toolkit for the indicators of resilience - bioversity international...seascapes (sepls), i have come...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Toolkit for the
Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes
RESEARCH PROGRAM ON
Water, Land and Ecosystems
For more information contact the Secretariat of IPSI, UNU-IAS
E-Mail: [email protected]
http://satoyama-initiative.org/
-
Toolkit for the
Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes
-
Table of conTenTs
Foreword 5Chapter 1 Introduction 7 1.1Aboutthistoolkit 7
1.2Socio-ecologicalproductionlandscapesandseascapes
(SEPLS) 7
1.3ResilienceinSEPLS–Whatisit? 8
1.4Abouttheindicators 9
1.5Whocanbenefitfromusingtheindicators? 12
Chapter 2: The indicators 17 2.1Whattheindicatorsmeasure 17
2.2Howtousetheindicators 18
2.3Listofindicators 19
Chapter 3 Practical guidance for using the indicators 29 3.1Stage1:Preparation 31
3.2Stage2:Theassessmentworkshop 38
3.3Stage3:Follow-up 45
Chapter 4 Examples from the field 49 4.1Namibia–Anoverviewoftheprocess 49
4.2Fiji–Identificationofconcretecommunityactions 54
4.3Turkey–Developmentofalandscape/seascapestrategy 59
4.4Kenya–Resultsanalysisforresearchers 64
Citation
UNU-IAS,BioversityInternational,IGESandUNDP(2014)Toolkit
for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production
LandscapesandSeascapes(SEPLS).
Acknowledgement
ThistoolkitwasdevelopedaspartofaCollaborativeActivityby
the United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study
of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), Bioversity International, Institute for
GlobalEnvironmentalStrategies (IGES), and theUnitedNations
Development Programme (UNDP) under the International
PartnershipfortheSatoyamaInitiative(IPSI).Thetoolkitisbased
on theexperiencesof field testingof thefirst setof the indica-
tors conducted by Bioversity International and UNDP. National
Coordinators from the UNDP-implemented Global Environment
FacilitySmallGrantsProgramme(GEF-SGP)inthetwentyUNDP-
COMDEKScountriesprovidedvaluableinputstothedevelopment
ofthefirstsetoftheindicators,andhavebeenplayingapivotal
roleinthetestingoftheindicators,capturingtheperspectivesof
communitiesinthefield.
The toolkit isalsobasedon theuseful inputs fromanumberof
individualswhoparticipated in the followingeventson the indi-
catorsandthetoolkit:UNU-IASSeminarontheindicators(April
2013,Yokohama,Japan),ExpertWorkshoponadrafttoolkitforthe
indicators (July2013,Yokohama,Japan)organizedbyUNU-IAS
and IGES, Seminars on Indicators Research (January 2014,
Rome, Italy) organized by Bioversity International. Participants
in these events include Maurizio Farhan Ferrari (Forest Peoples
Programme), Fumiko Fukuoka (UNDP), Yoko Watanabe (GEF
Secretariat),HongyanGu(ShanghaiAcademyofSocialSciences),
RikiyaKonishi(MinistryoftheEnvironment,Japan),FumikoNakao
(MinistryoftheEnvironment,Japan),DorothyWanjaNyingi(Kenya
WetlandBiodiversityResearchteam,KENWEB),NaohisaOkuda
(Ministry of the Environment, Japan), Krishna Chandra Paudel
(GovernmentofNepal),SuneethaMSubramanian(UNU-IAS),and
AtsuhiroYoshinaka(SCBD).
List of contributors
NadiaBergamini(BioversityInternational)
WilliamDunbar(UNU-IAS)
PabloEyzaguirre(BioversityInternational)
KaoruIchikawa(UNU-IAS)
IkukoMatsumoto(IGES)
DunjaMijatovic(BioversityInternational)
YasuyukiMorimoto(BioversityInternational)
NickRemple(UNDP)
DianaSalvemini(UNDP)
WataruSuzuki(UNU-IAS)
RonnieVernooy(BioversityInternational)
Designandlayout:[email protected]
Cover:AgrobiodiversityConservationAreainBegnas,Nepal.
©BioversityInternational/DunjaMijatovic
ISBN978-92-9255-006-6
-
Foreword As I have watched the development of the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS), I have come to believe that these have the potential to be one of the most effective tools for not only measuring, but also raising awareness of the concept of resilience in the field of sustainable development.
Perhaps the most outstanding feature of the set of indicators first developed by Bioversity International and UNU-IAS in 2012 is that they aim not to provide hard, quantifiable numbers to measure resilience – which would be a highly difficult and problematic process – but rather focus on a community’s own perceptions. By encouraging community members themselves to reflect on landscape and seascape resilience and how it can be improved, the indicators potentially give them a greater sense of ownership over management processes, hopefully leading to more lasting sustainability.
Up to now, this has been a good idea in principle, but there has been little practical guidance for how to translate it into actual practice. With the publication of this toolkit, based on actual experience from field-testing the indicators around the world, I am confident that this issue has been addressed. The indicators themselves have been updated to reflect lessons learned, and the guidance provided in the toolkit should allow users everywhere to make effective use of them.
As the concept of resilience steadily moves into the mainstream in the ongoing worldwide discourse on biodiversity and sustainability, I am proud to see that these indicators of resilience are also ready for mainstreaming as an impor-tant tool. I am sure that this toolkit will reward any community in which it is used with a greater appreciation of the resilience of their landscapes and seascapes, and with greater sustainability looking to the future.
ProfessorAlfredOteng-Yeboah
GhanaNationalBiodiversityCommittee
Floating islands on lake Titicaca, Puno, Peru©BioversityInternational/AlfredoCamacho
-
6 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 1: Introduction | 7
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 about this toolkit
This toolkit provides practical guidance for makinguseofthe“IndicatorsofResilienceinSocio-ecologicalProduction Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS)” inthefield.The indicatorsarea tool for engaging localcommunities in adaptive management of the land-scapesandseascapesinwhichtheylive.Byusingthetested methods presented in this toolkit, communi-ties can increase their capacity to respond to social,economic,andenvironmentalpressuresandshocks,toimprovetheirenvironmentalandeconomicconditions,thus increasingthesocialandecologicalresilienceoftheirlandscapesandseascapes,andultimatelymakeprogress towards realizing a society in harmony withnature.
The approach presented here is centred on holdingparticipatory“assessmentworkshops”.These involvediscussion and a scoring process for the set oftwenty indicators designed to capture communities’perceptionsof factorsaffecting the resilienceof theirlandscapesandseascapes.Theparticipants in these
workshopsaremembersof the localcommunityandstakeholdersinthelocalarea.Theirparticipationallowsthem to evaluate current conditions across the land-scape and identify and reach agreement on priorityactions, contributing to enhanced communicationamongstakeholdersandempowered localcommuni-ties. Workshops may be planned and implementedbypeople fromwithinoroutside thecommunity.Theguidanceprovided in this toolkit isprimarily intendedfororganizersandfacilitatorsofresilienceassessmentworkshops.
The toolkit is divided into four chapters. Chapter 1explains the conceptual background, the purpose,usesandbenefitsof the indicators.Chapter2 intro-duces the twenty indicators themselves. Chapter 3providespracticalguidanceonhow touse the indi-cators inanassessmentworkshopheldbythe localcommunity. This involves steps to be taken before,duringandaftertheworkshopitself,includingfollow-up discussions and repeated workshops, encour-agingacontinuing, long-term,adaptiveapproach tomanagement. Chapter 4 presents examples of pastuseoftheindicatorstohighlightcertainaspectsoftheassessmentprocess.
Tounderstandtherationaleandpurposeoftheindica-tors, the toolkit reviews two basic concepts: “socio-ecological production landscapes and sea-scapes(SEPLS)”and“resilience”.
1.2 socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (sePls)
Humanshave influencedmostof theEarth’secosys-temsthroughproductionactivitiessuchasagriculture,forestry, fisheries, herding and livestock production.Whilehumanimpactsareoftenthoughtofasharmfultotheenvironment,manysuchhuman-natureinteractionsareinfactfavourabletoorsynergisticwithbiodiversity
1
Semau island, Indonesia
©COMDEKSIndonesia/CatharinaDwihastarini
-
8 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 1: Introduction | 9
conservation. Around the world, local communities’efforts over many years to adapt to the surroundingenvironment and enjoy its bounty for the long termhavecreateduniqueandsustainable landscapesandseascapes that have provided humans with goodssuchasfoodandfuel,andservicessuchaswaterpuri-ficationandrichsoil,whilehostingadiversityofanimalandplantspecies.
These landscapes and seascapes vary widely dueto their unique local climatic, geographic, cultural,and socio-economic conditions. However, they arecommonly characterized as dynamic bio-culturalmosaicsofhabitatsandlandandseauseswheretheinteractionbetween people and the landscape main-tainsorenhancesbiodiversitywhileprovidinghumanswith the goods and services needed for their well-being.Avarietyofdifferentnamesexistfortheseareasacross countries and languages, including dehesa inSpain,ahupua’ainHawaii,andsatoyama inJapan,sotheterm“socio-ecologicalproductionlandscapesandseascapes”(SEPLS)hasbeencoinedtorefertothemcollectively.
SEPLShaveprotectedbiodiversityandprovidedlocalcommunities with ecosystem services around theworld for many years. However, with rapidly-growinghuman demands for food and other goods in recentyears,aswellaschangesinsocio-economicsystemsdue to industrialization, urbanization and globaliza-tion,diverseproductionareashavebeentransformedtowards more uniform systems requiring intensiveuse of external inputs such as chemical fertilizers,pesticides, and herbicides. Over time, this has hadsignificant impacts on the associated biodiversityandecosystemsthatunderpinagriculturalproductionactivities.Theseimpactscanbemeasuredintermsoflossofresilienceandsustainabilityinproductionareastoanextent that threatenshumanwell-being,due tothedegradationofnaturalresourcesandreductionsinecosystemservices.
