title: effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

30
1 1 Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and 2 development of larval and juvenile Palaemon serratus 3 (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Irish waters 4 5 Authors: Eoghan Kelly 1 , Oliver Tully 1 and Ronan Browne 2 6 7 Key words: Palaemon serratus; Larvae; Juveniles; Temperature; Salinity; Development, Survival 8 9 Postal Addresses of Affiliations: 10 2 National University of Ireland, Galway 11 1 Marine Institute, Rinville, Oranmore, Galway, Ireland 12 13 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 14 15 16

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

1

1

Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and 2

development of larval and juvenile Palaemon serratus 3

(Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Irish waters 4

5

Authors: Eoghan Kelly1, Oliver Tully1 and Ronan Browne2 6

7

Key words: Palaemon serratus; Larvae; Juveniles; Temperature; Salinity; Development, Survival 8

9

Postal Addresses of Affiliations: 10

2 National University of Ireland, Galway 11

1Marine Institute, Rinville, Oranmore, Galway, Ireland 12

13

E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 14

15

16

Page 2: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

2

17

ABSTRACT 18

The combined effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and development of larval and 19

juvenile Palaemon serratus from the west coast of Ireland were investigated. Survival over time was 20

measured at thirty combinations of temperature and salinity ranging from 10-19°C and 9-34‰ in a 21

fully factorial design. Salinity had a stronger influence than temperature on survival at all larval 22

stages except stage V. For juveniles the main effect changed from temperature between 100–200 23

degree days to salinity between 200–600 degree days and temperature between 600 and 800 degree 24

days. Estimates of time taken to 50% mortality showed that juveniles tolerated lower salinities for 25

longer periods and exhibited optimal salinity values which were 3‰ lower than larvae, at 26

temperatures between 10–15°C. Larval stage durations were found to be influenced by temperature 27

but not salinity. Comparison with published data suggests that populations of P. serratus have 28

adapted to local conditions of temperature and salinity. The results presented here have practical 29

implications for fisheries assessment and management, as the incorporation of environmental 30

effects into stock-recruitment models can improve their predictive capacity. 31

32

33

Page 3: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

3

INTRODUCTION 34

Decapod shrimps and prawns are an important component of coastal ecosystems as they provide a 35

crucial link between the micro and macro trophic levels by feeding on algae, bryozoans, small 36

crustaceans, molluscs and polycheates and in turn are predated on by various species of fish and 37

birds (Smaldon, 1993). Palaemon serratus (Pennant, 1777) is a coastal species of shrimp found in 38

the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Atlantic Ocean from Mauritania to Denmark and is at the 39

northern limit of its range around Ireland. It is harvested across this range and the commercial 40

fishery in Irish coastal waters removed between 150–550mt per year between 1990-2006. This 41

catch represented an annual removal of 29–66% of the spawning stock biomass between 2005-2006 42

depending on region (Kelly et al., 2009). Irish landings of this species increased throughout the 43

1990s, although since 1999 the general trend has been downwards, with large inter-annual 44

fluctuations in catch rates and landings (Fahy & Gleeson, 1996; Kelly et al., 2009). The reasons for 45

these fluctuations are not known, but may be due to inter-annual variability in recruitment either 46

because of restricted spawning output, as a result of excessive fishing or natural mortality on mature 47

adults, or due to variability around the stock-recruitment relationship caused by environmental 48

effects acting on early life history stages. 49

50

The life cycle of P. serratus includes a planktonic larval phase and demersal juvenile and adult 51

phases (Smaldon, 1993). Larvae hatch from May onwards and are common in inshore surface 52

waters in July (Figueras, 1987). The number of larval stages is variable depending on 53

environmental conditions but typically there are eight or nine (Fincham & Figueras, 1986). Late 54

stage larvae settle into shallow sub tidal habitats in late July and August (Forster, 1951; 55

DeBhaldraithe, 1971) and appear in the fishery in mid October (Kelly et al., 2009). Over this 56

developmental period the larvae and juveniles are exposed to large variations in temperature and 57

salinity due to the effects of solar heating, evaporation, rainfall and river flow (Figueras, 1987). 58

These environmental variables have previously been shown to have significant effects on the 59

Page 4: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

4

survival, metabolism and growth of P. serratus larvae in the Mediterranean (Yagi & Ceccaldi, 60

1984; Yagi & Ceccaldi, 1985; Yagi et al., 1990). 61

62

Palaemonid shrimp have body fluids that are hypotonic to seawater and must hyporegulate in order 63

to maintain the correct ionic balance (Panikkar, 1941; Parry, 1954; Spaargaren, 1972). When 64

exposed to salinity outside of their optimum range they spend an increasing amount of energy on 65

osmoregulation to maintain homeostasis. This energy demand is at the expense of other metabolic 66

functions and if the environmental conditions deviate too far from the optimum, homeostasis cannot 67

be maintained and the animal dies. In general the Palaemonid family of shrimp exhibit well 68

developed hyper- and hypo-osmotic regulatory capabilities in mid-range salinities (Freire et al., 69

2003). However, P. serratus is a marine species (Smaldon, 1993), which only enters estuaries 70

temporarily prior to larval release. Consequently, it has a higher iso-osmotic point and a more 71

restricted osmoregulatory range than the fully estuarine Palaemon longirostris and Palaemon 72

macrodactylus (Gonzalez-Ortegon et al., 2006). The influence of salinity on the rate of respiration 73

in the larvae of P. serratus from the Mediterranean was found by Yagi et al. (1990) to have a 74

quadratic shape with lower metabolic rates, as measured by oxygen consumption, occurring at both 75

low (13‰) and high (43‰) salinities with the optimum between 25–31‰. 76

77

As with all ectotherms, the body temperature of P. serratus, and hence its metabolic rate, is 78

dependent on ambient temperature. The relationship between metabolism and temperature is 79

positive, but non-linear, with an upper and lower limit. In larval P. serratus the maximum 80

metabolic rate of physiological processes, such as osmoregulation, was found by Yagi et al. (1990) 81

to occur at 29ºC. Combinations of low temperature and low salinity have a doubly negative effect 82

on the growth and survival of P. serratus larvae (Yagi & Ceccaldi, 1985). 83

84

Page 5: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

5

Off the south coast of Ireland, the average sub-surface water temperatures during the larval and 85

post-larval period from May to July ranged from 12–15ºC (Marine Institute data 2004-2006). In 86

contrast the optimal temperature for rearing P. serratus in the UK was estimated by Reeve (1969b) 87

to be in the range 22–26ºC, and larval survival was reduced and development was prolonged at 88

lower temperatures. Sub-surface salinity off the south coast of Ireland during April and May 89

