traineeship for architects integrating education, … · · 2014-12-15traineeship for architects...

Laura Lee, Architect, FAIA, Hon FRAIA _ Professor of Architecture28 November 2014 _ Architects Council of Europe (ACE) Special Session _ Brussels, Belgium

Traineeship for Architects

Integrating Education, Research, Practice +

INTERIM

ASSESSM

ENT/

EXAMIN

ATION

O

F ACADEM

IC TRAIN

ING

Students’ individual paths may

vary. IDP and ARE fall under

supervision of NCARB and are the

sole responsibility of the student. U

niversity of Minnesota assum

es no responsibility for adm

inistering or facilitating em

ployment, ID

P fi le, or ARE. Ideal path described here assum

es IDP hours align w

ith N

CARB distribution requirements.

MS under developm

ent by U

niversity of Minnesota faculty.

Target entering class Fall 2013.

SOU

RCE OF N

CARB STATISTICS: N

CARB by the Num

bers, published June 20

12

Academic

Internships

Professional

Continuing Professional D

evelopment (CPD

)

** *

LAW

MEDICINE

GERMANY: ARCHITECTURE

IRELAND: ARCHITECTURE

11 4

4

384

4

33

55

8 yrs

8 yrs

10 yrs

UNDERGRADUATE B.S. / B.A.

UNDERGRADUATE B.S. / B.A.

UNDERGRADUATE B.SC. / B.A. / B.ENG.IN ARCHITECTURE

M.SC. / M.A. / M.ENG.

UNDERGRADUATE B.SC. IN ARCHITECTURE

M.ARCH

D.O. / M.D.

RESIDENCY PROGRAM

J.D.

LICENSURELICENSURE

LICENSU

RE(Typically after1st or 2nd year of residency.Residency can last up to seven years depending on specialization.)

ABILITY TO

IND

EPEND

ENTLY

MAN

AGE TH

E CARE O

F PATIENTS

MASTERY O

F THE

MAN

AGEM

ENT

OF ILL PATIEN

TS/M

ASTERY OF

CLINICAL SKILLS

MASTERY O

F THE

BASIC SCIENCES

FINAL

EXAMIN

ATION

O

F ACADEM

IC TRAIN

ING

FINAL

ASSESSMEN

T/ EXAM

INATIO

N O

F PRO

FESSION

AL TRAIN

ING

TYPICAL PATH TO ARCHITECTURE LICENSURE IN U.S.

IDEAL* TRACK NON PRE-PROFESSIONAL, M.ARCH + PROPOSED M.S.

IDEAL* TRACK B.S. + M.ARCH + PROPOSED M.S.

11

11

1

22

22

22

2

33

33

33

3

44

41

1

1

11

14

452

21

1

13

32

6 872

23

3

22

21

5 761

12

2

77

644

7 yrs7 yrs

8 8.5 yrs

+/- 13.4 yrs

+/- 15.5 yrs

NCARB REPORTS AN AVERAGE TIME OF 8.5 YEARS FROM GRADUATION TO LICENSURE, BASED ON ALL ACADEMIC PATHS. THE LENGTH OF EDUCATION VARIES FROM FIVE TO SEVEN YEARS, DEPENDING UPON THE TYPE OF DEGREE.

IN RESEARCH PRACTICES** AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

DIFFERENT REGIONS OF GERMANY HAVE DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS. THIS CHART REPRESENTS THE MOST TYPICAL PATH TO LICENSURE.

IN RESEARCH PRACTICES** AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

NON PRE-PROFESSIONAL UNDERGRADUATE

UNDERGRADUATE B.S. IN ARCHITECTURE

M.ARCH

M.ARCH

M.S. RP

M.S. RP

(VARIES BY DEGREE)

