tpck presentation

15
Developing TPCK: Developing TPCK: Impact of experience Impact of experience and science and science expertise expertise Diane Jass Ketelhut Temple University [email protected]

Upload: jk1lee

Post on 11-Jun-2015

536 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tpck Presentation

Developing TPCK: Developing TPCK: Impact of experience Impact of experience

and science expertiseand science expertiseDiane Jass Ketelhut

Temple [email protected]

Page 2: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

TPCKTPCK

Koehler and Mishra’s TPCK framework

Page 3: Tpck Presentation

•Elementary ed certification programs:

• Low on science

• Low on inquiry models

Page 4: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Strong Science BackgroundStrong Science Background

Something like this should be used in classroom

“interactive technology is a great way to use visual and auditory learning styles to reach students with different learning abilities.”

“using interactive technologies is essential in these times.”

Page 5: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Weak science backgroundWeak science background

See no value for it

“I don't think that I will do all that much with technology when I get into my classroom ... If we can provide entertainment without the computer how cool are we?”

Page 6: Tpck Presentation

•80% of K-8 teachers do not teach with inquiry

•Pressures of high stakes testing

•Few experiences

Page 7: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Teaching ExperienceTeaching Experience

Something like this should be used in classroom

“We are currently living in an age where video games, ipods, laptops and cell phones rule.  In order to compete schools must find ways to engage and maintain our students' attention.  We have to incorporate more computer based research and activities into our lessons.”

Page 8: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Beyond Value…Beyond Value…

But:“I am a teacher who has two computers at home, I occasionally use my daughter's ipod, I play video games with my son and who doesn't have a cell phone.  I have all of these devices at the tip of my hand and yet I rarely use technology in my classroom.”

Page 9: Tpck Presentation

•How to achieve TPCK with deficient PK and CK?•Science instruction must be integrated with technology

Summer Institute 2008

Page 10: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Summer Institute 2008Summer Institute 2008

Exercise physiology in amPedagogy and technology in afternoon

preK-8 teachers

Page 11: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Evidence-Team 1Evidence-Team 1

Low on content and technologyStruggled to understand

Page 12: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Evidence Team 2 and 3Evidence Team 2 and 3

AnaerobicAerobic

Stronger on contentStruggled to understand how to teach it and integrate technology

Page 13: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

Biggest learning momentsBiggest learning moments

12%: tpck “how to use technology meaningfully”

25%: pck—real world connections

25%: content

Page 14: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

“It is simply my unwillingness to think out of the box when it comes to technology.  I'll try the latest teaching strategy or do something out of the norm that my colleagues won't do and yet I refuse to give technology a try.  Here I go with the excuses: lack of working computers, time, the curriculum, standardized testing, students' behavior, school walkthroughs, etc, etc, etc.  In spite of these I know I have to do better by my students.  Hopefully, this summer I'll be able to create some lessons and reformat activities that will incorporate more interactive technology.  Sadly, this statement sounds familiar.  Oh yeah, I think I said it last spring......”

Page 15: Tpck Presentation

4/14/09 AERA 2009: Diane Jass Ketelhut

ThanksThanks

This material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0639646. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Catherine Schifter, Susan Varnum, Judith Stull