(Marine Institute data 2003–2007) was 26–35‰. In addition the annual rainfall data on the south 90

coast (Met Eireann data 1998–2004) displayed 42% variation in annual precipitation which suggests 91

that there is significant interannual variation in salinity in coastal and estuarine areas. It is therefore 92

likely, given the published data, that temperature and salinity conditions in Irish waters are sub-93

optimal for development and survival of P. serratus unless these populations have specifically 94

adapted to these conditions. 95

96

The purpose of the present work was to model the survival of larvae and juveniles of P. serratus 97

hatched from mature berried females taken in Irish waters over a range of temperature and salinity 98

conditions which reflect those in Irish coastal waters. Previous work on the related species P. 99

adspersus and P. squilla (Berglund & Lagercrantz, 1983) showed adaptation of shrimp populations 100

to local environmental conditions and significant genetic differences existed between populations 101

along the European Atlantic coast. A comparison of the effects of temperature and salinity on 102

larval development and survival in populations of P. serratus from Ireland and the Mediterranean 103

might indicate if they have adapted to local conditions. Adaptive genotypic or phenotypic plasticity 104

is an important feature of species physiology in coping with environmental change, at any given 105

location, and in determining its overall geographic range (Gotthard & Nylin, 1995). 106

107

Page 6: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

6

MATERIALS AND METHODS 108

Re-circulating Aquaculture System (RAS) 109

Adult shrimp were sourced from Rossaveel, Co. Galway on the mid west coast of Ireland and were 110

transferred directly to a laboratory at Carna, Co. Galway. Here the ovigerous females were 111

removed and divided equally between 5 independent, 250L, thermostatically controlled, re-112

circulating aquaculture systems (RAS). The water temperatures were set at 10˚C, 12˚C, 15˚C, 17˚C 113

and 19˚C and the brood-stock was fed to satiation with pelleted food (Frippak Ltd. ‘Breed Shrimp’). 114

A light:dark cycle of 10:14 hours was maintained. Cannibalism and physical injury in the holding 115

tanks due to aggressive behaviour (Reeve, 1969a) was minimised by the use of AquaMatTM artificial 116

seaweed. During the brood-stock holding period the temperature, dissolved oxygen, salinity and 117

ammonia levels were recorded on alternate days. Temperature, salinity and DO were monitored 118

using a multi-probe (YSI 2500) while ammonia concentration was determined using a hand held 119

colorimeter (Hach DR/850). 120

121

Embryo development was monitored by viewing egg samples under a binocular microscope 122

(Philips, 1971). When well developed embryos were observed, a 70L larval collection device was 123

positioned underneath the outflow pipe from the main tank to collect larvae that were passively 124

removed from the brood tank. To ensure that the larvae at the start of an experiment were at the 125

same age, only larvae that hatched on the day prior to the beginning of the experiment were used. 126

127

Water quality parameters 128

Average water temperature over the brood stock holding period (17 February to 3rd May 2005) for 129

each RAS was 9.1˚C, 11.6˚C, 15.2˚C, 16.7˚C and 18.8˚C. Dissolved oxygen (DO) values were 130

higher at lower temperatures with an average of 7.6mg.L-1 at 10˚C and 6.1mg.L-1 at 19˚C. Levels of 131

DO for the 12˚C, 15˚C and 17˚C were in between these two extremes. In general it is recommended 132

Page 7: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

7

that DO levels in RAS be maintained at >5mg.L-1 (Timmons et al., 2002). Recorded values for 133

salinity in the brood-stock holding systems showed a significant (p<0.01) relationship with 134

temperature which was possibly due to evaporation. Mean salinity at 10˚C and 19˚C was 34.8‰ 135

and 36.6‰ respectively, with standard deviations across all RAS ranging from 0.42–0.86‰. The 136

ammonia concentration showed no clear relationship with temperature and mean values ranged 137

from 0.21±0.17mg.L-1 to 0.29±0.26mg.L-1. A maximum of 1.05mg.L-1 was recorded at 17˚C. This 138

value is a factor of 10 lower than the lethal limit for adult P. serratus of 10mg.L-1 (Reeve, 1969a). 139

Water temperatures recorded over the experimental period, 11th April to 26th August 2005, fell 140

within 0.2˚C of the target with standard deviations of between 0.3˚C and 0.6˚C. 141

142

Larval experimental design 143

The temperature control systems for the larval experiments were set at 10˚C, 12˚C, 15˚C, 17˚C and 144

19˚C. Each system contained 6 experimental vessels containing 1.5L of diluted seawater at a 145

salinity of 9‰, 14‰, 19‰, 24‰, 29‰ and 34‰. This resulted in a total of 30 temperature/salinity 146

combinations in a fully factorial, non-replicated experimental design. This range of temperature 147

and salinity was selected as it encompassed the environmental conditions likely to be experienced 148

by larvae and juveniles in Irish waters during May and June. One hundred larvae at zoeal stage I 149

were transferred into each of the 30 experimental vessels. To avoid temperature shock the larvae 150

were sourced from the rearing systems at the same temperature as the experiments. Aeration was 151

provided to each vessel and the rate of airflow was controlled to ensure a steady stream of bubbles. 152

The shrimp larvae were supplied with live nauplius stage brine-shrimp (Artemia salina) at a density 153

of ~10ml-1. To ensure maximum nutritional value, and to reduce the risk of bacterial (eg. Vibrio 154

spp.) infection, the Artemia cysts were decapsulated prior to incubation using sodium hypochlorite. 155

156

Numbers of viable larvae remaining in each experimental vessel were counted on alternate days. 157

After counting, a sub-sample was viewed under a binocular microscope to determine the average 158

