trainhy-prof – kick-off meeting 21/22 october 2010 novotel ... · 21/22 october 2010 novotel...

1

TrainHy-Prof – Kick-off Meeting 21/22 October 2010

Novotel Centrum Brugge

Minutes

Attendees - Arief Dahoe, U Ulster - Søren Linderoth, Risø-DTU - Svea Reiners, Heliocentris - Robert Steinberger-Wilckens, FZ Jülich - Chantal Hake, FZ Jülich R. Steinberger-Wilckens welcomes the participants. After a short presentation round of the partners, the coordinator briefly resumes background, objective and governance of the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH-JU). The FCH JU is the result of long-standing cooperation between representatives of industry, scientific community, public authorities, technology users and civil society in the context of the European Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform (HFPEurope). The Platform was launched under the 6th Framework Programme for Research (FP6) as a grouping of stakeholders, led by companies representing the entire supply chain for fuel cell and hydrogen energy technologies. The Platform concluded that fuel cell and hydrogen technologies can play a significant role in a new, cleaner energy system for Europe. However, if these were to make a significant market penetration in transport and power generation, there would need to be research, development and deployment strategies in which all the stakeholders are committed to common objectives. It was therefore concluded that a ‘Joint Technology Initiative’ for hydrogen and fuel cells should be formed. Based on this decision and the shared vision that emerged from the work of the platform, the FCH JU was established by a Council Regulation in May 2008 as a Public Private Partnerhsip and the legal entity representation of the JTI. Having started operations the same year, the goal of the FCH JU is to accelerate the development and deployment of fuel cell and hydrogen technologies to the point of launching them commercially by 2020. The initial period of operations will be 2008 to 2017. Objectives Reducing time-to-market: It is estimated that the activities of the JU will help to reduce time to market for hydrogen and fuel cell technologies by between 2 and 5 years and will therefore have a faster impact on improving energy efficiency, security of supply and reducing greenhouse gases and pollution. Commercial lift-off: TheFCH JU is to deliver robust hydrogen supply and fuel cell technologies developed to the point of commercial lift-off. For the automotive sector, the aim is to achieve breakthroughs in bottleneck technologies and to enable industry to take the large-scale commercialisation decisions necessary to achieve mass market growth in the time-frame 2015-2020.

2

For stationary fuel cells (domestic and commercial) and portable applications, the JU will provide the technology base to initiate market growth from 2010-2015.

Programme office and Governance The Programme Office will, under the responsibility of an Executive Director, be in charge of the daily management of the Joint Undertaking and execute all responsibilities of the FCH JU. The industry and research partners in the FCH JU have formed the Industry Grouping (New Energy World IG) and the Research Grouping (N.ERGHY) who together with the EU delegate the 12 members of the JU board (6 IG, 5 EU, 1 RG). IG, RG and EU share the running cost of the PO according to their share in board members. The PO administers and refines the Multi Annual Implementation Plan (MAIP), which contains the complete work programme for the calls 2008-2013. From the MAIP the annual calls (Annual Implementation Plans, AIP) are derived in dialogue with the Industry and Research groupings and approved by the EU. Project relevance for JU The EU, industry and all other stakeholders agree that human resources management and especially the formation, fostering and sustaining of a highly qualified employee base is essential in bringing fuel cells and hydrogen to the market. Up to now, the relevant education and training programmes are not coordinated at a European level. Three projects (Coordination and Support Actions, CSA’s) have been selected in the 2009 call to prepare European curricula in the areas of fuel cells and hydrogen. Although it is agreed that the educational schemes are important for technology development at a European level, it remains unclear, though, in what form and under which leadership the developed programmes will later be implemented. Consortium agreement Project fee clause From this year on, a project fee for JU projects will be implemented. This fee has been developed to include non-member institutions in contributing to the programme office costs (40 M€ for 10 years), leading to a reduction of the annual membership fees for affiliates of both JU partner organizations NEW-IG and N.ERGHY. For the JU, it is the only way to raise the office cost from all companies and institutions that benefit from the programme in a fair and responsible way. A special clause for the project fee has been included in the consortium agreement, based on the model clause N.ENERGHY provided (cf. annex I). Project overview Objectives

• deriving specifications for an overall fuel cell and hydrogen education and training curriculum for Young Professionals from the review of existing training programmes specific to FCH in Europe (scope, effectiveness, structure and cost),

• designing a curriculum and organisational structure to supply high-level professional training to graduate (minimum Bachelor degree) and PhD students as well as young professional in the areas of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies,

• building a financing scheme and business model oriented at a long-term sustainable performance of such a curriculum,

• initiating the structure and performing first test elements of these courses, • evaluating the suitability and success of activities and suggesting further action and

present action plan with organisational and financial information.