Dynamic mosaic of habitats and land uses in Gamri Watershed, Bhutan
1.3 Resilience in sePls – What is it?
Localcommunitiesandtheecosystemstheyliveinmayexperience pressures and disturbances of differenttypes and degrees, from extreme weather events tomarket shocks and profound demographic and insti-tutionalchanges.Forests, farmlands, lakesandotherhabitats are affected by fires, storms and droughts,andnearlyalllandscapesandseascapesareaffectedtosomedegreebyhuman-inducedpressuressuchaspollution, soil erosion, deforestation and introductionofinvasivespeciesthatcanleadtoecosystemdegra-dation.Eventssuchaspoliticalunrestandeconomiccrisesimpacthumansocieties,causingchangestotheway ecosystem goods and services are used. Thesedisturbances can directly and indirectly affect thelivelihoodsof localcommunities, forexamplethroughhigherinputprices,reducedproductionandlowercropprices.Inadditiontotheimpactsfromtheseshocksandshort-termdisturbances,ecosystemsareinfluencedbyrelativelygradualbutcontinuouschangesintheclimateandsocio-culturalpracticesandinstitutions.
While some changes may cause critical damage toecosystems and people’s livelihoods, SEPLS vary inthe degree to which their communities can absorb,resist and/or recover from these impacts. The abilityof a SEPLS to absorb or recover – in terms of bothecosystem processes and socio-economic activity– from various pressures and disturbances withoutlastingdamageiswhatisreferredtoasthe“resilience”of the SEPLS. More generally, resilience refers to the“capacityofasystemtodealwithchangeandcontinueto develop; withstanding shocks and disturbancesand using such events to catalyze renewal and inno-vation”1.Maintainingresilience inSEPLS iscrucial forsecuringecosystemservicesandsustainableproduc-tion systems for the long term, both benefiting localcommunities and contributing to global sustainabledevelopmentobjectives.
Strengthening of SEPLS resilience by local communities
The long-term persistence of community-managedSEPLSthatemployappropriatemanagementanduseofnatural resourcesandbiodiversitydefines themasresilient systems. Nevertheless, many communitiesface growing challenges in maintaining these land-scapes and the social and ecological processes thatsustainthem,especiallyinthefaceofrapidandofteninterrelatedchangesinsocio-economicsystems,accel-erated by increasing climate change and ecosystemdegradation.Communities,astheprimarymanagersoftheprocessesandresourcesofSEPLS,mustreinforceexisting management practices and institutions, andinnovateinordertoadapttothesechangesandrestoreor strengthen the social and ecological resilience oftheirlandscapesandseascapes.
ResilienceinSEPLSisaproductofecological,social,culturalandeconomicsystems,dynamically linkedtoeachotherinwaysthatcreatesynergies.Improvementsin ecosystem services, for example, may require theadoptionofnewmethodsofnatural-resourcemanage-ment,ornewtypesofdiversity incrops,animalsandassociated species. It may also require appropriatelocal governance mechanisms, including agreed-onrules on resource access, use and exchange, whichmaybeembeddedinformaland/ornon-formalinstitu-tions.Increasedsustainabilityofagro-ecosystemsmayrequire that access and equity issues be addressed,suchassupportfortheroleofwomenincropselection,productionandmarketing.
Themanagementofinterlockingsocialandecologicalsystemsrequiresthecapacitytoacceptandcopewithcomplexityandcontinuing adaptation.Thiscapacityis associated with rural communities that depend onthewiderangeoffunctions,productsandservicesthattheir landscapes provide. The resilience indicators inthistoolkitaredesignedtocontributetoacommunity’ssense of ownership over the planning, implementa-tion,monitoringandevaluationoftheirproductionandresource-managementpractices.Lessonsandknowl-edgegeneratedby theseactivitiescan thenbeusedtocommunicate localvisionsandstrategies for resil-ient landscapes and productive ecosystems as inputinto higher-level policies and programmes that affectcommunity livelihoodsaswellasfurtherconservationandresource-managementplanning.
1.4 about the indicators
Local communities require a more complete under-standing of the status and changes in conditions intheirlandscapesandseascapesinordertostrengthenresilience. However, resilience can be difficult tomeasure precisely because it is complex and multi-faceted. Instead of attempting to define an overall
1 StockholmResilienceCenter(2014)WhatisResilience?.http://www.stockholmresilience.org
©C
OM
DE
KS
Bhu
tan/
Dor
jiS
inga
y
-
10 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 1: Introduction | 11
measureofresilienceforSEPLS,thistoolkitintroducesanapproachformonitoringSEPLSusingasetofindi-catorsdesignedtocapturetheiressentialattributes.
Pastoral landscape in Jequitinhonha Valley, Brazil
TheIndicatorsofResilienceinSEPLSconsistofasetof20indicatorsdesignedtocapturedifferentaspectsofkeysystems–ecological,agricultural,culturalandsocio-economic. They include both qualitative andquantifiable indicators, but measurement is basedon the observations, tallies, perceptions and experi-encesof the localcommunities themselves.Theyareto be used flexibly and can be customized to reflectthe circumstances of each particular landscape orseascapeanditsassociatedcommunities.
ThespatialscaleofSEPLS,inthecontextofusingtheindicators,dependsonhowlocalcommunitymembersthemselves identify the area they depend on for theirsurvivalandlivelihood.Itgenerallyincludesthemosaicofland-usesfromwhichcommunitiesderivethegoodsandservicesonwhichtheydependdirectlyorindirectlyandwhere theyhaveadirect impacton the resourcebaseand regular interactionswith thenaturalbiodiversity.ASEPLSmaybedelineatedbyadministrativeboundaries(e.g., a national park or state borders) or geographicboundaries(e.g.,awatershed),orbyotherfactors.
Theindicatorsaimtoprovidecommunitieswithaframe-work for discussion and analysis of socio-ecologicalprocessesessential forSEPLSresilience.Thisrelatestocriticallivelihoodanddevelopmentobjectivessuchasfoodsecurity,agriculturalsustainability,institutional
Seascape in the Bouma National Heritage Park on Taveuni Island, Fiji
Inland water landscape at Begnas Lake, Nepal
©C
OM
DE
KS
Bra
zil/I
sab
elF
igue
reid
o
©B
iove
rsity
Inte
rnat
iona
l/Dun
jaM
ijato
vic
©B
iove
rsity
Inte
rnat
iona
l/Nad
iaB
erga
min
i
andhumandevelopment,provisionofecosystemserv-icesandconservationofbiodiversity,strengtheningofcommunity- and landscape-level organizations, andlandscape governance for equity and sustainability.Discussionoftheindicatorswithincommunitiesstimu-lates knowledge-sharing and analysis, which are keyfactorsincreatingsocialcapitalforlandscapegovern-ance,planningandmanagement,andfosterscommu-nityownershipof thisprocess.Periodicuseof theseindicators enables evaluation of progress towardsdevelopmentandsustainablemanagementobjectivesandidentificationofpriorityactionsforlocalinnovationandadaptivemanagement.
The indicators can contribute to local communities and other stakeholders in the following areas:
• Understanding sePls resilience
The indicators provide an analytical framework forunderstanding resilience and its status and changesin SEPLS. They are defined and measured in termsthatareeasyforlocalcommunitiestounderstandanduse,andcanbeadaptedforsuccessiveanalyses.By
assessing current conditions and trends in differentaspectsofSEPLS,userscanunderstandresilienceasamultidimensionalobjective.
• supporting development and implementation of resilience-strengthening strategies
The indicators can help to identify and track socialprocesses, institutions, and practices for land-use,conservation,andinnovationthatarepartofaresilientsystem’scapacitytoadaptandchange.Throughreviewand discussion of assessment results, communitiescan learn what areas and factors to focus on, whichmay include components of agricultural biodiversity,foodsecurity,ecosystemservices, livelihood,govern-anceandothers.
• enhancing communication among stakeholders
Because they provide a framework with a commonset of parameters, the indicators can enhance theexchange of experiences and information within andbeyond SEPLS and their communities, for example,
Landscape heterogeneity in the Cuchillas del Toa Biosphere Reserve, Cuba
©F
red
erik
van
Oud
enho
ven
-
12 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 1: Introduction | 13
betweenupstreamanddownstreamcommunitiesandamongcommunitiesindifferentgeographicregions.
• empowering communities in decision-making processes and adaptive management
Useoftheindicatorsfacilitatesacontinuousprocessofdiscussionandparticipationwithinlocalcommunities,leadingtoknowledgeofwhatworksandwhatdoesnot.ThiskindofadaptivemanagementmodelpromotesagreatersenseofownershipamongthepeoplelivinginSEPLS,encouraging them tobeactiveat thepolicy-makinglevel.Usingtheindicatorsasaframeworkfordiscussionalsohelpscreateconsensusonwhatneedstobedone tobuildor enhance resilienceacross thelandscapeandguidedecisionsandimplementation.
1.5 Who can benefit from using the indicators?
Whiletheindicatorsareprimarilydesignedtobeusedby local communities, they have the potential to bevaluabletoolsforotherssuchasNGOs,developmentagencies,andpolicy-makers.Theindicatorsmayalsobe helpful for researchers to understand SEPLS andhow communities see their landscape or seascape.The roleof facilitatormaybemore important in situ-ationswhere it isdifficult forcommunities touse theindicatorsontheirown.
The followingaresomepossiblebenefits fordifferentusers.
