transportation improvement program fy 2008-2011

8/22/2019 Transportation Improvement Program FY 2008-2011

1/82

Transportation

Improvement Program

AltoonaAnkenyBondurantCarlisleCliveDallas CountyDes MoinesGrimesJohnstonMitchellvilleNorwalkPleasant Hill

Polk CityPolk CountyUrbandaleWarren CountyWaukeeWest Des Moines

DESMO

INESA

REA

METROPOL

ITANPLAN

NINGORG

ANIZATION

Federal Fiscal Years 20082011

Main: 515.334.0075Fax: [email protected]

Merle Hay Centre6200 Aurora Avenue, Suite 300WUrbandale, Iowa 50322-2866


2/82

The Federal Fiscal Years 2008 2011

Transportation Improvement Program

2007 Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning OrganizationPlease call (515) 334-0075 to obtain permission for use.

The preparation of this document was financed in part through federal funds provided bythe U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and/or the

Federal Transit Administration.


3/82

Table of Contents

Glossary of Acronyms ............................................................................................................ Page i

Introduction and Procedures ............................................................................................. Section 1General Information and Guidelines .......................................................................... Page 1

Schedule for Solicitation of Project Applications ................................................. Page 3Surface Transportation Program .............................................................................. Page 4STP Transportation Enhancement ............................................................................ Page 10Amending and Revising the TIP ................................................................................... Page 13Guidelines for STP and STP TE Funding ................................................................... Page 15Public Participation Process ......................................................................................... Page 21

Federal Highway Administration Projects.................................................................... Section 2Surface Transportation Program .............................................................................. Page 26Highway Bridge Program................................................................................................ Page 28Interstate Maintenance ................................................................................................... Page 29STP Transportation Enhancement ............................................................................ Page 30Iowas Clean Air Attainment Program ..................................................................... Page 31

Planning .................................................................................................................................. Page 32Demonstration Awards ................................................................................................... Page 32National Recreational Trails Funding Program ................................................... Page 33Highway Safety Improvement Program .................................................................. Page 33Safe Routes to School....................................................................................................... Page 34High Risk Rural Roads ...................................................................................................... Page 34

Federal Transit Administration Projects ..................................................................... Section 3Transit Element ................................................................................................................... Page 35Description of Transit Investments ........................................................................... Page 37

Project Location Map ............................................................................................................. Section 4Project Listing ...................................................................................................................... Page 43

Map .......................................................................................................................................... Page 49

Financial Information .............................................................................................................. Section 5Finance (Federal Highway Administration Projects)........................................... Page 50Finance (Federal Transit Administration Projects).............................................. Page 51

Federal Fiscal Year 2007 Project Status Report .................................................. Section 6FHWA FFY 2008 Project Status Reports ............................................................. Page 55FTA FY 2008 Project Status Reports ..................................................................... Page 58

Resolution and Certifications ............................................................................................. Section 7ResolutionFHWA Financial Certification

FTA Financial Certification

Committee Representatives................................................................................................ Section 8


4/82

Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

Federal Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Page i

Glossary of Acronyms

DA: Discretionary Award

DART: Des Moines Area Metropolitan Transit Authority

DMAMPO: Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

FHWA: Federal Highway Administration

FTA: Federal Transit Administration

FFY: Federal Fiscal Year

HBRRP: Highway Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation Program

HES: Hazard Elimination and Safety Program

ICAAP: Iowas Clean Air Attainment Program

IDOT: Iowa Department of Transportation

IM: Interstate Maintenance

ISTEA: Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (providingnew director for metropolitan planning organizations across USA)

MPO: Metropolitan Planning Organization

MTPC: Metropolitan Trails Planning Committee

NHS: National Highway System

PL: Planning Funds

SRTS: Safe Routes to School

STIP: State Transportation Improvement Program

STP: Surface Transportation Program (federal allocation of money fortransportation projects)

STP TE: STP Transportation Enhancement (purpose is to fund projects orprograms related to transportation that will enhance the environment,scenic or cultural quality of a site or area)

TEA-21: Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (high priority funding)

TIP: Transportation Improvement Program

TTC: DMAMPO Transportation Technical Committee (analyzes and ranksprojects eligible for STP funds, gives guidance to DMAMPO, providesrecommendations to DMAMPO)


5/82

SECTION 1

Introductions and Procedures


6/82

Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Introductions and Procedures

Federal Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Section 1, Page 1

Introduction

The Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (DMAMPO) serves as the Des Moinesmetropolitan areas long-range transportation planning body. The DMAMPO includes sixteenmember cities: Altoona, Ankeny, Bondurant, Carlisle, Clive, Des Moines, Grimes, Johnston,Mitchellville, Norwalk, Pleasant Hill, Polk City, Urbandale, Waukee, West Des Moines, and WindsorHeights; one associate, non-voting, city: Cumming; and includes unincorporated portions of fourmember counties: Dallas County, Madison County, Polk County, and Warren County. TheDMAMPO carries out its transportation planning responsibilities in cooperation with the IowaDepartment of Transportation (DOT) and the Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority(DART).

DMAMPO membership and voting privilege is open to local governments wholly or partially withinthe DMAMPOs Planning Area. Both cities and counties possessing a threshold population of1,500 may be DMAMPO members. The Iowa DOT, the DART, the Des Moines InternationalAirport (DMIA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Federal Transit

Administration (FTA) serve as non-voting, advisory representatives on the DMAMPO.

The DMAMPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is an annually updated list of federalfund eligible transportation projects in the DMAMPOs Planning Area. It is updated every year andtraditionally covers a three-year period, however since July 2006, the TIP covers a four-year period.State Transit Assistance (STA) and Statewide Transportation Enhancement (Statewide TE) fundsare the only type of state funding shown in the TIP.

Projects programmed in the first federal fiscal year (FFY 2008) are referred to as the AnnualElement. Projects for the entire four years (FFY 2008-2011) are listed together by FFY and fundingprogram. Funding programs included in the Section 2, Federal Highway Administration Projects,

include projects that are eligible to receive the following types of funding: Planning funds, SurfaceTransportation Program (STP) funds, STP Transportation Enhancement (STP TE) funds, FederalRecreational Trails funds, Iowas Clean Air Attainment Program funds, Safe Routes to School,Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program funds, Highway Safety ImprovementProgram funds, National Highway Safety funds, Interstate Maintenance funds, and DemonstrationAward funds. Transit funding programs are included in Section 3 Federal Transit AdministrationProjects.

General Information and Guidelines for the Surface Transportation Program and SurfaceTransportation Program Transportation Enhancement Process

Passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) provided a new directionfor metropolitan planning organizations across the United States of America. Passage of theTransportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1997 strengthened this new direction formetropolitan planning organizations. The legislation allows metropolitan planning organizationsmore flexibility in prioritizing surface transportation projects. This flexibility is especially shownthrough the STP and STP TE funding process.


7/82



With passage of the ISTEA legislation, the DMAMPO began developing a process of determiningeligibility, analyzing, and ranking proposed transportation system improvement projects seekingfunding from the DMAMPO with the newly authorized STP and STP TE funds. The DMAMPOhas worked to develop an objective methodology for selecting projects to award funding, utilizing

specific criteria to measure a number of performance indicators to rank projects in each of the fiveSTP categories. The method utilizes accepted engineering techniques for measuring project needand benefit. The DMAMPO also developed criteria to rank the STP TE projects, dividing suchprojects into one of three categories. By the nature of STP TE projects, this ranking process is lesstechnical and more subjective than the STP project ranking process. Each project that falls within aspecific STP and STP TE category is evaluated on a 100 point scoring system. The DMAMPO onlyconsiders projects for funding that receive 50 points or more from the project evaluation stage.

The DMAMPOs Transportation Technical Committee (TTC), through its EngineeringSubcommittee, is responsible for all STP project evaluations. The DMAMPO TTC PlanningSubcommittee, along with Metropolitan Trails Planning Committee, is responsible for the STP TEproject evaluations. The DMAMPO TTC Planning Subcommittee specifically is responsible for the

STP TE Historic Preservation and the Scenic/Environmental project categories. The MetropolitanTrails Planning Committee is responsible for the STP TE Bicycle/Pedestrian facilities projectcategory.

Initially, the respective subcommittees, along with the DMAMPO staff, review project applicationsagainst the criteria and assign points to each project based on this review. After their respectivereview of applications, the DMAMPO TTC Engineering Subcommittee, the DMAMPO TTCPlanning Subcommittee, and the Metropolitan Trails Planning Committee, forward their projectreview results to the DMAMPO TTC for review on the project applications to go forward in theSTP/STP TE project funding evaluation process. The DMAMPO TTCs reviewed list of projectsgoes to the DMAMPOs STP Funding Subcommittee. The STP Funding Subcommittee holds a

meeting at which those project applicants with projects that score 50 points or more in the technicalevaluation have the opportunity to make a brief presentation to the STP Funding Subcommittee. Ina subsequent meeting, the DMAMPO STP Funding Subcommittee convenes to allocate the annualamount of STP and STP TE funds to selected projects. The STP Funding Subcommittee forwardsthat list of selected and recommended projects to receive STP and STP TE funds on to theDMAMPO Executive Committee and to the DMAMPO. The DMAMPO ultimately approvesthose STP and STP TE projects for inclusion in the TIP.

