title: adapting transactional models to an ever-evolving ... · • oversees implementation and...
TRANSCRIPT
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Title: Adapting Transactional Models to an Ever-Evolving World of Payment ReformSubtitle: Clinical Integration Networks: Organizational, Decisions & Regulatory Issues
Thursday August 4, 2016 2:00-3:30 PM EasternSponsored by the ABA Center for Professional Development
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Edward K. White, PartnerNelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Ed White is a partner of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP in Columbia where he practices in the areas of corporate, partnership, healthcare, taxation and non-profit law. Mr. White is a Certified Specialist in Taxation, a designation awarded by the South Carolina Supreme Court. Additionally, he is a Certified Public Accountant in South Carolina.
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Clinical Integration Network (“CIN”) Objectives
• Triple Aim– Improve Population Health– Improve Patient Care Experience– Lower Cost
• Legally contract as a single entity• Pursue Incremental Revenues• Advance With Payment Reform to Risk-Based Contracting
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Clinical Integration
• Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has stated that the joint negotiation of fees for services by competing healthcare providers could be justified either through (1) the sharing of significant financial risks among the providers or (2) the providers’ clinical integration.
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Clinical Integration
• FTC’s definition of Clinical Integration is “an active and ongoing program to evaluate and modify practice patterns by the network’s physician participants and create a high degree of interdependence and cooperation among the physicians to control costs and ensure quality.”
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Clinical Integration
• Key for achieving Clinical Integration are:
1. Develop and implement detailed, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines;
2. Limit participation in the program to providers who will follow the guidelines and the limitations on independent decision-making.
3. Measure and evaluate each participating provider’s compliance with the guidelines; and
4. Investment by all participating providers of time, energy, technology and financial resources in the development and enforcement of the clinical guidelines.
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Clinical Integration Models (CIN)
• Contractual Alliances• Joint Venture (Equity) Models• Private Payor and/or Governmental Payor
– Commercial CIN– Medicare Accountable Care Organization– Medicaid MCO CIN
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Reasons To Clinically Integrate
• Stay relevant in a shifting marketplace– Highest quality providers have best chance to survive changes
• Pursue incremental revenues from CIN• Build alliances• Prepare for government payment reforms
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Example For DiscussionJoint Venture CIN (Equity Model)
Product = shared savings contracts with migration to risk-based contractsStarting with private payor products and evolving to Medicaid and Medicare
products.
501(c)(3) Hospital
Health PlanPhysician Group
CINIndependent Practices
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Organizational Decisions
• Diligence and Integration Planning– Utilize Antitrust Do’s and Don’t’s while in pre-formation stage
with potential partners– Consider use of Joint Defense Agreement
• Steering Committee• Develop CIN Key Deal Points• Implementation Plan
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Organizational Steps
• Letter of Intent– Define the Objectives of CIN– Governance/Reserved Powers– Clinical Committee– Compensation for Achieving Benchmarks– Choice of Entity– Allocation of Income Loss– Proposed Product & Services– Capitalization
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Organizational Documents
• Operating Agreement/Articles of Organization– Governance Rights– Capital Calls/Debt Guarantee– Reserved Powers– Charitable Purpose Protection Provision– Rights of First Refusal– Allocation of Income Loss– Commitment to Clinical Integration Effort
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Committee Work
• Product Design – Migration to Risk Based Products?
• Creation of Clinical Integration Policies– Create Governance Process that:
• Develops and approves the guidelines• Oversees implementation and enforcement• Develops measures to identify high-cost providers and variance from guidelines• Audits electronic medical records• Performs individual and group performance benchmarking• Arranges for education to promote compliance• Implements corrective actions including mentoring, counseling, penalties and
expulsion
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Committee Work
• Compensation Policy for Achieving Metrics– Metrics and thresholds for compensation need to be clearly
defined– Designate data source for measurements– Remedial policies for providers who fail to achieve benchmarks
• Conflict of Interest Policy
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Contract Templates
• Provider Agreements– Specificity and clarity in defining metrics, thresholds for
payment of incentives, data source for measurements and thresholds
– Provider agrees to provide services to patients in accordance with policies and procedures of payors and CIN including those relating to quality, record keeping and reports
– Design incentives and clarify purpose of agreement is not to limit medically necessary services
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Contract Templates
• Provider will seek to facilitate in-network referrals – this will increase effectiveness of network and further goal of coordination of care
• Provider must participate in/adhere to the CIN’s clinical integration program
• Provider must participate in all payor agreements entered into by the CIN
• Provider will have no right to opt out of individual plan agreements based on fee schedule or otherwise
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Contract Templates
• Provider must agree to ongoing contributions of time and effort (e.g., service on committees)
• Provider must maintain necessary computer equipment and software to connect with CIN’s electronic platform
• Provider must make data available for developing, monitoring and enforcing clinical guidelines
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• Antitrust• Stark Law
– Indirect Compensation Relationship/Physicians– Incentive Plan Exception
• Anti-kickback Statute• Tax Exemption Issues for Tax-Exempt Hospital• Securities Laws/Exemptions• Insurance• HIPAA Privacy• Trade Secrets
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• Capitalization/Governance– Proportionality (capital, voting, debt guarantees)– Charitable Purpose Protection Provision– Pre-formation in-kind contributions
• Compensation– Detailed metrics, measurement and reporting– Clarity in defining thresholds
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• Fair Market Value Determinations– Capitalization, compensation (including metrics), and
distribution– Periodic redeterminations of fair market value as metrics and
incentives evolve– Minimum Compensation Guarantees– Option Rights– Do not begin CIN Program until effective implementation of
Clinical Integration Protocols
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• Effective implementation of Clinical Integration Protocols:– At the inception of the CIN, the more protocols the better. It is
okay to start with the understanding that more will be developed in the startup year.
– All protocols should be reviewed for effectiveness at least annually
– The Clinical Committee should meet regularly each year and minutes should be kept of each meeting
– Protocols are mandatory unless in the professional judgment of the physician that the patient should be treated differently; should be somewhat rare and should be documented in the chart
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• Protocols should describe the condition or situation being evaluated, describe and list the actual clinical steps and procedures to occur to perform the evaluations, and to treat or handle the results of the evaluation, i.e., if this ___, then ___. The more specificity, the better
• Make sure providers have appropriate training to understand the clinical protocols and what is expected of the providers, and if they will be using technology they do not presently use in order to participate in the CIN, make sure they know how to use it
• CIN needs to develop a system to review and audit files to measure providers’ compliance with the protocols and patients’ adherence to the protocols
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• CIN needs to develop a system to reward providers that follow the protocols and penalize providers that do not; can be in the reimbursement structure or bonus structure, or both
• Outcomes need to be measured. This will help inform changes that may need to be made to protocols and also give the CIN the opportunity to demonstrate how the CIN made a difference in improving the health of its patients. Eventually, a “Report to the Community” could be created which would ideally show improvements in a variety of areas made over time
• Cost savings (to patients) should also be measured. Eventually, sufficient data should be collected to help show how the protocols (and patients’ adherence to them) lead to decreased spending on healthcare
www.americanbar.org | www.abacle.org
Regulatory Issues
• Records should be kept of investments (both time and money) made in building the infrastructure of the CIN. While it is more challenging to track investments of time, keeping minutes of meetings, noting start and finish times, is one way to do this