Local communities: • Increase common understanding of SEPLS (e.g.,
conditionsandthreatstothem)amongandbeyondcommunitymembers
• Identify priority issues and actions for sustainingSEPLSthatbenefitlivelihoodsandwell-being,andtoevaluatepasteffortsthatcommunityhasmade
• Contributetoenhancingtrustandsocialcapital incommunitiesandresolvingconflicts
• Inform policymakers, donors, and relevant stake-holdersonthesituationoftheirSEPLSandneces-saryareasforsupportinamoreefficientmanner
• Exchangeexperienceswithcommunitieswhohavetriedtheindicators
NGOs and development agencies implementing projects in SEPLS:• Enhance understanding of resilience from the
perspectiveoflocalcommunities• Promoteparticipatoryprocesses• Monitorandevaluateprojectinterventionsonresil-
ience and biodiversity conservation and identifyareasforsupport
• Communicate with policymakers and donors onthe situation of the SEPLS they are working withandnecessaryareasforsupportinamoreefficientmanner
Policymakers and project planners:• Better understand local conditions from the
perspectiveoflocalcommunities• Improvecommunicationwithlocalcommunities• Identifyareasthatneedtobeimprovedandreflect
theseinpolicymaking,planning,andotherdecision-makingprocesses
• Increasecoherenceacrossdifferentprojectsitesbyapplyingacommonanalyticalframeworkandtools
Researchers:• Enhance multi-dimensional understanding of local
conditionsfromtheperspectiveoflocalcommunities• Deepen the understanding of resilience by exam-
iningresultsfromdifferentsites• Identifyresearchgaps
IndIcatoR aPPRoachES at dIffEREnt LEvELS
Indicator approaches are used increasingly invarious sectors and contexts. At the global andnational scales they play important roles in moni-toringprogresstowardachievingspecificgoalsandtargets. For example, around 100 indicators havebeen listed1 to monitor the progress of implemen-tationofthe Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-20202 andtheAichi Biodiversity Targets3,adoptedduringtheCBDCOP10inJapanin2010toprovideaframeworkforactionbyallstakeholderstoprotectbiodiversityandenhanceitsbenefitsforpeople.The Millennium Development Goals Indicators4areasetof60indicatorsforthemeasurementofprogresstowardtheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs)5,eightinternationaldevelopmenttargetstobemetby2015foraddressingextremepoverty.TheUNagreedattheRio+20Conferencein2012todevelopasetof Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)6 andiscurrentlyworkingtodefinethegoalsandrelevantindicatorstobeadoptedin2015.
National- and global-scale indicators need to bequantitative forcomparisonacrossspaceandtimeand to be able to aggregate data at larger spatialscales. They also must be scientifically valid andobjective, with assessment often conducted byexperts. Unlike these higher-level indicators, theIndicatorsofResilienceinSEPLSintroducedinthistoolkitareforuseatthelocallevel.Theyincludebothqualitativeandquantifiableindicators,butmeasure-mentisbasedontheobservations,perceptionsandexperience of the local communities themselves.These local observations can be complementedby scientific data and information from global andnationalobservationsanddatasetsaswellaspriorstudies.However,externaldatashouldbeabletobe
adoptedintothelocalknowledgebase.Theindica-torsinthistoolkitprovidelocalcommunitieswithaframeworktodiscussbothcurrentconditionsofresil-ienceandpotentialareasforimprovementaspartoftheprocessofadaptivemanagement.Thiscanleadtoquickandproactiveeffortsbylocalcommunitiestostrengthentheresilienceoftheirproductionland-scapesandseascapes.Italsoprovidesaconsistentprocess for monitoring resilience of the landscapeor seascape and the implementation of measuresto address components and factors that lead toreducedresilience.
TheIndicatorsofResilienceinSEPLSpartiallyoverlapandcomplementsomeofthehigher-levelindicators.Moreresilientlandscapesresultingfromtheuseoftheindicators and implementation of actions identifiedfromtheirusewillalsocontributetoglobalandnationaltargets, such as those of the CBD (e.g., the AichiBiodiversityTargetsandNationalBiodiversityStrategicAction Plans), and the FAO International Treaty onPlant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
1 UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XI/3(www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-11/cop-11-dec-03-en.doc)
2 www.cbd.int/sp/3 www.cbd.int/sp/targets/4 mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Host.aspx?Content=Indicators/OfficialList.htm5 www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/6 sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?menu=1300
-
14 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 1: Introduction | 15
BackgRound
The Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecologicalProduction Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS)and this toolkit were developed as a collaborativeactivity under the International Partnership for theSatoyamaInitiative(IPSI).
The Satoyama Initiative is a comprehensive effortto spread awareness that protecting biodiversityentails the protection of both wild and human-influenced natural environments, such as farmlandand secondary forest, which have been managedsustainably over a long time. It is also an effort atthoughtfulactiontowardstheconservationanduseof such human-influenced natural environments.EstablishedthroughajointcollaborationbetweentheMinistryoftheEnvironmentofJapan(MOEJ)andtheUnitedNationsUniversityInstitutefortheAdvancedStudy of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), the SatoyamaInitiativewasrecognizedduringthe10thmeetingof
theConferenceofthePartiestotheConventiononBiologicalDiversity(CBDCOP10)in2010.
Fromitsinception,theSatoyamaInitiativehastakenaglobalperspectiveandsoughttoconsolidateexper-tisefromaroundtheworldregardingthesustainableuseofresourcesinsocio-ecologicalproductionland-scapesandseascapes(SEPLS).Tothispurpose,on19October2010atCBDCOP10, the InternationalPartnership for the Satoyama Initiative (IPSI) wasestablishedtopromotetheactivitiesidentifiedbytheSatoyamaInitiative.Atotalof51organizationsenteredintopartnershipasfoundingmembersofIPSI,andasof2014, theirnumberhadmore than tripled.Asaninternational platform open to organizations dealingwithSEPLS,IPSIhassoughttofostersynergiesintheimplementationof their respectiveactivities, aswellasotheractivitiesplannedundertheinitiative.
To date, over 20 IPSI Collaborative Activities havebeen initiatedunder IPSI, including this toolkitanditsindicators,carriedoutbyBioversityInternational,the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies(IGES),theUnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme(UNDP)andUNU-IAS.FormoreinformationonIPSI,pleasevisitsatoyama-initiative.org
The Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecologicalProduction Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS)werefirstdevelopedbyBioversityInternationalandUNU-IAS. The set of indicators has been testedin the field by Bioversity International in Bolivia,BurkinaFaso,Cuba,Ethiopia,Fiji,Kenya,Mongolia,Nepal and Uganda, and also in selected areas intwenty countries participating in the CommunityDevelopment and Knowledge Management for theSatoyamaInitiativeProgrammeoftheUnitedNationsDevelopment Programme (UNDP-COMDEKS; seebelow) to form part of a baseline-assessment andcommunity-consultation process to help measureandunderstand the resilienceof target landscapesand seascapes. The field testing involved assess-mentsconductedthroughaparticipatoryandinclu-sivemulti-stakeholderprocess incommunities thatinhabit,useandprotectlandscapesandseascapes.These assessments have been subsequentlycompiledandanalyzedtosupportthedevelopmentofstrategiesbyidentifyingappropriatecommunity-based activities in each SEPLS to strengthen theirresilience.TheindicatorsinChapter2aretherevisedsetofindicatorsbasedontheseexperiences.
The Community Development and KnowledgeManagementfortheSatoyamaInitiative(COMDEKS)ProgrammeisanIPSIcollaborativeactivitybyUNDP,MOEJ,CBDSecretariatandUNU-IASwiththegoal
of promoting sustainable use and management ofnatural resources in SEPLS. Funded through theJapanBiodiversityFundestablishedwithintheCBDSecretariat, the COMDEKS Programme is imple-mented by UNDP, and delivered through the GEFSmallGrantsProgramme,allowingforafast,flexible,and proven mechanism to reach communities andcivilsocietyatthelocallevel.AspartofCOMDEKS,small grants are provided to local communityorganizationswiththeoveralllong-termobjectiveofenhancingresilienceinSEPLSbydevelopingsoundbiodiversitymanagementandsustainablelivelihoodactivitieswithlocalcommunitiestomaintain,rebuild,andrevitalizelandscapesandseascapes.COMDEKSgrant-making is expected to generate key lessonsoncommunity-basedbestpracticestomaintainandrebuildSEPLStowardtherealizationof“societiesinharmonywithnature”,asdefinedinthevisionoftheSatoyamaInitiative.Launchedin2011,theprojectisbeing implemented in twenty countries around theworld–Bhutan,Brazil,Cambodia,Cameroon,CostaRica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Ghana,India, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Mongolia,Namibia,Nepal,Niger,SlovakiaandTurkey.FormoreinformationabouttheCOMDEKSProgramme,visit:www.comdeksproject.com.
©L
IBIR
D/S
ajal
Sth
apit
-
16 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 1: Introduction | 17
2Chapter 2: The indicators
2.1 What the indicators measure
The indicatorsmeasureelementsofSEPLSresiliencethatare,almostbydefinition,stronglyinterrelated.Thepractices and institutions that they describe can begroupedinfiveareas:
• Landscape/seascape diversity and ecosystemprotection
• Biodiversity(includingagriculturalbiodiversity)• Knowledgeandinnovation• Governanceandsocialequity• Livelihoodsandwell-being
Landscape/seascape diversity and ecosystem protection
Heterogeneous landscapes and seascapes thatresemblenaturalpatternsprovidegreaterbiodiversitybenefits than intensively-managed monocultures ormarine environments where natural ecosystems likemangroves, seagrass beds or coral reefs have been
heavilytransformedbyextractivepractices.ResultingSEPLS are likely to support higher levels of biodi-versity andbemore resilient to external shocks thanmore simplified systems. In the context of climatechange,theprotectionandrestorationofwatersheds,forestsandcostalecosystemsinSEPLShelpregulatehydrologyandmicroclimate,therebyprovidingabufferagainstextremeweatherevents,floodsanddroughts.
Biodiversity (including agricultural biodiversity)
Thehealthofalandscapeorseascapeandtheecosys-temsitsupports isreflectedinpart inthediversityofspecies living in itand their interactions. Italsooftenforms the physical, cultural and spiritual bases ofcommunities’ well-being. Biodiversity contributes tocommunity and landscape/seascape resilience byprovidingecosystemservices,whicharesustainedordegradedbythepracticesandinstitutionsthatregulatethe use of natural resources. Agricultural biodiversityincludesspeciesusedforfood,fodder,fiberandfuel,aswellasthelargenumberofnon-harvestedspeciesinthewiderlandscapethatbenefitcommunitiesthroughthe services they provide, such as pollinators, soilbiotaandregulatorsofpestsanddiseases.Agriculturalbiodiversity provides material for experimentation,innovationandadaptation.Thegeneticdiversityfoundin local crop varieties and animal breeds, expressedin important traits such as drought, cold and salinetoleranceandresistancetopestsanddiseases,helpsthemadapttovarioussoilandclimateconditions.Lossin diversity of these traits decreases options for riskmanagementandadaptation.
knowledge and innovation
Communitiesstrengthentheirownresiliencebyexperi-menting, innovatingand learningwithinandbetween
Participants score their landscape using indicators for resilience during a workshop, Bhutan©COMDEKSBhutan/DorjiSingay
-
18 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS)18 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 2: The indicators | 19
differentknowledgesystems,culturesandagegroups.Adaptationstrategiesmaybenovelorold,butgener-allybuildonbio-culturalortraditionalknowledge.Thisknowledgeisspecifictothelocationsandculturesofgiven socio-ecological interactions. It is embodied inresource-use customs, agricultural traditions, locallanguages, cultural values and social institutions.Manycommunitiesarelosingtheirknowledgeoflocalresources, biodiversity and the historical events thathave shaped their landscapes and seascapes. Themaintenance of this knowledge increasingly dependsontheabilityofelders,parentsandtheyoungergener-ationsinacommunitytodocumentandshareit.
governance and social equity
Genderinequalities,socialexclusionandmarginaliza-tioncanhindertheabilityofwomen,indigenousgroupsand others to strengthen the resilience of their land-scapes or seascapes. Women, youth and the elderlyholdspecificknowledgeandskillsrelatedtobiodiver-sity.Forindigenouscommunities,resilienceisintrinsi-cally linked with efforts to protect traditional ways ofsubsistenceandculturalheritage.Theabilitytoaccessancestral lands and engage in traditional land useandagriculturalpracticesareimportantconditionsforcommunities to maintain biodiversity and associatedtraditionalknowledge.