COMPLETED*

INTERNSHIP

IDP CO

MPLETE

ON

AVERAGE

6.4 YEARS AFTER EN

ROLLM

ENT,

ACCORD

ING

TO

NCARB

IDP CO

MPLETE *

& LICEN

SURE

APPROX. 6 M

ON

THS

AFTER GRAD

UATIO

N

ARE AND

ID

P COM

PLETE *&

LICENSU

RE U

PON

GRAD

UATIO

N

LICENSURE

BAR EXAM /

MU

LTISTATEPRO

FESSION

ALRESPO

NSIBILITY

EXAMIN

ATION

PATHS TO

LICENSU

RE

FINAL

EXAMIN

ATION

O

F ACADEM

IC TRAIN

ING

PATHS TO LICENSURE IN LAW, MEDICINE, ARCHITECTURE

Copyright ACSA 2011©

PATHS TO PROSPERITY _ ARCHITECTURE VERSUS LAW

EDUCATIONCase–based

RESEARCHEvidence–based

PRACTICEPerformance–based

ANTHROPOLOGICALCULTURALECOLOGICALECONOMICALENVIRONMENTALETHICALENTOMOLOGICALEXPERIENTIALFINANCIALHISTORICALLEGALPHENOMENOLOGICALPHILOSOPHICALPHYSICALPOLITICALPSYCHOLOGICALSOCIOLOGICALTECHNICAL

INTEGRATION 1 _ KNOWLEDGE BASE

INTEGRATION 2 _ SEAMLESS TRANSITION

EDUCATION YR4

EDUCATION YR5

TRAINEESHIP 2 YEARS

QUALIFICATION CPDCPD

EDUCATION YR1

EDUCATION YR2

EDUCATION YR3

INTEGRATION 3 _ E E E

The Path to Becoming an Architect

E 1 EDUCATION AccreditedProfessionalDegree

E 2 EXPERIENCE Internship/TraineeshipPeriod

E 3 EXAMINATION ProfessionalExam

NATIONALARCHITECTUREORGANIZATIONSINTHEUSA

ACSA AmericanCollegiateSchoolsofArchitectureAIA AmericanInstituteofArchitectsAIAS AmericanInstituteofArchitectureStudentsNAAB NationalArchitecturalAccreditationBoardNCARB NationalCouncilofRegistrationBoards

E 1 EDUCATION

24 NAAB Student Performance Criteria

CRITICAL THINKING AND REPRESENTATIONA1.ProfessionalCommunicationSkillsA2.DesignThinkingSkillsA3.InvestigativeandAppliedResearchSkillsA4.ArchitecturalDesignSkillsA5.UseofPrecedentsSystemsA6.HistoricalTraditionandGlobalCultureA7.CulturalDiversity

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICEC1.StakeholderRolesinArchitectureC2.ProjectManagementC3.BusinessofArchitectureC4.Non-traditionalFormsofPracticeC5.LegalResponsibilitiesC6.ProfessionalEthics

INTEGRATED BUILDING PRACTICES,TECHNICAL SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGEB1.Pre-designB2.AccessibilityB3.SiteDesignB4.LifeSafetyB5.TechnicalDocumentationB6.EnvironmentalSystemsB7.StructuralSystemsB8.BuildingEnvelopeSystems/AssembliesB9.BuildingServiceSystemsB10.FinancialConsideration

INTEGRATED ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONSD1.IntegrativeDesign

E 2 EXPERIENCE Internship Development Program 17 Core Competences Category1:Pre-Design 260hourminimum 1A.Programming 80 1B.SiteandBuildingAnalysis 80 1C.ProjectCostandFeasibility 40 1D.PlanningandZoningRegulations 60Category2:Design 2600hourminimum 2A.SchematicDesign 320 2B.EngineeringSystems 360 2C.ConstructionCost 120 2D.CodesandRegulations 120 2E.DesignDevelopment 320 2F.ConstructionDocuments 1200 2G.MaterialSelectionandSpecification 160Category3:ProjectManagement 720hourminimum 3A.BiddingandNegotiation 320 3B.ConstructionAdministration 360 3C.ConstructionPhase:Observation 120 3D.GeneralProjectManagement 120Category4:PracticeManagement 160hourminimum 4A.BusinessOperations 80 4B.LeadershipandService 80

E 3 EXAMINATION

ARCHITECTS REGISTRATION EXAM (ARE) National Council of Architectural Registration Boards

7ExamSections:MultipleChoiceandGraphic

ProgrammingPlanning&PracticeSitePlanning&DesignBuildingDesign&ConstructionSystemsSchematicDesignStructuralSystemsBuildingSystemsConstructionDocumentsandService

SUPPORT E 1, 2, 3 EMERGING PROFESSIONALS COMPANION (EPC)