Page 8: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

8

larval stage (Fincham & Figueras, 1986). After counting and staging, the larvae were returned to 159

the experimental vessel with water at the original temperature and salinity, and re-supplied with 160

Artemia at the correct density. 161

162

Juvenile rearing 163

When larvae were to be on-grown to juveniles, they were removed from the larval collection system 164

and transferred to a static 70L vessel containing sea water at salinity of ~34‰. These rearing tanks 165

were supplied with moderate aeration and immersion heaters which maintained the temperature at 166

~20˚C. Brine-shrimp nauplii (Artemia salina) were prepared and added in the same manner as 167

described for the larvae. In addition 3L of mixed algal culture (Tetraselmis sp., Isocrysis sp. and 168

Nannochloropsis sp.) was added to each rearing tank. These algal species have been shown to 169

protect against disease, to enrich the nutritional content of the Artemia and to stimulate larval 170

feeding (Duerr et al., 1998; Soares et al., 2006). 171

172

Previous work on the rearing of P. serratus larvae by Reeve (1969a) showed that the time taken 173

from hatching to juvenile metamorphosis is a function of temperature and takes approximately 600 174

degree days. Degree days is the product of the number of days and temperature, and it is a 175

necessary standardization because metabolism in exothermic animals, and hence the rate of 176

development, is a function of temperature. Larvae at zoeal stage I were added to each rearing tank 177

over a period of 6 days, after which a new tank was set up for subsequent batches of larvae. 178

Separation of ages minimised the risk of cannibalism. Water quality was maintained by draining 179

and refilling the rearing tanks on alternate days. Artemia nauplii and mixed algal culture were 180

resupplied as described above. 181

182

Page 9: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

9

Juvenile experimental design 183

Before starting the juvenile experiments, a sub-sample was placed on a 1mm Sedgewick-Rafter 184

Counting Cell (Pyser SGI Ltd.) and viewed under binocular microscope in order to determine the 185

average size. Sixteen percent of the juveniles used in the experiments (240/1500) were measured. 186

The average total length ± standard deviation was 9.0 ± 0.7mm with a range of 7–11mm. 187

Temperature and salinity conditions for the juvenile experiments were the same as those used in the 188

larval experiments. The experimental vessels were modified by the addition of a single strip of 189

AquaMatTM (~20cm long by 1cm wide). This provided the juveniles with a surface to settle on and 190

was weighted at one end so that it floated vertically in the experimental vessel. Artemia feeding 191

rates were the same as for larvae (~10 per ml), however, a small amount of prepared food (INVE 192

Aquaculture Ltd. Product: PL+500) was also added. Fifty juveniles were introduced at the start of 193

each experiment and the water was changed every other day at which time surviving juveniles were 194

counted. 195

196

As age increased in the experiments, the variation in the moult-stage distribution also increased due 197

to individual variation in the inter-moult period. In the larval experiments this developmental 198

process was accounted for by following the numbers at each zoeal stage. However, juveniles do not 199

exhibit discrete morphological changes as they grow. Consequently, selecting a point in time from 200

the continuous time series of juvenile data to draw samples was more subjective. Samples were 201

extracted at 100, 200, 400, 600 and 800 degree days. 202

203

Modeling the experimental results 204

The numbers of larvae and juveniles surviving over time were plotted as wire-frame, three-205

dimensional charts: x (temperature), y (percentage surviving), z (salinity ). A temperature/salinity 206

response surface model was then fitted to the x, y, z data so that larval and juvenile survival over 207

Page 10: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

10

time could be predicted over the range of temperature and salinity conditions covered in the 208

experiments. In addition, the regression and ANOVA outputs of this analysis revealed which 209

variable, or combination of variables, had the greatest effect on mortality. A quadratic model of the 210

following form was fitted to the data: 211

y = a + (B1x1) + (B2x2) + (B11x12) + (B22x2

2) + (B12x1x2) (1) 212

Where: y = larval/juvenile numbers, B1 = Factor 1 (i.e. Temperature), B2 = Factor 2 (i.e. Salinity), 213

B11 and B22 = Quadratic terms (i.e. ‘Temperature2’ or ‘Salinity2’), B12 = Interaction term (i.e. 214

‘Temperature by Salinity’) and a = Constant 215

216

The quadratic response surface model was fitted, in Minitab©, using a least squares loss function, 217

as a multiple regression model with five explanatory variables (temperature, salinity, quadratic 218

terms for each and interaction term). The statistical significance of each of the parameters in the 219

quadratic model and their interactions can be interpreted as follows; if there is no relationship 220

between the response variable and the explanatory variables then the response surface is flat with a 221

slope of zero. If the linear term of one explanatory variable is significant then the surface is tilted 222

along that axis. If the squared term of that same explanatory variable is also significant then the 223

surface is both tilted and curved along that axis. If the linear and squared terms of both explanatory 224

variables are both significant then the surface is tilted and curved along both axes thereby producing 225

a dome shaped surface. If the interaction term is significant then the curvature of the dome surface 226

will be asymmetrical. 227

228

Time taken to 50% mortality and estimation of optimal salinity 229

To compare the results of all the temperature/salinity experiments, a single numerical value, the 230

time to 50% survival or LT50, was calculated which described the larval and juvenile survival under 231

each of the 30 temperature/salinity combinations. Linear regressions were constructed for each of 232

the experiments using the natural log of the proportion alive against degree days. The point of 233

Page 11: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

11

intersection of the regression line and the x-axis provided the estimate of the time to 50% mortality. 234

These LT50 values were then plotted against their respective salinities for each temperature tested, 235

and a quadratic regression model was fitted. The asymptotic point on the model provided estimates 236

of the optimal salinity for survival at each temperature while the intersection with the x-axis nearest 237

the origin provided estimates of the ‘critical salinity’ i.e. the salinity that would ‘instantaneously’ 238

reduce the number of larvae to 50%. 239

240

Larval development 241

The duration to each larval stage (in days) was taken as the median development point, or the point 242

at which half of the larvae had moulted to the next stage. These values were then logged and 243

plotted against temperature and salinity. Linear regression analyses were carried out to determine 244

the effects of each experimental variable on the development rate. Declining numbers of larvae 245

over time meant that the analyses were compromised for the later developmental stages. 246