3

Project rationale • The objective is to offer young professionals the opportunity to improve and complete the

skills most relevant to their current occupation without interrupting their professional life – therefore making the curriculum and education & training structure especially valuable for businesses and academic institutions alike since it does not remove the trainees from their ongoing assignments.

• What is more, the course content and the choice of course elements by the student can interact with the necessities of his or her main profession.

• While the course programme will (at least as one element) strive to offer ECTS points, the question of whether a degree can be obtained through the course system remains open to discussion once the TrainHy WP 1 and WP 2 activities have progressed.

Work programme and curriculum structure It was decided to elaborate the curriculum structure in two steps:

- integration of existing activities in 2011 - establishment of a new structure in 2012

The work plan was decided as follows: Oct-Nov 2010 – SOFC Summer School

• decide location, shape programme (topic) (JÜLICH, Risoe?) • decide extent of Summer School (1 week or several weeks) Jan 2011 (M4) • planning of details SOFC SS • planning of supplementary courses

Feb 2011 (M5) • finalisation of lecturer list & programme SOFC SS++ • collection of course information from WP 1

June – Aug 2011 (M9 – M11) • collect presentations • print booklets

Aug/Sept 2011 (M12) • school takes place • input from WP 2+3 available

Sept 2011 (M12)

• select Modules to be showcased • decide location(s) and access (all) • planning of details (all)

Oct / Nov 2011 (M13/14) • finalisation of programme & lecturer list

from Jan 2012 (M16) • performance of Modules

30 Sept 2012 (M24) • end of project

The structures were decided as follows (cf. also slides WP 4):

4

FC Academy

Dec 2011

HySafe course

Jan 2011

SOFC Summer School Special

SOFC Workshop

existing activities, advertised together

FC lectures FC lectures

SS suplementary courses

new activities, new types of activities SOFC Summer School Intro

A Primer in FCH Tech

PEFC Summer School Intro

ASI SOFC School

??FC Academy

FC Academy

Dec 2011

HySafe courseHySafe course

Jan 2011

SOFC Summer School SpecialSOFC Summer School Special

SOFC Workshop

SOFC Workshop


FC lecturesFC lectures FC lectures

SS suplementary coursesSS suplementary courses


SOFC Summer School Intro

A Primer in FCH TechA Primer in FCH Tech



ASI SOFC School

??

Sept 2012Jan 2012

Module3

Work in Progress WS

Module5

external modules external modules

Advances in FCH

AlumniConference

Module4

Modulen

Module1

Module2

H-Module nH-Module 3H-Module 2H-Module 1

Sept 2012Jan 2012

Module3

Work in Progress WS

Module5


Advances in FCH

AlumniConference

Module4

Modulen

Module1

Module2


Module3

Module3

Work in Progress WS

Work in Progress WS

Module5

Module5

external modulesexternal modules external modulesexternal modules

Advances in FCH

Advances in FCH

AlumniConference

AlumniConference

Module4

Module4

Modulen

Modulen

Module1

Module1

Module2

Module2

H-Module nH-Module nH-Module 3H-Module 3H-Module 2H-Module 2H-Module 1H-Module 1

5

Supplementary courses Several other projects of the JU will be running training or educational courses. It was decided to offer these the opportunity to join location and period of a summer school to increase networking possibilities and reduce organisation effort. This could apply to the Life Cycle Analysis (FC-HyGuide) and technology monitoring (TEMONAS2) projects organising training classes for the PO and other EU staff and stakeholders. Project logo The following logo was accepted as the project logo with some changes to be made:

- no flags - writing ‘Summer School’ to be replaced by project name - adaptation of colours to better compatibility with b&w printing

After presentation/discussion of the objectives of WP1-WP5 (slides have been distributed), the following meeting schedule for 2010 is agreed upon:

PCC Meetings 13/14.01 Belfast 15/16.04 Roskilde 27/28.06 Lucerne at Summer School 22.08-02.09 Viterbo 13/14.12 Berlin GA November ?? ???

