transportation management - mit - massachusetts institute of

37
Chris Caplice ESD.260/15.770/1.260 Logistics Systems Nov 2006 Transportation Management Fundamental Concepts

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

Chris Caplice ESD.260/15.770/1.260 Logistics Systems

Nov 2006

Transportation Management Fundamental Concepts

Page 2: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT2MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Agenda

Introduction to Freight TransportationLevels of Transportation Networks

PhysicalOperationalService

Impact of Transportation on Planning

Page 3: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT3MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Case Study: Shoes from China

How should I ship my shoes from Shenzhen to Kansas City?Shoes are manufactured, labeled, and packed at plant~4.5M shoes shipped per year from this plant6,000 to 6,500 shoes shipped per container (~700-750 FEUs / year)Value of pair of shoes ~$35

Source: Chiu MLOG 2005

Map showing Shenzhen, China and Kansas City, US removed due to copyright restrictions.

Page 4: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT4MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Pallets vs Slipsheets

48 x 40 in. pallet is most popular in US (27% of all pallets—no other size over 5%)

1200 x 800 mm "Euro-Pallet" is the standard pallet in Europe

Images of pallets removed due to copyright restrictions.

Page 5: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT5MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Containers

CharacteristicsAirtight, Stackable, Lockable

International ISO Sizes (8.5’ x 8’)TEU (20 ft)

Volume 33 M3

Total Payload 24.8 kkgFEU (40 ft)

Volume 67 M3

Total Payload 28.8 kkg

Domestic US (~9’ x 8.25’)53 ft long

Volume 111 M3

Total Payload 20.5 kkg

Images removed due to copyright restrictions.

Page 6: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT6MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Inland Transport @ Origin

3 Port OptionsShekou (30k)

Truck

Yantian (20k)RailTruck

Hong Kong (32k)RailTruckBarge

In Hong Kong9 container terminals

Figure by MIT OCW.

Page 7: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT7MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Ocean Shipping Options40 shipping lines visit these ports each w/ many optionsExamples:

APL – APX-Atlantic Pacific Express ServiceOrigins: Hong Kong (Sat) -> Kaohsiung, Pusan, Kobe, TokyoStops: Miami (25 days), Savannah (27), Charleston (28), New York (30)

CSCL – American Asia SouthloopOrigins: Yantian (Sat) -> Hong Kong, Pusan

Figure by MIT OCW.

New Kowloon

Victoria

CHINA

United States

Canada

Mexico

Shenzhen Plant

Kansas City DC

Stops: Port of Los Angeles(16.5 days)

Page 8: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT8MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Inland Transportation in US

M e x i c o

U n i t e d S t a t e s

Los Angeles

Miami

Savannah

New York

Port of Miami

Port of Savannah

Port of Los Angeles / Long Beach.

Port of New York

Kansas City DC

Kansas City

Figure by MIT OCW.

Page 9: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT9MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Port of New York / New Jersey

Minneapolis/St. Paul

Milwaukee

Chicago

Detroit

Indianapolis

FortWayne

ToledoPittsburgh

AlbanyAyer

Worcester

Washington D.C.

Norfolk

Cincinnati

CharlotteKnoxvilleNashville

Memphis

Little RockAtlanta

Meridian

Mobile

New Orlears

Tampa

500 Mi

500 Km Miami

Jacksonville

Savannah

CharlestonColumbia

East St.Louis

Kansas City

Syracuse

Montreal

Massena

Harrisburg

Buffalo

Toronto

Columbus

CSX

Norfolk Southern

Canadian Pacific

Canadian National

Connections

MN

WI

IA

IL

MI

MI

NYVT NH

ME

CT RI

MA

NJ

PA

MD

DE

VA

WV

NC

SC

GA

AL

MS

MC

AR

LA

FL

TN

KY

IN

OH

NEW YORK/NEW JERSEY

0

0

Birmingham

Figure by MIT OCW.