Livelihoods and well-being
Theresilienceofaproductionlandscapeorseascapeis also dependent on the availability of efficient andfunctioning infrastructure such as communication,health and education to meet various communityneeds and aspirations. Livelihood improvement canbedirectly linked to theoptionsandopportunitiesofcommunitymemberstoengageinavarietyofsustain-able income-generating activities developed through
peoples’ ingenuity and the biodiversity portfolio theyhaveavailable.
2.2 How to use the indicators
Theindicatorspresentedinthetablebelowhavebeendevelopedtoguidetheassessmentofresilienceduringassessment workshops participated in by communitymembersandothers.Assessmententails assigningascore and trend to each indicator in response to thequestionsinthetable’ssecondcolumn.Ascorecanbeassignedtoallindicatorsusingthe5-pointscalegiveninthetable’sthirdcolumn,andinformationabouttrendscanbecapturedusingthecategoriesshownhere:
Scores trends
(5)Veryhigh↑Upward trend
(4)High
(3)Medium →No change
(2)Low↓Downward trend
(1)Verylow
The other columns in the table are meant to facili-tate understanding of the questions for scoring andto capture additional information during the groupdiscussion. The first column gives an explanation ofthequestion forscoringandsomeexamplesofwhatismeantbysomeoftheterminology.Thelastcolumncontains, where relevant, additional questions whichcanbeaskedafter individual scoringhasbeendoneand the group is engaged in reaching a consensus.Thesequestionsarenotfixedandcanvaryaccordingtothesituationatthediscretionofthefacilitator.
Notescanbefoundinthefirstcolumnofsomeoftheindicators. Theseare intended to facilitate answeringthequestions for scoring. For example,when talkingabout landscape and seascape diversity it may beusefultorefertoaparticipatorymappingexercise,orthe timelineused toexplain theconceptof resilience
mayhelpscoringwhentalkingaboutthecapacityforrecovery and regeneration of the SEPLS. For morespecific advice on how to carry out an assessmentworkshop, see Chapter 3, where the mapping exer-ciseand timeline formpartof the introductionof theworkshop.
2.3 list of indicators
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
Landscape/seascape diversity and ecosystem protection
(1) Landscape/seascape diversity
Thelandscapeorseascapeiscomposedofadiversity/mosaicofnaturalecosystems(terrestrialandaquatic)andlanduses.
Examples:Natural ecosystems: mountains,forests,grasslands,wetlands,lakes,rivers,coastallagoons,estuaries,coralreefs,seagrassmeadowsandmangroveforests.
Land uses:homegardens,cultivatedfields,orchards,(seasonal)pastures,haymakinglands,aquaculture,forestryandagro-forestry,irrigationcanals,waterwells.
Note:Landscape/seascapediversityandlandusescanbedemonstratedthroughamappingexercise.
Isthelandscape/seascapecomposedofdiversenaturalecosystems(terrestrialandaquatic)andlanduses?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Thereisalargenumberofnaturalecosystemsandlanduses)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thereisonlyoneoraverysmallnumberofnaturalecosystemsandlanduses)
(2) Ecosystem protection
Areaswithinthelandscapeorseascapeareprotectedfortheirecologicaland/orculturalimportance.
Note: Protectionmaybeformalorinformalandincludetraditionalformsofprotectionsuchassacredsites.
Examples:Strictnaturereserves,nationalparks,wildernessareas,heritagesites,communityconservedareas,marineprotectedareas,limited-useareas,sacredsites,grazingreserveareas,rulesandregulationstoexcludeoutsidersfromthe(seasonal)useofnaturalresources,etc.
Arethereareasinthelandscapeorseascapewhereecosystemsareprotectedunderformalorinformalformsofprotection?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Keyresourcesareundersomeformofprotection)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Therearenoareasunderprotection)
Whichecosystemsareprotectedandwhatistheformofprotection?
-
20 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 2: The indicators | 21
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
(3) Ecological interactions between different components of the landscape/seascape
Ecologicalinteractionsbetweendifferentcomponentsoflandscapeorseascapearetakenintoconsiderationinnaturalresourcemanagement.
Examples of ecological interactions: Areasslatedforconservationorrestorationbenefitotherareasthroughpollination,pestcontrol,nutrientcyclingandincreaseofanimalpopulation.
Forestsprotectwatersourcesandprovidefodder,medicineandfood.Agriculturalactivitiescanaffectotherpartsofthelandscape.
Marineprotectedareasmayincreasemarinepopulationsalsoinotherinfishingareas(spill-overeffects).
Areecologicalinteractionsbetweendifferentcomponentsofthelandscapeorseascapeconsideredwhilemanagingnaturalresources?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Ecologicalinteractionsareconsideredwhilemanagingnaturalresources)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Ecologicalinteractionsarenotconsideredwhilemanagingnaturalresources)
(4) Recovery and regeneration of the landscape/seascape
Thelandscapeorseascapehastheabilitytorecoverandregeneratefromenvironmentalshocksandstresses.
Examples of environmental shocks and stresses:Pestanddiseaseoutbreaks;Extremeweathereventssuchasstorms,extremecold,floodinganddroughts;Earthquakesandtsunamis;Forestfires.
Note:Ifatimelineiscreatedduringtheworkshopintroduction,inwhichrecentshocksandstressesarelisted,itcanbeahelpfulreferenceforscoringthisindicator.
Doesthelandscapeorseascapehavetheabilitytorecoverandregenerateafterextremeenvironmentalshocks?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Veryhighabilitytorecoverandregenerate)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Verylowabilitytorecoverandregenerate)
Whatwasthecommunity’sresponsetorecentshocksandstresses?
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
Biodiversity (including agricultural biodiversity)
(5) diversity of local food system
Foodsconsumedinthelandscapeorseascapeincludefoodlocallygrown,gatheredfromlocalforestsand/orfishedfromlocalwaters.
Examples:Cereals,vegetables,fruits,nuts,wildplants,mushrooms,berries,livestock,milk,dairyproducts,wildlife/insects,fish,seaweeds,etc.
Doesthecommunityconsumeadiversityoflocally-producedfood?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Diversityoflocally-sourcedfoodsisveryhighandthesefoodsarewidelyconsumed)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thereareveryfewornolocally-sourcedfoods)
(6) Maintenance and use of local crop varieties and animal breeds
Householdsand/orcommunitygroupsmaintainadiversityoflocalcropvarietiesandanimalbreeds.
Examples:Seedguardians,expertanimalbreeders,animalbreedinggroups,homegardens,communityseedbanks.
Aredifferentlocalcrops,varietiesandanimalbreedsconservedandusedinthecommunity?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Localcropvarietiesandanimalbreedsarewidelyconservedandused)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Therearefewornolocalcropvarietiesandanimalbreeds)
Isthequalityofseedsandbreedsmaintained?Doinvasivespeciesreplacelocalonesoristhisnottakingplace?
(7) Sustainable management of common resources
Commonresourcesaremanagedsustainablyinordertoavoidoverexploitationanddepletion.
Examples: Grazingregulations;Fishing quotas;Sustainabletourism;Controlofwildlifepoachingandillegallogging;orharvestingofforestproducts.
Arecommonresourcesmanagedsustainably?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Commonresourcesaremanagedsustainably)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Commonresourcesareoverexploitedordepleted)
Whatisthestatusofexploitationofcommonresources(forests,fisheries,grasslands)?
-
22 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 2: The indicators | 23
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
knowledge and innovation
(8) Innovation in agriculture and conservation practices
Newpracticesinagriculture,fisheriesandforestryaredeveloped,adoptedandimprovedand/ortraditionalpracticesarerevitalized.
Examples:Adoptionofwaterconservationmeasuressuchasdripirrigationorwaterharvesting;Diversificationoffarmingsystems;Introductionorre-introductionofdrought-orsaline-tolerantcrops;Organicagriculture;Terracing;Reintroductionofnativespecies;Shiftingandrotationofgrasslands;Reforestation;Replantingofcorals,seagrassandmangroves;Fishhouses;Selectivefishinggear.
Doesthecommunitydevelop,improveandadoptnewagricultural,fisheries,forestry,andconservationpracticesand/orrevitalizetraditionalonestoadapttochangingconditions,includingclimatechange?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Thecommunityisreceptivetochangeandadjustsitspractices)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thecommunityisnotreceptivetochangeandmakesfewinnovations)
Whichinnovativepracticesareusedinmanagingagriculture,fisheriesandforestry?
(9) traditional knowledge related to biodiversity
Localknowledgeandculturaltraditionsrelatedtobiodiversityaretransmittedfromeldersandparentstoyoungpeopleinthecommunity.
Examples:Songs,dances,rituals,festivals,stories,localterminologyrelatedtolandandbiodiversity;Specificknowledgeaboutfishing,cropplantingandharvesting,andtheprocessingandcookingoffood;Knowledgeincludedinschoolcurricula.