6

ANNEX I

PROJECT FEE CLAUSE FOR CONSORTIUM AGREEMENTS Project Fee Subject to the duration, termination and survival provisions of Section 3.4 of this Consortium Agreement, the Partners agree to contribute a contribution towards the financing of the Programme Office of the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (PO of the FCH JU) termed “Project Fee” in the following. The Project Fee shall be calculated as a percentage, and be 4 (four) % of the total amount of grants to be received with respect to the Project, defined in accordance with the maximum FCH JU financial contribution to the Project in Article 5 of the Grant Agreement. Each Party, including the Coordinator, shall be obliged to pay the Project Fee. Each Party’s payment obligation shall amount to 4 (four) % of its allocated share in the total amount of grants to be received under the Project. Any Party’s contribution shall be payable in one single instalment at the beginning of the Project and shall be due within 45 days after the first payment instalment under and by virtue of the Grant Agreement has been received by the Coordinator. On receipt of an invoice for the Project Fee due by the Project and issued by the NEW Industry Grouping on behalf of the NEW Industry Grouping and the N.ERGHY Research Grouping, the Coordinator will split this invoice pro rata of the funding received by the Parties. These sums are invoiced by the Coordinator to the Parties. The payment is to be effected to the account given in the respective invoice and will from there be duly passed on to its purposeful use. Failure to pay the respective share in the Project Fee will be regarded as a Fault.

7

Contacts

Institution Name Phone Mobile e-mail JÜLICH Chantal Hake +49 2461 612244 [email protected] RISØ Søren Linderoth +45 4677 5801 [email protected] U ULSTER Arief Dahoe +44 28 9036 8763 [email protected] HELIOCENTRIS Svea Reiners +49 30 6392 6172 [email protected] Alternates JÜLICH Robert Steinberger +49 2461 615124 +49 170 2286662 [email protected] HELIOCENTRIS Stefan Sonntag +49 30 6392 6183 [email protected]

Draft 1.1 – 2010-09-22

1

Agenda TrainHy kick-off meeting

Thursday, 21 October 2010

Novotel Brugge Centrum, Katelijnestraat 65B , 8000 Bruges, Belgium

09:00 - 09:10 Welcome RSt

09:10 - 09:30 Short introduction of the partners and representatives All

09:30 - 10:00 TrainHy in the JTI context EC or RSt

10:00 - 10:30 Overview of contractual obligations and procedures for

Support Actions

EC or ChH

10:30 - 11:00 Coffee break

11:00 - 11:30 Overview TrainHy project and general issues RSt

11:30 - 12:30 Project approach and goals alignment all

12:30 - 13:30 Lunch at meeting hotel

13:30 - 14:30 Consortium agreement FZJ

14:30 - 15:30 WP 1: Work plan details and time lines (who/what/when) Risø


16:00 – 18:00 WP 2: Work plan details and time lines (who/what/when) Ulster

19:00 Dinner

Draft 1.1 – 2010-09-22

2

Agenda TrainHy kick-off meeting

Friday, 22 October 2010

Novotel Brugge Centrum, Katelijnestraat 65B , 8000 Bruges, Belgium

08:30 - 09:30 WP 3: Work plan details and time lines (who/what/when) Heliocentris

09:30 - 10:45 WP 4: Work plan details and time lines (who/what/when) FZJ


11:15 - 12:00 WP 5: Work plan details and time lines (who/what/when) FZJ

12:00 - 12: 30

Meeting dates and places (who/where/when), any other

issues All

12:30 End of the meeting

Mitg

lied

der H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t

TrainHy – Kick-off meeting

Contractual obligations and procedures for Support Actions

21 October 2010 | Ch. Hake, IEK-PBZ

18 October 2010 IEK-PBZ slide2

Reporting and Reviews

• Short duration of the project (24 months) ⇒ no mid-term review• To monitor progess of the project, 12 month reporting period

agreedevery 12 months overview of progressuse of the resourcesfinancial statement (Form C)

expected from each partner• Audit certificates to be delivered by FZJ and Heliocentris after

termination of the project


Reporting and Reviews

To support administrative work, please

• meet deadlinesfor deliverables and mile stonesand in general

Thank you ☺ ☺


Finances (reminder)

Funding:

• 100% of direct costs

• + 7% flat rate overhead

Project costs:

• cost of activities („Summer Schools“) and

• teaching materials ‚parked‘ with JÜLICH and HELIO


Prefinancing

ParticipantCoordination

/ Support Management Other Total Total receipts

Requested FCH JU contribution

Prefinancing

(A) (B) (C) (A+B+C)

Jülich 112.664,00 16.122,00 0,00 128.786,00 0,00 100.045,00 60.027,00

Risø DTU 75.700,00 0,00 0,00 75.700,00 0,00 42.800,00 25.680,00

Ulster 48.000,00 0,00 0,00 48.000,00 0,00 42.800,00 25.680,00

Helio 90.236,00 3.000,00 0,00 93.236,00 0,00 83.460,00 50.076,00

Total 326.600,00 19.122,00 0,00 345.722,00 0,00 169.060,00 161.463,00


Time Lines

• prepayment after signature of contract with JU• first report approx. M14 (incl. Form‘s C)• acceptance by JU ca. M16/17• next prepayment approx. M18-M20• final report approx. M26• acceptance by JU ca. M29/30• final payment ca. M32

Mitg

lied

der H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t


Project Overview

21 October 2010 | R. Steinberger-Wilckens, IEK-PBZ


Project Objectives

• deriving specifications for an overall fuel cell and hydrogen education and training curriculum for Young Professionals from the review of existing

training programmes specific to FCH in Europe (scope, effectiveness, structure and cost),

• designing a curriculum and organisational structure to supply high-level professional training to graduate and PhD students as well as young professional in the areas of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies,

• building a financing scheme and business model oriented at a long-term sustainable performance of such a curriculum,

• initiating the structure and performing first test elements of these courses,• evaluating the suitability and success of activities and suggesting further

action and present action plan with organisational and financial information.

minimum: Bachelor Degree or equivalent


Project Rationale

• The objective is to offer Young Professionals the opportunity to improve and complete the skills most relevant to their current occupation without interrupting their professional life – therefore making the curriculum and education & training structure especially valuable for businesses and academic institutions alike since it does not remove the trainees from their ongoing assignments.

• What is more, the course content and the choice of course elements by the student can interact with the necessities of his or her main profession.

• While the course programme will (at least as one element) strive to offer ECTS points, the question of whether a degree can be obtained through the course system remains open to discussion once the TrainHy WP 1 and WP 2 activities have progressed.


WP Structure

WP 1: Review of European

Programmes

WP 2: Curriculum

WP 3: Teaching Materials

WP 4: Implementation

WP 5: Dissemination &

EvaluationHyprofessionals

Regulator Training

WP 1: Review of European

Programmes

WP 2: Curriculum

WP 3: Teaching Materials

WP 4: Implementation

WP 5: Dissemination &

EvaluationHyprofessionals

Regulator Training


WP Effort

Workpackage

No. Work package title Type of activity

Lead partner

No.

Lead participant short name

Person-month

Start month

End month

WP 1 Review of existing European training programmes SUPP 2 RISOE 2 M1 M6

WP 2 Curriculum development SUPP 3 ULSTER 5.5 M4 M12

WP 3 Teaching material developmentSUPP 4 HELIO 7 M4 M12

WP 4 Implementation SUPP 1 JÜLICH 5 M6 M24

WP 5 Evaluation, dissemination & liaisonSUPP 1 JÜLICH 4.5 M1 M24

TOTAL24 (*)


Project Milestones

Milestone number

Milestone name

Work package(s) involved

Expected date

Means of verification (*)

MS1 Hand-over of first draft of D1.2 to WP 2 & 3 WP 1, 2, 3 M4

MS2 Web site operational WP 5 (+all) M6 web site accessible for general public

MS3 All organisational matters fixed for first course WP 4 & 5 M8

MS4 Lecturer roster completed WP 4 & 2 M8

MS5 Hand-over of draft report D2.1 to WP 4 WP 2 & 4 M9

MS6 Registration for first course closes WP 5 M9 sufficient participants recruited

MS7 First Course implemented and operational WP 4 (+2,3&5) M10

MS8 Hand-over of draft D3.1 + D3.2 to WP 4 WP 3 & 4 M12

MS9 Accreditation of ECTS points with the universities of participants WP 5 M15

MS10 Public Workshop (mini-conference) on project outcomes WP5 M23


Time Table

Months M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 M15 M16 M17 M18 M19 M20 M21 M22 M23 M24Project Phase

