Calibration Services performed standardGBAS Flight Validation

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 27

  • Selected FCS Results

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 28

  • Selected FCS Results

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 29

  • Economic Aspects

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 30

    Comparison of the costs of ILS, GBAS and GLASS for 20 years and a lifespan of the systems of 10 years. GLASS is clearly more inexpensive than the two other systems. A GBAS station is only more inexpensive in scenarios with the lowest initial costs.

  • Conclusion

    • The system works as expected• Parameters within specifiations for GBAS• Cost can be brought down compared to GBAS• Time to Alert requirements to be investigated.

    > Lecture > Author • Document > DateDLR.de • Chart 31

    “Assessment completed against GBAS GAST-C ("Cat I") flight inspection criteria as there are no flight inspection criteria for a system such as GLASS. The classification of "Limited Use" reflects this discontinuity in standards even though the GLASS fulfils all flight inspection relevant requirements of a GBAS GAST-C installation.”

    GLS Approaches using SBAS: a SBAS to GBAS converterStructure of this PresentationDifferential GPS (GNSS) PrincipleGround Based Augmentation System (GBAS)�Final Approach Segment Data BlockSlide Number 6Final Approach Segment Data BlockFinal Approach Segment Data BlockSatellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)RNP Approach to LPV MinimaAugmentation Systems and main UsersSBAS not for Commercial Air Transport? – “Historical view”Slide Number 14Augmentation Systems and UsersIntegrity Data (Protection Levels)Stanford Integrity PlotStanford Integrity PlotTechnical: SBAS to GBAS DifferencesTechnical: SBAS to GBAS DifferencesTechnical: SBAS to GBAS DifferencesTechnical: SBAS to GBAS DifferencesGLASS Technical FlowGLASS Results: Ground TestingOne Week Testing on GroundOne Week Testing on GroundFlight Validation Selected FCS ResultsSelected FCS ResultsEconomic AspectsConclusion