tiller et al’s research vs. today’s establishment science research

15
Tiller et al’s Research vs. Today’s Establishment Science Research

Upload: briar-harvey

Post on 30-Dec-2015

14 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Tiller et al’s Research vs. Today’s Establishment Science Research.  At an overly simplistic level, for the past several hundred years, establishment science has looked at nature via the lens of a fairly simple reaction equation MassEnergy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

Tiller et al’s Research

vs.

Today’s Establishment

Science Research

Page 2: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

At an overly simplistic level, for the past several hundred years, establishment science has looked at nature via the lens of a fairly simple reaction equation

Mass Energy

with each quality being convertible to the other via the well known relationship E = mc2, attributed to Einstein, where c is the velocity of EM light, m is mass and E is energy.

Our scientific research, which we call psychoenergetic science is an attempt to expand this picture of nature to deal with the next more complex reaction equation

Mass Energy Consciousness

with each unique quality being somehow convertible, one to the other.

Page 3: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

“No human qualities of consciousnessconsciousness,

intentionintention, emotionemotion, mindmind or spiritspirit can

significantly influence a well-designed

target experiment in physical reality.”

The Unstated Assumption of

Establishment Science

Page 4: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

A byproduct of this unstated assumption is that most of

the world has come to believe that there are no higher dimensions

in nature than spacetime, that nothing can travel faster than the

speed of EM light and that the four well-known and accepted

fundamental forces of gravity, electromagnetism, the short-range

nuclear force and the long-range nuclear force are all there is. This

has led to the very materialistic society that we presently live in

and that we humans are nothing more than this!

Page 5: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

To test this unstated assumption of

establishment science, we set up three carefully

designed target experiments to test the outcomes of four

separate, well specified intentions. The first target

experiment dealt with an inorganic material - water. The

second dealt with an in vitro organic material which is a

human liver enzyme while the third dealt with an in vivo

living system, fruit fly larvae.

Page 6: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

The way in which we brought human consciousness into the

experiments was to take two, identical, low tech electrical devices in

black plastic cases, ~ 7” x 3” x 1” in size, and set one aside as a

control. The other was set on a tabletop around which 4 well-qualified

meditators sat and they imprinted a specific mental intention into

that particular black box during a meditation session of ~1 hour long.

Eventually we learned that it was necessary to both wrap the black box

in aluminum foil and store it in an electrically grounded Faraday cage in

order to keep the mental imprint from leaking away. In this way the

mental imprint could be retained in the treated device, now called an

IIED (intention imprinted electrical device) for ~3 to 6 months so it

became possible to do some careful experiments with such devices.

Page 7: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

Our procedure was, first, to set up the particular target

experiment, in a laboratory in Minnesota that we were allowed to

use, and continuously gather background data. second, we took

the particular IIED out of its storage location, in the Stanford area of

California, and shipped it via FedEx to the Minnesota laboratory.

There, we placed it in the laboratory within ~1 foot of the target

experiment, plugged it into a wall electrical outlet and switched it

on. The total electrical power radiated from this IIED was less than

one millionth of a watt.

Page 8: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

One & Three Oscillator IIEDsOne & Three Oscillator IIEDsWith Power ConverterWith Power Converter

Page 9: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

Within 1 to 3 months, the equipment measurement for the

particular target experiment had begun to change from the normal

background values in the direction specified by the intention and

gradually leveled off near the magnitude of change specified by the

intention imprinted into the IIED. All of our three target experiments

were robustly successful. See next figure.

Page 10: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research
Page 11: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

The particular target experiment that we have had replicated by others in 8 U.S. laboratories and 2 European laboratories is the one dealing with water so let’s talk about that one:

In this case, Part A was

“To increase the pH of highly purified water in equilibrium with air by one full pH-unit with no chemical additions.” Our equipment measurement accuracy was about ± one - one hundredth of a pH unit.

Part B was

“To decrease the pH of this same type of water in equilibrium with air by one full pH-unit with no chemical additions and the same equipment accuracy.”

Thus, in this two-part target experiment, we intended to achieve a signal to noise ratio of a factor of ~100. This would be a huge experimental effect - and it was achieved as this piece of data shows

Page 12: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

5.5

5.7

5.9

6.1

6.3

6.5

time (min.)

pH

Equilibrium pH range 20-25 oC.

Exposure to pH-increasing device

Pure Water in equilibrium with atmospheric CO2

D pH up by +1.0 pH unit

0 960 1920 2880 3840 4800 5760 6720

pH up by +1.0 pH unit

Page 13: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

The collective results for these three target experiments showed

unequivocally that the unstated assumption of establishment science is very,

very wrong and that it is time for a major change in our worldview of nature.

Our subsequent experiments have provided revealing data on how this

probably happens. In short, our present working hypothesis is that physical reality

consists of two unique levels with a variable degree of coupling between them:

(1) our conventional electric, atom/molecule level functioning in

spacetime and

(2) a coarse physical vacuum, magnetic information wave level

functioning in a reciprocal spacetime.

Page 14: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

This latter level has a new kind of physics which can be modulated by

human consciousness. The output from these IIEDs seem to enhance

the coupling between these two levels of physical reality in the

laboratory space so that our instruments now measure the sum of the

normal spacetime uncoupled data response plus a coupling

coefficient times the physical vacuum level response.

Our working hypothesis is that this is how a specific human

intention mentally imbedded into an IIED can significantly

influence physical reality!

Page 15: Tiller et al’s Research  vs.  Today’s Establishment Science Research

Subsequent experiments by us have indicated that humans

have their acupuncture meridian/Chakra system functioning at

this coarse physical vacuum level while most of the body functions at

our electric atom/molecule level. So human intentions are capable

of achieving the same kinds of results if they have sufficiently built

the necessary internal infrastructure. By diligent internal self-

management and “internal infrastructure” building,

we believe that a normal human can transform to an

adept and then to a Master and then to an Avatar!