Work Package

WP 1 Review

milestoneshand over ▼

WP 2 Curriculum


WP 3 Teaching Materials


WP 4 Implementation

milestones go! ☻test starts ☻

WP 5 Evaluation

milestonesweb site ☻

participants ☻ ECTS ☻

Year 1 Year 2

Analysis Development Implementation Evaluation

1. Oct. 20101. Jan. 2011 1. Jan. 2012

30. Sept. 20121. Sept. 2011


Project Logo


Project Logo (2)


Summer School 2010 Example


Questions to Discuss

type of activity - summer school(s)- distance learning- seminars / workshops

type of activity in 2011timing in 2011 / 2012

locations in 2011 / 2012


Module 1

Introduction(obligatory)

Module 2a(optional) Module 3

requirements:- xxxx- xxxx

• following course beside work or studies• modules can be followed singly• credit weight ~ 2 to 15 ECTS (proposal: 2 week-1)• importance of a ‚certificate‘ (not a degree)• ECTS, CPD points• extensive ‚product‘ documentation, defined requirements• participants: min. 5 to 10, max. 10 to 45• fee: consider customer, ECTS and type of module

(typically ~1000 € week-1, including or not including boarding)

Module 2b(optional)

Assessment

requirements:- xxxx- xxxx

1 year

LT-FC

HT-FC

H2Module 2nexisting

univ. lecture

Mitg

lied

der H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t


Management Structure and Meeting Schedule



PCC

Scientific Managem

ent

PCPA

WPM

FCH JU

AdvisoryGroups

WTL

Management Structure

General Assembly = decision making body

PCC = WP leaders

difference:- „power of signature“- capability of making binding

decisions

GA for strategic decisions(1 meeting / year)

PCC for day-to-day working decisions


Meeting Schedule

1st Project Meeting 13/14 Jan 2011 Belfast Arief

2nd Project Meeting 15/16 Apr 2011 Roskilde Søren

3rd Project Meeting 27/28 June 2011 Lucerne Robert

4th Project Meeting Aug/Sept 2011 Summer School

Chantal

5th Project Meeting 13/14 Dec 2011 Berlin Svea

Mitg

lied

der H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t


TrainHy in the context of the FCH JU



NDA


Call text

Topic SP1-JTI-FCH.2009.5.1: Development of educational programmes

Rationale While several training programs exist in the EU, specific hydrogen and fuel cell-related technology training is needed to secure the required mid- and long-term human resource base of technical professionals needed within research, industry and users. This topic specifically addresses the need to provide technical training to future industry professionals at all levels, from technical schools all the way to graduate studies.

Overall project objectives / Scope of Work Projects should focus on the development of specific technology related training initiatives through various educational levels, in cooperation with other programs such as Leonardo. Suitable existing programs should be identified and concrete proposals shall be made to use them in an efficient and effective manner to develop the necessary human resource base. WP1 WP2/3/4


Call text

These proposals shall address the technical needs required to train educational groups at various levels, starting at technical school level and covering undergraduate and graduate studies. Project should focus on a specific educational level. The proposed initiatives shall be tested and implemented during the project, including specific measures for tracking of progress, by way of hiring rates of trainees within the program by industry, for example, even after the project is finished.

WP5

Expected Outcome • Mapping of existing training programs in the EU that may provide a good base

for this educational action• Develop proposals for specific initiatives on educational programs addressing

the need to develop a well-trained work force• Dissemination of results to industry and research

WP 1

WP 2/3/4

WP 5


Parallel Projects

• HyProfessional: coordinator: Hydrogen Initiative of Aragon goal: training of Technicians

• training of regulators: coordinator: TÜV Südgoal: training for regulating bodies

cooperation prospects:- review of existing programmes- coordination for a European professional training programme


Unresolved Questions to the JU

• who will perform the training programmes?

• what is the JU interest in programmes and what are the requirements?

• who will finance and coordinate the programmes?

WP 1Review of existing European training programmes

13/11 2008Presentation name2 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark

M6: March 2011


M4: Jan. 2011


Description of work


Description of work

M1-3 (Oct-Dec 2010):

RISOE collects information on existing courses on FCH at universities in Europe (from selected universities: DTU, ULSTER, TUM, IMPERIAL COLLEGE, BARCELONA,,)

RISOE collects information on FCH summer schools (already listed in the proposal)

JÜLICH supplements where needed.