Arelocalknowledgeandculturaltraditionsrelatedtobiodiversitytransmittedfromeldersandparentstoyoungpeopleinthecommunity?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Localknowledgeandculturaltraditionsaretransmittedtoyoungpeople)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Localknowledgeandculturaltraditionsarelost)
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
(10) documentation of biodiversity-associated knowledge
Thebiodiversityinthelandscapeorseascape,includingagriculturalbiodiversity,andknowledgeassociatedwithitisdocumented,storedandmadeavailabletocommunitymembers.
Examples: Traditionalknowledgeregisters;Resourceclassificationsystems;Communitybiodiversityregisters;Farmers’fieldschools;Animalbreedinggroups;Pastureco-managementgroups;Seedexchangenetworks(animalandseedfairs);Seasonalcalendars.
Isagriculturalbiodiversity,andassociatedknowledgedocumentedandexchanged?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Documentationisrobust)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thereislittleornodocumentationinthecommunity)
(11) Women’s knowledge
Women’sknowledge,experiencesandskillsarerecognizedandrespectedinthecommunity.Womenoftenhavespecificknowledge,experienceandskillsaboutbiodiversity,itsuseandmanagement,whicharedifferentfromthoseofmen.
Examples of women specific knowledge:Know-howabouttheproductionofparticularcrops;Collectionanduseofmedicinalplants;Caringforanimals.
Arewomen’sknowledge,experiencesandskillsrecognizedandrespectedathousehold,communityandlandscapelevels?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Women’sknowledge,experiencesandskillsrecognizedandrespectedatalllevels)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Women’sknowledge,experiencesandskillsarenotrecognizedandrespected)
-
24 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 2: The indicators | 25
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
governance and social equity
(12) Rights in relation to land/water and other natural resource management
Rightsoverland/waterandothernaturalresourcesareclearlydefinedandrecognizedbyrelevantgroupsandinstitutions,forexamplegovernmentsanddevelopmentagencies.Recognitioncanbeformalizedbypolicy,lawand/orthroughcustomarypractices.
Examples: Land-usegroups;Communityforestrycommittees;Co-managementgroupsorcommunities.
Doesthecommunityhavecustomaryand/orformallyrecognizedrightsoverland,(seasonal)pastures,waterandnaturalresources?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Rightsarefullyrecognizedandnotdisputed)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Rightsarenotrecognizedandheavilydisputed)
Dotheserightsgivesecurityintermsofaccessanduse?
(13) community-based landscape/seascape governance
Thelandscapeorseascapehascapable,accountableandtransparentlocalinstitutionsinplacefortheeffectivegovernanceofitsresourcesandthelocalbiodiversity.
Examples of institutions:Organizations,rules,policies,regulationsandenforcementaimedatresourcemanagement;Traditionalauthoritiesandcustomaryrules;Co-managementarrangements,forexamplejointforestmanagement,betweenlocalpeopleandgovernment.
Isthereamultistakeholderlandscape/seascapeplatformorinstitutionabletoeffectivelyplanandmanagelandscaperesources?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Platformorinstitutioniscapableoftransparent,participatoryandeffectivedecisionmaking)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thereisnomultistakeholderplatformorinstitution)
Doesagreementexistabouttheboundariesofnaturalresourcesintermsofaccessanduse?Isthepolicyandlegalenvironmentsupportiveornot?
(14) Social capital in the form of cooperation across the landscape/seascape
Individualswithinandbetweencommunitiesareconnectedandcoordinatedthroughnetworksthatmanageresourcesandexchangematerials,skillsandknowledge.
Examples:Self-helpgroups;Communityclubsandgroups(women’sandyouthgroups);Intercommunitynetworks;Associationsoffederationswithafocusonnaturalresourcemanagement.
Isthereconnection,coordinationandcooperationwithinandbetweencommunitiesforthemanagementofnaturalresources?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Thereisaveryhighlevelofcooperationandcoordinationinnaturalresourcemanagement)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thereislittleornocooperationandcoordinationinnaturalresourcemanagement)
Isthelevelofout-migrationlow?
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
(15) Social equity (including gender equity)
Rightsandaccesstoresourcesandopportunitiesforeducation,informationanddecision-makingarefairandequitableforallcommunitymembers,includingwomen,athousehold,communityandlandscapelevels.Examples:Uplandandlowlandcommunities;Communitymembersbelongingtodifferentsocialorethnicgroups;Women’svoicesandchoicesaretakenintoconsiderationinhouseholddecision-makingandatcommunitymeetingswheredecisionsaboutcollectiveactionsaremade.
Isaccesstoopportunitiesandresourcesfairandequitableforallcommunitymembers,includingwomen,athousehold,communityandlandscapelevel?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Accesstoresourcesandopportunitiesisfairandequitableatalllevels)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Accesstoresourcesandopportunitiesisnotfairandequitable)
Isdecision-makingfairandequitableforallcommunitymembers,includingwomen,atalllevels?
-
26 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 2: The indicators | 27
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
Livelihoods and well-being
(16) Socio-economic infrastructure
Socio-economicinfrastructureisadequateforcommunityneeds.
Examples of socio-economic infrastructure:Schools,hospitals,roadsandtransport;Safedrinkingwater;Markets;Electricityandcommunicationinfrastructure.
Isthesocio-economicinfrastructureadequatefortheneedsofthecommunity?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Socio-economicinfrastructuremeetsallcommunityneeds)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Socio-economicinfrastructuredoesnotmeetcommunityneeds)
(17) human health and environmental conditions
Theoverallstateofhumanhealthinthecommunityissatisfactory,alsoconsideringtheprevailingenvironmentalconditions.
Examples:Absenceorregularoccurrenceofdiseases;Frequencyofdiseaseoutbreaksthataffectalargenumberofpeople;Absence/presenceofenvironmentalstresseslikepollution,lackofcleanwater,exposuretoextremeweatherevents.
Whatisthegeneralhealthsituationoflocalpeoplealsoconsideringtheprevailingenvironmentalconditions?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Thehealthsituationandtheenvironmentalconditionsaregood)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Thehealthandtheenvironmentalconditionsarebad)
Whatarethemainrisks?Whattypesofmedicineareused?(i.e.traditionalhealingmethods,modernmedicine)
(18) Income diversity
Peopleinthelandscapeorseascapeareinvolvedinavarietyofsustainableincome-generatingactivities.
Note:Diversityineconomicactivitiescanhelphouseholdsincaseofunexpecteddownturns,disasters,changesinenvironmentalconditions,etc.
Arehouseholdsinthecommunityinvolvedinavarietyofsustainable,income-generatingactivities?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Householdsareinvolvedinavarietyofsustainable,incomegeneratingactivities)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Householdshavenoalternativeeconomicactivities)
Whatactivitiesgenerateincomeinthelandscapeorseascape?
Indicator description Questions for scoring
Scores discussion questions
(19) Biodiversity-based livelihoods
Livelihoodimprovementsinthelandscapeorseascapeareconcernedwithinnovativeuseoflocalbiodiversity. Examples: Handicraftsusinglocalmaterials,e.g.woodcarving,basketry,painting,weavingetc.;Eco-tourism;Processingoflocalfoods,bee-keepingetc.
Doesthecommunitydevelopinnovativeuseofthelocalbiodiversityforitslivelihoods?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Livelihoodsarebeingimprovedbyinnovativeuseoflocalbiodiversity)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Livelihoodimprovementsarenotrelatedtolocalbiodiversity)
(20) Socio-ecological mobility
Householdsandcommunitiesareabletomovearoundtotakeadvantageofshiftsinproductionopportunitiesandavoidlanddegradationandoverexploitation.
Examples of mobility:Shiftingcultivationandcroprotationpractices;Shiftingbetweenagricultureandherding/fishing;Seasonalmigrationofherders;Shiftingfishinggrounds;Maintainingreserveareasforperiodsofhardship.
Arehouseholdsandcommunitiesabletomovearoundbetweendifferentproductionactivitiesandlocationsasnecessary?
(5)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
Veryhigh(Therearesufficientopportunitiesformobility)
High
Medium
Low
Verylow(Therearenoopportunitiesformobility)
Arethereagreedrulesandregulationsforeffectivelydoingso?
-
28 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS)
3Chapter 3 Practical guidance for using the
indicators
The purpose of this chapter is to provide users ofthe indicators with concrete advice on their practicalapplication, including various processes for activelyengaging local communities in planning, preparingandholdingassessmentworkshops,and then imple-mentingactivitiesforrestoringandmaintainingSEPLSafteranassessmentoftheirresilience.
Whileitispossiblefortheindicatorstobeusedinseveraldifferentwaysforvariouspolicy-making,academicorotherpurposes,theyaregenerallyintendedtobeusedinthecontextofacommunity-basedassessmentwork-shopheldwithinthetargetlandscapeorseascape.Theguidanceprovided in this toolkit isprimarily intendedfororganizersandfacilitatorsofresilienceassessmentworkshops.
Different landscapesandseascapesmayhavevastlydifferent geographical scales, governance systems,stakeholders, cultural traditions, and resources, andthusrequiredifferentapproachestoassessmentwork-shopsandfollow-upactivities.Facilitatorsandstake-holdersshouldbeflexibleinidentifyinglocally-adaptedsolutionsaccountingforthespecificcircumstancesof
communities.Forguidance,thistoolkitprovidesexam-ples of the indicators in action, taken from previousfield-testing by Bioversity International and UNDP-COMDEKS,plussomepracticaltipsforpracticesthathavebeenproveneffectiveinthepast.
A resilience assessment generally consists of threemainstages:1)preparation,2)assessmentworkshopand3)follow-up.
The preparation stage consists of planning andorganizingacommunity-based resilienceassessmentworkshop. This may include steps such as clarifyingthe purpose of the assessment, determining theassessmentareaandobtaining informationaboutthelandscape/seascape,residentcommunitiesandstake-holdersaswellaspracticalmatterssuchastranslatingtheindicatorsintothelocallanguage.
Theworkshopitselfiswhentheassessmentofland-scape or seascape resilience by local stakeholdersactuallytakesplace.Aworkshopwillgenerallyconsistof: introductory presentations; scoring based on theindicators; anddiscussion, summary and next steps.This toolkit also provides tips for workshop facilita-tors to explain unfamiliar concepts such as “socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes”and“resilience”,andencourageactiveandmeaningfulengagementoftheparticipants.
