transgenic:how they affect organic agriculture in north dakota
DESCRIPTION
TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA. Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/ Walsh County 2002. NORTH DAKOTA. First in organic grain production 90,000 acres certified production. UNITED STATES. 1992-1997 certified organic cropland has more then doubled - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA
Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/
Walsh County 2002
UNITED STATES
1992-1997 certified organic cropland has more then doubled
Medium term growth rates 22%
PROBLEMS FACING ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
Organic standards have no set tolerances
Growing acreage of GMO crops in North Dakota and United States
UP of organic grains with GMO material will decertify it
Possible loss of markets
KEEPING SEED SUPPLY FREE OF U.P.
Growing acreage of transgenic soybeans, corn and canola pollen drift and insects
Concern about purity of North Dakota Seedstock Program
POLLEN DRIFT
Seen as one of the biggest threats to organic crops abandonment of certified organic
canola production by most producers Organic growers trying to to
develop procedures to deal with this
UNINTENDED PRESENCE WITHIN THE SYSTEM
Some buyers will reject anything over Zero
Almost impossible to clean last seed out of equipment and facilities
COMMUNICATION HAS BEGUN
Organic producers, breeders, North Dakota Seedstock Program, organic certifiers, Northern Plains Sustainable Agriculture Society and Extension have begun communicating on this issue
FARMERS BREEDING CLUB PROJECT
Northern Plains Sustainable Agriculture Society (NPSAS) has started training farmers to make seed selections
Goal is to develop alternative seed system
Project is under funded at this point
EDUCATIONAL SESSIONS
NPSAS and other organic organizations are providing training sessions for farmers
Certification groups are developing procedures to try to reduce risk
Resolutions have been drafted on transgenic crops by NPSAS
Organic community is organizing
STARTING WITH CLEAN SEED
Buy organically grown seed when possible
Test every lot of seed before your buy for contamination
SEPERATION BY TIMING OF PLANTING
Planting organic corn later then GMO corn goal is to try and get 5 to 10 day
difference in bloom
DILIGENCE THROUGH DISTANCE
Organic farmers consult with conventional neighbors put organic production as far away as
possible from transgenic fields separate far enough so bees should
not carry pollen between fields
FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATION
Producers are trying to use equipment and facilities that have never had transgenic products in them
Clean out affidavits on other items being used
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH CERTIFIERS
Certification organizations are developing standards and protocols
You need to know what is required of you
SOLUTIONS????
Communications Coexistence working group
Identify issues Gather information Make recommendations Disseminate findings
OBJECTIVES OF WORKING GROUP
Identify issues Gather information Promote understanding between
systems Develop BMPs Education
HISTORY
Pilot group 2 meetings 2001 Original organic groups, NDSU and
state personnel Decided to include all stakeholders
and write grant SARE grant
ISSUES IDENTIFIED
Liability Where does it lie for U.P.
Farmers, industry, NDSU Genetic drift (UP) Commingling
LAND GRANT RESEARCH FUNDING
Public crop variety research and development
NDSU mission relating to germplasm maintance and varietal development
Relationship to private companies
SEGREAGATION/PURITY
Segregation Can it be done and if so how?
Purity How do we keep things separate
Monitoring
GERMPLASM
Who has the right of access Multiple systems for plant
development Access to and development of non-
transgenic seed Long term storage viability of
germplasm base
STANDARDS
Protocols for research and development of seed increase
Protocols for commercial seed production
Education of growers
CONSEQUENCES
Cost /benefit of current commercial transgenic crops
Future transgenic development IP infrastructure for added value
and rural development
CONSUMER CONCERNS
Consumer perceptions, attitudes and education
Labeling costs and benefitsConsumer choice
Food feed and environment
This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, under Cooperative Agreement number 2000-38640-11923