247

RESULTS 248

Larval survival in relation to temperature and salinity 249

By larval stage II (Figure 1a) 100% mortality had occurred at 9‰ salinity, across all temperatures. 250

A relatively flat-topped response was observed for all temperatures at salinities >19‰, however, 251

numbers were also reduced for combinations of high salinity (29‰ and 34‰) and low temperature 252

(10˚C and 12˚C). By larval stage III (Figure 1b) there was a decline in numbers alive at the lower 253

temperatures (i.e. <15˚C) which resulted in the formation of a slope from the lower left to the upper 254

right hand side. This pattern continued to stage IV (Figure 1c), although by stage V there was an 255

increased mortality at the higher temperature/salinity combinations, resulting in the formation of a 256

single survival peak at 15˚C and 29‰ (Figure 1d). Survival at stage VI (Figure 1e) was 257

Page 12: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

12

characterised by 2 peaks at 15˚C and 24‰, and 19˚C and 19‰. The survival peak at 15˚C and 258

29‰ had weakened by stage VII (Figure 1f) and disappeared by larval stage VIII (Figure 1g) 259

leaving a single maximum at 19˚C and 19‰. By stage IX (Figure 1h) only 6 larvae out of the 260

original 3000 were alive. No larvae achieved metamorphosis under the experimental conditions. 261

Juvenile survival in relation to temperature and salinity 262

After 100 degree days (Figure 2a) survival at the lowest temperature (10ºC) and lowest salinity 263

(9‰) was 42% while the average survival at 15 ºC, 17 ºC and 19 ºC was >90%. Survival at 200 264

degree days at 10ºC was <60% across all salinities and after 400 degree days it was <45% (Figure 265

2b and Figure 2d). At the highest temperature of 19˚C the survival at 34‰ salinity was 58% after 266

400 degree days. Highest survival (72–86%) occurred at 19–29‰ salinity and 15–17˚C. After 600 267

degree days there were no juveniles alive at 10˚C or 12˚C, and the highest survival of 66% was at 268

17˚C and 19‰ salinity (Figure 2f). This trend continued after 800 degree days with no survival 269

across all salinities at 10˚C, 12˚C and 15˚C and a single point of survival of 46% at 17˚C and 19‰ 270

salinity (Figure 2h). 271

272

A model of survival in relation to temperature and salinity 273

At zoeal stage II the fitted quadratic model accounted for 79% (adjusted R2) of the variance in the 274

survival in relation to temperature and salinity. Both salinity and salinity2 terms were significant 275

(p<0.01). Thus the general shape of the quadratic model was tilted and curved along the salinity 276

axis. At zoeal stage III both the linear salinity and salinity2 variables remained significant (p<0.05), 277

however, by stage IV only the salinity2 value was significant (p<0.05). Temperature was the only 278

significant variable at larval stage V (p<0.05), although the goodness of fit of the model was just 279

48%. Salinity2 was the most influential factor at larval stage VI (p<0.05), VII (P<0.05) and VIII 280

(p<0.05) and at the final larval stage, temperature (p<0.05), temperature2 (p<0.05) and the 281

interaction term (p<0.01) were all significant. Thus salinity was the most influential variable in 282

Page 13: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

13

determining larval survival from stage I–IV, VI, VII and VIII, while temperature was most 283

influential at stages V and IX. ANOVA showed that the quadratic model was significant (p<0.01) 284

for larval stages II–V and IX and for stage VI and VIII (p<0.05). The model was not significant for 285

larval stage VII. 286

287

The fit of the quadratic model on the survival of the juveniles was more variable than for larvae 288

with temperature, salinity and temperature2 being significant (p<0.01, adjusted R2 64%) after 100 289

degree days. Temperature (p<0.05) and salinity (p<0.01) remained significant after 200 degree 290

days, although the main response was related to salinity2 (p<0.05). After 400 degree days all 291

variables, except the interaction term, were significant (p<0.01, adjusted R2 68%). Temperature and 292

temperature2 were the most influential variables after 600 degree days (p<0.01). None of the 293

variables were significant (p>0.05, adjusted R2 36%) after 800 degree days. The quadratic model 294

was significant for the juvenile data (p<0.01) for all of the time-points tested. 295

296

Time taken to 50% mortality and estimation of optimal salinity 297

The time taken to reduce the larval numbers to 50% (LT50) (Table 1) were plotted against salinity 298

and a quadratic model was fitted to estimate the optimal salinity for larval survival at each 299

temperature (Table 2). The fit of the model was good for 10˚C, 12˚C and 15˚C with R2>0.95, 300

however, it declined at 17˚C (R2=0.58) and 19˚C (R2=0.10). It was not possible to estimate the LT50 301

for the lowest salinity of 9‰ as the time-series for these experiments did not yield sufficient data. 302

However, from the limited data it was evident that the LT50 at this salinity was 2–4 days at all 303

temperatures. Optimal salinity at 10˚C and 12˚C was estimated to be 29‰ while at 15˚C and 19˚C 304

it was 28‰. At 17˚C the optimal salinity level was 21‰. In all cases the larvae preferred salinity 305

of less than 34‰. The point where the quadratic curve intersected the x-axis represented the 306

salinity level that would ‘instantaneously’ reduce the number of larvae to 50%. At 10˚C this critical 307

salinity was ~9.5‰ while at 12˚C and 15˚C it was estimated to be 12.0‰ and 10.5‰ respectively. 308

Page 14: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

14

Values for LT50 at 17˚C and 19˚C were similar across all salinities, implying that the larvae 309

tolerated salinities as low as 14‰ for extended periods at temperatures ≥17˚C. 310

311

Juveniles had a greater tolerance of low salinity than larvae (Table 3). At 9‰ salinity and 10˚C the 312