The DMAMPOs STP and STP TE funding process is outlined in the Guidelines for SurfaceTransportation Program and Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancement Funding (Guidelines),which are included in Section 1, and begin on page 15. The Guidelines, adopted by the DMAMPO

and amended as necessary, detail the process for most STP and STP TE funding related issues.


8/82



Schedule for Solicitation of Project Applications and Evaluation

August 2007 Newsletter Release: Information about DMAMPO STP and STP TEprograms and schedule of important dates.

September 2007 Workshop for public and prospective applicants at 3 p.m.

September 7, 2007 Letter of Intent Deadline: STP and STP TE project sponsors will submit aLetter of Intent describing the general scope of the project and an estimatedcost and funding breakdown. The DMAMPO staff [DMAMPO TTCEngineering and Planning Subcommittees] will use the one or two page letterof intent to determine project eligibility and the appropriate funding category.The DMAMPO staff will send an application packet and other materials tothe sponsors with eligible projects.

September 28, 2007 Applications will be available and sent to eligible project sponsors.Applications may be obtained by mail or downloaded from the DMAMPO

web site: www.dmampo.org.

October 26, 2007 STP and STP TE Application Deadline.

November 2007 Project evaluation and scoring by DMAMPO staff and the DMAMPO TTCEngineering and Planning Subcommittees.

January 2008* DMAMPO STP Funding Subcommittee STP Workshop: Applicants givenopportunity to present projects.

January 2008* DMAMPO STP Funding Subcommittee develops recommendation for STPand STP TE funding.

April 2008 Draft TIP with projects recommended for funding to DMAMPO TTC andDMAMPO for discussion.

May 2008 Draft TIP to DMAMPO TTC and DMAMPO for action. Public commentperiod and public meeting held.

June 8, 2008 Draft TIP to Iowa DOT.

June 2008 Final TIP to DMAMPO TTC and DMAMPO for discussion.

July 2008 Final TIP to DMAMPO TTC and DMAMPO for action. Public commentperiod and public meetings held.

July 20, 2008 Final TIP to Iowa DOT.

*All dates are tentative and subject to change


9/82



Surface Transportation ProgramThe intent of STP is to aid public road jurisdiction with funding for any road or bridge projects onthe federal aid system, which includes all federal functional class routs except local and rural minorcollectors. STP is also intended to provide funding for transit capital improvements, bicycle and

pedestrian facilities, and regional transportation planning activities.

A proposed project, to be eligible to apply for DMAMPO STP funding, must be included within orconsistent with the DMAMPOs current adopted long-range transportation plan. Roads must be onthe federal-aid system and bridges must be on the federal-aid system. The federal-aid systemcontains all roadways classified as collector or higher under the Federal Functional ClassificationSystem. Bicycle/pedestrian facilities must be on the DMAMPOs adopted bicycle and pedestrianfacilities plan.

All projects applying to the DMAMPO for STP funding must have a sponsor. Any public agencywith public road jurisdiction, public transit responsibilities, or transportation planning

responsibilities are eligible to request funding. In the DMAMPO Area, a sponsor may be one of theDMAMPOs member governments, the DART, or the Iowa DOT.

The DMAMPO sets a maximum funding award amount of 80 percent in STP or STP TE funding ofan individual projects total cost. The project sponsor must provide at least 20 percent of the totalproject cost through non-federal funds. All projects that receive STP funds must follow the SpecialProject Requirementsoutlined in the Iowa DOTs Funding Guide, under the Federal Surface TransportationProgramsection.

Applications are due on or before 4:30 p.m. on the date specified by the DMAMPO. Applicationsreceived after this date will be considered ineligible for STP or STP TE funding. The Guidelines

allow for granting of exceptions and exceptions may be granted at the discretion of the DMAMPOExecutive Director, only if the Executive Director is contacted before the established deadline andprovided with a reasonable explanation for the delay in submitting the project application.

The DMAMPO has four categories for STP projects:

1. Major Construction. This category has two divisions:Major Construction- Existing Projects are for projects adding capacity for asignificant length of an existing street or highway, or adding lanes to anexisting bridge.

Major Construction- New Projects are for projects creating a new facility ona new alignment, including new interchanges, or bridge replacement.

2. Minor Construction. This category is for projects providing spot improvements,such as arterial intersection channelization and signalization, bridge improvements,or railroad crossing signal improvements.


10/82



3. Preservation. This category is for projects that maintain or preserve the existinghighway and street infrastructure, such as pavement resurfacing, pavementreplacement, and bridge restoration.

4.

Alternative Transportation. This category is for project improvements other thanfor single occupant vehicle (SOV) use, such as pedestrian ways and trails, publictransportation systems, multi-modal facilities, and carpool/vanpool, and othermultiple-occupancy vehicle programs.


11/82



Major Construction Scoring Criteria

CriteriaExisting

Projects

New

ProjectsPoints

1. Level of Service Before & AfterConstruction (Facility & Corridor)

25 20LOS Existing Projects New ProjectsC 0 20

D 15 14E 20 6F 25 0

2. Facility Continuity - 20

Ratio of miles with facility constructed over mileswithout being constructed.

Ratio.20 - .45 20.46 - .65 15.66 - .85 10.86 - 1.05 51.06 + 0

3. Crash Benefit/Cost Analysis 20 -

Awarded for existing construction using b/c ratio.

B/C Ratio.80 + 20.60 - .79 15.40 - .59 10.20 - .39 50 - .19 0

4. Projected Future Traffic Volumes(ADT)

10 15 One point for every 3,000 ADT for Horizon Yearvolumes.

5. Functional Classification 15 15Principal Arterials 15Minor Arterials 10Major Collector 5Minor Collector 0

6. Existing Structure Condition 20 -

Pavement Management System Analysis:Excellent 0Good 5Fair 15Poor 20

7. Network Parameter (Vehicle Hoursof Travel)

- 20

Calculate the reduction in Vehicle Hours of Travel600 Hours + 20450 - 599 15300 - 499 10150 - 299 5

0 - 149 0

8. Other Funds 10 10

Local match 60.1% - 70% 10Local match 50.1% - 60% 8Local match 40.1% - 50% 6

Local match 30.1% - 40% 4Local match 20.1% - 30% 2Local match 0% - 20% 0

Total 100 100


12/82



Minor Construction Scoring Criteria

CriteriaTotal

Points Breakdown of Points

1. Crashes 20

Based on the list of highway crash location candidates

compiled by the Iowa DOT staff.

Projects ranked 1 - 200 20Projects ranked 201 - 500 17Projects ranked 501 - 1000 14Projects ranked 1001 - 1500 10Projects ranked 1501 - 2000 7Projects ranked 2001 - 2500 4Projects ranked 2501+ 0

2. Existing Level of Service (LOS) orDelay

30

Points based on existing LOS. Points are assigned asfollows:LOSA - B 0

C 0-5D 10-25

E 30

3. Total Volumes 10

Using the current ADT (Average Daily Traffic):

40,001 + 1030,001 - 40,000 820,001 - 30,000 610,001 - 20,000 4

0 - 10,000 2

4. Crash Benefit/Cost Analysis 15

B/C Ratio1 - 1.5 3

1.51 - 2.0 62.01 - 2.5 92.51 - 3.0 123.01+ 15

5. Improved LOS or Delay 15

Points are based on the difference in delay time fromexisting to improved condition.Delay/Vehicle (Seconds)25.0 + 1520.0 - 24.9 1215.0 - 19.9 910.0 - 14.9 6

5.0 - 9.9 3< 5.0 0

6. Other Funds 10

Local match 60.1% or higher 10Local match 50.1% - 60% 8Local match 40.1% - 50% 6Local match 30.1% - 40% 4

Local match 20.1% - 30% 2Local match 0% - 20% 0

Total 100


13/82



Preservation Scoring CriteriaCriteria

TotalPoints

Breakdown of Points

1. Surface Condition 45

Pavement Management System Analysis:Excellent 0Good 15Fair 30Poor 45

2. Existing Traffic Volumes - ADT 20

Using the current ADT:20,001+ 2015,000 - 20,000 1610,000 - 14,999 85,000 - 9,999 4

< 5,000 2

3. Functional Classification 20

Principal Arterials 20Minor Arterials 15Collectors and Major Collectors 5

Minor Collectors and Locals 0

4. Other Funds 15

Local match 60.1% - 70% 15Local match 50.1% - 60% 12Local match 40.1% - 50% 9Local match 30.1% - 40% 6Local match 20.1% - 30% 3Local match 0% - 20% 0

Total 100


14/82



Alternative Transportation Scoring CriteriaCriteria

TotalPoints

Breakdown of Points

1. Congestion Reduction 25

Measures the number of person hours removed from

the roadway per year. Range is as follows:60,000 + 2540,000 - 59,999 2020,000 - 39,999 15

0 - 19,999 0

2. Air Quality Benefit 25

Measures the number of grams of carbon monoxideremoved from the air per day. Range is as follows:150,000 + 25100,000 - 149,999 2050,000 - 99,999 15

0 - 49,999 0

3. Mode Efficiency 20

Measures the fuel efficiency of each mode. Range, ingallons of fuel saved per day, is as follows:601 + 20451 - 600 15301 - 450 10151 - 300 5

0 - 150 0

4. Benefit/Cost Analysis 20

Performs a benefit/cost analysis based on passengermiles traveled. The range is as follows:5.0 + 204.0 - 4.99 163.0 - 3.99 122.0 - 2.99 81.0 - 1.99 4

< 1.0 0

5. Other Funds 10

Local match 60.1% - 70% 10

Local match 50.1% - 60% 8Local match 40.1% - 50% 6Local match 30.1% - 40% 4Local match 20.1% - 30% 2Local match 0% - 20% 0

Total 100


15/82



Surface Transportation Program Transportation Enhancement

The DMAMPO follows the guidance from the FHWA in the administration of the STP TE projectselection. The FHWA has prepared a document, Guidance for Transportation EnhancementActivities, 23. U.S.C. and TEA-21, which may be publicly accessed at the web site:

www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/te/guidance.htm.

