towards pc methods for the characterization of randomly...

19
USC UQ Workshop • August 21-22, 2008 Towards PC Methods for the Characterization of Randomly Structured NanoComposites Omar M. Knio Johns Hopkins University

Upload: lydang

Post on 20-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

USC UQ Workshop • August 21-22, 2008

Towards PC Methods for theCharacterization of Randomly Structured

NanoComposites

Omar M. KnioJohns Hopkins University

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 2

Caveat Lector

• “Best effort” to solve a very difficult engineeringproblem

• “Toward PCE” is not redundant• Best == “guess” the solution (“because you’re

compelled to check your answer”)• Emphasis on ideas; no theory, no algorithms

(yet…)

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 3

Outline

• Introduction– Uniformly layered material– Randomly layered composites

• Modeling approaches:– Deterministic model for uniformly layered materials– Stochastic model for randomly layered composites

• Results• Discussion and Conclusions

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 4

Uniformly Layered Material

• typically vapor deposited• controllable reaction properties: propagation and ignition

Ni

Initial reactants: Ni and Al

Final Product: NiAl intermetallic

Al

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 5

Control of Reaction Properties: Bilayer

0

5

10

15

20

10 100 1000

Barbee and Weihs - LLNL

Rea

ctio

n V

elo

city

(m

/s)

Multilayer Period (nm)

JHU

Barbee and Weihs @ LLNL, 1996

Weihs et al.@ JHU, 1997

Bilayer Thickness (nm)

Rea

ctio

n Ve

loci

ty (

m/s

)

Control throughcomposition,annealingdiluents, etc… isalso possible

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 6

Randomly Layered Composites

Examples of rolled Ni/Al structures

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 7

Modeling of Transient Reaction Properties

• Elementary continuum description!• Model is deceptively simple -- based on (coupled)

evolution equations of concentration and energy:

)(

)(

CDdt

dC

dt

dQTk

dt

dh

!•!=

+!•!="

x

y

• In the case of uniformly layered systems, computationaldomain is simple as well!

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 8

Assumptions; Experimental inputs• Fast, diffusion-limited reaction• Thermal conductivity is independent of

temperature and composition• Fickian diffusion between reactants, described

using Arrhenius diffusivity:D = Do exp(-E/RT)

• Do, E, reaction heat are obtained fromexperimental observations

• Other thermophysical properties obtained fromfundamental measurements or calculations

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 9

Predictions: Effect of Bilayer and Annealing

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 50 100 150 200 250

Experiments: As-deposited

Experiments: 6hrs @ 150°C

Predictions: 6hrs @ 150°C

Predictions: As-deposited

Rea

ctio

n V

eloci

ty (

m/s

)

Multilayer Period (nm)

2w = 2.4nm

2w = 6.3nm

Annealingincreases

intermixingand slows the

reaction

Bilayer Thickness (nm)

Reac

tion

Vel

ocity

(m/s

)

Kinetics

Ther

mo

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 10

Modeling randomly (non-uniformly) layeredcomposites

Mechanically-processed

Bilayer Frequency vs. Bilayer Thickness

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000

Bilayer Thickness (nm)

Bil

ay

er

Fre

qu

en

cy

n=4

n=6

n=8

Controllable distributions

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 11

Approach• Probabilistic approach based on exploiting

measured pdfs of bilayer distribution. Assumptions:– include underlying assumptions as in deterministic model

for uniformly layered RMs– assume thermal profile is uniform in the front, which is

normal to propagation direction• Computational model:

– based on discretizing the pdf using an appropriatenumber of bins (need to worry about statisticalconvergence);

– solve for transient reaction in coupled layers with bilayerscorresponding to discretized pdf, and averaged energyequation that accounts for heat release in representativebilayer and for the corresponding density.

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 12

Illustration

Reaction Front

- Molecular diffusion process issimulated for representativelayer in each bin independently

- Solutions are coupled throughsection averaged energyequation that accounts for theprobability density of individualbins

- KL spectrum: crushed!Justification: asymptotics

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 13

Consistency of Stochastic Model

Discretization of experimental pdfs for rolled Al-Pd nanolaminates

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 14

Stochastic Convergence

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 15

Stochastic Predictions:Rolled Al-Pd Nanolaminates

• Reasonable agreement with experimental observations• Construction of simple design correlations for material behavior

– Random by design!

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 16

Dual Bilayer Ni-Al Composites

• Fabricated bydepositing two stakcsof different layering

• Use as a limitingexample of non-uniformly layered RM

Small Bilayers (~20nm)

Large Bilayers (~110nm)

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 17

Predictions and Data

Coarse

Fine

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 18

Discussion

• Reasonable agreement between modelpredictions and fine composite; disagreement forcoarse structure

• Origin of disagreement can be traced to theunderlying assumption in the probabilistic modelthat the temperature is uniform across layers

• Analysis consequently points to importance ofmulti-dimensional propagation regimes thatdepend on lengthscales of KL spectrum

USC UQ Workshop• LA, CA 19

Acknowledgments

Work supported by NIST Advanced Technology Programand ONR MURI

Contributors: T. Weihs, T. Hufnagel

M. Snyder (USNA), J. Trenkle, G. Fritz, R. Knepper, N.Walker, D. van Heerden, A. Mann, E. Besnoin, A. Gavens,S. Jayaraman, J. Spey