16 Core Competency IDP Requirements by NCARBTypical Chapter Contents (as conceived in 2004, revised 2010)

1. Narrative

2. Exercises

3. Evidence-based Learning

4. Health Safety Welfare

5. Design and Construction Liability

6. Ethical Dilemmas

7. Professional Continuing Education

8. Further Study

9. Personal Portfolio

10. Bibliography, References, Resources, Links

SUPPORT E 2 to 3 IDP OUTSTANDING PRACTICE AWARD

“Gensler’suniquetwo-partapproach–-asuiteoftoolsandanetworkofLicensure Champions--createsdynamicallyflexiblementoringstrategies.

Thissystemnurturesthelocalcultureanduniquerequirementsofover30officesonfivecontinentswhileachievingbroaderobjectivesandstandardsofexcellence.”

Inclusive Mentorship: Crossing Disciplines and JurisdictionsThe Common Thread: Nurturing the Enduring FundamentalsA Culture of StorytellingRich and Strategic Partnerships: Sharing Among All Levels and DisciplinesLearning to Mentor: The Importance of Training

The Importance of Multifaceted SupportStrategic Financial SupportIntellectual InfrastructureCultural Development Around LicensureLeadership Investment

SUPPORT E 3 to 2 PRIZE for Integration of Practice in Academy

course #1 professional practice in architecture

MINI CASESTUDY

CORE TEAM

ELLERBE BECKETPROJECT PROPOSAL

DD_DELIVERY

MASTER PLANNING OF HEALTH CARE CITY

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

CD_DELIVERYFAST-TRACKING

FIRM1_GHD [AUSTRALIAN] - ARCH/STRUCTURAL

FIRM2_SKM [AUSTRALIAN] - MECH,ELECT,PLUMB

FIRM3_DUBAI [LOCAL] - LANDSCAPE ARCH

FIRM4_NEW YORK - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMSCOMMUNICATIONS/SECURITY/ACOUSTICS

CONSULTANTS_[1] ENGLISH, [1] GERMAN, [2] CHINESE, [2] AUSTRALIAN

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL [RFP]

SUB-PARTNERING AGREEMENT

PROJECT ARCHITECTSINTERNAL

SKINECOLOGYACOUSTICSSTRUCTUREGLAZINGLEED INTERIORS MATERIALS

SILVER MEDAL

RECYCLED MATERIALSGREEN ROOFSPORCELAIN TILESPROJECT TRACKING

CONTRACTOR COSTS$1.5 MILLION FOR TRACKING

CONS

ULTA

TION

DECI

SION

PAT

HSIN

TER

NA

L

FIRM1_GHD [AUSTRALIAN] - ARCH/STRUCTURAL

FIRM2_SKM [AUSTRALIAN] - MECH,ELECT,PLUMB

CD PRODUCTION PHASE _ 25-30 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNERS PER FIRM CAPACITY _ 1,000- 2,000 DESIGNERS

CD PRODUCTION PHASE _ 10-15 STRUCTURAL DESIGNERS

CD PRODUCTION PHASE _ 25-30 M,E,P DESIGNERS PER TRADE

EXPECTED FINISH DATE _ 01 . 01 . 2009

PER FIRM CAPACITY _ 1,000- 2,000 DESIGNERS

CD P

RODU

CTIO

N

Lead Designer

Project ManagerProject Architect

Architectural Designer [15-20]

Project Designer

Lead Medical PlannerLead Interior Designer

ELLERBE BECKETINTERNAL

CORE TEAMArchitectural Drafter [2]Architectural Intern [2]

Jeff Frush, AIA, NCARB

Mic Johnson, AIA, NCARB

Interior Designer [5-8]Interior Drafter [1]

Interior Intern [2]

SD/DD PHASE _ 2-3 PLANNERS + 3-4 DESIGN ARCHITECTS

DD/CD PHASE _ 16-18 ARCH DESIGNERS

CD PRODUCTION PHASE _ 25-30 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNERS

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE CASE STUDIES 1

03STUDENT DETAIL PRESENTATIONS - IN CLASS

04RESPONSE AND EXPLANATION OF ACTUAL BUILT DETAIL - IN CLASS

Actual Built Detail

Student Proposed Detail

course #2 building stories

Students present individual solutions. Before revealing the actual detail, John Cook and the class respond and discuss the presentations to identify potential gaps or problems.