LT50 was 111 degree days, while at 12˚C and 15˚C the LT50 was 139 degree days and 158 degree 313

days respectively. LT50 values at 9‰ salinity and 17˚C and 19˚C were 499 degree days and 621 314

degree days respectively. At 10˚C, salinity of ~5.5‰ was required to ‘instantaneously’ reduce the 315

number of juveniles to 50% (Table 4). The optimal salinity for juvenile survival at 10˚C was 26‰ 316

while at 12˚C and 15˚C it was 27‰ and 25‰. The optimal salinity at 17˚C was 23‰, although the 317

survival at this temperature was similar across all salinities. At 19˚C it was 29‰. The optimal 318

salinity of 26‰ for juvenile survival at temperatures of 10˚C, 12˚C and 15˚C was, on average, 3‰ 319

lower than that for larvae. 320

321

Larval development 322

Multiple linear regression of the log development rate on temperature and salinity showed that the 323

time to each larval stage was significantly (p<0.01) influenced by temperature but not salinity. The 324

various salinity treatments were consequently used as pseudo replicates to calculate the average 325

developmental durations at each temperature (Table 5). The relationship between temperature (T) 326

and development rate (D) to larval stage IV (Figure 3) was described by a negative power function 327

(D = 2874.9 x T -1.7978) and was significantly different for Irish and Mediterranean (Yagi & 328

Ceccaldi, 1985) populations (ANCOVA, p<0.05). 329

330

DISCUSSION 331

The results presented show that larvae and juveniles of Palaemon serratus survive and develop over 332

a broad range of salinity and temperature. Nevertheless, increased mortality rates were observed at 333

Page 15: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

15

combinations of low temperature and low salinity. Larval survival increased with increasing 334

salinity at temperatures between 10–19˚C although survival at 34‰ was also sub-optimal. At low 335

salinity the survival of juveniles was higher than that of larvae and they also had lower salinity 336

optima. The tolerance of larval P. serratus to a broad range of salinities is not unusual among the 337

Palaemonidae and has been demonstrated in the early life stages of Palaemon xiphas and Palaemon 338

adspersus (Guerao et al., 1993). Such euryhaline physiology is evidence of adaptation by these 339

shrimp to the low salinity conditions which they encounter in coastal and estuarine habitats during 340

their early life history (Smaldon, 1993). 341

342

It is generally recognised that temperature, acting either independently or in conjunction with other 343

environmental factors, is one of the major factors affecting the survival of decapod larvae (Costlow, 344

1967; Hicks, 1973; Rochanaburanon & Williamson, 1976; Rothlisberg, 1979; Cockroft & 345

Emmerson, 1984; Preston, 1985; Anger, 1991; Brown et al., 1992; Kumlu et al., 2000; Lárez et al., 346

2000; Zacharia & Kakati, 2004; Li & Hong, 2007). However, in the present study the quadratic 347

response model showed that salinity was more important than temperature in determining survival 348

at all larval stages except stage V. In the case of juveniles the main curvature of the model changed 349

from temperature after 100 degree days to salinity after 200 degree days and back to temperature 350

after 600 and 800 degree days. 351

352

The increase in larval mortality rates after ~300 degree days may have been unrelated to 353

temperature and salinity and may instead have been due to changes in the physiology of the larvae 354

at this point in their development. Yagi et al. (1990) noted that a maximum respiration rate was 355

observed in zoeal stage IV which corresponded with a shift towards a more carnivorous diet. A 356

sudden increase in proteasic activity had previously been noted at this stage by Van Wormhoudt 357

(1973) suggesting an increase in dietary protein. In the present study 49%, 62% and 81% of the 358

larvae at 15˚C, 17˚C and 19˚C respectively were at zoeal stage IV when the mortality rates 359

Page 16: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

16

increased. It seems likely that the additional metabolic demand of making the developmental 360

transition from zoeal stage IV resulted in the increased mortality rates observed at this time. 361

362

Genetic studies of P. adspersus and P. squilla show that gene flow is restricted between 363

neighbouring populations (Berglund & Lagercrantz, 1983). This restricted gene flow may be the 364

result of the estuarine distribution limiting offshore and alongshore dispersal of the early life stages 365

and may lead to adaptation to local environmental conditions and to different physiological 366

preferences at different latitudes (Bilton et al., 2002; Freire et al., 2003). Experiments by Yagi & 367

Ceccaldi (1985), on a Mediterranean population, found that survival was highest at high 368

temperature (21–25˚C) and high salinity (25–37‰). This contrasts with the present work where 369

larval survival was highest between 15–17˚C and optimal salinity was ≤29‰. 370

371

While larval survival rates in the present study were more influenced by salinity, larval 372

development rates were determined solely by temperature. Comparison with data from Yagi & 373

Ceccaldi (1985) showed that at a given temperature the development rate was slower for the Irish 374

than the Mediterranean population. The Irish larvae also went through nine zoeal stages whereas 375

the Mediterranean larvae metamorphosed after six. Additional larval stages can occur as a result of 376

stressful environmental conditions but typically there are 8–9 (Fincham & Figueras, 1986). 377

378

Different temperature and salinity optima for survival and development rate between Irish and 379

Mediterranean populations of P. serratus suggest that populations are adapted to local 380

environmental conditions. However, direct experimental comparisons between the two populations 381

would be necessary to discount the role of experimental variation in relation to this hypothesis. 382

Irish populations appear to have lower temperature and salinity optima for survival although their 383

development rate, at a given temperature, was slightly slower. Tolerance to lower temperatures and 384

salinities in the Irish population suggests a capacity to adapt to conditions at higher latitudes. 385

Page 17: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

17

Together with rising ocean temperatures, due to global warming, this capacity may lead to a 386

northward expansion of P. serratus in European waters. In fact since the 1990s Irish shrimp 387

fisheries have extended from the south to the north of the country suggesting that this expansion 388

may have already begun (Kelly et al., 2009). The results also suggest that Mediterranean and Irish 389

populations may have different spawner recruit relationships. The larval development rate at a given 390

temperature is shorter in the Mediterranean population. Because larval mortality rates are very high 391

even small reductions in the duration of the larval phase can significantly increase the proportion of 392

the larval population recruiting to the juvenile phase. The efficiency of recruitment, for a given 393

spawning output, may therefore be lower at higher latitudes because temperatures are lower. 394

Recruitment may also be more variable at higher latitudes, where there is likely to be a higher 395

frequency of low salinity and low temperature events, which reduce larval survival. 396