The purpose of the STP TE process is to fund the projects or programs related to transportationthat will enhance the environmental, scenic, or cultural quality of a site or an area. A STP TEproject includes any project that qualifies in one of the twelve categories:

1. Provision of facilities for pedestrian and bicycles;2. Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists;3. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites;4. Scenic or historic highway programs (including provision of tourist and welcome centerfacilities);5. Landscaping and other scenic beautification;6. Historic preservation;7. Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities

(including historic railroad facilities and canals);

8. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof forpedestrian or bicycle trails);

9. Control and removal of outdoor advertising;10. Archeological planning and research;11. Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce

vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity;

12. Establishment of transportation museums.The DMAMPO groups these twelve (12) eligible activities into three categories as follows:

1. Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles; andprovision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists; preservation ofabandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian orbicycle trails).

2. Historic Preservation: Acquisition of historic sites; historic highway programs (includingprovision of tourist and welcome center facilities); historic preservation; rehabilitation andoperation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities (including historicrailroad facilities and canals); archeological planning and research; and establishment oftransportation museums.


16/82



3. Scenic/Environmental: Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic sites; scenic highwayprograms (including provision of tourist and welcome center facilities); landscaping andother scenic beautification; control and removal of outdoor advertising; environmentalmitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlifemortality while maintaining habitat connectivity.

The list of qualifying activities is intended to be exclusive, not illustrative. ONLY those activitieslisted are eligible STP TE activities. Enhancement measures in the activities listed, which go beyondwhat is customarily provided as environmental mitigation, are considered as transportationenhancements. STP TE projects are non-motorized transportation-related activities.

The focus is on the clear and credible description of how the proposed STP TE project relates tothe surface transportation system. Several questions should be asked:

1. In what way(s) is the project related to surface transportation through present or past useas a transportation resource?

2. Is there a direct connection to a person or event nationally significant in thedevelopment of surface transportation?

3. What is the extent of the relationship(s) to surface transportation?4. What groups and individuals are affected by the relationship(s)?5. When did the relationship(s) start and end or does the relationship(s) continue?6. Is a relationship substantial enough to justify the investment of transportation funds?

The STP TE guidance states that proximity to a transportation facility alone is NOT sufficient to

establish a relationship.

The following application types generally have been considered ineligible by the FHWA, incooperation with the Iowa DOT.

1. Surfacing or resurfacing of existing roads or construction of new roads;2. Construction of surfacing of parking lots (unless trailhead parking lot);3. Construction of low water crossings on roads;4. Picnic shelters, picnic tables, grills (unless directly related to a trailhead);5. Construction of new buildings (unless they are rest rooms or trailhead shelters in

conjunction with trails that will accommodate bikes or pedestrians);

6. Mitigation or NEPA Section 106 documentation of a bridge replacement;7. Applications without a public sponsor (city, state, or county agency);8. Historic applications where the facility or structure is not eligible for the National

Register of Historic Places (please review with the State Historic Preservation Office);


17/82



9. Historic preservation activities, which do not demonstrate some significant historicconnection with transportation system;

10.Normal environmental mitigation work.The Iowa DOT retained 50 percent of the STP TE funds and is programming those funds forStatewide TE projects. The other 50 percent of the STP TE funds go to Metropolitan PlanningOrganizations (MPO) and Regional Planning Affiliations (RPA).

A STP TE project may be developed in cooperation with other local jurisdictions, or public/privateagencies, but the project must be sponsored and submitted to the DMAMPO by a membergovernment. The STP TE funding is provided on a reimbursement basis, with the maximumamount of the federal funding of 80 percent of the eligible activities, and with the sponsoringgovernment or agency providing at least 20 percent of the total eligible costs.

The DMAMPO uses the following criteria to score the STP TE projects based on the three eligiblecategories.

Historic Preservation Criteria Score (1 5) Weight Factor Final Score

Relationship to surface transportation system 5 5 25Level of significant/quality of resource. 5 4 20Level of Threat 5 3 15Tourism and economic development potential. 5 1 5Multiple use potential. 5 3 15Available local funds. 5 3 15Relationship to historic district or local plans. 5 1 5Total Project Score 100

Score Levels (1 low 5 high/excellent)

All Historic Preservation projects score on a scale of (1 5) for each of the six criteria. The score of(1 5) for each criterion, multiplied by the weight factor, yields the final score. The total projectscore is the sum of the final scores for all criteria. (100 Points Maximum)

Scenic/ Environmental Criteria Score (1 5) Weight Factor Final Score

Relationship to surface transportation 5 5 25Quality of project 5 4 20Public demand 5 2 10Relationship to other proposed/existing project 5 3 15Multiple benefits to be provided 5 3 15

Available local funds 5 3 15Total Project Score 100


All Scenic projects score on a scale of (1 5) for each of the seven criteria. The score of (1 5) foreach criterion, multiplied by the weight factor, yields the final score. The total project score is thesum of the final scores for all criteria. (100 Points Maximum)


18/82



Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities Criteria Score (1 5) Weight Factor Final Score

Project on DMAMPO Bicycle/PedestrianFacilities

-- -- --

Previously received DMAMPO STP TE funds

under this category. Previously receivedDMAMPO STP TE funds under the othercategories

-- -- --

Local Support 5 2 10Multipurpose aspects. 5 3 15Financial plan 5 3 15Quality/significance of the site. 5 3 15Need for the project. 5 2 10Status of the facility right-of-way. 5 1 5Urgency of the implementation of the project. 5 1 5Impact to tourism and economic development. 5 1 5Facility Category Scoring: Connection,

Development, Extension, Upgrade, orCombination

20 -- 20

Total Project Score 100


All Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities projects score on a scale of (1 5) for each of the seven criteria,except for the Facility Category Scoring, which has a maximum score of 20 points. The score of (1 5) for each criterion, multiplied by the weight factor, yields the final score. The total project scoreis the sum of the final scores for all criteria. (100 Points Maximum)

Amending and Revising the Transportation Improvement Program

The DMAMPO staff considers the following criteria when amending and revising the TIP. TheDMAMPO staff believes these criteria to be consistent with all FHWA and FTA requirements.

An amendment occurs if proposed changes to the DMAMPO TIP meet any of the followingcriteria:

A project is added to the TIP in any fiscal year; The federal funds are increased by 20% or more of the original amount; or There is a major change in scope; for STP projects, a major change in scope is subject to the

review of the STP Funding Subcommittee.

If the DMAMPO staff considers a change to the TIP to be an amendment, the DMAMPO will needto approve the requested change and will need to follow the Public Participation Process, asincluded in Section 1, beginning on Page 18. The DMAMPO staff will schedule a TIP Public InputMeeting on a date before the DMAMPO meeting at which the DMAMPO will be taking action on aproposed amendment. The DMAMPO staff will issue an announcement of the TIP Public InputMeeting a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the scheduled public input meeting. If theDMAMPO approves the TIP amendment, the DMAMPO staff then will notify the Iowa DOT and


19/82



FHWA or FTA requesting that the Iowa DOT incorporate the amendment into the Iowa DOTsStatewide TIP. Generally, TIP amendments will take a minimum of sixty (60) days to complete.

Proposed changes to the DMAMPO TIP to be considered revisions if the proposed changes do

not meet any of the amendment criteria. Revisions often include the following types of changes:

A project is moved between fiscal years in the approved TIP; The total project cost is lowered; A projects federal funding source has changed; Minor changes in scope; or, Minor changes (less than 20%) to the federally funded portion of the project.

If the DMAMPO staff considers a change to the TIP to be a revision, the DMAMPO staff willhandle the revision administratively. Following a thorough review of a proposed revision, theDMAMPO staff will process the revision by notifying the Iowa DOT and FHWA or FTA of the

revision, so the change(s) will be incorporated into the Iowa DOTs Statewide TIP. The DMAMPOstaff will notify the DMAMPO and DMAMPO TTC representatives of all TIP revisions throughDiscussion Items on their monthly meeting agendas.