John Cook presents the actual detail development and construction process, emphasizing lessons learned from field observations as well as performance issues that develop once the building is in operation.

insulated glass

edge beam

spray foam insulation

SIP or rigid insulation

waterproof membrane

vapor retarder

3”x5” vertical mullion

3”x5” structural steel column

single pane glass

rigid polystyrene insulation

�lter fabric

pededstal

pavers

spray applied waterproof membrane

so�t framing

�nished ceiling - gyp/plaster

isolation hangers

sprinkler piping

sprayed �reproo�ng

suspended ceiling frame

electrical &

ventilation so�t

Proposed Detail sloped to roof drain 1/4”:12”


1 9 9 5 2 0 0 0

Exorem new dummy or sit at, consec teur adipis cing elit, 10 a diam no nummy nim euismod tincindit laoret dollore man 20 a aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, qui30 nostrud exerci tation ullam corper suscipit lobortis nis 40 aliquip ex ea commodo conqse quat. Dus autem vel em ire 50 dolor in hendrerit in vul putate velit esse. Molesti con 60 at, vel lum dol-lore feug viat nulla facilisis at vero er 70 et acumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent 80 tatum ril delenit augue duis dollore teb feugat nulla a 90. Lorem ipsum

dolor sit amet, cosen ceur adipscing elit, 100 a diam no nummy ni euisimod tincindit laoret dollore ma110 a aliqm erat volutpat.

Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, qui 120 nostrud exerci tation ullam corper susipit lobortis nis 130 aliquip ex ea commodo conse quat. Dus autem vel em ire 140 olor in hend rerit in vulup tate velit esse. Molsti con 150 at, vel lum dollore eu feugiat nulla. Facilisi at vero er 160 et acumsan et iusto odio dignisim qui blandit praesent 170 tatum ril delenit augue duis dollore te feuga nulla a 180. Lorem ipsum dolor sit

at, concseq teury adiping elit, 190 a diam no nummy odio ni euisod tin cint laoret dollore ma200 a aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad mim veniam, qui 210 nostrud exerci tation ullam corper. Susipit lobortis nis 220 aliquip ex ea commodo conse quat. Dus autem vel etm ire 230 olor in hend rerit in vulutate sut velit esse.

Molsti con 240 at, vel lum dollore eu feu-giat nulla facilisi at vero er 250 et acumsan et iusto odio dignisim qui blandit praesent 260 tatum ril delenit augue duis dollore te feuga nulla a 270 Lorem ipsum dolor sit at,

1 9 9 0

disaster relief temporary housingnagata, kobe Kaynasli, turkey Bhuj, india

paper churchKoBe, japan

paper studioKeio universityfujisawa, Kanagawa, japan

paper emergency sheltersByumBa, rwanda

paper archmoma

new yorK, ny

paper theater amsterdam

japan pavilionworld expo

hannover

odawara hall & east gate

liBrary of a poet

Molesti con 60 at, vel lum dollore feug

Facilisi at vero er 160 et acumsan et

iusto odio

Susipit lobortis nis 220 aliquip ex ea commodo

conse quat. facilisi at vero er

Dus autem vel etm ire 230 olor in hend rerit in vulutate sut

velit esse

paper arBor

Susipit lobortis quip ex ea conse.

Autem vel etm olor in sut velit esse.

2 0 0 5 2 0 1 0

Exorem new dummy or sit at, consec teur adipis cing elit, 10 a diam no nummy nim euismod tincindit laoret dollore man 20 a aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, qui30 nostrud exerci tation ullam corper suscipit lobortis nis 40 aliquip ex ea commodo conqse quat. Dus autem vel em ire 50 dolor in hendrerit in vul putate velit esse. facilisis at vero er 70 et acumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent 80 tatum ril delenit augue duis dollore teb feugat nulla a 90. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cosen ceur adipscing elit, 100 a diam

no nummy ni euisimod tincindit laoret dol-lore ma110 a aliqm erat volutpat.

Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, qui 120 nos-trud exerci tation ullam corper susipit lobor-tis nis 130 aliquip ex ea commodo conse quat. Dus autem vel em ire 140 olor in hend rerit in vulup tate velit esse. Molsti con 150 at, vel lum dollore eu feugiat nulla.

Facilisi at vero er 160 et acumsan et iusto odio dignisim qui blandit praesent 170 tatum ril delenit augue duis dollore te feuga nulla a 180. Lorem ipsum dolor sit at, concseq teury adiping elit, 190 a diam

no nummy odio ni euisod tin cint laoret dollore ma200 a aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad mim veniam, qui 210 nostrud exerci tation ullam corper.

Susipit lobortis nis 220 aliquip ex ea com-modo conse quat. Dus autem vel etm ire 230 olor in hend rerit in vulutate sut velit esse.Molsti con 240 at, vel lum dollore eu feugiat facilisi at vero er 250 et acumsan et iusto odio dignisim qui blandit praesent 260 tatum ril delenit augue duis dollore te feuga nulla a 270 Lorem ipsum dolor sit at, concseq teury adipscing elit, 280 a diam

2 0 1 5

paper bridgeremoulin, france

paper dometaiwan

cicb boathousepouilly-en-auxois, france

paper window houseparis,france

chengdu haulin elementarychengdu, china

paper studiokeio universityfujisawa, kanagawa, japan

tools

data

ideas

research methods

outcomes

metrics

key

Facilisi at vero er 160 et acum-san et iusto odio dignisim qui

Dus autem vel etm ire 230 olor in sut velit esse.

Autem vel etm ire 230 olor in sut velit esse.

flows of research trajectories may be identified for firms with enough demonstrated research expertise. Other firms’ flows may be more focused on potential research trajectories.

external influences such as collaborators or innovative processes brought in from other disciplines.

key coding indicates type or nature of project interconnection including: tools, data, ideas, research methods, outcomes, metrics, resources

connections specifies how research ideas connect between multiple projects


DESIGN BUILD 1 _ CRAFT _ ShoRT TERm CoLLABoRATIvE

DESIGN BUILD 2 _ SOCIAL IMPACT _ STUDENT THESIS

DESIGN BUILD 3 _ ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP

rElationsHiPs

SCHOOL CONSORTIUM

studEnt FirM

FaCultY

studEntnon-

ProFit

studEnt FirM

studEnt FirM

studEntnon-

ProFit

RESEARCH BASED PRACTICES 1 _ CONSORTIUM MODEL

knowledge loop

broken knowledge loop completed knowledge loop

practice

academy

identify issuesrelevant to profession

new techniques or recommendations based on research

practice

academy

In-house research positions firm as

market expert, limited sharing

of proprietary knowledge

Research meets University standards

for tenure and promotion,

dissemination through academic venues

RESEARCH BASED PRACTICES 2 _ LEADING INNOVATION

vjaapractice sp

practice k

practice a

practice spractice o

practice sa

practice f

disaster relief

global housing need

temporary

financial innovation

off-site fabrication

bio-inspired architecture

urban ecology

adaptive reuse

wind harvesting

high performance skins

interactive skins

building automation processes

media facades

leveraging manufacturing capacity

passive environmental systems

zero carbon footprint

zero energy

empirical testing

self-organising systems

shigeru ban

climate specific models

practice g

affordable

social space

large-scale architecture small-scale architecture

data-enabled technology

high-tech innovation

RESEARCH BASED PRACTICES 3 _ SHARED KNOWLEDGE

HGA

MS&R

Mortenson

MBJ

Cunningham

VRDL

GIS

BIM

Lean

IPD

Digifab

Health

Off Site

Learning

Representation

Design Process

Energy

Daylight

Biomimicry

Materials

House types

Housing

Adaptive Reuse

Geometry/Structure

Urban

Comparing virtual andphysical mockup

Use of energy modelin design process

Use of VRDL in design and construction (hospital)

Thermal bridging in adaptive reuse

Design of learning environment for IEQ

Understanding use of VRCL in design process

Tutorials and best practice recommendations

New understanding of VDC

Best practices for reducing thermal bridging

Best Practices for new IEQ schools

CONSORTIUMMEMBERS

CONSORTIUMRESOURCES

RESEARCH PROJECTS

SHARED KNOWLEDGE