397

The results presented here have practical implications for fisheries assessment as the incorporation 398

of environmental effects into stock-recruitment models can improve their predictive capacity. Such 399

models have been used in the management of many shrimp fisheries around the world e.g. the tiger 400

shrimp, (Penaeus esculentus) in Western Australia (Penn & Caputi, 1986), the ocean shrimp 401

(Pandalus jordani) in the Canadian Pacific (Hannah, 1993) and the white shrimp (Litopenaeus 402

setiferus) in coastal waters off Georgia, USA (Belcher & Jennings, 2004). Reducing the 403

unexplained variation in the stock-recruitment relationship will enable reference points for 404

recruitment over-fishing to be identified and increase the certainty in recruitment prediction. The 405

laboratory model described here could also be used to hindcast the likely effects of variability in 406

local temperature and salinity on shrimp recruitment. Given that the Irish shrimp fishery primarily 407

exploits the 1+ year class there is scope to include environmental effects on likely recruitment 408

success in the previous year for the management of mortality on the exploited year class. These 409

data, together with information on the relationship between development time and temperature, also 410

informs bio-physical modelling of dispersal capacity of larval populations of P. serratus. 411

Page 18: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

18

412

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 413

This study formed part of a thesis submitted to the National University of Ireland, Galway in partial 414

fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. We acknowledge the 415

constructive comments of Prof. Wallace Arthur. 416

417

FINANCIAL SUPPORT 418

This research was supported by the National Development Plan 2000–2006 administered by Bord 419

Iascaigh Mhara (project number 05.SM.T1.04). 420

421

REFERENCES 422

Anger K. 1991. Effects of temperature and salinity on the larval development of the Chinese mitten 423

crab Eriocheir sinensis (Decapoda: Grapsidae). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 72, 103-110. 424

Belcher C.N. & Jennings C.A. 2004. Evaluation of stock-recruitment curves for white shrimp in 425

Georgia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24, 654-661. 426

Berglund A. & Lagercrantz U. 1983. Genetic differentiation in populations of two Palaemon 427

prawn species at the Atlantic east coast: does gene flow prevent local adaptation? Marine Biology, 428

77, 49-57. 429

Bilton D.T., Paula J. & Bishop J.D.D. 2002. Dispersal, genetic differentiation and speciation in 430

estuarine organisms. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55, 937-952. 431

Brown S.D., Bert T.M., Tweedale W.A., Torres J.J. & Lindberg W.J. 1992. The effects of 432

temperature and salinity on survival and development of early life stage Florida, stone crabs 433

Menippe mercenaria (Say). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 157, 115-136. 434

Page 19: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

19

Cockroft A.C. & Emmerson W.D. 1984. The effect of temperature on the growth, development 435

and survival of Macropetasma africanus (Balss) (Penaeoidea: Penaeidae) larvae reared in the 436

laboratory. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 84, 203-210. 437

Costlow J.D. 1967. The effect of temperature and salinity on survival and metamorphosis of 438

megalops of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Helgolander Wissen Meeresunters, 15, 84-97. 439

De Bhaldraithe P. 1971. Studies on the biology of the prawn Palaemon serratus (Pennant) off the 440

Galway coast. In Ph.D. Thesis: National University of Ireland, Galway. 441

Duerr E.O., Molvar A. & Sato V. 1998. Cultured microalgae as aquaculture feeds. Journal of 442

Marine Biotechnology, 6(2), 65-70. 443

Fahy E. & Gleeson P. 1996. The commercial exploitation of shrimp Palaemon serratus (Pennant) 444

in Ireland. Marine Institute, Dublin, Ireland, 28 pp. 445

Figueras A.J. 1987. Distribution and abundance of larvae of Palaemonid prawns in the Ria de 446

Vigo, N. W. Spain. Journal of Plankton Research, 9(4), 729-738. 447

Fincham A.A. & Figueras A.J. 1986. Larval keys and diagnoses for the subfamily Palaemoninae 448

(Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) in the north-east Atlantic and aspects of functional 449

morphology. Journal of Natural History, 20, 203-224. 450

Forster G.R. 1951. The biology of the common prawn, Leander serratus (Pennant). Journal of the 451

Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 30, 333-360. 452

Freire C.A., Cavassin F., Rodrigues E.N., Torres A.H. & McNamara J.C. 2003. Adaptive 453

patterns of osmotic and ionic regulation, and the invasion of fresh water by the palaemonid shrimps. 454

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 136(3), 771-778. 455

Page 20: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

20

Gonzalez-Ortegon E., Pascual E., Cuesta J.A. & Drake P. 2006. Field distribution and 456

osmoregulatory capacity of shrimps in a temperate European estuary (SW Spain). Estuarine, 457

Coastal and Shelf Science, 67(1-2), 293-302. 458

Gotthard K. & Nylin S. 1995. Adaptive Plasticity and Plasticity as an Adaptation: A Selective 459

Review of Plasticity in Animal Morphology and Life History. Oikos, 74(1), 3-17. 460

Guerao G., Ribera C. & Castello F. 1993. The effect of salinity on larval survival of Palaemon 461

xiphias Risso, 1816 and P. adspersus Rathke, 1837 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Special 462

Publication, European Aquaculture Society, No. 19, 634 pp. 463

Hannah R.W. 1993. Influence of environmental variation and spawning stock levels on 464

recruitment of ocean shrimp (Pandalus jordani). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic 465

Science, 50(3), 612-622. 466

Hicks R.F. 1973. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on Hemigrapsus edwardsi 467

(Hilgendorf) and H. Crenulatus (Milne Edwards) from Wellington Harbour, New Zealand. Journal 468

of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 13(1), 1-14. 469

Kelly E., Tully O., Lehane B. & Breathnach S. 2009. The shrimp (Palaemon serratus P.) fishery: 470

analysis of the resource in 2003-2007. Bord Iascaigh Mhara, Dun Laoghaire, County Dublin, 471

Ireland., Volume 8, 48 pp. 472

Kumlu M., Eroldogan O.T. & Aktas M. 2000. Effects of temperature and salinity on larval 473

growth, survival and development of Penaeus semisulcatus. Aquaculture, 188, 167-173. 474