Description of work

M1-3 (Oct-Dec 2010):

JÜLICH collects information on existing training activities for post graduates (after B.Sc. or M.Sc?) in renewable energy.

RISOE supplements with RISOE activties on wind.


Description of work

M 4-5 (Jan-Feb 2011):

JÜLICH makes the first draft of the evaluation of measures from WT1.1 and WT 1.2

JÜLICH (and RISOE) completes the evaluation.


Description of work

M6 (March 2011):

RISOE outlines and makes the first draft of a summary report

JÜLICH collects skills required in industry – and estimate future job patterns information on existing training activities for post graduates(after B.Sc. or M.Sc?) in renewable energy.

RISOE collects the summary report

Mitg

lied

der H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t


WP 4 – Work plan details



FC Academy

Dec 2011

HySafe course

Jan 2011

SOFC Summer School Special

SOFC Workshop


FC lectures FC lectures

SS suplementary courses


A Primer in FCH Tech


ASI SOFC School

??


2011 Programme

Oct-Nov 2010 – SOFC Summer School• decide location, shape programme (topic) (JÜLICH, Risoe?)• decide extent of Summer School (1 week or several weeks)Jan 2011 (M4)• planning of details SOFC SS• planning of suplementary coursesFeb 2011 (M5)• finalisation of lecturer list & programme SOFC SS++

• collection of course information from WP 1June – Aug 2011 (M9 – M11)• collect presentations• print bookletsSept 2011 (M12)• school takes place• input from WP 2+3 available


Module3

Sept 2012Jan 2012

Work in Progress WS

Module5


Advances in FCH

Alumni Conference

Module4

Modulen

Module1

Module2



2012 Programme

Joint Programme

Sept 2011 (M12)• select Modules to be showcased • decide location(s) and access (all)• planning of details (all)Oct / Nov 2011 (M13/14)• finalisation of programme & lecturer list from Jan 2012 (M16)• performance of Modules30 Sept 2012 (M24)• end of project

Mitg

lied

der H

elm

holtz

-Gem

eins

chaf

t


WP 5 – Work plan details



WT 5.1 Advertising & Recruitment (JÜLICH, Risø, Ulster)

March 2011 (M6) (earlier?) • setup of web site (JÜLICH, Risø, Ulster)• start of advertising for Summer School++ (web site & otherwise)

(JÜLICH)• registration of participants (up to July 2011) (JÜLICH)Dec 2011 (M15)• start of advertising for Course 2012 (web site & otherwise) (JÜLICH)• registration of participants (JÜLICH)• participant portal (Ulster)


WT 5.2 Evaluation (JÜLICH, Risø, Ulster, Helio)

Apr 2011 (M7)• evaluation of HyAcademy (questionaire) (Risø)Sept 2011 (M12) • evaluation of Summer School++ (questionaire) (JÜLICH)Jan - July 2012 (M16 – M22)• continuous screening of module performance (shared)

(results, choice of modules, employer/employee expectations etc.) (questionaire and web based tools)

Aug/Sept 2012• final (overall) evaluation and assessment (shared)


WT 5.3 Liaison (JÜLICH, Risø, Ulster)

Oct/Nov 2010 (M1+2)• setup of advisory groups (JÜLICH)

* industry (approx. 5 to 10 members each)(Total, AirLiquide, Linde, TOFC, Wärtsilä, HEXIS, SmartFuelCells, SOFCpower, HyGear,

FCEurope, Intel.Energy, EdF, GdF/Suez, AREVA/Helion, Daimler, Vaillant, Baxi, Dantherm,Vattenfall, Statoil, E*on, VESTAS, RePower, Siemens ….)

* academic education bodies(U B‘ham, U Chalmers, RWTH, U Genoa, DTU, U Trier, U St. Andrews, TUM, U DU/E,

U Bordeaux, U Nantes, U Barcelona, KIT ….)