20/82



DES MOINES AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

GUIDELINES FORSURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

AND

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMTRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT FUNDING

Approved September 16, 1999Amended May 18, 2000Amended July 19, 2001

Amended January 17, 2002Amended October 16, 2003

Eligibility

1. The Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization

(DMAMPO), when considering project requests for SurfaceTransportation Program (STP) or STP Transportation Enhancement(TE) funds, shall place primary emphasis upon metropolitan-widetransportation system improvement needs as identified in theDMAMPOs Horizon Year Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and howthose needs impact the movement of people and goods throughoutthis metropolitan area and how the requested project will havepotential benefit and potential impact on all communities in the DesMoines metropolitan area. The DMAMPO shall give firstconsideration to funding regionally significant transportation projectsin the Plan.

2. All projects applying for DMAMPO STP or STP TE funding mustbe sponsored by one or more of the sixteen DMAMPO membergovernments, the Iowa DOT, or the DART. Other entities areeligible only with co-sponsorship by one of the organizations listedabove. When applying for STP or STP TE funds a sponsor mustsubmit a resolution from that sponsors council, board ofsupervisors, or similar governing body, guaranteeing the local fundsfor the STP match and authorizing the project.

Funding

Funding of projects with STP or STP TE funds for inclusion in the DMAMPOs TIP shallbe based on the following criteria:

1. The Iowa DOT annually allocates STP and STP TE funds to theDMAMPO.


21/82



2. The DMAMPO shall identify and shall consider all proposed projectfunding sources available when considering project funding requestsfor DMAMPO STP or STP TE funds for a projects implementation.

3. Any special planning activities will be paid for from funds generatedby DMAMPO member government assessments. The DMAMPOwill not set aside STP or STP TE funds for funding planning relatedactivities.

4. Jurisdictions undertaking STP projects must bear the initialexpenditures of the project, and receive reimbursement for eligibleexpenditures, as defined by the Iowa DOT. The agreement with theIowa DOT provides for reimbursement of up to 80 percent of theproject cost, or a set amount, whichever is less. Design andengineering costs are generally incurred in the early stages of aproject.

5. For roadway and STP TE projects, the amount of funds expendedfor work other than direct construction and right-of-way acquisitioncosts must be covered by the amount of the contribution of localfunds. Federal regulations generally require a minimum local matchof 20 percent of the total project cost.

6. Each application for STP funding must include a detailed breakdownof projected costs, including a summary of projected costs for workother than construction and right-of-way.

7. Funding within the various STP and STP TE project categories shall

be based on the following percentages of the DMAMPOs annualSTP and STP TE funds amount, as follows:

STP:Major construction 50 to 75%Minor construction 5 to 15%Preservation 5 to 15%Alternative transportation 5 to 15%

STP TE:Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities 33%Scenic/Environmental 33%Historic Preservation 33%

If an insufficient number of qualified STP projects have beensubmitted that would use all funding for a particular STP projectcategory, the DMAMPO then may allocate the remaining funds fromthat STP category to any other project category.


22/82



8. STP funds shall be allocated to an individual project for a specificfiscal year in the TIP. For projects extending over multiple years forimplementation, funds may be allocated to each of the necessaryfiscal years within the TIP to complete the requested project.

9. If the total amount of STP or STP TE funds received by theDMAMPO for any given fiscal year is less than the total amount ofSTP or STP TE funds allocated by the DMAMPO for that fiscalyear, then the DMAMPO shall re-evaluate all of the projects fundedfor that fiscal year and reallocate STP and STP TE funds to thoseprojects based upon the total amount of STP and STP TE fundsactually available for that fiscal year, giving consideration to thehigher ranking projects.

10. The DMAMPO shall fund a project not to exceed the STP or STPTE grant amount awarded, or the percentage of the awarded project

cost, which ever is less, except for Contingency Fund procedures.Any STP or STP TE funds returned to the DMAMPO for thisreason shall be included in the DMAMPOs next fiscal year STP orSTP TE funding allocation.

Project Priority Ranking

1. A new priority ranking shall be established prior to the annualdevelopment of the DMAMPOs TIP, to re-rank projects previouslysubmitted, but not approved, for STP or STP TE funding, as well asany projects requesting STP or STP TE funding consideration for thefirst time.

2. Prior to review of new projects to be considered for STP or STP TEfunding, the DMAMPO shall determine the status of all priorcommitments. All projects previously approved and for which somepart of STP or STP TE funds have been obligated shall receivepriority consideration for future funding, except if reasonableprogress to completion is not maintained as determined by theDMAMPO. However, the DMAMPO may reduce or eliminatemulti-year funding commitments in response to revenue shortfalls,reductions in its STP or STP TE allocation, or new priorities.

3. The DMAMPOs TTC and DMAMPO staff shall submit to theDMAMPO a technical ranking of individual project requests forDMAMPO STP or STP TE funding assistance. The TTCs andstaffs recommendations for individual projects shall be used by theDMAMPO in the DMAMPOs decision-making process forassigning STP and STP TE funds to requesting transportationimprovement projects. The TTCs and staffs recommendations shallbe based on their professional and technical expertise.


23/82



4. Once the DMAMPO has selected projects for funding based on theDMAMPOs current guidelines, the DMAMPO Executive Directorshall forward a letter to the DMAMPO STP and STP TE fundsrecipient outlining the stipulations associated with acceptance of the

DMAMPOs funds, including the need for the recipient to submit aproject concept statement within one year of the DMAMPO STP orSTP TE funding award and that the recipient needs to provide theDMAMPO Executive Director a semi-annual report on the status ofand the progress on the project which will be shared with theDMAMPO.

5. When a jurisdiction changes the scope of a project, after funds areawarded by the DMAMPO, the project must be reviewed again bythe TTC and the DMAMPO STP Funding Subcommittee todetermine whether the change in project scope would have materiallychanged the original prioritization ranking. Based on that

determination, the Subcommittee will make a recommendation to theDMAMPO Executive Committee, up to and including thewithdrawal of DMAMPO approval for STP funding for the project.This is the same process that may occur when a project does notmake appropriate, scheduled progress leading to recapture andreallocation of future funds previously designated for the project.The DMAMPO Executive Committee will, after due consideration,make a recommendation to the full DMAMPO for a final decision.Immaterial changes that would not affect the original scoring of aproject previously ranked and approved for DMAMPO funding maybe permitted in the sound discretion of the DMAMPO Executive

Director.

Funding for Large, Multi-Year Projects

Funding of large, multi-year projects with major construction category STP funds forinclusion in the DMAMPOs TIP shall be based on the following criteria:

1. Any DMAMPO member government or participating agencyawarded STP funding through the DMAMPO must begin to usethose STP funds in the original year programmed;

2. In its annual selection of STP projects, the DMAMPO may dedicatean amount not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of the MajorConstruction project category funds to multi-year projects;

3. For an individual, multi-year project, the DMAMPO may guaranteefunding for no more than three consecutive years. In the event theannual apportionment of funds is lower than expected at the time ofprogramming, a percentage of the Major Construction category maybe guaranteed. In the event the annual apportionment of funds is as


24/82



expected or higher than was expected at the time of programming,then a set amount would be guaranteed;

4. If a project applicant anticipates the project continuing beyond theinitial three years of guaranteed funding, and anticipates seeking

additional funding through the DMAMPO, the project applicantwould have the ability to submit a new project funding application tothe DMAMPO, and would need to go through the DMAMPOsproject prioritization process to seek project funding beyond theinitial three-year period; and,

5. The STP Funding Subcommittee has the ability to recommendfunding for a period that exceeds a three-year limitation for a projectthat the subcommittee considers of extraordinary regionalsignificance.

Additional Fund Availability

In the event that STP or STP TE funds become available, which were previously awarded totransportation projects, become available through the reduction of the reserve amount, orbecome available by an increase in a particular fiscal years obligation limit, the followingsteps will be followed, in order, until the situation is sufficiently resolved.

For STP Funds:1. Additional funds will be offered to those projects which were

awarded funds through the Project Priority process, yet were not fullyfunded by the DMAMPO. Projects will be considered based on theirprevious scores. All project information will be updated andconsidered, but no re-scoring of projects will take place. Thoseprojects currently in implementation will be excluded.

2. Additional funds will be offered to those projects which applied forfunds, received a score, but were not awarded funding. Projects willbe considered based on the score they received and only projectsscoring above 50 points will be considered. Project information willbe updated.

3. Projects which have already been awarded funds, and which areprogrammed after the current program year in the TIP, will beconsidered for funding in the current program year if, upon review,

the projects are ready to proceed with implementation.

For STP TE funds:1. Fully funded projects which need more money.2. Projects which were awarded part of the requested amount.3. Projects in out years which can be moved forward.


25/82



Projects will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and funded based upon need or by aproportion of the funds available.