Lárez M.B., Palazón-Fernández J.L. & Bolonos C.J. 2000. The effect of salinity and temperature 475

on the larval development of Mithrax caribbaeus Rathbun, 1920 (Brachyura: Majidae) reared in the 476

laboratory. Journal of Plankton Research, 22(10), 1855-1869. 477

Page 21: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

21

Li H.Y. & Hong S.Y. 2007. The effect of temperature and salinity on survival and growth of 478

Crangon uritai (Decapoda: Crangonidae) larvae reared in the laboratory. Marine ecology., 28(2), 479

288-295. 480

Panikkar N.K. 1941. Osmoregulation in some Palaemonid prawns. Journal of the Marine 481

Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 317-360. 482

Parry G. 1954. Ionic regulation in the Palaemonid prawn Palaemon (=Leander) serratus. Journal 483

of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31, 601-613. 484

Penn J.W. & Caputi N. 1986. Spawning stock-recruitment relationships and environmental 485

influences on the tiger prawn (Penaeus esculentus) fishery in Exmouth Gulf, Western Australia. 486

Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 37, 491-505. 487

Philips G. 1971. Incubation of the English prawn Palaemon serratus. Journal of the Marine 488

Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 43-48. 489

Preston N. 1985. The combined effects of temperature and salinity on hatching success and the 490

survival, growth, and development of the larval stages of Metapenaeus bennettae (Racek and Dall). 491

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 85(1), 57-74. 492

Reeve M.R. 1969a. The laboratory culture of the prawn Palaemon serratus. Fisheries 493

Investigations, 26(1), 1-38. 494

Reeve M.R. 1969b. Growth, metamorphosis and energy conversion in the larvae of the prawn, 495

Palaemon serratus. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1969(49), 77-496

96. 497

Rochanaburanon T. & Williamson D.I. 1976. Laboratory survival of larvae of Palaemon elegans 498

Rathke and other caridean shrimps in relation to their distribution and ecology. Estuarine, Coastal 499

and Shelf Science, 4, 83-91. 500

Page 22: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

22

Rothlisberg P.C. 1979. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and growth of 501

the larvae of Pandalus jordani (Decapoda: Pandalidae). Marine Biology, 54, 125-134. 502

Smaldon G. 1993. Coastal shrimps and prawns. Dorchester: Henry Ling Limited. 503

Soares R., Peixoto S., Wasielesky W. & D'Incao F. 2006. Effect of different food items on the 504

survival and growth of Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Pérez-Farfante 1967) post-larvae. Aquaculture 505

Research, 37(14), 1413-1418. 506

Spaargaren D.H. 1972. Osmoregulation in the prawns Palaemon serratus and Lysmata seticaudata 507

from the Bay of Naples Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 5(4), 416-436. 508

Timmons M.B., Ebeling J.M., Wheaton F.W., Summerfelt S.T. & Vinci B.J. 2002. 509

Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. New York: Cayuga Aqua Ventures. 510

Van Wormhoudt A. 1973. Variation des protéases, des amalyases et des protéines solubles au 511

cours du développement larvaire chez Palaemon serratus. Marine Biology, 19, 245-248. 512

Yagi H. & Ceccaldi H.J. 1984. The combined effects of temperature and salinity on the 513

metamorphosis and larval growth of the common prawn, Palaemon serratus (Pennant) (Crustacea, 514

Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Aquaculture, 37(1), 73-85. 515

Yagi H. & Ceccaldi H.J. 1985. The role of temperature and salinity on moult, metamorphosis and 516

growth at each larval stage of Palaemon serratus (Pennant) (Palaemonidae, Decapoda, Crustacea). 517

Annales de l'Institute Oceanographique, 61(1), 75-93. 518

Yagi H., Ceccaldi H.J. & Gaudy R. 1990. Combined influence of temperature and salinity on 519

oxygen consumption of the larvae of the pink shrimp, Palaemon serratus (Pennant) (Crustacea, 520

Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Aquaculture, 86, 77-92. 521

Page 23: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

23

Zacharia S. & Kakati V.S. 2004. Optimal salinity and temperature for early developmental stages 522

of Penaeus merguiensis De man. Aquaculture, 232, 373-382. 523

524

525

Page 24: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

24

TABLES AND FIGURES 526

527

Fig. 1: Percentage survival (y-axis) of Palaemon serratus larvae in relation 528

to temperature (x-axis) and salinity (z-axis) at zoeal stages II-IX (charts a-h) 529

530

Page 25: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

25

531

532

Fig. 2: Percentage survival (y-axis) of Palaemon serratus juveniles in relation to temperature (x-533

axis) and salinity (z-axis) at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 degree days (charts a-h) 534

535

536

Page 26: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

26

537

Fig. 3: Development rate of Irish and Mediterranean Palaemon serratus larvae to zoeal stage IV at 538

various temperatures 539

540

Page 27: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

27

541

Table 1: Linear regression coefficients for natural log of proportion of Palaemon serratus larvae 542

alive (y-axis) against time (x-axis) and time required to reduce initial numbers to 50% 543

Temp.

(˚C)

Salinity

(‰)

Slope Constant R2 N Days

to 50%

Degree Days

to 50%

10 9 - - - 1 - -

10 14 0.2634 -4.6108 0.90 12 17.5 175.0

10 19 0.1776 -5.0022 0.90 21 28.2 281.7

10 24 0.1066 -3.8686 0.93 29 36.3 362.9

10 29 0.0788 -3.3775 0.88 29 42.9 428.6

10 34 0.0781 -2.7614 0.84 28 35.4 353.6

12 9 - - - 1 - -

12 14 0.8448 -6.1332 0.99 4 7.3 87.1

12 19 0.3523 -4.9765 0.90 14 14.1 169.5

12 24 0.1917 -4.6177 0.98 20 24.1 289.1

12 29 0.1163 -3.1675 0.93 20 27.2 326.8

12 34 0.1261 -2.8951 0.89 20 23.0 275.5

15 9 - - - 1 - -

15 14 0.6852 -6.3455 0.91 5 9.3 138.9

15 19 0.1570 -2.5924 0.85 19 16.5 247.7

15 24 0.1675 -4.0540 0.94 19 24.2 363.0

15 29 0.1749 -4.1410 0.91 19 23.7 355.1

15 34 0.1755 -3.7118 0.87 15 21.1 317.2

17 9 - - - 1 - -

17 14 0.2196 -4.1683 0.89 15 19.0 322.7

17 19 0.1734 -3.1603 0.85 15 18.2 309.8

17 24 0.3280 -6.0763 0.91 13 18.5 314.9

17 29 0.3403 -6.7046 0.88 11 19.7 334.9

17 34 0.3195 -4.8069 0.90 11 15.0 255.8

19 9 - - - 1 - -

19 14 0.2095 -2.6623 0.94 15 12.7 241.4

19 19 0.1613 -3.0648 0.96 15 19.0 361.0

19 24 0.2235 -3.0377 0.92 14 13.6 258.2

19 29 0.3346 -5.1921 0.95 14 15.5 294.8

19 34 0.2771 -4.5359 0.95 15 16.4 311.0

544

545

Page 28: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

28

Table 2: Quadratic regression coefficients for LT50 in degree days against salinity to estimate 546