Maher TerminalExpress Rail II NS RR

Double stack thru:Harrisburg, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Ft. Wayne, toKansas City

CSX RR (5-10 days)Double stack thru:Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Pittsburgh, Stark, Indianapolis, to Kansas City

Truckload (2.5 – 3 days)NJ Turnpike to I-78W, I-81S, I-76/70 to Kansas City

Page 10: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT10MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Truck & Intermodal Operations

Container on Flat Car (COFC) Double Stack

Over the Road TruckPower Unit & 53’

Trailer

Trailer on Flat Car (TOFC)

Photographs removed due to copyright restrictions.

Page 11: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT11MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Air Freight

Photographs removed due to copyright restrictions.

Page 12: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT12MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Transport Options

So how do I ship shoes from Shenzhen to Kansas City?

What factors influence my decision?

Consider different types of networksPhysicalOperationalStrategic

Page 13: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT13MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Transportation Networks

Atlantic Ocean

UNITED STATES

Legend:TruckRailOcean

Example: Two clients ship product to Rotterdam. There are rail and truck options to multiple ports with various ocean carrier options.

Figure by MIT OCW.

Page 14: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT14MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Transportation Networks

ATLANTIC OCEAN

UNITED STATES

Legend:TruckRailOcean

Example: Two clients ship product to Rotterdam. There are rail and truck options to multiple ports with various ocean carrier options.

Physical Operational Strategic

Figure by MIT OCW.

Page 15: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT15MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Three Layers of Networks

Physical Network: The actual path that the product takes from origin to destination. Basis for all costs and distance calculations –typically only found once.

Operational Network: The route the shipment takes in terms of decision points. Each arc is a specific mode with costs, distance, etc. Each node is a decision point.

Strategic Network: A series of paths through the network from origin to destination. Each represents a complete option and has end to end cost, distance, and service characteristics.

Page 16: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT16MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

The Physical NetworkGuideway

Free (air, ocean, rivers)Publicly built (roads)Privately built (rails, pipelines)

TerminalsPublicly built (ports, airports)Privately built (trucking terminals, rail yards, private parts of ports and airports)

ControlsPublic (roads, air space, rivers)Private (rail, pipelines)

The physical network is the primary differentiator between transportation systems in established versus remote locations.

Page 17: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT17MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Operational Network

HUB

LOC

LOC

HUBCollection

Pick upcycle

Local Sort

Line-haulMain Sort

Line-haul

Main Sort

Local Sort

Deliverycycle

Distribution

Four Primary ComponentsLoading/UnloadingLocal-Routing (Vehicle Routing)Line-HaulSorting

Node & Arc view of networkEach Node is a decision point

Page 18: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT18MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Strategic Network

Path view of the NetworkUsed in establishing overall service standards for logistics systemSummarizes movement in common financial and performance terms – used for trade-offs

KCShenzhen

Air: 3 days, $??/pair

All Water Route: 35 days, $0.65/pair

Land Bridge: 28 days, $0.75/pair

Page 19: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT19MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Transportation Impact on TC

( ) Pr[ ]2 L SO

D Q DTC Q vD A rv k B SOQ Q

σ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= + + + +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

How does transportation impact our total costs?Cost of transportation

Value & StructureLead Time

Value & Variability & ScheduleCapacity

Limits on QMiscellaneous Factors

Special Cases

Page 20: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT20MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Simple Transportation Cost FunctionsPure Variable Cost / Unit

Modify fixedorder cost (A)

for Ordering Cost

units$/

ship

men

tunits

$/un

it

Modify unit cost (v)

for Purchase Cost

units

$/sh

ipm

ent

units

$/un

it

Pure Fixed Cost / Shipment

Mixed Variable & Fixed Cost

Modify both A and v

units

$/sh

ipm

ent

units

$/un

it

Page 21: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT21MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

More Complex Cost FunctionsVariable Cost / Unit with a Minimum

algorithm

units$/

ship

men

tunits

$/un

it

algorithm

units

$/sh

ipm

ent

units

$/un

it

Incremental Discounts

Note that approach will be similar to quantity discount analysis in deterministic EOQ

Page 22: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT22MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time & Lead Time Variability

Source xL σL

3PL 55 45

US 25 25

Pac Rim 85 35

EU 75 40Major Packaged Consumer Goods Manufacturer

What is impact of longer lead times?