Thefollow-up stagecanvarywidelydependingonthepurposeoftheassessment,butisgenerallyintendedtouseassessmentresultsaspartofanongoing,partici-patory landscape/seascape management and plan-ningprocess.Thistoolkitintroduceswaysofanalyzingassessment data and scores, organizing follow-updiscussionamongstakeholders,andidentifyingpriorityareasandcommunity-basedinterventionstoenhanceresilience.
Kituilandscape,Kenya
©RenFujimura
-
30 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 31
3.1 stage 1: Preparation
Setting the stage
Before planning the details of an assessment work-shop,itisadvisabletomakesurethereisaclearunder-standingofanumberofbasicprinciples,suchastheexact purpose of the assessment, the target SEPLS,etc.Allinvolvedpartiesshouldsharethesameunder-standingtoensurethateveryoneisworkingtowardthesamepurposes.
clarifying the purpose of the assessment
It isimportanttomakesurethateveryoneinvolvedintheplanningof theresilienceassessmenthasaclearandconsistentunderstandingofthepurpose(s)oftheassessmentandwhatitisexpectedtoaccomplish.Thepurposeoftheassessmentwillaffecthowitiscarriedout.
Tips:Some examples of purposes of an assessment mayinclude:• Gainingacommonunderstandingofthestateofthe
landscapeorseascape.• Identifyingstrengthsofandthreatstothelandscape
orseascape.• Empoweringlocalcommunitiestostrengthentheir
resilience.• Developing landscape/seascape management
strategies and identifying possible collaborativeactionsinthelandscapeorseascapetostrengthenresilience.
• Enhancing trustandsocialcapital incommunitiesandresolvingconflict.
• Monitoringresilienceofthelandscapeorseascapeanditscommunitiesovertime.
Selection of the assessment area
The target landscape or seascape should be deter-minedbasedon thepurposeof theassessment andthe available resources, and a demonstrated interestandengagementofthecommunitieslivinginthearea.
To help clarify why the landscape or seascape waschosen,itmaybeusefultodevelopanumberofparam-eters,suchasnaturalassets,socio-economicactivities,cultural heritage, threats and opportunities, and thepresenceofparticularspeciesandbiodiversityvalues.
indicators in action SELEctIon of thE aSSESSMEnt
aREa
• For Bioversity International’s study in Bolivia,a local NGO that had worked for over twodecades on the conservation, improvementand marketing of local varieties of roots andtubercropstobenefitsmallfarmersinsixteenvillages facilitated theplanningandpreparingof the resilience assessment. The NGOselected two of the villages to conduct theresilienceassessment.
• For the COMDEKS baseline assessment inNamibia, the target landscape was a newconservancy that had been created as anadministrative unit and was selected by theSGP National Steering Committee based ona number of criteria including its biodiversityvalue,ecosystemsensitivity,tourismpotential,its ranking among the most underdevelopedareas inNamibia, andUNDPpresence in thearea(seeChapter4).
outline of the practical guidance
• clarifying the purpose of the assessment• Selection of the assessment area• obtaining information about the landscape or seascape and its resident communities• Identification of stakeholders for planning• clarifying the SEPLS and its boundary • Identification of workshop participants and facilitators• deciding the style and duration of the workshop• Interpretation and translation of the indicators
Stage 1:Preparation
• Introduction – Self Introductions – Participatory mapping exercise – Discussion of biodiversity – Discussion of resilience – Explanation of the indicators
• Scoring – Individual scoring – Group scoring
• discussion, summary and next steps
Stage 2:Workshop
• analysis of assessment data and scoring• Present analysis of assessment and review summary the assessment • discussion of analysis and identification of key topics to discuss• discussion on potential action lands in the communities • Evaluation of the exercise
Stage 3:follow-up
-
32 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 33
Stakeholders gather to assess boundaries of the landscape in Daman, Nepal
obtaining information about the landscape or seascape and its resident communities
Obtainingscientificandstatisticalinformationaboutthelandscapeorseascapefacilitatesbetterunderstandingoftheareaandappropriatedesignandpreparationoftheassessment.Thisinformationisalsousefulforassess-mentparticipantsandstakeholderstohaveacommonunderstandingoftheareaandtoutilizetheinformationin the resilience assessment. Information may includelanduses,population,rainfall,livelihoodsandothers,aswellasbiodiversityanditsvalue.
Wherepossible,itisagoodideatoobtaininformationondevelopmentplansandprojectsbeingundertakenin the area, capacities of key stakeholders such asgovernments,NGOsandcommunity-basedorganiza-tions and their presence in the area, and any poten-tial opportunities and synergies available to enhanceresilience.
indicators in action IdEntIfyIng StakEhoLdERS
• During theCOMDEKSassessment inMalawi,the assessment facilitators were supportedby the District Executive Committee (DEC),composed of members from the differentgovernment departments (agriculture, fish-eries,environment,education,planning,etc.).Selected members of the DEC accompaniedtheassessmentcoordinatorsastheymobilizedcommunities through local traditional authori-ties and village heads. The team conducteda participatory appraisal with relevant NGOs,local communities and front-line agriculturaland natural resources extension staff in thearea.
• InNamibia,whereanassessmentwascarriedout for an already-defined conservancy, theNGOcontractedtoruntheassessmentmadeuse of the radio, which is the major meansof wide-scale communication in the area, togatherstakeholdersfromaroundtheconserv-ancy.TheNGOthenconsultedasmanypeopleas possible to gain an understanding of thevariousactorsandinterestsinthelandscape.
Consultation and planning
Consultation with local stakeholders is a useful wayand essential requirement to learn more about theareaandcommunitiestotailortheassessmenttolocalneeds.Somedegreeofconsensusmustbereachedontheassessment’spurpose,definitionofthelandscape/seascapeanditsboundary,participants,facilitators,etc.
indicators in action InfoRMatIon coLLEctIon
• GeographicInformationSystem(GIS)mappingwasused to identify the target landscape forCOMDEKS activities in Cambodia and dividethetargetareaintoanumberofsocio-ecolog-icalareastakingintoaccounttopography,rain-fallpatterns,soiltypes,landuse,forestcoverchangeandstatutorylandtenuresystems.
• In Bhutan, the baseline assessment of thetarget landscape was carried out buildingon an existing Watershed Management Plandeveloped in 2009 by the Royal Governmentof Bhutan, which had been stalled due to alack of financial resources. In this case, theCOMDEKS landscape-wide baseline assess-mentwaspartofanefforttobuildonexistingdevelopmentplanstorebuildandrevitalizetheGamri Watershed based on the data alreadycollectedforthoseplans.
Identification of stakeholders for planning
Key stakeholders in the area should be identi-fied during the planning process for consultation inthe next phase. These should represent all relevantsectors and may include local and national NGOs;indigenous peoples’, women’s, elders’, and youthgroups; officers in forest and agricultural manage-ment;cooperativesandunions;representativesfromlocal farmers, fishermen, hotel owners and tourismoperators;andothers.
Community members are consulted before devising landscape strategy, Cambodia
Tips:Consultation with local stakeholders will facilitatelearningmoreabout:• Community priorities, the current state of the
environment and socio-economic conditions andperceivedthreats.
• Existing and potential projects and plans in thetargetarea.
• Capacities and capability of the various stake-holdersinthearea.
• Opportunitiesforcollaborationwithotheractivities.• Suitable community representatives and other
assessment participants representing differentgroups.
• Theexpected time frame for trends inchangesofthe indicatorsof resilience (forexample,10years,30years,etc.).
Thefollowingpagescoversomeoftheissuesinvolvedintheplanningofanassessmentandconsultationwithlocalstakeholders.
©C
OM
DE
KS
Nep
al/T
opB
ahad
urS
hahi
©C
OM
DE
KS
Cam
bod
ia/N
gin
Nav
irak
-
34 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 35
clarifying the SEPLS and its boundary
The exact landscape or seascape should be definedbased on a community perspective. The boundariesof the landscape or seascape (watershed, jurisdic-tional boundaries, social definition of the landscapeorseascape,etc.)maybedeterminedthroughconsul-tation with key local stakeholders and/or by usingsketches,maps,GISdataoftheregion,etc.Ingeneral,it ishelpful to takeaflexibleapproachdependingonlocal needs. The SEPLS and its boundary can alsobe discussed at the beginning of the assessmentworkshop.
Identification of resilience assessment workshop participants
Theparticipants in theworkshopwill varydependingon itspurposeand thebackgroundof the landscapeorseascape.Participantsmayincludekeylocalstake-holderswithavarietyofinterestssuchaslocalfarmers,fishermen, government authorities, the private sectorandothers,aswellascross-sectorexpertise if tech-nicalserviceprovidersareincluded.
Attentionshouldbepaid toensuring there is agoodgenderandagebalance.Likewise,itisvitaltoincludeindigenous peoples and minority groups if they arepresent in the landscape or seascape. For a largeor diverse landscape or seascape, it is important toincludestakeholdersfromdifferentcommunitiesinthetargetarea.
In order to identify assessment participants fromdifferent groups, it is useful to visit all communitiesin advance. Communities can suggest key repre-sentativesof thecommunity tobeparticipants in theworkshop.
indicators in action cLaRIfyIng thE LandScaPE
In Cambodia, information from the GeographicInformationSystem (GIS)wasused todivide thetargetSeungSiemReapwatershedareaintothreesub-areas,upstream,midstreamanddownstream.Thewatershedarea ishighlyheterogeneousdueto the wide diversity of biological, geographicaland topographical features located within theregion.Inordertocapturetheheterogeneityofthetarget landscape, and identify potential commu-nity-basedactivities toenhance resilienceof thelandscape,thetargetareawasfurtherdividedintosix socio-ecological zones, taking into accounttopography, rainfall pattern, soil types, land use,forest cover change, and statutory land tenuresystems.
Geographic Information System (GIS) has been used in Cambodia to divide the target watershed area into three sub-areas and six socio-ecological zones based on the heterogeneity of the landscape.
gEndER MaInStREaMIng
Itisessentialthatgenderknowledgeiscapturedanddocumentedtoimprovetheparticipationofwomenin futurecommunityprograms including landscapeorseascaperesilience-strengtheningstrategydevel-opmentandactionplans.