optimal and critical values for Palaemon serratus larval survival 547

Temp.

(˚C)

N Squared

Term

Linear

Term

Constant R2 Critical

Salinity (‰)

Optimal

Salinity (‰)

10 5 -1.08 62.04 -490.91 0.96 9.5 29

12 5 -1.00 58.57 -551.56 0.96 12.0 29

15 5 -1.19 66.42 -564.46 0.98 10.5 28

17 5 -0.34 13.97 182.89 0.58 - 21

19 5 -0.19 10.70 157.02 0.10 - 28

548

549

Page 29: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

29

550

Table 3: Linear regression coefficients for natural log of proportion of Palaemon serratus juveniles 551

alive (y-axis) against time (x-axis) and time required to reduce initial numbers to 50% 552

Temp.

(˚C)

Salinity

(‰)

Slope Constant R2 N Days

to 50%

Degree Days

to 50%

10 9.0 0.1985 -2.2087 0.93 15 11.1 111.3

10 14.0 0.0706 -1.2545 0.81 25 17.8 177.7

10 19.0 0.0580 -1.7625 0.92 24 30.4 303.9

10 24.0 0.0664 -1.8329 0.77 25 27.6 276.0

10 29.0 0.0504 -1.7859 0.73 25 35.4 354.3

10 34.0 0.0630 -1.5937 0.78 25 25.3 253.0

12 9.0 0.2720 -3.1466 0.94 12 11.6 138.8

12 14.0 0.1040 -1.6413 0.76 13 15.8 189.4

12 19.0 0.2450 -5.6522 0.90 6 23.1 276.8

12 24.0 0.1267 -2.7149 0.77 13 21.4 257.1

12 29.0 0.1460 -2.8018 0.80 13 19.2 230.3

12 34.0 0.1171 -2.5218 0.70 13 21.5 258.4

15 9.0 0.1158 -1.2204 0.79 23 10.5 158.1

15 14.0 0.0705 -2.8499 0.82 21 40.4 606.4

15 19.0 0.0890 -3.9883 0.90 21 44.8 672.2

15 24.0 0.0917 -3.9892 0.97 19 43.5 652.5

15 29.0 0.0965 -3.8746 0.94 21 40.2 602.3

15 34.0 0.1073 -4.4550 0.93 20 41.5 622.8

17 9.0 0.0722 -2.1185 0.88 30 29.3 498.8

17 14.0 0.0794 -2.5569 0.91 32 32.2 547.4

17 19.0 0.0664 -3.1859 0.98 32 48.0 815.7

17 24.0 0.0737 -2.8402 0.98 32 38.5 655.1

17 29.0 0.1009 -4.0969 0.98 32 40.6 690.3

17 34.0 0.0921 -2.9454 0.93 32 32.0 543.7

19 9.0 0.1295 -4.2295 0.97 26 32.7 620.5

19 14.0 0.1105 -2.2221 0.96 22 20.1 382.1

19 19.0 0.1039 -1.8848 0.94 22 18.1 344.7

19 24.0 0.1162 -3.2704 0.97 28 28.1 534.7

19 29.0 0.1008 -3.1710 0.97 27 31.5 597.7

19 34.0 0.1057 -3.0960 0.95 28 29.3 556.5

553

554

Page 30: Title: Effects of temperature and salinity on the survival and

30

555

Table 4: Quadratic regression coefficients for LT50 in degree days against salinity to estimate 556

optimal and critical values for Palaemon serratus juvenile survival 557

Temp.(˚C) N Squared

Term

Linear

Term

Constant R2 Critical

Salinity (‰)

Optimal

Salinity (‰)

10 5 -0.74 38.57 -189.28 0.86 5.5 26

12 5 -0.41 21.49 -19.31 0.82 - 27

15 5 -1.86 93.05 -453.10 0.82 - 25

17 5 -1.36 61.43 -33.96 0.67 - 23

19 4 -2.31 136.54 -1413.60 0.99 - 29

558

559

Table 5: Average cumulative duration (days) of Palaemon serratus to each larval stage in relation 560

to temperature (Number of experimental observations, Standard Deviation) 561

Temp.

(˚C)

ZI-ZII

ZI-ZIII

ZI-ZIV

ZI-ZV

ZI-ZVI

ZI-ZVII

ZI-ZVIII

ZI-ZIX

10 17.4

(5, 1.7)

35.5

(4, 2.5)

49.3

(3, 1.2)

- - - - -

12 14.0

(4, 0.0)

25.5

(4, 4.7)

32.7

(3, 4.2)

37.3

(3, 2.3)

- - - -

15 8.8

(5, 1.8)

15.5

(4, 1.9)

19.5

(4, 1.0)

27.0

(4, 2.0)

30.0

(3, 0.0)

35.0

(2, 1.4)

38.0

(1, -)

-

17 6.0

(5, 0.0)

10.8

(5, 1.1)

17.6

(5, 0.9)

20.8

(5, 1.8)

26.7

(3, 1.2)

27.0

(2, 1.4)

29.0

(2, 1.4)

-

19 4.8

(5, 1.1)

8.4

(5, 2.2)

15.6

(5, 2.2)

20.0

(5, 0.0)

21.6

(5, 0.9)

24.0

(5, 0.0)

26.0

(5, 1.4)

28.0

(2, -)

562