transformative college curriculum a meaningful degree of understanding daniel j. glisczinski,...

15
Transformative Transformative College College Curriculum Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A [email protected]

Upload: marvin-cole

Post on 23-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Transformative College College CurriculumCurriculum

A meaningful degree of understandingA meaningful degree of understanding

Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A

[email protected]

Page 2: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

•The university has shaped itself into an industrial ideal—the knowledge factory. •Overloaded,top-heavy with expertness, information. •has become a know-how institution•ought to be a know-why institution. •goal should be deliverance from crushing weight of unevaluated facts, •from bare-bones cognition or ignorant knowledge: •knowing in fragments, knowing without direction, knowing without commitment (Rowe, 1990)

The University As

Knowledge Factory

Page 3: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Education: A “complementary convergence”

Between information and understanding

•ecology between informational, cultural, and values-rich understanding

•likely to empower those who understand it

•contains potential to isolate those who choose not to learn it (Friedman, 2005).

Page 4: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Types of Learning Habermas (1984)

critical assessment of

assumptions supporting the justification of

existing norms in order to

think and act in a self-

authoring manner.

critically understanding context, history, social structures,

and power structures which shape epistemological perspectives.

mastering tasks, solving problems, and learning how to manipulate environments and people toward specific

ends

Instrumental

Page 5: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Learning QuadrantsMezirow (1970) and Herbers (1998)

I.Disorienting

Dilemma

II.Critical

Reflection

III.Rational Dialogue

IV.Action

Page 6: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

1. To what extent are higher education students experiencing transformative learning?

2. How do transformative learning experiences affect higher education students’ present behavior?

Research Questions

Page 7: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Learning Higher Education Findings

Disorienting Experiences

(Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

73% of population reported experiencing

disorienting experiences

CommittedAction(Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

35% of population reported trying to figure out ways to adopt transformed ways of acting

Instrumental Learning(Habermas, 1984)

Critical Reflection

(Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

43% of population reported experiencing critical reflection that

their assumptions don’t fit current reality

Com

mu

nica

tive Le

arn

ing

(Hab

erm

as, 1

98

4)

•Preparing learners for present realities and future unknowns.(Maslow, 1971)

Rational Dialogue (Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

47% of population reported experiencing rational dialogue about constructing more accurate assumptions

Quadrant I.

Quadrant II.Quadrant III.

Quadrant IV.

Em

an

cip

ato

ry L

earn

ing

(Hab

erm

as,

19

84

)

Page 8: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

04/19/23 D. Glisczinski | [email protected]

8

Student Voices Reflecting Transformative Cycle

• Quad I:– Do I think this? Do I think that? What do I do now?– Man, my marbles were rolling around.

• Quad II:– The question “Why” became central– I realized there were other options than . . .

• Quad III:– I’d listen, read, discuss, listen some more, read more...– Now I go to be taught by those things which confused me

• Quad IV:– I’ve opened up my thinking and approach to . . . – And I try to do the same with my students and peers

Page 9: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

04/19/23 D. Glisczinski | [email protected]

9

Statements from Instrumentalists

• I don’t think about other people’s assumptions.

• What matters is what I want to achieve.

• I used to think about what other people, but have learned that that’s not how the world works

Page 10: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Assessment of LearningWiggins & McTighe (1998) and Bloom (1976)

Disorienting Experiences

Rational Dialogue

Action

Explanation (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Knowledge, Comprehension(Bloom, 1976)

Interpretation (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Comprehension, Analysis

(Bloom, 1976)

Application (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Synthesis (Bloom, 1976)

Perspective(Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Empathy: (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Self Knowledge(Wiggins & McTighe ,1998)

Evaluation(Bloom, 1976)

Critical

Reflection

Page 11: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Learning Theory of Action Transformative Learning Theory of Action and Assessmentand Assessment

Concrete, Disorienting Experiences

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Action, Experimentation(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Critical Reflection, Observation

assumptions don’t fit current reality

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Interpretation (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Comprehension, Analysis (Bloom, 1976)

•Prepare learners for present realities and future unknowns.

(Maslow, 1971)

Asse

ssmen

t Meth

od

sAss

ess

men

t M

eth

od

s

Application (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Synthesis (Bloom, 1976)

Perspective(Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Empathy: (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Self Knowledge(Wiggins & McTighe ,1998)

Evaluation(Bloom, 1976)

Explanation (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Knowledge, Comprehension(Bloom, 1976)

Rational Dialogue, Abstract Conceptualization(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Quadrant I.