Dec 2010 (M3) or Feb 2011 (M5) • first dialogue meetings with advisory groups (input to WP1/2/3) (J, R, U)

– initial inputfrom March 2011 (M6) • concept and negotiation for ECTS accreditation (J, R, U)• proposal(s) for LEONARDO activities (Ulster)

June 2011 (M9)• second dialogue meetings with advisory groups (input to WP1/2/3)

(J, R, U) – full concept


WT 5.3 Liaison II (JÜLICH, Risø, Ulster)

Nov 2011 (M14)• third dialogue meetings with advisory groups (input to WP1/2/3)

(J, R, U) - Implementation

Dec 2011 (M15)• ECTS points accredited at selected universities (DTU, Oldenburg,

RWTH, Ulster …)


WT 5.4 Dissemination

Oct 2011 (M13)• stakeholder mini-conference „Concept Presentation“ (JÜLICH)

* industry* academic education bodies* JU and EU* stakeholder representatives

continuous (all):• journal papers (if applicable)• reporting to FCH JU (also publicly on web site)• information prepared for public web site• advertising


WT 5.4 Dissemination II

Sept 2012 (M24)• 2nd stakeholder mini-conference „Experiences made & Hand-over“(JÜLICH)

* industry* academic education bodies* JU and EU* stakeholder representatives

TrainHyKick‐off Meeting

Bruges, 21. / 22.10.2010

Svea ReinersSvea Reiners

Agenda

I Who?I. Who?

II. What ?

III. How?

IV. When?

2

S R i

Who?

Svea Reiners» Dipl.‐Chem. , author, leader of technical documentation at Heliocentris

Daily job to create projects that serve the needs of specific groups

3

Who – Heliocentris Snapshot

» System integrator for fuel cell and hydrogen technology» System integrator for fuel cell and hydrogen technology

» Development of fuel cell system platforms

» Successful in marketing fuel cell technology since 1995» Successful in marketing fuel cell technology since 1995

» 50 employees and turnover of 3.4 Mio € in 2009

» Chosen integration partner of leading industry players :

» Ballard» Hydrogenics» Schunk

» Listed in the Entry Standard of Frankfurt Stock Exchange since June 2006

» Best‐practice example of the industry: established and growing product business» Best practice example of the industry: established and growing product business

4

Who – Outstanding Performance in three Business Segments

Education Systems ProjectsEducation Systems Projects

Offer

Education solutions for:

Offer

Standard fuel cell systems and application solutions for:

Offer

Customized and turnkey solutions for:

» Science Education» Technical Training

application solutions for:

» Laboratories» Prototyping» Industrial development

solutions for:

» Laboratories» Prototyping» Industrial development

Customer

» Schools & High Schools» Vocational Schools

C ll & U i i i

Customer

» Colleges & Universities» R&D institutes

I d

Customer

» Colleges & Universities» R&D institutes

I d

5

» Colleges & Universities » Industry » Industry

Who – Expertise in Science Education

Dr FuelCell® Model Car Dr FuelCell® Science Kit Dr FuelCell® Professional

» For teaching fuel cell and solar technology in the classroom

» Products for individual experiments as well as demonstration in front of groups

» Comprehensive teaching material

6

Who – Expertise in Technical Training

Instructor Training System HP600 Training System Nexa® Training System

» Fuel cell training systems for technical training at universities and vocational schools

» Close to reality through realistic setups and real fuel cell systems

» From basic technical experiments to complex laboratory experiments

7

Who – Global Market Experience

Origination of salesOrigination of sales2008

GERRoW GER24%

Europaw/o GER

Americas25%

RoW22%

» Over 60 countries served

» Export contributes to ca. 80% of sales

8

29% » Over 10,000 clients worldwide

» Responsible at Heliocentris:

Who?

» Responsible at Heliocentris: Stefan Sonntag (Product Manager)

» Projectmanager at Heliocentris:Svea Reiners (Documentation Manger)

» Team members:N NN.N.

TrainHy Project Team at Heliocentris

9

» Teaching Material Development

What?

» Teaching Material Development» Target Group : Young professionals (engineers and scientists with non‐specific knowledge

concerning fuel cells)

Heliocentris Deliverables WP3

10

Deliverables

What?

Deliverables

Presentation Material

H d Handouts

Concept for Experimental Materials for Trainers

Concept for Experimental Materials for Learners


11

» Heliocentris has experience in providing schools and universities with teaching and

What?

» Heliocentris has experience in providing schools and universities with teaching and experimentation materials

» Heliocentris itself is challenged by training young professionals coming from the fields of engineering, software development, electronics

» Knowledge concerning fuel cells and the specific requirements of this technology cannot be assumed to be known


12

Examples of Heliocentris Teaching and Experimentation Materials

How?