What is impact of lead time variability?

What are the sources ofthe lead time & variability?

2 (2)

InlandTransport

2 (1)

Load & Delay @ Port

26 (5)

OceanTransport

5 (2)

Unload &Clear Port

6 (3)

InlandTransport

15 (12)

ProductionTime

Total Lead Time = 56 days Avg (std dev)

Page 23: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT23MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time VariabilityDemand ~U(1,3)

Lead Time 3 weeks

6 units

4 units

6 units

Demand ~U(1,3)Lead Time ~U(3,6)

11 units

6 days

6 units3 days

7 units

4 days

Page 24: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT24MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

This is essentially the random sum of random numbersD~(xD, σD) items demanded / time, iidL~(xL, σL) number of time periods

1 2 3 41

...L

i Li

y d d d d d d=

= = + + + + +∑

2 2

[ ]

[ ] 0 0i

D d

d E D d

where E d and σ σ

= +

= = + %

%

%

We want to find the characteristics of a new variable, y:

Note that any observation of demand, di, consists of both a deterministic and a stochastic component:

Page 25: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT25MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

First, let’s find the expected value, E[y]

[ ][ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]( ) ( )[ ]

[ ] [ ][ ] [ ] [ ]

1 2 3

1 2 3 1 2 3

1 2 3

[ ... ]

... ...

...

0

L

L L

L

E y E d d d d

E E d E d E d E d d d d d

E LE D E d d d d

E D E L

E y E D E L

= + + +

⎡ ⎤= + + + + + + +⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= + + + +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

= +

=

% % % %

% % % %

Page 26: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT26MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

What is the impact of lead time variability?Assumptions

Lead Time and Demand are independent RVsDLeadtime =Demand over lead timeσLeadtime= Standard deviation of demand over L

( )22 2

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( )

Leadtime

Leadtime D L

E D E L E D

E L E Dσ σ σ

=

= +

Questions we can answer:1. What is the impact of lead time variability on safety stock?2. What is the trade-off between length of lead time and variability?

Page 27: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT27MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Transportation Options

When is it better to use a cheaper more variable transport mode?

Air – higher v, smaller σRail – lower v, larger σ

rrrLrrrr

aaaLaaaa

ra

DvrvkrDvA

DvrvkrDvA

++=

++=

−=Δ

,

,

2TRC

2TRC

where,TRCTRCTRC

σ

σ

Pick mode with smaller TRC

Page 28: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT28MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Transport vs. Inventory Costs

Shipment Size

Tran

spor

t C

ost

per

Ship

men

t

cf

Mode 1

cv+rvtm

Multiple Modes

Mode 2 Mode 3

Page 29: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT29MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Time Space Diagram

Production

Storage

Consumption

Consider a simple Production to Consumption Network

P C

Time

Spac

e

holdingmoving

holding

handling

Primary Tradeoffs:Moving vs. Holding

Page 30: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT30MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Mode Comparison Matrix

Truck Rail Air WaterOperational Cost

Moderate Low High Low

Market Coverage

Pt to Pt Terminal to Terminal

Terminal to Terminal

Terminal to Terminal

Degree of competition

Many Few Moderate Few

Traffic Type All Types Low to Mod Value, Mod to High density

High value, Low density

Low value, High density

Length of haul

Short – Long Medium –Long

Long Med - Long

Capacity (tons)

10 – 25 50 – 12,000 5 – 12 1,000 – 6,000

Page 31: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT31MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Mode Comparison Matrix

Truck Rail Air Water

Speed Moderate Slow Fast Slow

Availability High Moderate Moderate Low

Consistency (delivery time) High Moderate Moderate Low

Loss & Damage Low High Low Moderate

Flexibility High Low Moderate Low

TruckTruck RailRail AirAir WaterWater PipelinePipelineBTU/ Ton-MileBTU/ Ton-Mile 2,8002,800 670670 42,00042,000 680680 490490

Cents / Ton-MileCents / Ton-Mile 7.507.50 1.401.40 21.9021.90 0.300.30 0.270.27

Avg Length of HaulAvg Length of Haul 300300 500500 10001000 10001000 300300

Avg Speed (MPH)Avg Speed (MPH) 4040 2020 400400 1010 55

Page 32: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT32MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