Quadrant II.

Quadrant III.

Quadrant IV.

Page 12: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Learning Theory of Action Transformative Learning Theory of Action and Assessmentand Assessment

Concrete, Disorienting Experiences

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)73% of population reported experiencing

Disorienting Experiences

Action, Experimentation(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

35% of population reported trying to figure out ways to adopt transformed ways of acting Begin:

Instrumental Learning(Habermas, 1984)

and

and

and

and

Critical Reflection, Observation

assumptions don’t fit current reality

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

43% of population reported experiencing critical reflection that their assumptions don’t

fit current reality

Com

mu

nica

tive Le

arn

ing

(Hab

erm

as, 1

98

4)

Interpretation (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Comprehension, Analysis (Bloom, 1976)

•Prepare learners for present realities a•nd future unknowns.

(Maslow, 1971)

Asse

ssmen

t Meth

od

sAss

ess

men

t M

eth

od

s

Application (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Synthesis (Bloom, 1976)

Perspective(Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Empathy: (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Self Knowledge(Wiggins & McTighe ,1998)

Evaluation(Bloom, 1976)

Explanation (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Knowledge, Comprehension(Bloom, 1976)

Rational Dialogue, Abstract Conceptualization(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

47% of population reported experiencing rational dialogue and abstract conceptualization about more accurate assumptions

Quadrant I.

Quadrant II.

Quadrant III.

Quadrant IV.

Em

an

cip

ato

ry L

earn

ing

(Hab

erm

as,

19

84

)

Page 13: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Learning Theory of Action Transformative Learning Theory of Action and Assessmentand Assessment

Concrete, Disorienting Experiences

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Action, Experimentation(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Critical Reflection, Observation

assumptions don’t fit current reality

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Interpretation (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Comprehension, Analysis (Bloom, 1976)

•Prepare learners for present realities and future unknowns.

(Maslow, 1971)

Asse

ssmen

t Meth

od

sAss

ess

men

t M

eth

od

s

Application (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Synthesis (Bloom, 1976)

Perspective(Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Empathy: (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Self Knowledge(Wiggins & McTighe ,1998)

Evaluation(Bloom, 1976)

Explanation (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Knowledge, Comprehension(Bloom, 1976)

Rational Dialogue, Abstract Conceptualization(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

Quadrant I.

Quadrant II.

Quadrant III.

Quadrant IV.

Page 14: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Experiential Learning CycleKolb (1984)

Concrete Experiences

Reflective Observation

AbstractConceptualization

ActiveExperimentation

Page 15: Transformative College Curriculum A meaningful degree of understanding Daniel J. Glisczinski, University of Minnesota Duluth, U.S.A dglisczi@d.umn.edu

Transformative Learning Theory of Action Transformative Learning Theory of Action and Assessmentand Assessment

Concrete, Disorienting Experiences

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)73% of population reported experiencing

Disorienting Experiences

Action, Experimentation(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

35% of population reported trying to figure out ways to adopt transformed ways of acting Begin:

Instrumental Learning(Habermas, 1984)

and

and

and

and

Critical Reflection, Observation

assumptions don’t fit current reality

(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

43% of population reported experiencing critical reflection that their assumptions don’t

fit current reality

Com

mu

nica

tive Le

arn

ing

(Hab

erm

as, 1

98

4)

Interpretation (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Comprehension, Analysis (Bloom, 1976)

•Prepare learners for present realities and future unknowns.

(Maslow, 1971)

Asse

ssmen

t Meth

od

sAss

ess

men

t M

eth

od

s

Application (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Synthesis (Bloom, 1976)

Perspective(Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)

Empathy: (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Self Knowledge(Wiggins & McTighe ,1998)

Evaluation(Bloom, 1976)

Explanation (Wiggins & McTighe,1998)

Knowledge, Comprehension(Bloom, 1976)

Rational Dialogue, Abstract Conceptualization(Kolb,1984; Mezirow, 1970; Herbers, 1998)

47% of population reported experiencing rational dialogue and abstract conceptualization about more accurate assumptions

Quadrant I.

Quadrant II.

Quadrant III.

Quadrant IV.

Em

an

cip

ato

ry L

earn

ing

(Hab

erm

as,

19

84

)