towards an understanding of the impact of autonomous path planning on victim search in usar paul...

17
Towards an Understanding of the Impact of Autonomous Path Planning on Victim Search in USAR Paul Scerri, Prasanna Velagapudi, Katia Sycara, Huadong Wang, Shih-Yi James Chien and Michael Lewis Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh

Post on 20-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Towards an Understanding of the Impact of Autonomous Path

Planning on Victim Search in USAR

Paul Scerri, Prasanna Velagapudi, Katia Sycara, Huadong Wang, Shih-Yi James Chien and Michael

Lewis

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon UniversitySchool of Information Sciences, University of

Pittsburgh

Urban Search and Rescue

• Focus on Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear events

• Use multiple robots to search for victims in dangerous urban disaster environment

• Complex environment means that humans are required

Operator Tasks

• Operator has several independent tasks

• Processing vision data (identifying victims/problems)

• Rescuing stuck or broken robots (trapped under chairs or high centered)

• Planning exploration

• Coordinating robots

Increasing Robot:Operator Ratio

• Operators are extremely expensive compared to robots

• Easier to get more robots than more operators

• Robots spend much of their time moving slowly between locations

• Operator time is not efficiently utilized

• Unpredictably required

Autonomous Path Planning

• Robots are already performing SLAM w/ LIDAR data

• Allow robots to plan their own paths, to cooperatively explore the environment

• Path planning is mature, reasonably reliable in some environments

• Suspect that operators spend a lot of effort thinking about path planning, for little gain

Tradeoffs of Autonomy

• Large amount of operator time saved, corresponding increase in efficiency

• Robots use abstracted data to decide where to explore, human insight/semantic knowledge might be more efficient

• Operators may lose some situational awareness if they don’t need to control robots

Lattice Planning

• Straightforward implementation of published algorithms

• Nodes valued by expected information gain of going to that location

• Edges valued by probability of traversing safely

• Thresholded, with bias against paths of other robots

• Branch and bound search to find path that maximizes information gain

• Some limits on path length, preference for straightness, etc.

Nodes Edges Occupancy grid

Path

USARSim

• High-fidelity simulator based on Unreal Tournament

• Real-time physics with physics card

• Open source, freely available

• Maintained by NIST

Experiment Design

• 60 paid subjects in 30 teams of 2 used both designs

• 24 P3ATs, 25 min., large office environment, find/mark victims

• Auto:

• Path planner, with operator able to teleop or waypoint plan

• Manual:

• Waypoint planning for each robot, teleop when required

Thumbnails for each

robotEnlarged video and teleop

Map and Victim Marking

More Area Explored

Auto Manual

(p < 0.001)

(Manual condition: 4.26 robots ignored)

More Victims Found

Auto Manual

(p = 0.003)

(Same victims/area in both groups)

Decreased Marking Error

Auto Manual

p = 0.002

Same Workload

Auto Manual

Conclusions

• Autonomous path planning a useful way of reducing operator load when environment allows it

• Benefits (faster planning, handling more robots) outweigh costs (loss of situation awareness, lack of human insight)

• Operator’s time taken up with other activities

• Not clear they fully exploit all robots

• Future focus on data presentation/visualization