Examples of Heliocentris Teaching and Experimentation Materials

» Example Lecture Series Korea

» Example CET Experiment Guide» Example Hardware CET

» Example Nexa TS Experiment Guide» Example Nexa TS Experiment Guide» Example Hardware Nexa TS

Heliocentris Examples

13

Timeline WP3

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

Text TextTextText

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

2Topic

Text TextTextText

1Topic

1999 1999 1999

E

1999

14

ENTER CONCLUSION HERE

Thank you for your attention

TRAINHY-PROF

Kick-off Meeting

21 and 22 October 2010

Brugge, Belgium

WORKPACKAGE 2: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

University of Ulster United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE WORKPACKAGE 2

Development of a curriculum for Annual Training Course(s) comprising elements of the following: • summer schools, • distance learning, and, • block releases involving face-to-face teaching covering all aspects of FCH technologies

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

WT 2.1: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT Lead: ULSTER (X); Partners: JÜLICH (x), RISOE (X), HELIO (x) [X = major contribution, x = assisting contribution] Deliverables D2.1 International Curriculum on Fuel Cells & Hydrogen (1st version) M12 Milestones M2.1 Hand-over of Draft Report D2.1 to WP 4 M9 WT 2.2: ORGANISATION & FINANCE Lead: JÜLICH (X); Partners: ULSTER (X), RISOE (x) [X = major contribution, x = assisting contribution] Deliverables D2.2 Organisational & Financing Information M12 WT 2.3: Embedding of the Annual Training Course into the European Credit

Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) and the Credit Accumulation and Transfer Scheme

Lead: ULSTER (X); Partners: JÜLICH (x), RISOE (x) [X = major contribution, x = assisting contribution] Deliverables D2.1 International Curriculum on Fuel Cells & Hydrogen (2nd version) M23

Detailed breakdown of subtask activities

WT2.1a Collect teaching materials from: M3 (a)

(b) (c) (d) (e)

the SOFC Summer Schools (six in total), the European Summer School on Hydrogen Safety (four in total), the International Short Course and Advanced Research Workshop Series Progress in Hydrogen Safety (nine up to now), the Elite Master Education on Fuel Cells and Hydrogen, and, the materials by HELIO.

WT2.1b Develop on-line questionnaire to: M4 (a)

(b) (c)

Probe relative interest in the various levels and modes of course delivery: Postgraduate Certificate (PgCert), Postgraduate Diploma (PgDip), Master of Science (MSc), Short Source (SC) for Continuing Professional Development (CPD). Resolve the professional branches of prospective attendees: process industry, energy industry, oil & gas industry, civil works, aerospace industry, automotive industry, transport, distribution, fire & rescue brigades, insurance, teaching institution, research institution, legislative body. Resolve the employment pattern of prospective attendees, and hence the skill-set sought by employers: consulting, manufacture, design, teaching, research, operation, construction, legislation. (See for example http://www.hysafe.org/QuestHSE).

http://www.hysafe.org/QuestHSE

WT2.1c Develop modular structure of the International Curriculum on Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technologies (basic modules, fundamental modules and applied modules) based on:

M6

● ●

The teaching materials collected under 2.1b. Cross examination against existing University curricula that have to be enriched with HFC know-how (see Figure 1).

Figure 1

WT2.1d Develop topical content of the First Version of the International

Curriculum on Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technologies for deliverable D2.1 using the materials collected under 2.1a.

M9

WT2.1e Integration of summer school elements, distance learning and face-to-face block releases into one course delivery concept (see Figure 2) for educating Young Professionals (i.e. university degree students, vocational trainees, industrial staff, PhD students etc.).

M11

Figure 2

WT2.2a Requirements for, and, choice of location(s). Requirements for, and,

choice and acquisition of lecturers. M11

WT2.2b Financial analysis of the course programme, including European

funding schemes, industry sponsorship, student fees, participation of educational bodies etc.

M14

WT2.2c Analysis of the credit loading of the course programme (e.g. how many

ECTS-poins?; 1 ECTS-point represents 20 hrs of study effort). M18

WT2.3a Analysis of the compatibility of the International Curriculum on Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technologies according to WT 2.1 with university curricula and other training measures throughout Europe.

M20

WT2.1f Second Version of the International Curriculum on Hydrogen & Fuel

Cell Technologies for deliverable D2.1 using the materials collected under 2.1a and (inputs from other workpackages).

M23

trainhy-prof – kick-off meeting 21/22 october 2010 novotel ... · 21/22 october 2010 novotel...

Documents