Thenormsandcultureoftheareashouldbeconsid-ered.Toenableeffectiveparticipationofwomen inthe planning process and strategy development,community consultation and the assessment needtobeconductedinthecontextofsocialconventions,organizingseparatemeetingsformenandwomenifappropriate. This approach has been employed atseveralCOMDEKSsitesincludingGilgelGibeIdamcatchmentareainEthiopia.
Where inequalities exist, gender integration in theresilienceassessmentworkshopandstrategydevel-opment should focus on strengthening women’scapacities and leadership abilities, and helpingto advance their involvement in governance anddecision-makingprocesses,asgenderequityhelpsto increase resilience. Ways of doing this includesupportingspecificprojectsmanagedbywomen’sgroups within the landscape, ensuring women’sparticipation in community-based institutions andinvolvingwomeninengagementwithexternalpart-nersandnetworks.Forexample,aftertheassess-ment workshop in the Natewa-Tunuloa Peninsula,aCOMDEKSsite inFiji, a villagechief suggestedthat women should lead the COMDEKS projectrecognizing that, despite their limited access toresources, they can greatly improve livelihoods intheir communities such as by bark cloth produc-tion and weaving to support small scale cottageindustries.
Women are interviewed to gather information on local small scale farming activities, Niger
Women and men are separated into groups to ensure both perspectives are heard, Ethiopia
©C
OM
DE
KS
Cam
bod
ia/S
rey
Mar
ona
©C
OM
DE
KS
Nig
er/B
assi
rou
Dan
Mag
aria
©
CO
MD
EK
SE
thio
pia
/Zel
eke
Tesf
aye
-
36 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 37
deciding the style and duration of the workshop
A resilienceassessmentworkshopgenerally consistsofthreemainparts:1)anintroduction;2)scoringoftheindicators;and3)discussionoftheresultsandwrap-up.Timeconstraintsmayallowformoreorlesstime,buttestinghasshownthattheintroductionandscoringmaytakeonewholeday(includinglunchandteabreak),withanotherhalfdayfordiscussionandwrap-up.
The design of an assessment workshop should bebased on information obtained in the consultations,fieldvisitsandother informationcollection,andfinal-izedtogetherwithlocalstakeholders.Forthisreason,it is important to have a good understanding of thetargetlandscapeorseascapeandthesocio-economic,cultural,andothercircumstancesofresidentcommu-nitiesduringplanning.Forexample,womenandmentend to have different perceptions because of thedifferent roles they usually have, and come up withdifferentviewsonmanyoftheindicators.Insuchcasesit is recommended to have separate groups for thescoringprocessandthenbringtheresultstogetherinthewholegroupdiscussion.Thesameprocesscanbeconsideredforcommunitymembersofdifferentsocio-economicstatus.
The number, size and duration of assessment work-shops depend on the resources available and thecapacity of the communities. In many cases localcommunitymembers,suchasfarmersandfishermen,will be busy with their work, so it is advisable thatthe assessment workshop be completed within oneor twodays,oradapted to thescheduleof the localstakeholders.
Interpretation and translation of the indicators
Prior to the assessment workshop, it is essential tomakesurethattheresilienceindicatorsareexpressedinlanguagethattheparticipantswillbeabletounder-standeasily.Thismayrequiretranslatingthemintooneormore languages.EvenfornativeEnglishspeakers,itmaybenecessarytoalterthelanguageusedintheindicatorstomakethemmoreeasilyunderstoodinthelocalcontext.
Theindicatorshavebeendevelopedtobeapplicabletodifferenttypesandsizesoflandscapesandseascapes.Therefore, facilitators and participating communitiesmayalsoneedtoadjustthecontentofthe indicatorsdependingonthelocalcircumstances.Dependingonthe context, additional indicators can be integratedwhile indicators that are not deemed relevant maybediscarded.
During a baseline assessment in Niger, stones are used as markers
indicators in action SaMPLE aSSESSMEnt WoRkShoP
tIMEtaBLE
Bioversity International held assessment work-shopsinFiji,withparticipantsfromvillagesintheBoumaNationalHeritageParkonTaveuniIsland.Around 10 villagers from each of two villagesparticipated ina1.5dayworkshop.Since therewerealargenumberofparticipants,theintroduc-tionwasdoneforthewholegroupandthegroupthendividedintotwo,witheachvillagedoingitsownmappingexerciseandscoringoftheindica-tors.Discussionswereheld separately for eachvillagethenextday.
DAY 1: Introduction and scoring 9:30-10:00 Introduction(30min.)10:00-11:00 Participatorymappingexercise(1hour)11:00-12:00 Discussionaboutdiversityand
resilienceinthecommunities(1hour)12:00-12:15 Teabreak(15min.)12:15-14:00 Scoring(Questions1-7)
(1hour45min.)14:00-14:30 Lunchbreak(30min.)14:30-16:30 Scoring(Questions8-20)(2hours)16:30-17:00 Summaryoftheassessmentandnext
steps(30min.)
DAY 2: Discussions 9:30-10:00 Analysisofscoringandreview
summaryoftheassessment(30min.)10:00-11:00 Discussionofanalysisand
identificationofkeytopicstodiscuss (1hour)
11:00-12:00 Discussionofpotentialactionplans inthevillage(1hour)
12:00-12:30 Evaluationoftheexercise(30min.)12:30-13:00 Lunch(30min.)
Identification of facilitators
Facilitatorsarethepeoplewhowillruntheworkshop,andtheirrolemayinvolveorganizing,planning,actingasemcees,following-up,andothertasks.Thefacilita-torsshouldleadthesmoothproceedingofanassess-mentworkshopandstimulateactiveandequalpartici-pationofworkshopparticipants.
It is important tohaveanote-takeramong the facili-tators, who understands local languages to be usedduringtheworkshopanddiscussion.Thenotestakenby this person will be of vital importance during thefollow-upstage.
Ideally, facilitators have a working relationship withcommunitiesinthearea.Iflocalcommunitymembersare actively engaged in SEPLS management, theythemselves can become facilitators. In such cases,theymayrequiresometraininginhowtofacilitate.
Local NGOs and project coordinators who havedeveloped a strong relationship with local communi-ties throughexistingprojectscanbegoodcandidatesto serve as facilitators. Alternatively, facilitators needto develop a relationship with the communities andlearn about the landscape or seascape through avail-able documents and discussion with key communitymembersbeforetheassessmentworkshop.Inthiscase,facilitatorsmayneedtospendsometimeinthecommu-nitiestolearnaboutthembeforehand.
The role of the facilitator during an assessment isvital for explaining the concepts of “socio-ecologicalproduction landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS)” and“resilience”tocommunitiesandworkshopparticipants.Facilitatorsshouldhaveagoodunderstandingoftheseconceptsandbeable to translate the indicators intothe local language if necessary, or reword them withvocabularyunderstoodatthelocallevel.
©C
OM
DE
KS
Nig
er/B
assi
rou
Dan
Mag
aria
-
38 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 39
Tips:• Prepareenoughcopiesofthetranslatedindicators
foreachoftheparticipantsandfacilitators.• Provide pens or pencils and scratch paper for all
participants.• Ensurethatthereisenoughposter-sizedpaperand
markers,colouredpensformapping,stickers,tape,scissorsand/orwhateverwillbeneededforpromi-nentlydisplayingscoringresults,mapping,etc.
• Preparesuitable refreshmentsandorganizemealsforparticipantsasappropriate.
• Considerhowparticipantsaregoing toget to theassessment,andwhethertransportationshouldbeprovided.
3.2 stage 2: The assessment workshop
Introduction
Anassessmentworkshopwillgenerallybeginwithanintroductorypresentationgivenbythefacilitators.Itisimportantduringtheintroductionthattimebeallowedto answer any questions participants may have.Explainingkeyconceptsandansweringallquestionscanbeexpectedtotakeafewhours.
Participatoryactivitiesmayalsobecarriedoutatthistime,toensurenotonlythatparticipantsfeelcomfort-able interacting with each other, but also that theyhave a common understanding of the landscape orseascapeanditsresources.Seebelowforsomeexam-plesofparticipatoryactivities.
Itisagoodideatocollectparticipantinformationsuchas name, age, gender and village name or organiza-tion,or,alternatively,circulateasheetforparticipantsto provide this information at the beginning of theworkshop.
Baseline assessment workshop, Ghana
Tips:Theintroductionisagoodopportunitytoexplain:
• The purpose of the assessment and the value ofpeople’sparticipation.Beawarethatinsomeplacesitcanbeverydifficultforcommunitiestoopenupandholddiscussionsfreely.
• Thebasicconceptsof“socio-ecologicalproductionlandscapes and seascapes (SEPLS)” and “resil-ience”. It is important that all participants under-standtheseconcepts.Theuseofsimple,easy-to-understand language is recommended as well asexamplestohelpparticipantsunderstand.Itmaybeusefultousepicturesorphotosofsocio-ecologicalproductionlandscapesorseascapes.
• Other concepts found in the indicators, such as“agriculturalbiodiversity”and“landuses”.Picturesanddiagramsmaybehelpful.
• Theflowof the resilienceassessmentand indica-torsaccordingtotheirspecificthemes.Theseare:Landscape/seascape diversity and ecosystemprotection;Biodiversity(includingagriculturalbiodi-versity); Knowledge and innovation; Governanceandsocialequity;andLivelihoodsandwell-being.
• The workshop schedule, including plans forfollow-up.
Theexactprocedurefortheintroductorysegmentwillvarydepending on time, resources, local context, purposeetc.,andmayincludesomeorallofthefollowing:
Self-introductionsIfparticipantsare frommultiplecommunitieswithinalandscapeorseascape,oriffacilitatorsorotherpartici-pants are from outside the target community, it maybehelpful to haveeachparticipant introducehimselforherselfandexplaintheirinterestintheassessmentworkshop.
Participatory mapping exerciseHavingparticipantsdrawamapoftheir landscapeorseascape including resources, land-uses, landmarksandothers–agriculturallands,watersources,huntingor fishing areas, buildings, etc. – is useful for identi-fying the landscape or seascape and its boundariesand ensuring a common understanding of the targetarea.ParticipatorySEPLSmappingisalsoeffectiveforengagingparticipantsindiscussion.