This is essentially the random sum of random numbersD~(xD, σD) items demanded / time, iidL~(xL, σL) number of time periods

1 2 3 41

...L

i Li

y d d d d d d=

= = + + + + +∑

2 2

[ ]

[ ] 0 0i

D d

d E D d

where E d and σ σ

= +

= = + %

%

%

We want to find the characteristics of a new variable, y:

Note that any observation of demand, di, consists of both a deterministic and a stochastic component:

Page 33: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT33MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

First, let’s find the expected value, E[y]

[ ][ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]( ) ( )[ ]

[ ] [ ][ ] [ ] [ ]

1 2 3

1 2 3 1 2 3

1 2 3

[ ... ]

... ...

...

0

L

L L

L

E y E d d d d

E E d E d E d E d d d d d

E LE D E d d d d

E D E L

E y E D E L

= + + +

⎡ ⎤= + + + + + + +⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= + + + +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

= +

=

% % % %

% % % %

Page 34: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT34MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

[ ]( ) ( )22 21 2 3 ...y L LE D V d d d dσ σ ⎡ ⎤= + + + +⎣ ⎦% % % %

Finding V[y][ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] ( )[ ] ( )1 2 3 1 2 3

1 2 3

... ...

...

L L

L

y E d E d E d E d d d d d

L E D d d d d

= + + + + + + +

= + + + +

% % % %

% % % %

Both terms are independent random variables – note that E[D] is a constant, and V[aX] = a2V[x] and that V[X+Y] = V[X]+V[Y], so that

Substituting 1 2 3 ... Ld d d dλ = + + +% % % % [ ]( )22 2 2y LE D λσ σ σ= +

[ ]( )22 2 2 20E E E Eλσ λ λ λ λ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − = − =⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

We get

By definition, we know that [ ]( )22 2X E X E Xσ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦

Which gives us

Page 35: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT35MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

( )22 21 2 3 ... LE E d d d dλσ λ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = + + +⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦% % % %Substitute in so that,

( )2 2 2 2 21 2 3 1 2 3

1 1... ... 2

n n

n n i ji j i

x x x x x x x x x x= = +

+ + + + = + + + + + ∑ ∑

2 2 2 2 2 21 2 3

1 1

2 2 2 21 2 3

1 1

... 2

... 2

L L

L i ji j i

L L

L i ji j i

E E d d d d d d

E d d d d E d d

λσ λ= = +

= = +

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = + + + +⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎣ ⎦⎡ ⎤

⎡ ⎤= + + + + ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

∑ ∑

∑ ∑

% % % % % %

% % % % % %

Recalling that,

We get that,

Recalling that if random variables X and Y are independent, thenE[XY]=E[X]E[Y], and the E(d~)=0, the second term goes to 0, thus,

[ ][ ] [ ] [ ]

2 2 2 2 2 21 2 3

21 2 3

2

...

...

L

L i i

i

E E d d d d

E where d

E L E E L E d

λσ λ

μ μ μ μ μ

μ

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = + + +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦= + + + =

⎡ ⎤= = ⎣ ⎦

% % % %

%

%

Which, again, is a random sum of random numbers!(I substituted in the μ to

make it read easier)

Page 36: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

© Chris Caplice, MIT36MIT Center for Transportation & Logistics – ESD.260

Lead Time Variability

[ ]2 2iE L E dλσ ⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦%

[ ] [ ]2 22 2 2 2X XE X E X or E X E Xσ σ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − = +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

22 2 2 20 Dd dE d E dσ σ σ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + = + =⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦% %% %We get,

Starting with,

We recall that for any random variable X,

So that,

[ ]( )[ ]( ) [ ]

22 2 2

22 2 2

y L

y L D

E D

E D E L

λσ σ σ

σ σ σ

= +

= +

Combining terms,

[ ] [ ]2 2 2i DE L E d E Lλσ σ⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦%

Page 37: Transportation Management - MIT - Massachusetts Institute of

Questions?