Status Reports

1. The DMAMPO shall be advised semi-annually of the status andprogress of a STP or STP TE funded project. The recipientjurisdiction/agency shall submit to the DMAMPOs ExecutiveDirector a written synopsis of the progress accomplished, or delaysencountered, in implementing the project.

2. If the status report is not provided to the DMAMPO ExecutiveDirector by the date identified in the status report request, theDMAMPO Executive Director will issue a notice of delinquencyidentifying a ten (10) calendar day cure period beginning upon receiptof the registered notice. If the status report is not submitted by the

end of the cure period, the matter will be brought before theDMAMPO STP Funding Subcommittee within thirty (30) calendardays for a recommendation for action that will be forwarded to theDMAMPO Executive Committee for consideration and referral tothe DMAMPO.

3. If a jurisdiction/agencys STP or STP TE funded project does notmake satisfactory progress, does not obligate the STP or STP TEfunds provided within the year those funds were authorized by theDMAMPO and noted for that project as previously documented,then the DMAMPO may cancel the remaining STP or STP TEfunding for that project and return those STP or STP TE funds forinclusion in the next fiscal years STP or STP TE funding allocationfor projects. Such action to cancel project funding shall be based onthe following criteria:

a. The DMAMPO strongly believes it necessary to maintainrapid turnover of funds and implementation of specificprojects so as not to jeopardize the loss of any funding.

b. The DMAMPO strongly encourages jurisdictions/agencies tohave at least preliminary project plans completed prior tosubmitting a project for the DMAMPOs consideration for

funding.

c. The DMAMPO strongly believes that such a stipulation shallcause jurisdictions/agencies to provide better and moreaccurate project cost estimates and detailed traffic andengineering data, enabling both the TTC and the DMAMPOto evaluate a projects feasibility in a more detailed manner.


26/82



Interpretation

When and as necessary, the STP Funding Subcommittee will exercise responsibility forinterpreting the applicable Guidelines, subject to review and approval, disapproval, ormodification by the DMAMPO Executive Committee, subject to review and approval,

disapproval, or modification by the full DMAMPO Policy Committee.

Public Participation Process

Transportation, in all forms, is a most basic need of society. Partnering with the Iowa DOT, theDART, the FHWA, the FTA, and many other cooperating agencies, the members of the DMAMPOseek to provide an efficient and equitable surface transportation system for the Des Moinesmetropolitan area.

In accordance with Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 450 (23 CFR 450), the DMAMPOprovides continuous, cooperative, and comprehensive (3-C) transportation planning services. Aspart of this 3-C transportation planning process, the DMAMPO desires and requests citizen inputon the work, projects, and products proposed and created by the DMAMPO.

The DMAMPO includes sixteen member cities: Altoona, Ankeny, Bondurant, Carlisle, Clive, DesMoines, Grimes, Johnston, Mitchellville, Norwalk, Pleasant Hill, Polk City, Urbandale, Waukee,West Des Moines, and Windsor Heights; one associate, non-voting, city: Cumming; and includesunincorporated portions of three member counties: Dallas County, Polk County, and WarrenCounty. As of the 2000 U.S. Census, the DMAMPO Planning Area encompasses more than394,030 persons. In serving the nineteen governments, and the residents within those jurisdictions,the DMAMPO recognizes the importance and necessity of the public involvement process.

With representation from the nineteen governments, the DMAMPO is comprised of three maincommittees:

Representatives to the DMAMPO Transportation Technical Committee (TTC)include city engineers, county engineers, public works directors, community planningdirectors, Des Moines International Airport (DMIA) staff, DART staff, and advisorsfrom the Iowa DOT, FHWA, and FTA. This committee is charged with makingtechnical recommendations to the DMAMPO Executive Committee and theDMAMPO. The DMAMPO TTC meets on the first Thursday of every month at9:30 a.m. at the Des Moines Botanical Center.

The DMAMPO Chair, Vice-Chair, Secretary/Treasurer, two At-Large Members, andan Ex-Officio member make up the six representatives selected to serve on theDMAMPO Executive Committee. The DMAMPO Executive Committee reviewstransportation policy-related topics and recommends action to the DMAMPO. TheDMAMPO Executive Committee meets on the second Wednesday of every monthat 8:00 a.m. in the Conference Room of the DMAMPO office.


27/82



The DMAMPO Transportation Policy Committee is referred to simply as theDMAMPO. The DMAMPO acts on the recommendations of the DMAMPOExecutive Committee and of the DMAMPO TTC. Representatives to theDMAMPO primarily are local elected officials, city administrators, city managers,

and advisors from the DMIA, the DART, the Iowa DOT, FHWA, and FTA. TheDMAMPO meets on the third Thursday of every month at 4:00 p.m. at the DesMoines Botanical Center.

All meetings of the DMAMPO TTC, DMAMPO Executive Committee, and DMAMPO are opento the public. Members of the public may request time on the agenda of the DMAMPO TTC or onthe agenda of the DMAMPO to comment on specific subjects of interest to the representatives. Aminimum of two weeks advance notice should be given for requested agenda time. Additionalsubcommittees and working groups may be appointed at any time by the DMAMPO Chair toaddress specific transportation-related topics or areas of interest to the DMAMPO.

Goals and Objectives

The public involvement process required by 23 CFR 450 should provide complete information,timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and support early and continuinginvolvement of the public in developing plans and Transportation Improvement Programs

The DMAMPO is committed to the availability of timely, complete information; to the notificationof and public access to the decision-making process; and to ongoing public involvement throughoutthe transportation planning process including, but not limited to, the development of the Long-Range Transportation Plan, the Transportation Improvement Program, the Public InvolvementProcess, the Job Access/Reverse Commute plan, and goods movement planning.

Through this Public Involvement Process, the DMAMPO aims to identify methods for obtaining publicinput and encouraging public involvement in the transportation planning process.

Stakeholders and Public Groups

The DMAMPO has identified the following groups and individuals as those having potential interestin public input and involvement opportunities:

o Neighborhood organizations;o Homeowner associations;o

The Greater Des Moines Partnership, Chambers of Commerce, and other businessgroups;o Private transportation providers;o Groups representing travel modes trucking, railroad, transit, bicycle, pedestrian;o Advocacy groups for the disadvantaged and/or minority groups;o Transportation providers for groups that lack access to private vehicles;o Media newspapers, television, radio;o Governmental agencies;


28/82



o Schools, environmental organizations, social action groups, and hospitals; ando Organizations or individuals who have been notified of public hearings for major

projects, or organizations and individuals who have submitted written commentsrelating to public hearings for major projects. These individuals andorganizations would remain on the mailing list as long as the major project is

under development.

Outreach Techniques

In Touch is the DMAMPOs monthly newsletter, providing information on plans and programs,public hearings or public discussion, whom to contact at the DMAMPO to register comments, and aschedule of DMAMPO meetings, DMAMPO Executive Committee meetings, and DMAMPO TTCmeetings. In addition to the monthly newsletter mailings, special editions of In Touch may bepublished throughout the year to notify the public of scheduled public input meetings. TheDMAMPO promotes that any article printed in the In Touch newsletter may be used, with thepermission of the DMAMPO, as information in newsletters published by local neighborhoodgroups and associations, or member governments.

The DMAMPO website, http://www.dmampo.org, provides links to meeting agendas, committeerepresentatives, staff contact information, news, maps, plans, and publications produced by theDMAMPO. Links to member government and partner agency websites also are available.

Legal notice is published in The Des Moines Register, including the central Iowa distribution area, toinform the public of upcoming public input meetings.

Meeting announcements are published in The Des Moines Register the Monday preceding theDMAMPO TTC meeting and the DMAMPO meeting.

As plans and reports associated with major elements of the transportation planning process arecreated or updated by the DMAMPO, the DMAMPO hosts forums across the Des Moinesmetropolitan area to discuss these issues with the public at a local level. These plans and reports aredistributed to the main library of each DMAMPO member government. In the case of theDMAMPO member counties of Dallas, Polk, and Warren, the publications are distributed to themain library in the county seat.

The DMAMPO will work with those individuals needing language translation of DMAMPO plansor publications to a language other than English. A minimum two weeks notice of such requestsshould be given to the DMAMPO staff.

The DMAMPO promotes its availability to make presentations on transportation-related topics tolocal citizens, organizations, and groups. To schedule a presentation call (515) 334-0075, fax (515)334-0098, or e-mail [email protected].


29/82



Public Input Mechanisms

The DMAMPO accepts input and comments from the public through a variety of means:

Members of the public may make comments by calling the DMAMPO at (515) 334-0075.

Written comments may be:1. Faxed to the DMAMPO at (515) 334-0098;2. E-mailed to [email protected]; or3. Mailed to the DMAMPO, Merle Hay Centre 6200 Aurora Avenue, Suite 300W,

Urbandale, IA 50322-2866.

The public may submit comments to their respective DMAMPO TTC or DMAMPOrepresentatives for transmittal to the respective full committees.

Comments on DMAMPO plans, reports, and programs may be made at public input

meetings. The DMAMPO ensures that all public input meeting locations are accessible inaccordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Members of the public or a representative of a group, with expressed comments on aparticular topic may request of the DMAMPO Chair an appointment to serve as a citizenrepresentative on the appropriate subcommittee of the DMAMPO TTC or the DMAMPO.