Discussion of biodiversityDiscuss and list examples of agricultural and aquatic biodiversity such as fruits, vegetables,medicinalplants,trees, livestock,pollinators,fishandcrustaceans,includingtheirlocalnames.Itmayalsobeappropriatetolistvariouskindsofwildlife.
Discuss and list landscape or seascape compo-nentsincludingfields,forestpatches,rivers,pastures,wetlands,watersources,coral reefsetc.Also list thelocalwordsforthesecomponents.
Discussion of resilienceMake a timeline with major events and changes inrelationtotheclimate,environmentandothers,suchasdroughts,floods,storms,earthquakesetc.,onalargesheetofpaper.
Explain resilience, for example, as “recovering afterstress” (seeChapter1:“Resilience inSEPLS–What isit?”),andthenletparticipantsexplainitintheirownwords.
Explain adaptation,forexample,andaskparticipantshowtheycopewithdroughts,floods,typhoons,earth-quakes,forestfire,pest,diseaseandotherdisasters.
Explanation of the indicatorsExplaintheconceptofindicatorsingeneral,aswellastheIndicatorsofResilienceinSEPLSspecifically,theirpurposeandhowusingthemisintendedtobenefitthecommunity.
©C
OM
DE
KS
Gha
na/G
eorg
eO
rtsi
n
-
40 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 41
indicators in action
PaRtIcIPatoRy MaPPIng ExERcISE
Aparticipatorymappingexercisecanprovideanopportunity for involvement of a greater numberof both men and women from the communityincludingthosetraditionallymarginalized,buildingtrust and strengthening relationships betweenfacilitatorsandcommunitymembers,andestab-lishinga structure inwhichdecision-makingandresponsibilities are shared. The mapping activityinitiates a community involvement forum whichcontinuestobedevelopedthroughregularvillagemeetings. Finally, the maps created serve asreference material for future planning, providingimportantinsightintothespecificsocio-ecologicalcharacteristicsofthearea.
Community members in Fiji engaged in participatory mapping
localcontext.Whenparticipantshavedifficultycompre-hendingaquestion,facilitatorscanassistparticipantsbyexplainingthescoresandtrends.
Individual ScoringThefacilitatorshouldasktheparticipantsthequestionfor each resilience indicator and explain with somelocal contexts and examples. Have each individualparticipantgivehisorherownscoreforeachindicator.
Participants score their landscape using indicators for resilience during a workshop, Bhutan
Group ScoringAfterindividualscoringhasbeencompleted,thegroupshould discuss, for each indicator question, whichscorerepresentstheoverallperceptionsof thewholegroup.Thismaybedonebyhavingindividualpartici-pantsdiscusstheirscoresandtrendsandthereasonsbehind them to arrive at a consensus opinion, oranothermethodsuchastakingasimplemathematicalaverage.Thisstepisimportant:
• Toprovideaspacefordiscussion.• To identify different views within and among
communitymembers.
ScoringTheprocessofhavingtheworkshopparticipantsscoretheir landscapeor seascapeaccording to the twentyindicatorsofresilienceisattheheartoftheassessmentworkshop. The twenty indicators are each accompa-niedbyquestionsforuseinscoring,aswellasnotes,examples and additional discussion questions whereappropriate.
Thephysicalmethodofcollectingscoresmaydependon the local context. When planning the workshop,facilitatorsshoulddecidewhethereachparticipantwillbe given a scorecard, write their scores on a chalk-board,placeanumberofsmallstones intoacup,orsomeothermethod.
Scores:Theindicatorsareintendedtobescoredonafive-pointscale.Ascoreof1meansthelandscapeorseascapeperformsverypoorlyinthatindicatorandascoreof5meansanextremelygoodperformance.(seepage18)
trends: A basic score for each indicator may beenoughinsomecases.Incaseswhereresourcesallow,itmaybedesirable tohaveparticipantsalsoprovidetheirperceptionsoftrends,notesonreasonsfortheirscores,andpotentialproblemsandsolutions.
Trendsaregenerallycapturedusingatimespan(5,10,30yearsetc.)determinedforeachindicator.Itisgener-ally sufficient to evaluate trends using a three-tieredscale (improving; no change; worsening), but a morecomplex five-tiered scale (rapidly improving; slowlyimproving;nochange;slowlyworsening;rapidlywors-ening)hasalsobeenused.
Itisimportanttoaskquestionsontheresilienceindica-torsinawaythatiseasytounderstandforallpartici-pants. It is recommended that facilitators prepare inadvancehowtoposeeachquestiontotheparticipantsusinglocalexamplesandinterpretingquestionsinthe
• To reachacommonunderstanding (ifpossible)ofthe landscape/seascape situation and any threatsandsolutions.
Toreachconsensus,theadditionalquestionsfoundinthefourthcolumnoftheindicatortable(Chapter2)canbeaskedduringthediscussion.
Tips:• Facilitatorsshouldworkatcreatingaparticipatory
and communicative atmosphere to keep partici-pantsinterestedandengagedintheprocess.
• Itisimportanttocapturehowthingshavechangedtemporally and what the drivers associated withthesechangesare.Thiswillhelpthecommunitiesdevelopstrategies to improve their resilienceasafollowupprocesstotheresilienceassessment.
• Materials such as cards, small stones, plastic orpapercapscanminimizethetimetakenforscoring.Providingacupand5smallstones foreach indi-vidual participant, facilitators can ask the partici-pants to put stones for each question in the cupwhileanote-takercapturesindividualscores.
It may be useful to prepare an indicator score sheetliketheoneonthenextpageonaposter-sizedsheetof paper and write each participant’s scores for thewholegrouptosee,inordertofacilitateaparticipatoryprocessinarrivingatgroupscores.
©B
iove
rsity
Inte
rnat
iona
l/Dun
jaM
ijato
vic
©C
OM
DE
KS
Bhu
tan/
Dor
jiS
inga
y
-
42 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 43
Indicator Question#
name name name name name group consensus
Score Trend Score Trend Score Trend Score Trend Score Trend Score Trend
1234567891011121314151617181920
Table 1. Score sheet for group scores andrecoverfromshocks.Basedontheseunderstand-ings, participants should further explore options forenhancing the resilience of the landscape/seascapeandidentifypossiblenextstepsforthegrouptotake.
Everyoneshouldbeencouragedtospeakfreelyinthediscussion,evenifthereisrepetition,andanote-takershouldrecordthecomments.
Tips:Groupdiscussionisagoodopportunityto:• Identify potential solutions to problems facing the
landscapeorseascape.• Askparticipantswhatstrikesthemmostaboutthe
findings.• Discusshowtoimprovetheresilienceoftheland-
scapeor seascapeand identifypotential commu-nity-basedactivitiestodoso.
Thefollowingaresomeexamplesofpossibleelementsforthediscussion.Facilitatorscanconsiderorganizinganothersessionafewdaysorweeksaftertheassess-ment workshop to further promote discussion andidentifynextsteps.
Discussion of scoring results Aftersummarizing theassessmentscores, facilitatorsmaydisplaydiagramsand the indicatorscoresheetsonawall,andstimulatediscussiononstrengthsandweaknesses in landscape or seascape resilience.Facilitatorsmaygoovereachresilienceindicatorques-tionagain,orcovereachsub-categoryof the indica-tors. Participants should share their thoughts on thescores,theirreasons,andpracticesusedtorespondtoshocksandchanges.
Discussing the results of the indicators scoring exercise in plenary, Khotont district, Mongolia
Tips:The following is one option to process the collectedscoringdata:• Calculateaveragescoresofeachsub-categoryof
theresilienceindicators.• Drawaradardiagramonabigsheetofpapertohelp
participantsvisualizetheresultsduringdiscussion.
Discussion on specific topicsFacilitators can stimulate discussion to identify keytopicsforthecommunity.
Keydiscussiontopicsmayinclude:• Keycommunityconcernsandthreatstolandscape
orseascaperesilience.• Needsforimprovementincurrentpractices.
Scoring data collected at a workshop in Kenya
discussion, summary and next steps
Discussionoftheresultsoftheindicatorscoringisasimportantasthescoringitself.Anactiveandproduc-tivediscussionoftheindicatorscoringcanhelppartici-pantsunderstandhowtoenhancetheresilienceofthelandscapeorseascapeandidentifypotentialcommu-nity-basedactivitiesthatcanimproveresiliencebasedonthesefindings.Theadditionalquestionsfoundintheindicator table (Chapter 2) can be also asked at thisstagetoguidethediscussion.
Facilitatorsshouldguidethediscussion inawaythatencourages participants to share ideas, views, prob-lems, threats, explanations and local solutions suchasknowledgeandpracticesusedtomitigate,manage
©B
iove
rsity
Inte
rnat
iona
l/Yas
ukiM
orim
oto
©B
iove
rsity
Inte
rnat
iona
l/Ron
nie
Vern
ooy
-
44 | Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS) Chapter 3: Practical guidance for using the indicators | 45
Discussion of potential action plans within communitiesOncekeytopicshavebeenidentified,facilitatorsshouldencourage participants to discuss potential activitiesintheformofactionplansfortheircommunities.It isimportantthatcommunitymembersdeveloptheirownactionplanstoensurecommunityownership.
Example of radar diagram from a workshop in Fiji
Tips:Thefollowingfourelementsarekeypointswhendevel-opingactionplans:• Whatneedstobedone?• Whowilldoit?• Whowillleadit?• Who fromoutside thecommunitycanhelp imple-
mentactivities?
coMMon chaLLEngES In RESILIEncE aSSESSMEnt
Allocating sufficient time for discussionIf facilitators do not take enough time to explainthe purpose of the exercise, focusing, for example,onsimplygettingscores, theremaynotbeenoughdiscussionamongtheparticipants,makingthework-shoplesseffectiveforengaginglocalcommunities.
Managing expectations from communitiesItisimportanttomanageexpectationsfromcommu-nity members related to the resilience assessmentworkshop.Localcommunitiesshouldunderstandthatanassessmentworkshopisonestepinanongoing,participatoryprocesstoimproveresilience.
Encouraging participation of all stakeholders, including womenParticularlyinlarge-scalelandscapesandseascapes,sometimes only representatives of local coopera-tivesandcommunities,mostlymen,maybeinvitedtothe