Time scheduled on a DMAMPO TTC agenda or on a DMAMPO agenda also may berequested by members of the public or a representative of a group, to offer input to the fullcommittees.

All public comments and input received by the DMAMPO representatives and staff are shared withthe DMAMPO TTC, the DMAMPO Executive Committee, and the DMAMPO either in verbal orwritten form.

Schedule

Notification and announcement of all upcoming public input meetings are made approximately fourweeks in advance of the scheduled meeting through the In Touch newsletter and postings to theDMAMPO website, http://www.dmampo.org. Legal notice of a scheduled public input meeting ispublished in The Des Moines Registerapproximately one week in advance of the meeting date.

Regularly scheduled public input meetings occur annually in April and July for comment on theDraft and Final Draft versions of the TIP. The TIP is an annual document identifyingtransportation projects DMAMPO member governments and agencies intend to implement usingfederal funds over the next four years, beginning in July 2007. Other public input meetings are heldthroughout the year, as necessary, allowing for comment on proposed amendments to the approvedTIP.


30/82



Several public input meetings occur in conjunction with the update of the Year 2030 Long-RangeTransportation Plan (LRTP). The LRTP addresses transportation planning issues over a 20-yearperiod and is updated every five years. Amendments to the approved LRTPalso require a publicinput meeting.

Updates and revisions to the DMAMPOs Public Involvement Processrequire a 45-day comment period.The DMAMPO TTC and the DMAMPO will approve this document following the completion ofthe public comment period.

Evaluation

The DMAMPO will review this Public Involvement Process periodically in order to monitor theeffectiveness of the procedures outlined in this document. Following evaluation of the outputs andoutcomes of the Public Involvement Process, the DMAMPO may revise these methods to incorporatenew and innovative ways to involve the public in the transportation decision-making process.


31/82

SECTION 2

Federal Highway Administration Projects


32/82

Des Moines Area MPO2008 - 2011 Transportation Improvement Program

ponsor Name Project # / Location / Desc Length Project TPM

FHWA Brdg No Funding Pgmd Amts in $1,000's PA:Co

Sec:Twp:Rng FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 ITEM

] STP - Surface Transportation Program Inclusion in this list DOES NOT guarantee Federal Aid eligibilityegion Wide [00]

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

RGPL-PA26()--ST-00 Project Total $ 56 $ 112 $ 112 $ 56

In PrepTransportation Management Association: Funding for the operation of theTransport...

-- Federal Aid $ 45 $ 90 $ 90 $ 45 2

Trans Planning, Miscellaneous -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 45 $ 90 $ 90 $ 45

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

RGPL-PA26()--ST-00 Project Total $ 225 $ 225 $ 225 --

In Prep Iowa DOT's Transportation Management Center: Use of STP funds to support the useof the...

-- Federal Aid $ 180 $ 180 $ 180 -- 2

Trans Planning -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 180 $ 180 $ 180 --

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

RGPL-PA26(UDS)--ST-00 Project Total $ 44 $ 44 $ 44 $ 44

FHWA Approved SUDAS: STATEWIDE URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS -- Federal Aid $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 26MAP-MPO Trans Planning [Request to continue to program funds for SUDAS in all FYs af...] -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 35 $ 35 $ 35 $ 35

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

RGTR-PA26()--ST-00 Project Total $ 2,424 -- -- --

FHWA Approved MTA: 8 HEAVY DUTY FIXED ROUTE BUSES -- Federal Aid $ 520 -- -- -- 26MAP-DART Transit Investments [No 342, 347 and 348] -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 520 -- -- --

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

RGTR-PA26()--ST-00 Project Total -- -- $ 1,272$ 1,272

FHWA Approved DART: FOUR FIXED ROUTE BUSES: Transit Investments -- Federal Aid -- -- $ 900 $ 500 26Transit Investments -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 900 $ 500

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

RGTR-PA26(3-BUS)--ST-00 Project Total -- $ 909 -- --

FHWA Approved MTA : 3 FIXED ROUTE BUSES -- Federal Aid -- $ 520 -- -- 26MAP-DART Transit Investments -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 520 -- --

MPO-26 /DMAMPO

STP-U-PA26(PMS)--70-00 Project Total $ 51 $ 51 -- --

FHWA Approved Iowa Pavement Management: PVMT MGMT SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION FOR DMAMPO -- Federal Aid $ 41 $ 41 -- -- 26MAP-MPO Trans Planning [Iowa Pavement Management Program] -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 41 $ 41 -- --

allas County [25]Waukee STP-8177()--2C-25 1 Mi Project Total -- -- -- $ 3,700

FHWA Approved WIDENING ALICE'S ROAD: University Avenue to Hickman Road -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 650 26Pavement Widening -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 650

olk County [77]Ankeny STP-69-4(84)--2C-77Tgt Let Date: 03/18/2008 1 Mi Project Total $ 7,000 -- $ 7,000 --

FHWA Approved N ANKENY BLVD: N 18TH ST to N 36TH ST -- Federal Aid $ 500 -- $ 1,500 -- 26:Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 500 -- $ 1,500 --

Ankeny STP-69-4(84)--2C-77Tgt Let Date: 03/18/2008 1 Mi Project Total $ 7,000 -- -- --In Prep N ANKENY BLVD: N 18TH ST to N 36TH ST -- Federal Aid $ 2,000 -- -- -- 26:

Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 2,000 -- -- --

Ankeny STP-69-4(87)--2C-77Tgt Let Date: 02/17/2009 1.1 Mi Project Total -- $ 3,000 -- --

FHWA Approved N ANKENY BLVD: N 36th Street to N 54th Street -- Federal Aid -- $ 1,200 -- -- 26:Grade and Pave [Phase 3] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 1,200 -- --

Clive STP-1425()--2C-77 0.33 Mi Project Total -- -- $ 1,400 --FHWA Approved UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS: NW 78th Street to 73rd Street -- Federal Aid -- -- $ 690 -- 26:

Grade and Pave, Pavement Widening, Bridge Widening -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 690 --

Federal Fiscal Years 2008-2011 Transportation Improvement Program Section 2, Page 26


33/82

ponsor NameProject # / Location / Desc Length Project TPM



Des Moines HDP-1945(403)--6B-77 0.66 Mi Project Total $ 2,865 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedSE Connector: SW 2nd to SE 6th -- Federal Aid $ 2,292 -- -- -- 26:

Right of Way, Grade and Pave, Traffic Signals [Additional Work Code : 2011 - Bridge New ] -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 2,292 -- -- --

Des Moines STP-1945()--2C-77 0.48 Mi Project Total -- -- $ 25,500$ 24,500FHWA

ApprovedSOUTHEAST CONNECTOR IMPROVEMENT: SE 6th Street to SE 14th Street -- Federal Aid -- -- $ 1,000 $ 1,000 26:

Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 1,000 $ 1,000

Des Moines STP-1945()--2C-77 Project Total -- -- $ 620 --FHWA

ApprovedSW 9th STREET AND DART WAY INTERSECTION: Intersection of SW 9th Street and MTALane

-- Federal Aid -- -- $ 300 -- 26:

Traffic Signals, Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 300 --Des Moines STP-1945()--2C-77 Project Total -- -- -- $ 700

FHWAApproved

FLEUR DRIVE VIADUCT OVER THE U.P. RAILROAD: Fleur Drive north of Bell Avenue -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 300 26:

Bridge Deck Overlay, Bridge Rehabilitation -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 300

Des Moines STP-69-4(71)--2C-77 4 Mi Project Total $ 1,500 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedUS 69/NE 14TH: UNIVERSITY AVE to BROADWAY AVE -- Federal Aid $ 390 -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab [1] -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 390 -- -- --

Des Moines STP-U-1945()--70-77 Project Total -- $ 625 -- --FHWA

ApprovedEASTER LAKE DRIVE: Over branch of Easter Lake -- Federal Aid -- $ 245 -- -- 26:

MAP-29 Bridge Approach Repair -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 245 -- --

Des Moines STP-U-1945(704)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 01/20/2010 2 Mi Project Total $ 3,000$ 5,000 $ 9,800 $ 8,750FHWA

ApprovedINDIANOLA AVE: SE 14TH ST to ARMY POST ROAD -- Federal Aid $ 1,500 $ 1,200 $ 1,050 $ 1,150 26:

MAP-12 Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 1,500 $ 1,200 $ 1,050 $ 1,150

Des Moines STP-U-1945(707)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 05/19/2009 0.7 Mi Project Total $ 550 -- -- --FHWA

Approved Second Avenue: UNIVERSITY AVE to GRAND AVE -- Federal Aid $ 350 -- -- -- 26:MAP-14 Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 350 -- -- --

Des Moines STP-U-1945(708)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 05/20/2008 0.5 Mi Project Total $ 550 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedUNIVERSITY AVE : 6TH AVE to DES MOINES RIVER BRIDGE -- Federal Aid $ 178 -- -- -- 26:

MAP-15 Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 178 -- -- --

Des Moines STP-U-1945(727)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 05/20/2008 Project Total $ 345 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedCrocker Street Traffic Signal Upgrade: Crocker Street at 5th/6th/7th -- Federal Aid $ 150 -- -- -- 26:

MAP-26 Traffic Signals -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 150 -- -- --

Des Moines STP-U-1945(734)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 02/19/2008 Project Total $ 525 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedSE 5TH ST: Over YEADER CR -- Federal Aid $ 336 -- -- -- 26:


leasant Hill STP-163()--2C-77 Project Total -- $ 2,200 -- --FHWA

ApprovedUniverstiy Avenue: WCL Pleasant Hill to Des Moines EUAB -- Federal Aid -- $ 475 -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 475 -- --

leasant Hill STP-U-6102(610)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 04/15/2008 Project Total $ 426 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedPLSNT HILL BLVD: OAKWOOD DR to FAIRVIEW DR -- Federal Aid $ 213 -- -- -- 26:


Urbandale STP-U-1945(624)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 01/16/2008 Project Total $ 495 -- -- --Authorized MEREDITH DR: 76TH ST E 1.2 MI to IA 28 (MERLE HAY ROAD) -- Federal Aid $ 247 -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 247 -- -- --

Urbandale STP-U-7875()--70-77 Project Total -- $ 225 -- --FHWA

Approved86th STREET / MEREDITH DRIVE: 86th Street and Meredith Drive -- Federal Aid -- $ 112 -- -- 26:

MAP-27 Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 112 -- --



34/82


FHWA Brdg No Funding Pgmd Amts in $1,000's PA:Co:


Urbandale STP-U-7875()--70-77 Project Total -- $ 445 -- --FHWA Approved 100th STREET / DOUGLAS AVENUE: 100th Street and Douglas Avenue -- Federal Aid -- $ 222 -- -- 26:

MAP-28 Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 222 -- --

West Des Moines STP-8260()--2C-77 1.9 Mi Project Total -- -- $ 9,356 $ 8,356FHWA Approved GRAND AVENUE SOUTH: Raccoon River Park Entrance to Interstate 35 -- Federal Aid -- -- $ 1,000 $ 1,000 26:

Pavement Widening, Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 1,000 $ 1,000

West Des Moines STP-U-8260(613)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 03/17/2009 Project Total $ 16,900 -- -- --FHWA Approved SW CONNECTOR : S 1ST to IA 5 -- Federal Aid $ 3,000 -- -- -- 26:

MAP-1 Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 3,000 -- -- --

West Des Moines STP-U-8260(617)--70-77Tgt Let Date: 04/15/2008 1 Mi Project Total $ 5,291 $ 5,291$ 5,837 --FHWA Approved GRAND AVE: RAILROAD AVE to RACCOON RIVER PARK ENTRANCE -- Federal Aid $ 1,750 $ 417 $ 527 -- 26:

MAP-11 Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 1,750 $ 417 $ 527 --Polk CRD STP-S-C077()--5E-77 Project Total -- $ 17,000 -- $ 17,000

FHWA Approved I-35/80/NW 26TH ST: NW 26th Street Interchange at I-35/80 -- Federal Aid -- $ 1,200 -- $ 750 26:Grade and Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 1,200 -- $ 750

Polk CRD STP-S-C077(137)--5E-77 4.4 Mi Project Total $ 624 -- -- --In Prep NW 6TH DR/NW 16: ANKENY SCL to DES MOINES NCL -- Federal Aid $ 440 -- -- -- 26:MAP-7 Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 440 -- -- --

DOT-D01-MPO26 STP-()--2C-77 8.7 Project Total $ 5,464 -- -- --FHWA Approved IA 163: ECL DES MOINES TO LANDFILL(EB & WB) - STAT... -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab, Pavement Planing -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

DOT-D01-MPO26 STP-()--2C-77 Project Total $ 2,400 -- -- --FHWA Approved US 69: NE 18TH TO 54TH ST -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab/Widen -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

DOT-D01-MPO26 STP-28(38)--2C-77 1.1 Project Total $ 233 -- -- --FHWA Approved IA 28: IN DES MOINES FROM MADISON AVETO I-35/I-80... -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Planing [MPO Contribution] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

DOT-D01-MPO26 STP-69()--2C-77 2.5 Project Total $ 604 -- -- --FHWA Approved US 69: IN DES MOINES FROM GARFIELDAVE TO 43RD AVE... -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --PO-26 / DMAMPO STP-69()--2C-77 1 Mi Project Total -- -- -- $ 1,125FHWA Approved US 69: UNDECIDED -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 325 26:

Pavement Rehab/Widen [DMAMPO Initiative] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 325

PO-26 / DMAMPO STP-69()--2C-77 1 Mi Project Total -- -- -- $ 1,500FHWA Approved US 69: UNDECIDED -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 430 26:

Pavement Rehab/Widen [DMAMPO Initiative] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 430

] HBP - Highway Bridge Program Inclusion in this list DOES NOT guarantee Federal Aid eligibilityolk County [77]

Des Moines BRM-1945(729)--8N-77Tgt Let Date: 01/21/2009 Project Total $ 1,500 -- -- --FHWA Approved Easton Boulevard : Over Four Mile Creek 003761 Federal Aid $ 1,000 -- -- -- 26

Bridge Replacement -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

Polk CRD BROS-C077(99)--8J-77Tgt Let Date: 12/16/2014 Project Total -- $ 600 -- --FHWA Approved NE BERWICK DRIV: S of NE 70 Ave 281180 Federal Aid -- $ 480 -- -- 26

MAP-56 Bridge Replacement 05:79:23 Regional FA -- -- -- --



35/82




Polk CRD BRS-C077(119)--60-77Tgt Let Date: 12/16/2014 Project Total -- -- $ 400 --HWA Approved NE 50 Ave: E of NE 80 St 281050 Federal Aid -- -- $ 320 -- 26

MAP-51 Culvert Repair 17:79:22 Regional FA -- -- -- --

Polk CRD BRS-C077(BR-6604)--60-77 Project Total -- $ 450 -- --HWA Approved NE 72 St: S of US 65 606650 Federal Aid -- $ 360 -- -- 26:

MAP-57 Bridge Replacement 1:79:23 Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26BHF-()--2L-77 0.3 Project Total -- $ 770 -- --HWA Approved US 6: DES MOINES RIVER 3.5 MILESWEST OF I-235 040400 Federal Aid -- $ 616 -- -- 26:

MAP-59 Bridge Deck Overlay -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26BHF-()--2L-77 Project Total $ 1,273 -- -- --In Prep IA 163: MUD CREEK 2.2 MILES WEST OFCO RD S-27 (EB ... 040970 Federal Aid $ 1,018 -- -- -- 26:

Bridge Rehabilitation [ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --OT-D01-MPO26BHF-()--2L-77 Project Total -- $ 385 -- --HWA Approved IA 163: EAST FOUR MILE CREEK INPLEASANT HILL 040960 Federal Aid -- $ 308 -- -- 26:


OT-D01-MPO26BHF-141()--2L-77 Project Total $ 404 -- -- --In Prep IA 141: IAIS RR 0.2 MILE NORTH OFI-80 (SB) 041370 Federal Aid $ 323 -- -- -- 26:MAP-64 Bridge Rehabilitation -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26BRF-163()--38-77 Project Total $ 2,695 -- -- --In Prep IA 163: CAMP CREEK 0.1 MILE EAST OFCO RD S-27 (EB ... 040990 Federal Aid $ 2,156 -- -- -- 26:MAP-63 Bridge Replacement [ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26BRF-35()--38-77 Project Total $ 8,849$ 16,304 -- --HWA Approved I-35: I-80 EAST INTERCHANGE INDES MOINES 041720 Federal Aid $ 7,079 $ 13,043 -- -- 26:

MAP-68 Bridge Replacement, Grade and Pave, Pavement Rehab [Amounts of FA funds to beverified by IDOT]

-- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

] IM - Interstate Maintenance Inclusion in this list DOES NOT guarantee Federal Aid eligibilityOT-D01-MPO26IM-()--13-77 Project Total -- -- $ 12,248 --HWA Approved I-35: RR EP TRUE PKWY AND CREEKIN WEST DES MOINE... 041210 Federal Aid -- -- $ 9,798 -- 26:

MAP-74 Bridge Replacement -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26IM-()--13-77 Project Total -- $ 880 -- --HWA Approved I-80: OVER WALNUT CREEK 0.3 MILEWEST OF US 6 (EB... 041280 Federal Aid -- $ 792 -- -- 26:


OT-D01-MPO26IM-()--13-77 Project Total $ 300 -- -- --HWA Approved I-235: IN DES MOINES -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26:

Bridge Painting -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26IM-()--13-77 Project Total $ 6,000 -- -- --HWA Approved I-235: IN DES MOINES - UTILITIES ANDNOISEWALL -- Federal Aid $ 5,400 -- -- -- 26:

Grading -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

OT-D01-MPO26IM-80()--13-77 Project Total $ 600 $ 600 $ 400$ 400HWA Approved I-80: POLK,JASPER AND POWESHIEK COUNTIES -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26:

MAP-66 Patching -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

arren County [91]OT-D05-MPO26IM-()--13-91 3.8 Project Total -- -- $ 948 --HWA Approved I-35: 0.5 MILE SOUTH OF CO RD G-14TO NORTH OF IA... -- Federal Aid -- -- -- -- 26

MAP-76 Right of Way -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --



36/82

ponsorame

Project # / Location / Desc Length Project TPM

FHWA BrdgNo

FundingPgmd Amts in $1,000's

PA:Co


] ENH - STP Enhancements Inclusion in this list DOES NOT guarantee Federal Aid eligibilityallas County [25]Waukee STP-E-8177()--8V-25 Project Total -- $ 380 -- --FHWA

ApprovedSUGAR CREEK RECREATION AREA: Trail Connecting Centennial Park, Warrior ... -- Federal Aid -- $ 90 -- -- 26

MAP-48 Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 90 -- --

olk County [77]Ankeny STP-E-0187()--8V-77 Project Total -- $ 780 -- --FHWA

Approved NEAL SMITH CONNECTOR RECREATION TRAIL: Trail South of Oralabor Road from South An... -- Federal Aid -- $ 150 -- -- 26:


Ankeny STP-E-0187()--8V-77 3 Mi Project Total -- -- $ 925 --FHWA

ApprovedGay Wilson Trail Extension: Construction of a 3 mile, 12-foot wide, mu... -- Federal Aid -- -- $ 175 -- 26:

Ped/Bike Development -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 175 --

arren County [91]Carlisle STP-E-C077()--8V-77 Project Total $ 239 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedCarlisle/Indianola Trail: TRAIL EXT PH I FROM to SOMERSET TO CARLISLE -- Federal Aid $ 154 -- -- -- 26:

Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 154 -- -- --

olk County [77]es Moines STP-E-1945()--8V-77 Project Total -- $ 600 -- --FHWA

ApprovedEASTER LAKE TRAIL SYSTEM-BACKBONE TRAIL: ndianola Avenue and Highway 69 toSoutheast Corner of Easter Lake at Easter Lake Drive

-- Federal Aid -- $ 100 -- -- 26:


es Moines STP-E-1945()--8V-77 Project Total -- $ 1,400$ 1,400 --FHWA

ApprovedBEAVERDALE VILLAGE STEETSCAPE: Entance markers, sidewalks, cub/gutters, s... -- Federal Aid -- $ 89 $ 150 -- 26:

MAP-49 Acquire Scenic/Hist -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 89 $ 150 --

es Moines STP-E-1945()--8V-77 Project Total -- -- $ 600 --FHWA

ApprovedWaveland Trail: Phase II: Northside of 56th street & I-235 and exten... -- Federal Aid -- -- $ 125 -- 26:

Ped/Bike Development -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- $ 125 --

es Moines STP-E-1945()--8V-77 Project Total -- -- -- $ 1,200FHWA

ApprovedSoutheast Connector Trail System: Construction of a 10-foot wide trail and a... -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 125 26:

Ped/Bike Development, Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 125

es Moines STP-E-1945()--8V-77 Project Total -- -- -- $ 1,400FHWA

Approvedingersoll Avenue - Phase II: Implement pedestrian safety, traffic calmi... -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 150 26:

Scenic or Historic Hwy. -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 150

es Moines STP-E-1945(693)--8V-77Tgt Let Date: 02/17/2009 Project Total $ 500 -- -- --FHWA

Approved

WAVELAND TRAIL: Walnut Creek Trail to 56th Street -- Federal Aid $ 150 -- -- -- 26:

Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 150 -- -- --

es Moines STP-E-8260(706)--8V-77Tgt Let Date: 03/18/2008 3 Mi Project Total $ 1,000 -- -- --FHWA

ApprovedINGERSOLL AVE: STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS -- Federal Aid $ 150 -- -- -- 26:

MAP-34 Scenic or Historic Hwy. -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 150 -- -- --



37/82


FHWA BrdgNo


PA:Co


Des Moines STP-ES-1945(705)--8I-77Tgt Let Date: 01/16/2008 Project Total $ 700 -- -- --Authorized American Disc Trl: Segment 3 along Walnut Creek - North Valle... -- Federal Aid $ 376 -- -- -- 26:

Ped/Bike Grade & Pave [Statewide TE, combined FA $773,000 with (665) segment 1 and ...] -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

Des Moines STP-ES-1945(735)--8I-77Tgt Let Date: 04/15/2008 Project Total $ 717 -- -- --HWA Approved AMERICAN DISCOVERY TRAIL: Segment 4 along Walnut Creek - Bill Riley ... -- Federal Aid $ 573 -- -- -- 26:

Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

Grimes STP-E-3125(604)--8V-77Tgt Let Date: 12/21/2010 Project Total -- -- -- $ 300HWA Approved HWY 44 BEAUT: WCL OF GRIMES to CIRCLE DR -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 150 26:

MAP-40 Scenic or Historic Hwy. -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 150

Urbandale STP-E-7875()--8V-77 Project Total -- $ 303 -- --

HWA Approved RACCOON VALLEY TRAIL CONNECTION : Douglas Parkway Trail to Deer Ridge Park -- Federal Aid -- $ 75 -- -- 26:MAP-47 Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- $ 75 -- --

Urbandale STP-E-7875()--8V-77 Project Total -- -- -- $ 267HWA Approved Meredith Drive Trail Connection to Grimes: Meredith Drive to Grimes -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 118 26:

Ped/Bike ROW, Ped/Bike Grade & Pave, Ped/Bike Development -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 118

West DesMoines

STP-E-8260()--8V-77 Project Total $ 805 -- -- --

HWA Approved Valley Jct: 200 - 300 Blocks of 6th St. -- Federal Aid $ 450 -- -- -- 26:MAP-42 Scenic or Historic Hwy. -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 450 -- -- --

West DesMoines

STP-E-8260()--8V-77 Project Total -- -- -- $ 463

HWA Approved Railroad Street: Scenic beautification -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 20 26:Scenic or Historic Hwy. -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 20

West DesMoines

STP-E-8260(612)--8V-77Tgt Let Date: 07/15/2008 Project Total $ 139 -- -- --

HWA Approved 74TH ST BEAUT: 74TH ST BEAUTIFICATION MULTI-BLOCK ENHANCE... -- Federal Aid $ 104 -- -- -- 26:MAP-41 Scenic or Historic Hwy. -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 104 -- -- --

Polk CCB STP-E-C077()--8V-77 2.6 Mi Project Total -- -- -- $ 986HWA Approved 4-Mile Creek Greenway Trail: Ankeny to Des Moines -- Federal Aid -- -- -- $ 100 26:

Ped/Bike Development, Ped/Bike Grade & Pave, Ped/Bike ROW -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- $ 100

Polk CCB STP-E-C077(129)--8V-77Tgt Let Date: 08/19/2008 Project Total $ 1,399 -- $ 1,399 --HWA Approved 4 MI CR GREENWA: ANKENY to NEIL SMITH TRAIL -- Federal Aid $ 320 -- $ 92 -- 26:

MAP-32 Ped/Bike Grade & Pave -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 320 -- $ 92 --

M WaterworksSTP-E-1945(737)--8V-77Tgt Let Date: 06/17/2008 Project Total $ 1,200 -- -- --HWA Approved Fleur Drive Streetscape: FLEUR DRIVE STREETSCAPE -- Federal Aid $ 300 -- -- -- 26:

MAP-44 Landscaping [Sponsor: Des Moines Water Works] -- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 300 -- -- --

] ICAAP - Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program Inclusion in this list DOES NOT guarantee Federal Aid eligibilityClive STP-A-1425(614)--86-77Tgt Let Date: 04/15/2008 Project Total $ 2,300 -- -- --

HWA ApprovedNW 86th Street and University Boulevard Intersection Improvement: Increase intersectioncapacity by adding l...

-- Federal Aid $ 900 -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab/Widen, Traffic Signals [Moved $550,000 in STP funds from HDP-1425(611)-71-77.The $...]

-- : -- : -- Regional FA $ 550 -- -- --

Des Moines STP-A-1945()--86-77 Project Total $ 1,170 -- -- --In Prep East 14th Street Widening at Hull Avenue: Widening of the E 14th Street/Hull Avenue ... -- Federal Aid $ 750 -- -- -- 26:

Pavement Rehab/Widen, Traffic Signals -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --

Des Moines STP-A-1945()--86-77 Project Total $ 550 -- -- --

HWA Approved Merle Hay Road Traffic Signal Interconnect Upgrade: To upgrade the interconnect of 10signaliz...

-- Federal Aid $ 349 -- -- -- 26:

Traffic Signals -- : -- : -- Regional FA -- -- -- --



38/82


FHWA BrdgNo


PA:Co


Des Moines STP-A-1945(79)--5M-77Tgt Let Date: 08/19/2008 Project Total $ 450 -- -- --HWA Approved East Universi

transportation improvement program fy 2008-2011

Documents